Mike Luckovich

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 8:05 AM | Link to this

{{{{OBAMA: ‘We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times… and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK’…}}}}

Well, if this doesn’t sound a lot like Dhimmy Carter.

Asking foreigners for permission to cool our homes or drive our trucks, this is “policy?”

~~~~~

{{{{Sniper ousted from Iraq after shooting Quran- Urinal/DNC}}}}

Hey, at least he didn’t point his gun at Obambi, like Hickabee dreams about.

And if this is such a terrible transgression, then why are the Urinal/DNC making big as-s articles out of it, are we trying to inflame Muslim hatreds?

O.K. that’s all I got on this subject, you libs can get back to pis-sing on the Bible.

~~~~~

{{{{Dollars to doughnuts, war’s profits widespread-Urinal/DNC}}}}

Oh, I get it, making our brave and honorable soldiers as comfortable as we can during their hard mission is evil capitalistic money grubbing, eh?

I thought we “didn’t care” about the troops?

~~~~~

{{{{Meanwhile, Bruno expects another West Virginia-sized landslide tomorrow in Kentucky, where polls show her leading by a whopping 30 percentage points. So even as Obama begins campaigning as the nominee-to-be, Clinton keeps winning primaries.}}}}

Bwa.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 8:22 AM | Link to this

HAVE YOU SEEN THIS PICTURE? I SEE BEARS OF ALL COLORS IN IT….

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 8:23 AM | Link to this

LOUISVILLE, Ky. - A small but startling sign welcomed the gun lovers who arrived at the National Rifle Association’s annual gathering Friday. “Firearms WILL NOT be allowed in Hall A during the Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum.”

AREN’T THESE THE GOOD FOLKS WHO SUPPORT PACKIN’ GUNS IN RESTAURANTS, CARS AND NATIONAL PARKS! BUT, HEAVENS NO!!!, NOT AT THEIR PARTY!!

WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID OF?

It is time for serious talk about gun control in this country. If the NRA is afraid to allow them into their annual conference, they sure don’t belong in our local pancake house.

My kids and grandkids deserve a lead-free breakfast.

SEE MCCAIN AND OBAMA ON GUN CONTROL HERE

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 8:32 AM | Link to this

The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 337

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 8:35 AM | Link to this

McCain’s YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare

THIS IS EMAIL AMMO……

By StillbornDittos

May 19, 2008 8:43 AM | Link to this

At Gettysburg Cemetary in 1863, as the two armies slugged it out, there was a sign that read, “the discharge of firearms is prohibited”. True.

So all of the soldiers who fired their weapons there could have been jailed and fined, technically speaking.

So it is with the concealed weapons law. If they conceal their weapon they’re right as rain. If they expose their weapon they face prosecution pain.

I’m not trying to be Chicken Little, but accidental discharge of a unloaded, concealed weapon is the greatest threat to unsuspecting diners.

Nobody can afford the gas to eat out anyway, so only the rich will carry concealed weapons in restaurants. and who cares about them?

Now, if their unloaded, concealed weapons accidently discharge while their filling up with gas, then a catastrophe can occur. kaboom. Imagine if there’s a gasoline truck resupplying the inventory near the pumps when the unloaded, concealed weapon goes off. Then imagine there’s a propane truck stopped at a red light within 50 feet of the gasoline truck. Then imagine it’s near a nuclear power plant, and then imagine that all of this occurs in a poulty farm district with tens of millions of chickens just hanging around.

but go ahead and conceal your weapons and make sure they’re unloaded. Nothing could possibly go wrong, go wrong. go wrong

go wrong

kluck

By Mimi

May 19, 2008 8:45 AM | Link to this

The comments below are a perfect example of why blogging doesn’t work. They make no sense. And are gratuitous insults to an imagined opposition that doesn’t exist. i know of no liberals who “p** on bibles”, for instance. It’s inflammatory rhetoric which adds nothing to the discussion.

I think this blog is intended to be a commentary on the cartoon. I find the cartoon mildly amusing, not one of his best, but that may be because I still support Hillary since she has the experience he lacks. Now I expect we’ll hear a lot of misogynistic comments from the idiots who normally blog around this cartoon.

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 8:51 AM | Link to this

{{{{“The GOP, should I be the nominee, can say whatever they want to say about me, my track record,” Obama said. “If they think that they’re going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful because that I find unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or my family, mommy, make it stop!”}}}}

{{{{He called the strategy “low class.”}}}}

Well boo hoo hoo, sniff, sniff:

{{{{How Cindy McCain was outed for drug addiction- Salon/PMSNBC}}}}

Does this Obambi want to run with the big dogs or cry with the little babies?

Little sissy.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 8:56 AM | Link to this

John & Cindy McCain: Elitists

By GMAN

May 19, 2008 9:01 AM | Link to this

Poor By AJC Management! Your candidate can’t remember what he ate for breakfast nor his right from his left. The bar for Republican nominees has been lowered even further. Flippity floppity McSenile is his name and dishonesty is his game.

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 9:11 AM | Link to this

{{{{As it happens, Mr. Suckie Face Waxman’s own 30th California House district is already in gross violation of even the 1997 Clinton Administration standard of 0.084. This is part of the wealthy automobile mecca of Santa Monica, Westwood and of course Beverly Hills. In fact, Southern California is the only area in the country that has been designated by the EPA to be in “extreme noncompliance” with the ozone standards, which conveniently means it has been granted 20 years to clean up its act.}}}}

{{{{According to Joel Schwartz, a clean-air scientist with the American Enterprise Institute, “even if Southern California abolished every automobile in the metropolitan area, it couldn’t meet these stricter rules.” We’d love to see how many of Suckie Face’s constituents would give up the keys to their Lexus convertibles and hop on a Los Angeles bus in exchange for a minuscule improvement in air quality.}}}}

Gee, I wonder who it is pushing the new rules?

Idiot libs and their junk science maybe?

By StillbornDittos

May 19, 2008 9:13 AM | Link to this

McCain 08: I’ve seen more vigor in a bowl of soup.

Obama 08: You’re wife’s gonna need a bib.

Me 08: I’ll take the USA out of the SAUdi, and change the USA back to America and we can be free again.

Vote Me in 08. Just write my name in, I think there’s a way to use Wifi connected to an etch a sketch and an Iphone blackberry thing, but do it, or else we’re all finished. the Saudis rule us, look at how Bush tiptoes around king abdullah. I’m surprised he doesn’t wipe his you know what for him. Cant you see that?

Y cant anyone see that?

Y?

By truthman

May 19, 2008 9:21 AM | Link to this

State GOP idiot compares John McCain to Jesus:

http://www.ajc.com/autoracing/content/metro/stories/2008/05/17/gagop_0517.html?imw=Y

I guess you mean Jesus, they old latino guy who cuts my grass…I’ll accept that comparison!

Confidential to StllbornDittos…why do you think his fingernails are so dirty when he returns from Saudi A-rab-y?

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 9:32 AM | Link to this

Sen. Joe Biden: The President had me negotiate with Gaddafi: He should fire Gates and Rice as appeasers

By StillbornDittos

May 19, 2008 9:33 AM | Link to this

ew

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 9:47 AM | Link to this

I love the state of Oregon! I lived in Portland for a period of time in my young adult years, and I love the fact that Oregon just may be the state that puts Obama’s delegates over the top! WOO-HOO!

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 9:58 AM | Link to this

ITN: Great entry at 8:35AM. It took me awhile to respond, I was laughing too much.

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 10:03 AM | Link to this

ITN @ 8:23 — and I wonder why our state legislators won’t allow guns or other weapons to be brought into our gov’t buildings???

By truthman

May 19, 2008 10:05 AM | Link to this

All of the Pacific NW rules…great, progressive people, wonderful food and the Cascades and the Oregon coast are unbelievably beautiful…plus, they NEVER mention the Civil War…NEVER!!!!

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 10:14 AM | Link to this

Thanks Goldie and Daniel…..

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 10:19 AM | Link to this

McBush’s “Double-talk Express” continues — not only does his advisor do lobbying and PR for the tyrants of Burma (Myanmar):

[John McCain says we’re fighting in Iraq to plant “the seeds of democracy,” but the firm of his chief political adviser Charlie Black made millions lobbying for the world’s worst tyrants.— … Ferdinand Marcos, who executed thousands of his own citizens in the Philippines…— …Zaire’s Mobuto, who publicly hanged his opponents and looted his country’s vast mineral wealth…— …and rebel leader Jonas Savimbi, a mass murderer, who covered Angola with landmines.]#(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/16/mccains-lobbyist-scandalsn102037.html)

Charlie Black said he didn’t do anything wrong. John McCain should tell Black he did. Call John McCain and tell him to fire Charlie Black.

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 10:22 AM | Link to this

McBush and the Repugs just can’t leave the world’s dictators and their money alone!

A Fifth Top Aide To McCain Resigns— Finance Co-Chairman’s Lobbying Ties Are Cited

By Jesus

May 19, 2008 10:26 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By Dusty

May 19, 2008 10:28 AM | Link to this

Sure, Luckovich, polar bears in the Arctic are going to vote for Obama. Cute! People in the USA are going to vote for McCain.

The choice is between “charming inexperience”of Obama and “seasoned reasoning” of McCain. I’ll take good sense everytime over “charm” to run the United States. That’s because I want the USA to remain a republic and not a socialistic crawling country like a melting iceberg of far left lunacy and lost latitude.

By Copyleft

May 19, 2008 10:36 AM | Link to this

People in the USA are going to vote for McCain.

Sure they are… the dumb ones, that is.

Hopefully they’ll be VASTLY outnumbered this fall, so President Obama can start putting things right again. Although it may take him two terms to fix all the damage the Bushies have done.

By Midori

May 19, 2008 10:42 AM | Link to this

Ironies of ironies, Crusty — you and your Bush boot licking minions are about to become as obsolete as the majestic polar bear.

I’d rather keep the polar bears. After all, they ‘DO’ contribute something.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 10:45 AM | Link to this

In one of the most repellent columns one will ever read, syndicated columnist Kathleen Parker defended Fry’s claim that Obama is something other than “a full-blooded American.”

IF OBAMA IS A MUDBLOOD, IS MCCAIN A MUGGLE?

By Bosch

May 19, 2008 10:46 AM | Link to this

As if we don’t need yet another reason to vote for Obama - the polar bears say so.

Well, that just about does it for me :-)

Just read the article about Sam Nunn being one of Obama’s National Security Advisors - that’s the real reason to vote for Obama - if Nunn thinks he’s the real deal - I’m with him. Sam knows many things, and he definitely knows about national security and rebuilding our reputation in the world is critical to any kind of foreign policy - that’s what Sam will do. GO SAM!!!!! And GO POLAR BEARS!!!!!!

By @@

May 19, 2008 10:48 AM | Link to this

What’s with the Fynns in “the drink” ml? You wouldn’t by any chance, be bigoted against the Irish would ‘ya?

Sharks in the water….

Ferraro says she may not vote for Obama in the fall

(((Nancy Wait, described as a 55-year-old social worker in Indiana, told the Times that Obama was far less qualified than Clinton and described his recent comments that Clinton should stay in the race as long as she liked as condescending. Wait said she would “absolutely, positively not” vote for Obama in the fall, according to the Times.Wait said she would “absolutely, positively not” vote for Obama in the fall, according to the Times.)))

Obama’s “shooshe” problem.

I’m hearing a lot of women say ^^^ that. In Oregon, Obama leads 45 percent to 41 percent with 8 percent undecided and 6 percent not making a choice.

Members of Oregon’s NARAL chapter were among those who said they would NOT vote for Obama. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”

Hmmmmmmmmm…

By Gary

May 19, 2008 10:53 AM | Link to this

Keep attuned to the nonsense, fools. No one wants to read about suicide bombers or failed surges or Bushie’s staggering ineptitude anymore. McCain is wobbling around out there, defending it. Just shut the hell up and forget all about Iraq, let it just keep chruning and eating away and killing until the economy collapses and Halliburton and Lockheed and Bush’s puppet masters make a few more hundred billion dollars off the backs of young and exhausted soldiers who only joined the military because they couldn’t afford college or get a decent paying job in our economy or buy a home. The GOP still desperately needs middle Merkans to hate, to seethe, to burn with fear at least until election time so McShame can leverage America’s latent loathing of dark-skinned people and further convince the remains of Bush’s maniacal base that we need to invade and destroy and kill a great many more people in order to remain free and happy. It works for little people like homo-hating duh, aka ajc man, aka semper fi, aka zell, et al; and for RW, @@, devil brain, and more. Strong hatred is good hatred, eh! God bless thee Merkin people!

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 11:04 AM | Link to this

@@,

I read over the weekend that you didn’t believe that Obama was a Muslim. I agree with you that from our viewpoint he isn’t, but under Islamic law he is not only a Muslim but an apostate too.

His father was at one time a Muslim and even if his father became an apostate by disavowing Islam his offspring are still considered Muslims and the religion of the mother is meaningless in their eyes.

So the Islamic world in general and the militant Islamic world in particular considers him the worst kind of Muslim

By GOD

May 19, 2008 11:04 AM | Link to this

Jesus (10:26): Good boy, my Son. Tho I tend to be leaning away from impeachment, and more towards a sturdy rope.

You need be watchful for groups of Repugs carrying hammers and nails, Son.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 11:07 AM | Link to this

Jenna Bush: I may not support McCain

AND

Julie Nixon and Susan Eisenhower back Barack Obama

I’m hearing a lot of women who feel like they do!

By Dusty

May 19, 2008 11:07 AM | Link to this

Thanks, Midori@10:42 for giving us the perfect example of far left lunacy. You do it everytime.

Bosch @10:46

You are going to need a lot of reasons to vote for Obama because you’ve got a lot to overlook.

Sam Nunn is not going to get any closer to Obama than a ten foot pole, but still waving the Democratic Donkey flag on it. ONE of the national security advisors is like being on a committee of hundreds.

What we need is someone who ALREADY has experience in national security, not someone who has not given a minute of thought to it. Obama may look like a Boy Scout who can rub two sticks together and make fire, but he couldn’t light a fire with a blow torch.

OHHH but he makes a NICE speech. Great! Just what we need, a far left “mouth piece”. (Look up “mouth piece”, Bosch, before you ask.)

By carry on

May 19, 2008 11:14 AM | Link to this

By @@

May 16, 2008 7:03 PM | Link to this

“I contemplated shooting Huckabee with my trusty BB gun. PING…PING ping ping ping. I’m gonna have to saw that sucker down since it’s legal to carry concealed weapons.”

Blog Alert!!! I AM MAKING A CITIZEN’S ARREST on @@.

@@, you may not threaten to shoot a presidential candidate in this war on terror we face. Just like you may not joke about a bomb on a plane, YOU certainly have no right to conspire with others to improvise a handgun device to shoot Huckabee. That’s a felony, and I’m arresting you on it. This is a legitamate case for homeland security. I dont know you. I dont know what you’re capable of. People tell you who they are, and I know you’re a lunatic and that’s all I need to know to act. @@, you are under citizen’s arrest.

@@, you have the right to remain silent. You have the duty to stfu. Anything you blog can and will be used against you at gitmo if homeland security so orders.

Citizen’s Arrest! Dont ever blog again on this forum, @@, or I will make that phone call to homeland security. I’m sure they’ll appreciate how clever your threat against huckabee was.

Dont blog here again, you felon in training. or the terrorists win.

@@ is now under Citizens cyber arrest. Sorry, @@, but we are at war, and we cant tolerate terror threats even if you were joking, which I doubt. You dont joke. You only spread your hate. Well this time you went too far. Citizen’s Arrest! I called it. No backs, no vice versas, no changies.

By @@

May 19, 2008 11:23 AM | Link to this

(((we need to invade and destroy and kill a great many more people in order to remain free and happy.)))

Well Gary, I know the libs don’t consider “them people”, but I and others like me (conservatives) do regardless of their race.

“Abortion is the number one killer of black Americans—killing more black people than all other deaths combined,” said Day Gardner, president of the National Black Pro-life Union. “Yet there are black men and women who stand in support of the vicious killing of our smallest children—all in order to win popularity contests or for the coveted prize of becoming the first black president of the United States.”

Barack Obama, an African-American U.S. senator from Illinois who leads in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, strongly supports abortion rights.

Why do you hate African Americans and their babies Gary?

RW:

I’m assuming you also saw the CSM piece on “THE APOSTATE OBAMA”. I had never thought about it from the OBL propoganda angle, but I can see how it would/should add to the concerns of electing Obama as president.

Let’s think about this….if Obama would just drop out, it would diminish the call to radical extremism. Simple! but he probably doesn’t think that much about his country. Michelle sure doesn’t. (IWH)

It’s all about Obama!

By getalife

May 19, 2008 11:26 AM | Link to this

Oilbama finally takes the lead on something:

Obama to GOP: “Lay Off My Wife”

And he said be nice to Clinton supporters.

What a leader.

Geez.

By Bosch

May 19, 2008 11:28 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Your desperation is showing. Your head’s about to explode isn’t it?

Obama does have less experience in Washington - that’s why I like him. He’s willing to seek advice from experts - unlike the current Commander in Chief - that’s what a true leader does.

By The Devil You Say

May 19, 2008 11:43 AM | Link to this

getalife - you are right, what a leader!! He has done nothing in the U.S. Senate. He had no record to speak of in the Illinois Senate. And, he has NO administrative experience whatsoever. Also, his wife makes me cringe. She is a hate-America Firster. Hillary, for all of her faults, real and imagined, cannot be accused of ever even thinking some of the bizarre stuff that has spewed from the mouth of America’s most unhappy millionaire. We’re in for four years of another Jimmy Carter, gas lines and Iran crisis included. Have fun everybody.

By @@

May 19, 2008 11:46 AM | Link to this

(((@@, you may not threaten to shoot a presidential candidate in this war on terror we face)))

AHhhh nuts PoliFore. I was just gonna fill Huckabee full of blue bumps.

Huckabee reminded me of Barack Obama. Loved the attention….loved “the words”. He didn’t have as many -ahs- and -ums- in his rhetoric, but it was empty nonetheless.

By truthman

May 19, 2008 11:49 AM | Link to this

YOU PEOPLE ARE FRIGGIN’ IDIOTS WITH YOUR ‘OBAMA IS A MUSLIM’ TRIPE.

IT’S A F**KING LIE!!!

IT’S A F**KING LIE!!

ONLY STUPID, WHITE HATERS SUCH AS YOU KEEP REPEATING THE PROPAGANDA HOPING SIMILARLY STUPID, WHITE PEOPLE WILL BUY INTO YOUR CRAP!!

YOU SHOULD REALLY BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES, YOU RELIGIOUSLY BIGOTED PIECES OF S**T!!!

By Dusty

May 19, 2008 11:54 AM | Link to this

Bosch 11:28

What desperation? The fact that we have accomplished protection for our country, freed two countries from dictatorship and helped storm sticken people around the world?

Your knowledge is certainly limited but you think like a prejudiced liberal. I guess you would not call General Petraeus an expert. Nor would you call fighting terrorism a necessity.

But you do joke. Obama a true leader? Based on WHAT experience? His mostly non-voting experience in the Senate? His 20 years with the religious leadership of Wright? His years with his despise-America wife?

That may be your form of leadership and character. It is NOT mine.

By The Devil You Say

May 19, 2008 11:58 AM | Link to this

@@ - you are 1,000% right about Huckabee - all hole and no doughnut. His record is quite spotty too. He is what I like to call part of the Christian left. He is very conservative on social issues but quite liberal on economic and tax issues, at least for a Republican. He also is quite compassionate, with other people’s money. McCain would be making a BIG mistake if he were to pick Huckabee as his running mate. He adds 0% to the strenght of the ticket in any way.

McCain should pick someone like Kay Hutchison of Texas or Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota. He cannot choose Crist of Florida, and Condi Rice won’t take it.

By truthman

May 19, 2008 12:08 PM | Link to this

Dustball and Taz - McCain could dig up Ronnie Raygun for his VP and it won’t matter one whit come November.

The neo-conmen and woman are in their ‘last throes’ as “Dick” Cheney would say!!

Have fun running for dog catcher!!!

Bwahahahahaha!!!

By @@

May 19, 2008 12:19 PM | Link to this

Bosch:

There’s little difference between Hillary and Barack on the issues. Obama has a tendency to obfuscate while Hillary pontificates.

Barack Obama suggested Friday that he has more foreign policy experts from the Clinton administration backing his candidacy over Hillary Rodham Clinton’s, but lists provided by both campaigns show hers is nearly twice as long.

(((Clinton’s campaign provided 85 names of her husband’s former foreign policy advisers who are publicly backing her, while Obama’s campaign provided 47.)))

Asked how Obama backs up the claim of greater support, campaign spokesman Bill Burton said the senator was referring to an article that ran in The New York Times Magazine last month, which quoted an anonymous foreign policy expert saying most of the community was backing Obama.

Obama gets his “facts” about who his advisors are from the NYT? I wonder if he had to ahhh…ummm…had to think…ummm about…ahhh that. 57 states - no make that 60 states and counting. 57 with one more to go, not including Hawaii and Alaska.

Devil:

That’s the first time I’ve heard Kay Baily Hutchison mentioned.

Interesting.

I like Pawlenty.

I’ve already zipped an e-mail to his campaign site telling them Huckabee is an empty suit just like Obama. I reminded him that he’s running AGAINST Obama and should not run WITH Obama on the ticket.

truthman:

I didn’t say Obama was a muslim. I said that the radical extremists (OBL’s) perception of him as an apostate Muslim presents a dilemma for him and the country.

He should withdraw. Can’t have an apostate leading the Great Satan or are we the Little Satan? I always have trouble remembering which is which.

Maybe Obama’s Rev. Wright could clarify that for me.

By truthman

May 19, 2008 12:19 PM | Link to this

“Bush tells Arabs to give more freedoms to their people.”

Am I the only one who sees the irony of a confirmed torturer, kidnapper and war criminal telling the Arabs to be nice to their people.

He’s like the guy who can’t get the date with the hot chick: He went over to Saudi Arabia and asked her out. She said ‘No,’ and now he doesn’t like her and says bad things about her because she had enough sense to say ‘No’ to the American Idiot!!

By truthman

May 19, 2008 12:26 PM | Link to this

@@! Only 173 more days until you and yours get the spanking of your life (unlike Sen. Craig, you won’t like it!!!).

I’d take Rev. Wright over any of your relgious leaders. At least he knows of what he speaks!!

By truthman

May 19, 2008 12:32 PM | Link to this

Eygptian media: Bush the Appeaser!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/17/world/main4104474.shtml

See, the Chimperor can’t even get a date with the ugly chick like Dusty!

By The Devil You Say

May 19, 2008 12:33 PM | Link to this

@@ - Hutchison is actually the logical choice. She is a fiscal conservative with traditional views on social issues, but she is not a dinosaur. She is also extremely bright. Her drawback is that she has been in the Senate for a long, long time as well. Her strength is that she does have some administrative experience as the State Treasurer of Texas.

She shores up the base and she also appeals to moderate women who might be on the fence. She is also young enough (born in 1943) that she will be around for a while, especially since it is known that women tend to live longer lives nowadays.

Pawlenty is youthful, vigorous and SMART. He also has won two tough elections in left-leaning Minnesota and has held the line on taxes.

Obama will choose a fellow traveler. He will not do the smart thing and pick Clinton because he does not want the competition. He’s afraid of what will happen if he freezes them out. That is not showing leadership. It is showing cowardice.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 12:42 PM | Link to this

HERE’S A NEAT NEW RESOURCE BROTHER AND SISTER PROGRESSIVES!

By truthman

May 19, 2008 12:54 PM | Link to this

Why McCain doesn’t support our first responders, but supports tax cuts for the rich:

http://www.mccainpedia.org/index.php/Police

Thanks for the link, ITN!

-TM (the ab-original)

By carry on

May 19, 2008 12:56 PM | Link to this

I reported you @@. The guy at Homeland Security sounded angry that I was bothering him, but I read exactly what you wrote and he said that yes, it’s technically a red flag that could cause them to water board you for more info, but it probably was just an unhinged loser who has no life and who blogs only to herself using multiple ID’s like they see all the time on every blog that ever was. I said, “but sir, you need to protect america from terrorists, and lunatics and stuff.” He said, “get lost, moron.”

WEll! @@, I am watching you. Anymore assassination threats from you, and it’s Gitmo for U, girlfriend.

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 12:57 PM | Link to this

truth?man? @ 11:49,

Instead of going off on an all caps, vulgar rant perhaps you should read what I actually said.

I’m sure militant Islam would be happy to kill any US President, but in the case of Obama they feel like the law is on their side and I’m sure that extends to the citizens of any country that would elect an apostate to lead them.

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 1:04 PM | Link to this

Hey truthie, I heard Obambi was a Muslim, wat’s up wit dat?

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this

All: We have lived to see the day where the republican party is in the crapper. We need not wonder, why? They keep opening their mouths to change feet. You can see it here.

By Query for Neo-kkkons

May 19, 2008 1:07 PM | Link to this

With what would you rather have sex with:

1) Polar Bear 2) Crusty Dusty 3) Bi Danish 4) RW/Andiduh 5) @@

Vote!

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 1:09 PM | Link to this

Aahhh, yes, thee corpse is up from the grave and shambling around, terrifying thee dimwit cult members:

{{{{“You can declare yourself anything, but if you don’t have the votes, it doesn’t matter,” Clinton said Monday in a satellite interview with an Oregon television station before a campaign appearance in Kentucky.}}}}

{{{{“So I’m going to make my case and I’m going to make it until we have a nominee, but we’re not going to have one today and we’re not going to have one tomorrow and we’re not going to have one the next day,” Clinton said. “And if Kentucky turns out tomorrow, I will be closer to that nomination because of you.”}}}}

Go monster!

By Midori

May 19, 2008 1:18 PM | Link to this

{{{{Your desperation is showing. Your head’s about to explode isn’t it?}}}}}

Bosch: what do you mean ‘about to explode’?

Just look at her 11:54.

A more confused, deluded post couldn’t have said it better.

All of Mr. Ed’s horses and all Bush’s yes men couldn’t put Crusty together again.

By TW

May 19, 2008 1:21 PM | Link to this

If Obama looked like John Edwards, he’d have won West Virginia and would win Kentucky tomorrow. The trash in those states is of the same brainless branch that has given us the last eight years.

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 1:24 PM | Link to this

A look at the recent Special Election in Northern Mississippi shows just how bad it is for the republican party. In the primary (there were a number of candidates) the democrat got 49% the republican got 46%. Since neither candidate got 50%; another election had to be held. Before the Special election Cheney came to town, Rove showed up, the republicans called Obama a muslim, the republicans linked the democrat to Obama, they dusted off the race card. This District is a solid (safe) republican District. WHOOPS!! Guess what happened? The democrat won 54% to 46%! The democrat increased his vote total by 147%!

Now, isn’t that sweet.

By carry on

May 19, 2008 1:28 PM | Link to this

Y-y-yeah! neocons, vote!!! but dont forget your voter I.P: ——<=3

It’s raining, @@, it’s raining!!

bwa

By Say It Ain't So

May 19, 2008 1:28 PM | Link to this

truthman, the ‘funny boy’ of this blog.

Please show us where anyone has called Obama a Muslim?

Repeating lies over and over again is a trademark of the left. Remember the Tax Cut for the Rich lies you’ve been repeating over and over again? Or how about the lie that Gore won?

Since you crystal balls work so well, and you know for a fact that Obama is going to win, please share the winning lotto numbers with the rest of us.

And, who is this confirmed torturer, kidnapper and war criminal you keep harping about? Ever hear of due process? Please share with the rest of us where and when the ‘war criminal’ was prosecuted and convicted. Or is it just in the loony lefts minds?

-oops, there you go again “but supports tax cuts for the rich”

You are one dumb, or is that ignorant, work of art. Even after being shown the error of your rants, you keep making them. You should learn from your hero and leader, “Stupid is as Stupid does”.

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 1:32 PM | Link to this

Somebody needs to resurrect Harry Chapin. We finally have a sequel to 30,000 Pounds of Bananas

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this

ELITIST - elit·ist (\ā-ˈlē-tist)

By The Devil You Say

May 19, 2008 1:34 PM | Link to this

Daniel you are right, but after just two years of Obambi, rampant inflation, a disastrous foreign policy and gas lines five miles long, the Republicans will sweep to an unprecedented victory in 2010. 2012 will be even worse for the demagogues. Enjoy it while it lasts, because it will be the last hurrah of American socialists liberalism.

By carry on

May 19, 2008 1:39 PM | Link to this

alert: do not click on any blue lettered links provided by the unhinged underwear sniffers on this blog, they are likely to contain viruses that will take down your new 1500 dollar dell.

I learned the hard way.

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 1:40 PM | Link to this

Sick:

{{{{The Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision, upheld criminal penalties Monday for promoting child pornography.}}}}

Justice David Souter, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, dissented.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

POS.

Freak liberals.

Obambi judges.

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 1:42 PM | Link to this

Sick:

{{{{Boston’s Children’s Hospital bills itself as the hospital for children — and now it’s also the hospital for children who want a sex change, a procedure some critics are calling “barbaric.”}}}}

Taxachussetts, home of Swimmer Kennedy and John the Freak Kerry, liberal utopia.

POS.

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 1:44 PM | Link to this

I read somewhere that McBush is the “apostate” KKK leader — or was it for the Aryan Nation? I get all the white trash groups who support the Repugs mixed up…

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 1:47 PM | Link to this

Lucifer: The point of the post was that after Rove and Cheney and the Muslim Bomb and the “Race Card”; the democrat increased his vote total by 147%! This was in the Deep South and in a solid republican District! Unlike the Devil, I don’t know what the future will bring. I just want good government. Bye, the bye, we already have inflation, huge national debt, war, gas lines and a disastrous foreign policy.

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 1:50 PM | Link to this

The Devil @ 1:34 — LMAO!!!

It will take a lot longer than 2 years for the Repug Party to figure out how to be relevant in America again, and to find its moral compass…

By truthman

May 19, 2008 1:51 PM | Link to this

American Commander kisses Qu’ran before giving it to Sunni’s:

He must be a closet Muslim, eh, RW?

Iraqi police found the desecrated copy of the Muslim holy book on May 11 at a small shooting range near a police station in Radwaniya, a mostly Sunni district on Baghdad’s western outskirts, Buckner said. The volume was riddled with bullets and had graffiti inside the cover. Community leaders were outraged and threatened to stop helping the U.S. military fight the Sunni Arab militant group Al Qaeda in Iraq, said Ayad Jabouri, a tribal leader and member of the country’s largest Sunni political party. The U.S. command ordered an immediate investigation. “Commanders have since briefed local leaders on the results of the investigation and expressed their deep regret,” Buckner said. “They have also undertaken disciplinary action against the soldier who was involved, and he has been removed from Iraq.” The military did not release the soldier’s name or detail how he would be disciplined, saying that the case was still being adjudicated. A CNN crew was present when Army Maj. Gen. Jeffery Hammond, the commander of U.S. troops in Baghdad, met Saturday with tribal leaders in Radwaniya to offer an apology before a crowd of angry protesters. “I am a man of honor. I am a man of character. You have my word, this will never happen again,” Hammond was quoted as saying in the CNN report. “In the most humble manner, I look in your eyes today, and I say please forgive me and my soldiers.” Col. Ted Martin, commander of the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, then presented the tribal leaders with a new Koran, which he first kissed and touched to his forehead. Jabouri said local sheiks had accepted the apology. “Muslims and Arabs are targeted everywhere in the world,” he said. “The apology was very important to calm people down and convince them that not all soldiers, not all Americans, have the same opinion of Islam.” Shiite lawmaker Haidar Fakhrildeen, a member of parliament’s religious affairs committee, said he did not expect the matter to escalate.

DID YOU READ THAT, NEO-CONS? “Not all Americans have the same opinion of Islam!”

I guess @@/Dusty/Dunce/RW must hate the commander who treated the Qu’ran with respect?

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 2:01 PM | Link to this

SAY IT AINT SO…..

Guess what

“Repeating lies over and over again is a trademark of the left. Remember the Tax Cut for the Rich lies you’ve been repeating over and over again? “

IT AINT SO

Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says

OH AND BY THE WAY

Not That It Was Reported, but Gore Won

The entity that lives here as multiple personalities, thinks that by pretending it’s six or seven or eight different posters…we might just buy the claptrap he attempts to recycle.

The biggest lesson of the last eight years is:

IF IT COMES FROM A BUSH SUPPORTER IT MUST BE CHECKED FOR ACCURACY BECAUSE MOST LIKELY IT’S A LIE.

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 2:09 PM | Link to this

Goldie, Truthman: Andy, RW, boobs,

Devil and Dusty are closet democrats. I told Andy three years ago he was a recruitment poster for the dems. The more these people talk the more the independents are turned off. Somehow, they have grown addicted to their mantra. Their ship is sinking and they’re rearranging the deck chairs. I’m off to my work-out.

By Dusty

May 19, 2008 2:20 PM | Link to this

Midori@ 1:18

I see you are maintaining your reputation of all insults and no information.

That is not necessary. Your lack of sensible expression is notorious.

Are you ALSO “truthman” & “Query for Neo-kkkons”, the three of you known as the Ludicrous Liberal Losers ?

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 2:20 PM | Link to this

little newsie namejacker,

That “Gore won” story has more ifs, buts, probablys, and maybes than I’ve ever seen in what purports to be a news story.

Maybe it’s just more fever swamp bull squeeze.

By the way, we have an income tax not a wealth tax. If you really want to tax the bejeezus out of the rich then join me in supporting the Fair Tax.

By The Devil You Say

May 19, 2008 2:20 PM | Link to this

Daniel, even with the price of gas we don’t have rampant inflation. We also DO NOT HAVE GAS LINES. Perhaps you are too young to remember when old Dummy Carter was president. We also don’t have interest rates at 21%. We did then and will again. Our deficits, as a portion of the GDP are actually not as high as they have been in the past. That argument is sperious anyway.

Goldie - two years will be more than enough time. Socialism is a failed philosophy. So is appeasement. Obama is for both. I just pray that we make it that far!

ITN - At this point tax cuts will benefit the rich the most as 60% of the income taxes are paid by only 10% of the population. In fact, fewer people pay income taxes now than ever before. This phenomenon is thanks to the reforms implemented during the Reagan administration. It is therefore very easy to demagogue this issue.

I will also remind you that rich people don’t just keep their money under a mattress. Usually they invest it or spend it, thereby creating more jobs. The Demoncrats found this out in 1991 with their famous ‘luxury’ tax when they put so many workers on the unemployment lines because the rich folks stopped buying boats.

I know that you want to do the class warfare thing because it is such a cheap target, but it really is worthless as an economic argument. This is NOT 18th century France.

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 2:27 PM | Link to this

Same old politics of fear.

GRESHAM, Ore. (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama told seniors Sunday that Republican ohn McCain would threaten the Social Security that they and millions like them depend on because he supports privatizing the program.

I thought the cult leader was supposed to be about change.

By truthman

May 19, 2008 2:27 PM | Link to this

Dustball, I don’t need to write under any nom de plume except the only one I ever use - Truthman!!

And, just so you know in no uncertain terms, all of us “liberal losers” are about to take back out country from the hater neo-cons…and you know there ain’t s**t you or any of your neo-con liars can do about it!!

Bwahahahahaha!!!!

By truthman

May 19, 2008 2:29 PM | Link to this

@@/Dustmite! You remind me of what John McCain ‘lovingly’ calls his wife!

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 2:36 PM | Link to this

Sen. John McCain’s speech yesterday attracted a lot of media attention for what he said about Iraq –but it is what he DIDN’T say on Afghanistan and Pakistan that should worry most Americans. Conservatives like McCain have demonstrated that they may be strong on rhetoric but actually lacking in clear ideas on how to truly tackle the continued threat posed by the global Al Qaeda movement.

By Midori

May 19, 2008 2:37 PM | Link to this

ROFL, Truthman!!

you too? :)

can’t you just see McCain whispering those endearments in Crusty’s ear.

Someone give Crusty a towel, quick!!

As for using other names, Hint: it’s what “they” do, that’s why “they” continually accuse others of doing it.

no one ever accused those morons of original thought.

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 2:40 PM | Link to this

ITN, devil: Tax cuts? Please explain why borrowing from China for tax cuts is sound fiscal policy. “Sperious”, you don’t say! “Sperious” is no english word. Likely, you mean specious. But, “sperious” or specious; you’re wrong. Deficits harm us because corporations become addicted to cheap federal money. These are the pals of our leaders who bleed the treasury. Remember, Ayn Rand? Deficits are also bad because of debt service. When we borrow we have to pay interest. If we’re paying interest we are not investing that money in research, education and our future. The current brand of republican has betrayed America. You have been betrayed. It’s “sperious” to think otherwise.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 2:42 PM | Link to this

McCain Can Run, but Bush Won’t Hide

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 2:49 PM | Link to this

Devil: I’m sorry. What you meant was spurious. Which means false.

By Dusty

May 19, 2008 3:00 PM | Link to this

HO hum…

I see all the Ludicrous Liberal Losers are back. Nothing new. Same ol’ stuff…not even a thought on Luckovich’s little effort at unproven environmental efforts. Shame! You losers are supposed to support other losers such as Lucko… Have you no loyalty??

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:08 PM | Link to this

OH NO!

I stand accused of class warfare!

Wow, man….with a devastating argument like that a blogger might just weep into his pillow at night!

Guess what fella’….

YOU ARE SPOT ON RIGHT!

I am all in favor of class warfare considering the state of the union at the moment.

297 million people in the lower 90% of incomes…..we can take ‘em!

Will the 10% hit us with wads of fifties? Or bomb us with securities? IED’s made of beluga?

EEE GADS!!!!

It’s time to oust the ruling class….anybody with me??

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:17 PM | Link to this

DUCK EVERYBODY!!!

INCOMING BEIGNETS!

By Right-wing nut job in full glory

May 19, 2008 3:18 PM | Link to this

AJC Management loves criminal coddlers.

Scalia votes to overturn death sentence on technicality:

“The latest decision on Monday overturned the death sentence of Timothy Ring, a man convicted in Arizona seven years ago of participating in the fatal 1994 robbery of an armored car, and simultaneously overturned all the death sentences currently on appeal in five states, including Arizona.

At issue was Arizona’s practice of having judges, instead of jurors, deciding whether a convicted person deserved death or life in prison without parole. While a jury had found Ring guilty because he had helped plan the robbery, trial testimony had not placed him at the scene of the crime, and thus they did not find evidence of premeditation. At a sentencing hearing before a judge, there was further testimony from an accomplice in the crime who claimed Ring had not only been at the scene but had been the shooter of the driver of the armored car. On that basis the judge sentenced him to die.

Much attention was focused on Justice Antonin Scalia because two years ago he had written a strong opinion in support of the court’s 5-4 ruling in a case called Apprendi v. New Jersey.

In the end Scalia bowed to the new precedent he had helped set by Apprendi.”

Scalia is such a bleeding heart liberal pansy. The guy is guilty, why all of this p***-footing around? Consistency? What a cop out. I guess he thinks the Constitution applies to murderers. He and the rest of you limp-wristed liberals make me sick. I want a justice who when faced with a technical issue on a death penalty case, rather than cracking a book that he grabs a bat, finds the guy and start cracking his skull until he’s dead for whining about some Constitutional mumbo-gumbo.

We need some justices that understand the irrelvancy of a document that a bunch of dead guys wrote hundreds of years ago. We should be forward thinking like Bush who realized that Habeas Corpus which was first introduced as a legal impediment to the King’s power to incarcerate people without charge in 1215, was simply outdated and in need of discarding.

In fact, I say if you can read a book, you shouldn’t be a judge. Waste of time. Judges should just have a stamp that says “KILL.”

RWNJIFG

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:20 PM | Link to this

ATTN: CLASS WARRIORS

We have reports of up-armored BMW roadsters approaching from mid town!

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 3:37 PM | Link to this

Thee grand witness thee dhimmokrats have made to magically appear out of nowhere to testify against thee evil Karl Rove Monster:

{{{{Jill Simpson is an unusual woman. A lawyer, she has scratched out an uncertain living in DeKalb County, Alabama. Fellow DeKalb County lawyers describe her as “a very strange person” who “lives in her own world.” The daughter of rabid Democrats, she has rarely if ever been known to participate in politics as even a low-level volunteer. Yet today, she is a minor celebrity who is unvaryingly described in the press as a “Republican operative.” Those who know her in DeKalb County scoff at the idea that she is a Republican at all.}}}}

{{{{Recently, Simpson’s house and law office were on the auction block. Rumor has it that she is leaving DeKalb County for good and heading for the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Jill Simpson, who barely got by in Alabama, is now toasted by the national Democratic party and featured on network and cable news. All this because she has testified—without a shred of supporting evidence—to a conspiracy so vast as to be not just implausible, but ridiculous.}}}}

I seen Bushie peeping in Obambi’s window, really, I did.

Can I get a big new house in D.C?

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 3:43 PM | Link to this

This guy may shed votes in November but it won’t be from Republicans:

{{{{He has announced his candidacy for the nomination of the Libertarian party, which holds its convention this weekend. Barr served four terms in Congress in Georgia before getting trounced in a 2002 primary fight against Rep. John Linder sparked by redistricting. This is not a natural path to the presidency. >>>>The American Civil Liberties Union hired him as a consultant after 9/11<<<< and he’s been expanding on a libertarian streak he had in Congress — and shedding his otherwise orthodox right-wing views — ever since.}}}}

ACLU?

That’s the sicko lib organization that defended the North American Man Boy Love Association on free speech grounds.

Sick.

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:44 PM | Link to this

The Cult of The Warrior — Jack Kemp Was Right: McCain Would Be Too Dangerous as President

By W stands for worst

May 19, 2008 3:47 PM | Link to this

My how people like to rewrite history. 21 % interest rates, i believe that was a left over from Nixon. Same with the gas lines, Tricky Dick was more into spying on Dems than he was governing. Kinda like Bush, he is more interested in his standing with the lord more than how to make this country better. And to all you Obama has no experience, tell me one thing W did of any substance before he became President…

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:48 PM | Link to this

ACLU

YEP

That’s the sick bunch that defended Rush Limbaugh.

And

Larry Craig

DAMN

JUST DAMN

By Midori

May 19, 2008 3:54 PM | Link to this

Andy - you and your ilk’s first line of defense is to try to brand someone who has the goods on you rabid criminals as crazy.

this coming from the looniest bunch of lunatics on the block.

At least you admit that you’re a peeping tom. Any more quirks you’d like to admit to?

on second thought…….

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:56 PM | Link to this

Anatomy of a Right Wing Myth part II: Obama is the most liberal Democratic Senator

By IN THE NEWS

May 19, 2008 3:58 PM | Link to this

OBAMA IS THE MOST LIBERAL SENATOR: THE BIG REPUBLICAN LIE I WISH WAS TRUE…. Here is the comparative ranking of all 100 senators— across the board on all votes, not pre-selected votes— for the ‘07-‘08 session. As you can see, Obama comes in at #40,

By Devastator

May 19, 2008 3:59 PM | Link to this

Updated: Senator Robert Byrd (WV) Endorses Barack Obama

The Charleston Gazette reports an endorsement deep with symbolism: West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd is endorsing Barack Obama.

“After a great deal of thought, consideration and prayer over the situation in Iraq, I have decided that, as a superdelegate to the Democratic National Convention, I will cast my vote for Senator Barack Obama for President. Both Senators Clinton and Obama are extraordinary individuals, whose integrity, honor, love for this country and strong belief in our Constitution I deeply respect.”

“I believe that Barack Obama is a shining young statesman, who possesses the personal temperament and courage necessary to extricate our country from this costly misadventure in Iraq, and to lead our nation at this challenging time in history. Barack Obama is a noble-hearted patriot and humble Christian, and he has my full faith and support.”

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 4:05 PM | Link to this

Dubya’s administration has been busy appeasing nuclear terrorists — will McBush continue the same policies of appeasement? Probably so… you Bush-kissing trolls must be very ashamed of your terrorist-appeasing Party.

Perhaps equally important, the United States and Japan, which also took part in the talks, agreed to discuss normalizing relations with the Pyongyang regime. The United States will also begin the process of removing North Korea from its list of terror-sponsoring states, and lifting trade and financial sanctions.

By Paul

May 19, 2008 4:09 PM | Link to this

truthman 12:54

So you think funding of local law enforcement and firefighters is a Federal responsibility? In other words, the taxpayers of Macon county, Georgia fund the firemen of Knob Hill, (San Francisco)?

So maybe McCain was saying “no” regardless of how the bill was constructed?

ITN 2:01

If I may offer a suggestion - citing the “tax cuts benefits rich” just leads to the “of course, they pay bulk of taxes and about half American households don’t pay Fed taxes” rejoinders.

As I have done in the past. It’s a simple numbers exercise.

If the point is, the Bush Administration has given tax advantages to the very wealthiest of Americans while pursuing fiscally irresponsible policies, well, there’s a better way to make that argument.

Ditto for the point of distinguishing the poor and middle class families who’ve benefited from the tax cuts. Which is why many Dems are in favor or retaining those portions.

Of course, that just leaves Dems open to - oh, who’s in the news - Kennedy? - benefiting tremendously from the family trusts. Sen Edwards, too - he saved over a mil, easy.

But one doesn’t excuse the other. A bit of “yeah, our guys hose the taxpayers, too, but on balance, they’re not as bad” would be nice.

BTW - Hillary still supporting taxing hedge fund managers hundreds of millions of annual income at the capital gains tax rate instead of at the income tax rate? She’s still a Democrat, right? I just thought that stance might make her a Republican.

Devil You Say 2:20

Thanks for illustrating my point about taxes. But… late 20th century deficits literally exploded under Pres Reagan. Kinda funny, really, the fiscal conservative party leads the debt pile-on.

ITN 2:36

I’m really anxiously awaiting the Dems’ plans on dealing with the “continued threat posed by the worldwide al Qaeda movement.”

Wait! The Dems just admitted there is a threat posed by the worldwide al Qaeda movement?!!? And it’s continued? So it existed before now?!!? Who’da’ thunk?

ITN 3:08

“I stand accused of class warfare!”

You have plenty of class. No need to fight about it.

Nut Job 3:18

“Scalia votes to overturn death sentence on technicality:”

By Paul

May 19, 2008 4:17 PM | Link to this

Nut Job 3:18

“Scalia votes to overturn death sentence on technicality:”

Is “technicality” the same thing as “a provision of law?”

BTW - today’s cartoon: regardless of the words in the bottom right, I rather took it symbolically - Obama’s supporters are adrift, their bedrock melted by man-induced events, as they become isolated, drifting off to their eventual extinction.

Who says L doesn’t hit lib Dems?

By Goldie

May 19, 2008 4:19 PM | Link to this

{{Judges should just have a stamp that says “KILL.”}}

Nut Job @ 3:18 — like always, you “kill” me!

By Bosch

May 19, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this

OMG, Dusty calls me a “prejudiced liberal” in the same post as this non-sense:

“The fact that we have accomplished protection for our country, freed two countries from dictatorship and helped storm sticken people around the world”

Other than helping the storm victims which is great and all, but hardly a mark of a heroic leader, when did we accomplish the other two? Saddam is dead, yes, but quickly replaced by another regime - the Taliban is not out of Afghanistan.

Your desperation is showing through constant shots at Obama like the “America hating wife” the Wright NON-ISSUE - your side is so desperate you making s** up!

It’s very sad, and I guess you think the more you say it, more people will hear and believe it - but then again, Bush was elected TWICE.

Yes, Dusty, we have a completely different idea of what is a good leader and what is not - and George W. Bush, is definitely the poster boy for whom I believe to be the worst leader in the history of mankind. Well, Hitler was worse on the evil scale, but alot smarter.

By Bosch

May 19, 2008 4:25 PM | Link to this

Hey Paul!

“Obama’s supporters are adrift, their bedrock melted by man-induced events, as they become isolated, drifting off to their eventual extinction”

Ewwwwwww…….good one. How long did it take you to make that one up, or did you do it off the cuff?

You’re so off base Paul - the cartoon definitely means that the polar bears want us to vote for Obama - gosh, how crazy can you be! :-)

By Devastator

May 19, 2008 4:25 PM | Link to this

Paul,

In response to your 4:17. Are you saying that’s how you feel or that how Mike Lucko feels?

By Bosch

May 19, 2008 4:31 PM | Link to this

Mr. Nutjob,

“Judges should just have a stamp that says “KILL.””

If only that were the case for three people I know of who still reside on this planet….but don’t deserve to.

By W stands for worst

May 19, 2008 4:31 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Im still waiting for Dubya to do something about the Al-Queda problem. He will go down in history as having the tools and backing from other countries to destroy Al-Queda and did nothing. If anything he has made our country less secure.. Thats the real world view, not the pipe dream you have…

By Paul

May 19, 2008 4:36 PM | Link to this

Hi Bosch! You too, Devastator -

Off the cuff. Just thought about an alternate interpretation that would rile Obama supporters. Which is why L’s a good editorial cartoonist - some of his toons can be taken either way.

Bosch - read an interview with Ron Moore - BSG - you know the Last Supper pic? (makes a great desktop) - said none of those pictured are No. 12. And that No. 12 is already known. So much for the hybrid speculation. Gaeta?

I seem to recall that just before I dropped off the radar you were discussing how activist judges aren’t really all that activist? Was that correct? I thought you might like, if you haven’t already, to discuss the Calif Supreme’s gay marriage decision - particularly as it restricted the “equal protection” only to gays regarding marriage - not to alternate practices.

By Devastator

May 19, 2008 4:36 PM | Link to this

Bosch,

Is this the same Paul we that’s normally here?

By AmVet

May 19, 2008 4:36 PM | Link to this

Though there is still plenty of time and lots of opportunities for the details to change, truthman in his 2:27 is, nonetheless, absolutely correct.

No matter how this plays out, the worst “conservative” screw ups in American history have ensured that their chances for yet another encore performance are zero.

They should along with these demented right-wing voters be run out of town tarred and feathered. But as the American people are generally very forgiving, just relegating them to the political land of nod, where their impotent teeth gnashing on matters of import from man-induced global warming to fiscal policy will be most humorous, will have to suffice…

By Paul

May 19, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this

W for worst 4:31

“Thats the real world view, not the pipe dream you have…”

I dream of pipes?

Really, how did you infer a world view from that post?

I came close to citing the Dems’ Real Security manifesto from earlier on in the Bush Administration - said how they were going to deal with al Qaeda - and of course, since they’ve had Congress the amount of legislation they’ve introduced regarding that manifesto is… zip. Too many hearings, I suppose.

Before you state absolutes such as “nothing” you just might want to Google terms or concepts such as shutting down financial networks, agreements with other countries, joint operations in southeast (not west) Asia. I believe you’ll find it’s been a bit more than “nothing.”

But the real point is - remember that show of hands in the Dem debate? About “is there a war on terror?” Notice how the conversation changes the closer we get to a general election? The testosterone ante increases.

By Paul

May 19, 2008 4:52 PM | Link to this

Devastator 4:36

That would be me. But using any term including “normal” is stretching it -

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 4:55 PM | Link to this

{{{{By DHIMMINEWS May 19, 2008 3:48 PM ACLU YEP That’s the sick bunch that defended Rush Limbaugh.}}}}

Oh, I get it, if you defend a couple of wingers every once and a while, that gives you the right to molest little boys.

Sure thing, wanker.

By W stands for worst

May 19, 2008 5:04 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Way to trump the Bush doctrine, oh i forgot outside of high gas prices, borrowing from China for a bad war and not hunting down the actual terrorists who attacked us there is no Bush doctrine. I see you that instead of giving me examples you give a smart A&& answer, typical Bush lover

By Bosch

May 19, 2008 5:14 PM | Link to this

I’m not up on marriage laws - I’m sure there are some that are, but it is my opinion that judges have no business making decisions about who can get married and who can’t. To me, it’s a church thing. Sure, judges can perform marriages, so can captains on a ship, etc. but I think the issue of “gay marriage” is kind of a waste of a judges time and the taxpayers money.

But I’ll stick to my statement that there are no such things as activist judges, just some judges interpret the laws in ways in which you might disagree.

OOOHHHHHH, I have that picture on my desktop! Cool red dress. Well, that blows all my theories out of the water! Gaita, Dualla, or Tom the terrorist (Richard Hatch) guy? Did you see it Friday night? Gaita singing gave me the absolute chills. The Lucy Lawless Cylon has seen him, so it’s possible that it’s Gaita, he was Baltar’s assistant on New Caprica. Interesting.

By Paul

May 19, 2008 5:18 PM | Link to this

W for worst 5:04

There’s such a thing as a Bush “doctrine?”

What, pray tell, would that be?

When I hear absolutes such as “nothing” I have a difficult time taking the assertion seriously. So that influences my response. All in good humor, of course.

Did you ever read “Real Security?” It’s a couple of years old, so I don’t know if they still believe it or not. Maybe actually implementing it became just too tough once they got the Congress.

I suppose you could call some of the calls the Dems make in here my “pipe dream” though -

Link: Real Security: Protecting America and Restoring Our Leadership in the World

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 5:19 PM | Link to this

AmVet: You make a point. But, remember, no one thought Bush would be this bad. He got elected as a moderate. “Compassionate conservative” and all that. Had he known what he intended and had he said it; he would have lost. He has given voice to the most extreme in our politics. Every republican I know is ashamed of him. Many will vote for Obama. Here, on this blog, one sees an altered “diehard” view. A view designed more to create illusion, than anything else. The “genius” of the republican party is in getting people to vote against their self interest.

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 5:32 PM | Link to this

Warren Buffet supports Obama!

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 5:35 PM | Link to this

Dhimmistator,

Did the whole Klan endorse Obambi or just Grand Kleagle Byrd (D-W.VA)?

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 5:39 PM | Link to this

{{{{Truth be told, it was more campaign speech than lecture. It was dramatic because Lieberman, a senior Democrat, was speaking on behalf of John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee.}}}}

{{{{Most interestingly, Lieberman was very tough on his own party’s likely nominee, Barack Obama. (As far as we remember, he did not mention, or even allude to, Obama rival Hillary Clinton.) Lieberman noted that unlike McCain, and despite Obama’s “unity” rhetoric, Obama has no significant record of working across party lines in the Senate.}}}}

{{{{He described Obama as McGovernlike, a comparison at least one backer of the Illinois Democrat, Rep. Fortney Hillman Stark Jr. of California, has also endorsed.}}}}

Can you say Dukakis?

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 5:42 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

Do you ever get anything right?

FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) - Billionaire investor Warren Buffett said Monday he would be happy if either Barack Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton were the Democratic nominee because both have what it takes to be President

By Whoa...not from Bosch!

May 19, 2008 5:43 PM | Link to this

Bosch at 5:14:

At the root of the gay marriage issue isn’t nomenclature (e.g., the term “marriage”, “civil union”, etc.).

It is about civil-rights equality. Over a thousand rights and privileges come with a marriage certificate, rights and privileges that het partners take for granted.

It cost my partner and I thousands of dollars to generate the legal documents as far as inheritance, medical authority, etc. One $50 marriage certificate probably did it all for you and your wife.

And all it takes is one judge, sympathetic to a litigious, biological family, to undo years of planning. I’ve seen families, not having spoken to thier gay offspring in years, swoop in upon a death and take the body, the home and everything in it, kicking the surviving partner to the curb on the way out of town.

And that doesn’t even begin to address the issues of co-mingling finances, corporate pension benefits, social security pension, income tax inequality…

I think churches should have the say over who gets married in their church and who doesn’t. But by extension, they shouldn’t be the ones to say who gets civil rights equality and who doesn’t.

Call it “marriage,” call it “union,” I don’t care.

But judges are absolutely the ones to address the issue.

By Dusty

May 19, 2008 5:50 PM | Link to this

Sorry, Bosch but you ARE ignorant.

Afghans and Iraqis have their own governments. Nobody says they are perfect but you don’t even think ours is very good. We still support those two governments but they are established. So YOU do not care about their freedom. It is not YOURS.

You also believe there is little or no terrorism to fight and should be left for future generations. You don’t even care about your own freedom.

You can barely remember that we spent millions on the great tsunami of Indonesia and now are trying to help in Burma. We also spend billions on every disaster in our own country. BUT—foreign aid—one percent of a huge “farm bill” goes for foreign aid alone.

I don’t know where you got your admiration for Hitler but I don’t have any. It is obviously why you cannot see the leadership of Bush in a term which had one of America’s greatest disasters. (9/11 in case you forgot.) Bush led us and we are safe.

Babble on about great leadership. You don’t know it when you see it.

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 5:54 PM | Link to this

RW: When a person says another “has what it takes to be president”, I take that as support. You’ve been working way too hard. Take a rest. You’re anger and frustration is showing. Pretend he said: “John McCain has what it takes to be prsident” What would you call that?

By Defending Bush

May 19, 2008 5:57 PM | Link to this

Now hold on people, dont rewrite history. 911. bush ordered rummy to attack OBL, who the CIA had penned up in Afghanistan. Bush did the correct thing. he shined, man.

History tells us that Cheney and Rummy somehow belayed that order for some reason. PBS documentaries claim that rummy wanted to be chief of ops, and would budge until the CIA stood down.

However the real reason is that Cheney knew that there would be no Iraq if OBL was destroyed at Tora Bora, so he refused to let Rummy budge. The American people would have expected our army to come home after we caught and destroyed Al Queda in afghanistan.

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:03 PM | Link to this

NAME BARACK!

(Anyone? Anyone?)

By W stands for worst

May 19, 2008 6:03 PM | Link to this

Paul,

There is a Bush doctrine, it is called FAILURE…. Never read Real Security, i will check it out though…I find it funny when people on this blog talk about the long gas lines and how Carter was to blame. I guess they were smoking to much then because that happened in 74 2 years before Carter took office.

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 6:04 PM | Link to this

RW: While, Buffet also praised John McCain in the article, he said: “I don’t agree with him as much as with Barack”. I call that supporting Barack. Are you ok?

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:08 PM | Link to this

Folks, take the challenge:

NAME BARACK!

(If you enter today you may qualify for a free 57-state lapel pin!)

By Phyllis

May 19, 2008 6:11 PM | Link to this

OK. All right. I’ve said it before so I might as well say it one more time…

BARACK OBAMA: HE’S NOT BUTTER!

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 6:11 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

If someone said they supported one person over another in a race I would call that support. When they say they would be happy with either Dhimmicrat I call that partisan hackery. And he did it on foreign soil too! OMG…Where’s all the teeth gnashing from you moonbat(ic)s®?

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:18 PM | Link to this

There you GO, Phyllis! YOU’RE THE WINNER!!!!

And with that answer, you win an all-expense-paid vacation to U-topia!

That’s right, Pyllis: You’re going NOWHERE!

But wait, that’s not all! Because you gave the correct answer today, you also win this…

FABULOUS CLOISENET LAPEL PIN!

I know, I know, Phyllis—-and we’re SO HAPPY for you! With any luck, by the time you return from The Big U, this country will be led by The Big O!!

By Paul

May 19, 2008 6:19 PM | Link to this

W for worst

I think the Bush Administration has done some good things to combat al Qaeda - I referenced the work on the international level to hit their fundraising. It’s had a real effect. But just like with their aid to Africa, they just can’t seem to get the message out. Amazing.

Real Security illustrates how people will say whatever sounds good - they may even be sincere - but let a little time go by, even when they have the power, as the Dem Congress does now - and suddenly it’s “let’s not talk about that.”

Increasing the number of special forces? Good idea. I think RS said “double.” Secure loose nuclear materials terrorists could use to make “dirty bombs”? Sounds good to me - but it seems whenever someone not a Dem addresses it they are met with “fear mongering.” Redouble efforts to stop nuclear weapons development in Iran? Read that sentence again. I didn’t make it up. It’s in Real Security.

Carter may have gotten us started on conservation, alternate sources, etc - but there is been a long line of his successors - Democratic and Republican, in the White House and Congress - who have absolutely blown it. Absolutely. I mean, it took us what, 25, 30 years to increase mileage standards for cars?

And didn’t the Bush Administration just do another increase? Gotta give them that -

Even though Dingell, Dem of Michigan, fought it. Couldn’t resist… They’re all served us ill on this topic -

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 6:21 PM | Link to this

WsfW,

There was gas rationing in 1974 due to the oil crisis of 1973, but there were also huge gas lines in 1979. You can even look it up.

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:23 PM | Link to this

NAME BARACK!

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 6:26 PM | Link to this

RW: You should use more name calling in your posts. It really persuades the listener. Also, Warren Buffet is a multi-billionaire, principal , owner of Berkshire-Hathaway and much sought after for his investment skill and wisdom. Republicans would die for his support of McCain. You’re just jealous.

By Barack will...

May 19, 2008 6:26 PM | Link to this

…[um]…

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 6:27 PM | Link to this

The whininess quotient of the Barack Obama campaign increased this morning with an appearance on ABC’s Good Morning America. In an interview with Robin Roberts, Obama complained about criticism of his wife in a Republican political ad, proclaiming it “unacceptable” and “low class”. Obama, however, failed to explain why statements made in political speeches at campaign events should be off-limits to criticism:

One thing is for sure, if we elect Obama we’ll have the whiniest President in our history. Maybe that’s what he’s going to do in Tehran. Throw a crying jag and threaten to hold his breath or something.

{{{{{“For them to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her I think is just low class and I think they — most of the American people would think that as well,” he said. “I would never think of going after somebody’s spouse in a campaign.”-Obambi on ABC}}}}}

He would never think of going after someone’s spouse in a campaign? How about what he says about Billy Jeff?

By Barack stands for...

May 19, 2008 6:30 PM | Link to this

…uh…

By Defending Bush

May 19, 2008 6:32 PM | Link to this

Bush was actually the right man in the right job on 911. Sorry, but he was. I was so stupified and shell shocked that I needed a president to stand and deliver exactly as strongly as Bush did in the wake of 911. Bush was betrayed by his vice prez and his general. It’s that simple. Obama got away, and we’re supposed to take comfort that at least some arab somewhere is collateral damage for our missile strikes and patrols. It’s really a sad, upsetting, and ultimately party destroying story. Behold the death of conservatism in the back alleys of a magical desert city where rocket tubes become WMDs. Poof you’re a pos.

By Right-wing nut job in full glory

May 19, 2008 6:32 PM | Link to this

Paul asks:

Is “technicality” the same thing as “a provision of law?”

The short answer is ‘no.’ To illustrate:

A technicality is anything that permits a criminal to avoid death. For example take this headline and article:

Corpse Provides Ineffective Assistance to Defendant says Court

The Supreme Court today held that a man convicted of murder and sentenced to death deserved an actual living lawyer. Clarence Thomas dissented arguing that the lawyer may have just be ‘smelly.’ Further argued Thomas, “nothing in the record proves that medical problems suffered by the lawyer, if any, including his lack of animation, establishes that the lawyer was not effective. In fact, the lawyer may well have staged his own death as a trial tactic to gain sympathy from the jury.”

This, you liberal panty waste twit, is a technicality. The Sixth Amendment merely says that a defendant is entitled to a lawyer. Nothing in the document refers to whether the lawyer must actually be alive, awake, sober, literate or paying attention, but that doesn’t stop these “activist judges” from “interpreting” (re-writing) the Constitution to serve their liberal ends.

As to what a “provision of law” is: When a defendant can show by a proponderance of evidence that he should not be put to death because it is more likely than not that he is innocent a ‘provision of law’ requires that the defendant show by “clear and convincing” evidence that he is in fact innocent. This is a more than fair provision of law as I’m certain that almost no one could prove by clear and convincing evidence that they didn’t kill someone. Could you prove that you didn’t kill Jon Benet Ramsey? Didn’t think so. All we have to do is charge some poor guy, give him the corpse for a lawyer, and then kill the scumbag for doing what he might well have done.

In the end the real difference is this:

If the rule inhibits my lust for blood its a technicality. If the rule greases the tracks so that we can get on with the killing its a provision of law.

Paul,

I’m disappointed that you don’t know the difference. Are you really a Republican? I have my doubts. In fact I think you may be a closet human being.

RWNJIFG

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 6:34 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

I could really not care less about who does or doesn’t support McCain. You sure are touchy about the mildest form of nicknames. Are you related to Senator Whiny?

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:35 PM | Link to this

…and that, Ladies & Gents, is why I’d never be ashamed to call myself a Democrat: because I know that wherever I go in this great land—-in every city and hamlet, every great highway and recondite byway—-I can count on the American People to be dumbstruck when I ask, “Can you name Barack?”

God bless the NEA school system.

By Saul Aulinsky

May 19, 2008 6:38 PM | Link to this

NAME BARACK!

By W stands for worst

May 19, 2008 6:41 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Both parties are to blame for what is happening to this country, i dont support parties i support doers. Bush may have done some good but he could have destroyed them, for whatever reason he decided not to. Just like he decided to not heed Clintons advice that Al-queda is the biggest threat. And how he ignored that PDB one month before we attacked. We forget all that, not one hijaker was Iraqi…Think about it….

By Paul

May 19, 2008 6:41 PM | Link to this

Nut Job

Twit?!!? Republican?!!? Human being?!!?

Minor technicalities -

Preponderantly so -

By AmVet

May 19, 2008 6:43 PM | Link to this

“AmVet: You make a point. But, remember, no one thought Bush would be this bad.”

Actually, Daniel, I absolutely thought he was going to be a train wreck.

Oh! To have been wrong!

And I suppose there must have been many others. Remember the interview where he could not name virtually any of the heads of state?

To me, it was obvious George was WAY in over his head. The guy had a running and long term track record of dismal performances, questionable ethics and outright failures.

And unlike his dad who showed great valor in combat and who turned out to be a closet moderate (MUCH to the chagrin of the Reagan neo-con monkeys), it was patently obvious the fighter-pilot hero of Alabama was both dumb as a rock (by presidential standards), a chickenhawk AND a religious nut job.

NOT exactly a winning combination.

“He got elected as a moderate. “Compassionate conservative” and all that.”

But he also got elected by employing the sleaziest bunch of liars since Richard Nixon. I believed none of it.

“He has given voice to the most extreme in our politics.”

Extreme and derelict…

By The Rover

May 19, 2008 6:43 PM | Link to this

Come on. Surely one of you Idiocrats can do it. Just name Barack. Name him for what he is, for who he is. Just do it, so that at least a few voters will know whom they’re supporting or not supporting.

‘K? Too much to ask? Isn’t that the way democracy used to work? Huh?

HUH?

By RW-(the original)

May 19, 2008 6:44 PM | Link to this

Remember John Kerry’s “global test?”

Obambi has one too.

{{{{{We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK.}}}}

{{{{{At the Corner, Yuval Levin asks: “So at what temperature would other countries like me to keep my home, then, and how much should I eat?” }}}}}

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 6:51 PM | Link to this

AmVet: I was hopeful things wouldn’t get this bad. I didn’t believe him, either. I pray we make it to January, 2009 without a false flag operation and all out war in the Middle East. In order to be a leader, people have to follow you. No one’ following us. War gives them meaning. McCain harping about Iran, begs for war.

By Paul

May 19, 2008 6:52 PM | Link to this

W for worst 6:41

Think about it? When I observed the number of Saudis and tied it into the Saudi royal family’s - and by extension, the country’s - extremist Islamic ideology (Wahabbism) - I heard “fear monger.”

I guess that’s supposed to be the ultimate argument winner -

‘Nuther subject:

From today’s Dick Morris essay:

“To sum it up: A candidate who cannot get elected is being nominated by a party that cannot be defeated, while a candidate who is eminently electable is running as the nominee of a party doomed to defeat.”

Good line, eh?

Rover - Glenn: you want someone to “name” Obama? Okay. I could ask if you mean surname. Or fan the flames and ask if you mean Christian name. Both of which he has.

But you may mean “Title” as in “noun” as in “name.”

So, okay - how ‘bout “President Obama”?

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:52 PM | Link to this

I know. I know. And I really don’t mean to put any of you on the spot, but you know how it goes: some of us just like to know what or whom we’re voting for or against. Call us the Social Security Bloc of voters.

And it’s OK—-perfectly understandable, really—-if this is not the time for you to have to reach way down deep and bring up what the man stands for. It’s OK. Heck, it’s Spring!

Alternatively, you could always launch an ad hominem on me, for example (though I’d prefer you didn’t do, or you could take the “SO’s YOUR OLD MAN!” approach, in which case you’d probably be right.

Whatever fits your metaphysical pocketbook at this moment in time, that’s all right by me. I don’t mean for you to have to do it all now, but sometime, sometime soon, do please NAME BARACK.

By Kruschev's Father

May 19, 2008 6:53 PM | Link to this

Bush is the one who wants global stamp of approval now, RW. He freely admits it, and refers to it all the time.

The conservatives have got nothing left to blog about except pither and puss.

But we democrats are strong and we are rallying in Ohio, and in Florida, and then we’ll rally in Michigan and California. WOOHOO, and then over the TEXAS where we’ll RALLY THERE! WOOHEE!! WOOPPEEE!!

OMG, I just blew the election for Obma by acting like Howard Dean. What Have I done?

Oh, the remorse is more than I can bear. Darn.

Vote McCain in 08, sure, there’s more vigor in a bowl of soup, but I just blew the election by acting like a retard on national blog tv.

curses. This is your Fault, RW. You baited me. You dirty rat. You no good dirty rat. You stinkin’ rottin’ yellow bellied lying monkey stink……

By AJC Management

May 19, 2008 6:54 PM | Link to this

{{{{By Daniel May 19, 2008 6:26 PM You should use more name calling in your posts. It really persuades the listener}}}}

You mean “reader” don’t you, dimwit?

~~~~~

Aahhh, yes, thee corpse can no longer keep quiet, go figure:

{{{{Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is entering the Kentucky and Oregon primaries on Tuesday with one of the most pugnacious political messages of her campaign: That she is ahead in the national popular vote when all votes are counted, including from the unsanctioned primaries in Michigan and Florida and that party leaders who have a vote as super-delegates should reflect this level of appeal.}}}}

Nobody ever said that the KKKlintons were well grounded in reality, but whatever, don’t let this stop us from having fun.

Bring back Bruno!

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 6:58 PM | Link to this

Paul, I mean to ask O supporters, WTF is this guy? How do THEY classify him? They regard him as………………………………………………….WHAT, exactly?

By AmVet

May 19, 2008 6:59 PM | Link to this

Daniel, I have stated here numerous times that I think Bush may have one more major debacle up his sleeve before 01-20-09.

I am absolutely convinced his approval ratings will be the worst (by a wide margin) of any US President. EVER.

Let us just hope the neo-con screw ups don’t get us intractably embroiled in yet another deadly fiasco!

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 7:01 PM | Link to this

(I agree, duh: bring back B.)

LOOKIT! Lookit: where do you Dims get off even discussing The O when you can’t even say what species of politician he is?

HOW DARE YOU!

By Booty Call

May 19, 2008 7:06 PM | Link to this

Obama will be our next prez. can we stop talking about it? BUT:

Now lets all get a load of that hot first lady. this aint gonna be no camelot as cameltoe, if’n you be diggin’ what I be intimatin’. Man, this is the kind of player’s only booty calls that they Fiddy-Cented Tupac over, Blood.

What up in the white house? Man it’s all happening! Oh what a love shack attack we shall have in 2009! The lead alpha dog sets the tone for players all over the country, dawg. And you know it’s gonna be a turkey shoot, just like it was in the sixties and seventies man.

So viva viagra. We’re gonna have an 8 year long woodstock, man!!!

By Daniel

May 19, 2008 7:17 PM | Link to this

AmVet: You said it! Let’s hope the patriots in government can stop him.

By Glenn

May 19, 2008 7:17 PM | Link to this

See how it works, from coast-to-coast? (And I ain’t kiddin)

Y’ask, “Name Obama”,

and the next thing you get is a change of subject. It’s happening all over the country. Seriously. I’m trying to warn you all.

Heck, even though you’re Rebs and I’m just a surfer boy, still I’d share my antivenom with you. That’s right. Down to the last infusion.

But you’re gonna hafta fess up about this man from DC/Chicago/L.A./Honolulu—-whatever (whatever): WTF is this guy?

Answer, or prepare to be left behind.

I’ll send you a postcard either way.

By Speech Writer

May 19, 2008 7:39 PM | Link to this

And all Glenn or TTfT does is hack political foreskin. And they manage to make it dull and unreadable, which is quite a feat starting from the greatest writing in modern blog history.

I dont even have to post and you guys swing at me. I rule this blog. I own all your sorry azzes. I dont want them, but you keep conjuring up my ghost.

I am writing a memoir of my life which included time in a gorilla suit selling volkswagons in a circus in canada, being turned into an elephant man freak when I was ten by a drunken doctor performing plastic surgery on me when I was ten, and the 100 plus women I cranked thanx to the beatles making it fashionable to wear your hair so long that they couldn’t see my deformity until it was too late.

My story is the story of modern uber-schlameil. a super net zero-sum-hero. You wont believe a word of it, trust me, but it all happened. That’s how I know God wont punish me for the consequences of my existence: none of it was my fault. it was always the fault of a guy that looked like me or someone clever enough to hide while I stood there going , What?

Once, on a naval base in richmond virginia in 1963, just a couple of months before JFK, I started bellowing out my dad’s family barracks window like only a retarded 13 year old could bellow, “NOW HERE THIS. NOW HERE THIS. ABANDON SHIP. ABANDON SHIP. WE’VE BEEN STRUCK BY A JAPANESE TORPEDO! ABANDON SHIP. NOW HERE THIS. NOW HERE THIS. ABANDON SHIP. WE’VE BEEN STRUCK BY A JAPANESE TORPEDO.

Now, I bellowed that at the top of my lungs for a good ten or fifteen minutes thinking it was the funniest, coolest thing anyone had ever done. Now there was this commander who lived just a couple doors down in the same family quarters/barracks weird thingie we all lived in, and he finally had enought and attacked me by screaming even louder and pounding on my locked door so loud that it scared me under the bed where I STFU and didn’t barely breath for a half hour after he stopped yelling at me to STFU.

I later found out he was in WW2, and had suffered severe mental exhaustion from his combat experience with the Divine Wind kamikaze pilots. He was just serving out his time till retiremtn and only wanted a little piece till I came along and ruined it for him. I’ve never heard a man scream like that. It really scared me and maybe even scarred me a bit. I was afraid to tell my dad,