Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2008 > May > 15 > Entry
Nailing it
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (226) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon





DEL.ICIO.US


Comments
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 8:04 AM | Link to this
I heard Obama speak at length for the first time and I must say that I am amazed. Does this dude have dentures or what? What is the deal with all of the whistling when he speaks? Does he not know of toothpaste and floss? He’s not that old, did his teeth rot out at a really early age?
This is gross.
~~~~~
{{{{“We don’t have enough capacity right now to deal with it — and it’s not just the troops,” Obama, D-Ill., told a crowd in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. Obama posited that Arabic translators deployed in Iraq are needed in Afghanistan.}}}}
Now if only the Afghanis spoke Arabic we’d be in business but whatever.
Let’s just for a moment imagine that we really are losing the war in Iraq or Afghanistan, who among you could possibly blame it on not having enough translators?
Can you say “clueless?”
~~~~~~
{{{{Her landslide 67-26 victory over Obama in West Virginia — she won by 147,410 votes — won’t change that situation. The oft-repeated fact that no Democrat since 1916 has won the White House without winning West Virginia won’t change it, either. But together, those two facts show just how far Democrats have ventured into uncharted territory this year. If Obama is to win the White House, he’ll have to do it in a brand-new way, winning states that Democrats haven’t won lately with diminished support in states that have been important to Democratic victories in the past. Clinton’s campaign reminds Democrats of that, and it makes some of them nervous.}}}}
Isn’t it so wonderful to think, such karma, that the votes from Florida that the libs whined so much about in 2000 may wind up doing in Bruno’s kandidacy?
It’s so delicious.
By TW
May 15, 2008 8:06 AM | Link to this
WE MUST CALL ON JOHN MCSAME TO SEND BROWNIE TO CHINA!!
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:13 AM | Link to this
Attorney General John Edwards?……….. But it does raise an interesting thought experiment. John Edwards is a passionate fighter for the poor, for labor, and for universal health care—he would be a wonderful addition to any Democratic administration. He would be a great attorney general, particularly because he could fight for workers on labor law issues and he could fight for the traditionally disenfranchised on election law. He could really reinvigorate the role of the Secretary of Labor. He could head a regulatory agency like the FDA, where his distaste for corporate power could combine with his passion for fair and affordable health care.
AND
How does Supreme Court Justice Hillary Clinton sound?It sounds superb to us. Freed of the constraints of “triangulating” political considerations that have hobbled and severely compromised her progressive values, a seat on the Supreme Court would be an ideal way for Clinton to help steer our Constitution back to its original moorings. Without having to worry about voting based on future campaign strategy, she would be liberated to impact America in a profoundly positive way.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:13 AM | Link to this
Cindy McCain Divests $2 Million with Sudan Ties
AND
Mrs. McCain’s Refusal The wife of an ethics-and-transparency crusader seeking the presidency shouldn’t shield her tax filings.
AND OH, AND ABOUT THOSE REPEATEDLY PROMISED MEDICAL RECORDS?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:13 AM | Link to this
Young Evangelicals Abandoning GOP Over Iraq, Economy »
AND
Obama and the Cross…..I know the conservative policy purists will say that Obama is liberal and therefore Evangelicals won’t buy his “Evangelical speak”. Not so fast. Remember, many people vote based on an emotional connection to a candidate or if they can relate to that person. Obama may need to work on this perception that he is “elite” but when he talks about Jesus and the Bible and the fact that he’s a sinner, it makes him more real and in the process, more electable too.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 8:16 AM | Link to this
TW - yes, Katrina was bungled on so many levels, but I don’t recall that any of the local officials in Lousiana were Republicans, and I have noticed that the people of Louisiana elected a Republican governor after all of that mess. I also noticed that the people of Mississippi overwhelmingly reelected their Republican governor who received nothing but praise for Katrina. Maybe we should send them to China. After all, I did not see Nancy Pelosi, Harry Ried or Barak Obama getting their hands dirty down there.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 8:18 AM | Link to this
Yes, we may have a shortage of nails temporarily, but the Clintons will be on board the Obama train in a few more weeks!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 8:24 AM | Link to this
The Devil @ 8:16 — you’re correct that there weren’t many local officials with an ‘R’ next to their names in LA, and that’s the main reason there was such a slow response from Dubya’s administration after the flood. It was time to punish New Orleans for electing all those Dems to office, correct???
Ya see, Dubya has lead himself to believe that he can be an American president with only 28% of support from the radical right-wingnuts… you know, the same ones who believe that the Gulf Coast had it coming because of all its “sins”!
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:24 AM | Link to this
The Right Choice? The conservative case for Barack Obama……Barack Obama is no conservative. Yet if he wins the Democratic nomination, come November principled conservatives may well find themselves voting for the senator from Illinois. Given the alternatives—and the state of the conservative movement—they could do worse.Granted, when it comes to defining exactly what authentic conservatism entails, considerable disagreement exists even (or especially) among conservatives themselves. My own definition emphasizes the following:a commitment to individual liberty, tempered by the conviction that genuine freedom entails more than simply an absence of restraint;a belief in limited government, fiscal responsibility, and the rule of law;veneration for our cultural inheritance combined with a sense of stewardship for Creation;a reluctance to discard or tamper with traditional social arrangements;respect for the market as the generator of wealth combined with a wariness of the market’s corrosive impact on humane values;a deep suspicion of utopian promises, rooted in an appreciation of the sinfulness of man and the recalcitrance of history.Accept that definition and it quickly becomes apparent that the Republican Party does not represent conservative principles. The conservative ascendancy that began with the election of Ronald Reagan has been largely an illusion. During the period since 1980, certain faux conservatives—especially those in the service of Big Business and Big Empire—have prospered. But conservatism as such has not.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 8:26 AM | Link to this
Goldie - contrary to the hopes of so many of you in your ‘poddy’, the Clinton’s are too smart, too venal and too self-centered to do that. They see two likely senarios:
(1) Obama loses to McCain in a close election. This gives Hillary an opening for 2012. She will only be 65 then, so she is still young enough to run.
(2) Obama wins. It is a disaster for the Democrats. The Republicans have huge victories in the Midterm elections. Hillary takes the nomination from Jimmy II which Ted Kennedy attempted but failed to do in 1980.
The Republicans are losing NOT because they are acting like Republicans, but because they are trying to be Democrat lite. You Democrats don’t get it, but it is true. Like the French needed to relearn after the Socialist victory in 1997, Socialism DOES NOT WORK.
I hope you enjoy the gas lines and rising prices under Obama.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:29 AM | Link to this
WASHINGTON — The Republican defeat in a special Congressional contest in Mississippi sent waves of apprehension across an already troubled party Wednesday, with some senior Republicans urging Congressional candidates to distance themselves from President Bush to head off what could be heavy losses in the fall.
AND
GOP Adviser: This Is ‘94 In Reverse, We’re Pathetic
By Road Scholar
May 15, 2008 8:32 AM | Link to this
AJC Mgmt: the whistling sound was the wind going in your ear and coming out the other side. This was the FIRST time you have listened to him speak; all the anti drivel up to now on Obama was based on what others have said? This kills any credibility you have had…if you had any!
Yes unfortunately Devil, the Katrina reaction was one big clusterf..k. Both parties were to blame, but who was in ultimate charge? Leadership in ‘08!
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:32 AM | Link to this
GOP Uses GI Bill As A ‘Political Gimmick’ On Senate Floor To Thwart Passage Of First Responder Legislation
AND
McConnell’s Farm Bill Priority: Tax Breaks For Thoroughbred Race Horse Owners
OLD MCCONNELL HAD A FARM E I E I OH MY MORE OF THE SAME!
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 8:34 AM | Link to this
By Goldie 8:24 AM
Goldie, that stupid thought could only be true if the local officials were so stupid they just sat on their hands and did nothing while waiting for the feds to save them without even calling and asking for help. Oh, wait, that’s exactly what they did.
In your usual BDS, you’ve failed to acknowledge that Mississippi received the same aid from the same fed agencies, but didn’t have the same result BEACAUSE THE LOCAL OFFICIALS WEREN’T MORONS.
Everyone acklowedges FEMA was slow, but where is the admission the mayor and governor are completed dunces? And the dumba@@ liberals down there reelected the mayor. But thats pretty normal for liberals to keep repeating things that don’t work and expecting the result to be different. (think socialism). Gee I wonder if America will become a “Chocolate nation” if Obama wins? Friggin racist moron.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:35 AM | Link to this
Any body know any socialists running for the Presidency?
Any body know any delusional paranoids?
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 8:37 AM | Link to this
By Goldie 8:24 AM
Goldie, that stupid thought could only be true if the local officials were so stupid they just sat on their hands and did nothing while waiting for the feds to save them without even calling and asking for help. Oh, wait, that’s exactly what they did.
In your usual BDS, you’ve failed to acknowledge that Mississippi received the same aid from the same fed agencies, but didn’t have the same result BEACAUSE THE LOCAL OFFICIALS WEREN’T MORONS.
Everyone acklowedges FEMA was slow, but where is the admission the mayor and governor are completed dunces? And the dumba@@ liberals down there reelected the mayor. But thats pretty normal for liberals to keep repeating things that don’t work and expecting the result to be different. (think socialism). Gee I wonder if America will become a “Chocolate nation” if Obama wins? Friggin racist moron.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 8:39 AM | Link to this
Goldie - hardly. I recall that the problem was that the Louisiana officials were glacially slow in requesting federal help as is required by the FEMA law. I know that you want to blame the Bush administration for the storm forming in the Atlantic and everything, but I do believe that there is plenty of blame to go around.
I am NOT saying that the situation was well managed, but a large part of the confusion was the sheer incompetence of the local officials in Louisiana. Mississippi was a completley different case because they did go by the book.
The proof was in the pudding. The people of Louisiana spoke quite loudly in the gubenatorial elections in 2007, as did the people of Mississippi.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 8:41 AM | Link to this
{{{{By Road Scholar May 15, 2008 8:32 AM AJC Mgmt: the whistling sound was the wind going in your ear and coming out the other side. This was the FIRST time you have listened to him speak; all the anti drivel up to now on Obama was based on what others have said? This kills any credibility you have had…if you had any!}}}}
Road Kill: I am not a member of the cult, swooning over every gaseous discharge this exalted windbag expels, you dimwit, I usually just read the transcripts of his idiotic statements.
You do know how to read, don’t you?
Is mommy helping you with the mumbo jumbo this morning?
It still does not answer my first question, what’s up with the dentures?
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 8:41 AM | Link to this
Mr. Devil,
“You Democrats don’t get it”
You are right. I don’t get it. I do not get how you think the things you think and God only knows I hope I never will.
Hillary needs to give it up. She put up a good fight. That’s one of the reasons I really don’t like Hillary - it’s all about Hillary, and she doesn’t care if it hurts the party, or the people. She may as well be on McCain’s payroll right now.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:45 AM | Link to this
EVERY NOW AND AGAIN CERTAIN THINGS NEED TO BE REPOSTED TO REMIND FOLKS OF THE TRUTH …….KATRINA TIMELINE
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 8:46 AM | Link to this
By IN THE NEWS 8:35 AM
{{{Any body know any socialists running for the Presidency?}}}
Yes, Obama and Clinton.
I don’t care if they call themselves “progressives” or “democrats” or “liberals” or whatever the new fluffy name of the year is, their positions are socialist. They want to create a nanny state where all those poor unfortunate people are protected from mean rich white people in exchange for their vote. Wake up, fool.
If they really cared about poor people, you might see a few more of their charitable donations go somewhere other than their campaingns. Think about that for a few…
BTW, libs, I’d still like a number at which you believe a company’s profits are “windfall”. Do you have a number or is this just a soundbite to get votes from dumb people?
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 8:49 AM | Link to this
By IN THE NEWS 8:35 AM
{{{Any body know any socialists running for the Presidency?}}}
Yes, Obama and Clinton.
I don’t care if they call themselves “progressives” or “democrats” or “liberals” or whatever the new fluffy name of the year is, their positions are socialist. They want to create a nanny state where all those poor unfortunate people are protected from mean rich white people in exchange for their vote. Wake up, fool.
If they really cared about poor people, you might see a few more of their charitable donations go somewhere other than their campaingns. Think about that for a few…
BTW, libs, I’d still like a number at which you believe a company’s profits are “windfall”. Do you have a number or is this just a soundbite to get votes from dumb people?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:49 AM | Link to this
John McCain will fire you for lobbying for Burma, but he’ll still take your money.
AND
If John McCain seriously believes we are at war with al Qaeda in Iraq, that alone is such a serious error in judgment it should disqualify him from any chance to govern this country.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 8:55 AM | Link to this
AS USUAL
RB KNOWS NOTHING
ALL IT TAKES IS A LITTLE RESEARCH TO FIND THE SOCIALIST CANDIDATES
For President and Vice President of the United States: Brian Moore of Florida and Stewart Alexander of California — email — www.votesocialist2008.org — more information below.
BUT FOR
RB/ANDY/DUH/AJCMGMNT/ZELL/RW
IT’S ALWAYS EASIER TO
MAKE FAKE ACCUSATIONS
TOSS OUT POLITICAL HATE SPEECH
B.S.
MISLEAD
AND OF COURSE
WHAT HE DOES HERE EVERY DAY
UNDER MULTIPLE ID’s
LIE….
By @@
May 15, 2008 9:03 AM | Link to this
I know there are scissors for lefties but do they make “hammers” for lefties too ml?
To whom do lions cast their gentle looks?
Not to the beast that would usurp their den.
The smallest worm will turn being trodden on,
And doves will peck in safeguard of their brood.
And “DOVES” will peck in safeguard of their brood??????
Ooooohhhh! Democrats ARE warriors when fighting for their party.
Got it.
By get over it
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
Nobama NO WAY!
By Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
You are trying to turn America into another pathetic China. Look how they are using their army to dig through the rubble to try to save their people. Our country’s most shinning moment occurred during Katrina when our government didn’t socialize rescue services and left those duties to the free market.
God help us if we ever become another China. You libs disgust me.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:20 AM | Link to this
YOUNG REPUBLICANS
Yep, we remember them!
By w00t
May 15, 2008 9:36 AM | Link to this
{{{You are trying to turn America into another pathetic China. Look how they are using their army to dig through the rubble to try to save their people. Our country’s most shinning moment occurred during Katrina when our government didn’t socialize rescue services and left those duties to the free market.}}}
You mean like when the cost guard, and army showed up? Those free market companies? I hate to tell you but those are government services. Pretty close the socialism. If you really wanted the free market down there, we always could have sent Haliburton or Blackwater. Oh wait, I think we did do that…
Get off the blog noob.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:38 AM | Link to this
Panic at the House By Daniel Politi Posted Thursday, May 15, 2008, at 6:11 AM ET The New York Times leads with a look at the panic that set in among Republicans yesterday after their candidate lost a special congressional election in Mississippi.
By Midori
May 15, 2008 9:38 AM | Link to this
Young Republican Twit - wipe the dribble off your mouth and please explain what is so disgusting about soldiers rescuing injured people buried in rubble?
By HECKler
May 15, 2008 9:39 AM | Link to this
FOR IN THE NEWS.
Marxists/Communists/Socialists for the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency. By no means is he a true Marxist, but under Karl Marx’s writings we are to support the party with the best interests of the mobilization of the proletariat. Though the Democratic Socialists of America or the Communist Patty of America may have more Socialististic values, it is pointless to vote for these candidates due to the fact that there is virutally no chance they will be elected on a National level.
OBAMA IS CLOSE ENOUGH TO MARXIST PHILOSOPHY THAT HE WILL DO IN A PINCH ON THE ROAD TO A COMMUNIST RULE.
THE COMMUNIST PARTY NEEDS IDIOTS LIKE YOU IN THE NEWS. THEY LEAD AND YOU FOLLOW BLINDLY.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:40 AM | Link to this
GOP officials despair as ‘safe’ seats choose the other team
By GMAN
May 15, 2008 9:41 AM | Link to this
AJC Management
Your senile, swollen-jawed, flip-flopping nominee can’t remember what he had for breakfast this morning and can’t express a complete thought! THE CRACKER FACTOR IS ALIVE AND WELL IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD!
By the wire
May 15, 2008 9:42 AM | Link to this
*Washington - In an effort to bolster his Middle East peace effort, President Bush is considering sending Charles Manson as support for Condoleeza Rice.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:43 AM | Link to this
After String of Losses, Republicans Face Crisis
By dectra
May 15, 2008 9:44 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By dectra
May 15, 2008 9:46 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 9:46 AM | Link to this
As I am not a political party goon or hack, like the slobbering dhimokkkrats on this blog are, allow me to say welcome aboard the Conservative Movement Mr. Childers:
{{{{Democrats pulled off the win by smartly nominating a conservative, Travis Childers, from a rural swing part of the district who disavowed Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and hit Mr. Davis from the right.}}}}
{{{{Mr. Childers is well known as a cultural conservative who favors gun rights and opposes abortion.}}}}
You know, I’m starting to think that there are more DINO’s than there are RINO’s.
{{{{Then there are the record low congressional approval ratings. No Congress has fallen as far and as fast as the Nancy Pelosi/Harry Reid-led House and Senate. Unlike President Bush, congressional Democrats will be on the ballot this fall, and can do little to improve their lackluster record before then. It must also be disconcerting for Ms. Pelosi that the Democrats’ winning formula has meant conceding ground on guns, prayer, partial-birth abortion and other issues that matter to social conservatives.}}}}
And if you needed further proof of our success:
{{{{In his forthcoming book A Time to Fight, James Webb, democrat, criticizes Democratic leaders for prioritizing “hard-to-grasp themes such as the environment and global warming” over bread-and-butter issues “when our national security is in such disarray and our workers are watching their jobs disappear.” And in a chapter entitled “A Nation Descended from Many Nations,” in which he makes nice with the multiculturalists he once excoriated, he still writes, “We must, as a nation and as a government, struggle with such issues as illegal immigration and the extent that portions of the so-called diversity programs improperly affect fairness and government policy.” That seems a longwinded way of saying he understands many working-class whites are disadvantaged by porous borders and preferential policies.}}}}
He’s got a whole book full of gripes about the dhimokkkrats.
My kind of people.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:46 AM | Link to this
OH RW/ANDI/DUH
You can’t do better for a new character name than “heckler”?
By Midori
May 15, 2008 9:46 AM | Link to this
Olbermann To Bush: “This War Is Not About You…Shut The Hell Up!”
By Devastator
May 15, 2008 9:46 AM | Link to this
Right wingers have been calling democrats communists since before the sixties.
When are you guys going to find something new to say?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:49 AM | Link to this
OH, AND HECKLER (really the best you can do?)
IF I WERE A BLINDLY FOLLOWING IDIOT I’D BE WORKING TO SECURE JOHN McCAIN IN BUSH’S THIRD TERM.
NO WONDER ONE OF YOUR NAMES IS “DUH”
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:51 AM | Link to this
OH NO!
ALL DEMOCRATS DO NOT AGREE ON ALL THINGS!
OH NO!
THE BIG TENT HAS ROOM FOR DIFFERING OPINIONS!
OH NO!
LIBERALS SHOW TOLERANCE
OH NO!
AMERICAN VALUES, DECENCY AND MORALITY ARE PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC VALUES TOO!
OH YES! THE GOP IS HISTORY FOR 8 to 12 YEARS!
By dectra
May 15, 2008 9:52 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By FrankLeeDarling
May 15, 2008 9:54 AM | Link to this
I don’t have to wait for Obama to enjoy the high gas prices.I can do it right now, today ,under the sorry leadership of our republican president.
The Change you deserve is in their pocket.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 9:55 AM | Link to this
ITN, what is with your obsession with accusing people of posting with multiple ID’s?
And I’d still like a “windfall” profit number from any of you “big oil” hating libs. It appears you all might be trying to avoid the issue for fear your candidate’s plans might be proven stupid. Time to move beyond the sound bites and into reality.
Oh, gee, ITN. There is an actual socialist party out there so Obama and Clinton couldn’t possibly be socialists? Is that the line of thinking you’re trying to pass off as reason today? If so, sell it to truthman or woot, but spare the rest of us the stupidity.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:56 AM | Link to this
Republicans fear public has lost confidence
By DirtyDawg
May 15, 2008 9:57 AM | Link to this
After the past eight years, I’d take anything different - socialism, communism, fumigationism, lock ‘em all up and throw away the keyism, never again have to utter the word bush except when cleaning up the yardism.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 9:58 AM | Link to this
Shaken Republicans look to McCain as savior
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 9:58 AM | Link to this
Okay, I can’t tell, but does Mr. Young Republican think using the army to rescue people is a GOOD thing, or a BAD thing?
And - - - - huh?
“Our country’s most shinning moment occurred during Katrina when our government didn’t socialize rescue services and left those duties to the free market”
This kids got to be insane if he thinks Katrina was our country’s shining moment.
But “when our country didn’t socialize resuce services and left those duties to the free market”?
Anybody got a clue as to what the hell that means? Anybody?
Damn kids, they think they know everything.
By Midori
May 15, 2008 10:01 AM | Link to this
RB,
what is your obsession with posting the same tired, cliche filled posts over and over and over again?
check out “double posting for dummies”.
By dectra
May 15, 2008 10:03 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By Road Scholar
May 15, 2008 10:08 AM | Link to this
AJC: Obviously I can read, since I reponded to your first E-mail. I can also listen…. and think…and reason and plan. remarkable isn’t it!
Did you also read all of Rev Wrights sermons? His resume?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 10:09 AM | Link to this
Shaken Republicans look to McCain as savior
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 10:09 AM | Link to this
Oh those pathetic neo-cons! Had they just found a way to get one of their doofus darlings nominated:
In what could spell bad news for the presumptive Republican nominee John McCain, an overwhelming 86 percent of self-described “very conservative” voters said they are displeased with the current presidential candidates, and 65 percent of these voters said they are very unsatisfied.
That is freaking outstanding news for the nation as a whole, of course.
The vast majority of conservatives (76 percent) and Republicans (76 percent) also expressed significant dissatisfaction with the current candidates, as did more than half of political independents (55 percent).
More good news!
In contrast, Democrats are overwhelmingly content with the overall field of candidates, with 82 percent who say they are satisfied. Self-described progressives (85 percent), liberals (86 percent) and moderates (63 percent) also express strong satisfaction with the current candidates.
The time has come in this country for the misnamed “conservatives” to just plain give up all hope.
Their ideology of failure is toast.
And the crowd goes crazy!!!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 10:11 AM | Link to this
What the Bush-kissers’ occupation of Iraq really means:
Two former high-level Bush administration officials who served in Iraq told our committee that the State Department routinely turns a blind eye toward Iraqi government corruption.
The result: billions of U.S. tax dollars, as well as guns, ammunition, medical supplies and other equipment are siphoned off and diverted to the insurgents and militias who are killing American soldiers. According to the witnesses, unchecked corruption means U.S. taxpayers are funding, arming and equipping both sides in the Iraq war.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 10:14 AM | Link to this
By Midori 10:01 AM
Ah, yes, the “i’m smater because my server doesn’t post twice with the second post always being 3 minutes behind the first one” post.
Are you really so stupid to think I sit here and hit the post button twice for every one of my posts exactly 3 minutes behind the first one? Well, maybe you are.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 10:14 AM | Link to this
Bosch @ 9:58 — I read that Young Republican’s rant as satire… you know, kinda like the Right-Wing Nut Job who posts here sometimes…
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 10:15 AM | Link to this
GOPer compares brand to bad ‘dog food’
By HCCynic
May 15, 2008 10:16 AM | Link to this
Would all of you whiney tail evacuees, who keep griping about Katrina, please shut the “devil” up?! You people may not have gotten your backsides wiped with $100 bills like you wanted, your mayor and governor may not have gotten the under the table finance deal like politicians in Louisiana are accustomed to, but the rest of us around the Country got stuck with the refugees and the dregs of the New Orleans community.
You jerks got the better deal so stop your whining about the Fed’s response to Katrina!!!
The rest of us are sick of hearing it, and we are sick of you!!!
Oh, I guess i should point out a positive: At least the gutters and sewers in the City were flushed out by the flood.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 10:17 AM | Link to this
By Midori 10:01 AM
Ah, yes, the “i’m smater because my server doesn’t post twice with the second post always being 3 minutes behind the first one” post.
Are you really so stupid to think I sit here and hit the post button twice for every one of my posts exactly 3 minutes behind the first one? Well, maybe you are.
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 10:17 AM | Link to this
RB,
To be honest, I don’t know that much about the windfall profit tax hoolabalooey, which is why I didn’t try and debate it’s pros and cons yesterday.
I didn’t bring up taxes yesterday in the sense that I wanted to talk about them, only in the general sense that you and Mr. Devil claim that businesses don’t pay them, and by that logic, businesses don’t really pay for anything.
I suspect you do not know that much about the windfall tax profit either, or you’d be telling us how horrible they are in blessed detail. I’m perfectly aware that anytime a business is forced a cost, they pass that cost on to the consumer.
I suspect it is one of those phrases you’ve heard associated with Clinton (Obama isn’t advocating it from what I could tell - I read a little bit about it yesterday - not enough to understand it, because I’m “tax challenged,” but to know that Obama hasn’t said, and again, at least to my limited knowledge, that he’s all for that), and since it is something that Clinton has mentioned, then it must be all bad.
Personally, what I’ve read about it, I don’t see a problem with it, we are in a war aren’t we?
Anywho, like I said, I don’t know that much about it.
Like I said yesterday, if they are implemented, I see more layoffs, and higher gas prices - businesses are in business solely to make a profit, and that’s capitalism at it’s best.
But that’s one thing I have a real problem with - big businesses putting $$$$ before country.
By FrankLeeDarling
May 15, 2008 10:24 AM | Link to this
Its nice to see the amount of respect republicans have for our fellow Americans in New Orleans.
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 10:27 AM | Link to this
Goldie,
AHHHHH. I surely hope so. I’m so gullible sometimes. The thing is, the scary thing is, it could be real.
AAAAAHHHHHH! :-)
You know, I meant to tell you earlier, RE Katrina - as far as the local officials go, I think about the absolute f@cking chaos those people were in at the time - and the complete enormity of the destruction - I think in hindsight it’s easy to lay some blame on local officials because it’s really easy, but I dare say put anyone in that situation, and they couldn’t have handled it any better - not even some of the “know it alls” here.
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 10:29 AM | Link to this
{{{By Devastator
May 15, 2008 9:46 AM | Link to this
Right wingers have been calling democrats communists since before the sixties.
When are you guys going to find something new to say?}}}
Imagine that! Not only do we have communists feature prominently at “Anti-War rallies” and leading groups like International A.N.S.W.E.R., not only do we have people like Chesa Boudin, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn, but we also have WaPo columnists like Harold Meyerson fatuously asserting that the use of the term “American” is racist.
That would be the same Harold Myerson whose wiki bio says:
{{{The son of long time leaders in California of the Socialist Party of America, he was active in the 1970s in the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee.}}}.
Same ladder, different rungs.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 10:29 AM | Link to this
America learned a lot of hard lessons about our lack of national security because of Dubya’s incompetence following Hurricane Katrina — and no, the governor of LA did not “sit on” her hands; it was Dubya who sat on his hands!
Two days later, on Sept. 2, Blanco complained to the White House that FEMA had still failed to fulfill its promises of aid. While cloaked in customary political courtesies, Blanco noted that she had already requested 40,000 more troops; ice, water and food; buses, base camps, staging areas, amphibious vehicles, mobile morgues, rescue teams, housing, airlift and communications systems, according to a press office e-mail of the text of her letter to Bush.
Message to America from the Repugs: “put us in the White House and we’ll incompetently serve you, and maybe kill you by the thousands!”
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 10:31 AM | Link to this
For the more reality challenged Republicans in Cobb County, who haven’t denounced the bigot bartender:
The owner of Mulligans literally spells out his/her feelings about non-white people directly on the restaurant marquee. Slogans like “Discounts for Caucasian Escalade drivers,” “INS agents eat free,” and “Undocumented my a*! They’re illegal!” frequent the sign.
Marietta Square - the epicenter of the Moron Belt.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 10:32 AM | Link to this
Obambi whines:
{{{{In a statement, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., shot across the bow: “It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack, sniff, sniff, woe is me, paranoia self destroya.}}}}
Bush slams him for it:
{{{{White House spokesperson Dana Perino was asked if Bush’s line was a slam against Obama and she insisted, “It is not.”}}}}
{{{{“I understand that when you are running for office sometimes you think the world revolves around you. That is not always true and it is not true in this case,” Perino added.}}}}
Bwa.
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 10:37 AM | Link to this
First I saw where a major news outlet used one of my favorite terms to describe the GOP’s probable eventuality this fall - debacle.
And now my very favorite term for the Republican outcome this November.
GOP Loses Congressional Election, Faces Bloodbath in Nov.
This is all enormously gratifying, but I could not have possibly written a better script for this year.
By Devastator
May 15, 2008 10:37 AM | Link to this
Buy Danish,
…and the republican party also happens to be surrounded by people like that “Curious George” idiot.
I’ll make a deal with you. You can call me communist and I can call you racist.
Fair enough?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 10:41 AM | Link to this
Bush administration has reportedly cut off Chalabi. NBC News reports “that as of this week American military and civilian officials have cut off all contact with controversial Iraqi politician Ahmad Chalabi” due to “‘unauthorized’ contacts with Iran’s government, an allegation Chalabi denies.”
BUT WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO ABOUT GATES:
At a meeting of the Academy of American Diplomacy yesterday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that the U.S. should engage Iran with “a combination of incentives and pressure.” We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage … and then sit down and talk with them,” Gates said. He added that the U.S. “can’t go to a discussion and be completely the demander.”
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 10:44 AM | Link to this
Bosch @ 10:27 — I’ve heard some Repugs say something like “well, New Orleans is run by corrupt politicians!” — like that’s an excuse for standing by while its citizens are drowning in a flood… like they just deserve to drown or die of thirst because they may have some corrupt politicians… What an astounding lack of empathy for anyone beyond their own noses!
By dectra
May 15, 2008 10:47 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 10:49 AM | Link to this
Yet more evidence we are smack dab in the middle of Dumbar$eville:
The nation as a whole approves of Bush’s performance at a 27% clip, but here in the 1950’s Dixieland, President Bush’s overall approval is 41%.
And that epitome of Republican honor and valor, Suckstobeus Chambless, will win re-election hands down. Bet on it.
Reality challenged and pig-headed.
That is why overall, the non-conservative conservatives are going to get humiliated in the more rational sections of this country…
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 10:49 AM | Link to this
ITN - Obama and Clinton are socialists, with a little ‘s’. You can dress up a pig in a pink dress and call it a debutante, but you still have a pig. Their policies are socialistic, so therefore, they are socialists. A rose by any other name…
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 10:50 AM | Link to this
Faux outrage from Camp Bambi at Bush who dared remark negatively about the songs sung by Barry and the Democrats, while Bush was on “foreign soil”!
Let me guess - it’s a racist distraction to refer to Barry’s own words, on Barry’s own website.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 10:51 AM | Link to this
When the mayor of New Orleans is on every television show in America falsely claiming that armed gangs are roaming the streets and mass murder is being committed in the shelters, you can’t send in civilian aid workers as a first response.
Geez, you people are idiots.
By dectra
May 15, 2008 10:51 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 10:52 AM | Link to this
Oh, so now the liberals are posting comments disguised as “republicans” so that they can have someone to “debate with” that won’t stomp their as-ses into the ground, hahaha:
{{{{By Young Republican May 15, 2008 9:05 AM Our country’s most shinning moment occurred during Katrina when our government didn’t socialize rescue services and left those duties to the free market.}}}}
Playing with yourselves again, freaks?
~~~~~
{{{{By Road Scholar May 15, 2008 10:08 AM AJC: Obviously I can read, since I reponded to your first E-mail.}}}}
Road Kill: If you could read, then maybe you would have seen where I pointed out that mommy must be helping you post comments this morning.
Obviously she failed to inform you of this, perhaps she did it on purpose, knowing full well that you would further make an idiot of yourself.
Let’s call it her little cry for help, shall we.
Why don’t you leave your mother alone, you idiot?
Geez.
By dectra
May 15, 2008 10:54 AM | Link to this
Young Republican
May 15, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
What a travesty in China. Is this what you stupid liberals want to do to this country???? You leftists will destroy this country if Osama wins in November.
Yay!! MORE Fearmongering from the GOP. Your ‘China’ comment is based on what? Something you were indoctrinated with at your latest brownshirt rally?
Your retoric is standard stuff really for the party that lost my vote when you nominated bush as the best the party had to offer. Now you’d keep bush’s disaster of a presidency alive by installing mccain, who admits to planning to keep bush’s failed policies.
Why are people supporting Obama over mccain? Consider that for the last 7 years bush (the WORST president ever) and his GOP sycophants have given us:
NO Social Security NO Immigration Reform NO Border Security NO Health Care Reform
and…..(wait for it)….NO OSAMA BIN LADEN.
But what did we get?
A 3 Trillion Dollar Hole in the Treasury
Vote GOP ever again?
NEVER.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 10:59 AM | Link to this
It IS sad to what depths Dubya’s ignorance and incompetence are on display:
In a statement, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., shot across the bow: “It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack. It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel. Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power — including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy - to pressure countries like Iran and Syria. George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the President’s extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel.”
Even dumb-@ss Reagan knew that we had to talk to our enemies (Soviets and Chinese) in order to pursue true peace… some Repugs are still mad that we ever talked to them at all!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 11:02 AM | Link to this
{{You can dress up a pig in a pink dress and call it a debutante, but you still have a pig.}}
The Devil — exactly! And that’s why your Party are still full of fascists today…
By truthman
May 15, 2008 11:04 AM | Link to this
U.S. Marines don’t destroy Taliban Poppy fields:
See, now that is a sensible drug policy! If drugs were legal, the Taliban wouldn’t make any money of the sale of drugs.
LEGALIZE!!!
P.S. This is from Afghan media reports.
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/subcontinent/2008/May/subcontinent_May137.xml§ion=subcontinent
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 11:04 AM | Link to this
By Devastator
May 15, 2008 10:37 AM | Link to this
{{{Buy Danish,
I’ll make a deal with you. You can call me communist and I can call you racist.
Fair enough?}}}
Is that what you call “aggressive diplomacy”.
There is no evidence, anywhere, that I am a racist, but if you’re Proud to be Pinko, go for it!
Better to admit what you are than to use words like “progressive” to hide your true intentions and deeply held ideology.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 11:06 AM | Link to this
McCain Promises Victory In Iraq by 2013
SOUNDS THIRD TERMISH TO ME….
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 11:08 AM | Link to this
The United Steelworkers union endorsed Barack Obama for president Thursday, which should give the Illinois senator a powerful advocate in attracting the Democratic blue-collar workers his campaign has been courting.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 11:08 AM | Link to this
McBush offers a “timetable for withdrawal” from Iraq! Careful now, you Repug trolls. You’re voting for a terrorist-appeaser if you vote for McBush!
COLUMBUS,Ohio — Sen. John McCain predicted today that the Iraq war would be won and most American troops would come home by 2013 if he is elected president, joining his Democratic rivals for the first time in offering a timeline for a large-scale military withdrawal.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 11:10 AM | Link to this
Bush’s Idea of Sacrifice…..The nation is in despair over the war in Iraq and the toll it is taking on our troops and their families. But President Bush shows no outward sign of inner pain…….And yet now it turns out that Bush has indeed made a personal sacrifice on account of the war. According to the president yesterday, his decision to stop playing golf five years ago wasn’t just an exercise in image control or a function of his bum knee — it was an act of solidarity with the families of the dead and wounded…..Not only is it a hollow, trivial sacrifice at best, Bush’s story doesn’t hold water.
By HCCynic
May 15, 2008 11:11 AM | Link to this
Goldie @ 10:44 you wrote:
“like that’s an excuse for standing by while its citizens are drowning in a flood… like they just deserve to drown or die of thirst because they may have some corrupt politicians… What an astounding lack of empathy for anyone beyond their own noses!”
While I cannot speak for Bosch, for me it’s not a lack of empathy, rather it is a belief that people are responsible for their own well being and for the repercussions of their actions.
The people in New Orleans and Loisiana down there elected Nagin and those other idiots, and I fail to see why I should have empathy or sympathy for their poor decision making.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 11:13 AM | Link to this
{{{{{Obama is the only major candidate who supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.}}}}}
What a disgusting and dastardly attack!!! Whomever wrote that must be the lowest of the low and a vile racist to boot!!!
But they also work for Obambi
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 11:17 AM | Link to this
You Cobb county trolls must be so proud of your racist neighbors, displaying all their ignorant bubba-ness! Are y’all competing with Gwinnett county for the award given for “most ignorant citizens”?
Norman acknowledged the imagery’s Jim Crow roots but said he sees nothing wrong with depicting a prominent African-American as a monkey.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 11:20 AM | Link to this
A Sneak Peek Behind-the-Scenes of the Hamas Superdelegates
FUNNY STUFF!
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this
The real shame is that you liberals so freely throw out the term ‘fascist’ to describe Republicans when nothing could be further from the truth. Socialist does describe someone who wants government ownership and or control of the means of production and confiscatory tax rates as well as complete control of all financial institutions. That describes most liberal Democrats.
A fascist is a socialist with an extreme nationalist bent. That cannot describe the Republican party. If you just don’t believe in capitalism and free markets, please just say so and accept the lable socialist. Refer to the Republicans as capitalists as you obviously believe that ‘capitalist’ is a dirty word, but fascist does not describe the Republican party. It does describe Louis Farrakhan, Jeremiah Wright and some others because of their racial extremism, however.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 11:23 AM | Link to this
Boehner, Cantor: when in doubt, lie
IT’S THE GOP WAY TO GO!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 11:25 AM | Link to this
{{The people in New Orleans and Loisiana down there elected Nagin and those other idiots, and I fail to see why I should have empathy or sympathy for their poor decision making.}}
Wow.
So Cynic, what you’re saying is that you know for a fact that ALL of those people who died had elected Nagin, so they deserved to die? Or are you saying that it really doesn’t matter whether or not they voted to elect Nagin, they still deserved to die just because they lived there?
Wow. A true Repug in full glory. No wonder your Party is such a disaster today.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 11:26 AM | Link to this
By Goldie 10:44 AM
{{{I’ve heard some Repugs say something like “well, New Orleans is run by corrupt politicians!” — like that’s an excuse for standing by while its citizens are drowning in a flood…}}}
Hey dunce, if FEMA wasn’t there yet, wouldn’t it have been the pathetic LOCAL GOVERNMENT who was on the scene and not doing a dam thing to help their own people? Care to explain how all the busses that never moved were FEMA’s fault for us?
You really are pathetic. You would stand by a pool waiting for EMS to come and not throw the drowning man the life ring yourself? Tell us all what Blanko and Chocolate did FOR their people before you whine about what W didn’t do for them.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 11:29 AM | Link to this
By Goldie 10:44 AM
{{{I’ve heard some Repugs say something like “well, New Orleans is run by corrupt politicians!” — like that’s an excuse for standing by while its citizens are drowning in a flood…}}}
Hey dunce, if FEMA wasn’t there yet, wouldn’t it have been the pathetic LOCAL GOVERNMENT who was on the scene and not doing a dam thing to help their own people? Care to explain how all the busses that never moved were FEMA’s fault for us?
You really are pathetic. You would stand by a pool waiting for EMS to come and not throw the drowning man the life ring yourself? Tell us all what Blanko and Chocolate did FOR their people before you whine about what W didn’t do for them.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 11:32 AM | Link to this
ABC’s Stephanopoulos repeated school bus falsehood spread by Pruden, Hannity, and Gingrich
By Say It Ain't So
May 15, 2008 11:33 AM | Link to this
Goldie, (11:17) You liberal trolls must be so proud of your murdering neighbors, displaying all their ignorance by blowing up abortion clinic!
When you paint with such a wide brush, you’re bound to get some on yourself.
You, Amvet, truthman, BD, ITN, N-GA and others seem to think that every Republican agrees 100% with everything the GOP does. We do not!
Yet when we lump all you libs in one group, you come unhinged. Remember the old saying, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander you murdering scum bucket.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 11:36 AM | Link to this
RB - you don’t get it. If it rains too much, it is some Republican’s fault. If there is a drought, then it is some Republican’s fault. If a volcano erupts or there is an earthquake, it is some Republican’s fault. Just as I suspected, (according to Democrats) God MUST be a Republican!
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 11:38 AM | Link to this
Bosch, at least you admit you don’t understand the windfall tax. I’ll give you credit for that.
The whole issue is nothing more than a vote buying stunt as it will never be enacted. It will have the reverse effect on gas prices from what they’re selling to the non thinking public. And it’s all part of the class warfare attack on “big oil” as if the oil companies were some evil rich white guy trying keep the poor man down. If not, why bring it up?
Are we also talking about “big corn” and “big milk” as those prices have risen substantially too?
How about Microsoft’s margins? Is that considered neccesary? How many businesses could afford to quit using it? Are you going after wal mart too? And if they lower their prices more, will you complain they’re putting more small businesses out of business?
You people are playing with fire in this whole discussion of windfall taxes. And you’re being dishonest.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 11:39 AM | Link to this
When Hurricane Katrina passed by New Orleans the city thought they had dodged a bullet. It was only later when the levees breached that disaster struck, but the disaster is minuscule by comparison.
About 1,800 people lost their lives as a result of Katrina and that number includes people that died of all sorts of causes and sometimes hundreds of miles away. By contrast, the Indian Ocean tsunami in late 2004 cost over 212,000 people their lives.
Had Billy Jeff still been President you morons would be singing the praises of how well it was handled under the enormity of the circumstances.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 11:41 AM | Link to this
Bosch, at least you admit you don’t understand the windfall tax. I’ll give you credit for that.
The whole issue is nothing more than a vote buying stunt as it will never be enacted. It will have the reverse effect on gas prices from what they’re selling to the non thinking public. And it’s all part of the class warfare attack on “big oil” as if the oil companies were some evil rich white guy trying keep the poor man down. If not, why bring it up?
Are we also talking about “big corn” and “big milk” as those prices have risen substantially too?
How about Microsoft’s margins? Is that considered neccesary? How many businesses could afford to quit using it? Are you going after wal mart too? And if they lower their prices more, will you complain they’re putting more small businesses out of business?
You people are playing with fire in this whole discussion of windfall taxes. And you’re being dishonest.
By Morningstar
May 15, 2008 11:43 AM | Link to this
By The Devil You Say May 15, 2008 8:26 AM | I hope you enjoy the gas lines and rising prices under Obama
I know I’m ENJOYING (NOT) the rising prices of gas (and food) under the present administration. I passed the ‘fill er up and go’ station Tuesday afternoon and on the way back, noted regular gasoline had GONE UP within 2 hours. $3.78 to 3.79 9/10……paradise!!!
By Young Republican May 15, 2008 9:05 AM Our country’s most shinning moment occurred during Katrina when our government didn’t socialize rescue services and left those duties to the free market.
LET THEM EAT CAKE! Sorry worthless people shoulda known better than to permit that hurricane to land on their ‘sins.’
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 11:50 AM | Link to this
Devil, I also like the way they flock to the “scientists” who say global warming will cause X hurricanes to hit the US this year as proof we need to stop global warming, can’t be found when the predictions are WRONG, yet still believe the same scientist when they say the oceans will rise 30 feet in 10 years.
I thought is was hillareous the first earth day themes were about preventing the coming ice age. The dimwits have short memory, don’t they!
Mindless sheep on the road to stupidity.
BTW, nothing in the above commentary says I’m not for being a good steward of the earth, recycling, finding better energy sources, developing solar and wind power, etc. I’m merely against irrational stupidity.
By Say It Ain't So
May 15, 2008 11:51 AM | Link to this
While Bush and company may have been slow to respond to Katrina, O’Chocolate man just stood around and whined to the camera.
For the record, I do not consider myself a racist, but the mayor of New Orleans sure is. He is one you democrats can sure be proud of, fo’sure.
By the wire
May 15, 2008 11:53 AM | Link to this
Washington - clarifying his previous remarks about the open-ended occupation of Iraq, today Senator McCain said the war would be won in 2013, when he turns one-hundred.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 11:53 AM | Link to this
Devil, I also like the way they flock to the “scientists” who say global warming will cause X hurricanes to hit the US this year as proof we need to stop global warming, can’t be found when the predictions are WRONG, yet still believe the same scientist when they say the oceans will rise 30 feet in 10 years.
I thought is was hillareous the first earth day themes were about preventing the coming ice age. The dimwits have short memory, don’t they!
Mindless sheep on the road to stupidity.
BTW, nothing in the above commentary says I’m not for being a good steward of the earth, recycling, finding better energy sources, developing solar and wind power, etc. I’m merely against irrational stupidity.
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 11:54 AM | Link to this
RW,
Check out how our Georgia Reps voted on the $300 Billion dollar Farm Bill Boondoggle:
GEORGIA
Democrats — Barrow, Y; Bishop, Y; Johnson, Y; Lewis, Y; Marshall, Y; Scott, Y.
Republicans — Broun, N; Deal, N; Gingrey, Y; Kingston, Y; Linder, N; Price, N; Westmoreland, N.
Linder, Price, and Westmoreland (and George Bush) got it right.
The vast majority of this boondoggle goes to food stamps and other “nutrition programs” and supplying fresh fruit and vegetables to the kiddies (most of which will end up in the trash).
I guess many Republicans agree with Bambi that it’s the Great Depression all over again, and that parents are too poor and incompetent to pack a lunch for their own kids, including such high end items as… apples.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 11:56 AM | Link to this
Morningstar - I can remember the circumstances in 1976 only too clearly. Old Dummy Carter, with his insipid toothy grin, was running against Ford, complaining vociferously about the price of everthing from gas to bread. He also complained that the Republicans had done nothing about energy independence and alternative fuels. By the end of his administration, interest rates were over 20%. The rate of inflation was at 13% annually. We had gas SHORTAGES thanks to his failed energy policies - which amounted to rearranging the federal bureaucracy and creating a Department of Energy. Much the same will happen under Obama. He actually wants to RAISE the price of petroleum products with a windfall profits tax! So does Hitlery.
Remember what happened to the Democrats after four years of Old Dummy Carter? Well, expect the same. I just hope we survive the four years of an even more incompetent Barak H. Obama.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 12:03 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish,
That’s why so many conservative Democrats are beating wishy washy Republicans. It’s going to funny when the moonbat(ic)s® hold their great celebration, only to find that in the end conservatism carried the day. Too bad so many Republicans are too stupid to figure that out.
The other day the idiots that adorn the halls of Congress voted to ensure that oil would never fall below $75.00 a barrel again and they did it in a bipartisan and overwhelming manner. Let’s hope the conservative Democrats in the next Congress come to their senses and put that piece of legislation on the scrap heap where it belongs.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 12:04 PM | Link to this
RB - I know. They also have never read a history book. If you go to the site of the battle of Hastings today, you will find it one mile inland. All accounts of the battle record that it was fought on the shoreline. It was. However, the Earth was much warmer then, much warmer even than now. Sea levels were thus much higher.
They really will buy just about anything their ‘leaders’ sell to them, won’t they?
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 12:06 PM | Link to this
RB,
I think you are attacking without provocation.
I agree with the first two sentences of your second paragraph from the previous post - then as usual, you start ranting without provocation.
For one thing:
“And it’s all part of the class warfare attack on “big oil” as if the oil companies were some evil rich white guy trying keep the poor man down. If not, why bring it up?”
Um, I didn’t bring it up, that was you, actually it was RW, I think.
And, I don’t discuss things in terms of “class warfare attack(s)” and “white guys keeping the poor down.” That’s just silly talk.
What many people don’t understand about oil, and from what I can tell, is that the oil prices have more to do with the demand in China. Oil prices directly affect the prices of everything else - including milk.
“You people are playing with fire in this whole discussion of windfall taxes. And you’re being dishonest.”
We people? Not this people. Like I said, I don’t bring up things I know little about. And I’ve yet to see an actual “discussion” about it.
Apparently from your last post about it, you’d rather attack and assume than explain, which is pretty typical for you, but if you’d like to explain to me exactly why it is bad, other than job losses and higher gas prices, which I don’t think is a good thing, I’m all for it.
And, BTW, I don’t need your credit, it means nothing to me, to me that’s kind of like getting an endorsement from Rev. Hagee, but thanks anyway.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 12:24 PM | Link to this
McCain campaign threatened to cut off Newsweek’s access. Earlier this week, after Newsweek published a cover story examining the hardball tactics conservatives might use in the general election, Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) “true partner” and longest-serving aide, Mark Salter, fired off a stinging retort that accused the magazine of being “biased.” Today, a Wall Street Journal profile of Salter reveals that he also “threatened to throw the magazine’s reporters off the campaign bus and airplane“:
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 12:25 PM | Link to this
Bloomberg reported yesterday that Obama picked up endorsements from “three former chairmen of the Securities and Exchange Commission, two of whom were appointed by Republican presidents.” “We believe Senator Obama can provide the positive leadership and judgment needed to take us to a stronger and more secure economic future,” they said
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 12:27 PM | Link to this
McCain’s ever-evolving position on Social Security
By truthman
May 15, 2008 12:35 PM | Link to this
Bush sacrifices for the troops!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/13/bush-i-gave-up-golf-for-tn101595.html
What a fine American! Giving up golf for the duration of the war. That oughta scare the hell out of bin Laden!!
Doofus!!!
By truthman
May 15, 2008 12:36 PM | Link to this
Another racist Republican in office - at least for the next six months!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/14/gop-rep-uses-term-tar-babn101793.html
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 12:38 PM | Link to this
BUSH’S COMMENTS ABOUT APPEASEMENT…… ISN’T IT IRONIC
John McCain ist der selbe wie George W. Bush.
Ya Voll!
By truthman
May 15, 2008 12:42 PM | Link to this
So, I’m wondering what all you right-wingnuts in full glory are going to do after Nov. 4?
You’re going to wake up Nov. 5 to a Dem president and a veto-proof Democratic House and Senate.
Mississippi’s 1st Congressional election was the harbinger of the A$$-whipping the Repugs will receive in November.
What do you neo-conmen and women plan to do after you and your kind are rendered completely politically impotent in November?
By GreenJeans
May 15, 2008 12:47 PM | Link to this
Random thoughts..
Katrina: During the week prior, our Cajun neighbors across the street (and the Weather Channel, BTW) were hypervigilant to the potential disaster. Bush/FEMA could/should have been at the border, ready.
Bush was anxious last week to bust through government/protocol to get to the Myanmar victims; a fraction of that tenacity would have gone a long way in NO.
Curious George: Everybody seems to have forgotten the “Incurious George” Tshirts, buttons and novelty products sporting Bush’s morphed likeness in the recent past.
Remember the “Separated at Birth?” photos of Bush and the chimpanzee, with the exact same facial expressions (protruding, pursed lips, wide eyes)?
Good for the goose and gander, indeed.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 12:52 PM | Link to this
truth?man?,
What sort of legislation do you think this fantasy Dem Congress of yours is going to pass that the Dem President is going to veto?
By HCCynic
May 15, 2008 12:55 PM | Link to this
Goldie, you took my simple comment out of context, not surprising from a pinko, but out of context. The passage again, “The people in New Orleans and Louisiana down there elected Nagin and those other idiots, and I fail to see why I should have empathy or sympathy for their poor decision making.”
How did my lack of empathy or sympathy for their poor decision making, get exaggerated to “they deserve to die”. I did not say they deserve to die, i just do not give a tinker’s dam one way or the other.
Oh, while I am thinking about it, does anyone remember how many days or weeks in advance this storm was identified and forecast? I seem to recall it was far enough in advance that even if one had only started walking (assuming they knew they lived in a bowl below sea level) they could have found refuge somewhere on the other side of the levee, on higher ground.
Simple concept, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!
Goldie, You want cold from a Repug, here is cold: Darwin was right! It IS about survival of the fittest…
There, are you happy now?
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 12:57 PM | Link to this
Contact your Conservative democrat Senators and have them open the debate back up like it should be:
{{{{60 scientists wrote a letter to the Canadian prime minister asserting that the science is deteriorating from underneath global warming alarmists: ‘Observational evidence does not support today’s computer climate models, so there is little reason to trust model predictions of the future. … Significant (scientific) advances have been made since the (Kyoto) protocol was created, many of which are taking us away from a concern about increasing greenhouse gases. If, back in the mid-1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.’}}}}
{{{{Among the noted converts is Claude Allegre, a member of the French Socialist Party and a former Minister of National Education. Allegre is also a member of the French and U.S. Academy of Sciences. He once was a believer in the “science” behind global warming, but no more. He, too, wants a debate and his ranks are growing.}}}}
And for the help from these Conservative democrats, I express my heartfelt appreciation in advance.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 12:59 PM | Link to this
{{Yet when we lump all you libs in one group, you come unhinged.}}
The Devil, RB, Dull Danish — like I posted before, no wonder your Party is such a disaster today! You’re so busy painting “libruls” with such a wide brush yourselves, that you don’t even see that your 28% Club is toast in November!
By GreenJeans
May 15, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this
“…they could have found refuge somewhere on the other side of the levee, on higher ground.
Simple concept, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!”
Excellent point.
No either/or, but BOTH and ALL, please.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this
{{Goldie, You want cold from a Repug, here is cold: Darwin was right! It IS about survival of the fittest…}}
Posted just like that other true “Christian” that posts his garbage here day after day — is that you name-jacking again, ANDY-DUH???
By truthman
May 15, 2008 1:05 PM | Link to this
Sorry AJC mismanagement, Even your precious John McCain says global warming is real.
So, all three presidential candidates acknowledge global warming and nothing you or your wingnut minions can do about it!!
Hahahahahahahaha!!!
Lots of YOUR tax dollars will be spent on global warming in 2009 and beyond! Also, we’re dumping the “abstinence only” stupidity and marijuana will be decriminalized (hopefully, they’ll let us grow our own).
RW - you know I speak the truth. My veto-proof Democratic House and Senate are only 175 days away. But please, feel free to keep you head in the sand as you have for the previous seven years!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 1:08 PM | Link to this
Oh, and ANDY-DUH, I meant to add to my post above ^^^: GFY.
There, I’m happy now.
By Jesus
May 15, 2008 1:11 PM | Link to this
IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 1:11 PM | Link to this
truthman @ 1:05 — and even ANDY-DUH’s precious Newt believes global warming is real. Oh, how sad it is to watch the trolls decompose right here on this blog everyday…
By Daniel
May 15, 2008 1:11 PM | Link to this
“When you loe three ofthese in a row, you have to stop and wonder if there is someting wrong with your product” Tom Cole of the RNC on the three recent losses in Special Congressional elections.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 1:12 PM | Link to this
With such polished credentials one would think Claude Allegre would be a wealth of accurate information. However, Claude Allegre has never published a single peer review paper directly related to climate change or global warming. Basically, the only material he has printed with regard to climate change is a four paragraph opinion piece on climate change in the French newspaper L’Express. (English translation here) In the past Claude Allegre used global warming to defend the nuclear industry from the anti-nuclear movement………. So why all the strong emotions and personal attacks on people that he used to agree with? Now that increasing carbon taxes are a real possibility, some feel that his flip flop on global warming is an attempt to protect the fossil fuel industry just like he protected the nuclear industry in the past.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 1:13 PM | Link to this
{{{{But more profoundly, the Left-Islamist alliance — forged in common opposition to everything the West stands for — has made the abandonment of Israel a common priority across the spectrum of people who take their politics from fashion.}}}}
{{{{Alas, most of the West’s internal enemies, demanding the abandonment of Israel as first step, do not even know what they are doing. They are like parasites upon a host organism, and do not understand that when the host organism dies, they too will die.-David Warren}}}}
So true.
By truthman
May 15, 2008 1:14 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
I know it’s hard not to want to throtle the likes of the Dunces and others on here. But, let’s try not to sink to their level.
They won’t have the political clout of a fruit fly after Jan. 20, so let them rant like the little barking chihuahua’s they are (sorry, chihuahua lovers!).
They know they are more sunk than the USS Thresher (look it up).
The good news is I have a very large collection of rocks they can crawl under when the time comes.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 1:15 PM | Link to this
truth?man?,
That wasn’t my question dumba$$. Please try to focus.
What legislation will they be passing that the Dem President will want to veto?
By HCCynic
May 15, 2008 1:15 PM | Link to this
Goldie, no, I am not “ANDY-DUH”, I am simply a lurker who decided to get in the game, or “kitchen” today and “stir the pot” Nothing more, nothing less.
But, knowing you are now “happy”, I can be too.
Have a great afternoon.
By Daniel
May 15, 2008 1:20 PM | Link to this
When asked about the republican party chances in November Rep. Tom Davis, R. Va. said, “We are the airplane flying into the mountain”
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 1:22 PM | Link to this
Also, ANDY-DUH, using your terms “cold” and “survival of the fittest”, I’m sure you agree that those companies going bankrupt this year never should’ve been bailed out and just left to die instead? I mean, what’s good for the goose… as you trolls like to post…
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 1:23 PM | Link to this
SIAS, well lordamighty.
Harumph!
I for one, don’t lump all Republicans in the same chum bucket.
And IF I ever find a rational and reasonable one here, I will exclude him from it!
Hell, these clowns still have no earthly idea what the term conservative even means!
There are several very cogent and reasoned GOP leaning posters at Wooten’s, and I can assure you, they are as different from the regular mindless Bush apologists and “conservative” justifiers here as could possibly be.
Though that blog too has some chest-pounding chickenhawks and flat earth society members.
Like Goldie has already noted, the dwindling few here are Exhibit A in the disastrous and embarrassing humiliation that IS the 28 percenters in the neo-con ostrich club of the GOP.
Daniel,
First the “argument” was that the Republicans losing three long held seats was a good thing for the GOP! You know, it would allow the nation to see how the Dems were as incompetent as the previous office holders. Uh, OK….
Now, a scant day later, the argument is that it is “conservative” Dems who will win all of the seats that the GOP is certainly going to cede in November.
They still can’t understand, admit or believe that in the vast majority of places outside of the Moron Belt this faux conservatism will not be even a tiny factor.
This “reasoning” just keeps getting amusinger and amusinger (in Bushspeak)…
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 1:23 PM | Link to this
Goldie - as I have written here before again and again, you might win a pyrrhic victory because it will not last, but socialist systems never do. They attempt to defy the laws of human nature and economics, and that just won’t do. People want freedom of choice, not a command economy.
The Republicans were in horrible trouble in 1976. They lost the presidency and had tiny minorities in the Congress. However, they came roaring back thanks to the incompetence of the Democrats. It will happen again. Enjoy your gas lines after January 20.
By truthman
May 15, 2008 1:24 PM | Link to this
RW - There should be a comma between ‘question’ and ‘dumba$$.”
Second, if you notice, the current Democratic Congress is not veto-proof because we don’t have enough Dems voting against Curious George W. When we emasculate the Repubs in Nov., the progressive agenda will not be hindered by stupid, white people living in the “Leave it to Beaver” past!!
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 1:28 PM | Link to this
AmVet @ 1:23 — it is pretty amusing to watch Karl Rove’s minions going down in quicksand!
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 1:30 PM | Link to this
By Goldie 12:59 PM
{{{you don’t even see that your 28% Club is toast in November!}}}
Do you thing Goldie realizes the dem led congress is the 11% club and that’s worst than the 28% club? I mean, for me, thats a simple concept, but she spouts off here almost daily about the 28% club while never looking in the 11% mirror!! Amazing…
And they whine and whine about the 11% being because the R’s block all their grand legislation, but when asked what legislation was blocked, they change the subject and call people names.
By Say It Ain't So
May 15, 2008 1:31 PM | Link to this
truthman, that explains a whole lot about your lack of understanding the simplest concepts. (marijuana will be decriminalized hopefully, they’ll let us grow our own)
Now I see why you still think
It was a tax cut for the rich
Gore really won
Global warming
Keep smoking that stuff and remain a mental midget. peace man, far out, that’s some really good $hit you got going.
By Daniel
May 15, 2008 1:31 PM | Link to this
AmVet: Whatever happened to the “Permanent Republican Majority”? Perhaps it went the way of the hubris of the “K Street Policy”? Devil: I’m in a gas line already.
By Anna Burke
May 15, 2008 1:32 PM | Link to this
This Hillary cartoon is perfect. Will someone send this to her, PLEASE for all of us who want to see a Democrat in the White House???
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 1:32 PM | Link to this
truth?man?,
Again you haven’t answered the question,,,,,,,,dumba$$.
I’ll also bet you right now that you won’t have a veto proof margin, but the question remains. What legislation will the Dem Congress be passing that the Dem President will want to veto?
By Georgia74
May 15, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this
Is George Bush not the dumbest piece of crap ever elected to any office in this country?
By Daniel
May 15, 2008 1:37 PM | Link to this
RW: The answer is: Not much. What’s your point? The Republican Party has no one to blame but itself. What do you expect Americans to do? The funnt thinbg is most republicans consistently vote against their self interest.
By FrankLeeDarling
May 15, 2008 1:41 PM | Link to this
Saying New Orleans should have helped itself after Katrina is like telling the man who just got hit by a car to call his own ambulance.
Social Darwinism is alive in the Republican party
By Marty
May 15, 2008 1:41 PM | Link to this
The state that gave us Republicans Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan just gave Californians gay marriage.
Six Republican appointed justices and one Democrat decided the issue.
By truthman
May 15, 2008 1:41 PM | Link to this
Say it ain’t so: What did you say? Somehow, me and my 138 IQ didn’t quite hear you because I was coughing so much from the really killer hit I just took after my cooked-to-perfection lunch.
Man, my 401(k) is only up about six percent so far this year. I must really be an idiot to make money in a recession.
I’ll square off against a mental midget such as you anytime, anywhere. You and your ilk don’t stand a chance in November AND YOU KNOW IT!!!
Smoke weed every day!! God put it here for man to enjoy, right!?! That’s what the religious would say, right? God is infallable, so he put weed here for our enjoyment, right!?!
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 1:45 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
The point is that I’m trying to teach this stoner that he means filibuster proof.
Voting for the current crop of Republicans probably is voting against ones own interest since it’s just like voting for Democrats. When small government, freedom loving, conservative Republicans start running for office it’ll be a different story. That should start around 2010 unless McBushie gets elected.
By Marty
May 15, 2008 1:48 PM | Link to this
Its funny how Republicans attack Carter but ignore Ford.
Anyone still have a WIN button?
That will do it. Republican’s have slogans. Whip Inflation Now!!! Yep, mission accomplished.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 1:53 PM | Link to this
{{{{By truthman May 15, 2008 1:05 PM Sorry AJC mismanagement, Even your precious John McCain says global warming is real.}}}}
truthie: I don’t know how John McCain became precious to me, I must have missed something.
Just to clue you in, I do not hold the same opinions as many of these RINO’s do, McBushie being one of the premiere RINO’s, just as I’m sure you do not feel the same way as all of the DINO’s that your party has elected recently.
They are all true Conservatives and you are still a wormy surrender monkey pervert, but hey, at least you still got Pelosi and Hairy Reed on your side, right?
Just think, if things keep on like this, someday I’ll be a democrat and you’ll be a Repuglican.
Won’t that be fun?
{{{{Lots of YOUR tax dollars will be spent on global warming in 2009 and beyond!}}}}
I think the proper description is “our” tax dollars, seeing how a gallon of gasoline or a BTU of energy does not discriminate who it will be passing the tax levies along to.
But I do know this for sure; I can afford to pay for your junk science foolery, it will hardly bother me, who do you think your nonsense ideas will hit the hardest, oh brilliant one?
The poor and elderly.
As always.
But you dhimokrats don’t give a F about them, now do you?
By FrankLeeDarling
May 15, 2008 1:55 PM | Link to this
AMEN! truthman I hope yours is as good as mine
By truthman
May 15, 2008 1:57 PM | Link to this
RW - where are those republicans today?
Where are they!?! All I see is a bunch of Latino-hating, race-bating, war-mongering, China-sellout, SUV-driving, neighbor-spying, phone-tapping, spouse-cheating sex addicts voting again and again against their own self-interests.
Find me a small-government loving repub and I’ll show you a Libertarian! And, of course, the libertarians are also for the legalization of drugs, as am I.
Any way you look at it, RW, we progressives are in ascendance, and your neanderthal neo-con ‘ideals’ are in the shi##er!
Have fun, excrement-man!
By truthman
May 15, 2008 2:00 PM | Link to this
Dunce-boy!
I’m not in love with my money as are you and most of the neo-con scum.
Since you always purport to be religious, you might want to watch out for that ‘lover of money’ label you have so greatly earned!
To FrankLeeDarling: It’s very kind!!
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 2:01 PM | Link to this
Fact check time.
“The Republicans were in horrible trouble in 1976. They lost the presidency and had tiny minorities in the Congress.”
Incorrect. They were out-manned tremendously.
94th US Congress
US Senate
Republican: 39 Democratic: 61
US House of Representatives
Republican: 144 Democratic: 291
“However, they came roaring back thanks to the incompetence of the Democrats.”
Also, incorrect.
The GOP actually continued losing seats in the ensuing terms of Congress. Until finally in 1981, after 32 years in the minority they FINALLY became the majority party.
But alas, in the very next Congress and for the following three they were again right back where they belonged.
They did have a little 10 year run (can you say the current neo-con clusterf&ck?) but once again are on the short end of the stick looking at yet more hemorrhaging.
Republicans were in the minority in the US House for forty consecutive years and the US Senate for 32 straight.
And after this administration they may be looking at another forty.
Face the facts, neo-cons!
This nation has a long and demonstrable 50 year history of not caring for Republican leadership in Congress. At all. It is almost always a losing proposition, and the electorate knows it…
By President William J. Clinton
May 15, 2008 2:02 PM | Link to this
Please give my wife the nomination and the presidency. Otherwise, she is going to come back home to me and, yikes, that will cramp my style.
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 2:02 PM | Link to this
truthman,
What are the likes of Republicans going to do come November? Drink themselves into a stupor like we did in November 2004 (or was that just me?).
FranklyDarling,
Brilliant metaphor. Or rather a man whose just chopped off both arms to dial the 911 call. It bothers me when people put the Katrina issue in terms of Democrat v. Republican - it was a horrific humanitarian disaster.
I once saved my child from drowning - he wasn’t screaming for help, because he was struggling to stay afloat and not go under, I saw what was happening and if I hadn’t jumped in he’d have died. I love the argument, well, the governor/mayor didn’t ask for help fast enough! Absurd.
AmVet,
Chumbucket? LOL. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe don’t deserve that chumbucket - I wouldn’t put Lincoln Chaffe in there either, but he’s come to his senses and switched to Independent.
By All Together Now
May 15, 2008 2:04 PM | Link to this
Marty! What a great post, you gave me the seed of an idea for a game that we can all play.
Please post your favorite Republican Nonsensical Slogan…you know, the ones that don’t mean squat but Republicans toke on ‘em like doobies. I’ll start with some recent ones:
Family Values Culture of Life Shock and Awe!! Mission Accomplished! Cut & Run Party of Defeat
By Just Curious
May 15, 2008 2:05 PM | Link to this
I am just curious about the bruhaha concerning the t-shirt depicting Obama as Curious George. Instead of a monkey, wouldn’t a zebra be more appropriate…afterall, he is half white and half black. I guess only the black half is offended.
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 2:06 PM | Link to this
truth?man?,
I know when your 13.8 IQ runs out you can only resort to name calling, but if the Libertarians weren’t isolationists I’d be one. You could learn a lot by actually reading people’s views on things rather than making foolish assumptions.
By truthman
May 15, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this
AmVet,
You are correct. We need to add Chuck Hagel to the list of the ‘RSCs’ (Republicans Smelling the Coffee).
-TM
By truthman
May 15, 2008 2:12 PM | Link to this
Bosch, if they were just in a stupor, that would be an improvement from where they are now!!
By Say It Ain't So
May 15, 2008 2:14 PM | Link to this
truth, If you can find a bible, read Genesis 1:29,
While you are there read 1:28 and 1:30, then explain about PETA, vegans, and gays.
OH, I forgot, most libs think that religion is for the weak minded and a crutch.
You know, that sounds an awful lot like Karl Marx’s saying “It is the opium of the people”.
However, that quote is taken out of context. What he really said was
“Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.”
So I guess the left is heartless and spiritless. Go figure.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 2:16 PM | Link to this
VoteVets.org and CREW released an e-mail today that reveals “a Veterans Affairs (VA) employee directing VA staff to refrain from diagnosing soldiers and veterans with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).” The e-mail, dated May 1, 2008, complains about “compensation seeking veterans” and urges VA staff to rule out PTSD and “consider a diagnosis of ‘Adjustment Disorder’” instead:
DOES DER BUSHEN HATE DER TROOPS?
YA DA BUSHEN HATE DER TROOPS!
By FrankLeeDarling
May 15, 2008 2:16 PM | Link to this
Thanks,Bosch. these neocons will say anything to dodge the bullet that is coming for them in Nov.
By Goldie
May 15, 2008 2:17 PM | Link to this
All Together @ 2:04 — “Last throes!”
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 2:17 PM | Link to this
Aren’t “tiny minorities” and “out-manned tremendously” the same thing?
Why yes they are! As usual Blowhard is….well just a Blowhard.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 2:17 PM | Link to this
{{{{By truthman May 15, 2008 2:00 PM Dunce-boy! I’m not in love with my money as are you and most of the neo-con scum. Since you always purport to be religious, you might want to watch out for that ‘lover of money’ label you have so greatly earned!}}}}
truthie: I willingly give ten percent of my earnings to the church.
And you?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 2:19 PM | Link to this
Gay marriage ban struck down by California Supreme Court
CONGRATULATIONS!
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 2:24 PM | Link to this
Yes, there are indeed a small handful of reasonable and decent Republicans in the Senate - those mentioned from Maine, RI and especially the combat vet with the courage and intellect to stand up to the worst president in US history and say, “No sir. You are flat out wrong.” - Chuck Hagel.
And I still contend that McCain could turn out to be very effective at reducing the moronic neo-con intolerance and intransigence that have become the very hallmarks of this GOP.
We just may get the chance to see.
Daniel,
“Permanent Republican Majority”?
Holy Shiite, Batman!
Perish the thought!
And though I am cautious about using this word, it ain’t NEVER gonna happen. At least in my lifetime.
It is just another moronic slogan from the reality challenged numbskulls who gave us SO many others recently.
The neo-con situation and future in American politics is as secure as the Taliban’s in Afghanistan.
Always flitting around the edges of civilized society trying desperately to cause mayhem and fear.
Now the gutless bast@ards are cutting and running from their very recently once-beloved CIC and the entire Republican Party, using the demented “reasoning” that these true blogging patriots stand alone as the TRUE conservatives while the entire GOP is NOW apparently not. At least since they started getting ar$kicking after ar$kicking.
Talk about an identity crisis!
Talk about gullible idiots!
Ludicrous, but laughable nonetheless..
By Dusty
May 15, 2008 2:30 PM | Link to this
Well, whatya know? More of the same just like yesterday. IN THE NEWS cut’n’pastes like cheap wallpaper and then there’s the morbidity of America by AmVet the Awful. Poor Amvet! Never met a person he could love! HE DON’T LUV NOBODY AND WANTS U 2 KNOWIT!! And he doesn’t like the country either!!
But the presidential namecalling and then the laughable predictions make this the most fallacious liberal propaganda piece around. With every lib posting like comic strip yahoos, this blog’s credibility is lower than the Democrats in Congress and that is only 11%!
Look at the comment of Georgia74@1:33 Is that the comment of an American?
Nope, sounds like something from Osama bin Laden’s Hate America handbook.
Liberals have no shame. Undermine the officials, then the country. Pledge allegiance to this country only if liberal Democrats get to run it. Presently, such a wish would be the death of America as it was founded.
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 2:32 PM | Link to this
Excellent comprehension of the facts {{{ballerina}}}!
Must suck for you to pull for such losers for an entire lifetime.
And being reduced to looking for holes in the fossil record and voting for John McCain!
Hard-dee-f&cking-har!!!
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 2:32 PM | Link to this
SIAS,
Here’s the rest of the context for ya’:
Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man—state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion. Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.
By Georgia74
May 15, 2008 2:44 PM | Link to this
Dear Dusty, Served three years, actually two years, eleven months and twenty one days in the Marine Corps, twelve months, twenty eight days in Viet Nam, how about you? Are you more American than me? You can’t hold my jockey shorts.
By truthman
May 15, 2008 2:52 PM | Link to this
Poor ole Dustball! Can’t make a cogent comment, so he rehashes what we fine progressive, bleeding-heart, tree-hugging, bedwetting, panty-waist liberals know to be the truth.
No, I don’t tithe to a church just as I don’t put teeth under my pillow and hope for the tooth fairie! Feel free to believe in superstition - talking snakes, people flying up the ‘heaven’ (whatever that is?). It’s all a nice story, but there is no truth to it!
As Mark Twain said, “Faith is believing in something you know ain’t true!”
“Religion is the opiate of the masses,” is what Marx said.
I just say “No god? Know Peace!”
Pass it on!!
By AmVet
May 15, 2008 3:05 PM | Link to this
IF this is not just more political rhetoric it could be indeed a MOST welcome change from King George II.
“I’m not interested in partisanship that serves no other purpose than to gain a temporary advantage over our opponents. This mindless, paralyzing rancor must come to an end. We belong to different parties, not different countries,”
Democrats will be asked to serve in his administration, he will hold weekly news conferences and, like the British prime minister, will answer questions publicly from lawmakers.
McCain also pledges to halt a Bush administration practice of enacting laws with accompanying signing statements that exempt the president from having to enforce parts he finds objectionable.
“I will respect the responsibilities the Constitution and the American people have granted Congress,” the senator said, “and will, as I often have in the past, work with anyone of either party to get things done for our country.”
No wonder these d!ckheads and TRUE conservative blogging patriots loathe him so…
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 3:15 PM | Link to this
By FrankLeeDarling 1:41 PM
{{{Saying New Orleans should have helped itself after Katrina is like telling the man who just got hit by a car to call his own ambulance.}}}
Hey dunce, as usual, you’ve missed the point. In the case of Katrina, the man was told the car was coming 5 minutes before it arrived, was reminded every 15 seconds, and remained in the road until it hit him. Meanwhile, his good buddy Chocolate moved his family out of the road and then stood there and watched the man get run over while making no effort whatsoever to help the man out of the street. Once bloodied and near death, Chocolate, instead of giving the man CPR, calls 911 and stands there watching the man die until they arrive. Upon arrival, the EMT’s are berated for the camera’s for not doing more to keep the man from being hit by the car.
Why is the truth of this story so hard for you idiots to understand?
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 3:18 PM | Link to this
By FrankLeeDarling 1:41 PM
{{{Saying New Orleans should have helped itself after Katrina is like telling the man who just got hit by a car to call his own ambulance.}}}
Hey dunce, as usual, you’ve missed the point. In the case of Katrina, the man was told the car was coming 5 minutes before it arrived, was reminded every 15 seconds, and remained in the road until it hit him. Meanwhile, his good buddy Chocolate moved his family out of the road and then stood there and watched the man get run over while making no effort whatsoever to help the man out of the street. Once bloodied and near death, Chocolate, instead of giving the man CPR, calls 911 and stands there watching the man die until they arrive. Upon arrival, the EMT’s are berated for the camera’s for not doing more to keep the man from being hit by the car.
Why is the truth of this story so hard for you idiots to understand?
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 3:19 PM | Link to this
{{{{By truthman May 15, 2008 2:52 PM No, I don’t tithe to a church just as I don’t put teeth under my pillow and hope for the tooth fairie!}}}}
GFY, truthie (Good for you.)
In addition to my tithing, I also give of my time and during this service I see firsthand what good works the church does for the poor and needy, see, we actually do what you libs only talk about.
I am very comfortable in my faith, secure in the knowledge that is does good works not only in this world but the next.
Good works that actually amount to something and benefit those in need.
Which is something that you cannot say.
But you keep on harming and killing the poor and needy for the things that you worship above all, mouth breather, too stupid and hedonistic to realize that your rejection of your Creator has created a lack of purpose that has caused you to worship foolish and unproven mystical silliness instead.
If it makes you feel better.
By getalife
May 15, 2008 3:19 PM | Link to this
Grandson of Nazi Enabler Decries Talking to Nazis
Scumbag.
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 3:26 PM | Link to this
{{{By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 12:03 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish,
That’s why so many conservative Democrats are beating wishy washy Republicans.}}}
No kidding, although guns are not high on my list of how I define conservative, so I still can’t vote for them.
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 3:27 PM | Link to this
Andy,
The belief in God is neither proved or unproved it will never be verified or unverified - it’s called belief and faith.
“that has caused you to worship foolish and unproven mystical silliness”
To be honest, truthman could say the same thing about Christianity, or any religion for that matter.
By The Devil You Say
May 15, 2008 3:30 PM | Link to this
getalife - maybe G.W. learned from his grandfather’s HUGE mistake, just like John Kennedy disagreed with his Nazi-loving, appeasing and supporting father. The sins of the father should not be visited upon the son. In this case, we are talking about two different people. One obviously would have disagreed with his ancestor on this one.
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 3:35 PM | Link to this
This kind of thing really freaks me out:
9-year-old girl’s twin is found inside her stomach
By truthman
May 15, 2008 3:37 PM | Link to this
AJC mismanagement:
My creator is in St. Joseph’s Hospital recovering from unsuccessful cancer surgery. My creator is my father, along with my mother, who lives near Northlake.
You can have your myths, but please don’t attack others who don’t share you “faith.”
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 3:46 PM | Link to this
By Bosch 3:35 PM
{{{This kind of thing really freaks me out:}}}
Bosch, I saw that story. Interesting that the twin was a liberal.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 3:49 PM | Link to this
By Bosch 3:35 PM
{{{This kind of thing really freaks me out:}}}
Bosch, I saw that story. Interesting that the twin was a liberal.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 3:50 PM | Link to this
{{{{By truthman May 15, 2008 3:37 PM You can have your myths, but please don’t attack others who don’t share you “faith.”}}}}
truthie: You started this whole thing rolling because of your insane desire to wreck the lives of the poor and needy by “forcing your faith” in global warming on them.
All this even though the planet is getting colder, the ice is getting thicker and the polar bear population is growing.
I know this is way beyond your comprehension but you should really think about your true intentions here.
You don’t WANT to hurt the poor, do you?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 3:52 PM | Link to this
Just off the House floor today, the Crypt overheard House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers tell two other people: “We’re closing in on Rove. Someone’s got to kick his a*.”
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 3:52 PM | Link to this
truthman,
Hope your dad gets better - my creator is recovering from cancer treatments too.
RB,
The twin was a 9 year old kid.
By N-GA
May 15, 2008 4:00 PM | Link to this
Looks like McCain got religion!](http://watthead.blogspot.com/2008/05/john-mccain-stumps-on-climate-from.html)
By truthman
May 15, 2008 4:00 PM | Link to this
Thanks, Bosch! But, it isn’t looking too good!
So it goes!
Don’t worry about RB. You know those neo-nuts like to kick kids and dogs!
By George Washington
May 15, 2008 4:07 PM | Link to this
Looks like President Obama will have long coat tails….First year, the 60% Democratic House and the Senate will pass anything he proposes…..Ah suggests a federal tax rate of 90% on all income over 200K for a single, and 250K for joint, regardless of source of income….Ah suggest we remove the upper limit on social security and medicare taxes, every cent of income should pay into both programs….Let us set a special upper income tax for social security of 20% for all income over 90k for single, and 150k for joint. Heh heh heh, this payback thing is gonna be fun….heh heh heh
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 4:12 PM | Link to this
truthman,
Good luck anyway. To me, it’s all about how you live your life.
By Dusty
May 15, 2008 4:12 PM | Link to this
Georgia74 @2:44
Most Marines are highly patriotic and loyal. What happened to you? You don’t SOUND like an American as I have already mentioned. Nobody is interested in your underwear. It’s the dumb things you say that concern most of us.
Truthman,2:52
You seem a bit out of it today. But you do know how to name your fellow liberals here. Good job!
Since I have not mentioned religion, I just wonder in what seance you simmer. Far out in space, no doubt.
Amvet,3:05
Every day the same liberal lies. You try the brain-washing bit daily.
Same ol’ stuff:
“King George II”—No king but you are a peon.
“Bush enacting laws”—Congress enacts laws.
“d’ckheads”—have you looked in a mirror lately?
“TRUE conservative blogging patriots loathe [Bush]”—Nope, that’s liberal hatefilled antiAmericans who loathe PRESIDENT Bush, ever since he won his first election.
I guess you will repeat your tiresome litany again tomorrow. The “cute” has run out.
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 4:15 PM | Link to this
{{{By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 3:52 PM}}}
Conyers is closing in on Rove? Would he like directions to Fox News?
BTW, I do hope that the Dems restart their impeachment discussions. That should be a big help to the conservative dems who are winning formerly Republican seats.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 4:15 PM | Link to this
No, Bosch, the fetal twin.
By RB from Gwinnett
May 15, 2008 4:18 PM | Link to this
No, Bosch, the fetal twin.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 4:19 PM | Link to this
The Delusional President….. talked about a US Senator who wished he could have “talked to Hitler”……..
That Senator….
ARE YOU READY FOR THIS…
WAS….
Republican from Idaho, William Borah
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this
GOP Candidate Tony Zirkle Wishes Adolf a Happy Birthday
By GreenJeans
May 15, 2008 4:27 PM | Link to this
“we actually do what you libs only talk about.”
What a crock of hooey! It ain’t the SUV-drivin’ “prosperity christians” doing the majority of on-the-ground service to those in need. No, sir. They might write a check and serve their one day dishing out turkey on Thanksgiving (both welcome), but you will find that the overwhelming majority of folks getting their hands dirty with social issues and community service are LI-BE-RAL.
As long as “Christians” like this marginal poster—doling out its twisted version “love” on one hand and profane insults on the other—continue to spew ignorant dreck, the better.
I WANT them to wear their ignorance like a Grand Wizard’s cape…front and center, proudly, publicly, continually.
I want them to show themselves for who they are so that they can be known, denounced and rejected, much like the country is knowing, denouncing and rejecting the whole NeoCon/Christian Coalition/”Conservative” movement.
These folks have given Christianity two black eyes and cornholed the American public without a reacharound.
This country has just taken a seven-year swig of “conservative Christian” ipicac, and what’s coming back up in November ain’t going to be pretty. Necessary, but not pretty. And there’s no one to blame but themselves.
“your rejection of your Creator has created a lack of purpose…”
Laughable! Another “Christian” who thinks they know the only path. You think you’ve got a lock on God? So do the radical, throat-slitting Muslims that you imagine lurking around every corner. You deserve each other.
What a pitiful, sad, shrinking world you live in. Maybe that’s why you scream so loudly.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 4:28 PM | Link to this
Can you tell the difference between Bush and McCain?
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 4:32 PM | Link to this
McCain’s lobbyist campaign consultants and staff continue to link him with dubious foreign governments. This time it’s lobbyist and McCain campaign manager Rick Davis, Vladimir Putin, and the Ukraine
SO JUST HOW MANY EVIL REGIMES IS THIS CLOWN ATTACHED TO?
Bush, that’s one.
Myanmar, that’s two
Putin, that’s three
More???
By Bosch
May 15, 2008 4:34 PM | Link to this
RB,
I posted that story because I have always found it interesting and bizarre that it is biologically possible to one fetus to absorb another fetus - which hold both biological and theological implications.
However, and I shouldn’t be surprised, you took that story and instead of trying to discuss it biologically or theologically, you instead, decided to mock a CHILD, a dead child I might add. That is very disturbing.
You must be so proud of yourself.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 4:35 PM | Link to this
Bush Attacking Obama Is Bush Attacking All Democrats ………Obama doesn’t have to (and shouldn’t) do all the pushback. That’s what surrogates are for… and Bush just did his Great Uniter bit to help unite everyone in the Democratic party behind Obama.
By @@
May 15, 2008 4:40 PM | Link to this
Is there any way to please an environmentalist? Must they be all fatalistic all the time?
Paul McCartney’s carbon footprint is criticized
(((The former Beatle has long been an outspoken advocate of environmental causes and animal rights. He is a vegetarian who won’t even wear leather shoes. But now he’s being criticized for having a hybrid Japanese car flown to him in Britain rather than having it sent by ship.)))
I’m thinking the problem is not in how it was transported, it’s the fact that Lexus GAVE him a $158,000 car.
The greenie weenies gotta piddle about Paul while they’re peddling I reckon.
By IN THE NEWS
May 15, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this
{{{Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger released the following statement today regarding the state Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage:
“I respect the Court’s decision and as Governor, I will uphold its ruling. Also, as I have said in the past, I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling.” }}}
HOW ABOUT THOSE LIBERAL REPUBLICANS!
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 4:59 PM | Link to this
Islamic fanatics kill women and children, U.S. soldiers kill Islamic fanatics, so U.S. soldiers are evil.
Liberals “help” the poor and needy by unnecessarily raising the cost of necessities like food and energy and by forcing OTHER people to give them their money, while the libs clutch theirs with two fists.
Thanks for summing it all up for us Greenjeans.
By GreenJeans
May 15, 2008 5:11 PM | Link to this
Sorry, AJC at 4:59. I haven’t discussed soldiers, inflation or extortion at any point today.
Perhaps you are confusing me with someone on another blog?
I would like to make amends for one thing in my earlier post, and that is making the assumption that you are an SUV-driving prosperity Christian. Please forgive the stereotyping.
If you give selflessly of your time and money on behalf of those in need, then good on you, and I don’t care what you drive.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 5:50 PM | Link to this
{{{{So do the radical, throat-slitting Muslims that you imagine lurking around every corner.}}}}
I do not fear peaceful Muslims living in America nor do I know of any Christians that do, perhaps you’d like to point out the transgressions that you are aware of but do try not to come back at me with some suffering that cannot even approach that which is endured by Christians and their sacred traditions in this very country we speak of.
Because I will slam you if you do.
Until that time, I’m going to continue to as-sume that by saying around the corner you really meant “Iraq” where we are the force of good and the suicide bombers and “throatcutters” are evil defined, would you like to debate otherwise?
{{{{but you will find that the overwhelming majority of folks getting their hands dirty with social issues and community service are LI-BE-RAL.}}}}
Since it is a known fact that Conservatives and Christians are far more charitable with both their time and money than you libs are, it comes as no surprise that the subject matter would change to “inflation.”
I see your presidential nominee grasping his money as though it is a lifeboat in a stormy sea, nary a penny of it to spare for the poor, so again I must as-sume that you pinkos are “helping” the poor by “saving” the planet for them, or whatever other ridiculous easy little magic act that you can conjure up in a puff of smoke to make it look as though you are “doing something.” And to soothe your guilty consciences for being such sorry, depraved little freaks.
But then I see the results of your efforts; skyrocketing energy and food prices, and being that I am a normal, well adjusted person, I must ask, how exactly does this “help” the poor?
And you desperately want to make it worse for them, you long for it, don’t you?
You know that you can just blame it on “inflation” or perhaps “Bushie” and just move right on to your next silly notion that results in mass murder of the poor.
What a life, eh?
By the way, since my scruples were dragged all into this, I would answer to my judgment at this very moment, if necessary, I have nothing to fear, after all, I’m not a liberal.
Bwa.
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 6:20 PM | Link to this
{{{{Because Childers already successfully defined himself as a pro-life, pro-gun conservative Democrat, the GOP attacks bounced off him. Conservative Democratic voters didn’t believe the generic Republican attacks that Childers was a liberal.}}}}
{{{{To one smart Mississippian, the special election is easy to explain: “Travis Childers got the Bubba vote. He’s more like Bubba than is Davis, who hails from the Memphis suburbs.”}}}}
You got that, all you freaking RINO’s?
Conservatism always wins.
By Daniel
May 15, 2008 6:29 PM | Link to this
Bosch: One of the great failures of the last seven years has been the substitution of religious orthodoxy for medical science.
By TW
May 15, 2008 6:29 PM | Link to this
ITN - another great day of slicing and dicing, my friend. Well done!
God please never let the rightwing gain an understanding of ‘credibility’…too funny…
By RW-(the original)
May 15, 2008 6:41 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
Would you please provide some examples of religious orthodoxy being substituted for medical science? Please be specific and thank you in advance.
By GreenJeans
May 15, 2008 6:42 PM | Link to this
Wow…speaking through the well-padded cushion of your chair again.
Do you have multiple personalities?
OK, here goes…You think Christians are persecuted in America? Honey, you don’t even know the meaning of the word “suffering.”
By “around the corner” I meant FEAR, AJC. So many American “Christians” hold the same narrow views (“Ours is the ONLY way of believing) as do the radical Muslim characatures that they so fear.
I’d love to discuss charity and service with you, but how could I even begin a rational conversation with someone who believes that a person must either be Christian OR liberal? If you truly believe that, then you would be worthless in an exchange of understanding and ideas.
Check your earlier post. You, AJC, brought up the subject of higher prices, I just referred to it later as “inflation.” Didn’t switch topics at all, you did.
Again, maybe you have me confused with some other poster on another blog?
Continuing on…I have no presidential nominee, so not quite sure what the rest of the blather in that paragraph is about. Not quite sure who you are talking to in the subsequent paragraphs either; you seem to be taking someone’s inventory but it’s not mine.
Again, do you by chance cross-post on different blogs, and are confused?
Regardless.
I wonder why you go to such pains to project such an offensive personna, yet let slip glimpses of deep underlying compassion and concern.
Would that we could use that as a building block, and get rid of all the other nonsense. You might be quite formidable and interesting.
It’s a pity that, in the interest of community service, you might have just what we need, and that we might have knowledge/ideas/programming that you might use in your outreach.
By Randy
May 15, 2008 6:43 PM | Link to this
George W Bush commenting on foreign policy is tantamount to the Unabomber discussing mail etiquette.
Our president, long ago having qualified himself as a failure, now comes across as merely sad every time he opens his mouth. I appeal to his inner circle to advise him not to talk anymore. He has already cost the Republicans ‘08. His continuing flow of defeated nonsense could jeopardize 2012, and even 2016.
By Buy Danish
May 15, 2008 6:43 PM | Link to this
Sick of high gas prices? Blame the Democrats and the Republican Hall of Shame:
Collins, Snowe, Martinez, Dole, Smith, and John McCain who didn’t vote, but would have voted with the Dems.
Kudos to Mary Landrieu for voting with the Republicans.
Of course Snowe and Collins will be the first ones to complain about how expensive gas and heating oil is, but apparently they have caribou as constituents now, who are more important than humans who are second class citizens.
Meanwhile, will Johnny Mac make Joe Lieberman, one of the architects of the cap and trade scheme, Energy Secretary or give him the Dept. of Interior? Why dawdle in attempts to make us all miserable and bankrupt?
By AJC Management
May 15, 2008 7:16 PM | Link to this
You may want to start back up at the top, greenie, but I’m on the defense here.
You attacked me, remember?
Trust me, it is not too hard to define you as a lib, you attack Christians by calling us names, you defend liberals as the “saviors” of the poor, and then when I slam you on it, you answer by saying, “what, me a liberal?”
Don’t be ashamed, homey, it is what it is.
By TW
May 15, 2008 7:21 PM | Link to this
McSame couldn’t win in November with Jesus Christ on the ticket. Not that Christ would accept, being that the rightwing has wiped their backside with the Bible for the last eight years…
By SH
May 20, 2008 2:35 PM | Link to this
This was hilarious and true.