Mike Luckovich

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this

Yep, like putting lipstick on a pig.

No matter what color you choose, it’s still a pig.

~~~~~~~

It hadn’t rained in Atlanta for three weeks. Sonny prayed. That afternoon, rain fell into the Lake Lanier watershed. Last night, Atlanta Metro got a half of an inch.

Why do I have a feeling that this won’t be proof enough for the God hating dimwit liberals?

Thank you Sonny.

~~~~~~

Democrats know absolutely nothing about warfare:

{{{{The government has not decided whether to prosecute Blackwater Worldwide bodyguards for the Sept. 16 shooting of 17 Iraqi civilians, several law enforcement officials said Wednesday. The officials spoke in response to reports that the FBI has concluded that the shootings of ——>14 of the 17<—— victims were an unjustified use of deadly force.-Urinal}}}}

So three were justified and there was a threat to the convoy, eh? It wasn’t just marauding Americans driving around looking for innocent children to slaughter for kicks, like the Code Pinkos said?

And why is there no acrimony towards the three terrorists that chose to conduct an ambush among innocent civilians?

Are you libs on their side?

~~~~~~~

Democrats playing games with our troop safety:

{{{{The legislation, passed 218-203, was largely a symbolic jab at Bush, who already has begun reducing force levels but opposes a congressionally mandated timetable on the war. And while the measure was unlikely to pass in the Senate —- let alone overcome a veto —- Democrats said they wanted voters to know they weren’t giving up.-Urinal}}}}

Giving up on what, an Al Qaeda victory over the United States?

What silly, stupid little POS.

By @@

November 15, 2007 8:12 AM | Link to this

What’s that you say ml? The “dim” voters think Hillary’s “ruse” needs to be more radiant?

Hillary shopping for trendy “trinkets”.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this

Beautiful caricature of Hillary, Lucko!

Hillary is always making sure she appeals to “mainstream” sensibilities and therefore she will draw many Repug women voters into her camp, if she is selected by the Dems for the General Election. After all, who on the Repug slate has shown any interest in promoting issues that are important to educated women voters?

By mike

November 15, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this

Go Hillary. It is great to see so many of your haters in the press and on the so-called news channels. Just goes to show what type of people live in this country. Do the haters hate because you are a woman? Do the haters hate because you are married to Bill? Or do these people just plain ole hate for hate’s sack?

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 8:22 AM | Link to this

Yep, the Dems support victory for the U.S. by bringing our combat troops outta Bush’s occupation of choice. After all, our combat mission in Iraq has been over for almost 5 years now. All that is left to do there is for the democratically elected gov’t to stand itself up and start leading their own people into their own future.

Imagine how the U.S. would have felt if FRANCE, our main ally during the war against the Brits, had occupied our country 5 years after we had won the war — there would’ve been an American insurgency to remove the FRENCH from our soil!!! Instead, we Americans started working out our own future for ourselves and the French KNEW that their work was done here.

It’s a shame that Bush has never studied American history enough to know these things.

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 8:26 AM | Link to this

Now, with the surge in Iraq working, Democrats are completely demoralized. Al-Qaida was counting on them. We know the surge in Iraq is working because it is no longer front page news.

{{{{In a tape released in early September, Osama bin Laden bitterly complained, “You elected the Democratic Party for this purpose” — of ending the war in Iraq — “but the Democrats haven’t made a move worth mentioning.”}}}}

{{{{Musharraf has declared emergency rule in Pakistan, shut down the media and sent Supreme Court justices home. What’s not to like about a guy who orders policemen to beat up lawyers? I bet he has a good plan on illegal immigration, too.}}}}

~~~~~~

{{{{There should be one more participant, a man who won’t mince words about the Age of Aquarius—Nicolas Sarkozy, the new president of France. When Mr. Sarkozy was campaigning in April against the Socialist Ségolène Royal, he said: “In this election, it is a question of whether the heritage of May ‘68 should be perpetuated or if it should be liquidated once and for all.” He described the political Left born out of that period as “cynical” and “immoral.”}}}}

To say the least.

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 8:42 AM | Link to this

{{{{By Golduh November 15, 2007 8:22 AM Imagine how the U.S. would have felt if FRANCE, our main ally during the war against the Brits, had occupied our country 5 years after we had won the war — there would’ve been an American insurgency to remove the FRENCH from our soil!!! Instead, we Americans started working out our own future for ourselves and the French KNEW that their work was done here.}}}}

Blah, blah, blah.

Is idiocy not a common trait among Code Pinkos overwhelmed by their stupid emotions?

America is fighting against and achieving victory over foreign terrorists in Iraq, assorted scumbags from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Iran, Chechnya, Egypt and all the other breeding grounds of virulent hatred of freedom and slavish adherence to a false religion that oppresses women, uses rape as a punishment, slaughters innocent women and children, kills homosexuals, shoots people for selling “male” and “female” vegetables at the same vending table.

In other words, as always, America stands for human freedom, as we have all through our history.

And to be maligned by some dimwit like Golduh is the ultimate in irresponsibility, to shelter your stupid, filthy little mouth within the safety and freedom of America and have the nerve to spread lies and pervert Code Pinko propaganda about those who risk everything to keep this country free.

GFY (Good For You.)

By Georgia 74

November 15, 2007 8:44 AM | Link to this

Hillary 08’

By RogersParkRob

November 15, 2007 8:45 AM | Link to this

FYI to Mike @8:20am… People dont hate Hillary. We dont trust Hillary. She doesn’t have any experience as a leader. Besides, when she is pressed on her views, she trys to be on both sides on the issue. Additionally, when she was asked questions about her role during the Clinton presidency, her answered ranged from; ” I dont recall, I’m not sure about that, I dont have any recollection of that being the case.” These are the same statements you would never hear from a true leader.

Hillary. Tell me what you think. I may just vote for you.

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this

As a seasoned politician, Hillary is being careful NOT to take a stand on any of the issues until she’s nominated. Then she’ll release her claws!

On a different note, has anyone seen the photo of the Police (rock band, well, not rock band, but pop band) on ajc.com home page? Those guys are old! Look at Steward Copeland in the background.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this

Looks like Sonny needs to call out for the Native Americans who can perform a rain dance these days — his prayer vigil was woefully inadequate. Maybe north GA is being punished by Sonny’s vengeful God because of his lack of meaningful leadership:

While almost all of metro Atlanta got some rain, most rainfall totals were only around a 1/4 to 3/4-inch - not nearly enough to put a dent in the drought.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 9:09 AM | Link to this

{{of virulent hatred of freedom and slavish adherence to a false religion that oppresses women,}}

Yeah, lotsa luck, DUHHHH, with your religious crusade, and using war and violence as yours means of converting all the “terrrrrists” in the world!

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 9:10 AM | Link to this

Bosch @ 9:05 — yeah, The Police are certified geezers now, but I don’t think any other rock drummer can top Stewart Copeland!

By Mrs. Godzilla

November 15, 2007 9:12 AM | Link to this

I have said it before. If Hillary is the Democratic nominee I will support her fully.

But she is not my first choice.

Why?

Mike captures it in today’s toon. She does vacillate.

I’m not sure where you draw the line between listening to the people/polls and standing your ground on an issue. If she listens to the polls she’s accused of pandering. If she doesn’t she’s accused of being an elitist.

Sounds a bit like damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

Certainly, Romney and Guiliani are equally as guilty of vacillation. There’s been lots of flip-flop press on both of them. They are in the same situation.

How much listening do we want our candidates to do? Who should they listen too? Can they admit to shortsightedness and change position?

It is a puzzlement.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this

Oh, and I meant to add to my post above ^^^ to DUHHH—- GFY.

By Mrs. Godzilla

November 15, 2007 9:15 AM | Link to this

Rogers Park Rob….

Are you really from Rogers Park?

Sheridan Road? Lake Shore Drive?

By Prophetess Kelley P

November 15, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

Goldie give me a break. You got your rain as promised. I did the best that I could. Yesterday afternoon I proposed an arrangement with God that would have provided Georgia with a long steady soaking rain. I was to receive $50,000.00 in donations and through my prayer Georgia was to get all the rain it could handle.

I received a total of $1,320.18, you get what you pay for!

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is “considering” pro forma sessions during Thanksgiving break to stop President Bush from using the break to install any of his outstanding executive branch nominees.” Controversial

By Mr. Spockoduh

November 15, 2007 9:31 AM | Link to this

Is idiocy not a common trait among Code Pinkos overwhelmed by their stupid emotions?

By mm

November 15, 2007 9:39 AM | Link to this

Duh,

You and your fellow wingnuts are so gullible and naive. Sonny knew the weather forecast before he pulled his little prayer stunt.

Keep drinking the Koolade.

I guess George and Sonny have the hotline to God.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this

Over 35 million Americans faced hunger in 2006: USDA

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 9:41 AM | Link to this

Perhaps Harry Reid could hold real sessions and actually try to accomplish something rather than just pull a stunt to circumvent the Constitution.

By Toilet God

November 15, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

Behold the lord thy GOD is displeased. I command the wind to blow, the leaves to fall, the temperture to drop. That will be $11.95, cash, check, credit, or debit card accepted at over 10,000 locations, and growing daily. Ah MEN

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

Stewart Copeland is the best drummer in the world as far as I’m concerned - but the headband cracked me up!

By Toilet God

November 15, 2007 9:47 AM | Link to this

Hmmm, the lord thy GOD may accept virgin sacrifices in place of cash. Yeah, if ya want rain, bring on the virgins.

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 9:47 AM | Link to this

Hmmm….I vote for Hillary to be President…..of Rose Law Firm.

But she is not even capable of doing that. Oh well…who cares? Not me, as long as she and Bill get nowhere near the White House.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

RW

Explain how he would be circumventing the constitution.

Compare and contrast with the concept of recess appointments and whether or not that could also be considered circumventing the constitution.

By Scoreboard

November 15, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this

Giuliani, 48 percent; Clinton, 44 percent;

— Thompson, 47 percent; Clinton 44 percent;

By Krakatoa, East of Java

November 15, 2007 9:52 AM | Link to this

NO, the virgins are mine.

Want rain? Find me 72 conservative virgins (not Andy) and toss in.

By candide

November 15, 2007 9:52 AM | Link to this

Hillary alone is qualified, among all the candidates of the top tier in both parties, to be president. But the real question is: will she do the bidding of the Israel Lobby and attack Iran? Or will she drag the Israelis kicking and screaming to the peace table? That is what needs to be done or we whall have a middle east war much worse than the Iraq war. I think Hillary may be able to do this. Bill did not always give in to the Israeli Right wing the way Bush has.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

Prophetess @ 9:20 — so you subscribe to the Pat Robertson-Jerry Falwell method of fund-raising, I guess? They, too, often beg for their donations in order to “heal” whatever is ailing you… and lotsa luck with that fund-raising now that you have Rudy in your camp!

700 Club Psychics? Clairvoyants for Jesus?

By Aaron

November 15, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

Not only is Hillary an old bag but she’s got baggage. On her latest flop to flip-licenses for illegal immigrants:

{{{{The other candidates had more time to compose an answer, so they were spared the embarrassment. It was the pummeling she received from Barack Obama and John Edwards during and after that debate (and from moderator Tim Russert) that brought her husband, former president Bill Clinton, into the campaign, with the charge, as he put it, that “those boys have been getting tough on her lately.”}}}}

{{{{The former president’s intervention — volunteered during a campaign appearance on her behalf in South Carolina — raised the second, and largely unspoken, issue identified by my friend from the Clinton administration: the two-headed campaign and the prospect of a dual presidency.}}}}

{{{{In his view, which I share, this is a prospect that will test the tolerance of the American people far more severely than the possibility of the first female president — or, for that matter, the first black president.}}}}

{{{{As my friend says, “there is nothing in American constitutional or political theory to account for the role of a former president, still energetic and active and full of ideas, occupying the White House with the current president.”}}}}

{{{{No precedent exists for such an arrangement, and no ground rules have been — or probably can be — written. When Bill Clinton was president, the large policy enterprise that was entrusted to the first lady — health-care reform — crashed in ruins.}}}} as will Hillary’s chances to become president.

That having been said, as a conservative I want Hillary to win the dem nomination. The Bush dynasty made their way into politics first. The American public will not accept a Clinton dynasty in its wake.

This country will elect a Republican president in ‘08. NDAI!

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

ITFS,

I can’t read your whole article since it requires a subscription, but the snippet you put out seems to indicate that the Senate will recess from doing the people’s business but claim to be in session simply to prevent recess appointments which are clearly allowed in the Constitution.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

Bosch @ 9:43 — go Stewie!

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this

RW

While you may disagree, I believe preventing the recess appointment of the homophobic Dr. James Bolsinger as Surgeon General IS doing the peoples business.

Mr. Bush has a history of making [foul recess appointments].(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/04/AR2006010401953.html) Also let’s not forget the UN hating John Bolton.

The President’s maneuver is legal but so’s Harry’s.

And why does it have to be a recess appointment? Because nobody would approve them otherwise.

Again, preventing another crony appointment IS doing the peoples business and Harry Reid should be thanked.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 10:12 AM | Link to this

RW

While you may disagree, I believe preventing the recess appointment of the homophobic Dr. James Bolsinger as Surgeon General IS doing the peoples business.

Mr. Bush has a history of making foul recess appointments Also let’s not forget the UN hating John Bolton.

The President’s maneuver is legal but so’s Harry’s.

And why does it have to be a recess appointment? Because nobody would approve them otherwise.

Again, preventing another crony appointment IS doing the peoples business and Harry Reid should be thanked.

SORRY, I HATE TO MESS UP A GOOD LINK.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

Scoreboard — there’s plenty of other scoreboards saying this, and from the WSJ no less:

By 50% to 35%, the poll shows, Americans prefer that a Democrat gets elected to succeed Bush next November. In a direct matchup of leading candidates, however, that margin shrinks to 46% for Clinton and 45% for Giuliani.

And give a few more weeks for the felony indictments of Bernie attached to Rudy, and see what happens then!

By Scoreboard

November 15, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

CORRECTION: The poll results that were just posted were sent out without proper clarification.

The poll posted at 9:51 is not a national poll. This is a Georgia poll. Our staff thought it was a national poll because Sen Clinton is so very close to the leaders in a red state that she should be getting clobbered in. Sorry for the mishap.

A WAGA-TV (Fox 5)/Rasmussen poll of 500 Georgia voters:

Giuliani, 48 percent; Clinton, 44 percent;

Thompson, 47 percent; Clinton 44 percent;

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 10:24 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS @ 10:12

Confess now!! You would not approve of President’s choice for Surgeon General if he nominated Albert Schweitzer.

It is not the nominee that bothers you. It is your prejudice against the President. At least, you let Goldie take over the blue line items for a change.

By Gold star mom

November 15, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

Spockduh, and Luckoduh,

I find your writings about Code Pink to be some of the dumbest writings i have ever seen, it is obvious you have never lost a child to war. Once you have your ideas about Code Pink will probably change…

By Prophetess Kelley P

November 15, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this

Now is our chance for a warm winter!

I am announcing my first annual “Pray for a Warm Winter” prayer vigil. We’ll meet at the Capitol steps and everything.

Please make a donation at www.prophetCenter.com and a warm winter can be a reality.

Large donations please. You will get your return from God. He will lower your natural gas bill in return for your Love Gift$.

We are probably going to have to raise $1,000,000.00 for this one folks. That should put us in light jackets. $1,500,000.00 should keep us in sweaters!

God Bless you!

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

And when Hillary Clinton becomes president, we’ll expect your full support.

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

ITFS,

Wouldn’t the Democrat Party have more credibility if they took the recommendations of the President and voted them down in the Senate rather than make believe they know he’s going to make some nefarious appointment?

I guess it’s better political theater to just pull a stunt and pretend you’ve protected the people from some unseen danger. Democrats at their best you might say, all smoke and mirrors with zero substance. Next Monday the masked magician should expose the illusion that is today’s Democrat.

Later!

By Paul

November 15, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this

candide 9:52

“drag the Israelis kicking and screaming?” Abbas and Olmert met just last month! Abbas’s problem is with Hamas- moreso than Israel. Time to get current -

In The News

You missed a great headline - quip, really, one of the best of the political season:

“”When it takes two weeks and six different positions to answer one question on immigration, it’s easier to understand why the Clinton campaign would rather plant their questions than answer them,” said Barack Obama spokesman Bill Burton.”

Goldie

Good to know you’re a Stewie fan! He’s cool -

Today’s ‘toon is clever. ML seems to make the point Hillary’s driven by focus groups, will take whatever position the group she’s listening to wants, and avoids at all costs anything substantive.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

Well, Dusty, on that you are right!

But I don’t think Mr. Bush would actually nominate a dead guy.

If he did I sure would fight it.

(Although he recently did mention the death of the very much still alive Nelson Mandela)

As for having a “prejudice” against the President - it’s actually more a caution based on his own performance.

Harriet Meiers for the Supreme Court?

Michael Brown at FEMA?

Bernie Keric for DHS?

John Bolton at the UN?

If we dig back to the time of the failed Harriet Meiers nomination will we find you supported the nomination that was scuttled by the GOP?

By getalife

November 15, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this

The debate tonight will be very good with Clinton knocking it out of the park.

Here lead will widen after this debate and she will attack McLoser too show how tough she is.

The bitc-h question was planted to raise money for him but the best part will be their attacks on rudy.

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this

bosch @ 10:30

When Hillary becomes president and the sky falls in total disaster, I shall take the liberal method of supporting the country. That is, move to Canada. You know. Dual citizenship just like yours.

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

Paul,

In other words, she’s the perfect policitican!

Bwa!!!

Have you ever heard the song “Cannes” Copeland did on the 9 1/2 weeks soundtrack? Good tune.

By Paul

November 15, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Bosch

Perfect for the past, but not for what we need now.

I’d think many Dems would be just a tad concerned - this entire strategy of the Clinton campaign to label any questioning by fellow Democrats as “going negative” (Clinton campaign saying Obama’s abandoning the politics of hope) or attacking the messenger - what’s it portend for a Presidency? It has to be disconcerting.

I’ll look for it online.

Out for a while -

By H. Casey

November 15, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

MORE Guest Cartoons Please!!

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this

Bosch and Paul— I think Stewie could even match-up with the best of jazz drummers. That’s how much I love Stewie!

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this

{{{{By mm November 15, 2007 9:39 AM Duh, You and your fellow wingnuts are so gullible and naive. Sonny knew the weather forecast before he pulled his little prayer stunt.}}}}

m is for moron: Even the simplest things escape you, don’t they?

{{{{By JAMES SALZER The Atlanta Urinal-Constitution Published on: ———->11/07/07<————- With no rain in sight, Gov. Sonny Perdue is looking for a little spiritual help to get North Georgia out of its drought. Perdue’s office has begun sending out invitations to a prayer service for rain at the Capitol next week.}}}}

It took a lot of “faith” to schedule that a week in advance, huh, duhlard?

Why the everlasting eternal hatred of your Creator, moron?

Are you jockeying to become the Supreme Power of the Universe, maybe Der Fuhrer of the Earth, and just hate competition?

Or do you have a real guilty conscience?

Fool.

~~~~~~

{{{{By Gold star mom November 15, 2007 10:28 AM Spockduh, and Luckoduh, I find your writings about Code Pink to be some of the dumbest writings i have ever seen, it is obvious you have never lost a child to war. Once you have your ideas about Code Pink will probably change…}}}}

It’s awfully nice of you to hope for a death in my family, you liberals are just so “compassionate” towards your fellow countrymen, but whatever, Code Pink still sucks the big one.

Apparently, you and them have never had a family member leap to their death from a flaming office building, and no, since I am not a scumbag like you, I do not wish that on any Americans.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this

Paul,

Obama supports Spitzer’s loser poistion.

The Shuler Save Act will pass for border security so the next step is what to do with the millions already here.

Immigration is the #1 issue in Nevada so it will be an interesting debate tonight in my home town.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this

RW

No, I don’t think you are right about Democratic credibility on this one.

Keep in mind that it is the President who would be making the appointment outside of the standard process because of his fear of the fight that would insue.

(Although how much of a fight there would actually be is certainly debatable (see Mukasey))

All politics is theater RW. You are not naive. You know that. From Mission accomplished in a flight suit, to “Mr Gorbachov tear down this wall” - it’s theater.

It’s just time we had some outstanding performers.

Paul -

loved the Obama quote when I saw it the other day. Maybe he’s ready to step up. We shall see.

By Reality

November 15, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

The next president will inherit the disasters of the Bush Clowns: a dying dollar, at least two foreign wars, the housing collapse, the debt collapse, and last but not least, oil prices rise at an accelerating rate each year, as the reality of peak oil manifests itself.

By H. Casey

November 15, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this

MORE Guest Cartoons Please!!

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS

I realize that your choices in liberal decisions mostly depend on the polls. (You do work for the DNC, don’t you?)

My decisions depend on what I believe is the right thing to do. The GOP does not think for me.

Bush may have made some bad choices in personnel but I prefer that over a President who shows no ethical or moral standards. Bill Clinton comes to mind immediately. And now you want to run his “better half” as a candidate?? Some people never learn.

By John in Tampa, FLA

November 15, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this

Wrong color Billary. Some of the Repugs are already wearing Radiant Rouge.

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Move to Canada? Well, if you must, too bad you wouldn’t practice what you preach and support your president and your country.

Is that how true patriots act? I think not.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

Please move to Canada crusty and take your ilk with you.

You are not American anyway happily giving away your freedom, disgracing the real Americans who died for your freedom.

By Don't want to get my hands dirty

November 15, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

somebody please tell duh, andy,aaron

that on 11/7 the 7 day forecast showed rain 7 days out

gullible

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

Oh and another thing Dusty,

Canada has socialized medicine - so if you move up there, don’t try and come crossing the border for our superior health care.

You can’t have your cake both ways!

And get a jacket - it’s cold up there - and those moose - watch out!

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this

Both Obama and Huckabee are “surging” for the first caucus in Jan., which will make January verrry interesting!

University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll: Obama and Huckabee Surging

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 11:02 AM | Link to this

Reality @ 10:49 — and whichever Dem gets elected to the White House in ‘09 will have the biggest mess ever to have to clean up!

By mm

November 15, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this

Duh at 10:48,

Great defense of your stupid @ss prayer nonsense.

Say hello to Santa and the Easter Bunny for me.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this

We all know that Dust-for-Brains really hates America. She only has love for her ever-shrinking Neo-Con Repug Party.

By Gold Star mom

November 15, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this

Luckduh,

Well thanks for putting words in my mouth. First i did not wish death to any of your family members, i said it is obvious you have not lost a family member to war and if you did you might see code pink in a different life.

But thanks for clearing up that GOP supporters dont care about the losses suffered by military families. And since you didnt have any family members jump out of the world trade center you rant is as pointless as your facts. And the next time i visit my sons grave i will make sure to tell him how the GOP supporters called me a scumbag because i used my first amendment’s rights that my son died for…

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this

CNN is reporting (again) that Big Denny Hastert is going to resign today.

We’ll see.

By S. Cohen

November 15, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this

YEs, More guest cartoons!

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

Just like you, bosch@10:56

I would not give up my citizenship. I’d be a true patriot with DUAL citizenship. You can tell us how that works and still be a loyal citizen to both. Don’t skip over it, bosch. Explain it. BOSCH HAS DUAL CITIZENSHIP.

Actually, I wouldn’t really go to Canada. Somebody might think I was acting like a liberal!

By Prophetess Kelley P

November 15, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this

Dusty I implore you to reconsider that move to Canada. Did you know they have gay marriage there. If thats the reason you are moving there in the first place let me tell you something that may change your mind.

My Church has a gay conversion therapy program. We can get you converted for about $50,000.00- American. (If you prefer Canadian dollars that works even better.)

That reminds me, My church is hosting another anti-gay march on the steps of the Capitol. Go to www.prophetCenter.com to find out how to help.

GOD loves you.

By Prophetess Kelley P

November 15, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this

Oh BTW Dusty, if you need to go to a foreign country during the Hillary years My church has a ‘Christian Outreach to Muslim’ program in Iraq that needs volunteers. It would be perfect for you. You can live in beautiful downtown Baghdad for 8 years. Not only that you can SUPPORT THE TROOPS! And they get FoxNews!

GOD Bless you Dusty

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

You can figure that out for yourself. I don’t help unpatriotic cowards who would move to another country based solely on the fact they didn’t like our president.

Especially when you spend day in and day out calling us libs unpatriotic scum bags who help support the terrorist because we don’t like Bush and all that other garbage you spew constantly. At least we are still here fighting for the preservation of our Constitution!

You can’t back track now. Try if you must, but you said it - you would move to Canada just because you don’t like whose president. My, my Dusty.

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

Dear Phrophetess,11:20

Your great interest in gay marriage is of little consequence to me. Perhaps I can refer you to Goldie and other libs who might wish to take part.

Now, have a nice Thanksgiving and keep up the turkey trot for loony libs.

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

Good morning fellow bloggers!

In the spirit of Veteran’s Day, remember every day that you can wake up free, it’s going to be a great day!

Gold Star Mom,

Many of us who have blogged here for a long while, no longer feed the trolls. So with that in mind, don’t pay any attention to Andy/Luckoduh/Whatever. Or his tiny handful of ardent fans and supporters here.

Believe or not, he is actually much better than he used to be before he was banned for some time! So you can only imagine the venom that poured out of him before!

Most here simply ignore his tirades.

Off to be a good capitalist and help pay for the war!

Later all!

By GMan

November 15, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

” I dont recall, I’m not sure about that, I dont have any recollection of that being the case.” These are the same statements you would never hear from a true leader?

Think Ronald Reagan during Iran Contra!

Gman

By Gold Star Mom

November 15, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

Am Vet,

Thanks for your words. I dont use blogs but by seeing his comments just struck a nerve with me. I have found out long ago that you cannot debate ignorance, and Luckoduh is about as ignorant a person as i have ever come across…

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this

BOSCH WILL NOT TELL US ABOUT HIS DUAL CITIZENSHIP.

bosch, I have never called anyone a scumbag. That is your type of language. And I would never move to Canada. That was a sarcastic reflection of liberal behavior. Unlike you, I will never have dual citizenship. Just the USA for me.

I do think liberals like you undermine the country. You have called our elected President a “traitor”. You have spoken against the war in Iraq which works against our military. Such things are not said by a patriotic citizen. Because the President makes choices YOU do not like, does not make him a “traitor”.

You continue to make such statements and then proclaim your great patriotism. Doesn’t work, buddy. You have a right to say them but it portrays your anti-American feelings.

If you want to insult people many times, you better get use to receiving the same. It works both ways.

By Happy Cat

November 15, 2007 12:01 PM | Link to this

By Dusty November 15, 2007 10:50 Bush may have made some bad choices in personnel but I prefer that over a President who shows no ethical or moral standards.

Bush is a study in ethical and moral standards? Dusty you are a real gasser!! It’s much to early to be in the cooking sherry.

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 12:08 PM | Link to this

Dusty, Dusty,

You know sometimes people don’t like to talk about things on public blogs that are private matters.

At least I wouldn’t move to Canada just because I don’t like our president.

Your comments about dual citizenship just shows how totally ignorant you are. Sometimes those things happen without you asking for them.

Let’s see how many times have I mentioned my dual citizenship other than today - once. How many times has Dusty? At least three that I can think of. Dusty, it seems that you are much more fascinated with the subject than I am.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Yes, there are paid trolls (post insane comments to get others to respond) here, so do not feed the trolls.

By S. Cohen

November 15, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

Yes, more guest cartoons!!!

By Scoreboard

November 15, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

Dusty…..1

Bosch…..0

Scoring: Dusty-11:59-Unassisted

By Reality

November 15, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this

Dusty, let me help you make the decision to move to Canada: They have wonderful purple tent dresses made from real wwii parachutes, one chute per dress, and they are silk and dirt cheap! Now you can afford to wear one while the other is being washed (a big job, it takes an industrial size washing machine to wash one of Dusty’s Super XXXXXXXXXXXX size dresses). Of course, some of those stains just will not come out.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 12:24 PM | Link to this

I wonder how many $BILLIONS$ of US tax dollars Gen. Moosheriff will be stealing on his way outta Pakistan:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 — Almost two weeks into Pakistan’s political crisis, Bush administration officials are losing faith that the Pakistani president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, can survive in office and have begun discussing what might come next, according to senior administration officials.

By Reality

November 15, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

ONLY TRAITORS HAVE DUAL CITIZENSHIP! COME THE REVOLUTION, THEY WILL BE THE FIRST AGAINST THE WALL.

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

boschie,boschie

If you try to say my sarcasm about going to Canada is truth, I shall keep reminding you about your dual citizenship which is truth.

You started this by bringing my name into the discussion when I had not mentioned you in any way. Now you want to talk about “private affairs”.

I would not have known you had dual citizenship if you had not told us. Now, it is suddenly private!

“If you can’t stand the heat, don’t go in the kitchen.”

By Scoreboard

November 15, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

Atlanta .14 inch

Decatur.21 inch

Cobb County .28 inch

Gainesville .75 inch

Cartersville .82 inch

God loves conservative and very Christian Cartersville the most. God hates liberal Atlanta and Godless Decatur.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

Government Is Illegally Taking Money From Soldiers and Veterans Who Used Military Credit Cards, Lawsuit Alleges

By getalife

November 15, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this

Speaking of traitors

They should try him after the w disaster is over so he will not be pardoned.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

Under crisis conditions of an extraordinary magnitude political leadership of the highest level will be required in the next presidency. The damage is broad, deep and spreading, apparent not only in international disorder and violence, the unprecedented decline of U.S. prestige, and the flouting of our security and economic interests but also in the hollowing out of the federal government’s departments and agencies, and their growing incapacity to fulfill their functions, from FEMA to the Department of Justice.

By Worlds Worst Fixer-Upper

November 15, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - Ahead of the holiday travel crunch, President Bush has settled on steps intended to reduce air traffic congestion and long delays that have left passengers stranded.

Oh Shiite, Boy George has got his scotch tape and rubber bands out so he can ‘FIX’ us up again.

Mission Accomplished!!!

By Dusty

November 15, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

Reality@12:22

I think tent dresses went out of style some where in the dim distant past. I am a slender sylph who wears only hoop skirts.

Take your tent dresses to GoodWill where you bought them.

By RE

November 15, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

I imagine anyone strongly against dual citizenship has not lived in another country. Just a guess.

Hey, what is going on with the GOP candidates lately?

Fred thompson is rapidly approaching footnote status after his much hyped enterance into the race.

Huckabee was supposed to be a throwaway candidate, and is now getting some traction.

McCain was supposed to be done months ago, and now after taking a look at everyone else running, voters are starting to come back to him, I guess level headed policy and an actual record of serving his country is appealing, even to republicans.

Romney is still funding his own race, sinking a bunch of his own money into it. I swear this guy is the closest to the politician refered to in the “omen” than anyone else. He will say anything to get elected, he looks like he came from central casting, and he is the son of satan.

Gotta love guliani. GWB has combined the economic accumen of Carter with the integrity of Nixon. Guliani is going to have the foriegn policy of GWB along with the checkered personal life of bill clinton. Any bets on him announcing his next divorce during a state of the union?

And how about that Ron Paul. He was supposed to be washed out and the joke of the field, and now he is running 4th or 5th in the races, and outpacing most candidates in fundraising. This guy gets demonized by the GOP establishment, but he is the only real “strict constructionist” constitutional candidate that has been run since Thomas Jefferson.

By Phase Two

November 15, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

DAMASCUS, Syria - Thousands of Iraqi refugees in Syria have applied for resettlement in the United States, a U.N. refugee agency official in the Syrian capital said Wednesday.

King George’s ‘Great Republican/Iraqi Welfare/Amnesty Prgram’, Phase Two!!!

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

In the United States, dual citizenship is not very common among politicians, although Arnold Schwarzenegger has retained his Austrian citizenship during his service as a Governor of California.

By RE

November 15, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

What do you think about a constitutional amendment taking away a president’s pardon ability from oct 31st to the end of term for presidential election years. That way any shaky pardons will be public before the vote happens.

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

{{{{By Don’t want to get my hands dirty, just my mouth November 15, 2007 10:56 somebody please tell duh, andy,aaron that on 11/7 the 7 day forecast showed rain 7 days out gullibl.}}}}

Aaron?

gullibl?

{{{{———->With no rain in sight,<———— Gov. Sonny Perdue is looking for a little spiritual help to get North Georgia out of its drought.-Urinal}}}}

Nice try, dumbas-s.

~~~~~~~

{{{{By mm November 15, 2007 11:03 AM Duh at 10:48, Say hello to Santa and the Easter Bunny for me.}}}}

m is for moron: Equating your Creator with the Easter Bunny is not a sign of intelligence but what else would we expect from you?

You liberals have had “faith” in many silly ideas over the years, silly ideas that turned out to be nonsense, global cooling is the most prominent one in my mind.

Belittling the believers of a Creator, proof of which can be shown by me and you even being here, duh, is rather an audacious position on your part.

You proof your ignorance every time you open your mouth.

~~~~~~~

{{{{By Gold Star mom November 15, 2007 11:13 Luckduh, But thanks for clearing up that GOP supporters dont care about the losses suffered by military families.}}}}

Well, of course, I come here every day defending America and her brave soldiers because I hate them, yes it makes perfect sense, if you are a pinko, that is.

1)If you are a Gold Star Mother then I am Mother Teresa, risen from the grave.

2) I had a co worker on the top floors of Trade Center #1 that morning, I don’t know if he died instantly or suffered his last minutes in this world. All I know is that some scumbags cut throats, not George Bush and not America, crashed a plane into his building and killed a lot of innocent people.

Should we run and hide from them?

Should we surrender to them?

No, we should do what we are doing in Iraq, humiliating these bas-tards, until the job is done.

Would “your” “son’s” “sacrifice” be for absolutely nothing, as the 58,000 that you pinkos abandoned in Vietnam was?

Do you think “your” “son” volunteered to die for no reason?

Sick.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this

Michael Chertoff

AG Mukasey

Dual Citizenship

US/Israel

By Don't want to get my hands dirty

November 15, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

somebody tell duh/andy/aaron

that looking out the window and seeing no rain in sight is trumped by meteorilogical forecast that says rain 7 days out

is this guy the biggest idiot you ever saw or what.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

RE,

I think all trials should be scheduled after w is gone so he will not be able to pardon unless there is a statue of limitations conflict.

I think the FBI should form a task team to investigate all w’s crimes. I think if they are not held accountable, the International law may come into play.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 1:05 PM | Link to this

Gold Star Mom,

I thank you for your sons service and I mourn your loss.

I imagine you come across more of the likes of our “Duh” than you should have to and I am sorry you have to deal with such un-American, un-Christian attitudes.

What you don’t know is that “Duh” has never served his country other than what he sees as his duty behind a computer keyboard.(and you have read what that means)

What I’d like for you to know, is that the large majority of us here respect and admire you, and wish you well.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 1:07 PM | Link to this

Here is a blog on your water crisis

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

I posted 12:52 before I saw this:

{{{{By Gold Star Mom November 15, 2007 11:54 AM Am Vet, Thanks for your words. I dont use blogs but by seeing his comments just struck a nerve with me. I have found out long ago that you cannot debate ignorance, and Luckoduh is about as ignorant a person as i have ever come across…}}}}

Let me ask you, does this not qualify for a fake post, submitted by some sanctimonious blowhard obsessed with me, like for instance, DimVet?

Look at the writing style and go back over the “conversation” this wanker has with himself.

Truly weird.

By Bikini Bimbo

November 15, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this

Way to swing at everything, glennduh, like the unhinged uni-hacker you truly are.

Just let it go. You and @@ are so easily sent off scurrying between wooten and lucko and reread every post- it’s really funny to watch. We all love a fall guy, but enough. Sometimes, when it’s too easy, it’s no fun. SO Relax. Go with the flow, joe. (but let it go).

This just in: CNN just reported that China is exporting pencils and ammo that contain lead.

Name a Chinese Rock Band of the 70’s: Lead Zepellin.

By RE

November 15, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

Ha, Funny video

Finally a pledge to help america from a foriegn government.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

So it looks as if national Dem strategists are planning a major political offensive against House Republicans on the subprime mortgage crisis — an issue Dems think will help them capture more House seats in 2008. And the polls appear to suggest that there’s plenty of voter angst out there to speak to.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this

{{All I know is that some scumbags cut throats, not George Bush and not America, crashed a plane into his building and killed a lot of innocent people.

Should we run and hide from them?}}

DUHHH— 75% of America now knows that your guy Dubya is the ONE WHO RAN FROM THEM, and took the majority of our combat troops into Baghdad instead. Those “scumbags” you post about did not come from BAGHDAD, you warmed-over road-kill.

In essence, your guy has managed to fail at two attempts for “regime change” in two different countries. And I won’t even bother to list the tiresome rest of his “legacy”…

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this

{{{{By IN THE NEWS November 15, 2007 1:05 PM What you don’t know is that “Duh” has never served his country other than what he sees as his duty behind a computer keyboard.(and you have read what that means)}}}}

Wrong again, prop, you’re batting 0% since you’ve been posting to this blog.

I am not a an ignorant braggart, like you gasbag liberals are, I am not going to try to trump the debate by saying that I am a war vet or a “gold star mom,” I believe that EVERY American has an equal voice in how this country should be run.

All men are created equal, remember?

I’ll let you sick mofo’s use your “dead” “children” as battering rams so that you can get a point across that you are otherwise unable to debate on it’s own merits.

I am better than you are, hahaha.

O.K. so maybe I do brag…

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this

House votes to end CIA rendition program

By Gold Star Mom

November 15, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this

Moron (Luckoduh):

Well hello Mother Teresa, Oh you had a co worker who worked in the world trade center but you dont know if they are alive? Some co-worker, its a far cry from your quote “Apparently, you and them have never had a family member leap to their death from a flaming office building”

So you have a great knack for fiction, you go from a family member to a coworker who you dont even keep in touch with. Why dont you go with me to visit my sons grave if you dont believe me? And i think the people who protested Vietnam were correct there also, an i lost a brother in that war. So lets see i have lost 2 family members to war and you have a ficticious coworker from the world trade center, who is the liar here?

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this

I usually think Andrew Sullivan (a Repug) is a pompous @ss, but he’s spot-on about Obama’s appeal to many voters:

Consider this hypothetical. It’s November 2008. A young Pakistani Muslim is watching television and sees that this man—Barack Hussein Obama—is the new face of America. In one simple image, America’s soft power has been ratcheted up not a notch, but a logarithm.

It is worth recalling the key passages of the speech Obama gave in Chicago on October 2, 2002, five months before the war:— “I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war … I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.”

By W.

November 15, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this

You dope. Rain was in the FORECAST.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 1:56 PM | Link to this

So Duh,

do you have a little uniform and helmet you blog in?

is that your sservice to our country?

do you march around your keyboard saying hup 2 3 4?

is that your service to our country?

do you get your feet all cold and wet and sleep outside on the ground?

is that your service to our country?

do you eat MRE’s with a cold bud while you post vile stuff to gold star moms?

is that your service to our country?

do you were cammo underpants?

is that your service to our country?

do you think that anybody here said anything about your not having a voice in this country? do you compare what you (or i for that matter) do at our keyboards is in anyway comparable to the sacrifice made by the 175,000 troops currently in iraq?

is that kind of idiocy your service to our country?

does it bother you that except for a couple of trolls here and whoever you have tied up in your basement think you are a truly, remarkably rotten person?

in order to have a 0 batting average, i’d have to be playing ball with you.

and there’s no way that would ever happen.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

More from Andrew Sullivan (a Repug):

At its best, the Obama candidacy is about ending a war—not so much the war in Iraq, which now has a mo­mentum that will propel the occupation into the next decade—but the war within America that has prevailed since Vietnam and that shows dangerous signs of intensifying, a nonviolent civil war that has crippled America at the very time the world needs it most. It is a war about war—and about culture and about religion and about race. And in that war, Obama—and Obama alone—offers the possibility of a truce.

You cannot lead the United States without having a foot in both the religious and secular camps. This, surely, is where Bush has failed most profoundly. By aligning himself with the most extreme and basic of religious orientations, he has lost many moderate believers and alienated the secular and agnostic in the West. If you cannot bring the agnostics along in a campaign against religious terrorism, you have a problem.— Here again, Obama, by virtue of generation and accident, bridges this deepening divide. He was brought up in a nonreligious home and converted to Christianity as an adult… It is a modern, intellectual Christianity.

By RE

November 15, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

Andy, that had to hurt. Gold star mom just exposed what a blustering fraud you are.

One of two options, go away quitely and come back refreshed after getting the fox news propaganda fix for the night, or go off on endless cut and pastes to shut down the blog… again.

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

I would love to see a study showing the accuracy of a seven day weather forecast.

Imagine my surprise that ITFS disagrees with me. I’m shocked, SHOCKED I say. When a brilliant man like John Bolton can’t even get an up or down vote I think it’s high time we get a better definition of advice and consent.

/Just passing through….Later!

Oh and why is Blowhard making up characters to converse with again?

By GOLD STAR FARIE

November 15, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

Pay better attention! He did not know how his co-worker died. Not IF he died.

ITN, we know that you would not play ball with Duh, you only play with yourself.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 2:14 PM | Link to this

Another cowardly assault on the freedoms the troops died for

They should leave this country with crusty.

Geez.

By mm

November 15, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this

Duh,

Now for a serious post about the prayer for rain.

I find it odd that God would answer the Governor’s prayer for rain but would ignore the prayers of the parents of 4000 soldiers who prayed for their loved ones safe return from Iraq but yet their loved ones never came back alive.

Rain over life? I don’t think so.

By Gold Star Mom

November 15, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this

Moron (Luckoduh)

Come to my sons grave with me and i will show you this is not someone making this up. Actually maybe you should meet with my husband and spew this same hate filled message on him that you have on me, but be warned you better have good insurance if you do that.. You sir are plainly scum is the best work i can use…

In the News, thanks for your kind words. Yep i do run into these kinds daily, they ask about your child and when you explain their loss they complain about how high gas prices are not even caring about your loss..

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this

{{{{By Gold Star Mom November 15, 2007 1:52 PM So you have a great knack for fiction, you go from a family member to a coworker who you dont even keep in touch with.}}}}

DimVet: I said just as clear as day, I do not know how he died. It could have been instantly or he may have suffered.

What are you talking about?

How can I keep in touch with the dead?

I never said I had a family member die in the World Trade Center. Show me where you think I said this.

There is a big difference between having friend die in the WTC and a family member die fighting for the freedom of others in Iraq, I totally agree with you.

My friend’s death was an unspeakable abomination, children were on that plane, all he did wrong was show up for work that day, he did absolutely nothing to deserve what ever it was that happened to him.

“Your” “son” volunteered for his service, as I once did, and unless you are trying to tell us he was stupid, he knew EXACTLY what that service meant. I know a lot of veterans and to a man, every single one of them understood completely that they could lose their lives and still chose to risk everything because they believed in freedom and they believe in the greatness of the United States and they knew that none of this came without a price and that others had valiantly paid that price before them.

To use his death and his brave service to demean their mission, to use it to surrender the Iraqi people to the Islamic slave masters, scumbags that will murder them, is a selfish, disgusting way to belittle and slander his honorable sacrifice.

But since you are a lying POS liberal and not a “gold star mother,” I used your BS fake post as a wonderful opportunity to expand on a few thoughts and I thank you for the providing me the opening.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 2:29 PM | Link to this

Karl Rove Hired As Newsweek Contributor To ‘Balance’ Markos

Now that’s going to be some fun reading!

By no liberal shame

November 15, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this

liberals should be ashamed of these tactics used such as “Gold Star Mom”.

to do so, is a slap in the face of all military families.

shame on you.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

I suspect quite a lot surprises RW.

Comes from living in la-la land.

(Requires dual citizenship)

By getalife

November 15, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

FYI, I got a job offer to post insane rhetoric on left wing blogs like duh does.

I told them I am retired with plenty of gold and would never sale my soul to the wingnuts no matter what the pay.

I think duh is paid to post here, I would not take him seriously.

By Disgusted

November 15, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

Yup that be AmVet.

[[Actually maybe you should meet with my husband and spew this same hate filled message on him that you have on me, but be warned you better have good insurance if you do that..]]

A macaroon with no coconuts.

By RE

November 15, 2007 2:42 PM | Link to this

Ah, forgot about option 3, make up a bunch of new names to come out and attack with.

Well played andy, well played.

You’re still a blustering fraud though.

By Gold Star Mom

November 15, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this

Luckduh,

Let me put it to you this way, you had a friend die in the world trade center, where is your outrage when we didnt hunt down bin Laden?

See you had a friend die, not a relative, i cant begin to express to you the pain i feel everyday. You didnt watch my sons flag drapped coffin lowered into the groud, you werent there to hear the 21 gun salute, nor where you there when they handed me the folded flag from my sons coffin. The difference is it was your friend, not your blood. So you can call me fake all you want, and accuse me of being another blogger. But i have to visit my sons grave not you, so you have no idea what saccrifice is, and if you beleive we are fighting for freedom in Iraq then you dont live in the real world..

By The BIG Conservative Shame

November 15, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this

{{{{{{{By no liberal shame

November 15, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this

liberals should be ashamed of these tactics used such as “Gold Star Mom”.

to do so, is a slap in the face of all military families.

shame on you.}}}}}}

FREE SPEECH IS JUST FOR THE WARWHOREMONGERS.

By AmVet's sockpuppet

November 15, 2007 2:57 PM | Link to this

They don’t lower flag draped coffins into the ground. Maybe it’s time for a new name.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this

Yep,Kos vs Rove

Interesting reading.

By Gold Star mom

November 15, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this

Am vets sockpuppet (really Luckoduh)

You are just like a Bush fan, kill the messanger but ignore the message. You are taking everything i say to literal but i see you dont have the ba** to answer any of my questions to you. Thanks for you who showed your support, those like Luckduh im sorry that you support a president more than the troops. God bless to all of you….

By Blackadder

November 15, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

I just read where Bush’s best friends, Saudi Arabia, just sentenced a gang rape victim to 200 lashes and 6 months in jail. Birds of a feather flock together.

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

{{{{By RE November 15, 2007 2:42 PM Ah, forgot about option 3, make up a bunch of new names to come out and attack with.}}}}

RE: I can take care of my own business, I don’t need to make up fake posts to supplement my own arguments.

Aparently, you must think that “gold star mom” has got itself way in over it’s head or you obviously wouldn’t be ankle biting for it from the sidelines, like a little sissy.

{{{{By mm November 15, 2007 2:15 PM Rain over life? I don’t think so.}}}}

m is for moron: Um, maybe those soldiers died for God’s purpose and have taken their rightful place in Heaven with the reward of eternal life?

Do you not have faith, moron?

~~~~~

{{{{By “Gold Star Mom” November 15, 2007 2:43 PM Luckduh, Let me put it to you this way, you had a friend die in the world trade center, where is your outrage when we didnt hunt down bin Laden?}}}}

DimVet: My, my, how quickly we have descended into the same old tired moonbat talking points.

Has Bin Laden is a coward of epic proportion, he would never risk his life in service to his cause, he sends others to blow themselves up and kill innocent people.

So he is basically a harmless little punk.

9/11 wasn’t even his idea, it was KSM’s, who we got and have tortured, hehehe.

What Bush is doing and what I agree with is to draw his whole “army” into Iraq and kill them, leaving this POS to cower in his cave and whine about it.

This is the part I have a feeling you don’t like.

You lowlife liberals thought the United States was finally going to get it’s as-s handed to it, and you helped Al Qaeda as much as you possibly could, but guess what.

You lost.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this

“On the Sean Hannity radio program, pollster John Zogby said that Texas Congressman Ron Paul could end up surprising the field - and “embarass a lot of the frontrunners” by wildly exceeding expectations taking 15 to 18 percent in the New Hampshire primary.”

Bwa.

By no liberal shame

November 15, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this

funny how the “free speechers” are always the ones who are trying to limit it.

shame

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this

Do you liberals not have a problem being part of a group whose success at the next election depends largely on our efforts in Iraq going poorly over the next year?? If we’re winning in Iraq, you lose the election. If we’re losing in Iraq, you win at the polls. How can you call yourselves patriotic Americans when our soldiers have to lose (ie, get killed) for you to win? You’ve hung your future on our defeat. Pathetic…

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this

Do you liberals not have a problem being part of a group whose success at the next election depends largely on our efforts in Iraq going poorly over the next year?? If we’re winning in Iraq, you lose the election. If we’re losing in Iraq, you win at the polls. How can you call yourselves patriotic Americans when our soldiers have to lose (ie, get killed) for you to win? You’ve hung your future on our defeat. Pathetic…

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this

The Federal Communications Commission’s historically weak enforcement of cross-ownership waivers is worrisome when laid over a proposal from the chairman’s office to encourage media consolidation.

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this

What New FCC Rules Mean for Media

By mm

November 15, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this

RB the repeat poster,

Just because you have an opinion doesn’t make it true.

By Right-wing nut job in full glory

November 15, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this

In my intermittent visits to the blog, I look for particularly insightful and intelligent things to comment upon. Since Luck is able to take time out his very important schedule to make sure to be first blogger every single day, I usually don’t have to go far before finding something particularly remarkable. (Some may suggest that his ability to be first everyday suggests that he must be a loser with no life, but who am I too say that this behavior is sad enough to use the term ‘loser.’) Anyway, today I found this gem from Luck:

“Democrats know absolutely nothing about warfare.”

I agree completely. Dick Cheney learned all he needed to know about warfare prior to getting 7 deferments. He found out that you could die and decided that it was better if someone else did that. Give him credit, that’s smart.

Bush learned all he needed to know by flying outdated planes on booze and cocaine. That’s a real challenge and one he certainly was up for. I’m sure that he would have rather done sorties over Hanoi but there was no guarantee that they’d give him the booze and cocaine.

Further, as implied by luck we have only been successful in foreign wars when republicans were in charge. I’m sure we all know that FDR was a raging right wing loony Republican when he whipped the Nazis and the Japs in 3.5 years. And of course, Woodrow Wilson was right of Attila the Hun when we were victorious in WWI.

Meanwhile a Democrat named Nixon was in cahrge when we left Vietnam in defeat. The only foreign war we’ve lost was when a lib occupied the White House.

Further the only large scale war that the Democrats were ever successful in was the so-called Civil War when that damn liberal democrat Lincoln tried to force his liberal social policies down the throats of the South. The only war the libs ever one was against their own people. It reminds me of that lib Herbert Hoover sending out the army to kill dozens and run off thousands of WWI veterans who were protesting at the Capital. Yeah the libs are only really good at killing other Americans.

Good research and grasp on history there Luck. You are as always an informed and brilliant individual.

Oh by the way can you tell us the tales of how the GOP stared down Kruschev during the Cuban Missle Crisis?

Also remind me of the GOP President who was in Office when we won each foreign war i

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 3:54 PM | Link to this

Allan Lichtman: The 13 Keys to the White House … Why the Democrats will take back the White House

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

You’re right mm, my posts are hampered at times by my server double posting them. I know it makes you libs feel better about yourselves to call me names or to think your smarter than me because you can “only hit the post button once”, but next time you post, could you please tell me what’s not true about my 3:38 post. Wasn’t it one of your own fearless leaders in Washington who said if things improve in Iraq, “Well, then we have a problem”? It seems it’s not just my opinion now is it?

So, based on that logic, isn’t Gold Star’s son dying a good thing for your party? How do you look yourselves in the mirror…..

By Gonna Love 08

November 15, 2007 4:05 PM | Link to this

RB from Gwinnett,

Wow you are cut from the same stupid cloth Luckodumb is. Let me ask you this what had Iraq done from 91 - 01 that we suddenly had to invade them and not hunt down bin laden? You and Luckodumb seem to think that instead of going after the killer it is better to go after the store that sold the gun and let the killer remain free…

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 4:08 PM | Link to this

Nice. Looks like I’ve (finally) hit celebrity status while I was gone.

The only thing I take umbrage with though, is how a couple, either confuse the poorly written, pathetic jackers with me, or even more feebly, profess that I am creating them.

And I’ve tried so hard to stay under the radar.

Zooks.

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 4:15 PM | Link to this

By Gonna Love 08 4:05 PM

That’s nice, change the subject… You’re only name calling away from being a complete liberal. No wonder you don’t have a problem with Hillary not being able to answer any questions other than her lipstick.

I’ll speak to Bin Laden right after you explain how you support a group whose success depends on our soliders failure (ie, death).

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 4:18 PM | Link to this

By Gonna Love 08 4:05 PM

That’s nice, change the subject… You’re only name calling away from being a complete liberal. No wonder you don’t have a problem with Hillary not being able to answer any questions other than her lipstick.

I’ll speak to Bin Laden right after you explain how you support a group whose success depends on our soliders failure (ie, death).

By IN THE NEWS

November 15, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this

RB

First and most obviously, the death of one our Servicemen is not a good thing for any party. That comment is gratuitous and petty. It reflects poorly on your character.

Whether or not the war in Iraq “improves” the reality of HOW we got there, WHY we got there and how INEPTLY it has been played out remains front and center.

A politcal party that could so readily involve us in a “vanity war” once, surely wouldn’t have a problem doing it again.

The American people now know this. The American people won’t have it.

The Iraq occupation will be a part of the election mix in 2008.

That will only be one of the ingredients.

For the largest number of people in this country, the economy SUX. There are only signs that it will continue to get SUCKIER (technical term). We see billions of dollars in outgo, and very little income. I predict this will be the big issue. HUGE.

We see all the children left behind by teaching to tests, rather than teaching social studies, geography, civics or critical thinking skills.

We see friends and neighbors losing their homes.

We see our mee-mee’s and paw-paw’s struggling to make the choice between medicine and food.

We see kids and adults who can’t afford to see a doctor.

We see failed CEO’s walking away with humongous golden parachutes and carpenters with no work.

Our fish are full or mercury. Our beef is full of hormones. Our tween girls are developing too early.

The canadian dollar is worth more than a good old american greenback.

We pay mercenaries 100G’s and grunts maybe 30?

Our injured servicemen are coming home to a nightmare.

RB,

What’s not true about your 3:38?

The author.

By Gonna Love 08

November 15, 2007 4:22 PM | Link to this

RB from Gwinenett,

Let me be the first to day Hillary will be just as bad as Dubya. I dont see any candidates GOP or Dem that i support at this time. No group depends on the soldiers failure, get with the program we shouldnt be there.. So now answer my question about Iraq….

By Bosch

November 15, 2007 4:24 PM | Link to this

RB,

Can you tell us exactly who it is that said something this stupid?

““Well, then we have a problem”? [regarding Iraq]”

Now, I know you have a problem with taking things out of context as evidenced with your Hillary quotes from a few days ago - but I’m just curious as to who said that, the context it was spoken, etc.

Do you know what cherry picking is by chance?

However, if someone was that stupid to say that, and mean it the way you presented it in your post, then I want to know who that idiot is.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this

{{If we’re winning in Iraq, you lose the election.}}

Another Neo-Con idget who doesn’t know that AMERICA HAS ALREADY “WON” IN IRAQ… the “war” is over and has been for over 4 years now. The bad dictator is gone forever. Our troops have accomplished their mission.

Now all we have to do is end the American OCCUPATION of Iraq, and that’s what 75% of America also knows has to be done.

DUHHHH.

By Paul

November 15, 2007 4:42 PM | Link to this

Goldie 12:24

[[I wonder how many $BILLIONS$ of US tax dollars Gen. Moosheriff will be stealing on his way outta Pakistan]]

If you Really want to get depressed (just an expression – I wouldn’t wish that on anyone) I once saw an investigation that estimated the amount of embezzlement, stealing, fraud of several categories of foreign aid by African leaders was… just about equal to the amount of aid given in those categories. Then the people continue to suffer. You’d think these guys would be satisfied with stealing only, oh, a hundred million or so. Oh, care to guess where one of the worst tyrants (Idi Amin) lived after his regime fell? Saudi Arabia. Just one more reason to do all we can so we don’t have to interact with that country.

Good thoughts from Sullivan. Agree with Obama or not, I like the way he really thinks about questions and thoughtfully answers.

Re 12:44

Son of Satan?!!? Aren’t you an agnostic, or something like that?

AmVet

Zooks?

The gameshow, Shakespeare or Pogo?

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this

Since you asked… From the Washington Post.

{{{House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) said Monday that a strongly positive report on progress on Iraq by Army Gen. David Petraeus likely would split Democrats in the House and impede his party’s efforts to press for a timetable to end the war.

“I think there would be enough support in that group to want to stay the course and if the Republicans were to stay united as they have been, then it would be a problem for us,” Clyburn said.}}}

What he said was, if Petraus’ report on Iraq was positive, it’s a problem for the Democrats plans to surrender. War goes good, Dems go bad. You cannot deny that things going better in Iraq has a negative impact on the Dems chances in ‘08 and if things go poorly, their chances improve. You just can’t deny that.

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 4:49 PM | Link to this

Since you asked… From the Washington Post.

{{{House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) said Monday that a strongly positive report on progress on Iraq by Army Gen. David Petraeus likely would split Democrats in the House and impede his party’s efforts to press for a timetable to end the war.

“I think there would be enough support in that group to want to stay the course and if the Republicans were to stay united as they have been, then it would be a problem for us,” Clyburn said.}}}

What he said was, if Petraus’ report on Iraq was positive, it’s a problem for the Democrats plans to surrender. War goes good, Dems go bad. You cannot deny that things going better in Iraq has a negative impact on the Dems chances in ‘08 and if things go poorly, their chances improve. You just can’t deny that.

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

I left off the best part…

{{{Many Democrats have anticipated that, at best, Petraeus and U.S. ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker would present a mixed analysis of the success of the current troop surge strategy, given continued violence in Baghdad. But of late there have been signs that the commander of U.S. forces might be preparing something more generally positive. Clyburn said that would be “a real big problem for us.”}}}

A “positive” report equals “a REAL big problem for us”

Pathetic…

By Gonna Love 08

November 15, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

RB:

Wow you found one Dem that said that, what a coup, so answer the question about Iraq, again what changed in Iraq from 91-01 that we just had to invade them???

By Bikini Bimbo

November 15, 2007 4:52 PM | Link to this

CNN just reported that China is exporting pencils and ammo that contain lead.

Pop Quiz: Name a Chinese Rock Band from the 70’s? Answer: Lead Zepellin.

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 4:53 PM | Link to this

I left off the best part…

{{{Many Democrats have anticipated that, at best, Petraeus and U.S. ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker would present a mixed analysis of the success of the current troop surge strategy, given continued violence in Baghdad. But of late there have been signs that the commander of U.S. forces might be preparing something more generally positive. Clyburn said that would be “a real big problem for us.”}}}

A “positive” report equals “a REAL big problem for us”

Pathetic…

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this

I’m breaking my own rule to reply to this stupid POS, but this is too much:

{{{{By nut job in full glory November 15, 2007 3:43 PM Since Luck is able to take time out his very important schedule to make sure to be first blogger every single day,(Some may suggest that his ability to be first everyday suggests that he must be a loser with no life, but who am I too say that this behavior is sad enough to use the term ‘loser.’)}}}}

Go back to the blog archives, pick a day, any day, and see how many times this wanker tried to beat me being the first post everyday.

I guess this idiot thinks the blog just disappears every evening forever and ever.

What a stroker.

And it’s only because of his ignorance that I always post first, I can’t help it if I’m smarter than this puke puddle.

{{{{Meanwhile a Democrat named Nixon was in cahrge when we left Vietnam in defeat. The only foreign war we’ve lost was when a lib occupied the White House.}}}}

Nixon left an independent South Vietnam that successfully defended itself from the communists for two freaking years, right up until the democrat controlled Congress cut off their funding, in the most cruel and bizarre debacle in American History.

Once again, dic-klicker, it is not my problem that you are too stupid to read a book.

{{{{Oh by the way can you tell us the tales of how the GOP stared down Kruschev during the Cuban Missle Crisis?}}}}

Yes, 45 years later, a little punkas-s country 90 miles from our border is still thumbing their nose at the USA because Kennedy cut and run from it and from Turkey also.

Real bravery that was.

Again, read something every once in awhile, mofo.

I now return you to the relative obscurity that you are so used to, clown.

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

How sad is it that the Repug Party thinks that they can win in ‘08 by calling 75% of America names like “terrorist-enablers”, “defeatocrats”, and “traitors” — all because we all know that our combat mission in Iraq IS OVER, and it’s time to GIVE Iraq BACK TO THE IRAQIS.

Apparently the Repugs are counting on never-ending OCCUPATION OF IRAQ because you don’t believe they can even govern themselves — SHAME ON THE REPUGS!!!

The Repugs are never gonna win in ‘08 if you think that the 24% Club can do it by calling the other 75% of America your favorite s*cky names!!!

By Goldie

November 15, 2007 4:59 PM | Link to this

{{You’d think these guys would be satisfied with stealing only, oh, a hundred million or so. Oh, care to guess where one of the worst tyrants (Idi Amin) lived after his regime fell? Saudi Arabia.}}

Uber-Paul, you do amaze me at times. And we’re never gonna take the Saudis to task until we get a Dem in the White House, that’s fer-sure! Almost 7 years in the “war on terrrr” and not a thing done to stop the real terrorists-enablers…

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 5:01 PM | Link to this

Paul, I don’t remember where I picked it up but have used it since childhood. But Merriam-Webster says I’m archaic!

Gadzooks.

Pronunciation: \gad-ˈzüks, -ˈzu̇ks\

Function: interjection

Usage: often capitalized

Etymology: perhaps from God’s hooks, the nails of the Crucifixion

Date: 1694

archaic — used as a mild oath

By Something for the Repugs to chew on

November 15, 2007 5:02 PM | Link to this

What would George W. Bush and Dick Cheney be saying today if they were campaigning politicians running against a President Clinton (either one of them) who had outsourced our responsibility to retaliate against Osama bin Laden for his 9/11 attacks on our homeland?

“What would Karl Rove have been whipping up for Bush to say and what would Cheney (who needs no Roving ambassador) be saying on his own about a president from the other party who had chosen to allow al Qaeda’s leader to escape into Pakistan’s northern tribal areas of Islamic militancy? …

“What if the reason a President Clinton hadn’t teamed up to launch a joint military operation with Pakistan to capture bin Laden was that he/she had over-extended the U.S. military and gotten the troops pinned down in Iraq — and had to divert resources from efforts to crush the forces that attacked America’s mainland in 2001 so that in 2007 he/she still couldn’t complete the retaliation he/she had pledged to lead? What if a President Clinton had actually allowed bin Laden to remain at large, videotaping his taunts against America, whose president had vowed to get him, dead or alive, many years ago?

“We all know the answer: What Bush-Cheney-Rove and company would have done to either Clinton would have made what they did to one-time Vietnam War POW John McCain, triple-amputee Vietnam veteran Max Cleland and Vietnam Purple Heart medalist John Kerry look like a Crawford, Texas, picnic. They would have accused either Clinton of selling out and ducking out, of cutting and running from the vow to get Osama bin Laden and crush al Qaeda…”Bush-Cheney-Rove would have had America believing that a President Clinton who had done all of the above had sold America and our Star-Spangled Banner to the terrorists. They would have had us distrusting and despising a president who had been so weak after talking so tough.

“And they would have been right.”

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Didn’t we have a Democrat in the White House for eight years before President Bush was elected? How did that crackdown on Saudi Arabia go then, Goldielox?

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this

This is pathetic even for Blowhard.

{{{{The only thing I take umbrage with though, is how a couple, either confuse the poorly written, pathetic jackers with me, or even more feebly, profess that I am creating them.}}}}

After sucking up to Gold Star Mom all day, he’s now calling “her” stupid for not writing like him.

By Bikini Bimbo

November 15, 2007 5:19 PM | Link to this

Today’s weather: Widely scattered vespers, fire and brimstone for a litany of tempests.

Name a Chinese Rock Band from the 70’s: Lead Zepellin.

By Paul

November 15, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

Life’s full of surprises!

Well, the official religion of Saudi Arabia is one of the most virulent forms of radical Islam - Wahabbism. Not to go conspiracy theory on anyone, but the royal families (only about ten thousand cousins, here) have pumped money into the US for decades in the form of think tanks, Islamic studies departments, institutes - small wonder so many viewed the country as benign for so long. Of course, their conspicuous consumption doesn’t do much for a view of them as zealots, either. I suppose hypocrisy knows no religious boundaries.

I’ve long advocated taking steps to eliminate our need for Mideast oil. I know, people will come back with “world markets, can’t trace source, etc” - but such steps would greatly reduce petroleum consumption - which is the bottom line.

AmVet

At first I thought it might have been from Zippy Pinhead, but that was “Yow” or “Yowza!”

By John in Tampa, FLA

November 15, 2007 5:25 PM | Link to this

Florida State Represenative Bob Allen (R) found guilty of agreeing to pay $20.00 to perform oral sex on an undercover cop at a Titusville public restroom.

What is it with repugs and public restrooms?

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 5:25 PM | Link to this

The liberal baby-killing chameleon is trying desperately to change his spots, so it would seem:

Giuliani Woos Conservatives on Judges

Presidential contender Rudy Giuliani has been winning over some conservative Republicans by promising to appoint judges in the mold of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and others who might seem likely to limit the reach of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

Judges he named as New York mayor, however, could never be mistaken for Scalia.

Many anti-abortion activists are unmoved by Giuliani’s promise to appoint conservative judges.

“Rudy Giuliani has not changed his position _ he is running as a pro-abortion candidate; he’s been consistent with that,” David N. O’Steen, executive director of the National Right to Life Committee, said Tuesday, when the group endorsed Giuliani rival Fred Thompson, a former Tennessee senator.

By RB from Gwinnett

November 15, 2007 5:29 PM | Link to this

By Gonna Love 08 4:50 PM I told you already, I’ll speak to your Bin Laden question and Iraq right after you explain how you can support a party who benefits politically from the defeat of our servicemen and women. You do know their defeat means they come home in body bags, right? Remember poor Gold Star Mom from earlier today, right? You know, the one who’s sons death benefits your party? Remember her? You were sympathetic to her, but benefit from he sons death. Help me understand that.

You asked “who said that” and I gave it to you. Then you make a completely stupid comment about it only being 1 person. Try somehow in your feeble little mind to deny that our soldiers deaths in Iraq don’t benefit your chances of winning in ‘08. I can’t wait to hear it.

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 5:37 PM | Link to this

Paul, and to think I must regularly suffer the indignities of these ill-bred and sarcastic louts!

Some people have no sense of humor.

Yowza!

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this

Soldiers from 2-2 SCR patrol through what months ago were some of the most dangerous streets of all Iraq: South Baghdad. Months ago this likely would have resulted in a serious firefight. Tonight, 14 November 2007, we patrolled with members of the Iraqi National Police. All along the way people were happy to see us. Stores were opening. Kids were playing soccer or following us block after block. Some adults were playing ping-pong here and there, while others welcomed us to talk, including a couple of older Iraqi women who talked on and on and on, until finally the soldiers had to make an excuse to leave. I’ve seen this in many places in Iraq. When the older women get a chance to tell about their neighborhood, they want to tell about the whole neighborhood – on and on and on. Sometimes the soldiers make fake radio calls so they can leave.

By Buy Danish

November 15, 2007 5:43 PM | Link to this

Just stopping by briefly to mark an important milestone ignored by the MSM, but recognized by The Religion of Peace.

The establishment media is seemingly obsessed with “grim milestones” in the War on Terror, as the Associated Press reminds us this past weekend. But in the next week those same establishment media outlets will probably stand mute when yet another “grim milestone” is reached – the 10,000th attack by Islamic terrorists and militants since 9/11, which is responsible for approximately 60,000 dead and 90,000 injured.

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 5:52 PM | Link to this

Check this out:

1) “Gold Star Mother” and AmVet(eran)

See anything in common?

2) {{{{By “Gold star mom” November 15, 2007 10:28 AM Spockduh, and Luckoduh, (Insert first moron sentence here)}}}}

{{{{By AmVet November 15, 2007 11:42 AM Gold Star Mom, (Insert first moron sentence here)}}}}

The same exact paragraph composition.

After I pointed that out at 1:15, “mom” made a change, uh, actually, several changes:

{{{{By “Gold Star Mom” November 15, 2007 1:52 PM Moron (Luckoduh): (Insert first moron sentence here)}}}}

{{{{By “Gold Star Mom” November 15, 2007 2:18 PM Moron (Luckoduh)(Insert first moron sentence here)}}}}

3) A shared life altering obsession with Andy!:

Remember, I hadn’t said the first word to the bit-ch yet, I mean, DimVet, and here it attacks me-

{{{{By “Gold star mom” November 15, 2007 10:28 AM Spockduh, and Luckoduh, I find your writings about Code Pink to be some of the dumbest writings i have ever seen.}}}}

{{{{By AmVet November 15, 2007 11:42 AM Gold Star Mom, So with that in mind, don’t pay any attention to Andy/Luckoduh/Whatever.}}}}

Continued-

By Buy Danish

November 15, 2007 5:57 PM | Link to this

Blowhard AmVet is experimenting with his female side - just like Polly!

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 5:57 PM | Link to this

Continued-

4} And finally, of course, the lovely “spontaneous” conversation between the “two:”

{{{{By Gold Star Mom November 15, 2007 11:54 AM Am Vet, Thanks for your words. I dont use blogs but by seeing his comments just struck a nerve with me. You big hunk of man love.}}}}

Isn’t just the most silly and pathetic ploy that someone can use in a debate?

What does this wanker think we’re going to do, burst into tears and fall to our knees at the very sight of his fake nickname?

Maybe call the White House and tell them to surrender Now!

This ridiculousness may work in the classroom but out here in the real world it don’t fly.

Quit trying to censor people you lowlifes, this is a free country.

Deal with it.

By Bikini Bimbo

November 15, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

Thanks for being brief, Dye. By George I think she’s got it!

By Gonna Love 08

November 15, 2007 6:11 PM | Link to this

RB from Gwinnett,

I dont support any political parties so i dont think either of them benefit, though you could make a case for both parties benefiting, ala Dubya benefiting from McCain being a pow and adopting a black girl from mother teresa (you remember that dont ya?) so this is where you are greatly mistaken, I DONT BENEFIT from our soldiers death, nor have i ever said i had….So unlike you and luckodumb i support whoever is best for this country and dont get caught up in what is better for the party instead of what is better for the nation….

By getalife

November 15, 2007 6:12 PM | Link to this

Yes duh,

Just don’t be vet expressing your opinion at a vet parade or old up a sign saying you did not vote for w.

Geez.

By Buy Danish

November 15, 2007 6:17 PM | Link to this

Hey everybody, don’t forget to watch the great debate tonight - 8:00 on CNN.

By Deep Throat

November 15, 2007 6:21 PM | Link to this

Don’t ask but three or four years ago I ghost-wrote a white paper for an outgoing Congressman—whom I can’t ID except to say that he was GOP, black, from TX—who’d taken time out from politics to spend more time with his family. And with the oil business. No big deal except that the research collected for the confidential paper showed very convincingly that there are more oil reserves of the coastal Horn of Africa than in and around the Persian Gulf. So, a game theorist’s wet dream, a new game outcome: Win-Win-Win-Win-Win-Win!

By @@

November 15, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this

One down. From Stratfor:

(((But as the United States and Iran continue to threaten each other as part of their respective national strategies, Berlin has had a change of heart. Stratfor sources within various EU governments have said that, in the past week, the Germans have essentially flipped.)))

(((In part, the shift came because the German leadership realizes that recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports indicate that Iran’s secrecy about the details of its nuclear program has deepened of late, and that therefore additional sanctions are perhaps justified.)))

(((But the shift in the German position re-establishes the Western diplomatic wall on the issue, giving the Iranians one less crack to wedge open.))) Speaking of cracks…

PoliFore, what are you talking about? I don’t even comment on Wooten’s everday and then it’s usually once. I’m down to maybe 3 or 4 tops here. You’re paranoid buddy.

(((By Bikini Bimbo a/k/a PoliFore November 15, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this)))

(((Just let it go. You and @@ are so easily sent off scurrying between wooten and lucko and reread every post- it’s really funny to watch.)))

Speaking of “letting it go”. Maybe it’s time to let go of your pecker before it starts looking like Pinnochio’s nose.

Those two little holes at the base? That’s where yours and HIS gonads USED to be.

Blog on.

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 6:25 PM | Link to this

John,

I think somebody posted an extensive list a while back, but just how many is this now???!!!

And why is it that they are virtually always Republicans???!!!

It seems as if just random odds would dictate that the incredible percentage of perverts being from the GOP isn’t probable.

Any guesses, neo-cons?

Florida State Represenative Bob Allen (R) found guilty of agreeing to pay $20.00 to perform oral sex on an undercover cop at a Titusville public restroom.

What is it with repugs and public restrooms?

By Bikini Bimbo

November 15, 2007 6:26 PM | Link to this

Shave.

By Paul

November 15, 2007 6:27 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish

Isn’t this another of the “ask a question via video” debates?

I’d like to hazard a guess that the Clinton campaign’s warning to Blitzer - and Bill’s criticism (can I call Pres Clinton “Bill”? If Sen Clinton’s “Hillary”…) may have the unintended effect of pushing Blitzer to be just a bit more engaging than he’s been of late. Especially after his lighthanded approach with Pres Carter.

By Abbie

November 15, 2007 6:32 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Those Beantown vets were out of line, disruptive, defiant of the police and demonstrating without a proper permit. If their exercise of free speech outweighs all this, then the court should exonerate them and heads should roll at BPD. In the meantime, they get booked and bailed like anybody else. No cop in Boston I ever saw would relish arresting vets voicing their anti-war convictions. It had to have been a bad scene for everybody. Let’s see what the court does.

By Paul

November 15, 2007 6:33 PM | Link to this

@@

Perhaps we’re seeing the return of cooperating for the common good, taking a long-range view of consequences rather than a short-term view of profit.

I can’t help but think the past difficulties with our allies were driven, at least in part, by German leaders’ dislike of Pres Bush and Mitterand’s arrogance, elitism and dislike of… oh, heck, he was Mitterand being Mitterand. But now we have two leaders who put personality on the back burner and look at the common good. Besides which, I think Sarkozy (especially given his background and the state of France’s social situation) really admires America - not America defined by one person, but America that trancends one person.

By Buy Danish

November 15, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

Paul,

I think Wolf may tell the Clintons to eff off and look to getting really good ratings for CNN for a change.

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 6:40 PM | Link to this

As a result, he said that he is faced with the undesirable task of preparing to cease operations at Army bases by mid-February, and lay off about 100,000 defense department employees and an equal number of civilian contractors. A month later, he said, similar moves would have to be made by the Marines.

Here’s an idea. Check the internet activity of your employees at the Defense Department and just flat out fire the ones that are posting on or reading blogs all day. In fact we could probably extend that over the entire Federal government and eliminate the entire national debt in no time.

By SambaMambo

November 15, 2007 6:41 PM | Link to this

Licorice tattoo turned a gunmetal blue…

Myanmar Shave.

By Luckoduh

November 15, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this

{{{{No one, of course, can know the ultimate outcome of this long war. But the vaunted “facts on the ground” now at least admit a trend leading to what might reasonably be called victory: a suppression of the insurgency; a steep reduction in the level of domestic, sectarian violence; the existence of a constitutional government not unfriendly to America; a gradual reduction of American force presence with diminishing American casualties; and the assurance for a period of a continued base of operations from which to handle other possible contingencies in the region.}}}}

This ain’t “victory” in Harry Reid’s weird little world:

{{{{‘It is not getting better, it is getting worse,’ Harry Reid says…}}}}

So if it is getting better for America and worse for Al Qaeda and Harry Reid, which side would Harry be on?

~~~~~~

Look, al-Gitmo is already wasted, in anticipation of the great Shrillary Flame Out debate:

{{{{By getalife November 15, 2007 6:12 PM Just don’t be (a) vet expressing your opinion at a vet parade or (h)old up a sign saying you did not vote for w.}}}}

I know, it’s going to be bad for Shrillary tonite, geez.

By @@

November 15, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this

Paul:

You read the same Stratfor articles I do but for the benefit of everyone else who thinks they know ALL the details but don’t, there’s more:

(((Under Prime Minister Gordon Brown, the United Kingdom has become far more willing to support punitive sanctions, and perhaps even to nudge the situation toward a military resolution — a shift that has left Germany as the only major European power arguing for a softer line.)))

(((Conversations with French President Nicolas Sarkozy pressed home to Merkel that if sanctions were successful, a war could probably be avoided. So while sanctions would interrupt German economic gains, they would certainly be the lesser of two evils. After all, should the Americans go war with Iran, they certainly are not going to stop bombing if they see the “Made in Germany” label on a power plant.)))

(((The United States did offer a sweetener. During Merkel’s Nov. 9-10 visit to U.S. President George W. Bush’s Crawford ranch, Bush — very unofficially — signaled that if the issue of permanent German membership on the U.N. Security Council came to a vote, Berlin could count on an American “aye.”)))

A lot goes on behind the scenes. It’s the kind of stuff we’re not supposed to know about.

Frustrating to some but patience prevails.

By Gonna Love 08

November 15, 2007 6:50 PM | Link to this

RB from Gwinnett:

Still waiting on your answer…..

By getalife

November 15, 2007 6:50 PM | Link to this

Use one name coward,

Yeah, they really were causing a ruckus

Geez.

By Xavier

November 15, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this

I think Sarkozy’s for real. Like a Gaullist without the contempt. And the Germans seem to have gotten the chip off their shoulder from their having dropped a few pegs as a result of reunification. They set a good example, one we should follow when we get humbled after the Social Security tab comes due.

By getalife

November 15, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this

RW,

I thought cons were fiscal cons, they should shrink the rest of the waste.

Gates is on the right track because of the wasted and stolen billions of the Iraq disaster.

Downsize government, it is broken.

Go Gates!

By Paul

November 15, 2007 6:56 PM | Link to this

@@

Thanks for the fill-in. I hadn’t read the article that came out today - if I get done with projects before the debate I’ll check my in box.

Isn’t it amazing - how papers can print stuff we’re not supposed to know about (classified operations) but won’t print other things we’re not supposed to know about - but would give a better understanding of how we get “there” from “here.”

Couldn’t be one reflects poorly on select politicians, the other doesn’t. Nawwwww…….

By getalife

November 15, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

It some good chit duh.

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 7:01 PM | Link to this

In just over an hour, the country will watch the latest Democratic debate.

And it strikes me that the next President of the United States will almost certainly be on that stage tonight.

I’m not sure how I feel about that.

BUT…

Given that the for years now we have had to endure the worst, most incompetent and duplicitous administration in our history, and enabled by the likes of Rove, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Delay, Frist, Craig, ad nauseum, what choice does America really have?

There is simply no way the vast majority of us are willing to take another chance on this awful Republican Party.

No way.

Deal with it, neo-cons. Your demise is at hand.

By Chest Hair Puller

November 15, 2007 7:04 PM | Link to this

getalife, not ruckusology. The question is whether they substantially interfered with the free expression of those who were there playing by fair standing rules. That’s for a court to decide. It’s one of the best things courts can do, decide such cases. It’s beautiful, man.

And I am not a coward, really. Not exactly.

Not here anyway.

Not at the moment.

It was a mistake. We’ve all done things we’re not proud of. I’ve learned from this, and pray for the strength to move on. It’s never happened before, and I intend to see to it that it never will happen again.

“It was a case of accidental plagiarism.”

—John Merrill, Professor Emeritus, School of Journalism, University of Missouri

By getalife

November 15, 2007 7:04 PM | Link to this

US political strategy in Iraq on the brink of failure.

The Iraqi government is in gridlock.

Duh.

By Paul

November 15, 2007 7:07 PM | Link to this

AmVet

Might some say “we voted against Reps in 2006, thinking we’d see progress by a Dem Congress, and didn’t. So we’ll refine our outlook and recognize many running today aren’t running as Bush proteges, but as Reps (whatever that is!).

By Chest Hair Puller

November 15, 2007 7:12 PM | Link to this

You can’t handle success, maggots. Repeat after me: Pax Americana, Pax Americana, Pax Americana…

Ain’t no way 50 + 1 is gonna impregnate Chad for that twisted battleaxe. Rest easy. Count your blessings. Screw your rivals. Screw anything you want.

God doesn’t play dice with the United States of America. We’re too much fun to watch without the chance games.

By Buy Danish

November 15, 2007 7:15 PM | Link to this

While Getalife is whining, it’s as good a time as any to ask:

Is pouring concrete on train tracks to block military shipments just an innocent example of free speech, or is it fair to classify it as sedition?

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 7:17 PM | Link to this

Paul, IMHO, not one of these GOPers, who you assert are not running as proteges of GWB, are believable.

Why?

NOT ONE Republican has looked the nation in the eye and said, “It is true, this administration has done a horrific job of leading the nation. No excuses, no apologies. I will not follow in their foot steps.”

And then outline how they would lead differently/effectively.

Credibility.

Other than Hagel, it is sorely lacking in the free-falling GOP these days and I don’t see the nation getting duped once again by these posers, even though the Dems are merely a slightly better choice.

By AmVet

November 15, 2007 7:19 PM | Link to this

When you mythologists go to bed tonight, don’t forget to pray for rain.

And this time, MEAN IT!

By RW-(the original)

November 15, 2007 7:20 PM | Link to this

getalife,

I’m certainly for smaller government and I think my idea of firing government workers that spend their day on blogs would be a very good start. You’d be one lonely leftist though.

By Gen. Courtesy May

November 15, 2007 8:03 PM | Link to this

Letting cement do the dirty work beats having the cojones to lie down across tracks in front of trains moving munitions. That’s what they did in ‘73 to protest the bombing of Cambodia. Ah, those were the days when protesters were more than vandals.

Sedition? Sounds right. Conspiracy to commit murder? Maybe. One gets you the noose at Leavenworth, the other maybe 20 years in the nearest federal prison. Either way, it completely trashes the legacy of civil disobedience and the whole idea of CD.

By Julia

November 16, 2007 9:01 AM | Link to this

What’s the point of this kind of thing? Does this come out of boredom, a need for affiliation with other H. Clinton-haters, or simple mean-spirited-ness? It’s such a tired concept that it is no longer clever. Here’s a challenge: instead of resorting to this old cliche, how about thinking about what Hillary Clinton and the candidates are saying?