Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2007 > August > 20 > Entry
A wise choice
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (150) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon





DEL.ICIO.US


Comments
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 8:07 AM | Link to this
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 304
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this
Do You Think THEY Ever Think?
By Duh stands for Democrats
August 21, 2007 8:32 AM | Link to this
{{{{A few hundred protesters amassed at the gate of the resort. Police in riot gear used tear gas to hold back about 50 of them, who responded by flinging rocks, branches and plastic bottles. A line of police in riot gear jostled with about 50 demonstrators. A few hundred marched on the front gate of the summit compound shouting taunts. “I’ve heard it’s nothing,” Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said, dismissing the protests as Bush arrived at the Fairmont Le Chateau Montebello. “A couple hundred? It’s sad.”}}}}
“Sad,” hehehe.
Even the Canadians are getting tired of your whining.
~~~~~~
Oh, poor wittle Mookie, on the outs: {{{{The Mahdi leader al-Sadr, once a key government ally, predicted in an interview with Britain’s The Independent newspaper that al-Maliki’s leadership role is doomed because he is seen as a “tool for the Americans.”}}}}
Carry that as-s to Iran, we’ll get to you later.
~~~~~~
{{{{Abdullah Al-Muhajir, a.k.a. Jose Padilla, was convicted Thursday of supporting terrorist activity and, said Associated Press, “conspiracy to murder, kidnap and maim people overseas.” At the Leftist website Daily Kos, Padilla was hailed as an “American Martyr to ‘War on Terror,’” and his trial was compared to the witch hysteria: “As was the case during the witch trials of yesteryear, only the socially unpopular, the mentally ill, and the politically dangerous end up at the end of a noose or in yet another bonfire of political vanity.” The barely literate posting went on to complain that the case against Padilla “hinged on one piece of papar [sic]: an application with his fingerprints.” No mention of the fact that this “one piece of papar” happened to be an Al-Qaeda application.}}}}
If the moonbats can’t identify America’s obvious sworn enemies, how can we expect the left to protect us from them?
And what does this statement say about the liberal mantra of fighting the terrorists in court? Do they want this so they can release them back onto our streets?
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 8:32 AM | Link to this
…if we’d gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn’t have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq. Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein’s government, then what are you going to put in its place? That’s a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off … It’s a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.
The other thing was casualties. Everyone was impressed with the fact we were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had. But for the 146 Americans killed in action, and for their families — (the Gulf War) wasn’t a cheap war. And the question for the president, in terms of whether or not we went on to Baghdad, took additional casualties in an effort to get Saddam Hussein, was how many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth?
Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right.
Dick Cheney, 1994By Sweet Lorraine
August 21, 2007 8:33 AM | Link to this
Good toon. Once again, I’ve seen this same bit in a guest cartoon last month. Vick being tree’d by dogs.
Parallel develoment of comedy by like minded artists.
Not hackery.
I have to believe in Luckovich.
This just in: America has officially become “fed up already” with Iraq, and will no longer pay attention to any news. BTW: Why cant the US army plant IEDs in cars lining the highway and blow the Iraqis up? Why do we have to be the ones getting blown up? I just dont get it, but dont care either, cause I’m sick of the Iraq War, ho hum boredumb!!!!
In an unrelated event, the persistant drought over much of the country has been blamed on the original woodstock hippies who’s chants of “no rain, no rain” have finally been answered by god.
By FrankLeedarling
August 21, 2007 8:34 AM | Link to this
love the do you think link. spot on to bad THEY wont even consider any of the points made by the article
By Hey Mr. Duh
August 21, 2007 8:39 AM | Link to this
That trash you posted about Padilla…
Did it come from a Think Progress post or a commenter on the website?
By Sweet Lorraine
August 21, 2007 8:46 AM | Link to this
The unmentionably aforementioned blog needs mentoring.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 8:47 AM | Link to this
Good morning all - hello AmVet -
I’ve been away for a few days, so did I miss anything fun?
AmVet, like I said, I haven’t been here, but isn’t what you just posted the 1994 Dick Cheney “quagmire” interview?
I think it’s important for people to see.
So, what has the response been from our friends the neos?
By Duh stands for Democrats
August 21, 2007 8:49 AM | Link to this
{{{{By Hey Mr. Duh August 21, 2007 8:39 AM That trash you posted about Padilla… Did it come from a Think Progress post or a commenter on the website?}}}}
Straight from the “Daily Kooks:”
I am not an apologist for Jose Padilla, I belong to no “Free Jose” organizations nor am I a member of any “Jose Padilla defense funds,” although maybe I should have been, maybe we all should have been because when they throw away the keys to Padilla’s cell we will also throw away any pretense to being a nation of laws, a nation that respects human rights, we will throw away a large measure of what once made us a great and civilized nation.
Keep in mind that this guy was caught carrying a filled out application to join Al Qaeda.
Duh.
By Hey Mr. Duh
August 21, 2007 8:54 AM | Link to this
I can see why that would upset a Constitution hater like you.
Your own personal lily white fanny is more important than the priciples this Nation was founded on.
What a shame.
By ron
August 21, 2007 8:56 AM | Link to this
Didn’t care for the cartoon because it reminded me that Vick had been given a plea deal.Put the b******* on trial and let’s find out how big this mess really was.Let’s find out who else is in on it.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 8:57 AM | Link to this
I’m glad Mr. Vick accepted a plea deal, so maybe now, he’ll go to jail peacefully and we won’t have to hear about this anymore.
But, who am I kidding. He’ll probably get about 1000 hours of community service at the Atlanta Humane Society and be back on the field by mid-season.
I didn’t know until last night how much money Vick makes. Is he one of the highest paid QBs in the league? As a lot of you know, I’m not much of this type of football fan - how have the Falcons been doing lately - since Vick’s been on the team?
By GodHatesTrash
August 21, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this
Nice cartoon Mike. Hounds chasing a black man up a tree - reminds me of the good ol’ days of southron kkkonservatism.
If Vick is going to do time for killing dogs, how many centuries should George Dumbya Bush do for killing innocent Iraqis?
Dumbya - trash elected by trash.
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this
Hey Bosch, no nothing much new from our right wing bloggers. I post information and get flamed by the usual suspects, who cannot do anything other than take it personally and make it personal. Kinda sad, but not atypical.
What do you think the response to the 1994 Cheney interview has been from them?
Zero. Nada. Nilch. Nothing.
I mean, what can they say? Apparently the VP had some sort of epiphany after you-know-who was selected in 2000.
And then every single thing he said before, he no longer believed?!!! So he decided to completely ignore his own advice and invade Iraq, ending up in exactly the quagmire he’d already predicted. Brilliant.
More like reckless and deadly, Hey maybe I just stumbled upon two great nicknames for the daring duo!
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 9:07 AM | Link to this
REPORT: 68 Percent Of Foreign Policy Experts Favor Redeployment From Iraq
By Sweet Lorraine
August 21, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this
Cheney’s interview statements about why Bush Senior refused to allow his army to chase the Repudlickan Guard into Baghdad and depose Saddam was pre-911.
911, like money, changes everything.
911 woke up America to the fact that there has been an ongoing jihad war (redundancy intended) against the USA and Israel for decades.
Wrongly, people thought Iraq was the wrong war against the wrong enemy at the wrong time in the wrong place by the wrong people for the wrong cause, but after 911, it’s clear that we’ve been wronged.
‘muff said
By Goldie
August 21, 2007 9:30 AM | Link to this
I’m p!ssed as h3ll at Michael Vick, and I’m wondering if the judge in VA can tack on an extra year of jail time just because he continued to act like a “gangsta” and at the same time make $130 MILLION off the Falcons’ fans… or maybe tack on an extra year just for being so stupid!
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 9:31 AM | Link to this
Amvet, I’m not surprised. They have very little to go on these days.
I found this kind of funny this morning:
“Keep in mind that this guy was caught carrying a filled out application to join Al Qaeda.”
So Al Qaeda has applications? Too bad we can’t just find their filing cabinet. Wow, that would make things a lot easier.
Here’s my take on the Al Qaeda job application:
Name - Country of origin - Are you willing to be a suicide bomber? Yes or no.If you answered “yes” to question 3 you may skip questions 4-50 of the application, and simply sign in the appropriate section at the end of the application (on a separate sheet of paper, you will need to provide contact information for your next of kin).
Thank you for applying with Al Qaeda! Allah is great!
By Midori
August 21, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this
Bosch,
one thing you have missed/escaped is RW’s wrath.
He showed up out of nowhere yesterday to attack me.
He loves referring to me as a “parrot”.
I keep asking him to find some new material when he goes on the attack, but to no avail.
One thing you can’t accuse those folks of is originality.
Isn’t it ironic, tho: a foaming at the mouth, blind to the truth right wing parrot hurling that epithet at others?
I’m trying to take it easy on him, tho, as I’m aware he’s a failure both in and out of the bedroom.
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this
Well, it is going to be a long day. All the loony libs are here protesting already.
IN THE NEWS is giving us the usual hate columns from Democratic Underground.
Amvet digs up a 1994 column by Dick Cheney to keep us up to date. Gets all excited!!
Mr. Duh is mad as everything because terrorist Padilla was legally convicted of wanting and planning to kill his fellow Americans. Then Mr. Duh throws in a little bigotry tantrum…”your lily white fanny” referring to another blogger.
Bosch is thrilled over the 13 year old news article because it was written by Cheney. Dig up anything you can find and try to make something of it.
The second and regular liberal bigot GOD HATES TRASH throws out his own trash. Compares the President of the USA to dog killer Vick. Then tries to connect conservatives to the KKK.
Sweet Loraine, who is probably PoFo, is still stuck in Woodstock of hippie times and drug abuse.
Yep, going to be a long day. What next? Absolute proof that the Bush administration is involved in dog fighting in Iraq? Read it in Democrat Underground.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this
Sweet Lorraine, Please forgive me, I hate to say anything bad to someone with “Sweet” in their name, but your theory, while true, is quite banal.
By Hey Mr. Dusty
August 21, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this
Is that all you got?
The same old “review”?
What are you Medved-Lite?
What a shame.
By I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning
August 21, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this
“throws in a little bigotry tantrum…”your lily white fanny” referring to another blogger.”
and then
“who is probably PoFo, is still stuck in Woodstock of hippie times and drug abuse.”
By Trekkie Dull
August 21, 2007 9:44 AM | Link to this
Why are you mocking the job application Bosch?
At the time of his arrest Padilla also had a Star Trek communicator in his possession. No telling what sort of evil he was communicating with.
His special Cracker Jack Decoder Ring was another treacherous tool in his possession.
Tc’tak Du-oin Ch’tukin….Translated from Klingon means “Be very afraid of the evil-doers.”
Be very afraid. Be very very afraid Bosch, they now possess our technologies.
DuDu Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 9:55 AM | Link to this
Hello Midori - I’m sorry you had to endure all that, but, yes, try to take it easy on them, like I said, they have very little these days to make them happy.
Wait a minute, did Dusty just call Duh a bigot? Are they in a quagmire with one another?
Yes, Dusty it is likely to be a long day, and just to answer your comment, no I’m not thrilled about the 13 year old interview with Cheney. I find it quite disturbing. I’ve changed my mind about lots of things in the past 13 years, but I didn’t think the first Iraq war was a good idea, and I certainly did not think it was a good idea 4 1/2 years ago - and now.
This really bothers me about the British
So as the British leave, the insurgents are killing them - as the forces leave they’ll be sitting ducks for attack. Good lord, this is a quagmire.
Tschüß!
By N-GA
August 21, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this
So if you are caught with a CIA application when you visit Iran they can stone you to death? What about an “I LUV B.O.” button?
DuhDuhDumbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 10:00 AM | Link to this
Trekkie, I’m not mocking it — Do you know how some things in life get to be so absolutely absurd that you just can’t help but laugh? I mean, you’ve gotten mad, you’ve cried, you’ve gotten mad again, over and over, and then there is nothing left - so you just laugh. Haven’t you ever been in a situation like that?
Tschüß!
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 10:00 AM | Link to this
Ah, more liberal “news”!!!
I am guessing that AMVET is going to post the transcript of Pres. Clinton’s day in court when he lied under oath. That was not even 13 years ago and now Clinton’s back on stage with his wife trying for her election. Ho hum. More of the same.
Bosch is sure he knows more than the courts that found Padilla guilty.
And RW, who isn’t even here today, is the subject of accusations from a Peeping Thomasina who “knows” what is going on in everybody’s bedroom. Silly girl!!
But I commend Sweet Lorraine for seeing through the haze and remembering that things changed after 9/11. That’s amazing. Few liberals even want to mention 9/11.
Ang Goldie actually posted something on the cartoon of the day without condemning conservatives in the process. Way to go, Goldie!!
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this
Federal mine safety official’s credentials questioned
HECK OF A JOB, STICKY!
By GodHatesTrash
August 21, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this
Dusty, you stupid hillbilly kkklown - Vick is 10 times the man Dumbya is.
Mike Vick - lower than whale sh-it. Dumbya - way lower than that.
Dumbya is pure unadulterated trash, just like the MORONS that support him.
Trash.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this
This is bothersome too:
Top Shiite says Britain has given up in Iraq
By Hey Mr. Dusty
August 21, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this
If your “reviews” were films you’d owe us stars.
What a shame.
By Midori
August 21, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this
what do you know about his bedroom Crusty?
are you another dissatisfied customer?
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 10:12 AM | Link to this
Dusty, When have I said ONE THING about Padilla? The actual court case? For your information, I’m glad the b******* is in jail!
Damn, woman, you really don’t have much to go on these days so you have resorted to making s** up!
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this
Dusty, I know I’m wasting my time here, but do you have ANYTHING useful to contribute to the conversation other than pointless and juvenile commentary?
Anything at all?
By Midori
August 21, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this
{{{{{{{{If your “reviews” were films you’d owe us stars.
What a shame.}}}}}}}}
ROFL!!!
So true.
So very funny AND true!!!
Crusty - the gift that keeps on taking.
By Duh stands for Democrat
August 21, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this
{{{{By Bosch August 21, 2007 9:31 AM I found this kind of funny this morning:“ Keep in mind that this guy was caught carrying a filled out application to join Al Qaeda.” So Al Qaeda has applications? Too bad we can’t just find their filing cabinet. Wow, that would make things a lot easier.}}}}
I thought listening to your religious leaders and flying fully loaded airplanes into skyscrapers was a pretty stupid thing to do, I guess these terrorists aren’t the sharpest knives in the drawer.
But check it out, you potential mass murderers out there, all you have to do is act stupid and the left will let you off the hook.
They don’t mind seeing thousands of innocent Americans killed, obviously.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this
A few nights ago, for example, we witnessed the death of one American soldier and the critical wounding of two others when a lethal armor-piercing explosive was detonated between an Iraqi Army checkpoint and a police one. Local Iraqis readily testified to American investigators that Iraqi police and Army officers escorted the triggermen and helped plant the bomb. These civilians highlighted their own predicament: had they informed the Americans of the bomb before the incident, the Iraqi Army, the police or the local Shiite militia would have killed their families
By GodHatesTrash
August 21, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this
You know, those dogs that Vick killed were sh-it eating dogs - by killing those dogs Vick inadvertently made the world safer for Dusty and Duh’s brains.
Duh and Dusty - stupid hillbilly kkklown sh-it4brains trash.
By Hey Mr. Duh
August 21, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this
You then highly favor having the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA used as neo con charmin.
What a shame.
By tiff
August 21, 2007 10:27 AM | Link to this
If only we had the out-cry in this country over the war in Iraq that we have had over this Michael Vick case. The billions we could have put into health care, housing and urban, social security, our failing school system, so many other things I can think of this blog won’t even hold. “DOG FIGHTING” is to say the least horrible, but I know people in law enforcement at the highest level and they will tell you a plea is not always what it seems.
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
August 21, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this
The really sad part about all of this Padilla debate is that we even know about it. If things were run the wingnut way, he simply would have disappeared and been “liquidated.” American citizens who are accused of being terrorists should be identified as such by the President, declared an enemy combatant, snatched off the street and beaten for entertaiment and/or info and summarily executed without benefit of trial.
The whole problem with the Padilla case is that the system “worked” just when we were trying to show that the American legal system, like the Geneva Convention, was outdated and unworkable in a post-9/11 world. Now there is little hope that the President will have this important power. And as long as people have the Right to a public trial before a jury of his peers, the terrorists win.
RWNJIFG
By mm
August 21, 2007 10:45 AM | Link to this
More distortions and outright lies from the low IQ crowd. Don’t you wingnuts get tired of posting proposterous comments like:
Duh - [[But check it out, you potential mass murderers out there, all you have to do is act stupid and the left will let you off the hook.
They don’t mind seeing thousands of innocent Americans killed, obviously.]]
No Duh, if you support the war you are the one who doesn’t care about American lives. You would rather see an American soldier killed in Iraq than feed a hungy person in Atlanta.
Dusty - Still whining about Clinton lying about a BJ. Nobody died as a result. Fastforward to Bush. He lied about Iraq to American citizens, Congress, and the world. Thousands upon thousands have died.
You should put your thimble sized brains in gear before you put your keyboards in motion.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this
“This is the report the president has said over and over that he will use to decide where we go from here in Iraq,” concluded Schieffer. “Maybe it’s because I’ve been dragged down the old rabbit trail too many times by too many people with something to hide, but this does not sound like we’re headed to a straight answer.”
By getalife
August 21, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
Dick Cheney Once Again Claims He Isn’t Part Of Executive Branch.
The Dems caved again and dick will get away again.
He told Specter to not issue subpoenas and now Leahy said ok too.Pathetic.
Yes, England lost Basra and will withdraw from Iraq.
Our media stopped covering Iraq so you have to get info. from the British media.
Malarki went to Iran and Syria so dick wants him replaced. The dems will okay the surge to do this.
WTF Vick?
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this
Certain bloggers attention deficit disorder and ostrich characteristics aside, Clinton’s lie is not responsible for 3700+ American KIA, 25,000+ Americans wounded, 75,000+ Iraqi civilian deaths (a very, very conservative estimate), nor expenditures approaching half a TRILLION dollars.
Mr. Cheney’s stupidity, along with the President’s is.
Their complete arrogance, shameless hypocrisy, willfully blind intransigence and utter incompetence in this matter, and numerous others for that matter, are the news of the day, though apparently Dick had some small semblance of Clinton-like intellect 13 years ago.
It is becoming clear that this administration with no real allies is NEVER going to be able to find and kill OBL. It will take a non neo-con to do it and to effectively pursue the fight against our enemies.
And it will take American voters who are willing to swear off the worst of the GOP, unless and until they are replaced by men who will not imitate these sorry, inept ways.
By Tasty Tidbit
August 21, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this
{{{Fox News spokesman justifies Sean Hannity’s fundraiser for Rudy Giuliani as follows: “Sean is not a journalist.”}}}
No Duh!
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
August 21, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this
Duh,
I agree with you that the left, the democrats, the independents who don’t support Bush, and the RINO’s who have turned their back on Bush (about 70% of the pop.) do not mind seeing thousands of Americans killed. They could care less. They are indifferent. They keep doing the same things without any hope for success while soldiers die and all the while insist on staying the course because they do not care about dead American troops.
This is why I have insisted that we open up camps and systematically murder more than half of the US population. I call it Final Solution II. How can you share a country with people who are no better than our enemies, Duh? If you are willing to stand up and say things about your fellow citizens that essentially demonstrate that they are unworthy to live how can you not support killing them all? What is the differnce between a liberal and Bin Laden? As you have pointed out many times there isn’t any. However, I have repeatedly tried to get you to support what is an obvious plan to rid our country of Al Qeada types and you are too hypocritical to join. Why is that?
But back to the point, the left doesn’t care about thousands of dead Americans and that is true. What is also true is that they don’t have the balls to argue that there is a need for another 9/11.
I went back and looked at the tapes of Fox News when they were “covering” the Stu Barofsky? editorial stating that there was a need for another 9/11 and here is what was said:
John Gibson: I agree that it will take thousands of dead Americans to wake us up.
Brian Kilmeade (about the column): I think he has a point.
John Gibson on radio: America needs another 9/11.
This is an obvious endorsement for another 9/11 attack. The left doesn’t “mind” dead Americans, but only the Right has a “need” to see dead Americans.
Given that I am a winger and I only watch Fox and I think as I am told, I am again calling for a terrorsist attack on America until some winger friend out there can tell me why Fox was wrong to endorse this editorial and not fire thise who specifically endorsed the idea on the air.
RWNJIFG
By mm
August 21, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this
I may be wrong, but I believe congress only funded the war through September. They can still cut off the money (if they have any stones).
Be advised, the Betrayus report will say we are making progress. We need to give it more time. SSDD. We’ve been hearing this BS for 4 years. And the wingnuts lick it up right off the dirty floor.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this
AmVet, I read an article in Sunday’s AJC about Sam Nunn - what do you think about him? I always liked Nunn.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
DOWNTOWN SAN DIEGO – Poway defense contractor Brent Wilkes, charged with fraudulently obtaining millions of dollars in government contracts, will have an attorney paid for by taxpayers
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this
sweet @9:11 - “911, like money, changes everything.
911 woke up America to the fact that there has been an ongoing jihad war (redundancy intended) against the USA and Israel for decades.
Wrongly, people thought Iraq was the wrong war against the wrong enemy at the wrong time in the wrong place by the wrong people for the wrong cause, but after 911, it’s clear that we’ve been wronged.”
Uh, still not clear how 9/11 changed conditions in Iraq…maybe its more of those known unknowns we don’t know about…sounds dumber than duh…
Dust ball - there are no Clintons in the white house sweetie, and haven’t been for two terms…I’ll be remembering your “But Clinton” mantra when you clueless repugs start regurgitating your new Rove mantra in ‘09…”Iraq is Dems fault”…I have a carefully planned blog speech prepared entitled, “But Bush sucked Dck in ‘01”
Bosch and ITN…thank god you’re back…there has been no intelligent life here!
By Buy Danish
August 21, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this
Parrot,
Aw, poor widdle wee one, can’t take being called a “parrot”.
This from someone who accused me recently of being the sort of person who enjoys beheading children.
The sound you hear is not that of a violin.
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this
Ho hum
Bosch has lost his memory.Talks about Padilla and then conveniently forgets.
Bush lied and Clinton only told LITTLE LIES. Yeah, and 9/11 never happened and there are no terrorists to fight and nobody trying to kill us. Libs continue their fight against……American citizens.
Padilla is innocent because liberals said so. Who needs a court when you’ve got liberals???
Good liberal GOD HATES TRASH still coughing it up on the blog.
There’s also Peeping Thomasino who loves to talk “dirt” even when no one is interested but her.
Amvet, I believe Prime Minister Brown can handle the British situation quite well without your help. He and President Bush have had conferences and keep in touch. Maybe they would love your advice but I doubt it.
mm..off his rocker again. Let me quote him:”You had rather see an American soldier killed in Iraq than feed a hungry person in Atlanta.” Pure ANTI-AMERICAN protest material during war time…to lie about a fellow conservative.
Poor getalife. Democrats in Congress keep trying to pin something on Cheney. When he explains that what they are doing is not legal nor constitutional, they get all flustered and stop the foolishness.
Congressional Democrats kinda remind me of liberals here. Losers all.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 11:49 AM | Link to this
Raisedanidiot - Glad to be back.
I’m SO glad you pointed that out:
“Uh, still not clear how 9/11 changed conditions in Iraq”
AND, how ironic is that Sweet Lorraine’s post was at 9:11? Weird.
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 11:50 AM | Link to this
To me, Nunn is very much a mixed bag. I believe he would have a broad cross section of appeal as he is considered a moderate Democrat.
I liked some of his voting record in regards to the environment, government reform and on some civil rights issues. IF he ran, I would look at him very closely.
And I believe that a semi-hawkish Democrat could do infinitely better against our enemies than you-know-who.
But when the haters on the far-right read the following they will swear he is nothing but a garden-variety commie!
He is a self-professed New Democrat and an adherent of the “Third Way” instead of left-right debate. Read on:
America and the world have changed dramatically in the closing decades of the 20th century. The industrial order of the 20th century is rapidly yielding to the networked “New Economy” of the 21st century. Our political and governing systems, however, have lagged behind the rest of society in adapting to these seismic shifts. They remain stuck in the left-right debates and the top-down bureaucracies of the industrial past.
The core principles and ideas of this “Third Way” movement [began with] Bill Clinton’s Presidential campaign in 1992, Tony Blair’s Labour Party in Britain in 1997, and Gerhard Shroeder’s Social Democrats in Germany in 1998.
The Third Way philosophy seeks to adapt enduring progressive values to the new challenges of the information age. It rests on three cornerstones: the idea that government should promote equal opportunity for all while granting special privilege for none;
an ethic of mutual responsibility that equally rejects the politics of entitlement and the politics of social abandonment;
and, a new approach to governing that empowers citizens to act for themselves.
The Third Way approach to economic opportunity and security stresses technological innovation, competitive enterprise, and education rather than top-down redistribution or laissez faire. On questions of values, it embraces “tolerant traditionalism,” honoring traditional moral and family values while resisting attempts to impose them on others. It favors an enabling rather than a bureaucratic government, expanding choices for citizens, using market means to achieve public ends and encouraging civic and community institutions to play a larger role in public life. The Third Way works to build inclusive, multiethnic societies based on common allegiance to democra
By luckovichisaheadcase
August 21, 2007 11:51 AM | Link to this
IN THE (false) News - top 10 conservative idiots? The top 10 liberal idiots would be much more difficult to name as that includes almost all of them, since the one truly intelligent one, Daniel P. Moynihan, died five or so years ago. I guess you would start it with Al Gore and Jimmy Carter and then work on down, for you can only go down on that list. When it comes to liberals there is no up - eternal pessimists, the end of the world is nigh.
By bon scott
August 21, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this
Hail to the chief!! He can do absolutely nothing right:
Rove is leaving because there is nothing more for him to do; Bush is letting him go because he no longer has any use for him. His departure effectively marks the end of the Bush presidency - from hereon in Bush’s tenure is about keeping the troops in Iraq and as many of his administration out of handcuffs as possible. Last week Fox News asked the neocon commentator Charles Krauthammer how much time Bush had to promote his agenda. “None,” said Krauthammer. “It’s over. There is no agenda.”
A Bush aide once ridiculed a New York Times reporter for belonging to “the reality-based community”, which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality”. “That’s not the way the world really works any more,” he said. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality - judiciously, as you will - we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
Isn’t baseless arrogance a b—ch???
All hail the naked King. Don’t bother looking for his clothes. He wouldn’t know how to put them on if you DID find them.
By TMc
August 21, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this
The stupidest comment ever made by a liberal.
By OC
August 21, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this
We currently have a former drug using, military service dodging, lying retard for a president. I think an intelligent black man could do no worse. At the stage this country is in with this president, Gilligan and the Skipper would be a welcome improvement.
Obama talks properly and he talks to people like he is one of them. His education allows him to talk to the most sophisticated, and his upbringing allows him to talk to the lowest in this society.
Some idiot made this comment at Rick Badie’s column today.
Is Obama black enough? If you think blacks are the lowest in this society, then Obama is black enough.
There’s a liberal fool born every 2 seconds.
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 12:02 PM | Link to this
Strange, I mention no real allies in our “war” in Iraq and someone pops off about Prime Minister Brown. Huh?
BTW, many of our “allies” are kind of neo-con like. They pay lots and lots of lip service to the effort, but none of them are actually doing anything on the ground, much less standing beside one of our guys and watching his back in a fire fight.
Long before the British decided to cut their losses, we were on our own. Yes, the faithful can technically spin it to say we had a “coalition”, but that is just more GOP claptrap to make themselves feel better.
No one in the world, in their right minds, is going to send their kids to that hopeless loser of a situation when Bush and Cheney can just get keep getting ours killed instead.
After the past four years, would you, as the leader of another country, trust them to make good decisions?
Me either.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this
Dusty, As much as you try, honey, you are not very good at twisting and spinning words. Name one time I mentioned Padilla, himself, or the court case BEFORE my posts about the job application(I was making a joke about the Al Qaeda application)- please stop the lies!
AmVet, How funny. Dusty thinks that PM Brown is a conservative like Bush is. They also think that Merkel, and the French PM, can’t remember his name, are also conservative like Bush.
I guess that Dusty doesn’t remember the fact that PM Brown is replacing Blair who was outed because he was Bush’s lap dog. Shh…don’t tell her, just let her keep thinking that, it could be fun later.
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
August 21, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this
Dusty says: “Libs continue their fight against……American citizens.”
You are right. Let’s declare war on liberals and kill them all!!!! They are the real enemy anyway, right? How can we win the war on terror before we’ve won the war againt liberals? They aren’t really Americans anyway. Hell, they aren’t even real human beings. Lets do away with them. Haven’t we dehumanized them enough so that it feels good to want to kill them? I mean by the time a Madrassa teaches Muslims to feel the way about Jews that you feel about liberals, they are ready to kill some. The great thing about America is that you don’t have to go to a school to learn that liberals are sub-human you can just turn on the radio or Fox News. These media outlets have you thinking right so why are you sitting back and not promoting some real action against these parasitic rats? They are the last thing standing between us and victory in the War on Terror. Do you want to lose that war and die or would you rather kill people who don’t think like you and I? Your answer is obvious, you just need to acknowledge it.
RWNJIFG
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this
I’ve got to run out a bit - AmVet, where did you find that information for that post? I want to discuss this a little more later.
I’ll be back this afternoon.
Tschüß until later!
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 12:16 PM | Link to this
Bosch - as far as Dust ball goes…resistence is futile…they are borg! You’re just beating your head against the virtual wall…she won’t voice an original opinion, she won’t engage in real debate, she won’t even address any of your questions…see, watch this…
“Poor getalife. Democrats in Congress keep trying to pin something on Cheney. When he explains that what they are doing is not legal nor constitutional, they get all flustered and stop the foolishness.”
dust ball, what are “they” (dem congress) doing that is not legal or constitutional? and…investigating corruption and deceit in our government is foolishness? Give me your best comeback, come on…you can give it a little try….pppllleeeaase!
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this
Bosch, here’s the link:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/BillNelsonPrinciples+Values.htm
Also, lots of great stuff here:
http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/3476406.html
Not the last paragraph about how “produced a Democratic Party that operates nationally more or less at parity with the Republican Party”.
No wonder nothing gets done in Washington these days…
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 12:30 PM | Link to this
Bosch@ 12:03
How many times do we have to “correct” your memory ? Read your very own post at 9:31. You were making excuses for Pedilla. You are trying to wiggle out of that one but it is in print.
Tony Blair was Prime Minister for TEN years. Yeah, the British really rushed him out, didn’t they?
Then Blair’s own Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, took his place. They both get along with Bush and the British are our best allies.
Also, the French elected a new leader who immediately started making friendly overtures to the USA and George Bush.
I don’t twist words, Bosch. You would like to think that because I don’t agree with you. Nevermind your “analysis”. Your mind is a closed book and I am not interested in the contents.
By Correction
August 21, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this
The Bosch mind is a book with the pages missing. Empty from cover to cover.
By getalife
August 21, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
Poor crusty the clown.
Too stupid to realize she is the biggest loser on this blog.
Hell, she gets crushed at wingnut wooten’s blog.
Poor crusty, a total loser on both blogs.
Geez.
By Hey Mr. Dusty
August 21, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this
You just don’t get it do you?
You have lost.
All over this nation American patriots are calling for change. Calling for an end to the failed conservative agenda. It’s generational shift time, old boy.
Funny to use rapture talk, but you have been left behind.
What a shame.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this
dust ball - you don’t twist words because you’re just not that smart. I saw nothing in Bosch’s 9:31 that could be construed as “making excuses for Pedilla” or even eluding to his guilt or innocence…again, another non-issue to divert…you neo-cons are so adept at that! And yes, GB is sick to death of they’re neo-con heads just like here in the good ‘ol USofA…and don’t even try to make out like Bush has friends…cause he don’t, sweetie…he only has payees.
dust ball, what are “they” (dem congress) doing that is not legal or constitutional? and…investigating corruption and deceit in our government is foolishness? Give me your best comeback, come on…you can give it a little try….pppllleeeaase!”
answer my question, Nazi freak!
“
By RW-(the original)
August 21, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this
Have you ever noticed that people like…oh say AmVet…go around telling us the country has been destroyed by Bush in Washington. The Constitution has been shredded, there will soon be bread lines, the whole wide world hates because of all the things that have been done in Washington over the last few years, will turn right around and say {{{{{No wonder nothing gets done in Washington these days…}}}}}?
Bosch @ 9:55,
When you were so quick to console Midori over my blistering attack on her yesterday did it ever occur to you to go back and see if she was lying? I made two comments total yesterday and the only one mentioning Midori was wondering why she saw fit to type exactly the same thing getalfe had typed several minutes before her. You know, kind of like a parrot.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this
RAISEDANIDIOT(I THINK YOU’RE QUITE BRIGHT)
THANKS, GLAD TO BE BACK
HAD A LITTLE VACATION
By mm
August 21, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
Gordon Brown is already pulling the Brit troops our of Iraq. Are you blind?
The newly elected French president Sarkozy is not going to do any more about Iraq than Chiraq did. But the new guy will say “Hello” to the US and take a vacation here.
You are kidding yourself about these 2. Bush did not “win” them over.
What will you hang your hat on when the funds for Iraq are cut off in September? Bush’s “brilliant” idea to cut corporate taxes?
Oh, by the way, how did that little dog and pony show on the Afghanistan/Pakstan border last week turn out? Did we capture OBL? Didn’t think so.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this
A Simple Fact: Republicans Can’t Manage the Economy
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this
Cheney, Lieberman and the Iran War Conspiracy
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this
The War’s for Sale, and There’re Plenty of Buyers
By Midori
August 21, 2007 1:05 PM | Link to this
Looky here — RW the Original Retard Wingnut checks in.
Hey buddy, I’ve done some research for you.
Hope this helps
I have faith in ya; you can do it!!!
Cheers, and have a good day
By RW-(the original)
August 21, 2007 1:07 PM | Link to this
mm,
If you truly believe that Iraq funding is going to be cut off in September you’re loopier than I thought you were.
By mm
August 21, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this
ITN, keep digging. The truth is out there. One of these days a smoking gun will be found, and boy will it be fun to watch.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this
“Lieberman, appearing on CBS’s Face the Nation, said, “I think we’ve got to be prepared to take aggressive military action against the Iranians to stop them from killing Americans in Iraq. And to me that would include a strike over the border into Iran, where we have good evidence that they have a base at which they are training these people coming back into Iraq to kill our soldiers.”
Uh, bring our guys home, Joe…problem solved…dumb azz award guaranteed!
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 1:19 PM | Link to this
getalife,@ many times
How many blogs have removed you from their contributor’s list? Wonder why…….
mm,12:52
The Brisith mentioned pulling some troops out even before Blair left. But I see British soldiers on the news almost every night still fighting terrorists in Iraq just like us. Just because YOU want us to LOSE the war does not mean the British want the same. They are fighting with us.
The French president was over HERE shaking the hand of Bush. Nobody expected them to suddenly go to Iraq.
What fiasco in Afghanistan? You mean our joint effort with Pakistan to rid more terrorists from the mountains? I guess that you, like Obama, think we should go and A-bomb part of Pakistan and start a world war. That’s liberal stategy for ya’..
By getalife
August 21, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this
All they have to do is testify, prove they did not break the law and the investigations are over.
These cowards will cut and run like Rove from accountability.
Only the idiotic wingnuts believe they did not break. the law.
Their blind party over country is disgusting.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this
Next big question to divide our country will not be gay marriage, immigration, or even Iraq…it will be divided by those who want WWIII and those of us who don’t. Way to go Bush brains…think I’ll head for the hills from which I was raised (where the heat index is not 108 before lunch time…yet) and maybe find me a cave somewhere…stock it with good books so I can hole up for a while…get off the grid…geez, what a mess!
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
August 21, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this
There you libs go setting an unattainably high bar for what can be defined as alliance, agreement and friendship. Of course, our allies either aren’t going into Iraq or are leaving. They will never be smart enough to realize what a great idea it is to be there. Only Bush, his loyal followers and the Iraqi politicians who depend on the security we provide for their very lives see what a wonderful idea it is to be in Iraq. We can’t help that there are 5.2 billion stupid people on the planet and that only 30% of Americans “get it.” Its not our responsibility to make everyone as brillaint as 2003 Cheney. As we know, most people are still dumb like 1994 Cheney. Nor can we say that only going along with us into Iraq defines an ally. At this point we should just be happy that there are people who are still willing to be in the same room with Bush. That in and of itself reflects common ground and agreement on the big issues. At least its the best we’re gonna get.
RWNJIFG
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 1:30 PM | Link to this
Tenn. Nuclear Fuel Problems Kept Secret
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this
I think there is little doubt that the mood in this country is changing very quickly now. And thankfully for the better.
The President is setting new “records” for the longest period of abysmal approval ratings since record keeping began. And I think he is more than capable of screwing up even more and getting to the point where the historically unthinkable event of having four out of every five Americans saying he is not worthy of their support could happen.
So for us non neo-cons there is again some hope, as we know that not only is the ongoing disaster called the Bush administration short-lived, but that due to it’s constant and complete incompetence, the very future of neo-conservatism itself is almost assuredly finished.
I’m not sure it was worth it, but there’s nothing any of us can really do about it now.
And though we must endure 17 more months of this worst Presidency ever, and though the debacle in Iraq rages on, I sense a strong feeling, much like that of the noose closing around Nixon, that we will, as a nation, get through this and can see some light at the end of the tunnel.
And this gladdens and inspires the vast majority of us Americans, except for the Bush/Cheney faithful, who are angrier, more pig headed and more dissolute than ever.
It is going to be a hellishly long year and a half for them I suspect.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this
Petition calling on the U.S. Senate to filibuster and end the war in Iraq
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
August 21, 2007 1:45 PM | Link to this
getalife says: “Their blind party over country is disgusting.”
Don’t you see that there simply is no difference? Party loyalty to the GOP IS loyalty to the country and those who are loyal to the other party are, by definition, not loyal to the country. There simply is no need to distinguish these issues. Democrats are traitors, hate America, are indifferent to the deaths of Americans, could care less if the troops are killed, love Osama Bin Laden, etc…. Essentially they stand for everything that is Anti-American. All you have to do is read what we write. It is very clear that we do not think that you deserve to be Americans. We do not think you deserve to be heard. We do not think that you add any value to the debate. You are simply scumbags that are going to get the rest of us killed. You are nothing to us. And if we ever get the chance you are all going to get what you deserve. We were ever so close to dismantling the system so that we could retain permanant control and power, but the system is difficult to crack, what with that outmoded Constitution and all. But as Fox News’ John Gibson says “it’ll take thousands of dead Americans to wake us up.” Once that glorious catastrophic event happens, we will be there to feast of your fear and use it to subjucate the country to our will. We tried it once and we will try it again.
Vote GOP and vote for a strong central Government with secret powers over a cowardly populace which values security over freedom.
RWNJIFG
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 1:47 PM | Link to this
WASHINGTON - Sapped by nearly six years of war, the Army has nearly exhausted its fighting force and its options if the Bush administration decides to extend the Iraq buildup beyond next spring
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
August 21, 2007 1:55 PM | Link to this
Dusty says: “You mean our joint effort with Pakistan to rid more terrorists from the mountains? I guess that you, like Obama, think we should go and A-bomb part of Pakistan and start a world war. That’s liberal stategy for ya’..”
Now for some Right Wing strategy courtesy of Philip Atkinson of The Family Security Foundation, Inc.:
The inadequacy of Democracy, rule by the majority, is undeniable – for it demands adopting ideas because they are popular, rather than because they are wise. This means that any man chosen to act as an agent of the people is placed in an invidious position: if he commits folly because it is popular, then he will be held responsible for the inevitable result. If he refuses to commit folly, then he will be detested by most citizens because he is frustrating their demands.
When faced with the possible threat that the Iraqis might be amassing terrible weapons that could be used to slay millions of citizens of Western Civilization, President Bush took the only action prudence demanded and the electorate allowed: he conquered Iraq with an army.
This dangerous and expensive act did destroy the Iraqi regime, but left an American army without any clear purpose in a hostile country and subject to attack. If the Army merely returns to its home, then the threat it ended would simply return.
The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. Then there would be little risk or expense and no American army would be left exposed. But if he did this, his cowardly electorate would have instantly ended his term of office, if not his freedom or his life.
The simple truth that modern weapons now mean a nation must practice genocide or commit suicide.
Go to:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/
if you doubt their conservative credentials.
As to his point that foriegn policy by nuclear blackmail seems like a very good idea to me. How ‘bout you Dusty?
RWNJIFG
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 1:56 PM | Link to this
Dusty, You have some really bad reading comprehension problems. My 9:31 post WAS my Al Qaeda application joke in response to something Duh said about Padilla. Did you read my post after you started your tirade that said I was happy the guy was in jail? Of course you didn’t. You have to keep harping on irrelevant issues and acting like a two year old.
Why do I bother? Getting Dusty to understand logic is like collecting water with a strainer.
AmVet, Thanks for those links I will check them out. I don’t agree with Sam Nunn either on everything, I guess that’s impossible unless you are a Bushie who takes everything King George says as absolute truth. But he’s always seemed like a decent guy who doesn’t necessarily tow the party line and I like that.
mm, Like I said earlier, isn’t it funny how Dusty thinks Brown, Sarkozy, and Merkel are Bush buddies? Like I said, don’t tell her the truth, it could proove to be fun later.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 1:58 PM | Link to this
Dust ball, you Nazi freak coward!
dust ball, what are “they” (dem congress) doing that is not legal or constitutional? and…investigating corruption and deceit in our government is foolishness? Give me your best comeback, come on…you can give it a little try….pppllleeeaase!”
Are you afraid of me dust ball…I’m really just 5’3”, an unassuming 100 pds…maybe it would help if you picture me in my underwear…wait, maybe you’re doing that already…that’s too weird, scratch that…picture me with a Jenna Bush face, does that help?
By rushncap
August 21, 2007 2:02 PM | Link to this
Dusters — Blair left because he became intensely unpopular in that country. The reason for his unpopularity had almost everything to do with his support for Bush and the Iraq invasion. Gordon Brown has no interest, as far as I can tell, to support Shrub’s Iraq policies. He may not leave immediately like the Spanish did, but he certainly is not going to do anything to further England’s involvement in this clusterf@ck. He is lucky, Iraq is not viewed as British responsibility, so he can withdraw without too much hand-wringing.
And Sarkozy’s election had nothing to do with Bush, and everything to do with economy. Believe it or not, not every election on this planet has to do with us. I know, I know, how dare they? But it’s true. Sarkozy may be willing to be more friendly with the U.S., but not in the area of Iraq. He needs economic cooperation, he sure as hell isn’t going to commit his soldiers to die in the desert.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this
Connect the Dots: Karl Rove’s Politics Uber Alles Strategy and the Utah Mine Disaster
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this
Bosch, I think one of the numerous reasons that this administration has been such a mess is that the level of competence going in was so in question.
I can never recall another election where I thought, uh oh, this guy is, relatively speaking, a dunderhead.
Yeah, Ronnie was an actor, but at least he had some smarts. And he had other characteristics that in some cases made up, at least partially, for his “boobish” qualities.
But with this President I sensed none of that. His well-documented track record was extremely suspect at a number of stops along the way before he even got to the White House.
And not that it is completely about intelligence, but compared to his predecessors - Rhodes scholars, military academy graduates, etc. - it was clear that this guy spent too much of his youth hitting the bottle and the pipe, rather than the books, and was, to me, not of the mental caliber of the men who he followed.
But apparently to the Bush faithful, finding Jesus more than makes up for all of that.
By mm
August 21, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
Please provide your definition of victory in Iraq.
By This is
August 21, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this
the most boring blog at the AJC.
Constant regurgitation of the same old talking points.
Every time I stop by here it makes me want to hurl.
Why don’t you dorks get outside this box?
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this
Amvet - haven’t you heard? WWIII will bring us closer to armageddon and we’ll all be raptured…no need to think…God is our co-pilot! Let go and let God!! Just dust in the wind…right, dust ball?
By getalife
August 21, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this
“The Iraqi government’s progress towards meeting targets set by Washington to reduce violence by reconciling warring Shi’ite and Sunni Arab sects has been “extremely disappointing,” the U.S. ambassador said on Tuesday.”
Ya think?
Malarki has been in Iran and Syria and now they want to get rid of him.
Hello, Iraq is not our ally.
Geez.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 2:52 PM | Link to this
Cheaters Never Prosper…As Long As You Expose Them
By AmVet
August 21, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this
raised, that reminds me of the old joke - I want to die like my grandfather, peacefully and quietly in his sleep. Not screaming and crying like the passengers in his car!
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this
Amvet - I think that’s about the jest of what Canada and Mexico told the bush-head yesterday :)
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 3:12 PM | Link to this
oops, that’s gest, not jest…though the distinction here is fine..ha ha
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this
Waxman Confirms Existence Of Rove’s Politicization ‘Teams’
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this
A blistering internal report from the CIA slams the agency for not being prepared to tackle the al Qaeda threat before 9/11. “The former head of the Central Intelligence Agency, George Tenet, recognized the danger posed by Al Qaeda well before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, but failed to adequately prepare the C.I.A. to meet the threat, according to an internal agency report that was released in summary form today,” David Stout and Mark Mazzetti report for The New York Times.
By rushncap
August 21, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this
This is — according to your post you are bulemic, since you chose to come to this blog. Please seek professional help. You ARE beautiful.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 3:32 PM | Link to this
re: “Waxman confirms existence of Rove’s Politicization Teams”…hey, maybe we’re all on tv and nothing these past 7 yrs. has been real…spooky! Good grief, I say jail Rove’s Charlie Brown head, and fast!!
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this
Efforts to crack down on lead paint thwarted by China, Bush Administration
By Bob Faircloth
August 21, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this
My wife had a great idea….why don’t they make Vick pay the expenses on all the animal shelters in the Metro area for a few years???
He can surely afford it!!!
By Ralph
August 21, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this
Sad part is that Dustmite is pretty typical of the intellectual level of today’s America. A few decades ago such a mind as his (and others here) would be incomprehensibe to find speaking out. And would have been knocked on its butt daily. The masses are so methodically dumbed down by toys and gadgets that they no longer think and are terrified to look at or examine themselves. Therefore are they totally unteachable, ignorant and unwilling plus unable to view anything for that which it truly is. So we have such vacuous minds still talking about winning in Iraq, adoring a stench like Bush - the whole 9 yards. Pathetic and scary for the sake of our children. They make Hitler’s philosophy seem to have a bit of credence. We cannot afford the presence of these people. They poison everything. Such weakness and culpable blindness.
By getalife
August 21, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this
Cold war part II
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this
POLL: Liberals Read More Books Than Conservatives
By Duh stands for Democrat
August 21, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this
{{{{By MentalMidget August 21, 2007 10:45 AM No Duh, if you support the war you are the one who doesn’t care about American lives. You would rather see an American soldier killed in Iraq than feed a hungy person in Atlanta.}}}}
Huh, am I the one who is encouraging Al Qaeda to kill our troops and innocent people, grandstanding every outrage in bold print for them, and if they can hold on long enough we will flee from Iraq and give them the total victory that they seek, or is that you doing it?
Not even knowing you MentalMidget, I guarantee that I do more to “feed the hungry persons” in Atlanta than you do, unless you’re Mother Teresa, which I seriously doubt.
You make the most asinine untrue as-sumptions about people and then freak out over them, making wild claims and accusations that aren’t even close to being true, babbling the whole time about it.
When it is really you that is the problem.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this
ES&S Facing Fines, Decertification in CA for Use of Uncertified Software on Voting Systems
By getalife
August 21, 2007 4:18 PM | Link to this
US officials call for al-Maliki to quit for sake of progress in Iraq
Geez.
By Bosch
August 21, 2007 4:19 PM | Link to this
Duh, Do you really want to write things like this
“You make the most asinine untrue as-sumptions about people and then freak out over them, making wild claims and accusations that aren’t even close to being true, babbling the whole time about it”
when you have teammate Dusty blogging today?
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this
The bush-head -“The fundamental question is, will the government respond to the demands of the people,” the president said. “And if the government doesn’t … respond to the demands of the people, they will replace the government. That’s up to the Iraqis to make that decision, not American politicians.”
This little speech would impress me, buuut…I’m not really allowed to voice a dissenting opinion about my government…uhh…cuz I want us to WIN in Iraq! I’m no America-hater! I support our troops! what, hey wait, where’d you guys come from? What? Me? No, wait guys, I’m no L I B E R A L ! Don’t, no…don’t take my computer..I was just saying
By Hey Mr. Duh
August 21, 2007 4:21 PM | Link to this
“”am I the one who is encouraging Al Qaeda to kill our troops and innocent people ”’
Actually Yes.
It is you.
More terrorists, more attacks since Bush lied us into this occpuation. You support this.
So YES DUH, YOU ARE AIDING AND ABETTING TERROR.
What a shame.
By Willie
August 21, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this
Hey Little RW. You’re a real tough guy around women, aren’t you? How typical of insecure tiny boys. Wonder how you’d do w that mouth outside the protection of your trailer? Don’t bother - I already know. You’re a dime a dozen. Big mouth - no guts/nuts.
By Midori
August 21, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this
Willie,
he also doesn’t have any “mojo” (if you know what I mean)
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this
Duh @4:14 - seriously duh, you gotta stop, I’m trying to keep a “straight” composure in front of my customers…you’re too much all wrapped up for christmas, aren’t you dude?
By Cindy
August 21, 2007 4:36 PM | Link to this
I’m glad Vick has to face the consequences of his felony choices, but I hope he uses this as an opportunity to apologize, speak out against dogfighting and condemn those involved. He has an opportunity to turn this into something good. We’ll see if he stands up like a leader.
By getalife
August 21, 2007 4:41 PM | Link to this
In the News,
You may want to add the Guardian, the Times, BBC, etc.. British media to your favorites because our media stopped reporting on Iraq.
I posted this fact at the blogs so they might step up and replace our corporate wh-ore media and cover Iraq.
By Time Keeper
August 21, 2007 4:42 PM | Link to this
Nearly happy hour.
Better spread the kitty litter and newspapers down. Whatever absorbs waste.
The trolls will be back soon.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this
GETALIFE
I REGULARLY CHECK THE GUARDIAN AND THE BBC.
WILL CHECK THE OTHERS AS WELL.
IF YOU SEE SOMETHING INTERESTING PLEASE POST.
By IN THE NEWS
August 21, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this
GETALIFE
DID YOU NOTICE CNN?
ALL MINE ALL THE TIME
UNTIL
IT WAS CONCLUDED THOSE POOR GUYS ARE PROBABLY DEAD
THAT GOSH DARNED LIBERAL MEDIA!
By RE
August 21, 2007 4:51 PM | Link to this
Cindy,
I hear where you are coming from with Vick, but I would not want to hear an apology from him. He ran a dog fighting kennel for 6 years. This is not a one time thing to apologize for, some reckless action or spur of the moment poor decision. Any apology from Vick would be fake, he only regrets being caught and losing his career.
Let him serve his time, apologies are overrated.
By Can't Resist
August 21, 2007 4:53 PM | Link to this
George W. Bush and a secret service agent are taking a stroll when they come upon a little girl carrying a basket with a blanket over it. Curious, Bush asks the girl, “What’s in the basket?”
She replies, “New baby kittens,” and she opens the basket to show him.
“How nice,” says Bush. “What kind are they?”
The little girl says, “Republicans.”
Bush smiles, pats the little girl on the head and continues on.
Three weeks later, Bush is taking another stroll, this time with Karl Rove. They see the little girl again with the same basket. Bush says, “Watch this, Karl? It’s really cute.” They approach the little girl.
Bush greets her and asks how the kittens are doing, and she says, “Fine.” Then, smirking, he nudges Rove with his elbow and asks the little girl, “And can you tell us what kind of kittens they are?”
She replies, “Democrats.”
Aghast, Bush says, “But three weeks ago you said they were Republicans!”
“I know,” she says. “But now their eyes are open.”
By Duh stands for Democrat
August 21, 2007 5:09 PM | Link to this
{{{{By IN THE NEWS August 21, 2007 4:45 PM GETALIFE I REGULARLY CHECK THE GUARDIAN AND THE BBC. WILL CHECK THE OTHERS AS WELL. IF YOU SEE SOMETHING INTERESTING PLEASE POST.}}}}
I got one! I got one!:
A new Gallup Poll finds Congress’ approval rating the lowest it has been since Gallup first tracked public opinion of Congress with this measure in 1974. Just 18% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, while 76% disapprove, according to the August 13-16, 2007, Gallup Poll.
It’s nothing you will hear a peep of from PMSNBC but it is pretty funny, ain’t it?
Imagine, just 6 months in power and you gutless wonders have set an all time historical low, geez.
And how about this?:
{{{{‘The Iraqis Will Decide’ Bush: People of Iraq will choose their leaders}}}}
I thought Iraq was a flaming hopeless house of horrors, how can they be picking leaders?
And why does France want to become involved with this horrible quagmire?:
{{{{A ministry statement said Mr. Kouchner was in Baghdad “to express a French message of solidarity with the Iraqi people and to listen to the representatives of all communities. “This is one more example,” Mr. Johndroe said, “along with the new U.N. mandate, the neighbors conference process and recent announcements by Saudi Arabia to open an embassy and forgive Saddam-era debt, of a growing international desire to help Iraq become a stable and secure country.”}}}}
You libs are just sore because France left your little “Axis of Cry Babies.”
By getalife
August 21, 2007 5:10 PM | Link to this
In the News,
Now it is wall to wall Dean coverage.
I am watching Dodd on Hardball.
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this
Oh my goodness, I do believe that Bosch and rushncap are BOTH confused college students. Their recollections of what was actually said in a post seem beyond their conprehension.
Bosch tells a story supportive of Padilla and then says LATER that is was a joke and not what he meant and on and on.
rushncap thinks he is the prime minister of Europe and wants to correct all posts, just like he corrects freshman test papers.
I KNOW that Brown took Blair’s place when a vote was called. They had worked together many years. Brown is making every effort to get along with Bush. Brown is a quiet man and has never run his mouth about Iraq.
I never said that Sarkozy’s election had anything to do with Bush. I said that he came here and was very cordial with Bush. He is also starting to change some policies in France. Merkel is relatively unimportant.
Now, you two may think you are the greatest brains in the country. Some may think otherwise.
Obviously, neither of you have learned that the most intelligent people do not try to impress people with their greatness. Perhaps you two should try it sometimes.
By Ummmmm
August 21, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this
“I can get any girl if I just use a bit of the old mojo”
Women like Midori are a dime a dozen.
Cheap wh-ores and proud of it.
By Fly-on-the-wall
August 21, 2007 5:29 PM | Link to this
AmVet,getalife, In The News, Bosch,
I think you all need to reconsider how it is that you look at the more ‘conservative’ bloggers here so you can better understand them and why they like Shrub so much. He ‘found’ Jesus. He is being guided by God therefore he is not capable of making mistakes and if you do not follow him you not only are against the President you are also against God. Why it is that they put down Jimmy Carter all the time instead of Shrub is beyond me because if you’re looking at who the better ‘Christian’ is then Jimmy wins hands down. You can disagree with some of the things he says but his actions for helping the poor and downtrodden are leagues above whatever Shrub has done in his life or probably will do in his life after his presidency ends. You are dealing with people who firmly believe that we MUST mix politics and religion. The two must go hand-in-hand. This country is beginning to look like the one country the ‘conservatives’ hate so much - France. All you need to do is look back 230 years ago or so and you’d find very similar things going on. The nobles (i.e. our rich) getting more while the populace gets less. Wars are started to help the nobles and merchants but the populace fights them and then the economy fails which leads to the Revolution. I hope we don’t go down that same path.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this
Dust ball - there you are you sneaky little btch…ready to answer my question?
“what are “they” (dem congress) doing that is not legal or constitutional? and…investigating corruption and deceit in our government is foolishness? Give me your best comeback, come on…you can give it a little try….pppllleeeaase!”
Nah, I doubt it…you’re far too busy with non-issue diversions such as…”Oh my goodness, I do believe that Bosch and rushncap are BOTH confused college students. Their recollections of what was actually said in a post seem beyond their conprehension.
Bosch tells a story supportive of Padilla and then says LATER that is was a joke and not what he meant and on and on.”
Hint…better to let people think you’re an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
By getalife
August 21, 2007 5:39 PM | Link to this
“Former CIA director George Tenet “bears ultimate responsibility” for failing to create a strategic plan to stop al Qaeda prior to 9/ll, according to a review by the CIA’s inspector general that was made public today, more than two years after it was written.”
w will give him another medal.
Geez.
By Dusty
August 21, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this
I don’t respond to fools and idiots. If you don’t get an answer….well…..
By Ana Dendum
August 21, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this
The CIA’s analysis of al-Qaida before Sept. 2001 was lacking. No comprehensive report focusing on bin Laden was written after {{{1993,}}} and no comprehensive report laying out the threats of 2001 was assembled. “A number of important issues were covered insufficiently or not at all,” the report found.
By raisedanidiot
August 21, 2007 5:59 PM | Link to this
dust ball - at least you won’t be talking to yourself..ha ha hah ha…until tomorrow my formidable foe…smoke em if ya got em, people!!
By Sweet Lorraine
August 21, 2007 6:08 PM | Link to this
Got any peyote?
By Homie at Home
August 21, 2007 6:12 PM | Link to this
Y-y-yeah! Dusty is a s-s-sneaky little b-b-beeyayatchhhh!
By What goes around
August 21, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this
The first World Trade Center bombing
On February 26, {{{1993,}}} a 1,200-pound bomb in a van exploded in the parking garage beneath the World Trade Center. This was the most destructive terrorist attack carried out on U.S. soil up to that time, killing six people, injuring more than a thousand, and causing half a billion dollars in damage. If the van had been parked a few feet closer to one of the pillars, it could have collapsed an entire tower of the Trade Center, killing tens of thousands.
Comes around in 2001 when thousands were killed.
Thanks William Jefferson Clinton.
By Homie at Home
August 21, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this
Anyone read Hummer’s emotive dirge for Vick’s career on the front page (no less) of the AJC today? Mr. Hummer, if you going to reserve your best writing and make a mythical hero out of a bum, sir, then maybe you should quit journalism and sell doggie chew toys.
The very idea. Move on. Dont waste any more ink on Vick. He’s not worth it.
Besides, your assessment although well written, gets an F for content. Vick’s style of play didn’t revolutionize the position of quarterback, nor could it have. Blank didn’t know what to do with a passing halfback and he made him a running quarterback which is to say that he wasted him.
There’s no such thing as a running quarterback. All quarterbacks are passers. Period. It’s why they’re quarterbacks. The game evolved the way it did because of the logistics of that many men running around a confined space.
Now, if you had a good passing quarterback AND a passing halfback, then your offense would be invincible, if you also had the requisite front line, which is more important than a good quarterback.
Football is still only won in the trenches, sir.
‘muff said.
By Buy Danish
August 21, 2007 6:24 PM | Link to this
{{{By “Ralph”
August 21, 2007 4:06 PM
They make Hitler’s philosophy seem to have a bit of credence. We cannot afford the presence of these people. They poison everything. Such weakness and culpable blindness.}}}
^^^^^That is what you get when a liberal tells you what’s really in his heart and mind (I’d add soul to that list, but clearly Ralphie doesn’t have one).
By RW-(the original)
August 21, 2007 6:34 PM | Link to this
{{{{{By getalife August 21, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this All they have to do is testify, prove they did not break the law and the investigations are over.}}}}}
Isn’t that the text book definition of what you moonbat(ic)® freaks call McCarthyism? I thought you told us that was a bad thing.
Geez
By Kurdish Stanzas
August 21, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
The Iraq War. It’s a gas.
You should know that Bush is working hard to accomplish the mission of the Iraq War, which is that we win and the enemy loses, until the last drop of your blood!!
I dont see anything wrong with that.
Do you?
‘muff said
By RW-(the original)
August 21, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
Is there a reason you’ve avoided my question from 12:49? I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that perhaps you missed it and repost it for you now.
Bosch @ 9:55,
When you were so quick to console Midori over my blistering attack on her yesterday did it ever occur to you to go back and see if she was lying? I made two comments total yesterday and the only one mentioning Midori was wondering why she saw fit to type exactly the same thing getalfe had typed several minutes before her. You know, kind of like a parrot.
By getalife
August 21, 2007 6:50 PM | Link to this
RW,
Congress is full of commie loving pinkos.
They will cut and run from accountability like that coward Rove.
The corporate wh-ore media’s love affair with China and Rove makes me want to drink and smoke.
By RW-(the original)
August 21, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
getalife,
You’ve been drinking and smoking since before you even knew we had a Congress or a media.
Cheers!
By Sailor
August 21, 2007 7:58 PM | Link to this
“the Sailor said Andi/e-duh, you’re a fine girl…”
Good to see my sweetie and her gal pal RW back bloggin’!