Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this

The brilliant Senate, tired of doing the business of the people of the United States, are instead busily granting the rest of the world rights of US citizenship, even our sworn enemies:

{{{The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved a bill that would give detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) joined all 10 Democrats on the committee in approving the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act, which aims to counteract a law passed hastily in October that stripped detainees of their ability to bring their cases to court under the age-old legal principle of habeas corpus.-Urinal}}} Social Security is a train wreck, tax reforms could be saving us trillions, the stupid panty waist Coward liberals are ADDING people to our burden: {{{ “The headline is going to be ‘Democrats vote for the bill, Republicans vote against it, the president fails again,’ ” said Majority Leader Harry Reid, adding that he could not allow Republicans to take any more time on the bill because he needed to move on to other issues.}}}

And cavorting around the Halls of Congress chasing their demons:

{{{Next up for the Senate on Monday is a Democrat-driven, ———->nonbinding<———— vote of no-confidence in Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, who is the highest-ranking Hispanic in the Bush administration.}}}

Embaaaarrrrraaaassssiiinnngggg.

Cowards.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{Your critics have made much of this and have seen it as self-righteousness and moral absolutism, but this has guided you through the great, divisive issues faced by our country over these last, searing years. Scooter Libby was a soldier in your—our—war in Iraq, he was chief of staff to a vice president who had become a lightning rod to the war’s critics. He didn’t sit around the councils of power only to make the rounds in Georgetown’s salons insinuating that this was not his war all along. He didn’t claim this war when it promised an easy victory only to desert it when it stalled in the alleyways of Fallujah and Baghdad and in the twilight world of Arab politics.}}}

It’s your move, Bush.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 8:04 AM | Link to this

What ever was written on that “napkin” is what all of Europe has agreed to:

{{{There’s been a capitulation on global warming, but it hasn’t happened in the Oval Office. The Kyoto cheerleaders at the United Nations and the European Union are realizing their government-run experiment in climate control is a mess, one that’s incidentally failed to reduce carbon emissions. They’ve also understood that if they want the biggest players on board—the U.S., China, India—they need an approach that balances economic growth with feel-good environmentalism. Yesterday’s G-8 agreement acknowledged those realities and tolled Kyoto’s death knell. Mr. Bush, 1; sanctimonious greens, 0.}}}

Haha, Bush remaking the world in his image, geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

Like we really need more proof as to how stupid liberals are:

{{{Hinter Bollhagen, Germany —- By land and sea —- and even stark naked —- protesters mounted a concerted effort to break through the police cordon around the Group of Eight summit Thursday, with officers on horseback chasing some away from a security fence and police boats ramming others on the Baltic Sea.-Urinal}}}

8 paragraphs in this “story” not one mention of what these blooming idiots are protesting the G8 for.

Just a delightfully written tale of mindless violence, glorifying these goony protestors like they are some freaking pioneers.

I bet you could ask these children to explain why the G8 is causing them so much distress and all you will get in return is some stupid socialist slogan.

And what of the parents that taught these infants to forgo the democratic process, skip the legwork of gathering a majority and convincing that majority that your ideas are better, have the world vote on it, no, these idiots have only been taught to use violence as a tool, to create a scene like a big fat stupid whining baby.

All for NOTHING.

Who would pay attention to them?

Answer their attacks with a water canon.

What a waste.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 8:12 AM | Link to this

I wonder what it is about Republican politicians that they can’t be civil in the hallowed halls of Congress be it state or federal.

Cheney tells Leahy to go f@ck himself and now a Republican in Alabama punches a Democratic colleague. What a sad bunch these Republicans are.

By Mrs. Godzilla

June 8, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this

A pardon of either of these two individuals will not sit well with the American people.

Skinny Blonde Rich kid has to see the severely ticked judge today. (I heard somebody refer to the whole stuation this morning as “The Raw Skank Redemption”)

As for Scootie Patootie - I think we’ll see a perp walk on 6/14.

Peace.

By Mrs. Godzilla

June 8, 2007 8:18 AM | Link to this

Two Roman Catholic priests, Jesuit Fr. Steve Kelly and Franciscan Fr. Louie Vitale, are willing to go to prison to expose the fact that young soldiers at Fort Huachuca are being trained to torture. Further, one of those young soldiers has already committed suicide after going into the prisoners’ cages as an interrogator in northern Iraq.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this

Ooops:

The brilliant Senate, tired of doing the business of the people of the United States, are instead busily granting the rest of the world rights of US citizenship, even our sworn enemies:

{{{The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved a bill that would give detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) joined all 10 Democrats on the committee in approving the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act, which aims to counteract a law passed hastily in October that stripped detainees of their ability to bring their cases to court under the age-old legal principle of habeas corpus.-Urinal}}}

Social Security is a train wreck, tax reforms could be saving us trillions, the stupid panty waist Coward liberals are ADDING people to our burden:

{{{ “The headline is going to be ‘Democrats vote for the bill, Republicans vote against it, the president fails again,’ ” said Majority Leader Harry Reid, adding that he could not allow Republicans to take any more time on the bill because he needed to move on to other issues.}}}

And cavorting around the Halls of Congress chasing their demons:

{{{Next up for the Senate on Monday is a Democrat-driven, ———->nonbinding<———— vote of no-confidence in Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, who is the highest-ranking Hispanic in the Bush administration.}}}

Embaaaarrrrraaaassssiiinnngggg.

Cowards.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 8:21 AM | Link to this

Luckodull

[[What ever was written on that “napkin” is what all of Europe has agreed to]]

So just when do you think we’ll see an ML cartoon illustrating that?

Regarding the Immigration bill: [[Democrats vote for the bill, Republicans vote against it, the president fails again,’ ” said Majority Leader Harry Reid]]

We hear all the time how many on this blog aren’t hardcore Left partisans - but I’ll wager we’ll hear few laments from the regulars over the death of the bill. Bemoaning the loss of new voters, power blocks and entitlements will not occur as they can’t be seen to give credit to anything Pres Bush sponsors.

BTW - I think half a loaf is better than no loaf. Pass it and amend it later. Single-issue amendments would show the strength behind the objections.

Finally - I read a recap of columnists’ thoughts on the last Democratic debate. One cited a Hillary quote that hasn’t had much play: “The differences among us are minor.” What happened to “we’re not in lockstep?” So what’s preventing them (other than ego) from dropping out and throwing their support to ex-Sen Gravel?

By Mrs. Godzilla

June 8, 2007 8:23 AM | Link to this

Now that trashing Bush on TV is de rigueur for GOP presidential wannabes, one might think that the right-wing rhetoric of fear and violence might fall by the wayside, too. Guess again. Rather than dump that old Bush-Cheney bunk about a vote for the Democrats being a vote for nuclear annihilation by “terrorists,” many Republicans are framing the debate with a new word: “Jihadism.”

By Mike

June 8, 2007 8:29 AM | Link to this

Wow, still no cartoon of the highly unpopular Congress? I guess when Mikey “speaks truth to power”, he really means “spew partisan propoganda against the other side”.

Ann Coulter and Mike Luckovich: the only difference is the party.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 8:33 AM | Link to this

Look at this idiot lib, POS, time Ragazine’s true dullard:

{{{But the smart stuff is being drowned out by a fierce, bullying, often witless tone of intolerance that has overtaken the left-wing sector of the blogosphere. Anyone who doesn’t move in lockstep with the most extreme voices is savaged and ridiculed—especially people like me who often agree with the liberal position but sometimes disagree and are therefore considered traitorously unreliable.}}}

Whining cause he got spewed at and then he starts spewing:

{{{Some of this is understandable: the left-liberals in the blogosphere are merely aping the odious, disdainful—and politically successful—tone that right-wing radio talk-show hosts like Rush Limbaugh pioneered. They are also justifiably furious at a Bush White House that has specialized in big lies and smear tactics.}}}

What a crock of crap.

The left has been spewing since Lincoln was in office and now they are getting turned on by their own creation, stupid goony slobbering publically educated morons that only know how to throw slogans around.

Boo Hoo Hoo, Mr. Klein.

We are soooo sad for you, you sniveling little Coward.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 8:42 AM | Link to this

Funny Morons 8:12

Possibly they’ve been taking lessons from some of the posters here?

Regarding Alabama: so you’re on line with repudiating the notion that some words cannot be uttered to members of other groups because they would cause a violent, uncontrollable reaction in those who hear them?

Mrs. Godzilla - I believe I heard the Sheriff will have to appear, also. Possible contempt charges. The judge should put him in a cell next to Ms Hilton. And when Paris talks about “anxiety attacks, depression, difficulty coping” maybe the judge will say “Welcome to life. Deal with it.”

Regarding the torture article - lots of allegations, short on explanatory facts. I did not see the Arizona Daily Sun article, but did find part of a reprint which said

[[Peterson had a hard time separating being an interrogator from who she was as an individual, according to the article.

The soldier apparently had a lot of empathy for Iraqi detainees, so much so she was reprimanded and reassigned after just two days as an interrogator, the newspaper article stated.

She reportedly was concerned detainees did not have showers in the cage “where they were held” or other accommodations, did not like being required to be nice to one person and harsh to another and was particularly upset when only three of 43 detainees questioned were found worthy of additional attention, the newspaper said the investigating document stated.]]

SfC Peterson’s death is tragic. But to use her death, over issues detailed above (I’m not saying the details are complete - but if those isssues were the substance of her conflict) - well, for groups to use her death to advance a related political agenda is despicable.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2007 8:44 AM | Link to this

Paul,

I believe they could get most of that immigration bill passed if they didn’t insist on doing it all at once. Pass an enforcement bill with teeth then prove you’re willing to actually enforce it and the rest will easily pass through after.

That compromise bill is so vastly unpopular that Harry Reid is making a huge mistake by saying Democrats want it, but Republicans killed it. I think I’ll spend the next 18 months reminding him of that.

By Eric

June 8, 2007 8:45 AM | Link to this

Paris should run for the republican nomination. At least she would raise the intelligence factor in her party.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 8:53 AM | Link to this

RW-(the original)

I’d said earlier my initial impression of do one, then the next, was a stall tactic to kill it. However one interprets events, it seems your recommendation is about the only one that might have a chance of passing. So if no bill on enforcement, with language stating the other issues will be forthcoming, I’ll look forward to your reminders to Sen Reid - as well as the Minority Leader.

Mrs Godzilla - regarding the Huffington article about a “new” word - Jihadism. Whether it’s dim Republicans or ignorant Huffington posters, they’re anywhere from about 20 to 2000 years late with their “discovery” of the “new” word “Jihadism.”

By w00t

June 8, 2007 8:55 AM | Link to this

hey LuckDull, doesn’t this go against your ideas? I mean, I guess this guy doesn’t support the troops, supports Al-Queda, blah blah blah…

{{{ Iraq war supporters have repeatedly claimed that U.S. troops are harmed when Congress debates alternatives to the Bush administration’s failed policies in Iraq. “Think about the message we have sent them,” House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) said recently. “We have undermined their efforts, lowered their morale, and clearly sent the wrong message.” Vice President Cheney said the war debate was “detrimental to our troops.”

Today, however, Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, President Bush’s proposed “war czar,” disregarded these claims.

“I don’t believe it undercuts their morale,” Lute told the Senate Armed Services Committee during his confirmation hearing. U.S. soldiers “understand the democratic process,” he said, “and, in fact, that’s what we’ve sworn to protect and defend.” }}}

Take a look

By Alan Ira Belgym

June 8, 2007 8:55 AM | Link to this

Jessica Simpson should be her running mate. That would further increase the GOP IQ.

Hilton / Simpson ‘08

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2007 8:57 AM | Link to this

Paul,

No need to remind the minority leader that Reid said it was just Republicans killing the bill.

Frankly if they would enforce the laws we already have they would probably be able to pass the whole bill later.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this

Eric 8:45

I thought Paris was a Democrat? Celebrity, sense of entitlement and all that -

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 9:02 AM | Link to this

{{{“If it does not pass it is because America has risen up essentially and told their elected representatives that it should not,” said Tancredo. “This is a test of our Republic…to determine whether or not people in leadership will actually listen to the American people.”}}}

America is not near as stupid as you liberals think we are, which is an indication that your little re education camp, the public school system, is only having marginal success transforming the citizens of this country into mindless, politically correct slobbering idiots like steve-o, for instance.

Either that or you liberals are stupid slobbering goonies for not being able to see how ignorant this amnesty bill is, correct me if I’m wrong, we can’t pay for the future benefits of the people that are here legally, you want to add 20,000,000 more slaves on to that?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 9:10 AM | Link to this

{{{By w00t June 8, 2007 8:55 AM hey LuckDull, doesn’t this go against your ideas? I mean, I guess this guy doesn’t support the troops, supports Al-Queda, blah blah blah…}}}

Grasping for straws this morning woosie?

Are you desperately in search of something, anything that you can use against the United States of America, to prove that we are evil and up to no good?

Go fondle yourself, Coward.

Look for someone else to play with.

I love my country.

I’m not a weirdo like you.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2007 9:13 AM | Link to this

Speaking of steve-0, has anyone seen Blackadder?

Moonbat alert: Stop reading here!!

.

.

CU all at Happy Hour.

By Mrs. Godzilla

June 8, 2007 9:15 AM | Link to this

Paul,

Is Mr.Bush’s use of troops in photo ops to promote his agenda also despicable?

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this

{{{The next morning, Wednesday, June 6, Kelly and Vitale appeared in U.S. District Court in Tucson for a pretrial hearing. Responding to a Higher Power, Kelly refused to stand as ordered by the judge. The pretrial hearing was delayed and rescheduled for August.)))

Mrs. Godzilla,

In addition to the fact that there are all sorts of allegations in that story with no evidence to back them up (such as the “she was so distraught she committed suicide” claim), the arrogance of the “defendants” behavior as shown above is frankly appalling.

I have no sympathy for arrogant anarchists.

By Mike

June 8, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this

Anyone, liberal or conservative, who thinks that thier side is “the smart side”, “the right side”, or “the tolerant side” is deluding themselves.

There are plenty of intelligent and thoughtful people on both sides of the political spectrum. The real dividing line in society is between rational thinkers and partisan zealots. It’s pretty clear which category most posters on this board fall into.

By Big Bird

June 8, 2007 9:26 AM | Link to this

Golly gee Mike,

I’m sure it’s a surprise to you that you come to a political blog and find people with strong political opinions, but it shouldn’t be.

Unless you’re a devote masochist I wouldn’t recommend antagonizing both sides of the debate. Perhaps you’d be more comfortable at Sesame Street dot com.

By @@

June 8, 2007 9:30 AM | Link to this

Oh chit PoliFore; ml has given YOUR Paris to Scooter. I guess now you can…

ZIP IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this

It’s Subpoena Time

By Paul

June 8, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this

Mrs. Godzilla

Lots of hopscotch on topics on this forum. Point is raised, other information brought in which may affect the conclusion (no shower in your cell is now called “torture”), rather than staying on topic the attempt is to use the “justify bad behavior by citing other bad behavior.”

The President is the Commander in Chief. Presidents, SecDefs (including Clinton’s Republican SecDef, who had custom made, $1,000 apiece flight suits made for him and his wife to wear during photo ops, uh, I mean, meetings with the troops) do it and will continue to do it. The only way to prevent it (some will say any meeting with troops, at which photos are released, is political and a photo op) would be to ban all cameras and recording devices at any grouping of the President and any member of the military. Including when he gets on or off Air Force One or Marine One. That ain’t gonna happen.

Political? Sure. But every President (and his SecDef, and the Service secretaries) will continue to do it. I guarantee - if elected, Hillary may not wear a flight suit, but if elected, we’ll see lots more photos of her with troops than we already have seen. It goes with the office.

Despicable? Only if you’re a partisan. Absolutely, mind-numbingly political? Of course!

By w00t

June 8, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this

Dull, so I guess the War Czar is against American too. Better call the President.

No wait! He’s against America too!

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 9:44 AM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

I’m Googling this but I’m not getting anywhere.

{{{Your critics have made much of this and have seen it as self-righteousness and moral absolutism, but this has guided you through the great, divisive issues faced by our country over these last, searing years. Scooter Libby was a soldier in your—our—war in Iraq, he was chief of staff to a vice president who had become a lightning rod to the war’s critics. He didn’t sit around the councils of power only to make the rounds in Georgetown’s salons insinuating that this was not his war all along. He didn’t claim this war when it promised an easy victory only to desert it when it stalled in the alleyways of Fallujah and Baghdad and in the twilight world of Arab politics.}}}

Can we have the source? I’d like to read the rest of it.

Paul,

Half a loaf is NOT better. Once this bill with all its entitlements was passed there was NO turning back.

The fact that they couldn’t even make criminal acts (in addition to crossing the border illegally) grounds is deportation is pitiful.

I can’t understand what McCain is thinking by voting against that amendment.

By Can't Resist

June 8, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

Einstein dies and goes to heaven. At the Pearly Gates, Saint Peter tells him, “You look like Einstein, but you have NO idea the lengths that some people will go to sneak into Heaven. Can you prove who you really are?” Einstein ponders for a few seconds and asks, “Could I have a blackboard and some chalk?” Saint Peter snaps his fingers and a blackboard and chalk instantly appear. Einstein proceeds to describe with arcane mathematics and symbols his theory of relativity. Saint Peter is suitably impressed. “You really ARE Einstein!” he says. “Welcome to heaven!” The next to arrive is Picasso. Once again, Saint Peter asks for credentials. Picasso asks, “Mind if I use that blackboard and chalk?” Saint Peter says, “Go ahead.” Picasso erases Einstein’s equations and sketches a truly stunning mural with just a few strokes of chalk. Saint Peter claps. “Surely you are the great artist you claim to be!” he says. “Come on in!” Then Saint Peter looks up and sees George W. Bush. Saint Peter scratches his head and says, “Einstein and Picasso both managed to prove their identity. How can you prove yours?” George W. looks bewildered and says, “Who are Einstein and Picasso?” Saint Peter sighs and says, “Come on in, George.”

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this

Opinion: Massive deportations would destroy U.S. economy

I REALLY DON”T MIND DEPORTING FOLKS WHO CAME ILLEGALLY….BUT WHO”S GOING TO WRITE THE CHECK?

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 9:55 AM | Link to this

{{{By Buy Danish June 8, 2007 9:44 AM LuckoDull, I’m Googling this but I’m not getting anywhere.}}}

Fallen Soldier Mr. President, do not leave this man behind.

By Goldie

June 8, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

{{So what’s preventing them (other than ego) from dropping out and throwing their support to ex-Sen Gravel?}}

Uber— why would any Dem candidate have to drop out and support Gravel, when any Dem elected is going to start deploying American troops out of Iraq in Jan. ‘09?

By Paul

June 8, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish 9:44

I’d taken a brief look at the entitlement numbers - also the cost of the current system (lots of fun with numbers). My frustration is the problem gets worse every day - not nothing at all will happen. I looked at it as bad as the “fix” was, it’s still better than what we have, which will only get exponentially worse. Rather like a bunch of engineers standing around discussing how to repair a levee which keeps sprouting leaks. They’ll drown before they do anything (apologies to any engineers here).

But that’s a brilliant point about “Once this bill with all its entitlements was passed there was NO turning back.” One of those, oh, duh, talk about optimistically naive hope - Congress will readress an entitlement program.

Rather like this story about what I see as a fine attempt by the Democratic Congress to do away (finally) with the Alternative Minimum Tax. Past Democratic and Republican Congresses just kicked the can down the road. But the Democrats followed the unimaginative Party line of “tax the rich.” Sure they have paygo, and this is a permanent fix, but how about a little creative - end some corporate subsidies (and anger your contributors?) or abolish some Federal programs or agencies (and anger voters, contributors, and taxpayer money recipients?).

Link: [Democratic House Seeks Way to End AMT](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/07/AR2007060702146_pf.html}

I need to sign off for now - TTY this evening, possibly. Enjoy the pool!

By Goldie

June 8, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this

Thank God for liberals. My, my— what a short-term world we would be living in if not for liberals and their push to free ourselves from importing oil from the Middle East:

Europe’s first vegetable-fueled train begins service as part of billionaire’s bid to fight global warming

We all know that the Repug candidates will talk about doing something (as they did in this week’s debate), but they will never actually do anything about weaning Americans and Europe off of the big oil interests and their lobbyists…

By Goldie

June 8, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this

In the News @ 9:54 — and boy, won’t that be an ugly picture of America showing on the TV… tearing millions of young American children away from their parents as they get bussed out back to Mexico, Central America, and Canada. Not a pretty sight at all!

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

{{{By IN THE PROPAGANDA June 8, 2007 9:54 AM Opinion: Massive deportations would destroy U.S. economy I REALLY DON”T MIND DEPORTING FOLKS WHO CAME ILLEGALLY….BUT WHO”S GOING TO WRITE THE CHECK?}}}

Mass deportations is, well, propaganda.

No one from the right has even mentioned such a silly idea, only you goony scare mongering liberals would put forth such a ridiculous idea, you have no modesty what so ever, no matter how stupid, if it sounds good, some moron liberal will go with it, like Prop here^^.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

Goldie

Response before I go. That was a tongue-in-cheek response to Hillary’s assertion the differences between the Democratic candidates are minimal. I think there are some pretty fundamental differences - as there are between the Republican candidates. And that’s a good thing.

Hillary has a difficult time on Iraq. While line Army troops may be reduced, she’s recently stated other missions (training, air support, intel) which will require tens of thousands of troops indefinitely.

Which is just one reason I’d like to see a Manhattan-style project (not JUST conservation or JUST drilling or JUST alternative fuels/sources) for energy. Which will affect a lot of “free market choice” but would have a target of zero Middle East oil imports. Then I’d be happy with a zero military presence (other than maybe Marine embassy guards) in the Middle East. And a bunch of other places, too.

Hey, isn’t that part of the articles of faith mantra of a neocon? :)

I really must run - cheers

By mm

June 8, 2007 10:13 AM | Link to this

Luckodull 8:04

OK, we’ve seen your partisan, rightwing take on the G8 plan for global warming.

In reality, the other leaders were miffed that GWB would not commit to targets. But they had to agree to something. Thank God they already have plans (Kyoto).

Bush really did take that napkin with him. On it was written:

“Agree to nothing tangible. Need photo op”.

What a leader. Not on HIS watch.

Bush remaking the world in his image?

Luckodull, you are truly insane.

By Oh the humanity

June 8, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

I REALLY DON”T MIND DEPORTING FOLKS WHO CAME ILLEGALLY…

The we ALL better get ready to move. Except that is, the Pawnee, Sioux Arapaho, Cherokee, Blackfoot, Hopi, etc.

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

You had many good points this morning. Your specialty. The G8 protestors were something to behold on TV. Some of them were even dressed as clowns, a fitting costume.

As you said, little or nothing was printed or mentioned about their “objective”. I think a lot of Europeans are bored out of their skulls. They look like college kids out to have a good time. Who cares about the environment!

Mrs. Godzilla,

Please stop reading all the liberal propaganda material so early. Any group that takes a suicide as a political weapon is just as unstable as the personal tragedy they pursue. Then you reprint it as facts?

Oh, well. This is the same group that has used Tillman, Lynch, and Sheehan as propaganda tools. Why should I be surprised?

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

{{{By mentalmidget June 8, 2007 10:13 AM Luckodull 8:04 In reality, the other leaders were miffed that GWB would not commit to targets.}}}

The other leaders have NEVER hit Kyoto’s targets, in fact, they have steadily increased their outputs of “greenhouse” gases.

Bush introduced reality to the situation, haha.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By Oh, I’m wanking again June 8, 2007 10:16 AM The we ALL better get ready to move. Except that is, the Pawnee, Sioux Arapaho, Cherokee, Blackfoot, Hopi, etc.}}}

Always a victim, isn’t there?

What has the United States ever done good, Coward, can you name anything?

POS.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this

Oh the Humanity @ 10:16,

If you want to get down to the nitty gritty, please remember the conclusions on prehistoric times. The Native Americans would have to leave North America also. They came across the Bering Straits to Alaska from Asia. So that leaves wildlife as the first “roamers” of North America. I don’t mean Democratic “wildlife”.

Democratic “wildlife” would have cutnrun the continent at the first thunderstorm.

By Truthsayer

June 8, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

Luckovich is a hypocritical jerk. The liberals on this blog are sychophants. I give up. It’s like teaching calculus to a turtle!

By Deport Dusty and 11,999,999 other scumbags

June 8, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

Oh, well. This is the same group that has used Tillman

Why don’t you ask the Tillman family what they think of the mindless fools like yourself who still trust the Pentagon?

So you gutless cowards and Ann Coulter followers still actually believe the garbage that this man was not critical of the Iraq war and did not support President Bush’s re-election?

How about some words from someone who, unlike yourself, actually knew something about him, his brother Kevin?

Somehow our elected leaders were subverting international law and humanity by setting up secret prisons around the world, secretly kidnapping people, secretly holding them indefinitely, secretly not charging them with anything, secretly torturing them. Somehow that overt policy of torture became the fault of a few “bad apples” in the military.

Somehow back at home, support for the soldiers meant having a five-year-old kindergartener scribble a picture with crayons and send it overseas, or slapping stickers on cars, or lobbying Congress for an extra pad in a helmet. It’s interesting that a soldier on his third or fourth tour should care about a drawing from a five-year-old; or a faded sticker on a car as his friends die around him; or an extra pad in a helmet, as if it will protect him when an IED throws his vehicle 50 feet into the air as his body comes apart and his skin melts to the seat.

Somehow the more soldiers that die, the more legitimate the illegal invasion becomes.

Somehow American leadership, whose only credit is lying to its people and illegally invading a nation, has been allowed to steal the courage, virtue and honor of its soldiers on the ground.

Somehow those afraid to fight an illegal invasion decades ago are allowed to send soldiers to die for an illegal invasion they started.

Somehow faking character, virtue and strength is tolerated.

Somehow profiting from tragedy and horror is tolerated.

Somehow the death of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people is tolerated.

Somehow subversion of the Bill of Rights and The Constitution is tolerated.

Somehow suspension of Habeas Corpus is supposed to keep this country safe.

Somehow torture is tolerated.

Somehow lying is tolerated.

Somehow reason is being discarded for faith, dogma, and nonsense.

Somehow American leadership managed to create a more dangerous world.

Somehow a na

By Mike

June 8, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

Big Bird -

It may come as a surprise to you, but there are more poltical viewpoints out there than “wacko liberal” and “wacko conservative.”

Why is it any less appropriate to comment on the intellectual dishonesty of partisanship than it is to comment on the intellectual dishonesty of partisans?

I just find it amusing how opposing partisans are so similar in their arguments and thought processes. They are equally intellctually dishonest. Look at Deport Dusty’s post above. It is the same empty nonsense that LuckoDull would post. They even share the lame device of calling anonymous strangers cowards for not sharing their narrow views.

By Oh the humanity

June 8, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this

If you want to get down to the nitty gritty, please remember the conclusions on prehistoric times. The Native Americans would have to leave North America also. They came across the Bering Straits to Alaska from Asia. So that leaves wildlife as the first “roamers” of North America.

Conclusions? Wildlife? Roamers?

Are you insuating animals and people are the same? Are you insinuating coconuts migrate? Could you be any more dense? No answer is required - everyone can make their own determinations about you.

I love it when extremists try to sound intelligent or even relevant.

By Deport Dusty and 11,999,999 other scumbags

June 8, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this

Somehow a narrative is more important than reality.

Somehow America has become a country that projects everything that it is not and condemns everything that it is.

Somehow the most reasonable, trusted and respected country in the world has become one of the most irrational, belligerent, feared, and distrusted countries in the world.

Somehow being politically informed, diligent, and skeptical has been replaced by apathy through active ignorance.

Somehow the same incompetent, narcissistic, virtueless, vacuous, malicious criminals are still in charge of this country.

Somehow this is tolerated.

Somehow nobody is accountable for this.

Incredible that a neo-con would even utter his name but considering the warped, hypocritical, uninformed and immoral source, believable.

By Mike

June 8, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this

Wow, Dusty. Looks like you really , really hate anyone who disagrees with you.

Know what? There are plenty of conservatives who feel the same about you for the same silly reasons. You are the same as them.

By reebok

June 8, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

Cartoon is semi-clever…makes reference to the infamous “I’m the decider…that means I’m the one who decides” comment…also works in references to Paris Hilton and Scooter Libby…so a fair amount of thought went into it. More thought than the Election-Stealing Little Alcoholic gave to his failed Iraq war planning.

By What a waste of space

June 8, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

“Somehow” ^^that freak^^ is out on the streets. Probably one of your children’s teachers or professors.

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this

After nearly a year in retirement, the Constitution is making noises about a possible comeback.

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 11:30 AM | Link to this

I thought recovering alcoholics weren’t supposed to drink.

By Midori

June 8, 2007 11:40 AM | Link to this

Funny morons,

I wonder how many shots he did with that beer?

It made him miss a morning meeting.

Everyone knows he was hung over.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

GoldieDhimmi,

Regarding your enthusiasm for liberals using vegetable oil to fuel trains* what do you have to say about this?:

Only a few years ago, oil from palm trees was viewed as an ideal biofuel: a cheap, renewable alternative to petroleum that would fight global warming. Energy companies began converting generators and production soared./ Now, it’s increasingly seen as an example of how well-meaning efforts to limit climate-changing carbon emissions may backfire./Marcel Silvius, a climate expert at Wetlands International in the Netherlands, led a team that compared the benefits of palm oil to the ecological harm from destroying virgin Asian rain forests to develop lucrative new plantations./His conclusion: “As a biofuel, it’s a failure.”

That’s what liberals excel at - well-meaning ideas with disastrous results.

Isn’t it better to drill in ANWR and offshore, and use nuclear power than to destroy the rain forests and starve the poor by increasing demand for ethanol?

*It only accounts for 20% of the fuel

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this

Truthsayer,Oh Humanity, Deport Dusty, and Mike,

Keep your shirts on, boys! Whatsamatter? Somebody called you “wildlife that would cutnrun”? I’m sorry. I should have said “run & retreat wildlife”. Feel better now? Don’t want to hurt your tender, timid feelings. But some of you are a bit wild, you know.

And all that claptrap about who was first and belonged on the American mainland….. just thought I would present a few historical facts.

Yes, I can tell the difference between humans and animals. But sometimes it is difficult with all those “donkeys” braying up in Congress. I’m about ready to send a couple of bales of hay to them.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

How many of you Moonbats admire Che’Guevara? No wonder Che’ tee shirts do such a brisk business!:

Twice, Che plotted terrorist attacks against New York City. In November 1962, the FBI cracked a terrorist plot by Cuban agents who targeted Macy’s, Gimbel’s, Bloomingdale’s and Grand Central Terminal. They planned to blow up those landmarks with 12 incendiary devices and 500 kilos of TNT the day after Thanksgiving. Several months before visiting New York in December 1964 and being feted by the toast of the city’s intelligentsia, Che hatched a plan with the Black Liberation Army to blow up the Statue of Liberty, the Liberty Bell and the Washington Monument. The plotters were infiltrated in 1965 by a sharp-eyed NYPD cadet. - Che detested rock and roll and railed against “long hairs,” “lazy youths,” and homosexuals.

By In other words

June 8, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Keep your shirts on, boys, but please do drop those drawers! Aunt Dusty wants to see what’s down there!

Of course, I don’t care about genocide or all that claptrap about who was first and belonged on the American mainland. I’m a neo-con and I just pretend to give a damn about anybody but myself!

By getalife

June 8, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

w needs an intervention and rehab.

If Libby can stay out of prison for treason, Paris should be free too.

By Goldie

June 8, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this

{{The Native Americans would have to leave North America also. They came across the Bering Straits to Alaska from Asia.}}

Dust-For-Brains, and they came across some 10,000 years before Columbus arrived, so I believe that gives them a “right” to call America their land. European immigrants from the 1600’s on are rightly called the illegal aliens by the Native Americans.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

GoldieDhimmi,

Gawd you’re a moron.

Let me see if I have this straight - the accepted parameter for a moonbat is that the “immigrant” had to have arrived 10,000 years prior to anyone else?

By Newsworthy

June 8, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

Isn’t it better…than to destroy the rain forests and starve the poor by increasing demand for ethanol?

Brazil uses sugar cane to produce ethanol (7 times more effective than corn) and does not touch the Amazon Basin to do so. It has great promise as one fo numerous solutions.

ANWR is another failed idea. Read more. Inform yourselves. Get out of the past.

By In other words

June 8, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

Isn’t it better for Exxon/Mobil to drill in ANWR and offshore, and use nuclear power than to destroy the rain forests, that I personally don’t give a flying fu-ck about, and starve the poor, who I personally don’t give a double flying fu-ck about, by increasing demand for ethanol?

I’m a neo-con and I just pretend to give a damn about anybody but myself!

By Paul

June 8, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

Hmmm. Shall we apply the standard of “original inhabitants” or “first known imperialists get the land - the rest of you leave” to the rest of the world? Let’s apply the same standards to national boundaries, also! Middle East, Europe, Africa, Asia - it’s gonna be a whole lot of fun!

There are more important things reported today, like “Where in the World is Paris Hilton?”

Followed by “Who Cares?”

By Head up

June 8, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

Proof positive that there is NO global warming.

Denver’s low this morning was 31 degrees.

By Goldie

June 8, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

So I guess all you trolls here just hate it that your Repug candidates are all suggesting developing alternative energy sources such as biofuels in order to wean Americans away from oil??? Don’tcha just hate ‘em for saying things like that???

LMAO!

By She never took a logic class

June 8, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

Let me see if I have this straight - the accepted parameter for a moonbat is that the “immigrant” had to have arrived 10,000 years prior to anyone else?

So stupid and silly it doesn’t even warrant a response.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

In Other Words

I never knew that senior Democrat from Michigan who’s fought oh so valiantly for increased fuel economy standards, fighting tax credits for Hummers and subsidies for the auto industry was a neocon. He probably just didn’t have enough time ‘cause he was working so hard to gut any new gun control legislation.

You learn something new every day - thx -

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 12:23 PM | Link to this

Luckovich strikes again! Thank God for Mike and the AJC. America needs a good laugh, especially on Friday. This cartoon captures the “Essential Bush”. Newt has finally come around. He was quoted this week on Bush. Newt said: Bush is a Hopeless Incompetent”. Newtie Newt, Newt. Rah, rah rah. Yea Newt. The Newtster. Let’s here it for Newtocracy.

By mike

June 8, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

Personally I like Paris. Hey on one ahow they did not know what a laundry mat was for much less how to use one. It is more comical to see all the haters around the country and on the news espescially fox 5. The media gives more time to this crap than they do to the soldiers being killed each week. Most are mad because Paris is a blond with lots of money.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

Gosh, I can’t IMAGINE why the Republican Presidential candidates are talking about the threat of Jihadists!

In a horrific story of how an young Indonesian Muslim beheads an elderly Buddhist mill owner (kinda like a gang initiation ceremony I guess), we learn this:

The killing in February was one in a spate of beheadings that has shocked Thailand, a nation with no past history of the practice, and fueled fears that the brutal terrorist tactics of the Middle East are spreading in Asia./ Twenty-five beheadings — including 10 already this year — have been reported in southern Thailand since an Islamic-inspired insurgency erupted in 2004, claiming more than 2,200 lives…/”Beheadings are certainly on the rise outside of the Middle East proper,” said Timothy Furnish, professor of Middle Eastern history at Georgia Perimeter College. “These groups do take their cues from … hardcore Islamic thought coming out of the Arab world. Beheading infidels not only shocks, but also demonstrates Islamic bona fides to other groups.”/ Thai authorities say jihad videos from the Middle East, captured from rebel training camps, may be inspiring young men like Waekaji. One clip said to have come from Iraq shows a woman lying on her side on a patch of grass as a man slowly cuts her throat with a long knife. Blood spurts from the wound, the screaming finally stops and her head is completely severed

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

“So stupid and silly it doesn’t even warrant a response.” -She never took a logic class

That statement is relevant for about 99.9% of what our Funny morons® type here each and every day.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

I’ve read and heard a bit about “just enforce the laws on the books” regarding illegals (what’s the current nonracist phrase we’re supposed to use?). I’ve reviewed sections and summaries of Public Law 99-603 Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Near as I can tell, the penalties are pretty minimal - employer fines of $1,000 to $10,000, no penalties I can find for the illegals.

No wonder we have a mess. And it’ll continue to get worse. Dems, Reps - what an overall lack of leadership.

By The spokesperson for In other words

June 8, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

Neo-conservatism is a short-sighted, self-serving reactionary philosophy. It is not a party affiliation, although, as almost 80% of all Americans know, the vast percentage of those opposed to meaningful progress in a wide variety of extremely important areas for those reason listed above are Republicans.

Iow wanted me to pass along that is always satisfying to teach someone something they didn’t know before and he was glad he could help.

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this

in other words@ 11:56,

You poor lil’ peeping Tom!! You had to get down & dirty. Why don’t you grow up? Take your vitamins. Maybe that would help.

Goldie-Oldie,

I checked the Constitution and found it was not ten thousand years old. What a crock!! Maybe I am an illegal alien to this fair country. And maybe you are too, Goldie.

Better tell your idols, Senators Reid and Kennedy ‘cause I don’t think they know that they are illegal. Or maybe they do know.

Perhaps all us latecomers (after ten thousand years ago) will be deported to Mexico. Not many people left down there.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 12:41 PM | Link to this

She never took a logic class,

I assume you are referring to GoldieDim? I was just repeating her assertion afterall.

Perhaps you should read Paul’s 12:12 to “get” the idiocy of Goldie’s “logic”.

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

WONDER WHAT”S UP WITH THIS??

Breaking: Joint Chiefs Chairman Pace replaced. MSNBC reports, “Pentagon sources are telling NBC’s Jim Miklaszewski that Defense Secretary Gates has replaced Gen. Peter Pace as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff with Adm. Mike Mullen. He is currently the Navy’s chief naval officer.”

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Spokesperson: Not so fast! Don’t tell me I have no right to be greedy. And, by the way, torture is American! And don’t give me any of that crap about Mary being a Jew. Mary is the mother of God! Jaysus! Who, most likely, was a closet republican. Greed and death are good for the economy.

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

A federal judge froze William Jefferson’s assets

I thought Jefferson had already done that.

By In her own words

June 8, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Maybe I am an illegal alien to this fair country.

BINGO!

By In other words

June 8, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

I a*-u-me an enormous amount. For instance, I a*-u-me that most of the far right-wing information I read is not sheer lunacy. I also detest personal accountability as evidenced by the question, you are referring to GoldieDim? As I am generally incapable of any original intelligent thought, I was just trying, and failing miserably, to repeat her.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

In the news

Where’d you hear that?

By Paul

June 8, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this

In the news 12:52

[[froze… Jefferson’s assets]]

Cute.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

Thanks for this piece. Beautifully said.

Here’s one for you, dated 6/1/2007:

In a rare rebuke of a public official by name, the Senate Select Intelligence Committee has issued a scathing report blasting former Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV./The report claims Wilson misled the public and the intelligence committee about his trip to Niger in 2002 on behalf of the CIA to investigate claims that Iraq was seeking to purchase uranium in Africa.

Time to prosecute Ms. Plame Wilson for perjury - after Bush pardons Scooter.

By Truthman

June 8, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this

Today Amanda Beard!

Tomorrow Suchita Vadlamani!!

Go for it, Girlfriend!!

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this

“There’s a lot of blowhards in the political process, you know, a lot of hot-air artists, people who have got something fancy to say.” —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 17, 2007

I swear the man speaks like a 7th grader.

By The spokesperson for In other words

June 8, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

Daniel, are you really Zell Miller?

By Midori

June 8, 2007 1:07 PM | Link to this

{{{{{Oh, well. This is the same group that has used Tillman, Lynch, and Sheehan as propaganda tools. Why should I be surprised?}}}}}}}

lesson for today, boys and girls: it’s only ok for those people to be used as REPUBLICAN propaganda tools.

Once they woke up and started speaking the truth, then and ONLY then can they be regarded as tools of the left.

See how that works?

Dust-for-brains logic -101.

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this

Daniel,12:23

You are “funny” enough on Friday without praising the ever-loving-liberal Luckovich.

He, ml, is always knocking the President of the United States even as our leader represents us with good results at the G8 Conference. Scores good advantage points on environmental treaties, encourages the new US friendly French president,listens to Ms. Markel and even soothes Putin by encouraging his ideas on missile defense. The President is strong even though German food seems to disagree with him. (So what’s new about sauerbratten?)

Just once, I would like to see Luckovich show some preference for the USA instead of demeaning our President for the joy of those who hate us.

And Daniel, it wouldn’t hurt for liberals to stop making us guess about their allegiance.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

Pace is history.

Reconfirmation is impossible for the losers of the Iraq occupation.

Instead of being held accountable and fired, they will retire.

Many more to go to get winning leadership.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

In Other Words,

I’ll tell you what - Why don’t YOU tell us in your own words what you think the parameters should be!

10,000 years? 5,000? 1,000? 100?

By Truthman

June 8, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

Oh Dusty, you are so infantile in your thinking - or whatever that is you call it!

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

Spokesperson: No. I am the heart of the republican party. We need more hate and division in the country. War is good. Christian torture is healthy. Hate is a family value. Money. Money. Money. Grab the cash. Screw the little guy. We need more greed. We aren’t grabbing money fast enough. We need to borrow more from China.

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this

Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS): Chairman of the Senate Cover-up Committee

Joseph Wilson Fights Back

IS THERE ANY DOUBT THAT NEO CONS ARE OUT TO SCREW UP OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM….

By Midori

June 8, 2007 1:28 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish:

got a link to that “scathing report”?

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 1:30 PM | Link to this

The Missing Intelligence Report

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Here is the Democrat’s plan to get rid of the Alternative Minimum Tax. I agree we need to ditch that tax, but I don’t think this solution is much better.

How long before $500,000 is “middle class”? That’s exactly what went wrong with the AMT in the first place.

This illustrates the idiocy of coming up with arbitrary income figures to receive punitive (or favorable) tax treatment.

I also think it is wrong to argue that “only 2% of the population is affected”. Is it fair to be unjust just because only a few people are affected?

Time to dump this whole system for the Fair Tax!

By w00t

June 8, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this

Dusty, please don’t ever have kids. Your distorted view on reality will surely lead them to a mental health facility.

Bush does nothing for this country. If it seems that he is, then it’s a lie and it’s all for big business.

If Bush really cared about this country and its people, then he would end the war in Iraq, he would support the members at the G8 summit, he would stick to conservative principals and bring the nation’s debt under control, stop global welfare, etc, etc, etc.

By Loyal and Free

June 8, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this

The past six years have unquestionably been a disaster for the nation and for American democracy. But is it truly the swan song for the Republican Party?

How many years will it take to undo the incredible damage wrought by this terribly unqualified President?

Remember when the nation was not so almost universally disrespected and was strong and relatively united?

It is very sad to see this happening and sometimes I actually feel sorry for President Bush. He is to blame for the quagmire we now suffer through daily, but I am more disheartened by the American voters who empowered him in the first place. There were way too many warnings and way too many personal failures on his part to ignore, but many did so anyway.

And my heart aches for the 3500 American families who have had their lives ruined, in my opinion, by this failed experiment. There will be many, many more.

I am almost embarrassed to admit this, but sometimes I long for the days of Bill Clinton, who was much more like FDR - strong enough to react with reason and purpose rather than with blind anger, lies and selfish motives.

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this

Waxman’s letter to Hayden RE: Wilson

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this

I got to hand it to you liberals, you solved this “global warming” problem awfully fast:

{{{Up to 8 inches of snow fell in the Big Horn Mountains in northern Wyoming and forced highway officials to close a section of U.S. 14A between Burgess Junction and Lovell.}}}

And with such little effort too, all you had to do was talk about it.

But, it now appears you have brought back “global cooling.”

Maybe you should just STFU, no?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Midori

June 8, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this

In the News,

thank you for the many informative links.

they help clear up a lot of the lies, misinformation, and overall stupidity touted by the right.

By In other words

June 8, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this

I’ll tell you what - Why don’t YOU tell us in your own words what you think the parameters should be!

10,000 years? 5,000? 1,000? 100?

Dust-for-brains logic -101.

By @@

June 8, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this

Sound thinking Condi. Putin’s offer sounded sooooooo good, but upon further review was soooooo bad. It could have benefitted Iran more than anyone else.

“But we are continuing our discussions with the Czech Republic and Poland and we’re going to do that, we are continuing our discussions in NATO, and we’re going to do that. We will do what is best from the point of view of actually dealing with the problem, which is a real security problem. This isn’t a faux security problem.”

Putin “boosted”.

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

CHECK THIS OUT FOR REP AND DEM DEBATE FACT CHECKING AND FAIR TAX TOO

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

Dusty: I assume you are a good person. You are, most likely, a good neighbor. Surely, you would never kick your dog or throw garbage onto your neighbors lawn. Having said that, your painful agony over Bush lacks credence. Answer three questions: Do we have to love Bush to love America? Do we have to believe Bush to trust America? May we trust ourselves and the truth, or do we have to believe what Bush tells us?

By liberalextremist

June 8, 2007 1:45 PM | Link to this

Dusty as I periodically read your comments, you are nothing more than an a$$ kissing C*^# without an original thought.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 1:46 PM | Link to this

{{{By Stupid and Crippled June 8, 2007 1:34 PM Remember when the nation was not so almost universally disrespected and was strong and relatively united, blah, blah, blah.}}}

Coward:

Leaders of the world’s key industrialized nations Thursday clinched a compromise deal on combating climate change, including efforts to halve global greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The Group of Eight (G8) summit also witnessed an apparent easing of East-West tensions, with Russian President Vladimir Putin offering to share use of a missile radar station in Azerbaijan as an alternative to controversial US plans to deploy elements of a missile shield in Central Europe.

Bush is the man.

You gimp, goony liberals are jealous.

Plus you suck.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By mm

June 8, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this

Hey wingnuts. You continue to spout the rhetoric that anyone who does not support Bush is not a true American.

Under that logic, I guess you were not true Americans during the Clinton years.

Hypocrites.

By Midori

June 8, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this

would someone PLEASE confiscate Andy’s keys to the liquor cabinet?

By Two fer Friday

June 8, 2007 1:51 PM | Link to this

MONTGOMERY, Ala. - Republican Sen. Charles Bishop who punched a Democratic lawmaker in the head expressed regret, saying “that’s not the way grown men solve their problems,” but he said he won’t immediately apologize.

The usual Republican Modus Operendi, “Fight first, diplomacy later”. Worked so great in Iraq, they’re usung it in Congressional chambers now!

WASHINGTON - Veteran Republican Sen. Ted Stevens has hired lawyers and been instructed by the FBI to preserve records relevant to a burgeoning federal investigation into corruption in Alaska, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Looks like the Republicans are calling the Democrats ‘Jefferson- Bribery’ charges with a ‘Bishop-Assault and Battery’ & raising them a ‘Stevens- Theft by Taking’ scandal. When will the Democrats ever learn, Republicans will whup their azz any day of the week when it comes to corruption.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Today’s installment of Republican Double-Speak: “American troops will stay in Iraq as long as needed and not a day longer.” = “American troops would be stationed in Iraq permanently on the Korean model!”

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this

Dusty: Are we true Americans, even though we distrust Bush?

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 1:54 PM | Link to this

{{{By mentalmidget June 8, 2007 1:49 PM Hey wingnuts. You continue to spout the rhetoric that anyone who does not support Bush is not a true American. Under that logic, I guess you were not true Americans during the Clinton years.}}}

Clinton hated America too, you dumbas-s.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 1:55 PM | Link to this

Loyal and Free,

You say - {{{Remember when the nation was not so almost universally disrespected and was strong and relatively united?}}}

Remember when Leftist professors didn’t dominate American education? Just look above^^^ for all the comments from Leftists who just HATE the fact that this country was settled by European White Men and who would prefer that Cro-mangon man be roaming around in their place.

Midori,

Maybe this will help.

{{{According to Wilson, that memo was “little more than a recitation of his contacts and bona fides.” But in additional views from intelligence committee vice-chairman Sen. Kit Bond, Sen. Hatch, and Sen. Burr, released on May 25, 2007, they state flat out, “This is not true.”/And then they drop the bomb. “The Committee did not release the full text of the document, thinking it was unnecessary in light of the other evidence provided in the [original] report, but considering the controversy surrounding this document, making the full text available now seems prudent.”/The Valerie Plame e-mail, now fully declassified, shows without any doubt that she recommended her husband for the mission in Niger.}}}

Source:

www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=28662)

Here’s the de-classified email.

Sorry that it’s not from any terrorists daughters, but it’s the best I can do right now because…

I’m off to the pool.

Later.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this

Andy is drunker than w.

By IN THE NEWS

June 8, 2007 1:59 PM | Link to this

NEWSMAX AND FRONTPAGE SHOULD ALWAYS BEEN QUESTIONED…..

(YOU SHOULD ALSO QUESTION ALL THE SOURCES I DIG UP….)

NOBODY”S PERFECT, BUT ONLY 21% REMAIN NEOCONS>

By Paul

June 8, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

mm 1:49

[[You continue to spout the rhetoric that anyone who does not support Bush is not a true American.]]

I’ve read this forum for a while now. I don’t recall seeing this. I’ve seen references that opposing some of Pres Bush’s policies isn’t good for America, or can inadvertently provide support for our enemies - but I’ve not seen the direct link you reference.

Two fer Friday

[[Today’s installment of Republican Double-Speak: “American troops will stay in Iraq as long as needed and not a day longer.” = “American troops would be stationed in Iraq permanently on the Korean model!”]]

Care to guess which Party/Candidate(s) nearly had a coronary when this Administration did a big drawdown of troops in Korea? Said it was really, really dumb and dangerous and we needed to leave the troops right where they were?

By save the whales kill the seals

June 8, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

deport the humans out of America. they are all occupiers.

except midori- ummm hmmm.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

Dusty:

By The Watcher

June 8, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

””“I’ve read this forum for a while now. I don’t recall seeing this. I’ve seen references that opposing some of Pres Bush’s policies isn’t good for America, or can inadvertently provide support for our enemies “”“

Try looking just a smidge harder…..of course you may be trying to parse the words.

””“”Care to guess which Party/Candidate(s) nearly had a coronary when this Administration did a big drawdown of troops in Korea? Said it was really, really dumb and dangerous and we needed to leave the troops right where they were?”“”

So, what?

….Learning from history maybe?

Is it possible that maybe folks have grown wiser? Ok, just some of us.

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 2:09 PM | Link to this

We need to refrain from using the term global warming. The small-minded Funny morons® latch on to it and refer to weather reports like “Up to 8 inches of snow fell in the Big Horn Mountains in northern Wyoming” as if it proves anything.

Let’s use the more accurate term climate change because as the climate becomes more and more unstable we will continue to experience wacky weather. 8 inches of snow in June is NOT NORMAL.

The overall outcome will indeed be a hotter planet.

By Funny morons®

June 8, 2007 2:11 PM | Link to this

More wacky weather

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 2:12 PM | Link to this

By Paul

June 8, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this

Watcher

Wasn’t interested in parsing, just the intent and meaning. Saying “anyone who does not support Bush is not a true American” seems pretty clear. I’ve seen one side accuse the other of saying precisely that, or of saying those who agree with any policy are wingnuts, ignorant, etc, but don’t recall anyone saying what was alleged.

Regarding Korea, so what, growing wiser?

Well, it was Senator Kerry while running for President. I viewed it as entirely political (Bush suggests = oppose it). So if Democrats are learning from history, growing wiser by not engaging in kneejerk political opposition, well, that’s a good thing.

Just struck me as funny that keeping troops in Iraq for a long time is a lousy idea - Korea cited - while Korea and Germany both had troop levels slashed in the last few years.

By @@

June 8, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this

You know how when you throw a pebble in a pond, the ripples move outward?

(((Leftist parties dominated European politics throughout the 1990s and the early years of the 21st century; however, 2007 will see the end of the left as a leading force on the Continent. This slow shift has been accompanied by a move toward the right that reaches farther than the traditional “Big Three” — Germany, France and the United Kingdom — to include Poland, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium and Austria. In fact, a series of elections has allowed center and right parties to take the reins in all the large European states. It is time to consider the possibilities raised by a conservative Europe.)))

(((Stratfor first forecast the decline of the European left in 2005, when Germany and Poland both elected center-right coalitions. The current agenda of the right in both countries favors participation in military alliances such as NATO and closer U.S. relations. The Polish government is an avid supporter of the missile defense shield proposed by the United States, and under Merkel, Germany is considering getting behind such a program — a policy her leftist predecessor, former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, finds inconceivable.)))

(((For the first time in decades, Germany is a full and powerful member of the European community. More important, for the first time in centuries, there is no established political regime in Europe to counter German ambitions. The second is the United States, whose reach and influence in Europe runs deep.)))

(((For now, these two powers are more or less on the same page, sharing concerns about terrorism, energy security, immigration and Russian relations. The latter is the issue of the day; the Kremlin’s primary strategic thrust always has been to divide and conquer the European Union, and so — from the U.S. viewpoint — being able to count on a powerful and friendly Germany to ride herd on the Continent is no small blessing.)))

(((For now, Russia is the clear danger in Eurasia, and the German-led allied states of Europe are the perfect tool to keep the Kremlin in check.)))

America……..”THE ROCK”…….”THE CORNERSTONE”.

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this

Woot,1:33

Your ignorance is refreshing in that you know so little and want to talk so much.

Your greatest grievance is that I do not think like you. You despise everything American. I do not.

Continue being a fool, woot, but don’t try to evaluate the abilities of others. It makes you laughable.

Try talking with “Loyal and Free”@1:34? She is lamenting our dead troops while betraying the living who fight. Both of you undercut, undermine, and underestimate the efforts of this country. That seems to be the only discernible goal of liberals.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 2:26 PM | Link to this

By Loyal and Free

June 8, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Some professors are extremists but there is no doubt that overall, American universities still provide the brightest and most rational minds.

I believe you are using hyperbole when you say that American education is dominated by Leftist professors. And EVEN IF you were correct, it is my considerable experience that all but a tiny percentage simply teach their courses and offer no clues as to their politics.

It sounds as if your experience was very different. Where did you go to college?

These are after all the last remaining institutions that offer ultra-progressive opportunities afforded nowhere else. Business generally doesn’t. Government certainly doesn’t. Thinking outside of the box on steroids, if you will. That is why they offer degrees in Liberal Arts and Sciences not Conservative Arts and Sciences.

Besides how is this even remotely related to my statement that this republic was much more respected and united before this administration? I simply can’t see the connection.

I’ll respond to the equally strange European White Man vs. Cro-Magnon dilemma later. Gotta go!

By Scooter

June 8, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

Paris will now be the talk of all the upper crust parties. I’m sure she also thanks us for the publicity and interest.

Did Two Fer really imply diplomacy did not take place during the 90’s? That is probably why Hillary has such a difficult time with Iraq politically, because she remembers non-committal Bill’s troubles with Saddam.

Amazing how 9/11 made Saddam’s shenanigans acceptable? A few years pass and all of a sudden Saddam was a contained man who corrupted a humanitarian program to feed the majority of Iraqis? Saddam hated UBL and would never collaborate with him to attack a common enemy? and on, and on… but darn they are convinced.

Saddam can kickers?

Assuming UBL and Zawahiri are in the Afghan Mountains, where they have been amazing weapons and fortifying their elevated positions for a long time, how many troops would the whack-a-molers have us “commit” to the mountain?

By Paul

June 8, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

Daniel 2:26

[[Do we have to believe Bush to trust America?]]

Did anyone here seriously say that? I’m almost wondering if that’s one of those strawmen people set up so they can knock it down.

[[The answer is: NO!]]

Of course, I agree with you on that. It was true for the previous President (all of them, actually) and will be true for all future Presidents.

By The Watcher

June 8, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this

Gates Forced Pace To Resign To Avoid Congressional Oversight Of Iraq War

By The Watcher

June 8, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this

GOP threatens ‘meltdown’ over judicial nominees

By Loyal and Free

June 8, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this

Hi again Buy Danish.

The recorded history of mankind has been replete with one tribe or nation slaughtering another. I believe one of the greatest books ever written is The Outline of History by H. G. Wells. Yep, that H. G. Wells. It is very long but absolutely fascinating and details the entire recorded history of men up to the onset of WWII when it was published. I wholeheartedly recommend it to any and everyone.

As we have evolved as a species we have become slightly less blood-thirsty, but not much. However, I believe that the smarter we become, the less violent we become, and that is a good thing.

I would never dare to speak for those Leftists who just HATE the fact that this country was settled by European White Men that you refer to. But it is interesting that you use the word settle. Yes, I suppose that you could say that Cortez and the Spanish settled in Central America, but there are certainly more descriptive and accurate terms don’t you think?

And I am splitting hairs here somewhat but Cro-Magnons never lived on this continent.

But again, and much more importantly, your response has no pertinence with my original proposition. None.

Have a good weekend all!

By Jesus

June 8, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

{{{By moron June 8, 2007 2:09 PM Let’s use the more accurate term climate change because as the climate becomes more and more unstable we will continue to experience wacky weather. 8 inches of snow in June is NOT NORMAL. The overall outcome will indeed be a hotter planet.}}}

Yes, that is always what I pictured when you sniveling Coward liberals said the climate was getting warmer, is that it would snow in June.

Now that is “wacky.”

So the “hotter” it gets, the more it will snow in summer, and, um, uh, what ever.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Goldie

June 8, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this

Dust-For-Brains— always in need of a little more history education, aren’t you?

Here’s a report on recent research which proposes the spread of the first Americans coming in from Asia via a supposed ice-free corridor ca. 12,000 bp, can be traced through the distribution of Clovis technology across North America, and the way in which it appears to vary at a regional level.

It’s not real hard to learn new things, Dusty-brains— but it does require open eyes, ears and mind!

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 4:18 PM | Link to this

Ho hum,

I go out for awhile and seems like it’s Girls Gone Wild here. Poor old Daniel thinks he rules this blog. Sad case. I suppose he wants everybody who disagrees with him to cutnrun.

Daniel, respect for the President is what is lacking with liberals. When you say the words that terrorists want to hear, you encourage them. That means undermine, undercut and underestimate your own country. Pointing out disagreements is one thing. The constant, untruthful, even salacious comments about the President and his family are beyond anything you can call sensible, much less patriotic. There is a difference between disagreement and idiotic frenzy.

There!! I’ve said it. Patriotic!! The truth can be tolerated but outrageous fabrications have become common with liberals.

Loyal and free,

You are right that in America’s universities there are some very bright minds. I know because several of my children are in universities, one who has already taken the first qualifiers for a PhD in bio-chemistry.

The professors are very bright in their field of study and almost all are very liberal. In fact, I think it would be truly politically incorrect and seldom seen for a professor to be conservative. I have heard of only one.

Perhaps you have forgotten UCLA and the utter dissention they have produced many times. This is not just a student thing. It is instigated and led by professors. It has spread into the university systems as THE way to be. That is very sad.

Remember the historical reminders from WWII.”A slip of the lip may sink a ship.” Let’s not sink our country.

By Can't Resist

June 8, 2007 4:31 PM | Link to this

Liberal Prod

By getalife

June 8, 2007 4:33 PM | Link to this

w is officially off the wagon

By @@

June 8, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this

I’ve always found it interesting that when it comes to economics, students tend to be more conservative.

A professor of Economics at Harvard University had this to say about economics majors. He was responding to a question:

(((As a Princeton grad myself, I have full confidence in your teacher. Putting that issue aside, let me address your central question: Does the study of economics tend to make people conservative?)))

(((I believe the answer is, yes. My experience is that many students find that their views become somewhat more conservative after studying economics. There are at least three, related reasons.)))

(((First, in some cases, students start off with utopian views of public policy, where a benevolent government can fix all problems. One of the first lessons of economics is that life is full of tradeoffs. That insight, completely absorbed, makes many utopian visions less attractive. Once you recognize, for example, that there is a tradeoff between equality and efficiency, as economist Arthur Okun famously noted, many public policy decisions become harder.)))

(((Second, some of the striking insights of economics make one more respectful of the market as a mechanism for coordinating a society. Because market participants are motivated by self-interest, a person might naturally be suspect of market-based societies. But after learning about the gains from trade, the invisible hand, and the efficiency of market equilibrium, one starts to approach the market with a degree of admiration and, indeed, awe.)))

(((Third, the study of actual public policy makes students recognize that political reality often deviates from their idealistic hopes. Much income redistribution, for example, is aimed not toward the needy but toward those with political clout. This Dave Barry column, which is reprinted in Chapter 22 of my favorite economics textbook, describes a good example.)))

(((For these three reasons, many students in introductory economics courses become more conservative. Nonetheless, studying economics does not by itself determine one’s political ideology. I know good economists who are distinctly right of center and good economists who are slightly left of center. In my department at Harvard, I would guess that Democrats outnumber Republicans among the faculty at large (although there is surely more political balance in the economics department than in most other departments at the un

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 4:43 PM | Link to this

See what I mean about liberals?:

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Screaming and crying, Paris Hilton was escorted out of a courtroom and back to jail Friday after a judge ruled that she must serve out her entire 45-day sentence behind bars rather than in her Hollywood Hills home.

L.A. is packed full of pinko®s and gays, this is how they treat their fine women?

WTF, man?

Sick, sick, sick.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Midori

June 8, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

doesn’t “alcohol-free” beer contain a small amount of alcohol?

he isn’t fooling anyone.

probably doing shots of Snapps, too.

I know, I know: That’s a subject Andy would be an expert on.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this

w drunker than Andy

By Paul

June 8, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

Dusty

Nice words on having a classy disagreement.

Saying many university faculty are nonbiased is similar to saying American media is nonbiased. Every so often one runs across a survey or report showing faculty party affiliation. Republican (if one cares to equate Republican with more conservative and Democrat as more liberal) doesn’t show up nearly as often. It often varies by geographic location or size - but by and large I think the nature of the beast is liberal.

I made a comment, my son smiled and said “you can’t say that one culture is better than another, Dad. They’re different and their culture is their culture.” I said “what about Nazi Germany?” He said “They weren’t a culture. They didn’t last long enough.” I asked “And what if they won, established the Thousand Year Reich and turned the Soviet Union, parts of America and all Africa into a vast concentration camp?” His answer: “I know it’s garbage, Dad. I said everything you said to the prof and I repeated to you the nonsense he told me. I’ve learned to keep my mouth shut, tell them on the test what they want to hear and get a good grade.” Sad, isn’t it? (BTW - he’s now in the business world and has a rep as a very straight shooter - don’t ask him a question if you don’t want to hear a straight answer).

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this

Look at this little jewel:

{{{Even Reuters quotes a Palestinian legislator who says that Palestinians are “so fed up with the armed groups (Al Qaeda) ‘they now wish the Israeli occupation would take over in Gaza or hope for the return of Jordanian rule in the West Bank’ to get rid of them.”}}}

Now that the truth is starting to dawn on these Palestinians, will they begin to wonder WTF Al Jazeera was talking about?

And the western media, the Atlanta Urinal for instance?

The whole world will soon realize that we are not the bad guys, and man, are things gonna get real shi-tty for you sniveling Cowards.

Your end is near.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this

Poor kid,

Knows his Dad is an idiot using scare tactics.

Geez Paul.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 5:00 PM | Link to this

Too stupid to even realize?:

{{{Hastings got appointed to the federal bench by Jimmy Carter in 1979. In less than two years, he got indicted for soliciting a bribe in an FBI sting. In 1983, he won an acquittal, but a subsequent House investigation found that he had committed perjury in that trial. The House Judiciary Committee authorized a whopping seventeen counts for impeachment against Hastings in 1988… .Now Hillary has embraced Hastings, and indeed has made the former perjurer and corrupt judge as her campaign’s national representative. She says that with Hastings’ help, her “message of change” will get rolled across the country. The message is that the Clinton campaign has its own idea about the culture of corruption—they want to pursue it.}}}

Is this “woman” really this ignorant?

Is this blissful ignorance not a blessing for the Republicans?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

Goldie@4:14

Thanks for confirming my statement at 10:48. I mentioned that the study of prehistoric history states that the first humans to set foot on Alaska came by way of the Bering Straits from Asia. In other words, they did NOT ORIGINATE in North America. Try to keep up.

Getalife,

Put down your crack pipe before you start insinuating big lies about the President who happens to be a teetotaler.

You and Midori know an awful lot about drunks. Don’t blame your knowledge on Andy. He’s as sound as a dollar and doesn’t spend his days knocking the country and the President. Why don’t you two try it? The truth would be a lot better than those “suggestive” comments you make.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

“Loyal and Free”,

Apparently your antennae for irony and satire is a bit on the weak side.

I am fully aware that Cro-Magnon man did not inhabit this continent.

Indeed, if we were to follow Goldie’s idea that one needs to have established a homestead 10,000 years ago in order to lay claim to it, we would all be living in a very small and immensely overcrowded portion of the planet - and would be killing each other as we fought over the resources.

You’ll have to explain to us another time what the difference between “Ultra-Progressive” and “Leftist” is.

Despite your protestations to the contrary, it is undeniable that the trend in education has been to portray this country and its white, male, Christian founders as the enemy. Indeed, people like GoldieDhimmi complain about that all the time right here on this blog.

An educated adult should know that the definition of “liberal arts” has nothing to do with the word “conservative”.

Ironically, someone who calls themselves “Loyal and FREE” should be the first to know the difference.

Here are some definitions for you.

Have a nice weekend.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 5:15 PM | Link to this

Crack pipe?

Now I get it, Dusty is a crackhead.

Go figure.

Loser.

By Midori

June 8, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this

you’re correct, Dusty: I do know an awful lot about drunks.

Which model still do you have up and running?

By Midori

June 8, 2007 5:21 PM | Link to this

LOL, Getalife: who knew that Dusty was both Andy’s supplier AND his pusher?

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 5:25 PM | Link to this

Paul: You got it! Notice, though, none of the right-wingeers can respond. In fact, they are incapable of an answer, many republicans believe they are above the law and the country. Witness the “Pardon Libby” crowd. While we’re at it we should pardon all republicans in prison, under investigation and indictment. Wait! The list is too long. We don’t have enough ink in our pens.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

We have finally found one entrepreneurial, free-market thing about Midori:

She is an expert at making her own moonshine and is familiar with all the different models of stills.

Way to go, Midori!

By Dusty

June 8, 2007 5:32 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Glad to hear about your “straight shooter son” and your political discussions. We don’t do a lot of political discussing here. When I mention liberal professors, my “students” just kinda sigh. I think they have learned as your son did, best not to bring up politics with your professors.

I even steer away from those discussions with my liberal friends. One has red hair and I take note of that. Besides they are good friends and we tolerate our differences.

Have a good weekend, Paul and all. I think it is going to rain. You know, good folks..that wet stuff.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Those two crackheads do love each other.

It makes sense now.

Its not the kool aid, its the crack.

Geez.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 5:35 PM | Link to this

Aw, c’mon getalife.

Scare tactics? Parents do a service by having their kids challenge assumptions and drawing conclusions based upon whatever “reasoning” they’re hit with. “Every culture is the same” was the professor’s line. Only “scare” was an idea in a challenge to the statement based upon an extrapolation of a likely outcome if the Germans were victorious or negotiated a peace (a line I picked up from an historical novel).

Wait - don’t tell me you’re a Holocaust denier? You weren’t serious, just having fun, right?

By getalife

June 8, 2007 5:43 PM | Link to this

“I asked “And what if they won, established the Thousand Year Reich and turned the Soviet Union, parts of America and all Africa into a vast concentration camp?”

Pathetic hypothetical scare tactic trying to define thinking.

Poor kid.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 5:51 PM | Link to this

UnFunny Moron,

Here’s a scoop for you about snow in the summer. It may not be “normal” but you can’t blame it on SUVs or the usual scapegoats:

“Eighteen Hundred and Froze To Death The Year There Was No Summer”

Of the cold summers in the period 1811 to 1817, the year 1816 has gone down in the annals of New England history as “The Year There Was No Summer,” the “Poverty Year” and “Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death.” The year began with a moderate but dry winter. Spring was tardy and continued very dry. The growing season from late spring to early fall, however, was punctuated by a series of devastating cold waves that did major damage to the crops and greatly reduced the food supply. In areas of central and northern New England, the summer had only two extended periods without frost or near freezing temperatures. A widespread snow fell in June. As a result, corn did not ripen and hay, fruits, and vegetables were greatly reduced in quantity and quality.

Why did this happen do you suppose? Was MAN to blame?

{{{Various theories have been put forward.

The most likely cause was volcanic influences. Proponents note that a number of major volcanic eruptions preceded 1816… The volcanic theory of climatic influence relates increased volcanic activity with decreased temperatures}}}

AND

{{{Other causes of temperature abnormalities which have been hypothesized include abnormal temperature of ocean waters over a large area, solar variations related to sunspot activity, or changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide or ozone content, but no data exist to uphold or refute these theories. The final possible cause is that the weather of 1816 was just a matter of chance —- that a series of events occurring at the right place and time could initiate the atmospheric conditions which became the weather of the Summer of 1816.}}}

It’s never “chance” or “mother nature” for you guys - it’s always the fault of greedy, polluting capitalists.

What a miserable way to lead one’s life.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Don’t you know that you are only permitted to scare children about George Bush, Karl Rove and Neo-cons.

Teaching them about the implications of history and true evil is…evil!

btw, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that Getalife is a Holocaust Denier. We already know that he is a “partial birth abortion denier” and a “Sicilian Mafia denier”.

By Paul

June 8, 2007 5:54 PM | Link to this

getalife

It’s also known as teaching your kid to recognize styles in setups in arguments. And not being intimidated by position, rank or power. All the while being diplomatic.

We have a good time. But I do tell him it’s generally not a good idea to respond to a higher-up (or a wife) with “geez.”

Now I am outta here - cheers -

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

{{{{{doesn’t “alcohol-free” beer contain a small amount of alcohol?- by Midori}}}}}

Yes, parrot, and so do fruit juice, bread, and lots of other every day things.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

Paul: You may have described critical thinking. Long ago, when I was in college a fellow spoke to us who was a psychologist at Nuremberg. He had “interviewed” the top Nazis there. His opinion was that the Third Reich was so corrupt it would have crumbled from within had there been a negotiated peace. The Nazis felt themselves above the rule of law. Big mistake.

By @@

June 8, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

Well, if our media is going to serve the enemy’s aspirations, we may as well join forces and do it “the right way”.

Gauging the Effect of the Iraq War on U.S. Officials and the American Public

(((Aside from assessing the impact of isolated events like the GIMF ultimatum, Islamists have been following Western media to see how the daily clashes with the mujahideen in Iraq and elsewhere affect U.S. politics and public opinion. Below are two examples:)))

(((On March 11, 2007, the forum www.al-mohajroon.com posted a message titled “Poll: Americans Confirm Their Troops’ Defeat in Iraq.” [12] The message cited a Zogby poll in which over 50% of participants said that U.S. troops had failed in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The message stated that “the poll was conducted in the shadow of the continuing collapse of the American occupier’s army, [which is yielding to] the surge of the Islamic resistance operations in these two countries.”)))

(((A March 28, 2007 posting on the www.al-mohajroon.com forum emphasized that the U.S. House of Representatives had refused to approve the war funding bill without a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq. [13] The message ended with the following call to the mujahideen: “Make [your] attacks on them more intensive in the months before their withdrawal… They have not [yet] received [a big enough] part of the punishment they deserve for the crime they committed against the umma’s rights… Let history record that an army entered [Iraq] but did not [manage to] leave.”)))

All together now…1-2-3….

We, the American public, support our troops in their efforts to KICK YOUR A$$.

You liberals can say whatever you want when writing your representatives.

Will they keep their mouths shut though?

Probably not, they’ve got a presidential election to think about.

For liberals/Democrats; some things are just more important.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 5:59 PM | Link to this

I forgot to mention that it is absolutely de rigeur to scare your kids about the coming catastrophe of global warming, and to teach them all about the scary people who are at fault.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this

Never denied the Holocaust but using scare tatics might work on wingnuts but not with real Americans.

Brainwashing your kids by scaring them is pathetic.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

I could just imagine what you tell your kids about those evil Muslims.

Cowards.

Geez.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

Boobs: Are you lonely? It’s Friday night. Give it a rest.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 6:14 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I wish your side would get scared once in awhile. It would help if you feared real threats to our existence, instead of wasting all your energy on Chicken Little apocalypse tales of a doomed planet, and the Neo-Cons.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 6:16 PM | Link to this

Danish: You’re pretty frightening. Does that help?

By getalife

June 8, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this

BD,

I will leave you with these words from the mayor of New York City:

“There are lots of threats to you in the world. There’s the threat of a heart attack for genetic reasons. You can’t sit there and worry about everything. Get a life”

Let your kids decide and quit scaring them with your cowardice.

Geez.

By @@

June 8, 2007 6:19 PM | Link to this

Daniel:

What is it with you today?

Telling Dusty to leave the blog, get out of here and don’t come back…

telling me to give it a rest…

Do you aspire to be a fascist leader or what?

Tell me; do I give you a headACHE?

Semper and I are going out to dinner with friends shortly.

If it’s any of your business, I’ll let you know.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

Anybody ever wonder why Dhimmi Danny doesn’t moan and wail about the federal “deficit” anymore, like he did in the past?

{{{The rise in earmark secrecy has been accompanied by a massive increase in spending. In total, House Democrats have authorized $98 billion in new federal spending this year alone. They added some $6 billion to the omnibus spending package approved in January and more than $20 billion to the fiscal year 2008 budget. They stuffed more than $17 billion in additional spending into the supplemental and have racked up an additional $9 billion (and counting) in the first four appropriations bills they’ve marked up at the House Appropriations Committee.}}}

Presto, just a few short months in charge of Congress and the sniveling Coward libs “solved” the Republican deficit spending catastrophe by, viola, outspending the Republicans.

So now it is no longer something to shriek about, right Dhimmi Danny?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 6:27 PM | Link to this

Boobs: Enjoy. Here is what I asked earlier. “Do we have to love Bush to love America?” Dusty would not answer. Paul said, No. What do you say?

By rushncap

June 8, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this

More proof that there are just simply way too many idiots in this country. But hey, once we’re losing the global technology race, which is currently swinging heavily to the biological sciences, we’ll either wake the f up or become yet another superpower to have collapsed under the weight of its own hubris. I’m curious to see which one it’s going to be.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Don’t worry about me!

@@,

I was going to call Danny Boy on the exactly same thing, but I don’t have the energy to argue with sociopathic tyrants today.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2007 6:30 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

Nobody has ever said you did have to love Bush to love America, lunatic.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 6:37 PM | Link to this

{{{By rushncrap June 8, 2007 6:28 PMAmericans believe in both evolution, creationism: poll, More proof that there are just simply way too many idiots in this country.}}}

rushncrap: I know, how can those stupid people believe in “evolution?”

Geez.

I’m with you 100% on this one, I mean there is no evidence of evolution and the debate in favor of it usually consists of people screaming at you and holding their breath until they turn purple in the face.

We’d be better off just dropping this stupid theory altogether.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By @@

June 8, 2007 6:38 PM | Link to this

Daniel:

My answer would be “NO”.

But you know what Daniel….Dusty’s answer can be whatever she wants it to be, or it can be no response at all.

You see, that’s the difference between liberal fascists such as yourself, and people like me. People are free to do as they please.

Opinions are like a*******holes Danny boy, and you hold “your own” in high regard. Although I’m not sure how you manage that seeing how you’re not very “flexible”.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

RW: Thank you. There people who think Bush is America. you know. By the way, MSNBC reports that he’s at 21%. That is 21% think he got the country going in the right direction. Look, if you convince him to pardon Libby, throw one in for Paris Hilton, would you? She was bawling today about the injustice of it all.

By getalife

June 8, 2007 6:41 PM | Link to this

@@,

“If it’s any of your business, I’ll let you know.”

You just did.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 6:45 PM | Link to this

It’s a good idea to see the actual poll questions that Rushncap is fretting about.

One question was:

Creationism, that is, the idea that God created human beings———>pretty much in their present form<——-at one time within the last 10,000 years

As is often the case, they questions are poorly framed, and it is easy to see why people would answer some form of “true” for the second question since man as we know it in its present form IS comparatively recent.

You’d think that rushncap the “scientist” would be more discerning and not so eager to jump to conclusions.

By LuckoDull

June 8, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this

If this woman were a cutthroat Islamic terrorist, Bush would be catching hell right now for this:

{{{Screaming Paris Hilton Sent Back to Jail}}}

Tell me you deviants, how is this any different than Abu Ghraib?

Now we get nothing but silence from the sniveling Cowards, where is Cynthia Tucker at? Do all of her get out of jail missions have to be child killers, why not some premium heiress with a drinking problem?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Daniel

June 8, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this

Turn out the lights. It’s time to go home. Best wishes, to one and all.

By BlogFather

June 8, 2007 6:51 PM | Link to this

Did Paris put me in my place or what? She ran back to prison rather than pay off the “favor” she owed me for blogging her out of prison.

I would suggest the sheriff give Hilton a drug test. She had a whole night at home with her ‘stash. She had her drugs there too. (Oh, dont reach for THAT one RW, that’s way over your head).

Well, it looks like Hillary is the defacto president, with Bush completely dissed by the entire globe. I wonder if W believes in Global Scorning….

Well, now we have to face the pandora’s box in Iraq. Bush has assumed the liberal surrender monkey position once occupied by Sheehan, Cheney, out of respect for his daughter, has described the insurgency as “in it’s last blows”……I mean, there’s nobody left to lead us out of this.

I guess it’s up to The HILL. Her plan calls for a pullback, and allowing the Iraqis to be Mesopotamians and finish off their 10K year old civil war. Our troops patrol the borders and stop any foreign resupply, and this thing will peter out from a lack of oxygen in about……five hundred years.

That’s what Bush gave us folks, but Hill’s plan is the only way out.

The rest of you neo-pubs volunteer for mine sweeping, and I recommend Dye brainless, @@, RW and SchmuckoDork to lead the way, them being such patriots and all.

It’s a far, far better thing you do than you have ever done, and you wont be forgotten.

But either way, STFU!

bwa

Colin Powell on Meet the Press on Sunday morning.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 6:52 PM | Link to this

Look at Herr Daniel - ordering people around till the very end.

By RW-(the original)

June 8, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this

Danny,

The 21% number is the number that say America is going in the right direction. It’s been plummeting ever since Democrats took over Congress. That must be your crowd of fringe moonbat(ic)s® that make up that number. How’s it feel when 79% of the country is against you? How does it feel to be too stupid to make a decision without conducting a poll?

Pardon Scooter Now!! And Throw A Bone To Paris While You’re At It.

By Buy Danish

June 8, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

Good point about Paris and Abu Ghraib.

I think the girl is a useless twit, but she does seem to be getting a harsher punishment simply because she’s a famous and not very likeable rich girl.

Some punishment was called for but this is over the top.

By Snoop d double o-g

June 8, 2007 7:03 PM | Link to this

Blo-Fo, the Hill plan isn’t going to be any different from what’s going on now…

And I think Lucko was referring to a “Paris Hilton” more in the sense of a “Lewinski”.

Peace.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 8:05 AM | Link to this

Geez, even the Nation agrees with me:

Capitalism is ingesting global warming as happily as a python swallowing a piglet. The press, which thrives on fearmongering, promotes the nonexistent threat as vigorously as it did the imminence of Soviet attack during the cold war, in concert with the arms industry. There’s money to be made, and so, as Talleyrand said, “Enrich yourselves!” The marquee slogan in the new cold war on global warming is that the scientific consensus is virtually unanimous. This is utterly false. The overwhelming majority of climate computer modelers, the beneficiaries of the $2 billion-a-year global warming grant industry, certainly believe in it but not necessarily most real climate scientists—people qualified in atmospheric physics, climatology and meteorology. Geologists are particularly skeptical. Or take Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov, of St. Petersburg’s Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory. He says we’re on a warming trend but that humans have little to do with it, the agent being a longtime change in the sun’s heat. He says solar irradiance will fall within the next few years and we may face the beginning of an ice age. The Russian scientific establishment gave him a green light to use the nation’s space station to measure global cooling.

Check it out, I got thousands of climatologists and scientists in my court, you Kandy As-s Kowards got Jay Kookman in yous.

What else do you need to know?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{He who defines the issues tends to determine the outcome of the election. When pollster Peter Hart asked a bipartisan focus group which candidate could best protect the nation, several people mentioned Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, one mentioned Barack Obama, and no one mentioned Hillary Clinton. Evidently these people, unlike international elites, see the threat as Islamist terrorism and not climate change.}}}

It takes courage to fight Islamic terrorism which is why the Koward liberals are fighting the atmosphere instead.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{In the 102 quarters since Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts went into effect more than 25 years ago, there have been 96 quarters of growth. Since the Bush tax cuts and the current expansion began, the economy’s growth has averaged 3 percent per

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 8:10 AM | Link to this

{{{Terrorists or clueless saps? By Bob Braun, Urinal- That’s one of the problems with these highly publicized terrorism busts. They create the false impression that truly dangerous plots have been thwarted, but we really don’t have any way of evaluating the seriousness of the threats.}}}

The first World Trade Center bomber went to the rental agency the following day to get his deposit back on the truck used in the bombing. After he killed six people.

Who wants to be one of the next six, when the terrorists “get lucky” again?

What is the point of this storyline by the way? Are you saying we shouldn’t protect America because these cut throats are nothing but bumblers?

Or are you trying to pull some mindless political stunt taking the focus of the country off of national security, something that you Kandy As-s Kowards are weak at?

If there is no threat from Islamic Terrorism than why are you libs calling to adopt ALL of the 9/11 commission recommendations?

It doesn’t bother the drive by media at all to endanger your lives by playing down the threat of terrorism, especially if it helps get them elected to some government bribe taking position.

POS.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

However you can downplay the terrorist threat in Iraq, somewhat:

{{{Now the movement against Al Qaeda is spreading. “Salvation councils” similar to the Anbar Awakening have been formed in mostly Sunni Salahuddin province (north of Baghdad),Shiite-Sunni mixed Diyala province (northeast of the capital) and mostly Shiite Babil province (south of Baghdad). In some cases, their coming together coincides with cease-fires between U.S. forces and non-Al Qaeda insurgent groups. All are striving to reestablish normal relations with the Iraqi government.}}}

Deal.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By Maureen Downey The Atlanta Urinal America has a long history of mass migrations and an equally long history of mass hysteria in response to those migrations.}}}

Followed by a full page of nonsense, Americans hated the Irish and hated the Chinese, what ever, at least they were here LEGALLY.

What don’t you dullards understand.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 8:37 AM | Link to this

Cut off the end of 8:05:

{{{In the 102 quarters since Ronald Reagan’s tax cuts went into effect more than 25 years ago, there have been 96 quarters of growth. Since the Bush tax cuts and the current expansion began, the economy’s growth has averaged 3 percent per quarter, and more than 8 million jobs have been created. The deficit as a percentage of gross domestic product is below the post-World War II average.}}}

I believe we’ve also had 102 quarters of whining by the Kandy As-s Kowards.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

The unstoppable march of the wingnut world domination tour:

{{{President Nicolas Sarkozy’s plans to revive France’s economy and its identity appeared poised for victory on Sunday in parliamentary elections, with voters widely expected to give allies of their new conservative leader a mandate for change.}}}

Coming to a country near you.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 8:46 AM | Link to this

Remember what I said about liberals wanting to eliminate all humans but them:

{{{A 2003 study he co-authored, and a 2006 study that re-examined the data, found that each execution results in five fewer homicides, and commuting a death sentence means five more homicides. “The results are robust, they don’t really go away,” he said. “I oppose the death penalty. But my results show that the death penalty (deters) — what am I going to do, hide them?”}}}

Now think about what side Queen Pinko and her merry band of dullards is on.

If we released all of the death row inmates that they want, it would result in mass murder on a scale not seen since Hitler was alive.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By BORED WITH DULL

June 11, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this

Lucko- Whatever

I think I can speak for all the liberals, progressives, moderates, etc when I say:

Oh, blow it out your a$$.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

More news from the Abu Angeles women’s torture facility:

{{{“I was not eating or sleeping,” Hilton said. “I was severely depressed and felt as if I was in a cage. … It was a horrible experience.”}}}

The same libs that wouldn’t even consider harming a hair on the head of a cut throat Islamic lunatic, the same pinkos that have yet to meet a child killer that they didn’t just adore, are showing their courage, their bravery, their balls by visiting utter depravity upon this fine defenseless woman, for the “sin” of partying in Hollywood.

Geez, you liberals are weird.

There ain’t no doubt about that.

Kowards.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

June 11, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Lets see, we are arming Sunni insurgents that killed Americans.

We are working with the Sudanese government that is committing genocide.

Hell, next w will work with Iamanutjob to destroy Israel.

Geez.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this

{{{Next, we’ll enlist the media — they don’t know anything about science anyway – and we’ll use them to smear the tens of thousands of other honest scientists who might object to the questionable science being produced on demand. If we chant the mantra “global warming, global warming” long enough, soon everyone will have read about it in the papers – and you know the papers never lie. Eventually, if we’re really lucky, we’ll convert our cause into a cult religion. “Global Warming is the Opiate of the People”. You can work wonders with guilt.}}}

Kowards.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Funny morons®

June 11, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this

Top 10 signs you’re a fundamentalist

By Funny morons®

June 11, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this

“Is it really too much to ask the president of the United States to take his own policies seriously enough to actually know what they are?”

Aren’t you Funny morons® the least bit embarrassed in continuing to support this idiot?

By Observer

June 11, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

Funny morons - Top reason that a moron is a moron - he’s an arrogant, prejudiced, narrow-minded, bigotted, condescending atheist who thinks that he is smarter than everyone else because he does NOT believe in God. Maybe he’s right, but it does not give him the right to belittle those who do or to FORCE his beliefs upon others. That makes him STALIN, just another version of the fundamentalists to whom he claims to be so superior.

If you want to know what a hypocrite looks like, please go look in the mirror!

By getalife

June 11, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this

“…strikes me as a public service—it is exemplary: It sends the message, as Gilmore suggests, that even rich twits can’t avoid the law.

Scooter Libby? Not so much:

I have a different feeling about Libby. His “perjury”—not telling the truth about which reporters he talked to—would never be considered significant enough to reach trial, much less sentencing, much less time in stir if he weren’t Dick Cheney’s hatchet man. […]

But jail time? Do we really want to spend our tax dollars keeping Scooter Libby behind bars? I don’t think so”

The wingnut mind set.

Soft on crime except for Paris.

Geez.

By Funny morons®

June 11, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

…but it’s ok for Christians to do the very things you accuse me of. Take your own advice about the mirror thing.

There is nothing more intolerant than a Christian.

By silver

June 11, 2007 11:50 AM | Link to this

I see Wooten is bashing black people in New Orleans again about Katrina related fraud. The biggest fraus in the ajc is Wooten being called a journalist, imho. He should be called what he is, a paid mouth piece for the red neck bigots and ceo stuffed suits, imho.

By Lord Chaos

June 11, 2007 12:01 PM | Link to this

silver,

You are just as much of an ignorant thug as the people who are commiting those frauds!

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this

{{{By silver June 11, 2007 11:50 AM The biggest fraus in the ajc is Wooten being called a journalist, imho.}}}

Koward: Why are you whining at us about Wooten?

Are you afraid to speak up on his blog, IYHO?

Fool.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By getalife June 11, 2007 11:44 AM The wingnut mind set. Soft on crime except for Paris.}}}

al-Gitmo: Nice try:

{{{The judge who sentenced Paris Hilton to jail and the prosecutor who pressed for her incarceration objected Thursday to her early release for an unspecified medical condition. “The judicial process may have been improperly circumvented in this case,” said City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo.The LA County Democratic Party bestowed its annual John F. Kennedy Award to Rocky Delgadillo in 2002.}}}

Los Angeles is packed full of Kowardly woman hating libs, sick nasty little wankers.

Getting your kicks torturing that woman, geez.

Sick, sick, sick.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By silver

June 11, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Lap Dog Chaos - I suppose you agree with the suprme court ruling that the people at the bottom of the job market, home care workers, are not entitled to overtime? Compare that with the so called free market that grossly over rewards mr ceo with litteraly hundreds of millions of dollars of shareholder money, often via back dated options. Cheat the least amoung us, while rewarding the already fat cats. Hmms, sounds like the makings of a race and class war to me.

By Lord Chaos

June 11, 2007 12:23 PM | Link to this

silver,

None of what you just posted has anything to do with your previous post and my response. Wooten didn’t even mention the hurricane frauders nor is this his blog.

You are obviously on drugs,which most race whiners are, so therefore I’m going to have to dismiss you.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

Liberal “genius” at work:

{{{Denver is gearing up to fight global warming, and residents may soon be asked to make personal sacrifices to help save the planet. But the proposal also contains some ideas that may be unpopular, such as penalizing heavy users of electricity and natural gas and basing auto insurance premiums on the number of miles traveled.}}}

Taking to your wallet to soothe their poor little guilty pinko conscience:

{{{Denver Sees Coldest June Morning In Over 50 Years}}}

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By silver

June 11, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

I paid over 20k in fed taxes last year, and it is a ok with me if every cent of it is used to keep scooter libbie and his ilk in prison, hopefully for the rest of their lives.

By getalife

June 11, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

Free Paris, send Libby to Gitmo.

Make him talk about cheney.

By Lord Chaos

June 11, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

I see getalife is a celebrity hound like the rest of America. getalife needs to getalife.

By Funny morons®

June 11, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

Funny stuff

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 1:19 PM | Link to this

The Genarlow Wilson sentence is thrown out, he’s about to get the hell out of jail. For once our system worked (after not working in his case previously). Good for him. Just hope 2 years in prison have not ruined the guy.

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this

On a related note, the Shrub Junta has been dealt another court defeat, as their attempt to keep someone without charges and without representation has failed. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Ali al-Marri has to be formally charged with a crime, per Constitution, and cannot just be kept locked up inidefinitely.

God dammit, it’s sad that we have to rejoice any time the Constitution is actually adhered to. Amazing how low the bar has been set by this disaster of an administration.

By Gonna love 08

June 11, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this

Get a life:

Would like some chesse with that whine? I dont think the law was put on the books for Cheney no more than they procecuted him because he was Cheneys hatchet man, if you remember Fitzgerald was appointed by a Republican. Geez you guys are just way to ignorant to be using the internet

By getalife

June 11, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

Corsi attacks the gop on the immigration bill

By Jesus

June 11, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this

{{{By rushncrap June 11, 2007 1:24 PM it’s sad that we have to rejoice any time the Constitution is actually adhered to. Amazing how low the bar has been set by this disaster of an administration.}}}

rushncrap: I know this is way over your head but I’m going to take a shot at it anyway-

al-Marri is not a citizen of the United States therefore is not protected by the United States Constitution.

This really shouldn’t be that hard to gasp, especially for someone that brags about how much smarter they are than everybody else.

Maybe your just kinda dull, you reckon?

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By steve-o

June 11, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

It’s funny that the same neoCONs who bleated endlessly about the Duke boys have remained silent about the Wilson case. But then again, hypocrisy and Republicans go together like prostitutes and syphillis.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 1:44 PM | Link to this

My bad on al-Marri, he is a US citizen and the court is right to reach that decision, I agree.

I was thinking of a different nut job.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Midori

June 11, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this

Steve-o,

don’t you know? these guys don’t do “black justice”.

which is why one of their rationales for supporting this war is so phoney and laughable: “freeing the Iraqi people”.

Like they give a sh*t about Iraqis, or any brown people for that matter.

By getalife

June 11, 2007 1:51 PM | Link to this

WTF, Andy admitted a mistake?

OMG, the world is coming to an end.

Powell is right, shut down Gitmo and try them.

Geez.

By IN THE NEWS

June 11, 2007 1:55 PM | Link to this

{{{Mystery lawmaker’ in Jefferson case revealed. Buried in last week’s 16-count indictment of Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA), it describes how Jefferson introduced one of his alleged bribers to “a Member of the House Of Representatives, who was a prominent member of the Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection, for the purpose of garnering support” for the briber’s company. Today, Roll Call has revealed that the “mystery lawmaker” is former Louisiana Rep. Billy Tauzin (R), who ended up penning a 2002 letter praising the company, iGate, Incorporated}}}

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

I think li’l andy is typing to me again. Anyone have any ideas as to why?

By IN THE NEWS

June 11, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

{{{SO HELP ME IVY. The Post reports that President Bush is beefing up his besieged White House legal team with some crack lawyers to defend the administration against a variety of congressional inquiries. As the Post’s Peter Baker notes, all eight [of the newly-hired attorneys] received degrees from Ivy League schools or from West Point.

So, when it comes to policy-making over at the so-called Justice Department, a Regent University law degree, like the one held by Monica “I may have crossed the line” Goodling and a battalion of other fundies, suffices. But when it comes to protecting the president’s backside, apparently a divine legal degree is no substitute for an East Coast elite Ivy School pedigree.}}}

By getalife

June 11, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

Your AG is appealing the judge’s decision on Wilson.

He is still locked up.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 2:04 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife June 11, 2007 1:51 PM Powell is right, shut down Gitmo and try them.}}}

al-Gitmo: See 1:41 for my answer to that.

Geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By IN THE NEWS

June 11, 2007 2:09 PM | Link to this

On abortion, Fred Thompson unplugged:

By Paul

June 11, 2007 2:10 PM | Link to this

rushncap

Amazing story about that Wilson guy - altho I just read the headlines. It’s trumped, though, by the story I read a few weeks back about the guy who had sex with a minor (ages are iffy - she was 15, he 17) she was pregnant, wanted to get married, her parents objected, he spent time in jail, got out, they got married, have another kid - and he’s still a registered sex offender.

Regarding the al Marri case - I think I can deduce your feelings on the case, but seriously, I’ve yet to hear anyone propose an encompassing strategy for dealing with enemy combatants (at war with US, no state sponsor). Seriously, if it’s right, proper and moral to grant these people US Constitutional rights, how does one draw the line at which rights they’re entitle to? Or are they entitled to all Constitutional rights? The door, as they say, has been opened.

By Funny morons®

June 11, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

At the Creation Museum in Kentucky, visitors are given advice on the proper mind frame to have for your visit: “Don’t think, just listen and believe”.

That’s funny. I could swear that was also the advice given to Bush supporters.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

{{{By rushncap June 11, 2007 2:01 PM I think li’l andy is typing to me again. Anyone have any ideas as to why?}}}

A quick history for those of you not aware of it, rushncrap used to not be a spineless wonder, he would occasionally attempt to debate me but after the obscene public humiliation and resounding defeats that I inflicted upon him, he now ignores me.

Can you blame him?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By RW-(the original)

June 11, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this

steve-0,

The only person I know that’s trying to keep Genarlo Wilson in jail is a black Democrat.

By Paul

June 11, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this

rushncap

Me, also on the al-Marri (US citizen). Different kettle of fish. So my original questions stand (non citizens, enemy combatants) - but this al-Marri thing - whew. I can see all sorts of problems. “Your honor, I was held for 45 days after I was captured in the Philippine jungle battling a Philippino-US strike team. I told them I was an American, they didn’t believe me, didn’t read me my rights, nothing. Will you dismiss charges now? I need to get back to the front.”

Big prob - are they simply traitors, criminals, combatants, or both? I’m afraid we’re going to see this on a much larger scale as time passes.

IN THE NEWS

Ah, yes, ex Rep Tauzin, the guy we can thank for the noncompetes on the Medicare Prescription Plan.

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 2:20 PM | Link to this

Paul - we are not in a war. Did Congress ever declare war on anyone? Don’t think so. Therefore they are NOT enemy combatants, they are, at best, criminals. Enemy combatants get released once the war is over. Criminals get some sort of a trial. Holding a human being indefinitely, with no charges, with no end in sight, and, frequently, no compelling reason is entirely wrong. The door is opened, you say? So what? Tear the damn thing off the hinges, I say. If there is a case that they are dangerous, present it, convict them, sentence them. If not, let them go. Letting them rot in jail until such time as Czar Cheney decides he’s been amused long enough is not the American way.

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this

Paul — al-Marri is not a citizen, he’s a legal resident. But that’s sort of besides the point. So the question to you is: if you do not give them a trial, or tell them what they’re accused of, what exactly do you propose? Hold them without charges until they die? Shoot them to spare the taxpayer expense? Let them go once we defeated all terrorism everywhere for all time? If al-Marri is an “enemy combatant” then he will be released once the “war” is over. Since no one knows what the war is, much less who we are fighting, the concept of this war being “over” is laughable. So that’s a no-go. Is he a traitor? Maybe. I seem to remember that treason requires a trial. Rosenbergs got one. Does al-Marri not deserve one because he’s Arabic?

Bottom line: there is no war. Only Congress shall have power to declare war, remember? Since there is no official war there are no “enemy combatants”. Therefore anyone we detain is a suspected criminal. Accused criminals get trials to determine their guilt, and then either punished or let go. There is no in-between. There is no gray area. There is no “I’ll hold you in jail until I feel like it”. None. There are several very precisely defined legal categories, and the Bush Junta and their lapdog DOJ better decide which category each person falls under, and act accordingly.

By IN THE NEWS

June 11, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this

The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 294

By steve-o

June 11, 2007 2:51 PM | Link to this

RW,

You’re right about AG Baker and for that reason, I will be voting for his GOP challenger come next election.

But still, where was the outrage from pundits like Wooten, Limbaugh, and O’Reilly over this case, especially when they were so vocal about the Duke case?

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this

Actually, steve-o, RW is not right, as usual. One of the most vocal proponents of keeping Genarlow in prison is a white Georgia state senator. His name is Eric Johnson, and as you can see from his mugshot he’s about as white as they come this side of an albino polar bear. Please don’t fall into the “RW is right” trap again.

By steve-o

June 11, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

Thanks. Now excuse me while I go cry in the shower.

I won’t be falling into that “trap” again.

But I still won’t be voting for Baker. His office doesn’t seem to be backing down from the case.

By getalife

June 11, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

“Maybe Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt and his staff are just in denial. Or maybe they don’t read the papers, thus missing the sad news that Sen. Craig Thomas (R-Wyo.) died Monday, seven months after he was diagnosed with leukemia.

Whatever the case, Leavitt’s office called Thomas’s office late Thursday afternoon to request a meeting with the late senator.

Needless to say, grief-stricken Thomas staffers were stunned.”

Geez.

By Give me all of your money!

June 11, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this

Bush for President!

Of Kosovo.

Or Bulgaria.

By Give me all of your money!

June 11, 2007 3:37 PM | Link to this

The only person I know that’s trying to keep Genarlo Wilson in jail is a black Democrat.

Technically, he is correct.

He says the only person he “knows”…

But when he is so intentionally un/misinformed and “knows” so little about any of these topics, it explains why he “knows” that there is no evolution, “knows” there is no man-induced global warming and “knows” that the Bush administration is squeaky clean and the best in the history of the USA!

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this

U.S. astronauts Sunita Williams and Clayton Anderson switched places, with Anderson taking Williams’ seat on the space station. Williams will return to Earth aboard Atlantis after more than six months in space.

Keep your fingers and toes crossed LickaDick. Maybe these Kandy-a*******ed Kowards, as you call them, will all burn up on re-entry too.

Which would make a despicable POS like you very happy, no doubt

By RW-(the original)

June 11, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this

rushncao,

I think the State Attorney General is a little more important than Eric Johnson is in whether to appeal a judges decision.

steve-0

Perhaps there wasn’t as much outrage because the Black Panthers, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, a few dozen professors, and 24/7 cable coverage didn’t accompany the initial report demanding that the white boys be burned at the stake, although I’m not going to take your word for it that there wasn’t any outrage. I know that Limbaugh has discussed the case on his show although I don’t listen very often so I don’t know how much.

Neal Boortz has been screaming about it from day 1.

By RW-(the original)

June 11, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

You’re welcome Lizzy Palmer and thank you!

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 3:58 PM | Link to this

RW, yes, the AG is more important. That’s not what you said originally. Do I have to spell EVERYTHING out for you?

By RW-(the original)

June 11, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

You couldn’t spell cat if I spotted you the c and the a.

I’ve never heard Eric Johnson say that Wilson should serve his full ten years. Knowing you he probably hasn’t.

Later!

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this

Apparently you can’t read, RW. Why am I not surprised?

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

You idiotic neo-cons do realize that virtually the entire educated world rejects your unfounded nonsense and childish claims that mankind has n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with global warming, right?

You have heard that almost everyone now thinks you are ignorant and willfully blind, right?

And you do know that all but a minuscule percentage of the experts think you are merely ridiculous simpletons, right?

And you losers publicizing your stupidity and venom is N-E-V-E-R going to change that!

Fortunately the world will never be run by 15th century morons like yourselves again.

You have N-O chance to win this debate. N-O-N-E.

You are intellectually ill-equipped and you can never be trusted to speak the truth.

You are only destined to fail miserably and the entire world is ignoring your pathetic and futile absurdity.

Go burn some books, you cretins.

By steve-o

June 11, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

RW,

Are you capable of having a conversation without sounding like a snotty little biitch?

You seem good at digging up people’s old postings from weeks ago, so go and find out for yourself if Wooten has written about the case or if Limbaugh has addressed the case on his website. I doubt that you will find much.

Also, you bring up the New Black Panthers? Negro puleeze! They are a fringe group, unless you want me to assume that the John Birch Society or the Council of Conservative Citizens represent all white conservatives.

No matter how you spin it, the state robbed a teenage boy over two years of his life.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 4:43 PM | Link to this

{{{By 12 million scumbags June 11, 2007 3:42 PM Keep your fingers and toes crossed LickaDick. Maybe these Kandy-a*ed Kowards, as you call them, will all burn up on re-entry too.}}}

I’m sure those astronauts that burned up over Texas would rather have someone shining a light up NASA’s as-s to find out what went wrong and make positively sure it never happens again, like I’m trying to do, versus having you pervert liberals draw your weepy cartoons, mouth your stupid sentiments, splash around in the ocean looking for a new reason to rob the government blind and then turn right around a do the exact same thing that killed the first seven people.

It’s just a gut feeling, that’s all.

Duh.

Koward.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

June 11, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this

Debate on Ganzo on C-Span 2.

I vote no confidence in all of w’s friends.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

{{{By scumbags June 11, 2007 4:12 PM You idiotic neo-cons do realize that virtually the entire educated world rejects your unfounded nonsense and childish claims that mankind has n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with global warming, right?}}}

Uh, yeah:

{{{9 of 12 warmest years for Denver occurred before 1955…}}}

Geez.

The evidence staring them right in the face, they still get hysterical:

{{{Now read Dr. Jeffrey Glassman, applied physicist and engineer, retired from California’s academic and corporate sectors, who provides an elegant demonstration of how the CO2 solubility pump in the Earth’s oceans controls atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and how the increase in atmospheric CO2 is the consequence of temperature increase, not the cause.}}}

Well how about that, water again.

{{{The Achilles’ heel of the computer models, the cornerstone of CO2 fearmongering, is their failure to deal with water. As vapor, it’s a more important greenhouse gas than CO2 by a factor of twenty, yet models have proven incapable of dealing with it. The global water cycle is complicated, with at least as much unknown as is known. Water starts by evaporating from oceans, rivers, lakes and moist ground, enters the atmosphere as water vapor, condenses into clouds and precipitates as rain or snow. Each step is influenced by temperature and each water form has an enormous impact on global heat processes. Clouds have a huge, inaccurately quantified effect on heat received from the sun. Water on the Earth’s surface has different effects on the retention of the sun’s heat, depending on whether it’s liquid, which is quite absorbent; ice, which is reflective; or snow, which is more reflective than ice. Such factors cause huge swings in the Earth’s heat balance and interact in ways that are beyond the ability of computer climate models to predict.}}}

Now watch Polly and all the other Kowards contradict me not with facts but with shouting and hysteria.

Ignoramuses.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

LickaDick,

You mindless irrational idiot.

For every scientist you can find the rest of the world can report a thousand saying the opposite.

For every article you can find, the rest of the world can report ten thousand saying the opposite.

For every piece of evidence you can find, the rest of the wold can report a hundred thousand saying the opposite.

Wake the fu-ck up, you pathetic loser. The rest of the civilized world is laughing at the geniuses like you, so take it up with ALL of them!

And go burn some books, cretin. Especially those on NASA!

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

What did I tell you about the fact free shouting and hysteria, I’m pretty good, aren’t I?:

{{{By scumbags June 11, 2007 5:08 PM LickaDick, You mindless irrational idiot. For every scientist you can find the rest of the world can report a thousand saying the opposite.}}}

Funny that you can’t show us one, never less a “thousand,” of these “scientists” of yours, loser.

Clown.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By RW-(the original)

June 11, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

steve-0,

I’ll ignore your Blackadderish whining and pick up the conversation.

They didn’t rob him of two years since what he did was against the law at the time. The man that was recently released after serving several years for a crime he didn’t commit had those years robbed from him. In any case it seems like this outrage has as much to do with getting rid of any age of consent as it does with Wilson.

Nice dodge pretending that all I mentioned was the Black Panthers. Are dozens of Duke professors insignificant fringe players at Duke? Are Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, & ABC all fringe players.

By Bill

June 11, 2007 5:27 PM | Link to this

Well now. The rightwing druids are filled with xtra hatred and failure today. Every day is a nightmare for the little people. Hmmm. Let’s give little Scooter another 10 years bent over a barrel.

By Breaking News

June 11, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this

In Possum Creek, Kentucky, Ms. Thelma Snooter’s fifth grade science class has shocked the entire scientific world by irrefutably proving that global warming is not at all influenced by mankind and the use of fossil fuels.

The star student of the class, Curly Mushforbrains said that the science is boring and difficult to explain but trust him, THEY PROVED IT!

As a reward Ms. Snooter is taking the entire class to the Creation Museum in nearby Petersburg.

In an unusual and related story, Mr. A. LickaDick, of Georgia, called Fox News and threw a tantrum on national TV, saying that he had the proof first, though he couldn’t begin to say how his theory of Global Unwarming and the one in Kentucky were the same.

He did say that there was not one single instance he could think of, where a reputable scientist, respected scientific organization or governmental agency could produce ANY evidence of man-induced global warming.

Mr. LickaDick, who has no education or training in climatology, and is reported to have only finished the 10th grade, is known on extreme right-wing blogs, for his unusual theories of unrelativity, ungravity and unevolution.

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 5:47 PM | Link to this

Poor brave widdle andykins.

He is tenacious. Mindless and pathetically hopeless, but tenacious.

And those nasty old liberals, atheists and pinkos won’t play wif him and even give him one example.

Oh it is to laugh!

You idiotic andykins, you do realize that virtually the entire educated world rejects your unfounded nonsense and childish claims that mankind has n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with global warming, right?

You have heard that almost everyone now thinks you are ignorant and willfully blind, right?

And you do know that all but a minuscule percentage of the experts think you are merely a ridiculous simpleton, right?

And you losers publicizing your stupidity and venom is N-E-V-E-R going to change that!

Go burn some books on NASA, cretin.

By getalife

June 11, 2007 5:58 PM | Link to this

Geez, the gop were pathetic in that Ganzo debate.

Dems definitely won that one.

Ganzo must go!

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this

I was wrong, I totally missed the insane threats upon my family:

{{{By Breaking News June 11, 2007 5:40 PM Mr. LickaDick, who has no education or training in climatology, and is reported to have only finished the 10th grade}}

I guess the weak minded among us will stoop to any level since they are unable to think and reason.

I can’t even begin to imagine what it would take to cause me to start threatening other people personally, it’s like this mental cripple is from the middle east or something, just waiting for the call from his iman to go suicide bomb something.

{{{By Deport 12 million scumbags June 11, 2007 5:47 PM You idiotic andykins, you do realize that virtually the entire educated world rejects your unfounded nonsense and childish claims that mankind has n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with global warming, right?}}}

Well then why can’t you show me ONE?

Why are you reduced to screaming and shouting at me, with out any facts to back up what you say?

Is this something to do with your mental capacity?

Are you lazy?

A liar?

What is it, freak?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 6:14 PM | Link to this

LickaDick,

When you’re the last delusional and denying moron left, go ahead and strap on that explosives laden belt and do the only thing left. Go to your reward.

Non-survival of the weakest will never look so good. You probably don’t have long.

By Lord Help Us

June 11, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

Oh my, oh my…Lucko-coward…

Initially signed by 62 leading scientists, the statement now bears the signature of more than 11,000 scientists from all 50 states and several U.S. territories, including 52 Nobel laureates, 62 National Medal of Science winners, 194 members of the National Academies of Science, and science advisors to both Republican and Democratic presidents dating back to Eisenhower.

There is a link here that will show you names you are asking for.

Alas, I know you wouldn’t acknowledge reality if it walked up and beatch-slapped you…

Now, how about YOUR list of those that insist global warming does not exist or is not related to human activities…

Thanks in advance.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 6:33 PM | Link to this

“Beatch” slap this:

Signers by discipline- Public health, 2.6%, Social Sciences, 6.7%, Computer sciences, 2.1%, Education, .065%, Earth science, 8.8%, Engineering, 8.9%, History/Philosphy, .12%, Life Science (hahaha) 28%, Mathematics, 1.9%, Medical, 15%, Physical Science, 18%

Gee, not one climatologist.

Hahahahaha, you libs crack me up, I’ll give you that.

Life science 28%.

Geez.

(It does make you wonder why all of the Climatologists and Physicists agree with me, don’t it?)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Lord Help Us

June 11, 2007 6:40 PM | Link to this

Oh my little lucko-coward:

{{(It does make you wonder why ALL of the Climatologists and Physicists agree with me, don’t it?)))

Now, why don’t you provide us with some proof that ALL of the climatologists and Physicists agree with you???

Or, are you pulling your ‘facts’ from your usual source…

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 6:42 PM | Link to this

Initially signed by Ms. Snooter’s entire fifth grade class, the statement from the Global Unwarming Society on The Myth now includes a kid in Utah who claims to have seen icebergs forming in the Moab desert, 8 truck drivers from Arkansas, 43 Nascar sponsors and all 17 members of the Hootenanny Baptist Church in Cairo, Ga.

It does make me wonder why ALL OF THE CLIMATOLOGISTS AND PHYSICISTS AGREE WITH HIM!

Keep drinking that Kool Aid LickaDick! It tastes GOOOOOD!

By Lord Help Us

June 11, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this

(shhhh, nobody tell lucko-iamdumberthantoast that the Life Science Discipline is comprised of biotechnologists, biomolecular engineers, pharmacogenomics engineers and a number of other really smart people)…

Also, don’t tell him that climatologists belong to a number of scientific disciplines…

Does he even know what it means?

By @@

June 11, 2007 6:57 PM | Link to this

Dennis Miller nailed Harry Reid in this video.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

By Smokey the Bear

June 11, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this

Only you can Prevent Forest Fires.

And smog.

And illegal dumping.

And toxic landfills.

And overfishing.

And clear cutting forests.

And global warming.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 7:01 PM | Link to this

To bad you gimps already bet the farm on man made CO2, hehehe:

{{{Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn’t exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was one of the first Canadian Ph.Ds. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification.}}}

{{{A leading climatologist is maintaining that water vapor near the surface-not CO2- and natural cycles are the two primary reasons for the current global warming trend, as we are leaving the little ice age period and going into a long term warm cycle. The issue with CO2 is backwards, he says, and that the evidence from core samples, etc, show that rises in CO2 follow warming trends.}}}

{{{Well let me give you one fact first. In the first 30 feet of the atmosphere, on the average, outward radiation from the Earth, which is what CO2 is supposed to affect, how much [of the reflected energy] is absorbed by water vapor? In the first 30 feet, 80 percent, okay? Eighty percent of the heat radiated back from the surface is absorbed in the first 30 feet by water vapor… And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide? Eight hundredths of one percent. One one-thousandth as important as water vapor. You can go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.}}}

Um, to be continued, geez.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Lord Help Us

June 11, 2007 7:08 PM | Link to this

Oh My!

Lucko-imasdumbasanicecube…when you said ALL climatologists and physicists agree with you…you actually meant ONE!

Man, you can probably find ONE scientist that still says evolution is a myth!!!

You got a long way to go to get to ‘ALL.’

By Deport 12 million scumbags

June 11, 2007 7:09 PM | Link to this

You idiotic neo-cons do realize that virtually the entire educated world rejects your unfounded nonsense and childish claims that mankind has n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with global warming, right?

You have heard that almost everyone now thinks you are ignorant and willfully blind, right?

And you do know that all but a minuscule percentage of the experts think you are merely ridiculous simpletons, right?

And you losers publicizing your stupidity and venom is N-E-V-E-R going to change that!

Fortunately the world will never be run by 15th century morons like yourselves again.

You have N-O chance to win this debate. You are intellectually ill-equipped and you can never be trusted to speak the truth.

You are only destined to fail miserably and the entire world is ignoring your pathetic and futile attempts.

Go burn some books, you cretins.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 7:10 PM | Link to this

Oh my, oh my:

{{{What is the contribution of anthropogenic carbon dioxide to global warming? This question has been the subject of many heated arguments, and a great deal of hysteria. In this article, we will consider a simple calculation, based on well-accepted facts, that shows that the expected global temperature increase caused by doubling atmospheric carbon dioxide levels is bounded by an upper limit of 1.4-2.7 degrees centigrade. This result contrasts with the results of the IPCC’s climate models, whose projections are shown to be unrealistically high.}}}

Um, yeah, science:

{{{Traditionally, greenhouse gas levels are presented as dimensionless numbers representing parts per billion (ppb) multiplied by a scaling factor (global warming potential or GWP) that allows their relative efficiency of producing global temperature increases to be compared. For carbon dioxide, this scaling factor is 1.0. The factors for methane and nitrous oxide are 21 and 310, respectively, while sulfur hexafluoride is 23,900 times more effective than carbon dioxide [5]. The GWP from carbon dioxide is primarily due to the position of its absorption bands in the critical longwave infrared region at 2, 3, 5, and 13-17 micrometers.}}}

MIT, no way!:

{{{Dangerous Warming Unlikely, MIT Climatologist Says, Let us begin by considering the fundamental question of whether the observed increases in CO2 are likely to be a source of alarm. We will see how the matter of consensus has been employed to mislead and misinform the public. Our concerns over global warming are based on models rather than data, and if these models are correct, then man has accounted for over 4 times the observed warming over the past century (even allowing for ocean delay) with some unknown process or processes having cancelled the difference. We assume, moreover, that these unknown processes will cease, in making predictions about future warming.}}}

Um, to be continued, sigh.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Political Foreskin

June 11, 2007 7:10 PM | Link to this

Last Word on the Soprano’s Finale: I think if Tony can find the one-armed man before the relentless detective can find him, then he’ll be fine.

By Geico caveman

June 11, 2007 7:11 PM | Link to this

Disarm the militias? Surge?

Now lets give the Sunni militias a sh-itload of guns!

Mindless, dangerous neo-cons. They can’t get one single thing right. Not one. Not the war. Not the science. Not the border. Nothing. They are completely useless.

By rushncap

June 11, 2007 7:12 PM | Link to this

Other than long-winded Spelling Bee parade, Miller offers nothing at all about Reid. “Oh no, he has a bad voice”. “Vague, transluscent shade”?? That’s basically a 3rd grade insult dressed up in 11th grade vocabulary. Miller offers nothing at all in the way of substance, but I’m sure he’s in the corner somewhere masturbating over the fact that he was able to work Thermopylae into a diatribe against a U.S. Senator.

By Fed up

June 11, 2007 7:13 PM | Link to this

How many more will these incompetent, immoral republicans needlessly kill? How many?

Impeachment now.

By Midori

June 11, 2007 7:14 PM | Link to this

what did he nail him with, @@?

more of Dennis’ patented and equally incoherent rants in the guise of “jokes”?

now I see why your feeble attempts at humor suck — look at your inspiration.

you’re right — you COULDN’T have said it better. Worse, no problem.

By LuckoDull

June 11, 2007 7:17 PM | Link to this

Tell me when you’ve had enough:

{{{Throughout the past 420 millennia, comprising four interglacial periods, the Vostok record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is imprinted with, and fully characterized by, the physics of the solubility of CO2 in water, along with the lag in the deep ocean circulation. Notwithstanding that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, atmospheric carbon dioxide has neither caused nor amplified global temperature increases. Increased carbon dioxide has been an effect of global warming, not a cause. Technically, carbon dioxide is a lagging proxy for ocean temperatures. When global temperature, and along with it, ocean temperature rises, the physics of solubility causes atmospheric CO2 to increase. If increases in carbon dioxide, or any other greenhouse gas, could have in turn raised global temperatures, the positive feedback would have been catastrophic. While the conditions for such a catastrophe were present in the Vostok record from natural causes, the runaway event did not occur. Carbon dioxide does not accumulate in the atmosphere. by Jeffrey A. Glassman, PhD}}}

Duh.

{{{New Zealand meteorologist, former professor of atmospheric science at University of Wyoming, and one of the founders of New Zealand Climate Science Coalition Augie Auer blasted the ‘myth’ of global warming recently at a meeting of a farming group, saying, in fact: “It is time to attack the myth of global warming,”

The core of his argument is water vapor, and its dominant role in making the world warm. As I have said and reported in previous blogs, water vapor makes up 95% of greenhouse gases. NINETY FIVE percent. To drill the point home, let’s put some light on the percentages thrown about by the greenhouse gasbags: The other greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen dioxide, and various others including CFCs, contributed only five per cent of the effect, carbon dioxide being by far the greatest contributor at 3.6 per cent. However, carbon dioxide as a result of man’s activities was only 3.2 per cent of that, hence only 0.12 per cent of the greenhouse gases in total. Human-related methane, nitrogen dioxide and CFCs etc made similarly minuscule contributions to the effect: 0.066, 0.047 and 0.046 per cent respectively.}}}

No babble, no screaming, just the facts mam.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By @@

June 11, 2007 9:32 PM | Link to this

Midori:

I didn’t view Dennis’ comments as humorous, but Harry Reid WAS/IS definitely the JOKE.

You would have to “elevate” your vocabulary from the gutter to the executive suites to find Dennis “coherent” Midori. We all know that’s not going to happen any time soon if ever.

I could scroll up to tag some of your less than humorous comments, but it was too painful at first glance; why would I put myself through that torture a second time?

Now Getalife…..he’s funny!

By WeThePeople

June 13, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this

” There you go again……….”

LYING TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS NOT AN OPTION.

Got to Jail, Go Directly to Jail, Do Not Pass GO, Do Not Collect $2,000,000,000.00 etc., etc., etc.,

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNazis ©