Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2007 > June > 01 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USDon’t get all hot
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (472) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon
Services »
Comments
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this
{{{NASA chief ——>under fire<—— after remarks on global warming-Washington - The head of NASA said he was not sure global warming was a problem and added it would be “arrogant” to assume the world’s climate should not change in the future. Scientists called the remarks ——>ignorant<——-.}}}
Geez, looks like the liberals are in a particularly foul mood this morning, does the very thought of stolen tax dollars being “stolen” back from you cause much angst and worry?
This is a pure unadulterated view into the world of liberal “nuance” and “diversity,” one guy, who just so happens to be the boss at NASA, comes out with an opinion different from what the liberals believe, do they take a reasoned and thorough look at his ideas or do they bring out the long knives and the hate speech?
Look at this “under fire” language of divisiveness. Are the words “criticize” and “dispute” too much for you mouth breathers, uneducated agenda driven suckas-ses?
NASA should be dismantled and thrown in the sea, where their last several space flights have crashed into, not asked about something totally out of the realm of their stated, tax payer funded mission.
What’s next, the IRS doing studies on “moon landings?”
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
Slam dunk:
In this war, there are only two stories from the front that the MSM tells. The first is the U.S. body count, which they report with an unseemly zeal. The second is the “successes” of the enemy. Successes such as car bombs that kill “X” number of civilians. Getting those headlines in the U.S. papers is the central purpose of the mad bombers, by the way. The path to success for radical Islam is to chip away at public resolve in the U.S. That’s the mission of the press as well.
Al Qaeda’s best ally.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this
This should tell you all you need to know about immigration:
{{{When I ask if Mr. Bush thinks any of the current GOP candidates are proving to be leaders on immigration… He goes on to praise Mr. Kennedy, noting that an “untold” story is just how many Democrats are against this bill, and that Mr. Kennedy’s leadership will thus be necessary to get a bill through the Senate.}}}
Bush “reaching out” to the sniveling Coward liberals again, will he ever learn? What has that got us: No Child Left Behind, McCain Feingold Censorship, now they want to increase Social Security liabilities by 25 TRILLION dollars, we don’t have money for what we owe NOW, how much more ruin can be afflicted on the nation before it collapses in on itself?
If the Amnesty bill passes, I will start calling for Impeachment.
Mark My Words.
Peggy Noonan nails it:
{{{Now conservatives and Republicans are going to have to win back their party. They are going to have to break from those who have already broken from them. This will require courage, serious thinking and an ability to do what psychologists used to call letting go. This will be painful, but it’s time. It’s more than time.}}}
And Jed Babbin:
{{{There are so many problems between conservatives and President Bush: the war that is not being fought decisively, and may thus be lost inevitably; the out-of-control federal spending and now, with all these other problems rampant, he is trying to push an immigration bill that will apparently bankrupt Social Security and Medicaid while granting immediate legal status to who knows how many illegal aliens. Most importantly it will not — repeat not — secure the borders from the next ten million or the ten million after that.}}}
And Robert Rector:
{{{Mr. Rector has stubbornly argued that the Bush-backed bill now contemplated by the Senate would grant legal residency to millions of illegal aliens whose levels of education, income and job skills are so low that each of them represents a net annual cost to U.S. taxpayers of nearly $20,000.}}}
Bush can either become a Conservative or he can become a civilian.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Mrs. Godzilla
June 1, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this
And so it begins…..Bush starts moving on global warming.
Way to little, way to late.
I suspect we will se similar movement on the occupation before to long.
It’s pitiful.
Why wait till ‘08?
Impeachment
Indictment
Incarceration.
By Mike
June 1, 2007 8:22 AM | Link to this
Congress’s approval ratings are lower than Bush’s, yet Mikey has yet to draw a single cartoon about Congress since the Dems took over?
Speaking truth to power? Nah, just partisan hackery of the type we would expect from Sean Hannity or some other partisan zealot.
By gttim
June 1, 2007 8:25 AM | Link to this
Who did Bush steal the napkin from? Like he could have an idea!
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 8:26 AM | Link to this
{{{By Mrs. Godzilla June 1, 2007 8:13 AM And so it begins…..Bush starts moving on global warming. Way to little, way to late.}}}
It just goes to show you, no matter what Bush does, he could shower the country with free health care, free welfare, 1 day a year work weeks, it does not make a damn bit of difference, these sicko partisan goonies will always get foamy and enraged when they speak of Bush.
It’s a sure sign of insanity, stupid mindless insanity.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 8:36 AM | Link to this
“Less than sincere”? That’s saying it diplomatically… Also, I would double-check that napkin to be sure he didn’t spit his chewing tobaccy in it first!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 8:39 AM | Link to this
Oh, so how is the conversation going to go today:
WINGNUTS: Global warming is a myth. MOONBATS: No it’s not, we believe the scientists!
WINGNUTS: You moonbats are idiots. MOONBATS: No we’re not, you wingnuts are idiots.
WINGNUTS: No were not.
MOONBATS: Yes, you are.
Etc. Etc.
Yawn.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 8:41 AM | Link to this
Great cartoon Mike! It would be better if you showed Angela Merckel about to squash him with her boot.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 8:54 AM | Link to this
More “diplomacy”, Bush-style:
On Wednesday, representatives of the major powers met again in the Berlin suburb of Potsdam, this time for a G8 meeting. Such gatherings are typically relentlessly amiable, and so the delegates tried to make it this time. But beneath the forced grins, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov exchanged icy, even scary, words that suggested a new cold war is not inconceivable. “The arms race is starting again,” Lavrov said flatly.
I can’t believe Condi is still the Secty. of State for America…
By @@
June 1, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this
I watched this Connaughton guy in a press conference last night. He did an excellent job of explaining the research President Bush and the administration have committed to the Global Warming concerns since 2001. He also elaborated on what the other G-8 members have been doing.
“Each country will develop its own national strategies on a midterm basis in the next 10 to 20 years on where they want to take their efforts to improve energy security, reduce air pollution, and also reduce greenhouse gases,” said Jim Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.
(((While some European leaders appeared “impressed” with Bush’s proposal, some in Congress weren’t: “It is vitally important for America and this president to re-engage internationally on this issue and agree to targets for reducing heat-trapping pollution,” said Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., chairman of the House select committee on global warming. “Instead, all President Bush is willing to do is engage in fruitless discussions until the very end of his administration.”)))
Did anybody catch Ed Markey’s “solution” to the problem? Well, no, I don’t believe he had one.
(((EPA administrator Stephen Johnson said in an interview the president’s announcement represents “a global strategy” aimed at bringing in fast-growing countries that have not had to make the same emissions cuts as other nations. He noted that the EPA has calculated that by 2015, developing countries will outpace developed nations in terms of greenhouse gas emissions.)))
In listening to Connaughton, it sounded as though all of the countries had a different, and fractured plan. Nothing cohesive.
Countries shouldn’t jump on some “bandwagon” when China and India are/will be blowing “smoke” out their big ol’ tubas.
The precautionary principle is something that conservatives understand, encourage and support. Anything else is just an emotional knee-jerk response that could render catastrophic consequences.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this
Scooter’s sentencing is scheduled for next week, and he’s begging for mercy. I think an appropriate alternative to serving jail time is that he gets sent to Baghdad to further his cause of “promoting freedom” in the Middle East.
Libby’s lawyers said Thursday would be unfair. Citing numerous letters from former colleagues and friends, they said Libby deserved only probation. “His dedication to promoting freedom abroad and keeping American citizens safe at home is beyond question,” the attorneys wrote.
After all, as his attorneys say, it’s “beyond question” what he and his Neo-Con buddies have done to America and the rest of the world…
By Mrs. Godzilla
June 1, 2007 9:07 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull,
” no matter what Bush does, he could shower the country with free health care, free welfare, 1 day a year work weeks, it does not make a damn bit of difference “
That’s absolutely correct. There is nothing that will save this President from the legacy of incompetence he himself has created.
We take the State of the Union very seriously, and your Mr. Bush has “screwed the pooch”. Period.
“sicko partisan goonies will always get foamy and enraged when they speak of Bush.”
This one’s only half right. Rage yes. Justified to boot. Foamy - well that more rightly describes the general tenor of your posts.
“If the Amnesty bill passes, I will start calling for Impeachment”
We will hold you to that. Ladies and Gentlemen of the blog - remember this.
Take care of yourself LuckoDull. Strap yourself in tightly. It’s gonna be a bumpy ride.
By Midori
June 1, 2007 9:08 AM | Link to this
Dan Bartlett has resigned.
By Funny morons...
June 1, 2007 9:09 AM | Link to this
Conversation between George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter while at Billy Graham’s place:
GHWB: You know, Jimmy, I told those sons of b!tches to go with Jeb. They think they run the g0ddamned world … heh heh, well I suppose they do.
JC: Ah know, Ah know. But ah shouldn’t have mentioned Junior by name, that’s unfair to you, George. He’s not your fault.
GHWB: I should’ve made Babs abort that one. Ha ha ha ha —
By Midori
June 1, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this
Mrs. Godzilla,
why do you even attempt to have a rational conversation with that drunken zot?
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this
OMG— even Alabama jumps out ahead of Georgia… such a sad reflection of our state Legislature today:
The slavery apology that the Alabama Legislature passed Thursday expressing the state’s “profound regret” and “deepest sympathies” still must be signed by Gov. Bob Riley. But he has already said he will sign it.
By Funny morons...
June 1, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this
Further proving his dedication to leaving no embarrassing failure unrepeated, Bush is sending Meghan O’Sullivan back to Iraq!
O’Sullivan is the hot-for-Washington former top aide to the President. Here’s a fun game: read through this brief biography and try to find a single sentence that doesn’t point to her direct culpability in a textbook example of a massive, deadly failure at all levels of government:
[[[O’Sullivan spent time in Baghdad early in the war, working for Jay Garner, and subsequently Paul Bremer. After returning to Washington, she joined the White House staff in October 2005, becoming Bush’s top policy adviser on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan until her resignation last month.]]]
That’s right, we’re sending officials from the g0ddamn Coalition Provisional Authority back to Iraq! Meghan will be in Iraq to help their joke of a government meet our jokes of benchmarks. Expect great things! If you’re living in the one of the few parts of Baghdad that haven’t been bombed, then burned down, then ethnically cleansed, well, sleep with the lights on. Haha, just kidding, you have no electricity!
By getalife
June 1, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this
w’s lame plan is to have meetings until he is gone.
Typical failed leadership.
Today, Malarki’s time is up on his troops being ready so we can withdraw.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this
I believe America may be ready for a good basketball player living in the White House in Jan. ‘09:
Mr. Obama, like everyone else on the court, was laughing. And with a head fake, a bit of contact and a jumper that seemed out of his range, Mr. Obama sank the shot that won the game.
Obama/Richardson ‘08!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 9:21 AM | Link to this
Karl’s friend Timmy resigned yesterday too. I wonder where Karl’s going to place him now.
By silver
June 1, 2007 9:21 AM | Link to this
The idiots at DOD say the cure for global warming is nuclear winter - that should give you some idea as to their intellectual level. Our Chimp in Chief has failed in internatinal relations, failed in conventional wars of aggression, and failed on almost all domestic issues. So does he withdraw in disgrace as any decent human being would? No, now he is baiting the Russian Bear, initiating a new game of Global Thermonuclear War. Be afraid, be very afraid, as these neo-clowns are almost completely amoral. They will willingly kill billions if it will keep them in power a little longer. I personally blame anyone and everyone who voted for Bush in 2000, sadly including myself and my wife. If only we had known exactly what it was we were voting for! Pure Evil comes to mind.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 9:21 AM | Link to this
Bosch,
In your opinion, is it okay to mention this?:
A cold snap in Argentina led to electricity and natural gas shortages this week, idling factories and taxis and causing sporadic blackouts in the capital./Beset by the coldest May since 1962, millions of residents fired up space heaters, straining Buenos Aires’ electrical grid for three nights and forcing authorities to slash power supply nationwide and briefly cut domestic natural gas provisions and exports to Chile.
Or do you prefer the “the debate on Global Warming is over and it is the fault of greedy and selfish men” argument?
By Mrs. Godzilla
June 1, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this
Midori
Ok, I admit I’m tilting at “windbags”.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this
Bush, Cheney, and their out of touch right-wing counterparts have failed and failed miserably in having any vision for the future in regards to green industry. Green industry is the future and the first ones to get it right will reap the rewards in regards to the environment, as well as economically. Bush has never taken it seriously before, why would his lame-duck arse start now?
Goldie,
Be careful. You will surely attract the ire of the resident wingnuts with your 9:14 post. But I agree, it’s truly a shame and a massive kick in the balls when Alabama shows more class than your own state.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 9:26 AM | Link to this
More on the Argentine freeze, this time about why the Country could not deal with the event:
Political analyst Rosendo Fraga said Argentina’s energy woes date to a 2002 economic crisis, when regulators froze rates for home utility bills just after the peso devalued more than 70 percent against the dollar. Since then, far less revenue has been available for upgrading and building plants and other infrastructure.’/”A lack of investment in the energy system, in great part generated by the freeze on utility rates, has created a situation which soon or later could explode,” Fraga said.
Price controls? Lack of investment in infrastructure? Gosh, what does that remind you of?
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 9:28 AM | Link to this
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Griffin Resigned After Conyers Requested ‘Vote Caging’ Evidence from BBC
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 9:29 AM | Link to this
Kyl Vows To Block Open Government Bill (Sen. Anonymous)
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this
Well, of course, Buy Danish, it is okay to mention that.
That’s really upsetting that those poor Argentinians are having a cold spell.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this
{{{By Mrs. Godzilla June 1, 2007 9:07 AM That’s absolutely correct. There is nothing that will save this President from the legacy of incompetence he himself has created.}}}
No give from the goonie^^.
{{{By Goldie June 1, 2007 9:14 AM The slavery apology that the Alabama Legislature passed Thursday expressing the state’s “profound regret” and “deepest sympathies”.}}}
But one meaningless apology washes away hundreds of years of slavery, murder and brutality, geez, what an idiot you must be Goldilocks.
Even I went along with Hillary when she was pandering for votes in the Senate by saying that Saddam had WMD and she voted to send our soldiers to the Middle East, where she later abandoned them, geez, if I can get behind that pig, it just shows you what slobbering partisan insane hacks these liberals really are.
Coward.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By RW-(the original)
June 1, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this
Goldie and steve-0,
It is easier to pass a meaningless resolution to appease race baiters like you two, but standing on principle shows more leadership. Not to mention that the Georgia legislature isn’t even in session.
Bosch,
Hardly anybody says warming doesn’t exist only that it isn’t from man made CO2 output. What does your reframing the argument back to “wingnuts claim it doesn’t exist” make you if not an idiot?
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this
[OMG— even Alabama jumps out ahead of Georgia… such a sad reflection of our state Legislature today]
Goldie, although I can sympathize with some people’s reasoning in wanting an apology from slave states, I personally don’t see the point. Some of those states, (Like Georgia), should apologize for what they’re doing NOW,(Peachcare, Taxes, HMOs), forget about the past.
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this
[OMG— even Alabama jumps out ahead of Georgia… such a sad reflection of our state Legislature today]
Goldie, although I can sympathize with some people’s reasoning in wanting an apology from slave states, I personally don’t see the point. Some of those states, (Like Georgia), should apologize for what they’re doing NOW,(Peachcare, Taxes, HMOs), forget about the past.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this
More breaking news:
Dan Bartlett, counsel to the Chimperor for the last 13 years, has, as have so many of the criminals in the Chimperor’s junta, jumped ship effective July 4 (rather ironic for a criminal to choose the day of our independence to extricate himself from the yoke of Bush criminality, don’t you think?).
C’mon wingnuts, rationalize it for me!!
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this
Ooops! Sorry for posting that twice!!!
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 9:41 AM | Link to this
To DebbieDoWrong,
Actually, you should apologize for posting it at all!
TM
…Stupid white people!!
By Doug
June 1, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
LuckoDUMB. The head of NASA is an administrator, not a scientist. Leaving stuff out again, huh? In fact isn’t he a political appointee? Correct me if I am wrong.
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
[[BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Griffin Resigned After Conyers Requested ‘Vote Caging’ Evidence from BBC]]
Good Lord!! Is there no END to the debauchery, lawlessness, and LIES from the Bush Administration? How can anybody, in good consciensce still believe ANYTHING that comes out of the White house anymore?
By getalife
June 1, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
Hell has frozen over.
A pig flew.
Over some body’s dead body.
Alabama apologized for slavery.
The point is admitting they were wrong.
Something the wingnuts never do.
Take RW for instance, instead of saying it is the right thing to do, he uses a racist argument.
Geez.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 9:47 AM | Link to this
{{But I agree, it’s truly a shame and a massive kick in the balls when Alabama shows more class than your own state.}}
Steve-O, I don’t think the term “class” could be used to describe our GA legislators today!
By @@
June 1, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this
It’s all in the strategy…
(((In short, say analysts, Iran is especially vulnerable to international sanctions. Implemented effectively, such measures could destabilize the regime.)))
(((THE SENSE that there is a stark choice between a military strike or diplomacy, evident in how the issue is often framed in the media and by politicians, is misleading. Conference attendees saw a different underlying distinction: between those who wish to stop Iran’s program through some mixture of discussions and the threat of violence, and those who have resigned themselves to an Iranian bomb - in the words of Arad, between “the appeasers and the opposers.”)))
(((As Arad put it, “that a military option was prepared in Israel and America is certain. The plans are always ready,” and in encouraging the diplomatic process as a way of avoiding the real possibility of force, “the very existence of [such plans] helps to prevent their execution.”)))
(((It is, so to speak, a strategic game of “good cop, bad cop,” with both cops fully aware that neither can get the job done alone.)))
(((Diplomacy, too, could only be pursued in the “shadow of the threat of a military strike,” something many of the advocates of diplomacy at the conference seemed to be depending on.)))
Do you see how it works? Many countries are counting on us to play “bad cop” while they get to play “good cop”.
I believe the liberals within our own country like to call our bad cop approach, “warmongering”.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 9:49 AM | Link to this
Won’t it be great in ‘08 when the Dems take back the White House and America can begin to show respect for scientists once again?
We’re gonna love ‘08!
By getalife
June 1, 2007 9:50 AM | Link to this
Um, I think Griffin resigned to head Fred’s election campaign.
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this
Truthman: I’m not “white”. I always put down “black/hispanic origin” when/if I check that little box on forms.
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 9:52 AM | Link to this
Truthman: I’m not “white”. I always put down “black/hispanic origin” when/if I check that little box on forms.
……Stupid Truthman…….
By RW-(the original)
June 1, 2007 9:56 AM | Link to this
getalife,
I could say “”Impeach Bush”” and you would become his biggest supporter. Start thinking for yourself.
Truth?man and Midori,
Help me out please. Did the entire Clinton administration go through eight years with nobody ever resigning? ….or being murdered in Fort Marcy Park….
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this
RW, Buy Danish is telling everyone about the cold snap in Argentina. So, I guess all the scientists who’ve been studying climate change are wrong.
Silly them, and silly us to believe them.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this
{{{By Doug
June 1, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
LuckoDUMB. The head of NASA is an administrator, not a scientist. Leaving stuff out again, huh? In fact isn’t he a political appointee? Correct me if I am wrong.}}}
Doug,
Please advice Al Gore’s scientific credentials.
Thanks in advance!
By @@
June 1, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this
Damn, Debbie and I have something in common. I always check black in that little box on forms, but I’m white.
I like messing with their minds.
Besides that, it’s not relevant IMO.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this
President Bush yesterday announced a “new international climate change framework,” setting “aspirational goals” for reducing carbon emissions but “no concrete targets or dates, no enforcement mechanism and no penalties for noncompliance. It also wouldn’t take effect until four years after Bush leaves office.
By DebbieDoRight
June 1, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this
Oh and here’s another one for you Truthman,
I don’t believe in reparations, all the people who would’ve been the recipients of such a fund have already died;
I think it’s time to stop being BLACK in capital words and start being Black and Proud as our ancestors were. No matter what their circumstances were they were PROUD of who they were and wore their pride even when they were being spit upon, bullied and kicked; and their pride sustained them and they PERSEVERED.
So I guess you must want to take away my “BLACK” card now huh and push me out the race.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this
Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson on global warming: “There’s much we know and can agree on around the climate change issue, and there’s much that we just don’t believe we do know…and we want to have a debate about the things we know and understand, the things we know about that we don’t understand very well, and the things we don’t even know about around this very complex issue of climate science. So that will continue to be our position
THIS CLOWN IS A COMBO BETWEEN RUMMY AND NORM CROSBY
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this
No RW,
I would agree with you.
He deserves to be impeached.
After his chest thumping episode, he probably needs a mental facility.
I think he lost it reading My Pet Goat and being told we were under attack. He froze and his eyes glazed over.
Then he went and hid in Nebraska’s corn fields like a true coward admitting he was getting out of harms way.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this
{{{By Bosch
June 1, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this
RW, Buy Danish is telling everyone about the cold snap in Argentina. So, I guess all the scientists who’ve been studying climate change are wrong.
Silly them, and silly us to believe them. }}}
Silly Bosch,
As it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be, the climate is always changing.
Anything else you’d like to know?
By RW-(the original)
June 1, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this
Bosch,
Buy Danish is pointing out that amid the hysteria about the rapidly overheating earth there is ample evidence that it’s just a normal climate shifting cycle that’s been going on for millions of years. The moonbat(ic)s® point out with great fanfare any evidence of somewhere that warming has affected and deliberately ignore evidence that shows it’s a normal shift. Did you notice that Madame Pelosovitch didn’t go to Iceland where the ice mass is increasing?
Did you know that most new species that appear on earth do so during warming periods? Maybe we need global warming to “evolve.” What a brilliant Creator we must have had to figure that out.
RWOUTRWOUTRWOUTRWOUTRWOUTRWOUT
See you all much later!
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this
{{{By Doug June 1, 2007 9:46 AM LuckoDUMB. The head of NASA is an administrator, not a scientist.}}}
So he’s just a dolt, like you, that doesn’t understand anything about NASA, even though he is in charge of it.
Got it.
Tell me, genius, what does NASA stand for, National Aeronautical and Space Agency, no?
Where, pray tell, are the words “climate” and “atmosphere.”
So our “space” agency is now full of part time rogue climatologists, is this what it’s come down to?
No one sees the connection here?
The last time NASA dabbled in junk science they declared the foam for their shuttle environmentally unfriendly and switched to a non Freon based foam, which caused the very next launch to burst into flames and disintegrate, slaughtering 7 innocent astronauts.
Call me old fashioned but I’d much prefer these perverts in Florida would stick to safely launching men into space and getting them back, instead of robbing the federal treasury.
You know what I mean?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Doug
June 1, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this
Buy Danish, now tell us all of the places in the world that are suffering well above average temperatures and severe drought. You dumbazz naysayers only make yourselves look that much more stupid by cherry picking locales that are a little chillier than normal. Science rules BD.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this
Bosch 8:39
No fair, the Reader’s Digest Condensed shortcircuits all their fun -
But you did a nice job of setting up extremes with no middle ground
@@ 9:06
There was another piece on NPR yesterday - report on effectiveness of European efforts so far - answer: not very to mixed. Cited German coal and credit efforts. Same efforts some here are advocating US adopt because (?) of fascination with all things European.
RW-(the original) 9:34 [[Hardly anybody says warming doesn’t exist only that it isn’t from man made CO2 output]]
I’d say “it isn’t ENTIRELY from man made CO2 output.” So that leads to: how much compared to non man made? What of the man made can we control? What’s the cost of control? Questions I’ve not seen addressed by the ‘scientists’ (but how a scientist who’s specialty is infectios diseases is given credibility on weather issues just because he’s a ‘scientist’ escapes me).
And as I believe you’ve pointed out - being skeptical on the extent of man-made global warming does not mean one does not support other conservation or environmental care issues.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this
Buy Danish, Seriously, what does Al Gore have to do with the climate change debate? He made a movie, you didn’t like it, yeah, we get it, whatever.
What scientific credentials, specifically on climatology, does the NASA official have?
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this
BD thinks science is witchcraft.
She is living in the wrong century.
She would screaming to have them burned like the good little Christians did to witches.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this
Yes, Buy Danish, I’d like to know how those Argentinians are doing. I feel bad that they are so cold. Can you find out for me?
I’d also like to know when it’s going to rain again at my house!
Can you tell me that too?
While your at it, can you tell me the winning lottery numbers?
Oh, and can you also tell me how Lost is going to end up? Are they in hell, or is the island really a wacky experiment gone awry. And what’s up with those polar bears? Huh? Do you think Kate and Sawyer will make it, and damn I hate it that Jack is hooked on Oxycotin.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this
{{{By getalife June 1, 2007 9:46 AM Hell has frozen over. Alabama apologized for slavery.}}}
al-Gitmo: The next stop is the Alabama State Treasury.
You’ll be seeing some pigs fly.
{{{By getalife June 1, 2007 10:05 AM I think he lost it reading My Pet Goat and being told we were under attack. He froze and his eyes glazed over.}}}
Versus John Kerry fleeing from the Senate like a Coward.
Kerry ‘couldn’t think’ on 9/11
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this
Al Gore showed leadership on this issue and the wingnuts are not use to this concept.
He scares them with his scientific facts.
So they bash him like they do the Muslims.
Just scared to death of everything.
Cowards, pure and simple.
By Funny morons...
June 1, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this
I love how the wingnuts pull the “but it got cold in Argentina” routine as an argument against global warming. That’s why I prefer the term climate change. There’s no refuting the fact that our climate is changing in weird ways for the worse and the OVERALL OUTCOME will be a hotter planet.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this
Hey Andy,
Remember what w spewed on the bullhorn on top of the rubble?
I do.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 10:24 AM | Link to this
@@ 9:48
While Pres Bush has not made a strong enough push for Iran economic sanctions (including for investors) regarding their nuc program, care to guess who’s opposed? Hint: UN Sec General, China, Russians, Germans (you can select “all of the above” - and the UberLibs can join in with condemnations of these dirty capitalists (China, Russia),
Have any candidates from either party called for sanctions? Or offered any other nonmilitary solutions?
Buy Danish 9:58
Silly you. Al Gore doesn’t have to be a scientist. He’s a celebrity! But seriously, he’s done more studying on it than many. It’s just the research he cites and the conclusions he arrives at are open to debate. Did he ever accept the debate challenge from Lord Monckton? I don’t think he did. More’s the pity.
Link:Lord Monckton Requests Global Warming Debate with Al Gore
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this
{{{By Bosch
June 1, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this
Buy Danish, Seriously, what does Al Gore have to do with the climate change debate? He made a movie, you didn’t like it, yeah, we get it, whatever.}}}}
Silly Bosch,
You must be joking!
Doug,
Here is a record of droughts in U.S. going back to 1895.
Quiz question:
What year had the most severe droughts, and how many SUVs existed then?
DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH®
By Sailor
June 1, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this
Actually, my gal Andi/e is a scientist.
A biologist - an expert on trouser trout.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this
{{BD thinks science is witchcraft.
She is living in the wrong century.}}
Getalife— just think where the world would be today if we didn’t have Dems promoting scientific and medical research during the last century: possibly no penicillin, polio vaccines, AIDS inhibitors, or birth control pills. What an even scarier world this would be today!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this
Oh, and also Buy Danish, if the counterargument to those who dispell that CO2 emissions are causing climate change make a movie about it, I’ll be sure to watch it.
Where’s their movie? Can you tell me that too?
By Anti-NeoCon
June 1, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this
Watch how many Republicans running for office in ‘08 “uninvite” President Idiot to their campaign stops. Republicans are going to pay the price for supporting a President whose interests lie with his friends and not with those he’s supposed to serve — a greater price than they paid in ‘06.
Republicans are REALLY gonna hate ‘08!
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this
We don’t know what we are doing, what’s the mission, waaaahhhhhhh, cries the sniveling Cowards:
{{{Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the No. 2 U.S. commander in Iraq, said Thursday that U.S. military officers were talking with Iraqi militants — excluding Al Qaeda — about cease-fires and other arrangements to try to stop the violence. He said he thinks 80 percent of Iraqis, including Sunni insurgents and Shiite militants, can reach reconciliation with each other, although most Al Qaeda operatives will not.}}}
Choking that disease to death.
You’re gonna hate 07®.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this
Oh my goodness,
Let us get ALL our apologies in order so we can live in ethereal peace and perfection.
Liberals apologize to our troops for not supporting them with words or actions.
Liberals apologize to scientists for calling Al Gore an authority on climate changes and applauding him as he blows “hot air”.
Liberals apologize for supporting Luckovich for daily demonizing the President of the United State.
Liberals apologize to the President for calling for impeachment when he has done nothing illegal.
Liberals apologize to children for trying to make government their parents.
Liberals apologize to NYC for suggesting that 9/11 was an “inside” job.
Liberals apologize for claiming America’s elections are rigged when there is no evidence of such.(Ask the Supreme Court.)
Liberals apologize for a “press” that reports all negative events in Iraq but nothing positive or progressive.
Liberals apologize for using grief sticken families and mothers for propaganda purposes against our military and the war.
Now, will everybody feel better? Need more apologies?
And please,liberals, do something original if you can and not something you just copied off another post.
By Corey
June 1, 2007 10:32 AM | Link to this
People, blogs are meant for comments regarding a particular topic(Global Warming). The vent is where anything goes. How in the he@3 did we go from global warming to slavery apologies on this blog? Peace.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this
{{Where’s their movie? Can you tell me that too?}}
Bosch— I’m sure that someone at Exxon/Mobil is working on funding that movie and hiring the necessary actors!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this
Seriously Buy Danish, I would like to know those things I posted at 10:16. I’ll wait for your response.
Oh, I’m so excited! Buy Danish is going to tell me the winning lottery numbers and how Lost is going to end up!
Ohhhh, the anticipation.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this
Corey,
Thanks for your blog expertise but if you read this blog, it goes all over the place.
Look at Dusty’s post ^^^^^.
All about liberals.
Geez.
Peace.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 10:38 AM | Link to this
Which of the Repug candidates have hired K.Rover as a consultant for their campaigns? After all, he is the architect of their leader’s 2 squeaker-wins, and yet none of them want to use his expertise? Why is that?
By @@
June 1, 2007 10:38 AM | Link to this
Getalife:
(((Al Gore showed leadership on this issue and the wingnuts are not use to this concept.)))
You have got to be kidding me.
Al Gore was looking for a schtick to recover from his failed run for the Presidency. As much as the liberals here would like to believe he’ll try another campaign run; I predict he won’t.
He’s riding his own gas emissions so high on this global warming schtick he’s adopted a god complex.
Did you listen to his interview on NPR?
He basically told everyone, you…me…EVERYONE in this country that we lacked the ability of reasonable thought. That he knew the way, and could show us the way. The guy is so damn arrogant and condescending.
He’s beginning to remind me more and more of Moore.
Why are liberals so willing to have their intelligence insulted by the likes of guys like MooreGore?
By Paul
June 1, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this
IN THE NEWS 10:03
Clown? Well, lots of people got hung up on “known knowns” and “we know there are factors we don’t know” (standard groupings for operational plans, but foreign concepts to many). Actually, I thought it did a pretty good job of encapsulating what others are saying.
[[There’s much we know and can agree on around the climate change issue]]
Hopefully - “know” and “agree” may be challenging
[[and there’s much that we just don’t believe we do know]]
Also True. But I’m more interested in what we do believe that we don’t know.
[[and we want to have a debate about the things we know and understand]]
Getting agreement on that will be tough
[[the things we know about that we don’t understand very well]]
Some will never admit to that -
[[and the things we don’t even know about]]
Again, some will never admit that or will minimize it
[[around this very complex issue of climate science.]]
True - but many want to treat is as a simple solution.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this
Paul,
I missed that particular invite. Too funny. I do recall some Danish scientists asked to debate him, but that offer was also refused. I believe they were the authors of “The Chilling Stars”.
Here’s someone else I’d like Al Gore to debate. The Father of Climatology, Dr. Reid Bryson.
“Climate’s always been changing and it’s been changing rapidly at various times, and so something was making it change in the past,” he told us in an interview this past winter. “Before there were enough people to make any difference at all, two million years ago, nobody was changing the climate, yet the climate was changing, okay?”/“All this argument is the temperature going up or not, it’s absurd,” Bryson continues. “Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air.”
Dittos to Funny Moron^^^^^
DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH®
Silly Bosch,
Has anyone ever told you that you are childish? I don’t have the patience to answer silly questions. I’ve already raised one child, and thankfully he never asked anything nearly as idiotic as your 10:16.
By George
June 1, 2007 10:42 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull, what you are “just now” discovering is Bush does NOT care about you and other conservatives. He is doing exactly what big business wants him to do. What big business TELLS him to do and right now, big business wants cheap labor inside the US.
They want a constant supply of Mexican workers coming into the United States, because they then don’t have to pay them well. The don’t have to give them health benefits and they can use this pool of illegal immigrants to break any union they want to break.
WAKE UP!
The GOP does not serve the interest of conservatives, only the interests of those people paying the bills.
GAK62
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this
Wow. Goldie posted a comment. I responded only sparingly and the whole blog now has gone to shiit. Unbelievable. Who would’ve thought that the subject of a simple apology would bring out the venom in some people.
I hate that I missed RW’s daily performance of being the resident dick. Maybe I’ll catch up with him at happy hour where I’m sure he’ll try to p!ss in as many of other people’s drinks as possible.
I don’t see how wingnuts get so wound up about MAN-MADE global warming. Centre-right governments around the world are on board for stemming the effects of global warming, but the worthless bunch of bleating wingnuts here act like people are asking them to sacrifice their first-born child. They refuse to see the fact that every year after 1976 has been hotter than 1976, or that droughts have occurred more frequently, or that there is overwhelming evidence of the ice caps melting, etc.
It must be nice to remain willfully ignorant with no shame.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this
@@,
Yes, you are not use to real leadership.
You support a failed leader who admits global warming but wants have meetings until he is gone.
That is failed leadership, no matter how you spin it.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this
Buy Danish 10:40
I thought Lord Monckton would be a good choice. He, also, is not a scientist, he has researched the issue, he has to many a “celebrity” status and some will be enamored of him because of his accent.
Plus, I’d love to see the look of disdain on Lord Monckton’s face and hear his riposte when Gore uses his “when the planet has a fever you don’t read a novel” line.
I’ll have to sign off now - way too much fun yesterday and I’ve a pile of work to catch up on.
Cheers -
By Eric
June 1, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this
Only cheney has lower approval ratings than the shrub.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this
I’m off to find that movie Bosch is looking for, but meanwhile I found this to add to my “Global Warming Debunked” file.
Albert Einstein once said, “Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of truth and knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.”/While the gods must consider An Inconvenient Truth the ultimate comedy, real climate scientists are crying over Al Gore’s new film. This is not just because the ex-vice-president commits numerous basic science mistakes. They are also concerned that many in the media and public will fail to realize that this film amounts to little more than science fiction.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this
White House Blames NASA Chief’s Global Warming Denial On His ‘Wry Sense Of Humor
{{{{The White House’s science adviser Jack Marburger also tried to dismiss Griffin’s ignorance, insisting the NASA administrator was joking:
“It’s pretty obvious that the NASA administrator was speaking about his own personal views and by no means representing or attempting to represent the administration’s views or broader policy,” Marburger said. “He’s got a very wry sense of humor and is very outspoken.“}}}}
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this
Well, damn, Buy Danish, you asked me if there was anything else I would like to know — and I would seriously like to know all those things.
You still haven’t told me when the other side’s movie is coming out. Whose going to star in it? Can you tell me that too?
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this
U.S. embassy ‘built with coerced labor.
{{{{{During a telephone interview last weekend, [a high-level project manager] said the laborers “had their backs to the wall,” and had been living 20 to a trailer. Protests over First Kuwaiti’s bad food, abusive treatment from managers and unsafe working conditions were routine among many of the 2,700 workers}}}}}
By Another Anti-neocon
June 1, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this
One of the more obvious problems with neocons pooh poohing man-made global warming is that when it comes to ANY matters more complicated than filling up their gas tanks, they are simply and intentionally ill-equipped to understand and address these matters. Just look at the two or three kooks here who try their damnedest to make their ignorance sound rational.
One reason is because they are, in many/most cases, horribly uneducated. And because they have this insane belief in interpreting the Bible literally, they think they’re bound for a promised paradise and simply don’t give a flying fork about the future of this planet. AND NEVER WILL. Their hatred and distrust for all science just confirms the lunacy, pigheadedness and fallacies of their mythology. It is odd how in so many ways they are identical to the Islamists in this regard. Or they try desperately to merge the two and pervert it with laughable stunts like the Creation Museum. These people are merely the ridiculous and unreasoning progeny of the flat-earth at the center of the universe gang.
A second major component of this chosen stupidity is that a large part of their collective consciousness requires them to blindly strike out in anger and take a counter position whenever any non neocons and non-religionists propose theories, even those based on exhaustive research and confirmation. Again, just like the dangerous dirtbags in the Middle East.
Also note that many of these fools, though either too ashamed or too gutless to admit their belief in the mythology, will support it’s demented positions because they are joined at the hip politically with the unenlightened and uninformed.
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this
CDC’s Ability To Respond To Tuberculosis Scare Hampered By Bush’s Budget Cuts
{{{{In a report submitted to the House Appropriations Committee earlier this year, CDC Director Julie Gerberding warned that a TB outbreak could result from the administration’s proposed cuts. She noted that “emerging plagues such as drug-resistant tuberculosis represent ‘urgent threats that have become more prominent in the dawn of the 21st century.’”}}}}
By getalife
June 1, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
There is your leadership @@.
The NASA guy was only joking.
Its all a big joke to them.
The worst leadership we will ever see. You name it, they have screwed it up.
Geezus fereaking Kerist.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this
Bosch,
Get your popcorn ready, sit back, and enjoy.
“The Great Global Warming Swindle”.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this
{{{By George June 1, 2007 10:42 AM LuckoDull, what you are “just now” discovering is Bush does NOT care about you and other conservatives. He is doing exactly what big business wants him to do. What big business TELLS him to do and right now, big business wants cheap labor inside the US.}}}
I told you before, I am not a stupid hack like you, I am an American.
“Big business” is also telling Bush to impose new regulations on emissions so that they can make a killing selling technology to satisfy the idiot “global warming” zealots.
And you goonie liberals are Bushbots on that issue.
Problem is, unless this new technology can shut off the Sun, it won’t make a freaking bit of difference whatsoever to the climate.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this
[What Global Warming Debate? News: The scientific consensus is unambiguous: global warming is real and human-influenced, and we can do something about it. Here’s what to tell those who suggest otherwise.] (http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2005/05/debate.html)
ITS A MATTER OF WHO HAS A BETTER TRACK RECORD ON THE TRUTH - DON’T IT?
By TrekkieDull
June 1, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this
Hey Dusty, would you like to accompany me to the big Bloggers Convention next week? Let me know soon, motel rooms in the greater Valdosta metropolitan area are expensive, Dateline NBC is busy doing a series of Internet predators, they have taken all the rooms. I need about six roommates.
Anyway, a guy who plays an alien on Stargate Atlantis is supposed to be signing autographs.
Also, A guy that has blogged half his life on the same site is supposed to make a video appearance. I guess his butt sores have healed.
It will be fun!
DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this
Glaciers are melting, the weather’s becoming weirder, and animals are getting antsy. You don’t have to look far for evidence that the earth’s climate is changing before our very eyes. Here, a sampling of global warming’s greatest hits
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this
Before I go -
IN THE NEWS.
I suggest that a certain parrot who blogs here and is employed by the CDC voluntarily sacrifice her job for the “greater good”.
This particular parrot is just one of many government employees who manage to spend a lot of time here on the taxpayer time.
Think of that the next time anyone tells you that some agency or another is suffering from a funding crisis.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this
All joking aside, does it really matter who is right on this issue? Is it a natural occurence (sp?), is it CO2 emissions? Who cares. The point is that we are ruining our planet for our children and many generations of children and if we don’t get serious and do something about it, our only planet is going to be destroyed.
I’m glad this has finally come to the forefront, and people are starting to take it seriously. It really p** me off that people would rather argue about the causes. Who cares, just do something about it.
Paul made a comment earlier that kind brings up a good point, “And as I believe you’ve pointed out - being skeptical on the extent of man-made global warming does not mean one does not support other conservation or environmental care issues.”
Exactly, it doesn’t matter what you are skeptical about, just take care of the planet — recycle, walk more, don’t litter, take canvas bags to the grocery store, etc.
By @@
June 1, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this
Paul @ 9:48:
What a coincidence, I had just left the Asia Times Online when I came back and saw your comment. Interesting articles over there on that very subject. China, Russia, Iranian sanctions. Past screw ups under Clinton result in present screw ups.
It seems conservatives are trying to deal diplomatically with China, while Democrats are wanting to lower the trade boom.
I really don’t have a very good grasp of global economics and trade issues, but I try….
When I ask the husband to elaborate he says: “Every country works a backroom deal that will benefit them in the end. They’re willing to make concessions, but they’ll never forfeit the game.”
By Funny morons...
June 1, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
Since it came up again this link bears repeating
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
{{{I told you before, I am not a stupid hack like you, I am an American.}}}
No LuckoDork, you are a stupid hack.
And American? LOL! If you were alive during the Revolution, you would’ve been a Tory sell-out because the principles of Paine and Jefferson would’ve went right over your brainless head.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this
Yeah, Buy Danish did it!!!!!!!
I’ll go get my popcorn bucket, I’m sure this will be great!
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 11:05 AM | Link to this
{{{{By Another Anti-neocon June 1, 2007 10:54 AM One of the more obvious problems with neocons pooh poohing man-made global warming is that when it comes to ANY matters more complicated than filling up their gas tanks, they are simply and intentionally ill-equipped to understand and address these matters.}}}}
You’d think that after an opening paragraph like that some facts would be presented to back up that statement.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, yeah, right.
This mental cripple does the EXACT thing that it accuses us of doing:
{{{Or they try desperately to merge the two and pervert it with laughable stunts like the Creation Museum.}}}
Geez, can this be real?
Watch me make all these goonies go silent:
{{{Water vapor constitutes Earth’s most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth’s greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many “facts and figures’ regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold. Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin.}}}
Humans couldn’t change the climate if they wanted to.
What are you going to do, clever little pinko®, mop up the Oceans?
Put out the Sun?
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this
{{{By @@
June 1, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this
When I ask the husband to elaborate he says: “Every country works a backroom deal that will benefit them in the end. They’re willing to make concessions, but they’ll never forfeit the game.”}}}
Then he pats you on the the tush and tells you to finish the dishes…
By Deport 12 million scumbags
June 1, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this
I suggest that a certain dipsh-it who blogs here and is not, nor ever has been, employed get a job at McDonald’s or Burger King for this blog’s “greater good”.
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this
steve-o
i saw that too…..”the husband”???
does she get an allowance too?
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this
{{{To determine the Sun’s role in global warming, Dr Solanki’s research team measured magnetic zones on the Sun’s surface known as sunspots, which are believed to intensify the Sun’s energy output. The team studied sunspot data going back several hundred years. They found that a dearth of sunspots signalled a cold period - which could last up to 50 years - but that over the past century their numbers had increased as the Earth’s climate grew steadily warmer. The scientists also compared data from ice samples collected during an expedition to Greenland in 1991. The most recent samples contained the lowest recorded levels of beryllium 10 for more than 1,000 years. Beryllium 10 is a particle created by cosmic rays that decreases in the Earth’s atmosphere as the magnetic energy from the Sun increases. Scientists can currently trace beryllium 10 levels back 1,150 years.}}}
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this
Deport 12 million scumbags, Do you mean LuckoDull, Buy Danish, or Dusty?
By Another Anti-neocon
June 1, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this
Humans couldn’t change the climate if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t eliminate 90% of the world’s rain forests if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t poison the world’s rivers and lakes if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t create dense smog in the atmosphere if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t cause a hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t reduce many commercial fish populations by 75% if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t directly cause the extinction of thousands of species of plants and animals if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t cause widespread habitat destruction if they wanted to.
Humans couldn’t prove that the earth isn’t at the center of the universe if they wanted to.
Neocons couldn’t find their fat a-sses with both hands if they wanted to.
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this
The Death of Republicanism As We Know It
{{{{The Republican National Committee, hit by a grass-roots donors’ rebellion over President Bush’s immigration policy, has fired all 65 of its telephone solicitors, Ralph Z. Hallow will report Friday in The Washington Times.
Faced with an estimated 40 percent fall-off in small-donor contributions and aging phone-bank equipment that the RNC said would cost too much to update, Anne Hathaway, the committee’s chief of staff, summoned the solicitations staff last week and told them they were out of work, effective immediately, the fired staffers told The Times.}}}}
By Deport 12 million scumbags
June 1, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this
Eliminating those three pieces of idiotic fascist cr-ap would be one helluva start to fixing this country, that’s for sure. Losers all.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this
Watcher,
Very 1950s-ish if you ask me…
By Anti-NeoCon
June 1, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
Dittos to “Another Anti-NeoCon”
Republicans are REALLY gonna hate ‘08!!!
By getalife
June 1, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
A must read for all wingnuts
Bwa.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this
Green Elephants must speak up
{{{{Theodore Roosevelt declared that efficient use of resources is a moral and patriotic obligation. Frugality and restraint are hallmarks of true conservatism…………On the very day he was sworn in—urged on by some of his largest campaign contributors—Mr. Bush suspended one of the most popular and widely supported forest conservation rules in U.S. history. ……….. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a priceless environmental legacy of the Eisenhower presidency, which first set the land aside for wildlife habitat. But President Bush seems to regard the refuge—one of the most pristine places left in North America—as just another oil and gas field}}}}
By @@
June 1, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this
steve-o & Watcher:
I claim no ownership “my husband”, nor does he claim ownership “my wife” of me.
That’s the reason I refer to him as “the husband” and he refers to me as “the wife”. It’s kind of like “the” CEO or “the” Comptroller of a company.
Actually, he tends to load the dishwasher most of the time. I do ALL the cooking though. I’m better at it than he is.
I always welcome a pat on my tush though. My Dad used to give them to my Mom. As a kid I remember how it made me feel…like there was love in the home.
Now just “being a tush” like you steve-o?
I have no idea what that feels like, but maybe you can share with us.
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this
IN THE NEWS - The only surprising thing about your refreshing post at 11:23 is that small donor contributions to the GOP are down just 40%. Any takers that that figure goes up to 80% before the ‘08 election? 12 years and neo-conservatism is virtually dead.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this
Republicans for Environmental Protection’s Policy Position on Global Climate Change Our Greatest Environmental Challenge
{{{{{Simple physics explains global warming. Here are incontrovertible facts: The sun shines, warming the Earth. Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other “greenhouse” gases prevent the escape of some of that solar heat back into space. So far, so good. The presence of greenhouse gases makes the Earth a warm and hospitable planet for life. Without these gases, Earth would be a frozen wasteland.
But you can have too much of a good thing. The natural balance of heat-trapping gases is finely tuned. The artificially rapid increase of carbon dioxide in the past century has tipped the atmosphere out of balance. The combustion of fossil fuels and removal of forest cover that absorbs CO2 have resulted in an observed 30 percent increase in CO2 concentrations since the mid-19th century. Today, global average CO2 emissions equal one ton per person each year. But the U.S. rate is 5 tons per person each year, more than any other nation.}}}}}
By @@
June 1, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this
steve-o & Watcher:
I claim no ownership “my husband”, nor does he claim ownership “my wife” of me.
That’s the reason I refer to him as “the husband” and he refers to me as “the wife”. It’s kind of like “the” CEO or “the” Comptroller of a company.
Actually, he tends to load the dishwasher most of the time. I do ALL the cooking though. I’m better at it than he is.
I always welcome a pat on my tush though. My Dad used to give them to my Mom. As a kid I remember how it made me feel…like there was love in the home.
Now just “being a tush” like you steve-o?
I have no idea what that feels like, but maybe you can share with us.
By MM
June 1, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this
Luckodull,
Do you find it so reprehensible to simply clean up the atmosphere. What is the harm? No matter who is right, and it is not a republican vs. democrat issue. Do you think there are republicans and democrats in countries overseas that are debating this issue?
I think you enjoy inhaling car fumes. Your posts certainly prove that out.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this
@@,
You want to know what my tush feels like?
This is the wrong blog for that type of question, hon.
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this
“The wife”
The old ball and chain…..
I prefer the more complimentary… my better half…. my lovely bride….
By George
June 1, 2007 11:37 AM | Link to this
If the federal government really wanted to control illegal immigration, they would simply enforce the laws currently on the books against employers who hire illegals.
But the GOP (and the Demo to a lesser extent) are in the back pocket of big business, who tells the federal government to “Look the other way” while they make enormous profits off the cheap Mexican labor pouring into the United States.
GAK62
By George
June 1, 2007 11:37 AM | Link to this
If the federal government really wanted to control illegal immigration, they would simply enforce the laws currently on the books against employers who hire illegals.
But the GOP (and the Demo to a lesser extent) are in the back pocket of big business, who tells the federal government to “Look the other way” while they make enormous profits off the cheap Mexican labor pouring into the United States.
GAK62
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this
IN THE NEWS - more thanks for the 11:31. You’re quote from TR beautifully illustrate why these posers are absolutely the antithesis of American conservatives. They conserve nothing. They are as conservative as OJ was innocent. Maybe one day the Republican party will get away from this sickening thing it has morphed into and return to rational and reasonable positions and common sense patriotism.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 11:40 AM | Link to this
{{{By MM June 1, 2007 11:33 AM Luckodull, Do you find it so reprehensible to simply clean up the atmosphere. What is the harm?}}}
Because the true motive of you socialists is to cripple the economy of the United States.
It’s what you are all about.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By @@
June 1, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this
…and steve-o, you always seem to grab onto the “most petty” of issues.
I always wonder why that is. Maybe you can elaborate on that as well.
I could care less what you call your significant other.
“The” husband…”My” husband.
It’s irrelevant to me. Your posts have become irrelevant to me.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this
I call mine the “ex”.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this
AmVet, You forgot mention that the Republican party and the neo-cons that associate with them also do everything in their power NOT to abide by or “conserve” the Constitution of the United States.
By CLAX
June 1, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull describes Democrats as sicko partisan goonies will always get foamy and enraged when they speak of Bush …. I think LuckoDull needs to take a look in the mirror …He Sounds Exactly Like Those He Criticizes… LuckoDull, You need to start taking the Lithium again Pal
By CLAX
June 1, 2007 11:49 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull describes Democrats as sicko partisan goonies will always get foamy and enraged when they speak of Bush …. I think LuckoDull needs to take a look in the mirror …He Sounds Exactly Like Those He Criticizes… LuckoDull, You need to start taking the Lithium again Pal
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 11:51 AM | Link to this
MM, Haven’t you been going to the “Liberals are out to destroy the economy of the U.S.” meetings?
Don’t worry, I’ll catch you up.
See, we’ve all been meeting in secret to destroy the American economy so we will all loose our jobs, we’ll be forced to ride around in horse and buggies again, our place in the global economy will become non-existant, and then the Muslims will come over here and take over and we will become their slaves forever! Blessed be to Allah!
By Another Anti-neocon
June 1, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this
Because the true motive of us neocons is to NEVER EVER put ANYTHING ahead of money. Not even the future of this planet is worth a few pieces of silver to us close-minded and ignorant moonbats.
It’s what we’re are all about. And it’s why I will NEVER EVER honestly answer the question - why do I find it so reprehensible to clean up the atmosphere. For I have no good answer.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:01 PM | Link to this
Come on now Another Anti-neocon, somebody answered that question earlier. The neo-cons don’t care about the environment because they are all going to a better place above the clouds where angels sing and harps play, and the streets are golden.
And we are all going to be stuck down here in the polluted hell they created. It will be the ultimate, “I told you so” for them.
By mk
June 1, 2007 12:01 PM | Link to this
Lucko,
…it does not make a damn bit of difference, these sicko partisan goonies will always get foamy and enraged when they speak of Bush.
It’s a sure sign of insanity, stupid mindless insanity.
Coward
This reads two ways, you mindless watercarrier.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this
{{why do I find it so reprehensible to clean up the atmosphere. For I have no good answer.}}
Another Anti— I think the only usual reason given is the “reduction of corporate profits”… it might take away too much from the MULTI-BILLION $$$ PROFITS that the oil industry has been experiencing with Bush/Cheney. God knows we can’t have that happen!
By Lord Help Us
June 1, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this
The Jig is UP!
We’ve been ‘outed’ by the resident psycho…
Now that our evil plot to cripple the economy of the US has been exposed, we must come up with another nefarious scheme…
I GOT IT!!
Let’s blow up the size of the US gov’t in an unprecedented manner, appoint inexperienced people throughout gov’t agencies, explode the US debt, AND get ourselved bogged down in military quagmires!!
Sound like ‘Plan B’ to me.
Troops…Let’s get to work. We’ll destroy this country if we have have to destroy this country to do it!!
I love ‘conservative logic.’
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:08 PM | Link to this
Hey Goldie - I like paying a whole bunch of money for gas, because then I don’t have money for those awful tempting things like beer and cigarettes. See, they are just trying to save us from ourselves.
Okay, I’ve got to stop joking around.
By mk
June 1, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this
Lucko,
“If the Amnesty bill passes, I will start calling for Impeachment.
Mark My Words.”
Oh, I think everyone here has them marked…
Bushofascism, its the money stupid. It’s always about the money
By Midori
June 1, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this
funny how you guys hit the nail on the head, re: Buy Danish and witchcraft.
That’s something the Hag really knows a lot about.
Maybe that’s what went down in Argentina? They were on the receiving end of one of her spells?
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this
{{I like paying a whole bunch of money for gas,}}
Bosch— I know what you mean… if I had more money to spend each month, I might be able to afford more college tuition for my young’uns, and we all know where better education might lead — to the ranks of the enlightened and the liberals!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:16 PM | Link to this
Midori, I personally think calling Buy Danish a witch is insulting to all true witches worldwide. :-)
By mk
June 1, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this
Unless you get C’s at an Ivy League school then your daddy can buy you the Presidency!
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this
{{“If the Amnesty bill passes, I will start calling for Impeachment.}}
And just never mind that his guy Dubya has America in an unending and unnecessary war against the Iraqis — a no-win war with no good solutions for ending it… the Neo-Cons have America right where they’ve always wanted us to be!
By AntiRadical
June 1, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this
Good toon, ML. It appears that the “Decider’s” past deviciveness will haunt him for the remainder of his term in office.
In DC, right or wrong, in order to get along you have to go along. Ron Reagan understood this simple regulator of our system of government; George Bush hasn’t got a clue and apparently, never will.
I can’t say that I buy into all the eccentricities of the environmental movement but anyone who thinks that humans do not spoil, pollute, denude and destroy environmental systems should take a walk through the Mumbai slums or for that matter a dip in our own Chatahoocie river.
Conservatives must realize that this is an issue about which they, themselves, are highly divided. Our industrialists wish to esacape as much regulation as they can in order to pad their bottom line; sportsmen and gun entusiasts, conversely, wish to protect habitats so that their sporting traditions can be passed to their children and descendents.
Conservatives would be well served to find another issue to hitch their falling star to. This is simply another of those loaded wedge issues that liberals can effectively use to divide them and diminish their voice.
Conservatives have surely lost their way under the leadership of George W. Bush. If they would live up to their stated goals of smaller government and fiscal restraint, they might have more of a chance to influence the wedge issues that appear to be so dear to their hearts. Unfortunately, they have demonstrated no willingness, integrity, or intellect to do so.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:20 PM | Link to this
That’s right Goldie. Higher education is a liberal plot to build our army of socialists.
I personally would like to go on vacation this year, but alas, I can’t. But that’s okay, I’ll just work more, you know, the good Puritan ethic.
That’s why I was so hoping Buy Danish would tell me the winning numbers to the lottery, but I guess she’s all talk. She had no intention of telling me what I needed to know. Sniff. Sniff. I feel so used.
By Midori
June 1, 2007 12:20 PM | Link to this
LOL, Bosch - there is much wisdom in your words :)
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 12:21 PM | Link to this
Bosch, that 11:51 explains everything! I knew there must be a simpleton explanation! And why conserve the Constitution when you can get the sheep to believe that our “war president” knows what is best for the nation and its people in these particularly distressing times. sarc.
Goldie, it is really strange how the neocons are almost kamikaze-like and how they seem to enjoy screwing themselves and their families to protect the wealth of corporations run by corrupt people that dump on them as a matter of course. Blind allegiance is truly a scary thing.
By the stopper
June 1, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this
Damn you, Bosch!
“we’ve all been meeting in secret to destroy the American economy so we will all loose our jobs, we’ll be forced to ride around in horse and buggies again, our place in the global economy will become non-existant, and then the Muslims will come over here and take over and we will become their slaves forever! Blessed be to Allah!”
Indeed! Allah be prayzed! I loves me some fundie Allah!
Because we progressives, we’re all about keepin’ the wimmenfolk and homerseck-shulls down.
Seriously, you think Luckodork realizes that the vast majority of people viewing this comments section, come here solely to laugh at him?
By Midori
June 1, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
give her a couple hours — she has to warm up her cauldron and crystal ball :)
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 12:24 PM | Link to this
When will Perdue stop being shortsighted and make the investment in creating an educated workforce with our greatest natural resource: our children?
A very good question. Why, Sonny?
By Midori
June 1, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this
Hey guys,
did anyone watch Washington Journal this morning?
Brian Lamb wanted to hear from conservatives only, and wanted to hear their support or non support of Chimpolini.
you may be pleasantly surprised
Click on 6/1/2007. You need Real Player.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this
{{Blind allegiance is truly a scary thing.}}
AmVet— so true… We have much work to do in un-doing the wreckage brought on by the Neo-Cons!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this
AmVet, I would show you the secret hand shake, but our enemies on this blog are watching and I would get in trouble with the higher ups. You know, no hurt feelings.
And about the Constitution, it’s probably outdated anyway, we probably need a change. I mean, hell, it is over 200 years old, we need to get right with the times! It’s the 21st century now.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this
Goldie, Because Sonny doesn’t give a s** about our children’s education. He thinks we need to privatize it and give our children’s education over to the corporations who are proving themselves to be much better at managing things.
Midori, We better be careful. When Buy Danish gets back and sees what we’ve said, she might turn us into frogs. I don’t like frogs, they are creepy.
By Midori
June 1, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
ribbit, ribbit :)
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:37 PM | Link to this
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
Midori, stop it! You’re freaking me out!
By getalife
June 1, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this
There ya go.
You just have to laugh at the sheer lunacy of the wingnut mind set.
Bwa.
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this
Bosch, you know the neocons are on the run when Newt the Nut says that unless we replace red vs. blue with red, white and blue, we’re in trouble. This coming from the guy who was the very poster boy for the beginning of the most venomous personal attacks, holier-than-thou hyper-hypocrisy and sickeningly blind intransigence. They are probably going to trot him out as a candidate for “08 and then we can all have another really big laugh!
The other almost comical aspect of the Republican candidates is their almost unanimous and absolute adulation for all things Ronnie. Are they so blind they can’t even see, that it was Reagan who got them going down this neocon road full speed with no steering? Driving with their eyes closed. Hilarious.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this
{{{By Bosch June 1, 2007 11:51 AM See, we’ve all been meeting in secret to destroy the American economy so we will all loose our jobs, we’ll be forced to ride around in horse and buggies again, our place in the global economy will become non-existant, and then the Muslims will come over here and take over and we will become their slaves forever!}}}
Yep, look minutes from those “secret” meetings, geez:
Capitalism wrecks the environment-Why we fight for a socialist alternative-OUR ENVIRONMENT is deteriorating rapidly. In the past 50 years, human activity has changed the ecosystem more rapidly and extensively than in any other half-century in human history. Global warming has caused the arctic ice sheet to halve in thickness in just 30 years. Half the earth’s forests have disappeared as have an even higher proportion of wetlands.
You sniveling Cowards are like the biggest jackas-ses to ever roam the Earth:
{{{Environmentalist campaigners have advocated protectionism as a means of restraining the profit motives from inflicting environmental damage. The World Socialist Movement views this as an unrealistic aim, due to the inherent priority of profit within capitalism. For a detailed review of these issues, see our series of articles on Globalisation.}}}
You don’t even know the causes that you lobby for.
The true uneducated public school TV watching generation right here at the Luckobit-ch blog.
Dumbas-ses.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this
SURPRISE! SURPRISE! SURPRISE!
Defense Secretary, Top General Endorse 50-Year U.S. Presence In Iraq
{{{{[In Newsweek, Jonathan Alter adds:
The only two reasons to station troops in the Middle East for half a century are protecting oil supplies (reflecting a pessimistic view of energy independence) outside the normal channels of trade and diplomacy, and projecting raw military power. These are the imperial aims of an empire. During the cold war, charges of U.S. imperialism in Korea and Vietnam were false. Those wars were about superpower struggles. This time, the “I word” is not a left-wing epithet but a straightforward description of policy aims–yet another difference from those two older wars in Asia.}}}}
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this
Bush Surgeon General nominee runs program to “cure” gays
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this
How to make money by going green
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this
{{{By AntiRadical June 1, 2007 12:18 PM I can’t say that I buy into all the eccentricities of the environmental movement but anyone who thinks that humans do not spoil, pollute, denude and destroy environmental systems should take a walk through the Mumbai slums or for that matter a dip in our own Chatahoocie river.}}}
Spammie: If you can find one rational Conservative that takes the position that man does not pollute at all, I would love to know who he is.
All I’m saying is that the al-Gorebots couldn’t be more wrong about CO2 and it makes absolutely no sense to cripple the United States economy because of it.
Remember DDT?
CO2 can only so much solar radiation, it’s effect on warming is like .000008%, I thought you libs were in favor of science?
Have you ever been in a laboratory?
Ever read a Chemistry book?
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this
Green is good
{{{{This era won’t be about efficiency - although there are still lots of gains to be made there - but about increasing revenues and inventing entirely new businesses. That, at least, is what DuPont has set out to do, albeit with mixed results. That’s also why GE is selling wind turbines as fast as it can produce them. }}}}
By AntiRadical
June 1, 2007 12:53 PM | Link to this
AmVet- I would have to disagree. Reagan was a good and effective President, so was Bill Clinton.
I did not support everything that either did, and both were corrupt in their own fashions, but to deny prosperity and security under either is disingenuous.
Don’t let George Bush cut your nose off to spite your face. We need a two party system of government in order to satisfy our system of checks and balances.
See you guys another day, duty calls.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this
Going Green: Not Just “Good Business”
{{{But climate change is also an opportunity. New markets will develop to meet the needs of communities affected by climate change. Without policy, these markets will be a search for painkillers — treating symptoms, not the cause. With comprehensive policy, we’ll create a healthy set of risks and opportunities for businesses to develop and deploy low-carbon solutions faster than their competitors. That’s where the patents are going to be, and that’s where the markets are headed worldwide.}}}}
By One Voice
June 1, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this
Hey getalife,
What do you think of a John Edwards/Ron Paul ticket? After hearing Paul talk on Bill Maher last week I was really impressed and thought a split ticket may lure those in the middle.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this
Dammit LuckoDull! How did you get those minutes from our meeting?
Dammit, now we’re doomed. The enemy has infiltrated our camp. That’s it. It’s over.
Amvet, So true about Newt. Isn’t a newt a kind of lizard? Aren’t newts what witches use in their spells to ward off evil spirits? We should ask Buy Danish.
You’ve hit the nail on the head Amvet — so true, so true. ;-)
By getalife
June 1, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this
Poor Andy is a gutless coward scared to death of global warming, Muslims, illegal immigrants, etc…
Its just too much for his tiny spine to handle.
Drink up some more courage Andy. The liberals will fix it.
Geez, coward.
Bwa.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this
Showcasing the Growth of the Green Economy
{{{{{By many accounts, the green business movement is taking off, with the marketplace topping more than $228 billion in the United States and with such companies as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. getting into organic food and General Electric Co. plowing into renewable energy. Levi’s is introducing organic cotton jeans. Vanity Fair recently published a green issue}}}}
By Lord Help Us
June 1, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this
Why the victory lap lucko-master?
C’mon man, we already fessed up, please don’t revel in our defeat…it hurts our feelings.
We have given up on our evil plot to ruin the US economy by cleaning up the environment. Okay?
We have our first meeting tonight on our NEW nefarious scheme to turn this country into such an economic mess people will be going to Cuba to get decent medical care. I mean it.
We’re going to EXPLODE the spending of the US gov’t…appoint incompetent ideologues throughout gov’t, EXPLODE the national debt…start a military quagmire that will cost trillions…alienate the entire world so that no one will help us out…
WHY, oh why, didn’t we think of this before…It’s so much easier than cleaning up the environment.
So, stop us if you think you can, mister…we will persevere.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this
In the News, I didn’t see that article you posted earlier. Do you mean to tell me that there is FINALLY going to be a cure for homosexuality?
OH THANK THE LORD! We are finally saved from those freaks of nature! My family will be so happy when I tell them my cousin will finally be cured! It’s a miracle, it truly is. Although, I’ll miss her girlfriend. She’s been a part of the family for 20 years now, oh well, I guess she’ll be cured too, can marry a man, and start her own damn family!
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this
@@,
First you want me to tell you how my arse feels and now you tell me that I’m dead to you? Ouch. Total 180.
One Voice,
Ron Paul’s fiscal platform would be incompatible with that of Edwards. Paul is an old-school conservative in the mold of Goldwater in Reagan. However, even though my views don’t exactly square with Paul’s, I have a lot of respect for him because I can actually see his LOGIC in forming his opinions, unlike the kooky irrational neoCONs running the country today.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this
One voice,
I like both of them and think they should run as not being corporate wh-ores or pro we, the people.
We do not need two corporate who-re parties.
One gop is enough for the corporate utopia agenda.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 1:05 PM | Link to this
Lord Help Us, “We have given up on our evil plot to ruin the US economy by cleaning up the environment. Okay?”
Good strategy, we’ll just keep letting the enemy think that - wink, wink.
Just don’t tell them where the secret meeting tonight is. All the true liberals know the place.
By Craig
June 1, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this
The Repugs always know how to stimulate the economy. Looks like another great year for helicopter manufacturers and that inadequate piece of crap called a Humvee. Surge on, men, surge on. “Onward Christian Soldiers.” Yup.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this
{{{By getalife June 1, 2007 12:57 PM Poor Andy is a gutless coward scared to death of global warming}}}
al-Gitmo: If I was “scared” of “global warming” wouldn’t I be the one calling for action on it, like you are?
Scaredy cat.
{{{Muslims}}}
Don’t it figure, the brave “global warming” warriors don’t have time to bother with something that is killing innocent women and children everyday for real, like it might distract them from their epic battle against the weather.
Geez.
{{{illegal immigrants, etc…}}}
Dude, you are in the chimperor’s camp on this one.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Coward.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Mrs. Godzilla
June 1, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this
Since we’ve been found out…
Bosch, LHU, and Goldie….don’t bother with the caterers
Midori and Getalife….forget the decorations
We’ll have to come up with a plan B for double super secret destroy the economy lodge meeting.
And damn I really wanted to wear my “Just say no to economic growth” lapel pin on my “I am planning to destroy America” T-shirt.
Those neo-cons spoil all our fun.
Rats!
What’s next? No more Merit Badges for polluting the planet?
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this
I was going to bring my famous depleted uranium tipped cannolis.
By Lord Help Us
June 1, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
Let’s have our meeting at the Vice President’s place - they’ll never think to look there AND they will never release the visitor logs…
And, HEY…a bonus! A lot of the material we need for our agenda (see above) should be readily available at Cheney’s.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 1:19 PM | Link to this
Sorry, Mrs. G, LuckoDull was just too smart for us. But don’t get yourself down, we’ll come up with another plan, you can still wear your t-shirt and lapel pin, it will just be delayed a bit, that’s all.
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this
LHU,
Great idea.
Isn’t he always in the bunker anyway?
While we are there we can get Mary to help us promote the homosexual agenda!
By George
June 1, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this
You’re right LuckoDull, the liberals are secretly trying to DESTORY American and Charles Nelson Reilly was on the grassy knoll in Dallas!
He takes his “Perfect Crime” with him to the grave……
By Paul
June 1, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this
steve-0 1:02
Just in quick, here -
Altho elected as a Republican, Ron Paul is pretty much a Libertarian (and a Libertarian that could make other Libertarians nervous) - not “old-school Republican.” In fact, he ran as a Libertarian candidate, and, finding out it’s pretty difficult to buck the two-party systesm in this country (even liberals aren’t very liberal when it comes to greater political representation) he ran as a Republican.
There are a couple decent web sites - his own, campaign, etc - that list his positions. Neocons and uberLibs would both be screaming bloody murder if he was given a free hand to implement his views!
Later - have a good afternoon
By getalife
June 1, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this
Andy,
Let me attend our meeting and I will get back with you.
Of course, you are not invited.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 1:22 PM | Link to this
Lord Help Us, Dammit, your right! You’re so smart! I think we need to appoint you as our leader! But, do you think Cheney will make that information available to us? He’s kind of secretive about that kind of thing, I’m sure we can trick him, but then, he might shoot us in the face!
Oh, the dilemma. But I think it will work.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this
{{{By Bosch June 1, 2007 1:05 PM “We have given up on our evil plot to ruin the US economy by cleaning up the environment. Okay?”}}}
That’s great guys!
I guess this means that you are going to stop cutting down trees, trucking them to the mill, dumping mill waste into the local streams, bleaching paper and dumping that waste into the waterways, trucking the paper to your printing facility, sending your reporters out in their cars to drive around getting stupid, mindless anti American stories, fleets of trucks and cars belching smog so that you can send your low rent pinko army out to throw your trash “news” paper in my beautifully landscaped yard, all of that trash getting collected by fleets of garbage trucks and finally, the rotting heaps of garbage at the massive landfills leaching the ink products into the local waterways.
It’s about time.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this
Okay, all, I have to run out for a while, but while I’m gone, I’ll be thinking of better, more efficient ways to destroy the American economy.
I’ll let you know when I get back.
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this
AntiRadical, agreed that Ronnie did a few good decisions. (Bombing Khadafi and his unwillingness to turn the executive branch into an autocracy come to mind). My point is that overall, his presidency was pretty much a dictator-coddling, apartheid supporting, gigantic government, in your bedroom peeking, destined to fail war on drugs, knee-jerk reactionary wreck. And how about these little gems?
He plunged the country into staggering debt.
He slashed taxes for the rich.
He advocated prayer in public schools.
He cut off aid to the homeless and mentally ill.
But for me the most alarming aspect of the Reagan legacy is how little this country seems to have learned from it. The neocons have adopted Reagan’s position that the US, can by definition do no wrong. They have, like him, used this strange, delusional, optimistic arrogance as a justification for a very long list of atrocities and sins.
He was in fact the father of the failed neo-conservative movement and deserves the “credit” for being so. And he was the first chickenhawk president - making movies instead of putting his a$$ on the line like so many others of his generation. And the first to really cozy up to filthy lucre of the religious frauds and charlatans.
And of course, I would absolutely love to see a decent, moral Republican party. But there are very, very few signs - Hagel being a notable exception.
By test
June 1, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this
test 1
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 1:28 PM | Link to this
SHOULD I CANCEL THE BAND?
By test
June 1, 2007 1:28 PM | Link to this
test 2
By Lord Help Us
June 1, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this
Andy! I didn’t know you could get the Washington Times delivered in Atlanta!
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this
{{{By AmVet June 1, 2007 1:27 PM My point is that overall, his presidency was pretty much a dictator-coddling, apartheid supporting, gigantic government, in your bedroom peeking}}}
Coming from the same sniveling Cowards that say Castro has a better health care system than we do and who want to tell us what size car to drive.
Is this for real?
Do you libs even know what you are saying or does all the babble coming out of your mouth just sound good to you?
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this
Well, wonderful,
Midori found her soulmate Bosch, gave him a kiss and turned him into a frog. Wasn’t much of a change though. He was a snake before.
In the meantime,Lord Help Us @ 12:07 gives us the true message that liberals send to “support” the troops: Troops—Let’s get to work. We’ll destroy this country if we have to destroy this country to do it.
This is not conservative logic. It isn’t even logic. Those are the words of a typical liberal written by a liberal.
Liberals have forgotten the fight against terrorism. It is now a fight against other Americans whose politics don’t match theirs. Any measure is acceptable. If alQueda could vote, liberals would be inviting them over. They certainly are encouraging them.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this
Oh RW, you are so out of touch!!
Just enjoy your hate-filled, boogeyman-needing life.
Debbie DoWrong,
I don’t give a rats A$$ what color you SAY your are, it’s your opinions that give you away as a money-grubbing Republican.
As a practicing atheist, I always thought hispanics/blacks were all into the Bible and doing things for the least of us. I always thought their faith was more genuine than most white Repbulicans - Guess I was wrong!!
No god? Know Peace!!
By Sean
June 1, 2007 1:44 PM | Link to this
By Lord Help Us
June 1, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this
Andy! I didn’t know you could get the Washington Times delivered in Atlanta!
Lord help us, that Washington Times delivery prgram is a government entitlement program for all the chicken littles that have such a huge terrorist phobia that they can’t contribute to the economy because of their fear of leaving the safety of their foul smelling bedrooms. Andy is just taking advantage of that. Rumour has it that Sonny is cutting it from the budget on Monday.
By reebok
June 1, 2007 1:44 PM | Link to this
If Bush has a plan on a napkin, someone wrote it for him…unless it’s a cocktail napkin, in which case the little alcoholic may actually have written it himself.
By @@
June 1, 2007 1:46 PM | Link to this
Well, when you liberals throw your BIG PARTY, be sure to invite Hillary as your guest of honor.
She does sing your “favorite song”.
(((“I prefer a ‘we’re all in it together’ society,” she went on. “I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none.”)))
(((In a quintessential example of Clintonista doublespeak, Hillary outlined her economic fairness doctrine: “There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets, but markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed. Fairness doesn’t just happen. It requires the right government policies.”)))
(((So, according to Ms. Clinton, free markets work best when they’re constrained by the right government policies. In other words, free markets work best when they’re not free.)))
She’ll sing it in Russian…
(((Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev said of Roosevelt’s “New Deal” paradigm shift, “We can’t expect the American people to jump from Capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism.”)))
(((Echoing that sentiment was perennial Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas (the grandfather, incidentally, of Newsweek Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas): “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”)))
I understand that Hillary is bi-lingual. You can all join hands and sing her praises. Just one big ol’ “Hoot ‘n Nanny”.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this
Oh Dusty, you must be drinking again!!
We liberals haven’t forgotten the Chimperor’s “War on Terror.”
It’s just that we beleive America would’ve been better served if we were actually fighting where the terrorists were (e.g. Afghanistan…remember that theater of war?) rather than creating a worldwide terrorist training ground in Iraq.
BTW, it seems the terrorist’s own “surge” is working out really well, isn’t it? More American lives wasted in the past two months than since 2004. Gosh, you wingnuts must be so proud!!!
why don’t you explain to me why Afghanistan isn’t important…oh, that’s right, they ain’t got no OIL!!
By Moshe
June 1, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this
Andy, you need help dude! Since when do two rusty junk cars in front of your single wide constitute a beautifully landscaped yard. But if you got some more of that good sh^t you’re always smokin, Moshe sure would love to come over and partay with you.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this
@@
Just give it up. You are so “Ward Cleaver” it’s not even funny!
Why does a strong woman scare you so much? Do you already hate Barack Obama’s wife. She actually graduated from an Ivy League school, unlike your Chimperor!
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this
Bosch @1:24
If only you were kidding!! Unfortunately, you are not.
By Auntie Dusty
June 1, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this
Dusty @ 1:52
If only you were thinking!! Unfortunately, you are not.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 1:59 PM | Link to this
@@ 1:46
Regarding “fairness” and Hillary - just one more thing to file away that’s a clue to how someone thinks.
You know the hoopla about Hillary accepting jet flights from big business (are we SURE she’s not a Republican?) - and nevermind it was from that sleeze who sells elderly Americans’ private info to solicitors and gives Clintons huges sums of money - and who’s being sued by shareholders - just ignore that.
The big issue is, when asked if it was right, she said she follows the rules, everybody does it. Hmmm. Follow the rules, meaning “My conduct is circumscribed by written rules, minimum standards, not what I think is right.”
When pressed, she said “You’ll have to ask someone else if it’s good policy.”
Just follows the rules. No internal moral compass? Ask someone else if it’s good policy? A US Senator and Presidential candidate can’t answer that?
With answers like that, it’s amazing there are people who hate Bush and love Hillary.
Look out - here comes Obama!
Link: Hillary - I followed the rules, don’t know if it’s good or not
PS - I’ll give you 1:4 that within the first five responses you’ll read “what about Bush? Rudy? Newt?” So predictable -
By Fred
June 1, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this
Andy is over at Wootens blogging as stop global whining - chemically neuter the alBore. Getting demolished too.
By TrekkieDull
June 1, 2007 2:02 PM | Link to this
I’ll have you know Moshe, Andy has a Spock Ear topiary in his yard that is to die for.
Ronnie Reagan loved the Star Trek movies btw.
DuDaDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
By IN THE NEWShttp://www.theagitator.com/archives/027836.php
June 1, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this
G.O.P. Immigration Immolation
By regulator
June 1, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this
Hillary 08”
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this
Oh @@,
Just like your marriage, your international political views are stuck in the 1950s. Communism is dead and has shown that it doesn’t work. Did you hear that the Cold War is over?
Nobody on this board is advocating for a controlled economy. We just give a damn about the future of our beloved country instead of worrying about me, me, me like wingnuts.
You gotta choose who you’re fighting. Socialists? Islamofascists? Socialist Islamofascists? Suicide bombing, bearded Muslim extremists sipping lattes and driving hybrids? I dunno, pick one and stick to just one.
By giggles
June 1, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this
“As a practicing atheist”
Truthman, how do you practice it?
Flex in the mirror?
By Paul
June 1, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this
Truthman 1:52
I’m sure the Yale and Harvard alumni will be amused by your assertion that they didn’t attend an Ivy League school! Maybe when the meet Ms Obama could ask Pres Bush “Which Harvard did you attend?”
:)
By Galeo
June 1, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this
Just a little something to help make a right wingers day.
We applaud Governor Perdue for his veto of SB15. We agree with the Governor that SB15 would have had many unintended consequences, similar to the arrest and detention of the Canadian tourist recently in Brunswick, Georgia.
We applaud legislators who voted against this measure, especially GALEO Board Members, State Representatives Pedro Marin (D-Gwinnett, #96) and Tony Sellier (R-Fort Valley, #136).
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) and the Georgia Rural Urban Summit, among others, did an outstanding job opposing and actively lobbying against the legislation during the House of Representatives’ debate.
Comprehensive immigration reform is moving in our U.S. Congress and will solve the issue of unlicensed drivers among the undocumented immigrant population. We also applaud our U.S. Senators, Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, for moving forward with real solutions towards comprehensive immigration reform.”
Governor Perdue’s Statement regarding the veto of SB15 Veto Number 32 SB 15
SB 15 seeks to increase the penalties for driving without a valid license. In addition to other punishments, it provides that a first offense would result in a misdemeanor to be punished by imprisonment of at least two days and not more than twelve days. It also authorizes a $500 to $1,000 fine for first offenses. This broad provision would catch not only those who willfully drive without any valid license, but also persons who move into the State with a valid out-of-state driver’s license that have not obtained a Georgia driver’s license within 30 days of establishing residency. Though judges may suspend the period of imprisonment if the new resident had a valid driver’s license from another state and had good cause for not yet obtaining a Georgia one, SB 15 does not prevent that new resident from being booked and fingerprinted. I fear an unintended consequence of this legislation, as drafted, would subject persons with valid out-of-state driver’s licenses to stout criminal penalties even absent the commission of a willful act. Thus, although I support the intent of tracking persons that possess no valid driver’s license, the potential harms of this legislation cause me to VETO SB 15.
By La Raza
June 1, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this
—The RNC fired it’s entire donor phonebank after small dollar donations started drying up, and Bush’s immigration stance is cited as the reason.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this
Truthman sometimes known as Auntie,
“Afghanistan aint got no oil” and you aint got no brains.
For instance, you said that the “chimperor” did not go to an ivy league school. No, George W. Bush did not graduate from one, but TWO. Yale in 1968 and Harvard 1975.
Since you probably did not make it through grade 5, better stay away from the education insults. They tend to be self-incriminating for you.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this
Here’s one way to keep the Guard troops from having to fight the Chimperor’s illegal, immoral war!!
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/6/1/11530/57971
Too bad Sonny doesn’t care about the 48th Brigade or he could’ve used “States Rights” to keep our boys and girls here and safe from Bush/Cheney’s “War For Oil!”
By Buy Snails
June 1, 2007 2:20 PM | Link to this
Please everyone. Support the Taco Bell Boycott!!
Boycott Taco Bell until they change their name to Freedom Bell! Buy American!
No justice, No Tacos, put the beans on the side.
By George
June 1, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this
Conservative love to tell you, that if the Democrats ever control the government, the country would eventually become a communist state. Of course, that’s ridicious, but it makes for a great scare tactic….
What is scary???
Imagine if the right-wing religious lunatic-fringe of the GOP ever got true control of the government.
The country would be in complete lockdown, 24/7.
It would just be a matter of time before gays would have to wear pink triangles on their chests and Arab-Americans would be either deported or put in camps.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this
Oh Paul, you completely missed the point (as usual!).
My point being that W only got into Yale with the help of Daddy W. He was too stupid to be admitted into the University of Texas Law School, but somehow Daddy W. got him Yale where I seriously doubt he graduated honestly.
Just like his draft-dodging, you gotta dig a little deeper that Alberto Gonzales’ propaganda machine!!
By JerryFalwell
June 1, 2007 2:26 PM | Link to this
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 2:17 PM
Since you probably did not make it through grade 5, better stay away from the education insults. They tend to be self-incriminating for you.
TALK ABOUT THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK! Dusty di make it through half a semester at my Liberty U. Doing pretty good too. But she fell a little short of the standards that we set for our Christioan student body. Caught her having sex on the 50 yard line down at the stadium with the offensive line and had to expell her. It’s my fault though. Should have seen it coming when she told me in her entrance interview that she was here to find a husband to serve in each and every way. So I guess she was interviewing a wide array of candidates.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this
Come on now, I know that can’t be Jerry Falwell, he’s dead. I read it in the news just the other day. You aren’t fooling anyone here.
By The Uniter
June 1, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this
This is for all you butt kissing Bush apologists, if he would have said these things to me he would have been on his a*, but i will let you decide:
NPR’s Michel Martin yesterday interviewed Elaine Johnson, whose son, Army Spc. Darius Jennings, was killed when a helicopter was shot down by Iraqi insurgents Nov. 2, 2003. Not long after her son’s death, Johnson met with Bush.
“MARTIN: So when you left that meeting, did you leave with a determination to do something, or did that happen over time?
“Ms. JOHNSON: … [I asked the president,] what’s the mission? He couldn’t give me an answer. I said well, I’m going to tell you what. I’m on my mission now. My mission has just begun. And my mission is to fight, to bring these troops home, to take care of these troops when they get home.
“Then he gave us a presidential coin…. And then after that, he told us ‘Don’t go sell it on eBay’. Now you tell me how insensitive that can be? What kind of a caring person is that?”
By Red Skull
June 1, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this
This blog is getting more meaningless by the day.
By @@
June 1, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this
Truthman:
A strong woman doesn’t scare me. Having a President (female) who is admired for settling, appeasing, and tossing the towel to her husband as a role model for our young women, does.
(((“She’s not a housewife or Laura Bush figure and she might as well be single in certain respects. Even when her husband was cheating on her more publicly than anybody had been cheated on before, she remained nonchalant. She had made her peace with who he was.”))) while he was making his piece with another (several other) women?
That’s not what I call a strong woman.
steve-o:
A full-out “socialist” government here in the U.S. has always been my greatest fear for this country. I’ve seen every liberal in here echo Hillary’s proposals at one time or another.
You are either too dependent, or too stupid to see where this can lead.
There are still some on this board who proclaim that Hugo is doing great things down there in Venezuela. The history of failed “socialist governments” is not so long ago, that we can’t all see it happening in front of us today.
Steve-o, regardless of what you claim, I think socialism is exactly what you want for this country.
Outta here for a few.
By Funny morons...
June 1, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this
So I guess this means we’re stuck with Gonzo…
“I’m honored to be here with the eternal general of the United States, mi amigo Alberto Gonzales.” —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 4, 2007
By Lord Help Us
June 1, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this
In the words of a GREAT American:
‘I gotta go…you’re killin’ me.’
(MAN! I miss The Kimmer…afternoons just aren’t the same)
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this
{{{By @@
June 1, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this
Steve-o, regardless of what you claim, I think socialism is exactly what you want for this country.}}}
Yo’ MAMA wants socialism!
LOL!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this
Lucko buddy, In response to your 1:24 post - Ummmmmmm, that’s your guys that do that stuff.
Dusty, I’ll have you know that I am not a frog! And how dare you call me a snake. I am not a snake either.
I am, however, a huge soccer fan.
By Taroko & Yushan
June 1, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this
Taroko: Hey Yushan, Have you ever seen such a bunch of idiots on one blog? These people hate Bush like he stole something from them. How do you say get a f*cking life in Taiwanese?
Yushan: Take it easy Taroko. We just got here. We have to make a good impression on these idiots first. Once we’ve adapted to their perverted lifestyle and screwed a couple of these other sharks here, then we’ll give them a piece of our mind.
Taroko: OK.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this
Truthman 2:23
Really?!!? At 1:52 you wrote:
[[She actually graduated from an Ivy League school, unlike your Chimperor]]
Well, I did say Ms Obama could ask him which Harvard he attended, which doesn’t mean “graduate,” but given the first sentence referenced “alumni” I thought that was understood.
Same old canard about Bush unable to read, think or make it through a university. You may want to compare both his and Kerry’s post HS educational attainments, if you still want to keep chasing your tail (figuratively speaking).
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
By the way, England is playing Brazil in a friendly tonight, which I think will be a major arse-whupping by Brazil. England may not even qualify for Euro 2008.
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 2:50 PM | Link to this
@@,
We have to resist socialism by insisting on the status quo of fascism. These are the 14 indicia of a facsist state. We Republicans are following them all to a “T” to ensure that socialism is defeated:
Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, etc… Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
Supremacy of the Military -
Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to enforce traditional gender roles. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used by the government over the masses. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham or areBy Bosch
June 1, 2007 2:51 PM | Link to this
GASP!!!! Steve-o, what have you said? How can you say that about our fine English friends? Just kidding, I know, they asked Beckham to come back? Are they serious? Did I hear that right? Surely not.
I just hate Brazil. Well, not the country, just their soccer team - Portuguese speaking freaks.
Go, Go Deutschland!
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 2:54 PM | Link to this
con’t
manipulated by smear campaigns against opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
As you can see we are doing all the right things. As long as we stay true to our fascist thinking and policies we’ll keep the socialists at bay.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this
Oh my God, that games is about to come on!
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 2:56 PM | Link to this
LaRaza,@2:15
You might do better to check on your illegal immigrants than checking the phone people at Republican headquarters.
I’m pretty sure the callers at Republican headquarters are LEGAL citizens. That is, they obey the laws of the USA.
By mk
June 1, 2007 2:56 PM | Link to this
I was wrong. I thought the bushofascists here were just drones, mindless pi ss boys. I was wrong, so wrong. They actually do believe all the drivel they spew. They actually believe anyone with a contrary viewpoint is out to destroy America.
Wow.
It must be awful for them. Islands of sanity amidst the sea of anarchy. How lonely they must be. Lonely and angry.
(Judging from the tone their angry, name calling, filth spewing rhetoric, which just happens to reach a crescendo inversely proportional to the administrations poll numbers, it seems to be taking a toll on their emotional condition.)
Anyone else find it amusing that lucko-dork calls others spammie?
By Lord Chaos
June 1, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this
The only reason “Right Wing nut job in full glory” is not a republican is because he/she is afraid to be. He/she spends so much time mentally breaking down the right wing point of view that it is evident that he/she wants to believe it. He/she’s parents were probably democrats who scared the day lights out of him/her.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
England asked Beckham to come back? LOL!
I hope you at least respect the country of Brazil for contributing oh so graciously to the attractive female population of the world.
As far as my favorite Portuguese-speaking freaks that I love to hate—I’m going to have to reserve that for Portugal’s team. Even though C. Ronaldo is FIFA POY, I still can’t stand his pretty-boy diving arse.
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this
So, @@, you’re totally OK with a draft-dodging, AWOL president who has absolutely no respect for our men and women in uniform?
Gosh, are you from N. Korea?
Again, why are we in Iraq when they had nothing to do with 9/11? Why?
Why don’t we have 150,000 troops in Afghanistan - where bin Laden is - and zero troops in Iraq - where the oil is?
What is your rationale, dude!?!
By getalife
June 1, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
All those phone operators were fired.
It seems people are not donating to the gop due to the immigration bill.
They think white power is in trouble.
By Funny morons...
June 1, 2007 3:06 PM | Link to this
GEORGE W. BUSH complaining about political fear mongering is like Lindsay Lohan complaining about out-of-control celebrities.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this
Of course steve-O I respect the country. I was just kidding.
Yes, Beckham is back. Maybe they missed his wife, after all she is spicy!
Now, now, don’t be too harsh on pretty Cristiano. He’s definitely a pretty boy, but he can run like the wind. He makes Rooney look like a fat slob.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
I got the game on at work!!
By Truthman
June 1, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this
OK, Paul, here’s a question I ask all wingnuts:
Is Bush smarter than you?
Yes or no!
See, I know Bill Clinton is smarter than I because he was a Rhodes Scholar and actually studied when he was in school.
Just answer the question, Paul
By Paul
June 1, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this
Truthman 2:18
Regarding [[illegal, immoral war]].
Finally, a topic worthy of discussion! Thank you!
So just what is a “legal” war? Do all parties have to abide by some “rules” to fight a war? What about the aggressor? If the aggressor obeys the rules but the defender doesn’t, it the war still illegal? What are the rules? If one party rejects the rules as illegal and fights the war, does that make the war legal?
And what’s a “moral” war? One in which people die humanely? How does one do that? What if one country’s or ideology’s morals conflice with another? If they’re both fighting for opposing, but to them, moral, principles, is the war still moral? Or immoral?
Can one morally conduct an illegal war? Or legally conduct an immoral war?
Take your time. I’ve got to go for a while, but please keep it at a higher level by not mentioning Iraq/Bush etc. After all, you seem to imply there can be a moral war. Or a legal war. Or a moral, legal war. For all parties? Has interesting foreign policy implications.
Thanks again! TTFN -
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this
steve-o Me too! Thanks for reminding me. Whew, I almost missed it!
By George Bush
June 1, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this
All you can kiss my a$$! I run this country however I want and it aint a damn thang you can do about it!
Go ahead, I dare any of you to say something smart so I can send a platoon up your a$$!
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this
Lord Chaos,
You clearly aren’t paying attention. Of course I am a Republican. I believe in the right-wing point of veiw as outlined in the 14 attributes of a fascist state. All 14 are necessary to avoid the evils of Hillary, socialism, etc… All 14 are good things. I’m glad that I have people that I can vote for who share my fascist values. I mean I can’t think of one of those 14 attributes of fascism that isn’t part of our right-wing agenda. Can you?
RWNJIFG
By mk
June 1, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bul ls hit
By Paul
June 1, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this
Truthman
I just saw your 3:18 when I hit post. You sure like to make statements/accusations but when asked to explain, simply ask questions on other topics, yes? Can we please finish one before moving onto the next?
Regarding Pres Clinton and Bush: in some areas, definitely, in other areas, doubtful. “Smart” is not usually viewed as a unitary, discrete measurement. Any more than “intelligence.” Usually more factors come into play. Gets complicated, which is why it’s important do not only define terms, but the relative importance of each term.
But that was neat point you made - Clinton and Bush were both draft dodgers! But Bush did it when serving in the military! Go figure!
(BTW, as I’ve said before, the 60’s views of patriotism were a bit different than today’s, so those examples don’t really apply) -
Oh, and if Clinton actually studied in school (the implication being Bush didn’t?) - hey, if Bush can get an undergraduate degree at Yale and an advanced degree at Harvard without studying, I’d say that makes him pretty “smart!”
Later, dude -
By Lord Chaos
June 1, 2007 3:22 PM | Link to this
RWNJIFG,
Why don’t you let go, and give in to your inner conservative feelings. Chaos can see straight through your chirade. You are using sarcasm and jokes to fight the inward temptation to be a republican.
Don’t worry. Mommy and Daddy won’t hurt you this time.
By getalife
June 1, 2007 3:25 PM | Link to this
Hey George,
I see you have a new show
Good stuff.
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this
{{I was going to bring my famous depleted uranium tipped cannolis.}}
Watcher— LOL! Oh, please do still bring those cannolis. I always look forward to chowing down on those!
By John Ellickson
June 1, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this
I know it is great fun to slam people with the word “liberal” as if it were some foul four letter word, (thank you Ronald Reagan), but if some of you brilliant conservatives would learn how to use a dictionary, you might try looking up both “liberal” and “conservative”…you might not be so all fired proud to call yourselves conservative.
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 3:36 PM | Link to this
Lord Chaos,
Sarcasm? Jokes? No, I take this very seriously. I am proud to be a part of the 14 point fascist agenda. We will remain in charge of things for a very long time as long as we stick to our 14 principles of fascism.
I think you are afraid of the label: “fascist.” Don’t be. Embrace it. It is who we are. Just ‘cause we aren’t killing Jews doesn’t mean that we aren’t facsists any more than Hillary has to drink vodka to be a commie. Hitler was a Jewish hating fascist. We are Jewish-loving, ‘cause Christ can’t come back to kill them unless they are alive in Isreal, fascists.
I’m a proud fascist. You ought to learn to wear the name with pride. Don’t be like liberals who call themselves “progressives.” We should be fascists who don’t hade behind misleading labels like “conservative.”
RWNJIFG
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 3:40 PM | Link to this
mk@2:56,
If someone called you all the “names” thrown at conservatives here on this blog, would you think they were for you or against you?
Liberal name calling comes because conservatives are supporting the policies of this country and the war in Iraq.
Conservatives do not tell the troops to retreat. They do not apply salacious names to the President et al. They do not accuse the administration and the UK of lying about Sadaam and his activities, and they do not continually say the war in Iraq is pointless, lost and only for oil. You do not find conservatives marching in anti-war protest parades.
Liberals call their insults “free speech” and a contrary opinion. It is also called “free speech” that undermines the troops, the citizens and the government of this country. That seems to be the goal of those liberals using insults, lies and a liberal press.
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
They would have been easy to find in the dank, dim, darkness of the secret Cheney bunker.
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this
John Ellickson,
The English language has a well-known liberal bias. German is more “fair and balanced.”
RWNJIFG
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this
Please help me! I am a conservative trapped in a liberal’s body. I’m afraid to vote republican because my mommy won’t love me anymore. I’d have to change my entire lifestyle and I’m just to comfortable and complacent to do that. Please! Someone advise me on how to handle this duel dilemna.
By John Ellickson
June 1, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this
Read the writings of Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, Cheney obviously did (I don’t know if bush can read)…it is a walk in the park to get from here to there…
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this
{{Liberal name calling comes because conservatives are supporting the policies of this country and the war in Iraq.}}
Dust-For-Brains, you think that being part of 29% constitutes “supporting the policies of this country”? WOW… No wonder America is ranked at the bottom of the math heap.
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
You are right. The only way we canwin the war on terror is to suspend the Constitution. Freedom ain’t free and we’ve got 70% of the people, including many of our own troops who are endangering themselves.
Can we start killing these liberal traitors, please? Come on, let’s heat up the ovens. They’ve been asking for it for a long time. We need a “Final Solution” to the liberal problem.
Besides liberals are the real enemy. Always have been. Liberals are responsible for more deaths of Americans than terrorists and they simply undermine everything we stand for. Remember Bush says that “they” (the terrorists) hate us for our freedoms. If they see what we do to the liberals they will see how little we regard freedom and then we won’t have to worry about the terrorists anymore.
RWNJIFG
By Right-wing nut job in full glory
June 1, 2007 3:56 PM | Link to this
3:47 is an obvious highjacking by some commie that needs a good dose carbon monoxide at the liberal “re-education camps” that are soon to open.
By Auntie Dusty
June 1, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this
If someone counted all the names called by conservatives on this blog, they’d probably add up to about equal to the names called by liberals.
Name calling Equality. It’s what this blog is all about.
Conservative name calling comes because they are unable to deal with their minority status.
Conservatives support the death and maiming of other peoples kids while reapimg all the tangible monetary benefits of what began as Bush’s Oil war and is now Bush’s 50 year occupation.
You never find a modern day conservative calling for world peace. All they are saying is give war a chance. They defend every illegal and immoral action by their leaders because somewhere, somehow thay are personally profitting from the death of American servicemen, the ruination of our planet and the starvation of our poor.
Conservative insults are free speech. Liberal insults are treason. Conservatives are content to have what they believe pumped directly into their heads by GE, Viacom, Disney, and Rupert Murdoch.
Mostly though, and thankfully, they are the most recent addition to the endangered species list.
I don’t have to tell them to go to hell, they have reservations.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this
{{{By La Raza June 1, 2007 2:15 PM —The RNC fired it’s entire donor phonebank after small dollar donations started drying up, and Bush’s immigration stance is cited as the reason. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!}}}
Gee, let’s see here, will the RNC do without donations or will they do without George W Bush, gosh, I wonder.
The boy is pushing his luck.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{By Red Skull June 1, 2007 2:32 PM This blog is getting more meaningless by the day.}}}
You know, skully, the first time I heard you, I would have swore that your were a blooming idiot.
But then wham, you come out of the blue and say something smart.
Who da thunk it.
BTW, I believe grade school let out for the summer, all the dumbas-s neglected liberal kids are at play^^.
You present factual evidence, they call you a f-ag-got.
We got 2 and half months of this ahead of us.
And then their parents will do the same.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{By John Ellickson June 1, 2007 3:30 PM I know it is great fun to slam people with the word “liberal” as if it were some foul four letter word}}}
It looks like someone might just be a little embarrassed to be called a sniveling Coward liberal.
I would be too, geez.
Live with it, punkas-s.
You are one.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Danny Carver
June 1, 2007 4:05 PM | Link to this
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 2:56 PM | Link to this
LaRaza,@2:15
You might do better to check on your illegal immigrants than checking the phone people at Republican headquarters.
I’m pretty sure the callers at Republican headquarters are LEGAL citizens. That is, they obey the laws of the USA.
All ya gotta do is throw out the bait and the racist among us will always bite. Huh, Dusty. Always suspected you were one of those klan girls.
By mm
June 1, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this
It will be nice when either an independant or a democrat wins the whitehouse so that you rightwingnuts will crawl back under the slimy rock you crawled out from under.
You people are deluded.
Times running out. We can see the fear in your keystrokes.
By mk
June 1, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this
I am no expert on psychotic episodes, but the depths of the delusions of the pseudo-conservatives here is simply mind boggling. Oops, is that name calling?
Dusty, it’s just that you’re so laughably wrong on so many topics it’s hard to respond without throwing in an insult. And the they-did-it-first excuse is pretty lame especially considering the level of hate the conservatives imbibe their speech with.
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 4:19 PM | Link to this
In response to my Reagan’s administration was a dictator coddling, apartheid supporting wreck, LuckoDull says: Coming from the same sniveling Cowards that say Castro has a better health care system than we do and who want to tell us what size car to drive. AND NOTHING ELSE!
I’ve already told you once, there is only one of me. Why do you keep insisting that I am more than one person? Are you delusional? Cross-eyed? Drunk? And when did I ever mention Castro? Or cars? And more to the point, why can’t you even remotely defend your positions without spinning off onto something COMPLETELY unrelated? It indicates that you don’t have a clue on how to explain or justify what you believe. If you really do believe the junk you say you do. I think someone is having a bad life.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 4:19 PM | Link to this
SO I HEAR GREG PALAST MET WITH JOHN CONYERS YESTERDAY NIGHT IN NYC.
MAYBE THE “CAGERS” WILL END UP IN A CAGE THEMSELVES>
By Goldie
June 1, 2007 4:21 PM | Link to this
So, will the ‘08 elections be a referendum for change in America, or for enduring 4 more years of status quo? If the former, who would be the candidate that best represents “change”?
By getalife
June 1, 2007 4:22 PM | Link to this
“The boy is pushing his luck”
“But then wham, you come out of the blue and say something smart.
Who da thunk it”.
Geez.
By Another Anti-neocon
June 1, 2007 4:33 PM | Link to this
mk, it is quite amazing to me how these idiotic pretenders who call themselves conservatives and patriots can be SO uninformed and intentionally ignorant about EVERY single major issue! Is there some sort of stupidity test for them I’ve never heard of? Uncanny.
But Auntie Dusty has the line of the day - Mostly though, and thankfully, they are the most recent addition to the endangered species list.
Too funny! I never thought I’d be happy to see a species go extinct and become part of the fossil record!
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this
{{{By AmeriWanker June 1, 2007 4:19 PM LuckoDull says: Coming from the same sniveling Cowards that say Castro has a better health care system than we do and who want to tell us what size car to drive. AND NOTHING ELSE!}}}
Would you like me to list all of the sh-it?
Addressing a Democratic fund-raiser yesterday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., told wealthy supporters the government will need to take money away from them for the “common good.”
I could go on for days.
Geez.
{{{I’ve already told you once, there is only one of me. Why do you keep insisting that I am more than one person? Are you delusional? Cross-eyed? Drunk? And when did I ever mention Castro? Or cars? And more to the point, why can’t you even remotely defend your positions without spinning off onto something COMPLETELY unrelated? It indicates that you don’t have a clue on how to explain or justify what you believe. If you really do believe the junk you say you do. I think someone is having a bad life.}}}
Anybody know what this dude is babbling about, cause I sure don’t.
Coward.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Yeah, Right!
June 1, 2007 4:47 PM | Link to this
Why jump on Bush about Global Warming? Because he’s doing the same thing he always does. No Child Left Behind resulted in adding a new level of paperwork, no improved funds, and left children behind; the Troops and Security Fence for the border turned into nowhere near the number of troops promised and a “virtual” fence (no, really, it’s there, you just can’t see it); and now we get new Aspirational Goals for greenhouse gases that will come into being … 4-5 years after Bush leaves office and in the meantime he’ll take the giant step of having … more meetings. This is what conservatives have fought for and built for over the last 30+ years? this is what liberals are supposed to compromise with? An education bill that’s nothing but paperwork, an invisible fence, and environmental meetings? Pathetic ….
By Ralph
June 1, 2007 4:47 PM | Link to this
Praise the Lord and all you weakling neocons, it’s that time again. Yep. Weekend. Watch them NACAR hayshakers drive. Pull yore ballcaps down over yore shaved heads, slip inta yore gangsta tees and shorts n flipflops, stick yore cellphone up yore arse, throw up sum gravel from yore pickup, head on down to thee sports bar 4 dranks of courage n political babble. Hot damn, it don’t git no bettern this! Good Christyan Murcuns all.
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 4:49 PM | Link to this
PALAST”S WEBSITE IS DOWN DAMMIT!
I WANNA SEE THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CAGING E_MAIL BEING HANDED TO JOHN CONYERS…..
IF I COULD I’D BUY ALL YOU GOOD PROGRESSIVES A COLD ONE TONIGHT…..
By TrekkieDull
June 1, 2007 4:51 PM | Link to this
Mk, naDevvo’ yIghoS !!!!
That means “go away” in Klingon.
Andy and Dusty are infamous here and you are just jealous.
Now please just “bIjatlh ‘e’ yImev”
Translation: “Shut up”
DaDuDaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
By USDA
June 1, 2007 4:52 PM | Link to this
Dusty’s brain is just that… DUSTY from lack of use. All you bush-lickers are the same.
By Deport 12 million scumbags
June 1, 2007 4:56 PM | Link to this
Newt says: 28% support, losing every contested Senate seat but one - that’s a collapse, Mr. President. You are a failure. Too bad all he meant was a failure to that sell-out and worthless political party. Not a failure to the nation. Newt Gives a Hoot! Gringrich in ‘08!
By getalife
June 1, 2007 4:59 PM | Link to this
Here is your “cager”
Palast is taking heat at kos for his sensationalism but they are still hurting over the dem betrayal on Iraq.
By Dusty
June 1, 2007 5:01 PM | Link to this
Oh dear,
Liberals are all fired up because I said they acted like liberals. Then they treated the blog with a typical tirade of liberal “sweet talk” aka “hate”.
mk—-we understand. You cannot speak without throwing insults, just as you said.
LaRaza—bigot..
I have a legal and lovely Hispanic in my family. You go for the Klan. You’ve got the mindset.
Auntie—pull up your rocking chair and go knit with Mrs. Godzilla. She might think your senility is humorous. Besides, you are the one who said @ 2:04 “Liberal insults are treason.” Now, now, that is not politically correct. Watch your manners, auntie.
Ignorant and predatory rants have nothing to do with math. They simply identify a certain lack of character. Liberals give us the best examples to be found. Luckovich also gives us a carton exemplifying the liberal loss of integrity.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this
It would appear many on the left side of the Great Divide are really, really good at fighting the last war but not quite so capable of looking forward and coming up with a plan. That’s fine for the primaries, but -
Gotta do better than that in the general election -
Why didn’t I pick on “right” side? ‘Cuz most candidates are distancing themselves from the President’s policies (and sound strangely like Hillary, except for Ron Paul) and are talking more than most about “what happens after Iran?”
By Ralfie
June 1, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this
Praise mother Earth all you little metrosexuals, it’s that time again. It’s the man to man dominatrax weekend! So slip on your TuTu’s, blow dry those flowing Johny Edwards locks, grab that bottle of butt lube, hop into the Prius (watch yo head,) and head on down to Little Richard’s for some drinks of, eh, depravity, geez.
It don’t git no better dan dis!
Cowards.
By Midori
June 1, 2007 5:05 PM | Link to this
In the news,
some links in this thread
:)
By Rev Haggard
June 1, 2007 5:15 PM | Link to this
I’m there!
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 5:16 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
It’s pretty funny to see “Danny Carver” accusing you of being a bigoted “Klan” girl while the fact that a group is called “La Raza” doesn’t cause him to bat an eyelash.
Silly Bosch,
Are you obsessed with me or something? You mentioned my name over and over while I was gone today. Considering that “Bosch” only began appearing here a few weeks ago, I find it quite remarkable that you think you know so much about me and my positions on the issues.
I’ll tell you what - Why don’t you point to ONE post that I have made since you’ve been hanging here that is “witch like”?
By TrekkieDull
June 1, 2007 5:20 PM | Link to this
Newts hair appeared in the “Tribbles” episode.
By Tom Foley
June 1, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this
Rev Haggard, I’ll meet you at Little Richards at 8pm.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 5:26 PM | Link to this
Wasn’t GoldieDhimmie bragging about how wonderful Democrats made the modern world, and didn’t she cite the invention of the pill as a crowning achievement? Why look what’s in today’s paper!
One might think this Huxleyesque vision of a Brave New World just a few years from now sounds a little fantastical. Yet it is the prediction of one of the world’s most eminent scientists, Carl Djerassi./Professor Djerassi is the man who invented the Pill, the first oral contraceptive, which triggered the sexual revolution of the 1960s, and which many would argue changed the face of society and sexual morality for ever — and not necessarily for the better./The Pill gave us sex without children. Now Djerassi has turned that concept on its head. He believes the developed world is heading towards its next cultural revolution — children without sex.
It turns out that the “sexual revolution” is really about getting rid of sex altogether.
Happy yet?
By Holly Wierd
June 1, 2007 5:39 PM | Link to this
New movie idea - Newts “hair” fights an inter-stellar battle with Trumps “hair” for control of the vast oil-rich Toupee galaxy! I don’t want to give away too much, but the plot is thick and tangled and the ending involves a gigantic comb!
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish, It doesn’t take much to figure you out. You aren’t that interesting. You play by the neo-con playbook.
steve-o - Dammit. I had a post to you written celebrating England’s win, when wouldn’t you know. It wasn’t such an a*-whooping though. I love John Terry, what a player (even though he plays for Chelsea). Their success was due to England calling back Beckham and his lovely Spice Girl wife - ha ha!
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 5:42 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish,
You are being completely dishonest and disingenuous with that article. It addressed the fact that more and more women are having their eggs frozen in order to have kids later in life when they want to instead of racing the clock. In the meantime, I suppose, they will engage in all the sex they want using the pill or contraceptive.
Don’t tell me that you believe only in having sex to procreate…
By I hate traitors
June 1, 2007 5:44 PM | Link to this
Does this Buy Danish really think that birth control is a bad thing?
And that name says it all when it comes to traitors! Whatever happened to buy American?
By Buy Snails
June 1, 2007 5:45 PM | Link to this
Hey Buy Danish, it sounds like I need to introduce you to my friend “Buy Cucumber”
Boycott Tacos
By Paul
June 1, 2007 5:54 PM | Link to this
Hey Buy Danish
I meant to thank you the other day - midweek - you were one of the last posters and came off with a really good, LOL post. Thx.
I’ve popped in and out of here today, almost interesting. I found out Clinton and Bush are fellow draft dodgers but Bush dodged the draft by serving in the military! Also, Clinton was a Rhodes scholar while Bush graduated from Yale and Harvard without studying! Wow! That was about that tired, old “who’s smarter?” thing some love. There should be an answer anytime (anyone can answer, please!) on just what the heck is an “illegal, immoral war.” (Check 3:10) - once we figure out what that means, we’ll have to see if that means they’re all rah-rah over legal, moral war. Rather frightening, isn’t it?
Oh, and a followup from earlier: looks as if the Brits reported a debate of sorts between Gore and Lord Monckton (I wonder what atheists call him?):
Link: Response to Al Gore’s Commentary in the Daily Telegraph
Too bad the wire services didn’t pick this up - any guesses why?
By Paul
June 1, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this
Bosch, steve-o
I thought you might want to see (or fondly remember) what English soccer fans are capable of:
Link: English Soccer Fans Drink Germany Dry
Or why it ain’t Bush’s fault the Germans hate us -
Link: Germans Angry at US Sponsor
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 6:13 PM | Link to this
Maybe I missing something here:
{{{Boeing has been sued by suspected Al Qaida operatives transported by the CIA to Arab countries for interrogation and torture. The ————->American Civil Liberties Union<————— has filed a federal lawsuit against Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Dataplan on behalf of three Al Qaida suspects transported by the CIA under the so-called “extraordinary rendition program.”}}}
I wonder if Al Qaeda knows that the ACLU defended the North American Man Boy Love Association too?
You know what they say about by association.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this
Wonderful tale of any American family get together:
{{{The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office is investigating several assaults and a shooting in connection with 59 illegal immigrants found Thursday in two Litchfield Park-area houses. Acting on a tip, deputies found 49 people in a house in the 6000 block of North Florence Avenue, with 10 more in the 12500 block of West Orange Drive, according to the Sheriff’s Office. One man had been shot while three others had been beaten, according to the sheriff’s office.}}}
Yes, let’s sign all of them up for social security, geez.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By steve-o
June 1, 2007 6:21 PM | Link to this
Bosch,
I was stunned for most of the match. That wasn’t a marginal English team. They were playing for keeps…even without Rooney. And when did Beckham get a new pair of legs? Terry seems like a classy guy.
It was interesting, I thought the game was over, so I left my desk to get a snack at the 89th minute and when I got back, Diego scored the equalizer. I could only imagine the streets of England had they won! It was a very entertaining 2nd half. England got my respect again.
Paul,
The police in England have special units assigned to investigate hooligans and rowdy fans. In fact, before the team travels abroad, they have a list of people who are required to turn in their passports so they can’t leave the country while England plays abroad. Talk about hardcore…
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 6:25 PM | Link to this
{{{Griffin, who has come under fire in Congress for cutting programs aimed at monitoring climate change, said in a US radio interview Thursday he had “no doubt that a trend of global warming exists.” But, he told National Public Radio, “I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with.” James Hansen, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s top official on climate change, expressed shock at Griffin’s comments in a later interview with NPR. Asked his response, Hansen said: “I almost fell off my chair.”}}}
What would you rather have happen:
A) Fall off your chair?
B) Ride a flaming shuttle until it crashed into the sea ten minutes later?
And if you were with NASA and had several shuttles go out in flaming “glory” would you:
1) Worry over the Ocean you crashed into getting warmer?
2) Try to focus all of your energy and efforts into making space travel as safe as it can possibly be.
Hansen is a freaking cancer on our space program, the Chinese will surpass our stupid, mindless, junk scientist as-ses within a few years.
But hey! The libs will get bundles and bundles of government grants to study warm weather during July!
Yay!
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Paul
June 1, 2007 6:27 PM | Link to this
LuckoDull
Check the ACLU website - About the ACLU - mission is to limit the power of the democratic majority and preserve the protections of Constitutional rights for all of us.
Al Qaeda are “us?”
BTW - care to guess which President began the rendition program? Hint: his name began with a “C.” Wonder if that was one of the policy meetings his wife took part in?
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 6:29 PM | Link to this
{{{George W. Bush on Thursday unveiled a striking about-face on global warming, calling on the world’s leading economies to join the US in agreeing a global target to reduce carbon dioxide emissions before the end of his term in office.}}}
He’s sided up with the sniveling Cowards.
Or should I say they have joined forces with the Bush Master?
They agree on immigration, “global warming,” no withdrawal dates for Iraq ever, just never ending continuous warfare in the Middle East, I seen the vote.
Geez.
The guy is good but this is scary.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By @@
June 1, 2007 6:34 PM | Link to this
Paul:
Your Daily Telegraph link didn’t take me anywhere. I ventured off on my own though in search of their response to Gore. Didn’t see anything specifically related to Gore per se, but I found this.
Living costs to rise after carbon trading
Now that won’t really hinder me. I’ve been practicing conservation for years. It’s become a habit. I hope all of our liberal friends are ready to make the sacrifices.
There are people “less fortunate” who will be negatively impacted though. That should concern everyone.
Of course when it comes to heating, I’m sure the government will step in to help. Hugo has! Well, not in his own country, but he’s eager to give away his country’s heating oil over here to our poor.
That Hugo, whatta guy!!!!
There’s also another article that says citizens are protesting outside a building where they’re meeting to discuss carbon trading. I think they’re convinced it’s a scam.
By RW-(the original)
June 1, 2007 6:38 PM | Link to this
{{{{{I hate that I missed RW’s daily performance of being the resident dick.—-by stevie-zero}}}}}
Which of my THREE comments today got you crying the most stevie?
What’s wrong with this picture?
By Patriotic Foreskin
June 1, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this
It falls on all good men to point out that there is no credible blogging support for Bush (or the right) left on the internetz, (internetz? uh, W? Could you give me the language of origin? Is there another pronounciation? Can you use it in a sentence? Internetz. Internetz. I…..n….t….e….r..n…e…t…s…..DING…..I’m sorry, you’re not as big of an idiot as our president, you dont win the spelling bee, now if only you had chosen the word “potatoe”.)
Bush fancifully compares a future occupation of Iraq to our troop presence in Korea. Not even close, W. not a thread of similarity, but I’m sure W is thinking the 58 Parallels of Pauline, or somethng equally stupid.
No, we are in new territory, the path not taken. The war where everybody came.
But the fact that Bush would stretch the fabric of credibility with the Korea analogy shows an isolated fool surrounded by yes men. The Vietnam comparison was obviously wrong. Then they tried Bosnia, the Sudan, Afghanistan, and of course, the Whiskey Rebellion of 1822… all of which are unique.
We are in unchartered destiny, and none of it has been understood by Bush. He is grasping at straws. He has no ideas, and nothing new to offer.
Except his resignation, which I accept.
By Bosch
June 1, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this
Paul, Thanks for the memories. That’s pretty sad when you drink all of Germany dry. I do also remember the Budweiser fiasco.
Soccer hooligans are really crazy, and not to condone their behavior BUT, I love soccer games for their fans - they sing, they play drums, they blow horns, but then again, they also beat the crap out of each other.
Great game though!
By Paul
June 1, 2007 6:42 PM | Link to this
steve-o 6:21
Hardcore is right. But if you were around when some of those hooligans (they have such great adjectives and expressions) went to the Continent and wreaked havoc - it’s an appropriate response.
LuckoDull 6:29
You’ll never, ever get them to admit they agree with any of his policies. Instead of being glad for the change they’ll lament it’s not enough, or too late, or not sincere. Lotsa half-empty glasses.
By RW-(the original)
June 1, 2007 6:44 PM | Link to this
OMG!! Classic
stevie-0, I’m doing all the ROTFLMAO stuff.
{{{{{It was interesting, I thought the game was over, so I left my desk to get a snack}}}}}
Does work ever get in the way around there?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bosch—”“I’m watching the soccer game at work while I blog, stevie!”“
stevie-0—”“Me too Bosch!! Except all this watching and blogging is making me hungry.”“
ROTFLMAO indeed!
By IN THE NEWS
June 1, 2007 6:44 PM | Link to this
MIDORI
HERE’S A PRETTY PICTURE
By Deport 12 million scumbags
June 1, 2007 6:45 PM | Link to this
hey curly, i knowz you only do it wunct a week rite for you put on yer Sundy finest goin ta meetin britches. but I got some reallygood cheep toofpaist from China. How meny toobs doez yu want?
By Paul
June 1, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this
@@ 6:34
Let’s try this again
Link: Lord Monckton’s Response to Al Gore’s Global Warming Commentary, London Daily Mail, 19 Nov 2006
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 6:49 PM | Link to this
“Them” will never admit to agreeing with any of his policies because as progressives they have to tell the truth.
“Them” (72% of Americans, by the way) can’t find a policy that has worked to their benefit.
D’UH.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 6:49 PM | Link to this
The sniveling Cowards, stroking their guilty consciences and killing children because of it:
{{{The WWF, Greenpeace, Oxfam, Sierra Club, Rainforest Action Network and other multinational activist groups battle mines in Romania, Peru, Chile, Ghana and Indonesia; electricity projects in Uganda, India and Nepal; biotechnology that could improve farm incomes and reduce malnutrition in Kenya, India, Brazil and the Philippines; and DDT that could slash malaria rates in Africa, where the disease kills 3,000 children a day. They harp on technology’s speculative hazards and ignore real, life-or-death dangers that modern mining, development and technology would reduce or prevent. They never mention the jobs, clinics, schools, roads, improved housing and small business opportunities — or the electricity, refrigeration, safe water, better nutrition, reduced disease and fewer dead children.}}}
Thanks for all your “help,” geez.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Jesus
June 1, 2007 6:49 PM | Link to this
IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!
By Paul
June 1, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
Watcher
So what do you want to do? Increase the marginal tax rate for our poorest taxpayers by fifty percent and slash the child care tax credit? To the levels they were at before Pres Bush changed them? (I know, he didn’t change them - it was a joint venture with Congress - just using the loose lingo of the blog) -
Okay, so it didn’t affect 72 percent. Just some of our poorest. Sounds good to me -
By Deport 12 million scumbags
June 1, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
Hey curly i dont no nuffin bout no werld heatin up but y r yu so mad at dem yankees n sience peeple Dey seemz like gud enuff peeples to me N y r u so mad bout dem anteewar fokes Im shore dey jus wantz der kinfokes to cum home
By Patriotic Foreskin
June 1, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this
This incurable TB case on the airline…I dont want to frighten you good people, but for the last ten years a growing number of this type of TB has been observed by the CDC. It is caused by a mutation that is a direct result of people with curable TB who stop taking the medicine. Then whatever TB is left mutates into a superbug, totally incurable, and very contagious. The media doesn’t want to scare us so that’s why the kabash on the threat. But what a threat, you could be anywhere and someone could breath in your face and too bad for you.
Pray.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this
RW,
In addition to Tom Morrow, we have Hillary giving American’s the finger.
To whom it may concern:
I am not opposed to birth control.
I am opposed to Gloria Steinem’s proposition that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle, and the extension of that which is that children don’t need fathers.
I am concerned about where the Brave New World is leading us.
Paul,
I’m not sure which post you’re referring to, but glad I made you laugh!
By Deport 12 million scumbags
June 1, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this
Hey curly, howze cum u call dem soljers cowerds wen uze never sirved in da milaterry
By Paul
June 1, 2007 7:01 PM | Link to this
Jesus 6:49
Why do you want to impeach Bush? He wants to give you amnesty!
You’re hay-sus, right?
By AmVet
June 1, 2007 7:03 PM | Link to this
Does Lucko REALLY think ANYONE falls for that, “Oh, woe is me! I can’t understand what they’re talking about, is there anybody out there who can help poor little me?” garbage at 4:46.
Yes, he is ignorant and willfully stupid. And when the heat gets turned up, certainly gutless. But not so stupid that people can’t see through his pathetic attempts at bullsh-itting his way through life.
What in the name of Jesus H. Christ does his rantings about Castro, cars or Clinton have to do with the claim that Reagan was vastly over-rated?
Obviously nothing. But he has no intelligent or even thoughtful answers so he resorts to the only thing he is good at - making up other completely off-the-wall unrelated demented extremist crap as he goes along and then pretends he doesn’t understand what he doesn’t want to hear. It reminds me of a petulant 11 year old. Does the AJC have a children’s political blog?
What a way to go through life. Angry at the world, eyes closed, irrelevant, moronically simple, a lover of fascism and full of impotent rage.
Looks like most have here have him sized up pretty well. And to those people, I say keep up the good work and have a great weekend!
By The Watcher
June 1, 2007 7:08 PM | Link to this
Paul, I’ll tell you what I want.
I want a family (4-5 human beings) to be able to live on 50 grand. No Hummers. A regular sized TV. Reasonable stuff.
I want the best damn public educational system the world has ever seen.
I want air that’s safe to breath and water safe to drink.
I want a safe food chain.
I want universal health care.
I want a free exchange of ideas and information.
I want habeus corpus.
I want truth, justice and the American way.
This is the greatest country on earth and if we cannot do these things, with all of our combined wisdom, strength and resources - than we might as well call it quits right now.
This is America. The land of opportunity. The land of the free.
God Bless us everyone!
PS: Are there any of those things that I want you think are going to cause the distruction of our nation? Do you think we are not strong enough to accomplish these things?
By getalife
June 1, 2007 7:16 PM | Link to this
My goodmess,
w had the audacity to tells us we are scared of diversity.
Its your party idiot freaking out over losing white power.
Clinton wants more outsourcing and can’t spell.
Gates is threatening China. He wants to know what they are up to.
Geez.
By LuckoDull
June 1, 2007 7:16 PM | Link to this
Talk about ranting:
{{{By AmeriWanker June 1, 2007 7:03 PM What in the name of Jesus H. Christ does his rantings about Castro, cars or Clinton have to do with the claim that Reagan was vastly over-rated?}}}
Reagan defeated communism, started an economic expansion that continues today, rebuilt the military from it’s Jimmy Carter Coward Korps to the most powerful force in the world.
Of course a sniveling Coward liberal would think that was “over rated.”
Geez.
Coward.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Buy Danish
June 1, 2007 7:18 PM | Link to this
AmVet,
At the risk of being accused of treating vets badly, I have exactly the opposite opinion of LuckoDull.
Among other admirable qualities, he is knowledgeable, informative, entertaining, has great antennae for irony, and is great at following his advice to “frisk the liberal first”.
You on the other hand did not actually dispute a thing he said, but instead went off on a multi-paragraphed personal attack.
Your diatribe left me with the impression that I could easily ascribe the very negative qualities you are projecting onto him on yourself.
By silver
June 4, 2007 9:12 AM | Link to this
Bi Danish and LukoDull sound an awful lot alike, could they be the same troll poster under two ids?
By Shawny
June 4, 2007 9:16 AM | Link to this
I voted for the wall, before I decided not to support it
By Shawny
June 4, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this
Where is the outrage over this?
This will not be protrayed in the MSM. sad
By The Watcher
June 4, 2007 9:30 AM | Link to this
Shawny
We all agree….
[[[[Berger claims his removal of the documents, which may have contained material harmful to his own reputation, was an “honest mistake.” Yet, when National Archives officials demanded that Berger return the documents and paperwork, he produced only some of them and then claimed to have “inadvertently” destroyed the rest. Berger’s actions were shocking. And his defenses do not sound credible.
Berger should be prosecuted, just as anyone in the Bush administration who attempted to undermine the work of the 9/11 commission should be prosecuted. Yet some of the Democrats who have been most critical of Bush administration abuses have tried to come up with excuses for Berger. By rushing to the partisan barricades in defense of Berger, they are making a big mistake.
While it may be true that Republicans are ginning up the Berger controversy at this point in order to cover for the misdeeds of members of their own party, Democrats should not waste an ounce of energy defending the former Clinton aide.
In fact, Democrats should be celebrating the fact that he has been forced to resign as an adviser to Kerry. The further Berger is from the Kerry campaign, the more likely it will be to take responsible stands on the war in Iraq in particular, and on national security in general}}}}
From the common dreams website in 2004….
Isn’t this something you should have taken care of while the GOP was in control of congress?
However, aren’t there a few more important items on our plates right now?
Like, say, IRAQ?
Shawny, do you know how many of our servicemen died in the last three days? How many tortured bodies turn up this weekend? How many Iraqis were killed this weekend?
Focus Boy, focus.
By Scooter
June 4, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this
Well the G-8 countries got together and discussed how much liberty and freedom their governments should take from its citizens. Why would they want to take power away from their people in an effort to chase an arbitrary goal that can constantly be moved further and further away? Government surely can simplify complex issues, such as global climate change, for those foolish enough to surrender power to their “mother countries”.
As the saying goes, “scratch a Green, and you’ll find a Red.” This truism illustrates the fact that environmentalism is merely a convenient proxy for liberals’ larger goal of increasing government control over our lives. The fact that years must pass before environmental assertions can be disproved makes it an especially convenient vehicle for their larger agenda.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
Jesus F’ing Kerist,
Shawny is STILL beating that dead horse?
It ain’t gonna get no deader, Shawny.
Unbelievable!!!!!
By Idiot Alert
June 4, 2007 9:47 AM | Link to this
What a sniveling little whiner you are Shawny.
Please would anyone that supported what Berger did please speak up!
Does anyone here even know of someone that supported what Berger did?
I have never heard anyone suggest he should have gotten away with his CRIMES.
Who took it so easy on him???????????
By Can't resist
June 4, 2007 9:49 AM | Link to this
Scratch a global warming denier and you find the parents or grandparents of fat kids who eat crap, have tubes in their ears and alergies, asthma or ADD/ADHA, etc. but are pretty hot on their playstations.
By Paul
June 4, 2007 9:49 AM | Link to this
Shawny
A bit more light on the subject here:
Link: Did Berger steal original documents showing Clinton Administration did too little in response to Al Qaeda?
Nothing worthy of a special prosecutor, here!
By The Watcher
June 4, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this
Here’s an idea….
As soon as George Bush gets Bin Laden off his ” TO DO LIST” maybe he’ll have time to get to Sandy Berger.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this
Yes we do need special prosecutors for w and cheney destroying documents like Rove’s emails and visitor records.
I agree.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this
I know I tend to be forgetful at times, but I could have sworn that Sandy Berger had his day in court, was convicted, and sentenced.
Am I missing something here?
By Paul
June 4, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this
Watcher 9:30
Yup, yup, and yup. But it’s a good example of double standards and “if you do it, bad, if my side does it, ignore” that both parties play.
Midori 9:46
Beating dead horses is a favorite pasttime here - avoids looking at the present and future.
But I’ll predict any time you bring up any Rep conduct from the past you’re going to see your line tossed back at you.
By Can't Resist
June 4, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this
From Shawnys link
“And Sen. Joe Biden admitted during the debate that a wall wouldn’t keep out illegal immigrants. That would be the same Joe Biden who last year, yep, voted for the wall that won’t keep out illegal immigrants. So why support something that you know isn’t going to work? Biden tried to sell the line that his intent in supporting the fencing was to keep out illegal drugs not illegal immigrants, who can go over, around or under any fence. As if drug smugglers haven’t known how to go over, around or under border “
The guys right. Little brown people could get over, under or around the fence with a “nickel bag”.
However, a fence with a checkpoint might stop a truckload don’t you think?
Unless there are lots and lots and lots of those little brown people digging vast tunnels to get the truck through……
If so we better get more warn Nabisco to bake more Oreos….
By The Watcher
June 4, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this
Paul….
Who ignored what?
In April 2005, Berger was convicted of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material.
The GOP lead congress might have used their great big rubber stamp and started an investigation. But no, it apparently didn’t matter enough to them. (And you by the way….how many letters did you write or calls did you make to get your Representatives to look at Berger closer?)
Bringing this up now is a classic (if dated) GOP tactic.
Deep $hit is happening because of the worst of the right in what’s left of the GOP so they point fingers in any direction they can rather in a vain hope that no attention will be brought to whats happening right this minute in this country.
Young man, you are in danger of losing your soul.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 10:20 AM | Link to this
{{{{But I’ll predict any time you bring up any Rep conduct from the past you’re going to see your line tossed back at you.}}}}}
For one thing, that doesn’t make any sense — especially when it’s you people who keeps tossing up and tripping on that line.
Second, Yeah, like Gerry Stubbs, etc.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this
The surge er escalation is not working, just more wasted wasted lives.
Hillary will withdraw as soon as she is sworn in, then Bill will apologize to the world.
It will take the Clintons one term to clean up w’s disasters and another term to get us where we were.
Never ever vote gop in the WH again. Learn from this disaster America.
By Paul
June 4, 2007 10:27 AM | Link to this
Watcher 10:18
I’ve read elements from that opinionjournal op/ed elsewhere. Just seems to me if Condi had done something similar, cut a plea deal to avoid trial, had a judge outraged at the deal to avoid trial - had an ongoing Congressional investigation that didn’t have the rest of the story - well, these pages would still be full of it.
Same tune, different lyrics.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this
Its called double jeopardy but the wingnuts have no problem breaking the law to appease their ignorant agenda.
Idiots.
Get over it losers, case closed.
Lets look at the current criminals in the WH.
Geez.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this
Getalife,
re your 10:34: I couldn’t agree more!!!!
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this
Top 5 myths about America
By getalife
June 4, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
Midori,
Looks like the wingnuts are at Wooten’s today where they belong.
Paul,
I watched your hero BO just get absolutely crushed by James Carville in a debate.
BO was hating America and bashing big oil. His show is all an act.
Carville just told the truth to win.
By nellieh
June 4, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this
“gimmee my napkin back”. Same as not worth the paper it is written on?
By Paul
June 4, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
Getalife 10:55
I didn’t see it. Don’t think I recorded it, either. BOR generally thinks big oil is ripping off the American public and speculators manipulate the price of crude. Thinks “free market” is a joke when it comes to big oil. If he was in a debate with Carville, that means:
Carville/Liberal Dems support big oil, don’t think they’re ripping off the American public, crude prices aren’t being manipulated and in general it’s a free market thing.
This is incredible – you and liberal Dems like Carville support big oil?!!? What next? Will Hillary rescind her call for an exess profits tax?
Who’da thunk?
Midori 10:20
I meant the phrase that someone else was still beating a dead horse. Let me rephrase. If the discussion was back on Reagan administration and you brought up Iran/Contra and Ollie North, I’m just saying you’d get a response back of “still beating that dead horse? He testified before Congress - had immunity (part of the legal system - similar to a plea bargain) - so it’s old history. It’s over, sheesh.”
But “dead horse” depends upon which side of the Divide one’s on -
Watcher from 7:18 Friday
Nice “want” list. Has broad appeal. “I want to pay for” lists generally don’t have much appeal. Couple of observations:
Nothing will cause “destruction” of the nation. Universal health care will be very expensive – more so than now. Question is how it will be structured, who pays, how much, when are payment made. Saw a story recently, rural county, busting meth addicts/sellers, county was going broke with dental care - pulling all the rotten teeth, then providing crowns, overlays, dentures - restoring entire mouth. Just an example of cost escalation -
[[I want a family (4-5 human beings) to be able to live on 50 grand. No Hummers. A regular sized TV. Reasonable stuff.]]
Median household income’s around 46k. Household size between 2 and 3. Most families live on it. No matter how much you make you can always find a way to spend more. I’ve a friend, makes @ $150k a year, couple little kids, in debt up to his eyeballs. Over $80k on credit cards alone. I know people with less than $50k income who are debt free or close to it (and who pray they don’t get hit with major medical expenses).
[[I want the best damn public educational system the
By Paul
June 4, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this
Watcher - continued from 11:03
[[I want the best damn public educational system the world has ever seen.]]
My mantra. Federalize most of primary education.
[[I want air that’s safe to breath and water safe to drink.]]
Doing a pretty good job now. Can always be better.
[[I want a safe food chain.]]
Again, overall good. Exceptions make news. Keep your eye on the genetic stuff, though.
[[I want universal health care.]]
See earlier comments. We spend over $5k a year per person. Some good models exist - Mitt Romney/Massachusetts good partnership between Reps and Dems.
[[I want a free exchange of ideas and information.]]
Which is why you’re here. Just be glad you’re not a hardline conservative trying to speak at a liberal university. Hardline liberals have an easier time with conservative audiences.
[[I want habeus corpus.]]
Already have it. Some want to extend it to citizens of other countries. Interesting - let’s press for freedom of religion, speech, and women’s rights in the Middle East/Africa while we’re at it.
[[I want truth, justice and the American way.]] So do lots of others. Which is why so many countries that “hate America and Bush” have so many people trying to get here!”
Other duties call - TTYL
By getalife
June 4, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this
There is one thing w and cheney lead on and that is big oil and corporations.
Government assisted subsidies and record profits while gouging the people and creating more global warming.
This is what the wingnuts cheer on.
Pathetic.
By Dusty
June 4, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this
Ho hummmmm
Conservatives are not wasting their time on this four day old cartoon that wasn’t “fresh” to start with.
The liberal posts are the usual “leftovers”.
Paul gives us good reliable comments so he gets “nhi naw oh ho Clinton cleanup (Ha!!!!)” and other misc. clutter.
Luckovich is like the “server” here. Sometimes, maybe later, and then drop out. That’s the way liberals run things.
By Apocalypse
June 4, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
Dusty,
At least Luckovich didn’t lie in order to get us here. That’s the way conservatives run things.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
Dusty,
Paul’s posts are pathetic like yours.
Go back to wingnut wooten’s and take Paul with you.
Geez.
By Apocalypse
June 4, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this
getalife,
I’m an Obama supporter, but who did you think won the debate last night? Did you see it?
By @@
June 4, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this
I can get “all hot” if I want to ml. Where’s the new toon? What do they pay you for anyway?
I love british sitcoms. On the “Vicar of Dibley”, the vicar posed the question; “When an accountant is backed-up, what does he do?”
“He works it out with a pencil.”
You’ve got a pencil don’t you ml? Give us a new toon why don’tcha?
By getalife
June 4, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this
Apocalypse,
Bill Clinton, therefore Hillary won.
Obama will be VP.
By RW-(the original)
June 4, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this
Apocalypse,
I don’t think there was any real winner last night other than maybe CNN showing itself to be more like Fox in asking serious questions. PMSNBC must be pulling out all the stops for their next debate. I imagine we’ll hear Chris Mathews ask them which forest creature they most aspire to be.
The big loser should have been Hillary Rodham with her absurd response that “”we aren’t going to discuss hypotheticals”” but she got saved when the rest of them decided to hide behind her pantsuit.
Do we really want a President that tells us up front that they aren’t willing to look ahead at what might happen and have a response at the ready?
By Apocalypse
June 4, 2007 12:15 PM | Link to this
getalife,
I think you may be right. I love both of them, but they are entirely to nice to each other.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 12:21 PM | Link to this
It was funny watching them attack Wolfie with his stupid questions. Like w, they refused to answer hypotheticals.
But it ok for w’s admin., right RW?
Your hypocrisy is showing again and you should get ready for 8 more years of Clinton in the WH.
Bwa.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this
Apocalypse,
They will make history twice with a Clinton/Obama ticket.
They are the most popular candidates in the country and think they can get us back on track.
An added plus, wingnuts heads will explode for 8 years.
By @@
June 4, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this
That one shocked me as well RW, and my thoughts were the same. Political “capitalism”…don’t wanna waste THAT on hypotheticals now do we?
It was a mutual admiration society of democrats in the top running. The remainder were at least honest.
The senator from Alaska is very entertaining in that he doesn’t withhold any punches when it comes to pointing out the truth about the Democrats.
By Apocalypse
June 4, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this
getalife,
How about Biden for Secretary of State? Since he seems to be such a freaking expert.
By RW-(the original)
June 4, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this
@@,
That guy from Alaska is flat out insane. Kind of like Ron Paul in the GOP debates.
getalife,
We’ll probably get four years of Hillary followed by eight years of Jeb Bush. Will Chelsea be ready for a run in 2020?
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 293
By @@
June 4, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this
Let’s hear it for the ladies who want to take on the threat of radical islamists, and take it off in front the camera.
Protest over beheading threat
(((A group of female TV news readers have marched through Gaza City to protest against a fundamentalist group’s threat to behead them if they did not don modest Islamic dress.)))
(((Around 50 anchors and employees from government-run Palestine TV, mostly women wearing Muslim headscarves, marched from the station’s offices in Gaza City toward the office of President Mahmoud Abbas to protest against the threat from a group calling itself the Swords of Truth, known for firebombing internet cafes and record stores.)))
(((“We will cut throats, and from vein to vein, if needed to protect the spirit and morals of this nation,” the group said in a statement emailed to news agencies on Friday. The statement accused the female news readers of being “without any … shame or morals”.)))
GFY (Good for you) ladies.
For the radical Islamists, GFY.
By RW-(the original)
June 4, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
IN THE FEVER SWAMPS,
Try mixing it up a little. That’s two straight DUmmie links.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
Apocalypse,
Richardson for Secretary of State, Biden for UN, Edwards for AG.
Hillary will have have many good choices for her cabinet.
RW,
Jeb will never win. The Bush days are over.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this
Commanders Say Push in Baghdad Is Short of Goal
{{{{Three months after the start of the Baghdad security plan that has added thousands of American and Iraqi troops to the capital, they control fewer than one-third of the city’s neighborhoods, far short of the initial goal for the operation, according to some commanders and an internal military assessment.}}}}
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this
Attacks on U.S. Troops in Iraq Grow in Lethality, Complexity
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this
May’s Tally for the Splurge: Day 1494
By RW-(the original)
June 4, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this
IN THE FEVER SWAMPS,
Try mixing it up a little. That’s two straight DUmmie links.
By @@
June 4, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this
Gravel is definitely insane, I attribute it to dementia; but when a candidate keeps repeating that the leading candidates are too afraid to speak out or act on their principles, you gotta appreciate his honesty.
In the debate last night he said “Don’t let these guys fool you, everything they’re proposing is gonna cost you money.”
Now he wasn’t saying that he could offer it without cost, but that they were lying to the people when they said it wouldn’t cost.
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this
Special for Prop 12:45-
Providing aid and comfort to Al Qaeda:
{{{The rising pace of American troop deaths escalated this weekend as 14 more servicemen were reported killed in Iraq, all but one from makeshift ——->bombs that insurgents have been employing with greater lethality<—— against American soldiers and armored vehicles.-Urinal}}}
A surge of troops confronting and fighting the enemy means more casualties, any idiot should be able to figure that out.
So why is the Atlanta Journal Constitution taking advantage of that fact to publish some Al Qaeda propaganda about “increased lethality?”
GFY AJC, stick it in your behind.
You’re Al Qaeda’s only hope, and that ain’t no exaggeration.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By RW-(the original)
June 4, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this
@@,
I did like it at the end when he started screaming at Hillary that her “husband” had never really balanced the budget he had just stolen our Social Security money and then said everyone but him on the stage planned to do the same thing. Nobody responded to him which was also telling.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 1:05 PM | Link to this
Breaking News on MSNBC: Federal Officials seek Corruption Charges Against Congressmen William Jefferson
About d*mn time.
Good riddance to bad garbage.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this
RW
MIGHT WANT TO TAKE YOUR OWN ADVISE
EXACT SAME POST AT 12:42 and 12:49
ALSO, MAYBE I’LL PLAY WITH YOUR NAME TOO
REALLY a WOMAN
REAL WANKER
ROTTEN WART
ROTOUND WOMBAT
ROGUE WAHOO
ROASTED WINGNUT
REPROBATE WILLIE
RECIDIVIST WRONGDOER
RECTUM WIPER
REVOLTING WEAKLING
RUBE WACKO
REALITY’S WRONG
RADICALLY WIERD
ROBUSTLY WICKED
RAVENOUSLY WIRED
RUSTIC WEENIE
REPULSIVE WATERCARRIER
RIBALD WHACKOFF
RAUNCHY WUSS
THIS IS TOO MUCH FUN
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 1:19 PM | Link to this
{{{By IN THE PROPAGANDA June 4, 2007 12:43 PM Commanders Say Push in Baghdad Is Short of Goal}}}
In the same Cowardly article, waaaayyyyyy down at the bottom of it:
{{{Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the senior American ground commander in Iraq, said in a brief interview that he never believed that a midsummer timetable for establishing security in Baghdad was realistic. “This was always going to be conditions-driven,” he said, noting that he always had expected it would take until fall to establish security across much of the city.}}}
Little Prop, Al Qaeda sympathizer, geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By @@
June 4, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this
My oh my, the Moon is shining.
(((In an interview published by a Spanish newspaper, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said he is looking at ways to boost the U.N. presence in Iraq. “Our activity has been very constrained by the situation on the ground, but after I went to Iraq and saw the situation for myself I am now thinking about how we can make other contributions to increase our presence there,” he added.)))
(((Ban noted that the UN has played a very important, constructive role in helping Iraqis in the government. He added that an amended constitution was passed to the Iraqi parliament and hoped amendments being made to Iraq’s constitution would allow the country to return to law and order. UN Secretary General denied any US pressures on the United Nations to boost up its role in Iraq.)))
So now the U.N. is willing to invest more in Iraq.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this
HIDING BEHIND YOUR KEYBOARD AGAIN LUCKODULL?
YOU WOULDN”T RECOGNIZE A “QAEDA” IF IT BIT YOU IN THE A$$>
IF I WERE YOU< I’D LOCK MY DOORS AND COVER THE WINDOWS WITH NEWSPAPER.
QAEDA IS WATCHING YOU.
YES YOU LUCKODULL.
SEE THOSE EYES PEEKING OUT OF THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS MAIL SLOT. ITS ONE OF THEM THERE QAEDA”S CHECKING YOU OUT>
THAT GUY THAT DELIVERS YOUR CHINESE FOOD, YEP YOU GUESSED IT - ANOTHER QAEDA STAKING YOU OUT.
BE VERY CAREFULL WHAT YOU SAY IN FRONT OF ROVER - THE QAEDA HAVE DRUGGED HIS KIBBLE>
THEY HAVE YOUR SHOWER BUGGED
THEY HAD A COMPUTER CHIP IMPLANTED IN YOUR BODY WHILE YOU WERE PASSED OUT YESTERDAY.
YOUR LAWN GUY IS KEEPING TRACK OF YOUR EVERYMOVE - YEP QAEDA TOO
THEY KNOW YOU ARE THE KEY. IF THEY TAKE OUT LUCKODULL< THEY WIN.
ITS ALL ABOUT GETTING YOU.
ALWAYS HAS BEEN
QAEDA HANDBOOK HAS AN ENTIRE CHAPTER CALLED ’ GET LUCKODULL”
THEY SMELL YOUR FEAR FROM THOUSANDS OF MILES AWAY
THE REST OF US JUST SIT BACK AND LAUGH.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this
U.S. Government Gave Airtime to Terrorists, Official Admits
By Midori
June 4, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this
In the news,
too
freaking
FUNNY!!! :)
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this
Raging Caging What the heck is vote caging, and why should we care?
By getalife
June 4, 2007 1:44 PM | Link to this
Wingnuts need to look at our own government intead of worrying about how screw up other countries.
Newt knows:
“The government is not functioning. It’s not getting the job done,’’ Gingrich told “Fox News Sunday,” citing Hurricane Katrina, the war in Iraq and immigration. “Republicans need to confront this reality.”
Take your pathetic, ignorant propaganda to wingnut wooten’s.
Nobody is buying into your bs here.
Worry about our country, it is in deep “w”.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this
MIDORI
THANKS
BUT WE MUST ALL SHARE OUR CONCERN FOR LUCKODULLS SAFETY
AREN”T YOU ASCARED FOR OUR LITTLE LUVKIEDULL?
WHAT WOULD THIS BLOG BE LIKE IF QEADA ACTUALLY GOT HIM? IMAGINE THE TEARS AND WAILING!
ANY VOLUNTEERS FOR THE KEEP LUCKODULL SAFE FROM QAEDA MILITIA? WE COULD GET REALLY COOL MATCHING OUTFITS.
ITS OUR JOB AS GOOD AMERICANS TO KEEP LUCKODULL SAFE …..YOU ARE EITHER WITH US OR AGAINST US>
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this
{{{By IN THE PROPAGANDA June 4, 2007 1:34 PM YOUR LAWN GUY IS KEEPING TRACK OF YOUR EVERYMOVE - YEP QAEDA TOO}}}
Prop: Why do you as-sume that everyone is a lazy as-s sniveling Coward that has to bring slaves from another country to do their menial household chores, like you are?
I do my own landscaping and it shows.
By the way, me and Al Qaeda would be great friends, if they were ever able to come by and see me, that is.
They want to go see allah and the 72 virgins and I want to check out the ballistics of some new hollow points that I reloaded; it would be a very productive relationship.
Anyway, I don’t suspect I’ll be seeing my new buddies any time soon, they got their hands full with those Iraq Sunnis right now.
I’ll bet they’re having enough “fun” without me.
Coward.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this
U.S. says can’t link Tehran to Afghan arms flow
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this
McCain Declares Americans Will Support U.S. Troops In Iraq For 50 Years
By Dusty
June 4, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this
Good grief,
This sorry four day old cartoon is STILL here!!! Must be a long holiday, hangover or something..
Management,puh leeze!!
There is a child on this blog that prints all messages in BIG BABY LETTERS. Could you carry him back to the nursery where he belongs? He is a real nuisance and I am sure his keeper is looking for him.
Oh and take getalife with you to the “senior” room. He is having those scary hllucinations again about liberals in the White House. Hillary! Bill!! EEEEeeeeee! No wonder he is losing it.
By teamouse
June 4, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this
Hey, lump o’ dung, can’t you neocons admit you just can’t substitute slogans for thinking, and you all blundered the U.S. into a morass that has drained our economy, will break our armed forces and has accomplished little besides strengthening radicals and terrorists?
By getalife
June 4, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this
Hahahaha, who is losing it?
You should listen to Newt.
He is getting real and you are the losers, crusty the clown.
Bwa.
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this
{{{By teamouse June 4, 2007 2:32 PM Hey, lump o’ dung, can’t you neocons admit you just can’t substitute slogans for thinking, and you all blundered the U.S. into a morass that has drained our economy, will break our armed forces and has accomplished little besides strengthening radicals and terrorists?}}}
Because it hasn’t?
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Observer
June 4, 2007 2:46 PM | Link to this
getalife - you hypocrites amaze me. For years Newt could do nothing right! Now that he is speaking out against someone against whom you hold a pathological and irrational hatred, you suddenly think that he sounds reasonable. He happens to be right, but not for the reasons you sychophant liberals think. The Bush Administration has been way too liberal on too many issues and too accomodating to you folks. Which only proves what Ronald Reagan said - you cannot convince a liberal of anything and you cannot compromise with them because they know so much which isn’t so!
By Midori
June 4, 2007 2:52 PM | Link to this
Super Cyclonic Storm Gonu Heads For Oman, Persian Gulf - Cat 5 Now, Cat 4 At Landfall - Reuters
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 2:54 PM | Link to this
TO DUSTY I AM A “real nuisance”
I AM FLATTERED
BUT I AM HOPING TO UPGRADE TO A REAL PAIN IN HER A$$!
THERES ALWAYS ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT…..
By getalife
June 4, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this
Here the deal Observer,
You will see the gop candidates debate and say stay the course on w’s policies while Newt is saying the government is broken.
The Dems say the same thing.
I will go with the ones that get real and speak real.
I suggest you do the same.
Get real loser.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 2:56 PM | Link to this
Are you the observer from MST3K?
How’s Pearl and Coco?
Cambot?
Crow? Tom Servo?
Gypsy?
Price of photo-op with Bush keeps dropping
Soon he will have to pay people to stand next to him.
By Dusty
June 4, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this
Now, now getalife, it is going to be all right..
Who listens to Newt? He ought to be teaching history instead of trying to make it.
Relax, getal. I will send over your huggie Hil & Bill dolls right away. Hang on! They’re coming..
By Observer
June 4, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this
getalife - you also cannot read. I said that Newt was right!!!! I was pointing out your hypocrisy. You are only saying so because he is critisizing Bush. Your hypocrisy amazes me. By the way, you folks are still defending the stupidity and the bad foreign policy decisions from the 1990s that got us into this mess. I guess when Billery mess up everything its okay, because they are socialists and they say they care - and laugh all the way to the bank because sychophants like you buy their books and buy tickets to their meaningless speaches so you too can say “I am an erudite liberal” even though all the evidence shows SOCIALISM DOES NOT WORK. Just ask the French!
By getalife
June 4, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this
Your right Dusty, it will be alright in 08.
Too much reality from Newt.
Deal with it loser.
By Newt=GOD
June 4, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this
Its a coincidence you say?
It was just a few short weeks ago that Newt was on stage with James Dobson and his Focus on the Family radio program. Now Newt is suddenly speaking out against Republicans. In fact he is letting them have it. All of them. Bush too.
Its obvious that God changed him that day. Newt said he repented and now we are seeing the fruits of a new man. A man that seems born-again. A man that has seen the light.
God changed Newt into a human being that day. Thank you God. A miracle.
By @@
June 4, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this
In Bahrain, Protests Against Repression of Freedom of Expression
(((The MPs saw the scenes in which the male and female dancers were in perverted positions. It is absolutely impossible to remain silent about this - especially when the scenes were presented publicly, without shame!… Our country is Bahrain, not France or America! Bahrain is a Muslim country, and its identity is Islamic and Arab; its principles are Islamic, and its character is Islamic…”)))
What dance were they doing, The Lambada? Yes, I know it well….anyhoo:
(((“Honorable MPs: Ask yourselves, and ask all the countries of the world, from East to West, what their parliaments do. The answer will necessarily be the opposite of what you are doing and what you are wasting your time on. Isn’t it your obligation to teach the people how to actualize democracy, instead of being the ones to disparage and destroy it?)))
It sounds like the U.S. is among the role models for the true freedom fighters in Arab society.
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this
Good news from the Middle East comes in pairs, well bad news for you sniveling Cowards:
{{{ “Sunni residents of a west Baghdad neighborhood used assault rifles and a roadside bomb to battle the Sunni insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq this week, leaving at least 28 people dead and six injured, residents said Thursday,” the Washington Post reported Friday: In the western province of Anbar, which is predominantly Sunni, tribal leaders have formed an umbrella group, the Anbar Salvation Council, to join with U.S. and Iraqi troops in a common fight against al-Qaeda in Iraq, which used to dominate the province.}}}
And:
{{{“Afghanistan’s Defense Ministry says some 60 Taliban fighters were drowned when their boat sank as they were attempting to cross the Helmand River.”—Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, June 3RD.}}}
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this
Observer,
I can see thru your bs wingnut.
Only blind idiots do not see the mess w has created .
Of course he is right but HE is still a hypocrite on impeaching Bill while having his own sick affair.
The buck stops with w.
Admit it.
By The Watcher
June 4, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this
Observer - you are right - socialism does not work.
As evidenced by the last 7 years, neither does fascism or un-regulated capitalism.
By Dusty
June 4, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this
Hurry, keeper, IN THE NEWS is here and he’s crying. Thinks he’s done something. Well, he has. Bring the Pampers!!
By Observer
June 4, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
Yes getalife it will be ALL right in 08 because Thompson will be elected and Hillery and Barak will still be in the Senate and Edwards will still be a hypocrite making money from phony charities!
By God=NEWT
June 4, 2007 3:21 PM | Link to this
Good quote on Reagan. Here’s another Reagan quote that I find fascinating.
“BONZO, I told you not to hang from the chandeliers!”
By getalife
June 4, 2007 3:26 PM | Link to this
Lazy fred is another w but lazier.
Good luck with that loser.
By God Loves NEWT
June 4, 2007 3:29 PM | Link to this
“…it will be ALL right in 08 because Thompson will be elected”
Is that you Bonzo????? They taught you how to type???? Another miracle!
By Angry Yeti
June 4, 2007 3:29 PM | Link to this
I have a better cartoon. Show Hillary looking down into a dresser drawer faceless and asking herself. “Let’s see, which face should I put on today?” And have the masks labeled as Liberal, Centrist, Socialist and poor black woman from Alabama. (Referring to her speech with a horrible southern accent.)
BTW, Global warming (man made at least) doesnt exist. The Sun is hotter. It’s as simple as that.
What seems more logical, The polar ice caps on Mars are melting because of a cyclical warming trend of the Sun, or due to carbon gases put out by Martian power plants and cars that they drive?
By Observer
June 4, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this
getalife - if you believe that, then why do you keep voting for inveterate and unapologetic socialists? The Democrats in this country have consisently proposed more government regulation and outright ownership of the economy. They constantly propose to make private property and individual responsibility irrelevant. Hillery is still proposing a complete government takeover of the healthcare system even though anyone living in a nation with socialized medicine will tell you it is a nightmare if they are honest! The fact is that Newt has not changed anything which he has said for the last thirty years, at least on the economic front. You have hitched your wagon to the real losers!
By The Watcher
June 4, 2007 3:33 PM | Link to this
Just what we need in the White House… another B list actor.
What was that quote about why he left the senate….?
By Newt Loves NEWT
June 4, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this
Angry Yeti, yes that was “Bonzo Lands on Mars” 1953 I think. Ronald Reagan was joined in that film by a very young Fred Thompson who played little Jimmy. Bonzo once saved little Jimmy from a well on Mars, in the sequel I believe.
A good Reagan quote from that movie… “Mr.Martian….Tear down that wall and lower your antenna’s.”
By getalife
June 4, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this
Yes Observer, the economy was great during the Clinton years.
I have hitched my wagon to proven winners.
Peace and prosperity.
We will get back that America.
Deal with it loser.
By FUDDY EDWIN OBSERVER TRUTHYGUY
June 4, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this
PROVE THESE STATEMENTS
A. They constantly propose to make private property and individual responsibility irrelevant.
B.anyone living in a nation with socialized medicine will tell you it is a nightmare
You can’t hide….it’s your silly prose.
By Mr. Obvious
June 4, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this
To Paul and the neocons.
What do y’all think the Iraqi war is costing? Beans?
I would rather see those funds spend in America on Americans. Health care, education, infrastucture, border protection, cops on the beat, etc.
By Observer
June 4, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this
getalife - the economy was good, not great, during the Clinton years because after 1995 the good guys were in charge, among them, Newt. The good guys balanced the budget over his repeated objections - he said maybe in 9 years. They prevented his “wife’s” power grab in trying to take over health care. The good guys, among them Fred Thompson, prevented further rises in taxes which would have stifled the economy. Unfortunately, the good guys did not have control of foreign policy. We had Cobart Towers, the embassy bombings, the Cole and the first attempt to down the Twin Towers - all of these went without response. The Clintons are losers, just like old Dummy Carter and Dum Gore and John Kerry. Bye now.
By NEWTLoves Newt
June 4, 2007 4:03 PM | Link to this
Its not from a movie But we can’t leave W out now can we? Here’s my favorite Bush quote….”Lets just pretend.”
By Paul
June 4, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this
Well, I just get back, skim thru the comments and the last I see is Mr. Obvious at 3:46. Mr. Obvious? Given UberLibs tend to change names to save face, it’s gotta be…. getalife? Still shocked you agree with Bill OR about oil companies and not with liberal Dems like Carville who think it’s “free markets, baby?” (10:55, 11:03)
Since when do neocons want to slash the Defense budget?
Catch ya’ later when you get some specifics to go with the labels -
By Newt loves Quayle
June 4, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this
For those that are not really super intelligent like Obswerver…..
White Hat = Good Guys
Black Hats = Blacks, Mexicans, gays, atheists, the medically uninsured, water restriction followers, and people who do 65 in the left lane.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 4:17 PM | Link to this
The good guys?
Not getting real there observer.
I thought you said Newt was right but then you call them the good guys? He said they broke the government. Those are not good guys idiot.
Geez, come back when you can get real about the gop losers (bad guys).
The buck stops with w. Period
By Paul
June 4, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this
Newt loves Quayle
Interesting comment, if the speed limit’s 65? So it’s okay with you to break the law if enough people do it? Or it’s a group to which you belong? So, applying that line of thought to your implications about Mexicans (illegals?) - you’re a Lib? Never thought of liberalism that way -
By getalife
June 4, 2007 4:25 PM | Link to this
You should watch the debate Paul before you spew.
Dead wrong as usual but expected from all wingnuts.
Geez.
By Newt LOVES potatoes
June 4, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this
Picture this 2003….Bush says to Rummy, “How’s the Iraq script going”
Rummy says “I got the ending done.”
“Great” says Bush.
“Now we just need a good begining. How about Weapons of Mass Destruction. Or Terrorism. I’ve got it, Evil Dictator!” Ya, lets pretend….”
“Can we get Fred Thompson to play me?? I just loved him on that tv show, what was it called ….oh yea Mission:Accomplished.”
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 4:42 PM | Link to this
{{{By Angry Yeti June 4, 2007 3:29 PM What seems more logical, The polar ice caps on Mars are melting because of a cyclical warming trend of the Sun, or due to carbon gases put out by Martian power plants and cars that they drive?}}}
Yeti: If you keep this^^ up, the trolls in here will start calling you a f-a-g.
Cause they damn sure can’t debate it.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
June 4, 2007 4:58 PM | Link to this
“Freedom of speech, freedom of association and freedom of conscience are not a thorn in the side of government,” Rice told the ministers. “Disagreeing with your government is not unpatriotic and most certainly should not be a crime in any country, especially a democracy.”
By Midori
June 4, 2007 5:30 PM | Link to this
If President Bush and Vice President Cheney can use vulgar language, then the government cannot punish others for doing the same thing on television.
That, in essence, was the decision today when a federal appeals court struck down the government policy of fining stations and networks that broadcast programs with profanity.
The decision, by a divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York, was a sharp rebuke for the Federal Communications Commission and for the Bush administration. It was a major victory in a legal battle being waged by the four television networks — Fox, CBS, NBC and ABC — that had filed the case.
By Jason S
June 4, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this
I think that it is a shame that everyone who “agreed” with this cartoon are doing so in their nice “air conditioned” offices/homes. Drive their nice BMW’s, Lexus’, Mercedes and proberly big donors to the DNC. Well, when I see the AJC being delivered by horse and cart, and everyone sitting in “Green” homes and all driving hybrids then, stand with GW and wait for the science to determine what the cause is. Oh, I forgot, Al Gore’s presentation was that good…. Al Gore’08 anyone?? anyone???? I didn’t think so….
By Jason S
June 4, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this
I think that it is a shame that everyone who “agreed” with this cartoon are doing so in their nice “air conditioned” offices/homes. Drive their nice BMW’s, Lexus’, Mercedes and proberly big donors to the DNC. Well, when I see the AJC being delivered by horse and cart, and everyone sitting in “Green” homes and all driving hybrids then, stand with GW and wait for the science to determine what the cause is. Oh, I forgot, Al Gore’s presentation was that good…. Al Gore’08 anyone?? anyone???? I didn’t think so….
By Old Retired Physics Teacher
June 4, 2007 5:57 PM | Link to this
Hollywood Liberal Elites: Reagan, Bono, Arnold, and now Fred! How’s than again?? I thought Hollywood was all liberals? Who’s really living in denial and Fantasy Land??
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 6:11 PM | Link to this
{{{By Old Retired Physics Teacher June 4, 2007 5:57 PM Hollywood Liberal Elites: Reagan, Bono, Arnold, and now Fred! How’s than again?? I thought Hollywood was all liberals? Who’s really living in denial and Fantasy Land??}}}
Geez, this is the best you can do?
Smear Thompson as being from Hollywood?
You ever hear of a guy named John Wayne?
Clark Gable?
Not all actors were sniveling Coward perverts like you.
You know what I mean?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Midori
June 4, 2007 6:14 PM | Link to this
Andy,
you’re going into “Sybil” mode again………
you’re only fooling yourself — which can’t be very difficult.
not difficult at all…..
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this
{{{“The charges in the indictment against Congressman Jefferson are extremely serious. While Mr. Jefferson, just as any other citizen, must be considered innocent until proven guilty, if these charges are proven true, they constitute an egregious and unacceptable abuse of public trust and power,” Pelosi said in a statement.}}}
Just think, if Jefferson were a US soldier or a Republican, Pelosi could have said those things about him before the indictment came out.
But she was scared! Brrrrrr, he’s a democrat, Blinky, they’re above the stupid law.
So when is he going to resign?
So we can get to work on Feinstein, hehehehe.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this
Midori,
I guarantee you this FFC case will go to the Supreme Court and I bet it will be overturned.
The fact that Cheney told that jackass Leahy to GFY in a private conversation is irrelevant to what is broadcast on the airways.
I guarantee you that neither Bush, Cheney, or Blair grab their crotch like in public - which was what I found the most disgusting about the Super Bowl kerfuffle.
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this
{{{By Mr. Obvious
June 4, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this
To Paul and the neocons.
What do y’all think the Iraqi war is costing? Beans?
I would rather see those funds spend in America on Americans. Health care, education, infrastucture, border protection, cops on the beat, etc.}}}
Obviously deluded,
With the single exception of “border protection”, Al Qaeda no doubt agrees with you.
Paul,
I’m reading “State of Fear”. Didn’t you recommend that excellent read to me?
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:30 PM | Link to this
Woops, make that “grab their crotch like Kevin Federline (or whoever Ms. Jackson’s co-conspirator was)”
By Midori
June 4, 2007 6:32 PM | Link to this
Andy,
must write this day down in History, as once more I agree with you.
Jefferson should resign.
BD: bubble, bubble toil and trouble.
I’m out - lots of yard work to do.
If I run across any devil’s wort, or any other kind of fungus, I’ll jar it for you.
a gal can’t get caught short when casting those much-needed spells, can she?
Keep that cauldron bubbling!!!
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:36 PM | Link to this
Midori,
Thanks for another pointless contribution.
btw, why did you post that stuff about Tropical Storm Gonu? Trying to warn Ahamadinijead and the Mullahs to take cover?
By getalife
June 4, 2007 6:36 PM | Link to this
Haha, get use it wingnuts.
GFY and everything they have done will come back.
Its called karma.
Bwa.
By @@
June 4, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this
Can anybody here tell me what’s making this sound.
I’m curious and can’t wait for the answer.
Michael Yon has an excellent site. He’s a pretty good writer too. Check it out. The story “Final Option” is a good read. Shows ‘ya how innovative our guys can be when addressing difficult situations in Iraq.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 6:44 PM | Link to this
BTW, I said Jefferson should resign a long time ago.
Its that coc rearing its ugly head (pardon the pun).
By Paul
June 4, 2007 6:49 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish 6:28
Yes, I did. I believe it’s the one Al Gore refers to in order to belittle those who question his conclusions. It seems to play better on a sound bite instead of addressing his assumptions - excuse me, “facts.”
It’s a pretty good read, then at the end Crichton pulls his all-to-recently-typical “time to finish writing. I’ll just go fantastical, here.” But be sure to read the epilogue. That’s one topic libs never want to discuss!
Server’s been terrible today. I asked Mr. Obvious what the point of that was. Never made it through. Just as well - it was a ????? post I was responding to, anyway.
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:51 PM | Link to this
Global Warming News!
Blue planet: SUV use on the rise on gas giant Neptune?
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this
Paul,
I cheated and read the epilogue already.
Do you use IE or Firefox? Firefox is much better in the sense that you don’t get stuck looking at the little hour glass spinning around forever.
By The Short Hairs
June 4, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
Hillary shined at the Democratic Debates last night. She’s clearly emerging as a leader, and she is larger than life. She appears decisive, and strong. America will embrace her, our next president.
It’s a done deal.
All the green conservatives have is eco-cute, neo-newt fatheads who misunderstand the science they use to criticize global warming.
There has never been a more ostentation display of sheer ignorance malapropped to the world on the scale that we have witnessed in the history of science. (Sir Isaac Newton had to put up with a Rush Limbaugh stuntwit who challenged and denied every law Newton imagined and then, when it the law was generally accepted, he claimed that Newton stole it from him.)
There’s nothing left of the repudlickan party. nothing.
Now we must face the vestiges of the evangelical right’s gift to the globe: the continuing adventures of a free jihad in Iraq.
Bush is the modern Mussolini, and today’s quiz is: What did the Italians finally do to Mussolini for his war adventurism? There was no reason for Italy to join in the Axis Powers. I’m sure Mussolini had a great manifesto of homeland security reasons that I’ll bet the farm Rove copied word for word when Bush presented his justification for the invasion of Iraq.
BTW: Goebel’s wrote the blue print for the evangelical right’s seizure of power in this country. They read his book.
Word.
By Paul
June 4, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
getalife 6:44
Agree with that, too. That will be a good standard for future occurrences. I just cannot understand the assignments Spkr Pelosi gave him, though. You’d think a Californian would understand “toxic.”
By Willie
June 4, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
The World’s Greatest Embarrassment is now aboard Air Farce One, winging his way to new and fresh humiliations in Europe. Surge on, heroes, surge on.
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 6:55 PM | Link to this
Midori,
If you’re looking for witches, I think I found one for you.
Rosie: I paint toy soldiers red and glue them to wood to mourn
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 7:15 PM | Link to this
The foiled JFK plot reminds me to ask - How could we possibly have been so foolish to believe that Al Qaeda were in Iraq before we invaded?/SARC.
The Shukrijumah family wound up in Florida, where the terror suspect was educated, went to college and reportedly learned to fly planes./Some terror experts think 31-year-old Shukrijumah is among a handful of up-and-coming leaders of al Qaeda handpicked by Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, to keep the terrorist network running.
Florida - yes. Iraq - NFW!
By getalife
June 4, 2007 7:42 PM | Link to this
Good question Joe
You missed this one at Hot Air BD.
Geez.
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 7:52 PM | Link to this
(I refreshed the page and the comment box was still open, geez.)
{{{Mary Matalin, the former counselor to Vice President Cheney, says she will be advising Thompson. A campaign source says she will be an unpaid adviser. Matalin is friends with Thompson and his wife, Jeri, and her involvement began informally, the source says. Advisers say the head of economic policy for Thompson’s fledgling team will be Lawrence B. Lindsey, who was President Bush’s first economic policy adviser and an architect of his tax cuts. Lindsey was chief economic adviser to Bush’s first presidential campaign and is a former member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Lindsey will also have a hand in the campaign’s broader policy formulation, sources say.}}}
Republicans are a well oiled machine and the democrats are pathetic.
This is going to be a walk.
You’re gonna hate 08®.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 8:19 PM | Link to this
Getalife,
I didn’t miss it. I don’t give a flip about it.
Do you know her? Maybe she can explain why it’s getting warm on Mars and Neptune.
LuckoDull,
I’m waiting for the campaign-finance lawsuit that says that Matalin can’t work for free.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 8:34 PM | Link to this
Well, I tend to focus on this planet.
When a reporter asked lazy fred what he would do as President he replied, “Lots of things.”
Being Hollywood, methinks he gets high on the weed. Not that there is anything wrong with that but he is lazy.
You should run Newt, he is the only getting real. Make another contract with America which they will not honor.
Face it, Clinton will win. Start smoking weed so you can deal with it.
Bwa.
By @@
June 4, 2007 8:53 PM | Link to this
Good gawd, that idiot Chavez blames everything on the U.S.
(((Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said June 3 that the student protests following his refusal to renew Radio Caracas Television’s (RCTV) contract were instigated by the United States — and that it is clear the 1999 constitution is too permissive and should be revised.)))
Who in Venezuela does this guy think he’s kidding?
Oh yea…the poor people.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 9:05 PM | Link to this
She will send Bill to talk to Hugo. He thinks w is the devil but Bill will win him over.
Then we will lift the embargo on Cuba and I will finally get my cigars.
I wonder if pinko Jim brought some.
By LuckoDull
June 4, 2007 9:06 PM | Link to this
{{{To that end, Mr. Thompson said the next president should have the courage to talk straight with the American people and bluntly say that Americans will have to confront both the soaring cost of entitlements and the need to remain committed in the war on terror, even when Iraq is “in the rear-view mirror.”}}}
“Talk straight with the American people.”
Well, that eliminates sHrillary.
Deal.
Hail to the Chief.
You’re gonna hate 08®.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By getalife
June 4, 2007 9:17 PM | Link to this
It is ridiculous to talk about American Social Security with the waste of almost a trillion dollars on the Iraq disaster.
“Rear view mirror”?
Ending the occupation?
That is anything but getting real and talking straight.
By @@
June 4, 2007 9:58 PM | Link to this
President Bush should have warned them that discussing their faith would get them in trouble with the liberals.
Clinton: Faith Got Me Through Troubles
(((Edwards revealed that he prays—and sins—every day.)))
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 10:03 PM | Link to this
Getalife,
How much time have you spent in Hollwood? I don’t think that weed is what they’re into.
By Buy Danish
June 4, 2007 10:10 PM | Link to this
Maybe we can get crack prosecutor Patrick Fitzfong Fitzgerald on this case.
Feds name CAIR in plot to fund Hamas Prominent U.S. Islamic group designated ‘unindicted co-conspirator’
And maybe he can clip the wings of the Flying Imans while he’s at it.
By RW-(the original)
June 5, 2007 12:38 AM | Link to this
Has ml decided to go the Motel 6 route? They do seem to be leaving the lights on around here, even if they can’t get him to scribble a new toon.
By LuckoDull
June 5, 2007 6:32 AM | Link to this
{{{Mr. Obama claims he can achieve these goals by reinstating the Clinton-era income-tax rates on those earning more than $250,000; by “driving down the costs, taking on the insurance companies, making sure that they are limited in the ability to extract profits and deny coverage”; and by “mak[ing] sure the drug companies have to do what’s right by their patients instead of simply hoarding their profits.” A former community organizer in Chicago who admired the radical Saul Alinsky, Mr. Obama still talks like the college sophomore who has taken his second sociology course. This is what passes for presidential timber in the Democratic Party today?}}}
Yes, indeed it is.
Dull candidates for a dull party.
Lazy Fred looks like Abraham Lincoln compared to these dimwits, he hasn’t even announced yet.
You’re gonna hate 08®.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{Not one democrat candidate thought securing America’s borders should be the highest priority. Not one thought that infiltrating and destroying terror networks should be the highest priority. Not one thought that winning in Afghanistan should be the highest priority. Not one thought that preventing a nuclear weapon from falling into the hands of terrorists should be the highest priority. They are the eight blind mice. And as al-Qaida in Iraq members might say after one of these candidates ends U.S. involvement in the war there, “See how they run!”}}}
But they thought regulating your health care was a top priority:
{{{However, nationalizing care typically saves money by denying treatment. Political bodies or bureaucracies decide who is entitled to what, and spend accordingly. The well-to-do flee to private clinics or other nations, including America, for better treatment. Everyone else suffers from inadequate or delayed care. The ill consequences are highest for those suffering from diseases requiring immediate, sophisticated, and expensive treatment.}}}
From the vent:
{{{If you liked the way the government handled the TB scare, you’re gonna love national health care.}}}
Keep shining that beacon of light down upon all of your idiocies democrats, tell us all of the intrusive, dehumanizing, unmotivating ideas you want to inflict upon us.
Please.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
June 5, 2007 6:37 AM | Link to this
Yeah, this guy is a real moonbat liberal:
{{{Illegal immigrants in France’s sight.- France set tough new quotas for the number of illegal immigrants authorities should arrest and expel each month. Brice Hortefeux, who heads the Ministry of Immigration, Integration, National Identity and Co-Development, reiterated President Nicolas Sarkozy’s goal of 25,000 expulsions by the end of 2007 —- compared with 24,000 in 2006 —- and set a year-end goal of 125,000 arrests for alleged illegal entry or residence, a ministry statement said.}}}
Watch France’s problem just go away now that the appeasement has been stopped. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
Now this is a moonbat liberal:
{{{Like many liberals with the itch to micromanage our lives, Mr. Gore clearly believes the American people are ignorant to the point of endangerment. So he has become a media scholar, and unloaded his communications theories in a book excerpt hyped by his friends at Time magazine.}}}
Can you imagine getting up everyday being that bitter and enraged at all the other Americans not doing what you mistakenly think is right?
And then going home at night and doing exactly the same thing that you spent all day raging about, except twenty times worse than anybody else?
This guy needs to be institutionalized.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
June 5, 2007 6:52 AM | Link to this
{{{Some years ago, I ran into Fred Thompson at Washington’s Reagan National Airport and had a chat with him as we waited for a (very) delayed flight. I found him to be affable and nice — good company, if you want to know — but I cannot remember a single thing he said. Alas, it is about the same with his Senate career. If Thompson’s name came up in some sort of free association game, he would be a genuine stumper: Thompson and what? There is no Thompson Act, Thompson Compromise, Thompson Hearing, Thompson Speech or Thompson Anything that comes to mind.-richard cohen, WaPo}}}
Now replace the name “Thompson” with the name “Clinton” in this article and tell me what the difference is.
Hillary hasn’t done squat, 8 years in the WH and six in the Senate with nothing but pandering and verbal gaffes and corruption to show for it.
Why does cohen not find a problem with that?
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
June 5, 2007 7:08 AM | Link to this
Here’s an example of what hard working and energetic democrats have wrought upon America:
{{{ Some of the painful consequences of various “liberations” that began in the 1960s have included the disintegration of families, skyrocketing crime rates, falling test scores in school, and record-breaking rates of teenage suicide. A long downward trend in teenage pregnancy and venereal diseases sharply reversed during the 1960s, starting a new trend of escalating teenage pregnancy and venereal diseases, climaxed later by the AIDS epidemic.}}}
Maybe we could use a “lazy” president, some one who doesn’t turn every “problem” into an excuse to expand government.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
June 5, 2007 7:56 AM | Link to this
{{{We need to look carefully at the phrase “George Bush’s war.” It tells us everything we need to know about this field of candidates. Not our war — not America’s. Bush’s war. You get the implication here. When we quit the war, we’re not really quitting; we’re just cleaning up Bush’s mess. He’s the one this thing is all about — not Saddam, not the weapons of mass destruction nearly everyone believed him to have; not the “bumper-sticker war” on the homicidal maniacs who took down the Twin Towers, and whose imitators are multiplying. No, this thing is all about Bush and “lies” that no one ever has shown were lies as opposed to truthful representations of mistaken intelligence. This kind of rubbish can give you the willies. To each of the candidates spouting off in this manner we concede the constitutional right to seek and win the presidency. Are you thrilled yet? On Sunday night’s evidence, we can quit the war, and it will all be Bush’s fault. That’s the definition of victory their lexicon contains — blaming Bush and letting the devil take the hindmost. Whatever such a strategy might have to do with American peace and security.}}}
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.