Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2007 > May > 20 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USGeorge’s report card
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (285) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon
Comments
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this
Let’s see what “global warming”scare mongering the libs have for us this morning:
{{{Report: Warming Imperils State Flowers KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Imagine the Sunflower State without sunflowers.-Urinal}}}
Really?
The first Europeans observed sunflower cultivated in many places from southern Canada to Mexico.
Why bother with the truth when pushing your agenda, what with so many mouthbreathing pinko® willing to swallow your BS whole?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{The do-nothing Democrats- The Democrats’ latest report card came last week in a Gallup Poll that showed their job-approval ratings had sunk to 29 percent, several points below even President Bush’s low job-approval numbers, which Gallup said were “holding steady” at 33 percent since April. Democratic strategists and independent pollsters say their party will pay a political price in next year’s elections if they cannot show the American people they can do the nation’s business.}}}
You’re gonna hate 08®.
{{{Public perceptions are everything in congressional politics, and the voters see a Congress more interested in grilling administration officials in politicized hearings in an effort to embarrass the White House and ambush senior Bush advisers.}}}
You know what I mean?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{It is particularly troubling for a conservative to watch Obama speak, because it is clear how naive his views are and how dangerous their policy implications. He said he has spoken to terrorism experts who have told him that there are only about 10,000 committed terrorists, and the rest are people facing hardship, or being educated in madrassas that teach hate. “That environment allows the hardcore terrorists to recruit,” Obama said.}}}
Snowflake is admitting that he knows there are only 10,000 terrorists but yet he wants to flee from them.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this
{{{Jimmy Carter couldn’t carry George W. Bush’s water bucket, let alone Tony Blair’s. It’s a special kind of egomania he possesses, one that seems to grow in inverse proportion to both his advancing years — when some men might speak in lower tones — and to his record as president, about which others might not speak at all.}}}
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{Lebanese troops tightened a siege of a Palestinian refugee camp Monday where a shadowy group suspected of ties to Al Qaeda was holed up, pounding the camp with artillery a day after the worst eruption of violence since the end of the country’s civil war.}}}
Looks like the sniveling Coward democrats are the only friends Al Qaeda has left in the world.
Let’s give them another non binding resolution of love, y’all, pick up them spirits.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
Look at the things that sniveling Coward liberals look for in their candidates:
{{{Any day now, Michelle Obama’s handlers will have her glued into one of those Sunday-go-to-meeting Baptist grandma crown hats while smiling vapidly for hours at a time. When, of course, she’s not staring moonstruck, Ã la Nancy Reagan, at her moon doggie god-husband who’s not one bit smarter than she is.}}}
You think these people spend much time wondering about national security and the economy?
In between episodes of Oprah maybe?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Mrs. Godzilla
May 21, 2007 8:09 AM | Link to this
This poor performing student needs to be expelled.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 8:09 AM | Link to this
If a revolution is waiting to happen, it is among black voters. And it is in the direction of conservatism. More and more blacks are getting it that the root of the problems in their communities flow from values — family breakdown, promiscuity, drugs, crime and education. Whereas nine in 10 blacks still vote for Democrats, in the 2006 Pew survey, 19 percent of black voters said they considered themselves part of the “religious right.”
And growing.
{{{Now remember that “progressive” is today’s code word for “liberal.” Suggesting that this increasingly defines today’s evangelicals tells us more about the wishful hallucinations of left-wing journalists than reality.}}}
They want your votes, no doubt about that, they just don’t want your values.
You’re gonna hate 08®.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 8:11 AM | Link to this
to North Georgia — haven’t exactly thrived, even with mulch, extra water and the protective shade of surrounding pecan trees.
The summer heat has taken its toll on them, year after year, draining them of vitality. According to the National Arbor Day Society, they’re probably victims of a warming climate, with too many hot days making them an exotic species in a region they once symbolized
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this
Reid’s plan to block Bush’s recess appointments. “Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has a little trick up his sleeve that could spell an end to President Bush’s devilish recess appointments of controversial figures like former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton.” U.S. News reports
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 8:18 AM | Link to this
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 291
By ron
May 21, 2007 8:22 AM | Link to this
Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are scary people,and so is George Bush.America is about leaderless and I don't see anyone in the near future taking over the helm that I would be willing to follow far. None of the current crop of presidential candidates can do anything to make me vote for them,the only thing they can possibly do is to make me not vote for them.By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 8:26 AM | Link to this
{{{By IN THE NEWS May 21, 2007 8:11 AM to North Georgia — haven’t exactly thrived, even with mulch, extra water and the protective shade of surrounding pecan trees. The summer heat has taken its toll on them, year after year, draining them of vitality.}}}
Blah, blah, blah, Jay Kookman, “climate expert,” blah, blah, blah.
Freaking pandering little goony.
What about the drought, you reckon that has anything to do with it?
Or maybe EVERYTHING to do with it?
Dullards.
And before you mouth breathers start blaming the drought on “global warming,” check the record books and see all of the droughts we’ve had for the last couple centuries.
You pinko®s are grasping for straws with this “global warming” bullsh-it, and we uncover every lie as soon as you tell them.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By @@
May 21, 2007 8:33 AM | Link to this
Dang ml, did you take classes to learn to draw ^^^ THAT poorly?
[Speaking of Barak Obama….]http://patriotpost.us/alexander/edition.asp?id=532)
(((With the next presidential election still 18 months out, the mainstream media (MSM) are advising conservative candidates to take a cue from the electorate and be more “centrist” in their views. But is the media’s estimation of “the political center” the same as that of the electorate? Just how biased are the political metrics the media relies upon to analyze electoral contests?)))
The current banter about this political center has its origin with Bill Clinton’s political strategist Dick Morris, who fabricated the 1990s technique of “triangulation” for his client. He did so on the bet that a centrist straddle, or at least the appearance of one (fake right — run left), would lift Clinton above liberal and conservative partisanship.)))
(((So what does the media mean by “political center” now — as they call for greater moderation and bewail the loss of civility due to the major parties’ divisive political views?)))
(((Further, what, exactly, is a “centrist” approach to our war with Jihadistan? Thwarting one jihadi plot for every terrorist attack that succeeds? Funding the troops one month but not the next?)))
(((So, is the center a place … or a ploy? Left-elites in the media endeavor to substitute their ostensibly enlightened policy preferences for the benighted views of most Americans, and they are astute at propagating these views. One of their most effective and subversive tools is the use of media polling to drive, rather than reflect, public opinion.)))
(((Ronald Reagan understood that the Leftmedia’s zeitgeist, the belief system providing the lens through which they perceive reality, was dark. Thus, their notion of centrism was badly skewed; so Reagan talked over the top of political and media talkingheads, addressing the American people directly. That was his genius.)))
They fooled me once with Bill Clinton and he delivered Osama, so it’s a NO THANKS on Obama.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 8:35 AM | Link to this
News: THE MAY-THE-OSTRICHES-DROWN-FIRST AWARD FOR GLOBAL WARMING DENIAL
By Let's Face It
May 21, 2007 8:37 AM | Link to this
George Dumbya Bush is an emotionally crippled drunken sociopath, like most of the people that voted for him. Luckodull is the perfect example of the Bush voter.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 8:39 AM | Link to this
Frankly, if all it takes to turn illegal aliens into good honest Americans is for this bunch of Washington weasels to wave their magic wand, I have another small job in mind for them. How about if they grant amnesty to every criminal in America? After all, don’t we want to bring these fugitives out of the shadows? Many of them, after all, are the fathers of children who are American citizens. I mean, do we really want to split up families by sending these hard-working burglars, bilkers and bank robbers, off to jail?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Just becauseI said so, na, na, na
May 21, 2007 8:42 AM | Link to this
By Let’s Face It
May 21, 2007 8:37 AM | Link to this
George Dumbya Bush is an emotionally crippled drunken sociopath, like most of the people that voted for him. Luckodull is the perfect example of the Bush voter.
Where’s the beef?
By Jesus
May 21, 2007 8:50 AM | Link to this
IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!!
By gadem
May 21, 2007 8:50 AM | Link to this
Let’s use Dull’s reasoning skills… 1.) if it rains then there is no drought. 2.) If there are no trees, there would be no wildfires.
By the stopper
May 21, 2007 8:53 AM | Link to this
“Luckodull is the perfect example of the Bush voter.”
Not fair. I’d wager that close to a majority of “Bush voters”, would not vote for Bush again if given the opportunity.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 8:56 AM | Link to this
It is now clear that United States attorneys were pressured to act in the interests of the Republican Party, and lost their job if they failed to do so. The firing offenses of the nine prosecutors who were purged last year were that they would not indict Democrats, they investigated important Republicans, or they would not try to suppress the votes of Democratic-leaning groups with baseless election fraud cases
By @@
May 21, 2007 9:03 AM | Link to this
Sometimes ‘ya just gotta do whatcha gotta do…politics be damned!!!
(((Pakistani authorities on Sunday apparently delayed an operation to wrest control of Islamabad’s Red Mosque and two associated seminaries from rogue mullahs and their followers.)))
(((Despite the mobilization, authorities have played down the idea of an operation. Such assurances notwithstanding, the belligerence of the mullahs is such that an operation will likely take place sooner or later. In fact, both the information minister and interior minister told the media that the government has spared no efforts to reach a negotiated settlement with the mullahs, but now has been forced to adopt a tougher line. Both ministers said the government can no longer tolerate the behavior of the renegade clerics.)))
(((This weekend’s flare-up comes after students from the seminary associated with the Red Mosque kidnapped four policemen May 18, then demanded a prisoner exchange for eleven of their associates who were in the custody of the authorities. On Saturday, the militants released two of the policemen, and authorities released two students on Sunday. These conciliatory gestures aside, there appears to be a growing consensus within the government that the regime has no choice but to put its foot down and deal harshly with the mullahs.)))
(((Moreover, the government is hoping the move will go over well with the public, because there is broad public support for cracking down against Talibanizing forces.)))
By Beef? I prefer Fish...
May 21, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this
I’m Andi, I don’t like beef. My favorite is fish.
Trouser trout, of course.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this
{{{By gadumb May 21, 2007 8:50 AM Let’s use Dull’s reasoning skills… 1.) if it rains then there is no drought. 2.) If there are no trees, there would be no wildfires.}}}
Yes, I know that gadumb is one of the most crippled dimwits in all of the fever swamps, but I sure would like to know when I said any of that^^.
The only time I mentioned drought is because you “global warming” goonies are trying to blame the forest fires on it, when everybody knows the trees are burning because of the drought.
No water, duh.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this
I agree with stopper - the intelligent people among those who voted for Bush would take their vote back if given the opportunity.
I believe Let’s Face It may have meant to say “Luckodull is the perfect example of the Bush supporter.”
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this
Just in case you mouthbreathers don’t believe me:
{{{THE PRIMARY HAZARD WILL BE THE COMBINATION AND CONTINUATION OF VERY DRY FUELS FROM THE RECENT LACK OF RAINFALL AND LOW RELATIVE HUMIDITIES. THESE FACTORS WILL COMBINE TO RESULT IN CONTINUED HIGH FIRE DANGER POTENTIAL ACROSS ALL OF NORTH AND CENTRAL GEORGIA.- National Weather Service.}}}
Duh.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull has really gotten it right this morning.
A Democratic led Congress is “losing it”.
Jimmy Carter is “losing it”.
Obama is “losing it”.
Palestine is “losing it”.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 9:15 AM | Link to this
It’s bad enough that the federal government has yet to take the threat of global warming seriously, but it borders on malfeasance for it to block the efforts of states such as California and Connecticut that are trying to protect the public’s health and welfare.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this
Little more than a year ago, al-Qaida’s core command was thought to be in a financial crunch. But U.S. officials said cash shipped from Iraq has eased those troubles. “Iraq is a big moneymaker for them,” a senior U.S. counterterrorism official said.
Our occupation of Iraq is helping Al Qaeda. Bush is helping Al Qaeda. And every member of Congress, Republican and Democrat, who continues to support this war is helping Al Qaeda. We already knew this The CIA determined a long time ago that Iraq had become the newest and best training ground for Al Qaeda in the world, but now we discover that our occupation has also replenished Al Qaeda’s finances.
The Republicans have literally enabled Al Qaeda so that they are better able to kill our troops, and our civilians, in Iraq, Afghanistan and at home. When is the Republican noise machine going to start defending America instead of defending their failed president?
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this
Ain’t it the truth?
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 9:26 AM | Link to this
Notice how the true Conservatives are the only ones voicing opposition to the “immigration amnesty bill?”
And look at what side Bush is on, he’s supporting the Surrender Sisters Reid and Pelosi, he’s full in their camp on this one.
Perfect example of why his approval rating is almost as low as the democrat Congresses is.
Bush is a freaking liberal.
That’s why we don’t approve of him.
Duh.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 9:31 AM | Link to this
Matter of fact, I got a new classification for “Cons” like Bush, McCain and Schwarzennegger, kind of along the lines of the “Compassionate Conservative” label.
Let’s from now on call them “Confused Conservatives.”
It’s a lot nicer name than what I first thought of.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By GPayne
May 21, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull is a perfect example of the Bush-licking rednecks that support the last 6 years disasterous years. By the way regular gas is now over $3 a gallon in Georgia.
By Lickodull
May 21, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this
I adore President Bush.
I pledge him my undying loyalty.
From my knees of course.
Right in front of his zipper.
Yum.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®
By Mike
May 21, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this
GPayne -
It is sad that you can’t make an argument with resorting to childish (and lame) name calling. It is sad to see so many liberals who are so intolerant of folks who dont share their very narrow views. Isn’t that what guys have been demonizing Falwell for?
That being said, let me know what the $3 per gallon price has to do with “Bush-licking rednecks”. You don’t seem to have even a rudimentary grasp of what drives gas prices.
Please educate us rednecks.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this
Linkin Park steps up to the plate
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
Granting a “path to citizenship” to millions of immigration criminals already here and millions of their relatives back home (who will be allowed to join their illegal alien point men in America under this bill) will do as much to discourage further illegal immigration as granting car thieves a path to ownership would do to discourage future auto theft.
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{By GPayne May 21, 2007 9:33 AM LuckoDull is a perfect example of the Bush-licking rednecks that support the last 6 years disasterous years. By the way regular gas is now over $3 a gallon in Georgia.}}}
Does this mean we can drill in ANWR now, dullard, or are you sniveling Coward liberals still worried it might frighten the Caribou?
And are you tax and spend government gluttons willing to give up your 50 cents a gallon cut?
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Let's Face It
May 21, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this
If you are dumb enough to have voted for this moron, you are completely undeserving of any respect.
You are part of the problem, Mikey boy. GFY, idjit.
Besides, you can’t edumacate a redneck.
Too dense, too stupid, too superstitious, too ignorant, too inbred.
By @@
May 21, 2007 9:49 AM | Link to this
Mark Steyn had a great piece on the “amnesty” bill for illegal immigrants.
The “unforeseen circumstances” were the result of “political correctness” forced on this country by the left.
How many times have the conservatives here been called “racist bigots” by the liberals because we wanted immigration laws enforced in this country.
I’m usually one of those people who is slow to react, but I saw this immigration “fiasco” coming long before it became a political football. Oddly enough I saw Osama on the horizon as well.
So why is it the leftists saw neither as a threat to our national security and sovereignty?
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 9:52 AM | Link to this
Then only thing I’m going to miss after ‘08 is Mike’s great hilarious pictures of bush.
By @@
May 21, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this
Oops!!!! I guess I should have used the PC term “undocumented workers”.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 9:56 AM | Link to this
FROM THE PRESIDENTIAL WANNA BE WEBSITES:
THE GOP FIRST……
MCCAIN: “Along with his commitment to clean air and water, and to conserving open space, he has been a leader on the issue of global warming with the courage to call the nation to action on an issue we can no longer afford to ignore.”
ROMNEY: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
GUILIANI: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
PAUL: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
BROWNBACK: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
HUCKABEE: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
GILMORE: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
HUNTER: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
TANCREDO: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
TOMMY THOMPSON: NO MENTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
By Mike
May 21, 2007 9:56 AM | Link to this
Let’s Face It -
So you are trying to hide the fact that you really don’t know anything about the subjects that you discuss because anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a redneck who can’t be educated?
Wow, that is some argument! You win. Hands down.
Can any of the Bush-hating folks explain to me why “rednecks” are responsible for $3 gas? You get an extra credit if you can string together a paragraph without calling someone a name (something you would never do if you weren’t anonymous in your house.)
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this
Mike: I noticed how you presented your argument in a clear, well thought out manner based on facts and how you did’t resort to calling your opponent a f-ag or screaming that he suc-ks the Senate Majority Leader’s di-ck.
You must not be a liberal.
By the way, hpayne, LFI and lickodull are the same troll, it’s Polly the AJC Approved® blog disease, their only hope against the Conservative wave of truth.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this
Then only thing I’m going to miss after ‘08 is Mike’s great hilarious pictures of bush.
By big, Big, BIG REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
May 21, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this
LuckoDull @ 9:20- “Bush is a freaking liberal.”
That’s no surprise, anybody left of Lester Maddox is a ‘liberal’ to LuckoDoll! But he’s absolutely right about Republican type conservatives, they’re all liberal free spenders, and pro-immigration monkeys who want to expand the reach of big, Big, BIG REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT into your bedroom, your postbox, your computer, and anywhere else the pussywhipped American public will allow them to.
After they cow everyone else into fawning servitude, then Republicans can get about their real business of redistributing our hard earned tax dollars to their good ole buddies in big, Big, BIG BUSINESS faster than Mark Foley can hump a Congressional pageboy!
By @@
May 21, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this
Well, it looks like Musharraf went ahead and bit the bullet.
(((About 40 Islamic students were arrested May 21 in Pakistan after attempting to enter Islambad’s Red Mosque to support students from the mosque’s seminary who have held two police officers hostage since May 18. Four officers were originally captured, but two were released May 19 after three students who had been detained by intelligence officials were released.)))
Good for him.
By The Watcher
May 21, 2007 10:00 AM | Link to this
Cindy, If we get lucky we will be able to see Mike draw cartoons about Bush’s impeachment, indictment and then incarceration.
By MM
May 21, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this
Immigration became a major problem under the Bush administration and Republican congress. They allowed illegals to come into this country in hordes in order for their rich friends to be able to hire super-cheap labor.
And what was their argument? “Well, nobody in this country wants these low paying jobs”.
And you rightwingnuts are blaming the liberals?
BS
By Mike
May 21, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this
big, Big, BIG REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT -
Well that is some analysis. All Republicans are bad people who seek to fleece the all others.
Gosh, what a fountain of intellect we find here on this board.
This is just a place for people to come and say outrageous nonsense that they would never say in person. Pathetic.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this
AND NOW FOR THE DEMS
CLINTON: “Hillary recognizes that global climate change is one of the most pressing moral issues of our time. She supports policies to reduce carbon emissions and other pollution that contribute to global warming.”
OBAMA: “We need to take steps to stop catastrophic, manmade climate change. If we do not act, the consequences will be devastating for future generations, especially for the poorest global populations. Barack Obama believes the U.S. must act decisively and creatively to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.”
EDWARDS: “To protect our future, John Edwards believes that Americans must be patriotic about something other than the war. We must act now by investing in clean, renewable energies like wind, solar, and biofuels to create a new energy economy, developing a new generation of efficient cars and trucks, and putting new energy-saving technologies to work in buildings, transportation, and industry”
BIDEN: “Joe Biden supports a “cap and trade” approach to regulating emissions and investment in technologies that can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
DODD: “The Plan: 1. Reduce 80 percent of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. ………”
GRAVEL: “Senator Gravel believes that global climate change is a matter of national security. As President, he will act swiftly to reduce America’s carbon footprint in the world bypassing legislation that caps emissions.”
KUCINICH: “The EPA under the Bush Administration has stood for Every Polluter’s Ally. The air and the water and the land are viewed by this administration as just another commodity to be used for private profit”
RICHARDSON: “I have been honored to be recognized as an Environmental Leader of the Year by the National Environmental Trust, the National Wildlife Federation, and Vanity Fair magazine for our work in New Mexico. The very first piece of legislation I passed as a young Congressman was to protect and create a new wilderness area in northwestern New Mexico. As President, I will do even more to protect our environment, just like we did in New Mexico.”
By It's a no-brainer
May 21, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this
Mostly rednecks vote for Bush —-> Bush creates an economic atmosphere that encourages gouging by big business (including big oil who have enjoyed record profits under Bush) —-> hence rednecks, in effect, cause high gas prices.
By @@
May 21, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this
Well, here in America we have the “pro-choice” leftists, but in China they have the “pro-choice” farmers…
(((Thousands of farmers in China’s south protested the country’s “one-child” family planning policy, residents said May 21. Farmers demonstrated at up to four township governments in Guangxi province, clashing with local police during at least one demonstration. The protests took place May 18-19 in response to newly instated “family planning” work teams that had been dispatched to the area earlier in the month to fine families found in violation of the government’s population planning policies.)))
Good for them!!!!!
By getalife
May 21, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this
Homer explains the liberal media
Family Guy went back in time with Al Gore as President.
Great stuff.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this
Mike - I must assume you are including your friends RW-(the original), Dusty, @@ and Buy Danish among those who come and say outrageous nonsense that they would never say in person.
Especially the name calling.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this
Ah man, now w is a liberal.
Do tell Andy.
Geez.
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this
I don’t know that global warming is caused by man, but when a million year old iceberg disintigrates and a 6000 year old ice shelf collapses I have to wonder if there isn’t some man made assistance. Why didn’t they go last warming cycle? If in fact we did work toward reducing the gases, pollutions, etc. what would it hurt? Certainly not the environment.
By big, Big, BIG REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
May 21, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this
[Mike @10:02- “This is just a place for people to come and say outrageous nonsense that they would never say in person. Pathetic.”](http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2007/05/20/georges_report.html#comment-12543220
Hey Mike, your catching on quick. Don’t know bout anybody else but I say the same outrageous nonsense in person as well. LMAO.
Anybody that takes blogging or simple conversation over-seriously, needs intensive therapy in a rubber room. This is also a place to read a few chuckles on an otherwise uneventful Monday morning. Get a grip, Mikie, your whining is ‘pathetic’.
By Let's Face It
May 21, 2007 10:20 AM | Link to this
Mike, I assume like most rednecks you settle your arguments violently whenever possible. The redneck in the White House is one of your ilk, a stupid arrogant POS who gets others to fight for him.
I am not afraid of defending myself in a fair fight with the likes of you, but I would have to assume, given your redneck heritage, that you would either shoot me in the back, or bring a crowd of like-minded yahoos that you could easily cajole into a lynchmob.
Gutter trash like you is not worth a single drop of my blood, although I would urinate on you, unless of course you were on fire, when it might put out the flame.
By Let's Face It
May 21, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this
Mike, I assume like most rednecks you settle your arguments violently whenever possible. The redneck in the White House is one of your ilk, a stupid arrogant POS who gets others to fight for him.
I am not afraid of defending myself in a fair fight with the likes of you, but I would have to assume, given your redneck heritage, that you would either shoot me in the back, or bring a crowd of like-minded yahoos that you could easily cajole into a lynchmob.
Gutter trash like you is not worth a single drop of my blood, although I would urinate on you, unless of course you were on fire, when it might put out the flame.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this
{{{By getalife May 21, 2007 10:14 AM Ah man, now w is a liberal. Do tell Andy.}}}
1) Offering amnesty to those who are in the country ILLEGALLY.
2) Passing this legislation even though it will increase the Federal Budget by TRILLIONS of dollars.
3) Passing this legislation even though it will expand the size of government.
4) Swamping our health care system, our school system, our roads, creating more smog and pollution.
These are all acts of a liberal, al-Gitmo.
Therefore I call Bush a liberal.
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®
By Clara
May 21, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this
MpeachW 10:11——Every one of the people you mention in your post come here and try to debate issues every day only to be called names by people like you that are incapable of reasoned debate. Even today you’re immediately accusing people that haven’t even posted of speaking nonsense and name calling. This board was much more enjoyable to read when people like you weren’t around.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this
{{{By Cindy May 21, 2007 10:16 AM I don’t know that global warming is caused by man, but when a million year old iceberg disintigrates and a 6000 year old ice shelf collapses I have to wonder if there isn’t some man made assistance. Why didn’t they go last warming cycle?}}}
Let’s see, the last warming cycle was 13,000 years ago, how do you know they weren’t melted?
Emotions guiding your thoughts and decisions makes you dull.
And gives you a stupid overwhelming urge to blame everything on man.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®
By Glub, Glub, Glub
May 21, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this
10:25- “Therefore I call Bush a liberal.”
Damn, another rat finally jumps ship!
By getalife
May 21, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this
My goodmess Andy,
Your hero Reagan did the same thing.
Was he a liberal too?
Do tell.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this
the former First Lady agrees with a recent Time magazine article by Karen Tumulty that noted, “The principles that propelled the [conservative] movement have either run their course, or run aground, or been abandoned by Reagan’s legatees.
By @@
May 21, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this
MM:
(((And you rightwingnuts are blaming the liberals?)))
Let’s visit the history of immigration in this country.
It was fed by the call for “diversity”, something the leftists promote before thinking about the consequences.
If business hadn’t given them jobs, you liberals would have been screaming “racism”, inhumane treatment, etc. etc. etc. Hell, you are making those claims today when it comes to “undocumented workers”.
There is plenty of blame to go around as far as the lack of “enforcement” on this one, but it’s origins can be attributed to the “progressive movement”.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 10:38 AM | Link to this
Rotten Peach,
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
How peachy! You’re singling me out, because HORRORS! I call you “rotten peach”? Your selective indignation is hilarious.
It’s impossible to take you seriously since you have not complained about a single one of your venemous foul mouthed comrades.
You are an insufferable phony. (OOPS I called you a name!!!).
By ABS
May 21, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this
Clara - Pot meet kettle. Yes, there is name calling from the left, but there is just as much from the neo-cons. And no, I’m not saying it’s right from either side.
Not only does the right name call as well, but now they’ve taken it upon themselves to dig up trash about people like Cindy to try and discredit her, and stalk people like me and rushncap and give out personal information.
This blog isn’t for entertainment purposes anymore, it’s become too personal.
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this
By the way, for all those who thought I invented “Ke-rist” (looking at you, Stalk), here’s proof otherwise. As a bonus, it makes fun of Falwell. I think we’ve waited long enough to slam the man.
By the way, when was the last time an AG been this incompetent?
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 10:42 AM | Link to this
I said I didn’t know it was caused by man. I simply have questions: if the last cycle was 13000 years ago, how did the million year old iceberg survive then and not now?
And you didn’t answer the question; what would it hurt to try to reduce our gases and polution?
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this
Clara - I have never referred to other posters here with disparaging names.
They, on the other hand, do quite frequently. Buy Danish and RW take great joy in calling names and bastardizing IDs for some twisted thrill.
You can’t have serious discourse when you start a post with (and I paraphrase) “Rotten Peach you freaking moron”.
By Clara
May 21, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this
ABS——I don’t intend to engage you on this as I much prefer to read and not post. As an uninvolved reader it is almost never the right that starts the mud slinging over here, but they are awfully good at finishing it.
How do people get personal information of yours on an anonymous blog? I think you may be a little paranoid.
Good Day!
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this
FACT: By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this
Mike - I must assume you are including your friends RW-(the original), Dusty, @@ and Buy Danish among those who come and say outrageous nonsense that they would never say in person.
Especially the name calling.
FICTION: How peachy! You’re singling me out, because HORRORS! I call you “rotten peach”? Your selective indignation is hilarious.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
Clara - check out Buy Danish’s 10:28.
Please tell me how I initiated that?
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this
Clara - Pardon me - I meant 10:38
By @@
May 21, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this
Good gawd! Would all you people get over your “sensitive selves”.
If you’ve got some substance to offer to the debate, overlook the “name-calling” and get into the debate.
It’s really very easy…
Boo Hoo Hoo Hoo!
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this
Now we’re taking our eye off the ball and arguing about name calling.
How ridiculous.
Let’s get back to the issues and stop the name calling and ID manipulation.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 11:02 AM | Link to this
Rotten Peach,
Isn’t it a bit difficult to have “serious discourse” with someone who uses the pseudonym “MpeachW”?
I refuse to use your moniker because repeating it effectively endorses your contemptible position.
By The Watcher
May 21, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
Clara, please go to the archives and do your homework.
Most every day there is this one guy who is the first poster….usually multiple posts…and they end with insults.
First up every day…..
After you review a few weeks worth come back and tell us who starts it.
By Lickodull
May 21, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this
I love George Dumbya Bush, because he is just like me.
A failure.
A total abject failure.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®
By Let's Face It
May 21, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this
Let’s call Buy Danish Bi Danish, since it is far more apt.
Her poor son, a an angry fat b-utch bi-tch for a mother…
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this
Buy Danish - you refuse to use my chosen ID so naturally you must choose one that insults.
As I said before - how juvenile.
I hope Clara is watching.
By Eric
May 21, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this
too bad miss andi won’t be around when the earth begins to sizzle.
By MM
May 21, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this
@@
Immigration is when someone enters the country legally.
Just so you know, I am a registered Independant. It’s too shameful to be a Republican or a Democrat.
Diversity makes me puke.
All illegals should be deported immediately.
By Eric
May 21, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this
too bad miss andi won’t be around when the earth begins to sizzle.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this
Rotten Peach,
I’m going to call you a few more names:
Boring, whiny, juvenile, hypocritical, phony, and sanctimonious.
Shall I continue?
Really, what do you want me to do? Call you “Sweet Georgia Peach”?
Fugedaboutit.
By @@
May 21, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this
Damn, I’m beginning to think there is one “leftist” poster in here talking to itself under multiple IDs just so it can prolong a discussion on political discourse and name-calling.
Aaarrrrggghhhh, you leftists waste everyone’s time on here with your “tender sensibilities”.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this
How many American can break the law, not pay taxes and demand amnesty for these crimes?
The next time you are pulled over for speeding, tell the officer you demand amnesty.
Geez.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this
I see Clara has no defense for her claims after seeing Buy Danish’s little tirade.
Typical.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this
Better yet, since they waste so much money, lets all not pay taxes and demand amnesty.
Geez.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this
“I know you’re not supposed to speak ill of the dead, but I think we can make an exception because speaking ill of the dead was kind of Jerry Falwell’s hobby.” -Bill Maher
By getalife
May 21, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this
All Americans locked up should demand amnesty.
Geez.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
Watching Bush’s final press conference with Tony Blair was painful, but it’s nothing like the pain he’ll likely feel when Gordon Brown takes the reins next month. This isn’t new news for Bush, as Brown will merely be continuing Blair’s plan to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq as announced earlier this year. Blair will likely get a pass, but the White House is already starting to frame the issue by suggesting that a pullout of British troops would be a political stunt by Brown. Brown will be seeking an early bump in the polls.
How long until the right wingers start pulling a “French” on the British?
By Observer
May 21, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
Ole Jimmy, by far the worst president of the 20th century, passing judgment of the foreign policy of another president is like a French teacher passing judgment on how a Calculus teacher is performing in the classroom. It’s just a non-sequitor. Typical, Ole Jimmy is just desperately looking for a legacy other than abject failure.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this
[George W. Bush’s Report Card]http://fixco1.com/bushreportcard.html)
By Monitor
May 21, 2007 11:27 AM | Link to this
It appears some readers support the paid trolls over the average joe.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
This just in, OBL demands amnesty for Al Queda.
See where I am going with this?
Geez.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
Doctors claim that Lincoln would survive his wounds today:
A group of University of Maryland experts state that “If he had lived he would at the very least have been partially blind, unsteady on his feet, numb in certain regions of his body and inarticulate. In other words, thanks to the many stunning advances in medical science, a gunshot wound to the head merely turns Abraham Lincoln into George W. Bush.”
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
@@, get over yourself. You’re not nearly as great as you have convinced yourself you are.
By Observer
May 21, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this
MM - may I ask in what state do you live? Many states in the South don’t have registration by party. Here in Georgia we just vote in the primary of our choice when election time runs around.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this
‘Axis of Evil’ Report Card
By @@
May 21, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this
Getalife:
Are you in jail down there in New Orleans?
I’ll be more than happy to put up your bail, but I’ll have to DEMAND that you give up your green feather dusters.
(Insert smile here)
By Midori
May 21, 2007 11:30 AM | Link to this
MpeachW,
I wonder if the wingnuts will start calling them “tea-sipping surrender monkeys”?
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this
Observer makes a convincing case for tough child abuse / child endangerment laws. There is no telling what happened to him in his childhood, but it’s obvious that it was bad.
By mountain man
May 21, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this
Jimmy Carter has equivocated on his characterization of Dumbya as the “worst presidence in history” in terms of international relationships by stating that his statement was “careless”. Careless, hell, its the damn truth, Jimmy, and you need to stick to your guns!
I get tired of reading the rantings of this fool Luckodull every time I open this blog. The state insane asylum really shouldn’t be giving internet access to patients during all hours of the night and day. Its not in their best interests therapeutically.
Some day they’re gonna release Luckodull and he’s going to hurt or kill someone.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this
Midori 11:28
That was FUNNY!
By Monitor
May 21, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this
It appears some readers support the paid trolls over the average joe.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this
Once again, it is that time of year when we update the parents of our students on their child’s progress, and we regret to inform you that your son, Georgie, is not doing as well as we’d hoped and expected when he embarked on his four-year program at our school
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this
Human-Rights Watchdog: “D” on George W. Bush’s Report Card
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this
Economic Report Card of George W. Bush: D Minus
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 11:38 AM | Link to this
These comments -
{{{By Observer
May 21, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
Ole Jimmy, by far the worst president of the 20th century, passing judgment of the foreign policy of another president is like a French teacher passing judgment on how a Calculus teacher is performing in the classroom. It’s just a non-sequitor. Typical, Ole Jimmy is just desperately looking for a legacy other than abject failure. }}}
{{{By Observer
May 21, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this
MM - may I ask in what state do you live? Many states in the South don’t have registration by party. Here in Georgia we just vote in the primary of our choice when election time runs around. )}}
Provoke this response -
{{{By rushncap
May 21, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this
Observer makes a convincing case for tough child abuse / child endangerment laws. There is no telling what happened to him in his childhood, but it’s obvious that it was bad.}}}
That^^^must be the sort of “science” that rushncap uses to justify his inclination to believe the Global Warming hysterics.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this
George W. Bush’s Report Card
By @@
May 21, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this
Although I have made “the personal” choice to ignore any posts that rushncap addresses to me; I am taking this rare but “frequent” opportunity to explain something to him.
What “YOU” think of me rushncap has NOTHING to do with what I think of myself, but your constant “whining” about how much “I” think of myself clearly indicates your “lack of self-confidence”.
I can’t help you with that rushncap.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this
WoooHoooo
Talk about being sensitive!!
Jimmy Carter has now “cut-n-run” from his derogatory statements about President Bush. Said it wasn’t anything personal. Oh yes…
Poor ol’ Carter. Can’t forget that he’s a Democrat who was not elected again after four years of ineffectual leadership.
Just like Gore who can’t forget that he couldn’t get elected at all. Went and got himself a new banner to run with…the environment.
For lack of any other goal, Democrats now add a green banner to their big white one.
Liberal logos: Retreat from Iraq!! Retreat from icebergs!! It’s Neat to Retreat! We can Beat with Retreat!!
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 11:46 AM | Link to this
Well, at least we found Muffin’s strength, finally: non-sequiturs. Congratulations, Muffin.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this
Hilarious!
The FOX News GOP Debate in 45 Seconds
By @@
May 21, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this
Getalife:
Good golly, would you look at this from Stratfor…
(((Leaders of the U.S. Teamsters Union and other members of the Change to Win federation are set to meet with Chinese officials and the Chinese government-run All-China Federation of Trade Unions during a two-week visit to China that began May 21. The “solidarity-building” visit marks the official end of a boycott of China’s state-run labor federation by U.S. labor leaders. In addition to meetings, the U.S. labor representatives plan to conduct a collective bargaining seminar.)))
The “Teamsters” are in cahoots with China.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this
@@,
So is our government.
Pinkos!
Geez.
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this
Wal-Mart is China’s 4th largest trading partner.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 12:06 PM | Link to this
Surrendering Iraq to the Iraqis is laughable but shows how the gullible wingnuts like Dusty believes anything the gop spews.
Their government should vote on their Independence Day and name it before it collapses.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this
McCain pulls a “Cheney”
Nice family values this bunch exhibits. It’s no wonder the right wingers on this blog behave the way they do. They like that sort of thing.
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this
“Although” “@@” “does not realize” “it”, “her every post” “drips with” “her adoration” “of herself”, “and” “her conviction” “that she is superior” “to everyone else” “is completely” “apparent”. “No one else” “is buying” “it”.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this
Rotten Peach,
Oh, the outrage! rushncap is a “name caller”! He called me “Muffin”.
Should I begin to whine like a mewling infant about now?
By Midori
May 21, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this
Across South, Democrats open wallets
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this
getalife,
You have already surrendeded to your afternoon “relaxer” so don’t worry about retreat. Go fight an iceberg.
MpeachW,
Has the DNC hired you to replace “Goldie”? You seem to spout the same liberal stuff post after post. Just wondering.
rushncap, the “intellectual” sap,
Stick with physics. Study the inclined plane. Take a hike. Your cute little insults get tiresome. Go insult Luckovich who is now drawing ugly pictures of Bush’s mother. Now that is worth an insult.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 12:32 PM | Link to this
Sorry Dusty - as soon as I can find some conservative stuff I can agree with I’ll spout some of that too.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 12:32 PM | Link to this
{{{{{Go insult Luckovich who is now drawing ugly pictures of Bush’s mother.}}}}}}}}
they are so life-like. right down to the pearls.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this
I’ve found an even better picture of Barbara Bush
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 12:36 PM | Link to this
Impeach Gonzales. Robert Greenwald’s Brave New Foundation is airing a new online video that calls for the House Judiciary Committee to begin impeachment proceedings against Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this
{{{By Glub, Glub, Glub May 21, 2007 10:34 AM 10:25- “Therefore I call Bush a liberal.” Damn, another rat finally jumps ship! By getalife May 21, 2007 10:34 AM My goodmess Andy, Your hero Reagan did the same thing. Was he a liberal too? Do tell.}}}
I guess it does seem strange to liberals to see a political party that isn’t made up of a bunch of partisan hack goonies that all say exactly the same thing.
Diversify, you dimwits, try tossing around differing opinions, discuss the varying viewpoints instead of monitoring the DU waiting for new talking points to be released.
Yeah, right, hahahahahahahahahah, puh-leeze.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
{{{By mountain girl May 21, 2007 11:31 AM I get tired of reading the rantings of this fool Luckodull every time I open this blog.}}}
Poor wittle mountain girl, doesn’t it just break your heart, sniff, sniff.
Why, I’ll ave to be more pinko® like from now on, wittle thing, I wouldn’t want you feeling put upon.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this
No Andy,
It is strange you calling w and Reagan liberals.
Geez.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this
Fox News and the Liberal Media
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this
The Christian Right’s Fear of Pleasure is Our Greatest Threat to Choice
By Chris
May 21, 2007 1:00 PM | Link to this
War rages in Lebanon. More of alcoholic Bush’s crazed meddling.
By Lord Help Us
May 21, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this
How about some of you wingnuts tell us what ‘conservative’ candidate you would like to see get the GOP nomination. (and why)
I’ve seen you guys endorse Giuliani, but Rudy’s even more liberal than George Bush or Ronald Reagan.
Is Romney a ‘conservative?’
What about McCain?
ARE there ANY viable ‘conservative’ candidates?
I wonder why…
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this
Conservative candidate avoids Iraq talk. Jim Whitehead (R), a former Georgia state senator running in the special election to succeed the late Rep. Charlie Norwood, is making a concerted effort to avoid discussing the war, claiming “Iraq has not been a big thing in our district“
By Willie
May 21, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this
How many GI’s slaughtered uselessly this past weekend? Belive the number is 15 since Friday. The SURGE is working - everywhere but for/by Americans. Is that somehow a surprise to you Repug filth?
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this
LHU, I too have been watching and wondering who the neocons, RW, BD, @@, Dusty, Andy, etc. will back in the Republican primary. Will be interesting.
By Clark
May 21, 2007 1:23 PM | Link to this
Goon, you ask “What is Romney.” He’s a Mormon. I had the misfortune to be sentenced corporately to 4 years in Salt Lake City.And learned well the vicious hatred that dwelled neath the masks of those quiet, smiling faces. An experience never to/should be forgotten. Even those you think may be “normal” have that goose-stepping indoctrination seared into their souls. Not a pretty sight or fact.
By Lord Help Us
May 21, 2007 1:23 PM | Link to this
Cindy, I think it is hilarious…
All of the viable GOP candidates have stated positions on issues that would have them lumped into the pinko, lieral, coward, etc. category on this blog.
I just wonder why there isn’t a viable ‘conservative’ candidate that would meet with approval from the trolls that prowl this blog…
Maybe it’s because the wingnuts here represent a radical, fringe component of the GOP…not even close to mainstream American…just a theory.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this
{{{By Cindy May 21, 2007 1:10 PM LHU, I too have been watching and wondering who the neocons, RW, BD, @@, Dusty, Andy, etc. will back in the Republican primary.}}}
Maybe next year, when we actually start getting close to the “Republican primary,” we’ll share that information with you.
Until then, let us relax and enjoy the next 8 months of democrat bungling, misrule and sheer ineptitude, after that we can decide who will represent us in our 2008 cakewalk.
You know what I mean?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this
TSA Confiscates Congressman’s Last Meal During Food Stamp Challenge
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this
“…after that we can decide who will represent us in our 2008 cakewalk.”
Don’t you mean perp walk? :-)
By SarahConnah
May 21, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this
Thing I love about Mike’s toon is he always captures the Bushie’s features perfectly!
Curtsie!
By Midori
May 21, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this
{{{Until then, let us relax and enjoy the next 8 months of democrat bungling, misrule and sheer ineptitude}}}}
that anything like the severe Republican bungling, misrule and sheer ineptitude when they ran Congress these past years?
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this
MpeachW,
You will never find anything good about conservatives in DNC material. Try reading something else.
Chris,
Please explain what Bush has to do with the conflict in Lebanon.
Lord Help Us (amd I hope he does),
Before we talk about conservative candidates for the presidency, how about a review of the DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM for 2008? I mean besides the present presentment of retreat and the current investigation of everything that is not Democratic.
You liberals are so interested in Republican candidates. Are you planning to vote for them?
Midori,
Drawing an ugly picture of someone’s mother is considered the lowest form of “humor”. Was your mother a bit “funny”?
By @@
May 21, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this
LHU:
Looking at the GOP candidates right now, I’d support Giuliani. For me, his explanations for his political stances as they relate to social issues are well founded. He’s a strict constitutionalist and federalist. He’ll let the courts rule, but does not want Supreme Court justices who legislate based on their ideaology.
That’s a refreshing change over what’s been promoted from the left for 30+ years.
He’s a big fan of ALL the “conservative” justices. He is well-versed on the law and how it is SUPPOSED to function.
He’s a student of religious philosophy and understands well, the threat of extremists within the Islamic faith.
He is big on national defense.
I also agree with Ron Paul as to his stance on NATO and the U.N., but I’m not so naive as to think that we can live isolated from the world around us. I would opt to bring about changes in the U.N. rather than pull out of it altogether.
If I was going to vote Democratic, which I’m not, I would go for Richardson. He is diverse in his experience. He, at least, has the gonads to stand firm on his platform rather than trying to have it both ways like Hillary and Obama.
The elections are a long way off, and there’s much to learn from the GOP candidates. I don’t think we’ll be seeing too much pressure put on the Democratic candidates to answer honestly.
They want to “pick and choose” who asks them the questions. They don’t want to sit on the “hot seat” that is FOX news. That’s very telling to me.
I’m outta here.
By Red Skull
May 21, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this
F^ckoDull,
You’re exactly right, and when you losers finally leave the White House, I’ll be in your face to tell you “I told you so.”
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this
LuckoDull,
Ann Coulter once said that she would like a 2 Party system where George Bush was the opposition. I love Ann!
:)*
Cindy,
I like Guiliani, Romney and Thompson and would be delighted with anyone of them.
Cheers*!
*Rotten Peach - Note my happy, happy, happy posts. Hope you’re happy now.
Later…
By Midori
May 21, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
snap
crackle
POP!!
Your turn………
By SarahConnah
May 21, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this
Dusty, The drawing of Babs Bush was right on.
As my Momma use to say:
Beauty is skin deep but ugliness runs all the way to the bone. In Bab’s case, ugly was the mold.
Curtsie!
By getalife
May 21, 2007 1:45 PM | Link to this
More oversight will bring us more scandals.
Yes, lets sit back and enjoy the Waxman hearings.
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this
Actually, Dusty, I am following Rudy. His past has not shown him to be a neocon and he supports women’s rights. Although he showed leadership after 9/11, I think he was a little weak before and might have been riding the waves of tragedy like bush. There’s plenty of time to research.
But, I do like diversity; it would be great to have somebody other than another old white man in the white house.
By MM
May 21, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this
Registered in FL.
By Lord Help Us
May 21, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this
@@, I actually agree. (what are the odds?)
I would LOVE to see an election come down to Rudy on the GOP ticket vs. several of the Dems (Richardson and Biden being my Favs).
Don’t be fooled, Rudy is playing the conservative crowd like a fiddle…He will tack hard left once (if) he secures the GOP nomination.
With the above ticket, the country would be in a win-win situation.
Congress will stay in Dem control (by virtue of the seats that will be up for grabs in 2008).
The last 15 years have convinced me that our system of checks and balances works better when neither part controls both Executive and Legisllative branches of gov’t.
By @@
May 21, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this
Heeeyyyyy, I didn’t get to include Thompson since he hasn’t announced, but I’d definitely go with Fred.
Romney sounds great, but he’s beginning to remind me of “Slick Willy”.
I’m not too big on candidates who sound like career politicians.
You know…like Hillary, Obama and Edwards. Two “recycles” and a “newbie”.
Eeeeewwwwwwwww!!!!!!
So long…
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this
Well there you go. Buy Danish loves Ann Coulter. The most divisive, nasty, dishonest pundit out there. She has called on the killing of liberal politicians and NY Times reporters. Not to mention the outright lies in her books.
No wonder Buy Danish has no people skills.
By Apocalypse
May 21, 2007 1:59 PM | Link to this
Guys,
If Buy Danish say she’s leaving, then that also means @@ is gone. You may want to wait a while before posting.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this
Deryk Schlessinger - where did Dr. Laura go wrong? :-)
By Apocalypse
May 21, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this
Oops. Looks like she’s still here.
By In case anyone hadn't noticed
May 21, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this
MpeachW is the moron formerly known as Blackadder.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this
In case anyone hadn’t noticed - nice try but wrong as rain.
Care to offer proof?
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 2:10 PM | Link to this
Midori
Are you describing your brain or eating popcorn?
Sarah Connah,
No need to tell us about “ugly”. You’re here every day.
Cindy,
Your “diversity” seems somewhat limited. “Somebody other than an old white man in the White House” is what you posted as your choice for president.
That is not a standard for presidental candidates. That is bigotry.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 2:10 PM | Link to this
In case anyone hadn’t noticed - if not proof at least what lead you believe such a cockamamie idea.
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 2:14 PM | Link to this
In case anyone hadn’t noticed - …and just might you be? Why didn’t you sling that accusation using your real ID?
Because you’re wrong and you know it.
Nice fishing. Catch anything?
By Onslaught
May 21, 2007 2:15 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
Having nothing, and I mean, nothing but old white males as presidents in the past has been bigotry.
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this
Sure, Dusty, whatever you say. Any more sage advise for me today on what I should or shouldn’t do, or did you spend the past week coming up with that one and need another one to reload?
By Midori
May 21, 2007 2:19 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
I’m describing the stupid dribble that constantly emanates from your mouth.
By Apocalypse
May 21, 2007 2:20 PM | Link to this
If anyone wants to comment to Buy Danish, go ahead. She is still here in the form of Dusty.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this
Dusty’s life is filled with nothing but things old and white.
She/it refuses to come out of her/its “comfort zone”.
By In case anyone hadn't noticed
May 21, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this
2:08—2:10—2:14—Classic Blackadder
By getalife
May 21, 2007 2:30 PM | Link to this
Russert on the Daily Show said Rove and others refuse to come on his show.
Good interview.
By SarahConnah
May 21, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this
Dusty your personality is showing.
I posted nothing derogatory to you…but you did to me.
Shows me all I need to know…pathetic butt-wipe that you are.
Curtsie! Curtsie!
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this
In case anyone hadn’t noticed - …and you are?
Why are you afraid to tell us who you are?
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this
Just as the Bush administration’s claims of voter fraud are being dismantled, so too is the American Center for Voting Rights (ACVR) — a conservative front group that identified pervasive election fraud
By Paul
May 21, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this
rushncap 10:41
[[By the way, when was the last time an AG been this incompetent?]]
Janet Reno?
After much reflection, one good thing I can say about Gonzales is nobody died on his watch.
Pls don’t ask me to name a second thing -
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this
Mike Huckabee to Brody File: “I Do Not Believe in Teaching About Sex or Contraception in Public Schools”
By Paul
May 21, 2007 2:39 PM | Link to this
Lord Help Us 1:03
So the Republican frontrunners are moderate to liberal.
What’s the prob with that?
By MpeachW
May 21, 2007 2:42 PM | Link to this
Another fine example of GOP family values
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this
I’m assuming you mean Waco, Paul? That may have been mishandled, yes, but when you have a suicide cult, there is a limited amount of things an AG can do. Frankly, Gonzales is incompetent even when there are no disasters to deal with, I’d shudder to see what would happen if he had something of substance to do. He might have made “Brownie” look like Churchill.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 2:46 PM | Link to this
I think of Homer Simpson every time I hear “liberal”
Geez.
By Lord Help Us
May 21, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this
No problem at all, Paul!
I am THRILLED that we are looking to have a choice between a moderate Dem and a moderate Reb for our next President.
The country wins either way…which is the way it should be!
By Paul
May 21, 2007 2:50 PM | Link to this
Clark 1:23
I’m surprised corporations have such bigoted people on staff (I’m assuming at the corporate level). Did you find your coworkers agreed, or did you muzzle the courage of your convictions and keep your comments to yourself while there?
I flew through there last year on a connecting flight. A guy deplaning had moved there two years previously from LA (he was a senior executive with jr high to sr high kids). I asked him how it was there - heavy LDS culture and all. He said they didn’t want to move there but the job required it. He said they now loved it - lots of outdoors activities, his kids had lots of friends, no pressure on religion - and he could trust his coworkers to not stab him in the back or lie.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 2:56 PM | Link to this
rushncap
I got a good laugh from your “incompetent even when there are not disasters to deal with” line. I think I’ll borrow that from time to time (I’m sure a few more will follow in the coming years).
Lord Help Us
This is where it could get real interesting - on what issues will the Rep candidate tend towards outer conservatism, on what issues will the Dem candidate tend towards outer liberalism (the debates, such as they are, have already given a few clues). Discounting those “outer” forces in the parties, which will play better with the moderate swath of voters? Yup, this is shaping up pretty interestingly.
By SarahConnah
May 21, 2007 2:57 PM | Link to this
Check out this article on crooksandliars.com:
“Bush Wants Full Control Of Government During Catastrophic Attack”
Closest guarantee I’ve seen that there WILL BE another “911 Product”
Curtsie while screaming!
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this
Repugs are “moderate to liberal”? Which of the Repug candidates are offering a different war policy approach from Bush’s, other than Ron Paul? During the debates, all I heard from 9 of them was “we should strike Iran hard!”, “I want to double Gitmo!”, “FEAR!”, “TORTURE!”, “let’s call it MURDER!”, “hunt them down to the gates of Hell!”
Sounds like Bush’s continuing war on terrrr tactics… and the terrrrists are continuing to grow their numbers world-wide.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this
Well, Cindy,
I post about your comments and “Onslaught” answers. Get Apocalypse to give you your correct ID.
Sarah Connah,2:31
See what I mean.
rushncap,
I took about 5 seconds thinking of you. That was more than enough. Still making “muffin” melarky in the deli lab?
Poor ol’ Midori,
Yeah I like a little diversity. Like we have over at Emory. How about you up the street? Any better?
Oh, W….W, go can your peaches. Either you are a ventiloquist or a swap-out ID. Quit acting so innocent.
NOW, what is the Democratic Policy for voters to decide on in 2008?
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this
Paul, your 2:39
Ask the neocons what’s wrong with that.
LHU and I were discussing that they were an interesting lot.
Regardless, it looks like the death of the neocons. Yeah! Joy!
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this
Bushniks will be gone: it will be great in ‘08
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this
SaraConner 2:57
But wasn’t a lot of the flack the administration took after Katrina because they did not go in and take over? FEMA played its traditional (up to that time) coordinating role and the administration deferred to the mayor, other local authorities and the governor?
Gotta decide what the policy is: defer to local authorities during national disasters - let them run it until they’re in over their heads and endangering people, or jump right in and let the feds take it from the start. Whichever way it goes, those who critizice the feds for not jumping right in shouldn’t criticize when the feds say they’re going to run things in the future.
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 3:06 PM | Link to this
Do any of the trolls here wonder why your guy W needs to hire a “war czar” to oversee all of his wars? That’s supposed to be what the commander-in-chief does, so why doesn’t W just go ahead and call his new guy the “Commander-In-Chief”?
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 3:06 PM | Link to this
Paul, your 2:39
Ask the neocons what’s wrong with that.
LHU and I were discussing that they were an interesting lot.
Regardless, it looks like the death of the neocons. Yeah! Joy!
By Midori
May 21, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this
poor ole dusty - the planet’s biggest moron has the nerve to try to lay that title on others.
p*nis envy, dusty?
By getalife
May 21, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this
“Kill? Torture? 9/11? 9/11. Kill. Torture. Kill. Kill. 9/11. Kill. Kill…rational statement… Screw you traitor! 9/11. Torture. Kill. Jack Bauer B***. Nine. E. Leven…(pause for applause)
9/11 Forever. Double Torture. No Law…(pause for extended applause)… John Edwards is Pretty… (pause for extended applause)…judges call it. Winner is “9/11 Forever. Double Torture. No Law.”
Geezus fereaking kerist
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this
Cindy 3:01
I think I can surmise the answer without asking. What strikes me, though, is how the Republican party seems to be moving away from “neocons” (whatever they are) and the positions of conservative Christians (who are among the power brokers, it seems) and towards more moderate postitions. Democrats, however, seem to still be in the grip of the very liberal wing of the party, with those who stray from the dogma pretty well marginalized.
BTW - the only candidate who has called for another invasion of an Islamic country is a Democrat. Now that’s irony!
By Lord Help Us
May 21, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
The GOP candidates are pandering for the nomination, so I do not put much stock in their attempts to ‘get to the right’ of the other candidates. They know they need the social conservatives for momentum and the social conservatives love torture and war more than they hate gays and gun control (the irony is searing…).
They always do this. Once the nomination is secured, they’ll tack back to the center.
The frontrunners have a moderate (I wouldn’t go so far as ‘moderate to liberal’) track record and I do not believe they are weak minded (like Bush) enough to led around by the nose (like Bush) by powerful aides (including VP’s).
Either way the improvement from the current Administration will be like a breath of fresh air…
By Lickodull
May 21, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this
As a she/male in the GOP, I find Ann Coulter both attractive and repellent at the same time.
In my case, it is probably just p-enis envy.
I’m Andi/e, remember?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Cindy
May 21, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
Your post was so ignorant it was just begging to be attacked.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this
I’ll take the “incompetence” of Janet Reno ANY DAY over the “competence” of Gonzales.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 3:24 PM | Link to this
Paul,2:37
As to your need for a second good word about Gonzalez (as compared to Reno),
Nobody has been kidnapped and sent to Cuba.
Midori,3:07
No response is necessary. You’ve gone “dirty”.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this
Dusty
I was thinking along the lines of Krauthammer’s column in which he called for Gonzales to resign - not because he did anything illegal, but he took a nonissue and let it develop into what we have witnessed.
Midori
Not that I’d want to choose (it’s really a false choice) , but I’ll take someone whose main crime seems to be bureaucratic incompetence over one whose decisions lead to the deaths of children. And who’s then allowed to continue serving.
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this
{{one good thing I can say about Gonzales is nobody died on his watch.}}
Paul, Gonzo has endorsed Bush & Rummy’s “enhanced” interrogation tactics, so he can be held responsible for those detainees who have died after being “enhanced”:
A US army jury has sentenced a military interrogator to a reprimand and forfeiture of pay for the 2003 death of an Iraqi General under interrogation.
Gonzo doesn’t deserve any respect as AG…
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this
Dusty — 5 seconds of thinking?? Oh my, you’re over your quota for the week. Got a headache now?
P.S. No one got kidnapped by Janet Reno. Your Elian Gonzales fantasies notwithstanding.
By GetanEnema
May 21, 2007 3:33 PM | Link to this
I’m Gertalif/ie and I’m a gay he/she in the democrat party, home of the flaming f-ags, at least until after the election when we don’t need their votes anymore.
But we’ll still let them bone us, of course.
By Onslaught
May 21, 2007 3:33 PM | Link to this
Musty,
It is indeed time for a president to more accurately reflect America.
By steve-o
May 21, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this
Gonzales is a spineless weasel who, by far, is an embarassment to the Federal government. He has emphatically shown that he may indeed be the worst AG in modern US history. Any man who pressures his second-in-command to resign and then pin everything on him in retrospect will successfully reveal to the world his lack of testicles without having to even unzip his fly.
And Dusty, that boy was sent back to his father. At least he is guaranteed health care unlike 25 percent of American kids.
By sean wineburger
May 21, 2007 3:36 PM | Link to this
Wow, the guy that’s posting as “LucKoDULL” has got a lot of free time. If you ever stopped to think before you started ranting, you might realize that you’re a prime example of why republicans scare the sh*t out of most normal folks (even if they do keep getting elected - heck, I’d vote for McCain any day of the week, but mostly because he strikes me as a rational and intelligent leader, with some solid military background - not because he screams and lashes out like a little child). You should really get on some medication soon buddy; that old ticker of yours sounds like it’s gonna blow at any moment.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:37 PM | Link to this
Goldie
We were discussing Attorneys General and their direct decisions, not once, twice or thrice removed. Moving down the chain, one can pin almost anything on someone at the top (Congresswoman caps increased for FDA and transfers funds to - oh, a tuna fishing museum in her district: FDA doesn’t implement Phase IV of Mad Cow Tracking Program: field inspectors don’t overlap inspections: person gets Mad Cow and dies: Congresswoman is responsible for person’s death).
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this
In case you trolls try to forget what your guy’s done to American credibility and respect throughout the world, just remember your cheerleading on the sidelines while all of the news has been available to you:
SAN DIEGO - An Iraqi whose corpse was photographed with grinning U.S. soldiers at Abu Ghraib died under CIA interrogation while suspended by his wrists, which had been handcuffed behind his back, according to investigative reports reviewed by The Associated Press.
And just remember what anyone who is detaining American soldiers right now is probably thinking about the validity of our “American morals”…
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 3:40 PM | Link to this
Cindy,
Which one what attack??? Have you dropped “Onslaught”etc.??
Kinda hard to identify you folks these days. Now “Goldie” is here and MpeachW seems to have left.
Amazing how liberals “know” all about conservative candidates but seldom mention their own. Not that I blame them. If I were a liberal, I wouldn’t mention Democratic “runners” either.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 3:40 PM | Link to this
Steve-o,
we’ve got a mind meld thing going on here.
kick a$$, baby :)
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this
{{We were discussing Attorneys General and their direct decisions, not once, twice or thrice removed.}}
Paul, I believe the Atty. General could have put a stop to the torture memos to begin with, and then maybe we wouldn’t have had Abu Ghraib torture and deaths? So, where do you think the buck should stop, with Bush instead of Gonzo??? Take your pick.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this
Goldie 3:30
I just reread your post. The case you cited involved a person operating outside the bounds of lawful procedures - that is why he was court-martialed and convicted. You’d really need to come up with a case like Khalid Sheik Mohammed dying to make your case.
By Apocalypse
May 21, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this
Paul,
Have you noticed that you have a tendency to kiss at least two a*******es in the same manner on this blog? Buy Danish and Dusty. The reason for that is because they are one person and currently she is using Dusty. Hope you’re having fun jacka$$!
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this
Thirty years ago today
By Brian Curtis
May 21, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this
Paul: What do you consider the “very liberal wing” of the Democratic party?
Remember, all these are majority American positions: National healthcare, getting out of Iraq, supporting public education, the right to unionize, environmental protection, increased fuel efficiency standards, increased minimum wage, the protected right to abortion, and legal recognition of same-sex couples.
All of these enjoy MAJORITY support among Americans… and yet a candidate who embodies those positions is called a “far-left fringe” candidate? Odd, given that that’s MAINSTREAM America talking.
By steve-o
May 21, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this
Midori,
I love you back!
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this
Bush’s Report Card:
Leader of the “free world”: F-
Compassionate Conservative: F+
Fiscal Conservative: F
Conservative: F
Reading a teleprompter: F
Increasing terrorist numbers: A+
By Onslaught
May 21, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
I am the one and only Onslaught! I am a concoction of both Eric Linsherr and Charles Xavier. You, ma’am, are a racist pig who only wants white males to dominate.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this
Goldie
Again, the discussion was more on the current situation with Gonzalez - but your opinion regarding the development of US policy in processing enemies operating outside the bounds of international agreements is a fair one. I view Gonzalez in that case as one person in the process giving legal advice - as I’d rather suspect CIA’s, DOD’s, State’s, and others “attorneys generals” did. But to equate those excesses with the current law governing enhanced interrogation procedures is, in my mind, a bit off.
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this
Midori & Steve-O: “I love you, man!”
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this
Apocalypse
Have you noticed you have a tendency to be unable to state a position, give rational reasons supporting it, and acknowledge a good point made by the person with whom you’re discussing an issue? But you do have a demonstrated ability to substitute taunting and namecalling as a substitute for thought.
Stay with what you’re good at!
By Midori
May 21, 2007 3:55 PM | Link to this
same here Goldie!!!
:)
By steve-o
May 21, 2007 3:55 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
Love you back!
Great report card. The best part about it is that he won’t be able to repeat any classes!
By Paul
May 21, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this
Brian Curtis 3:47
[[Remember, all these are majority American positions: National healthcare, getting out of Iraq, supporting public education, the right to unionize, environmental protection, increased fuel efficiency standards, increased minimum wage, the protected right to abortion, and legal recognition of same-sex couples]]
Some of the polls and analyses I’ve been watching show most of those items are favored by the majority of self-identified “moderate” Republicans.
My impression is that the power brokers within the Democratic Party are more hyper in their views than are many rank and file members, in much the same way is true with the Republican Party. It’s just the nature of the beast that those with strong beliefs and the money and contacts to effect those beliefs gravitate towards the power positions.
By Apocalypse
May 21, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this
Paul,
What’s there to say? I, just like the rest of the world, am counting down to the day we rid your type of troop killing filth out of the White House. You and the filty beast of a woman that uses multiple IDs on this blog continue to come up with lame excuse after lame excuse for supporting something that does your country no good. You care nothing about finding Bin Laden, you have no sympathy for the working middle class, and you take pride in the continual useless deaths and kidnappings of American soldiers.
What more can I say that hasn’t already been said moron?
By Midori
May 21, 2007 4:05 PM | Link to this
Paul,
In your 3:53 you are describing the very people whose rears you firmly plant your lips on here every day.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this
Apocalypse 4:02
Thanks for making my point.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 4:08 PM | Link to this
Uh oh, Steveo’s back!!
Now all conservatives are going to be big prejudiced boneheads. (I’m not talking to you, rushncap.)
Little Elian Gonzlez was screaming and crying when he was grabbed by Reno’s agents banishing guns. He was living with relatives in Miami. His mother had died trying to get him to America.
So healthcare is SO much better in Cuba. Well, if you cannot PAY for your children’s illnesses, go to the emergency room (USA). They and the tax payers will take care of you.
Sounds like you would love for the government to “baby-sit you and yours”. That’s the liberal way.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this
Midori 4:05
I disagree with your assessment of Goldie (see my 3:49).
By Paul
May 21, 2007 4:15 PM | Link to this
Dusty
About an hour ago I observed the only candidate who’s called for an invasion of an Islamic country post-Iraq is a Democrat. The silence from the traditionally-Democratic Party supporters (let me rephrase: “Supporters” for “anything the Democrats do is great, anything a Republican does is idiotic, selfish and a danger to the Republic”) has been… deafening. Any idea why?
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 4:16 PM | Link to this
Paul @ 4:10— you wish!
By rushncap
May 21, 2007 4:19 PM | Link to this
Not talking to me, Dusty? Did I make you cry and curl up in a ball again?
Elian Gonzales was “grabbed” because his idiot relatives refused to obey the law of this land. If his relatives didn’t want him crying, they should have followed the law and returned the child to his father. I know you conservatives like to claim that you like rule of law and family values. I guess you like it only when it’s convenient. Face it, Reno did the right thing, you just hate anything Clinton-related.
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 4:19 PM | Link to this
{{About an hour ago I observed the only candidate who’s called for an invasion of an Islamic country post-Iraq is a Democrat.}}
I have no idea who you’re posting about, Paul — hence the “deafening” silence…
By Midori
May 21, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this
it’s morning in America. Again.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 4:22 PM | Link to this
No GOP presidential candidates will be at Falwell’s funeral
By RW-(the original)
May 21, 2007 4:22 PM | Link to this
I think we all agree that Gonzales is a screw up as AG we just disagree on the reasons, but it’s lunacy to say that having to figure out how to handle the legalistic hurdles of fighting a global war with an enemy that respects no borders is nothing compared to burning down a guys church and killing all the women and children inside.
Reno turned what would have been a simple arrest if they waited for the next trip to town by Koresh into a national tragedy. She also sent in armed storm troopers to pick up a little boy that she easily could have done without all the fanfare.
What else did Reno do? She let Jamie Gorelick take away any chance of preventing 9/11.
I don’t think Gonzo is anywhere near the incompetent that Janet Reno was.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this
“McCain Unplugged: “Maybe [Romney] Should Get Out His Small Varmint Gun And Chase Those Guatemalans Off His Yard”
Hahahahaha.
Sean,
I guess you missed McTemper cussing out the Senator from Texas.
You do not want this guy with a finger on the button.
He has anger issues and bat s-hit crazy.
Geez.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 4:27 PM | Link to this
Goldie 4:19
Okay, I’ve recovered from your 4:16 -
My point was that if Rudy, Mitt, John (we’re all on a first-name basis, here) had issued a call for an invasion, now, of an Islamic country many here would have gone ballistic. But because the invasion call was issued by a Democratic candidate there’s nary a peep. The reaction should not be because the person who issued the call is a Democratic or a Republican candidate - it should be based upon whether or not it is good policy for the country.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 4:31 PM | Link to this
Oh my goodness Onslaught,
All the time I thought YOU were a racist white pig with a ring in your nose and …lo and behold…you’re a what??? Unicorn?? Capricorn? Or just plain ol’ corn-y!!
Oh, the LACK of prejudice on this blog is so impressive. I mean you could almost miss it.
May I make a wild guess that YOU, Onslaught, are a liberal? One that waves a white flag, knocks the government, BUTTTT supports the troops but NOT the war??
Yes, I saw your picture in the anti-war protest march. You need a haircut.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this
Official: Iraq Planning for U.S. Pullout
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 4:36 PM | Link to this
Paul @ 4:27— please post WHO YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT AND MAYBE SOMEONE CAN RESPOND… again, which Dem are you posting about? Do you know the name???
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this
{{{By sean wineburger May 21, 2007 3:36 PM Wow, the guy that’s posting as “LucKoDULL” has got a lot of free time. If you ever stopped to think before you started ranting, you might realize that you’re a prime example of why republicans scare the sh*t out of most normal folks. You should really get on some medication soon buddy; that old ticker of yours sounds like it’s gonna blow at any moment.}}}
Polly/ a.k.a. LickoDull: When ever I read something that one of you dullards write that I don’t agree with, I search for the facts explaining why and then post them in a rebuttal that is easy for everyone to understand, you should really try it instead of just whining like a big fat as-sed baby.
Or is that all you know how to do?
Really, it’s been about a year now and all I’ve seen from you is sniveling and gay bashing.
You must be a real piece of work.
You know what I mean?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 4:47 PM | Link to this
Goldie 4:36
I’m sorry, I misunderstood - I thought you meant who on this blog was I referring to.
The person in question would be Senator Joe Biden, Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Presidential candidate, calling (some weeks back) for an invasion of Sudan.
He called, I believe, for unilateral American action now. Not UN action. Not with allies. Just us. Rather boggles my mind. And the fact so many here hadn’t a clue to what I was referring to shows the scant exposure given by the media.
By Dusty
May 21, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this
Paul,
You will have to take off your garden gloves and fight with these errr “patriots” who like to throw “dirt”. (Liberals don’t like to talk about any kind of invasion. It is hard to “retreat” and “invade” at the same time.)
Now they will get angry. I mentioned “Patriots”!!! Using anything resembling or sounding like “patriotism” is diagnosed as a fatal disease by liberals So, beware.
rushncap,
When I mentioned prejudiced boneheads I knew you would think I was talking to you. I wasn’t. I was only trying to protect your tender feelings. You can drop your security blankee now.
By IN THE NEWS
May 21, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this
Pentagon Making Preparations To Keep Tens Of Thousands Of Troops In Iraq For ‘Decades’
By Berenice
May 21, 2007 5:00 PM | Link to this
Come on people lets be fair, Bush has come a long way from whiskey and cocaine…..oh wait, NO HE HASN’T. Jimmy Carter knows what he said is what he meant to say, it’s okay, we all understand. Bush is avoiding to be called a failure by refusing to pull the troops from Iraq, but when the next president is in office and the troops are pulled, then he is still going to be called a failure and be blamed for all those deaths. He needs to be a man and do something good for once and agree to have all the troops pulled out. Or maybe Bush can show us how to defeat the Iraqis, I mean he does have experience in war….oh wait….AWOL!!!!
By Paul
May 21, 2007 5:02 PM | Link to this
Dusty 4:54
[[Now they’ll get angry]]
I think silence will continue to reign. The only one who’s addressed this that I recall was N-GA.
The implications for the US are pretty staggering, especially given that Sen Biden called for a military invasion after, I believe, OBL said any American intervention would be a call for Islamists around the world to flood to Iraq and fight the Great Satan (let’s see, if we leave Iraq OBL and Islamists won’t follow us….. never mind).
So, vote for Biden, invade an Islamic country. Maybe he could turn that into a campaign slogan (Note to Biden: slogans are usually less than 1,500 words).
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this
The Sniveling Cowards cut and run from MoveOn!:
{{{In grudging concessions to President Bush, Democrats intend to draft an Iraq war-funding bill without a timeline for the withdrawal of U.S. troops and shorn of billions of dollars in spending on domestic programs, officials said Monday.}}}
Fraid of those falling approval ratings, were we?
Trying to hit the vacation earlier then we planned on?
Groveling before the Bush Master, again?
Geez.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Berenice
May 21, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this
Come on people lets be fair, Bush has come a long way from whiskey and cocaine…..hahahaha!!!! Jimmy Carter knows what he said is what he meant to say, it’s okay, we all understand. Bush is avoiding to be called a failure by refusing to pull the troops from Iraq, but when the next president is in office and the troops are pulled, then he is still going to be called a failure and be blamed for all those deaths. He needs to be a man and do something good for once and agree to have all the troops pulled out. Or maybe Bush can show us how to defeat the Iraqis, I mean he does have experience in war….oh wait….AWOL!!!!
By Brian Curtis
May 21, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this
Dusty: That’s only because you toss around the word “patriotism” all the time with no clue what it means.
Here’s a hint: Patriotic Americans are opposed to what Bush has been doing. You’re not a patriot.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 5:15 PM | Link to this
Luckodull 5:03
Rather playing out as Dick Morris predicted, didn’t it?
You know, if the percentage of pork/bribes added on to the bill, compared to the bill as a whole, were applied to the federal budget… that’s really scary. The Republican Congress was bad enough with the pork - I sure hope the Democratic Congress isn’t practicing to do them one better -
By steve-o
May 21, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this
{{{By Dusty
May 21, 2007 4:08 PM | Link to this
Uh oh, Steveo’s back!!
Now all conservatives are going to be big prejudiced boneheads. (I’m not talking to you, rushncap.)}}}
Dusty,
No…just boneheads. I don’t think you’re prejudiced at all, but I do think that you’re blind allegiance to Bush is a little boneheaded.
{{{Little Elian Gonzlez was screaming and crying when he was grabbed by Reno’s agents banishing guns. He was living with relatives in Miami. His mother had died trying to get him to America.}}}
His mother took him from his dad without his approval. If I had my child taken from me, I’d be really p!ssed.
{{{So healthcare is SO much better in Cuba. Well, if you cannot PAY for your children’s illnesses, go to the emergency room (USA). They and the tax payers will take care of you.
Sounds like you would love for the government to “baby-sit you and yours”. That’s the liberal way.}}}
No…it’s about actually being compassionate without framing the word “compassion” in a corny, exploiting way as in “compassionate conservative”. It’s about actually giving a damn about children having health care.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 5:18 PM | Link to this
Brian Curtis 5:12
Dusty’s response was in reply to my post regarding Sen Biden’s call for an invasion. Any thoughts on that?
By Jeff Sheridan
May 21, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this
Same crap, different day.(The arguments in the blog, i mean.)
Great cartoon, though.
And, here you go, naysayers. http://users.collegefrontpage.com/member.php?username=jeffrosaurus
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 5:41 PM | Link to this
{{He called, I believe, for unilateral American action now. Not UN action. Not with allies. Just us.}}
Paul— please do provide the links which support your assertions of Biden’s “unilateral American action now.” Thank you.
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 5:47 PM | Link to this
Paul— here’s somee info I found about Biden, and he’s not advocating “unilateral” anything:
Under U.N.-backed agreements approved last fall, a hybrid force of 22,000 African Union and U.N. peacekeepers are to be deployed in Darfur to protect and provide relief for 2.5 million Darfurians who have been forced from their homes and are now confined to camps. “We must set a hard deadline for Khartoum to accept a hybrid U.N.-AU force,” Biden said.
BTW— you’d probably hear more support for this from the Dems if we weren’t stuck in Bush’s quagmire in Iraq for so long…
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this
Paul, I guess you’re more comfortable bringing up Biden’s suggestion about Sudan than you are about all of the Repug candidates who are pressing for “hitting Iran hard” right now (as they stated in their first debate)? What exactly do they mean by “hitting”, and do they realize that Iran is close to having nukes? Are they suggesting that we hit their nuclear facilities? Is that a bright idea? And are they bright for suggesting that “intelligence sources” state that Iran is producing nukes so we’d better “hit ‘em hard!” (same ole deja vu)???
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 6:08 PM | Link to this
Sen. McCain IS pretty funny about Romney — ouch!
in response to a question about Romney’s immigration position, McCain said he’d “wait a couple of weeks and see if the winds change and Mitt comes back around” to his side, and, he said, musing about why Romney seems so touchy on the issue, “Maybe Mitt should get out his small varmint gun and chase those Guatemalans off his yard.”
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this
Well, well, isn’t this a conundrum?:
{{{In an open letter to be published on Tuesday, more than 20 religious groups urged U.S. leaders to limit greenhouse gas emissions and invest in renewable energy sources.}}}
Are the libs finally gonna listen to the Church?
Ain’t this some sh-it, the last couple of days have found the pinkos in bed with Bush on immigration and now they will be worshipping at the Lord’s altar on “global warming.”
Anybody check to see if hell is froze over?
What’s next, you candy as-sed sniveling Cowards, are you going to demand victory in the war in Iraq?
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By @@
May 21, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this
I don’t have a lot of confidence in U.N. peackeeping forces. Their record of successes isn’t too good.
If recent history teaches anything, it is that half-hearted efforts—which give a false sense that something is being done but only end up costing peacekeepers’ lives—can be worse than none at all.
It makes a politician look good though. Like he really cares or something.
I don’t buy the Democrats’ threats against Iran either. It’s usual campaign rhetoric. They’ve gotta be tough on something, anything but Iraq.
Going along to get along…that’s all it is.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 6:15 PM | Link to this
And how about this good news:
{{{TRIPOLI, Lebanon, May 21 — The confrontation between the Lebanese Army and Islamic militants at a Palestinian refugee camp continued unabated today, after an eruption of violence on Sunday that claimed at least 39 lives and left dozens injured.}}}
The former subjects are blasting away at their zipper head religious rulers, the whole world wants Al Qaeda dead, well except for the sniveling Coward American liberals.
That’s what I’m talking about.
USAUSAUSAUSAUSAUSA
By Paul
May 21, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this
Goldie
Sorry about the delay - other things going on.
Here are his opening remarks before his committee (source: his web page)
Link: Sen Biden’s opening remarks
I see you sourced the Associated Press report. The confusion, I believe, comes from mixing in the UN proposal, which Sudan has rejected and Sen Biden has criticized in the wire report. It is clarified when listening to his remarks. He doesn’t see Khartoum accepting the force, so, he says, the US must impose force. The US can’t command the UN - so it’s really a “go it alone” operation, hoping the UN will follow. That’s where the 2500 subsequent number came from - it is different from the 22,000 African Union/UN force.
So he wants to stop the genocide, the UN’s delayed as Sudan won’t accept the force, so Sen Biden calls for imposing force and said it could be done with 2500 American ground forces. He referenced a NATO no-fly zone - hasn’t clarified if NATO won’t agree if he’d also impose an American no-fly zone.
By Goldie
May 21, 2007 6:21 PM | Link to this
Gore/Obama ‘08!
While Gore stops short of flatly calling for the impeachment of Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, he certainly gives the impression that in his view such a move would be well deserved. He calls the president a lawbreaker, a liar and a man with the blood of thousands of innocent lives on his hands. Most of Gore’s ire stems from, not surprisingly, the war in Iraq, a war that Gore opposed from the beginning. Bush, he writes, “has exposed Americans abroad and Americans in every U.S. town and city to a greater danger of attack because of his arrogance and willfulness.”
By @@
May 21, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this
Alright, which one of you anti-war liberals is holding the burkah for our Lady Liberty?
Danish Mermaid Statue Given a Headscarf
By Paul
May 21, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this
Goldie 6:00 pm
Has nothing to do with being “being more comfortable about hitting Iran.” That, also, if fraught with difficulty - as is facing Ahmadinejad with nukes. A key difference is and air/naval campaign (Iran) vs ground forces (Sudan).
They are different scenarios with different arguments for what constitutes America’s strategic interests (Iran) vs an action that has nothing to do with our strategic interest (Sudan).
BTW - I see a few here last week criticized alleged US funding of Iranian antigovernment groups. If this were to cause a policy change by the Iranians, isn’t that in our interest? I can only guess these people want “no action” on Iran.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 6:24 PM | Link to this
{{{By Cindy
May 21, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this
PART 1:
Actually, Dusty, I am following Rudy. His past has not shown him to be a neocon and he supports women’s rights. Although he showed leadership after 9/11, I think he was a little weak before and might have been riding the waves of tragedy like bush. There’s plenty of time to research.}}}
Rudy weak? How’s that Cindykins?
PART 2:
{{{But, I do like diversity LA DI DAH; it would be great to have somebody other than another old white man in the white house.}}
When are you going to get past race and gender?
Maybe it’s time for a Congressional White Caucus and the like? Time for affirmative action for white males to make up for the past injustices of the last decades?
SQUAWK! BWAK!
By @@
May 21, 2007 6:27 PM | Link to this
I guess Al Gore conveniently forgot the truth about all the Muslim extremist attacks that preceded George Bush’s presidency.
Oh well…..no need to look at the facts I suppose.
Is it getting warm in here or what?
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 6:32 PM | Link to this
{{{{Americans are moving out of Burger King-filled megabases and into local neighborhoods to protect the population; in tandem with Iraqi counterparts, they are forging relationships with local citizens, marginalizing the enemy and filling the power void insurgents leave behind. Petreaus is putting troops in harm’s way in order to hasten security improvements, which will ultimately shorten the war and save American and Iraqi lives. All I ask — as a soldier who fought next to Americans and Iraqis who died for Iraq’s future — is for the time necessary to give this winning strategy a chance. First Lt. Pete Hegseth served in Iraq with the 101st Airborne Division and is the director of VetsforFreedom.org. He grew up in Forest Lake.}}}
Any questions?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this
@@,
The person (or persons) who put the Burka on the Mermaid were protesting the Islamification of Denmark.
I think they made their point very well indeed, and it was most definitely NOT a lib that did it.
By @@
May 21, 2007 6:40 PM | Link to this
It’s really not my nature to be mean, but we’re talking about Al Gore here.
Would we really want a crybaby loser type “guy”??? overseeing our national security?
O.K., enough about Gore. Is there anything available on Teddy?
I need to get this out of my system.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 6:42 PM | Link to this
Don’t worry Andy, the Dems still have no balls
You will get your blood.
Geez.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
{{{The Treasury Department’s tax-collection data for April puts the federal deficit over the 12-month period ending April 30 at $144.7 billion. This leaves the deficit at about one percent of GDP, and declining, which is not a significant economic problem. The decline is due to surging tax revenues from a booming economy. The deficit is down about $120 billion, or 45 percent, since last April. It has declined by $309 billion, or 68 percent, over the last three years from the peak of $455 billion in April, 2004. This experience shows that combining pro-growth tax cuts with just moderate spending restraint can sharply reduce, and, indeed, eliminate the deficit.}}}
And this is despite 9/11, a war on terror and a bunch of uninsured pinkos living below seal level that let their houses get washed away in a hurricane.
Make the tax cuts permanent, you sniveling Cowards.
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
Well, I’m about to go eat dinner and get ready for the season finale of “24.” The main antagonist is the Chinese government. It’s no coincidence that ‘24’ is one of the most popular shows in China - courtesy of pirated DVDs which is one of China’s main exports. Nice way to get back at ‘em, isn’t it? “You disregard agreements and pirate millions of dollars’ worth of our DVDs. You like our show? Okay - pirate away - spread ‘em all over China - and let your citizens see their government as warmongers who get their just reward from an American superagent!”
By @@
May 21, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish:
I know. It was just an opportunity I couldn’t pass up.
The Turkey/EU reference made it clear what their protest was about.
Our liberals still insist we’re the bad guys in Iraq. That America IS the terrorist. I figured they’d want to dress up our Lady to look like a terrorist. I’ve actually seen political cartoons indicating such.
By getalife
May 21, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this
Paul,
24 is not real.
You sound like a gop candidate.
Wow.
By Midori
May 21, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this
{{{{Would we really want a crybaby loser type “guy”??? overseeing our national security? }}}}}
well, we have a bully, crybaby, drug addled, incoherent, babbling, loser of a moron overseeing it now.
the difference is, Gore can string a sentence together without a hammer and a bucket of nails.
he also doesn’t go around trying to push his fake religion off on everyone, unlike the moron in charge now.
I don’t recall Gore lying us into war either.
or outing covert agents.
or sending his goons to the hospital to bully and strong arm a seriously ill man recovering from surgery.
I could go on and on, but what’s the point?
In your eyes, Bush is all things to all people.
you seriously need to get them examined. and your head.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this
getalife
Of course it’s not real.
Are any of the candidates real?
I was commenting on Hollywood (you know, bastion of left wing Democratic ultraliberals) coming up with a nice little scheme to get back at the Chinese for taking dollars out of their profits.
Money and power, getalife. It always gets back to money and power.
By @@
May 21, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
(((By Midori)))
(((well, we have a bully, crybaby, drug addled, incoherent, babbling, loser of a moron overseeing it now.)))
Well I know you ^^^ try hard to oversee it Midori, but you haven’t been elected, so don’t be so hard on yourself.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 6:55 PM | Link to this
@@,
Yes, they do look at America as being the terrorist. However, I doubt too many Libs have Burquas in their closets*, but they are happy to step aside and let it happen.
It’s the end game of multi-culturalism.
*Although I did see an absolutely nauseating video of a British woman who had donned the suffocating burqua because she found it so “liberating”.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 6:57 PM | Link to this
getalife
[[Hollywood (you know, bastion of left wing Democratic ultraliberals]]
Except for Bo Derek. She’s Republican.
Bong, now!
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 6:57 PM | Link to this
Getalife,
You know that 24 is not real. Good first step! If you put down your bong long enough you might figure out that man made Global Warming isn’t real either.
By GodHatesTrash
May 21, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this
A pack of cowardly GOP jackals posting here today, as usual. Disgusting filthy morons.
Burn in Hell you twisted bassturds.
By Paul
May 21, 2007 7:01 PM | Link to this
Midori - Buy Danish (not there’s a combo to address)
I saw an author interviewed - I’ll see if I can remember where - who did a nice piece on manmade global warming as a religion. He went through all the elements and showed the counterparts in the “movement.” He said the response from some of the more vitriolic was not exactly nice. No sense of humor at all, it seems.
By Buy Danish
May 21, 2007 7:02 PM | Link to this
Speaking of Lady Liberty, here’s an outfit that would blend perfectly with her green skin tone.
I literally have difficulty breathing when I look at these images, it’s so suffocating.
By LuckoDull
May 21, 2007 7:04 PM | Link to this
{{{Last week, on the House floor, Chairman Murtha violated House rules in an expletive-laced tirade, pointing his finger and threatening my priorities “now and forever.” Just last week, Chairman Murtha “exploded” and “unleashed a loud, finger-jabbing, spittle-spraying piece of his mind” at a colleague on his committee, according to The Hill. Chairman Murtha then “…threatened to withdraw support from a defense project…” vital to his colleague’s district, according to the article. This week he attempted to intimidate me and when I had the audacity to question the merits of the project, his reaction was more finger pointing and intimidation.}}}
They won’t fight Al Qaeda but they’ll fight for their pork and earmarks, manning up like vicious jungle soldiers, maybe we could cut Murtha’s bribery funding, get him foaming at the mouth and then parachute him into Baghdad.
Wouldn’t those terrorists just cower before the Great Foam Specked Warrior?
Geez.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.
By Swiftvoter
May 25, 2007 9:04 AM | Link to this
“…………., my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.”©