Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 8:02 AM | Link to this

It’s kind of funny how liberals just assume that Wolfowitz’s girlfriend would not have been smart or talented enough to earn that job with out his help.

I guess the libs think women are weak and stupid, alive just for the pleasure of the man, helpless to succeed on their own.

All that bra burning for nothing, the pinko®s got you right back in the kitchen.

Have you heard any talk of her qualifications on the left?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

Last weekend a traffic jam several miles long snaked out of the Mansour district in western Baghdad. The delay stemmed not from a car bomb closing the road but from a queue to enter the city’s central amusement park. The line became so long some families left their cars and walked to enjoy picnics, fairground rides and soccer, the Iraqi national obsession.-Washington Post

It is growing, spreading, taking hold in all corners of the country, freedom and peace, something that all people yearn to live in, and once the Iraqis get a taste of it, after all the years of torment under Saddam and Islamic fascism, it’s going to be like a wave washing the evil from their country.

And you libs and your beloved Al Qaeda can’t stop it.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By getalife May 3, 2007 2:54 PM Kudos to the Israeli people for getting out and protesting their failed leadership.}}}

Excellent point gitmo.

Protesting because their sniveling Coward government LOST a war to a bunch of raggedy cut throat killers.

Just like the democrats in America are trying to do.

{{{“Both of us are convinced Olmert has to go home because of his great failure during the second Lebanon war,” they wrote in the column that appeared in the Maariv daily under the headline “Come Protest.”}}}

That is what we will be saying about you in 08.

And you’re gonna hate it.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 8:02 AM | Link to this

I doubt, for example, that our television networks have spent as much time exposing the horrors of life for millions of women in pre-liberation Iraq and Afghanistan as they’ve spent covering Abu Ghraib. For some reason, everyday atrocities such as the endemic beatings, honor killings and forced marriages of women just don’t seem to be newsworthy. A new study from Johns Hopkins University indicates that, since the Taliban was ousted five years ago, Afghan infant mortality rates have improved dramatically. Every year, more than 40,000 babies live that would have died under Islamofascist tyranny — and the statistics are still improving. The main reason, according to the study, is improved women’s access to medical care.-Fred Thompson, Your Next President

Yes, why do libs sit on good news about America, hiding it from view?

Makes you wonder about their true intentions, don’t it?

Cowards.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{Despite these horrific trends, no Islamic leader or cleric has denounced those who recruit, indoctrinate, train and arm the suicide bombers who kill children. By contrast, in the aftermath of last month’s murders at Virginia Tech by a deranged Korean American student, the government of Korea, dozens of Korean American community groups and the killer’s family all expressed remorse and condolences for the victims.}}}

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Blackadder

May 4, 2007 8:05 AM | Link to this

This ANTI-BUSH, ANTI-WAR music has been aired by many college and public radio stations nationwide.

ALL 20 SONGS on the COMPILATION are LISTED BELOW, with FREE RealAudio and MP3 links… ENJOY! (scroll down for the good stuff)

By Mrs. Godzilla

May 4, 2007 8:10 AM | Link to this

A real studly Republican indeed!

By @@

May 4, 2007 8:23 AM | Link to this

This one is pretty funny ml.

I’m not really following this story on Wolfowitz. It’s another one of those stories where you can sit back with a wait and see attitude.

I know Hugo Chavez is wanting to pull out of the World Bank. I guess maybe it’s his “high moral standards” that are influencing his decision.

I saw this cartoon and it was “damned” funny.

Just thought I’d share.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 8:27 AM | Link to this

The Bush administration killed a proposal to clamp down on the student loan industry six years ago following allegations that companies sought to shower universities with financial favors to help generate business, according to documents and interviews with government officials.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 8:28 AM | Link to this

[Well, that was a quick flip-flop even by Republican standards] (http://americablog.blogspot.com/2007/05/tommy-thompson-retracts-anti-gay.html)

By Mike

May 4, 2007 8:29 AM | Link to this

Notice how Mikey never drew a cartoon about the 12.8 billion dollar oil-for-food scam. Instead, he gripes about a raise for a career employee to bring in a salary range similar to over 1,000 Wrodl Bank employees.

Like all of the AJC pundits, Mikey does not attack folks based on any kind of principle. Instead, their attacks are strictly partisan in nature with attacks launched against any who wear a label different than theirs.

No wonder this paper is dying.

By Categorically Unfit

May 4, 2007 8:30 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - A bid to allow lower-priced drugs to be imported from Canada and elsewhere survived a challenge in the Senate on Thursday, making approval likely despite the Bush administration’s opposition.

Well, here’s another bill for King George to veto. Big Oil owns Big Pharma so you can bet your sweet a$s that the big, Big, BIG GOVERNMENT Republicans are gonna fatten the wallets of their Big Oil buddies by forcing YOU to pay inflated prices for prescription drugs made here in the USA . Same drug, same package, same assembly lines, same ingredients, but sold overseas for a fraction of what Americans are forced to pay because WE are not allowed to buy them back at the lower overseas price.

This is just one more example of how today’s Republicans truly DESPISE the FREE MARKET SYSTEM. They have become such stalwart moral ideologues that they have completely abandoned any attempt at administering the country in a conservative manner. Republicans have become identical to the free-spending, trade-restrictive, legislation-intensive, judicially-activist pols that Ronald Reagan decried some 20 years ago. We have now come full-circle!

It is truly pathetic to see the depths to which the Republican Party has sunk under the influence of the mad cackle of neo-puritans that have infested its’ ranks in recent years. Ideologues have a moral compulsion NOT to ‘compromise’. They are categorically unfit to serve in political office as ‘compromise’ is the true essence of politics.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 8:33 AM | Link to this

GOP Debate: Ron Paul Speaks Truth About Iraq And Conservative Values

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 8:35 AM | Link to this

Well, that was a quick flip-flop even by Republican standards

By @@

May 4, 2007 8:36 AM | Link to this

Getalife:

This may be old news to you, but it’s new to me.

Defense Official Contradicts Murtha Claim that Petraeus Didn’t ‘Talk to Any of Us’

(((Murtha told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews on Tuesday, “They bring Petraeus back - purely political move. Petraeus comes back here. He doesn’t talk to any of us. He only talks to the news media and so forth trying to sell this program.”)))

(((A senior Defense Department official told Cybercast News Service that Petraeus personally briefed Murtha and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in an April 24 phone conference that lasted 20-30 minutes.)))

(((The following day, Petraeus conducted two 90-minute, top-secret level operations intelligence briefings for representatives and senators.)))

Your “PeePaw” Murtha is up to his old tricks.

Maybe you should jump off of “PeePaw” Murtha’s lap and stop listening to his tall tales.

I hear he really likes to go on fishing expeditions. Get your pole. He can tell you all about the big one that got away.

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 8:38 AM | Link to this

From:

“Know-Nothing Congress’ Willful Ignorance on Iraq. By Lawrence F. Kaplan.”

The theme -

{{{Obliviousness, after all, has its uses. It comforts the sensibilities of politicians whose varying levels of awareness allow them to favor certain facts and not others.}}}

The Know-Nothing’s ignorance -

{{{The suggestion, moreover, that American forces ought to confine themselves to “targeted counter-terror operations” rather than trying to sort “friend from foe” misunderstands the most basic tenets of counterinsurgency, ignores the lessons of the past four years and purposefully slights the testimony of Petraeus and his fellow experts.

Living among the population and sorting “friend from foe” is precisely how the military generates intelligence tips, which, in turn, provide the key to “targeted counter-terror operations.” It can’t be done from Kuwait, and it can’t be done from Okinawa. In fact, the one brand of diplomacy that truly matters in Iraq - the U.S. militiary’s tribal diplomacy, which accounts for the recent turn-around in Anbar Province - is precisely the mission that Reid’s demand for a skeleton force would shut down.}}}

The delusional spin -

{{{WHERE all this leads is clear. Piece together a string of demonstrably false “facts on the ground” from a suitably safe remove, and you’re left with a scenario where we can walk away from Iraq without condition and regardless of consequence.}}}

The consequences -

You don’t need to watch terrified Iraqis pleading for American forces to stay put in their neighborhoods. You don’t need to read the latest National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, which anticipates that a precipitous U.S. withdrawal will end in catastrophe. Why, in the serene conviction that things are the other way around, you don’t even need to read at all. Chances are, your congressman doesn’t either.

By RW-(the original)

May 4, 2007 8:39 AM | Link to this

Here’s how the moron at ITN’s 8:27 link introduces the WaPo article.

{{{{{{Were they ever proactive on any looming problem?}}}}}

Um,,,,Iraq?? Err…..Social Security?? UH…Tax cuts to end the recession???? Hmmm….wiretaps of foreign terror suspects to prevent another terrorist attack??

One voted for by the Democrats and undercut ever since, another met by the moonbats with, “problem? what problem?”, the next has brought record amounts of cash into the treasury but the libs are foaming at the mouth to raise your taxes and kill economic growth, so far so good with the wiretaps—-no attacks, no US citizen violated—-but the Dems can’t wait to try to string Bush up for being proactive here.

The thing the AntiAmerica blog doesn’t tell us is when the Bush administration vetoed a student loan bill since it’s the only way they could have killed it.

You see IN THE NEWS, this is why if you live in the feverswamps you will remain ignorant for life.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 8:44 AM | Link to this

Last night’s Repug debate was very revealing: the party is full of white men who love to lead like dictators, they can’t wait to attack Iran based on the “intelligence” of their possession of WMD’s, and they all acknowledge that their party has lost its grounding in reality and principles… what a scary bunch of Americans.

Do those guys last night think that Americans are stupid enough to fall for their rhetoric of “optimism” when they just can’t wait to start a new war with Iran? Do they still not believe there may be OTHER WAYS of dealing with using bombs and war as their first option?

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 8:45 AM | Link to this

Republican Congressmen are simply dancing with the ones what brung them. Is Ralph Nader right when he says there’s no diff between Dems and Cons and that’s why he runs? Dems seem a more motley group. Other than that….they dance with the ones what groomed them too.

You would too for the millions in contributions and opportunities post term that will come your way if you play along. Millions. Bwaha Millions! You’ll be rich. You’ll get the babes. You’ll have friends. Think of it!

Just think of it.. and all you have to do is get along and along you go.

By RW-(the original)

May 4, 2007 8:47 AM | Link to this

Categorically Unfit,

Have you ever purchased medications from Canada? It works great if you have a few months to wait for your prescription to be filled, but you have to pay now.

Just think when the whole US can reimport drugs. You can pay your Canadian pharmacy today for drugs you may get in 2015.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 8:47 AM | Link to this

Last sentence @ 8:44 should have read:

Do they still believe there may be OTHER ways of dealing with terrorist nations without using bombs and war as their first option?

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 8:50 AM | Link to this

Don’t worry, be happy. Al Qaeda is not in Iraq. This is just a “civil war” and we have no business intervening in their tribal conflicts.

Or is it that they’re only there because we’re there and once we leave they’ll go home (where ever that is) and, I don’t know, live in perfect harmony?

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) — American soldiers discovered a girls school being built north of Baghdad had become an explosives-rigged “death trap,” the U.S. military said Thursday.//The plot at the Huda Girls’ school in Tarmiya was a “sophisticated and premeditated attempt to inflict massive casualties on our most innocent victims,” military spokesman Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said.//The plot was uncovered Saturday, when troopers in the Salaheddin province found detonating wire across the street from the school. They picked up the wire and followed its trail, which led to the school. Once inside, they found an explosive-filled propane tank buried beneath the floor. There were artillery shells built into the ceiling and floor, and another propane tank was found, the military said.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 8:54 AM | Link to this

AH, BUY DANISH

GLAD TO HAVE A MINUTE TO CHAT WITH YOU

I WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND OFFER OF ADVICE LATE YESTERDAY.

HOWEVER, I ONLY TAKE UNSOLICITED ADVISE FROM PEOPLE OF CHARACTER

RW

ARE YOU PREJUDICED AGAINST THE FEVER SWAMPS? I GUESS YOU ONLY TRUST THE WORDS OF THE IGNORANT IN MCMANSIONS>

BIGOT, BUT WE ALL KNEW THAT

BUT I THINK WERE THEY EVER PROACTIVE ON ANY PROBLEM IS A GREAT DISCUSSION POINT>

IT GOES TO PLANNING, PREPAREDNEDNESS AND MOST IMPORTANTLY

COMPETENCE

By Blackadder

May 4, 2007 8:55 AM | Link to this

Another RW lie - I personally know someone in Connecticut who purchases pharmaceuticals (2 prescriptions) from Canada. They wait a week to 10 days for delivery at most. They save over $200 on each order.

Poor lil Ricky

By RW-(the original)

May 4, 2007 9:03 AM | Link to this

Blackadder,

It all depends on what prescription you have. With Nexium it will usually take a few months. Other drugs are more readily available NOW.

With price controls you also get supply restrictions and rationing. Once you open the market to 300,000,000 Americans there won’t be any drug without huge waits.

Now would you like to apologize for calling me a liar or would you like to punch me for showing, once again, what a complete and utter moron you are?

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this

LuckoDork,

You’re post at 8:02 reflects just how dillusional and misinformed you are. Israel’s war with Lebanon was stupid and ill-planned according to a commission set up by Olmert’s own government, and the people are responding accordingly. Kind of makes you wish that W was held accountable for his own ill-planned war.

You were probabably one of those yahoos last summer who were rooting for Israel to level all of Lebanon while being completely ignorant of the history and demographics of Lebanon. You probably also ignored the fact that it was an organization and not a sovereign country that kidnapped the Israeli soldiers.

But to racist-azz neoCONs like you and others on this blog, “they’re all ragheads trying to kill us”, no matter what their religion, gender, or disposition. I still hold you to the challenge—the next Muslim you see walking down the street, slap him or shoot him just to show them we mean business.

You cowardly, spineless little punk.

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this

Categorically unfit,

Do you know WHY Canadian drugs are so much cheaper than ours and what the consequences would be if drugs were no longer purchased in the American market?

{{{By Goldie

May 4, 2007 8:44 AM | Link to this

Last night’s Repug debate was very revealing: the party is full of white men who love to lead like dictators Blah Blah Blah}}}

That comment is very revealing. Goldie is a freaking bigot.

According to Goldie, we need to choose candidates based not on their qualifications, experience, or vision, but by their race and gender.

IN THE NEWS,

I asked you to back up your “civics lesson” about over riding Presidential vetoes.

I asked you who “they” were when you blamed our military for the media’s errors.

I’m sorry that that requesting facts to substantiate your moonbat statements represents a “character” flaw on my part.

I don’t doubt that Stalin would have agreed with you.

By CornShucks

May 4, 2007 9:07 AM | Link to this

Wolfawitz is a lunatic. He’s one of the archetects of the Iraq War. He drew up plans for invasion soon after Desert Storm 1, and went to Bush Sr. with them, who knew that only a lunatic would invade Iraq and open up the pandora’s box of ancient tribal/sectarian feuds that have lived for thousands of years, and was told to go soak his head.

Of Course Bush Sr is a great man. Bush Jr is a lunatic too, so like minds connected and now we’ve got this catastrophe in Iraq, which is the Democrats fault for believing Powell, Rice and Cheney’s evidence of an imminent and grave threat to US interests.

No imminent threat, just graves.

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:09 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Yeah…it’s interesting that Al Qaeda wasn’t in Iraq until we invaded them.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this

COULD RON PAUL HAVE WON THE DEBATE?

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this

Running out, but I can’t go without dealing with steve-o the clown.

Steve-o,

I don’t think you know squat about the history of Lebanon, but because you’re a Useful Idiot, it doesn’t surprise me that you take the side of Hezbollah in this conflict.

I recommend that you familiarize yourself with Brigitte Gabriel. Watch her video and you’ll get a clue about Lebanon’s history and the lesson that is there for this country.

American Congress for Truth.

Of course there’s always the possibility that you want exactly what she warns about to happen here.

I’ll check in later to get your reaction…

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 9:16 AM | Link to this

OOPS. Steve-o strikes again.

Al Qaeda most certainly was in Iraq before we invaded.

I really get tired of doing research for you fools, but I’ll provide links later that prove you wrong, yet once again.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 9:18 AM | Link to this

Watched that pathetic debate last night.

Ronald Reagen won.

Clue to the gop, he is dead idiots.

Geez.

Only one had a brain and his name is Ron Paul.

The only one that did not want another preemptive war with Iran.

What a bunch idiotic, cowards, scared of Hillary and another country that will never attack us. They did not learn a damn thing from the Iraq occupation.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

Why would the Repugnant Party only have 10 white men in their primary race for ‘08 and on the stage for last night’s debate? Could it be that they have an appalling lack of other demographics in their party who they will support for serving as the next president???

Or is it because the women and minorities of their party KNOW where their proper place is in a “civil” society, i.e. in the kitchen or serving and following their white men’s lead???

By Categorically Unfit

May 4, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this

RW- As a matter of fact, I have been unlawfuly ordering my medications from several overseas pharmacies, including several Canadian firms, for 5 years now (catch me if you can). Service has always been exemplary with delivery times ranging from 2 day express to 2 weeks for non-expedited items. I would just like to do so without being made a criminal in the process.

All the medication that I have ordered came in the original shrink wrapping and it has all worked equivalently to those I have purchased at American pharmacies. The only problem I see is that many overseas firms will sell you morphine, hydrocodone, amphetamines, and even marijuana without a prescription or a doctors consult. Many require a precursory doctors consult for those medications which is perfunctory at best.

Making legitimate medication illegal to purchase through the free market simply opens the door to illicit drugs and black market profiteers as well as the white market profiteers who own the Republican Party!

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:26 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

YOU don’t know a damn about Lebanon. See, I’m not an idiot savant like you who needs to surf the web for stuff I know nothing about or read endless blogs. And just because I didn’t agree with Israel’s tactics doesn’t mean that I supported Hezbollah. You are so freaking dumb! I mean, can you really think or does that drug-addled fatass down in Palm Beach have to do all of the thinking for you?

And fuuk you and your links. Al Qaeda was not active in Iraq before we invaded them! There were no major attacks by Al Qaeda in Iraq under Saddam. In fact, bin Laden was p** at us because Saudi Arabia chose us to protect their interests against Saddam Hussein instead of him and his mujahadeen.

The funning thing is that I didn’t need to read some obscure link to know this. Get a clue and get a life before you accidentally make one more soul as ignorant as you.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 9:27 AM | Link to this

Steve-O, you are correct @ 9:09— al Qaeda had no presence in Iraq while Saddam was in charge… they had some training camps set up in the northern mountains which were outside of Saddam’s reign, according to our “no-fly zone” rules at the time. We all know that Saddam would not allow any religious zealots to operate in Iraq while he was Iraq’s leader.

Since America has now destroyed any and all structure to their society, al Qaeda and many other terrorists groups thrive there and are growing exponentially… a vital part of what Bush-kissers call “spreading democracy in Iraq.”

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 9:31 AM | Link to this

BUY DANISH AND I TOLD YOU TO DO YOUR OWN HOMWEORK

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE BLOG BUY DANISH IS EITHER IGNORANT OR SLIMEY.

YESTERDAY SHE ASKS THIS QUESTION: “IF THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT THE PELOSICRATS THEN WHY CAN’T THEY GET ENOUGH VOTES TO OVERRIDE THE VETO?”

SHE IS IGNORANT IF SHE DOESN”T KNOW THE ANSWER. BUT SHE “FEIGNS” DON’T YA’ KNOW

SHE IS SLIMEY. WHY? YOU SAY SURPRISED (YEAH RIGHT)

BECAUSE SHE THINKS IT MIGHT EMBARRASS THE DEMOCRATS TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

BUT NO WE ARE NOT AFRAID OF THE TRUTH

ANSWER TO QUESTION: THE DEMS HAVE A SOLID MAJORITY OF PUBLIC OPINION BEHIND THEM BUT DO NOT HAVE A VETO PROOF MAJORITY IN EITHER HOUSE OF CONGRESS.

(BY THE WAY, THE IRAQIS ARE HAVING A SIMILAR PROBLEM)

ARE WE EMBARASSED BY THAT - HELL NO

WE HAVE HAD OUR SLIM MAJORITY IN GOVERNMENT FOR SLIGHTLY OVER 90 DAYS

AND WE CONTINUE TO EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION, INCOMPETENCE AND EVIL OF THIS ADMINISTRATION. IMPEACHMENT IS BACK ON THE TABLE. SUBPOENAS ARE JUST STARTING TO FLY> AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS ARE SCURRYING FOR EXECUTIVE COVER.

BUY DANISH HAS BEEN BOUGHT AND SOLD> HER BASE IS SHRINKING, SHE HAS NO CANDIDATE, AND NO POSSIBLY BELIEVABLE DEFENSE FOR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF THE PRESIDENT AND HIS POLICIES>

LET”S ASK HER AND RW AND LUCKO IS THERE ANYTHING AT ALL THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES COULD DO THAT WOULD POSSIBLY CAUSE YOU DO GIVE UP SUPPORTING HIM?

ANYTHING AT ALL??

MAYHEM AND MURDER?

WAR PROFITEERING?

HOW ABOUT IF HE GOT A LITTLE FELATIO ON THE WHITE HOUSE PATIO?

IF BUSH ABUSED YOUR CHILD WOULD YOU STILL BACK HIM?

I”M GOING TO GET ME A CUP OF COFFEE AND HOPE BUY DANISH GOT CHICKEN POX AFTER PUBERTY.

BUY DANISH AND HER ILK CAN NO LONGER GET AWAY WITH FRAMING ISSUES FROM THAT NARROW 25% VIEWPOINT OF THEIRS>

YOU SEE IS EVERYDAY NOW RIGHT HERE

THEY THROW OUT WHAT THEY THINK IS A STEAMY TURD AND WE TOSS IT RIGHT BACK

AFTER A FEW HITS THEY ALWAYS GOTTA GO…

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:31 AM | Link to this

Thanks, Goldie.

I’m sick of Buy Danish and LuckDork’s vapid cluelessness. Seriously, ignorant people like that make a bad case for democracy. And the sad thing is that the Internet has only served to reinforce their ignorance and stupidity.

By @@

May 4, 2007 9:36 AM | Link to this

I like the sound of that “once AND future PM”.

Bibi: “I’ll be back!”

(((Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s once and future prime minister, said it was “not enough to push Hezbollah 30 miles north of the border” and that failure to “disarm Hezbollah … from its missile arsenal” would be “a great victory for that terror organization and for its sponsors in Tehran and its facilitators in Damascus.”)))

(((Emud Olmert subjugated Israeli security needs to international political correctness.)))

Yes he did. I remember it well!!! Public outrage by all the liberals here. Hezbollah was counting on your support and you delivered.

The articles I’ve read would indicate the the Israeli government and the citizens were angry because Olmert wasn’t aggressive enough.

By Hey Moron

May 4, 2007 9:37 AM | Link to this

I’ll settle this dispute between Buy Danish and steve-o. Al Qaida was in Iraq prior to the war. They were in a region that was not under Saddam’s control and Saddam was trying to get rid of them. All indications are that they were not there at Saddam’s invitation or request but were there in anticipation of our arrival. You will note that neither Saddam nor his son’s sought Al Qaida help or assistance when they were on the run. The fact is that Bin Laden and Saddam were as likely to be allies as Buy Danish and steve-o.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 9:38 AM | Link to this

“Also on Palfrey’s list of customers who could be potential witnesses are a Bush administration economist, the head of a conservative think tank, a prominent CEO, several lobbyists and a handful of military officials.”

Our source has told us that the “head of a conservative think tank” is in fact Grover Norquist.

Hahahahahaha.

Figures, family values and all that crap.

By Paul

May 4, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this

Mrs Godzilla

I hope you were able to catch the webcast of the Dalai Lama speaking on “The Meaning of Compassion in Everyday Life” from Rice University on Wednesday. Very good hour and a half. He did speak at length on religious strife in the world, not in a political or judgemental view, more with great sadness.

Goldie

Did we watch the same debate? Granted, I scanned through it but paused for each question, not necessarily the answers. I heard the attendees were selected because they polled at least one percent (!). More egos up there - not one said “I don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell so I’ll opt out.”

I thought some of the questions exhibited a bias, then thought maybe they reflected many of the popular assumptions and so was a good way to address them. For instance, question “Is the rise of conservative Christians (influence/numbers) a good thing for the Republican Party?” This after the reports a few months back about the lack of influence and marginalization by the Administration. Maybe Brian Williams will ask at the next Democratic debate, “Has the rise of atheists been a good thing for the Democratic Party?” :)

Romney, Giuliani came off well. Romney with public/private health insurance brings a new dimension. Giuliani touted his mayorship in a Democratic city and how he worked with Democratic political leadership. McCain? Good guy, just don’t know if he can succeed here.

Big difference: half the Democratic candidates think there is a global war on terror - all the Republican candidates do. In fact, Giuliani observed not one of the Democratic candidates mentioned radical Islamic facists, while it was a topic last night (differentiating it from Iran/Iraq).

Lots more questions about size of government and taxes than at Democratic debate.

Oh, and reference your comment about all the white guys - I believe an African American ran for President in 1996 and 2000 as a Republican. And he polled better than a bunch of those guys on stage last night.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this

Did y’all just love seeing Warmonger McCain pointing his finger at the camera like a great dictator last night and showing such “passion”, as his advisers liked to call it during post-debate interviews? ROFLMAO!

By RW-(the original)

May 4, 2007 9:44 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

While you were all touting George Tenet as a great and all knowing fount of knowledge last week you might be interested in knowing there is a whole chapter in his book that details Al Qaeda presence in Iraq before 9/11.

Categorically Unfit,

That doesn’t answer the question of what you’ll do for your drugs after the market is open to the entire US population. Sorry to hear that you’re so sick, addicted, or both.

getalife,

I have a wedding to go to. Try not to have hallucinations of me posting while I’m away.

Have a great weekend all!

By getalife

May 4, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

McLiar said the war is “right on track.”

He is worse than w and that is saying something.

Geez.

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

Hey moron,

Thank you for the clarification. Be prepared for Buy Danish to bombard us with shiity links!

@@,

Nobody here supported Hezbollah and the Isrealis aren’t upset because the IDF weren’t brutal enough, they were upset at the fact that Olmert launched the war without a plan…kind of like someone we all know.

By Paul

May 4, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

getalife 9:18

[[Watched that pathetic debate last night. Ronald Reagen won. Clue to the gop, he is dead idiots.]]

Don’t you mean “clue to the GOP and Chris Matthews?” Didn’t he lead off the debate invoking Pres Reagan in his questions, and when he got off that the references by the candidates stopped?”

‘Nuther topic, today’s cartoon. Rather a day late and a dollar short, but better than ignoring it. Anyone catch what Ms. Girlfriend gets paid? Nearly $137,000? Working at the State Department? I heard a bit of discussion about how her salary is paid by some think tank/nongovernmental group but that doesn’t make sense. Some of these midlevel bureaucrats are getting a pretty sweet deal, considering the median household (not person, but household) income in the US is just over $40k a year.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 9:49 AM | Link to this

{{{By RW-(the original)May 4, 2007 8:39 AM You see IN THE NEWS, this is why if you live in the feverswamps you will remain ignorant for life.}}}

RW: IN THE PROPAGANDA is a lib censor trying to silence the truth by throwing as much BS out as possible.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By steve-o May 4, 2007 9:06 AM LuckoDork, You’re post at 8:02 reflects just how dillusional and misinformed you are. Israel’s war with Lebanon was stupid and ill-planned according to a commission set up by Olmert’s own government, and the people are responding accordingly.}}}

Look, moron, I told you about the fever swamps and how I would not participate, right?

Israel’s was ATTACKED by cut throat lunatics wanting to kill them because of their race*, you as-shole, and Olmert didn’t totally destroy them like he should have.

(*And why is it that liberals, who supposedly don’t discriminate on the basis of race, are always on the side against Israel, with the terrorists?)

Define yourselves, liberals.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this

BIG LIE

“IN THE PROPAGANDA is a lib censor trying to silence the truth by throwing as much BS out as possible.”

ANSWER THE QUESTION LUCKO

IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?

By Paul

May 4, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this

Goldie 9:27

Sorry, Mr. Tenet condradicty your assertions about al Qaeda. While he disputes the command and control assertions, he doesn’t dismiss the camps as of no consequence or beyond the capacity of Saddam to influence.

Link:What Tenet said about al Qaeda in Iraq

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this

LuckoDork,

So in destroying them, should they have destoyed all innocent Lebanese as well? Seriously, how do you discriminately kill with missles and an all-out invasion?

By JP

May 4, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

Goldie, if you’re not scared sh**less after last night, you just need to wait til the next debate. This is a study in the marketing of fear and terror—it seems that if you’re not terrified of what the terrorists might do next, the terrorists have won!

After all, it’s really as simple as We Win, They Lose. Seriously, they think it is.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

a handy, dandy cut-out guide to Bush’s screwups

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

{{In fact, Giuliani observed not one of the Democratic candidates mentioned radical Islamic facists}}

Paul— you may want to double-check the quote from Giuliani. He was careful not to use the term “fascists” which the Repugs just love to use (I believe it’s because it’s so dear to their own philosophy)… I think he used the term “extremists” instead, but we’ll have to research that for the direct quote, and whether or not he was even correct in making his statement.

Mostly, I remember Romney trying to use his canned and planned debates points, no matter what the question was. Such as always endearing himself to Ray-gun’s legacy and “optimism”, and finding himself “without words” when asked what was wrong with America and could be improved upon. Couldn’t even think of the fact that his beloved president has divided this country more than it’s ever been and he is offering no attempt to even fix that. Instead, he’s more willing to change his positions to suit his party in his attempt to take over the White House.

And Giuliani seemed very frustrated that he couldn’t keep bringing up his claim to being in NY at the time of the 9/11 attacks… his main claim to being the best candidate in continuing his guy’s “war on terrrrr”… pretty sad really.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

{{{By IN THE PROPAGANDA May 4, 2007 9:51 AM IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?}}}

It isn’t about politics, you slobbering hack goony.

It’s about national security, it’s about democracy and freedom, it’s about doing the right thing.

Which is the side Bush Master is on.

YOU are on the side the sucks the democrat national committees d-ick, no matter what.

You’ve been defined.

We know who you are.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS,

LuckDork won’t answer the question. I beginning to think that it’s a good thing that ignorant bastards like LuckoDork and Buy Danish vote GOP. It will scare level-headed people from voting Republican after seeing a bunch of ignorant chumps controlling the party’s platform.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

To Blackadder @8:05 who has inspired me to write poetically (sorta). Add your own music:

Blackadder, the traitor, has given us a list

Of those who sing Anti-Bush, Anti-war, Anti-American bliss.

Just betray your country, oh who needs it?

Support the terrorists! Run and quit!!!

So now we are sure about ol’ Blackadder.

He squirms and slides and gets “badder and badder”!!!

Blackadder, the traitor, run and quit!

We know you’re just a cowardly twit!!!

(No applause, thank you.)

By RW-(the original)

May 4, 2007 10:00 AM | Link to this

I would vote for a Herman Cain/Michael Steele ticket right now.

How about you Goldie?

Don’t drop the bong getalife, it really was me with one last post.

Later!

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this

ANSWER THE QUESTION LUCKO

IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this

ANSWER THE QUESTION DUSTY

IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this

RW— I don’t see either Cain or Steele attempting to represent their party on the national level, do you? And what do you think would be the chance of the Repugnant Party “base” even supporting such a ticket?

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this

ANSWER THE QUESTION RW

IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?

By Paul

May 4, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

Goldie 9:57

Good point on the quote - I couldn’t check as I’d already deleted the debate - I thought I’d put the term en parens as I didn’t get his exact wording but see I didn’t. I agree “Fascist” is one of those loaded terms severly misused. The point I was going after is this may shape up as one of the defining difference between the two parties and Democrats can tap in to some defining language rather than the protect America general theme Obama and Hillary are developing.

Just a thought in passing - yeah, Romney invoked a lot of Reagan, could have something to do with playing to optimism (remember the blowback from Pres Carter’s ‘malaise’ speech) and a different way forward. Not unlike Obama. Now, there’s an interesting comparison!

I must sign off pretty soon, so excuse me if I miss a response. Pleasant weekend -

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this

LuckoDork is the type of guy that wakes up and goes straight to the computer.

He doesn’t shower or bathe.

No personal hygiene.

He’s easilly manipulated by talk radio and bullshiite sites like Townhall.com

He’s completely ignorant of others not like him.

He’s probably very shy and unassuming in person, with no presence when he enters the room.

His love life/sex life is horrid.

He has always been an underachiever.

Hence his faux blog personality.

You’ve been defined.

We’ve always knew who you were.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By Black Danish

May 4, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this

Ya’ll beta leev my buddy RW alone. RW is good white folks and he be talkin all da good republican stuff.

Dem media peoples talkin bad ‘bout Rudy. Rudy don’t be likin abotion unless da woman be in danger or somethin.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this

{{{By steve-o May 4, 2007 9:54 AM LuckoDork, So in destroying them, should they have destoyed all innocent Lebanese as well? Seriously, how do you discriminately kill with missles and an all-out invasion?}}}

Who gave the moron cut throats, who have f’ed their world up so bad that other people have to build the weapons they slaughter innocents with, the missiles?

That’s who I would have bombed.

As far as what Israel should have done, mark off the Katusha’s range back away from their border and then flood that zone with the IDF, any missile that sets sail, whoever launched will die before it lands.

Any more questions, you slobbering bozo?

Stupid little DNC toadie.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Commander Guy

May 4, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

Thought you’d like to see pictures of the folks that might get my job.

Mitt Romney

By JP

May 4, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

Blackadder: How about Take a Bow by Muse?

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

RW,

Have a good time today. I went through this last fall and it was fun. The priest was in the conga line at the reception. The bride was dancing too in her long white dress with an added cowboy hat. It was certainly a joyous occasion!!

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

ARE YOU AFRAID?

ANSWER THE QUESTION LUCKO

IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?

By Paul

May 4, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

JP

Last Wednesday we discussed characteristics of O’Reilly, as well as the content of the show. The topic came up about “namecalling” - what, nine times a minute? I believe I made a point that I’d like to hear the definitions used as well as the source material. I’ve found it useful to examine the methodology by which conclusions or results are arrived at. Also the weight given to factors.

Here’s a link with the grad student’s paper at Indiana University. This is how he defines “namecalling”:

[[The terms conservative, liberal, left, right, progressive, traditional, or centrist were treated as name calling, if they were associated with a problem or social ill or if coupled with a derogatory term.]]

Wow. Go to a program with a political bent and label any political label as namecalling. “SecDef Rumsfeld and his conservative aides appear dismissive of conflicting opinions from military officers” - according to the definition, that’s namecalling. I’m sure you see how that one definition skews the “results.”

BTW, interviews with Mr. Tenet over two nights. Lots of tough questions. Told him he thought he didn’t do a proper job in stopping with Sec Rice and not going direct to Pres. Lots of followup about Tora Bora. Addressed Clinton Administration contention they tried to kill bin Laden (also brought on the Ops head of CIA’s bin Laden unit who said, in effect, “no.” Wasn’t done to point fingers but more from an historical, developmental perspective. But at the end he thanked Mr. Tenet for his service and for appearing.

By @@

May 4, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

steve-o:

I think if you go back and read articles and accounts coming out of Israel during the conflict with Lebanon, you’ll find that they were disappointed in the lack of aggressive tactics, so I’ll agree with you to a point. I don’t think Olmert had what it took to win. He caved in to international pressure.

Hezbollah uses their own people to serve as human shields. They conduct their wars from civilian vantage points. They know what they’re doing. They don’t adhere to international laws during their conflicts, but know full-well other countries are compelled to do so.

You may not have supported Hezbollah directly, but if you were one of those who admonished Israel for using all means to protect itself, you did aide Hezbollah indirectly

Before you go into the argument that Israel took land away from the Palestinians, then you better be prepared to move out of North America, because we took it away from the Native Americans.

I’m out.

By RW-(the original)

May 4, 2007 10:20 AM | Link to this

IN THE FEVER SWAMPS,

YES! IF PRESIDENT BUSH DECIDED TO SURRENDER TO AL QAEDA LIKE THE DEMOCRATS WANT TO DO HE WOULD LOSE MY SUPPORT.

Goldie,

Since as you so brilliantly observed they aren’t running so we don’t know. I think the Republican base would come a heckuva lot closer to supporting a Cain/Steele ticket than Democrats would.

getalife,…………BOO!

Now I’m leaving!

By Paul

May 4, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this

JP

One more time - the link dropped out completely - it’s pdf file, hope that doesn’t have something to do with it.

Link:Indiana University grad student paper

Diane Rehm show on NPR is having a panel discussion on the debate.

By @@

May 4, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

I am also Buy Danish. I use : when addressing the person my posts are directed to to throw you guys off.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

CALL EM OUT

RW

BUY DANISH

DUSTY

LUCKODULL

@@

ANSWER THE QUESTION

IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?

DOES ANYBODY ELSE SMELL CHICKEN?

By Cindy

May 4, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

Interesting stuff, Paul, but what is the source? Maybe the tortured Iraqi that was the “reliable source” for many other of bush’s arguments?

By Blackadder

May 4, 2007 10:27 AM | Link to this

“Of those who sing Anti-Bush, Anti-war, Anti-American bliss.” -Dusty

Anti-Bush? Of course. Anti-war? You betcha! Anti-American? NEVER! I guess you never matured to the point everyone else has where Anti-Bush and Anti-War DON’T mean Anti-American.

JP, That Muse song is excellent. Another one that is just as relevant today is War Pigs by Black Sabbath.

By Jigsaw

May 4, 2007 10:27 AM | Link to this

Why do Buy Danish, @@, and RW always announce that there leaving the blog like their Elvis f*cking Presley?

Buy Danish doesn’t leave this blog unless she’s going to eat,take a dump, or see a doctor.

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this

@@,

See that’s the thing…the last 2 paragraphs in your last post is what annoys me about some people…you automatically put words in my mouth and make misguided assumptions when you debate someone.

I totally agree with you in the Hezbollah uses human shields. It shows how cowardly they are. I opposed Israel’s tactics because they forfeited the upper hand when they started bombing Lebanon indiscriminately.

At this point in time, Lebanon was rebuilding after a long civil war and they were on the path to becoming a model for a pluralistic, multicultural democracy in the Middle East. Just a few months prior, they were able to get rid of the Syrians after the assasinatiion of their former prime minister.

Hezbollah upset this process when they stupidly and cowardly kidnapped the IDF soldiers. The world sypathized with Israel. Israel could have had the upper hand had they planned better and looked for other means. Instead, they launced an all-out war which destoryed a lot of infrastructure in Lebanon, compromised their integrity, and resulted in defeat.

By Paul

May 4, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

Cindy 10:25

Source for what? The Tenet/al Qaede/Iraq? That was a Weekly Standard synthesis of Tenet’s book and interviews.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

They never leave.

16 times they mentioned Reagen.

It is a very weak field but Americans will vote for them anyway for abortion.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 10:32 AM | Link to this

OK RW NICE START

I NOTE YOU CAN’T ANSWER A DIRECT QUESTION WITHOUT AN INSULT/LIE ABOUT SOMEBODY ELSE.

SO IF BUSH SURRENDERS TO AL QAEDA HE WILL LOSE YOUR SUPPORT.

BUT WE COULD WITHDRAW FROM BEING THE BABYSITTERS IN THE IRAQI CIVIL WAR WITHOUT SURRENDERING TO AL QAEDA

IPSO FACTO

AS LONG AS WE COULD GET OUT OF IRAQ WITHOUT A SURRENDER, YOU”D SUPPORT IT.

ARE GOING WITH THE PEACE WITH HONOR GAMBIT?

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

LuckoDork,

Your post at 10:10 shows why the GOP has gone from being the party of national defense to being the party of the Keystone Cops.

By Paul

May 4, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

Cindy

Pls don’t key in on Weekly Standard. It was the first hit on Google and I thought it did a pretty good job of more fact/less opinion. I’m hearing the same stuff from other, more mainline sources. Frankly, when I saw “Weekly Standard” I thought “Evening Standard” (a Brit paper). Not hardly the same.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this

The Dems position is to withdraw but leave some troops to fight Al Queda.

RW is supporting the Dems.

GFY.

By steven daedalus

May 4, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this

Hillary 08’

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this

{{{By IN THE NEWS May 4, 2007 10:16 AM IS THERE ANYTHING GEORGE BUSH COULD DO TO LOSE YOUR SUPPORT?}}}

What’s the matter, toadie, are you out of democrat national committee talking points to flood the blog with this morning and you have to resort to mindless bullsh-it?

Drilling a hole in a 8 month old infants head, I would definitely not supprot that.

Supporting the enemy, Al Qaeda, by offering to surrender to them, that would pis-s me off.

If he were conducting show trials and political witch hunts instead of conducting government business, now that would anger me.

I guess to answer your question, if the president did just about anything you libs do, it would cause me to not support him.

Are you stupid or what?

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 10:42 AM | Link to this

Paul,

BO would not let Tenet answer the questions as usual.

I could only stand a few of minutes of his crap.

It was pathetic.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this

Searching for Mr. Reagan - Los Angeles Times

Did you dumb as-s libs try looking in his grave?

What the F is with this story line, is this not some ridiculous concept that can only come form ignorant liberal “nuance?”

Much like they’ve taken warm summer weather and turned it into mass hysteria?

Any politician, any Conservative editorialist that plays along with this nonsense is signaling their unseriousness, their utter lack of ability to reason, their total non understanding of the important issues.

Reagan, God Rest his soul, is gone.

MoveOn.

Define the sniveling Coward liberals.

Highlight their treachery so that it is easily packaged, easily understood.

We win.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By @@

May 4, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

ITN:

Just saw your question. Quick reply.

George Bush would lose my support if he bailed on Iraq or our allies.

Gone till later.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

To confused IN THE NEWS @ 10:23

The question: Is there anything George Bush could do to lose your support? YES. Here’s a list:

If George Bush…..

Wore a “turban” like Durbin.

Spoke like foxy Boxer.

Acted dumber than Schumer.

Started terror-hidin’ like Biden.

Got cozy with Pelosi.

Started a retreat screed like Reid.

Stopped eating spinach like Kacinich.

Acted like a nut with a $400 haircut.

NEWSY,DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE SILLY QUESTIONS?

By eric

May 4, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this

maybe is you perform background checks for political appointees we would not be in this situation. How would those folks who think nothing is wrong with this feel if your co-worker got a sweet deal by sleeping with your boss?

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

Harry Reid’s hometown newspaper, starring in his as-s:

{{{Now, mind you, the fact that the Democrats are racing to get some money into the pipeline so the troops don’t run out of ammo is a good thing. Their reasons are more cynical political calculus than patriotism — they know that declaring the war lost, pulling out and leaving the Iraqis to suffer a massive bloodbath does not play well in the polls.-Las Vegas Journal}}}

Defining these sniveling craven little Cowards.

To the tee.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this

OK LUCKO DULL LETS SUMMARIZE

IF BUSH SUPPORTED INTACT DILATION AND EXTRACTION HE”D LOSE YOUR SUPPORT. I CAN SEE THAT.

OFFERING TO SURRENDER TO AL QAEDA WOULD P** YOU OFF< BUT YOU’D STILL SUPPORT HIM. I ASSUME YOU SAW RW’S RESPONSE.

AND IF HE SUPPORTED ACCOUNTABLIITY AND THE CONCEPT OF CHECKS AND BALANCES YOU”D BE ANGRY BUT STILL SUPPORT HIM. I IMAGINE HENRY WAXMAN WILL WEEP INTO HIS PILLOW OVER THAT>

THANKS

OH AND BY THE WAY, YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT LIBS HATING 07….

THE REASON

ITS SO VERRRRY FAR AWAY FROM NOVEMBER 08.

By @@

May 4, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

Dusty:

You are priceless. I’m off to work with a huge smile on my face.

Thanks.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

{{Israel could have had the upper hand had they planned better and looked for other means. Instead, they launced an all-out war which destoryed a lot of infrastructure in Lebanon, compromised their integrity, and resulted in defeat.}}

Steve-O, sounds an awful lot like Dubya’s methods of problem-solving, yes?

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this

Blackadder@ 10:27,

I am quite mature enough to know when America is at war you cannot separate the country from the conflict.

Keep trying to explain. But we already understand. You are AGAINST the efforts AMERICA is making against terrorists and that includes Iraq.

People like you understood “anti-war” quite well during the Viet Nam war. They fled to Canada.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

AND THEN THERES DUSTY

WHO AS LONG AS BUSH ISN”T A DEMOCRAT WOULD CONTINUE TO SUPPORT HIM.

MURDER< MAYHEM>ABUSE.WAR PROFITEERING AS LONG AS HE HAS AN R AFTER HIS NAME SHE”LL SUPPORT HIM

ANYBODY SURPRISED?

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this

Dusty-brain, Boobs and Danish-Donut— get back to your kitchens and bedrooms, where your party wants to keep you. Buh-bye!

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this

In the News— I’m not surprised.

By DawgBite

May 4, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 8:02 AM | Link to this

It’s kind of funny how liberals just assume that Wolfowitz’s girlfriend would not have been smart or talented enough to earn that job with out his help.

LuckoDumb!!! PUHLEEEEZE!!! Even you are not that stupid.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

what’s “priceless” about a laundry list of stupidity and high schoolish taunts?

and where are all these “allies” I keep hearing about?

By MLK Jr.

May 4, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

A man should be judged by the content of his character, not the color of his skin.

Would someone please explain this to Goldie?

By Cindy

May 4, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this

Sorry, Paul. A lot happened in between comments. Yes, I was referring to the Tenet’s source. Great IU article by the way.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this

OH LUCKY DULL

are you out of democrat national committee talking points to flood the blog with this morning and you have to resort to mindless bullsh-it?

NOPE JUST CALL EM AS I SEES EM

BESIDES I WOKE UP IN A PARTICULARLY GENIAL MOOD AND FELT IT WOULD BE FUN TO POKE THE BEAR ALL DAY

YOU GUYS ARE TOOOO MUCH FUN TO WATCH

By Categorically Unfit

May 4, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this

RW 9:44- “That doesn’t answer the question of what you’ll do for your drugs after the market is open to the entire US population.”

That’s an easy one. I’ll probably go back to buying my medication at the local pharmacy since they will then have competition from the overseas markets and will have to price their wares accordingly. If the American pharmaceutical industry chooses not to compete, I’ll continue to buy my medications from Canada, Brazil, England, Mexico, India, China, or where ever gives me the best value for my money, as I do now!

The free market is a wonder thing if it is allowed to function. Republicans continue to pervert the free market in order to protect the sheltered earnings of their favorite campaign donors, Big Oil and its’ naggardly offspring, Big Pharma.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

TIMIDLY @@ WRITES AND RUNS

George Bush would lose my support if he bailed on Iraq or our allies.

EVERYTHING ELSE IS OK

LIES< DEFICIT< NEW NUKES< TREATMENT OF VETS<

AGAIN, ANYBODY SURPRISED?

By Cigar Vendor

May 4, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

steve-o at 10:06 is what we define as a Swisher Sweet. If some guy would just put a ring on his cigar all would be right in his itty bitty world.

He’s looking for a fella to spark him up.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

Yes, they love the lies, the cover ups, the scandals, etc… as long as they can cheer on the blood of our troops in the middle of a civil war.

Pathetic.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

Poor bigot “old white men” Goldie, Midget Midori and FLOOZY NEWSY,

How about “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never harm me.”???

If you don’t like that one, how about Nanananananana !!!

You three(or maybe you are one) just aren’t “poetical” among other things. Sorry about that.

By Paul

May 4, 2007 11:40 AM | Link to this

Cindy

I’m having a right fine time of it today - I gather from the Tenet link you saw it was “Daily Standard” not “Weekly Standard” (a rather conservative pub). Better explains thinking “Evening Standard.” As RW says, “stop digging!” so enough on that. Comes from running dual monitors or not enough coffee.

Later - (left monitor, OFF!)

By steve-o

May 4, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

The Israel-Lebanon conflict sounded a lot like the child-king’s method of problem solving. It’s refreshing to see that the Israeli people are quick to hold their leaders accountable. Meanwhile here in the US, our leaders keep shoveling the general public a bunch of bullshhit because mindless lemmings like LuckoDork and Buy Danish will believe anything.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Jeff Gannon’s ‘Bible Reading Marathon

you might remember him from this

By getalife

May 4, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this

My goodness, w took us from a superpower Clinton left him to begging for help from small ME countries.

Just gaze at this shame w and the gop have done to our country.

Geez.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

Dusty just confirmed to us that all she has in her cranium are sticks and stones.

Wonder what holds it together?

Caulk?

By Longfellow

May 4, 2007 11:51 AM | Link to this

HERE IS A RHYME FOR FRAU DUSTY WHOS BRAIN IS WEE OLD AND RUSTY WHEN ASKED FOR HER HEART SHE JUST RIPPED BIG FART EXPLAINING JUST WHY SHE SMELLS MUSTY

By Midori

May 4, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

Commander Codpeice

Pretty funny video.

wonder if Dusty has one of those in her brain, too?

By Blackadder

May 4, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

1 “You are AGAINST the efforts AMERICA is making against terrorists and that includes Iraq.” -Dusty

2 “People like you understood “anti-war” quite well during the Viet Nam war. They fled to Canada.” -Dusty

I am definitely FOR efforts to fight the terrorists and their leader who attacked us on 9/11. Apparently Bush isn’t since he doesn’t “spend that much time thinking about him”. That has nothing to do with Iraq and never has.

Those who fled to Canada were right to do so. Why die for an unjust war? If there were a draft now and I were of age to be drafted you bet your a$$ I would avoid, by whatever means, being sent to Iraq. Afganistan is another story entirely. I would welcome the chance be a part of bringing down Osama Bin Laden.

By GOPhers Ain't Conservative

May 4, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this

THE WANING OF THE GOP by William F. Buckley

Just cause GOPhers call themselves conservative doesn’t mean they are. GOPhers make genuine conservatives wanna puke.

By Liberal lies and the liars that tell them

May 4, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

I love reading that Republicans aren’t conservatives when such comments are written by people who want socialized medicine and nationalized banking. Maybe we aren’t conservatives in China, where liberal means wanting free markets and private property, but we are conservative by the modern day definition.

The cartoon today is ironic as all of the evidence shows that everything that Wolfowitz did was by the book. Maybe it is because he is conservative and Jewish that bothers you anti-semites and Chavez backers. Half truths are lies and that is what you are telling about most conservatives right now. Your reward will be in defeat and an upleasant afterlife.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

Andy, after 08 election

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

Listen to this lib:

{{{Socialist opponent Segolene Royal said on Friday that France risks violence and brutality if her opponent right-winger Nicolas Sarkozy wins Sunday’s presidential election. “It is my responsibility today to alert people to the risk of (his) candidature with regards to the violence and brutality that would be unleashed in the country (if he won),” she said.}}}

She’s been watching Hillary’s campaign.

“It is my duty to warn you that if you elect this pinko®, they may surrender your country to the terrorists, being that they are sniveling Cowards.”

Hey, this tactic has potential.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Dusty

May 4, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this

Ho hum

Blackadder admits he is a traitor but only if necessary.

Midori shows she is dull.

Longfellow needs a bath.

So long. Like @@ (who has a job and doesn’t blog at work), I will see you later. Don’t fret now.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

There are some Americans who believe that if Dubya has a remote chance to “win in Iraq”, it will require the drafting of our younger Americans into the military service, in order to overwhelm the streets of Baghdad and Anbar, and “just kill ‘em all!” (as some counter-protesters have screamed at anti-war demonstrations).

Of course, sane Americans know that this will never work, because (a) the Repugnant Party will not support a draft of their own children — only other people’s families and kids should be forced to sacrifice, and (b) we’ll never be able to “kill ‘em all” no matter how long or how hard we fight in Iraq.

The sooner we get rid of the Repugs in the White House, the sooner we can bring our troops home from that civil war and begin the real work of wiping out terrorist cells globally.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 12:49 PM | Link to this

you know all about “dull”, don’t you Dusty?

dull “wit”

dull “intellect”

dull universe

I’d say you’re an expert on the subject.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

“They stood earnestly in a row, combed, primped and prepped, as Nancy Reagan gazed up at them with courteous interest. But behind the hopeful candidates, a dwarfing shadow loomed, a shadow almost palpable in its power to remind Republicans of the days when men were men and the party was united. His power is only increased by his absence. But enough about Fred Thompson.

This is a piece about Thursday night’s Republican presidential debates, but first I would like to note that the media’s fixation with which Republican is the most like Reagan, and who is the next Reagan, and who parts his hair like Reagan, is absurd, and subtly undermining of Republicans, which is why they do it. Reagan was Reagan, a particular man at a particular point in history. What is to be desired now is a new greatness. Another way of saying this is that in 1960, John F. Kennedy wasn’t trying to be the next FDR, and didn’t feel forced to be. FDR was the great, looming president of Democratic Party history, and there hadn’t been anyone as big or successful since 1945, but JFK thought it was good enough to be the best JFK. And the press wasn’t always sitting around saying he was no FDR. Oddly enough, they didn’t consider that an interesting theme.

They should stop it already, and Republicans should stop playing along. They should try instead a pleasant, “You know I don’t think I’m Reagan, but I do think John Edwards may be Jimmy Carter, and I’m fairly certain Hillary is Walter Mondale.”

Cont…

By Daniel

May 4, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

Midori: Thanks. Great piece. America aches for leadership. All of America owes a debt of gratitude to Jim Webb. Webb knocked off that dumbbell Allen. Allen was touted as the “Next Reagan”. Which can only mean more debt, more Corporate Welfare and a lot more BS. Why can’t they just tell us the truth?

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

DUSTY

PLASTIC

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

You clown liberals want a Reagan, how about Michael:

As my pal Ann Coulter put it, “The not-visibly-insane Democrats all claim they’ll get rough with the terrorists, but they can’t even face Brit Hume. And over at the Hot Air blog, it was noted that that this is a win-win situation for everyone, [except for both remaining Centrist Democrats]: “the Dems get to show how tough they are against an enemy who’s more their speed and Fox gets to tout itself as the network that frightens the left.” The idea of facing Fox on live TV scares them silly and the Democrats, as is their usual practice, ran for cover. If they can’t dictate the rules of the game they won’t play.

Sniveling wormy little Cowards, stupid mindless walking gaffes, they know full well Fox will bust out their ignorance for all to see.

Define them.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this

“The Waning of the GOP” @ 12:07… there were a couple of instances in the Repug debate last night where some candidates lamented how badly the Repug Party had veered off course in the past 6 years. No wonder the 29% cult members wail so loudly here day after day. They hitched their wagons onto an ideological whack-job and they’re paying the price now.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this

Bush’s point man for escalation plan resigns.

J.D. Crouch, the deputy national security adviser whose office “was the nerve center for the Bush administration’s top-to-bottom review of war strategy that culminated with the president’s decision in January to send more troops to Iraq,” announced his resignation today, saying “it was time, for both him and his family, to leave the government for the private sector or academia.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this

BIG LIE

“”You clown liberals want a Reagan”“

BIG TRUTH

By GOPher Tax

May 4, 2007 1:06 PM | Link to this

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York drivers opposed Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s new traffic-fighting $8 fee for taking a car into Manhattan, a survey said on Thursday, and almost half of the group said it would force them out of their cars.

See, Republicans really are against new taxes……they call them “fees” instead so that makes it all better. Of course, if you’re like me, $8 outta your pocket feels the same rather they call it a tax or a fee or whatever.

This would be more of the ‘smaller’ government that Republicans LIED to us about to get elected!

By Midori

May 4, 2007 1:06 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

personally, I think they should dig Reagan up and run him.

No one would be able to tell the difference.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

Midori, drudging up old news and making it new, yaaawwwwwnnnn, it’s all she’s got:

{{{I found an October, 2003 article from Antiwar.com, Pentagon Hawk Released – Straws in the Wind? which discusses Crouch’s dismissal following the WMD fiasco: “He’s not being fired, but they’re starting to move people around,” said one knowledgeable source. “It’s all about (Bush’s) reelection and how to get rid of the loonies without looking like they screwed up.” As assistant secretary, Crouch reported to Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith, whose office has been responsible for postwar strategy in Iraq.}}}

This dude has been in the attic for the last three years.

Losers don’t last very long with the Bush Master.

Cowards.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

and what do you have, Andy?

outside of a brain tumor, and empty crack pipe, and a room littered with empty Jim Beam bottles?

By Commander Guy

May 4, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

Thought you’d like to see pictures of the folks that might get my job.

Rudy

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 1:13 PM | Link to this

Daniel @ 12:58— ah yes, the Repugs lost their “next Reagan” to his Macaca moment in history. And, actually, the same thing should’ve happened to Ray-gun when he decided to announce his own candidacy in Philadelphia, Mississippi back in ‘80.

I’m with Midori — this “Reagan love” that the Repugs keep saying is what America is looking for is pure horsesh!t. America suffered greatly for his lack of any empathy for Americans who were poor, or had AIDS, or were mentally ill. Glad he’s finally been put in the ground.

By Commander Guy

May 4, 2007 1:13 PM | Link to this

Thought you’d like to see pictures of the folks that might get my job.

McCain

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this

BIG LIE

Losers don’t last very long with the Bush Master.

SEEMS THEY CAN LIFE INTHE ATTIC FOR A FEW YEARS EH< WHAT?

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

Oh, Commander Guy— don’t insult Captain Kangaroo!

By Commander Guy

May 4, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

Thought you’d like to see pictures of the folks that might get my job.

Ron Paul

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

“Ronald Reagan was neither a fox nor a hedgehog. He was as dumb as a stump.”— Christopher Hutchins.

That explains why the Repugs are so enthralled with Ray-gun. There’s no “there” there.

By Commander Guy

May 4, 2007 1:23 PM | Link to this

Thought you’d like to see pictures of the folks that might get my job.

Brownback

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 1:25 PM | Link to this

Look at how these Cowards lie about the greatest man that ever ran this country:

{{{By Goldie May 4, 2007 1:13 PM I’m with Midori — this “Reagan love” that the Repugs keep saying is what America is looking for is pure horsesh!t. America suffered greatly for his lack of any empathy for Americans who were poor, or had AIDS, or were mentally ill. Glad he’s finally been put in the ground.}}}

Unbelievably wormy:

{{{AIDS cases were first reported in the United States in 1981, but it wasn’t until 1983 that HIV was formally identified as the cause. As Deroy Murdock notes, Reagan mentioned the disease at the latest in September 1985 when, responding to a reporter’s question about AIDS funding, Reagan said, [I]ncluding what we have in the budget for ‘86, it will amount to over a half a billion dollars that we have provided for research on AIDS in addition to what I’m sure other medical groups are doing. And we have $100 million in the budget this year; it’ll be 126 million next year. So, this is a top priority with us. Yes, there’s no question about the seriousness of this and the need to find an answer.}}}

Somehow, lying must obscure their own failures from themselves, isn’t that just so weird?

Keep defining yourselves, you bitter little losers.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this

Andy,

They can’t kill Brit and Fox friends. Tough on security and Faux News? Get real idiot.

That is a ridiculous argument but what do you expect from Mann.

Geez.

By Commander Guy

May 4, 2007 1:29 PM | Link to this

Thought you’d like to see pictures of the folks that might get my job.

Tommy Thompson

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 1:30 PM | Link to this

Everybody knew he was a dumbass. Ronald Reagan was famous for not understanding how government works and not particularly caring about it.

By green peas

May 4, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this

Goldie, who else would you like to see dead?

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this

What Reagan Got Wrong Liberty is not the absence of government.

By Mighty Manfred

May 4, 2007 1:39 PM | Link to this

Goldie 1:16- Oh, Commander Guy— don’t insult Captain Kangaroo!

I second that motion, Goldie. Bob Keeshan was a good Marine and a decent human being. Associating Captain Kangaroo with Republicans is despicable. They can have ‘Mighty Manfred the Wonder Dog’ from ‘Mighty Mouse’ fame, instead. Manfred is more in line with their image and Mighty Mouse has too much integrity for ‘em.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 1:39 PM | Link to this

Reagan lied about the Iran-Contra scandal, continually. At a February 1988 press conference, he denied that his administration had held secret talks with Ayatollah Khomeini’s regime to arrange a guns-for-hostages deal, a fact that had been indisputably documented.

By Blackadder

May 4, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

getalife 12:27 link

That’s just wrong…

…that’s Andy NOW!

By COMMANDER GUY

May 4, 2007 1:48 PM | Link to this

I apologize to Keeshan fans every where.

How about this:

McCain

better?

By A hole in one gopher

May 4, 2007 2:12 PM | Link to this

Is a liberal gopher really that stupid?

Bloomberg is supporting Gore’s global warming hysteria with those NYC driving fees.

Thanks for showing us your stupidity. We don’t find useful tools like you in our own conservative party.

What a numbnutz.

By MISLEADING PERHAPS?

May 4, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

BLOOMBERG IS A REPUBLICAN

HE IS A MEMBER OF “A hole in one gopher” POLITICAL PARTY

THE NEOCONS ARE EATING THE LAST OF THE REPUBLICANS

By MISLEADING PERHAPS?

May 4, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

ALSO

DONT NEOCONS REFER TO GUYS LIKE BLOOMBERG AS A RINO?

By No Stupid gopher

May 4, 2007 2:29 PM | Link to this

Bloomberg was planning a presidential bid on the Independent ticket.

Independent from his brains. That says he’s a democrat.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

Bloomberg was a republican who switched to democrat in order to run for mayor of NYC.

Another bomb for you morons: the same applies to Ray Nagin - a republican’t who switched in order to run for Mayor of New Orleans.

You morons sure like to spew a lot of uninformed b.s.

By Homeland Security

May 4, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

SunSat Satellite Solutions

Track cell phones from your home computer using repeater triangulation, GPS and GSM technology. See where your spouse, children, or competitors are every minute of every day!

FREE!!!

By reebok

May 4, 2007 2:59 PM | Link to this

The Republican field is absolutely pathetic. The GOP better pray Hillary is the Dem’s pick, because she’s the only potential candidate who could possibly lose to the has-beens and never-weres in the Republican fold. Obama or Edwards would take 45 states against any of the Grumpy Old Men.

BTW, today’s cartoon is funny.

By Dull Warblogger

May 4, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this

I had sex with Paul Wolfowitz and he didn’t give me a raise. He wasn’t even that tasty, maybe because he sometimes sleeps with girls, not just us she/males.

He did like my Curly girl hair though.

By steven daedalus

May 4, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this

There are no conservatives in heaven. Jesus was a liberal tried and true.

By John Q Public

May 4, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

Fred Thompson won the debate last night

He gets points for not standing on the stage with that pack o’fools.

By Bi Dunnish

May 4, 2007 3:12 PM | Link to this

Wolfie is my baby daddy

By The Watcher

May 4, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this

Tancredo, Huckabee and Brownback said they don’t believe in evolution.

Not Presidential material.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this

ever notice how republicans never get these?

By John Q Public

May 4, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this

add the Edwards package to the security for Obama and it makes one wonder if the neo cons can control their own

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 3:36 PM | Link to this

Watcher @ 3:14 — yes, the creationists onstage at the debate last night were quite astounding, with their hands raised in the air. Here’s another Repugnant hero who is not presidential material:

How can you have the mess we have in New Orleans, and not have had deep investigations of the federal government, the state government, the city government, and the failure of citizenship in the Ninth Ward, where 22,000 people were so uneducated and so unprepared, they literally couldn’t get out of the way of a hurricane.

So long as the Repugnants try to represent only their 29% cult, they’re not going to get the White House again for a long time.

By g k chesterton

May 4, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this

“Complaint always comes back in an echo from the ends of the world; but silence strengthens us.” Please repugs be silent.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this

Midori @ 3:31— and I wonder who would send death threats to the Rutgers women’s basketball team after Imus got sacked? Bunch of terrorists right here in America.

By Midori

May 4, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

they are completely and utterly vicious, psychopathic, and out of control.

By green peas

May 4, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this

“This lady went back in time and her assignment was to kill Hitler. I thought, What if I could go back in time and hurt George Bush?” —Cindy Sheehan

By Dull Warblogger

May 4, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this

[Since Jeff Gannon/Guckert was there, you know I would have have bowed my head too - Right into his lap!!!]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/03/AR2007050302170.html)

God what a hunk! He’d have me on my knees for sure - but then, I’m Andi/e…

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By Dull Warblogger

May 4, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

[Since Jeff Gannon/Guckert was there, you know I would have have bowed my head too - Right into his lap!!!]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/03/AR2007050302170.html)

God what a hunk! He’d have me on my knees for sure - but then, I’m Andi/e…

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By Midori

May 4, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

another example of their warped and hateful mental state

I wonder how many of those posts were Andy’s?

By green peas

May 4, 2007 3:50 PM | Link to this

Republican Head Quarters Vandalized by Democrats

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this

NEOCON WEEK AT A GLANCE

By green peas

May 4, 2007 3:55 PM | Link to this

Republicans Homes Vandalized by Democrats

By Jigsaw

May 4, 2007 3:56 PM | Link to this

I want to play a game:

Barack Obama is receiving Secret Service protection because @@(Buy Danish) has been stalking him. She says she just loves dark meat.

This is what she is doing when she is not blogging, that’s why she disappears so much.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

GREEN PEAS

THE PERPS ARE BAD. NO ONE HERE SUPPORTS THAT KIND OF BEHAVIOR>

HOPE THEY CATCH THE LITTLE BA$TARDS

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 4:00 PM | Link to this

The Bush-cult is contemplating supporting a member of the Mormon-cult:

The former Massachusetts governor is to give the commencement address Saturday at Robertson’s Regent University in Virginia, a golden opportunity to reach core GOP voters. Yet the many people who seek spiritual guidance from Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network and its Web site will find Romney’s Mormon faith listed as a cult. The candidate and his Christian supporters have been working hard to overcome evangelical antipathy toward the teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, whose 19th-century founder, Joseph Smith, said he revised parts of the Bible to correct it.

I guess being a cult member also explains his preference for the L. Ron Hubbard book “Battlefield Earth” for fiction reading — WOW. How much further can the Repugs dig their own hole?

By steven daedalus

May 4, 2007 4:00 PM | Link to this

Green Pea brain- You forgot to report these were unsubstatianted claims made by thr Repugs, yeah with their record you can really believe them.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 4:05 PM | Link to this

AGAIN I SAY UNTO YOU ITS THE FORGED LETTERS……

Three months before President Bush uttered his infamous 16 words, claiming there was evidence that Saddam Hussein was building a nuclear weapon, a State Department analyst named Simon Dodge had determined that the evidence for the claim was likely fraudulent. Dodge emailed his assessment to fellow intelligence analysts in October 2002, and then again in January 2003 (two weeks before Bush’s State of the Union), saying the documents supposedly from Niger were “probably a hoax” and “clearly a forgery.”

REMIND ME TO POST THIS AGAIN AFTER 5 WHEN THE LEFTOVERS COME OUT FROM WHEREVER THEY ARE HIDING>

By green peas

May 4, 2007 4:07 PM | Link to this

Sure thing,

I’m sure no peas loving liberals burned all those Hummers to the ground in the name of saving the environment either right?

By Dull Warblogger

May 4, 2007 4:08 PM | Link to this

Let me assure you that Bi Danish and I are just friends - she likes the girls, and I like the guys, although she gets a little frisky when I get in my little blue GAP dress, the one with all the goo spots on it…

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife May 4, 2007 1:27 PM They can’t kill Brit and Fox friends. Tough on security and Faux News? Get real idiot. That is a ridiculous argument but what do you expect from Mann.}}}

gitmo: Then why did they cut and run from Fox news

Sniveling little Cowards, perhaps?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By Midori May 4, 2007 3:48 PM Goldie, another example of their warped and hateful mental state I wonder how many of those posts were Andy’s?}}}

I don’t do Midori links, I can just imagine some pinko worm burrowing deep into my hard drive, so could some one tell me how Midori defines warped and hateful posts?

Was it something about not killing unborn babies?

Maybe it was a post about how great America is, those really make her mad.

Stuff like this they think is great:

{{{By Dull Warblogger May 4, 2007 3:46 PM [Since Jeff Gannon/Guckert was there, you know I would have have bowed my head too - Right into his lap!!!]}}}

Making fun of gay people and discriminating against sexual orientation: Perfectly acceptable to the liberals!

Define yourselves, Cowards, jack somebody’s name and call them a fa-g.

Hahaha.

Dumbas-s wasters.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Jigsaw

May 4, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish wants the people on this blog to believe that she has a life.

If she’s not here, its only because she is in a drunken stupor.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

Go, Arianna!

“Last night on Anderson Cooper 360°, Anderson Cooper asked David Gergen, the Weekly Standard’s Stephen Hayes, and me to pick our headline for the GOP debate. A Competition to See Who Could Be the Biggest Neanderthal was mine.”

By green peas

May 4, 2007 4:13 PM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS- “NO ONE HERE SUPPORTS THAT KIND OF BEHAVIOR”

From peas loving Goldie on Ronald Reagan:

“Glad he’s finally been put in the ground.”

By Midori

May 4, 2007 4:15 PM | Link to this

Andy,

you don’t even do life, much less “midori links”

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 4:21 PM | Link to this

GREEN PEAS

DO YOU NOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE?

COMMITTING AN EVIL DEED VS. RUDE COMMENT

OH< CRAP

LOOKS LIKE WE GOT ANOTHER FEIGNER HERE!

By Paul

May 4, 2007 4:27 PM | Link to this

Goldie 4:00

Mormon “cult?” You have quite a bias there, don’t you? Polls show most of the hardcore “won’t vote for a Mormon” are evangelical Christian types - does that explain it?

Why did you not ever bring up this “Mormon cult” thing when talking about Sen Harry Reid? He’s a Mormon, too, quite different politically from Gov Romney, but a Mormon nonetheless. Obviously their church doesn’t direct them what to say or do - Mormon Senator Hatch supports stem cell research - so -

-wait, didn’t you tell me once with Gov Romney it was his politics? So why the constant emphasis on namecalling another faith? You’ve gotten a bit testy when such tactics are applied to Moslems - could you show the same consideration for others, pls?

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

GREAT BIG LIE

Making fun of gay people and discriminating against sexual orientation: Perfectly acceptable to the liberals!>>>>>>

THEY DONT CALL HIM luckDULL FOR NOTHING

IRONY ESCAPES HIM (I SUSPECT HE”S ESCAPED FROM SOMEWHERE)

HOWEVER WHAT REALLY WOKE THE SLUG UP THIS AFTERNOON WAS GANNON

I THINK THATS TELLING

LUCKODULL WE WON”T MAKE FUN OF YOU IF YOU COME OUT AND FACE YOUR PASSION FOR THIS GAY MALE MILTARY HOOKER CUM JOURNALIST> IT WILL MAKE YOU MORE HUMAN IN OUR EYES

WE DONT CARE THAT GANNON IS GAY

WE CARE THAT HE SPENT 150 NIGHTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE….WHY? DID HE LOSE HIS CAR KEYS? TOO DRUNK TO DRIVE? PERHAPS CANOODLING WITH ONE OF THE MAJOR HETERO”S IN THE WEST WING>?

IF CLINTON CAN”T HAVE HETERO FELATIO ON THE PATIO THEN WHOEVER WAS HOSTING GANNON CANT HAVE GAY F****** ON THE PATIO

HAVE YOU EVER WORKED IN WASHINGTON?

By getalife

May 4, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

Andy,

No real Americans watch Faux News. It would be a waste of time. gop should debate there.

Told ya wingnuts are dangerous and should all be sent to Gitmo.

By IN THE NEWS

May 4, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this

FOR LUCKODULL

ITS PINK

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 4:36 PM | Link to this

Paul @ 4:27— it’s the Pat Robertson website that says “cult”… I’m simply the messenger.

By Reality

May 4, 2007 4:37 PM | Link to this

getalife is gay.

By Goldie

May 4, 2007 4:40 PM | Link to this

Also Paul @ 4:27— I really find a lot of humor in the Bush-cult members at Robertson’s university calling the Mormons a cult… kinda like kettles, yes? I think it’s hilarious!

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

{{{By IN THE NEWS May 4, 2007 4:30 PM WE CARE THAT HE SPENT 150 NIGHTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE….WHY? DID HE LOSE HIS CAR KEYS? TOO DRUNK TO DRIVE? PERHAPS CANOODLING WITH ONE OF THE MAJOR HETERO”S IN THE WEST WING>?}}}

Oh, O.K.

{{{Web-porn scandal rocks Clinton White House West Wingers downloaded gay, bestial, teen sex videos, jamming firewall system Posted: August 9, 2000}}}

Yes, you libs are puritans, how could I have not known this?

Geez, Clinton was working some many holes the odds are against all of them belonging to females.

Hypocrite.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

{{{By getalife May 4, 2007 4:30 PM No real Americans watch Faux News. It would be a waste of time. gop should debate there.}}}

Well then no one will see them saying stupid sh-it, they should be relieved that no one is watching.

They can discuss the one square policy amongst themselves.

We’ll be sure to bring that up.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By Cindy

May 4, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

The New York Times Friday, May 4, 2007 Robin Toner and Robert Pear Published: June 9, 2004 “Advocates for people with AIDS have long asserted that Mr. Reagan’s lack of leadership on the disease, which was first reported by the Centers for Disease Control in 1981, significantly hindered research and education efforts to fight it. His surgeon general, Dr. C. Everett Koop, wrote later that ”political meddlers in the White House” had complicated his work on the disease, and that ”at least a dozen times I pleaded with my critics in the White House to let me have a meeting with President Reagan” on AIDS in the mid 1980’s. ” April 6, 1987 United Press International By Celia Hooper WASHINGTON—”President Reagan twice last week broached the subject of AIDS, but some experts believe he took the wrong tack in his verbal entrance into the fight against an epidemic that has killed over 19,000 Americans. On Tuesday, Reagan and French Prime Minister Jacques Chirac jointly announced the settlement of a dispute between French and American laboratories over the discovery of the AIDS virus, and on Wednesday Reagan made his first major address on AIDS before the Philadelphia College of Physicians. ”After almost six years of silence on the epidemic,” said Rep. Henry Waxman D.-Calif., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health, ”the president has finally said that he will fight the disease.””

Ryan White was born in Kokomo, Indiana on December 6, 1971. Three days after he was born the doctors found out Ryan was a hemophiliac (a blood disorder) and had to use Factor VIII which he received twice a week. He contracted AIDS from tainted blood products used to control bleeding. In 1984, when his mother, Jeanne White, told him he had AIDS, little was known about the disease. (What had been going on for 3 years since its identification??? Oh yeah, Reagan ignored it.) Ryan White, to me is a hero and at the same time one of the greatest avoidable tragedies in this country. I have often wondered and will never know if Reagan had encouraged research into AIDS; had testing of blood donation begun earlier because of the attention; if Ryan White would not still be with us today. Ryan faced down those who opposed him with a radiant smile that makes me cry today when I see his picture. For me Ronald Reagan will always have that boy’s blood on his hands.

By Paul

May 4, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this

Goldie, thx. I took your last paragraph as more of a personal view. I’d hoped the country had gotten past that with the Kennedy/Catholic thing. We’re at the point where voting for a woman is a nonissue for most, same for an African American, but the country still has a lot of religious prejudice. One commentator wrote that Romney’s quest may do the good of preparing the way for a future Mormon candidate.

It still strikes me unlikely Democrats would refer to Sen Reid in the same manner if he decided to make a run for the Presidency. In fact, I’d wager they’d be pretty merciless on the Robertsons and those who repeated their prejudices.

Thanks again -

By Paul

May 4, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this

Goldie 4:40

Ha! The irony’s probably lost, though -

By Paul

May 4, 2007 4:51 PM | Link to this

Was I incorrect earlier in my recollection Chris Matthews, MSNBC moderator for the debate, was the first to invoke Reagan in his lead questions and the candidates’ references subsequently tapered off?

It’s bad enough to constantly point the finger back at Clinton when discussing Bush, but pointing it all the way back to Reagan? Please! What next? Lincoln? Andy Jackson?

This is reason enough for MSNBC to not let Matthews do any more moderating.

By bon scott

May 4, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this

Moldy Donut, sorry it’s taken so long to answer this rant you posted yesterday. You’re not exactly high on my list of priorities, what with real work to do…

By Buy Danish - May 3, 2007 7:06 PM - Bonnie Scott, admit it, you are obsessed with Andy and “hate” him with every fiber of your feeble body and brain. Just to pick out one of your outrageous charges, when has Andy ever made a comment that any sane* person could construe as “woman hating”? There are a lot of “woman haters” on this blog, but Andy is not one of them. *that excludes you, so that could be the problem.

Your seeing eye dog is a very good typist, but has very poor idea retention, and an inability to forward offensive statements to you, his/her handler. Too bad.

Nary a day goes my that Luckodummy doesn’t complain about menstruation and it’s effects on a woman’s mind, a woman’s physical strength, her ability to stand up to males, etc.

This is in addition to his regular use of words like hooker, s-lut, emotional weaklings, and emotional deviants (especially Hillary). And then there’s his mocking use of words like gay, h-omo, le-sbo and (my favorite} meterosexual. Still don’t know what he means by that.

But the BOTTOM LINE is that if you don’t EXACTLY agree with Andy, you are subject to constant and (I admit) very creative verbal abuse, with the occasional threat of physical assault.

I’m really glad he spends his days hunkered down over his computers, especially when he brags about his guns. As I said yesterday, he’s not much different from the South Korean maniac who murdered dozens of people last month at Virginia Tech. He hates people, especially women who aren’t exactly in lockstep with him. Men who disagree with him suffer almost as much. I’d hate to see the AJC revoke his posting privileges. Without this outlet, he’d probably go terminally postal.

I don’t hate Andy, but I do pray for him.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

{{{By Cindy May 4, 2007 4:44 PM The New York Times Friday, May 4, 2007 Robin Toner and Robert Pear Published: June 9, 2004}}}

Cindy: You and the pinkos at the New York Times can rewrite history all you want, WTF does it prove?

Talk about sick in the head, you think we can’t go back and look at the federal budget expenditures?

Facts don’t lie like a lib does.

Define yourself, sicko.

Tell us about how you know Reagan makes Bill Clinton look like a weak little sh-it eater and you libs have to knock Reagan to make your sorry life whole again.

And a liar too:

{{{Overall funding for AIDS-related programs within HHS has increased by 150 percent under the Clinton Administration}}}

Oooohhhh, a “whopping” 150 percent over the Republicans, gosh, whoppee.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By @@

May 4, 2007 5:47 PM | Link to this

So, whose going to allow their economy to fail first?

China more assertive in climate talks

It’s China for crying out loud. The country we are soooooo indebted to.

The world sure does get complicated sometimes.

Always facing dilemmas like ^^^ that.

By getalife

May 4, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this

China can do whatever they want.

We are begging for help from Syria and Iran.

Go w yay.

Geez.

By @@

May 4, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this

I don’t know whether abortion is legal in Austria, but isn’t this sweet?

“Activists Want Chimp Declared a “Person”

It’s important to note that while I love animals, would never hurt one, and have gone to great lengths to find homes for abandoned animals….I am not a fan of primates.

By N-GA

May 4, 2007 6:05 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Ms.Riza’s salary at the World Bank is $193,590/year. This WaPo story goes into some detail. The article notes that this amount is NET, not gross.

It remains to be seen what really occured, but one would think that Wolfowitz would have gone out of his way to avoid any controversy that could have arisen from his involvement with Riza.

Here you will find the World Bank’s salary grid. Riza’s position is Senior Communications Officer for the Middle East & Asia. That puts her at Grade “G” and her salary exceeds the maximum for that grade by $26,000.

BTW, she also gets generous benefits & expense reimbursement.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 6:10 PM | Link to this

{{{By bon scott May 4, 2007 5:03 PM By Buy Danish - May 3, 2007 7:06 PM - Bonnie Scott, admit it, you are obsessed with Andy and “hate” him with every fiber of your feeble body and brain.}}}

Danish: I guess finchie answered “yes” to your question, if you condense his six paragraph manifesto.

He won’t be my first stalker.

Ain’t that right, Polly, don’t you just get miffed having another loony on your side of the street, you little gay baiter.

Cowards.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By @@

May 4, 2007 6:11 PM | Link to this

Damn Getalife, you’re becoming quite the introvert/isolationist. I think you need some company.

I just looked online for you. There’s a strip club in NO called “Big Daddy’s”.

Begging? Isn’t that what you’ve been calling diplomacy?

You’re a hard man to please Getalife.

Go see Big Daddy and practice a little diplomacy. ;-)

By @@

May 4, 2007 6:15 PM | Link to this

Sincerely yours, Paul Wolfowitz

By getalife

May 4, 2007 6:21 PM | Link to this

@@,

The world does not want our help anymore after this illegal occupation. A British diplomat came out today and said the Iraq intell was a known lie. The truth is coming out.

Maybe Bill’s world tour will help.

Diplomacy at a strip club involves plenty of cash and not much effort because the women are corrupt.

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this

By bonnie finch scottie-May 4, 2007 5:03 PM |Nary a day goes my that Luckodummy doesn’t complain about menstruation and it’s effects on a woman’s mind, a woman’s physical strength, her ability to stand up to males, etc.

Bonnie,

Really? “Nary a day” is quite a broad statement, so with a year’s worth of archives available to you, you should be able to back that up very easily.

You spent the last 2 years b!tching that “Bush Lied!”, there were no WMDs in Iraq blah blah blah, so here’s your chance to demonstrate your credentials as a crack fact finder!

{{{And then there’s his mocking use of words like gay, h-omo, le-sbo and (my favorite} meterosexual. Still don’t know what he means by that.}}}

You don’t have a dictionary at your disposal? Poor, poor Bonnie. No wonder you have it in for people with Maseratis.

{{Metrosexual: n. An urban male with a strong aesthetic sense who spends a great deal of time and money on his appearance and lifestyle.}}

This website documents the history of the word, citing articles from your favorite papers, like WaPo. Maybe you were in rehab when these stories came out? Now’s your chance to catch up on what you missed!

www.wordspy.com/words/metrosexual.asp

By @@

May 4, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this

My Dearest Getalife:

Corruption is your forté.

Charitable giving is “your passion”.

I’m sure some of those hard working ladies lost SOMETHING in Katrina.

Say Hi to Big Daddy for me.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 6:31 PM | Link to this

The clear, unmistakable sounds of victory:

{{{Al-Fahdawi’s efforts seem to be snowballing in Diyala province. Yesterday, two Diyala tribes, the Karki and Shimouri, “signed a peace agreement at the home of the Mujema tribal leader in Diyala province, Monday,” and “promised to ‘consolidate and unify to battle all insurgents that penetrate among [their] tribes.’” Seven other tribes announced joining the Anbar Salvation Council in late April. The Anbar Salvation Council’s national political movement, the Iraqi Awakening, is set to meet in Baghdad in May. And most surprisingly, the Adhamiya Awakening has been established in the troubled Baghdad neighborhood to fight against al Qaeda.}}}

Victory for America, not for you sniveling Coward liberals.

Before long there ain’t going to be anybody to surrender to.

USAUSAUSAUSAUSA.

This calls for putting the fire to the end of a Opus X.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By @@

May 4, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

About Syria and Iran…this is the part I like best. From Stratfor:

(((Though Damascus and Tehran see eye to eye on a number of issues and are jointly invested in several militant proxies, the Syrians are concerned that any concessions Iran makes with the United States on Iraq could end up seriously compromising Syrian interests, particularly since Saudi Arabia has now become a bigger player in the negotiations. Such fears stem from Saudi efforts to engage Iran in containing Hezbollah and Hamas — two militant groups that provide the Syrian regime with substantial bargaining power.)))

There was another article about the negotiations. An Arab writer commending the U.S. for standing firm against Syria. Syria came into the meeting pretty smug, but hit a brick wall.

I’ll try to find it before closing.

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 6:49 PM | Link to this

{{By steve-o

May 4, 2007 9:09 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Yeah…it’s interesting that Al Qaeda wasn’t in Iraq until we invaded them.}}}

steve-o,

I see that Paul linked to the article that review Tenet’s intelligence about Al Qaeda’s presence in Iraq before we invaded.

Did you read it?

Here’s what Wiki says:

Zarqawi’s first major attempt at a terrorist attack occurred in 1999 after his release from prison. He was involved in an attempt to blow up the Radisson SAS Hotel in Amman in 1999 because it was frequented by many Israeli and American tourists. He failed in this attempt and fled to Afghanistan and then entered Iraq via Iran after the overthrow of the Taliban in late 2001. From Iraq he started his terrorist campaign by hiring men to kill Laurence Foley who was a senior U.S. diplomat working for the U.S. Agency for International Development in Jordan. On October 28, 2002, Foley was assassinated outside his home in Amman. Under interrogation by Jordanian authorities, three suspects confessed that they had been armed and paid by Zarqawi to perform the assassination. U.S. officials believe that the planning and execution of the Foley assassination was led by members of Afghan Jihad, the International Mujaheddin Movement, and al-Qaeda.

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this

Al Qaeda in Iraq:

[LONDON — Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi set up “sleeper cells” in Baghdad before the Iraq war to attack American forces occupying the country, according to a British intelligence report.’(http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1089901831124_85311031/?hub=World)

The report, dated March 2003 and released as part of an overall review of British intelligence, forecast the string of Zarqawi’s attacks against American targets during the past year “using car bombs and other weapons.” It said he was setting up groups of fighters to be activated at a later time, known in the intelligence field as “sleeper cells.”

British Prime Minister Tony Blair claimed vindication Wednesday after a committee led by Lord Butler released its report that concluded British intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was flawed, but said the government had not deliberately deceived anyone as it built a case for toppling Saddam Hussein.

While Butler’s report faulted British intelligence for having few reliable sources and not properly analyzing information, it did credit the spies with foreseeing the al-Zarqawi strikes on coalition forces.

By Buy Danish

May 4, 2007 6:57 PM | Link to this

Al Qaeda in Baghdad:

Zarqawi’s activities were not confined to a small corner of northeast Iraq. He traveled to Baghdad in May of 2002 for medical treatment, staying in the capital of Iraq for two months while he recuperated to fight another day. During his stay, nearly two dozen extremists converged on Baghdad and established a base of operations there. These al-Qaida affiliates based in Baghdad coordinated the movement of people, money and supplies into and throughout Iraq for his network.

By Peter

May 4, 2007 7:00 PM | Link to this

There is not a single American in Iraq who is protecting our liberties. What a hoax. The ONLY thing America has accomplished is the slaughter of its own poorly trained troops who never belonged there, the slaughter of untold thousands of civilians, created a firestorm against us in the entire Middle East which will burn past our lifetimes - and you ain’t seen nothin yet. That “handful of insurgents” is just getting started. I’m for building concentration camps here for Neocons. Hmmm?

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 7:01 PM | Link to this

The clear, unmistakable sounds of victory:

{{{Turn on any television or radio debate in Turkey these days and the main subject of discussion most likely concerns the threat Islam poses to the country’s future. “Do you want us to become another Iran or another Afghanistan?” one frustrated secularist demanded of an Islamic supporter during a Turkish radio station phone-in earlier this week.}}}

Victory for America, not you sniveling Coward liberals.

Now go on, get under your beds and dream of Al Qaeda car bombs you sick mofo’s.

Your days are numbered.

Watch the curtain come down on you.

Bye, bye.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.

By LuckoDull

May 4, 2007 7:14 PM | Link to this

{{{Hamas Calls for ‘Extermination of Jews The Palestinian militant organization Hamas not only wants the elimination of the state of Israel, but also the extermination of the Jews, according to the group’s newspaper.}}}

Define yourselves liberals, let the world know who you are.

Side up with these filthy wastes against Israel, let these ruinous scumbags drag their society back to the 7th century under your care and guidance.

This is who you are, mass murderers, no better than Hitler, no better than Al Qaeda.

Lie for these people, spread their propaganda, publish fake pictures, whine for them.

That’s you.

Depraved little sicko Cowards.

And we know it.

You’re gonna hate 07®.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®.