Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2007 > April > 08 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USCivil war
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (190) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon
Comments
By Not Dull
April 9, 2007 8:37 AM | Link to this
Oh my! guess this means that we won’t be greeted as liberators anymore.
Shiite rallies mark anniversary of Baghdad’s fall Huge turnout follows calls by radical cleric for Iraqis to ‘unify’ against U.S.
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Tens of thousands marched through the streets of two Shiite holy cities Monday to mark the fourth anniversary of Baghdad’s fall.
By DebbieDoRight
April 9, 2007 9:12 AM | Link to this
{{Oh my! guess this means that we won’t be greeted as liberators anymore. Shiite rallies mark anniversary of Baghdad’s fall Huge turnout follows calls by radical cleric for Iraqis to ‘unify’ against U.S.}}
It was only a matter of time…..history never lies, it just repeats itself when people ignore the lessons of the past.
By Performance Data
April 9, 2007 9:44 AM | Link to this
DOE average cost of gasoline:
Bill Clinton takes office on 1/20/1993. 317 weeks into his term of office on 2/15/99 the cost of a gallon of gas was = $0.939/gal.
George W. Bush takes office on 1/20/2001. 324 weeks into his term of office on 4/9/2007 the cost of a gallon of gas is = $2.78/gal.
$2.78 a gallon, according to the latest Lundberg Survey
You do the math! It’s not hard to see why the economy did so great under Clinton. Hell, in the good old days, people could actually afford to drive to work!
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this
This woman is tripping slam out of her mind:
So this folly will continue, fueled by a perplexing cultural ethos that worships individual gun ownership. A century from now, anthropologists will look back and wonder what in the world this was all about. They’ll sift through the ruins and the historical record, in much the same way anthropologists today puzzle over cannibalism and the sacrifice of virgins in long-dead civilizations. They’ll wonder how a highly advanced and sophisticated culture allowed unchecked personal gun ownership, despite the carnage. Sorting through this insanity will no doubt inspire reams of literature of anthropologists and social historians a century from now. Perhaps by then the American love affair with the gun will be a curious moment in history; for now, it’s a lethal and inexplicable reality.- Queen Pinko, Urinal
1) It is absolutely the truth, that the closer we get to the Easter promise of salvation through Christ, the more loony the candy as-ses pervert liberals will become. The mere thought of the world worshipping God instead of them drives these degenerates totally insane.
2) America’s history and the gun are irrefutably and forever interlocked, they go hand and hand, much like deviant sexual behavior is part and parcel of liberalism. Does the saying “the shot heard round the world” sound familiar?
3) Americans live free from tyranny, because we shot to death the original tyrants and all the other potential tyrants took note of this. When we are unable to defend ourselves, and believe me, little socialist Tucker knows this, we will be ripe for enslavement.
4) More people die in car accidents then gun deaths by far and away, anyone ever heard a lib freaking out about the automobile carnage?
5) The majority of gun deaths in the United States are black on black crime committed with illegally owned firearms. WTF good will it do to make laws against gun ownership?
continuedBy LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 9:47 AM | Link to this
Continued-
6) A June CBS News report proclaimed Great Britain “one of the most violent urban societies in the Western world.” Not surprisingly to many observers, the violent crime rate has risen dramatically and steadily since gun bans have been instituted.”
7) Why no mention of Senator Webb, flaming pinko, toting his cannon to work in Congress? Oh, I’m sorry, that “wasn’t his gun.”
It’s obvious that this lib wants to take your guns away from you so that you are left unprotected and have no recourse against aggression. Gun crimes can be reduced by stepped up enforcement of existing gun laws, instead of letting these little darlings walk, like Tucker advocates for all the time, lock them up.
People cannot shoot other people from a jail cell.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Senate Ankle Biters For Islam
April 9, 2007 9:50 AM | Link to this
Can the AJC ever, EVER see the good side of anything?
{{{A hail of mortar rounds wounded about a dozen people nationwide, but the number of civilians reported killed or found dead was among the lowest —- 19 —- since the U.S.-Iraqi security crackdown in Baghdad began more than seven weeks ago.-Urinal}}}
I know reporting the successes of Al Qaeda is the top priority of you candy as-s filthy mouth pervert liberals, after all they are your allies, but do you have to qualify all of the good news coming from Iraq with some bad?
Could we have not just said “the lowest number yet” and be done with it?
I know an American would have.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
As always, when the AJC Grand Poohbas go on their Religious Holiday Sabbaticals (hahahaha) the Vent is jam up. Promote the weekend help!
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
{{{Prominent Iraq war opponent Cindy Sheehan urged US President George W. Bush on Friday to “end this madness” and accused his Democratic foes of having “betrayed” their anti-war supporters. The anti-war movement “lost a little momentum during the elections, but it’s picking up again” because “the Democrats aren’t really doing anything” to end the conflict, she said.}}}
The democrats lied?????
No way!
There must be some misunderstanding. They would never, NEVER renege on a campaign promise.
(Cindi, you ain’t the only one who got cheated. What exactly did you expect, you associate with known felons, liars, scoundrels, perverts and scumbags. Deal with it.)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Complete and Utter Failure
April 9, 2007 9:53 AM | Link to this
NEW YORK - In a rueful reflection on what might have been, an Iraqi government insider details in 500 pages the U.S. occupation’s “shocking” mismanagement of his country — a performance so bad, he writes, that by 2007 Iraqis had “turned their backs on their would-be liberators.”
First came the “monumental ignorance” of those in Washington pushing for war in 2002 without “the faintest idea” of Iraq’s realities. “More perceptive people knew instinctively that the invasion of Iraq would open up the great fissures in Iraqi society,” he writes.
What followed was the “rank amateurism and swaggering arrogance” of the occupation, under L. Paul Bremer’s Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), which took big steps with little consultation with Iraqis, steps Allawi and many others see as blunders:
In his 2006 memoir of the occupation, Bremer wrote that senior U.S. generals wanted to recall elements of the old Iraqi army in 2003, but were rebuffed by the Bush administration. Bremer complained generally that his authority was undermined by Washington’s “micromanagement.”
Although Allawi, a cousin of Ayad Allawi, Iraq’s prime minister in 2004, is a member of a secularist Shiite Muslim political grouping, his well-researched book betrays little partisanship.
On U.S. reconstruction failures — in electricity, health care and other areas documented by Washington’s own auditors — Allawi writes that the Americans’ “insipid retelling of `success’ stories” merely hid “the huge black hole that lay underneath.”
What a complete and utter failure this President has been!
By WootenDull
April 9, 2007 9:54 AM | Link to this
(Originally meant to post Saturday at Wooten’s, before the AJC staff shut down their servers and went on their extended religious sabbaticals, hahaha.)
A Urinal hit piece on religion:
Across metro Atlanta, pews will be packed with one-day visitors. Parking will be scarce, and some disgruntled “regulars” will be angry that the traffic both inside and outside their churches will be heavier than normal because of “Chreasters,” a euphemism some folks use to describe people who come to church only on Christmas and Easter.-Atlanta Urinal
I got one question for you church going “experts” at the AJC, how the F would you know what happens at Easter Services?
We all know the intentions of the AJC is to keep you away from your place of worship, they are sick in the head and even thinking about lots of people Praising the Lord upsets them to no end, as you can clearly see^^.
Make no mistake, we welcome you with open arms, fellowship and some good breakfast, come and celebrate the Risen Lord with us in His house.
And while you are amongst us, your brothers in Christ, think of all the ridiculous things you’ve heard about Christians from the mainstream pinko media and just think of how totally bogus and false all of their nonsense really is.
Just like everything else they say.
Up from the grave He arose,
With a mighty triumph o’er His foes,
He arose a Victor from the dark domain,
And He lives forever, with His saints to reign.
He arose! He arose!
Hallelujah! Christ arose!
Go rain on someone else’s parade, AJC.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Truthman
April 9, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this
Today is great day in American history!
142 years ago Robert E. Lee surrendered to that great Ohioian, U.S. Grant, on the steps at Appomattox!!
Grant did not accept Lee’s sword in surrender, thus allowing his confederate friend to save face.
Our union survived and the confederacy was defeated!!
Hooray for Grant and hooray for the Union!!
By Walt
April 9, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this
“I got one question for you church going “experts” at the AJC, how the F would you know what happens at Easter Services?”
I am not saying that you are not saved but I am saying you are not setting much of an example for the unsaved.
Walt
By Shawny
April 9, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this
Just read Tucker’s gun article. Good think she doesn’t have a place to put in comments. She would get pounded for such extreme idiocy. What a nutbag! Wrong on all levels.
By @@
April 9, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this
Your perception of what’s going on in Washington is accurate. It’s a “tribal” war within the U.S.. Democrats vs. Republicans. It’s fueled by political ambitions. How sad.
Regardless of what the PNAC “conspiratorial” crowd wants to believe, George Bush did not enter office “hungry” for war. He responded to an invitation sent by “the radical extremists”. One that had been sent many times prior to his taking office, but went unanswered over decades.
The enemy that attacked us on 9/11 wasn’t restricted within the borders of any one country. They are presently being “restricted” by our actions in Iraq, however.
The enemies of George Bush’s Iraq Policy are being aided by the MSM. I’ve listened to too many independent reporters, along with military personnel, give reports of positive results on the surge effort in Iraq. They also report the negative. Both accounts have to be given within “one” report/article before I’ll believe what I’m hearing/reading.
One such article by Greg Reeson:
Imagine if the mainstream media devoted as much time to stories about the good things our troops are doing as they allow for the bombs and the blood. Perhaps Americans would be less skeptical about our prospects for success if they were able to tune in to the evening news and see a balanced approach to Iraq, one that provided a truer picture of what was happening on the ground. Perhaps then the calls for precipitous withdrawal would die down just a bit as the public realized that all wars involve both progress and setbacks, and not just the latter.
There are those who can choose to wage war for “political power” and there are those who choose to wage a war for “freedom” from powers of evil.
I’ll support the latter. Our military, the moderate muslims, and the efforts put forth by this administration.
You have the “freedom” to choose which one you support. When the bill comes due, it’ll have your “liberal” name on it though.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this
{{{By Walt April 9, 2007 10:06 AM I am not saying that you are not saved but I am saying you are not setting much of an example for the unsaved.}}}
Walt: I have some serious doubts about God casting my soul into eternal damnation because I used the F word.
You know what I’m saying, there would be a lot of vacancies in Heaven if that were the case.
And it really doesn’t help the “unsaved” to think that we in the church are a bunch of unforgiving prudes that constantly spy on and scold people, like the liberals do.
You have read the Bible, haven’t you?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Truthman
April 9, 2007 10:32 AM | Link to this
You tell ‘em, Walt!
By Truthman
April 9, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this
You tell ‘em, Walt!
By getalife
April 9, 2007 10:36 AM | Link to this
Civil war, lets give the wingnuts Utah.
Muqtada al-Sadr Orders Tens Of Thousands To Protest Fall Of Baghdad: “Get Out, Get Out Occupier!”
Ah yes, the Iraq disaster continues.
The drug business in Iraq is booming.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this
Oh really, @@? So what “good” has the surge done so far? Are we going to hear another heartwarming story about some U.S. soldier saving a kitten or painting a school somewhere? Tell you what, @@, how about you look here and check out the “Average casualties per day” statistic. I’m assuming you can find it. And if you do you will see that we are losing 4.56 soldiers PER DAY so far in April, compared to 2.65 in March and 3.0 in February. If we stay at this pace, this would be the worst month, casualty-wise, since 2004. But do tell us about some school that opened. And hurry up, before someone bombs that school.
By DullOfSchmidt
April 9, 2007 10:43 AM | Link to this
The truth hurts, doesn’t it, Luckodull? Your idiot leader has no clue what he’s talking about - can’t even sell his own illogical war the right way.
U.S. military, intelligence and diplomatic experts in Bush’s own government say the violence in Iraq is primarily a struggle for power between Shiite and Sunni Muslim Iraqis seeking to dominate their society, not a crusade by radical Sunni jihadists bent on carrying the battle to the United States.
Our president keeps whining about how the timetable would make things worse. Why not get innocent troops out of Iraq and back home with their families? Why not reinforce the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan? Of course, you and your fellow parrots could never explain that. You’re just waiting for Bush to say something so that you can form “your” “opinion” of the war and what to do.
Pathetic.
By JNH
April 9, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this
*am not saying that you are not saved but I am saying you are not setting much of an example for the unsaved (10:06AM)
Great observation Walt. We all must learn to ‘walk the walk’ prior to ‘talking the talk.’
By Yada Yada Yada
April 9, 2007 10:45 AM | Link to this
GEORGE W. BUSH IS AN IDIOT.
By lars larsen
April 9, 2007 10:45 AM | Link to this
Me and my friends Olie Olsen and Sven Svensen were sittin’ on the lake (its still frozen up here) fishin’ for muskie and crappie over the weekend and we were talkin’ about current events like the weather and global warmin’ and that crazy war that Bush and his goofy buddies got goin’ over there in Iraq. Olie seen Mike’s cartoon in the AJC online (we get it up here in Minnesota over the computer) about the Democrats in Congress fightin’ against ole Bush and his craziness and he says, “Now that’s a war that needs to be fought! That ole Bush is crazy as hell as someone’s got to stop him.” Olie listened as says, “Ya, you betcha!”
I says, “The only person crazier than that ole Bush is that fella LuckoDull what keeps writin’ in with all that crazy talk. That guy is a stick or two shy of a cord.” Sven chimes in and says, “Ya, he’s a fish or two shy of a limit. Ole Olie just says, “Ya, you betcha!”
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this
-=-
M.A.D. - Mutually Assured Destruction.
or - How I came to love the Bomb’!
Now that Iran has been emboldened by the fall of Saddam - their worst enemy, they can proceed with their programs without Saddam complaining anymore about them or threatening to run over them with his tanks.
-=-
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this
{{{By getalife April 9, 2007 10:36 AM Muqtada al-Sadr Orders Tens Of Thousands To Protest Fall Of Baghdad: “Get Out, Get Out Occupier!”}}}
Question: Does gitmo even realize anymore that he is propagandizing for a stooge of Iran, the same Iran that kills Jews and innocent Americans?
And that if this were World War II, which was before the onset of candy as-s liberalism, we would have blown Sadr and his punkas-s “army” right into hell?
Sick, sick, sick.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
{{{By rushncrap April 9, 2007 10:39 AM And if you do you will see that we are losing 4.56 soldiers PER DAY so far in April, compared to 2.65 in March and 3.0 in February.}}}
Let me see if I can help Teach here out with some statistics, when you step up combat operations and enter into hostile ares with the intentions of clearing them of enemy fighters, YOU GET MORE CASUALTIES.
Duh.
If you want to see the success of the surge, look at how many fewer innocent Iraqi’s, the people the surge is supposed to protect, are getting blown up by Al Qaeda.
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Brian Curtis
April 9, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this
Ahh yes, that noble Christian LuckoDull hysterically calling for more killing and blowing up of innocent people.
For Jesus, y’know.
By Senate Ankle Biters For Islam
April 9, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
Dedicated, loyal, pro American members of Congress in a letter addressed to rogue, Al Qaeda collaborating Blinky Pelosi, who is off shopping for gold and diamonds like the people she “represents.”:
Our troops need this funding, and they need it soon. The Senate is in session and ready to work. We respectfully request that you cancel the remainder of your break, call the House back into session, appoint conferees promptly, and work in good faith to pass a clean supplemental funding bill that the President can sign as soon as possible. Every day we don’t fund our troops is a day their ability to fight this war is weakened.
Nan is busy, y’all.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this
-=-
No - It’s not an anti-pinko rant from Andy, nor is it advertisement for an upcoming sci-fi B-movie, but the headline reads!
“Godless North Korean commies ate my monster rabbits!”
How dare they! and during Easter no less! Don’t they know Easter is about Bunnies, Chocolate, and Eggs?
But that’s ok — we have our Navy Seals prepping up the “James Bond” Strike Subs at our (secret base in the Indian Ocean)[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/07/marinevilleindiego_garcia/] to take out those evil Commies, and get bloody revenge for Fluffy!
Cheers -
-=-
By getalife
April 9, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this
Lets just call it an illegal occupation for oil Andy.
Al-Sadr is calling on his followers to kill Americans and not fellow Iraqis.
What kind of idiot would fill his administration with Pat Robertson’s followers?
Geez.
By mountain man
April 9, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this
It’s kind of interesting that LuckoDull claims to be a Christian and at the same time rattles his sword and calls for more violence. Where in the Gospels does Jesus advocate violence? How can anyone in their right mind read the story of Jesus and see him endorsing the kind of conflict that LuckoDull and his mentor Bush seem to think is an answer for the troubles in the world. If anything, Jesus advocating complete non-violent protest against the demonic power of his world, the Romans. There was a radical party in Judea which advocated violence against the Romans, and they were called Zealots. Some historians think that Judas might well have been a Zealot, and turned against Jesus because Jesus would not endorse violent radicalism against the Romans.
LuckoDull, don’t use Jesus’ name while advocating the kind of nutcase extremism you do. Maybe you better go join the Zealots, or maybe a modern day reincarnation such as the Aryan Nations.
You’re pathetic.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this
{{{By getalife April 9, 2007 11:08 AM What kind of idiot would fill his administration with Pat Robertson’s followers?}}}
Question: Does gitmo even realize anymore that he has just come to the defense of religious loony that encourages suicide bombings of innocent women and children by dissing a religious loony that doesn’t encourage the suicide bombing of innocent women and children?
So who’s side would you think gitmo is on?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this
-=-
== Reposted ==
-=-
No - It’s not an anti-pinko rant from Andy, nor is it advertisement for an upcoming sci-fi B-movie, but the headline reads!
“Godless North Korean commies ate my monster rabbits!”
How dare they! and during Easter no less! Don’t they know Easter is about Bunnies, Chocolate, and Eggs?
But that’s ok — we have our Navy Seals prepping up the “James Bond” Strike Subs at our secret base in the Indian Ocean to take out those evil Commies, and get bloody revenge for Fluffy!
Cheers -
-=-
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
{{{By mountain Woman April 9, 2007 11:12 AM Where in the Gospels does Jesus advocate violence? LuckoDull, don’t use Jesus’ name while advocating the kind of nutcase extremism you do.}}}
1) I have to ask this because I’m not sure, do you libs think terrorists blowing up innocent women and children is good or evil? Seriously, I would like to know.
2) What does Jesus teach concerning evil?
3) Hear the word of God: 1 In those days John the Baptist came, preaching in the Desert of Judea 2 and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.” 7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath?- Matthew 3, verses 1, 2 and 7.
4) When will you pinko’s actually read the Bible instead of quoting from the Huffington Post Cliff Notes version of it?
For instance, Goldi, renowned Luckovich blog idiot, considers the Book of Romans, one of the most powerful and beautiful books in the Bible, to be “evil” just because of the title “Romans.”
It’s starting to get pitiful, y’all.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 11:30 AM | Link to this
-=-
Andy - American Jihadist for Christ!
-=-
By Walt
April 9, 2007 11:33 AM | Link to this
“By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this
{{{By Walt April 9, 2007 10:06 AM I am not saying that you are not saved but I am saying you are not setting much of an example for the unsaved.}}}
Walt: I have some serious doubts about God casting my soul into eternal damnation because I used the F word.”
I wouldn’t think so either.
But at some point you are going to have to stand before Christ and say:
“This is what I did to advance the work of salvation.”
And it is hard to shoehorn the F word into that.
And that would also go for a lot of what you post.
Walt
By Midori
April 9, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this
For the life of me, I don’t even know why you guys even acknowledge Andy.
Ignore him; don’t sink to the Retard’s level.
Anyone can google bible verses, but everyone can’t live by them.
By Jesus
April 9, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this
IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this
O.K. put Thomas Dullard and Midori down in favor of not fighting and stopping terrorists that suicide bomb innocent people.
Anybody else want to join them?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
Wally:
Would God approve of abortion?
Would God approve of homosexuality?
Would God approve of teaching young children about deviant sexual behaviors?
Where does Wally, defender of liberalism, stand in regard to these issues?
Tell me again about the F word?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Dusty
April 9, 2007 12:02 PM | Link to this
What a battle!! Luckovich has finally drawn something that might have a little truth to it. LIBERALS MAKE WAR ON THE WHITEHOUSE!! Absolutely correct, Luckovich!! Show ‘em where the real battle is!! Liberals fight Washington and retreat everywhere else.
Most days now we have liberals searching the world for countries to surrender to. Syria and Iran, both targets for surrender by liberals. In the meantime, run..run in Iraq and demand retreat even as our troops fight bravely.
At home, conservatives fight against retreat, the only goal important to liberals.!! You got it, Luckovich. The great battle of Washington.
By Truthman
April 9, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this
The Chimperor is THE Poster boy not only for jihadist recruiting, but also in support of keeping abortion safe and legal…lol!!!
In four years we: Defeated the confederacy and preserved the Union.
In four years we: Defeated the Axis powers and ended WWII.
In four years we: Totally fvcked up a country that did nothing to us, and are not fighting the countries that actually attacked up.
I guess in some people’s minds, that’s progress!
By Walt
April 9, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this
“Would God approve of abortion?
Would God approve of homosexuality?
Would God approve of teaching young children about deviant sexual behaviors?
Where does Wally, defender of liberalism, stand in regard to these issues?
Tell me again about the F word?”
Where does Wally, defender of liberalism, stand in regard to these issues?”
I am really not very liberal.
I’ll add that being against abortion and the rest does not balance out using the F word. That is not how it works.
People need to look at you and say, “Christians are really special. Maybe I will check that out.”
But for you, I would recommend they look at Matthew, Ch. 7 verses 21-23.
Walt
Walt
By Truthman
April 9, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this
OK, from what I get from my Christian friends is the Christian god is infallable.
Therefore, god made homosexuals and made them for a reason.
See how silly religion becomes?
Please, toss your barbaric superstitions in the same box with the Tooth Fairie and Santa.
By Midori
April 9, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
why don’t you wash down a Xanax with some of Andy’s vodka?
I’m sure he can spare a bottle for you — he buys it by the case.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this
-=-
Andy —
I’m fine with stopping terrorist (whenever possible).
I’m just not fine with invading a country that had nothing to do with the terrorist and killing over 600,000 people that also had nothing to do with the terrorist -
(Ahem) - and especially in the name of Jesus!
Andy - you are a pathetic hatemonger and warmonger - plain and simple.
And Dusty is still suffering from delusions of patriotism as she still believes that Terrorism can be defeated by war. Just remember Dusty that when you kill one of their family members, especially a wife or their children, it just makes them want to strap on a backpack bomb themselves and seek revenge on the USA!
Kill all you want - They will make more! —- Plenty More!
Oh and in no way has a “liberal” here ever suggested that we surrender America. But we are definitly suggesting we bring the troops home TO AMERICA in order to PROTECT AMERICA at HOME!
You prefer our troops playing targets to protect Haliburton’s Oil! Or instead of protecting the Good ol USA you would have our troops protect the Iraqi’s Civil war. In either case - you want our troops to die uselessly in faraway lands for a cheap slogan to improve the TV image of a failed leader.
Hmmmmm - just like the good ol’ days of Vietnam!` - Also said to be protecting America’ and it’s people from the evil communist horde by (attacking them over there).
Cheers -
-=-
By Blackadder
April 9, 2007 12:23 PM | Link to this
This is the type of government you morons voted for.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this
Wally: You run your mouth every day in favor of the democrats and liberalism, which means you advocate abortion and deviant sexual behavior.
What is that about the “beam in your eye?”
{{{But for you, I would recommend they look at Matthew, Ch. 7 verses 21-23.}}}
“By their fruits you will recognize them.”
If I have caused anyone to sin, I sure would like to know when it was, so that I make sure I don’t do it again.
I speak for Good as I know it and there is nothing that a lib like you can say that will ever change that.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Walt
April 9, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
“By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this
Wally: You run your mouth every day in favor of the democrats and liberalism, which means you advocate abortion and deviant sexual behavior.
What is that about the “beam in your eye?”
Midori’s point that you are a retard -is- compelling but in the hope that you are not, you’ve never heard me come out in support of abortion or deviant sexual behavior.
Assuming you are more than 11 years old, why would you say I support something when you have no idea -what- I support?
Do you want your coterie of morons to support you?
Or what?
As I indicated, I am nt very liberal on a lot of things.
For instance, I could easily support —after due process — the death penalty for Bush and Cheney.
Walt
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this
-=-
Blackadder -
That’s precisly the government those morons want.
They want a government that has watchlist, secret courts, citizen monitoring and spying, and the SS (Secret Service) to arrest, and indefinitly detain anyone that speaks negatively about their Fuhrer’ (ahem!) President. Oh and all arms of government under one philosophy with no debate or discussion.
It’s a sad day when a citizen using his basic right of “Free Speech” puts you on a terrorist watchlist.
So this is how Freedom dies!
Thomas/PNAC
-=-
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this
{{{By Dull Thomas April 9, 2007 12:22 PM I’m just not fine with invading a country that had nothing to do with the terrorist and killing over 600,000 people that also had nothing to do with the terrorist}}}
1) Prove that American soldiers killed 600,000 people. Actually let’s seperate this issue, prove that 600,000 have died. And then prove that the terrorists didn’t kill the vast majority of them. (Ever wonder why Thomas uses a casualty figure that has been proven to be a fake and then blames the deaths on America instead of Al Qaeda who actually killed them? Thomas, GFY.)
2) Was Saddam Hussein a terrorist or what do you call someone who kills 100,000 Iraqis per year?
As I said before, GFY.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By For the Record ...
April 9, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this
Reading the Model Christian Andy’s posts reminds me of a story about the Conquistadors in the Carribean who were about to burn an Indian chieftain at the stake for heresy.
“Accept Christ and you will go to Heaven when you die,” the Padre of the troops pleaded with the Chief.
“Will there be Christians in Heaven?” the Chief asked.
“Yes, of course!”
“Then I do not wish to go to that place,” the Chief replied calmly.
Andy, there is no way a hatemongerer like you is going to get into Heaven, unless God gives you a pass because He made you mentally unbalanced. In which case, just think how great it will be: you will get to frolic in Paradise for all eternity with its principle population: poor black people! Not a rich Republican will be in sight! Just like you always dreamed!
By Lysol
April 9, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this
LuckoDull, Do your pastor/ SUnaday school teacher know your identity in this blog?
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this
Blackadder,
The comment section is quite interesting over at your link to the Paranoid Professor. Are ALL you libs lying loons like that?
Consider that question to be rhetorical, I already know the answer.
By Randy
April 9, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this
Day in and day out nothing ever changes at this cesspool of liberalism Mikey. The comics for a working stiffed cartoonist rail against the system. Rail against america and rail against Bush. When they aren’t railing against religion, they use it to support their chickenshit definition of evil.
Weak, weak, weak — their arguments and them.
Not worth the gunpowder it would take to blow them to hell and back.
You and your liberals are the evil in America.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this
Idiot
Geez.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this
Kerry continued: “We do not—and I cannot stress this enough—want to offend anybody or cause anyone to dislike us for any reason.”
By Truthsayer
April 9, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this
For the Record - by the same standards, not a rich Democrat will be in sight in Heaven either. Ted Kennedy, Bill and Hitlery, John and Teresa, Diane and Richard etc… will all be in the other place because they did not follow the Biblican admonition to sell all to the poor and follow Jesus. You liberals always seem to want to pick and choose and you don’t realize that the same rules apply to you as well - at least spiritually.
By Truthsayer
April 9, 2007 1:00 PM | Link to this
Sorry - I left something out - it should have read: “sell all and give it to the poor”.
By Midori
April 9, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this
and Randy,
you and your ilk are the idiot criminals in America.
By jacksonwolff
April 9, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this
Awfully strange that the ones who are so facinated with “deviant sex” are the ones who end up doing it, Ted Haggard comes to mind.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this
getalife,
What do you call Max Cleland?
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this
{{{By For the Record …April 9, 2007 12:46 PM In which case, just think how great it will be: you will get to frolic in Paradise for all eternity with its principle population: poor black people!}}}
I know this is going to be hard for a dullard, who’s whole life is centered on this grievance and that grievance, to understand, but when it comes to the Kingdom of God we are all poor black people.
Your earthly body is not of that World, you blooming idiot.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Brian Curtis
April 9, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this
Dusty: For once, I agree with you. Congress and the liberals ARE making war on the White House. In fact, all of America is lined up against the White House.
So why aren’t you? A patriotic American like you should be fighting the Bushies’ crimes tooth and nail, rather than defending themm.
By Buy Danish
April 9, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this
{{{By rushncap April 6, 2007 10:20 AM
I’m not fantasizing about killing Jesus. I’m just, you know, disappointed that we didn’t do it right the first time.}}}
rushncap,
Is this Atheist Jew humor? Russian Jew emigre’ humor? Or is this you being dead serious and not meant to be humorous at all?
Walt,
I see that you are in a high dudgeon over the use of the “f” word but, unless I missed it, I find no similar concerns about rushncap’s, err, botched joke.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 1:09 PM | Link to this
{{{By Lysol April 9, 2007 12:50 PM LuckoDull, Do your pastor/ SUnaday school teacher know your identity in this blog?}}}
Yes, my Pastor knows me.
{{{By jackenoff April 9, 2007 1:01 PM Awfully strange that the ones who are so facinated with “deviant sex” are the ones who end up doing it, Ted Haggard comes to mind.}}}
So, if you associate the sins of one person to all of Christianity, is it safe to say that you, pinko, are a homosexual baby killer?
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 1:14 PM | Link to this
If Elizabeth Edwards is really so scared of this dude it looks like there is a very simple solution.
Johnson said he ————->has put his property on the market<————, in part blaming the high property taxes for his decision to leave. He also wants to move for another reason./// “I don’t want to live somewhere where someone’s always complaining about me,” he said.
They probably want to get it condemned so they can just take it from the poor guy.
By jacksonwolff
April 9, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this
homosexual, yes, but I don’t seem to remember killing any babies.
as for being a “pinko,” if thats the wost you can call me, then I must say you are a sad little man. You have my pity
By Randy
April 9, 2007 1:30 PM | Link to this
Stepped in s** in whose backyard Midori? Do you want to talk about the dems and how many times they were let off the hook, ignored or given a slap on the wrist for criminal acts?
That was a great link on Elizabeth and John Edwards. When will you libs realize the dems and their high fallut’n party favorites don’t care about the little people?
Suck-ahs till the day you die.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this
{{{By jackenoff April 9, 2007 1:20 PM as for being a “pinko,” if thats the wost you can call me, then I must say you are a sad little man. You have my pity}}}}
Let’s take this slow from the top:
{{{By jackenoff April 9, 2007 1:01 PM Awfully strange that the ones who are so facinated with “deviant sex” are the ones who end up doing it, Ted Haggard comes to mind.}}}
But:
{{{By jackenoff April 9, 2007 1:20 PM homosexual, yes, but I don’t seem to remember killing any babies}}}
How are you any different than Ted Haggard??????
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this
{{Make no mistake, we welcome you with open arms, fellowship and some good breakfast, come and celebrate the Risen Lord with us in His house.}}
Andy-Dull, who the h3ll would ever want to worship with you in “His house”— you who displays such hatred for 70% of your fellow Americans? Worship with your style of “fellowship”??? HA!
You are dumb, dumb, dumb!
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this
Muffin — you can classify that any way you see fit. I don’t give a rat’s behind.
Although mostly I think it was “p!ss off Muffin” humor. So I think I did well there.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 1:34 PM | Link to this
{{I am not saying that you are not saved but I am saying you are not setting much of an example for the unsaved.}}
Thank you, Walt— it’s the hypocrites like Andy-Dull that made me a “recovering Baptist” myself…
By irish65
April 9, 2007 1:39 PM | Link to this
Luck O Dull: Thanks for the ZZZs! It helps me eliminate your diatribe from my reading.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 1:40 PM | Link to this
RW,
“What do you call Max Cleland?”
A great American war hero.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this
{{For instance, Goldi, renowned Luckovich blog idiot, considers the Book of Romans, one of the most powerful and beautiful books in the Bible, to be “evil” just because of the title “Romans.”}}
Andy-Dull, you need to provide the link of where I used the term “evil” regarding the book of Romans— that’s your terminology!
I was stating that I would not give a lot of credence to a book named after the Romans on matters concerning war and peace… they don’t exactly have a great record for their peaceful ways during the past 3000 years!
You ignorant, lying hypocrite!
Why don’t you do us all a favor and provide some quotes from Jesus regarding hypocrites???
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 1:47 PM | Link to this
{[LIBERALS MAKE WAR ON THE WHITEHOUSE!!}}
Thanks for pointing that out, Dusty-birdbrain! The liberals in Congress HAVE to make war on the White House, because the White House is making war on America and the rest of the world!
Thanks for your appreciation of the liberals, Dusty-birdbrain!
By jacksonwolff
April 9, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this
LD
I was commenting on how people such as yourself, who always scream at the top of their lungs about my sex life(none of your business anyway)always turn out to be the biggest crystal queens around.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this
getalife,
Why do you call someone that your silly link says he almost blew himself up an idiot and someone that really did blow himself up a hero?
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this
{{will all be in the other place because they did not follow the Biblican admonition to sell all to the poor and follow Jesus.}}
Truthsayer/ Fuddy Duddy— please be sure to provide us a list of all your Repugnant friends who have sold “all” and followed Jesus??? How stupid are you now?
By getalife
April 9, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this
We have our smoking gun
Its over.
By Nomad
April 9, 2007 1:55 PM | Link to this
getalife - Cleland did not get his wounds in battle.
NOMAD
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 1:57 PM | Link to this
{{{By Goldie April 9, 2007 1:43 PM {{For instance, Goldi, renowned Luckovich blog idiot, considers the Book of Romans, one of the most powerful and beautiful books in the Bible, to be “evil” just because of the title “Romans.”}}}
Snicker, snicker, as I was saying:
{{{{I was stating that I would not give a lot of credence to a book named after the Romans on matters concerning war and peace… they don’t exactly have a great record for their peaceful ways during the past 3000 years!}}}
Goldilocks: Maybe you should like actually read the Book of Romans, no?
(Just imagine the surprise these goofballs get, after believing every word out of the Huffington Post, and then seeing that the Book of Romans has almost nothing to do with the Romans. What idiots these people are.)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this
Great job you’ve done in Iraq, Repugnants! You’ve got members of the Iraqi police squads marching against their “enemies” (guess who???) with the other Shia protesters:
Iraqi soldiers in uniform joined the crowd, which was led by at least a dozen turbaned clerics — including one Sunni. Many marchers danced as they moved through the streets.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this
{{{By jackenoff April 9, 2007 1:49 PM I was commenting on how people such as yourself, who always scream at the top of their lungs about my sex life(none of your business anyway)}}}
If it’s none of my business then how in the F would I know?
If you want to keep it to yourself maybe you shouldn’t be parading up and down the street, no?
Duh.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this
{[Goldilocks: Maybe you should like actually read the Book of Romans, no?}}
Andy-Dull— I have read it, you ignorant d!ckhead, and I don’t take much advice from Romans! And why don’t you take a break from telling lies, for even 1 day… you lying liar!
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:06 PM | Link to this
{{Book of Romans has almost nothing to do with the Romans. What idiots these people are.)}}
Andy-Dull, you make it very plain who the idiot here is on this blog. The Book of Romans “has almost nothing” to do with Romans???
LMAO!!!!
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this
Nice smoking gun there gitmo. Proof that the Bush administration wasn’t violating Federal law by using Federal property for campaign activities. So you plan to do what with this revelation that they were following the law?
I guess Nixon should have just tried this trick of subpoenaing the campaign activities of the DNC instead of breaking in.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 2:09 PM | Link to this
You know, I think Stalk really does not understand what the article is saying. I think maybe 3 or 4 months ago I assume he was just playing dumb, but now…. I’m pretty sure he IS this dumb.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 2:16 PM | Link to this
“Global warming” my as-s:
{{{Two weeks into spring, Easter morning temperatures were in the upper 30s along the Gulf Coast and in the single digits in northern Minnesota and the Dakotas. Atlanta had a low of 30 degrees, with a wind chill of 23, the National Weather Service said. The same reading hit New York City’s Fifth Avenue, celebrated in song for the traditional Easter Parade of spring finery.}}}
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 2:17 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
Try to pay attention.
gitmo said this was THE SMOKING GUN and it WAS OVER for the administration, so I read the story. The only facts are concerning the dual system for political interface that was first initiated by the Clinton administration, all the rest is speculation. Therefore gitmo must be basing his SMOKING GUN on the known facts of the story.
Now quit showing off your ignorance and go do something productive. Are you blogging from “work” again today? I love the excuse that you can do anything you want at work since it’s your own laptop. If you brought your own pool table to work do you think you should get paid for playing 9-Ball all day?
By B. Moore
April 9, 2007 2:20 PM | Link to this
In Romans 3:23 Paul says “All have sinned and all fall short of the glory of God.” That includes each and every believer as well!
Have fallen and are falling. Past and present.
We must strive to seek God’s glory as much as possible now and to do so requires among other things that we suffer with Christ.
If folks sit around thinking their suffering is greater than his was, they’re blind to him.
He suffered for me.
Did he suffer for you?
Acknowledge God. His sacrifice and his suffering for you.
Your cartoon is marketable today Mike.
By Dusty
April 9, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this
Brian Curtis@ 1:02
I really don’t need you to interpret what I post here or direct my decisions. It is quite clear what I am saying. LIBERALS MAKE WAR ON THE WHITEHOUSE. It is not all Americans. It is LIBERALS, the retreaters. They are so afraid to support the troops that they make war on the Commander-in-Chief while mewling and posturing to our enemies.
Congress has its Democratic dictators. They ignore the President of the United States and try to make unmerited foreign policy on your own. What imposters! What cowards!! And all for politics and election jealousy!
I hope the American people rise up and vote out the numerous unscrupulous Congressional Demo Dictators in Congress. They are a disgrace and a danger to this country.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this
{{{By Goldie April 9, 2007 2:03 PM {[Goldilocks: Maybe you should like actually read the Book of Romans, no?}} Andy-Dull— I have read it, you ignorant d!ckhead, and I don’t take much advice from Romans! And why don’t you take a break from telling lies, for even 1 day… you lying liar!}}}
Goldilocks: Are you under the care of a psychiatrist?
The Book of Romans is written by Paul TO the Roman people, instructing them on how to live the life of a Christian, through God’s Word.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the Roman Army, you blooming idiot.
(This is very insightful into the ways of liberalism, a lib will live a lie, defend a lie, go to their ignorant grave believing a lie. Liberalism IS a lie. If Goldi read the book of Romans then I’m a Chinese woman.)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:29 PM | Link to this
B.Moore—
“Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” (Matthew 5:9)…
Are you a peacemaker?
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:32 PM | Link to this
{{If Goldi read the book of Romans then I’m a Chinese woman.)}}
Andy-Dull, should we start referring to you as Egg Fu Yung now?
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this
-=-
Dusty — sort of like the Republicans made war on the whitehouse during Clinton’s Presidency?
What Goes around Comes around..
I am personally glad the rubberstamping of bills is over!
Checks and Balances Babe’ Checks and Balances!
—
RW -
Where do you get your garbage about Max Cleland. Obviously from some talking points neocon BS source. Even if the wounds were accidental from a grenade that got loose from Cleland (as has been debunked many time), that still makes his injuries in a warzone valid. Does a soldier who gets killed by friendly fire deserve less credit for dying in war than a soldier that gets killed by the enemy.
You are a sick individual that cannot respect a man who served his country in wartime, and paid a severe cost of his very limbs to serve our country.
Cleland is a War Hero - period!
—
Andy the scientist once again shows his lack of knowledge about greenhouse effect and the laws of thermodynamics.
Cheers
-=-
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 2:39 PM | Link to this
{{{By Goldie April 9, 2007 2:29 PM “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” (Matthew 5:9)… Are you a peacemaker?}}}
Goldi doesn’t even know what the Book f Romans is ABOUT, but she quotes second hand scripture to make her stupid political points.
Can you say Pharisee?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Little Right of Center
April 9, 2007 2:39 PM | Link to this
goldie, how can a peacemaker call someone an idiot or a lair in almost ever post? Oh, let’s not forget stupid?
I think, you are the one who is so full of hate, lies and a few cards short of afull deck, bless your heart.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this
If you ever had a job that didn’t require mopping, Stalk, you would know that some people get paid based on what they do, not how long they spend at work. I can blog all I want, provided I finish what I need. I’m sure being on welfare provides you with greater flexibility, but I don’t mind the tradeoff.
If Congress gets access to those computers, this administration is going down, hard core. So you better hope it doesn’t.
By Blackadder
April 9, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this
QUESTION: Do you favor a withdrawal of all United States military from Iraq within the next six months?
ANSWER: Yes 52% No 39% Undecided 9%
No, those are not particularly shocking numbers.
We have known for a long time that Americans favor the rapid withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.
What is interesting about these numbers is who they come from.
The Strategic Vision polling group asked 600 likely Iowa caucus goers the question in a survey conducted March 30-April 1, 2007.
To be more precise, the survey queried 600 likely Republican caucus goers.
George Bush can forget about rallying the nation behind his war.
At this point, Bush can’t even rally the most engaged Republicans in the nation behind the continuation of quagmire. He can, of course, still engage the mindless losers on this forum who still support him.
Needless to say, when the president threatens Congress with a veto of an Iraq supplemental spending bill that includes soft benchmarks and a slow timeline for withdrawal, Democratic leaders would be wise to quote from the Bush lexicon: “Bring it on!”
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this
{{Does a soldier who gets killed by friendly fire deserve less credit for dying in war than a soldier that gets killed by the enemy.}}
Thomas, they all deserve to be honored for their sacrifice. It’s only the brainwashed stupid sh!ts who try to make our dead or injured service men and women their party’s political pawns — it’s all in a day’s work for their party!
By rushncap's administrator
April 9, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this
We have caught rushncap playing pocket pool on the job.
We’ve talked to him but he doesn’t seem to be listening.
He keeps fumbling in his pocket for something he says he lost.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this
{{I think, you are the one who is so full of hate, lies and a few cards short of afull deck, bless your heart.}}
Way Right— you’re attempting to “bless” my heart? No thanks, bud. You war-mongering Bush-kisser.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 2:47 PM | Link to this
-=-
True Goldie -
Plus - Max Cleland did honorably serve his country both in war and in congress.
Whereas the people that these jerks support and praise as their heros ran like babys away from teh war with deferrments and national guard and any way they could avoid real military action like the True heroes such as Cleland, Kerry, Murtha, —-
No Saxby, Bush, Cheney and the lot of them only know how to pilliage this country - not serve it!
Throw the bums out!
Thomas/PNAC
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 2:50 PM | Link to this
{{George Bush can forget about rallying the nation behind his war.}}
Blackadder— the rally’s over… Americans will have no more of W’s war that’s based on his lies and mangled deceptions. Can you say “drawings” of the mobile WMD labs that Colin Powell used for his U.N. presentation in ‘03? Can you say “mission accomplished” before we had 4 years of occupation of Iraq?
W is the one who will be withdrawing the funds for our troops if he vetoes the spending bill sent to him…
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 2:51 PM | Link to this
{{{{{If Congress gets access to those computers, this administration is going down, hard core. So you better hope it doesn’t.}}}}}
And you know this how? I hope you really are on a performance based pay scale, Dmitry. Everyone should be, but it’s hard to believe you would support Capitalism that way.
Thomas the Tragically Boring,
Please point to where I disparaged Max Cleland or STFU. Oh, and stay out of my conversations unless you are going to pick them up from their genesis.
By Midori
April 9, 2007 2:55 PM | Link to this
hmmmmmmmmmm……..
RW is morphing into Buy Danish - or the other way around……
I guess she really does complete him…..
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 2:58 PM | Link to this
Parrot,
Who rattled your cage?
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this
The Repugnant Party and the NRA think it’s a great idea for everyone to be packing heat in America, no matter where the gun is obtained, or what age or mental capacity the gun-bearer has:
Police Say Gunman Shot 3 Inside Detroit-Area Office Building; 1 Dead
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this
-=-
Sure RW
— By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this
getalife,
Why do you call someone that your silly link says he almost blew himself up an idiot and someone that really did blow himself up a hero?
Now that’s just today.
I have seen you, Andy, and Buy Danish all three trash Cleland often on this blog in the past too. This is just the broken record mantra that you 3 post about Cleland blowing himself up on his own grenade. If that is true then it was a wartime accident, because what sane person would ever risk dying by using a grenade to get a section 5?
Cleland got his injuries while doing his duty, and most likely the way it was reported and recorded as injury sustained during combat.
So How about you “STFU” with your lies yourself!
As far as the Idiot that getalife posted - well he was showing his great knowledge of Green technology by attempting to plug the electrical cord into the fuel tank. — DUH! (chuckle)!` Yeah real bright! A environmental scientist is he’!
-=-
By B. Moore
April 9, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this
Goldie; I am a peacemaker. I have found it deep within my soul. It exists between me and my God.
He suffered for me and I acknowledge that. I am not worthy of his grace and I acknowledge that too.
You quote The Beatitudes.
The nature of the Beatitudes is spiritual and personal, not political and global. In light of this fact, biblical peacemakers have a three-fold agenda, but I’ll address only one. The one on the topic of war.
Christians attempt to lead their nations into peaceful co-existence. They must realize however, that this is not their primary calling nor will the effects be long-lasting (see Matthew 24:6). As long as the leaders of nations remain hostile toward the God who made them, they will continue to be hostile toward their global neighbors.
Our country was founded on Judeo/Christian beliefs. We place ourselves in great peril when we ignore that historical fact or when we fail to fight to protect it.
By Blackadder
April 9, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this
Ricky Wingnutsack wants people to stay out of his converstions ON A PUBLIC FORUM WHERE THERE IS NO STRUCTURE OR OVERSIGHT.
Sometimes you give me a huge chuckle, Ricky.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this
RW is Buy Danish.
Weird huh?
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this
-=-
?? Ricky Wingnut??
I thought it was Rove Wannabe’ —
Laters folks I’m gone for the day
Thomas/PNAC
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this
Thomas,
Sorry but that’s not disparaging Cleland, at least not in the context of the conversation. getalife said that if someone carelessly did something that led to their physical harm that person was an idiot, but changes the tune when it’s Cleland instead of Bush.
Now go find something that backs your ridiculous accusation that any of us has said that Cleland blew himself up on purpose you lying bastard.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this
{{The Book of Romans is written by Paul TO the Roman people, instructing them on how to live the life of a Christian}}
BTW, Andy-Dull— I don’t put much faith in the writings of the Apostles, in their efforts to build their empires and support their religious dogma. They never really “got it” when Jesus was alive and teaching, remember? And it wasn’t very nice how they decided to rewrite Mary Magdelene’s history after Jesus died…
No thank you. You can keep your brand of “religion” which is not really based on Jesus’ teachings…
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this
Stalk, I’d explain to you how pay works here, but why rub it in?
How do I know this administration is going down if what’s on those computers is revealed? Call it a “hunch” or call it “an educated guess based on overwhelming amount of evidence to support the idea”. Hell, you can call it “Suzy” for all I care. But I know that you’re praying that those emails remain forever sealed. You’re scared, and you should be.
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this
B.Moore,
People such as Goldie use political and social reasons to explain spiritual truth. She wouldn’t believe that winter is cold, unless she heard it on the news. If believers told her it was cold, she’d question it. You know, just as the light knows, that it takes faith in order to believe that Jesus died on the cross for humanity and that God raised him from the dead three days later. Prayerfully, those who have not accepted that will one day overcome whatever spiritual or emotional fear that is keeping them from receiving truth from above.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this
{{Goldie; I am a peacemaker. I have found it deep within my soul. It exists between me and my God.}}
Thank you, B.Moore.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this
G-ood F-or Y-ou, Twinkle Toes, GFY
By the way, was that you in The Onion the other day? They showed some guy that said he just wanted to punch somebody, but I don’t remember whether it was over political differences and they didn’t call him Blackadder.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
{{{Bush’s job-approval rating in a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll taken Monday through Thursday is 38%.}}}
Heh.
{{{Congressional Job Approval 35.7%}}}
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this
Stalk, I’d explain to you how pay works here, but why rub it in?
How do I know this administration is going down if what’s on those computers is revealed? Call it a “hunch” or call it “an educated guess based on overwhelming amount of evidence to support the idea”. Hell, you can call it “Suzy” for all I care. But I know that you’re praying that those emails remain forever sealed. You’re scared, and you should be.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
How about explaining why I would be scared if any emails came out? Here’s a hint for you, I don’t work in the White House you moron.
I’m also a big proponent of actual wrong doing being prosecuted no matter the political party.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
April 9, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this
-=-
Oh you guys had a grand field day when Little Orphan Annie (Coulter) said her garbage about Cleland. You guys even posted links to many NeoCon trashing points websites.
Ok so tell me - Are what you now saying is Cleland is a Hero?
Say to me if you dare - say Max Cleland is a bona fide war hero! And that you appreciate his service to our nation in times of war! Say it —- lets hear that you support him and what you posted wasn’t a slam to the man! Tell me you think his act was an act of courage!
Bet you can’t —
Here’s the real story of that day by another soldier who was with Cleland that day!
Now I really have to go! before RW’s Escalade and the rest of the idiots hit the road!
Thomas/PNAC -=-
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:21 PM | Link to this
Are you going senile on us, rushncap? Consider my 3:19 a response to both your 3:13 and 3:19.
By Blackadder
April 9, 2007 3:21 PM | Link to this
Ricky Wingnutsack - I don’t know which is more pathetic. Your attempt at humor or your attempt to be relevant.
GFY - good one you kindergarten dropout.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this
{{People such as Goldie use political and social reasons to explain spiritual truth.}}
No Power— I took Jesus’ words into my heart at a very young age and it stuck with me. You know those radical free-thinking ideas like “love they neighbor” and “blessed are the peacemakers”… this really burns up the funadamentalists and dogmatists when they do their damnation of everyone who doesn’t agree with their very narrow view of what constitutes a Godly life. I’m with the poster who earlier stated that God himself created homosexuals, so why should they be condemned by you?
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this
Stalk — no, you’re not a big proponent of that. You may say that you are, but you’re not. It’s quite obvious that those emails contain a whole slew of incriminating information, the only question is whether Congress gets its hands on that. And you’re shaking in your boots because you know they might.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this
Thomas the Talk Engine,
If we said all these things you should be able to find them. Since you know they don’t exist you just make your accusations and drive away. Freaking Liar!! Put up or shut up.
Here’s an easy one for you Thomas. Prove I ever said I own an Escalade. Good idea to hit the road though, because Blackadder will be bowling over anybody that gets between him and the exit door in about twenty minutes.
By B. Moore
April 9, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this
Power of Light; Overcoming the fear is to open yourself up to receive his forgiveness and his peace. Amen to that.
Goldie; You are welcome. Open yourself up to the possibilities. They are endless when you allow God to show the way.
Enjoy the day everyone.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
I really am a proponent of punishing true wrong doing and you’ll find nothing I’ve ever written that backs your theory that I’m not.
There’s a big problem with allowing Democrats to obtain all RNC communications though. Would you be willing to turn over all DNC computers and records at the same time?
By Brian Curtis
April 9, 2007 3:35 PM | Link to this
Dusty: No, you’re not getting it. AMERICANS are against Bush and his war. If you’re on Bush’s side, you’re—guess what!—anti-American.
I’d expect better from a proud patriot like yourself. But instead, you keep cheering the anti-American Bush and his anti-American war. The liberals (and it’s not just liberals fighting this nonsense) are the real Americans, and we’re waiting for you to come to your senses and join us.
We’re over here, fighting for our troops and our country—which means AGAINST BUSH.
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 3:36 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
God created people. We choose our lifestyles based upon inate natural existences, experiences,and spiritual relationship to him. God doesn’t create murderers, but the people who commit murder are created by him. In my former form, I chastised homosexuals quite a bit, but the Light loves them as much as he loves everyone else. The point is, no matter what lifestyle or action that we have taken here on earth we can be forgiven. The unfortunate fact is that a lot of us would rather question things we don’t want to understand rather than accept love and discipline like good children should.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 3:37 PM | Link to this
Stalk — no one is talking about turning over RNC documents. You either can’t read, or assume the rest of us can’t. The issue is that these supposedly “RNC-matters only” computers were used to conduct government business in order to avoid oversight. That is illegal, not to mention immoral. I guess you never ask yourself “Why would anyone go to these lengths if they have nothing to hide?”, but some of the rest of us do.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this
“Abramoff’s response, according to a copy of his e-mail released by Waxman’s committee, was: “Dammit. It was sent to Susan on her rnc pager and was not supposed to go into the WH system.” Ralston later resigned in connection with the lobbying scandal.”
Busted.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this
In many other respects, the ill effects of warming are overblown. Sea levels, for example, have been increasing since the end of the last ice age. When you look at recent centuries in perspective, ignoring short-term fluctuations, the rate of sea-level rise has been relatively uniform (less than a couple of millimeters a year). There’s even some evidence that the rate was higher in the first half of the twentieth century than in the second half. Overall, the risk of sea-level rise from global warming is less at almost any given location than that from other causes, such as tectonic motions of the earth’s surface. Is there any point in pretending that CO2 increases will be catastrophic? Or could they be modest and on balance beneficial? India has warmed during the second half of the 20th century, and agricultural output has increased greatly.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:45 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
What’s illegal is doing political business on government property. Why do you think Clinton started the dual system.
Kerist, it’s just like you with your dual use laptop sitting next to your workplace computer or at least operating on a separate server. I know for sure you don’t want the history of that laptop out for all to see.
Now who gets to be the arbiter of what’s political business or what’s government business on the private computer system? Is it fair to let Democrats see ALL the information and ferret out out what they think is government business?
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this
You really are dense, Stalk. They were conducting GOVERNMENT business on PRIVATE computers. That is illegal. Period. I would never take data on my personal computer, or, if I do, I would always have backups on the common network. This is not only courtesy, this is, in fact, a requirement. Obviously this administration does not feel like it needs to be constrained by either legality or morality. In anything, including this.
By Walt
April 9, 2007 3:52 PM | Link to this
“The liberals (and it’s not just liberals fighting this nonsense) are the real Americans, and we’re waiting for you to come to your senses and join us.”
Bears repeating.
Some people need to wake up.
Bush fooled you.
You need to be grown up enough to see it.
Walt
By getalife
April 9, 2007 3:54 PM | Link to this
“Waxman’s initial request to the RNC seeks e-mails relating to the presentation of campaign polling and strategy information to Cabinet agency appointees. He is also expected to ask for e-mails relating to Abramoff’s activities, which Waxman is also investigating. )
So busted.
Bwhahahaha!
More oversight please.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 3:56 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
That’s only the allegation so again I ask you, who are to be the ones that should look at ALL the information on the RNC computers to ferret out what was government business?
You guys are sure quick to convict people with no trial and very little evidence, what form of government would you call that?
By getalife
April 9, 2007 4:00 PM | Link to this
More hatred of the troops.
120 day extended duty.
Geez.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 4:01 PM | Link to this
{{We choose our lifestyles based upon inate natural existences}}
No Power— ask most homosexuals and they will tell you that it’s not a “lifestyle” as you like to call it… it’s simply who they are. Now, you choosing the Repugnant lifestyle and doctrine, that’s a different story! And I’m sure you will be forgiven by God in due time.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this
Some people are so unbelievably dense:
{{{By Goldie April 9, 2007 3:23 PM I’m with the poster who earlier stated that God himself created homosexuals, so why should they be condemned by you?}}}
God created man in a flawed world and gave him a choice; to reject sin or to embrace sin.
You can choose to have sex or to not have sex, no one is forced to have sex.
God did not “create” homosexuals.
That is a vile blasphemy to even say something like that.
Sick, sick, sick.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this
{{God did not “create” homosexuals.}}
Any of my gay bloggers here care to help Andy-Dull with his problem?
I guess God didn’t create the homosexuals and bisexuals found in the animal kingdom either, huh, Dull? Did they “choose” their lifestyle too? How brainwashed exactly are you?
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
How in the world do you expect a human being to be able to accurately tell you how they were created? We are not creating ourselves here. The only reason people think in such a way is because they refuse to consult the one who did create them.
Sexuality is not an accurate way to categorize ourselves anyway. The reality of who we are is not based on sexual preferences. The Light was not born a heterosexual, he was born a male. I became one through the listing that I gave you earlier. I wasn’t born eating meat, but I do eat meat now. Being omnivorous is not the reality of who I am and neither is being heterosexual. I’m a male who likes women and eats meat, but I wasn’t born doing that, nor am I arrogant and stubborn enough to claim such. I didn’t create me.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 4:13 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
The problem with trying to get help on this question from your side is that most of them don’t believe God even exists much less ever created anything.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 4:16 PM | Link to this
I don’t know who should look at all those emails, Stalk, but someone should, and probably will. Those staffers made their own bed, they have no one to blame now. If they didn’t use those comps for gov’t business, no one would have to look through them. So now they are (hopefully) going to pay the price.
And I’m not convicting anyone. A-holes like you simply think that the Shrub administration should get away with anything and everything because… well, who the hell knows why you think that (or anything). Most of the rest of the country is getting sick of this BS. If they have nothing to hide, good for them. But it’s starting to look more and more that there are far more skeletons than closets in this farce of an administration.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 4:20 PM | Link to this
{{Sexuality is not an accurate way to categorize ourselves anyway. The reality of who we are is not based on sexual preferences.}}
No Power— good point. And another reason why we should not take it upon ourselves to condemn others for their sexuality. Unless you believe like Andy-Dull that sex is one of the “sins” as he posted above ^^^ @ 4:02.
Why should we care what 2 adults decide to do with their sexual lives? There are many myths, fears and phobias described in the Bible, and I don’t think it’s a good idea to continue those phobias when we learn what the truth really is. If someone says their homosexuality is God-given, who are we to judge that? Because some old geezer wrote it was a “sin” 2000 or more years ago??? Puh-leez.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 4:22 PM | Link to this
Light — if you were not born heterosexual, you can become gay. Why not, for the sake of proving us all wrong, try it for a couple of weeks. See how that goes.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 4:26 PM | Link to this
Waxman to Rice: No, you may not be excused
He is the oversight pit bull man.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 4:27 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
Don’t get all huffy just because you realized you’re full of sh!t and can’t answer the questions.
Waxman obviously wants fishing expeditions for any and everything. Discussing polling data for your campaign sure as hell doesn’t sound like government business to me. It sounds like political information which is exactly why you have this non-government computer.
I would think you’d be sick of the baseless accusations that are tearing apart our government. So far for all your bluster you’ve got one perjury conviction for something with no underlying crime. At this point in the last administration there had been dozens of people jailed for felonies.
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 4:28 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
The old geezer’s were inspired by God himself. You sound like the type of person who also doesn’t respect the “old geezers” who probably tried to talk sense into your life,e.g.mother,grandmother,grandfather,etc.
If God existed 2000 years ago,wouldn’t you agree that he probably exists today? Therefore, when it was written is irrelevant. The bible is not a history book, although there is some history in it. It is a collection of stories based on fact and metaphors combined to speak the truth about who we are and who God is. To believe or not to believe is our choice.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this
“In the past five years, we have learned that the executive branch has circumvented federal bans on torture, abandoned the Geneva Conventions, monitored Americans’ phone conversations without the required warrants and “outsourced” torture through “extraordinary rendition” to several foreign governments. Recently we learned that the FBI recklessly abused its power to secure documents through emergency national security letters.”
Good article on cheney.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this
Is this what you do when you know you’re beat, Stalk? Lie through your teeth and hope no one notices? Nice try.
We’ve had a Democratic Congress for only a few months. Let’s see how many Bushies are in jail a year from now. I assume you’ll be sending them care packages.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 4:36 PM | Link to this
{{The old geezer’s were inspired by God himself.}}
No Power— so they themselves tell us. But how exactly do we know which of their fables are to be believed? And there’s some real whopper stories they tell. Don’t get me started on the burning bushes and talking serpents again.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 4:40 PM | Link to this
{{probably tried to talk sense into your life,e.g.mother,grandmother,grandfather,etc.}}
BTW, No Power— my folks never taught me to discriminate against others based on their sexuality, skin color or even eye color… even they did not believe everything that was written in the Bible thousands of years ago.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
Usually people go to jail because they’ve been convicted in a court of law, not a Congressional witch hunt.
It’s also usually customary to have a crime committed before you start rounding people up and locking them away. Maybe it’s your Russian roots longing for the day that you can just warehouse your opponents or make them disappear entirely. It doesn’t work that way in this great country or at least it didn’t before moonbats got control of Congress. Why do you guys hate the Constitution so much?
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 4:47 PM | Link to this
Stalk — how do you know I “hate the Constitution”? You don’t even know what it is.
By Buy Danish
April 9, 2007 4:48 PM | Link to this
The true story of why Max Cleland lost to Chambliss:
Once upon a time….
Democrats make it sound as though Cleland’s opponent, the four-term Republican congressman Saxby Chambliss, ran an ad something like this: “Sen. Max Cleland,” — cue the ominous music — “is he a patriot? Georgia wants to know.”//Of course, nothing remotely like this ran. The case for foul play rests on a tough anti-Cleland ad that Chambliss broadcast featuring Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. The ad didn’t morph Cleland into either of these figures or say that he supported them. It noted at its beginning that the United States faced threats to its security as the screen was briefly divided into four squares, with bin Laden and Saddam in two of them and the other two filled with images of the American military.//It went on to explain that Cleland had voted 11 times against a homeland-security bill that would have given President Bush the freedom from union strictures that he wanted in order to set up the new department. The bill was co-sponsored by his Georgia colleague Sen. Zell Miller, a fellow Democrat. Bush discussed details of the bill personally with Cleland, and Chambliss wrote him a letter prior to running his ad urging him to support the Bush version. Cleland still opposed it, setting himself up for the charge that he was voting with liberals and the public-employees unions against Bush and Georgia common sense.
The End.
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 4:56 PM | Link to this
rushncap,
The Light will not take you up on your propositon for three reasons: 1. He doesn’t want to. 2.Romans 1:27 says that its an abomination, and due to the lack of creative(life) skills that it brings, I agree.And 3. You’re an idiot.
Goldie,
What difference does it make what they didn’t teach you? You wouldn’t listen anyway.
Also, we’ve already gone over the examples you gave. Your refusal to accept it is your bag. I will say this though: You asked which one of their fables should we believe? First, of all, you would have to have a born again regenerated heart to understand the bible. I didn’t understand it until I got saved. All of a sudden, what didn’t make sense to me began to slowly reveal itself. In other words, whether the bush was burning or not made absolutely no difference to me. What was important was, what is God saying using this illustration or story.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 5:00 PM | Link to this
rushnap,
You agree to freedom of speech for Democrats so we’ll give you partial credit for the first amendment, but since you don’t believe in it for Republicans we can check the 14th off the list.
I’d be willing to bet you don’t support the 2nd.
I’m sure you don’t want a soldier anywhere near your condo so you probably like the third.
You’re obviously dead set against the 4th and the 5th since you are advocating for the violation of them both today.
Should I go on? We know you hate women so we can probably scratch out the 19th.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this
{{{By Goldie April 9, 2007 4:09 PM Did they “choose” their lifestyle too? How brainwashed exactly are you?}}}
Goldilocks: You should talk to your psychiatrist about that mental disorder where you define everybody by what they do with their wee wees.
I would like to think, and in fact let’s drop the sarcasm here, the God of Abraham and his Kingdom of Heaven have nothing to do with sex, our Creator is an Awesome God and deviant sex is a trivial human thing to say the least.
He gave us the “tools” necessary to reproduce and have off spring, of course we abuse those “tools,” like we do with drugs, alcohol and everything else we can get our hands on.
{{{I guess God didn’t create the homosexuals and bisexuals found in the animal kingdom either, huh, Dull?}}}
Dogs eat their own feces. Lions kill their own young, ooops, so do liberals, skip that one. Sheep will follow the leader off of a cliff.
And you?
Hahaha.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By rushncap
April 9, 2007 5:07 PM | Link to this
Stalk — please do go on. You like to hear yourself speak, so why deprive you of that?
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this
{{What difference does it make what they didn’t teach you? You wouldn’t listen anyway.}}
That’s where you’re wrong, No Power. They taught me to listen to Jesus’ words as a guide to follow, and I have. I never read any words that He said that taught me to discriminate against my neighbors. What do you think His words would be to us today regarding how to deal with Iraq now?
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 5:09 PM | Link to this
Don Imus is in a heap of trouble. Only his African American fans can save him now.
By Goldie
April 9, 2007 5:10 PM | Link to this
{{He gave us the “tools” necessary to reproduce and have off spring,}}
And to experience pleasure in life. You small-minded twit.
By Power of Light
April 9, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
But his words were written by old geezers over 2000 years ago.
By One Voice
April 9, 2007 5:24 PM | Link to this
Andy or Walt,
With yesterday being Easter I was thinking about some questions that were never really answered during my childhood when I was a Christian, so I figured I’d come to the experts with them. Since Jesus’ physical body rose from the dead, what ended up happening to it? Did it float up through the atmosphere into space and will the Hubble space telescope capture pictures of Jesus floating around Jupiter in his robe sometime in the future? And if that happened, then wouldn’t he have had some problems going through the atmosphere? Or did his body die again in order to go to heaven? Or is he still walking around here on earth in the form of a hippy or say, Mitt Romney? So what exactly did happen to his physical body since physical things aren’t part of the spiritual world? Where did it go? I’m sure one of you guys has a perfectly rational answer as usual.
By getalife
April 9, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this
Now it is getting interesting
D’oh!
By Buy Danish
April 9, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this
One Punk,
Why don’t you ask rushncap for some advice on where to go to get answers to your questions.
rushncap has quite a lot of experience in these matters, and particularly likes to troll at Christian women’s websites.
Since you claim to be in academia like Little Squirt rushncap, I bet the two of you could be lifelong comrades.
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this
and in fact let’s drop the sarcasm here
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Bill
April 9, 2007 6:05 PM | Link to this
Recall the usual knee-jerk, crazed, unbalanced, Republican would-be “moralists” who caused all manner of disgusting laws to be passed over Janet Jackson’s superbowl boob. Why would we wonder that equally crazed goons are demanding Imus’s scalp over a slip of the tongue. 98% of these people likely never heard of Imus before. See what you wannabe chickenhawk Nazis start? Your usual brilliance always shows.
By Buy Danish
April 9, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this
RW,
Want to lay any odds on whether rushncap will demand that Henry Waxman conduct an investigation of this?:
It’s being called the equivalent of a paparazzi gotcha: A snapshot of Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) and his chief political/media adviser David Axelrod — taken in the Senator’s Capitol Hill office!//ROLL CALL reports: Congressional ethics rules forbid the use of federal office space for political and campaign activity.
CC: Getalife
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this
{{{By Goldie April 9, 2007 5:10 PM And to experience pleasure in life. You small-minded twit.}}}
Goldilocks: Let’s try to make this real simple to where even an idiot like you can maybe understand. If God created all men to be homosexuals and lust after each other then 100 years tops there would be no more humans. (I’m as-suming that you know men cannot reproduce.)
Maybe the men that lust after women are the freaks, God really just wanted only a few souls up there in Heaven with him, you reckon?
I’m going to pray for you tonight Goldi and I mean pray hard too.
{{{By One Voice April 9, 2007 5:24 PM Since Jesus’ physical body rose from the dead, what ended up happening to it? Did it float up through the atmosphere into space and will the Hubble space telescope capture pictures of Jesus floating around Jupiter in his robe sometime in the future?}}}
I’ll have to ask him though I hope it’s not any time soon.
It does figure that a clever little worldly pervert like you could get stuck on the minutiae and use it as a reason to ridicule something you are too stupid to understand.
The worldview of modern liberalism is dependent upon a central truth- that God is either nonexistent or irrelevant. His mere existence is a condemnation of their thinking, and His involvement in mankind’s affairs guarantees their conviction in the court of absolute morality. We are called to obey the voice of His Holy Spirit, believe in Him, and be given a new life. As we do - it will impact how we think, the actions we commit to, and the behaviors we engage in. These changes threaten the belief system of liberals who are steadfastly committed to the muck and the mire they now live in. Sin and selfishness often cause blindness.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:11 PM | Link to this
!
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:16 PM | Link to this
Lets make this real simple.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Willie
April 9, 2007 6:17 PM | Link to this
Seems like BD, RW and Alwaysdull are xtra heavy into mental excretia today. The surge success has them groping.
By RW-(the original)
April 9, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish,
We ought to get an investigation into why the rest of outlining rushncap’s disdain for the Bill of Rights didn’t post.
I’m sure it’s alright for Democrats to run campaigns out of their Federal office space as long as they throw out at least five baseless charges against a Republican each day. Or maybe in the immortal words of the Goreacle, there’s no controlling legal authority when it comes to that side of the aisle.
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 6:21 PM | Link to this
{{{By Retardo Montelbaum April 9, 2007 6:16 PM Lets make this real simple.}}}
Hey, I thought the troll didn’t read my posts?
Can’t these candy as-ses tell the truth about anything?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ®<——back off with the Zzz’s punk.
By One Voice
April 9, 2007 6:22 PM | Link to this
Granny,
If I have a question about physics, I’ll direct it to rushncap. If he has a question about psychology or literature, he can direct it towards me. As for you, I certainly wouldn’t ask you for advice on employment, ethics, or basic logic, since it is so evident that you are devoid of knowledge or experience in any of those areas.
Andy,
Why is it that each and every contradiction or obviously illogical supposition in the bible is “minutiae”? I have to expect that something, anything stated in it would have some sort of validity. You didn’t answer my question because you couldn’t. The resurrection is such a blatantly stupid scenario that it cannot logically be defended, as is the case with the majority of the bible. The only evidence you can show us for anything is the evidence that you are a complete and utter fool.
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:26 PM | Link to this
CNN reported that McCain’s March to the Sea(food) in that Baghdad market proves the surge is a success. Forget that Sherman had less troops or firepower accompanying him in his own March to the Sea.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Geezus
April 9, 2007 6:38 PM | Link to this
Hello
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this
There were hundreds of Messiah’s crucified before Christ. Every few years some yahoo stood up and said, “I am the Messiah and I will lead the Jews to freedom from the Romans”.
Well, the Romans would pretend to give him a fair trial, pay a few locals to yell, “Crucify Him” when they displayed him before the crowd, and pretend to offer to let him go, and march him through the center of town and string him up for all to see. This went on for hundreds of years, they figure 100 million rebels were crucified just like that. You didn’t have to claim to be the christ or the king of the jews, you just had to cause a ruckus.
However, after Christ, nobody ever claimed to be the messiah again, instead, anyone who wanted revolution would yell, “I am Spartacus”, (and then he’d automatically get strung up).
This is the gospel according to Retardo Montelbaum.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Buy Danish
April 9, 2007 6:42 PM | Link to this
One Punk,
If you were the expert on psychology that you are claiming to be you would have had yourself committed to an asylum a long time ago.
If you had any friends, they would have called the ambulance for you.
By Geezus
April 9, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
A time limit??? Mike, I’m disappointed. (you must be staying up too late reading…lol)
By LuckoDull
April 9, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this
{{{By One Voice April 9, 2007 6:22 PM Andy, I have to expect that something, anything stated in it would have some sort of validity.}}}
Monkey Man: Are we talking about “evolution” or the Bible?
That was just sarcasm, my own special way of ridiculing you modern day hysteritics, I know that the Bible has irrefutable truth behind it whereas the “theory of evolution” is totally baseless.
Why are we here, what is the purpose behind this life?
The mere thought of that question is good enough for me.
You, on the other hand, can wander in your self imposed intellectual desert.
Have fun.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this
My own special way of ridiculing you.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this
Why are we here? What is the purpose behind this life?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this
Have fun.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Retardo Montelbaum
April 9, 2007 7:03 PM | Link to this
On the other hand, you can wander in your self imposed intellectual desert.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
By Paul
April 9, 2007 7:14 PM | Link to this
Goldie
Why do you bother trying to explain spiritual matters to people who really don’t care but just enjoy harassing people who do?
By @@
April 9, 2007 8:20 PM | Link to this
Paul:
I’m a little confused by your post to Goldie.
(((Why do you bother trying to explain spiritual matters to people who really don’t care but just enjoy harassing people who do?)))
I’ve just finished reading the responses to Goldie, and they all seemed to be from people who “DO” care.
If there was harassment, it was preceded by caring advice. Scriptures tell us that, as Christians, we will suffer ridicule, and to be strong in our faith. Goldie held up just fine from what I could see.
Conservatives suffer ridicule for our faith daily on this blog.
Personally I saw no serious harassment from the people Goldie addressed. Different intepretations of scriptures maybe.
All in all, I thought it was a pretty good read.
No harm, no foul.