Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

April 6, 2007 8:02 AM | Link to this

Hey, why are all you libs taking Good Friday off if you don’t believe in Jesus, hahahahaha, oh Lord.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

I find it hard to believe that there can really be people that bad off that they just have to buy alcohol on Sunday; but that didn’t stop the AJC Staff from creating one:

{{{I’m 60, well over the age of consent. How about letting me decide if I should drink on Sunday or not?-Vent}}}

See how these libs at the Urinal use their media to program their robots to think they are in the “mainstream?”

Do you personally know anyone who has ever freaked out on Sunday morning after realizing the cabinet is bare of liquor?

So what else do the pinkos lie about, huh?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

{{{The State Ethics Commission decided Thursday that it had enough evidence to consider allegations that former Lt. Gov. Mark Taylor’s-democrat, gubernatorial campaign took illegal contributions from a company and failed to fully identify other donors.}}}

Lucky he’s a democrat, cause all the other democrats will be looking the other way.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By FlyGirl Pinkos For Al Qaeda, On Their Knees

April 6, 2007 8:04 AM | Link to this

{{{Despite claims by some critics that the Bush administration invaded Iraq to take control of its oil, the first contracts with major oil firms from Iraq’s new government are likely to go not to U.S. companies, but rather to companies from China, India, Vietnam, and Indonesia.}}}

You candy as-sed suc-khole liberals are going to lose this war in Iraq just as sure as Al Qaeda is.

Get used to it.

{{{The fact that liberals have to lie about this country should convince any objective observer as to who’s telling the truth. The left, for example, insists that we invaded Iraq for its oil. And, yet, even after all this time, not only have we not confiscated their oil fields, we haven’t even used Iraqi oil revenue to finance, as I think we should, that country’s reconstruction.}}}

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

{{{Prime Minister Pelosi and Secretary of State Lantos undermine U.S. foreign policy—and maybe their own party. With her trip, Ms. Pelosi has now reassured the Syrian strongman that Mr. Bush lacks the domestic support to impose any further pressure on his country. She has also made it less likely that Mr. Assad will cooperate with the Hariri probe, or assist the Iraqi government in defeating Baathist and al Qaeda terrorists.-WallStreetJournal}}}

The beginning of the end of democrat party power, two years from now, when Republicans lord over Washington, we will point to this moment and give thanks.

Thanks, Nan!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

“Global warming” my as-s:

A BROAD SURFACE RIDGE WILL CONTINUE TO BUILD SOUTH FROM CANADA …AND CONTINUE TO DOMINATE NORTH AND CENTRAL GEORGIA THROUGH THE WEEKEND. A DRY BUT MUCH COLDER AIRMASS IS EXPECTED TO SETTLE IN OVER THE STATE WITH LOWS SATURDAY AND SUNDAY MORNING APPROACHING NEAR RECORD LEVELS.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 8:04 AM | Link to this

More news from Blinky’s Trip:

{{{The saving grace in Pelosi’s meddling is that she probably hasn’t done much harm, except to her reputation. That won’t be true in Iraq, however, if her foray into military strategy with timetables for troop withdrawals becomes law. That could wipe out America’s best chance for winning in Iraq—pursuing counterinsurgency tactics to secure Baghdad. That would be overreaching with a distinctly harmful impact.}}}

Thanks, Nan!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

{{{I have been to Iraq twice and dined with Iraqi women and talked to Arab women from various backgrounds. Brigitte Gabriel, author of “Because They Hate,” commented that Nancy Pelosi’s actions will be seen by the “Arab street” as going behind the back of a man (George W. Bush) in charge to further he own agenda. She won’t be seen as a reasonable person, she will be seen as a woman who doesn’t know her place. Terrorist have praised her but they won’t take her seriously.}}}

Thanks, Nan!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

{{{What’s wrong with that, you ask? What’s wrong is that she didn’t just lobby the president to begin diplomatic talks. She conspired with the Syrian regime to alter the president’s policy toward that regime. Is it beginning to sink in out there? If there is any doubt about Pelosi’s collusion with Syria to weaken the president and thus the United States, or if there is any doubt about the poisonous fruits of that infernal collusion, hear the words of Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al Moallem following the Assad-Pelosi meeting. He said, “These people in the United States who are opposing dialogue, I tell them one thing: Dialogue is … the only method to close the gap existing between the two countries. … We are happy that Mrs. Pelosi and her delegation had the courage and determination to bridge these differences.”}}}

Ummm, giving aid and comfort to the enemy is the very definition of treason, which is punishable under constitutional law.

Can you say impeachment?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 8:07 AM | Link to this

Back home, conservatives and liberals alike criticized Pelosi’s diplomatic freelancing as naive, sloppy and dangerous. Republicans on Capitol Hill jokingly took up a collection to bring her home. “I never thought I’d say this, but I really wish Nancy Pelosi was back here in the Capitol,” a top GOP aide said.

Off on her own little trip.

Rumblings that I’ve been hearing have Pelosi being impeached before Bush is.

Before she does too much damage is the reasoning.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 8:18 AM | Link to this

Money quote:

{{{{How dare Pelosi give extraordinary legitimacy to a terrorist nation whose own foreign policy rests on the murder of Christian leaders in the region.}}}}

Thanks, Nan!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Steven

April 6, 2007 8:24 AM | Link to this

This Keef snorting ashes story was debunked days again as an April Fool’s Day joke on an unimaginative reporter asking the usual lame and repetitive questions.

As usual, Luchovich ignores the facts and simply traffics in sensational commentary of the worst kind. The man is a disgrace to journalism and reinforces the AJC’s reputation for inaccurate reporting and commentary.

By rushncap

April 6, 2007 8:26 AM | Link to this

Come on, li’l andy, a day off is a day off. If we have to kill Jesus for that one, well, why the hell not? He’s immortal he can take it. That being said, today is the earliest I’ve shown up to work in months.

By Nomad

April 6, 2007 8:29 AM | Link to this

Lucko you are really bringing it this morning. Keep it up.

I wonder what the libs are going to do since today’s cartoon is not bashing Bush or taking about Global Warming (total joke).

Maybe some of the libs out there should sniff the ashes of a great democrat such as JFK so that they could actually grow some guts. Liberals are pathetic.

Happy Good Friday.

NOMAD

By Jesus

April 6, 2007 8:41 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By LuckoDull

April 6, 2007 8:43 AM | Link to this

{{{By rushncrap April 6, 2007 8:26 AM That being said, today is the earliest I’ve shown up to work in months.}}}

You getting some private time in with the ole workstation this morning, rushncrap, wink, wink?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Republican big, Big, BIG Government

April 6, 2007 8:46 AM | Link to this

Poor Andy, prohibition ended 80 years ago and he’s still riding the temperance wagon.

You know, alcoholism crosses all income, religious affiliation, and political party lines. Liberals are no more likely to become drunks than are conservatives. In fact, liberals with their focus on back-to-the-earth healthy living, might even be less likely to succumb to the disease.

It’s really somewhat amusing to see conservatives, who profess to wanting government off our backs, become the stalwart of governmental control whenever the issue turns to controlling what and when someone else chooses to drink!

More of that Republican Big, Big, Big government at work, holding your hand, wiping your a$$ for you, and protecting you from……yourself!

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 8:46 AM | Link to this

If you showed up to WORK why are you here?

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 8:50 AM | Link to this

{{{{{In fact, liberals with their focus on back-to-the-earth healthy living, might even be less likely to succumb to the disease.}}}}}

Except liberals only focus on making other people live the life they profess. They’ll just buy a bunch of grain alcohol and porterhouse offsets and party on.

By Senate Ankle Biters For Islam

April 6, 2007 8:50 AM | Link to this

If Bush doesn’t have his own timeline, some Republicans on Capitol Hill appear to have one. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the U.S. commander in Iraq, recently briefed members of Congress and, according to Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, projected that the surge should demonstrate progress by August. If that doesn’t happen, she reported, some moderate Republican senators warned that their support for the war will evaporate. Mitchell’s account makes sense: Moderate Republicans would want results or the unpopular war off the table as they begin the 2008 campaign season, which, given the ever-lengthening political time-frame, starts after Labor Day.

No consideration for the future and well being of Iraq.

No consideration for the certain spread of terrorists throughout the Middle East.

No consideration for the national security of the United States.

Only concerns for THEIR political well being.

Wonderful.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 8:52 AM | Link to this

Rw-(the origiinal) 8:46

It depends on if your definition of “work” works.

By LuckoDull

April 6, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this

By AntiRadical April 6, 2007 8:46 AM In fact, liberals with their focus on back-to-the-earth healthy living, might even be less likely to succumb to the disease.

Click on Spammie’s comments^^ to see an al-Gore fixing to bust wide open in a fat explosion.

In the middle of him freaking out about what other Americans are doing, no less.

Dumba-ss Spammie: When did I say the law was right?

The whole point of my comment was to point out the Urinal’s usage of propaganda to get it’s slobbering idiot mind controlled robots to chant slogans on their behalf, like you are.

See what I mean?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Buy Danish

April 6, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this

Before I hit the road -

{{{[Now that’s a little bizarre. Clinton was the first Democrat you mentioned. He sent a letter to himself?}}}

Fran,

You clearly do not know how to read. I said MANY OF THEM sent a letter to Clinton (that would be Billy Jeff, the former President, not his Machiavellian candidate wife who was also among those cited in the link I provided where Dems warned of the perils faced by Hussein and WMDs). If you’d bothered to read the link you’d have known that.

Here’s a link to the letter I cited - call it “bizarre” if you wish, but you’ll have to take your complaint elsewhere since I didn’t write it:

Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, today, along with Senators McCain, Lieberman, Hutchison and twenty-three other Senators, I am sending a letter to the President to express our concern over Iraq’s actions and urging the President `after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.

To be continued. I have to break this up because of tedious and useless rules invented by the AJC…

By Republican big, Big, BIG Government

April 6, 2007 9:07 AM | Link to this

RW @8:50am- Except liberals only focus on making other people live the life they profess. They’ll just buy a bunch of grain alcohol and porterhouse offsets and party on.

Now THAT’S rich! Like it isn’t the Republicans who are “making other people live the life they profess” by limiting their freedom to buy booze whenever they please.

Looks like Republicans ‘were FOR (smaller government) before they were AGAINST it’! LMAO

By Paul

April 6, 2007 9:10 AM | Link to this

Well I thought it was going to be a slow news day, even though a few good topics have been breached. All bets are off now, though. Brace yourself for another firestorm of retribution from the Left, maybe even from the right. We saw the major campaign issue from the Virginia senatorial race - a term referring to someone’s ethnicity. Ann Coulter just got roasted for her (calculated?) remark about John Edwards appearance, Rush Limbaugh lost his sports gig for musing why some quarterbacks have the position, and now we have another affront to decency, intelligence, demeaning comments and gross insensitivity. Another noted figure is about to lose his contract and have scorn and ridicule heaped upon him. Brace yourselves. The Left will be consistent in their outrage (maybe some on the Right will join in) and may even seek the appointment of a Federal prosecutor to get to the bottom of “who said what.”

Link:The Latest Insensitive Outrage

Excerpt: NEW YORK — Don Imus is creating controversy again.

On his “Imus In The Morning” show Thursday, he referred to the Rutgers women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos.”… He compared them to the Tennessee team, saying “The girls from Tennessee — they all looked cute.”

The conversation then went on to compare the game to “the jigaboos versus the wannabes.” Media Matters reported that the show’s executive producer, Bernard McGuirk, made that comment… Imus has more to say about those remarks, according to the New York Times. Imus said people should relax and not worry about “some idiot comment meant to be amusing.”…A Rutgers spokesperson issued a statement saying, “We agree with Mr. Imus that this was, in his own words, an ‘idiot comment.’… “

We are very proud of the success of the Rutgers women’s basketball team. Coach Stringer and the Rutgers players are outstanding ambassadors for this great institution.”

At least Rutgers showed some class in their response.

By Walt

April 6, 2007 9:19 AM | Link to this

“The conversation then went on to compare the game to “the jigaboos versus the wannabes.” Media Matters reported that the show’s executive producer, Bernard McGuirk, made that comment… Imus has more to say about those remarks, according to the New York Times. Imus said people should relax and not worry about “some idiot comment meant to be amusing.”…A Rutgers spokesperson issued a statement saying, “We agree with Mr. Imus that this was, in his own words, an ‘idiot comment.’… “

We are very proud of the success of the Rutgers women’s basketball team. Coach Stringer and the Rutgers players are outstanding ambassadors for this great institution.”

Well, Candace Parker -is- pretty doggone cute.

I just put away my UT car flag last night. :D

Walt

By @@

April 6, 2007 9:22 AM | Link to this

True or not ml, the thought of Keith Richardson “snorting” his father gives a whole new meaning to the term “urned income”.

Oh, by the way….about that earned income.

The Stones partying offshore with America’s “snooty” liberals.

Democratic politicians stealing from America.

Stingy behavior!!! Just shameful!!!

Democrats, thumbing their nose at their constituents.

By Buy Danish

April 6, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this

{{{Sure most Democrats acted to support the President in a time of national emergency. What did you want them to do, obstruct him?}}}

AND

{{{I understand that a hyperpartisan such as yourself and your idol, the President, have no clue as to the meaning of bipartisanship but those Democrats you mentioned do and acted accordingly! That really just galls the hell outta ya, don’t it?}}}

FRAN,

This is the convoluted, nonsensical and nauseating doublespeak, and as such it is difficult to know where to begin.

What do you call the pranks the “bi-partisan” Dems are pulling at this very moment? Oh wait. They’re on vacation now, my bad.

What do you call the pranks they pulled before they fled to meet with Syrian terrorists or go on vacation? I don’t know about you, but I’d call it “obstruction” particularly since the Senate unanimously approved Gen. Petraueus and are now “obstructing’” his plans to turn the tide in Iraq.

Sen. Harry Reid was one of those Defeatocrats who voted in favor of Petreus’ nomination. Now he wants to cut off funding to the troops while lavishing avocado and mango growers with bribes, err, largesse.

You have two choices - you can be “bi-partisan” and support the efforts of the President and his Generals in Iraq and on all fronts in the War on Terror*, or you can take the partisan side that guarantees defeat and will result in unimaginable chaos and victory for the Islamists - who want to destroy our civilization.

*OOPS! The Defeatocrat Kommisars have expunged that phrase from official use. My bad again.

Have a nice bi-partisan day.

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 9:26 AM | Link to this

RbBBG,

When was the law outlawing Sunday sales in Georgia written?

Bonus question, when did Republicans finally take control of Georgia’s governance?

By Paul

April 6, 2007 9:28 AM | Link to this

@@

Midnight would’ve been too early for a pun like “urned income.”

Groan…

By DebbieDoRight

April 6, 2007 9:36 AM | Link to this

I’m just surprised anyone even KNEW that there was a NCAA WOMEN’S basketball championship game. AND it was mentioned on radio!!!??!! I guess times are a changing!

SIDENOTE: Both Tennessee AND Rutgers had the same ratio of starting players 4:1, 4 Black starters, 1 white. The reason Rutgers lost is because Tennessee’s players average height is, (except for the point guard), 6 feet. Rutgers players average is 5’9”.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this

Indict Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice, Powell, Wolfowitz, Feith, Kristol, Bremer — war criminals, all of them! Editing intel reports to support their war-mongering desires:

Captured Iraqi documents and intelligence interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two former aides “all confirmed” that Hussein’s regime was not directly cooperating with al-Qaeda before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a declassified Defense Department report released yesterday. The declassified version of the report, by acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble, also contains new details about the intelligence community’s prewar consensus that the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda figures had only limited contacts, and about its judgments that reports of deeper links were based on dubious or unconfirmed information. The report had been released in summary form in February.

Lying, blood-thirsty, and war-mongering criminals!

The Repugnant Party is a dead-end in ‘08.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this

Blinky’s getting impeached!:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi may well have committed a felony in traveling to Damascus this week, against the wishes of the president, to communicate on foreign-policy issues with Syrian President Bashar Assad. The administration isn’t going to want to touch this political hot potato, nor should it become a partisan issue. Maybe special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, whose aggressive prosecution of Lewis Libby establishes his independence from White House influence, should be called back. The “Logan Act” makes it a felony and provides for a prison sentence of up to three years for any American, “without authority of the United States,” …

Thanks, Nan!

Should have listened to Bush.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

DDR,

The tournament was on wall to wall on ESPN and another BIG reason Tennessee won was Pat Summit.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

Don’t you lying blog-trolls let the facts get in the way of your assigned jobs: telling hateful lies in order to defend your criminal leaders in Washington. Your party needs you to continue your evil ways today…

By LuckoDull

April 6, 2007 9:55 AM | Link to this

Oh my:

{{{Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.}}}

Bye, bye Nan!

Oh, this is getting good.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this

RW (the original)

Maybe my earlier post regarding Imus was a bit too transparent. I found his remarks tasteless, offensive and not idiotic, just plain stupid. Same for his cohorts.

But imagine if the same comment had been made by Sean Hannity on his radio show. We would not see the same level of avoidance. Rather, the condemnation would have been swift and harsh, accompanied by calls to revoke his FCC license.

Which leads me to my question. Conservative commentators regularly criticize those within the fold who “screw up” or make outrageous comments. I do not see the same on the Left, with the exception of Sen Lieberman, whose sin was to align himself with what had been sold as a “Bush” policy. Imus’ comments? Largely ignored. Rosie O’Donnell (sp) saying US citizens conspired with others to murder thousands of their countrymen? It’s a “manufactured” controversy, now let’s move on to “real” news, please.

So, is the “outrage” of the Left true outrage against perpetuation of stereotypes or furthuring outlandishly fashionable ideas, or is it manufactured when it would further the goal of political gain?

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this

Check this out:

After Pelosi is impeached and imprisoned, it falls on Schwarzenegger to appoint a replacement Senator.

Will he or won’t he?

Of course I’m talking about a Republican or a dhimmi.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

You left out the footnote that exempts any Democrat of ever being prosecuted for anything.

Ann Coulter had a great line last night when some moonbat tried to tell her Peolosi was only echoing the message from the Bush administration. Coulter said, “No, the administration message was DON’T GO.”

By rushncap

April 6, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this

Because, Stalk, my workplace has an internet connection, and I have a computer with a browser installed on it. That’s why I’m here. What’s your excuse? “They killed Jesus 2000 years ago, I’m gonna be an annoying douche to celebrate”?

By Midori

April 6, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this

would someone PLEASE confiscate Andy’s crack pipe?

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

Paul,

It’s all manufactured outrage and had Hannity said something like that he wouldn’t even be allowed to apologize for it much less have a bunch of liberals writing it off.

I didn’t realize you and I were discussing this though. Did you mean to address that 9:58 to someone else?

By gadem

April 6, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this

RW, was the administration screaming that to the Republican Representatives that went…probably not.

When will Cheney and the administration stop lying?

…probably never…that is what they do best.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

RW - (the original)

Didn’t mean it as a discussion - just wanted a response from someone who would provide a reasoned response. I would’ve preferred addressing it to someone regularly towards the Left (generalizing here) of the continuum, but RE or N-GA but they hadn’t yet shown. Rushncap came on after I posted.

I’m inclined to agree with your assessment, though.

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

rushncap,

Most employers prefer that their employees do productive work on the paid for computers. In your case I can see why they prefer you spend the day making an a-ss out of yourself on a blog.

That being said, I’m off to do a little work on my golf swing.

Why are you fantasizing about killing Jesus for a day off, weirdo?

Later!

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

It’s Good Friday, so it seems that all of the fundamentalists should be asking themselves: who would Jesus want America to bomb next for “freedom”?

So many countries to choose from who are either harboring terrorists or are run by ruthless dictators and/or religious zealots:

Saudi Arabia, Sudan, North Korea, Iran, Syria, Jordan, Uzbekistan, Egypt, Algeria, Albania, and on and on …

Yes, I remember well those Sunday School lessons where Jesus taught us to hate our neighbors and bomb them into submission to our way of life.

By RW-(the original)

April 6, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this

Paul,

It could also be the any publicity is good publicity in Imus’ case. I’m only guessing that his ratings are way off, but it seems to me that when I travel I find him on less and less stations where he used to be.

gadem,

The discussion that takes place is the key to a violation of the Logan Act.

RW OUT!

By @@

April 6, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

Paul:

There’s a vast difference between the likes of Stern, Imus, and Rosie O’Donnell in my opinion.

Howard Stern and Don Imus are capable of intellectual debate, but choose to appeal to the lowest common denominator with what THEY determine is humor.

Rosie O’Donnell is just a “mean-spirited” individual lacking in the intellectual ability for debate. She, too appeals to the lowest common denominator. She is representative of the liberals I see here daily.

The three of them can be reduced down to a “thick gooey syrup” of liberal libations. Kool-aid it ain’t.

Regardless of who makes comments like the one Imus made, I’ve always found them disgusting and non-productive.

By rushncap

April 6, 2007 10:20 AM | Link to this

Considering that the only person who paid for my laptop was me, you can take your “most employers” and, in the immortal words of Lieutenant Huxley, shovel it.

I’m not fantasizing about killing Jesus. I’m just, you know, disappointed that we didn’t do it right the first time.

Have fun with your golf swing. Maybe Muffin can drive you there to give purpose to her life. But at least you’ll be an annoying little douche elsewhere.

By DebbieDoRight

April 6, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

{{DDR,The tournament was on wall to wall on ESPN and another BIG reason Tennessee won was Pat Summit.}}

I know I watched AND I’m a BIG Tennessee Womens B-Ball Fan, (I was glad LSU knocked off Connecticuit). I’m just surprised a lot of MEN watched or even knew about it! It must’ve been a very slow sports day!

The above was a VERY sexist remark, (but true)

By Paul

April 6, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

Goldie

I’m not aware of any who use Christian theological principles to promote war.

That said, one could infer from your post a recognition of the danger posed by jihadists who, when joining horrific weapons, well-organized public relations efforts and a theology that promotes subjugation of nonbelievers, pose a threat to the West.

So, is it possible to counter this threat without resort to military force - or is military force but one item in the range of available options? I’d submit the latter - pressure on financial institutions and reporting and tracking financial transactions is but one of many effective means we’ve seen employed.

By Midori

April 6, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

speaking of a “mean-spirited” individual

By DebbieDoRight

April 6, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

{{Regardless of who makes comments like the one Imus made, I’ve always found them disgusting and non-productive}}

Imus is a mass of contradictions. Although he may talk a certain way; he routinely acts another. A lot of his money goes to undeprivildged children and he runs a camp for underpriviledged kids too AND gives lots of money to Children’s Hospitals. He is not just a “money giver”, he also rolls up his sleeves and helps out too.

The other two I don’t know so much about; however I can say that although you spoke disparingly against O’Donnel, et al.; you failed to mention the likes of Coulter, Limbaugh, O’Reily, (O’Really), Hannity and Homeboy, Barber, etc.

By Truthman

April 6, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

Hey LuckoDull, I was talking to Jesus last night and he said he didn’t know you!

By Paul

April 6, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

@@

The other night I saw a replay of Rosie on O’Reilly’s show for an extended interview (do you hear the gasps along the Internet connections?). It was 2002 or 2003. It was polite, all in all a fine discussion. BTW, she said “everyone” - advisors, friends, advisors, told her not to go on the show. She said they were wrong - she was glad she did.

She said although she didn’t know much about Afghanistan, she had - not quoting here - impressions, gut feelings - about it. In other words, pretty much an emotional response. Nothing wrong with that. I’ve a family member who operates the same way on these topics. She admits she doesn’t have much background, but has strong emotions. I think a large measure of the population operates that way and it’s a challenge for the parties to carry their message to both styles.

I’m about out of here. Not a day off - just errands and back to work.

Later -

By @@

April 6, 2007 10:38 AM | Link to this

This is a great tribute to a “liberal turned conservative.” I’m not sure if it was Andy or RW that first introduced me to Thomas Sowell. Did I ever thank you guys? If I didn’t, I am now…

“I am reliably informed that the militants have already made up their list of ‘Uncle Toms’ among the black faculty there, and it takes very little to qualify. The people who really sicken me are the white liberals who promote and romanticize this kind of thing…. “

Hats off to an intellectual black belt with a warm and sensitive heart.

Big Daddy gave me Mark Steyn and you guys gave me Thomas Sowell.

Excellent!!!!!

By Yada Yada Yada

April 6, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this

Why are people so mean spirited and angry? Life is too short and precious to go through it that way.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this

I guess the Stones are going on tour again and getting some publicity.

Let todays lying by the wingnut insurgents begin.

By DebbieDoRight

April 6, 2007 10:42 AM | Link to this

Midori — your link won’t work!!!

By Paul

April 6, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

DebbieDoRight

My musings were limited to those making racist remarks or promoting as fact accusations of murder and conspiracy against citizens.

That’s why I gave as examples (9;10) of the Virginia Senate race, Ann Coulter’s homophobic comments and Rush’s comment (not, I think, intended as racist).

I’m not familiar with many of the others you mentioned - there’s really too many to keep track of. My point was, such comments are regulary made on both sides of the spectrum, the Right regularly criticizes its own, while my impression is the Left doesn’t to the same degree.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

Quick question:

What do you think is a worse crime, firing some political appointees that serve at the pleasure of the president or collaborating with the enemies of the United States?

The “most ethical Congress in history,” eh?

I already know who will answer what, I just want to verify.

(The libs would love nothing better than to see the United States enslaved by some socialist country like China, they think they’ll be appointed rulers or some such fantasy.)

Thanks, Nan!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Midori

April 6, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

DDR,

let me try again

By DebbieDoRight

April 6, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

Midori Thanks! I am somewhat amazed though that Cheney is STILL telling that lie; perhaps he knows that his faithful will believe it and keep drinking that Kool-Aid faithfully no matter what. Do you ever wonder what type of power these type of people, (Svengali, Jim Jones, Hitler, Razmutin, Cheney, Dubya), have over people that makes them continually believe lie after lie and SMILE while they martyr their lives off to them?

It’s like that old joke, “are you gonna believe what I tell you, or what your lying eyes see?”

By Mitzi Lewis

April 6, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

Dear Mr. Luckovich: I always love your work until today. You are so right on the point regarding Bush but I have to defend my Keith Richards. If you will go to rollingstones.com, click on news you will see the statement by Keith on 4-4-07 that the story of the coke and ashes is not true. Keep up the good work on Bush and hopefully people will finally admit the truth. Your Bush ego cartoon several weeks ago was one of your best.

Mitzi

By rushncap

April 6, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

Midori, thank you. I honestly am starting to doubt Cheney’s sanity. Literally, he may be going senile.

By @@

April 6, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

Alright, some of my posts have gone missing.

Midori:

Your second link came through. I thought Cheney’s “gentle scolding” of Pelosi was appropriate for her childish “bad behavior”. I found it highly amusing that he would use that term.

I think Nancy Pelosi was a horrible choice as House Speaker, but she’s the result of a Democratic led Congress, what can I say? I’m a conservative.

She’s all yours.

DebbieDoRight:

I’ve clearly stated that I don’t like Ann Coulter’s approach. Bill O’Reilly? Interrupts his guests too much, but still puts forth intelligent debates and points out the absurdity of liberal policy.

The others? I’m not familiar enough to comment.

By regulator

April 6, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

The most amazing thing about this blog is that Andi thinks any body reads anything he writes. Wonders never cease. Hospitalize Andi now!

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

The Light hopes that G.Britian does not rely on these 15 cowards to defend them in upcoming battles.

By ML

April 6, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

Dear Mr. Luckovich: I agree will all your cartoons until today. I have to defend Keith Richards. Go to rollingstones.com under news and you will see the statement from Keith that the rumour circulating regarding the cocaine and his father ashes are not true. Keep up the good work on trying to make people see the “real” Pres. Bush.

ML

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

cheney is a lying liar

Sick of the lies.

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this

Mitzi Lewis,

The Light has read Keith Richards’ comment on Rolling Stones’ website. That does not prove he didn’t do it. Even if he didn’t, he would still have to be high to think such a thing. How could you still love such a mentally desecrated human being.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this

ML,

Are they going back on tour?

Could be a publicity stunt.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

It is amazing that wingnuts love cheney lying to them but informed Americans see this disrespect as an insult to our intellegence.

Sick of the lies and disrespect.

We are not all gullible, ignorant wingnuts.

Geez.

By Chris Hansen

April 6, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

getalife,

I’m Chris Hansen, and as you know I’m with Dateline NBC and we’re continuing our story on adults who use the internet to have sex with children. We haven’t spoken to you in a while and was wondering if you have received the treatment that we recommended?

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

Chris,

Wrong guy, you are looking for Andy.

He posts perverted stuff not me.

By Chris Hansen

April 6, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

getalife,

I can’t argue with that. Andy is definetly a super perv. Our producers are already working the GBI in building a case against him. Is there anyone else on this blog that you know of that needs our surveillance?

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this

Paul’s hero loses it again

Unhinged, shrill and just plain nuts.

Geez.

By Truthman

April 6, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

Spooker of the Dimwits…and all other neo-conmen and women on this site who are sooooo outraged that Nancy Pelosi engaged in DIPLOMACY!!

Here’s your Republicans who went to Syria THE WEEK BEFORE PELOSI!!!

Frank Wolf, (R-WVa); Robert Aderholt, (R-Ala); and Joseph Pitts (R-Pa)

Attached is the story about them going to Syria and meeting with Assad.

Your selective indignation, not to mention y’all’s unreconstructed ignorance, is showing loud and clear!!

It’s OK for Repubs to go the Syria, but not Dems.

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070404/republicans-syria

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:46 AM | Link to this

Power of light.

By bon scott

April 6, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

Midori… your link provides new evidence that Cheney is either a congenital lial, amoral or both. There was never a Saddam-Osama coalition. To suggest otherwise is just plain idiotic.

Saddam and Osama HATED eachother. Saddam saw Osama’s (Sunni) Al Qaeda as a serious threat to his rule over a majority Shia country. Osama saw Saddam as a “Jack Mormon”… an infidel who didn’t pray, didn’t attend Mosque services, ate port, liked Johnny Walker and (gasp!) consorted with concubines.

Oh, Osama may have set up a few training camps in Iraq, but only after paying off the local army and police, who probably paid off Saddam, who was happy to take the cash as long as the “training ” camps remained small, isolated, and incapable of pulling off 9/11s.

Now, thanks to the bungled US invasion, Iraq is teeming with jihadists eager to blow themselves up if they can take a few Americans with then. Bush has turned Iraq into one big terror ground. Isn’t that special!!

Meanwhile, Al Qaeda is rebuilding along the Afghanistan Pakistan border. There aren’t enough US coalition forces to stop them, there still isn’t a solid Afghan government, and Pakistan’s Musharraf is basically taking advantaage of both US aid (which he happily accepts) while sheltering terrorists who have promised to leave his and his precarious government alone if he lets them do whatever he wants… including attacking the US.

And you demented wungnuts still think Iraq is the US is the world’s most pressig terror problem.

May God have mercy on us,

By Truthman

April 6, 2007 11:47 AM | Link to this

getalife:

Don’t respond to Power of Dumb/Chris Hansen.

I’m sure he’ll attack me next.

I will not respond!

As my father’s boss used to say when someone said something stupid to him; “If I respond, that’s when two fools meet!”

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:51 AM | Link to this

I will not feed the troll.

By Chris Hansen

April 6, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this

getalife,

I believe Power of Light used to call himself “Doom”. This is the second time you’ve mentioned him, is he some sort of thorn in your side ?

Also, who is truthman? Is he your son or something? Sounds like a lonely individual to say he won’t respond to someone who hasn’t addressed him. I’ve seen some lonely desperate people throughout my years at NBC, but that idiot takes the cake.

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 11:55 AM | Link to this

What is going on this blog? You people have nothing better to do than to attack the Light! I don’t know who this fake Chris Hansen is, but the Light assures you j******* that I have nothing to do with him.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

bon scott,

w is ignoring another one of these

I think the next attack will involve a Mexican truck loaded with explosives crossing the Mexican border.

It is insane.

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 11:58 AM | Link to this

getalife,

You are known for your nickjacking prowess, but you’ve seem to have cooled off a bit. Don’t let truthwoman get you into more trouble.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this

{{{By Lieman April 6, 2007 11:45 AM It’s OK for Repubs to go the Syria, but not Dems.}}}

Let’s bring them up on charges too.

{{{By getalife April 6, 2007 11:46 AM | Power of light.}}}

Doomwit: Apparently, you’ve cast a spell on gitmo, either that or he was getting ready to jack your nick and forgot what he was doing.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

Does anyone one else find it as funny and as comforting as I do, that these candy a-ss moron liberals would go and make up a bunch of unfounded, false accusations against Bush and then turn right around and commit a felony like it was nothing?

Bush is a wormy little failure, yes you heard that correctly, a wormy little failure, who, in fact, deserves to be impeached, IF, I say again IF he doesn’t get Pelosi removed from office.

This is cut and dried, the Logan act was written JUST FOR this kind of subversion and giving of comfort to the enemy.

Let’s put it to work.

By @@

April 6, 2007 12:04 PM | Link to this

Truthman @ 11:45:

Republicans and Democrats undermining foreign policy?

It all boils down to two choices. Republicans are trying to “cover their a*******es” in the 2008 elections, and the Democrats are “showing their asses” for the 2008 elections. That’s the only thing they’re committed to. The intentions are there for all who care to see.

It’s all political. They didn’t fool the Syrians and they haven’t fooled me. They all made America look weak and pliable.

You know what they say about opinions? Everybody has one.

I’m gone for the day because this server is dropping most of my posts. I’ve got better things to do.

By Chris Hansen

April 6, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Looks like I’ve started some trouble here. We’ll have to come back some other time and check on your progress. In the meantime, you might want to stay away from this Light/Doom character and you also might want to find a girlfriend for your son truthman.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

-=-

Good Morning Viet — err Syria???

First we have the WSJ (and all the loyal Bushitnites) grasping (and gasping) at straws to make some sort of a case based on the “Logan Act”. Oh No - Not the Logan Act Again! Never ever push the Logan Act button!..

Historically, the act has been used more as a threat to those engaged in various political activities than as a weapon for prosecution. In fact, Logan Act violations have been discussed in almost every administration without any serious attempt at enforcement, and to date there have been no convictions and only one recorded indictment.

Uhhm — did Nancy Pelosi pay for this trip to Israel and Syria out of her own pocket, or (ahem) did the United States pay for this trip? And was this with or without State Department consent?

Next they will try and re-instate the Sedition’s act.

—

And Cheney and Douglas Feith are still trying their best to connive us all into believing that Saddam and Laden were in bed together. The sad thing is some people are stupid enough to actually believe that lie.

—

Yes indeed - the spin-spam flim-flam keeps on churning!

Thomas/PNAC

By Daniel

April 6, 2007 12:06 PM | Link to this

Happy Easter! Enjoy your Passover! The rest of you will just have to have a pleasant weekend! Daniel

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this

Speaker of the Dhimmis,

Its the Light, Doom no longer exists. You seem to be right, though. The only reason getaboy didn’t say anything is because his sex slavemaster,truthman, told him not to. Otherwise, it would have been the same old garbage,garbage that the Light doesn’t have time for anymore.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

You too Daniel.

By Dubya

April 6, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this

But 8 more GI deaths in a day shold make you shaved headed, burr cut freaks feel like tough heroes, eh? If it made Kojack look pathetic, imagine how you look. Tho you talk more like Koblack. Putcher caps on, swig some courage, roar off in yer gangsta duds in you SUV fer a manly weakend. Take your unfortunate family along on the trip. Ignorance is best taught early.

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this

{{{By Chief GasBag April 6, 2007 12:05 PM Historically, the act has been used more as a threat to those engaged in various political activities than as a weapon for prosecution. In fact, Logan Act violations have been discussed in almost every administration without any serious attempt at enforcement, and to date there have been no convictions and only one recorded indictment.}}}

Bill Clinton fired 93 attorney generals, disrupting several investigations of democrats, without any repercussions what so ever.

For some reason that info doesn’t seem to bother you pinkos.

Least not until you need a “get out of a felony for free card.”

Stick it up felon Pelosi’s as-s!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By The Pathway

April 6, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

“You too Daniel”. Awwwww, isn’t that sweet?

By Oh Really!

April 6, 2007 12:15 PM | Link to this

By the fool who goes by RW - Except liberals only focus on making other people live the life they profess.

I didn’t realize that the Governor and Lt. Governor of GA and most Republicans were liberals.

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 12:16 PM | Link to this

getalife,

That wasn’t me.

By Oh Really!

April 6, 2007 12:20 PM | Link to this

By the fool who goes by RW - When was the law outlawing Sunday sales in Georgia written? Bonus question, when did Republicans finally take control of Georgia’s governance?

At the moment those are moot points. It’s who is in power NOW who is refusing to bend on the subject. What a partisan POS you are.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 12:22 PM | Link to this

-=-

Yes have a happy Easter everyone!

And Remember - The Prince of Peace, his sacrifice, and his words of wisdom.

Thomas/PNAC

By Walt

April 6, 2007 12:24 PM | Link to this

“Bill Clinton fired 93 attorney generals, disrupting several investigations of democrats, without any repercussions what so ever.”

Amny moron could tell that Clinton insulated himself from criticism by so doing.

His treatment of the USA’s was uniform.

Bush’s treatment by targeting 8 for disloyalty was partisan. It made a mockery of the justice system.

If we want to hear talking points from FOX, we’ll just tune in, thanks.

Walt

By Power of Light

April 6, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

The Light is exiting this blog, Happy Resurrection day to everybody!

And you too getalife.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

-=-

Kill Ratio anyone?

Great toon piccy!

-=-

By getalife

April 6, 2007 12:32 PM | Link to this

Amen.

Pastors are starting to talk about the behavior of the religious right.

Its about time.

By Midori

April 6, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

Bon Scott, Getalife,

Cheney’s “credibility” has been in its “last throes” for the past 2 years.

I wish he would just STFU.

The wingnuts eat his lies up hook, line and sinker.

If they ever start thinking on their own, the country is in big, big trouble.

And Happy Easter back to you, Daniel.

It’s such a pleasure having you here.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

Midori,

I think impeachment of w and cheney are back on the table.

President Pelosi has a nice ring to it and will make wingnut heads explode all over red country.

By Walt

April 6, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

“I think impeachment of w and cheney are back on the table.”

I’d say not, but not because they don’t deserve it.

One of the upsides of the surge for these horrible people is that it gives them a plausible reason for leaving our guys “in contact” and taking casualties.

And as long as that situation maintains, Congress won’t act in a way that would disrupt our “war effort”.

Getting some of our people killed in combat in an ongoing situation was always part of the Rethug power strategy.

Walt

By Walt

April 6, 2007 1:17 PM | Link to this

The shame of it is that the Congress won’t go ahead and approve impeachment articles because the conventional wisdom is that the Senate won’t convict.

I’d say cross that bridge when it appeared. If Bush were actually impeached in the House, it might restrain him some. He’d think about getting a preemptive pardon too, which he can’t get if he is actually impeached.

The Dems are looking at the historical precedent that it hurt the ruling party when Clinton was impeached.

Duh, the same people who opposed Clinton’s impeachment are wild to get Bush in the dock.

Walt

By Gidget

April 6, 2007 1:26 PM | Link to this

They aughta put you on the radio, walt.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 1:45 PM | Link to this

Walt,

I agree with Ron Paul

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this

Yesterday morning Andy-Dull commented “Let’s give war a chance.” He has not been forthcoming with the lyrics to his new war-song, so I’ll contribute some ideas (sung to the tune of Lennon’s “Give Peace A Chance”):

“Repugs are talkin’ about terrorism, fear-ism, gayism, jihad-ism, hate-ism, sexism, world-powerism…

“All they are saying, is give war a chance!” {repeat 1 time}.

By Nomad

April 6, 2007 2:08 PM | Link to this

Impeachment talk is wishful thinking because it won’t happen. Pelosi should be impeached for trying to talk for the American government without express permission, but that won’t happen either. Keep dreaming.

Have you got anything better or is it the same crap you spout here everyday?

NOMAD

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this

Having changed all of his political stances to run in ‘08, today’s Doonesbury nails Flip-Flop Romney once again:

Scroll down the page to see: “Is there anything that HASN’T changed?”… “Yes, my deep conviction that I should be president!”

LMAO!

By getalife

April 6, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this

Nomad,

Your hypocrisy is showing

Speaker Pelosi is preparing to be President.

Say it with me Nomad,

President Pelosi!

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

President Pelosi!

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

-=-

Goldie —

Here yah go —

Give War a Chance!

-=-

By getalife

April 6, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

“Cheney and Limbaugh have about six military deferments between them. Them talking war is akin to Jeff Gannon talking girls.”

Geez.

By Nomad

April 6, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

I am sorry NoLife you should realize that she shouldn’t be there in the first place. After ‘08, I wouldn’t worry about her being speaker especially if the Congress passes the tax increase that has been going around the last couple of weeks. They were planning it in ‘94 and were voted out. I hope history repeats itself.

NOMAD

By Paul

April 6, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

getalife 10.44

Hero? I suppose that’s a liberal’s weak point - inferring, then extrapolating to the absurd.

You also gave the forum a great example of what happens when you go to secondary sources - particularly biased blogs - for information. I saw the exchange between O’Reilly and Geraldo. It was quite uncomfortable, really - lots of finger pointing and histrionics - I almost changed channels. But - here’s the part your “source” cut out (maybe neocons aren’t the only ones who doctor information) to make the intel fit the story they wanted to sell - right after your clip ends, what you didn’t see, is they both sat back, grinned at each other and said, in effect, “so, what’re you doing this weekend?” There were a few chuckles, a bit of who got the best of whom, then a bit of chitchat. It appeared quite staged, like with two lawyers in a courtroom (Geraldo is a lawyer).

Gotta stop letting others analyze your intel and feed you conclusions. Douglas Feith, anyone?

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

Like the other war criminals who have since left the White House, did Douglas Feith also receive a presidential medal for his war propaganda efforts?

Check out the last paragraph of this NY Times article about Feith’s whereabouts these days:

The Pentagon policy offices set up by Mr. Feith have been abolished, and he has left the Pentagon and is writing a book on the war.

Impeach Bush Now!

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this

-=-

So Folks —

How about 12 years of Dubya’ - Can yah handle it? How about 16?…

Mr. Cheney suggested that the Bush Administration may seek to challenge the 22nd amendment in the 2008 presidential election in an effort to ensure that the war in Iraq is successful.

Now let me get this straight -

We Overthrew the dictator of Iraq, so we could install our own dictator into power?

Actually - if you really want to point at a shadow government - just point at all the people involved in the PNAC. They are the current masters of this country policy.

Thomas

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this

Thomas @ 2:27 — that link is excellent!

“toostupidtobepresident.com”— LMAO!

By The Dream Team

April 6, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this

Clinton/Pelosi in ‘08.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this

Getalife— the Repugs chose the highly-honored “war heroes” of the Bush-Cheney ticket in 2000 and trashed McCain in the same campaign. It’s no wonder their party is kissing their @sses buh-bye now!

By Midori

April 6, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

Get a load of Nomad calling someone “no life”, especially since he’s been wandering aimlessly looking for a clue.

And a point.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

DreamTeam @ 2:43— maybe so… but I like the sound of Obama/Edwards in ‘08, just as a first choice.

By Walt

April 6, 2007 2:50 PM | Link to this

“They aughta put you on the radio, walt.”

Thanks.

I find it really tiresome that no one ever lists as a reason to impeach Bush - to restore the honor of the Nation and the Flag.

Bush’s handlers are almost as bad as the Nazis.

All the blood and suffering that has gotten us this far in our struggle for human rights and freedom is wasted if Bust ambles off to Crawford and Cheney retires to his ill-gotten estate on the Chesapeake.

They -have- to go to prison.

Walt

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:53 PM | Link to this

{{I’m not aware of any who use Christian theological principles to promote war.}}

Uber-Paul @ 10:26— do you want me to list the trolls’ names for you?

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 2:54 PM | Link to this

-=-

Aha’

I have been duped!

Cheney/Bush challenging 22nd amendment article is an April Fools Hoax!

LOL —

Hmmm but then again - what if Cheney and Dubya did —— Hmmmmmm`…

Thomas/PNAC

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 2:57 PM | Link to this

{{They -have- to go to prison.}}

Walt, they should be impeached for abusing the Constitution the way they have, as well as using lies to promote their war-propaganda machine (a la Project For a New American Century, which includes Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Frum, Bremer, and Kristol).

By Paul

April 6, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this

Goldie

Not particularly, thanks. I was referring more to major, recognized “players.” Not fringe groups or hyperpartisans who assume the blogs they frequent are representative of the American body politic. But if you find some who promulgate such “principles” by all means, have at it!

BTW - have you yet read Sen Obama’s book? It’s a very good read. He may be “the most liberal guy running” but when one reads his opinions, one finds sound, principled reasons and a consistency of thought. Not that they aren’t debatable, which he acknowledges, but he does generally make a sound case. Your “dream team” could very well come to pass. Polling data suggest Hillary’s nomination is far from a lock.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this

{{Cheney/Bush challenging 22nd amendment article is an April Fools Hoax!}}

Whew — thank God we’re not fighting that battle, too. We’ve got our hands filled with the impending impeachment process…

By rushncap

April 6, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this

Ummmm, Nuked, I think that link is fake. “newyourketimes.com”, “McKrack”, I think you’ve been had.

By rushncap

April 6, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this

Damn, beaten to the punch…

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this

{{have you yet read Sen Obama’s book?}}

Uber— yes, I’m in the middle of the 2nd book right now… and I’m finding it a lot more engrossing than the first one, just personally. I particularly like when he writes about Bush’s advice to him when he was first sworn into the US Senate — pretty funny!

By Walt

April 6, 2007 3:07 PM | Link to this

Here are the various headers that are listed under the Wikipedia entry on Bush Impeachment as reasons to impeach:

NSA warrantless surveillance controversy

2003 invasion of Iraq

Justification for invasion

Violating the U.N. Charter

Geneva Conventions controversy

Extraordinary rendition

Treatment of detainees

Leaking of classified information

Declassifying for political purposes

Hurricane Katrina

Abuse of power

Any one of those should bring these horrbile people down.

Walt

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

Uber, BTW— I meant to mention that the 2nd book is entitled “The Audacity of Hope”, in case you were commenting about his first book.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

Its all staged bs on that channel Paul.

There is a reason the Dems will not debate on that channel.

Talk about bias, get real Paul.

I read wingnut blogs and find nothing but spin and never admitting failures or lies.

I find the truth about failures and lies on left wing blogs.

It is like night and day and it is a damn shame you can’t see this obvious fact.

I have no respect for people who ignore facts, failures and lies to encourage the destruction of our country.

Those people are pathetic and failed Americans.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

Funny, yes, but also sadly true.

I’m about to sign off. Back to work then prepare for the weekend gathering. Have a pleasant weekend.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:11 PM | Link to this

Walt @ 3:07— I’m with you, Bro!

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this

Also, Walt— I’m thinking back to the days of ‘72 when it was inconceivable that the criminals in Nixon’s White House would ever be impeached… some dreams do come true. Patience, my man, patience.

By Oh Really!

April 6, 2007 3:14 PM | Link to this

While the Republican leadership and their mouthpieces in the media have been frothing at the mouth to condemn Nancy Pelosi over her visit to Syria, they have been noticeably more generous towards Republicans visiting Syria as well. Even when they (gasp!) criticize the President on foreign soil.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this

{{It is like night and day and it is a damn shame you can’t see this obvious fact.}}

Getalife, have patience with our uber-Paul. He is slowly, but slowly, coming around to reason and the truth. It is obviously a strong addiction to wean oneself away from the “entertainment” of Fox Noise, Sean “Puffy” Hannity, and Oxycontin Limbaugh, et al…

By Paul

April 6, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this

Getalife

Lots of angst there, yes? I’ve seen plenty of Democrats on O’Reilly - one reason I record and breeze through. They get questions they don’t get elsewhere, along with focused followup. I wonder how Senator Kerry and his wife - who were on earlier in the week, promoting their book but eager to discuss other topics, would react to your characterization that they are not “Dems?” Not to mention the Reverend Al Sharpton (a regular), Mike Farrell (a frequent guest) - but I guess the bias-free blogs don’t refer to them as “real” Democrats, either.

Personally, I don’t frequent the other blogs - left or right. I come here as it’s one of the few political cartoon sites that has comment.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:16 PM | Link to this

Have a Happy Easter weekend, uber-Paul!

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

{{{Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.}}}

They got Blinky by the balls (San Fran, you can never be sure.)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

{{{By Goldie April 6, 2007 1:49 PM Yesterday morning Andy-Dull commented “Let’s give war a chance.” He has not been forthcoming with the lyrics to his new war-song, so I’ll contribute some ideas (sung to the tune of Lennon’s “Give Peace A Chance”):}}}

There’s a song called “give peace a chance?”

??

Why?

Now just imagine a group of cut throat terrorists with a couple of tambourines and some spoons, hahaha, maybe they’ll put down their neck saws long enough to belt out a couple of choruses, you reckon?

You pinkos got your heads up your as-ses.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this

{{I’ve seen plenty of Democrats on O’Reilly - one reason I record and breeze through.}}

Just one more comment, uber, about Fox— I personally think the Dems are making a mistake by forcing a withdrawal of the Dem debates from Fox Noise. They’re losing that chance to reach those subscribers with hearing the Dems’ message…

By Midori

April 6, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this

Paul,

this guy’s blog is probably more to your taste

By Oh Really!

April 6, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this

“There’s no question that Saddam Hussein had al Qaeda ties.” Dick Cheney

Captured Iraqi documents and intelligence interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two former aides “all confirmed” that Hussein’s regime was not directly cooperating with al-Qaeda before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a declassified Defense Department report released yesterday.

The declassified version of the report, by acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble, also contains new details about the intelligence community’s prewar consensus that the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda figures had only limited contacts, and its judgments that reports of deeper links were based on dubious or unconfirmed information. The report had been released in summary form in February.

By Brett

April 6, 2007 3:24 PM | Link to this

“KOBLACK>” I love it. White trash trying to look and talk like black trash. The people who officially study these things say that 80% of American caucasian males range between homely and ugly. Now they dress ugly, talk ugly, act ugly, and look triple ugly. Used to be a time when guys took pride in themselves and had their hair styled, other things, to look their possible best. But not the “WORST GENERATIONS.” That covers 90% of the geeks on this blog. Midori, I see the garbage boys are after you again. That’s cause you’re a woman and they are terrified of women. Dedicated woman-haters. The biggest threat in their lives are women. One day I’ll take the time to define these runts to you. A complete explanation of and about them. Take care, child, be well.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:24 PM | Link to this

{{ maybe they’ll put down their neck saws long enough to belt out a couple of choruses, you reckon?}}

Andy-Dull, only love and peace can conquer hate and war (to paraphrase MLK Jr.)…

By Midori

April 6, 2007 3:26 PM | Link to this

sorry Paul, here’s the current link

and would you PLEASE take Andy with you?

By What a moron - and you voted for him!

April 6, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

“And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I’m sorry it’s the case, and I’ll work hard to try to elevate it.” —George W. Bush, interview on National Public Radio, Jan. 29, 2007

By What a moron - and you voted for him!

April 6, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this

“Make no mistake about it, I understand how tough it is, sir. I talk to families who die.” —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Dec. 7, 2006

By getalife

April 6, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this

Well Paul,

This blog is a good source for both sides as long as you look at Andy’s, RW’s, BD’s, @@’s. etc..sources and compare them to other sources to find the truth.

It takes a lot of reading and I have found that once the right wing spews something, read the left wing rebuttal.

The truth has a left wing bias which leads to lack of credibility for the right.

I think it is disrespectful to be lied to and sick of being disrespected by our leadership.

They have lost the trust of the majority of American people and getting back the trust is a huge issue.

By What a moron - and you voted for him!

April 6, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this

“We’ve never been stay the course, George.” —George W. Bush, attempting to distance himself from what has been his core strategy in Iraq for the last three years, interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Oct. 22, 2006

By Walt

April 6, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this

“…..{{{Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.}}}

They got Blinky by the balls (San Fran, you can never be sure.)….”

Speaker Pelosi can certainly act as an agent of the United States as well as anyone else.

Bush is not Fuhrer and Chencellor yet.

Although he should be if he could keep you safe from al Qaeda, right?

Walt

Walt

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this

Walt, dearie, you may want to check out the US Constitution, I doubt if you have the mental capacity to understand it but it will keep you from making ignorant mindless statements for several days while you read it.

{{{Democrats in Congress have been busy flexing their foreign policy muscles almost from the moment they took power in January, for the most part responsibly. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) crossed a line this week by visiting Syria, where she met with President Bashar Assad. She violated a long-held understanding that the United States should speak with one official voice abroad - even if the country is deeply divided on foreign policy back home. President Bush’s policy has been to refuse to negotiate with Syria until it changes its behavior. That behavior is malignant. Syria has long meddled destructively in neighboring Lebanon and is widely seen as the bloody hand behind the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri. Syria has aligned itself with Iran and supports the violently anti- Israel groups Hezbollah and Hamas. It foments violence in Iraq by allowing suicide bombers and jihadists to cross the Syria-Iraq border.}}}

The Attorney General’s entire prosecution under the Logan Act can based on this statement:

{{{Also along was House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., who said the meeting was “only the beginning of our constructive dialogue with Syria, and we hope to build on this visit.” That suggested Democrats are going beyond unobjectionable fact-finding and getting-to-know-you conversation into something closer to negotiations, undermining U.S. diplomacy.}}}

You libs are done dealing, the whole thing is fixing to come crashing down around you.

Should have listened to Bush.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:42 PM | Link to this

A partial quote of MLK Jr. from April 1967, which still resonates today:

“Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted… I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as one who loves America, to the leaders of our own nation: The great initiative in this war is ours; the initiative to stop it must be ours.”

By LuckoDull

April 6, 2007 3:45 PM | Link to this

“Global warming” my as-s:

{{{Tonight’s Game Between Minnesota And Chicago Has Been Postponed Due To Cold Weather. No Makeup Date Has Been Announced.}}}

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Midori

April 6, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this

Andy, you ignorant ___ (fill in the blank),

Listened to Bush about WHAT???

The coke addled alcohol incompetent hasn’t been right about ONE FREAKING THING in the past 5.5 years!!!

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this

{{Should have listened to Bush.}}

LMAO, Andy-Dull. Just this morning you were admitting what a dismal failure for America your guy is!

No thanks— Americans no longer listen to your lying sack-o-shiite pres.!

By getalife

April 6, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this

Andy does not bother to post his links anymore.

Geez.

By Walt

April 6, 2007 3:54 PM | Link to this

“Walt, dearie, you may want to check out the US Constitution, I doubt if you have the mental capacity to understand it but it will keep you from making ignorant mindless statements for several days while you read it.”

You don’t bother to quote the Constitution.

That’s not a big surprise.

Note that the speaker of the House can institute procedures to remove the president and note also that this power is not reciprocal.

See, I won’t even insult you personally.

That’s what Sen. Hagel was talking about the other day when he suggested the president needed to cool his jets.

Walt

Walt

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this

{{“We’ve never been stay the course, George.” —George W. Bush}}

Thanks for those reminders, “and you voted for him”! Makes me think W is gonna start denying that his party also claimed:

“We’ll be greeted as liberators!” and

“It’s a slam dunk!” and

“Freedom is on the march!” and

“We’ve turned the corner in Iraq!” and

“There is no doubt!” and

“these are the drawings of the mobile labs!” and

“I don’t think we can win it.”— W, as stated on the “Today” show here:

Asked “Can we win?” Mr. Mr. Bush said, “I don’t think you can win it. But I think you can create conditions so that the — those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world.”

By Goldie

April 6, 2007 4:13 PM | Link to this

Has anyone heard this week which side our troops are fighting for in Iraq? Is it for the Sunnis and Saudi Arabia, or for the Shia and Iran?

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this

-=-

Andy -

Since you don’t know the science behind global warming (or much about science at all) your opinions on global warming are without any factual merit.

Record Cold is absolutely a defined climate event that can be caused by global warming.

Do you even have a basic understanding of what “The Greenhouse Effect” is? How it affects the temperature of our earth? How Greenhouse gasses help and harm our lives?

If you don’t know the subject other than “ohh it’s cold outside - so much for global warming” and re-posting talking head quotes from paid science hacks who are paid to disavow and falsify real research, then you are an un-educated idiot posting in the wind.

If you truly wish to learn then start here!

It’s not advanced or detailed, but I think even your mind may be able to understand the first part.

Thomas/PNAC

By Walt

April 6, 2007 4:23 PM | Link to this

Those of you Bush supporters who are appalled at Rep. Pelosi’s trip to Syria and flap like trained seals at the cues you get from FOX news discount the fact that our military has had to swim against a strong tide of Bush Administration incometence and a total lack of leadership in foreign affairs.

Rumsefeld interferred with the orderly deployment of our combat forces to Iraq, ensuring that national guardsmen and not MP’s were on duty at Abu Ghraib.

Bush’s flunky Bremer disbanded the Iraqi army and told the Sheiks to screw off, virtually -guaranteeing- the situation we face now.

And despite the flat lies of Dick Cheney, we had THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND names of Iraqi soldiers willing to support us.

That was 4 years ago.

Now the situation is irretreivable in any military sense.

And when the vacuum of diplomacy is at last filled by SOMEONE, you are too blind to see that as a good thing.

FOX throws you a few sardines and a you balance a ball on your nose for them.

Arf arf.

Walt

By Speaker Of The Dhimmis

April 6, 2007 4:49 PM | Link to this

{{{By Heap Big Chief GasBag, Dullard April 6, 2007 4:23 PM Record Cold is absolutely a defined climate event that can be caused by global warming.}}}

Oh, O.K.

{{{By Walt April 6, 2007 3:54 PM You don’t bother to quote the Constitution. See, I won’t even insult you personally.}}}

Wally: I’m not insulting you, I’m just being brutally honest.

Don’t take it so bad, I don’t think you are as f’ed up as Thomas is.

Now back to the Constitution:

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

If Blinky didn’t like us killing the terrorists, she is more than welcome to advise the President of her overwrought feelings.

She does not have the authority to dictate foreign policy.

I also believe that, under this same constitution, when she is convicted of the felony she committed she will have no rights at all.

Cept to sit in that cell.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Walt

April 6, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

Goldie sends:

“Has anyone heard this week which side our troops are fighting for in Iraq? Is it for the Sunnis and Saudi Arabia, or for the Shia and Iran?”

Our being in Iraq helps both Sunni and Shia and it doesn’t help us.

Walt

By Walt

April 6, 2007 4:55 PM | Link to this

“She does not have the authority to dictate foreign policy.”

She didn’t propose a treaty did she?

You are just flat ridiculous.

It has been said by our military men for -years- that there is no military solution in Iraq.

Bush has, for -years- eschewed a political or diplomatic solution. We have thousands of dead Marines and soldiers who should be alive today, but are not because the president has co-opted our foreign policy to right wing nut jobs in Israel.

And - I know you’d feel safer if Bush -were- Fuhrer, but he is not.

And it is very obvious that you are willing to yield everything to him -if- he will keep you safe.

He has actually brought down the worst military/political situation in the nation’s history down on our heads.

Walt

By getalife

April 6, 2007 4:58 PM | Link to this

Meet the new Monica, she resigned

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

April 6, 2007 5:02 PM | Link to this

-=-

Headline should read - Monica Goodling “Cuts and Runs”!

-=-

By Walt

April 6, 2007 5:09 PM | Link to this

“Headline should read - Monica Goodling “Cuts and Runs”!

I hope she wears a blue dress when she testifies.

Walt

By Gidget

April 6, 2007 5:13 PM | Link to this

It’s a symptom of the ignorance so rampant in America that most of today’s post reveal: Iraq War. Iraq is the cradle of civilization. There are 10K year old outhouses there, morons. There is no way to write a blog about the war that could possibly cover the subject matter without using up 8K megapixels of bandwidth, you ignorant jackasses and goat-abusing lickwads from hell. I have to sit here and read the sphintorial speculations about what this war means from neo-scroats and anal-scrubs who only know the comfort their own knees feel when they service each other for spewing utter disinformative turds of wisdom that only a dung beetle would appreciate. Shut the fuque up, you pathetic pieces of shiite. You have blogged enough. We know your limitations about data, talent, and insight. You stink to a man. There is no situation that could possible arise that I would need to read another word from any of you. You’re not even there. Recede, Recind, and Recitivize, you pompous fools. Morons…..ALL!!!!

Gee, why dont you guys all apply to the CIA for the position of Senior-Analyst, cause they surely need your amazing insights into this Iraq War thing.

Is there no platitude or wive’s tale that you nudniks wont blog about?

Why dont you all just stop posting entirely? Dont post. Just lurk. That’s a win win, and a far, far better world than I could ever have expected to evolve from the stench of your last 5000 posts, you collective gaggle of goofs.

By getalife

April 6, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

What a freaking mess

Just look at all that crap.

Geez.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Gee, I wondered what happened to the two bloggers Edwards fired. One’s accounted for -

By Dusty

April 6, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

I see.

All the usual liberal bunnies are here dropping their yellow eggs of defeat all over this blog. I see Luckovich pictured the typical liberal in his latest cartoon. Yep, “under the influence”.

Liberals continue to pour out their efforts to undermine the country….calling the President and Vice President vile nonsensical names…calling anybody who is conservative “liars”….supporting violators who go mewling to foreign enemy countries…trying to rearrange the Constitution..suggesting indictments without any evidence of wrongdoing….supporting our troops by sinking the military funding bill with liberal pork…rich energy wasting liberals declaring the earth is melting from man made pollution…trying to give a war withdrawal schedule knowing that it will aid our enemies…”supporting”our military morale by saying all they do is worthless and bloody…voting to send General Petraeus to Iraq and then trying to stop fulfillment of his “surge” plan….claiming Americans like to kill and torture. The list goes on and on.

Then you liberals wonder why conservatives think you are working against our own USA. Saying that you are saving the country by bulldozer politics doesn’t cut it. Your actions, as I have mentioned above, show quite clearly where you want to lead us—-a defeated country with a socialistic government subjugated by fundamentalist Muslims.

As Dylan Thomas wrote:

“Do not go gentle into that good night.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.”

Our country is the light at this time.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this

Say, getalife, just back for a moment (that earlier post was just too good to pass up) - thanks for the 3:30 response. While much has merit, I’ve generally found that not matter which side begins - liberal or conservative - the counterpoint is often just as exaggerated. Which is why I try to get to the source - the statute, the regulation, a copy of a speech, etc - to form an opinion. Two other good sources for an accuracy check are factcheck.org (mostly for campaign-related assertions, they’re going to get a heck of a workout this season) and snopes.com (altho they occasionally try to interpret in areas where they obviously don’t have much background).

By getalife

April 6, 2007 5:48 PM | Link to this

Snopes.com?

Nevermind Paul.

Geez.

By Paul

April 6, 2007 5:59 PM | Link to this

getalife

two subcategories on snopes: media matters and politics, pertinent here. The religion one’s appropriate, also.

Latest example was the one of Pres Bush looking through binoculars with the lens cap on to illustrate what a doofus he is. Snopes showed same basic pic with Pres Clinton - amazing how much stuff gets recycled by the Left and the Right, doctored to suit their agenda. They also did some good work on the Pres Bush Air Guard fraud and the Sen Kerry Swift Boat accusations.

By Danny

April 6, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this

All you little frightened chickenhawk boys, have yourselves a real he-man weekend. Beat the wife, the kids, the dog. Dress like a gangsta. Just the truth as I see it all around me in Mercah.

By Bill

April 6, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

No Dustmite, our country is not the LIGHT at this time. It has filthily seeped into DARKNESS precisely because of ignorant, hate-filled, bitter, jealous failures such as YOU.

By @@

April 6, 2007 7:02 PM | Link to this

One quick post, and then everybody can have a great Easter and/or weekend.

From Stratfor…

“A senior aide to radical Iraqi Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr revealed on Thursday that al-Sadr had sacked two senior lawmakers representing his al-Sadrite Bloc in parliament after they met with Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. military forces in Iraq. The two deputies, Salam al-Maliki and Qusai Abdul-Wahab, reportedly attended a dinner gathering at the home of former Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari also attended by Petraeus — though in an interview with U.S.-funded Alhurra television, al-Maliki denied meeting Petraeus or any U.S. official.”

By Season's Greetings

April 8, 2007 8:29 AM | Link to this

Happy Pesach, Merry Easter, and Happy Birthday to the Sultan of Johor.

By john saunders

April 12, 2007 3:52 PM | Link to this

hey mike,

your stones cartoon was crap. you are a loser- it was a joke you moron. and you stink as an artist. you wife is probably fat and annoying and you are a tub of crap