Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 8:04 AM | Link to this

Here’s Osama bin Laden in a 2004 audio message: ‘The most important and serious issue today for the whole world is this Third World War, which the Crusader-Zionist coalition began against the Islamic nation. It is raging in the land of the two rivers. The world’s millstone and pillar is in Baghdad.

{{{Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) asked Army Lt. Gen. David H . Petraeus during his confirmation hearing yesterday if Senate resolutions condemning White House Iraq policy “would give the enemy some comfort.}}}

{{{Senate rebukes Bush- Urinal Front Page}}}

What means more to the AJC, cheap political points or the security of the United States?

The article from above in the Urinal makes absolutely no mention of the pork that was added into the spending bill, not one word.

Anti American democrat party harpies is what this “news” paper is.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 8:05 AM | Link to this

{{{Those of you who criticize Mike Luckovich should note that all three political cartoons in this week’s Newsweek are Mike’s! We have a gem here, people!}}}

I thought that all three cartoons sucked so it makes perfect sense that PMSNBC’s “News” week would be so aroused by them

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

At one point, Schumer asked Sampson to confirm that McNulty had been left out of the loop on the forced resignations of eight U.S. Attorneys, a patently absurd question, given that DOJ emails and time stamps confirmed that McNulty was clearly in the loop on all firings, as were his chief of staff and a key aide, David Margolis.

So if Sampson lied about this, what else was he lying about?

You can pretty much throw out all of his testimony.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

{{{However, in the five and a half years since September 11, 2001, there have been roughly 40,000 killings by gangs and gang members in this United States of America, mostly in the African-American and Hispanic sections of large cities. Huge swaths of major American cities, especially my home city of Los Angeles, are “no-go” zones for law-abiding people from outside the neighborhoods and even police go into them reluctantly. The innocent women, children, old folks and non-gansgsta men in the communities are living in a nonstop reign of terror. We watch on the national news every day about the killings in Baghdad — and they are terrible. But the local news in every large city and many medium-sized ones begins with a parade of killings by gangs in the past 24 hours, killings of old people in their living rooms, of little girls heading home from church.}}}

When will CNN lead with this?

Can’t they score any political points with it?

3000 deaths in the war on terror versus 40,000 deaths for nothing, absolutely pointless mindless barbarism, we don’t hear a freaking peep from the pinkos.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 30, 2007 8:14 AM | Link to this

Love the ‘toon.

To make the picture more accurate, there should be 2.8 water fountains labeled Neo-cons and 7.2 fountains labeled American Patriots.

Also, the Neo-Con fountain needs to mounted on a wall covered with mold, with rodent feces sprinkled underneath – what’s good enough for our vets is good enough for them.

Oh, and since they don’t really care about the environment – the water can come straight from the “Hootch”.

Got Pepto?

Peace.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 8:19 AM | Link to this

Yes it’s a true great divide. The Democrats do all they do to divide and conquer. Only their division envisions defeat as part of their plan for victory. And now Cartoon Boy is blaming the Republicans for the divide when the Democrats have violated their pledges about cooperation and inclusion - i.e. allowing the minority to introduce amendments etc… They are just acting the way they did in the forty straight years they controlled the House of Representatives.

They are also busy manufacturing scandals where none exist and ole Chucky Schumer was saying guilty until proven innocent yesterday during the Senate Judiciary Committee Inquisition.

And What do all of you apologists for America’s enemies say about the coerced confessions of the British sailors and the fact that the Iranians have gone back on their word to release the woman sailor? I guess you all agree with Rosie O’Donnell - America and her allies are always wrong!

By PATCHES

March 30, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this

Somebody help me save LuckoDull.

We have to plug the hole in that balloon head of his.

It’s leaking air.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

By Old Guy

March 30, 2007 8:27 AM | Link to this

Hey LuckoDull,

Did you see Samson on TV yeaterday?

Lock the B*ard Gonzales UP!!!!!

heheheheheheheheheheheheheh

By Eric

March 30, 2007 8:27 AM | Link to this

It must be total bliss to blindly follow the lead of virtual Einsteins, Bush and Lieberman and never have to bother with formulating an original thought of your own. A little knowledge of history coupled with a minute or two of unbiased thought will lead you to the conclusion that this Iraq thing will not be won by the tactics currently employed by the dumbass in the Whitehouse. Thanks for another good one, Mike!

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 8:32 AM | Link to this

THATS A GOOD BOY TRUTHSAYER

STAY AWAY FROM YOUR TYPE OF “FACTS”< THEY KEEP GETTING YOU IN TROUBLE

WE CANT DISPUTE YOUR INSIPID OPINIONS

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 8:37 AM | Link to this

{{{By Mrs. Godzilla March 30, 2007 8:14 AM To make the picture more accurate, there should be 2.8 water fountains labeled Neo-cons and 7.2 fountains labeled American Patriots. Oh, and since they don’t really care about the environment – the water can come straight from the “Hootch”.}}}

The pinko water fountain should be run by a pump 20 times larger than what the average water fountain uses and twenty underprivileged Americans should be banned from using the fountain to “offset” the energy wasted by the libs.

{{{By Dumb Guy March 30, 2007 8:27 AM Hey LuckoDull, Did you see Samson on TV yeaterday?}}}

Yes, every word he said I checked against WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION and none of it matched.

Gee, gosh, I wonder, should we believe the word of a newly found, brand new pinko “patriot” or what is contained within legal papers.

I know who you “believe.”

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. (Look punk, air leaking is SSSSSSSSSSSSS, ZZZZZZ is snoring, which is what you dullards cause me to do, with your childish playground tactics.)

By PATCHES

March 30, 2007 8:41 AM | Link to this

So you admit to being asleep while blogging?

That figures.

By @@

March 30, 2007 8:51 AM | Link to this

Well, my first post didn’t make it in, so let’s try again ml.

I find it somewhat “subversive” that you would use “water fountains” to make your point. I’d like some clarification. Is the Democratic party the defeatists or are the large percentage of minorities that vote Democrat “the defeatists”.

On to the real reason for the “great divide”.

Veto Any Iraq Withdrawal Timeline, Veterans Tell Bush

“The IVAW head also criticized the Democrats for “putting forth the image that they’re trying to end the war” but instead using their opposition as “a stalling tactic to put them in place to do well in the 2008 elections by continuing to make the administration look back without actually ending the war.”

“Kurpius agreed that the votes in Congress are “pure, partisan politics” even though the troops’ lives are in the balance, but he was more concerned with the impact the final bill would have on the eventual outcome of the Iraq war.”

“”America will not lose the war in Iraq because of enemy action; our defeat will be caused by the lack of American resolve to finish what it starts,” he said.”

So, the VFW and the IVAW agree on something.

Democrats suck. They’re political opportunists.

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 8:52 AM | Link to this

{{{By PATCHES March 30, 2007 8:41 AM So you admit to being asleep while blogging?}}}

You liberals remind of a stupid oafish clod that I knew when I was growing up. This dullard used to get his jollies by chasing younger kids that would walk by the back of his house, like he did to me one day. To correct this, I traveled by the front of his house the next day with no problems. It took him 6 months to figure out what was going on and soon after that started chasing me again.

So I had my friend walk through the following day, get this moron to chase him and lead him by the corner of a building, which I was standing behind out of sight with a 2 X 4.

Needless to say, the clod pinko did not chase anyone anymore.

This^^ is exactly what Bush needs to do with Congress.

Lead them to the corner of a building and crease their freaking foreheads.

Why is Sampson not charged with perjury this morning?

Why is Webb a free man?

Why is Plame making money off of her lies and treason?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 8:52 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS - What in the world did I say that was not a fact?

By the way, the only thing accurate about the cartoon today is a glaring accuracy - they have indeed become the Defeatocrats. They are invested in defeat. If we win in Iraq, they lose. It’s a pathetic situation for a political party to place itself in. Tut, tut, tut.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 8:57 AM | Link to this

RECOMMENDED READING

Bush’s veto pen kills troops.

Bush’s veto sends troops to Iraq without rest, without armor, and without training. No president in American history has ever abandoned troops in the field to die. But George W. Bush is about to show you he’s “man enough” to do it, just to prove he can.

That’s because he’s not serious about accomplishing anything in Iraq. Nobody could look at his record of failure there and conclude otherwise.

As for his concern about setting an artificial deadline, with or without this bill there’s already an artificial deadline: January 20, 2009. Because it’s simply not physically possible to elect another president so willfully ignorant and as openly traitorous as this one. In short, George W. Bush is the only person on the planet who believes this occupation can feasibly last one day longer than his term in office. So anyone who pretends that moving the date up a few months is going to make a damned bit of difference in this disaster just isn’t doing any serious thinking about the situation.

But in the meantime, George W. Bush will veto troop readiness, and then lock himself in his bunker while they die.

And he’s chomping at the bit to do it, too.

By Ad-Hoc

March 30, 2007 9:02 AM | Link to this

IF we win in Iraq? Wow, I thought that was a forgone conclusion with you guys…

By @@

March 30, 2007 9:09 AM | Link to this

So, who are they gonna vote for?

Fifty percent of adults would not vote for Clinton.

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this

{{{By IN THE NEWS March 30, 2007 8:57 AM Bush’s veto pen kills troops. Bush’s veto sends troops to Iraq without rest, without armor, and without training. No president in American history has ever abandoned troops in the field to die. But George W. Bush is about to show you he’s “man enough” to do it, just to prove he can.}}}

Prop: In the future, could you address your posts to “ignorant slack jawed pinkos who only get their “news” from the Huffington Post.”

Seeing how everyone else in the world knows what a bald faced lie it is you just posted, it would save us some time and trouble.

Just one question, are you really stupid enough to believe what you post, just wondering?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 9:19 AM | Link to this

{{they have indeed become the Defeatocrats. They are invested in defeat. If we win in Iraq, they lose.}}

Truth-Denier, my estimate is that about 95% of what you post is not fact — it’s your OPINION. And you obviously don’t know the difference, just like W and Rover.

Pathetic Americans is what you all are — where’s the “uniter” that W promised on the campaign trail in 2000? He doesn’t exist!

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 9:19 AM | Link to this

During the past 2 years, more than 17,100 basic and applied American scientists, two-thirds with advanced degrees, have signed the Global Warming Petition. Signers of this petition so far include 2,660 physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, meteorologists, oceanographers, and environmental scientists (select this link for a listing of these individuals) who are especially well qualified to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide on the Earth’s atmosphere and climate.

{{{“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”}}}

“Settled,” eh?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 9:21 AM | Link to this

For all of you committed Socialists out there and Republicans (political appeasers) who think that giving in to the Socialists is a good idea, I just lifted this from the Encyclopaedia Brittanica. I checked Wikipedia and they had the identical article:

After a series of privatisations and reforms in the late 1990s and early 2000s, government intervention in the Romanian economy is somewhat lower than in other European economies.[17] In 2005, the liberal-democrat Tăriceanu government replaced Romania’s progressive tax system with a flat tax of 16% for both personal income and corporate profit, resulting in the country having one of the lowest fiscal burdens in Europe, a factor which has contributed to the growth of the private sector.

The reason I have cited this for you folks is that the Defeatocrats have decided to RAISE taxes by a total of $400 billion after the next election by letting the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 “die.” I guess they want a stagnant economy with zero growth and high unemployment as they have in Franc, Spain, Germany and Great Britain right now?

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this

TRUTHSAYER

“What in the world did I say that was not a fact?”

NOTHING YET TODAY

WANNA REVIEW? STATUTES IN PURGE CASE, DEATHS OF DETAINEES IN OUR CUSTODY, MCCAIN FLIP FLOPS?

LUCKO NAPPER Seeing how everyone else in the world knows what a bald faced lie it is you just posted, it would save us some time and trouble.

THIS IS CALLED A LIE

EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE WORLD? JUST YOU AND TWENTY SOMETHING %…. AND YOU ARE NOT THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD MOST LIKELY JUST ANOTHER WIDE LOAD

IT MUST BE LONELY FOR YOU

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 9:25 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS - the people killing the troops as usualy are the panty-waste Defeatocrats who are invested in defeat. They bought votes in Congress with pork that would have made Tip O’Neal ashamed to be a Democrat and conditions which NO commander in chief could agree to. Just in 2005 Hitlery was stating that setting a time-table would be foolish. All you folks are doing is setting a date certain for surrender. You are determined to have another Vietnam no matter what!

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 9:26 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS - you need to confine your reading to fiction - oops, you already do!

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this

{{All you folks are doing is setting a date certain for surrender. You are determined to have another Vietnam no matter what!}}

Truth-Denier, you’re “an ignorant slut” (to quote Chevy Chase). You’re also a Bush-kisser, which is even worse these days…

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS - again you are either reading someone else’s posts or you are halucinating. I never said anything about statutes in purge cases or deaths of detainees in our custody, although there have been few if any documented cases thereof. I agree that McCain is a flip-flopper. I was just laughing about how all of ya’ll were ready to support him for the Republican nomination in 2000, like any of you would have actually voted for him. By the way, his record of flip-flops is nothing compared to Hitlery, Kerry, Slick Willie or Edwards.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 9:38 AM | Link to this

IN THE AL JAZEERA NEWS,

Do you actually think that the American people are stupid enough to believe the Orwellian propaganda you just cited (without attribution, I might add)?

Or is LuckoDull correct in wondering whether you are enough of a Useful Idiot to believe this outrageous disassembling of the facts?

There are only two possibilities:

One: You are a Useful Idiot and believe the ludicrous propaganda.

Two: You know it’s a lie and you are counting on the American people being stupid enough to buy it so your plans to destroy this country can proceed.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 9:39 AM | Link to this

“Why is Webb a free man?”

Because of a lot of free men just like him.

Walt

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 9:39 AM | Link to this

{{{{{“There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane,}}}

Dull, you need to tell this to your more reasonable Repug members of Congress who stated the “debate is over” last week during Vice-President Gore’s testimony.

Oh, but I forgot! You’re one of the believers in the “truth” written in the Book of Genesis, and all of those other myths, prejudices and fairytales written in the Bible a few thousand years ago. That explains so much about your mental problem.

By Staffer

March 30, 2007 9:41 AM | Link to this

Contact your Representatives and tell them to demand Bush sign this

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

{{{By Goldie March 30, 2007 9:39 AM Dull, you need to tell this to your more reasonable Repug members of Congress who stated the “debate is over” last week during Vice-President Gore’s testimony.}}}

Goldilocks: This may surprise you but Republicans are not slobbering partisan goonies who can’t think for themselves, sitting around waiting for the latest talking points to come falling out of the Daily Kos, like you pinkos are.

The Republicans you speak of made up their minds and they are wrong.

17,100 learned individuals agree with me that the debate ain’t over.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By mountain man

March 30, 2007 9:50 AM | Link to this

Did you see the video of “M C Rove” the other night on the news? I would guess that old Rove was about the geekiest kid in the neighborhood, even geekier than Luck. It’s no wonder that the trauma he experienced from the taunts of the other kids turned him into the kind of freak he is. Too bad he wants to take it out on the rest of the nation and the world.

Bush is the same way. Always dismissed as the family clown who would never make anything of himself, he tries to compensate by getting in way over his head and the whole country suffers.

I hate to think of Cheney’s childhood. His persona only reveals a hint of the darkness within. I wonder if a book will ever be written about it. It might be more entertaining that Mailer’s new historical novel on Hitler’s childhood.

See what happens when chronically maladjusted people take power? A tragedy for all concerned.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this

The wingnut insurgents are getting desperate on this blog.

The hate for fellow Americans is at a disgusting point.

Mike’s toon shows this hatred and the people who want our troops, trained, well equip, rested and not fighting in a civil war are called names.

The wingnut insugents are disgusting Americans.

By Bitter Harvest

March 30, 2007 9:56 AM | Link to this

Neos become more laughable by the day. They’re like lab rats who have been trained to push a lever to get a reward; now that the lever is gone they’re still pushing air where the lever used to be.

Sadly for the rats, the world has moved on. Even sadder is the fact that the rats have not realized yet that the tired old mechanisms of deflection and obfistucation: to urban crime in the USA, Hillary and her wayward husband, or about anything other than the failure of neo-politics and conservativism ala George W. Bush, are not working any longer.

The advantage to be gained by attack politics has waned. The people are now fully awake and focused on ACTION. Republicans are now just alienating ever large segments of the voting population in a futile attempt to hold onto an intractable base that doesn’t have any ability to compromise and govern.

The Rovian windfall slash and burn strategy that had been embraced by Republican leaders is now becoming a very bitter harvest, indeed! Now they either have to alienate their base or eschew any possibility of appealing to centrists. They are well and truely, screwed beyond immediate recovery.

Genuine conservatives have now defected to the Democratic party where their efforts at conservative reform have more chance of bearing fruit. As Gov Schwarzenegger recently said in referring to Rush Limbaugh, neos have now become “IRRELEVANT”!

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 9:58 AM | Link to this

{{{Mike’s toon shows this hatred and the people who want our troops, trained, well equip, rested and not fighting in a civil war are called names.}}}

Getalife,

It does?

Are we looking at the same toon, or has raging feverswampitis aggravated your BDS hallucinations?

Later folks….

By @@

March 30, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

Getalife:

No, like I told you last night at RW’s,

This is DISGUSTING.

Not a peep…not a word…no Democratic outrage.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

TRUTHSAYER

ARE YOU 13?

DO YOU SUFFER FROM DEMENTIA?

JUST THIS WEEK YOU BRAGGED ABOUT ALL THE READING YOU HAD DONE REAGRDING THE PURGE AND COULD NOT SEE ANY LAWS BROKEN YOU SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED THE NYT

I SHOWED YOU THE NYT FROM MARCH 19 (THAT YOU APARENTLY LIED ABOUT READING) THAT LISTED LAWS (SOMETIMES CALLED STATUTES< YOU NINNY>) THAT MAY HAVE BEEN BROKEN

I ALSO HAD TO DISPROVE SOME BS STATEMENT YOU MADE REGARDING NO BODY BEING HURT IN OUR CUSTODY>

ARE YOU JON LOVITZ?

YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY

YOU ARE A JOKE

YOU LIE ABOUT YOUR LIES

YEP, THATS IT YOUR ARE 13

ON TOP OF THAT YOUR POSTS ARE

BORING.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this

“Bush’s veto sends troops to Iraq without rest, without armor, and without training. No president in American history has ever abandoned troops in the field to die. But George W. Bush is about to show you he’s “man enough” to do it, just to prove he can.”

Taken in perspective, who could dreamed 5 years ago we could have this kind of disaster?

Harkening back to “Comments just too hard to believe”, Rummy the Dummy said you don’t necessarily have the Army you want when you go to war.

That’s true maybe, if the Japanese Navy attacks you in Pearl Harbor.

And I remember hearing 2-3 years ago about how some of the artillery units in Iraq were running patrols in Hummers.

That’s not what they are trained for.

And there were not enough MP’s so reservists from Pennsylvania were guarding POW’s at Abu Ghraib.

Bush and his people didn’t do the most rudimentary due diligence on this.

It really will come down to what Michael Moore asked in 2004: when will our young people trust us to send them to war again?

And this morning I had to laugh because I had an e-mail from the Army Recruiting Command.

I sent back asking if they knew how I could get back in the Marine Corps.

Walt

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this

BUY DANISH

THERE IS A VERY REAL THIRD OPTION.

YOU HAVE A GREAT VIEW OF YOUR KIDNEYS BECAUSE YOU HEAD IS SO FAR UP YOUR RECTUM.

PLAN TO WRECK THIS COUNTRY?

NO THAT WOULD BE THE HANDIWORK OF YOUR KEEPERS/HANDLERS/OWNERS…

THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY.

REMEMBER< IF NEEDS BE THEY WILL THROW YOU UNDER THE BUS TOO>

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 10:06 AM | Link to this

Goldie - no that appellation belongs to you and it was Dan Akroyd that said it to Jane Curtain, not Chevy Chase, you ignorant …..

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 30, 2007 10:07 AM | Link to this

-=-

@@? (9:59)

Outrage about what?

[URS boasts some 25,000 employees working in more than 20 countries. Although the firm has a long history of government work, it has focused more on those activities since acquiring EG&G from the Carlyle Group investment firm last year for about $500 million.]

Ok - I’m outraged that a democrat business owner may get a 600 million contract from buying a company that republicans got Billions of dollars of no-bid contracts through Haliburton, KBR, Carlyle, etc.

The only difference is the Money here will probably actually be spent for the troops and not pocketed like the previous owners have done…

Now that was an outrage!

Thomas/PNAC

By getalife

March 30, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this

@@,

I liked your word so much, I decided to use it.

Did you find another source on Feinstein resigning?

The wingnut insurgency designed to eliminate entitlements for the poor is disgusting.

You and your ilk are purposely destroying our country and I find that disgusting.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

IN THE PRAVDA NEWS _ I still have not found any laws broken in the purge. And I did not recall mentioning the purge yesterday. Using the NYT as a source is hardly credible. The fact is NOT one statute (law for those of you from Covington) has been broken. None of the firings was “improper” under the applicable regs or statutes. Also, even Nina Totenberg of NPR has admitted as much. You folks really have a way of trying to manufature scandal. When Republicans make charges, they are usually true.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

BD,

Did you find another source or should we call him Jason Leopold?

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

TRUTHSAYER

IS YOUR MIDDLE NAME BOX OF ROCKS?

By @@

March 30, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

PNAC:

Funny how you lend so much credibility to the word “probably” when it applies to a Democrat, but are so “certain” of wrong-doing when it’s a Republican.

Getalife:

You know the Democrats like to operate “under the radar”. Lies of omission are accepted by their constituents.

The only question they ask of their party is “Will you respect me in the morning?” “Leave the money on the nightstand.”

Iran wants EU away from sailor dispute

Is this little “prick” emboldened, or what?

Walt:

Ahmadenijad is violating the Geneva Conventions. He’s using the sailors for propoganda purposes. Parading them on television for all to see.

I’m off to get ready for work.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 10:24 AM | Link to this

IN THE FANTASY NEWS - I seems to me that whenever I counter you inane rebuttals, you just have to call me stupid or some other epithet. I will no longer reply to you unless you can keep it civil. I will also refrain from questioning your intelligence because I believe that the level of your intelligence matches the level of your maturity - very low.

I have been quite accurate and my opinions are based on facts, not fanatasy - unlike yours. You remind me of the Socialists who always claim that it would work if the right people tried it.

I also don’t think that any of you libs replied to the FACT that Romania has a booming and growing economy because of low taxes and relatively low government involvement in the economy. I do find it interesting that the world economies with the best rate of growth (including ours right now) also have lower marginal tax rates. Coincidence? I think not.

By Jesus

March 30, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

ARE YOU IMPLYING FOLKS FROM COVINGTON ARE NOT AS BRIGHT AS YOU ARE?

WELL< WELL< YOURE A BIGOT TOO

BTW, WRONG CITY, WRONG COUNTY,

BUT THATS YOU

WRONG

WRONG

By getalife

March 30, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

“Ex-Gonzales Aide Testifies “I Don’t Remember” 122 Times”

Hey, they are using Reagan’s plan to not lie.

Another Libby.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

getalife - you “don’t recall” Hitlery Clintax’s hundreds of “don’t recalls” do you? Again, you libs are a fountain of selective memory and hypocrisy.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this

{{I have been quite accurate and my opinions are based on facts, not fanatasy - unlike yours.}}

Truthsayer is really the “Old Fuddy Duddy” who used to post that his opinions were the same as “facts” — I was wondering what happened to you, Fuddy! I thought maybe they’d locked in your room for good at the fuddy-home.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this

Rush Limbaugh: Don’t fire Gonzales even though he’s incompetent because winning elections is much more important:

I’m at a loss to understand why it is that even some people on our side and the conservative media think throwing Gonzales away is going to stop this. Now, they’ll say, “Well, that’s not what we’re trying to do. We want competence. We are conservatives, and we have high values, and high standards.” This is a battle going on here. There’s an election that’s going to hinge on stuff like this, and everybody the administration throws overboard is a tantamount admission to people that pay scant attention to politics there’s all kinds of corruption going on in there.

More Rush: “USA Today’s got a poll: ‘Do you think something’s wrong about the firing of eight US attorneys?’ 72% said yes. 72% of the American people, a bunch of blithering idiots who have no idea what they’re talking about, but yet they voted, so these polls matter.”

By Walt

March 30, 2007 10:37 AM | Link to this

“Ahmadenijad is violating the Geneva Conventions. He’s using the sailors for propoganda purposes. Parading them on television for all to see.”

Ahmadenijad can google UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAMDI PADILLA and he can find arguments made by the Bush Administration for holding people exactly the way he wants to.

Walt

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 10:39 AM | Link to this

TRUTHSAYER

I SHOWED THAT LAST POST OF YOURS AROUND

THANKS FOR GIVING US ALL A HEARTY LAUGH

BEING CALLED A SOCIALIST, HOWEVER INACCURATELY, BY A FASCIST IS QUITE A COMPLIMENT

NOW BACK TO MY GOOD WORKS>>>>

By Midori

March 30, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

Former US Atty says goal of Bush’s DOJ was to fix elections

By Walt

March 30, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

“More Rush: “USA Today’s got a poll: ‘Do you think something’s wrong about the firing of eight US attorneys?’ 72% said yes. 72% of the American people, a bunch of blithering idiots who have no idea what they’re talking about, but yet they voted, so these polls matter.”

Nuh uh. That’s not a real quote is it?

Walt

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this

Those British sailors are reaping what America has sown!

Therefore, I don’t want to hear any of the neo-conmen and women on this site crying about them being forced to write letters admitting they were in Iranian waters!

And I sure don’t want to hear y’all whining if they get tortured!

Your Chimperor and your Attorney General both say torture is OK. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and all that!!

If we don’t live by the Geneva Convention, why should other countries? Heck, those Swiss never fought in a war, right?

Be happy, repubs, other countries are emulating your president!!

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 30, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

-=-

@@ - I said probably because I have no absolute proof that the Democrat will not follow the same route as the corrupt Republicans before. He may - or He May Not! That is entirely up to his moral standards. Money sadly corrupts most anyone.

But - He “Probably” will do the right thing with all the eyes now looking at the “Government Contract Process” especially after the events of KBR and Cheney.

I do not see your article saying URS Corp., got this contract in a no-bid contract, nor that Feinstein had anything to do with the bid process.

So - You are once again making a non-point argument.

whereas:

U.S. oil and war profiteers are making out like bandits. On January 7, 2007 the UK Guardian reported that Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR), a division of the energy and military giant Halliburton, had secured contracts in Iraq worth $13 billion including an uncontested $7 billion contract to rebuild Iraq’s oil infrastructure. KBR has 30,000 employees in Iraq. Over 150 US companies have been given contracts in Iraq worth over $50 billion.

So again — I have to clarify a non-point question here that I already answered before.

Thomas/PNAC

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

Phreedumb is on the March!!

Jesustan Forever!!

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

WALT

I BELIEVE THATS A REAL QUOTE

THINK PROGRESS

By getalife

March 30, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this

Meet the new Saddam:

Radical cleric blames U.S. for Iraq woes

Except this one is backed by Iran.

Geez.

[“No longer Bush’s war but the GOP’s

It was conceived by a small band of neoconservatives who had on their side the vice president’s robust agreement and unflagging determination to have the United States return to Iraq. They, in turn, had the president’s ear.”](http://www.trueblueliberal.com/2007/03/30/no-longer-bushs-war-but-the-gops/)

Nice work Dems.

By Truthsayer

March 30, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this

IN THE GOBBELS NEWS - As I was saying about the petty insults, they real are beneath contempt. I would remind you that a “fascist” is nothing but a super-nationalistic, racist socialist. I remember seeing a CBS report hosted by Mike Wallace in the 1960s talking about Franco in Spain and how he was no friend to free enterprise.

On the other hand, you and the other libs on this blog are constantly backing Socialist programs and ideals. You want higher taxes, more government interference in the economy and mock any reference to allowing the free market to solve problems, as it always does when allowed. You are Socialists because you back a “poddy” which aims to do all of these things - the more govenment the better. The best example of this would be the late Senator Wellstone from Minnesota. He at least was honest. I really cannot say that for the rest of you.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this

Phreedumb is on the March!!

Jesustan Forever!!

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this

The Interior Department inspector general reports that a senior Bush political appointee, Julie MacDonald, repeatedly altered scientific field reports “to minimize protections for imperiled species, and disclosed confidential information to private groups seeking to affect policy decisions.”

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

The Wall Street Journal continues (sub. req.) to make life miserable for Nevada Gov. Jim Gibbons. The paper first reported a month ago that Gibbons was under federal investigation for improper gifts (possible bribes) from a defense contractor.

Now the paper reports that Gibbons’ business as a legislator

By Mike

March 30, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

So let me get this straight. Luckovich is attacking Rove for being a partisan name-caller?

The AJC editorial board brings hypocrisy toa new level.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

Rudolph W. Giuliani told a grand jury that his former chief investigator remembered having briefed him on some aspects of Bernard B. Kerik’s relationship with a company suspected of ties to organized crime before Mr. Kerik’s appointment as New York City police commissioner, according to court records.

Mr. Giuliani, testifying last year under oath before a Bronx grand jury investigating Mr. Kerik, said he had no memory of the briefing, but he did not dispute that it had taken place, according to a transcript of his testimony.

Mr. Giuliani’s testimony amounts to a significantly new version of what information was probably before him in the summer of 2000 as he was debating Mr. Kerik’s appointment as the city’s top law enforcement officer. Mr. Giuliani had previously said that he had never been told of Mr. Kerik’s entanglement with the company before promoting him to the police job or later supporting his failed bid to be the nation’s homeland security secretary.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 11:11 AM | Link to this

HHS official quits after Medicaid action KEVIN FREKING Associated Press WASHINGTON - The head of the federal office responsible for providing women with access to contraceptives and counseling to prevent pregnancy resigned unexpectedly Thursday after Medicaid officials took action against him in Massachusetts.

The Health and Human Services Department provided no details about the nature of the Massachusetts action that led to Dr. Eric Keroack’s resignation.

Just five months ago, Keroack was chosen by President Bush to oversee HHS’ Office of Population Affairs and its $283 million annual budget. The pick angered Planned Parenthood and other groups that support abortion rights, which viewed him as opposed to birth control and comprehensive sex education. Keroack had worked for an organization that opposes contraception.

“Yesterday, Dr. Eric Keroack alerted us to an action taken against him by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Office of Medicaid. As a result of this action I accepted his resignation,” Dr. John Agwunobi, assistant secretary for health, said in a terse statement Thursday evening.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

REPUBILCANS “SEXY BACK”??? The New York Post, of all venues, reported recently that the Tennessee senator had of late become something of a sex object for “Capitol Hill hotties,” one of whom complained about “all these other women” who wouldn’t leave the senator alone. “I can’t get up to get a cocktail at a party without coming back and finding some girl sitting at my chair,” the woman was quoted as saying.

Margaret Carlson, the writer for Time and host for CNN, is described this way: “She calls his apartment all the time. It’s the joke all over Washington that Margaret has this huge crush on him. And Fred is clearly not interested.” (To which the gallant Thompson responded: “I generally don’t comment on these matters, but as it relates to the statements made about my friend Margaret Carlson, I should be so lucky.”)

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

{{the people killing the troops as usualy are the panty-waste Defeatocrats who are invested in defeat.}}

Fuddy Duddy— if you don’t want to be called names here, you need to stop the name-calling. You have a bad habit of always pointing the finger at everyone but yourself — but, that actually makes sense, because that’s exactly what the Repugnant Party does. And “that’s the facts”!

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this

{{As I was saying about the petty insults, they real are beneath contempt.}}

Contempt is as contempt does, Fuddy…

By Walt

March 30, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this

“So let me get this straight. Luckovich is attacking Rove for being a partisan name-caller?

The AJC editorial board brings hypocrisy toa new level.”

The AJC Editorial Board backed the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

They are plenty fair.

Rove has been studying Herr Geobbels.

You are proof of that.

Walt

By LB

March 30, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this

When will these right-wingers ever realize that the middle east countries will NEVER be democratic because the majority still prefer to live in a Biblical mindset? They put more importance in their tribe and religous views than their country and will therefore always live in turmoil. It is naive and arrogant to think that the U.S. has the right, and is even capable, of ever changing it.

Of course, the war-mongers who boastfully beat their chest and wave the flag proclaiming the war is necessary to protect our country and eliminate terrorism are only fooling themselves because guess what? It will never go away. Never. Terrorists are like cockroaches that scurry into dark crevices once the light comes on. You might kill a few, but there are thousands just like them, and as long as you keep feeding them, there’ll be thousands more. Our presence in the region is only creating the hatred that feeds the roaches.

If the Iraqis want democracy, it’s time they start taking control. I think we’ve paid more than our share.

God Bless America and its soldiers who willingly serve to protect it. However, in this case, I’m afraid our troops were not sent to protect our country, but to serve a personal vendeta by their Commander-in-Chief.

By Wrong Again

March 30, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Senate Defies Bush, Ties Iraq War Funds to Withdrawal.

The Chimperor still thinks he has a limp-wristed, panty-waist, do-nothing Republicans Congress to rubber-stamp his every insanity without any oversight whatsoever. As usual, he is WRONG AGAIN!

White House backs attorney general

No shiite, Sherlock. King George thinks keeping an admitted perjurer in the office of Attorney General will restore public confidence in the executive branch. As usual, he is WRONG AGAIN!

By Midori

March 30, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this

Dubya Gets High

By BJ

March 30, 2007 12:02 PM | Link to this

When will these left-wingers ever realize that the inner city hood will NEVER be democratic because the majority still prefer to live in a Gangsta mindset? They put more importance in their tribe and demeaning to women views than their country and will therefore always live in turmoil. It is naive and arrogant to think that the U.S. has the right, and is even capable, of ever changing it.

So therefore, we should pull out of Compton, cause the killin won’t never stop.

Focus more on dem Iraqis, cause it least they want freedom.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

Is Rudy also in the pockets of the Mafia? You decide:

Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani acknowledged again Friday that he made a mistake when he recommended Bernard Kerik to be the nation’s homeland security chief. The acknowledgment followed a report in The New York Times that the former New York City mayor was warned about Kerik’s relationship with a company with suspected ties to organized crime even before Giuliani appointed Kerik as New York City police commissioner.

Apparently Kerik’s Mafia ties did not even matter to Rudy way back in 2000. This could be a big problem for ole Rudy in ‘08.

By LB

March 30, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

When will these right-wingers ever realize that the middle east countries will NEVER be democratic because the majority still prefer to live in a Biblical mindset? They put more importance in their tribe and religous views than their country and will therefore always live in turmoil. It is naive and arrogant to think that the U.S. has the right, and is even capable, of ever changing it.

Of course, the war-mongers who boastfully beat their chest and wave the flag proclaiming the war is necessary to protect our country and eliminate terrorism are only fooling themselves because guess what? It will never go away. Never. Terrorists are like cockroaches that scurry into dark crevices once the light comes on. You might kill a few, but there are thousands just like them, and as long as you keep feeding them, there’ll be thousands more. Our presence in the region is only creating the hatred that feeds the roaches.

If the Iraqis want democracy, it’s time they start taking control. I think we’ve paid more than our share.

God Bless America and its soldiers who willingly serve to protect it. However, in this case, I’m afraid our troops were not sent to protect our country, but to serve a personal vendeta by their Commander-in-Chief.

By RE

March 30, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

Just an observation here on the British sailors being held by Iran.

The location of the sailors provided by the UK govt places the 2 boats 1.7 miles inside Iraqi waters an hour before the incident took place, this is the last location called in by the UK sailors as they boarded a ship to inspect it.

An hour passes without any update on location.

6 Iranian boats surround and arrest the 15 sailors on two UK boats.

The legality of the incident is dependent upon a line in the water. The question I have about this is in a region with 3 US aircraft carrier groups with all attendent ships, constant air survailence by US and UK forces, if the British location is correct, how would 6 Iranian boats get 1.7 miles inside Iraqi waters without challenge?

By getalife

March 30, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

The wingnut insurgency is winning in America.

Their goal is to destroy the middle class, increase military spending to end entitlements for the poor and tax cuts for the wealthy.

The corporate utopia agenda for the North American Union and cheap labor will complete their victory.

The wingnut insurgents who cheer this on are traitors, pure and simple.

We must fight these traitors and the middle class needs to take a stand and say enough is enough.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

What is it that you don’t believe? That DiFi resigned from MILCON or that her husband benefited from her work on the committee?

Here is WND’s take on the story. You’ll note that CREW is squawking about it as is The Center For Public Integrity. The investigative report was sponsored by The Nation. These are all Left wing groups.

Why don’t you call them up and ask them to stop lying about DiFi?

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

Who cares where the British sailors were.

In today’s Bush/Cheney world, you can be snatched off the street anywhere for anything and it’s OK.

Alberto Gone-zales, punta extraordinare, and his “justice” dept. made sure that kidnappings and torture were OK.

So, repubs, don’t cry or say they are being mistreated. Your “American” leaders made it all possible.

“As you sew, so shall ye reap!”

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this

Here’s the reason John Kerry and his merry band of pinkos want us to be more like Europe:

Why put European ships or planes outside of European territorial waters when that will only guarantee a crisis in which Europeans are kidnapped and held as hostages or used as bargaining chips to force political concessions?

Nothing would make the libs happier than forcing a humiliating defeat on America in Iraq, just look at how hard they “fight” for it in Congress.

We’re going to be the world’s most polite slaves if the left has it’s way.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RE

March 30, 2007 12:40 PM | Link to this

It makes a huge difference where the sailors were taken. If they were taken in Iraqi waters, it would be a case of foriegn aggresion against UN mandate. If it took place in Iranian waters, than the UK is at fault.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 12:41 PM | Link to this

{{{{As you sew, so shall you reap!}}}

Truthiman,

Maybe you should stay away from trying to quote the Bible unless you want to be known as Mr. Malaprop.

By RE

March 30, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this

I think BD may have a copyright on the entire bible as well as “unfreaking-believeable”

Be careful

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

We’re fixing to throw a party:

With four aircraft-carrier battle groups, several hundred carrier-based strike fighters, and 20 strategic bombers just minutes or hours from Iran, the United States will have assembled everything it needs to cripple the regime and wipe out the most important elements of its nuclear program. Iran needs to know that this is the only alternative to complying with the Security Council resolutions.

Iran will be WANTING to release the British.

Let the festivities begin.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Midori

March 30, 2007 12:53 PM | Link to this

Poor Chimpolini has been dumped by his Saudi boyfriend

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

Hey, I just point out to the so-called christians on this site some of the words of their own book!

All I do is show their transgressions in the context of their holy book.

I also suggest that they are not true christians unless they live by The Sermon on the Mount and the Beatitudes.

Don’t blame me if I get the religious wrong all upset with my quotations of the scripture they all claim to live by!

Don’t blame the messenger, cha cha!!

Personally, I believe religion is a huge waste of time and money - but that’s just me.

P.S. to RE: Recruiters are waiting to you to help fight W’s war in Iraq. Why don’t you put your Culo where your Boca is!?!

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 12:54 PM | Link to this

Hey, I just point out to the so-called christians on this site some of the words of their own book!

All I do is show their transgressions in the context of their holy book.

I also suggest that they are not true christians unless they live by The Sermon on the Mount and the Beatitudes.

Don’t blame me if I get the religious wrong all upset with my quotations of the scripture they all claim to live by!

Don’t blame the messenger, cha cha!!

Personally, I believe religion is a huge waste of time and money - but that’s just me.

P.S. to RE: Recruiters are waiting for you to help fight W’s war in Iraq. Why don’t you put your Culo where your Boca is!?!

By RE

March 30, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this

Just a question for Andy and others looking to start a bombing campaign against Iran.

Then what?

What happens after we bomb all the nuke sites, destroy the military bases and equipment, and bomb the central government. What do we do after that?

By getalife

March 30, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

BD,

They linked the same source.

Try again.

I think it is time to declare war on the wingnut insurgency.

The middle class and poor are not getting representation in government.

No taxation without representation.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

FINALLY

The House Government Committee today formally requested Secretary Rice to testify before the Oversight Committee on Apr. 18th regarding the Bush administration’s claims that Iraq sought uranium from Niger, White House treatment of classified information, the appointment of Ambassador Jones as “special coordinator” for Iraq, and other subjects.

Claims that Iraq were seeking uranium from Niger were based on documents that were later proved to be forgeries, and caused ire among Democrats and others who felt the Administration had provided false information to Congress about Iraq in the lead-up to war.

LA DOLCE VITA FOR LIBS!

By RE

March 30, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this

What are you talking about there truthman?

By Walt

March 30, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

“We’re fixing to throw a party:

With four aircraft-carrier battle groups, several hundred carrier-based strike fighters, and 20 strategic bombers just minutes or hours from Iran, the United States will have assembled everything it needs to cripple the regime and wipe out the most important elements of its nuclear program. Iran needs to know that this is the only alternative to complying with the Security Council resolutions.

Iran will be WANTING to release the British.”

Your source is the National Review!

Their prognostications prior to OIF were similarly rosy.

Maybe the difference between Bush opposers and Bush supporters is that the latter have an ability to view the future in the experience of the past.

Walt

By Right-wing nut job in training

March 30, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this

These questions are for the real Americans posting here.

I am a right-wing nut job in training and I support the war, the President and hate liberals. Lately however I have been limited to beating them with clubs rather than logic because for some reason I can’t answer these commies’ questions about Iraq. Help me out so that I can address them. These are a few:

1) Isn’t our presence in Iraq putting off the inevitable blood-letting that will take place whenever we leave? Won’t the Shia and the Sunni and the Kurds fight for their own interests and seek to dominate as much of the resources of the country as they can? Isn’t it simply a question of when?

2) Because the Shia are the dominant sect won’t they win a large portion of Iraq if not the whole and then allay with Iran, their Shia brothers?

3) Won’t the Shia set up an Islamic state similar to Iran and the Taliban that at best tolerates and at worst harbors terrorists?

4) Aren’t we in the same or worse position than we were before March 2003 vis-a-vis the Middle East at the cost of thousands of lives and billions of dollars?

5) What should victory look like to us real Americans? How will we know it when we see it? How we will get there?

I understand that the name calling and attacks are fun, especially with bats, but I’d like to hear some constructive arguments that I can use for when my arms are tired.

Thank you,

Right wing nut job in training

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 1:06 PM | Link to this

RE,

???????????????????????????????????

There is a slight difference in the meaning of the words “sow” and “sew” but if you want to hound me over nothing, all I can do is yawn.

At least you understand that Iran cannot sieze sailors in Iraqi waters. What you want to do about it is another topic altogether.

LuckoDull,

I like Newt’s idea of taking out their oil refinery.

Getalife,

Why don’t you contact Feinstein’s office and ask them if these Left wing groups are lying about her?

Here’s the contact info.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 1:07 PM | Link to this

Oh yeah: Gone-zales will be gone by supper tonight!!

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 1:08 PM | Link to this

[A LITTLE BACKROUND ON THE ITALIAN LETTERS](http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/11/09/italy/index.html0

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

Oh yeah: Gone-zales will be gone by supper tonight!!

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

Numbnuts:

1) No.

2) Iran will be empty by then.

3) All the more reason to eliminate Iran.

4) No, plus Al Qaeda has greatly benefited with us sending many, many thousands of them to paradise. It’s been a win/ win situation.

5) Baghdad will be just as safe as Compton? Wait a minute, we’ve won the war! Yay America!

To answer your question, you have stated a good case for the invasion of Iran, so therefore you are officially a wingnut.

Congratulations.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 1:18 PM | Link to this

BD,

I could give a dang about her but do like the truth.

That story is bs. mm is a joke. That source is worse than Jason Leopold because there were other reporters reporting on the Rove indictment.

I know you will never admit it because you are a wingnut insurgent.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish:

“I like Newt’s idea of taking out their oil refinery.”

Big Oil would love that.

Walt

By Randy

March 30, 2007 1:22 PM | Link to this

RE & Walt - You two dem macarooooons are pathetic.

You believe what the idiot of Iran says? You’re eager to blame the U.S. and Britain, but not Iran.

This isn’t the first time Iran has taken hostages. You know that don’t you?

MOD briefing shows Royal Navy personnel were in Iraqi waters

Why don’t you two go talk to the frvckin AhmaNUTjob yourselves. He’ll be so frvckin glad to see the two of you.

Get a one way ticket. We sure as hell don’t need loser communist sympathizers like you inside the USofA.

Get a frvckin clue morons!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pathetic pu-s-sies.

By RE

March 30, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this

BD, What a wonderful world it would be if all you could do is yawn.

By the way, RW’s post late last night to you where he mentioned “buy danish” and “samoan tuna packers” in the same sentence was inherently funny, dialogue box closed before I could comment though.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this

So many armchair warriors - chairborne Rangers, if you will - on this site.

All talk and chest-thumping, never any signing on the dotted-line and going of to support their beloved prez’s war!

Chickenhawk! Chickenhawks all!!

Don’t go too close to a KFC, they might mistake you for dinner!! Try the Condi Rice meal: Two small breasts, two large thighs and two right wings!!!

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 1:35 PM | Link to this

Idiot Walt,

One: Do you understand what a refinery is and who it benefits?

Two: Do you understand that the United States buys no oil from Iran?

Getalife,

It is not MM’s story you freaking moron. It is a story written by a LEFT WING reporter who got his funding from the LEFT WING Nation Magazine.

If you are being truthful when you say you care about the truth, then you will accept the truth and get off of this topic before you are made to look even more idiotic and deranged than you already are.

RE,

Don’t hold back. Please share what Denmark and the cartoon intifada has to do with Samoan Tuna packers.

By Look Again

March 30, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

Ha, ha, ha, ha, the Republicans are on a roll today. Look at Pelosi, look at Iran, look at Clinton, look at Europe,look at John Kerry, look at AHYTHING at all EXCEPT what Republicans have done with their opportunity to govern!!!

Republican always have to run down the Democrats cause that’s all they ever had. They can’t point to THEIR plan to win in Iraq cause THEY NEVER PLANNED, consequently they’re reduced to placing token bandaids on the hemmorhaging catastrophy that is Iraq today. They can’t point to improvements in foreign affairs because they have denigrated America’s standing in the theater of world opinion.

Their economy is stagnant, mortgages are failing at a rate unparalleled in american history, basic personal freedoms have been seized in the name of ‘safety’, the health crisis and the number of America’s uninsured have remained unaddressed and have thereby increased exponentially, the national debt continues to soar unabated, energy costs have rocketed through the stratospere, they have attempted to outsource vital american interests in the transportaion sector to foreign muslim governments (Dubai Ports) that probably have no great love of America, at best, and worst of all they have virtually eliminated the system of checks and balances instutued by the founding fathers through abrogating their congressional responsibilities to provide oversight to a President who so very clearly needed it.

Yes, my friends, look at ANYTHING except the FAILURE of Republicans to capitalize on the opportunity to govern that was entrusted to them by the american electorate. Or…..we can pull our heads from the sand, see the light of a new day, and work to secure a better future for our children and ourselves. The choice is ours, let’s not FAIL our children and our children’s children again.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

BD,

mm linked his story idiot.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 1:41 PM | Link to this

RE— I think some posters may get you confused with “RW” the right-wing extremist…

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

{{Isn’t it simply a question of when?}}

Nut-job in Training— good assessment at 1:01.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 1:45 PM | Link to this

{{All talk and chest-thumping, never any signing on the dotted-line and going of to support their beloved prez’s war!}}

Remember, Truthman— the Repugs are the party of “5 deferments” and “I had other things to do”.

By RE

March 30, 2007 1:46 PM | Link to this

Good briefing from the MOD. It says a lot and misses alot at the same time. There is no time reported for the abduction, and no overflight to determine location, and the tracking for the boarding party is offline at 9:10 AM. Nor does it say how many ships were invloved.

This should be an easy thing to figure, what I cannot understand is that in the worlds most heavily monitored and patroled waterway how, from intial reports, 6 iranian ships can get 1.7 miles inside iraqi waters and not be challanged, or have any cooberating radar track of where they are. There should be EC2 coverage of the area from the US. There should be radar tracks of all ships from the cornwall.

Just doesn’t seem right

By getalife

March 30, 2007 1:47 PM | Link to this

This story is total bs

Wingnut insurgents always lie.

They have no credibility and should be marginalized.

Geez.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 1:49 PM | Link to this

{{The choice is ours, let’s not FAIL our children and our children’s children again.}}

Look Again— so many Americans are looking forward to Nov. ‘08 when the White House rightfully returns to the Dems!

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 30, 2007 1:55 PM | Link to this

Look Again,

Well Done!

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:00 PM | Link to this

BD,

Did you sign up for her wingnut spy network?

Geez.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

You are making a complete a* of yourself.

Does the “Berkeley Daily Planet” look like a Right Wing publication to you?

To quote from the last line of the story:

“Peter Byrne is a investigative journalist based in the Bay Area. Research for his investigative series on U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein is supported by a grant from the Investigative Fund of the Nation Institute.”

Is “The Nation” a Right Wing magazine?

You are making so little sense I am wondering if there isn’t something seriously wrong with you.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this

“Two: Do you understand that the United States buys no oil from Iran?”

Do you understand that when supply goes down, demand goes up?

Walt

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:12 PM | Link to this

BD,

Just admit it.

You could not find another source.

Its total bs and other blogs are laughing about it.

You are an idiot.

Geez.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

Look Again Sends:

“Ha, ha, ha, ha, the Republicans are on a roll today. Look at Pelosi, look at Iran, look at Clinton, look at Europe,look at John Kerry, look at AHYTHING at all EXCEPT what Republicans have done with their opportunity to govern!!!”

It may be lucky for our country that the Rethugs have screwed up even the simplest governmental tasks because they have been driving us down the same road down which Germany went in the 1930’s.

Walt

By Why Was That

March 30, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

Yes, this is not the first time that Iraq has taken hostages. And why was that…

In the midst of World War II in 1941, Nazi Germany began Operation Barbarossa and invaded the Soviet Union, breaking the Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact. The act had a huge impact on Iran, as the country had technically declared neutrality. However, Iran had maintained good relations with Nazi Germany and was seen by some as a potential member of the Axis. Thus a preventive invasion was staged by the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union.

During the subsequent military occupation, the Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate in favor of his son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. He replaced his father on the throne on September 16, 1941. It was hoped that the younger prince would be more open to influence from the pro-Allied West, which later proved to be the case.

The Shah also authorized the creation of the secret police force, SAVAK (National Organization for Information and Security, which was organized with the help of the CIA and Mossad). This infamous agency operated its own secret prison, used torture extensively, assassinated dissidents, and kept the CIA informed. Abuses by SAVAK laid the foundation for support of the Islamic Revolution which swept the Shah from power in 1979 and resulted in exile for the remainder of his life.

Reluctantly, on 22 October 1979 President Jimmy Carter allowed the Shah to make a brief stopover in the United States to undergo medical treatment. The compromise was extremely unpopular with the revolutionary movement, which were against the United States’ years of support of the Shah’s rule, and demanded his return to Iran to stand trial.

This resulted in the kidnapping of a number of American diplomats, military personnel and intelligence officers in what became known as the Iran hostage crisis. Once the Shah’s course of treatment had finished, the American government, eager to avoid further controversy, pressed the former monarch to leave the country.

The Iranian revolution and hostage crisis occurred because America supported a brutal, murdering dictator and tyrant, much as it supported Sadaam Hussein when he was America’s darling in the Middle East. Today we can only wonder if Iran was as justified in taking British hostages as they were in storming the American embassy in 1979. Historically speaking, you

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

Idiot Dolt Walt,

One: The refinery REFINES oil for the use of the Iranian population. We buy UNREFINED oil from oil producers.

Two: You have the theory of supply and demand exactly bassackwards.

If the demand goes up the supply goes down, not the other way around you freaking moron.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 2:14 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

This is for you!

I am Loyal Democrat.

{{I will take the side of any entity that declares itself to be an enemy of the United States. I will consider any action taken by my government to be improper, and defend the position of any nation that opposes my own. I will not stand by while the concepts of freedom and liberty are allowed to infect the thoughts of repressed peoples. Rather, I will combat such efforts and convince the slaves of dictatorships that they have it better than anyone else.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I will tell all Americans that they had 9/11 coming as retribution for all of our evil deeds inflicted upon members of the most peaceful religion on earth. I will work to undermine any effort to destroy the Islamic tidal wave of terror that has vowed to wash onto our beaches. I will strive to weaken our military as it attempts to carry out its mission overseas. I shall encourage total surrender to any foe that threatens us.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I shall stir up domestic unrest by separating my fellow citizens into groups, and then I will encourage each group to distrust the next, and convince each that I am their one true friend. Through this magnificent deception, I will rule them all. I will convince minorities that they are inferior, and that they need my special help to succeed in life. Once I have them suspicious of others and fully demoralized, I will keep them down, and make their every gain dependent on what I decide to let them do. I shall oppress minorites worse than any avowed racist could ever hope to.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I will make every effort to criticize people that achieve, to hinder those that aspire, and ridicule those that display self-worth. In spite of my lack of personal merit, I will elevate myself in the eyes of others by bringing people with actual character down. I will prey on people’s envy of others’ success, and I will gain undeserved power as a result. I will take from those that earn until they lose the motivation to build up mankind any longer.

I am Loyal Democrat.

I will promote the tyranny of socialism, and crush the only economic system that has advanced mankind. And when we are all financially destitute and controlled by an omnipotent government, I shall laugh at the destruction I

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this

Sorry BD,

I am going to stop responding to ignorant wingnut insurgents.

Its waste of time and energy because you lie and will not admit it when caught.

Your intellectual dishonesty is disgusting.

Sick of the wingnut insurgent lies. Spew them to someone else.

By RE

March 30, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

ok, both of you settle down.

If supply goes down, it does not affect demand. Demand remains constant. However price rises as supply goes down.

Supply, demand, and price are the three factors in the equation.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

“One: The refinery REFINES oil for the use of the Iranian population. We buy UNREFINED oil from oil producers.

Two: You have the theory of supply and demand exactly bassackwards”

First, if we bomb their refineries, they have plenty of money to buy refined oil on the open market, driving up the price of gas here.

You’re the one with it backwards.

Reduce the supply and the price on what is left has to go up.

Didn’t you ever see “Goldfinger”? Goldfinger planned to radiate the US gold supply with a nuclear device.

That would make the value of the gold he held sky rocket.

Walt

By RE

March 30, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

Guess the author!!

“I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do? Who would we put in power? What kind of government? Would it be a Sunni government, a Shia government, a Kurdish government?

“Would it be secular, along the lines of the Baath party? Would it be fundamentalist Islamic?” he asked. “I do not think the United States wants to have U.S. military forces accept casualties and accept responsibility of trying to govern Iraq. It makes no sense at all.”

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:30 PM | Link to this

cheney?

By Little Right of Center

March 30, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this

Getalife, 12:18 “Their goal is to destroy the middle class, increase military spending to end entitlements for the poor and tax cuts for the wealthy.”

Our goal is to improve the middle class by giving them more opportunities. The left’s goal is to remove the middle class all together by making everyone a “low class” welfare recipient.

Yes we need to increase military spending. That is what provides you the freedom to spread your lies.

End entitlements for the lazy ignorant freeloaders, you got that one right. Either be willing to work for what you need and be a member of society, or do without.

Since you are still calling the tax cuts a “tax cut for the wealthy”, you’re showing your ignorance.

Run along all you bleeding heart liberals, rumor has it that today is double food stamp day. Go get your free ride off the backs of real Americans.

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this

I could post a link to an Aryan Nation website (or even one for Michelle Malkin) and paste the words of “I am a Republican, a War-Monger, and a Hate-Monger”, but I don’t want to dirty up this blog with that garbage.

By Walt

March 30, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

“Supply, demand, and price are the three factors in the equation.”

Thanks. I mispoke.

If one reduces the supply, the price of what remains will tend upward.

Walt

By Walt

March 30, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

“Supply, demand, and price are the three factors in the equation.”

Thanks. I mispoke.

If one reduces the supply, the price of what remains will tend upward.

Big Oil would love that.

Walt

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

Little Right of Center?

Wingnut insurgent.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this

RE,

It’s not entirely true that Demand remains constant. At some point the demand decreases as the price rises.

In any case, Walt is an ignorant fool, so please direct your economics lessons to him.

Getalife,

Three indisputable facts:

The story is by a left winger. Feinstein steered projects to her husbands’ firm and did not recuse herself as she should have. She is no longer on the MILCON committee.

How the hell can you tell me that I’m being intellectually dishonest on this issue?

By RE

March 30, 2007 2:40 PM | Link to this

Man, you got that one too quick getalife.

I thought it would be out there for a little while

Yes, Dick Cheney on ABC from 1991

By Fixer Upper

March 30, 2007 2:41 PM | Link to this

Today’s america is made up of sniveling men and the women who stroke them.

Hardened, but not for battle.

Sad, but true.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:42 PM | Link to this

Yes, Big oil would break their record profits if they bomb Iran.

It will probably happen unless Congress blocks it.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this

Idiot Walt,

I just saw your 2:27 post which was easy to miss since you are too dull to direct it to me. You also need to learn how to use these amazing things called “quotation marks”.

I never said a thing about the price of oil being affected. The price has already gone up and we have not launched a single missile.

The Iranians are literally and figuratively holding the world hostage with their illegal actions.

By Fixer Upper

March 30, 2007 2:48 PM | Link to this

Today’s american male doesn’t wear the ring on his finger. He wears it in his

Nose?

His Nipple?

His penis?

His tongue?

Can be led around by women from any/all locales.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 2:48 PM | Link to this

RE,

Michael Ware on CNN is reporting that the Sunnis have been armed and given 30 vehicles to hunt and kill Al Queda free of government interference.

This is good but will they kill just Al Queda or Shiites and Americans too?

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

RE,

GUESS THE AUTHOR!

{{If this were a Republican senator’s spouse scoring bundles off the spoils of war and passing it along to fellow Republicans, the liberals would be up in arms. But since Dianne Feinstein is a leading Democrat, mum’s the word.}}

I already told Getalife the answer so he can’t play.

By Fixer Upper

March 30, 2007 2:53 PM | Link to this

Today’s american male would gladly bend over for a terrorist if their women asked them to.

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 2:56 PM | Link to this

WHAT IS A LOYAL REPUBLICAN?

A FACIST!

Fourteen Defining Characteristics Of Fascism By Dr. Lawrence Britt

Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.

Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial busines

By RE

March 30, 2007 2:58 PM | Link to this

Are the Sunnis mentioned Police?

If they just armed a mob, I am not sure that is such a good thing.

I have noticed that most of the equipment we are supplying them with is outdated, which is a good thing. I have a feeling that whatever we give to Iraq will be turned against US forces in the future

By RE

March 30, 2007 3:01 PM | Link to this

I don’t know BD, Limbaugh?

By Goldie

March 30, 2007 3:04 PM | Link to this

{{Yes we need to increase military spending. That is what provides you the freedom to spread your lies.}}

Way-out Right, you’re mixing up several arguments with your post. First, you obviously are very familiar with spreading lies, because every time to post, you tend to include lies and insults with whatever other ignorance you want to display. Are you really Andy-Dull with another hijacked blog name?

I believe that the freedom of speech is given to all Americans in the Bill of Rights. What has that got to do with “we need to increase military spending”? Seems like you just love the idea of increased military spending, with no accountability? You’re a true Bush-kisser, aren’t cha?

By IN THE NEWS

March 30, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this

Bush Caught Hyping False Iraq Spending Deadline The Bush administration has been trying to force Congress to abandon its support for an Iraq withdrawal time line by claiming that a “clean” Iraq spending bill must be signed by mid-April or U.S. troops will suffer. The Hill reported, the Pentagon and the White House have been “sounding alarms and sketching worst-case scenarios if Congress does not pass the 2007 supplemental by April 15.”

Renewing his veto threat on Wednesday, President Bush told Congress “the clock is ticking for our troops in the field“:

BUSH: Congress continues to pursue these [withdrawal] bills, and as they do, the clock is ticking for our troops in the field. Funding for our forces in Iraq will begin to run out in mid-April. Members of Congress need to stop making political statements, and start providing vital funds for our troops.

Meanwhile, Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) and others have been arguing that Bush is wrong, and that funds won’t dry up until June, giving plenty of time for negotiations:

Murtha says he believes the April 15 date for funds running out is incorrect. Based on the inquiries he’s made, he said, the Pentagon will start running out of money at the beginning of June.

“We’ve never had a year where they didn’t give us bad information,” said Murtha, who’s known for his contacts inside the military. “We’ve been asking people and we think it’ll be the end of May.”

Now we know who’s right. A new report from the Congressional Research Service makes clear that Bush’s deadline is completely fabricated:

In a memo to the Senate Budget Committee dated Wednesday, the congressional analysts said the Army has enough money in its existing budget to fund operations and maintenance through the end of May — about $52.6 billion. If additional transfer authority is tapped, subject to Congress approving a reprogramming request, the Army would have enough funds to make it through nearly two additional months, or toward the end of July. Using all of its transfer authority, the Army could have as much as $60.1 billion available.

See the full CRS report HERE.

Commenting on the report, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) said, “This study confirms that the President is once again attempting to mislead the public and create an artificial atmosphere of anxiety. He is using scare tactics to defeat bipartisan legislation that would change course in Iraq.”

By getalife

March 30, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

RE,

There were police with them. They were chanting and dancing to Sunni tribe chants in the video. All armed with machine guns like a mob.

The vehicles are police vehicles. Seems like it would encourage more civil war.

By Midori

March 30, 2007 3:18 PM | Link to this

Rove Aide Resigns

Coincidence?

By Why Was That

March 30, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

{{If this were a Republican senator’s spouse scoring bundles off the spoils of war and passing it along to fellow Republicans, the liberals would be up in arms. But since Dianne Feinstein is a leading Democrat, mum’s the word.}}

Sure they would, and why is that?

Maybe cause Diane Fienstein is zealously trying to stop immoral american involvement in a war that is otherwise enriching her husband’s business, while Republicans keep trying to extend their failed involvement in the Iraqi civil war in order to squeeze a little more juice from that lemon!

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 3:46 PM | Link to this

RE,

No, actually the quote is from Joshua Frank of Antiwar.com, in an article about Feinstein entitled “The Democrats Daddy Warbucks”

Getalife is feverishly hallucinating that this story is a lying right wing conspiracy to destroy Feinstein, and no matter how much evidence I provide to the contrary he refuses to see it.

Just part of being a moonbat I guess.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this

If we’d listened Carter and weaned ourselves off of oil, who would give two $hits about the mideast.

Reagan, Bush the Elder, Clinton and Bush the Dummer all failed America and increased our dependence on foreign oil.

That IS the truth!

By RE

March 30, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this

BD,

Any evidence of favors or preference to her husband’s companys?

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 3:55 PM | Link to this

OMG! I just saw ML’s illiterate and deranged screed of March 16th.

What an embarrassment! Why didn’t the AJC editors just say no?

Bwahahahahahahahahaha.

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 4:02 PM | Link to this

RE,

Of course.

San Francisco Chronicle, April 2003.

Peter Byrne’s story here.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 4:16 PM | Link to this

Such feigned outrage!!

You Diane Feinstein haters are the same people who were glad John Edwards’ wife has cancer.

I’ll call your Diane Feinstein and I’ll raise you on “Dick-head” Cheney and his zillions of Halliburton war profits.

Now there is a scum-sucker of the first order!!

By RE

March 30, 2007 4:24 PM | Link to this

Hey, if she steered a contract his way improperly, bring up charges.

Just because a person is a dem does not mean they are above improper conduct. Nor does it excuse another transgression by a GOPer.

Looks fishy, but not dirty, not yet at least

By RW-(the original)

March 30, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

By RE-{{{{By the way, RW’s post ——->late last night<———}}}}}

Is this little weasel trying to go into competition with Blackadder to see who can be the biggest cry baby on this blog?

By the way, “”late last night”” was timestamped by the AJC server at 7:25PM. So not only does this slacker like to sleep in, he’s got a strange idea of late at night too.

I’m just passing through, but by the time I get back would somebody let me know if we’ve hired an Attorney General that will go after all these corrupt Democrats, Like Jefferson, Feinstein, Reid, Pelosi…..Yikes, we’re gonna need a bigger justice department.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 4:32 PM | Link to this

More stupid Republican Tricks. This time from Rep. Boner of Ohio.

http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fthinkprogress.org%2F2007%2F03%2F29%2Fboehner-tuskegee%2F

Typical repub. Know’s nothing about history of African-Americans,(except that Strom Thurmond must’ve been pretty good in bed).

Speaking of Strom, why wasn’t he up on rape charges for impregnating a 16-year-old black girl? Rape charges have no statute of limitations. I guess if you’re an old, racist, Dixiecrat, rapin’ the help is OK

By Buy Danish

March 30, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this

Truthiman,

Who TF are you talking to? The people who are doing exposes on Feinstein are Leftists.

Please call them if you have any complaints.

RE,

It was not just one contract. No one is covering this in the MSM so you can rest assured that Feinstein will not be pursued for her patronage and self-enrichment.

I leave it to others to determine if any laws were broken, but since the Justice Department won’t even pursue Sandy Burlar, the odds of them pursuing this are nil.

In any case she is also on the Ethics committee and should resign from that committee.

Things that are unethical are not necessarily criminal.

Gotta run.

By Truthman

March 30, 2007 4:36 PM | Link to this

Have a nice weekend, 26 percenters (or, is it down to 25 percent)!!

Go love on your Shrub and your “Dick.”

Todos Puntas!!!

By RE

March 30, 2007 4:36 PM | Link to this

MMM, Strom is dead. Couple of years ago.

Man you are sensitive RW, how did I hurt your feelings this time. Really, I will try not to upset you anymore, no reason to get angry.

By RE

March 30, 2007 4:52 PM | Link to this

More bad news for bush

Speaking of which, when was the last time he had a good day?

Reminds me of the phrase thrown around here sometimes “for the liberals, the world started today”

Looks like Waxman remembers things prior to Nov. 7th. C-span might become more popular than american idol before this admin is out.

By Midori

March 30, 2007 5:19 PM | Link to this

Waxman To Rice: Your Days Of Blowing Off My Letters Are Over

By Right-wing nut job in training

March 30, 2007 5:26 PM | Link to this

Thank you for your earlier responses. I told a stupid lib friend of mine that the solution to Iraq is to invade Iran and kill everyone in Iraq and Iran. The lib thought that voters wouldn’t not go for that. While I was beating him with a club like a baby seal I told him that voters don’t matter when you are spreading democracy. In fact I think to save our democracy we ought to ban voting altogether. Look where its gotten us. Our democracy can not afford democracy in a post-911 world.

Thanks again,

Right wing nut job in training

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 5:26 PM | Link to this

Hey, um, getalife:

SPEARSVILLE, La. (AP) — Two fifth-graders had sex on a classroom floor while two others fondled each other in the classroom, according to a teacher at Spearsville High School. Walker said teachers learned Wednesday about the incident, which allegedly occurred during an assembly Tuesday to talk about a 15-year-old student accused of stabbing another student to death over the weekend.

Maybe you should quit worrying about what Bush is doing and go check on the kids.

Either that or move to Baghdad where it’s safe.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By getalife

March 30, 2007 5:36 PM | Link to this

“They cuss at the teachers and throw things at them, and nothing is done,” Walker said. “There was even one student who grabbed a teacher in the butt and nothing was done. The students run the school.”

No thanks.

By @@

March 30, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

Well at least there’s no divide between states sponsoring terrorism and the Democratic congress.

Pelosi going to Syria despite objections

“This is a county that is a state sponsor of terror, one that is trying to disrupt the Senora government in Lebanon and one that is allowing foreign fighters to flow into Iraq from its borders,” Perino said.

Let’s do lunch, right Nancy.

Jay Rockefeller will be along later. He may have crucial information for Assad.

There are plenty of countries involved in negotiations with Syria. We shouldn’t be one of them.

Unbelievable subversion.

By Politics Aside

March 30, 2007 6:22 PM | Link to this

CNN just reported that Iran has captured 15 tuskeegee airmen who were forced to ditch their planes, out of fuel, in the Bermuda Triangle , which is located squarely inside Iranian Territorial Waters, and Amninidijihad has the satellite fix to prove it!!!

Is there no end to the evil from this leg of the axis, lifted so high, clearing the way for the golden shower the world must endure from these mad dogs of Iran?

I’ve forgiven the Iraqis, and am willing to now attack Iran, but this time, we should attack without mercy, which no Iranian expects us to do, and which will end in their ruin and defeat, and then we handle al queda in Iraq with ease.

The axis of evil will not stop till they rule der verld, unt ve musten geshtoppen them!!! (enheimer)

By RW-(the original)

March 30, 2007 6:25 PM | Link to this

Don’t overestimate yourself RE, I’m not a liberal so I’m in complete control of my own existence which includes my feelings.

You only tried to point out that the comment I made into an available comment box which the AJC timestamped at 7:25 was a “”late night”” comment to try to use it a tatteling-to-the-teacher tactic the same way Blackadder cries to the staff here. Proof of that is that you not only mislabeled the timing of it you also misrepresented the comment and when Buy Danish asked you about it you ignored her and changed the subject.

I hope this comment doesn’t post to late for you, but if it does it should still be here when you roll out of bed at noon tomorrow.

I do hope you’re right about these witch hunts the Democrats are conducting becoming more popular with viewers than AI. If more people saw what sleaze liberals really are we’d never see another one in power.

By Daniel

March 30, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this

RW: No witch hunts. It’s called: Law Enforcement. You misjudge the American people. You’re listening to way too much Oxycontin. Republicans are wway off. You got clobbered in November. It’s going to get much worse for you. Snap out of it!

By Daniel

March 30, 2007 6:48 PM | Link to this

RW: “Sleaze liberals” What are you talking about? Who are you talking about? They own you. You’re a fool. You have lost your capacity for critical thinking. Your carping about liberals makes you look stupid. Why does our thinking for ourselves bother you Bush toadies so much?

By Russ

March 30, 2007 6:55 PM | Link to this

Another proud week for Bushie and the All-American Patriots and warriors who support him and his ilk. Well done.

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

The bull dy-ke Hillary defense:

{{{BOSTON — Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, amid a growing clamor for his resignation, acknowledged Friday there is confusion about of his role in firing U.S. attorneys and said he doesn’t “recall being involved in deliberations” over which would be ousted.}}}

Bravo Albert! Give those pinko goons some of their own medicine, that was the Clinton stock answer for everything, even when caught red handed with hard evidence against them.

If I were Albert, in the middle of the show trial I’d have my cellphone ring, I’d ask for a moment from the chief inquisitor and then would speak loudly into the phone “no Mr. President, I don’t need that pardon, yet.”

And then bust out laughing in Waxman’s f’ed up face.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

By RW-(the original)

March 30, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

Didn’t you spend most of this week saying you weren’t a liberal? Come Friday afternoon and you claim to not only be a liberal, but a proud one.

Law enforcement has to do with prosecuting or investigating a crime. Bringing people to show trials to try to find a crime is a witch hunt.

By Daniel

March 30, 2007 7:00 PM | Link to this

BUsh lied to America. We will never ever forget that.

By Dusty

March 30, 2007 7:03 PM | Link to this

And so the close of another day in lalaliberal land. What a loss! A whole lot of nothing but knock the good old USA. Have fun kiddies. alQueda loves you..

By LuckoDull

March 30, 2007 7:11 PM | Link to this

{{{House Of Representatives Silent on British Hostage Crisis WASHINGTON (AP) - Members of the House left Washington on Friday for their two-week spring break without weighing in on the international crisis tormenting the nation’s closest ally: the capture of 15 British sailors and marines by Iran.}}}

Silence is approval, right?

Or maybe in their mad rush to start the two week vacation, the “tough” “grinding” schedule under Pelosi, they forgot to say something?

Could be that it wasn’t worth the effort, you can’t attach pork to a statement.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.