Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2007 > March > 27 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USEaster baskets
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (312) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon
.JPG)
Services »
Comments
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 8:04 AM | Link to this
The Urinal cartoonist shows his understanding of politics^^.
The Urinal editorial board shows it’s knowledge of business:
Corporate executives who live in lavish homes tend to perform poorly for company shareholders, two university researchers have concluded.
The Urinal shows it’s learning in history:
{{{Ronald Reagan didn’t “defeat” communism. It defeated itself. Reagan just happened to be president at the time.}}}
Who needs SAT’s to prove that you are 50th in national education testing? We just have to listen to you.
(Whoever at the Urinal has a major raging gay thing for Jeff Francouer and feels the need to post his picture every single solitary day of the week, get over it. Grow up. Talk to rushncrap about stress relief. Ask Jeff out on a date. Spare all of the rest of us the moony eyed infatuation. I haven’t seen it this bad since some AJC pinko got the hots for Venus Williams. Calm the F down.)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By regulator
March 28, 2007 8:05 AM | Link to this
Bush seems a little tall for me, Great Toon!
By Mrs. Godzilla
March 28, 2007 8:10 AM | Link to this
Don’t worry Mr. Bunny.
First, you are bigger than Mr. Bush and can “thump” him if required.
Second, you are not a political appointee so you can give eggs to any body you want.
Third, you might want to call the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus and all your buddies and warn them to expect pressure from Karl Roves office.
Peace.
By Kinja
March 28, 2007 8:13 AM | Link to this
Yawn. Mike, there has to be something else in the news you can ridicule for a while.
By Charles Aulino
March 28, 2007 8:17 AM | Link to this
Mike: you’re comments about the 30% of American’s who still support Shrub & his team of idiots is right on. The American voters have got to understand that this is what you get when you elect a Frat Boy to the White House. Please keep up the good work.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this
Huh?????What current event does this cartoon refer to?
Didn’t the Democrats just receive $124 Billion in bribes from Nancy Pelosi to vote for the Surrender Date Certain Iraq funding bill?
Aren’t those bribes the pretty eggs for the Dem’s baskets?
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 8:28 AM | Link to this
DAMN THOSE GOPers ARE LOYAL
GOP to Shift Blame to Bush for Blocking Withdrawal Bill
Unwilling to do the White House’s heavy lifting on Iraq, Senate Republicans are prepared to step aside to allow language requiring troop withdrawals to reach President Bush, forcing him to face down Democratic adversaries with his veto pen. Acknowledging the political risk of opposing a measure that, according to a new Pew poll, is supported by 59% of voters, Republican Thad Cochran said the GOP is setting itself up to be “part of the problem if [Bush’s Iraq policy] doesn’t work.”
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 8:39 AM | Link to this
The free world gets weaker, the Islamic fanatics get stronger:
The latest report is that the Britons were ready to fight off their abductors. Certainly their escorting ship, HMS Cornwall, could have blown the Iranian naval vessel out of the water. However, at the last minute the British Ministry of Defense ordered the Cornwall not to fire, and her captain and crew were forced to watch their shipmates led away into captivity. The mullahs in Tehran clearly see the new pacifist trend in Britain not as a hopeful sign of future accord, but as supine surrender. Just as clearly, they have singled out Britain as the latest weak link in the Coalition fighting in Iraq and in the War on Terror.
When they lead you away will you go quietly with them or will you be wishing that your government blows them out of the water?
We have become spineless and they know it.
Enjoy your remaining years of freedom.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Performance Issues
March 28, 2007 8:47 AM | Link to this
GOPhers lied to us and slimed their way into the Presidency. Didn’t do em a bit o good cause once they got it they still had to perform and you know how it is with Republican men and performance issues.
Limbaugh wasn’t carryin those lil blue pills with him to the Dominican Republic to stiffen his eyebrows! He, also, wasn’t in the land of kiddie sex to write a sequel to “My Pet Goat”!
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 8:49 AM | Link to this
Is this what Republicans and Bush want America to support?
Off-duty Shiite policemen enraged by massive bombings in the northern town of Tal Afar went on a revenge spree against Sunni residents there on Wednesday, killing at least 45 men execution-style, police and hospital officials said.
The policemen began roaming the town’s Sunni neighborhoods on foot early in the morning, shooting at Sunni residents and homes.
A senior hospital official in Tal Afar said at least 45 men between the ages of 15 and 60 were killed with a shot to the back of the head and four others were wounded. He
By Group Hug
March 28, 2007 8:51 AM | Link to this
BAGHDAD - Shiite militants and police enraged by massive truck bombings in the northwestern town of Tal Afar went on a revenge spree against Sunni residents there Wednesday, killing as many as 60 people, officials said.
The gunmen began roaming Sunni neighborhoods in the city, shooting at residents and homes, according to police and a local Sunni politician.
Yup, everything is peachy keen with the Iraq surge. All the Iraqis are gonna get together for a group hug around the campfire tonight after which they will break off into a rousing chorus of “Kumbaya”!
Heard enough Bushshit for one day?
By @@
March 28, 2007 8:53 AM | Link to this
Well ml, let’s see what I’ve got in my little basket today.
I’ve got employees at a manufacturing plant in Cleveland, Ohio who have filed charges of intimidation against their UNION.
I’ve got Senators “Teddy” Kennedy and Barbara Boxer reintroducing the Equal Rights Amendment on behalf of women.
Living it up in the good ol’ 60’s again? Democrats will need some victims to win in ‘08.
And here’s some more victims for Democrats to champion.
Case of the ‘Flying Imams’ Prompts Congressional Action
Republican lawmakers mentioned CAIR’s lawsuit, warning it would have a “chilling effect” on passengers who might be less inclined to report suspicious behavior. But some Democrats argued that shielding people from such lawsuits would encourage racial profiling on the part of passengers.
But there ^^^ you are ml dancing with your two left feet.
“You shuffle to the left”
“Then you shuffle to the left”
“And then you HOP HOP HOP”
“Do the Dummy Hop”
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this
THE NERVE OF SOME TWITS TO TALK ABOUT VICTIMS>>>>
FOCUS SMALL MINDED ONE
VICTIMS FOR REPUBLICANS
Honor the Fallen
The following fatalities were identified by the DoD on 3/26:
Cpl. Henry W. Bogrette, Lance Cpl. Trevor A. Roberts
Official DoD Count of Troops Killed in Iraq: 3228 Troops Killed in Afghanistan: 369 Wounded in Action: 25052
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this
Count Ms. Goodling’s silence as one more unintended consequence of the Scooter Libby case. Mr. Libby made the mistake of cooperating with the investigation into a leak he had nothing to do with, and he later found himself charged with perjury based on little more than conflicting memories of who said what and when. The prosecutor never even charged anyone for the leak that started it all.
The candy as-s pinkos, realizing that they will never get their agenda passed through Congress like they promised all their voters before the election, have resorted to spending all their time trying to catch Republicans in these kindergarten level perjury traps, find something completely legal, call it a crime, have your mouthpieces in the lib media feign outrage and trump up the charges, and then hold show trials and kangaroo courts hoping to catch the slightest case of he said, she said and then send the Republican to prison.
Meanwhile ignore bald face and blatant democrat lies and actual criminal acts like the three blind mice.
Problem is, the Republicans aren’t near as stupid as the liberals are and have clammed up, which is what any sane person would do.
So what we are left with is basically paying for a full time legislature and getting a DNC field office instead, conducting political witch hunts and voter drives on the taxpayer’s dime.
Proud of your non vote in 2006, “Republicans?”
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this
WHOS AFRAID OF TWO THOUSAND EIGHT?
The Problem With Fred Thompson: Wait - I’m gone a week and Fred Thompson makes some noises about running for President and immediately jumps to third in the GOP primary polls? Now the easy thing would be to crack wise about this development, but Matt Yglesias, Daniel Larison and (especially) Vic Matus seem to have that well in hand, so let me attempt to develop a serious point instead: Specifically, that the Thompson boomlet bodes very ill for the GOP’s chances in ‘08, not because it suggests how weak the current field is (though it does), but because it suggests that the particular weaknesses of the Republican candidates will make it next-to-impossible for any of them to pull off both a primary win and a general election victory.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 9:14 AM | Link to this
“The free world gets weaker, the Islamic fanatics get stronger:
The latest report is that the Britons were ready to fight off their abductors. Certainly their escorting ship, HMS Cornwall, could have blown the Iranian naval vessel out of the water. However, at the last minute the British Ministry of Defense ordered the Cornwall not to fire, and her captain and crew were forced to watch their shipmates led away into captivity. The mullahs in Tehran clearly see the new pacifist trend in Britain not as a hopeful sign of future accord, but as supine surrender. Just as clearly, they have singled out Britain as the latest weak link in the Coalition fighting in Iraq and in the War on Terror.”
The Brits may have realized that firing on the Iranians might precipitate the Bush Cabal into attacking Iran.
Galling as it was, they had to hold their fire.
And people being people, can you blame the Iranians for seizing Coaltion perople when we seize theirs?
Walt
By @@
March 28, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this
Walt:
Are you posting from Iran?
Is Iran your Utopia?
By Jesus
March 28, 2007 9:27 AM | Link to this
IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 9:30 AM | Link to this
For those of you leftwingers who scream about right-wing intimidation and indoctrination, I just want you to remember that your beloved teachers’ unions and the government have a monopoly on education - or indoctrination of our children. Read the following:
Banning LEGOs
Teachers at a Seattle day care center decided to ban LEGO building blocks — those colorful little bricks kids use to build such creations as robots, monster trucks, space ships and vast futuristic cities. The Hilltop Children’s Center bills itself as a nationally recognized, non-profit, non-religious facility. So why did the teachers toss the LEGOs?
We’ll let them explain: “We agreed that we want to take part in shaping the children’s understandings from a perspective of social justice. So we decided to take the LEGOs out of the classroom. The children were building their assumptions about ownership and the social power it conveys — assumptions that mirrored those of a class-based, capitalist society — a society that we teachers believe to be unjust and oppressive.”
After months of what the teachers called “social justice exploration” — they let the LEGOs back in — but kids were only allowed to build “public structures” of standard sizes in a village dedicated to what they called “collectivity and consensus.”
By Walt
March 28, 2007 9:34 AM | Link to this
“By @@
March 28, 2007 9:24 AM | Link to this
Walt:
Are you posting from Iran?
Is Iran your Utopia?”
No. But I am a little upset that the Bush Cabal has eschewed diplomacy when the result has been to cost us 3,000 KIA and the loss of a war to boot.
I am like them in one way though.
I am tribal.
I don’t give a rat’s rectum if the Shia and Sunni have a blood bath. Saying we can’t leave to prevet that is just a dodge to keep our people in harm’s way so that Bush can claim to be a “war president.”
If Bush -ever- has to honestly answer questions about this, he will weep like a child - because he got caught.
Walt
By Most Credible
March 28, 2007 9:39 AM | Link to this
LONDON - Britain’s military said its vessels were {{{{1.7 nautical miles inside Iraqi waters}}}} when Iran seized the sailors and marines on Friday. Iran’s foreign minister said meanwhile a female British sailor held captive by Iran may be released later Wednesday or on Thursday, a Turkish TV station reported.
Hmmmmm. When Iran captures a female prisoner they let her go. When American soldiers capture one they lock her up, rape her, shoot her and all her family in the heads, and then cover it up. Remember Haditha, we got confessions now ya know?
OR
TEHRAN (Reuters) - The 15 British sailors and marines seized by Iran last week were {{{{0.5 km inside Iranian waters}}}} at the time, Iran’s embassy in London said in a statement on Wednesday, the official IRNA news agency reported. Earlier, Britain increased pressure on Iran by releasing evidence it said showed the 15 military personnel were operating in Iraqi waters when they were captured by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
Who to believe? I’m going with the ones who have lied the least so far and who thereby have the most credibility, the Iranians! Hell, at this point, I’d trust the word of Billy Clinton before that of King George or any of his cronies.
By ed lorenzo
March 28, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this
Looking Ahead – Tulsa, Oklahoma, March 2016
“James, are you going to the station this morning?”
Kay had been up since 5 am and was anxious to see ex-senator James Inhofe off to work. Not the fancy offices he had occupied in Washington DC some years back, or even the modest offices of the Oklahoma legislature in Oklahoma City. Now, it was the small Recharge station on the outskirts of the city of Tulsa. The gas stations of old remained a sweet memory for many, same as the availability of cars, buses, motorcycles and airplanes. James had been lucky to get a job at this Recharge Station after his forced exit from the government. For some years, Conservatives had played their cards without concern for logic, common sense and the well being of the nation. As a political philosophy, which – incidentally had only enjoyed sporadic injections of valid thought and substance – it had failed miserably having caused considerable damage to the republic and to the rest of the world. Their removal however had arrived too late. Some of the worst predictions had been fulfilled.
These thoughts crossed her mind as the ex-senator appeared in the kitchen door wearing his work green coveralls and his straw hat.
“Yes, I have station this morning. We are charging up some government sand crawlers.”
He looked out the window and could not hold the tears that flowed from his eyes at once. All he could see from his window was the outline of some of the university buildings sitting on the expanse of sand that had become the natural panorama of most of the United States.
“Damn you Al Gore!” he muttered and sat down to breakfast.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 9:40 AM | Link to this
Ah, the blind 26 percenters are out bleating like sheep about us “bad old liberals and their hate of the Chimperor.
DEAL WITH IT, B-OTCH!
As long as you support abrogation of inalienable rights; as long as you support a man’s right to tell a woman what to do with her body; as long as you support terrorism by fight where it ain’t; as long as you support Bush’s version of white, christian supremacy, we on the right side of history will continue to call you out about it and destroy all of your hateful, paranoid theories.
Please move to Jesustan!! We’ll give you the south and Utah. Just give us a country where science and the rule of law are respected, and you can have your 15th century Jesustan and your University of Creationism!
Alberto Gone-zales!! He’s no better than a Nazi judge during the show trials of the 1930’s.
And your boy from the FBI yesterday saying “facts could be wrong.” Even Arlen Specter, a real conservative, was ticked off by that response.
Apologists for American Fascism. That’s what the haters of Clinton on this blog are!!
By @@
March 28, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this
Six brave and courageous souls supported/protected by U.S. Coalition Forces and Iraqi soldiers.
“This job is very dangerous for us. It is dangerous to talk freely. But if I am scared and everyone is scared then who will help Iraq? Nobody.”
Leftists here in the U.S. keep talking about support for the minority. Well, here you go…six left after 51 succumbed to threats by the extremists. Threats against their “freedom of speech”. Threats against their right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
Well, like LuckoDull, I’m proud to be a member of the minority here in America. The group that stands behind the troops, their commitment to freedom, and the “brave” Iraqis.
By ummmm
March 28, 2007 9:42 AM | Link to this
and that truthsayer 9:27 was posted why?????? Who gives a flying freak.
By Scooter
March 28, 2007 9:49 AM | Link to this
Perhaps the democrats would give their eggs to the terrorist as a peace offering? Then they can have some eggs to go with the first piece of their Caliphate.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 9:50 AM | Link to this
Hey ummmm,
Don’t get too mad. TS and @@ and Andy are chickenhawks - they talk and talk and talk, but you’ll never see them wear the uniform. You won’t even see them at the VA hospital in Decatur visiting our veterans (as I do twice a month).
As long as they get their antiseptic, FAUX News worldview, they don’t have to make ANY sacrifices for our courageous men and women they voted to put in Iraq where there were no terrorists.
Big talk, no action!!
They’d crap in their pants if they had to the fighting. You’d better bet they’d be on their way to Canada!
Chickenhawks! Chickenhawks all!!
Gone-zales esta un Punta!
By ed lorenzo
March 28, 2007 9:55 AM | Link to this
Looking Ahead – Tulsa, Oklahoma, March 2016
“James, are you going to the station this morning?”
Kay had been up since 5 am and was anxious to see ex-senator James Inhofe off to work. Not the fancy offices he had occupied in Washington DC some years back, or even the modest offices of the Oklahoma legislature in Oklahoma City. Now, it was the small Recharge station on the outskirts of the city of Tulsa. The gas stations of old remained a sweet memory for many, same as the availability of cars, buses, motorcycles and airplanes. James had been lucky to get a job at this Recharge Station after his forced exit from the government. For some years, Conservatives had played their cards without concern for logic, common sense and the well being of the nation. As a political philosophy, which – incidentally had only enjoyed sporadic injections of valid thought and substance – it had failed miserably having caused considerable damage to the republic and to the rest of the world. Their removal however had arrived too late. Some of the worst predictions had been fulfilled.
These thoughts crossed her mind as the ex-senator appeared in the kitchen door wearing his work green coveralls and his straw hat.
“Yes, I have station this morning. We are charging up some government sand crawlers.”
He looked out the window and could not hold the tears that flowed from his eyes at once. All he could see from his window was the outline of some of the university buildings sitting on the expanse of sand that had become the natural panorama of most of the United States.
“Damn you Al Gore!” he muttered and sat down to breakfast.
By IVAW
March 28, 2007 9:55 AM | Link to this
@@ doesn’t speak for us. We speak for ourselves!
IRAQ VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR
By Walt
March 28, 2007 9:55 AM | Link to this
“Alberto Gone-zales!! He’s no better than a Nazi judge during the show trials of the 1930’s.
And your boy from the FBI yesterday saying “facts could be wrong.” Even Arlen Specter, a real conservative, was ticked off by that response.
Apologists for American Fascism. That’s what the haters of Clinton on this blog are!!”
Concur.
Funny how the term “show trials” crept into Bush’s comments the other day.
Of course they have taken so much from the Nazis, maybe it just slipped in.
Walt
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 9:56 AM | Link to this
{{{By Walt March 28, 2007 9:14 AM And people being people, can you blame the Iranians for seizing Coaltion perople when we seize theirs?}}}
The only way candy a-ss wally will ever figure this out is when the Iranians sieze his family and carry them away.
Until then, he’s going to continue spouting stupid socialist bullsh-it and propagandizing for suicide bombers and Islamic throat cutters.
It’s an ingrained ignorance that these left wing pervert idiots suffer from.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Paul
March 28, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this
@@, ride-me-I’m-a-scooter, TS, LuckoLoon. Yep, you’re “behind the troops.” Waaaaay behind. Always has been that way w Repugs. Cowards & hate-mongers all. Bitter losers in life. Yawn.
By IVAW
March 28, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this
I am currently on inactive ready reserve status. I served four years in Georgia, Iraq, and Kuwait between 2001 and 2005. I am glad to be out and done. I was stationed at Fort Gordon, GA; Camp Victory, Iraq, Camp Doha and Camp Afrifjan, Kuwait. I was lucky I only had to be in Iraq for a few months it still affected me for months after I was home, I was jumping at any loud noise, waking up scared. I am happy I found IVAW.- Jennifer Lyon, E-4, 385th Signal Co.
By Paul
March 28, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this
@@, ride-me-I’m-a-scooter, TS, LuckoLoon. Yep, you’re “behind the troops.” Waaaaay behind. Always has been that way w Repugs. Cowards & hate-mongers all. Bitter losers in life. Yawn.
By IVAW
March 28, 2007 10:09 AM | Link to this
Hammers Can’t Fix Computers By Jason Lemieux March 20, 2007
Hi. My name is Jason Lemieux, and I am veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps infantry. I served three tours in the Iraq occupation, and I have something important to tell you. You see, there are a lot of members of Iraq Veterans Against the War who speak out on the immorality of the occupation. Tons. While I agree with them that the occupation is immoral and unjustified, I don’t think that you are all that moved by hearing it. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not implying that you, the reader, are a bad or uncaring person. It’s just that lots of things in this world are immoral, and for most of us they all blend together after a while. What I want to tell you about the occupation of Iraq is something else entirely: Whether or not we are justified in occupying Iraq is irrelevant at a certain level, because we stand no chance against our enemy there, and every life lost fighting them is in vain.
To find out why Jason says, “Whether or not we are justified in occupying Iraq is irrelevant at a certain level, because we stand no chance against our enemy there”, follow the link to his complete article on our website.
By regulator
March 28, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this
I think Andi is the one with the thing for Franceour, he doth protest to much.@@, you are a first class idiot.
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this
ITS A LEGO CONSPIRACY
YOU KNOW THEY ARE MADE BY A
“DANISH” COMPANY
By getalife
March 28, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this
The question is why in the world did the British not fight?
They said they were in Iraqi waters and could engage to protect themselves.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 10:18 AM | Link to this
IVAW: Thanks for these posts.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this
I’m with Jesus when it comes to that peace-thingy.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this
I just read Jason Lemeiux’s well-thought out, cogent treatise about 4th generation warfare.
Excellent! Covered all the important points and showed in pure black and white why we can’t “win” in any traditional sense of “winning war.”
Blast all you want, neo-conmen and women, but we can’t win this war with guns and bullets.
Dump Zaxby “chickenhawk” Chambliss (pun intended) and Johnny Isakson in 2008. Bush rubberstampers for war!
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this
{{{By getalife March 28, 2007 10:17 AM The question is why in the world did the British not fight?}}}
They were probably thinking that imprisonment and torture were easier routes to take then having to deal with a bunch of flaming candy as-s pinkos asking them why they killed all of the cutthroat Iranian terrorists, that’s what I’m figuring.
They were pretty much right to believe that.
Our pinkos are ready to fight anyone except the enemy.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this
Boy, just imagine where America would be if Ray-gun had not dismantled all of President Carter’s plans to quit importing oil from the Middle East.
All of those terrorist-enabling countries would be broke today!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this
”{{{By Walt March 28, 2007 9:14 AM And people being people, can you blame the Iranians for seizing Coaltion perople when we seize theirs?}}}
The only way candy a-ss wally will ever figure this out is when the Iranians sieze his family and carry them away.
Until then, he’s going to continue spouting stupid socialist bullsh-it and propagandizing for suicide bombers and Islamic throat cutters.”
We seized their people.
Why shouldn’t they seize ours?
Any special cachet from being the “city on the hill” or a fair broker or benevolent superpower has been -totally- p** away by these horrible scumbags in the Bush Cabal.
Can’t you see that?
Walt
By Speaking of Easter...
March 28, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this
From California to Florida, a string of Creation “Science” museums are springing up across the country as part of the Christian Right’s attempt to rewrite the past and make it conform to the Bible.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this
“Dump Zaxby “chickenhawk” Chambliss (pun intended) and Johnny Isakson in 2008. Bush rubberstampers for war!”
That would be sweet.
The governor and our officials in DC make this state a laughing stock.
Walt
By getalife
March 28, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this
That is bs Andy.
Not engaging tells me they were in Iranian waters.
Once again, that credibility problem has reared its ugly head.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this
Goldie,
I’ve been saying that since Bush the elder (who actually fought in a war and is not happy the junior is killing our troops in Iraq).
If we had listened to Carter and weaned ourselves off of oil, the entire middle-east would be of no more consequence to our national security than say, the Bahamas!
By @@
March 28, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this
Getalife:
The capture of the British naval personnel is a ploy by the Iranians. It comes right after the recent U.N. sanctions (unanimously supported). They’re hoping to provoke the U.S. and Britain into military action.
They know America’s leftists well. People like Walt who have sympathy for Iran and see them as victims of the U.S. The people who have no knowledge of the history of radical extremists.
They may therefore be calculating that any strikes by the UK (or the U.S.) will be on military or strategic sites; devastating, but survivable — particularly when Iran will be seen as the victim in such action.
I know you don’t want to see it, but too much progress has come about in surrounding Arab countries AGAINST Iran.
I don’t think Blair will undermine that progress. Unless, of course, he allows himself to be “victimized” by the terrorist appeasers in the U.K.
You know…the people like Walt.
By Lane
March 28, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this
WE WILL BE GREETED AS LIBERATORS!!!!
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 10:51 AM | Link to this
Neo-conmen and women, please answer this question:
Why do you love money so much?
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this
By IN THE NEWS
{{{March 28, 2007 10:16 AM
ITS A LEGO CONSPIRACY
YOU KNOW THEY ARE MADE BY A
“DANISH” COMPANY}}}
This^^^^^^gets the most irrelevant post of the week award.
The Marxists who run the daycare center where they brainwash young children to be good Communists are ANTI-Legos.
Sheesh.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
{{{{By getalife March 28, 2007 10:44 AM Once again, that credibility problem has reared its ugly head.}}}}
Yes getalife, you bastion of truth:
Among the many findings that dispute environmentalists’ claims are: Manmade carbon dioxide emissions are roughly 5 percent of the total; the rest are from natural sources such as volcanoes, dying vegetation and animals. Annually, volcanoes alone produce more carbon dioxide than all of mankind’s activities. Oceans are responsible for most greenhouse gases. Contrary to environmentalists’ claims, the higher the Earth’s temperature, the higher the carbon dioxide levels. In other words, carbon dioxide levels are a product of climate change. Some of the documentary’s scientists argue that the greatest influence on the Earth’s temperature is our sun’s sunspot activity. The bottom line is, the bulk of scientific evidence shows that what we’ve been told by environmentalists is pure bunk.
Everything the liberals say is bunk, designed to scam taxpayers, spoken to fool their slack jawed beady eyed voters.
And it works too, listen to these idiots harp like seals.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
@@,
Sorry but it does not pass the common sense test.
If they were in Iraqi waters. they could engage to protect their troops.
With the US and Iran playing massive war games right next to each other, it might be a good thing that they did not engage.
Maybe the England did not want to start WWIII.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this
Oh the wicked web we weave…!!
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2007-03-27T215910Z01N27218781RTRUKOC0_US-USA-PROSECUTORS.xml
Poor little Alberto! CUTTING AND RUNNING!!
Punta!!
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this
GOTTA ADMIT THEY TAKE SNEAKY TO A NEW LEVEL
There’s your answer. White House personnel appear to have been systematically avoiding using their government emails on the job because they knew they might some day be subpoenaed.
But as we noted earlier with Karl Rove, this may have been too clever by half. If the president’s aides were using RNC emails or emails from other Republican political committees, they can’t have even the vaguest claim
By Dusty
March 28, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this
Well, somebody went to all the trouble of stealing Paul’s ID @ 9:59 and 10:04. It isn’t enough to insult @@ for her support of the troups, you have to throw in phony scurrilous remarks. Now that is a really really crooked way of getting your point across.
There are plenty of names for people who are a disgrace to this country. You know some of them by their blogs here. They are so twisted that they think losing the war is the way to save our country.
Listen to these hate America people: Make war funding a pork project for Democrats. Impeach Bush. Get a resignation. Declare Gonzalez a criminal without legal cause. Declare Cheney a would be murderer and warmonger. Go back and say Reagan did nothing. Declare presidential elections fraudulent. Demonize homeland security. Iran is better than the British. Why didn’t the British start another war? The list of liberal propaganda goes on and on to the detriment of our country, our troops and our allies.
I SUPPORT THE TROOPS. @@ supports the troops. Loyal Americans support the troops. All the trash from loco liberals will not change our love and support of this country.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this
“They know America’s leftists well. People like Walt who have sympathy for Iran and see them as victims of the U.S.”
I have no sympathy for Iran.
But I know that nations don’t have morals. They have interests.
And I know that Bush and his handlers have been derelict in their duty by letting emotions enter in to the conduct of our national affairs.
Walt
By @@
March 28, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this
Truthman:
(((By Truthman March 28, 2007 10:44)))
(((If we had listened to Carter and weaned ourselves off of oil, the entire middle-east would be of no more consequence to our national security than say, the Bahamas!)))
When you used the word “WE”, I guess you were referring to “YOUR” environmentalists who have done everything within their power to “STOP” domestic drilling and the development of nuclear energy sites in the U.S.
They must have been the “mouse” in your liberal pocket.
Or maybe it’s the other way around.
You and your Democratic party are the “mouse” in “THEIR” pocket.
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this
Truthman - you really do need to get a new name! We conservatives do not love money so much. Otherwise, Ted Kennedy, Diane Feinstein, Herbert Kohl, Mark Dayton (ret), Jay Rockefeller, John Kerry, John Edwards and Maria Cantwell, just to name a few of the megamillionaires in the Senate, would all be Republicans. It is you liberals who think that money is the answer to EVERYTHING. The only time that you complain about spending is when it is YOUR money or it is being spent on the defense of this country.
Let me illustrate by listing a few Republican politicians who made it when they had not inherited their wealth or been members of a political dynasty - Abraham Lincoln, William McKinely, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Wendell Wilkie, Dwight Eisehnower, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich, Mel Martinez, John Tower, Jeff Sessions and the list goes on and on and on. You can name a few Democrats too.
I will ask the question again: Why don’t all these megarich liberals - e.g. Al Gore - take all of their money and give it to the poor and go live in walk-ups in a working-class area of town? Your hypocrisy again speaks volumes!
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this
Yes Dusty, we all know that you think you support the troops. We got it. The CAPS are extraneous. We realize you base your whole identity on your “support of troops” by posting on an obscure blog. Enough already. I think I speak for the majority when I say that we’re fed up with you telling us this every 5 minutes. At this point A-N Smith coverage seems tactful in comparison.
By Anonymous
March 28, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this
rushnap - Did you mean EXTRANEOUS or SUPERFLUOUS? I suggest that your undereducated liberals with undeservedly high opinions of your own intelligence find dictionaries before you use multi-syllable words and then turn around a criticize a Republican who mangles a syllable or two when you don’t even know the definition of the words you are using!
By Anonymous
March 28, 2007 11:21 AM | Link to this
rushnap - Did you mean EXTRANEOUS or SUPERFLUOUS? I suggest that your undereducated liberals with undeservedly high opinions of your own intelligence find dictionaries before you use multi-syllable words and then turn around & criticize a Republican who mangles a syllable or two when you don’t even know the definition of the words you are using!
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this
Truff, @@: Why are you always whining about leftists and liberals?
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this
-=-
Heee - hee hee —- oh this is too much!!
[There were no predators. T-Rex had such big teeth, the museum explains, so it could open coconuts. Only after Adam and Eve sinned and were cast out of paradise did the dinosaurs start to eat flesh.]
This coming from the same kooks that at one time thought the Universe revolved around the flat earth. I guess that fossil fuel that they are using in their bus is blood from mother earth too!
-=-
Concerning the 15 captured British prisoners. The choices of what to do about the situation and events are England’s alone and not the US-of-A’s business. As a matter of fact if the USA entered into the argument here, then that would make it tougher on England in negotiating the captives returns.
As you may (or may not) realize, that we (The USA) have been bending and even violating the rules of the Geneva Conventions in Iraq. This includes the Iranians taken in Iraq as “Enemy Combatants” and not “POW’s”. This means now that any American taken by Iran (or any other Mid-East country involved in Iraq, can use the same rules in dealing with our troops (including torture sadly).
England can (for now) at least say they have not violated the Geneva Conventions, and should Iran violate the Geneva Conventions against their troops, then England has recourse within the world courts.
So we Amerikan’s should just butt-out when it comes to the British 15 “POW’s”.
Thomas/PNAC
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this
COMPROMISE ANYONE?
Bush has the authority to engineer a change of direction in the war. But he lacks the credibility with the public to reestablish consent for his course.
Congressional Democrats, even after their seismic Senate victory Tuesday, ultimately lack the leverage to mandate a new course in Iraq. But they offer Bush his only possibility of rebuilding a public consensus over America’s role in the war.
Because neither side can set a sustainable course on its own, their choice is either to continue colliding in polarized confrontations like Tuesday’s Senate vote narrowly approving a time limit for withdrawal, or to seek agreement on a strategy for Iraq that a broader coalition in Congress and the country might support.
By @@
March 28, 2007 11:29 AM | Link to this
Walt:
Bush “HAS NOT” let the “emotions” of the Democrats and their anti-war liberals impact his decisions regarding Iraq.
A strong leader keeps his eye of “the objective”, not hysterical “emotions”.
The clock is ticking for our troops in the field,'' Bush said in a speech this morning in Washington.If Congress fails to pass a bill to fund our troops on the front lines, the American people will know who to hold responsible.”
There is nothing of value to be found in hysteria and emotional rhetoric. It takes you nowhere but around the block to where you started.
It’s that “victimhood” mentality that the Democrats are so fond of and dependent upon.
I’m off to work.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this
When you say “multi-syllable”, Dusty, do you mean “polysyllabic”? Or are you gonna tell us about just how edumacated you is?
@@, does the overuse of quotation marks make you feel wittier?
By @@
March 28, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this
Oops! Just saw Dusty’s post.
Dusty: I hate to sound like some of the “self-promoting” liberal(s) on this site, but I must say….
I love the way you “sum ‘em up” (the liberals). Their disdain for this country and all that she represents can be disheartening, but only if we allow it.
I don’t, and neither do you.
In other words….ATTA GIRL DUSTY.
By @@
March 28, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this
rushncap:
Did you have something of “”“”“”RELEVANCE”“”“”” that you wanted to say?
””“”“”AS USUAL”“”“”” it would appear “”“”“”NOT”“”“”“.
By Anonymous
March 28, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this
rushnap - you are the one in need of an edumucation. Multi does mean more than one. Polysyllabic means many syllables. I was referring to your inablity to use words of more than ONE syllable! You still don’t know the difference between EXTRANEOUS and SUPERFLUOUS. You are the latter.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 11:50 AM | Link to this
{{If we had listened to Carter and weaned ourselves off of oil}}
Truthman— that’s what America got with Ray-gun and Daddy Bush: no “vision-thing” for problem-solving and the continual supporting of terrorists nations in the Middle East.
The Repugnant Party is terrorist-enablers!
By getalife
March 28, 2007 11:52 AM | Link to this
Its a damn shame wingnuts do not want our troops, trained rested and well equipped to fight in the Iraq civil war.
Why do you hate the troops wingnuts?
Geez.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this
{{{By Sir Dullard March 28, 2007 11:23 AM As you may (or may not) realize, that we (The USA) have been bending and even violating the rules of the Geneva Conventions in Iraq. So we Amerikan’s should just butt-out when it comes to the British 15 “POW’s”.}}}
Thomas: You should “butt out” when the discussion concerns adults.
I only respond to you because you offer the perfect opportunity to show everyone exactly the kind of regime that you pervert socialists are propagandizing for on this blog:
On August 10, 1994, in the city of Arak, a woman was sentenced to death by stoning. According to the ruling of the religious judge, her husband and two children were forced to attend the execution. The woman urged her husband to take the children away, but to no avail. A truck full of stones was brought in to be used during the stoning. In the middle of the stoning, although her eyes had been gouged out, the victim was able to escape from the ditch and started running away, but the regime’s guards recaptured her and shot her to death.
You mofo’s sit in here and sh-it out of your filthy polluted mouths about America “torturing,” all on behalf of the REAL TORTURERS.
FY.
This is who you are, by speaking on behalf of these crazed murderers, you are no better than they are and give legitimacy for their actions.
There is no excuse for what you do, none, you are the scum of the Earth.
You need to be washed away.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this
@@ — people who live in glass houses…
When was the last time you posted something relevant? “Lib’ruls suck” does not really count, sorry.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 11:58 AM | Link to this
If we question Bush does that make us liberals? If I think Bush is not the sovereign, does that make me a leftist?
By Jeff
March 28, 2007 12:04 PM | Link to this
Past time to hang Bush and his goons.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this
Daniel @ 11:58— any deviation from the standard cult-worship that the extremist 29% has for W, brings out the slings and arrows… just sickening, and downright un-American!
By getalife
March 28, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this
legalize it already
Did you know that the feds will not prosecute unless caught with over 500 pounds of weed smuggled over the border?
Tax it to help the deficit.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this
-=-
Andy! World Policeman at large - ! Woo - hoo! So you want the USA to be the World Empire setting the laws and rules of every nation and religion!
Ignorant Idiot!
-=-
Here are “More Words of Wisdom” from a great man..
Enjoy
Thomas/PNAC
—
We are not retreating - we are advancing in another direction.
—
You are remembered for the rules you break.
—
“The powers in charge keep us in a perpetual state of fear keep us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it by furnishing the exorbitant sums demanded. Yet, in retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to have been quite real.”
—
There is no security on this earth; there is only opportunity.
—
The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war.
—
Never give an order that can’t be obeyed.
—
No man is enitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.
—
It is part of the general pattern of misguided policy that our country is now geared to an arms economy which was bred in an artificially induced psychosis of war hysteria and nurtured upon an incessant propaganda of fear.
—
“Last, but by no means least, courage - moral courage, the courage of one’s convictions, the courage to see things through. The world is in a constant conspiracy against the brave. It’s the age-old struggle - the roar of the crowd on one side, and the voice of your conscience on the other.
—
“Could I have but a line a century hence - crediting a contribution to the advance of peace, - I would gladly yield every honor which has been accorded me in war”
—
-=-
By Walt
March 28, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this
“The Repugnant Party is terrorist-enablers!”
That’s true, but not intentional.
The Bush Cabal sold out to Israel and AIPAC. Tey co-opted our military for the securing of Israeli strategic objectives.
Unfortuately, Israel’s leaders are as bad as ours.
Walt
By Dusty
March 28, 2007 12:16 PM | Link to this
UH oh…five minutes are up..I have to tell rushncap that I SUPPORT THE TROOPS.(You know how he forgets.)
As to relevance, Anonymous put it so well: rushncap is SUPERFLUOUS.
By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this
Walt,
Too bad your boyfriend Patton isn’t in charge. He’d rescue those Brit soldiers in Iran, although you would probably try to sleep with them.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 12:21 PM | Link to this
Goldie: They never answer my questions. It is why they lost the moderates and conservatives.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this
“By Jeff
March 28, 2007 12:04 PM | Link to this
Past time to hang Bush and his goons.”
Now, now.
Only after due process.
Walt
By IVAW
March 28, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this
Response to Bush’s Escalation Speech by Jason Lemieux Sat, 01/13/2007
In his recent speech, the President referred to tactics that many in the military are familiar with, including ‘clean and sweep’ and door-to-door home “visits” by U.S. military personnel. These approaches have failed miserably during the nearly four years of occupation, and have served to alienate and enrage the Iraqis against the U.S. presence in their communities. Clean and sweep operations haven’t worked, and they never will. The problem, contrary to what Bush states, is not that we have neglected certain areas or haven’t remained in one area long enough to ‘hold’ it after the sweep. The problem is that this is not a war of geography in which terrain can be “cleared” of resistance and “held.”
The people that Bush tries to paint as ‘terrorists’ are really local antagonists. They are citizens of Iraq who feel that the U.S. military is so oppressive that it is worth destroying one Humvee at a time. When sweeps are conducted the insurgents merely go to ground, sitting passively in their homes with their families as our soldiers rifle through their belongings in a vain attempt to find contraband that isn’t there, or is so well hidden that it would take far too long to uncover in the sweep of such a large area. They will always have more time to hide than we have to search. The entire time, American soldiers wearing full body armor and supported by armored vehicles and aircraft are breaking down doors, pulling up carpets and otherwise tearing the house apart. They will not, of course, put everything back in its place when they are done. The soldiers will speak directly to women, giving them orders and sometimes even making physical contact in order to get the women clustered together in one room, where they are easily controlled. The damage done to the familial and tribal honor by ignoring the patriarchal rules of this culture causes a hundredfold more harm than the success gained in these sweeps. There are hundreds of thousands of people who have had their houses tornadoed countless times in a vain attempt to find the ‘terrorists,’ and all of them are now supporters of the resistance.
To read the rest of the reasons that Jason thinks Bush’s escalation plan is FUBAR, follow the link to his complete article posted on our website.
By Midori
March 28, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this
Every Man for Himself Bush administration discipline slips further
As George Bush’s tenure winds down, he has started thinking about building his presidential library. Somewhere off the Mission Accomplished Atrium he should put a boxing ring. An administration that came into office boasting of exemplary teamwork looks like it’s going to end in a hail of blame-placing, finger-pointing, and backbiting.
The Justice Department’s White House liaison, Monica Goodling, has refused to testify before the judiciary committee because she is worried she’ll be blamed for the controversy over the eight fired U.S. attorneys. Her lawyer explained in a press release that she would take the Fifth in part because one of her former bosses at the Justice Department was blaming his false testimony on her, claiming that Goodling “did not inform him of certain pertinent facts.”
The finger-pointing over the U.S. attorney firings comes just a few weeks after a long display of it in the Scooter Libby trial. The defense portrayed the vice president’s former chief of staff as the victim of a plot by his former colleagues to make him take the blame for outing a CIA agent. (Goodling mentioned the Libby example as the specter she fears; Democratic senators cited Libby when referring to Sampson’s role.) Like the U.S. attorney scandal, Scooter Libby’s trial was a forum for displaying years of bitter acrimony between different parts of the administration.
All administrations produce unhappy people in the second term. At the end of Bill Clinton’s tenure, George Stephanopoulos and Robert Reich wrote memoirs that were unflattering to some of their former colleagues. The Bush team has already had such disgruntled types: Paul O’Neill, David Kuo, and Richard Clarke. What has changed at this point, though, “is that it feels like it’s every man for himself,” says one former senior administration official.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
“By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this
Walt,
Too bad your boyfriend Patton isn’t in charge. He’d rescue those Brit soldiers in Iran, although you would probably try to sleep with them.”
Patton was blessed to have civilian good leaders.
The civilian leaders we had at the end of the 1930’s were very good.
Seeing a new war coming, they advanced General George Marshall over @ 150 senior generals to be the Chief of Staff in 1940. He had his eye on Patton, Eisenhower, Clark and Bradley, among others.
Good civilian leadership will always trump good military leadership on the other side.
Just ask the Germans.
Walt
By Dusty
March 28, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
Nuked,
Could you condense your propaganda a bit? You really should say whom you are plagiarizing with your “cut-n-paste” jobs.
You don’t have to post ALL the liberal material you receive at one time.
Luckovich has already “egged” the president in his usual political outbursts. Your outbursts are SUPERFLUOUS!! (I love that new word! It fits the liberals here so well.)
By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this
Doom has endorsed Sen.Chuck Hagel for the Republican nomination in ‘08.
Barack Obama will win the democratic nomination.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this
Thanks Dusty. I bet you feel all nice and fuzzy about yourself. You can now feel that you’ve done your part. Certainly the families of all those who have died or have been injured in this useless war are sending you “Thank You” cards as we speak.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this
Man, is Dusty studying for the SATs a few decades too late?
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 12:47 PM | Link to this
Midori: The scandals are eclipsing one another. Everyone has forgotten Jeff Gannon. Rove knows who he is.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this
-=-
Andy -
In your 11:56 post you compared my ideals with the horrible events of that Theocracy and their in-humane treatment of their own nations people.
No sir — I am totally against rulership by religion. I was in protest against the Taliban long before 9-11. I am the one who is outspoken against such a regime, whether it be Muslim, or Christian. And I certainly don’t want to see such things come to the United States.
You sir are the one pushing for merging church and state with religion taught in schools, and for a specific religion being the basis of our nation’s laws. You are the one pushing to make our country a Theocracy!
I fight for seperation of Church and State, and for the rights of every person to have the “FREEDOM” of worshipping (or not worshipping) as they see fit in the religion of their choice.
You sir are the traitor to this country as you would depose the “Constitution” and the “Bill of Rights” to further your own personal liberties while denying others theirs.
You would place this country at risk by spreading our military forces far and wide in matters and things not in the interest of this country, while waving a flag and saying how great it is we waste our national resources while looking good in a “Public Relations Pose”.
Yes I believe in a Very Strong military that can handle any situation, but bogging our forces down in that sandpit called Iraq, is just plain stupid.
Are we prepared if some major event occurs in the world tomorrow?
No we are not!
We would be hard pressed to re-organize our military forces if (God forbid) the United States itself was attacked.
So Andy - You wish to what?
Police the world?
Rule the world?
— Tell all countries how they should run their countries?
Manifest Destiny?
We are the United States of America! Proud to be a diverse and free culture. We all have differing opinions and ideas. But we still live under 1 flag and a set of rules put into place by our founding fathers. We are not Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, or any other country. Nor do we rule them!
Nor should we!
If you wish to support a group of men who scoff at the “Bill of Rights” and our Freedoms while they Empire Build, -Then I call you the real traitor to the United States!
Thomas/PNAC
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this
You liberals have all proved today that you are somewhat unhinged. It must be the wonderful indoctrination sessions you attended at what you euphamistically called “school” or “college.” These institutions must have been run by the same mindless idiots who are now running that Marxist daycare center in the People’s Repugance of Seattle.
Over and over again you prove in your blogs that you hate America first and worst. You enjoy lauding any regime that is anti-American because you are so blinded by your hatred of one man. I wonder how you would have felt if Republicans had done this during WWII? As I recall, many lame Reps, both liberal and conservative, were “isolationists” as were many Democrats, before the war started. Eveyone pulled together and we won. You want defeat at all costs because you believe that defeat would guarantee you political victory. Such a victory would be pyhrric at best. You folks would be the second after practicing Christians that the Islamofascist would stone to death. Your shortsightedness really proves that you are either stupid or just blind. In the end you scare the crap out of me because you could actually get real power and absolutely ruin this country.
By Dusty
March 28, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this
I am also @@ and Buy Danish.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this
Daniel: how bad does a party have to be when one of its top leaders can molest a bunch of underaged staffers, and have this be eclipsed within a couple of months?
By Midori
March 28, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
could you imagine the outcry if, during the Clinton years, it was revealed that a gay prostitute was POSTED in the press corps, trying to pass as an actual journalist?
and that said prostitute’s only reason to be there was to ask silly, pro-admin questions?
and that said prostitute visited the WH
By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this
To all this may concern: Christopher is going to die within the first two episodes of ‘The Sopranos’.
By Midori
March 28, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
could you imagine the outcry if, during the Clinton years, it was revealed that a gay prostitute was POSTED in the press corps, trying to pass as an actual journalist?
and that said prostitute’s only reason to be there was to ask silly, pro-admin questions?
and that said prostitute visited the WH hundreds of times after hours?
I wonder what he was “selling” during all those after-hour visits?
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this
Truff: I’m going to ignore you until you answer two questions: 1) Does it make me a liberal when I question Bush? Does it make me a liberal if I believe Bush is not the sovereign?
By Walt
March 28, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this
“I wonder how you would have felt if Republicans had done this during WWII?”
They did.
In September, 1944, the Republicans pushed the idea that there was no plan for demobilizing the Armed Forces after the war.
It was totally made up.
Walt
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this
-=-
Actually Dusty -
Concerning my post at (12:10)
I was with-holding the name of the “Wonderful War Hero” who made those quotes just to see which of the ChickenHawk Lovers Gang here would be the very first to Swiftboat and Trash:
(Ahem) General Douglas MacArthur
Congratulations for calling him a Liberal!
And just one more quote from him:
“I shall return!”
Thomas/PNAC
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 1:00 PM | Link to this
Done venting, Truth? Feel a bit better about your life now?
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 1:01 PM | Link to this
Walt - you have betrayed yourself as the true anti-Semite that you are. You are pulling the same racist, stupid, lame, inane and repulsive argument put forth by your hero, Adolph Hitler. You are saying that all of these problems are because Bush sold out to the Jews? Who in the World are you, Cynthia McKinney’s campaign manager or maybe Ahmadenijab’s press secretary? Your repulsive screed could have come right out of the pages of “Mein Kampf”.
You are lower than pond scum. I guess you are proud to be of the same party as such great anti-Semites as Theodore Bilbo and James Eastland!
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this
rushnap - no I do not feel better about my life because nincompoop liberals every day are doing their worst to ruin this country and turn it into a new Cuba or Iran. I guess you feel better because you are one of them.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this
{{{By Sir Dullard the Terrorist Enabler March 28, 2007 12:50 PM You are the one pushing to make our country a Theocracy! (This is as far as I could make it through dullard’s manifesto.)}}}
I’ve been attending United Methodist Churches my entire life and I missed the sermon about stoning women to death in front of their children.
In fact, the closest thing I can remember is Jesus saying to some cut throats “let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” (How fitting.)
I’m pretty sure that is the same thing Bush is fixing to tell the Iranians, in his own special way.
They took our people hostage, they bomb our embassies, they kill our soldiers in Iraq.
What more would you like them to do to get your attention, wormy one, burn America to the ground?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this
Dusty,
Supporting sending the troops into a civil war for the forth time, some untrained and not well equipped is hating the troops.
Why do you hate the troops Dusty?
By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 1:06 PM | Link to this
See what did I tell you people? Doom told you that Iran was trying to provoke an attack! They’re televising the captured Brits on Iranian television. Why do you think thy’re doing that? To provoke a Holy War and fulfill their stupid prophecy!!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 1:13 PM | Link to this
The thing now is for American Jews to state clearly that they support the United States more than Isreal.
That’s not asking too much is it?
It is -no- accident that the main architects of this horrid adventure are mostly Jewish.
Most of the PNAC maniacs — or should I say traitors — are Jewish.
Walt
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 1:15 PM | Link to this
Walt - I guess your next post will be SIEG HEIL!
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 1:17 PM | Link to this
{{{By Mr. Stroke March 28, 2007 12:55 PM Daniel: how bad does a party have to be when one of its top leaders can molest a bunch of underaged staffers, and have this be eclipsed within a couple of months?}}}
Who are you talking about, Palmie, Gary Studds the democrat from Florida who got elected 3 times after he was caught with an under aged staffer?
How in the F can a bunch of liberal perverts sit up in here gossiping about the sex habits of a few sicko Republicans.
You wankers put degeneracy on the map.
Honestly, tell us how many cum stains you have on the carpet in front of where you sit.
What makes these jerk offs think that they are better than everybody else?
Do you have a well refined stroke?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 1:18 PM | Link to this
Truth — I would say that I really care that you don’t feel better, but that would be dishonest. And I leave that to your side on this board.
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this
Walt - as many a good Jew or Christian has said to himself when confronted by bigots like you - I know who you are! Go look at a portrait of Satan and you will be looking at your patron. I cannot believe after all we went through over sixty years ago that nitwits like you are still blaming the Jews because they wish to protect Israel. Has it ever occurred to you that they may think that it is the right thing to do? Has it ever occurred to you that 99% of American supporters of Israel think that Israel’s continuing existence is not only the best thing for the Israelis but for the United States as well?
Again, you have betrayed yourself as an anti-Semite, a race-baiter and a true low-life.
By rushncap
March 28, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this
Walt, Jews aren’t the ones who started this. And while some of the people in administration a Jewish, you will find Jews in almost every position of power in this country. Clinton had a bunch of them as well.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 1:24 PM | Link to this
I’ll bet you Repugnant trolls here are really proud of your party for supporting the terrorists in IRAN in the 80’s, what with Ollie selling all of those weapons to them… that’s on top of insisting that America continue its dependence on Middle Eastern oil— you’re obviously just a bunch of terrorist-lovers!
No wonder you were thrown on your arses from Congress in November — you don’t know what you even stand for anymore. It’s all lies, lies, and more lies!
By Not Surprised
March 28, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this
The hypocrisy of the left is unbelievable. The article linked by “Speaking of Easter” @10:40 show how unscrupulous these people are.
First, the website begs you to petition Al Gore to run for President. (Red warning light starts blinking).
Second, the article about creation science museums is written by a former employee of the New York Times. (Danger! Danger! Run Will Robinson! Run!).
In the article, he compares creationism with the Nazi pseudo science of eugenics. The problem with this statement is that the modern eugenics movement was founded by Sir Francis Galton - a cousin of none other than Charles Darwin! Eugenics has its roots in evolution, yet the author is blantently trying to associate it with creationism. And the author of this literary gem has the sheer gall to accuse Christians of rewriting history?
Hello pot, meet kettle.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this
-=-
Andy =- I too am Methodist =- FYI
Death for Adultery
If a man commits adultery with another man's wife, both the man and the woman must be put to death. (Leviticus 20:10 NLT)-=-
[They took our people hostage, they bomb our embassies, they kill our soldiers in Iraq.]
We took their people hostage (enemy combatants), We bombed their cities, We killed their solsiers in Iraq (their country)…
You might also say - WE cast the first stone in Iraq!
Thomas/PNAC
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 1:29 PM | Link to this
{{Go look at a portrait of Satan and you will be looking at your patron.}}
Truth-Denier, you obviously believe in W’s and Rover’s example of how to “win hearts and minds” in America, dontcha? You trolls are just so cute with your insults and hatred for Americans, day after day in the blogosphere… most Americans can’t wait to throw y’all out of the White House, too, in ‘08.
By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this
Homocrats may or may not necessarily molest children or sleep with the same sex more than republicans, what makes them so dangerous is the fact they want to legalize those activities.
By Not Surprised
March 28, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this
And of course that would be “blatantly”, not “blantently”.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this
Flip:
{{{Most Democrats were in agreement until recently on the foolishness of setting a surrender date. Senator Clinton told the Village Voice in early 2005 that she didn’t think “you should ever telegraph your intentions to the enemy so they can await you.” And just last June, Senator Obama made clear he agreed with her at least on this point. “A hard and fast, arbitrary deadline for withdrawal,” he said, “offers our commanders in the field … insufficient flexibility …”}}}
Flop:
{{{Clinton to Back Iraq Deadline In Shift, Senator Supports Measure Setting Withdrawal Date}}}
Firm, unwavering leadership, well, as long as no one objects.
Cowards.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 1:36 PM | Link to this
Goldie - again, you liberals lie by twisting words. I was referring to Walt the anti-Semite. Taking things out of context and using them against people is a cheap trick whether you are a liberal or a conservative. It makes you just a cheap hack.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this
W’s promised veto of the Iraq funding legislation will show America that he is the one who is willing to de-fund the troops — why does the Repugnant Party hate our troops so much?
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 1:39 PM | Link to this
{{{By Sir Dullard The Religious Woman StonerMarch 28, 2007 1:27 PM Andy =- I too am Methodist =- FYI Death for Adultery If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife, both the man and the woman must be put to death. (Leviticus 20:10 NLT)}}}
So how many men and women has your “church” put to death Tommy?
Is this like a weekly fellowship gathering type event?
What an absolute, unbelievable numbnut.
Methodist my as-s.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 1:39 PM | Link to this
{{Taking things out of context and using them against people is a cheap trick }}
Truth-Denier, you need to follow your own advice and take a long look in the mirror. If anyone is using cheap tricks here day after day, you are certainly one of them!
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 1:42 PM | Link to this
Not Surprised @ 1:33— you’re not another one of those anal-retentive spelling dictators, are ya? Poor thing.
By Power of Doom
March 28, 2007 1:45 PM | Link to this
Just watched the video of Brit troops being held in Iran. They where eating Iranian food and forced to write letters to loved ones and the UK govt. Just thought I point that out since none of you here on this blog seem interested. Guess you can’t get interested if there’s not around the clock hype involved.
By Dusty
March 28, 2007 1:46 PM | Link to this
Awwww..IVAW..another cut-n-paste job..(one who called terrorists “local antagonists”!)
then Midori… plagiarism..
rushncap…hey..I SUPPORT THE TROOPS!
Nuked, Thomas, somebody..
still TOO LONG, cut it short. By the way, we won WWII just like we will win the Iraq War. The WWII troops were supported by all Americans. Now we have all the retreat-is-good-for-America goof offs.(MacArthur wouldn’t like that.) Makes a difference but we will win anyway.
getalife,
Did the Feds turn over the 500 pounds of weed for your disposal?? Sounds like you are doing a good job. puff puff…
By regulator
March 28, 2007 1:50 PM | Link to this
Bush just withdrew the nomination of another scum-ball he tried to appoint, if this adminstration weren’t so sad and dangerous, it would be hilarious.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 1:58 PM | Link to this
Saudi King Abdullah, whose country is a close US ally, on Wednesday slammed the “illegitimate foreign occupation” of Iraq in an opening speech to the annual Arab summit in Riyadh.
“In beloved Iraq, blood is being shed among brothers in the shadow of an illegitimate foreign occupation, and ugly sectarianism threatens civil war,” Abdullah said.
He also said that Arab nations, which are planning to revive a five-year-old Middle East peace plan at the summit, would not allow any foreign force to decide the future of the region.”
Geez, w lost his holding hands lover.
Yes Dusty,
Weed helps the pain in your chest after open heart surgery.
It is not Cuban cigars but better for pain.
By Midori
March 28, 2007 1:58 PM | Link to this
Um, Dusty
By Randy
March 28, 2007 2:10 PM | Link to this
Mikey - Your frvuckin librul fans here are straight from Hallowienies III. They have their heads up the a* of you and their dear leader in Iran.
No wonder they can’t see. They’re in a dark place.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this
candy,
Tis a dark place you dwell up w’s as-s.
Come out and take a breath of reality.
Geez.
By regulator
March 28, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this
Charles Rangel, best line of Bush admin., speaking of Bush, ” He pretty much shatters the myth of white supremacy”
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this
Did you see the Chimperor on TV saying he’ll veto the bill setting a hard date for withdrawal from Iraq (not Afghanistan, neo-conmen and women. We SHOULD be in Afghanistan).
Did you see how his beedy little eyes darted around the room and he bit his lip like a little kid that knows he’s doing bad!!
But, I’m sure all the neo-con multiple-personality bloggers on this site just love his “F the will of the American people.” Man, he sure showed us liberals, didn’t he!?!
Cutting our constitutional rights and running from the truth!
Punta! Scheistkopf!!! A modern-day Hedley Lamar!!
By Take George with you
March 28, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this
Boy i am damn glad i didnt move to Georgia when i was offered the chance. Reading this blog shows me that the education level in Georgia has dropped dramatically. The GOP lovers facts are way off base with the rest of the world. I have never seen people so in love with political parties instead of their country.
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 2:26 PM | Link to this
Goldie - I defy you to find one instance when I have ever pulled the cheap trick you just pulled. Pointing the finger at another and saying “he did it too” is too elementary school for a grown person.
I also noted that Walt did not reply. I guess he is too busy attending a bund meeting!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this
“Flip:
{{{Most Democrats were in agreement until recently on the foolishness of setting a surrender date. Senator Clinton told the Village Voice in early 2005 that she didn’t think “you should ever telegraph your intentions to the enemy so they can await you.” And just last June, Senator Obama made clear he agreed with her at least on this point. “A hard and fast, arbitrary deadline for withdrawal,” he said, “offers our commanders in the field … insufficient flexibility …”}}}
Flop:
{{{Clinton to Back Iraq Deadline In Shift, Senator Supports Measure Setting Withdrawal Date}}}
Note the distance between these two events. Two years.
It is way past time to get Bush’s dead hand off the control of our military.
Walt
By Little Right of Center
March 28, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this
Goldie, I think that SNL has coined a phase that describes you to a “T”, “Goldie, You Ignorant Slut” !
If you thieves would quit trying to steal the taxpayers monies with all the non military pork, then the President would not veto your stupid bill.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this
w will note veto the funding for his disaster.
He is lying as usual.
Geez.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this
“Walt, Jews aren’t the ones who started this. And while some of the people in administration a Jewish, you will find Jews in almost every position of power in this country. Clinton had a bunch of them as well.”
The main PNAC players are Jewish.
Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle, KrsitoL, others.
A lot of the important players are Jewish.
Cheney’s not Jewish but he’s gotten $40,000,000 from Halliburton.
Bush is a puppet.
Any comments on the merits?
If I am right - and I am - things are going great in Iraq for the people who pitched this war.
Walt
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this
-=-
(apologies in advance if this post twice)
-=-
No Andy —
My church has not put anyone to death and by the “Bill of Rights” I plan to keep it that way - so that NO church will be ruling this country and have the ability to put people to death.
(Although there was that little thing in Salem a few years back…)
We are not a Theocracy and I surely do not wish us to become one - The Seperation of Church and State is a must!
-=-
Awww Dusty - I thought you liked the “Superfluous” verbage….
Although Dusty will superfluously inveigh a panoply of boondoggle sycophantic patriotism invectives, and will foist upon us her verbosity of lexicon based concomitant and non apropos nor succinct verbiage that she can grok, she will continue to claim lèse-majesté while taking ablutions from the truth as if in a balneology while acting like a colporteur shill for absolution of the star-chamber chimera and prevaricate victory nostrum of a draconian conspiracy until the internal inferno has become ice.
By the way - What War?
Are we at war with Iraq?
Then shouldn’t we be killing them??
Looks like our troops are being police!
Declare Victory in Iraq already and bring the troops home!
Let the hired guns of Haliburton (BlackWater) do the policing of Iraq from now on!
Cheers —
Thomas/PNAC
By Midori
March 28, 2007 2:39 PM | Link to this
Mr. Bush takes the fifth
By Walt
March 28, 2007 2:42 PM | Link to this
“By Little Right of Center
March 28, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this
Goldie, I think that SNL has coined a phase that describes you to a “T”, “Goldie, You Ignorant Slut” !
If you thieves would quit trying to steal the taxpayers monies with all the non military pork, then the President would not veto your stupid bill.”
Even Bush hasn’t said that is the reason.
You can’t even remember what you hear on FOX.
Walt
By bon scott
March 28, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this
By Buy Danish - March 28, 2007 8:20 AM - Huh?????What current event does this cartoon refer to? Didn’t the Democrats just receive $124 Billion in bribes from Nancy Pelosi to vote for the Surrender Date Certain Iraq funding bill?
Another lie from another chronic liar. Still can’t get over the 9/11 trouncing?. Which was Bush’s faul? Take some of Andy’s meds. Maybe they’ll help. Maybe.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this
Let’s talk non-military pork!
Billions of $$$ in tax breaks for the super-rich!!
Billions upon billions for corporate welfare!
Billions upon billions siphoned off to Halliburton, KBR and others so they could:
— Create a mercenary army in Iraq that does not have to abide by the Geneva Convention or the Army Escalation of Force Rules. Nor are they counted as casualties in the official DoD body counts.
— Create clandestine airlines to fly people to torture prisons all over the world.
— Deny basic human rights and act as police, judge and jury to people THEY deem to be the “enemy!”
There’s probably half a trillion $$$ down the tubes due to non-military pork.
Bush esta un Punta!
By Dusty
March 28, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this
Before I leave for the afternoon..
Regulator,
Anyone who quotes Rangel has got to be a comic themselves.
getalife,
Oh,yes, therapeutic weed smoking! Must be your Louisiana voodoo docs. No doctors here prescribe illegal hemp intoxicants for heart patients.
It does explain a lot of your posts. And maybe other liberals also?
By Walt
March 28, 2007 2:45 PM | Link to this
“By Truthsayer
I also noted that Walt did not reply. I guess he is too busy attending a bund meeting!”
Any comments on the merits of what I said?
If the objective was to fulfil Israeli objectives and not American ones, things are going -great- in Iraq.
Walt
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 2:47 PM | Link to this
{{{By Walt March 28, 2007 2:27 PM Note the distance between these two events. Two years.}}}
wally: You are a prime example of what has gone wrong with George Bush.
Didn’t I explain to you yesterday that it would behoove you to not continue to try to debate me, that I would reduce you to being a neuter with very pronounced high pitched whine like bull dy-ke Hillary has?
I don’t know why I keep extending the olive branch to your goofy as-s, you haven’t the sense to accept it.
But no, like Bush, I am “compassionate” and cannot find it in my heart to blow your doors off, even though you keep biting my hand like some raving lunatic.
Just look at how ridiculous your response is^^.
It’s like toying with a mental retard, I never have, and I’m not about to start.
Shoo.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this
Why am I read “them” when talking about Jews?
Aren’t y’all proud that you believe America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles (whatever those are these days!).
If so, Jews are “us,” not them.
Another reason religion fails; such inherent exclusivity and, thusly, a perceived superiority!
“Show me why you reject all other gods and I shal show you why I reject yours.”
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 2:53 PM | Link to this
-=-
That’s the funny thing about it Truthman —
The Muslim God and The Christian God are the same god. Jesus is even considered a prophet by the Muslims.
Amazing how Man can go to war and do so much evil in the name of GOD!
So —
All we are saying (Mr Bush) is give peace a chance!
Thomas/PNAC
By Walt
March 28, 2007 2:54 PM | Link to this
“Truth Misnomer:
Walt - you have betrayed yourself as the true anti-Semite that you are. You are pulling the same racist, stupid, lame, inane and repulsive argument put forth by your hero, Adolph Hitler. You are saying that all of these problems are because Bush sold out to the Jews?”
I am not saying that at all.
Bush is a puppet.
Cheney sold us out to the Jewish lobby, definitely.
Any comments on the merits?
Things look great in Iraq — if you are Israeli.
Walt
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 3:00 PM | Link to this
{{{By Sir Dullard The Woman Stoner March 28, 2007 2:38 PM No Andy —My church has not put anyone to death and by the “Bill of Rights” I plan to keep it that way - so that NO church will be ruling this country and have the ability to put people to death.}}}
How many men and women has your “church” wanted to put to death Tommy?
Dullard.
How do you like this, at 12:50 punk as-s Thomas was telling everyone that the United States was an veritable orgy of torture and now, 2 hours later, he’s telling us that he’s the only thing standing in the way of the United States torturing, uh, “someone.”
What a wanker.
Do you record the sound of your own voice Tommy?
And listen to it all night?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Socrates
March 28, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this
Just because you recognize that Isreal’s interests are not always the same as ours, and simply because you don’t ascribe to the idea that God entitled the Jews to that strip of land doesn’t make you an anti-Semite.
I am no anti-Semite, but I recognize that Isreal is all to happy to see us use our military to protect its security. Further, they trust that we will keep doing just that because if Isreal has to start flexing its muscle it will destabilize the friendly oil rich states and cost us money and perhaps put militant Islamists in control of more and more resources. This is an unfortunate situation we are in with respect to Mid-East policy, but you shouldn’t be called names simply because you identify the issue.
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 3:09 PM | Link to this
Walt - you are a true anti-Semite. Give me the evidence that Cheney sold out. I know about your wet-dream fanatasies of Bush being a puppet. I guess that you think that Clinton was bought by the Jewish lobby too? Your argument is disgusting and is only worthy of a blindly biggoted anti-Semitic, vile, nasty, s.o.b. who has yet to be poddy trained! Your lame excuse for such vile accusations are exactly the types of arguments used by Hitler and other anti-Semites sixy to seventy years ago. Again I tell you, I want you to give me one REAL example of how Cheney “sold us out” to the Jewish lobby, you Cynthia Mckinney loving piece of feces?!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
“Walt - you are a true anti-Semite. Give me the evidence that Cheney sold out. “
$40,000,000 and a milti-million dollar house on Chesapeake Bay.
But his actions make no sense in any other context.
Walt
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
-=-
Thats not the church doing torture - thats the Think-Tank conspiracy boys of the PNAC that thought of that one and how to hold prisoners (hostages) outside of the law!
Cheers Andy - for your spin’
Thomas/PNAC
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
Socrates - Walt’s accusations are right out of “Mein Kampf” and frankly your excuses are just as bad. Most people who support Israel sincerely believe that what is best for Israel is also in our interests. Israel is the ONLY functioning democracy in the Middle East. Yes they support what we are doing in Iraq because they believe that it will lead to peace - which is NOT what radical Islamists want. This inane argument that somehow we have “sold out” to the Israeli lobby is something that anti-Semites on the left and the right have been pushing all of my life and it is disgusting. You are putting yourself in the same catagory as such luminaries as Senators Bilbo and Eastland and Fulbright and even Pat Buchanan, a man that even Newt Gingrich classified as a fascist. Go attend your bund meeting now.
By RE
March 28, 2007 3:20 PM | Link to this
Walt,
A clarification of terms.
The jews are a people, and trying to broadbrush them with an agenda is disingenious
Isreal is a nation, one with it’s own interests. AIPAC does have a strong influence over AEI and other GOP think-tanks. Most of the influence from Israel in government is only from the conservative wing of Israel, we do not get the full picture of Israeli politics.
But I do agree, Israel’s interests should not trump US interests. Israel is not an ally of the US, it is a dependent.
By regulator
March 28, 2007 3:21 PM | Link to this
Truthsayer is Buy Danish. She couldn’t or wouldn’t recognize the truth or reality if it slapped her in the face. She’s pitiful and idiotic.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 3:22 PM | Link to this
Speaking of selling out, Lou Dobbs going after free trade in Washington was excellent work.
w’s free trade agenda is terrible for real Americans.
He is the only one reporting on the North American Union and w’s disastrous free trade bs.
Nice work Mr. Dobbs.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 3:24 PM | Link to this
“By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this
Socrates - Walt’s accusations are right out of “Mein Kampf” and frankly your excuses are just as bad.”
What I have said is the only thing that makes any sense.
What’s wrong? I am saying that the war is going great.
Don’t you agree?
Walt
By Truthsayer
March 28, 2007 3:29 PM | Link to this
I AM NOT BUY DANISH, but I do not mind be compared to her, she’s a smart cookie.
getalife - I guess you hate Clinton too? He got the NAFTA through a Democrat controlled Congress with Republican support after all! It was also backed by every living former President at the time, even ole Dummy Carter!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this
“The jews are a people, and trying to broadbrush them with an agenda is disingenious”
What I am saying is that some American Jews have put the welfare of Israel above that of the United States.
Who skewed the intel inside the Pentagon - Feith, a Jew.
Who told Congress that General Shinseki was wildly off the mark in his estimate of troops needed to subdue Iraq — Wolfowitz - A Jew.
Who said — on 9/11 — that we should attack Iraq?
Wolfowitz.
It walks like a duck, it talks like a duck.
It’s a Jewish duck that saw a way to stop Saddam funding the families of suicide bombers who attacked inside Israel.
Remember when there was a whole spate of attacks on Israeli buses and markets?
Those attacks on buses and markets have pretty much stopped.
All they needed was our Armed Forces to do it.
Walt
By getalife
March 28, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this
Make no mistake, supporting sending the troops for the third or forth time into a civil war, without proper rest, training, equipment and health services if they are injured, is hating the troops.
Why do wingnuts hate the troops?
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 3:41 PM | Link to this
I hate to say it, my progressive friends, but the whole free trade debacle began under Clinton.
I remember the debate when Clinton and Bush the Elder both stated they supported NAFTA. That’s when Ross Perot delivered his famous “Sucking Sound” retort.
Ol’ Ross was right-on about that one!!
Of course industry is going to go overseas if they can get the same work done for 1/10th the price and don’t have to adhere to U.S. labor laws!
I read that in “No $hit” magazine!
That all said, Bush is not off the hook for trying to destroy the American middle class!
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this
{{it would behoove you to not continue to try to debate me,}}
“debate”????
ROFLMAO! A debate is impossible when one side is a fool like you, Dull.
By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!
March 28, 2007 3:47 PM | Link to this
-=-
“Where does he get those wonderful toys!”
http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/1186/8611002.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/boles1010.html
-=-
By getalife
March 28, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this
Ross was right and w sees that it is not working yet he is trying to fast track more free trade and form a North American Union.
He does this for a corporate utopia agenda.
It would be a good question to ask the candidates if they support the North American Union.
If they support it, you will know where their loyalties lie.
Its not with the real American people.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 3:51 PM | Link to this
Truthman @ 3:41 — you are correct.
See, that’s the difference between the liberals and the rightwing extremists here. The liberals always know where the truth lies, no matter who the President is. A similar thing occurred in ‘68 when it was the liberals who told Pres. Johnson that he would not be supported if he ran again for the presidency, and that’s why Johnson withdrew from the race.
Liberals don’t cheerlead for bad presidential policies, as opposed to what the rightwing extremists do — they always fall in line and salute their party leaders no matter how bad they are and how much harm they are causing America!
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this
Socrates @ 3:03— thanks for posting. It’s always good to get Socrates’ perspective on the today’s issues!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 3:58 PM | Link to this
“Goldie Sends:
Liberals don’t cheerlead for bad presidential policies, as opposed to what the rightwing extremists do — they always fall in line and salute their party leaders no matter how bad they are and how much harm they are causing America!”
Good catch, Goldie.
The Rethug faithful act like “good” Germans adn then call everyone else Nazis.
Walt
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this
{{Yes they support what we are doing in Iraq because they believe that it will lead to peace}}
Truth-Denier, you and your Jewish friends really believe that our occupation of Iraq is going to lead to peace? Really? You still believe that fairy tale?
Wow. Your problem is really bad, Dude. Thousands of years of tribal wars in the Middle East, and you still believe that an American occupation is going to change that?
What exactly is your definition of “peace”, please?
By getalife
March 28, 2007 4:03 PM | Link to this
Pelosi to w:
“Calm Down With The Threats, There’s A New Congress In Town”
Bwhahahahaha!
By Midori
March 28, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this
Anyone who refers to Hag Danish as a “smart cookie” is one delusional, simple-minded, mentally challenged SOB.
By RE
March 28, 2007 4:13 PM | Link to this
Anyone want to start taking bets on how long it will take before the wingnuts turn on Pat Tillman’s mom?
I see a Cindy Sheehan type smear campaign coming up.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this
“Calm Down With The Threats, There’s A New Congress In Town”
The scandal with the USA’s shows the way the Bush White House has acted for the whole first 6 years they were in office.
That is a scary thought.
Walt
By Big, Big, Big Spenders
March 28, 2007 4:28 PM | Link to this
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Fiscal conservative Steve Forbes on Wednesday endorsed former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani’s bid to become the Republican nominee for president in the 2008 race for the White House.
Gak, cough, sputter, thump- Oh sorry, I was laughin so hard my a$$ fell slap off! Now the Republicans are gonna run a liberal for President. Hell, all the liberals have to do to get one of their boys elected is to call him a Republican.
Now that the Republicans are totally out of the closet, maybe Ted Kennedy will switch parties. Then we would have all the big, big, big spenders all together and they can all go……….shopping!
By @@
March 28, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this
rushncap @ 11:56:
(((When was the last time you posted something relevant? “Lib’ruls suck” does not really count, sorry.)))
My first post this morning, offering ml some other topics. Gawd knows he’s overdone this one.
Union intimidation of employees.
Rebirth of the ERA.
Democrats siding with lawyers for the 6 imams allowing lawsuits against the passengers who reported their concerns.
A quick little exchange with Walt, questioning where his loyalties can be found.
Credit to six brave Iraqis who are trying to encourage peace at the risk of their own lives, and the lives of their families.
Quick little exchange with Getalife giving my take on the 15 british sailors being held in Iran.
Pointed out to Truthman that our oil dependency is partly due to environmentalists.
Pointed out to Walt that Bush does not give in to emotions, but instead keeps his eye on the objective in Iraq.
Commended Dusty for her steadfast support of America.
Now…let’s look at your “substance” today. Oops, nevermind ^^^ bad word choice (substance).
Anyway, you come in first thing “all pumped up”….damn….scratc-h t-hat. Nooooo, don’t “scratch it”…somebody might be watching.
Ummmmmmmmmmmm, “lathered up”, “worked up”?
See rushncap, nothing works with you. You’re just “A DRIP” in more ways than I care to think about.
I’ll give credit where credit is due. You did say something worthwhile at 1:24. It was something that all the conservatives already knew, but I’m sure, Walt (a liberal), appreciated your efforts.
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this
I SUGGEST TILLMAN WAS FRAGGED
HE HAD GONE ON RECORD AS SUPPRTING KERRY AND AGAINST THE INVASION IN IRAQ
NOT THE POSTER BOY THE ADMINISTRATION WAS LOOKING FOR>
By Walt
March 28, 2007 4:33 PM | Link to this
“By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this
I SUGGEST TILLMAN WAS FRAGGED
HE HAD GONE ON RECORD AS SUPPRTING KERRY AND AGAINST THE INVASION IN IRAQ
NOT THE POSTER BOY THE ADMINISTRATION WAS LOOKING FOR>”
His buddies wouldn’t frag him. I don’t buy your idea at all.
Walt
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 4:37 PM | Link to this
RE: Thank you for t for the entry on Stauffenberg yesterday. His is a fascinating story. Born into an aristocratic family. He lost a eye and arm in North Africa. A staunch conservative he supported Hitler into 1944. He then turned and planted the bomb in East Prussia that almost got Hitler. Later he was hung along with the others. Today there is a memorial to him and the resistance. They are referred to as the Deutsche Widerstand. Or, German Resistance. I look forward to the movie. No one cares about Scientology. Cruise puts on make-up and pretends to be someone else.
By RE
March 28, 2007 4:38 PM | Link to this
@@, for future reference, please take a look at the CIA world fact book detailing the Production
and consumption
Now in your opinion, do we have more of a production problem in the US or a consumption problem. Please note the values for Mexico and Canada in the rankings, out two safest and closest sources of foriegn oil and also that they are net exporters.
By Goldie
March 28, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this
I saw a brief interview with one of Tillman’s platoon buddies a few nights ago, and I believe him when he stated that it was a tragic mistake and everyone in the platoon knew what had happened right away. They were told by superiors to keep their mouths shut about it. He was near tears himself in speaking about it in the TV interview.
Mrs. Tillman is outraged that her son’s death was used by this administration as a recruiting tool, and she has every right to be outraged!
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 4:43 PM | Link to this
WALT
I DONT WANT TO BELIEVE IT EITHER
BUT HIS UNIFORM AND DIARY WERE BURNED BEFORE THEY COULD BE RETURNED TO HIS PARENTS
IT HAS HAPPENED BEFORE
REMEMBER THERE ARE RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS IN THE SERVICE ALSO (AND CRIMINALS
HIS MOTHER CONSIDERS IT A POSSIBILITY
By @@
March 28, 2007 4:43 PM | Link to this
IN THE NEWS:
Odd that you would mention the Tillman story.
Earlier this morning I ran across a letter published somewhere. It was from someone presently serving, or retired from the military. He had plenty of criticism for everyone. Military, Bush administration, Democrats, anti-war activists
He said he was sick and tired of the way EVERYONE was exploiting the death of Pat Tillman to further their personal agenda.
The guy said Pat Tillman was a member of the military who chose to serve his country and did so admirably. He deserved to be remembered for THAT REASON more so than any other.
I agree with him.
By IN THE NEWS
March 28, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this
@@
TILLMANS MOM AGREES HE”S BEEN EXPLOITED
HER PERSONAL AGENDA IS TO GET TO THE TRUTH
I SUPPORT THAT, DONT YOU?
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 4:47 PM | Link to this
Goldie: Yet again, the voice of reason cuts through the hogwash. The outrage of the Tillman family is justifiably toward the military and Pentagon who attempted to buil the war hysteria on Pat’s death. Shameless rat republican cowards, afraid of the truth.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this
{{{By bon scott
March 28, 2007 2:43 PM | Link to this
By Buy Danish - March 28, 2007 8:20 AM - Huh?????What current event does this cartoon refer to? Didn’t the Democrats just receive $124 Billion in bribes from Nancy Pelosi to vote for the Surrender Date Certain Iraq funding bill?
Another lie from another chronic liar. Still can’t get over the 9/11 trouncing?. Which was Bush’s faul? Take some of Andy’s meds. Maybe they’ll help. Maybe.}}}
Wow.
Sybil Bon Scott,
Where is the “lie” in my statement? Are you denying that there is $124 BILLION in bribe money? Or is the “Surrender Date Certain” untrue in your estimation?
What does my statement have to do with 9/11? NOTHING??
Where do I say anything about “faul”s? NOWHERE?
What do I have to do with Andy? NOTHING?
Where is the evidence that anyone other than YOU are on “Meds”? NOWHERE?
What a pathetic, obsessed, loser you are.
Regulator,
I am not Truthsayer. Get a new hat - your antennae is broken.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this
{{{By Goldie March 28, 2007 4:39 PM I believe him when he stated that it was a tragic mistake and everyone in the platoon knew what had happened right away. They were told by superiors to keep their mouths shut about it. He was near tears himself in speaking about it in the TV interview.}}}
O.K. so we’ve totally forgiven the people that shot him to death by “accident,” the ones that sane people would say are like, you know, most responsible for his death, but we can’t forgive those who first thought of sparing Tillman’s family the details of the forgiven ones mistake.
So what’s the witch hunt for?
The army said no impropriety?
Oh, I forgot something, Bush Derangement Syndrome, oh yeah, that’s it.
The moonbats think they can somehow pin this on Bush.
Never mind, now I see why Goldi felt the need to vomit all over the Tillman family’s grief with her politically motivated puke.
How gross.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By RE
March 28, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this
Fun clip, it is long, of the director of the GSA being questioned in the house.
So let me get this right, if you are a Bush appointee, is it required to have “no recollection” of anything you have done?
Dirty dirty dirty, using public funds to support GOP candidates. I have to believe that Rove and others truly believed that the GOP would never lose power, it isn’t just that they violate the law, it is that they do it so blatenly
By @@
March 28, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this
IN THE NEWS:
Could you please use an inside “type” (voice).
Of course I agree, but I’d like to see the media and everyone else allow that to happen in private. If Mrs. Tillman wants to share with the public after the findings. Great!
RE:
Clearly consumption is our biggest problem. I don’t disagree with that. I personally do everything I can to limit mine. I’ve been doing that for 15 years. You can’t force people to conserve though. You’d stand a better chance with businesses.
Liberal Californians loooovvvveee their cars.
It should have been addressed 30 years ago and environmentalists have stood in the way of progress in the field, so to speak.
For the time being, I’m wanting to buy us some leeway while we explore other options. With Latin America and Russia moving towards government owned oil, I wouldn’t want to be dealing with them anytime soon.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 5:07 PM | Link to this
BD: There’s nothing wrong with you that a couple tours in Iraq wouldn’t cure. What was General Patraeus talking about when he said, “This is not amenable to a military solution”. You fall way too easily for the jingo rhetoric. We were bamboozled into this. It is now time to hold Bush’ feet to the fire. Bring the troops home, right now!
By Walt
March 28, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this
Buy Danish:
“Where is the “lie” in my statement? Are you denying that there is $124 BILLION in bribe money?”
Of course. It’s ludicrous.
Walt
By RE
March 28, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this
Andy,
Come on, it was only a few days ago:
WASHINGTON, March 23 — A Pentagon investigation into the death by friendly fire of Cpl. Pat Tillman in Afghanistan will make recommendations that nine officers, including four generals, be held responsible for mistakes in the way the incident was handled and disclosed, a defense official said.
They found no impropriety in the ->shooting<-
They are holding 9 officers including 4 generals responsible for the way it was disclosed.
Someone more knowledgable than I am please help me with the chain of command here, is the report of the death of a soldier usually overseen by 4 generals? Seems unlikely. Now a decision to change the findings would seem to include more officers than a simple report of what happened.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 5:20 PM | Link to this
Walt & Daniel,
Are you both Sybil Bon Scott now too?
I have no interest in carrying on a conversation with 3 loony tunes at a time.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this
RE: We’re talking about the government here, right?
The same people that deliver death notices to the wrong houses, and have been doing that since the Civil War.
You slobbering idiots smell blood in the water and are insane with raging ignorance for Bush, so you use the Tillman family.
Don’t correct me when you have so many grievous errors in your own conduct dude.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this
BD: Answer one question: What was General Petraeus talking about when he said, “The Iraq War is not amenable to a military solution? See, you cannot answer. In this void you emerge a fool. Bush talks Victory and surrender in so doing he is making a fool of America and you. Will one of you right-wing nut jobs answer the question for BD. If you annot, turn off your computer. It’s nap time. Maybe you’ll feel better a little later.
By @@
March 28, 2007 5:37 PM | Link to this
Daniel:
You’re omitting the rest of what General Petraeus said.
“It cannot be won by military effort ALONE, it must be coupled with diplomatic and economic efforts.”
You guys need to stop cherry picking from statements.
Oh, that reminds me…I think Getalife did that earlier. I’m going back up to see.
By RE
March 28, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this
kid, 4 generals were in on the reporting of tillman’s death.
Not normal. Staged. For political and PR effect. On purpose, not accidental.
That is a bad thing.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 5:40 PM | Link to this
“Someone more knowledgable than I am please help me with the chain of command here, is the report of the death of a soldier usually overseen by 4 generals?”
Four doesn’t seem unreasonable at all. That would take it from division level, through corps, to army and thence to the puzzle palace.
Tillman was in the Rangers, but the chain of command is still going to be something like that.
It’s easy to imagine a cover-up going to the 4 star level.
In fact, it is hard to imagine it -not- going to that level.
Walt
By getalife
March 28, 2007 5:42 PM | Link to this
Since McLiar said we can walk the streets of Baghdad, open the green zone to verify this rhetoric.
Geez.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 5:43 PM | Link to this
@@: My point. Now, explain that in the context of our president’s insistence upon “Victory and Surrender” rhetoric. What is he talking about? In my view, he is, once again wrapped in partisan politics. It is his political a* that he is preoccupied with. The old story of the sacrifical lamb being replayed again. Your with America or your for the terrorists. If your republican your good if your democrat your bad. The democrats are for defeat the republicans are for victory. How long are you going to swallow that crp?
By @@
March 28, 2007 5:51 PM | Link to this
Good grief, it looks like RE and Walt are now exploiting Pat Tillman just to rile us. Maybe for the “fun of it”?
Sorry fellas, this girl won’t play the “exploitation” game with you two.
Getalife:
I found your “omission”. And now, for the rest of the story….
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - The Saudi king sharply criticized Arab leaders Wednesday for divisions and infighting and painted a bleak picture of the bloodshed and turmoil across the Middle East as he opened an Arab summit in the Saudi capital. // King Abdullah said in an address to the delegations that Arab nations are “further from unity than they were at the time of the founding of the Arab League,” the 22-member body formed in 1945 to promote Arab unity. // Abdullah pointed to the bloodshed in Iraq, where he called the U.S military presence an “illegitimate occupation” and warned that “abhorrent sectarianism threatens a civil war.” // “The real blame should be directed at us, the leaders of the Arab nation,” he said. “Our constant disagreements and rejection of unity have made the Arab nation lose confidence in our sincerity and lose hope.”
Those little // <—— slanty things are paragraph breaks since we’re not allowed to serve up spam links.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 5:52 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
If you want me to comment on a statement someone like Petraeus made, you will have to provide a link to the entire statement. I am not going to waste my time trying to find an out of context phrase, never mind comment on it without the benefit of context.
But, since you are obsessed with Gen. Petreaus, perhaps YOU can explain why the Dems in the Senate (and Hagel) approved his nomination unanimously if they had no intention of doing anything but undermining his efforts.
By Walt
March 28, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this
“Sorry fellas, this girl won’t play the “exploitation” game with you two.
When I exploit women I do it with $1 bills.
Walt
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 5:59 PM | Link to this
BD: Our government is trying to find a way out of the Iraq War. The Iraq War quagmire is Americas quagmire. The Middle Class will end up paying the bill. We were told it would cost 2 Billion. We are now in at 500 Billion and counting. What is the mission? What is the projected total cost? What is “victory”? America needs to bring this terrible mistake to a quick end. Listen to the Bush criticism of Clinton on the Bosnian War. Or, pretend this is a democratic war, that might help.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this
{{{By RE March 28, 2007 5:40 PM Not normal. Staged. For political and PR effect. On purpose, not accidental. That is a bad thing.}}}
RE, I guess the depths of Bush Derangement Syndrome elude me, to what end was this guy’s death staged?
For oil?
You need to seriously think about the direction that your life has taken, you’ve been reduced to a slobbering partisan hack that spends all your energy on undermining the same government you leach off of.
That’s a “bad thing.”
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Salman
March 28, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this
I have to admit your pics are very realistic and authentic. Good job keep it up!!
By @@
March 28, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this
Daniel:
I’m not swallowing any crap. It should be dealt with from the point where we stand at present. Move forward, not backwards.
Why does he say what he says? Because the Democrats are so determined to destroy Bush while he’s trying to focus on destroying (discouraging) the enemy.
Hell, if I was Bush, I’d just hit you upside the head with a 2X4 and can the rhetoric.
Your party’s symbol is a “mule”, right? Sometimes you just gotta smack ‘em to get them to move. Mules are mean-spirited and stubborn animals.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this
Walt,
Lap dances are $10.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
Nancy Pelosi just bribed the Dems with $120 Billion dollars. That’s a fact.
I have no idea where you are pulling your numbers from since as usual you provide no links to substantiate your statements, but whatever the cost, it is necessary.
I know you think it’s a spending priority, but you’ll just have to pay for your own daycare.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 6:10 PM | Link to this
Oops, never mind about the green zone.
One soldier and one contractor killed in the green zone.
And of course the head of the UN video.
Geez, keep swallowing those lies wingnuts.
By @@
March 28, 2007 6:12 PM | Link to this
Walt:
$1 bills?
I thought you said you were gay.
Maybe it was Daniel who said HE was gay.
Or maybe it was Daniel that said YOU were gay.
By Politics Aside
March 28, 2007 6:12 PM | Link to this
Iraq’s situation is too complex to describe in a partisan blog. The best you can say is that victory is not impossible, but neither is chaos.
I’d say we’re still in the first inning in iraq, and there’s nobody out, and the beer is warm.
We simply dont have enough data to judge the situation and can only use the Iraq War topic to badger our political opponents, like we know what’s going on and they dont.
Typical political back and forth.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:15 PM | Link to this
Getalife,
What do you think happens in war exactly?
It occurs to me that you don’t know, and everytime you read that someone has died you are shocked by the news.
Maybe you think war means battling it out with the competition for lap dances with the girl of your dreams?
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 6:16 PM | Link to this
@@ You’re mad at democracy. You’re upset with democratic traditions. The Democrats in Congress are getting at the truth. This scares Bush. We were lied into war. There is neither moral nor legal justification for our presence there. Save the pseudo-macho trough talk. No, you wouldn’t pick up anything. You wouldn’t swing it. And you wouldn’t hit anything. I heard that crap as a child. Bush is doing a good job destroying himself. He doesn’t need my help. What is he doing to America? Years ago gal said he was in way over his head. Sad, terribly sad, but true.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this
Politics Aside,
When they open the green zone to all Iraqis and the brand new multibillion dollar embassy is not blown up, that will be victory in Iraq.
Its not that complicated.
Geez.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 6:22 PM | Link to this
Benedict Danish,
Well, I don’t believe anything w, McLiar or the hate party spew about anything.
No credibility.
None.
As far as strip club battles, the one with the most money always win.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:24 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
Did you ever get through 3rd grade? Seriously. Your “prose” is horrendous and painful to read.
I really think that blogging with adults is beyond your capacity.
Maybe you could try blogging with Ronald McDonald.
You could opine about whether Hummers with Happy Meals are bad for the environment.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 6:31 PM | Link to this
{{{By getalife March 28, 2007 6:18 PM When they open the green zone to all Iraqis and the brand new multibillion dollar embassy is not blown up, that will be victory in Iraq.}}}
Baghdad is too close to Iran.
So Iran must be eliminated.
I know this makes you peace loving perverts sad to think of, who will carry on the religious killings in their absence, but it’s something your just gonna have to deal with.
I’m pretty sure Bush is going over their options with them as we speak.
They need to start practicing the “religion of peace” like they tell you idiot liberals they are, or we will make them rest in pieces.
It’ll be like a win, win.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 6:31 PM | Link to this
BD: Don’t read it. You’re part of the reason Bush is at 28% and sinking. You’re part of the reason the republicans got clobbered in November. Adults? All you do is blubber and whine about that which you know not. What you should do is get off your ample behind, turn off the computer and hike down to the VA. Perhaps, just perhaps, if you talked to a vet you might learn something. No, you won’t do that.
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:33 PM | Link to this
Getalife,
I’m happy to hear that you found a place where you were a winner, and it only cost you $10 bucks to collect your prize.
By LuckoDull
March 28, 2007 6:38 PM | Link to this
You know, I didn’t think of something earlier:
With the body barely cold, the Left has begun demonizing the late Pat Tillman. Tillman is the former NFL star who turned down a $3.6 million contract to join the Army Rangers after 9/11. He was killed last month in Afghanistan after Islamist soldiers ambushed his jeep. For most Americans, such noble service would qualify Tillman as a national hero, but it has unleashed a torrent of hatred on the Left. The most recent example is this cartoon from Ted Rall:
This ought to be interesting to see what we can drag up from the dregs of the pinko nation, when they thought Tillman was just an ordinary Joe that got killed by the enemy.
And not a plaything to use against Bush.
I’ll be back with more.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
Liberals are correct.
Repubs are wrong!
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
I’ll tell you what - stop addressing your tedious comments to me then. Okay?
As for my a* - it is not ample in the least, and only a half-witted idiot like you could be dull enough to imagine you actually know what it looks like.
By @@
March 28, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this
Daniel:
OMG, did you just tell me how I feel?
Mad? No, can’t say that I am.
Laughing? You betcha.
Bush is in for two years. I really don’t think the guy cares about the legacy he leaves behind. I think he cares more about giving the Iraqi government time to achieve some sort of opportunity for success.
There are Democrats and Republicans alike who are more worried about their political futures than Bush is.
I swear…that’s the reason I like George Bush. There’s nothing that even closely resembles a politician.
Getalife:
I am going to “DEMAND” that you provide links to your claims from here on out.
You warrant close scrutiny bubba.
BTW, my Mom had open heart surgery and she doesn’t have to smoke pot for pain.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 6:45 PM | Link to this
Liberals are correct!
LuckoDull is wrong!
Andy is wrong!
@@ is wrong!
Dusty is wrong!
RW is wrong!
Mike Luckovich is correct!!
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this
LuckoDull,
Thanks for the link to the Ted Rall cartoon. That just about says it all about the “hearts and minds” of the “patriotic” Left, doesn’t it.
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this
Liberals are correct!
LuckoDull is wrong - again!
Andy is wrong - again!
@@ is wrong - again!
Dusty is wrong - again!
Mike Luckovich is a sage for this age!
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 6:50 PM | Link to this
As always, poor grammar and punctuation by the neo-cons!
Repubs are bad! Libs are good! Never use plastic if you can use wood.
Be kind to strangers. Give good jobs to vets. Recycle glass bottles. Spay, neuter your pets!!
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this
Bwahahahahaha.
Did someone just jack Truthman’s name, or does the idiot think that that counts as a winning argument?
@@,
Everytime I ask Getalife for a link he tells me to look it up myself, without giving the slightest clue where to begin. I’m an accomplished Googler, but even I can’t Google nothing and hope to find something.
He has no facts at his disposal - he just parrots what he reads from the nutroots.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this
@@: Bush cares about oil, money and power. No, it’s not two years. It’s more like 21 months. We’re counting the days. Obviously you are firm in the ever shrinking delusional minority of Bush loyalists. Thank God for the Democratic Congress, Checks and Balances, Oversight, Valerie Plame, Patrick Fitzgerald and David Iglesias!
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 6:53 PM | Link to this
We liberals are on the right side of history!
LuckoDull is wrong - daily!
Andy is wrong - hourly!
@@ is wrong - every minute!
Dusty is wrong - every second!
Mike Luckovich is a sage for the age!
Be advised, though, I don’t hate any of you!
By Truthman
March 28, 2007 6:56 PM | Link to this
I’m just being very immature at the end of the day!!
It fits with some of the drivel I’ve read today.
By RE
March 28, 2007 6:57 PM | Link to this
I swear…that’s the reason I like George Bush. There’s nothing that even closely resembles a politician.
I swear, there is nothing in George Bush that even closely resembles a president either.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this
Why doesn’t the right-wing freak show get off this Blog? Luckovich is running at 90% favorable. You are losers. Go where someone might think you near normal. Andy got one sanity vote. Actually, given his multiple personalities it should have counted as 1/3 vote.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this
Well Andy,
That was almost sane except for the genocide thing.
I think Al-Sadr will return after we leave for Iranian influence and that nice new embassy will be blown up.
I think the clerics inciting terrorism should be arrested for making terrorists threats.
By Politics Aside
March 28, 2007 7:00 PM | Link to this
The cartoons have been very insightful lately, and funny 2
By @@
March 28, 2007 7:02 PM | Link to this
Daniel:
There’s nothing unique about you. Eventually, you all begin to sound like the same conspiracy theorists.
Bush!!!!!!
Money!!!!!!
Oil!!!!!!
Power!!!!!!!
Jews!!!!!!
Too freakin’ funny.
By getalife
March 28, 2007 7:04 PM | Link to this
@@,
Tell your Mom to try it.
It helps but makes you very hungry.
By Daniel
March 28, 2007 7:06 PM | Link to this
@@: There you go again. Nothing was said about Jews. Is there something wrong with you? What are you thinking?
By Buy Danish
March 28, 2007 7:09 PM | Link to this
A perfect follow up to Ted Rall.
Hot new internet trend: Tormenting people with cancer.
Be sure to click on ALL the links and read about what some sick prick did to Cathy Seipp, who died last week.
By Who's To Blame
March 28, 2007 7:13 PM | Link to this
Speaking of DEMANDING!
Bush DEMANDS Clean War Funding Bill
Democratic leaders, determined to force Bush to change course in Iraq, also disputed his contention that Congress would be to blame for any funding difficulties in a war they have vowed to end.
“Why doesn’t he get real with what’s going on with the world?” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “We’re not holding up funding in Iraq and he knows that. Why doesn’t he deal with the real issues facing the American people?”
Pelosi responded to Bush with a blend of conciliation and challenge. “On this very important matter, I would extend a hand of friendship to the president, just to say to him, ‘Calm down with the threats,” she said. “There’s a new Congress in town. We accept your constitutional role. We want you to accept ours.”
Democrats took control of Congress in January after elections framed by voter dissatisfaction over a war that has now claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops and cost more than $350 billion.
“This war must end. The American people have lost faith in the president’s conduct of the war. Let’s see how we can work together,” added Pelosi, D-Calif.
Well there you have it. Bush DEMANDS to have it ALL his own way, while the Democrats “extend a hand of friendship” and offer to “work together”.
Now we will clearly see EXACTLY WHO it is that will be holding up funding for our troops. Whichever side it is that will not compromise and get these funds to the troops who need them will be to blame, plain and simple! He who DOES NOTHING loses!
My bet is that BOTH will end up compromising to get part of what each wants. That IS the way our government is supposed to work but with an ideologue like Bush, who is more than capable of cutiing his (and our) nose off to spite his face, we can only wonder.
By @@
March 28, 2007 7:20 PM | Link to this
Hell Daniel, I was just lumping you all together. You all sound so much alike.
Some other leftist on here was blaming it all on the Jews, PNAC links to the administration, Skulls and Bones??????
I’m just all wide-eyed with wonder at the possibilities you guys present. The sheer power of speculation. The very “meat” of the grey matter.
Wait…I think they call those “meat heads”.
RE:
Bush isn’t the first, nor will he be the last guy who doesn’t meet everybody’s expectations of what “appears presidential”. Clinton appeared very “presidential” but he wasn’t very effective in the face of terrorism.
By RW-(the original)
March 28, 2007 11:25 PM | Link to this
If a blog hour is from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p. m. how long is a blog day? It would seem to make the concept of Monday through Friday obsolete.
I will say the moonbats on this board may need hours that long to recover from the wild fits of vertigo they must go through from their spin. Case in point, and I won’t beleaguer this you can just look it up. When Joe McCarthy held hearings and government officials took the fifth they were labeled by some to either be communists or to have some guilt to hide. The left here derides that and it’s what they sneeringly call McCarthyism, but they can’t wait to label anybody from the Bush administration guilty if they take the fifth. Dizzying indeed !!
Disclaimer: A comment box was open and since I’ve been traveling extensively I have no idea what time it is in human, not blog, hours.
By shadrivers
March 29, 2007 5:56 AM | Link to this
“Someone more knowledgable than I am please help me with the chain of command here, is the report of the death of a soldier usually overseen by 4 generals? Seems unlikely. Now a decision to change the findings would seem to include more officers than a simple report of what happened.”
There were three separate investigations before the one just published. Each investigation was sabotaged by a general up the line.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 8:04 AM | Link to this
So where’s the new BS “work of art?”
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By IN THE NEWS
March 29, 2007 8:07 AM | Link to this
IT POSTED AT 8:04
By George
March 29, 2007 8:12 AM | Link to this
Every time I hear the Jimmy Buffett song Fruitcakes, I thing of Andy/Dull. I wonder why?
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 8:18 AM | Link to this
I was talking to them^^ Prop.
You liberals are some nosey little bastards.
Georgie Girl: Everytime I hear the word homosexual stalker, I think of you.
I wonder why?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 8:24 AM | Link to this
I missed this but still hit the nail on the head:
{{{I thing of Andy/Dull.}}}
Did you mean “I’ve a thing for Andy/Dull,” Georgie?
That’s real sweet.
But I’m spoken for.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By DebbieDoRight
March 29, 2007 8:42 AM | Link to this
Oh No!! Sybill used the “H” word!! Why Sybill why?! Weren’t you the one criticizing the “REAL” right (correct) thinkers on this blog about their use of the word, and now you, using one of your many off-beat (insane) personalities are doing the same thing!! Shame Sybill. Shame. Shame. Shame!
By Swiftvoter
March 29, 2007 8:51 AM | Link to this
As a very wise man once said “There’s a little truth in every joke”!
By History Teacher
March 29, 2007 8:52 AM | Link to this
Daniel - again you and the liberals on this blog need to verify your information before you start spewing stuff. The devil is often in the details. That’s where we catch your sloppy selves. Von Stauffenberg might have been hung, but he certainly was NOT hanged. He was SHOT. He was one of the few conspiritors against Hitler who was given that “privilege.”
Walt - I’ve just been reading this blog this morning and going through all of the stuff you wrote yesterday. Truthsayer is right. You are an anti-Semite. Many more Jews held positions under the Clinton Administration than the Bush Administration and the policies toward Israel are almost identical in many ways. In fact, Bush’s energy Secretary was an Arab-American.
Walt - I think you have a problem. Your rantings yesterday betray a very deep prejudice. You need help.
By Walt
March 29, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this
“Walt - I’ve just been reading this blog this morning and going through all of the stuff you wrote yesterday. Truthsayer is right. You are an anti-Semite. Many more Jews held positions under the Clinton Administration than the Bush Administration and the policies toward Israel are almost identical in many ways. In fact, Bush’s energy Secretary was an Arab-American.
Walt - I think you have a problem. Your rantings yesterday betray a very deep prejudice. You need help.”
I stand by everything I said yersterday.
It is fact based.
If you have something to say on the merits, then let fly.
Israel is committing suicide by abusing our help. Count on it.
Walt
By Goldie
March 29, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this
{{Many more Jews held positions under the Clinton Administration than the Bush Administration and the policies toward Israel are almost identical in many ways.}}
History Rewrite— what has any of that got to do with our 4-year occupation of Iraq? I believe Walt’s posting yesterday was the fact that many members of the PNAC think-tank that promoted Bush’s war were Jewish. How does that make him anti-Semitic, just for stating that they were Jewish? Your statement as I quoted above ^^^ could definitely be construed as anti-Semitic, if I cared to do that…
By Goldie
March 29, 2007 10:03 AM | Link to this
How long has John McCain been showing signs of old-timers’ dementia — has it been since about 2003, or was it even sooner than that???
By Bkackadder
March 29, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this
I am a liberal. I am a Democrat, although no matter what some on the right say, I am not a hard-core partisan. I do look at the issues. I often disagree with my party, especially those stuck on the far left side of the spectrum. I have no desire to be a Republican, but I do not hate people who are. Well, OK I hate some of them, but they are asses. Some of them hate me too - it’s fair. My point isn’t about individuals, but rather the collective - I don’t dismiss someone JUST because they are Republicans. I wait for them to say something right off of Fox News, and then I dismiss them.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this
{{{By Bkackadder March 29, 2007 10:10 AM I am a liberal. I am a Democrat}}}
Glad you could get that off your chest, psycho.
If there was a new cartoon posted^^ I would have “dismissed” your entire comment as I normally do, but since it’s slow this morning, I’m left with a few questions:
Are you always this weird?
How many names do you have, including misspelled versions of “blackadder?”
Do you really believe someone would jack any of your names?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this
Mike must have went to Washington to watch bozo the clown tell stupid jokes and rove dance like an idiot.
Probably sucked without Colbert.
Samson is testifying today. At least he has the balls to testify under oath in an open hearing.
By rushncap
March 29, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this
Stalk — thanks for admitting that it’s too hard for you to even figure out the time. I suspected as much. Passing 2nd grade must’ve been a b!tch for you.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this
RW,
Um, your computer will tell you the date and time.
Geez.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 10:48 AM | Link to this
Sampson said he screwed up, held himself accountable and resigned.
If everybody in this administration did the same, there would not be anybody left.
Geez.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this
Here is my morning prayer today: “Lord thank you for this day. Give me the strength to be Your servant in all things I undertake today. Also, I pray that you hold Kyle Sampson in the palm of your hand. He will testify today before our Congress. I pray that he tells the truth. Also, give Monica Goodling the strength to tell her lawyer to take a hike. She, too should go before the American people and tell the truth. Thank You for Your wisdom and guidance in this. Daniel
By History Teacher
March 29, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this
getalife - concerning your 10:21 post:
Mike must have went to Washington to watch bozo the clown tell stupid jokes and rove dance like an idiot.
Please do not call anyone on here stupid again. This goes beyond the small typos and misspellings and failure to capitalize. “must have went” only proves that you must never have GONE to school and that you got your diploma by fishing it from a box of Cracker Jack!
By regulator
March 29, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this
Sampson has already lied ten times.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:00 AM | Link to this
The Senate just passed the Iraq spending bill.
The hate party is trying to tell the American people why they all voted no to funding the troops.
Geez.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
{{{By getalife March 29, 2007 10:21 AM Mike must have went to Washington to watch bozo the clown tell stupid jokes and rove dance like an idiot.}}}
Luckovich is probably rummaging through Bush’s underwear drawer, if the strength of his recent^^ cartoon’s is any indication of his whereabouts.
Guaranteed, at about 7:00 a.m. this morning, it dawned on these silly as-s idiot pinkos, at least the ones out of bed, that “BS” is not exactly a word that you want gracing the pages of your family “news” paper.
This is not something we will be seeing today.
I’ll bet they sent the delivery truck drivers back out to retrieve.
And, as always, I’ve got my framable copy safely tucked away in the memento drawer.
Right next to all the other left wing candy as-s idiocy.
Yes, it’s so full I can barely close it.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this
HT: You place a preposition before a gerund!
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 11:04 AM | Link to this
Mommy, what does BS stand for?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
The Atlanta Urinal, yesterday’s “news” and today’s democrat talking points:
Gonzales’ former top aide set to testify today that dismissed prosecutors failed to support Bush’s priorities.
They wouldn’t do what the boss says!
Why, how awful!
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
Bush rules over you candy as-ses:
{{{{President Bush yesterday ridiculed House and Senate lawmakers for pork-laden Iraq war funding bills that set 2008 deadlines for full U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq, vowing to veto what he called “arbitrary” limits on U.S. military commanders. On the Senate bill, Mr. Bush noted that “there’s $3.5 million for visitors to tour the Capitol and see for themselves how Congress works.” To loud laughter from the cattlemen, he added: “I’m not kidding you.”}}}}
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
So who’s breaking the law here:
{{{The contrived controversy over the firing of eight U.S. Attorneys is largely an exercise in imaginary indignation. Congressional Democrats suggest that some of the firings may have been improper and demand to know the reasons for each of them. By what authority they make such demand is not clear, since the Supreme Court has ruled that, with limited exceptions, Congress has no voice in the dismissal of federal officers.}}}
Ignoring the will of the Supreme Court?
Should we ignore Roe V Wade too?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
And now to the awards:
{{{As it happened on Tuesday, a close aide of Webb’s got caught in a field of fire and the Senator’s first and last reaction was to cut and run and wash his hands of a fellow Marine. Imagine that. Less than three months into his first senatorial term, he tosses honor out of the window, as if needing to impress Sen. John Kerry. How long before Webb tosses his own medals over the White House fence? It’s a free country, true, but we pray he doesn’t include the Enemy Of The Week pin we’ve now awarded him. The thing is, it’s the last decoration he’s likely to receive. He should treasure it the way we do.}}}
Lock the coward up now!
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By History Teacher
March 29, 2007 11:05 AM | Link to this
Walt - I guess you would be one of those who thinks that “The Protocols of Zion” is a real book rather than a crude forgery and that Ahmadenijad is right to condemn Israel and to call for its distruction? So to save Israel we should withdraw all support, military, financial and diplomatic? Your rantings about “selling out” and other wacko consipiracy theories just prove you are a racist bigot. My friend Truthsayer was right when he called me and asked me to read over this early this morning. It is in the tradition of Cynthia and Billy McKinney as well as Pat Buchanan and the KKK. You are blaming the victims, not the aggressors. You are sick and must have learned this kind of bigotry at your mother’s knee. It’s just pathetic.
By Buy Danish
March 29, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this
Bckackadder of many names disagrees with “people stuck on the far left side of the spectrum”?
Anyone want to guess what Snake’s other blog names are, and how far to the left he let’s them roam?
By History Teacher
March 29, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this
Daniel - that is perfectly proper. That is called an “adverbial prepositional phrase.” It is VERY good English and it is even good Latin.
By Buy Danish
March 29, 2007 11:11 AM | Link to this
Woops. Delete apostrophe after “let”.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this
Andy,
You are babbling incoherently again.
Take your meds.
Why does hate your party hate the troops and voted to cut their funding?
As far as that pork goes, it goes to Americans not Iraq reconstruction.
Why does your hate party hate the American people?
Do you have to hate to be happy?
Thats weird man, especially for so called Christians.
Love and peace instead of hate and murder are real Christian values.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this
I wonder if the candy as-ses will be quoting Novak today?:
Following the example of their Senate brethren last Friday, House Democrats will adopt a budget resolution containing the largest tax increase in U.S. history amid massive national inattention. The breakdown of the bill on the House floor today (resembling the Senate version) raises taxes an average of $1,795 on 115 million taxpayers in 2011. Some 26 million small-business owners would average $3,960 more in taxes. The decreased number of Americans actually subject to income taxes will all be paying higher taxes, and 5 million low-income Americans will be returned to the rolls.
Taking money straight out of your pocket, the pockets of the poor and giving it to Al Gore.
How do you like that decision to stay home on election day 2006, “Republicans?”
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By @@
March 29, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this
Walt:
Are you going through life with “Loose Change” rattling around inside your head and thinking it’s your brain(s)?
Gore has “two marbles” and you have “loose change”.
GFY (Good for you)!
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this
gal: Bush totally misjudges the American people. I suspect the “real” support for Bush is in the low teens. I would say 13%, maybe 14%. Diehard republicans support the party. The public is on to them. Congress should vote to withdraw financial support for the war. The generals will get it. General McCaffery has issued a scathing indictment of the war. “No city in Iraq is safe”.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this
Come on Andy,
Do not hate your own hate party.
Geez, take a vacation.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this
HT: I demur. It is redundant. I prefer an economy of language. “You got your diploma fishing it from a box of Cracker Jack”. Says it all.
By Buy Danish
March 29, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this
How rich! Daniel who doesn’t even write at a third grade level is correcting grammar now?
Here is an illustrative example of Daniel’s butchered prose style:
{{{By Daniel
March 28, 2007 6:16 PM | Link to this
@@ You’re mad at democracy. You’re upset with democratic traditions. The Democrats in Congress are getting at the truth. This scares Bush. We were lied into war. There is neither moral nor legal justification for our presence there. Save the pseudo-macho trough talk. No, you wouldn’t pick up anything. You wouldn’t swing it. And you wouldn’t hit anything. I heard that crap as a child. Bush is doing a good job destroying himself. He doesn’t need my help. What is he doing to America? Years ago gal said he was in way over his head. Sad, terribly sad, but true.}}}
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this
{{{By Daniel March 29, 2007 11:17 AM General McCaffery has issued a scathing indictment of the war. “No city in Iraq is safe”.}}}
Maybe he wants more troops?
I doubt if he’s a skirt wearer like you, wanting to run and hide.
Besides, Senator Webb has issued a “scathing indictment” about the safety of the streets in Virginia and Washington DC, where he feels the need to carry a cannon with him.
Oh, I’m sorry, it wasn’t his gun, hahahaha.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this
Daniel,
Yes, you know you are winning or losing in Iraq if the green zone is safe.
It is not and more attacks are occuring inside the green zone.
If they open the green zone to all Iraqis and the new multibillion dollar embassy is not blown up, we have won the Iraq war.
I do think that will ever happen.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this
History Teacher: When Daniel types all of his tears, snot and slobber rain down upon his keyboard, so he tries to be brief.
Cut him some slack, it can get expensive for him.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this
history teacher,
GFY.
I never claimed to write well.
Fell free to correct my grammer if it makes you feel better.
But looking at the education system in Ga. and their numbers, I would brag about being a teacher in Ga.
Geez.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this
gal: McCaffery’s piece is devastating. Look for a “revolt” of the generals. They are tired of our troops being used by poitical hacks for partisan political purposes.
By @@
March 29, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this
I recall that PoliFore used to be obsessed with “gerunds”.
Then Blackadder picked up the “grammar banner” often referring to misuse of “gerunds”.
Now Daniel?
Talk about Multiple IDs…..
I’d have to guess that there are fewer liberals on this site than meets the eye.
Now THAT’S a desperate attempt to mislead.
Off to work.
By Repub Smackdown!
March 29, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this
Republicans Fear 2008 Meltdown
Republicans across the country are warning that increasing public discontent toward President Bush, the Iraq war and the GOP brand in general threatens to send the party’s 2008 campaign planning into a tailspin.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this
Make that “would not brag”.
By Buy Danish
March 29, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this
Bwahahahahahaha.
Daniel prefers an “economy” of language! That helps explain his juvenile, choppy style. Or maybe @@’s on to something, and it’s an attempt to hide his identity as a multi-id’d poster?
Daniel,
Don’t worry your little head about identifying parts of speech - the ability to identify gerunds is highly overrated. Stick to the basics like creating sentences that flow as easily as your tears.
Getalife,
Um, you are the one who is babbling incoherently. LuckoDull is making perfect sense.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this
Daniel,
Yes, they are being abused and the hate party hates our troops.
The Dems Iraq spending bill addressed 1100 citations in VA care and demands reports to have them all fixed.
The hate party voted no.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this
Benedict Danish,
Andy is hating on you idiot:
“How do you like that decision to stay home on election day 2006, “Republicans?”
Geez.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 11:46 AM | Link to this
BD: Now, now. No one is talking to you. Mind your own business. gal: Kyle Sampson puts the lie to the Justice Department claim that the White House wasn’t politically involved in the ouster of the eight US Attorneys.
By @@
March 29, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this
A quick follow-up to my 11:54…
I forgot to mention the connection between multiple IDs and “paranoid schizophrenia”.
The liberals are an oddity.
An endless source of entertainment.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 11:53 AM | Link to this
Daniel,
BD is not American.
At least Sampson knew he screwed up and resigned.
I am sick of the lies.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 11:59 AM | Link to this
@@: You’re supposed to be at work. Get off the Blog, quit whining about liberals. The “real” support for Bush is at 13%. You’re upset because your losing. You’ve lost the moderates, independants and conservatives. You’re in the crapper. Shut up and get to work.
By Buy Danish
March 29, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this
getalife,
Andy is “hating ON me”? Is that Nawlins talk or something? Seriously, I don’t actually know people who talk in this, er, vernacular. Whatever it is, I hope you don’t tell girls that you want to “love ON them”.
Since I voted, and voted straight Republican, Andy is not talking about me, and I would not use the word “hate” to describe his disapproval of those who wandered during the last election cycle in any case.
Personally, I would call them “idiots”, but hate and rage is an emotion that your side owns.
By Walt
March 29, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this
“By History Teacher
March 29, 2007 11:05 AM | Link to this
Walt - I guess you would be one of those who thinks that “The Protocols of Zion” is a real book rather than a crude forgery and that Ahmadenijad is right to condemn Israel and to call for its distruction? So to save Israel we should withdraw all support, military, financial and diplomatic? Your rantings about “selling out” and other wacko consipiracy theories just prove you are a racist bigot. My friend Truthsayer was right when he called me and asked me to read over this early this morning. It is in the tradition of Cynthia and Billy McKinney as well as Pat Buchanan and the KKK. You are blaming the victims, not the aggressors. You are sick and must have learned this kind of bigotry at your mother’s knee. It’s just pathetic.”
I’d be glad to hear your comments on the merits of the situation.
Walt
By Buy Danish
March 29, 2007 12:10 PM | Link to this
Look at Daniel try to order @@ around. Achtung! Andy had him nailed as the little fuhrer right from the beginning.
Daniel is of the same mold as One Punk in that respect.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this
gal: America is tired of the lies. You reflect the heart of the nation. America is sick of rampant dishonesty, politics and incompetence. America is tired of endless war. America is tired of chicken-hawk republicans. We can thank the Lord for Jim webb, David Iglesias, Alice Fisher, and Nancy Pelosi. One more honest American will make my day. Life is great!
By Goldie
March 29, 2007 12:34 PM | Link to this
{{My friend Truthsayer was right when he called me and asked me to read over this early this morning. It is in the tradition of Cynthia and Billy McKinney as well as Pat Buchanan and the KKK. You are blaming the victims, not the aggressors.}}
Talk about schizophrenia — LMAO!!! “My friend Truthsayer called me… and asked me to read over this”— now that’s schizo!!!
Eeew— what a bunch of creeps the rightwing loonies are!
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this
{{{By Daniel March 29, 2007 12:17 PM gal: America is tired of the lies. You reflect the heart of the nation. America is sick of rampant dishonesty, politics and incompetence. America is tired of endless war. America is tired of chicken-hawk republicans. We can thank the Lord for Jim webb, David Iglesias, Alice Fisher, and Nancy Pelosi. One more honest American will make my day. Life is great!}}}
The democrats haven’t told the truth since Senator Byrd made his acceptance speech as the KKK Grand Kleagle.
JFK was a scoundrel, Carter was a dolt, hell even FDR hid his polio from the nation.
The whole premise of liberalism is based on bullsh-it (or BS! as cartoon boy likes to say,) just take a good close look at political correctness for what Daniella calls “truth.”
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this
Daniel,
Indeed.
Life is great and too short to be hating and judging of others.
Our country is great and we can do so much better than the last six years.
History will not be kind to this failed administration and their supporters.
They are a cancer on our democracy and reputation.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this
Goldie: The creeps are desperate. They know they’ve lost. The ship has deserted the sinking rat. No one trusts Bush. The idiots on this Blog represent the bottom of the barrel.
By LuckoDull
March 29, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this
The only honest “democrat” in the whole freaking party, at any level throughout the entire country, and they tried to run him off:
{{{Sectarian violence is down in Baghdad. The radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has fled. The Mahdi Army, which terrorized Baghdad last year, appears to be splintering. And the Iraqi government — its spine stiffened thanks to our renewed support — is taking the critical steps for political reconciliation. All of us want to bring our troops home as quickly as possible. But decisions in war should be made by our military commanders based on facts on the battlefield, not by politicians in Washington watching the polls.- Sen. Joe Lieberman is an Independent Democrat from Connecticut.}}}
The honorable man that the pinkos have no use for.
His spine frightens them.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
By getalife
March 29, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this
We are in the last throes of the wingnut insurgency.
The new Dem majority will be greeted as liberators when they regain the White House.
We must stay the course to defeat the wingnut insurgency to rid our country of these evil doers and axis of evil.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 1:07 PM | Link to this
Uh-ooh! Another honest man on Capitol Hill! Sampson just testified that the firings were political! He said he was told to install “Bush Loyalists” in the nations law enforcement system.
By RE
March 29, 2007 1:54 PM | Link to this
I keep getting a picture in my head of
Karl Rove
Sitting somewhere saying, “I hate you Kyle”
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 2:10 PM | Link to this
Bush is an extraordinarily weak and awkward man. He surrounds himself with sychophants. The nation is on to him. The republican party is beginning to get it. There is a steady corrosive drip of damning revelations. Each day brings a new scandal that eclipses those of the previous day! Which, in turn overtook the one before. We stopped talking about Irwin Libby’s five Guilty Convictions because that hero: Valerie Plame was before Congress. We aren’t talking about Valerie because Kyle Sampson is telling us the Attorney General lied to Congress and America two weeks ago.
By Daniel
March 29, 2007 5:05 PM | Link to this
Sampson got religion when he heard the Libby verdict.