Mike Luckovich

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 8:11 AM | Link to this

I wonder how all of the left-wingnuts are going to blame this one on Bush and the Republicans in Congress as well, especially since this is a Canadian company with all of that wonderful government overregulation and socialized medicine.

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 26, 2007 8:17 AM | Link to this

I feel very sorry for the folks whose four legged family members have been hurt. Anybody messes with the beasts that live at Casa de Godzilla and they’ll be hell to pay.

But I am worried about the people food chain too.

Seen this?

FDA fails inspection March 16. 2007 6:01AM

Feeling hungry? This may curb the appetite:

An Associated Press analysis of federal records found the Food and Drug Administration, protector of the nation’s food supply, conducted just half the inspections in 2006 than it did three years ago. The same analysis showed that FDA safety tests on U.S.-produced food fell almost 75 percent during the same period.

The news isn’t any better for imported foods, the AP reported. FDA inspectors physically checked 1.3 percent of imports, about three-quarters of the amount inspected in 2003. FDA employees in field offices who specialize in food issues have been reduced by 12 percent.

“We have a food-safety crisis on the horizon,” said Michael Doyle, head of the University of Georgia’s Center for Food Safety, to the AP recently.

From the Gainesville Sun

Government has some uses. A big one is protecting the food supply.

Anybody want a peanut butter and spinach sandwhich?

By Ga Liberal

March 26, 2007 8:20 AM | Link to this

Lame to say the least. I expected Mike to have some insight to the human condition vs this meaningless dribble. It would be better if he had used the tainted dog food and showed it being served to injured Iraq war soliders as a part of Republican cost cutting.

By Patrick

March 26, 2007 8:23 AM | Link to this

This just goes to show what a BAD IDEA this is to outsource some resources of food production. The tainted food was linked to a type of rat poison that is illegal in the US, but not where the farm that provided the wheat supply is located: CHINA. All food production companies, regardless if it’s for human or animal consumption, should use the farms in the US, where the ever-so-wonderful government can have better control over what goes into said food. THese farms are just as capable of producing enough crop for food production as a farm in China or Korea. Right now it’s the US vs. Everyone Else. Who’s to say that a farm in Peru that provides some food we eat may pull the same trick, and kill hundreds of US citizens? Will we decide to use domestic farms then? I’ll bet you the cost will be cheaper in the long run.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 8:26 AM | Link to this

Ga liberal - I’m so glad that you are finally disappointed, but there is something that you must understand: Luckovich is this inane and vacuous EVERY DAY, EVERY CARTOON.

By Ga Liberal

March 26, 2007 8:44 AM | Link to this

What a waste of space. I expected Mike to make commentary on the human condition; not on dead pets. I would have been expecting something like feeding the tainted pet food to wounded Iraq war vets as part of Republican cost cuts at the VA. Or Republican immigrant-bashers feeding it to illegal immigrants. This is just doesn’t measure up to Mike’s usually high quality work.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 8:45 AM | Link to this

Well, after complaining that President Bush second-guessed the generals in Iraq, House Democrats second-guessed the very general their Senate colleagues overwhelmingly approved just two months ago. On Friday, the House passed by only six votes (218 to 212) an emergency Iraq war spending bill that requires withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by August of next year. That’s exactly the type of arbitrary deadline Gen. David Petraeus has said would be counterproductive. But never mind what the general in charge thinks, the House has to embarrass Bush. Priorities, priorities.

Lock the Plame bitc-h up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Idol Worship

March 26, 2007 9:05 AM | Link to this

Bush is great, bush is good, let us thank him for our food.

By Paul

March 26, 2007 9:11 AM | Link to this

Mrs. Godzilla

Have you ever asked people who make the general “government’s too big, cut it” if the FDA’s included? This is what can happen. Usually they backtrack.

Note I said “can happen” - as if one took a look at FDA staffing you might find, oh, one or two inspectors for every 100 or 200 in the bureaucracy. That’s the real issue - not “cut” or “expand” but reallocate resources away from those projects or programs that do not directly support the agency’s mission to those that do. There’s a tremendous amount of “overhead” in every federal agency. The argument doesn’t have to be “cut government” or “we obviously don’t spend enough in these areas - spend more and we’ll fix the problem.”

By Paul

March 26, 2007 9:12 AM | Link to this

LuckoDull - 8:45

“Priorities, priorities?”

How about “politics, politics?”

But they care -

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 9:32 AM | Link to this

How long before the scribbler claims President Bush kidnapped the British sailors to get an excuse for attacking Iran?

Exit question——(since I’m heading out to a job site-rushncap take special note that one day’s 5:00AM is another day’s 10:00, if you have the ability to comprehend that)—-Since Iran has been killing US soldiers for a couple of years and is now kidnapping our closest allies military members, when does the bombing begin?

Bonus question for the moonbats here—Should we surrender now or wait until you authorize a war?

By Kerry

March 26, 2007 9:33 AM | Link to this

As posted on another blog, I’ve always felt guilty that on my budget, I cannot afford Eukanuba and the like for my Cocker and Lab. They are super healthy on the tried and tru Alpo!! But after seeing this, I think I’ll stick with what works. I would be furious if, after paying all of this money for designer dog food, it ends up killing my pet. Menu Foods should be ashamed.

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 26, 2007 9:43 AM | Link to this

Bonus question for the WingNuts here…

Is it possible that there might be something between surrender and war?

Do not confuse choices offered with choices actually available.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 9:45 AM | Link to this

-=-

So RW —

You want to go to war with Iran? —

1) How will you fund such a war?

2) Where will you get the extra troops needed for such a long and protracted engagement of war?

3) Are you suggesting that the USA invade Iran, and thus violate international law yet again?

4) or perhaps are you suggesting nuclear war?

You sir are a clear cut example of a “WarMonger”. War without reasoning out the eventual consequences is insane to say the least.

Any reasonable tactician know that you only pick the fights you can win!

Can you prove that this is winnable?

Thomas/PNAC

By Jesus

March 26, 2007 9:48 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By regulator

March 26, 2007 9:51 AM | Link to this

I agree with Jesus.

By Ga Liberal

March 26, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

What a waste of space. I expected Mike to make commentary on the human condition; not on dead pets. I would have been expecting something like feeding the tainted pet food to wounded Iraq war vets as part of Republican cost cuts at the VA. Or Republican immigrant-bashers feeding it to illegal immigrants. This is just doesn’t measure up to Mike’s usually high quality work.

By @@

March 26, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

This one is funny ml. The husband gets upset when I bring the “doggy bags” home for “My Buddy” (THE mutt).

Maybe the husband feels slighted. He wants to be the only MUTT for me.

Anyhoo ml, here’s some “food for thought”.

Why Hybrid Cars Aren’t Selling Well

“The ultimate irony is that Big Oil may do more for world peace and prosperity than all the posturing of diplomats and world leaders combined.”

I’m curious as to how the liberals would “force” this issue without treading on an individual’s personal preferences.

By Ga Liberal

March 26, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

What a waste of space. I expected Mike to make commentary on the human condition; not on dead pets. I would have been expecting something like feeding the tainted pet food to wounded Iraq war vets as part of Republican cost cuts at the VA. Or Republican immigrant-bashers feeding it to illegal immigrants. This is just doesn’t measure up to Mike’s usually high quality work.

By Ga Liberal

March 26, 2007 10:12 AM | Link to this

What a waste of space. I expected Mike to make commentary on the human condition; not on dead pets. I would have been expecting something like feeding the tainted pet food to wounded Iraq war vets as part of Republican cost cuts at the VA. Or Republican immigrant-bashers feeding it to illegal immigrants. This is just doesn’t measure up to Mike’s usually high quality work.

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

@@ The market will straighten this out. When Arabia and OPEC trade oil in Euro’s gas in the US will get more expensive.

By getaife

March 26, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this

Record profits while real Americans are struggling for big oil is greed.

The tensions with Iran is causing the price go up and war will make it worse.

An investment opportunity is ethanol.

Sugarcane not corn.

By Walt

March 26, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

“By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 8:45 AM | Link to this

Well, after complaining that President Bush second-guessed the generals in Iraq, House Democrats second-guessed the very general their Senate colleagues overwhelmingly approved just two months ago. On Friday, the House passed by only six votes (218 to 212) an emergency Iraq war spending bill that requires withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by August of next year. That’s exactly the type of arbitrary deadline Gen. David Petraeus has said would be counterproductive. But never mind what the general in charge thinks, the House has to embarrass Bush. Priorities, priorities.”

If people remember, Petraeus was the great white hope for training the Iraqi army also, and that was a bust.

The administration has not suggested anything new with the “surge”.

Bush should be impeached over the hash he has made of our affairs.

Walt

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 10:56 AM | Link to this

getalife - If we switch over completely to ethanol, we will still have all sorts of CO2 problems because it is still a fossil fuel. Also, as anyone who is halfway acquainted with the facts about mass agriculture, sugarcane farming is quite damaging to the soil and most if it is grown in the areas where tropical rain forests are allegedly being depleted by the minute.

You are, in effect, advocating a resource which, although techinically renewable, is even more damaging to nayture than the one we use now and which can potentially cause more environmental problems. It is also WAY to expensive to produce and will not be cost effective. Basically, you are talking about making rum in massive distilleries.

This solution of ethanol isn’t even a good temporary fix. It is also just a sop, in the end, to big agriculture. You will be complaining about them next and they will be just as big a criminal to you as big oil. The irony about “big oil” is that most of “big oil”, except in the US, is owned by governments, which you socialists always say are much better for the people!

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 11:02 AM | Link to this

Oil is the reason we’re in Iraq. It makes pure economic sense to decrease our dependence on foreign oil. I was pleased to hear the president say this.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 11:10 AM | Link to this

-=-

Andy Andy Andy —

Just because the Democrats (overwhelmingly) approved of the Republicans choice in military leaders for the “Iraq Fiasco”, Does not by any means infer that this would have been the Democrats choice or that the Democrats aggree with his opinion 100%.

It’s amazing =-

The Democrats come into power in congress on the platform of getting us out of Iraq.

Shortly afterwards the WingNuts and NeoCons are screaming “So whats the Democrats plan to get us out of Iraq, when are you going to do it?”

Now that the Democrats are doing something to get us out of Iraq, the Neocons flip/flop Two-faced style, and say that’s terrible that you are getting us out of Iraq and going to have the troops withdraw by August (of get this) NEXT YEAR!….

So Petraeus and the rest of the Presidents men, had best get their job (mission) wrapped up ASAP - as they have 15 months!

Heck, many full blown wars don’t even last 15 months, so what’s the problem?

Can General Petraeus and Dubya’s Boys still not get the “Mission Accomplished” in Iraq?,.. Even if we give them a whole nuther’ year?

Thomas/PNAC

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 11:14 AM | Link to this

Daniel and all other who have not been listening for the last seven years: Bush has always said we need to decrease our dependence on foreign oil. Alternative fuels, though, are still a thing in the future, and most of the ideas are just pie in the sky. Meanwhile, liberals will not allow us to do the kind of domestic exploration or drilling we desperately need to do -e.g. drill in ANWR or the Gulf of Mexico or off the coast of California. They cite environmental reasons and then complain about dependence on foreign oil. We could also figure out better ways to burn coal, but we run into environmental wingnuts with that issue because of concerns about mining. The funny thing is that these are the same people who made fun of Reagan for SDI and then turn around with nutty schemes of their own not any more likely to work than that one!

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 26, 2007 11:19 AM | Link to this

Truthsayer

Mr. Bush has said an awful lot about what should be done to be sure.

What exactly has he DONE?

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this

Truff: You lose credibility when you whine. “Liberals will not allow us….” For six years republicans controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency. Maybe they didn’t do it because it’s a bad idea? Actions speak louder than words. It is always weak to scapegoat another.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this

Both parties seem bent on playing political games with America. It doesn’t seem to be any authentic interest in continuing the greatness of this country, but rather a continuos manipulative daily “Super Bowl” of pork and debate that captures all of us in a mental political prison.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 11:37 AM | Link to this

Daniel - I didn’t whine about a thing. I just pointed out a fact. The Democrats filibustered all attempts to allow the drilling in places I mentioned earlier. It takes 60 votes in the Senate to envoke cloture and the Democrats always were able to get at least 41 against those bills, so debate was never cut off and they were never brought to the floor. So please don’t state that we had six years (1.5 the Democrats held the majority in the Senate) to do things when you folks were actively blocking the solutions the Republicans were proposing!

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 11:39 AM | Link to this

Godzilla, please read my reply to Daniel and also remember that he has funded research into workable hydrogen cells, although scientist friends of mine assure me that is WAY in the future, although theoretically feasible. Nuclear power is still the best long-term solution to much of the problem!

By getalife

March 26, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

Lying liar,

You need to research about ethanol because you are not even close.

Keep reading.

Figures, since our government has no credibility, you probably get your info. from them.

If you recall, I have stated many times that our government has no credibility and no accountability.

Well, now they are seeing some accountability to expose their lack of credibility.

So now, we have a lame duck administration that the American people can’t believe a word they spew.

The question for the politicians running is how to get the credibility back to our government.

I propose lying to the American people is a felony, zero tolerance, go straight prison for 5 years.

They write laws and this stop the lying liars.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

-=-

TruthSayer Lots of people are doing something for the environment everyday such as WVO/Bio-Diesel. More and more vehicles are running on vegetable waste oils and fuels.

Big Oil is about profits - period. That’s what a corporation does. Unless they control the market of fuel, then they will do everything in their power to eliminate (alternatives) and competition to their products. I don’t really blame Big Oil as evil. That’s just the nature of the corporate beast.

Since Dubya’s family is a part of that Oil Beast, do you seriously think he will do anything to mess with Big Daddy’s and Soul Brother’ Cheney’s profit margins?

[B-100] - (aka 100% Bio-Diesel) works just fine in any diesel engine, but the auto-manufaturers will void the warranty on any car that uses a mixture of BioDiesel/Diesel at any quantity of B-20(%) or above.

But thank goodness we see more and more Bio-Diesel home-brewers, and more and more cars, busses, trucks, generators, etc., running on vegetable oil fuels.

For more on Bio-Fuels in Atlanta - go to:

http://www.vegenergy.com

Thomas/PNAC

By getalife

March 26, 2007 11:51 AM | Link to this

There is not one solution for energy and there are many alternatives to oil.

We should implement all alternatives to wean off oil.

Support the midwest and southeast La., United States, instead of the Middle East.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 11:58 AM | Link to this

Doom enjoys seeing nickjackers such as getalife, actually engage in political debate. There’s something special about finding Jesus over the weekend I guess.

By Dusty

March 26, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

Today Luckovich gives us filet mignon for the dogs. Tomorrow I guess we will get “pork” for the troops. We know which one Luckovich supports and it isn’t the troops.

By Dusty is Buy Danish and @@

March 26, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

I blog the way I do in order to cope with a cheating husband,

By Dusty is Buy Danish and @@

March 26, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

I blog the way I do in order to cope with a cheating husband,

By Dusty is Buy Danish and @@

March 26, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

I blog the way I do in order to cope with a cheating husband,

By Dusty is Buy Danish and @@

March 26, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

I blog the way I do in order to cope with a cheating husband,

By Dusty is Buy Danish and @@

March 26, 2007 12:26 PM | Link to this

I blog the way I do in order to cope with a cheating husband,

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

“Friday [March 16] was the first time we have ever heard that story,” Sen. Bond said in a statement. “Obviously if we had, we would have included it in the report. If Ms. Wilson’s memory of events has improved and she would now like to change her testimony, I’m sure the committee staff would be happy to re-interview her.” Now, Rep. Westmoreland is trying to do just that. In addition to asking for the transcript of Mrs. Wilson’s interview with Senate investigators, and the full text of her February 12, 2002, memo, Westmoreland submitted a question to Mrs. Wilson that could tell us more about that chance, why-don’t-we-send-Joe meeting with unnamed CIA colleagues. “List all the parties participating in the conversation you described in detail during the March 16, 2007 hearing,” Westmoreland asked Mrs. Wilson, “including, but not limited to, who told you there was a query from the Vice President’s office and who suggested your husband for the trip to Niger because of his expertise in Africa?”

Lock that as-s up.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

crusty,

The hate party had 500 billion of pork in 2005.

You support our troops by sending them into a civil war, untrained, with worn out equipment.

You can stop with your fake patriotic bs.

Pathetic as usual.

By Midori

March 26, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

Dusty spouts the same crap night and day. This one’s for you, silly b*tch

She is a fake, silly b*tch at that.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 12:35 PM | Link to this

getalife - you did not refute one thing that I wrote. As usualy you just called names. By the way, Bush has backed the use of ethanol, as have many of the Socialist Senators from the Midwest like Harkin, Dorgan and Conrad. My point is that this fuel is not a true long-term solution. Ethanol also cannot be produced in sufficient amounts to replace current fossil fuels. Ethanol is also a carbon fuel which pollutes, so in the long-run it makes no sense!

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Where you aware that I updated my ID? This will help to ensure that the B*tch Danish idiots are put on notice when they see me here.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 12:38 PM | Link to this

-=-

Dusty -

My mother’s dog died 2-weeks ago, her only companion to her in that big old house of hers in Alabama. Now she is all alone. My suspicion is that it was the dog food since she uses those brands. She refuses to even talk about the tainted foods at all in her sadness, stating it doesn’t matter because even if that was the cause it won’t bring her back.

I am quite sure that if she had known that the dog food was tainted that she would have gladly fed her filet mignon instead of risking losing her.

Mike L’s toon is very much on target the way we treat our pets better than our spouses sometimes. (Not that I see this as a bad thing). My girlfriend would kick me out of the house before the cat any day of the week. chuckles.

Your sheer hatred of Mike L. is clear though. (as well as the hatred of RW, Danish, Andy)

You take a simple cartoon related to a specific subject of how we adore our pets, then blog trash it in order to decry politics. There is absolutly nothing about politics in this cartoon at all. So why are you making something political of it.

Oh wait - I forgot - it’s because you hate the cartoonist!

However if you do want to discuss Democrat Pork in recent bills, I’m sure it would be fun to compare it to 6-years of Republican Pork in bills that was rubber-stamped through without even a second glance by our current sitting President and the GOP held congress.

Mmmm - Smell the burning bacon!

Thomas/PNAC

By regulator

March 26, 2007 12:42 PM | Link to this

Sen. Hagel- Rep. Neb.- ” Bush impeachnent an option.” Jesus is right.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 12:45 PM | Link to this

Lying liar,

Sigh.

Ethanol is a renewable energy with low carbon emmisions.

Like I said, read more.

I will give the devil his due on w working with car manufactures to use flex fuel.

Its a baby step but better than nothing.

I repeat, there is no single solution but a combination of alternatives is the way to go to limit supporting the Middle East.

Investing in US interests will create jobs and help rural economies.

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 26, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Truthsayer,

First, it’s Mrs. Godzilla. I do not misuse your name I would respectfully request the same treatment from you.

Next, read this

So this is all he has done regarding our addiction to oil. Thank heavens he handled his own addictions better. (???)

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this

White House still supporting Gonzales.Even though both liberal and conservative lawmakers, pundits, members of the media, and the American public are pushing for Gonzales’s resignation, the White House refuses to budge. “We are not negotiating,” White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. “We are where we are, which is where we were last week. I can understand why people would think we have not made the right decision, but we think we have.”

DOES ANYBODY ELSE THINK MAYBE GONZO HAS MORE ON BUSH THAN JUST THAT D.U.I. AND A JURY SUMMONS?

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 1:03 PM | Link to this

-=-

Truthsayer -

Ethanol is a bio-product that is enviromentally nuetral. Unlike fossil fuels which are not enviromentally nuetral.

If you use ethanol as a fuel, the carbon emmitted into the atmosphere is equal to the carbon taken from the atmosphere to grow the plants that were used to make ethanol.

Fossil fuel carbons are removed from the ground and then put into the air environment never to be returned (in man’s history) to the ground again.

You obviously haven’t a clue as to how much ethanol could be mass produced if we really put into productions bio-breeders and such that use algae’ etc, to mass produce ethanol fuels.

In short - you don’t know what your talking about Truthsayer!`

Thomas/PNAC

By Walt

March 26, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

“DOES ANYBODY ELSE THINK MAYBE GONZO HAS MORE ON BUSH THAN JUST THAT D.U.I. AND A JURY SUMMONS?”

Good point.

Walt

By Walt

March 26, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

It may be that Gonzales knows about the forged discharge documents from Bush’s National Guard service.

And the documents -were- forged. Three documents signed by three different officers in three different cities would have separated Bush from the ANG.

The docs presented in 2004 were all signed by the same officer in the same HQ.

Walt

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 1:14 PM | Link to this

WALT

IS THAT THE STUFF HIDDEN IN THE OLD MANS LIBRARY?

By Dusty

March 26, 2007 1:18 PM | Link to this

Nuked America,

I am sorry about your mother’s pet. I suggest you get over there and visit instead of blogging and get another pet for your Mother.

Luckovich makes outlandish cartoons of the President, the troops and Republicans just about 95% of the time. That is what I hate. I hate propaganda against this country, the president and the troops. That is the only kind of hate I deal out. I don’t like the undermining of the country and the troops. You got a problem with that?

Also..

My sympathy to the blogger who cannot stop repeating herself. I think there are meds that might help that psychosis. So sad to keep repeating false information.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 1:25 PM | Link to this

PNA - Yes I do know what I am talking about. Carbon emissions are carbon emissions. Alcohol is not a wonderfully clean buring fuel and the argument about neutrality is about a good as Gore buying those offsets. Also the damage done to the land to grown crops like sugarcane which tear up and depleat the soil and cause errosion anyway are just not the way to go. This again is not a long-term solution but it is rather like putting a tiny band-aid on a gaping wound and saying - that’ll do for now! You folks have developed a new religion around all of this mess rather than looking to long-term, market-driven solutions. It’s really rather pathetic.

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 1:29 PM | Link to this

WootenDull,

Since Rep. Westmoreland is not optimistic about his chances of getting a response from Waxman or Ms. Plame Wilson, I suggest he buy lunch.

Bring a tape recorder, Lynn!

Truthsayer,

Thank you for you posts on the realities of ethanol, hydrogen fuel, et cetera. It’s too bad that fools like PNAC are unwilling to look objectively at the issue. He and others are so obsessed with the bogeyman called Global Warming that they don’t seem to care about how sugarcane farming damages ecosystems.

Siltation from soil erosion has clogged coastal ecosystems, especially coral reefs and sea grass beds, which are important to a wide range of species. Nutrient runoff from sugar cultivation has led to nutrient loading and eutrophication of freshwater and marine systems… Finally, sugar mills are cleaned periodically, and the organic matter that is flushed can tie up all oxygen in nearby rivers as it decomposes. This in turn asphyxiates fish and other aquatic organisms.

PNAC and Getalife are polluters! Ha Ha Ha.

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 1:31 PM | Link to this

Dusty -

The visiting of mom soon is already planned, and the phone calls are quite regular. I doubt she will get another dog, seeing as she cannot keep up with a younger dog. But in either case that is her choice not mine.

If you hate Propaganda, then why do you support these puppet masters and the propaganda that constantly spews from Karl Roves office at the behest of the Think-Tank gang. Better yet why do you repeat and put out such propaganda yourself?

Your Blogging is not supporting the troops, Your blogging is supporting the War Makers and their greedy corporate partners. You make this war look like it has a good couse - which it does not! Cheneys personal war profits of 40-million as Vice President should disturb you, but instead you admire him….

You support a single figurehead over the good of the whole country. Now that’s scary!

Now your figurehead has eroded the very fabric of freedom in this country as we lose our essential rights in freedom of speech, press, expression, etc. Does the “Constitution” and the “Bill of Rights” mean so little to you?

I found this great quote online today: -=-

It’s so simple !

The “causes of crime” are the freedoms that permit people to do bad things.

Do away with the freedoms and people can no longer do bad things.

Why has no-one thought of this before….?

Oh, excepting Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, Bob Mugabe..

I think there’s a pattern here……

-=-

(now that’s a mouthful!)

Thomas/PNAC

By RE

March 26, 2007 1:32 PM | Link to this

Truthsayer,

Fossil fuels like Coal, Oil, natural gas take sequestered carbon and burn it releasing it inot the atmoshpere raising the amount of CO2 in the air.

Ethanol based fuels from corn, sugarcane, pulp wood… etc take CO2 from the atmoshpere whle the plant is growing and then is released back into the atmoshpere when it is burned. The amount of CO2 in the atmoshpere does not change because the plants absorb CO2 while growing.

If you have evidence of this being an unworkable solution, please inform the proper authorities in Brazil, as they have an ethanol based auto industry. I am sure they will be happy to know the system they currently have working is impossible.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this

lying liar,

You are an idiot. You have no idea what the hell you are spewing.

Geez.

Try reading.

By Alert

March 26, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this

GLOBAL WARMING HEAT ALERT.

Please take appropriate precautions. Elderly and children should avoid prolonged exposure to the sun.

All people, especially those with light skin should use a strong sun block before going outdoors.

GLOBAL WARMING HEAT ADVISORY in effect.

By Dusty

March 26, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

In case no one else noticed the free flow of totally untrue liberal propaganda being passed out today, let us mention this foolishness;

THERE ARE NO FORGED MILITARY DOCUMENTS FOR PRESIDENT BUSH.

“THE OLD MAN’S LIBRARY” CONTAINS THE OLD MAN’S PRESIDENTIAL PAPERS IN HIS LIBRARY.

PRESIDENT BUSH IS WEALTHY AND DOES NOT NEED TO SUPPORT ANY INDUSTRY INCLUDING OIL.

GP GONZALEZ AND BUSH ARE BOTH HONEST MEN AND FRIENDS, NOT BLACKMAILERS.

REPUBLICANS HAVE ADDED ‘PORK’ TO BILLS BUT NEVER ONE ON A MILITARY FUNDING BILL AS DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE.

To paraphrase an old saying: “What a tangled web Dems weave, when first they practice to deceive.”

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this

SINCE WHEN DID DUSTY START DOING COMEDY?

WHY NOT ADD>>>

THERE ARE WMD”S

WE WERE GREETED AS LIBERATORS

YELLOWCAKE< YELLOWCAKE

IRAQI OIL MONEY WILL PAY FOR THE WAR

WE WON”T BE THERE BUT A FEW WEEK TOPS

WE DID NOT PUT UP THE MISSION ACCOMPLISHED BANNER

THEY TOOK ALL OUR W’S

WE DO NOT TORTURE

WE DO NOT HAVE BLACK OP SITES IN EUROPE

I NEVER KNEW JACK ABRAMOFF

JEFF GANNON, WHAT A NEWPAPER GUY

PAT TILLMAN WAS KILLED IN AN AMBUSH

REPUBLICAN LEADERS DIDNT KNOW ABOUT FOLEYS THING FOR PAGES

WALTER REED IS BLOWN OUT OF PROPORTION

LOOK AT ALL THOSE MOBILE CHEMICAL WEAPONS LABS

WE GOT OSAMA

LOOK WHAT A GOOD JOB WE DID AT RECONSTRUCTION

NOBODY EVER THOUGHT THE LEVEES WOULD FAIL

HELL, I DONT HAVE ENOUGH TIME

GOT MORE ANY BODY?

By Solution To Global Warming

March 26, 2007 1:53 PM | Link to this

Gasoline at $7.50 a gallon.

All automobiles parked except for essential non governmental business.

Walk everywhere.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Yeah, that would be like asking Gore to turn his thermostat up a little in summer.

Ain’t gonna happen.

W E often hear about global warming causing more heat deaths - but very little about cold deaths. It is true that, for example, the temperature rise from global warming will probably cause 2,000 more heat deaths in the United Kingdom by 2080. Yet studies indicate that the same temperature increase will also decrease cold deaths - 20,000 fewer U.K. cold deaths by 2080. Mentioning 2,000 more deaths, but not the 20,000 fewer cold deaths that go with them, is no basis for sound policy. For the United States, the net lower death count from global warming in 2050 is estimated at 174,000 per year.

The real reason libs want to stop global warming; it could save your life.

They want you dead.

Lock the Plame bitc-h up.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RE

March 26, 2007 1:54 PM | Link to this

GOP slogan tracker:

“Family Values” Down 6.5

Popular in the late 90s and early 00s, this familiar phrase is out of favor due to the multiple marriage candidates running, and frequent outing of closeted homosexuals in GOP circles.

“Undermining the troops” Down 2.3

Previously popular and effective, has lost much of it’s effect due to repitition and lack of followthrough exemplified by the Walter Reed situation

” Stay the Course” Unchanged

Popular phrase lost all of it’s value after nov elections when we found out that stay the course actually meant adapt to win

“show trial” up 8.5

New popular phrase being rolled out last week to explain each and every instance of questionable governmental action. seen as the logical followup in 07 to previously effective “political witchhunt” and “Fishing expedition”

“Honor and integrity to the office” Unchanged

Phrase was popular in 99-00, then immediately lost all value. Has not been used in many years. Look to 08 for resurgence, hot pick for the long term

By The Peoples for a Nuked' Amerika' Century~!

March 26, 2007 1:56 PM | Link to this

-=-

Buy Danish -

You must be a natural blond…

An idiot giving cudo’s to the rantings of an idiot!

There is a major difference in fossil fuels and bio-fuels as a poluting factor. But you go ahead and keep mucking up the air.

I think you will enjoy your bottled air along with that bottled water!Or do you remember what they use to joke and say about the very concept of bottled water and pollution? Or do you still drink water straight from the river? Yummy!~

If either of you even took time to read my post you may have noticed me pushing the Bio-Breeder (algae based) methods of extracting ethhanol for fuels.

As to sugar cane farms,.. Well if they managed the farms correctly with runoff containment ponds you wouldn’t have that sorry run-off pollution either!

But rather than find solutions you prefer to stick to the Fossil Fuel rhetoric and propagada talking points —- Ohhh But Strip Mines and Oil spills are sooo much better than sugar cane farms that get bio-degradable waste in the water systems…

Sweety! You can keep the sugar for your Coffee and Cola’s - !

—-and on that note - I’m off for the day. Time to go home and fix something to eat and get ready for “24”…

Thomas/PNAC

By 'Do-Nothing' President

March 26, 2007 2:19 PM | Link to this

When the hell is King George going to fund the troops. The Democrats gave him a bill authorizing funding last week but the ‘Do-Nothing’ President still thinks he is dealing with a Republican ‘Do-Nothing’ Congress.

Why is the Chimperor playing politics with troop funding? All he has to do to fund the troops is sign the appropriations bill he got LAST WEEK but he threatens to veto the troop’s funding in order to play some cowboy control-freak game with Congress.

King George doesn’t give a shiite about the troops, all he cares about is having everything all his own way. Republicans say to hell with the american voter and their mandates, and to hell with the troops in order to have it THEIR way.

Republicans first order of business is Republican welfare, any thought they give to the troops is only an afterthought that they tack on in order to give the appearance of patriotism. Republican troop support is as PHONEY as their self-proclaimed ‘moral’ superiority.

By Dusty

March 26, 2007 2:20 PM | Link to this

Silly silly Nuked,

You are saying what you want to say even when it is not true. That is freedom of speech. That doesn’t mean I have to like what you say or what Luckovich draws.

If I am a warmonger then so is Congress, your elected repsentatives who voted to go to war. They saw the same infomation as the President and the CIA & FBI searched out that information. In other words, everybody in the country is a warmonger except you and your liberal buddies.

I guess we would have to include the UK as warmongers also since they approved the same info we did and took action.

Cheney made his money legally which means it was not against the law. Are you angry because you are not rich and never will be?

I have had NOT one freedom taken away from me. Have you? Are you in jail? Perhaps you would like to tell us exactly what freedoms you have lost.

As to your mother, why did you spin us a sad tale and then turn around and say you had taken care of it?

There are always two sides to the “truth” of almost every liberal post. I hate that.

By PUNDITS R US

March 26, 2007 2:24 PM | Link to this

“”There are always two sides to the “truth” of almost every liberal post.”“

There is NO TRUTH in a neo-con post.

Only greed. Always greed.

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this

Idiot PNAC,

What is “cudos”?

RW,

Apparently Rosie (the Riveter) O’Donnell reads this blog. She was spreading your conspiracy theory about Bush setting up the capture of the Brits as an excuse to invade Iran on The View today.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 2:26 PM | Link to this

PNAC - you just want to live in a fairy land where things will magically get better because you will it so. The solutions are not easy. I am not opposed to finding solutions. I just want to find workable long-term solutions which will be environmentally sound and not solutions which are at best band-aids and at worst more damaging than what we are doing alread.

And if you think that bio-fuels are more environmentally friendly, ask all of the folks dealing with desertification in parts of South America and the Sahel in Africa.

The best long (and short) term solution for mass power production is nuclear power. Wind power will never produce the massive amounts of energy needed in the modern world. Hydroelectric power might be a viable solution except that these dam* dams also cause a huge amount of ecological harm. While we’re at it, we also need to stop farming in deserts and on marginal land which also does a tremedous amount of damage!

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 2:27 PM | Link to this

PNAC - you just want to live in a fairy land where things will magically get better because you will it so. The solutions are not easy. I am not opposed to finding solutions. I just want to find workable long-term solutions which will be environmentally sound and not solutions which are at best band-aids and at worst more damaging than what we are doing alread.

And if you think that bio-fuels are more environmentally friendly, ask all of the folks dealing with desertification in parts of South America and the Sahel in Africa.

The best long (and short) term solution for mass power production is nuclear power. Wind power will never produce the massive amounts of energy needed in the modern world. Hydroelectric power might be a viable solution except that these dam* dams also cause a huge amount of ecological harm. While we’re at it, we also need to stop farming in deserts and on marginal land which also does a tremedous amount of damage!

By ITS NOT EASY BEING GREEN

March 26, 2007 2:31 PM | Link to this

Truthsayer,

How close would you be willing to live to a Nuclear plant?

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 2:33 PM | Link to this

{{{AntiRadical March 26, 2007 2:19 PM When the hell is King George going to fund the troops. The Democrats gave him a bill authorizing funding last week but the ‘Do-Nothing’ President still thinks he is dealing with a Republican ‘Do-Nothing’ Congress.}}}

Spammie: Who the F are you talking to?

Are you some kind of slobbering idiot or what?

Check it out, Bush said he was going to veto the bill because you lying candy a-ss pinkos larded it up with pork and set a date for Al Qaeda’s victory parade.

Stick your funding bill up your as-s where your brain resides.

What a dupe.

Lock the Plame bit-ch up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RE

March 26, 2007 2:36 PM | Link to this

PNAC - you just want to live in a fairy land where things will magically get better because you will it so

Truthsayer - you just want to live in a fairy land where things will magically get better because the free market will make it so

By Walt

March 26, 2007 2:44 PM | Link to this

Dusty Sends:

“They saw the same infomation as the President and the CIA & FBI searched out that information.”

That has been thoroughly debunked.

The true picture was hidden by the Bush people.

Congress -was- derelict in its duty, that is certainly true.

But Bush hid the true intel.

Even -if- the iontel was the same for everyone, it was Bush who pulled the trigger on this diaster.

Walt

By Dusty

March 26, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

Do NOthing..

Your thoughts are as phony as your spelling. It is PHONY, not phoney unless you are a “telephoney”.

By Creationism Muslim Style

March 26, 2007 2:53 PM | Link to this

ORSAY, France (Reuters) - With creationism now coming in Christian and Muslim versions, scientists, teachers and theologians in France are debating ways to counteract what they see as growing religious attacks on science.

These theoretical debates became a pressing issue in France last month when schools unexpectedly received free copies of an “Atlas of Creation” by Turkish Islamist Harun Yahya that blames Darwinism for everything from terrorism to Nazism.

Fundamentalist Christians and fundmentalist Muslims sound pretty much the same, don’t they? They both call everybody else Nazis and terrorists and they both use force instead of diplomacy to solve their problems.

At least now we already have a text book ready for the new religion classes in Georgia public schools. Now all we need is primers for Wicca, Druidism, and Satanism for Republicans to teach our kids. Won’t you be proud when your baby girl brings home a report card on which she has made an ‘A’ in ritual virgin sacrifice?

By getalife

March 26, 2007 3:03 PM | Link to this

Blog hours: 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday. If the comment box isn’t there, it’s after hours so DON’T post. thank you.

Geez.

By RE

March 26, 2007 3:08 PM | Link to this

Dumb Rules.

I hate laws that are idiotic, the kind of laws and rules that common sence would tell you are not needed. But there is always that portion of people who choose to abuse something until the rule needs to be created. Who are those kind of people?

Looking at you RW and Andy

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

EVERY TIME YOU TURN AROUND….

Rove’s Powerpoint: How Bush’s Architect Has Politicized The Federal Government The Washington Post reported today that General Services Administration chief Lurita Doan and Karl Rove deputy Scott Jennings held a videoconference earlier this year “with top GSA political appointees, who discussed ways to help Republican candidates.”

Jennings, the White House’s deputy director of political affairs, gave a PowerPoint presentation on Jan. 26 of polling data about the 2006 elections.

When Jennings concluded his presentation to the GSA political appointees, Doan allegedly asked them how they could “help ‘our candidates’ in the next elections,” according to a March 6 letter to Doan from Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Waxman said in the letter that one method suggested was using “targeted public events, such as the opening of federal facilities around the country.”

These activities are now being investigated as potential violations of the Hatch Act, which prohibits partisan campaign activities on federal property.

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 3:11 PM | Link to this

ONLY THE MOST DISGUSTING OF THE NEO_CON LEFTOVERS COULD POSSIBLY DEFEND THIS CRAP>>>>

Army deployed seriously injured soldiers. Salon.com’s Mark Benjamin has a new report documenting how U.S. soldiers with debilitating injuries and other medical conditions, including female soldiers who were pregnant, were deployed for weeks to the desert training facility at Fort Irwin, California. “In some cases, soldiers were sent there even though their injuries were so severe that doctors had previously recommended they should be considered for medical retirement from the Army.” Military experts say the decision “was an effort to pump up manpower statistics used to show the readiness of Army units.”

By getalife

March 26, 2007 3:15 PM | Link to this

Nice work wingnuts.

If you can’t win, cheat and try to shut down free speech.

Geez.

By Goldie

March 26, 2007 3:22 PM | Link to this

{{I don’t like the undermining of the country and the troops. You got a problem with that?}}

Dusty-brain, I agree— I don’t like anyone who undermines America and our troops either. That is why you won’t see me cheerleading for anyone who:

1) uses the invasion of Iraq as a fear-mongering political tool, always to be used against those who do not agree with Bush’s war policies;

2) did not do the proper planning for the invasion and occupation of Iraq to begin with;

3) did not use the BILLIONS of $$$ allotted for the occupation to prepare our military hospitals for the injured troops arriving home from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Also, our leaders in the White House who predicted that the invasion of Iraq would be a “cake-walk”, or any such nonsense in promoting this occupation, do NOT deserve to be trusted with any more predictions about what will happen when American troops are withdrawn.

Your credibility for all matters regarding war and occupation is ZILCH.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 3:26 PM | Link to this

Get rid of this wingnut

Geez.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 3:26 PM | Link to this

Those of you who don’t think that the free market will solve most of our commodity problems, including energy, are truly delusional if you think some government program will solve it. These are the people who buy $600 toilet seats and “run” the post office and AmTrack! You might be able to cite an occasional successful government wartime project, but those are the exceptions. Government dictats are also not very efficient. Coercion just does not work well because folks cheat. Just read a little history about what a mess rationing was during World War II here and in Britain.

By Arch

March 26, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

Dustmite, RW, BD, Luckofreak and the other weak sissified Repub woman-haters are in another uproar today. Their walls are tumbling.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 3:28 PM | Link to this

{{{By AntiRadical March 26, 2007 2:53 PM Fundamentalist Christians and fundmentalist Muslims sound pretty much the same, don’t they? They both call everybody else Nazis and terrorists and they both use force instead of diplomacy to solve their problems.}}}

Spammie: So now you are a “neocon?” We should fight the war on terror?

BTW, how’s the “insurgency” going in your beloved Thailand, that veritable playground of child molestation?

Those terrorists are a pain in the as-s, aren’t they?

gitmo: Is that considered a warning?

RE: Of course you don’t look at Georgie Girl who started the whole deal, doing it every morning for months before I started.

Slobbering hack.

The AJC censors Conservatives!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Truthsayer

March 26, 2007 3:30 PM | Link to this

Goldie - the invasion was a cake-walk. It has been the occupation which has been difficult. If you will remember it took us less than three weeks to topple Saddam Hussein’s regime!

By RE

March 26, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this

Rove does not use much whitehouse e-mail

Hmmm, by using alternate e-mail to keep these e-mails off the whitehouse records, he might have lost exec privilidge protection of them.

By RE

March 26, 2007 3:33 PM | Link to this

Good call Andy, George would be one of those who dumb laws are made as well.

I apologize for not including him along with you and RW in my mentioning of people responsible for dumb rules

By Mrs. Godzilla

March 26, 2007 3:38 PM | Link to this

Truthsayer,

Today’s market forces cannot be trusted to work to the improvment of all Americans. They are working for their own bottom line.

From Lil Abner -

“What’s good for General Bullmoose is good for the USA”

NOT.

By JNH

March 26, 2007 3:39 PM | Link to this

Great blog IN THE NEWS (1:52PM)! The list could go on, but geez Bushies, get a grip!!!

By Goldie

March 26, 2007 3:39 PM | Link to this

{{the invasion was a cake-walk. It has been the occupation which has been difficult.}}

Truth-Denier, I’m not sure what your definition of “cake-walk” might be, but we lost many American troops during the invasion those first few weeks. I don’t call that a cake-walk myself. I’ve never been to a cake-walk where any participants were killed. You have???

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 3:43 PM | Link to this

This issue of White House personnel using RNC email accounts to get around governmental records archiving regulations could turn out to be a very big deal. Rep. Waxman has put the RNC on notice not to destroy any of these emails.

According to the National Journal, about 95% of Karl Rove’s email traffic has been on these RNC email accounts.

Now, I don’t know all the legal and constitutional ins and outs of this debate. But whatever claim the White House may have to protect everyone at the White House from congressional scrutiny by invoking executive privilege, this use of outside private email accounts may turn out to be too clever by half.

Can executive privilege even conceiveably cover emails from the Republican National Committee? By any definition, those aren’t emails written or received by anyone in their capacity as a presidential advisor. They’re private and have nothing to do with the president in his executive capacity.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 3:44 PM | Link to this

{{{By RE March 26, 2007 3:33 PM Good call Andy, George would be one of those who dumb laws are made as well.}}}

RE: Georgie Girl set the precedence, RW and I followed it-

{{{By George October 5, 2006 07:59 AM I’m sure that the resident idiot Andy will try and spin this to be something positive for the war effort.}}}

{{{By George September 2, 2006 01:09 PM I can’t wait to see how Andy spins this one.}}}

That whole entire 6 week period, I waited patiently for the Urinal to do something about Georgie Girl, THEY NEVER DID.

I took matters into my own hands, the rest is history.

I even had a pinko at Wooten’s yesterday telling me that he would have had the first post if he hadn’t wun a marwathon with his fwiends.

Try getting up early, you whining liberals.

Lock Plame up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 3:48 PM | Link to this

{{{{Also, our leaders in the White House who predicted that the invasion of Iraq would be a “cake-walk”, or any such nonsense in promoting this occupation, do NOT deserve to be trusted with any more predictions about what will happen when American troops are withdrawn.}}}}

Goldiedull,

You don’t trust what the White House and others to predict would happen if American troops were withdrawn?

Fine! YOU tell us what will happen!

I’m all ears!

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this

UN FREAKIN BELIEVABLE

LET IT RAIN. Let’s hope it doesn’t rain when the North Koreans and Iranians attack us with their ballistic missiles:

Torrential rains wiped out a quarter of the U.S.’ intercontinental ballistic missile interceptors in Ft. Greely, Alaska last summer — right when North Korea was preparing to carry out an advanced missile launch, according to documents obtained by the Project On Government Oversight.

“The flooding occurred during a three-week period between the end of June and early July 2006,” POGO notes, in a statement. “The flooding damaged 25% of the U.S. interceptor missiles’ launch capability. These silos house the interceptor missiles that would be used to attempt to intercept a missile aimed at the United States. No interceptors were in the flooded silos.”

Noah (really, could this story have a more appropriately dubbed author?) puts it aptly:

What exactly are we getting, for the $9 billion a year we’re paying for missile defense? And why can’t it take a little rain?

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this

In the news: anyone else see this as a complete parallel to Nixon tapes? I hope this turns out as well for the Bush Administration as it did for Nixon’s.

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this

IF SOMEONE IS ALL EARS

WHERE DOES THERE BRAIN GO?

OOPS. NO BRAINS JUST EARS

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS,

“Unfreaking believable is mine”. I own that phrase.

Make up your own expressions, you unimaginative spam monkey.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 3:59 PM | Link to this

In the news: anyone else see this as a complete parallel to Nixon tapes? I hope this turns out as well for the Bush Administration as it did for Nixon’s.

By IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 4:00 PM | Link to this

BUY STALE DANISH

YOU DONT OWN SH!T

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 4:04 PM | Link to this

IN THE NEWS,

It is even more brainless to use a meaningless, vague phrase instead of a focused name or ID. Doom uses a statement that reflects the reality of who he is, and you still know whose speaking to you. You obviously use another Id as well, but you are just to afraid to reveal yourself for fear of being destroyed on these blogs.

By Midori

March 26, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this

March 26 (Bloomberg) — Monica Goodling, a counsel to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who helped coordinate the dismissals of eight U.S. attorneys, will invoke her constitutional right not to answer Senate questions about the firings, her lawyer said.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm………..

By Goldie

March 26, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this

{{“Unfreaking believable is mine”. I own that phrase.}}

You mean some bloggers actually copyright the garbage that they post? Amazing… The words in quotes do not even make sense, so why bother getting a copyright on senseless words?

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 4:10 PM | Link to this

There goes Buy Danish using the Monkey word again. Funny, I thought you gave up name calling. Yeah right!

Doom is fed up with Anna Nicole coverage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By Walt

March 26, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

“You don’t trust what the White House and others to predict would happen if American troops were withdrawn?

Fine! YOU tell us what will happen!

I’m all ears!”

If US troops left Iraq, nothing much would happen that is not already happening.

US troops cruise around and get shot and blown up, and sometimes disrupt the routines of those who wish us ill.

When we leave the immediate neighborhood, it is as if we were never there.

Except for the memoroy of dead US Marines and soldiers.

We could accomplish any objectives we need to from Kuwait, Qutar, ships afloat and other friendly bases.

Walt

By RE

March 26, 2007 4:12 PM | Link to this

Nixon was much more effective as president than GWB. He helped to open China. He established the EPA and helped bring Vietnam to a close.

Much better leader than GWB

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 4:17 PM | Link to this

Correction!

“Unfreaking believeable” is mine.

Doomster,

I don’t recall calling anyone a monkey other than the spammer, but since people like IN THE NEWS are really big on the Theory of Evolution, he could take it as a compliment.

By THE POWER OF IN THE NEWS

March 26, 2007 4:17 PM | Link to this

BETTER?

New York police spied broadly before 2004 GOP convention

“For at least a year before the 2004 Republican National Convention, teams of undercover New York City police officers traveled to cities across the country, Canada and Europe to conduct covert observations of people who planned to protest at the convention, according to police records and interviews,” the New York Times reports in Sunday’s edition.

Records show that in hundreds of files labeled “NYPD Secret,” the NYPD intelligence operations “chronicled the views and plans of people who had no apparent intention of breaking the law.”

The files included members of church and anti-war groups, environmentalists, and even three New York City elected officials.

In some cases, records of lawful activities were shared with police departments in other states.

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 4:18 PM | Link to this

Walt,

Are you Goldie?

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 4:21 PM | Link to this

There is only one power on this blog, but Doom has to admit that was somewhat funny.

P.S. Someone must show Doom how to post links onto this blog like some of you do.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 4:21 PM | Link to this

Talk about Karma.

There is a new Monica to plead the fifth.

Bwhahahaha!

There is your next toon Mike.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 4:26 PM | Link to this

I certainly agree, RE. It’s amazing that there is a President who could make us long for Nixon, but Shrub managed that feat. That may be the singularly most impressive thing about his presidency: suddenly we have to totally re-calibrate Presidential rankings. Apparently the bottom is much further down than we previously thought. What’s amazing about Bush is that he has failed to have a single accomplishment of any note. Aside from the Afghanistan war, which turns out to be a mixed bag, I cannot think of a single thing he has done well. He had 6 years of complete Congressional compliance, unprecendented mandate by the American people, an unheard-of margin for error, and… nothing. At all. Not a single damn thing done well. You are right, even Nixon had some major accomplishments, despite his paranoia and grand abuses. Easily the worst President in a century.

Reminds me a turn-of-the-century joke by a Russian comedian about new Russia. ” ‘Don’t worry’ they assured us ‘it can’t get any worse than this.’ Turns out it can. And we can head that way for a long while yet.”

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 4:29 PM | Link to this

Muffin — are you under the impression that you invented “un-freaking-believable”? Really?

By The Infinite Power Of Andy

March 26, 2007 4:34 PM | Link to this

Grasshopper: [The text you want to be blue goes in here.]$(the link you want to use goes in here)

Remove the dollar sign before you post.

Lock the Plame bitc-h up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RE

March 26, 2007 4:37 PM | Link to this

Why are we supposed to lock up Plame again?

Lying to Congress?

See Al Gonzales

By LMAO

March 26, 2007 4:38 PM | Link to this

LMAO….“‘Unfreaking believeable’ is mine.”

Some people take this blog waaaaay too seriously.

Unfreaking believable! LMAO!!

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 4:38 PM | Link to this

Doom will not respond to the algae that called him grasshopper, a*******hopper.

By LMAO

March 26, 2007 4:43 PM | Link to this

Btw, LMAO is mine, I own it. LMAO!!

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

rushncap: You make a point. We don’t know how bad Bush really is! Thank a merciful Lord for Vakerie Plame and a Democratic Congress! At least, we are restoring some Checks and Balances. Democrats haave held over 80 Hearings on Iraq. How mqny did the republican Congress hold? Zero. Bush is a dismal failure.

By Magneto

March 26, 2007 4:45 PM | Link to this

Doom,

What’s with the name change? Have you increased your power on this blog? I see Bi Danish is still around.

By RE

March 26, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this

Ok, Time for the copyrights, it seems first claim takes it.

I claim “pinko” and “moonbat”

They are mine now, you can’t use them

so there

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 4:50 PM | Link to this

Haha: Doomwit was expecting a pinko to show him how to link.

Little does he know that they have their kids do it for them.

RE: Lock Plame and Gonzales as-s up now!

Hurt my feelings by getting a wartime Attorney General, instead of this spineless poofball.

Make me the AG, I’ll lock all you libs up.

Murtha first.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 4:52 PM | Link to this

Fine, I’ll get in on this: I claim all articles. “A”, “the”, “an” are now mine (seeing as how I use them a lot), please everyone else refrain from using them.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 4:52 PM | Link to this

Master of Magnetism,

Buy Danish is stabilized for now. As for your first question: Yes, my power has increased. The only concern is some of these morons may mistake the more advanced Doom as a sign of weakness. I’m prepared to launch a full scale assault if one of them screws up.

By Walt

March 26, 2007 4:53 PM | Link to this

“Walt,

Are you Goldie?”

Any comment as to content?

We could and should withdraw from Iraq.

It suits Bush politically to be getting our guys killed.

That was always the upside to the deployment for him.

Yes — he is absolutely corrupted by power.

Walt

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 4:54 PM | Link to this

WTF is this?:

SENATE STAFFER BUSTED FOR CARRYING WEBB’S LOADED GUN: Phillip Thompson, executive assistant to Senator James Webb (D-VA ), has been arrested by Capitol Hill Police on Monday for ‘inadvertently’ holding the senator’s loaded gun, according to a person close to the investigation. A Senate staffer reports that Thompson was arrested for carrying the gun in a bag through security at the Russell Senate Office building while the Senator was parking his car. Thompson was booked for carrying a pistol without a license (CPWL) and for possessing unregistered ammunition.

Who was he going to assassinate?

Why is he not locked up or getting the F beat out of him?

Was he gonna shoot Lott or maybe McConnell?

Anti war, eh?

Lock Webb’s a-ss up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this

RE: You can’t even spell pinko.

Lock Webb’s as-s up now (seriously.)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 4:58 PM | Link to this

Robert D. Novak in todays Washington Post has an excellent article: Bush is alone. The most often heard words from republicans in Congress on the Bush Administration: INCOMPETENT. The most often heard word on Alberto Gonzales: INCOMPETENT. Hapless Bush loves a Brown-Noser.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 4:59 PM | Link to this

F*ckoDull,

That’s just an example of the power of Doom. I don’t need my kids, multiple Ids, nickjacking, or the ability to post links. My power is ever present and self sustainable.

P.S. John Edwards’ announcement was a publicity stunt!!!

By RE

March 26, 2007 5:03 PM | Link to this

Sounds like the godfather, you need a wartime consigliere.

Lock Gonzales up now.

And lock andy up for copyright infringement, pinko is my word now, but we can work out a licenising agreement for a fee.

By Magneto

March 26, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

Power of Doom,

I think the Edwards’ were making the announcement as a precaution in case it becomes an issue down the road. The publicity and sympathy that came with it is incidental.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

{{{By Power of Doom March 26, 2007 4:21 PM P.S. Someone must show Doom how to post links onto this blog like some of you do.}}}

Doomwit: Are there several of you?

Or just one with a major mental defect?

If you don’t need help, don’t ask for it, Nancy.

Shees.

Lock the Plame bitc-h and the Webb psycho up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Midori

March 26, 2007 5:07 PM | Link to this

ROFL!!

Gee Andy - the site seems to have an issue with your hacking into the blog during off hours.

You should thank them!!

All the more time for you to polish off another crate of vodka.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this

F*ckoDull,

That was me. I don’t take kindly to the term Doomwit in case you’re wondering. Also, you informing me that people use their kids is not help. Next time, make sure you are offering help before you get frustrated at my requests.

P.S. Somebody named Andy attemted to help the Doom(is that you?), but it wasn’t very effective.

By Midori

March 26, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this

Last April, while the Justice Department and the White House were planning the firings, Rove gave a speech in Washington to the Republican National Lawyers Association. He ticked off 11 states that he said could be pivotal in the 2008 elections. Bush has appointed new U.S. attorneys in nine of them since 2005: Florida, Colorado, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Arkansas, Michigan, Nevada and New Mexico. U.S. attorneys in the latter four were among those fired.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this

{{{“To our knowledge, this incident was an oversight by the Senator’s aide. Phillip Thompson is a former Marine, a long-term friend and trusted employee of the Senator. We are still awaiting facts.” Developing…}}}

Yes, every morning my .357 Magnum surprises the sh-it out of me, all tucked in my waistband without my prior knowledge.

I never would have thought that the democrats would expose what total jack as-ses they are so soon after getting in power, I was thinking it would be closer to the end of the year.

I was wrong, they’re outing themselves early.

Anybody wonder why Webb is toting a cannon around D.C, a place where possession of guns is outlawed?

Is he sceered?

Fwightened?

Ready for his next meeting with Bush, huh? Huh?

Lock him up!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Webb gave the staffer his gun because he was going to travel and the staffer forgot about it.

Desperate, aren’t you?

By Magneto

March 26, 2007 5:21 PM | Link to this

The Great Britain and Iranian situation is music to conservative’s ears. They can’t wait to start another war.

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 5:31 PM | Link to this

What’s the deal with the comment box warning. I have never once posted without a comment box being there, so may I infer that when I see a comment box it isn’t after hours?

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

Over two years ago I told you the republican party had been hijacked by nut-jobs. Now the people are telling you. Bush is at 28% and sinking. The republicans, REPUBLICANS in Congress regard Bush as incompetent. Political hacks are in charge. David Iglesias is a talented, capable prosecutor. That’s why he was sacked. No room in BushWorld for either talent or competence.

By Dusty

March 26, 2007 5:34 PM | Link to this

Oh boy,

Democrats on the loose. Support the troops by messing up their funding.

Nixon compared to Bush when his legal life more closely related to Clinton’s only Clinton wouldn’t resign.

Lock up Gonzalez even though there is nothing illegal in what he has done.

Power of Doom puts out IN THE NEWS and other propaganda from comic books. I didn’t guess. His ID was on it.

Oh well, this is a liberal blog. Why should I should expect something that makes sense?

By Walt

March 26, 2007 5:37 PM | Link to this

“Lock up Gonzalez even though there is nothing illegal in what he has done.”

Except lie under oath.

Walt

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 5:39 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife March 26, 2007 5:17 PM Andy, Webb gave the staffer his gun because he was going to travel and the staffer forgot about it.}}}

gitmo: He was attempting to assassinate one of his rivals in the Senate, I told you Webb was a psycho, but I’m willing to let the facts come out.

Gonzales will be gone so we’ll get this prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, no sissy sh-it.

The bigger question remains, if it wasn’t premeditated murder as you suggest, why is he toting a cannon around DC?

In violation of the law?

Hell, Michelle Malkin spent weeks in Baghdad, she was never armed.

Is Webb a pus-sy?

Lock him up!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 5:41 PM | Link to this

Liberal blog, Dusters? Erm, no. You are not liberal. Neither are RW, Muffin, li’l andy, @@, etc etc etc. And considering how much drivel all of you combined post every day, this is certainly not a liberal blog. To a neocon a single instance of disagreement with their Almighty Bush means the whole blog is liberal. Absolutely can’t take reality, even in the smallest of doses.

By RE

March 26, 2007 5:41 PM | Link to this

Lying to congress is illegal. Remember all the arguements about why no admin officials need to be sworn in because it is already a crime.

That is what gonzales did, lie to congress.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 5:41 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

What the hell are you talking about? IN THE NEWS is one of the biggest jacka$$es on this blog! Doom has been trying all day to find out how to post a link here but everyone is too chickesh!t to help me because they know I will be totally invincible then.

You didn’t see my ID anywhere unless I posted it or some nickjacka$$ did it.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 5:45 PM | Link to this

RW(the dumba$$),

What they are referring to is the ‘Post your Comment’ link. Those of you who possess no life whatsoever have found the time to post even when the blog has been closed.

By RE

March 26, 2007 5:47 PM | Link to this

Doom only occasionally refers to himself in the third person, still creepy

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 5:49 PM | Link to this

RE,

Nowhere near as creepy as using a f*cking prefix for a name loser!

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

Dooma$$,

Did you miss this?

{{{{{Grasshopper: [The text you want to be blue goes in here.]$(the link you want to use goes in here)

Remove the dollar sign before you post.}}}}}

No it seems you didn’t miss it since you whined like the little liberal moby you are when Andy tried to help you.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 5:51 PM | Link to this

Andy,

The facts did come out. Its over.

Did mm find that Jamal guy over there?

By Magneto

March 26, 2007 5:51 PM | Link to this

Power of Doom,

You’re on fire man! Chill.

By RE

March 26, 2007 5:52 PM | Link to this

Initials, not a prefix.

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

Dooma$$,

As I stated before I’ve NEVER POSTED WHEN THERE WASN’T A COMMENT BOX! Now STFD and STFU!

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 5:54 PM | Link to this

RW(the f*ckup),

If you think that Doom is a fa@@ot a$$ liberal than you are even dumber than I thought. Why don’t you stick your lonely head up your a$$ and see if it fits.

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

RW,

Do you think that the AJC is going to issue a one window rule? Maybe set up alarm bells that ring if it’s after 7 pm? Haul “offenders” in for loitering?

Munchkin rushncap,

Maybe if I told my jokes in Russian with a turn of the century Yiddish accent you would get them. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

Unfreaking believable.

LuckoDull,

I apologize for addressing you as WootenDull earlier.

Goldie,

I’m still waiting for your prediction as to what would happen if our troops were to leave Iraq prematurely.

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 5:57 PM | Link to this

RE: Gonzales aide Sampson will testify before Congress. He will also take the Fifth Amendment against self incrimination! The theory is that Sampson along with politicians conspired to oust very able men and women. Sampson hired a liberal democrat attorney who told him about Irwin Libby. When the going gets tough the tough get going!

By Magneto

March 26, 2007 6:00 PM | Link to this

There she is!!! The lovely Bi Danish. Can I add RW to your repertoire?

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 6:04 PM | Link to this

{{{By getalife March 26, 2007 5:51 PM Andy, The facts did come out. Its over.}}}

Look at what a lib thinks is “over:”

Spokeswoman Sgt. Kimberly Schneider said the aide was charged with carrying a pistol without a license and possessing an unregistered firearm and unregistered ammunition.

Gee, I wonder what would be going on right now had it been Rove that got busted with the cannon?

Anybody want to take a wild guess?

But no, our poofball Attorney General is wetting his pants before Congress like a schoolgirl in the principle’s office, instead of turning the screws on some democrat as-s.

Once Webb had the fully loaded pistol, who was he going to shoot?

We don’t have time to ask serious questions about the mental stability of a Senator because we’re asking questions about harmless hiring practices?

WTF?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

Dooma$$,

I thought I told you to STFD and STFU.

Buy Danish,

The new warning box up top says that if you don’t see a comment box it’s outside of posting hours. The reverse must also be true.

How soon before liberals are going to run to the ACLU about the Forest Park kids going to school in Churches the rest of the week? Probably about the same time it takes for Blackadder to cry to the AJC whenever somebody posts when he doesn’t like it.

By RE

March 26, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

Not sure about Sampson, TPM listed a retraction saying it originally had misidentified goodling as sampson.

It is tough to keep up with all the scandals coming out right now. need a scorecard

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this

Touche’!

Washington, D.C. - Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Lamar Smith (R-TX) today asked Former President Bill Clinton if he would be available to testify at the Democrats’ Thursday hearing on presidential pardon authority…”Former President Clinton is no stranger to controversial pardons, most notably the pardon of Marc Rich on his last day in office,” stated Ranking Member Smith. “I can think of no better person to address this issue.”…

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this

Muffin, you can try telling jokes any way you like. You don’t have any talent, for anything. You’re a less talented Carrot Top. Stick to driving to the golf course.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 6:09 PM | Link to this

RW(the fa@@ot),

Doom will respond to you when you adopt the English language as a means of communication.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:13 PM | Link to this

Stalk — what makes you think people listen to you when you tell them to “STFU”?

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:14 PM | Link to this

besar mi asno Nancy Dooma$$.

By Buy Danish

March 26, 2007 6:15 PM | Link to this

Is it just me, or did Doom just respond to RW?

What a dolt.

Little Squirt rushncap,

I’m sure your paper dolls find you very funny, bright, handsome and talented.

Gotta run, folks.

By Power of Doom

March 26, 2007 6:17 PM | Link to this

Since there is obviously no one here that can withstand the Power of Doom, I bid all of you homocrats, and conservative homosexuals such as RW farewell. Happy a$$ humping!

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:17 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

It got you butting your nose in didn’t it?

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this

I never claimed I was funny, Muffin. You’re making $#!t up again. You seem to think you’re funny. You’re not. You’re just some fat cow whose life is tied to this blog. Well, hey, who am I to judge, right?

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:21 PM | Link to this

Stalk - butting in is not quite SingTFU, is it? Do you often find that people do the exact opposite of what you tell them to?

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 6:23 PM | Link to this

Oh good, he’s a pathological liar too:

{{{Webb told The Richmond Times Dispatch in December that he considers himself a “strong Second Amendment person” but said he does not carry a gun to work.}}}

No kidding, so that means he had a purpose to carry the cannon today, huh?

Who the F was he going to kill?

We need to get to the bottom of this before someone gets seriously hurt.

It had to come to this, even after the alarm bells were rung with this guy writing about Dads suc-king their son’s pen-ises, you goofy libs still voted for this waster, did you feel a kinship with him?

Stupid mofo’s, put a freaking loony in the Senate in close proximity to our Nation’s leaders, will you stop at nothing to harm America?

Lock him up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 6:24 PM | Link to this

CNN said Sampson. They could be wrong. Whoever testifies will take the 5th. Criminal wrongdoing at the highest levels of our government! Why are they all getting lawyered up? If they had nothing to hide, why not just tell the truth?

By getalife

March 26, 2007 6:25 PM | Link to this

Now the GSA is under scrutiny.

Wingnuts are not funny.

Geez.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 6:27 PM | Link to this

Just think if Fitz was AG.

You think they got problems now.

Geez.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this

Look at who the libs sent to Congress, a regular Mr. Smith:

{{{WEBB’S WEIRD WORLD}}}

{{{The Author’s Disturbing Writings Show a Continued Pattern of Demeaning Women}}}

{{{Some of Webb’s writings are very disturbing for a candidate hoping to represent the families of Virginians in the U.S. Senate.}}}

Webb’s novels disturbingly and consistently – indeed, almost uniformly – portray women as servile, subordinate, inept, incompetent, promiscuous, perverted, or some combination of these. In novel after novel, Webb assigns his female characters base, negative characteristics. In thousands of pages of fiction penned by Webb, there are few if any strong, admirable women or positive female role models.

Now the guy is stalking around the Senate building armed to the teeth.

Nice choice pinkos, way to go.

Lock Webb up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:29 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

I don’t give a damn what you do, but what I do know about you is that if I told you to GFY you’d try.

By getalife

March 26, 2007 6:29 PM | Link to this

Andy is losing it again.

Take your meds man.

Geez.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:34 PM | Link to this

Stalk, stalk, chill, buddy. Not everyone acts like your friends in your trailer park. Oh, and while I do find it darling that you can use the terms like “I do know”, you really should avoid them. It gives other people the appearance that you think you know something. Then they would be liable to make fun of you, and you’d have to run home and cry, and… it would be a big mess for you. Just a heads up. Looking out for you, buddy.

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:38 PM | Link to this

Dmitry, Dmitry, Dmitry,

Why oh why are you such an obsessed loser?

By Ann Coulter

March 26, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

Did you read what Webb wrote about your mother? Even made me blush.

Ann

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:42 PM | Link to this

The Democrat Party is looking for a few good spies.

{{{{{The Democratic Party needs to support that kind of diligent reporting in the new election cycle — with video crews permanently on the ground in early primary states, for example. What did John McCain say in New Hampshire? Who did Rudy Giuliani visit in Iowa? What did Mitt Romney do in South Carolina? The DNC needs to know the answers to these questions every time a Republican makes a campaign stop, and we have to be ready to take the proper course of action. Let’s set up a state-of-the-art operation to bypass the media and take the story of their lies, flip-flops, and out-of-whack priorities directly to you.}}}}}}

That diligent reporting they’re talking about was how they used Macaca to get that armed to the teeth psycho, Webb, elected.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this

Stalk, considering the amount of time you’ve spent tracking me down, you really should avoid calling me the “obsessed” one. Buddy — I know you need online hobbies since you don’t have real ones, but sheesh, at least stop saying that others are like you.

By Willie

March 26, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this

More filthy Republican lies come forth every hour of every day. Scum. At least the “surge” is working beautifully as predicted.

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 6:46 PM | Link to this

rushncap: Do I detect a smidgen of desperation amongst the nut-jobs? The posts are testier than usual. In the toilet, are we? Down the drain? Up sh*t creek, you say? Put a fork in it. The ship is deserting the sinking rat. Here come the subpoenas. The roaches are running for cover.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this

By the way, anyone want to start a pool to guess how many times after the regular 7 p.m. deadline our desperate little buddy RW will post?

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:51 PM | Link to this

Dmitry,

I’ll take ZERO in that pool, the same amount as the minutes I’ve ever spent tracking you down. Why do you insist on making yourself look so foolish?

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this

By the way, rushncap, you’re a fine one to talk about online hobbies. Or are you still trying to tell us that your jerking off is work related?

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:54 PM | Link to this

Daniel — I think so. I really do. There will be a core of about 20% of the population who can watch Bush devour a orphaned baby on live TV and support him as much as always. On this board people like RW and Dusty and Muffin have so totally divorced themselves from reality that nothing matters to them any more. But for the rest of the people, it seems like the jig is up. I think this is going to snowball.

By LuckoDull

March 26, 2007 6:55 PM | Link to this

{{{Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 3/7/2007- “The District’s ban on handguns has been on the books for three decades. It was passed in response to residents’ concerned about gun violence in their community.” “D.C. residents don’t want handguns on their city streets. We don’t need to start another war zone in our nation’s Capitol; Iraq and Afghanistan are bad enough.}}}

Did you pat your fellow Senator down, Jim?

Careful, he’s not all there.

Lock Webb up now!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Midori

March 26, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

as usual, facts are not on RW the Original Moron’s side.

He constantly posts outside the blog’s regular hours. Anyone can and have seen it. The same way he posts constantly about some obscure references Rushncap made on an equally obscure blog some years ago.

Yet Rushncap is supposed to be the “foolish” one. I suppose telling the truth about idiot wingnuts with no lives makes one “foolish”.

You wingnut morons could teach Colbert a thing or two about “truthiness”.

By rushncap

March 26, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

Zero minutes and how many hours, Stalk? How long did it take you to find my posts from 6 years ago? And as for jerking off, don’t you wish for the good old days when your equipment could actually handle such a chore?

By Daniel

March 26, 2007 7:03 PM | Link to this

rushncap: I think Bush has totally misjudged the wrath of the American people over the lies on Iraq. I work-out with a couple republicans. They are ashamed. If called they might tell a telephone poll they support Bush. In truth, they do not. Both say they never expected it to get this bad. Bush ran as a moderate. We are nation betrayed.

By RW-(the original)

March 26, 2007 7:05 PM | Link to this

Zero minutes and zero hours. Have you ever used google? Any fool that uses their real name and the same screen name all over the internet is very easy to find purely by accident. I’m hitting the post button at 6:59, I can’t begin to tell you when this hideous server will post it.

I can’t remember back to a time when I had to rely on paper girlfriends, Dmitry. Sucks to be you!

By Lord Help Us

March 26, 2007 7:17 PM | Link to this

GOD BLESS OUR FOUNDING FATHERS!!!

OVERSIGHT…IS BEAUTIFUL…

The incompetence and duplicity of the Bush Administration is FINALLY being exposed.

Now, as I have stated previously, stand back and watch as the candidates for the Republican nomination absolutely repudiate Bush and his cabal of losers.

Get this…the Republican nominees will be running as the ‘reformers’…as in ‘we won’t be anything like what you’ve seen for the last 8 years.’

BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

By Califorinia Dreaming

March 26, 2007 8:22 PM | Link to this

I see a comment box. It’s only 6:21 in San Francisco. Where is everyone?

By bon scott

March 26, 2007 9:00 PM | Link to this

Truth is an alien concept to most neocons. Iraq was run by a tyrant before he was shown the door. But it was a peaceful city where freedom of expression was tje most dangerous crime of all. It got you jailed or worse. But now, Baghdad may be the most dangerous city in the word.

The US made it this way. Free speech is good. But not if expressing it gets you kidnaooed, tortured and killed.

The people who planned this fiasco shouled be kidnapped, flown to an unknown location, and be forced to submit to waterboarding and similar “Club Fed”perks

No legal representation, no habeas corpus. Confine them indefintely. If its good enouh for toothless Afghan farmers whonly crime growingopium to feed their children, then it’s good enough for America’s so called ‘“best and brightest”

It may be years away, but the US warngers and their superiors will be puished, i this world or the next,

Karma, baby. Isn’t it it nice that in so many ways, people who do evil things eget theirs in the end, SNICKER…

By @@

March 26, 2007 9:04 PM | Link to this

Well alrighty then Mr. AJC Webmaster.

As a conservative, I’ll be on my best behavior, and say that….

….you ARE welcome!!!!!!!!!

By @@

March 26, 2007 9:44 PM | Link to this

Saddam, Uday and Qusay did some horrible things to the Iraqi people, but I never heard of them “kidnaooing” anyone.

I wonder if it’s painful.

finch?

Oh…I’m typing this in a comment box Mr. Webmaster.

By Greetings From Waikiki

March 26, 2007 11:24 PM | Link to this

I just stumbled onto your site and noticed that I had a comment box open and it’s currently 5:24PM. Where is everybody?