Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

February 21, 2007 08:57 PM | Link to this

It doesn’t surprise me at all that cartoon boy watches some moonbat “news” channel that dwells on the life of the latest nutjob.

Not that PMSNBC and The Clinton News Network are much outside of the fever swamps but doesn’t Mikey know that they run the same tape of the same Iraq bombing, over and over and over again, all day long, even if it’s a week or two old?

What more do you want?

So take off all your clothes, flip the channel and get down with your gleeful anti American self.

Sit there in front of your TV, all wooded up, and wish for more dead US soldiers so that you can get joyously excited.

Have fun.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 08:04 AM | Link to this

ml, it would’ve been more accurate to have a story about a school or water treatment plant opening in some province of Iraq and having the reporter say no we’re going to headline a story about civilians being killed by American soldiers. Don’t you think? Oh yeah, the “media” stopped reporting such things when Iraqi infrastructure was 40 percent of pre-liberation levels and they want to leave the publics’ opinion there.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 08:08 AM | Link to this

Yes, the White House would prefer that all news organizations were owned by Rupert Murdoch — more Britney! more Anna Nicole! more American Idol! more missing young white women in the Caribbean!

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 08:13 AM | Link to this

When “5-Deferment” Cheney was spinning yesterday about what a good idea Britain leaving Iraq is, I spit out my Chardonnay and almost wrecked my Volvo…. the bad propaganda from the White House continues!

By regulator

February 22, 2007 08:17 AM | Link to this

Yea, lets sugar coat this war right over, 3500 have been killed but, Most, made it back alive or maimed, 500,000 Iraq’s have been killed but gee millions are still alive, the infrastructure of the country is ruined but look, they bult a new gas station in Basra.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 08:19 AM | Link to this

Dick “No Doubt” Cheney is the Al-qaida appeaser extraordinaire since 2001! He and Dubya walked right into Al-qaida’s trap by getting our troops stuck in a civil war in Iraq… OBL often stated that his goal was to engage American troops in a quagmire and take America down, just like he brought down the USSR in Afghanistan.

More propaganda from Mr. 5-Deferment-Coward:

“I think if we were to do what Speaker Pelosi and Congressman Murtha are suggesting, all we will do is validate the al-Qaida strategy,” the vice president told ABC News.

By Mike

February 22, 2007 08:22 AM | Link to this

Mikey is right! There is no bad news about Iraq being reported by the media.

Ah, the intellectual honesty of liberals…

By Mrs. Godzilla

February 22, 2007 08:24 AM | Link to this

Right On!

I have always been a seeker of truth. It has never been harder than it is at this moment in time.

To be fully and accurately informed an individual can’t just hit the flippers’ power button. I check at least 15 different sources daily, more if time allows or curiosity demands.

Read, Learn, Share.

By candide

February 22, 2007 08:26 AM | Link to this

The reactionary Republicans like to keep the masses focused on Britney Spears and Anna Nicole Smith — it keeps them from trying to think.

That’s why Catholic colleges were so good at basketball — it kept students from discovering how crazy Catholic doctrine really was. Keep the fools busy with trivia.

By @@

February 22, 2007 08:28 AM | Link to this

O.K., I’m totally confused on this one ml.

I don’t watch MSNBC, but THEY do seem to be obsessed with Britney.

Britney Spears’ nannies are speaking out

Britney’s extreme makeover

Britney Spears shedding more than her hair

Britney crying, pulling out hair before haircut

Is Britney Spears headed for rehab?

Britney crying, pulling out hair before haircut

Is Britney Spears headed for rehab?

Britney Spears: Not in rehab

Report: Britney Spears Checked Into Rehab

Britney Shaves, Hulk Snuggles, Who’s Your Daddy Now?

So why is that Tony Snow’s fault? The reporter in your cartoon IS Tony isn’t it.

Are you saying that Tony should be reporting on the more important Britney because it’s the hard hitting news that appeals to the liberal audience of MSNBC?

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 08:30 AM | Link to this

Uh-oh! Bush-kisser McCain’s continuing double-talk is going to continue his downward spiral in the Repugnants’ polls:

“John said some nasty things about me the other day, and then next time he saw me, ran over to me and apologized. Maybe he’ll apologize to Rumsfeld,” Cheney said in an interview with ABC News.

Looks like the Bush-kisser’s train has wrecked in the station again!

By @@

February 22, 2007 08:31 AM | Link to this

Goldie @ 8:13:

Were you drinking and driving?

{{{When “5-Deferment” Cheney was spinning yesterday about what a good idea Britain leaving Iraq is, I spit out my Chardonnay and almost wrecked my Volvo}}}

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 08:31 AM | Link to this

An aircraft lost in a war zone!!!! No way!!!! The Horror!!! Stop the press!!! Run around shrieking like a sissy!!!:

9,949 US Air Force aircraft lost over Europe in World War 2.

And I’m still not sure that we “won” in France.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz.

By w00t

February 22, 2007 08:33 AM | Link to this

Yeah, Dull because it’s not like Fox news has turned into court TV showing the Anne Nichole Smith court hearing, or showing Britney Spears night after night, or that your pals Hannity and Bill O’Rielly would rather start a “jihad” against Al Gore and NBC instead of talking about important stories and being REAL journalist.

Maybe we should just start calling them Republican News Network (RNN), or Dumb Republican Talking Points Network (DRTPN), or Fake News Network (FNN), or We Don’t Report News Network (WDRNN), or Republican Mouthpiece Network (RMN). I could go on, by why even try… you already knew that.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 08:37 AM | Link to this

Why would Dubya recently declare that he “welcomes” debate about our occupation of Iraq, and then have Darth Vader Cheney pound on the Dems for keeping the debate alive:

Before the election, Bush, McCain and others knew just as well as they know today that things were going poorly in Iraq. But for political reasons they refused to acknowledge it, and their supporters attacked critics of our Iraq policy as unpatriotic merely as a means to silence them. There’s something deeply amoral about such a tactic. It betrays a lack of respect for basic democratic principles — and for each other as Americans.

Yes, this administration is “deeply amoral.”

By Brian Curtis

February 22, 2007 08:39 AM | Link to this

And still people pretend that we have a “liberal” media. Is anyone still buying that line?

By LMAO

February 22, 2007 08:39 AM | Link to this

My goodness @@, your 8:28 post is a little on the paranoid side, Tony Snow? LMAO. You might want to take a short break from the blogs. You are sounding delusional. In fact you’re starting to sound like Andy.

GET HELP! Its not to late for you.

By Writer's block

February 22, 2007 08:42 AM | Link to this

Bush looked at the situation in Iraq and said, “we’re gonna need a bigger army”.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 08:46 AM | Link to this

Uh-oh! Looks like 5-Deferment Cheney is in deep d00-d00 on his current trip to Asia:

In the days before his arrival, Japan’s defense minister, Fumio Kyuma, branded the Iraq war a “mistake.” Touching down in Tokyo on Tuesday afternoon, Cheney was greeted with the sight of a large truck cruising the blocks surrounding the U.S. Embassy blaring a message through a loudspeaker: “Yankee Go Home!”

Looks like this administration now has a Coalition of the Dwindling…

By LMAO

February 22, 2007 08:48 AM | Link to this

Oh my god. Good news out of Iraq. Of course the media totally ignored it.

We are being treated as liberators! !Our allies have come to our aid! Mission is accomplished, the insurgency is in its last throes, the oil paid for everything, and Iran says Hi.

Also, our soldiers are handing out candy. Why does the liberal media hate America?

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 08:53 AM | Link to this

There is little question that many patriotic Americans have raised that black flag, sensing that most networks and even their neighborhood dailies have become outposts of the doctrine police, shading their reporting of the war to reflect ideology or partisan agendas.

Or, in the case of the Atlanta Urinal and many others, even going full blown pro Al Qaeda, hoping for dead Americans, any dead Americans that they can drag through the streets and shake at the “enemy” Bush.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 09:04 AM | Link to this

{{Or, in the case of the Atlanta Urinal and many others, even going full blown pro Al Qaeda, hoping for dead Americans}}

Andy-Dull, you are deeply amoral.

By Brian Curtis

February 22, 2007 09:04 AM | Link to this

Dull: You know, the liberal protestors may be “exploiting” the dead… but Bush is the one getting them killed in the first place.

Who deserves more of your anger?

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 09:09 AM | Link to this

There is far too much information out there to know and the “media” largely chooses to share the informational topics that will lead the masses to the same conclusions as that of the “media” editors and producers. When the Iraqis were lining up day in and day out to join the Army or Police and the terrorists were bombing the lines, how many stories did we see about Iraqis eager to defend their newfound freedoms? I didn’t see any. However, I saw dozens upon dozens of stories stating the recruits were there because they couldn’t find work in a country that was destroyed by US forces. Is that bias or objectivity? Why did the daily updates on Iraqi infrastructure stop? At both Marine recruiting centers I was at in 2002 I spoke with at least a dozen college graduates who were leaving good jobs to join the Corps. But, on the drive there all NPR and other media outlets reported on were poor poor people who felt their only chance in life was to join the military. This was obviously because Bush destroyed the our massive economy in the first 2 days of his administration. Certainly no previous policies had anything to do with it because everybody knows the US economy can turn on a dime.

The more the dumb masses change this nation from a republic to a democracy the more power the media has, period. The Executive Branch receives foreign intelligence the masses do not see, but the ignorant masses can now affect our nation’s defense, it is a course for self destruction.

Of course people on the left will continue the grand illusion that the “media” is not biased because the “media” is biased in favor of their political philosophy of; government is great, government is good, let them thank the government for their food.

By Jack

February 22, 2007 09:10 AM | Link to this

What is up with Fox news and Anna Nicole Smith. Every 3 minutes with that network something flashes about that bimbo.

By w00t

February 22, 2007 09:12 AM | Link to this

Dull, I guess you better go back and read your story. Looks like you can add Fox news to your list of news agencies that have “[gone] full blown pro Al Qaeda, hoping for dead Americans, any dead Americans that they can drag through the streets and shake at the “enemy” Bush.”

“The same thing may not be possible for the media, obsessed as they are by ratings and rantings. Fox will, of course, insist that it is fair and balanced…”“>http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/stories/MYSA022207.02O.allard.523ae81.html)

Basically, your story says that TV news should ask questions, something that you don’t prefer them to do.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 09:14 AM | Link to this

It’s time Republican war dodgers.

The liberal media is not going to fight your battle.

The rest of the world has no interest in fighting your battle.

About the only ones left to do the fighting are the millions of Conservative war supporters.

Its time. The threat is real. Right?

ENLIST

By jnh

February 22, 2007 09:14 AM | Link to this

NO ONE with a brain would think we have a liberal media.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 09:15 AM | Link to this

By Brian Curtis February 22, 2007 09:04 AM but Bush is the one getting them killed in the first place.

Brian: That’s where you’re wrong and what makes you a pinko fundamentalist.

Bush and American soldiers aren’t the ones flying planes full of people into skyscrapers nor are we blowing ourselves up in the middle of a bunch of women and children.

But your side is.

You libs and your weenie ancestors shrugged off the threat Hitler posed to the world allowing him to get big and strong. 50 million people died because of it.

Saddam won’t be killing 50 million.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 09:20 AM | Link to this

Its time Mikey. Scooter, you too. Its your patriotic duty.

ENLIST

By @@

February 22, 2007 09:20 AM | Link to this

LYAO:

Me, delusional?

For someone who shows up here consistently laughing their a$$ off, I’m not sure we could consider your liberal thought process “sophisticated”. Deranged maybe.

“I think the viewers are sophisticated enough to welcome all viewpoints,” he said.

Hell, if I lost a hair everytime the leftists here link to Keith Olberman’s comments as the be all and end all of the spoken truth, I’d be bald at both ends, and the object of your “sophisticated” obsessions.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 09:26 AM | Link to this

Is it that serious LuckoDull? Hitler? 50 million dead? Iraqi’s blowing up skyscrapers?

This war requires a WWII effort then right? You war dodging chickenhawks better head down to the recruitment center. What are you waiting for? Your country needs you.

Vote yes for the surge….ENLIST

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 09:29 AM | Link to this

Here’s some great video from Fox News that had nothing to do with Britney or Anna.

Tammy Bruce on the Left’s “Malignant Narcissism, where she nails the Parrots psychoses

If all you are seeing is Britney and Anna you must be watching the daytime Fox soaps.

From 4:00 in the afternoon until 10:00 at night there’s Cavuto, John Gibson, Brit Hume, Shep Smith, O’Reilly and Hannity and Colmes. Many of those shows re-run later for night owls.

There is plenty of fair and balanced substance in those programs.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 09:30 AM | Link to this

By w00t February 22, 2007 09:12 AM Looks like you can add Fox news to your list of news agencies that have “[gone] full blown pro Al Qaeda.

Dullard: You’re the one who believes Fox is some kind of right wing cheering section.

It’s your strawman, not mine.

I’ve been saying for years that Fox is crawling with pinkos and will endorse bull dy-ke Hillary in 08.

Look at what headlines they’re blaring right now:

Second Rape Claim Hits Iraqi Troops Allegation could undermine reputation of Iraq’s security services, which U.S. hopes can take over so troops can come home

There wasn’t a women out of 20 million in Germany that didn’t get raped by the Russian hordes, you pinkos wanted to negotiate with them. Now all it takes is some second hand heresay to shut the whole war down, no matter if we are fighting for innocent people or not.

Don’t side me up with hysterical panty waist Fox, you can have them.

You’re like two peas in a pod.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Doug

February 22, 2007 09:32 AM | Link to this

Corky Cobb, these conservative war supporters you speak of are Dick Cheney wannabes. As long as they don’t have to go, there children don’t have to go, war is just hunky dory to them. Where do think the term “chicken hawk” came from. These keyboard badazzes single handedly make the case for a return to the draft. You can bet your sweet patooty that if that were the case the ranks of these bar stool commandos would shrink to an all time low. But I agree with you. They support this war so strongly that they should do their patriotic duty and enlist. If they are too old and have kids, they should send them to the recruiting station immediately. That way they can come in here and represent themselves as someone who walks the walk instead of just talking the talk. But we know better, don’t we Corky Cobb?

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 09:35 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish, instead of blogging full time maybe you should do something about it. Something productive. Freedom needs you, right? Our way of life is at stake, right? To hell with the media….

ENLIST

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 09:43 AM | Link to this

Corky Cobb, you don’t know jack $hit about me so don’t presume to. I will tell you something though. I hang out at a bar called the Highlander near the intersection of Piedmont Rd and Virginia Ave. I have a black tattoo of the “Trail of Tears” (a Indian on horseback all hunched over) on my left forearm and I will look forward to you coming on down there with yo bad self. I don’t know that you will like what of yours I cork with your own cobb.

Your incessant ENLIST posts show a extreme level of immaturity.

By DebbieDoRight

February 22, 2007 09:44 AM | Link to this

{{Bush looked at the situation in Iraq and said, “we’re gonna need a bigger army”.}}

Yes, but that was AFTER the republicans lost at the polls. Before then he was saying, “That Rummy is doing a great job” and “We’re not going to change course”. Amazing how a few votes against your team can change your tune isn’t it?

By @@

February 22, 2007 09:46 AM | Link to this

Let’s all take a look back at what radical extremist Osama Bin Laden had to say about America’s media:

“In an October 2002 statement, marking the first anniversary of the Afghanistan invasion, bin Laden discussed the importance of “the media people and writers who have remarkable impact and a big role in directing the battle, and breaking the enemy’s morale, and heightening the Ummah’s morale.”

So, if Osama is counting on the liberal media, and their defeatist attitude to win his war, why would you choose to help him?

“Down with America”. Is it a view and the liberals share with the extremists?

There is an excellent article in Stratfor, “Jihadist Perspectives on a U.S. Withdrawal”.

They anticipated early withdrawal from the battlefield even before they attacked on 9/11.

He knows you liberals all too well. He’s been watching you for years.

By Jack

February 22, 2007 09:46 AM | Link to this

By Mike

February 22, 2007 08:22 AM | Link to this

Mikey is right! There is no bad news about Iraq being reported by the media.

Ah, the intellectual honesty of liberals…

By “liberal” do you mean anyone to the left of Mussolini, Mike?

By Jack

February 22, 2007 09:50 AM | Link to this

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 09:43 AM | Link to this

Corky Cobb, you don’t know jack $hit about me so don’t presume to. I will tell you something though. I hang out at a bar called the Highlander near the intersection of Piedmont Rd and Virginia Ave. I have a black tattoo of the “Trail of Tears” (a Indian on horseback all hunched over) on my left forearm and I will look forward to you coming on down there with yo bad self. I don’t know that you will like what of yours I cork with your own cobb.

There you go Corky! Scooter told on himself. Just another bar stool chicken hawk. He ain’t comin off that stool. All talk, no walk.

By Juleebella

February 22, 2007 09:55 AM | Link to this

Breaking News >> Watch the Anna Nicole Hearing on LIVE Streaming Video at 10:30 a.m. ET

This is from the Fox News website.

Yes, I do believe we need to get our priorities straight.

By Brad

February 22, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this

Scooter will too come off his stool, Jack. When he has to go outside to p** against the wall and sell a little meth to buy his next Bud with. Give him credit where credit is due.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 10:04 AM | Link to this

Time to be cured of Bush Derangement Syndrome. I’m offering my psych consultation services free of charge to the squawking parrots.

Here is a lengthy obituary/Biography of Saddam Hussein from The Times Online/U.K.

Malignant narcissists like Brainless Curtis, Woot, and little Amy will find plenty of facts which belie the propaganda that Hussein never threatened America or the rest of the world, or that Bush is an evil dictator.

Enjoy the read. I’ll be back later to check up on your progress.

By @@

February 22, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

Jack a/k/a/ Corky Cobb:

I know Scooter personally, and he did try to enlist. He was turned away for medical reasons.

Don’t worry though, he’s fighting the leftists’ environmental war. His degree is in environmental economics.

Now, GFY or enlist yourself. You’re argument is getting very old and redundant.

Think of the conservatives as already enlisted in the war effort because you LIBERAL DEFEAT-A-CONS are the enemy. You fit right into OBL’s game plan.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this

The liberal media is not going to fight this war @@. Its time for the American freedom fighters to put up or shut up. No more waivers for you war dodgers.

The war lovers are going to have to contribute. Scooters Indian just shed another tear. “Where are the warriors” he asks, “why am I tatooed on this guy?”

The terrorists have access to the internet.They see all of our warriors sitting at home blogging. They know that our bloggers won’t leave the comfort of home.

Its the “warrior” bloggers that have emboldened the enemy. The terrorists are not afraid of keyboards.

Our “warriors” are sitting this one out.

Vote YES for the surge…..ENLIST

By DNC

February 22, 2007 10:10 AM | Link to this

I am so glad that you are a conservative Buy Danish. You single handedly do more for the democratic party everyday than James Carville and Donna Brazille rolled into one. Every time you open your ignorant semi-literate mouth another dem is born. Keep up the good work BD.

By Givin Iraq a Lickin

February 22, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Four Iraqi soldiers have been accused of raping a 50-year-old Sunni woman and the attempted rape of her two daughters in the second allegation of sexual assault leveled against Iraqi forces this week, an official said Thursday.

A lieutenant and three enlisted men denied the charge but later confessed after they were confronted by the woman, a Turkoman. A second allegation within a single week is likely to undermine further the reputation of Iraq’s security services, which the U.S. hopes can take over from coalition troops so the Americans and their allies can go home.

King George and his friends keep winning the hearts and minds of Iraqis one woman at a time. Quiet your fears though, this is all part of Georgie Boy’s ‘Grand Iraqi Surge Plan’ and Republicans have their ‘firm hands and tongues’ deployed to lick the situation.

By Jack

February 22, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

Very good @@! Then Scooter should do his patriotic duty in the employ of a civilian contractor in Iraq! There is more than enough environmental issues there now for sure. Dick Cheney and co. has created a land of opportunity for ole Scoot. Of course he won’t do that either. Too dangerous for him. He prefers to sell meth, drink Bud, at pizz on the wall down at the bar. He ain’t comin off the stool. And the medical deferment thing. Let me guess. Bad knees, flat feet, or just plain old Cheney/Gingrich disease? The good old chicken hawk syndrome.

By CNN

February 22, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

You won’t see us in non-stop Anna Nicole/Britney mania like Fox

By DebbieDoRight

February 22, 2007 10:20 AM | Link to this

{{There wasn’t a women out of 20 million in Germany that didn’t get raped by the Russian hordes, you pinkos wanted to negotiate with them}}

And that’s something you’re PROUD of? Raping women is bad enough, but raping a MUSLIM woman would take this war into an all time high for enlistment into any islamic facist regime that chanting “Death to Americans, they rape our resources and our women”. THAT’s something you wish to see? You are a sick twisted pathetic excuse for a man/woman/whatever.

By Brian Curtis

February 22, 2007 10:21 AM | Link to this

Dull: That’s where you’re wrong again. The IRAQIS weren’t doing any of that until we invaded at Bush’s order.

BUSH is responsible for our soldiers being there for no good reason, and BUSH is responsible for their deaths.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

So you think my argument is getting old and redundant?

The war loving crowd has been preaching the same “liberal media, liberals love Osama, the threat is real” bs for the past year and a half on this blog. Now thats what I call redundant.

ENLIST

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

This is great, these hyper-intelligent ENLIST people, or person, have, or has, no problem displaying their immaturity. Dollars to donuts says I won’t be seeing any of these tough guys testing me to get off the “bar stool”.

Just because I go to a bar with pool tables and dart boards doesn’t mean I get hammered, but; when I do have too much I take a cab home (hat tip @@). Rather than taking an open container on the road with me.

By @@

February 22, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

Corky Cobb:

(((The liberal media is not going to fight this war?)))

Yes they are. They’re fighting on behalf of the enemy.

(((The terrorists have access to the internet.)))

You bet they do, and they’re using tools like you to further their cause.

(((They see all of our warriors sitting at home blogging.)))

Would that be you liberal warriors combined with the terrorists efforts? Is that the “our” of which you speak?

(((They know that our bloggers won’t leave the comfort of home.)))

Again, “our”? Why would they want you to leave? Your doing a helluva job for them.

(((Its the “warrior” bloggers that have emboldened the enemy. The terrorists are not afraid of keyboards.)))

Absolutely, that’s what we keep trying to tell you.

(((Our “warriors” are sitting this one out.)))

No you’re not, your helping the terrorists just like they thought you would.

I do support the surge, the terrorists weren’t expecting it. They were surprised.

So…..what’s your excuse again? Do you have one? You continue to support the terrorists because???????

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 10:27 AM | Link to this

{{Bush and American soldiers aren’t the ones flying planes full of people into skyscrapers}}

Andy-Dull, and neither were the Iraqis flying those planes either… you keep forgetting that part. Or are you intentionally trying to conflate Sept. 11 with Iraq? Are you still doing that, Andy-Dull????

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

Queen AntiR of Yahoo,

Maybe we should send the UN in to solve that rape problem, you reckon? Perhaps you think it’s just peachy for the UN to demand sex from twelve year olds as a condition of getting food for their families since you have never linked a Yahoo story about that, yet you can’t get us a Yahoo story of an alleged Iraqi rape fast enough.

By Shawny

February 22, 2007 10:28 AM | Link to this

CNN w/no Brit?!?

Right there on the home page…scroll down a bit and see Britney Spears’ ex gets emergency hearing

You are right, though. CNN doesn’t refer to her or the Fed

here

or here

or any of these places

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this

By AntiRadical February 22, 2007 10:17 AM BAGHDAD, Iraq - Four Iraqi soldiers have been accused of raping a 50-year-old Sunni woman and the attempted rape of her two daughters in the second allegation of sexual assault leveled against Iraqi forces this week, an official said Thursday.

Spammie: Every day Islamic Fascists strap bombs on and blow themselves up in the middle of innocent women and children, hundreds of times, I’ve never ever heard you express any outrage over that.

You’re an opportunistic little piece of sh-it, scumbag, filthy mofo, cheering on America’s enemies and dogging the defenders of freedom.

You’re nothing but rot.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Neo-Think

February 22, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

By LuckoDull February 22, 2007 09:30 AM- There wasn’t a women out of 20 million in Germany that didn’t get raped by the Russian hordes

Neo-puritan think at it’s finest. ‘It’s ok for US troops and their embedded units to rape Iraqi women, cause the Russkies raped German women 60 years ago.’

Neos will rationalize absolutely anything as long as it will let em make a few more warbucks.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 10:32 AM | Link to this

{{You’re nothing but rot.}}

We know you are, Andy-Dull!

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

By DebbieDoRight February 22, 2007 10:20 AM And that’s something you’re PROUD of? Raping women is bad enough, but raping a MUSLIM woman would take this war into an all time high for enlistment into any islamic facist regime that chanting “Death to Americans,

It’s Muslims raping Muslims, you pre programmed anti American idiot.

And no, it’s nothing I’m proud of, you mindless drone, but it is reality. Freaking people get raped in ATLANTA you puke, much less in a war zone.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this

Sheesh, now Goldie is parroting Pee Wee Herman.

Polly err…Corked butt,

Since you hang out at the Star Bar it shouldn’t be too tough for you to pop over and visit Scooter.

By @@

February 22, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Again, from Stratfor:

“Bin Laden’s opinion of U.S. resolve was not shaken by the “shock and awe” campaign that was unleashed in Afghanistan and, later, Iraq.”

Of course it wasn’t. He looked at the history of the liberals forced withdrawal from Vietnam.

“In a February 2003 message, he said, “We can conclude that America is a superpower, with enormous military strength and vast economic power, but that all this is built on foundations of straw.”

Let’s see now. Would that be the same strawmen the liberals like to build. They certainly don’t believe in building on a firm foundation. One that will collapse is more to their liking.

“So it is possible to target those foundations and focus on their weakest points which, even if you strike only one-tenth of them, then the whole edifice will totter and sway, and relinquish its unjust leadership of the world.”

Percentages…I’m not convinced that the “extreme left” comprises the greatest percentage in this country, but I do know that they are willing to exploit the ignorance of others in their cause.

Afterall, an ignorant tool is a useful tool in America’s liberal community.

Did you guys know that Kuwait was on Osama’s hit list? Rather odd that Saddam would choose to invade it.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

@@, I’m not on this blog every single day of the year screaming at the top of my lungs in support of a war I refuse to fight myself..

I’m not here every single day demanding others do something that I myself don’t want to do.

You war lovers want to blame everyone but yourselves for the mess in Iraq and refuse to do anything about it.

You war lovers support the surge as long as it does not include you.

You war lovers claim this big threat in Iraq but do nothing about it.

You war lovers call others cowards safe behind your deferments and keyboards.

You war lovers are all for war as long as you don’t have to give up American Idol, your SUV’s and your $400,000 mortgages.

You war lovers are all for war as long as its not you being blown up.

You war lovers are all for war unless it means leaving your families.

Its your patriotic duty…..ENLIST…Lead the way

By DebbieDoRight

February 22, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

{{Perhaps you think it’s just peachy for the UN to demand sex from twelve year olds as a condition of getting food for their families}}

You didn’t finish the sentence, it was the SOLDIERS assigned to the UN who did that, not the UN itself. Those SOLDIERS were disciplined, dismissed, and detained as any SOLDIER who violates the rules. Just like the Iraqi soldiers need to pay for what they did.

By DNC

February 22, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

Keep up the good work LuckoDull! You and those of your ilk create more democrats everytime you open your ignorant mouths. You just might become DNC man of the year if you keep that mouth running. Thank you LuckoDull.

By Bill Carver

February 22, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 10:25 AM | Link to this

This is great, these hyper-intelligent ENLIST people, or person, have, or has, no problem displaying their immaturity. Dollars to donuts says I won’t be seeing any of these tough guys testing me to get off the “bar stool”.

You and Dick Cheney sure do talk a good game Scoot boy. But how well can you walk?

By DebbieDoRight

February 22, 2007 10:54 AM | Link to this

{{It’s Muslims raping Muslims, you pre programmed anti American idiot.}}

Duh. I CAN read you know and unlike you, comprehend what i’m reading!! I was talking about the BIG PICTURE idiot!! This is an American, started, and maintained war! Duh.

{{And no, it’s nothing I’m proud of, you mindless drone, but it is reality. Freaking people get raped in ATLANTA you puke, much less in a war zone}}

Again, look at the BIG PICTURE. DUH.

By Neo-Think

February 22, 2007 10:55 AM | Link to this

By LuckoDull February 22, 2007 10:29 AM- You’re an opportunistic little piece of sh-it, scumbag, filthy mofo, cheering on America’s enemies and dogging the defenders of freedom. You’re nothing but rot.

Why thank ya LuckoDull, I love you too. Your kind and thoughtful choice of words makes me wanna be ya.

The next rationalization:

By LuckoDull February 22, 2007 10:29- Every day Islamic Fascists strap bombs on and blow themselves up in the middle of innocent women and children, hundreds of times, I’ve never ever heard you express any outrage over that.

So, it’s ok for American troops and their embedded Iraqi trainees to rape Iraqi women cause Islamic fascists strap bombs on and blow themselves up in the middle of innocent women and children.

See what I mean, there is absolutely nothing that a neo won’t rationalize in order to make a few more warbucks.

Let me give ya some help with your rationalizing, LuckoDull, it’s ok to rape Iraqi women because:

It will intimidate Iraqis into submission and thereby help insure the safety of American troops.

Russkies raped german women in WWII.

Islamic fascists are gonna blow em up anyway.

Anybody wanna help LuckoDull come up with more rationalizations for rape and torture?

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

You know if you go the home page of CNN right now you’ve got the grandstanding judge in the Smith case plastered all over it. If you go to the Fox News home page you’ve got this rape story you libs are wetting your pants over.

Question: How many women in Iraq AREN’T being raped now that Saddam, Usay, and Quasy are dead and their rape rooms are shut down?

By jnh

February 22, 2007 11:03 AM | Link to this

YES, the draft should be reinstated; however, let’s make it fair. No exemptions because “I’m in school etc. etc.” All those who can AFFORD to send their kiddies to university can forget about those Cheney deferments! Let’s see how many Bushie supporters we have then!!

By Neo-Think

February 22, 2007 11:05 AM | Link to this

Next two rationalizations:

By LuckoDull February 22, 2007 10:35 AM- Freaking people get raped in ATLANTA you puke, much less in a war zone.

It’s ok for American soldiers and their embedded Iraqi trainees to rape Iraqi women cause women get raped in Atlanta. It’s ok for American soldiers and their embedded Iraqi trainees to rape Iraqi women cause Iraq is a war zone.

A neo will rationalize anything all day long before he’ll let the american voter pry his yellow weathered crusty blood-soaked fingers from one single solitary warbuck.

Think I’ll quit calling attention to neo-rationalization. This could be a decade long deal and BS bores me.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

Even the Repugs in Congress know that the White House is doing a “bad spin”:

“What I’m worried about is that the American public will be quite perplexed by the president adding forces while our principal ally is subtracting forces,” said Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.), a longtime war supporter who opposes Bush’s troop increase. “That is the burden we are being left with here.” The notion that the British pullback actually signals success sounds like bad spin, added Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). “I think it’s Alice in Wonderland looking through the looking glass,” he said.

By DNC

February 22, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this

Everyone here should be cheering LuckoDull, Buy Danish and crew on. They are the best friends that the democrats come ever have. Thanks to wingnuts like them the dems can save their campaign warbucks for crunch time. In the meantime, let LuckoDull and Danish do the work for us. They are too damn dumb to realize that it is people like them that gave it to the dems in 06. Very few people on this earth would want to be associated with them. They don’t realize that they are the “taliban” that mainstream America is most afraid of. Kepp up the good work guys. The DNC appreciates it!

By Neo-Think

February 22, 2007 11:15 AM | Link to this

Oooops, another rationalization for rape:

By RW-(the original)February 22, 2007 11:01 AM- How many women in Iraq AREN’T being raped now that Saddam, Usay, and Quasy are dead and their rape rooms are shut down?

So, it’s ok for American troops and their embedded Iraqi trainees to rape Iraqi women cause Saddam, Usay, and Quasy did it first. RW, thanks for calling attention to the fact that there really isn’t that much difference in the Saddam Iraq and the Bush Iraq. Just a rationalization away from being identical.

Neos never tire of rationalizing their tireless pursuit of warbucks, regardless of what atrocities they use to acquire them.

By @@

February 22, 2007 11:16 AM | Link to this

Corky:

(((@@, I’m not on this blog every single day of the year screaming at the top of my lungs in support of a war I refuse to fight myself..)))

No, but you are on this board everyday helping the extremists win THEIR war.

(((’m not here every single day demanding others do something that I myself don’t want to do.)))

I’m not even “demanding” that you give up your support for the terrorists. Just pointing out the flaw in your logic.

(((You war lovers want to blame everyone but yourselves for the mess in Iraq and refuse to do anything about it.)))

I don’t know of anybody who loves war, but they’re always going to be a global reality. I reserve some of the blame for our side. The difference is that was then, and this is now. There’s a war going on, you either choose to fight it or run away from it. You pick the terrorists’ effort or America’s effort.

(((You war lovers call others cowards safe behind your deferments and keyboards.)))

I didn’t call you a coward, that’s your side calling conservatives cowards. I just said your thinking was misguided and illogical. You may not have the wherewithall to know what you’re doing.

(((You war lovers are all for war as long as you don’t have to give up American Idol, your SUV’s and your $400,000 mortgages.)))

Again, war lovers? Liberal rhetoric, nothing more.

I don’t drive an SUV, and I don’t have a $400,000 mortgage. Just asking here…is there some reason why you would resent somebody who does?

Oh, and btw, I only watched American Idol a couple of times, and that was only because I thought Constantine was a cutie.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this

When did I say anything was “O.K?”

By Neo-Think February 22, 2007 10:55 AM So, it’s ok for American troops and their embedded Iraqi trainees to rape Iraqi women cause Islamic fascists strap bombs on and blow themselves up in the middle of innocent women and children.

I guess if we are going to project our thoughts onto eachother, then allow me:

You libs don’t care about women being raped in Iraq, in Atlanta or Russia, even saying you do is a freaking joke. All you care about is bashing George Bush, period.

YOU are the ones that leave dictators in place killing and raping their citizens, WE are the ones that free them from oppression and give them freedom.

When Al Qaeda kills hundreds of innocent women and children, YOU get gleeful and happy, WE get angry.

YOU tell us how great your are and then go and call black people unclean.

YOU are the filth.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RNC

February 22, 2007 11:25 AM | Link to this

Actually, we’re all cheering Johny Murtha, the bribe taking, American troop slandering cut and runner.

Go, Johny, go.

By BillCarver

February 22, 2007 11:26 AM | Link to this

RW…just turned on Fox and all I saw was Anna Nicole Smith.

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

Well, apparently this blog isn’t going to reach any discernible level of intelligent debate, well with all of these new names saying the same things, so I’m out. @@, I hope you are having fun with Corky.

The terrorists are counting on our retreating prior to the Iraqi’s being capable of defending themselves, so keep up the defeatism and critical hind-sight jockeying. Keep pretending that the Iraqis who have put their lives on the line to defend their new representative government don’t deserve our support any longer. Keep pretending terrorists come from a specific location rather than the larger Middle-East. The terrorists would like to be able to pick the battlefields and they are counting on the lefts “Whack-A-Mole” strategy to give them that benefit. The terrorists would like to know our plans and strategies and they would appreciate you leftist continuing the efforts to have those publicly disclosed. Before one of the talking points come; the PLAN was to remove a lying deceitful and duplicitous dictator, then install a government representative of the Iraqi people to fill the vacuum that would result. Any further PLANNING by the civilian leadership is micro-managing and we know how well that worked out in Vietnam.

The wonderful thing about criticism based on hindsight is you can always be right, but nobody will ever know how your criticism would’ve affected the current reality.

By Neo-Think

February 22, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

By LuckoDull February 22, 2007 11:24 AM- When Al Qaeda kills hundreds of innocent women and children, YOU get gleeful and happy, WE get angry.

Sure, Neos get angry {as long as those women and children are sittin on top of a buttload of easy pumpin oil deposits}. Not so much when those women and children are black and oiless like in the Sudan. Ya don’t hear much neo-outrage over anyplace that ain’t got something in it for them do ya? Hearing a neo play the ‘altruist card’ is much like hearing OJ play the ‘race card’- nothing but crocodile tears.

By Dr.Doom

February 22, 2007 11:41 AM | Link to this

In honor of Ni,er,Black History Month I believe we should send all of the African Americans to fight the war in Iraq.

This way, even if we lose, crime in America will drop 300%.

By @@

February 22, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

Scooter:

I always have fun, you know that. Excellent post at 11:34. Pretending is a child’s game. Realities are much harder to face. Liberals don’t like them.

BTW, I’ve already received several calls about “the picture”. It’s a big hit.

By Jack

February 22, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

Halliburton Co. (NYSE: HAL), a provider of oilfield services, is holding job fairs in Fort Worth Friday and Saturday to recruit job seekers for job opportunities in Iraq.

The job fairs will be held in two sessions — at 8 a.m. and 1 p.m. — at the Holiday Inn, 100 Altamesa E. Blvd., in Fort Worth.

The company is looking for civilians and former military service members who want to go to Iraq and Afghanistan as civilian contractors.

Thought this might be of interest to you patriotic bloggers that otherwise might be ineligible to join the military. Since all of you I am sure want to support President Bush and the war in Iraq by doing something other than blogging for the cause, this might help. I am sure all of you will be putting yourselves in harm’s way, so let me be the first to say that the rest of us will miss you here. You can hold the thanks too. I am more than glad to help you get to Iraq where you can actually show the strength of your convictions in a tangible way. Interestingly enough Environmental Engineers are one of the hottest job openings in that country. Here’s your chance to come off that stool Scoot. Glad I can help.

By DNC

February 22, 2007 11:45 AM | Link to this

You are doing a fine job today LuckoDull! Keep up the good work! You are single handedly performing a third trimester abortion on the republican party. You are definately our man of the year! GO LuckoDull GO!!!

By Truthman

February 22, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

So, all you little policemen up in Hall Co. must feel so proud of yourselves what with busting those vicious pot houses!!!

For every house you bust, 50 slip through you fingers. You cannot stop it. You cannot legislate morality.

Why don’t you worry about your illegal immigrants working in all you chicken houses and let the pot smokers alone. Or, better yet, go bust your own for illegal use of steriods. It’s a big, silent problem that the media won’t confront.

The “War on Drugs” is as futile as W’s War in Iraq.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 11:54 AM | Link to this

“When Al Qaeda kills hundreds of innocent women and children, YOU get gleeful and happy, WE get angry.”

Wowie! You get angry and take the anger out on a blog. That sure is getting the job done isn’t it.

Al Queda is reading cr@p like this and laughing. “What are the American war lovers going to do? Blog us to death? Are they going to hit us over the head with a blog? Type the words ‘we will kill the terrorists’ over and over again 7 days a week”

The terrorists knew the anti-war people would make a fuss. What they didn’t expect was the American warriors staging a sit-in. As in sitting down next to their computers thinking they can win a war as if its a video game. OOOHHHH, I’ll bet they’re really scared. Lol.

Why are you war loving dodgers emboldening the enemy? Why are you sitting this one out?

ENLIST

By Jack

February 22, 2007 12:02 PM | Link to this

By Jack

February 22, 2007 11:42 AM | Link to this

Halliburton Co. (NYSE: HAL), a provider of oilfield services, is holding job fairs in Fort Worth Friday and Saturday to recruit job seekers for job opportunities in Iraq.

The job fairs will be held in two sessions — at 8 a.m. and 1 p.m. — at the Holiday Inn, 100 Altamesa E. Blvd., in Fort Worth.

The company is looking for civilians and former military service members who want to go to Iraq and Afghanistan as civilian contractors.

Thought this might be of interest to you patriotic bloggers that otherwise might be ineligible to join the military. Since all of you I am sure want to support President Bush and the war in Iraq by doing something other than blogging for the cause, this might help. I am sure all of you will be putting yourselves in harm’s way, so let me be the first to say that the rest of us will miss you here. You can hold the thanks too. I am more than glad to help you get to Iraq where you can actually show the strength of your convictions in a tangible way. Interestingly enough Environmental Engineers are one of the hottest job openings in that country. Here’s your chance to come off that stool Scoot. Glad I can help.

Just in case you “patriots” missed it the 1st time.

By Dr.Doom

February 22, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

Cooky Cobb,

Why don’t you enlist bit$h! Your subhuman rants have no place in a otherwise civilized society.

You and all the rest of the raped as a child liberals need to get lost.

By Truthman

February 22, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this

We SHOULD be in Afghanistan!

We SHOULD NOT be in Iraq!

Now, how is that anti-war. What it is is pro-common sense that is so lacking in Cheney’s…er…Bush’s administration.

Again, how is that anti-war? C’mon, tell me!

By Addolf Hitler

February 22, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this

I heard my friend Joseph Goebbels posted yesterday, I am proud to see that the Republican Party is carrying on our traditions and I would also like to thank their stoolies who post here, thanks, Andy, @@, Buy Danish, Dusty and all the rest. Guten Tag. Adolf

By Devastator

February 22, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

Jack,

Good blog buddy. Unfortunately, the can’tservatives won’t take you up on it because they are a bunch of talk and no action,(at least when it comes to themselves of course.) Frankly, I believe that they, along with their president, enjoy watching their soldiers die.

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 12:14 PM | Link to this

BillCarver,

Do you have a point or did you just feel the need to tell me what you’re watching? Perhaps Neilson would be a lot more interested than I am.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 12:17 PM | Link to this

By Corny Cobb February 22, 2007 11:54 AM “When Al Qaeda kills hundreds of innocent women and children, YOU get gleeful and happy, WE get angry.” Wowie! You get angry and take the anger out on a blog. That sure is getting the job done isn’t it. Al Queda is reading cr@p like this and laughing. “What are the American war lovers going to do? Blog us to death?

We as in the Conservatives, you know, the ones that have the United States Armed Forces sticking their foot up the terrorists a-ss?

I’ll bet Al Qaeda is laughing, up with the 72 virgins.

Makes YOU sad to think of, don’t it?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

If you support our troops, you should check out this website. There are many ways to show your support:

The 2007 IAVA Legislative Agenda- Bringing New Veterans’ Voices to Washington

By Truthman

February 22, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

@@…please tell me where bin Laden is located?

Canada? France? Germany? Britain? Iraq?

I’ll bet he’s on the Pakistani/Afghani border…NOWHERE NEAR IRAQ.

Don’t you believe we should focus our forces there, and, if not, why not?

By Shawny

February 22, 2007 12:24 PM | Link to this

Don’t look now, but CNN.com has a live feed of the Anna Nicole Smith hearing.

I said don’t look.

By Corky Cobb

February 22, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

Luckodull, what boot do you have sticking up Bin Laden’s butt? Would that be a virtual reality boot? Is there a video game that allows you to do that?

By Dr.Doom

February 22, 2007 12:25 PM | Link to this

Falseman,

The goal is to eradicate the world of terrorism. It isn’t just about defending 9/11 anymore. We should dedicate our resources to wherever radical islamists show their ugly faces so that there won’t be a repeat of 9/11.

Got it Jacksa$$?

By DNC

February 22, 2007 12:28 PM | Link to this

Thanks again to all those like LuckoDull, time for the truth, and Dr. Doom for doing their part in the creation of more and more democrats. Keep aborting the republican party with your posts.

By Truthman

February 22, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

Very good, Shawny!!

RDRR!

By Devastator

February 22, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

Dr.Doom,

How are we eradicating any terror when we are allowing the 1# terrorist to go free?

By Truthman

February 22, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

Dr. Doom,

Since I already work for DoD and contribute every day to the GWOT, when are you going to enlist? What are “we” doing, Dr. Doom?

You and your ilk use the plural “We” all the time, but when it’s time to actually do something, it’s usually “them” who fight your wars.

Money talks, BS walks! - John Jenrette

By Truthman

February 22, 2007 12:46 PM | Link to this

Devastator,

Remember March 13, 2002 when the Chimperor famously said, “I don’t know where bin Laden is, and I don’t waste a lot of time thinking about him.”

That’s why the repugs don’t go after him, their leader says he doesn’t think about him, so why should his syncophants?

By DNC

February 22, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 12:17 PM We as in the Conservatives, you know, the ones that have the United States Armed Forces sticking their foot up the terrorists a-ss?

Obviously my work is done here today. My efforts can best be focused on raising funds from all the new democrats that the above moron creates everytime he posts. “Conservatives” like this semi-literate cretin keep performing their 3rd trimester abortion on the republican party and make it virtually a lock for the dem nominee in 08. Mainstream America is running far and fast from these right wing luntics. 06 proves it. Congratulations on getting this country back on track dumbazz. Thanks to you the republican party is moving left at the speed of light. Great job! Keep up the good work.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

By Dullastator February 22, 2007 12:39 PM How are we eradicating any terror when we are allowing the 1# terrorist to go free?

Dullastator: You can’t be stupid enough to be insinuating that Bin Laden is the only terrorist in the world?

It would have been much better to have caught Bin Laden before he knocked the World Trade Center over, surely you agree with this, right?

And who was it that had the best chance to catch him but instead chose to waffle and pus-sy out?

Want to bet Saddam will never knock over any tall American buildings?

Want to bet that Zarqawi won’t be blowing up any innocent American children?

And you are against this concept?

This angers you that we are killing blood thirsty, cold blooded murderous savages?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By For the Record ...

February 22, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

“The Case-Church Amendment was a piece of legislation that sought to rein in President Richard Nixon’s conduct of the Vietnam War. Named for its principal co-sponsors, Senators Clifford P. Case and Frank Church, it was passed by the United States Congress on June 19, 1973. The Amendment prohibited any further U.S. military involvement in Southeast Asia without Congressional authorization, effective August 15, 1973. The veto-proof vote was 278-124 in the House, and 64-26 in the Senate.” (Wikipedia)

Case, by the way, was a Republican. Case-Church was bipartisan, as can be seen by the huge vote majorities.

There are two types of people who are now saying “liberals” forced us out of Vietnam when it was and remains clear that the vast majority of the American public had turned against that war — those who lie for partisan purposes (Coulter, Gingrich, Malkin, et. al.) and those who are simply too lazy or too stupid to learn the truth (like most of the right-wingers here and on Wooten’s site.)

By Devastator

February 22, 2007 01:00 PM | Link to this

Truthman,

The only thing they’re thinking of is oil revenue. Too bad the ignoramoses on these blogs don’t realize that. Haven’t heard from the usual suspects today:Buy Danish,Dusty,etc. They’re probably somewhere getting off on Anna coverage.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 01:00 PM | Link to this

He’s not Hillary!

What is clear is that Obama is sparking unusual turnout early in the presidential campaign. Massive crowds are signing up for tickets, standing in long lines and taking time out of their day for the chance to hear the freshman Illinois senator speak in person about his vision for the country.

By Devastator

February 22, 2007 01:10 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

I receive Obama’s newsletters. You should look into it. Today, he’s gathering support for his de-escalation of Iraq act.

By Dr.Doom

February 22, 2007 01:29 PM | Link to this

Devastator and Goldie,

Why don’t the two of you get it over with and get a room. There, you can spew all your liberal garbage in each other’s arms.

By getalife

February 22, 2007 01:32 PM | Link to this

Anna’s trial gets more coverage than the Libby trial

The blogs give more coverage to the Libby trial than the MSM.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 01:41 PM | Link to this

By DullNC February 22, 2007 12:48 PM Obviously my work is done here today. My efforts can best be focused on raising funds from all the new democrats that the above moron creates everytime he posts. “Conservatives” like this semi-literate cretin keep performing their 3rd trimester abortion on the republican party and make it virtually a lock for the dem nominee in 08.](http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2007/02/21/get_priorities.html#comment-1018717)

Blah, blah, blah:

And the first campaign finance reports for the 2007-2008 election cycle — in which the parties will be keeping in a wide-open race to succeed President Bush while again battling for congressional majorities — suggest that the question again is not whether the GOP will have a money edge, but by how much. The reports, filed to the Federal Election Commission by Tuesday’s deadline and analyzed by CQPolitics.com senior reporter Greg Giroux, showed that the Republican National Committee (RNC) raised $10.5 million in January, compared to $5.7 million for the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

It took what, all of two months to make America sick of liberals, again?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Shawny

February 22, 2007 01:41 PM | Link to this

getalife…that is because Libby wasn’t a hottie, in Playboy, nor is his child’s legitimate dad in question.

Sensationalism sells!

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 01:44 PM | Link to this

Good point, Mike. That dastardly librul media has gone all gaga over ANS’s death and Brit’s hairdo because it’s part of their grand plan to bring down the Bush administration.

And can someone please explain to me who, besides the immediate family, gives a flying fark about what happens to ANS’s body? Are they assuming we’re all a nation of necrophiliacs or something? I mean, honestly, who gives a damn? Let the family grieve, we don’t need to know any of this.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 01:44 PM | Link to this

{{The goal is to eradicate the world of terrorism.}}

Doomy— your goal is about as effective as the “war on drugs”. Or how about the “war on poverty”? Or the “war on ignorance”? How exactly do you plan to eradicate any of those ideas?

By getalife

February 22, 2007 01:45 PM | Link to this

Jane’s blog had great coverage of the Libby trial

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 01:49 PM | Link to this

Devastator @ 1:10— yes, I’m on the mailing list, too!

By @@

February 22, 2007 01:49 PM | Link to this

Truthman @ 12:19:

I can’t help you with what you are insistent on believing, but in my opinion, Osama Bin Laden has been incapacitated along with Al Qaeda.

Again, from Stratfor and I hope it doesn’t exceed the word limit. If it does, I’ll continue:

“Perhaps the most telling aspect of the Feb. 13 message is that al-Zawahiri refers to Taliban chief Mullah Mohammad Omar as the leader of the global jihadist movement.”

“It would appear that, given the Taliban’s resurgence in Afghanistan, al Qaeda is willing to accept Mullah Omar as its supreme leader. This could be an indication that al Qaeda’s apex leadership has weakened to the point where it is heavily dependent on the Pashtun jihadists. Osama bin Laden is likely incapacitated and unable to lead the jihadist struggle effectively; and al-Zawahiri on his own might not be in a position to lead the movement, especially since many of al Qaeda’s top leaders have been killed or captured. Furthermore, al-Zawahiri’s pledge of allegiance to Mullah Omar indicates that the jihadists anticipate greater success in Afghanistan than in Iraq.”

So would that ^^^ indicate that they’re not doing too well in Iraq, but they are there?

Elsewhere in this most recent message, al-Zawahiri acknowledges a weakness on the part of jihadists when he says they “are in need of men, money, materiel, opinion, expertise and information.”

I’d say that ^^^ means we’ve cut off the head of the snake.

They’re plan was to launch their greatest offensive in the spring, but something has forced them to launch it early. I’m reading that Pakistan’s and Afghanistan’s aggression against them has forced their hand.

Please try reading something other than left-wing rhetoric. It truly will expand your ability to think beyond defeatism.

Now, I’m off to the track.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 01:53 PM | Link to this

Troglodyte tho I am, I’d like to congratulate the Brits for having the sense and courage to pull out of this Iraq scam.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 01:54 PM | Link to this

So @@, if we’re doing so well in destroying Al Qaeda, then who is in Iraq. Shrubby keeps telling us we’re fighting Al Qaeda there (so we don’t have to fight them in Memphis, apparently). But since you’ve now determined that we have beaten them, then who is blowing stuff up in Iraq? You guys need to get your story straight: are we supposed to be scared of Al Qaeda or elated that we have beaten them behind the inspired leadership of our, erm, President.

By Buy Danish (the real deal)

February 22, 2007 01:58 PM | Link to this

Dr. Doom, c’mon down. I’ve got something for you. My warm beast of desire. I tire so of RW- he’s so shallow and I’m so deep.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 02:00 PM | Link to this

Goldie, it’s simple, according to the neocons. To eradicate Muslim extremism we keep bombing and invading until they start liking us and stop wanting to kill us. Oh, and until they sell us their oil for $6 a barrel. It’s a fool-proof plan!

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 02:02 PM | Link to this

I see that “Amy” has rematerialized as “DNC” today. Either that or DNC has plaigiarized some of Little Amy’s favorite words and phrases from yesterday.

Yawn.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

I see that an idiot wanker has arrived to help DNC and Little Amy out.

What a juvenile, tedious bunch of Malignant Narcissists.

By Corky's Sister

February 22, 2007 02:25 PM | Link to this

You must already know from the way that my little brother Corky whines like a big baby but, yes, he is nothing but a gutless wonder.

All that wailing that he does at the real men, the real men that fight to protect women, children and the elderly from the terrorists, he does it from under my bed.

What’s even worse is when the little pervert gets in bed with me, soaking wet from peeing the bed, and tries to hide between my legs.

All that Enlist! Enlist! is nothing but a load of crap, you should see the way he mounts the floor and all the neighborhood men enlist his mouth.

By @@

February 22, 2007 02:37 PM | Link to this

rushncap @ 1:54:

What exactly is it that you require from me as adequate nourishment for your brain power, or lack thereof? I’m thinking….

…formaldahyde, pickling brine?

You want desperately for Al Qaeda to be in one location, while history before the Iraq invasion, and since the Iraq invasion has clearly proven that they are global in scope. That’s glogal rushncap. You’re mind simply refuses to encompass anything so vast.

From Assyrian International News Agency:

“Al Qaeda continues to be operative in Iraq, killing both Sunnis and Shi’ites in the hopes of fueling the civil war. But since the killing of al-Zarqawi in Iraq on June 7, 2006, the dominant terrorist militia is Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army.”

Where is Sadr?

BTW, how IS that “pickle” of yours hanging today? Is it green with envy?

By w00t

February 22, 2007 02:44 PM | Link to this

I think it’s really funny how conservatives, republicans, or whatever… have to resort to personal attacks and name calling when they are presented with a very well put argument.

“They sky is blue.” “Well, your mom is FAT!”

Instead of acting like a child, why not support you claim with some facts or something that is well though out and written?

What’s said is that you even seen this from so called “news” sources. IE: Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reily. Instead of them asking questions, or contributing a good story from Iraq of Afghanistan, all they can do is talk down the supposed “drive by media” or “secular progressives”. They help to further push the country apart.

By RE

February 22, 2007 02:47 PM | Link to this

Please, a moment of silence. I have just recieved terrible news about Buy Danish and Andy. We will mourn them

By N-GA

February 22, 2007 02:54 PM | Link to this

Sometimes the libs on this blog take some lumps, and sometimes they give some.

But today it was just awful. Neo-Think absolutely thrashed poor little Andy. Beat him so badly his own mother wouldn’t recognize him. If there had been a referee, he would have stopped this one. Simply no contest at all.

But the finest moment came when Neo-Think responded (at 11:15) to RW’s post of 11:01. What a smackdown!! It was so utterly brutal that RW retired from the arena without a retort, only to reappear elsewhere on a different topic.

It was such a complete victory that I have had to go back and re-read each of the posts simply to enjoy them again.

Thank you Neo-Think!

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 03:05 PM | Link to this

Anybody want to bet that N-GA is Neo Think and he posted the bullcrap at 2:45 in an attempt to save some face after the major league as-s whooping he got this morning?

I’ll put a million bucks on it, hahahahahahahahahaha.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Heinrich Himmler

February 22, 2007 03:05 PM | Link to this

Thanks to Andy,Buy Danish,@@,Dusty and the rest of you Neo-Nazis, sorry I mean Neo-Consevatives, we will stop the presses.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 03:13 PM | Link to this

Whiny WooT,

Cry me a river. Do you see the “name-calling” on your side? Vile, vicious, filthy trash which is quite the contrast to words like “jackass” or “blowhard”.

RE,

I saw that when it was posted at around 9:00 this morning. The difference between you and me is that I did not have the poor taste to post it.

What a classless boor you are. Of course that ugly character trait makes you fit right in with the rest of the parrots.

Look! Just like clockwork another arrogant classless boor shows up to join the wanking parrot chorus———->

N-GA,

The aviary needs cleaning! Hurry before Princess Midori has a squawking fit!

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 03:17 PM | Link to this

@@, sorry honey, your fascination with my pickle, while disturbing and very gross, is also one-sided. You’ll really have to find someone with a “dumb old and ugly” fetish. Try li’l andy.

By @@

February 22, 2007 03:20 PM | Link to this

wOOt:

Excuse me, but I don’t recall that you’ve always been so civil here.

(((By w00t August 23, 2006 04:29 PM)))

(((RW you are a worthless human being that desrves nothing more than to live in the times of Nazi germany.)))

But at least you offer a half-hearted confession to being a liar.

(((By w00t August 23, 2006 05:41 PM)))

(((Maybe I lied, maybe I didn’t, but you’ll never know.)))

Do you guys do this to yourselves on purpose, or are you just not bright?

LuckoDull:

I’ll take your bet. It’s become too obvious to ignore here, but when your brain is as adled as a liberals what else is there to do.

They talk to themselves.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:20 PM | Link to this

I see Buy Durian couldn’t resist the temptation to include me in her latest meltdown and fury at those who ask that she act more like a human being.

Tsk, Tsk.

How “niggardly” of you, Durian.

By @@

February 22, 2007 03:23 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

I was talking about your brain. What in the world possessed you to think………oh nevermind, I forgot, you don’t use your brain, it’s been pickled.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:23 PM | Link to this

RE,

ROFL at that 2:47.

By Just sayin'

February 22, 2007 03:24 PM | Link to this

wOOt,

Apparently you don’t read through this blog very often.

Is that why the libs continually namejack, play moby, and post crap like RE @2:47?

you say:

“Instead of acting like a child, why not support you claim with some facts or something that is well though out and written?”

what, something like this?

“What’s said is that you even seen this from so called “news” sources. IE: Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reily”

wOOt, first of all, this sentence doesn’t even make sense. As everyone knows, Limbaugh, O’Reilly, etc. gives their opinions, just like you do. No one claims they are a “news” source.

So what is your point? Other than you like to write childish little rants?

You’re right LuckoDull- these silly a* libs love to scratch their own backs (among other things). They get caught all the time too!

By @@

February 22, 2007 03:28 PM | Link to this

RE:

I agree with Danish. That clowns link was in very bad taste.

Those were two people who died. Was it so you could use their deaths to have some sort of sick fun with Danish and Andy?

Sometimes even you surprise me with your links.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:28 PM | Link to this

Yes, the rape rooms are indeed closed, eh?

Instead of constricting it to one room, some have resorted to doing it in the entire house, or so it appears.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:29 PM | Link to this

speaking of childish little rants

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 03:30 PM | Link to this

Right, @@, you were talking about my “brain”. I’d have to be as brain-dead as your friends Muffin and Stalk to buy that one. I’m glad I’ve finally got to strip away that fake “niceness” veneer, though. That’s something.

By @@

February 22, 2007 03:31 PM | Link to this

OMG, and now we have Midori ROFL at RE’s 2:47.

Well, Midori ROFL at anything distasteful doesn’t surprise me at all.

By Just sayin'

February 22, 2007 03:35 PM | Link to this

These libs have a sick sense of humor.

Like their idea of supporting the troops

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:36 PM | Link to this

the most honest man in news

By regulator

February 22, 2007 03:38 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish, You seem to use the word vile alot. May I offer some alternatives lest you become redundant: wretchedly bad, highly offensive,unpleasant,objectionable, repulsive, morally debased,foul, filthy,poor wretched,of mean or low condition,menial,lowly,degraded or my two favorites,ignominious or paltry.I hope will make you look less foolish in the future.

By RE

February 22, 2007 03:40 PM | Link to this

Cue the fake outrage in 3…2…1….

Nothing like a lecture on class from BD

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:40 PM | Link to this

well, @@, I find you very distasteful, but I’m not laughing at you.

You are a clown, tho, albeit a pathetic one at that.

So now you’re the blog police, who deems what one can find funny? Doesn’t surprise me as all of your lame jokes fall flatter than rancid pancakes.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 03:44 PM | Link to this

Here’s a guy you Parrots really should invite over to the aviary. He is SO you.

Meet Andrew Stone

Princess Parrot,

I brought your name up because WooT had the violins out about “name calling”. Since you one of the top 5 worst offendors, if not THE worst, it was entirely relevant that I mention Midori, Queen of the Parrots.

btw, You used the word “niggardly” incorrectly.

By @@

February 22, 2007 03:48 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

It’s a strategy I enjoy using. It leaves ones adversary vulnerable to exposure. You have no idea what I meant, but your response revealed your mind.

Out again.

See ya’…..

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 03:50 PM | Link to this

regulator,

GFY, jackass. Vile works for me. Here’s my advice:

You may want to learn to cut and paste from your Thesaurus. That mess you ended up with only serves to illuminate your ignorance.

rushncap,

It was an error in your brain functioning that exposed you, not ours.

By regulator

February 22, 2007 03:52 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish, What is the correct use for the word niggardly?

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:56 PM | Link to this

would someone please get Buy Durian some bird seed? Maybe that will calm her down.

First I’m a princess, now I’m a queen.

And Buy Durian remains a niggardly sheep througout the ages, who likes to nibble on bird see while trying to tell people how to use the word niggardly.

I suppose it takes a niggaredly person to be so well versed in the use of the word.

Now if she could just come up with some alternatives to “vile”.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:57 PM | Link to this

I see Durian also likes to tell people to “GFY”.

Is there no end to her niggardness?

By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:59 PM | Link to this

RE,

all of her taste is in her mouth.

which is why I call her Durian.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 03:59 PM | Link to this

RE,

It’s not “fake outrage”. It’s a real observation.

Spot on too.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 04:01 PM | Link to this

See Spot run.

Run Spot run.

See Buy Durian fake outrage.

Fake Durian Fake.

By RE

February 22, 2007 04:04 PM | Link to this

Class:

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 03:50 PM | Link to this

regulator,

GFY, jackass. Vile works for me.

By RE

February 22, 2007 04:05 PM | Link to this

I agree, vile works for you

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 04:07 PM | Link to this

Regulator,

What?! Lose your Thesaurus?

Here’s a clue: It has nothing to do with referring to Midori as one of the name-calling Parrots, which is what I did and what she called “niggardly”.

Here’s a story about a politically-correct moron having a hissy fit over the use of the word “niggardly” to describe a budget.

That story^^ is a great peek inside the mind of Useful Idiots.

By Dusty

February 22, 2007 04:08 PM | Link to this

This blog is a total loss. Well, not totally. @@ and a few others see exactly what is demonstrated here. I see the same thing. Liberals are trying to undermine our country. Why?

Liberals hate the President and the Vice President.

Liberals want us to lose the war in Iraq.

Liberals see conspiracy even when the news is good. They look for bad news and keep repeating it.

Liberals support the troops by telling them they are fighting for nothing and doing bad things. They tell veterans that nobody cares.

Anyone not agreeing with liberals is a Hitler,Neo-Nazi, oil hungry, Halliburton employee, coward, bedwetter, blind follower, empire builder, etc.etc.etc.

Liberals show more loyalty to Osama, Saddam than our own President. They do not even have the character to support their own country. They hide behind freedom of speech to support our enemies. It is a sad day for America to have citizens like some on this blog. I hope they are not representative in any way of real Democrats. If that is not true, we are in big trouble in America.

By regulator

February 22, 2007 04:11 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish, Now you’ve hurt my feelings. I was only trying to help, I know I am incomplete because I don’t like to cut and paste. I was only trying to be like you. I am stopping now because the teardrops are clogging my keyboard.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 04:12 PM | Link to this

{{By Midori

February 22, 2007 03:57 PM | Link to this

I see Durian also likes to tell people to “GFY”.}}

Is there no end to her————> niggardness<—————?

Parrot,

Is there no end to your ignorance?

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha.

RE,

I’m sorry that you are too freaking stupid to see the difference between making jokes about someone’s death, which has been done 2 days in a row at my expense, and using the word to describe the symbol of the Democrat Party, and the acronym for “Good For You”.

By getalife

February 22, 2007 04:18 PM | Link to this

Crusty the clown spews libs, blah, blah, blah.

Clowns, indeed.

Geez.

By RE

February 22, 2007 04:18 PM | Link to this

Dusty, I am going to give this a shot.

I do not want us to lose the war in Iraq. The victory conditions set forth however (a stable pro-western government) are not achivable by US forces. That can only be achived by the Iraqi people. I believe this is highly unlikely considering the animosity towards the west in general and the US in particular. So due to poor strategy at the highest level, we have become involved in a situation where victory is not going to come about through US military action, or even through US diplomatic action. It is a foolish thing to commit the military into a situation you cannot win.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 04:22 PM | Link to this

@@, apparently you believe that you’re terribly clever. I had not realized that previously. Let me attempt to disabuse you of that notion. You are not. At all. You’re continuously attempting to be “cute”, and, although you are failing, it takes people some time to catch on. There you do have some skill. But that’s about all.

Muffin, “our” brain? I’m not surprised to hear you admit that you share a “brain” with @@.

By getalife

February 22, 2007 04:25 PM | Link to this

Speaking of clowns at Faux News

Hilarious.

By w00t

February 22, 2007 04:35 PM | Link to this

Dusty the parrot strikes again! SQUWAK!

It’s good to know that you parrot every talking point that Darth Cheney spews every day.

Dusty, why would a person that lives in US, WANT the US to lose? What kind of since does that make? I love my car, my job, my TV… Why would I want to give that up?

Anyone in this country can hate the president and the vice president at their choosing. That’s what makes America so great. There is nothing written that says we have to stand behind them during a time of war, or any other time.

I do support my country. I support my country in by not wanting my children or other people’s children to have to clean up the mess that we have created. I don’t want them growing up in a world where every Muslim will hate us for the next 40 years because of what we have done in Iraq. I support my country by not trusting the president and government on blind faith. Instead I question and ask for the truth. That’s what makes this country so great. Is that something you’re willing to give up Dusty, The ability to question your government when you do not agree? Would you rather be made to support a president no matter what at all times?

What you want all American citizens to do seems more in line with what you claim to be fighting. Blind faith in anything is not support; it’s more of a delusion.

By Tests "R" Us

February 22, 2007 04:35 PM | Link to this

Midori and Buy Danish, if both of you shall call each other parrots, then both of you should take my parrot test. A true parrot could not compliment their opponents party nor could they criticize their own party. So, will you take the test?

If so, each of you will list at least one complimentary thing about your “oppositions” party and at least one criticism of your party. She with the most compliments of the opposition and criticisms of their own shall be deemed not to be the true parrot.

Shall the true parrot be displayed to other bloggers?

By Midori

February 22, 2007 04:37 PM | Link to this

National Guard going to Iraq don’t have enough rifles

Maybe they sure use Durian and @@’s brains instead?

That will teach those “terraists”!!

By N-GA

February 22, 2007 04:41 PM | Link to this

Andy…Everyone knows you don’t have a million dollars. But if your blog buddies want to help you out, then let’s arrange a time and place for settlement of the bet.

Of course you will run from your own bet, bedwetter.

I don’t know who Neo-Think is, but he/she sure took your measure today.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 04:42 PM | Link to this

Test R Us,

I’ll go ahead and concede to buy Durian.

Has to be the first contest it has won in her life.

Glad that I could be of service, Durian.

The pleasure is all mine.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 04:43 PM | Link to this

and to prove it to you, Test, I submit exhibit A

Isn’t she cute?

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 04:52 PM | Link to this

N-GA,

All you were doing as Neo-think was slandering our troops the way you do so often under your usual name. For someone that claims to be a war hero you sure hate the United States military men and women. Why are you so bitter?

By Midori

February 22, 2007 04:57 PM | Link to this

Buy Durian at 4:12,

is there no end to your cackling?

doesn’t that hurt, with your mouth full?

By Test "R" Us

February 22, 2007 05:00 PM | Link to this

Midori, is your concession an admission of being a left wing parrot, or are you waiting for BD to go first?

By Writer's block

February 22, 2007 05:01 PM | Link to this

Retardo-rama

By Test "R" Us

February 22, 2007 05:02 PM | Link to this

Midori, is your concession an admission of being a left wing parrot, or are you waiting for BD to go first?

By N-GA

February 22, 2007 05:03 PM | Link to this

Hey Real Wanker…there you go again, spewing outright lies. I never claimed to be a war hero, but you continue to dishonor our troops by throwing that kind of crap around. It is you who hate US troops…no draft, no armor, no SERVICE! Neo-Think handed you your arse today, didn’t he. LMAO!!!!!!!

By RE

February 22, 2007 05:04 PM | Link to this

Hating the troops, wouldn’t someone who hated the military do something crazy like… oh I don’t know, send them in to a combat zone without a rifle?

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 05:07 PM | Link to this

By w00t February 22, 2007 04:35 PM I support my country by not trusting the president and government on blind faith.

w00t: I’ve never thought of it this way before. Your eloquent writing has caused me to view the country and our leaders in a whole new light. How could I have been so wrong? After I finished reading your words, I tore at my clothes and sobbed on my knees before the Lord. Thank you for saving my life. sarc/ off.

While I got you on the line, how come you filthy two faced pinkos voted FOR the war in 2003?

N-GA: Considering the cheap port wine that you serve your old lady, I seriously doubt if you could cover the bet.

And speaking of your little NeoThink act, let me show you exactly what you did to me this morning:

LuckoDull said “N-GA, Have you stopped beating your wife?”

See how that works, now all the dullards in here are clapping, thinking that N-GA is a wife beater.

If that juvenile act applies to me, does it apply to you?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 05:08 PM | Link to this

Midori, Keith O. is the best— I try to watch every evening, and end up flipping the channels between him and Stephen Colbert… they’re both incredibly funny and smart!

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 05:12 PM | Link to this

{{{By rushncap

February 22, 2007 03:30 PM | Link to this

Right, @@, you were talking about my “brain”. I’d have to be as brain-dead as your friends Muffin and Stalk to buy that one….}}

rushncap,

^^^^”Your” brain versus “ours”.

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 05:13 PM | Link to this

N-GA,

Let’s pretend it wasn’t you this morning. Whomever it was simply repeated the same slanderous lie about our troops over and over and you’re having an orgasm over it. What’s that say about you?

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 05:14 PM | Link to this

{{Liberals show more loyalty to Osama, Saddam than our own President. They do not even have the character to support their own country. They hide behind freedom of speech to support our enemies.}}

Dusty-brain— just like Andy-Dull, you too are deeply amoral and use your opinions as a guideline as to who supports “our enemies”… you are the one emboldening our enemies with your daily rants against Americans’ use of free speech, simply because they don’t agree with your very narrow viewpoint.

You terrorist-appeaser!

By @@

February 22, 2007 05:16 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

The strategy I’ve developed is one I use on the job. There is no intended malice there. Instead, it offers an observation that allows me to modify a behavior that is destructive to the student’s potential. You guys let it happen to yourselves. If you’re that subjective, I don’t want your party anywhere near national security.

But alas, you are adults, not my students. You do, however, behave like children with behavior disorders.

The kids love me. Their life is better because of what I do. Their efforts exceed mine, and that humbles me. My efforts are nothing by comparison.

Over the last couple of days I’ve presented several topics worthy of in depth discussion. An opportunity to open the mind up to possible strategies that may impact what’s going on in Iraq.

The liberals never miss the opportunity to pass on those opportunities to exercise their mind, and I’ve always wondered why. But I’m beginning to see the reason. They don’t have the ability to.

It aggravates you that I’m too “clever” to fall for your liberal bias when it comes to Iraq.

From day one, I have never misled anyone here about where I stood on defending this country from the intended harm of radical extremists. It is priority #1 with me.

I remain very open to some liberal ideas, but that’s never been enough for all of you. With you guys, it’s all or nothing.

Out again…..

By Dusty

February 22, 2007 05:21 PM | Link to this

RE,

Perhaps you are more familiar than I am about wars. But I never heard of a war in which the outcome was known.

But I have heard of wars where the country did not give support and goals were lost. There ‘s Viet Nam. We lost to communism and half trained troops.

WWII, many times the war seemed lost. Right after Pearl Harbor, we were short on everything. But the entire country was behind the troops and gave it everything possible. We won against imperialism over many difficulties.

Democrats turned against this war before it started. Although they supported the war in Congress (at that time), they still griped about losing a perfectly legal election and undermined all the President’s efforts. Liberals turned their war efforts to fighting President Bush. It is still obvious. It has seeped into the morale of the troops. It has been the banner of the news media and Hollywood. Whether you can ignore the obvious or not, DEMOCRATS ARE NOT SUPPORTING OUR WAR EFFORTS. If they are, they are not posting on this blog or showing it anywhere else.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 05:27 PM | Link to this

Tests R Us,

Since I was raised a Democrat, criticized that Party, and switched in 1994, I have met all the necessary qualifications to determine that Midori is a Parrot while I am an independent thinker.

As icing on the cake, I criticize my Party for losing the last congressional elections and I criticize members of my Party who are spineless RINO Republicans.

There!

Left-wing Parrot,

Why did you post that story today about the soldiers being accused of raping some Iraqi women? You posted it, but I don’t recall any squawking Parrot commentary to go with it.

Please don’t be niggardly - share the reason for posting that story with us.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 05:31 PM | Link to this

Midori— I saw your fantastic link about Rudy G. in the blog last night, but it was after-hours for the blog and I couldn’t tell you how much I enjoyed it… in case anyone else missed it, I’ll post the link again:

“Sure, he has no foreign or national policy experience, and both his personal life and political career are riddled with scandal,” said Hammond. “But in the key area of having been on TV on 9/11, the other candidates simply cannot match him. And as we saw in 2004, that’s what matters most to voters in this post-9/11 world.”

By Dusty

February 22, 2007 05:32 PM | Link to this

New names on the list..Durian???? Terrorist appeaser…bedwetter(repeat)…amoral…Darth Chaney.

And the propaganda..”send our troops to a combat zone without a rifle..”

And I am supposed to take you liberals seriously??

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 05:34 PM | Link to this

Danish — “he but repeats th’ offense”.

@@, you really should really just stick to working with “special” students. Sorry to break it to you, but your cherished strategies don’t work on the rest of us. They just make you look foolish. Maybe that’s just an occupational hazard, so consider me telling you this a mitzvah.

What aggravates me isn’t that you’re too clever. You’re not. It’s not even that you’re trying to be too clever. What aggravates me is that you act like a petulant 12 year old any time you’re challenged on anything; and any time someone does not accept you as the great peacemaker and an all-wise yet humble guru. Like I said, maybe that’s just an occupational hazard that you need to be aware of.

Also, not buying your whole “open mind” BS. You don’t have an open mind. You want us to believe you have an open mind, which are 2 different issues. And as for Iraq, your mythically open mind got exposed a couple days ago when I proposed that dividing Iraq may be the best solution. I got immediately, and viciously, attacked, by you, among others. On the merits of my proposal? No, of course not. On the fact that it was me who was proposing it, therefore let’s ignore what rushncap says and talk about pornography instead.

You’re not clever, @@. Sorry. You are more clever than your students, yes. But in the real world we have different measuring sticks.

By RE

February 22, 2007 05:44 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

The out come of a war is never known, but before you send in amred forces, the victory condition and exit plan should be set forth and achivable by your armed forces.

A country’s support for a war does not have much to do with the eventual outcome. The germans did not stop supporting germany in ww2, neither did the japanese stop supporting japan.

We tend to lose wars when the victory conditions are not our own. In vietnam our victory condition was a stable pro western government. That was not something the US military could install. Korea ended in stalemate.

Wars that we win are the ones with identifyable objectives and victory conditions. in 1991 our objective was to remove Iraqi forces from Kuwait.

We won

WW2 to remove german and japanese forces from occupied countries.

we won

Revolutionary war, remove the british from US soil

we won

Aside from the civil war, all the wars we won were through defeating a foriegn power occupiying a soverign country.

This has nothing to do with the amount of support there is for this war, it is based upon a flase premise for victory

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 05:48 PM | Link to this

@@,

rushncap just called you “a mitzvah”!

rushncap,

Repeated Offense? It is not our fault that you made a stupid blunder. Better?

Regarding your love note to @@, I “attacked” you on your idiotic plan to divide Iraq into 3 parts because your version proposed handing over 1/3 of it to the Iranians.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 05:49 PM | Link to this

{{Democrats turned against this war before it started.}}

Dusty-whiner— And your point is???? The invasion and war against Iraq was ill-conceived, ill-prepared, and used as a blunt instrument against anyone who DARED to question its validity. What will our enemies think when you post such hatred for 77% of Americans, hmmm???

By Dusty

February 22, 2007 05:51 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

since you like to evaluate character by your own standards, you won’t mind if I do the same for you.

You should not be working with students. Anyone with your vindictive character, lack of morals and filthy vocabulary should not be around young people. Adults in the real world do not want their children exposed to such adverse elements even in college.

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 05:51 PM | Link to this

Wow @@!! I had no idea you had viciously attacked rushncap so I went back and looked. This was simply brutal, no wonder he’s still crying days later.

By @@ February 19, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this rushncap: I remember in the beginning of this war in Iraq, the leftists were complaining that America was forcing our idea of democracy in Iraq. It’s their decision to make, not mine. If they want to divide themselves up, fine. I’m in favor of the time and military support they need to make those critical decisions. What are you? Some kind of emperialist? Are you wanting to dictate to other countries now?

I had to remove the paragraph breaks to do that in one link. @@, I think you’re dealing with someone far too sensitive to be exposing themselves in public like lil’ Dmitry.

By RE

February 22, 2007 05:55 PM | Link to this

Dusty, Midori linked to the article above at 4:37

Capt. Christopher Heathscott, a spokesman for the Arkansas National Guard, said the state’s 39th Brigade Combat Team was 600 rifles short for its 3,500 soldiers and also lacked its full arsenal of mortars and howitzers.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 05:57 PM | Link to this

Muffin — it’s not my fault you don’t know the English language well enough to understand what I wrote. Hint: look up pronouns and singular vs. plural. It’ll do you good.

I did not call @@ a mitzvah, you twit. Jezus, can’t you at least freaking Google what the word means before puking your retardation all over this board?

You are not the only one who attacked my plan. And I addressed your problem: I would rather have Iranians influencing 1/3 of Iraq (which they will anyways, whether we like it or not) without American soldiers dying by the dozen.

By Dusty

February 22, 2007 06:00 PM | Link to this

RE

That’s just it. You don’t even know what support means. It isn’t a choice. It is knowing that your country is fighting for you and you are fighting for it. You give it everything you’ve got.

You have defintely defined the Democratic war effort. If things don’t go just right, then forget it. Cut and run which all the excuses in the world won’t justify. Support is everything. You Democrats have forgotten how to give it.

I’m gone. Dinner is ready.

By @@

February 22, 2007 06:02 PM | Link to this

RW:

I was in the process of finding my response to rushncap. Once again, Doc…you’re quick on the draw.

When I hear the word “petulant” I always think of a “pouting” child.

It looks like rushncap just gave himself a “fat lip”, and so well deserved, too.

rushncap:

Stop hitting yourself. It’s sad to watch. I have kids at school who do that.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 06:05 PM | Link to this

Oh Dusty — doesn’t it just tear you up inside that I do work with students, all the time? Doesn’t it just make you want to retch that I taught for 4 hours straight yesterday, and that I’m partially responsible for the grades of dozens of young, impressionable college kids? Doesn’t it just grind your gears that my students love me? So sorry!

Stalk — I addressed @@’s concerns in my response to her. And, might I add, her “we should not be telling other countries what to do” bit of standup won her quite a few laughs. You are right, however, for one post she refrained from mentioning pornography. It’s as if the gates of heaven had opened up that day and god smiled on us all on this blog.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 06:06 PM | Link to this

{{{By RE

February 22, 2007 05:44 PM | Link to this

A country’s support for a war does not have much to do with the eventual outcome.}}}

What do you think happened in Vietnam? Unfreaking believable.

Goldilocks,

Regarding your 5:49,

The point is that you don’t vote for a war, send our military to fight a war, and then decide you want to desert them and hightail it out of there while the war is still in progress.

As a mother of a son who will be eligible for military duty in a few years, I shudder to think of what it must be like to have a child in combat with the sort of “troop support” you cowardly, backstabbing Dems provide.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 06:07 PM | Link to this

We have one train wreck talking about another train wreck:

McCain: Bush Pursuit of Iraq a ‘Train Wreck’

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 06:08 PM | Link to this

Great save, Stalk. You saved @@, once again, from the horrifying prospect of actually doing some thinking. Stick to your kids, @@. Compared to them you’re a beacon of reason. Better be the big fish in your tiny puddle, in the open waters you get devoured too easily.

By RE

February 22, 2007 06:15 PM | Link to this

Well, I tried.

Dusty sums it up,

“That’s just it. You don’t even know what support means. It isn’t a choice. It is knowing that your country is fighting for you and you are fighting for it. You give it everything you’ve got.”

It is more important in her mind to show an emotional display of support than it is to have a winning strategy. No amount of yellow stickers, blind allegiance to your president, or voting for the GOP is going to make Iraqis develop a pro western government.

By @@

February 22, 2007 06:16 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

It’s funny that you would choose the word “mitzvah” considering your views on religion.

There are two interpretations “a commandment”, as in one of the ten, which I saw as an act of God’s “kindness”.

Based on what I’ve seen here, you probably just see it as a “commandment” which gets in the way of your desires to do as you please.

So, were you being G-d-like and issuing your “commandment” to me because I so viciously (cough) attacked you?

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 06:17 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

Would you please point to the part of @@’s Monday response that you find to be such a vicious attack? Crying, screaming, and name calling doesn’t distract us from the fact that you were just caught in another bald face lie.

By RE

February 22, 2007 06:18 PM | Link to this

BD

Vietnam was never winnable because the victory conditions were not in US hands. It was up the the vietminese to have a stable pro western government. We were there in one capacity or another for over 10 years. Out loss in vietnam did not have anything to do with the attitude of our country. It had to do with an unattainable victory condition

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 06:18 PM | Link to this

{{{Maybe that’s just an occupational hazard, so consider me telling you this a mitzvah.)))

I know what the word means. Is that how it’s supposed to be used^^^?

As for “yours” versus “ours”, “Ours: is a possessive pronoun. Mine. Yours. Ours.

Like Dusty, I have to run too. Not cut and run, but run to a meeting.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 06:19 PM | Link to this

For once Muffin is right — the popular support of a war in a country oftentimes determines the winner. In Vietnam it was patently obvious. America was in ‘Nam for no reason and with no good purpose. Therefore the American populace — with good reason — did not support that dead-end war. The Vietnamese, on the other hand, were fighting for their homes, for their country. They cared deeply. So they won. Same thing with Iraq: we are there for no good (or any, really) reason. Therefore Americans are tired of this useless war, and don’t want any more of our boys and girls dying. We are simply sick of it. Iraqis are fighting for their country, for their land, and for their religion. They will not tire out. They will win, not because they are better than us in any sense. They will win because they have something worth fighting for, and we don’t. Lies as motivation only last so long in this day and age, and they are wearing out rapidly.

By @@

February 22, 2007 06:23 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

I’m the little fish in my big pond of achievers (that would be the children).

And I’ll tell you this rushncap…it beats you “standing” in the puddle you continuously make for yourself when you rant.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 06:25 PM | Link to this

now Buy Durian professes to be an English teacher.

what persona will she don next?

witch doctor?

street walker?

say hi to your sister hags for me at your meeting of the southeast coven.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 06:27 PM | Link to this

@@,

i’ve always suspected that you were a carp.

thanks for the verification.

By Midori

February 22, 2007 06:29 PM | Link to this

Rushncap.

thank you for that informational, thought-provoking and eloquent 6:19.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 06:30 PM | Link to this

Yes, @@, it’s hilarious. You either don’t know, or pretend to not know the more common usage of the term “mitzvah”, which is used to mean a good deed. Are you under the impression that atheists don’t do good deeds, or that they don’t speak Hebrew?

Stalk, you are right. I misspoke. @@ did not viciously attack me, Muffin did. @@ simply brought up a couple of objections, and, when I addressed them, retreated into her usual “cuteness”. The way I wrote my post the implication was that I was attacked by @@. That is not what I meant, and for that I apologize.

Muffin, you were talking about my brain. Brain. Singular. Then you started talking about “ours”. Not “our brains”, but “ours”, which is referencing the still-singular brain of mine. Therefore the way you wrote your sentence its literal meaning was that you and @@ shared a brain. I found that amusing and chose to poke fun of you. End of story. You can get as defensive as you like.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 06:31 PM | Link to this

{{They will not tire out. They will win, not because they are better than us in any sense. They will win because they have something worth fighting for, and we don’t.}}

Thank you, rushncap— well posted.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 06:32 PM | Link to this

By RE February 22, 2007 06:18 PM Out loss in vietnam did not have anything to do with the attitude of our country. It had to do with an unattainable victory condition

You really are a dullard, RE, I believe you’ve earned some kind of title with your illiteracy.

We lost Vietnam because you libs had no spine and, even then, you had to cut off funding to kill the South.

And then mass killing began.

Which you are responsible for.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 06:34 PM | Link to this

Lol @ Midori’s 6:27. And thank you for your kind words about my post.

I’m sorry if you think I “rant”, @@. I guess classifying my posts as such makes it easier for you to avoid dealing with their contents. Just as well. You need to save your strength for your kids.

By @@

February 22, 2007 06:43 PM | Link to this

Aaawwwhhh Midori thanks.

I take great pleasure in being that small fish in my big pond.

You, on the other hand are the epitomy of the verb “carp”.

Constantly complaining, when you’re not engaging in one of your many delusional, hysterical squawking rants.

Half parrot, half carp.

Is there a name for a creature like that?

BTW, you can’t maintain civility for long. Hang in there, you’ll learn how one day.

Practice, practice, practice!!!!

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 06:49 PM | Link to this

Nice half a*******ed apology rushncap!

Different subject for anyone that might know how SSH_PUTTY works. Specifically this is for access to IP addresses that are connected to Lantronics equipment that has ports connected to RS232 ports in telephone systems that need VT-100 emulation for remote programming.

Do I need anything more than the IP address and the port number that is listening to gain access from outside the WAN? If so where is it in the setup?

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 06:49 PM | Link to this

Other Iraqi war veterans still on duty there believe Appeal for Redress misses a larger point. “As an American soldier, I feel like we took an oath to obey the orders of our commander-in-chief and officers appointed over us,” says Army Spec. James Smauldon. Said another serviceman in Iraq, Army Capt. Lawrence Nunn, “I know what I’m here fighting for, to give the Iraqi people some democracy and hope, so I am 100 percent behind this mission. You don’t sign up to pick which war you go to.”

Duty, Honor, Country.

By Max

February 22, 2007 06:53 PM | Link to this

Congrats Bush. Congrats Pentagon. Congrats Walter Reed. Let’s send more troops out there. Somewhere. Anywhere.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 06:53 PM | Link to this

Which is about 10 as-$es more than we’ll ever hear from you, Stalk. But then again, I have at least some integrity. You don’t.

By Steve

February 22, 2007 06:58 PM | Link to this

Yethir there, LuckDumb. Hustle more of that precious deemocracy to Iraq. God knows they’ve demonstrated that they want it and need it and have craved it for over 2000 years. We’ve got insects like you to prove that point. Keep up your intellectual work.

By Mike

February 22, 2007 06:58 PM | Link to this

Anyone notice that the AJC.com’s current headline is

“Smith to be buriedin Bahamas Anna Nicole to rest next to son.”

Nice to see the AJC has its “priorities straight.”

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 06:59 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

When I say something that needs apologizing for I’ll let you know.

By Goldie

February 22, 2007 07:01 PM | Link to this

{{Duty, Honor, Country.}}

Right, Andy-Dull— where did you put yours?

By Midori

February 22, 2007 07:02 PM | Link to this

ever notice how, when someone completely puts Durian and her coven in place, they obsess about it constantly for days on end?

Durian kept throwing Amy’s name out there today, yet Amy was nowhere to be found.

Also, when someone asks Durian to act like a human being, i.e., display some sort of manners, she (in her words) “vilefully and niggardly” goes on the attack?

Poor, poor Durian. She just refuses to join the rest of the human race.

By @@

February 22, 2007 07:02 PM | Link to this

…and rushncap, you willfully ignored the words coming from Al Qaeda’s own “horses a*”, er mouth.

You didn’t want to hear that Zawahiri, and Al Qaeda’s efforts have been weakened.

That wouldn’t fit your agenda, now would it?

Not all Iraqis are fighting against us, there ARE those who are fighting along side of us. Helping us with information.

The extremists hated us before Iraq, there will be those that hate us after Iraq.

I’ve always believed the war would require a long and enduring presence in Iraq.

Longer than any of us had hoped for or could imagine, but necessary all the same.

By Scooter

February 22, 2007 07:02 PM | Link to this

I recieved a funny email and thought i would share it. If you feel that government is the cause of many problems you will like it. If you think government is the cure for all things you may not like it. Here it is:

Noah in 2007

In the year 2007, the Lord came unto Noah, who was now living in the United States, and said, “Once again, the earth has become wicked and over-populated, and I see the end of all flesh before me.

Build another Ark and save 2 of every living thing along with a few good humans.”

He gave Noah the blueprints, saying, “You have 6 months to build the Ark before I will start the unending rain for 40 days and 40 nights.”

Six months later, the Lord looked down and saw Noah weeping in his yard - but no Ark.

“Noah!” He roared, “I’m about to start the rain! Where is the Ark?”

“Forgive me, Lord,” begged Noah, “but things have changed. I needed a building permit. I’ve been arguing with the inspector about the need for
a sprinkler system. My neighbors claim that I’ve violated the neighborhood zoning laws by building the Ark in my yard and exceeding the height limitations. We had to go to the Development Appeal Board for a decision.

Then the Department of Transportation demanded a bond be posted for the future costs of movi ng power lines and other overhead obstructions, to clear the passage for the Ark’s move to the sea. I told them that the sea would be coming to us, but they would hear nothing of it.

Getting the wood was another problem. There’s a ban on cutting local trees in order to save the spotted owl. I tried to convince the environmentalists that I needed the wood to save the owls - but no go!

When I started gathering the animals, an animal rights group sued me.

They insisted that I was confining wild animals against their will. They argued the accommodation was too restrictive, and it was cruel and inhumane to put so many animals in a confined space.

Then the EPA ruled that I couldn’t build the Ark until they’d conducted an environmental impact study on your proposed flood.

I’m still trying to resolve a complaint with the Human Rights Commission on how many minorities I’m supposed to hire for my building crew.

Immigration and Naturalization is checking the green-card status of most of the people

By For the Record ...

February 22, 2007 07:03 PM | Link to this

Andy: “We lost in Vietnam because you libs had no spine …”

Quite the quinella: ignorant and stupid!

Or, possibly, the product of a totally amoral liar who knows better but is too childish and petulant to admit the truth.

Fear not, decent, intelligent posters: these right-wing fools really are a world unto themselves; a small, shameless minority of True Believers who can’t even recognize their own myriad, deparate pathologies when forced to confront them face-to-face.

They are only dangerous when they get elected …

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 07:06 PM | Link to this

Steve: Yes, we all should live under the oppressive rule of Islamic fundamentalists, thanks for your thoughtful, caring suggestions.

I wish you would have spoken up before we lost 200,000 soldiers saving the Frenchies.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By LuckoDull

February 22, 2007 07:16 PM | Link to this

By For the Record … February 22, 2007 07:03 PM Andy: “We lost in Vietnam because you libs had no spine …” Quite the quinella: ignorant and stupid! Or, possibly, the product of a totally amoral liar who knows better but is too childish and petulant to admit the truth.

Yeah, whatever:

Historians have directly attributed the fall of Saigon in 1975 to the cessation of American aid. Without the necessary funds, South Vietnam found it logistically and financially impossible to defeat the North Vietnamese army. Moreover, the withdrawal of aid encouraged North Vietnam to begin an effective military offensive against South Vietnam. Given the monetary and military investment in Vietnam, former Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage compared the American withdrawal to “a pregnant lady, abandoned by her lover to face her fate.” 2 Historian Lewis Fanning went so far as to say that “it was not the Hanoi communists who won the war, but rather the American Congress that lost it.”

Hahahahahahahahahaha, dumn a-ss.

Believe me and google too, this is a consensus among even the liberals.

When Congress cut off funding the South died, along with 2 million others.

That would be a democrat party legacy.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By rushncap

February 22, 2007 07:34 PM | Link to this

Stalk, you’ve done enough to warrant about a year’s worth of apologies, straight. And that’s just to me.

@@, yeah, Al Qaeda has been weakened. I’m sure that’s of significant comfort to the mothers of soldiers who died today, or yesterday, or will die tomorrow. And that’s “weakened”. Not stopped. Not even “incapacitated”. Now if we actually went after Al Qaeda after 9/11, maybe we’d have Zawahiri, and bin Laden, and everyone else. Instead we did this useless invasion. Great. We now at a point where the smallest defeat is our greatest victory. You may like that vision for America, but I don’t. And you are yet to explain why this Iraq thing was so “necessary”. “‘Cuz Bush said so” isn’t a good reason, btw.

By RW-(the original)

February 22, 2007 07:47 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

If kicking your butt in debates day in and day is something I should apologize for then you’re probably right. For anything else I’ll need more than you whining like a two year old.

By Buy Danish

February 22, 2007 09:53 PM | Link to this

RE,

I think LuckoDull explained the facts of life and Vietnam to you, so I have nothing to add.

CUT

I “viciously attacked” rushncap? Where? By pointing out that he made his own bed (so to speak) with his own brain?

rushncap,

Do tell!^^^^

Regarding your flowery but historically inaccurate speech at 6:19 -

The North Vietnamese were fighting for their land and their homes? In South Vietnam?

And who are the “Iraqis”? I thought that they didn’t exist and were merely three warring tribes who you wanted to be in tres partes divisa.

How did the Americans win WWII? Were they fighting for “their land and homes”, or were they fighting ideologies like Nazism?

We had victories over the ideologies of Nazism, Communism, and Fascism, yet you’re surrendering to Islamofascism?

Yes, there are still rag tag Commies (like you) running around, but all in all the ideology was defeated.

CUT

{{{Also, when someone asks Durian to act like a human being, i.e., display some sort of manners, she (in her words) “vilefully and niggardly” goes on the attack?}}}

Parrot,

You’re lecturing me on “manners”????? Ha Ha Ha. You really are delusional. Maybe in an aviary it’s perfectly proper to talk about smelling kotex?

Moving right along, in the future, please do not put quotation marks around words and then falsely attribute them to me. Unless you want to get a reputation as a liar.

I never said “vilefully and niggardly”. I said “vile”. There is no such word as “vilefully” outside of the aviary and possibly Huge Stunty’s dictionary.

Moreover, you first used the word “niggardly” today, albeit incorrectly, and then came up with a new word! “Niggardness”!

You parrots sure do talk funny.

By Peter

February 23, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

‘Dull - Vietnam was a conflict that the U.S. never should have become entangled with. To focus on cause for losing in a flawed mission seems futile. We would still be in that QUAGMIRE today if we did not pull troops out. (“Fighting terrorism there” rather than in Iraq … or could we do both?) The takeover by North Vietnam was inevitable and would not have been as bloody had the U.S. not engaged in carpet bombing and defoliation.