Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

February 18, 2007 07:32 AM | Link to this

So who’s the dog “talking” to, Bush or the “news” paper box?

It looks to me like the dog is looking right at the box.

It makes much more sense that way, seeing how Bush’s “surge” plan is an astounding success-

Report: Terrorists Fleeing Baghdad

and the “news” paper box is soon to be taken off the street because no one has a use for it anymore-

We will no longer deliver a print newspaper to outlying regions every day (hicktowns full of rednekkks.)

But don’t worry, libs, your Anti American “cred” got a boost from pro Al Qaeda vote in the House.

You still got your game.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Mad As Zell

February 18, 2007 04:54 PM | Link to this

“W Loses Cred”, well I would guess so, thanks to the constant brainwash, rinse and spin of left-wing traitors like Mike Pinkovich,Jihad Cindy Tucker, Poppin’ Jay Bookman and their communist Benedict Arnold-like, Al-Qadea-worshipping, Fidel Castro/Hugo Chavez/Kim Jong Il-loving colleagues at the Al-Jazeera Urinal Constitution and other anti-American, democracy- sabbotaging liberal media propagandist outlets like it. You anti-American, anti-military traitors have worked to tirelessly sabotage and undermine President Bush and the War on Terror from the start and are finally getting your much-hoped-for result of making America suffer a humilating defeat so you atheist morons can get back in control of the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court. Strange how the ONLY WAY for the looney left to win national elections is for traitors like Mike Luckob—— and those of his ilk to make America lose its will to fight and win international battles against tierney. Leftists repeat after the liberal media: Brainwash, rinse, spin, repeat; brainwash, rinse, spin and repeat every 30 minutes for the 24-hour news cycle on MSNBC, NBC, CNN, HEADLINE NEWS, CBS and NBC! Mike Pinkovich (a.k.a. Luckob——), Jay Bookend, Jihad Cynthia -ucker and the rest of the anti-American, pro-Al-Qadeq, pro-Nazi, pro-Leninist, pro-Stalinist, pro-Castro staff at the Al-Jazeera-Urinal-Constitution/New York Times South and other left-wing media propagandist spin outlets like it can go to flamin’ Yankee-traitor,San Francisco/ Northeast/New York/ Massachusetts-liberal hell. Jim Wooten save yourself from these brainless, spineless atheist hedonists and go write and a real American paper.

By Mad As Zell

February 18, 2007 05:08 PM | Link to this

Judging by your readership, circulation and subscription figures, your left-wing propaganda soiled toilet rag you call a newspaper is going straight to hell and deservedly so. Burn AJC, BURN!

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 07:55 AM | Link to this

It was a disgraceful and dishonest resolution, and it must have done wonders for the insurgents’ morale. Democrats hardly bothered to disguise that when they say they “support and protect” the troops, what they really intend is to undermine and endanger their mission. The Politico, a new Washington news site, reported Thursday that the strategy of “top House Democrats, working in concert with anti war groups,” is to “pursue a slow-bleed strategy designed to gradually limit the administration’s options.” If they had the courage of their convictions, they would forthrightly defund the war, bring the troops home, and brave the political consequences. Instead they plan a more agonizing and drawn-out defeat — slowly choking off the war by denying reinforcements, eventually leaving no alternative but retreat.

A nice politcally safe defeat for America or so they think.

We know who’s behind it, who’s abandoning our troops and our allies, again.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By George

February 19, 2007 08:01 AM | Link to this

Looks like Andy is up to his old ways again. I’m sure that he will have another nervous breakdown and be off the blog again when the men in the white coats come and get him. I wonder how many other names he posts under?

Andy, do you think blogging causes insanity?

Oh yea, why is W so tall in this toon? He is such a little man and very few people listen to what he says.

By Mrs. Godzilla

February 19, 2007 08:16 AM | Link to this

Mike - You are the Grand High Poobah of Understatement!

How wretched must one mans(?) life be that he gets his kicks from hacking into a newspaper blog?

By candide

February 19, 2007 08:17 AM | Link to this

Bush is the worst president we have ever had. The damage he has done will take decades to reverse. He should be removed.

By One Voice

February 19, 2007 08:19 AM | Link to this

I thought I told you to dance, Monkey, just like your Chimp messiah.

By Scooter

February 19, 2007 08:20 AM | Link to this

Ahh proof, what the world never got from Saddam the innocent.

By Swiftvoter

February 19, 2007 08:21 AM | Link to this

Sounds like someone woke up on the wrong side of the rock!

By Little Right of Center

February 19, 2007 08:44 AM | Link to this

Not one comment to dispute what LuckoDull and Mad as Zell said. Just name calling and personal attacks. Must be great to be a brain dead leftie.

By Brad

February 19, 2007 08:51 AM | Link to this

Anyone see 60 Minutes last night? The Kurds are at peace and prospering. Only 50 U.S. soldiers for 5 million people. One great success in Iraq! Hopefully they will be an example for the rest of Iraq.

By Takes one to know one

February 19, 2007 08:53 AM | Link to this

“Just name calling and personal attacks. Must be great to be a brain dead leftie.”

Isn’t it ironic?

By Steven Daedalus

February 19, 2007 08:58 AM | Link to this

I don’t guess Andy got any loving this weekend.

By Roy

February 19, 2007 09:01 AM | Link to this

Beautiful article and complementary picture of Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri on the front page. Then in the Opinion page we see ML’s drawing of OUR president looking like a duck with great big ears! Shame!

By Little Right of Center

February 19, 2007 09:04 AM | Link to this

TakesOneToKnowOne- I see that grade school is out today.

By Takes one to know one

February 19, 2007 09:10 AM | Link to this

Lil’ Rightie

Ironic that you are out also…

By Takes one to know one

February 19, 2007 09:12 AM | Link to this

Lil’ Rightie

Your snippish comment is cute. But you called the name callers a name.

What grade does that put you in? Or are you on the short bus?

By Andy"s Mom

February 19, 2007 09:14 AM | Link to this

Oh dear, my Andy is going through another one of his spells. What should I do? We just got a new puppy. I’m so scared. Oh dear.

By Brian Curtis

February 19, 2007 09:19 AM | Link to this

You know, the next time an incoherent raving screed issues from the president of Iran… I’ll be hard-pressed to decide whether he’s more or less credible than Gee Dubya.

By Wingnut Whiner-Babies

February 19, 2007 09:20 AM | Link to this

Boy, the wingnuts are whining like a bunch of water-boarding frat boys that got kicked off campus now that the Democrats are making ‘em pony up and go on record about Iraq.

Voters wanna be able to hold politicians accountable for their actions or lack thereof. Republicans wanna sneak around in the shadows and avoid any repsonsibility for anything, EVER. The Iraq resolution is sooooooooo inconvenient to the way Republicans wanna do government ! ! !

Boo, hoo, hoo, sniffle, whine, snark. Big bad ole Democrats are pickin’ on poor little ole Republicans. ‘We don’t want anybody to hold us accountable, we don’t want to go on record, we are ashamed of what we have supported and we wanna hide so those dastardly voters don’t spank us’.

Mean ole bad Democrats makin’ us go on record, it’s an unamerican, commie,pinko, liberal america hate fest. Anybody that would make us own up must hate America, our soldiers, dogs, mom, apple pie, little kids, and baseball. Baaaahhhhhh, boo-hoo, sniffle, snark! Dirty pinko liberals.

Don’t know about anybody else, but I’ve heard quite enough from the wingnut whiner-babies. I’m ready to hear from some people of REAL integrity who aren’t afraid to go on record for what they claim to believe, regardless of the fallout! Wingnuts oughta go home and come back to government when they have had a chance to grow some backbone ! ! !

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 09:36 AM | Link to this

Last week we had Obama pretending to be Lincoln and now we find he has a motto similar to Reagan’s. Reagan said “There’s no limit to what you can accomplish if you don’t care who gets the credit.” B.O. says “There’s no accomplishment that you shouldn’t hog all the credit for.”

I guess that isn’t so similar, is it?

By Cartoon Connoisseur

February 19, 2007 09:41 AM | Link to this

Good ‘toon Mike. If the ajc was smart, they would run these cartoons in Al Jazeera also. They would be a huge hit!

By w00t

February 19, 2007 09:46 AM | Link to this

The AJC is bad for America? Mad as Zell, do you really think that all those news organizations are wrong and Fox news is right?

I think what your problem is, “the truth hurts”.

The real problem with America is people like you. The ones that want to spread their hate around the country and the world. Conservatives and republican say they support the United States, but how?

Conservatives would much rather spend billions of hard earned American tax dollars on a war that had no links to Al-Queda, no WMD’s, no weapons program, and no reason to be there. Conservatives would much rather send their money to the largest welfare recipient on the face of the planet, Iraq, than to its own people in America. Instead we could be building better schools, paying for healthcare, finding cures for diseases, etc, etc. I think you should read this article

Conservatives would much rather go in to schools and try to strip out teaching they don’t see fit. Let’s teach our kids to ignore science, they’re all witches anyway, and who ever believed that Galileo guy anyway. We’re now engaged in a modern day witch hunt against our scientist and educational institutions.

Conservatives would much rather deny the possibility that their actions have an effect on the planet they live on. They would rather believe that it is a conspiracy by scientist and socialist to stop them from driving SUV’s and using incandescent light bulbs. Besides, what do they care, even if this global warming “thing” is real, it won’t affect them in the near future. Why should they worry about future generations, it’ll be their problem.

But, hey, let’s go on p** off the world, blowing up countries that we don’t like, pollution our planet, dumbing down our kids, crapping on our own people, sending our jobs over seas, limiting women’s rights because that’s what important in the world.

Seems to have worked well so far…

By Jesus

February 19, 2007 09:49 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By Night Train

February 19, 2007 09:50 AM | Link to this

Wingnut, Why have a vote that doesn’t mean squat? The Republicans have gone on the record and we have voted for what is right. If you want to stop the war as the Democrats claim, then hold a binding vote to cut the funding.

You want to talk tough but don’t have the backbone to take a hard stand. Cut the funding already, your party has the power to end the war in 30 days! Your party just doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to do anything except whine about the decision of people with the ability to act on their convections.

You talk a good game, you’re just lacking the balls to back up your dribble. CALL FOR THE VOTE, CUT THE FUNDING, QUIT WASTING EVERYONES TIME AND MONEY WITH A FEEL GOOD VOTE.

By IN THE NEWS

February 19, 2007 09:52 AM | Link to this

If, indeed, the Iranians are funding, arming and training Shiite militias and we are threatening military action against Iran, then doesn’t it logically follow that we should be threatening military action against Saudi Arabia which has been funding the Sunni insurgency, an insurgency that has killed far more Americans than the Shiite insurgency?

By REALLY STUPID OR A LIAR

February 19, 2007 09:58 AM | Link to this

“your party has the power to end the war in 30 days”

are you suggesting a coup?

cuz’ the laws, rules of conduct, constituion won’t allow what you so stupidly suggest.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 09:59 AM | Link to this

{{Anyone see 60 Minutes last night? The Kurds are at peace and prospering. Only 50 U.S. soldiers for 5 million people. One great success in Iraq! Hopefully they will be an example for the rest of Iraq.}}

Brad— if you’d been paying attention regarding the Kurds for years now, you’d know that they’ve always been a separate and separated part of Iraq. They’ve been the only friends America has had in Iraq, and that friendship is being tested these days with our attempts to make them participate in the governing of Iraq… we’ll see how it all works out for the Kurds. They’ve always wanted to be separate from Iraq.

By IN THE NEWS

February 19, 2007 10:01 AM | Link to this

Well, this just gets more and more interesting.

As we noted in the post below, Republican campaign contributor Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari got indicted on Friday for attempting to send over $150,000 to fund terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.

He contributed a decent amount of money to GOP congressional campaign committees in the 2002 and 2004 cycles and managed get named to a number of ‘committees’ and ‘councils’ set up as perks for GOP campaign contributors, including something called the “White House Business Advisory Committee.”

By IN THE NEWS

February 19, 2007 10:02 AM | Link to this

AND MORE

Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda regaining power. “Senior leaders of Al Qaeda operating from Pakistan have re-established significant control over their once battered worldwide terror network and over the past year have set up a band of training camps in the tribal regions near the Afghan border,” the New York Times reports. “American officials said there was mounting evidence that Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, had been steadily building an operations hub in the mountainous Pakistani tribal area of North Waziristan. Until recently, the Bush administration had described Mr. bin Laden and Mr. Zawahri as detached from their followers and cut off from operational control of Al Qaeda.”

By Jim

February 19, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this

Woof! Woof! Call me Blarney, too.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 10:08 AM | Link to this

The rightwing liars are still writing their crying op-eds, claiming that Valerie Plame was not considered “covert”, therefore Scooter committed no crime — here’s what another former CIA undercover analyst says:

Thanks to the work of Patrick Fitzgerald and his team of prosecutors, we now know beyond any doubt that the Vice President of the United States and members of his staff ignored intelligence and tried to spin the press away from the truth that Joe Wilson found in Africa—Iraq had not sought uranium. Cheney and Libby feared what the American people might do if they discovered they had been lied to about the case for war in Iraq. Now there is no doubt. They did lie and these lies have been exposed. Unfortunately, the Victoria Toensings of the world seem hell bent on perpetuating the lies and living in the delusional world that it is okay to out an under cover CIA officer during a time of war.

Stop the lies, you rightwing Terrorist-Appeasers! Why do you hate America so much?????

By Little Friskies

February 19, 2007 10:14 AM | Link to this

Good Dog Barney! Smart Dog Barney!

By Night Train

February 19, 2007 10:15 AM | Link to this

Really STUPID,

Are you claiming that the “the laws, rules of conduct, constituion won’t allow” a vote in congress? WOW! Do our elected officials know that they are not allowed to VOTE.

They DO have the power to VOTE (is that your coup?)to cut ALL funding for the war. That IS allowed by our laws, rule of conduct AND the Constitution.

cuz’ the laws, rules of conduct, constituion won’t allow what you so stupidly suggest.

By Political Witness

February 19, 2007 10:16 AM | Link to this

We dont hate america, but we do despise each other. The internet has made us enemies because the delivery is so cold. Reading emails, as you all well know, can enflame hatred and disqust against family members. The internet magnifies the effect of the printed word. It just does, and this is a phenomena that historians will point to as one of the reasons for the trials and tribulations we are about to endure.

By @@

February 19, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

ml, Americans are gonna want “proof” from our Democratic led congress.

Is Barney gonna get his “one bullet”?

Why are they so intent on hiding the “proof” about who their target is?

Why won’t they just “bite that bullet” and be the mighty anti-warriors we know they are?

Does it have anything to do with the 2008 elections?

By Shawny

February 19, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

Night Train…There is absolutely no real benefit (to the country) of the non-binding resolution. It does nothing but provide a political advantage to maintain house/senate control in 2008. Here’s how:

Dems that vote for it, no impact.

Republicans that vote for it, in order to distance themselves from an unpopular president and unpopular war, may get points for their stance, but from whom? Lib voters that won’t vote for they anyway? What do they gain? They lose.

Republicans that don’t vote for it…align with the (mostly) same voters that put them in office to start with, but get labeled Bushies, which is an unpopular label. They lose.

So, it is a wedge bill, partisan divisor. No real benefit. No substance. Pure politics. Get ‘em on record, play it against them in 2008.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

Poor poor Stalker Boy. He’s so unused to politicians doing good things (he does, after all, lick the anus of the Shrub administration) that he just couldn’t let a good deed — like Obama’s — stand without tearing into him. Name the last selfless thing the Shrub did for anyone, Stalk.

Oh, wait, I’m sorry, if it’s not a porn site, you wouldn’t know. My bad…

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 10:24 AM | Link to this

“If Iraq don’t kill you, Walter Reed will.”

I like how the Bush administration “supports the troops”.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

Military amputee uninvited from Bush event because the press would see him with no legs

I like how the Bush Administration “supports the troops”.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 10:29 AM | Link to this

So much for the Global War on Terror. If I have my recent history right, George Bush was going to get Bin Laden before he decided he didn’t care about him. Well, Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are making a comeback while the U.S. is pinned down in Iraq. If this can happen, George Bush doesn’t care about the security of Americans.

“We’re gonna git him dead or alive” -GW Bush

It looks like Bush likes Bin Laden better alive.

By REALLY STUPID OR A LIAR

February 19, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

YOU SAID “THE POWER TO END THE WAR IN 30 DAYS”

I STAND BY WHAT I WROTE YOU IDIOT

By Midori

February 19, 2007 10:30 AM | Link to this

Funny toon, Mike.

I’ve always said that if that guy told me it was raining outside, I’d personally have to get up and check for myself.

Goldie - you should see the reader’s comments to that Washington Post editorial Toensing wrote. It’s over 40 pages long (I was reading some of them last night), and some of her true believers are still yelling that Plame was not covert, and that Scooter didn’t lie under oath, and thus should not ever have been tried.

The very same Toensing who dominated the television screen during the Clinton impeachment advocating just the opposite.

These people never let irony get in their way. Or hypocrisy. Or the truth.

They just keep repeating a lie over and over in the hope that some will take it as truth.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

Welcome home! The Republicans hate you!

Support troops indeed!

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 10:33 AM | Link to this

Dmitry,

Take it up with the LA Times moron.

By Night Train

February 19, 2007 10:35 AM | Link to this

Shawny,

I agree completely with what you are saying about the non-binding vote. If they want to vote on something to stop the war, take a real “binding” vote that cuts the funding.

By @@

February 19, 2007 10:40 AM | Link to this

Hey look! There’s oil in them thar Iraqi hills.

Iraqi Sunni Lands Show New Oil and Gas Promise

Shiites have theirs. Kurds have theirs, and now Sunnis have their own.

Thanks to the foreign oil corps. You’ve done good work.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 10:42 AM | Link to this

Have y’all anything so far from our GA legislators about requiring paper ballots for our next election? I have not heard so far in this sessions and am wondering if any of you fellow Georgians have heard anything…

Often under pressure from voting-rights groups, 27 states have decided to require paper trails. Last month, Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida went a step further, asking the legislature to pay for replacing touch-screen machines by next year with optical-scan devices, which read paper ballots. Virginia and Maryland are considering similar moves.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this

How can I take it up with LA Times, Stalk? They’re a liberal rag! They would never publish anything bad about a Democrat! Their sole raison d’etre is to bash Bush and good god-fearing conservatives such as yourself. Therefore the only logical conclusion is that you made a webpage that looks —exactly— like LA Times’ to smear Barack. Right?

By IN THE NEWS

February 19, 2007 10:45 AM | Link to this

Unfortunately, with the blackout of true reporting , there is no way to confirm or deny this story, but it’s horrifying all the same, and I suspect it happens far more than we know.

TimesOnline: (h/t Clodine)

When Iraqi soldiers and police smashed their way into Mohammed al-Jabouri’s home on the first day of Baghdad’s latest security crackdown last week, he did not imagine they would steal the family’s life savings.

The security forces separated the men from the women and then ordered Jabouri’s wife to give them a suitcase filled with jewellery and £20,000 in cash. When she argued they threatened to shoot her. Then they destroyed the furniture and broke the windows of the cars in the garage.

“The same militiamen who used to raid our areas in the past are now conducting the security crackdown, using this as a chance to attack us further,” Jabouri said.

Later the same night, security forces raided a compound containing the homes of 110 university professors and their families. Professor Hameed al-Aathami described what happened: “They dragged us out of our beds as we slept with our wives and children, took us outside, bound our hands and blindfolded us. They beat, cursed and insulted us.”

By IN THE NEWS

February 19, 2007 10:46 AM | Link to this

Yes, the story is a couple of days old, but we didn’t have a chance to mention it before and I wanted to be sure to put it out there, since the American media is certainly not playing this up.

InTheNews:

An Italian judge has ordered that 31 people stand trial over the kidnapping of an Islamic cleric as part of the US policy of extraordinary rendition.

Virtually all of the 26 American suspects are thought to be present or former CIA agents, while the other five defendants are Italian nationals.

Prosecutors allege that Osama Mustafa Hassan Nasr was abducted in Milan on February 17th 2003 and flown to Germany and then his native Egypt to be questioned over suspected terrorist involvement.

Critics say Mr Nasr, only recently released, was taken to Africa in order to be tortured.

The previously secret US practice of extraordinary rendition, employed at the height of the war on terror, saw terror suspects taken to countries with more relaxed laws on interrogation and torture.

Italian prime minister Romano Prodi has not yet decided whether to ask for the 26 American defendants to be extradited - a request almost certainly to be turned down - but under Italian law the trial can go ahead regardless.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 10:47 AM | Link to this

@@ — so now that everyone has oil fields, would you support breaking up Iraq into 3 parts?

And hey, I’m glad it only cost over 100,000 deaths (and a few 100,000s injuries) to find that oil. Pretty cheap.

By Shawny

February 19, 2007 10:50 AM | Link to this

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ferguson19feb19,0,6115686.column?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

Another op-ed from that right wing rag, the LA Times (chuckle). It is actually pretty good, and though it focuses on Obama, it brings up some good points on the vacuum created in a pullout

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 10:53 AM | Link to this

Delusional Dmitry,

Sure dude…

Are you SURE you graduated from anything? Ever?

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 10:58 AM | Link to this

Good response, Stalk. Right on the mark. What have YOU ever graduated from, huh? You are so keep to know all the details of my personal life, are we willing to share a bit about our own pathetic existence, Stalk? Hmmmm?

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 10:59 AM | Link to this

Thanks for the link Shawny. I think it’s obvious to almost everybody, Dmitry excepted, that the LA Times is carrying the water for Hillary.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this

Sorry Dmitry,

I don’t go to Christian Women’s web sites to discuss the “benefits” of porn like you do. Or even to Yahoo chat rooms like this one:

Wow, you’re just an all around nice guy, aren’t you Dmitry

With social skills like that I see why you have to resort to porn.

By @@

February 19, 2007 11:13 AM | Link to this

rushncap:

I remember in the beginning of this war in Iraq, the leftists were complaining that America was forcing our idea of democracy in Iraq.

It’s their decision to make, not mine.

If they want to divide themselves up, fine. I’m in favor of the time and military support they need to make those critical decisions.

What are you? Some kind of emperialist? Are you wanting to dictate to other countries now?

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 11:22 AM | Link to this

Ummm, @@, hate to break this to you, but we have invaded and taken over a country. I think we’re slightly past the “we shouldn’t dictate what other countries can and can’t do” point. It’s entirely up to us what happens. There is no true democracy until the last U.S. soldier leaves, and you don’t want that to ever happen. Therefore yes, it’s up to us. Your hero Shrub should have thought of all this BEFORE the invasion, of course, but since that train has also sailed, we’re stuck in no man’s land.

Good job stalking me, RW. You’re really getting good at this. I’m glad you finally found something you’re good at. Certainly life isn’t one of those things, but online stalking is the next best thing. Congrats.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 11:23 AM | Link to this

“What are you? Some kind of emperialist? Are you wanting to dictate to other countries now?” -@@

That question could well be asked of the Chimperor. It’s funny you didn’t see that.

By getalife

February 19, 2007 11:24 AM | Link to this

My homeboy is listening to me:

“Reid: Iraq war ‘worst foreign policy mistake’ in U.S. history.”

Indeed.

By LMAO!

February 19, 2007 11:28 AM | Link to this

“we shouldn’t dictate what other countries can and can’t do”

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this

Oh good, I’m not the only one who found @@’s comments both funny and depressing in the “you can’t seriously have just said that” type of way.

By getalife

February 19, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this

“The idea that somehow we’re manufacturing the idea that the Iranians are providing IEDs
in Iraq is preposterous.”

w, who would never mislead us to start a war.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this

Dmitry,

You sure are busy lashing out at the messenger this morning. This time take it up with google.

Speaking of not thinking about your vote in advance. The Silky Pony didn’t have time for that before he sent our troops to war.

Scroll down.

By getalife

February 19, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

“Bush wrong again:

Bin Laden rebuilding power base American officials said there was mounting evidence that Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, had been steadily building an operations hub in the mountainous Pakistani tribal area of North Waziristan. Until recently, the Bush administration had described bin Laden as detached from his followers and cut off from operational control of Al Qaeda.”

heckofajob w.

Geez.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 11:44 AM | Link to this

Oh, I’m sorry, it was Google that posted those messages on this board? What’s next, Stalk, gonna blame your night-vision binoculars for watching me as I walk home at night? Or Sony for making cameras with which you will take pictures of me?

You’re a sick little boy. Get a life.

By Cornering the Market

February 19, 2007 11:48 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Insurgents launched a brazen coordinated attack on a U.S. combat post Monday, sending in a suicide bomber and clashing with American troops. Two U.S. soldiers were killed and 17 wounded, the military said.

Yup, the Republican war escalation is really turnin’ things around in Iraq. Now, the ‘Ali-Akbars’ are attacking our military outposts directly, but Republicans are gonna tell us that we really got ‘em on the run and these are just their ‘last desperate throes’ ! ! !

Since their war stocks are about to tank, the Republicans must be tryin’ to diversify and corner the market for bullshiite.

By @@

February 19, 2007 11:49 AM | Link to this

rushncap:

The oil resources for the Sunnis presents an equal opportunity for them. I would have thought a socialist, such as yourself, would be celebrating.

I’ve been surfing the net and found this:

In interviews with The Associated Press, Basri and four other militants detained with him said they were uneducated men, seeking to avenge relatives killed in a Muslim-Christian conflict six years ago and brainwashed by members of the al-Qaida linked Southeast Asian terror network Jemaah Islamiyah.

Basri repeated his confession to the AP, describing in detail its planning and execution.

“The preachers told us it was a form of worship,” he said. “They said, ‘The Christians cut of the heads of Muslim girls in the war, so know it is payback time.’”

Basri claimed he was sorry “not just from my mouth but from deep in my heart.” But he nevertheless joked and laughed as he described how it took two swipes of his machete to lop the head off one of the girls.

“It is a fact that al-Qaida took these people to Poso in 2001,” he said after showing a reporter video footage of terror training seized from an Arab fighter at the time. “They wanted to create a religious war.”

What’s that he said? Al-Qaeda took these people to Poso in 2001? Let’s see now…that two years prior to our invasion of Iraq.

Blackadder and LMAO:

My mind doesn’t dwell in the dark corridors of “America is a fascist conspirator” like you guys.

It focuses on the “proven” conspiracy mentioned in my ^^^ link.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 11:50 AM | Link to this

rushncap,

I posted an LA Times article to the blog and you took that as someone stalking YOU. Have I mentioned that in addition to being a miserable bastard that you’re delusional?

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 12:00 PM | Link to this

Erm, Stalk, the LA Times article is not stalking. You digging up something I wrote on some board —7 years ago— IS stalking. You really really need a life. Or a woman. Or a pet. Or anything.

@@, I’d have thought an idiot like yourself would have appreciated someone taking the time to correct you. Guess not. Oh well.

By LMAO

February 19, 2007 12:03 PM | Link to this

WE CAN USE THE NEW FOUND OIL TO PAY FOR THE WAR!!!!!!

Hip-hip-horray!!!!

Bush is my hero.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 12:08 PM | Link to this

Dmitry,

Check out your 10:23 response to the LA Times article then apologize.

BTW, it was last summer when you were telling the girls why you “use” porn. Hardly 7 years ago.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 12:11 PM | Link to this

It amazes me how indignant the wingnuts here get when the subject of name changes comes up. Then they refer to us with other names that they think are clever. If you want us to use the same name all the time then quit referring to us with other names.

What a weird bunch.

By @@

February 19, 2007 12:16 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

Is your 12:00 response the best you can do?

Wouldn’t you first have to prove me wrong, before you can correct me?

I’ve always been the one conservative on this board who gave you credit for having some intelligence.

You reward me by “DECLARING” me wrong, and calling me an idiot because I have the same opinion as you. “Equal opportunity is a good thing for all concerned.”

What a puzzle you have become. Is there a piece missing between your ears?

Too funny!

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

Blackadder,

If you don’t like Dmitry’s name take it up with his parents.

By @@

February 19, 2007 12:30 PM | Link to this

Blackadder:

Let’s talk about getting indignant on name changes shall we?

I recall you commending me on a humorous post I had made. Said it was hilarious.

Shortly after that I addressed you as “BlackUdderly Ridiculous”. You immediately got “indignant”, came back and said “It didn’t take me long to reduce myself to ridiculous name calling.”

I would argue that it didn’t take you long to lose your sense of humor, and become “indignant”.

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

By Spammie/ AntiRadical February 19, 2007 11:48 AM BAGHDAD, Iraq - Insurgents launched a brazen coordinated attack on a U.S. combat post Monday, sending in a suicide bomber and clashing with American troops. Two U.S. soldiers were killed and 17 wounded, the military said. Yay! Now I can dog Bush and America out today! Yay for Al Qaeda! Keep up the good work!

POS.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 12:33 PM | Link to this

Not only is Mitt Romney a FLIP-FLOP on many issues for the past 2 years, he also lies about what his Mormon religion believes about Jesus:

But when contacted by ABC News for a clarification of Mormon theology, a church spokesperson said the Mormon Church does teach, in part, that Jesus will someday return to North America. “We believe that Christ will return again to the Earth, and while that day is not imminent, it is our responsibility to prepare for that eventuality. One appearance will be to the new Jerusalem and another will be to the Jerusalem of the old world,” said spokesperson Michael Purdy. “It is our belief that the new Jerusalem will be established within the state of Missouri.”

Not a good sign when a candidate has to lies about his “beliefs”, and Romney has quite a lying record now.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 12:43 PM | Link to this

RW - I haven’t noticed anyone use the nick Dmitry here.

@@ - I don’t give a flying f what you call me or anyone else. I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy that abounds from your side. It just makes you all seem so unintelligent. Juvenile actually. But don’t mind me. Go right ahead and enjoy yourselves.

By @@

February 19, 2007 12:48 PM | Link to this

Aawwwhhh. I’m gonna put this up for Dusty in case she drops by. Anybody else who’s interested and wants to celebrate free expression.

THESE COLORS DON’T RUN

Now I don’t know if Melanie’s claims of war memorial desecration and the like are valid, but there’s no doubt her efforts are valiant, and deserve recognition.

You go girl.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 12:50 PM | Link to this

Not only is she being tricked by President Bush, Republicans, vast right-wing conspiracy, Kim Jong Il, and President Clinton, now she’s even being tricked by her own campaign. When she gets into the Oval Office, that red phone’s going to be ringing off the hook with crank callers. We’ll be on DefCon “Boo!!” for four years.

By One Voice

February 19, 2007 12:51 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

rw does have a life. What you see here eveyday is the extent of it. He also has a woman. When his first wife left him in the 80’s because he was such an a-hole, he got a mail order bride who doesn’t speak any English, has a 4th grade education, and has no opinions, so they get along perfectly. He also has pets- rats (seriously).

Question: What kind of woman would willingly embrace a rat?

Answer: rw’s wife, and she won’t even go near his pet rat.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this

Blackadder,

I don’t go by RW here either, but I’m not going to cry all day over you truncating my name. Grow up!

BTW, have you seen all the names Buy Danish gets called by your “mature, intelligent” fellow travelers? And you guys incessantly b!tch about Andy changing names, so you can’t get by on that either. Perhaps you should change names or the subject.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 12:58 PM | Link to this

See Dmitry,

That’s why One Voice is the original stalker boy. He’s pretty bad on the details though.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 01:02 PM | Link to this

Now W tries to equate his “war on terrr” with the Revolutionary War:

“In the end, General Washington understood that the Revolutionary War was a test of wills, and his will was unbreakable,” said Bush.

What the dip-stick doesn’t mention is that America is the invading country in Iraq, so that is the equivalent of being on the side of the British in the Rev.War! DUHHHH!

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 01:10 PM | Link to this

RW - You are still missing the point (not surprising). Whoever is using names toward BD doesn’t b*** about name changes. I don’t b*** about name changes. YOU and the rest on your side b*** about name changes.

Again I was pointing out your hypocrisy. If name changes are so bad, then use the person’s nick and not some variation that you think is clever.

And you think truncating to RW is hypocritical? rushncap is right. You need a life.

By Midori

February 19, 2007 01:11 PM | Link to this

“Please tell me what one word best describes your impression of George W. Bush. Tell me just the ONE best word that describes him.”

That question - asked periodically by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press [pdf] - is always a polling goldmine. The newest results, just out, do not disappoint.

Incompetent comes in first, just as it topped the list in March 2006. But a year ago, Good held the number two spot; this time, it’s Arrogant.

In February and May 2004, and February 2005, the top two were positive: Honest and Fair, or Honest and Good. But by July 2005, Incompetent had dislodged Good, and today, you have to go down to third and fourth place to find an upbeat adjective.

In previous polls, Christian always made the list, but this time, not one of the 740 respondents offered the word.

Idiot has gone up steadily through the years, while A* has held its own.

Stubborn and Steadfast are neck and neck.

Dumb was not offered this year, but if you add the Ignorants and the Idiots to the Stupids and the Confuseds, you’re approaching ten times the Greats.

Unaccountably, Sucks, which made a strong showing two years ago, has fallen off the list.

Brave, Tough, Honorable, Consistent and Confident have vanished, but Trying is a new starter.

As many people answered Dishonest as said President, but that doesn’t count the people saying Liar.

By @@

February 19, 2007 01:13 PM | Link to this

Blackadder:

Thank you for your dignified, intelligent, and mature response @ 12:43.

(((@@ - I don’t give a flying f what you call me or anyone else.)))

Personally, I have no problem with the person who keeps changing his/her names. I could go into a psychoanalysis as to why I think they do, but then, I’m not working this week.

I will continue to have fun, and thanks for the permission, which I never needed in the first place.

Like RW said. Time to change topics. You’re running out of shoulders you can cry on here.

By @@

February 19, 2007 01:19 PM | Link to this

I need to go into psychoanalysis, but I’m having a hard time pulling myself away from this blog.

By Midori

February 19, 2007 01:20 PM | Link to this

WASHINGTON: Back when Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was first lady, no one better embodied what she once called the “vast right-wing conspiracy” than Richard Mellon Scaife.

Scaife, reclusive heir to the Mellon banking fortune, spent more than $2 million investigating and publicizing accusations about the supposed involvement of Clinton and former President Bill Clinton in corrupt land deals, sexual affairs, drug running and murder.

But now, as Clinton is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, Scaife’s checkbook is staying in his pocket.

Christopher Ruddy, who once worked full-time for Scaife investigating the Clintons and now runs a conservative online publication he co-owns with Scaife, said, “Both of us have had a rethinking.”

“Clinton wasn’t such a bad president,” Ruddy said. “In fact, he was a pretty good president in a lot of ways, and Dick feels that way today.”

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 01:22 PM | Link to this

@@ - you’re most welcomed. Permission granted.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

@@ - how do you equate pointing out hypocrisy with wanting “a shoulder to cry on”?

Your thought process certainly is peculiar. No wonder you’re a Republican.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 01:26 PM | Link to this

Blackadder,

I know you think it’s perfectly normal for people to make up multiple names and then talk to themselves on the blog, but it’s really something they should be called out on. Maybe they (seeker/finch) (Thomas/PNAC) will see how crazy they are and get help.

With you, you were called out because it was obvious you had been here all along, but you have no distinguishing characteristics. You sound exactly like, RE, LHU, gadem, gttim, and others in that all you ever do is harp on some minute detail, whine about Bush, and echo left wing talking points without ever uttering anything meaningful and only rarely saying something amusing.

There is no hypocrisy here as there are countless examples of your side complaining about Andy changing names when he only changed names to stay ahead of Midori and her band of name jackers.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 01:28 PM | Link to this

As I was saying, a name jacking at 1:19 and Midori at 1:20.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 01:33 PM | Link to this

midori 01:20 - Excellent link!

By RE

February 19, 2007 01:33 PM | Link to this

Drudge Report

BRITNEY COMES OUT SWINGING FOR BUSH Wed Sep 03 2003 19:35:45 ET

Britney Spears came out swinging for President Bush on Wednesday during an interview with CNN’s Tucker Carlson.

CARLSON: A lot of entertainers have come out against the war in Iraq. Have you?

SPEARS: Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens.

CARLSON: Do you trust this president?

SPEARS: Yes, I do.

CARLSON: Excellent. Do you think he’s going to win again?

SPEARS: I don’t know. I don’t know that.

Not to pile on, but didn’t someone out there have a report on the correlation of mental instability and support of GWB?

END

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 01:40 PM | Link to this

This blog really shows a bunch of sick people.

First Luckovich sketches our American President as an ugly wimp talking to his dog which is more closely a caricature of Luckovich than the President.

Liberal comments seem to celebrate any loss in Iraq and declare the surge hasn’t worked when it has hardly started. Liberals hate Bush enough to want to lose the war and say they may cut off war funds if possible.

Brian Curtis thinks the President of Iran is comparable to the President of the United States. He can’t decide which he thinks is the best or probably, which one he will support.

rushncap has such a dirty mouth his jaws should be wired. Talk about filth and you’ve got rushncap.

IN THE NEWS scrounges world news to find antiAmerican information he can post to prove that everything American is rotten.

Goldie is already spouting the Demo bulletin info with talk of paper ballots. Got to get the excuses ready for losing elections in Georgia to Republicans and losing national elections in 2008.

Blackadder wants to point out the hypocrisy on consertive comments while overlooking the blatant dislike and total non-support of our country’s actions by almost every liberal here.

I consider this a very strange way to show how much you care for your country. In other words, I don’t think these fundamentalist liberals care at all.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 01:42 PM | Link to this

“…and then talk to themselves on the blog” -RW

How could you possibly know that I think that’s normal. Quit assuming you know what I consider normal.

“There is no hypocrisy here as there are countless examples of your side complaining about Andy changing names when he only changed names to stay ahead of Midori and her band of name jackers.” -RW

But did I ever complain about Andy changing names? Never. I pointed out that he did it when you went on your rant about me doing it. As I told @@, I don’t care what your side does. I merely point out your hypocrisy and now we’ve spent all this time going back and forth so I obviously hit a nerve.

Where you got the idea I pretended to be new I’ll never know. I never claimed to be new and mentioned myself that I used to be Proud Liberal Pinko (with the occasional “Quote of the Day” thrown in).

Go ahead and keep spinning. You’re a hypocrite and that’s all there is to it.

Case closed.

By RE

February 19, 2007 01:48 PM | Link to this

RW Sorry I never contribute anything meaningful or funny.

Here is an idea for you. It is about the Iraq war. The victory condition we have set out is that Iraq needs to have a stable pro-western government. No troops come home until this condition is met.

Now I would say that it is a huge blunder to have victory or defeat for your military decided upon by a foriegn country’s political leanings. Now amount of US military action will bring about this political solution, therefore they will be stuck in the crossfire without the ability to achive victory because they are persuing a bad premise for victory.

Also the idea that there could be any stable pro-western government in Iraq is far-fetched. 2 Generations of Iraqis have died either through direct military action in 1991 and 2003-present, or through perceived shortcomings of american policy including the abandonment of the shia after the gulf war in 1991 leading to thier massacre, starvation and hardship brought about by oil for food, and the lack of security leading to sectarian violence more recently.

I do not believe that the US is responsible for all of Iraq’s problems during the occupation, but if they are percieved to be by the iraqi people, it does not matter what the truth is. So in this enviornment, what possibility is there of a pro western government arising in Iraq?

By @@

February 19, 2007 01:55 PM | Link to this

RE:

How do you feel about the far left-wing’s support of “Hugo Smoochin’ Cindy Sheehan”? Do you guys even acknowledge her anymore, or have you written her off as a useless looney tool, while at the same time having sympathy for her plight.

I’m beginning to feel sympathy for Britney’s struggles, but I wouldn’t claim her as one of ours, regardless of what she says.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 01:59 PM | Link to this

Apologize to you for what, Stalk.

The link you posted today was to something 7 years ago, retard. Here is a quote from there ” westpark, a useless poster (Not rated) 26-Aug-00 04:02 pm ” Note the date, freak. 2000.

You are obsessed with me (and with my sex life). That is not healthy. You should see a shrink. Your welfare check may not cover it, but there are free psychiatric services available everywhere. My best friend works in one of those, so I know. She is not in your area, but maybe she knows where to look. I can ask her, if you wish.

By AntiRadical

February 19, 2007 02:04 PM | Link to this

Good toon ML. Like Chicken Little before them, the current administration has declared the sky to be falling so many times, no one is listening, anymore. Now, all we can do is pray that the clouds do not actually rip asunder until credibility has been restored to the oval office.

Luckodull @12:31 PM- Linking me to the 11:48 post is a little delusional, don’t you think? Since it is always only you who bothers with such drivel, it makes me suspect that it is indeed you who is the spammie poster to begin with.

If you think that you can lob in such grenades and then jack another poster’s nick to attribute them to, you are more psycotic than even I have imagined. Someone who had no input into such posting would ignore it; the fact that you do not speaks volumes.

When I care to address you, I will pull the string in the center of your back, till then- bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz off.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

No, @@, my 12:00 is not the best I can do. It’s the best that you deserve. I called you an idiot because you insist on calling my a socialist. I’m well over your cuteness, give it up. You’ll have to come up with a new creative way to cover up your lack of substance and your mean spiritedness.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

Dmitry,

What was the date when you told the TrueU girls why you took “porn breaks” at “work?” Here’s a hint

The 7 year old comment is the exact same bile that spills from you daily, so I don’t know why you’re complaining. Unless you’re embarrassed that you’ve always been the jerk we see today.

Blackadder,

Interesting that you started off saying that nobody on your side ever complains about name changes and now it’s supposedly just you. Even then you admit you just recently did mention it.

RE,

Be fair, I said you were occasionally amusing.

By RE

February 19, 2007 02:11 PM | Link to this

@@ I feel fine about Cindy Sheehan. Chavez is an interesting guy. He moves toward a more socialist monetary policy, and it seems to have helped the poor in his country. He has used the threat of nationalization to bargin for more advantageous deals with foriegn investors, and it has worked out better for the people of his country, to the detrement of some big corporations.

There are a lot of levels to monetary policy/ socialism. Some I agree with, some I am against. He was reelected and is popular in his country. I am not familiar enough with Venezual to know about what type of check there is on his power, there is a tendancy of very popular leaders to drift toward a dictatorship which is usually a bad thing

By Midori

February 19, 2007 02:12 PM | Link to this

Black Adder - glad you liked it.

this is pretty funny: George of the Bungle

It appears that RW has bored with stalking Rushncap, and I am now his target. Am I to suppose that now I’m RE?

Ho Hum……..

Wrong again, RW. Good thing you’re not a PI.

have fun, folks. Time to go grab some grub.

By Devastator

February 19, 2007 02:14 PM | Link to this

RE,

You’ve made an excellent point. Anyone that supports the mess “The Decider” has gotten us into has to be not only mentally unstable, but also suffering from chronic delusions.

I know a good therapist for all you can’tservatives out there.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 02:16 PM | Link to this

Stalk — GFY.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 02:17 PM | Link to this

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck either.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 02:18 PM | Link to this

{{This blog really shows a bunch of sick people.}}

You’re right, Dusty-Brain — you and the other rightwing loonies are a bunch of sick people. Thanks for posting.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:19 PM | Link to this

Scroll up to see what brought this lame excuse on

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:23 PM | Link to this

Parrot,

Learn to read, I said you were a name jacker I didn’t say you were RE. Granted you don’t say much worth reading, but when Friday rolls around nobody can say you aren’t entertaining.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 02:23 PM | Link to this

Don’t worry Midori, there’s plenty of Stalk to go around. There are 24 hours in a day, so he has lots of time to stalk more than 1 person. I guess when one does not have a job, a family or a life one has plenty of time to concentrate on tracking down every last tidbit of information about people on a blog.

By Devastator

February 19, 2007 02:25 PM | Link to this

Hey Goldie,

I was going to say that to Dusty. Oh well, better luck next time for me I guess.

Goldie, who do you think is a bigger idiot, Dusty or Buy Danish? I can’t decide.

By RE

February 19, 2007 02:26 PM | Link to this

RW,

COnservatives cannot be funny. As proof I would direct you to the show on Fox News that premeired last night.

Worst laugh track ever.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:26 PM | Link to this

Good for you too Dmitry!

By the way, Blackadder, why didn’t you b!tch about the names rushncap uses to address others?

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 02:28 PM | Link to this

By AntiRadical February 19, 2007 02:04 PM Luckodull @12:31 PM- Linking me to the 11:48 post is a little delusional, don’t you think?

Spammie: Aren’t we all so lucky that you were here to defend your honor, what are the odds of that, go figure, you checking the responses to Anti Radic, er, Spammie’s posts?

Don’t worry Spammie, we won’t hold your paranoid pscysophrenia against you, why should we when you’re doing such a good job of it yourself?

So what country are you molesting children in nowadays, have you moved on from Thailand?

Tell us about yourselves.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Brian Curtis

February 19, 2007 02:34 PM | Link to this

RE: Modify that to “Conservatives can’t be INTENTIONALLY funny.”

Because despite themselves, they wind up saying and doing the silliest, most entertaining things.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:34 PM | Link to this

RE,

That was not just the worst laugh track ever, it may well have been the worst show ever.

It was almost like what a liberal parody of what they think conservatives are like would be.

I really think Murdoch needs to pull any trace of it and bribe Snopes to say it was only an urban legend that is was ever shown.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 02:36 PM | Link to this

“By the way, Blackadder, why didn’t you b!tch about the names rushncap uses to address others?” -RW

As I stated before - rusncap never complained about name changers. You did.

One more time: I WAS POINTING OUT YOUR HYPOCRISY! I WAS NOT COMPLAINING ABOUT YOUR USING OTHER NAMES! Rick, I don’t give a flip what you do just don’t be a hypocrite when you go it.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:37 PM | Link to this

LuckoDull,

In case you missed it my 2:19 link is Queen AntiR of Yahoo exposing themselves.

By RE

February 19, 2007 02:38 PM | Link to this

COnservatives do Outrage and anger really well. WHen liberals do it it sounds like whining. But the liberals have the comedy and sarcasim down pat. Colbert is the king of sarcasm and it is a funny, watchable show.

By Blackadder

February 19, 2007 02:40 PM | Link to this

Nice family values kind of guy. Again, more hypocrisy.

“Speaking of George Bush, with whom Ariel Sharon developed a very close relationship, Uri Dan recalls that Sharon’s delicacy made him reluctant to repeat what the president had told him when they discussed Osama Bin Laden. Finally he relented. And here is what the leader of the western world, valiant warrior in the battle of cultures, promised to do to Bin Laden if he caught him: “I will screw him in the a$$!”

Nice president you wingnuts voted for.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 02:47 PM | Link to this

Blackadder,

Do you really want to stand by the statement that rushncap has NEVER complained about name changers? If so please go read every comment he’s ever made and certify that for us.

See what I mean about you getting hung up all day a one tiny little bit of minutia?

You’ll have to joust with your “hypocrisy” windmills another time. I’m heading out to enjoy the rest of this lovely day.

By AntiRadical

February 19, 2007 02:48 PM | Link to this

LuckoDull- I often check in here after lunch if I have time. You obviously have timed your jacking to catch my eye, but you already know that.

I have seen other examples of your hysterical paranoia over the course of the past few months but only while reading the blog after hours so I had no chance to respond to your lunacy. Aren’t we all so lucky that you just happened to jack my nick at the time I normally post, what are the odds of that, go figure indeed.

I will defer to your opinion as regards the molestation of children, you are unquestionably the expert in such matters.

I find the fact that you did not even bother to deny the claim that I poised regarding your true identity as the yahoo spammer to be most revealing. Innocent people never defend their own honor in your twisted world, do they?

By Devastator

February 19, 2007 02:48 PM | Link to this

Blackadder,

The Decider sounds like he may have some sexual desires for Bin Laden.

No offense.

By RE

February 19, 2007 02:50 PM | Link to this

So you were asking for something substansive RW, no comments on our victory conditions in Iraq being out of our control?

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 02:52 PM | Link to this

Adder, I’ll save you the time — I have never complained about name changers. Though, to be fair, since RW is the one in charge of keeping track of my life, you should probably ask him to double-check.

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 02:54 PM | Link to this

By AntiRadical November 3, 2006 10:06 AM In King George’s court, a military commander gets cashiered if he disagrees with the administrations LIES. See the above article by Lt Col Grunow for the TRUTH ! ! !

RW: I remember that day well ! ! !

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 02:59 PM | Link to this

Did Spammi, er, I mean Anti Radical just call me Spammie?

Huh.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By INSANITY

February 19, 2007 03:01 PM | Link to this

This is a friggin anonymous blog.

And yet to many it seems like this is the center of your life. Full time jobs demand less time.

Some are so caught up in this soap opera it seems to dominate their lives.

This is just plain weird. Get help.

By Apocalypse

February 19, 2007 03:04 PM | Link to this

None of you people are saying anything of significance. Why don’t you shut your computer off and do some work for a change?

By RE

February 19, 2007 03:09 PM | Link to this

Slow day, all the banks are closed, hence more time for blogging

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 03:11 PM | Link to this

By INSANITY February 19, 2007 03:01 PM This is a friggin anonymous blog. And yet to many it seems like this is the center of your life. Full time jobs demand less time. Some are so caught up in this soap opera it seems to dominate their lives. This is just plain weird. Get help.

Uh-huh:

Dealing With Control Freaks by Thomas J. Schumacher, Psy.D., R-CSW More About Thomas…Most all of you have had to contend with control freaks. These are those people who insist on having their way in all interactions with you. They wish to set the agenda and decide what it is you will do and when you will do it. You know who they are – they have a driving need to run the show and call the shots. Lurking within the fabric of the conversation is the clear threat that if you do not accede to their needs and demands, they will be unhappy.

Can I sleep now Hillary?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 03:11 PM | Link to this

Hi Goldie and Devastator

Maybe you are one and the same. You sound like “one”. Sorry your originality is so lacking that you just copied my lead on line. Oh well, you’d better use the Dem’s reports since you don’t have any thoughts of your own.

Thanks, @@, (12:48) for the line to an actual march for America. Good to hear about one that isn’t Cindy Sheehan and Jane Fonda. I missed your reference on my first scan here. Glad to read about Americans who are supporting our country and our troops with fervor!.

By Dr.Doom

February 19, 2007 03:14 PM | Link to this

INSANITY,

F$ck off you buzzard! If you don’t like it here, take the batteries out of your dildo and use them for a walkman while taking a bath!!

Jackass!

By RE

February 19, 2007 03:20 PM | Link to this

Funny cartoon from Politico

By Devastator

February 19, 2007 03:21 PM | Link to this

Musty,

Ever the conspiratist aren’t you?

Dummy.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 03:23 PM | Link to this

Is RE trying to tell us he’s a bank robber?

{{{{{By rushncap August 22, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this Boris — are you li’l andy?}}}}

By AntiRadical

February 19, 2007 03:26 PM | Link to this

Now, LuckoDull & one of his many other personnas, RW, resurrect one of his many prior nic-jacks @2:54 in order to “out” me as the yahoo spammer.

Tell you what, spammie, believe what you wish. Does it make any difference, whatsoever? It is an anonymous blog you poor pathetic creature; I could post as you, too, if I had your level of integrity, instead of jacking my own nic.

I simply choose not to play your sad little game. Keep up the good work, though, we can’t wait to see what imaginary playmates and slimey tricks you will come up with next. You have always been the resident entertainment, afterall.

By Brian Curtis

February 19, 2007 03:32 PM | Link to this

Dusty: As usual, you don’t understand that both the Colors Don’t Run and the anti-war marches are supporting the troops.

Hoping to get more of them killed, as you do, isn’t exactly “supportive.”

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 03:42 PM | Link to this

Liberal Newspaper Update,

AJC is aching!! Despite all the nice polish put on their report, AJC is cutting LOTSA employees. Here’s some of the numbers leaving: 128 independent contractors for out lying delivery, 80 in editorial operations, and 44 said to be “inside” the newspaper. If you are in your 50’s at AJC, you may be offered a voluntary buyout package.

AJC has taken pride on its editorial pages for mostly venemous attitudes toward our Republican President, Government and anything that sounds like Republican. Jim Wooten has been the only one with a few kind words for conservatives. If subscribers left in droves, I don’t think there should be any surprise at AJC, even with the trend to read on the internet.

This newspaper does not represent the region in which it is published. Even though it is owned by a rich Democrat, that does not change the location, politics or sentiments of the region. Money cannot change everything.

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 03:53 PM | Link to this

By AntiRadical February 19, 2007 03:26 PM I could post as you, too, if I had your level of integrity, instead of jacking my own nic.

Spammie: Alright, I’ll tell you what, since you’ve got this all figured out, could you tell us why I would ever want to jack your name and post the same nonsense that you post?

WTF would that prove?

Are you trying to say that your posts are so silly and mindless that they can be called name jacks meant to discredit you?

You want to talk about a revolving personality, you’re a virtual merry go round of insanity, just like Spammie’s posts.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Steven Daedalus

February 19, 2007 03:54 PM | Link to this

Dusty, You are a pitiful apologist for your Republican cronies and ideals, jump on over the cliff, or better still wait for Andy, maybe you two can hold hands on the way down.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 03:56 PM | Link to this

{{This newspaper does not represent the region in which it is published.}}

Dusty-brain— it’s called the “Atlanta Journal-Constitution”, not the Republican Journal-Constitution. What about the “Atlanta” part don’t you understand? We all know if you had your way, there would be NO news-reporting, just the rightwing propaganda put out by KKK Rove— What a pathetic Georgian you are!

By LMAO

February 19, 2007 04:00 PM | Link to this

Dusty every time click you click re-load you earn the liberal AJC more money.

Why don’t you go to the conservative Atlanta newspaper website?

What? Atlanta doesn’t have a conservative Newspaper???? With all the demand??????

WHY??????????

By getalife

February 19, 2007 04:01 PM | Link to this

So, this is the God w talks to

Geez.

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 04:02 PM | Link to this

Brian Curtis,

I don’t usually call names here but you are a blithering idiot.

Posting that I am “hoping to get more of them [troops] killed” is the biggest lie you have purposely ever told. And you have told a lot.

Go run in your ant-war marches and see how many troops think you are supporting them. You are cut-n-run and nothing else. I do not consider that support of the troops.

By @@

February 19, 2007 04:02 PM | Link to this

RE:

It was only in late January that the national assembly in Venezuela agreed to allow Chavez to rule by decree for 18 months. They were so excited about his plans for Venezuela that they temporarily disbanded themselves.

The oaf has been pretty busy since then. Let’s see, he’s nationalized the country’s electricity, and telecommunications. Oil is his people’s main source of revenue, but foreign companies are reluctant to enter contracts with him because his plans are to strip them of their majority stakes in the projects they may want to pursue.

And now for the tight-fisted clincher. He’s probably going to press for constitutional reform eliminating presidential term limits. He wants to remain in power until 2030.

Hell, by then his people will be so oppressed under his power, they’ll be nothing more than his slaves at the ballot box. But that, of course, will depend on whether he even gives them the privelege of voting. It’ll only be the poor that are left. The ones without options.

The middle class in Venezuela are making a fast exodus. They’re not stupid. They know what’s coming.

rushncap:

I’m sorry you find my posts mean-spirited and lacking in substance. I’ll scroll up and see if you have set an example which I should follow. Give me just a minute…..

Ummmmmm…NOPE, nothing I’d want to emulate. Sorry again!

Well, look at that ^^^ two apologies in one post. I know how important they are to you.

I guess it’s the fact that I don’t care to emulate you that makes me such a “meanie” in your @@’s.

I’m over and out for now.

By Rev Haggard

February 19, 2007 04:10 PM | Link to this

Getalife. That man is obviously a fraud.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 04:13 PM | Link to this

Dusty-brain— to help you understand news-reporting, our friend Stephen Colbert put it this way:

“Reality has a well-known liberal bias.”

Too bad, Dusty — you’re just gonna have to continue to get your non-facts from the Washington Times or Fox News…

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 04:14 PM | Link to this

Goldie & Stephen,

This is a Republican state whether you like it or not. It is not the state of Atlanta. Newspapers are supposed to be impartial in their news reporting. If over 66% of the editorials are liberal and 100% of the cartoonist’ output is liberal, this is not a balanced news organization as led by its editors.

There are other indications and omissions in their presentations which I will not bother to mention. Balance, not 100% either way, is what is missing.

TV Newscasters are coming under fire for their misleading and slanted news reports. I see the same partiality in the AJC.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 04:18 PM | Link to this

Oh, some more of Colbert’s wisdom about our prez:

“I stand by this man. I stand by this man because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message: that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound — with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world.”

“The greatest thing about this man is he’s steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change; this man’s beliefs never will.”

“As excited as I am to be here with the president, I am appalled to be surrounded by the liberal media that is destroying America, with the exception of Fox News. Fox News gives you both sides of every story: the president’s side, and the vice president’s side.”

I love this guy!

By @@

February 19, 2007 04:18 PM | Link to this

Oops! Before I go, I want to change that for rushncap. Make it “meanie pants”.

Better! That’ll be on a level that he understands.

By AJC.com /facts

February 19, 2007 04:20 PM | Link to this

We like crazy Andy and Weird RW.

They hit reload like crazy. Every click makes us money.

Andy alone has made us about $20,000.00.

Please freaks, stay, get comfortable.

Our motto: Every time a bell rings an angel gets their wings or Everytime a weirdo clicks a Cox gets more money!!

I guess the jokes on you!!!!!

By AntiRadical

February 19, 2007 04:26 PM | Link to this

LuckoDull @3:53- I have no idea what you are trying to prove. If I knew that I would be as delusional as you are.

The nic-jacking was going on long before I ever joined this blog. That simple fact incriminates those who were here before me. I have no idea if you are indeed the gameplayer but the fervor with which you accuse me makes you extremely suspect.

I do not imagine that the far-left radical, Spammie, is much different than the far-right radical, LuckoDull. Indeed, it would not surprise me to learn that you were both.

But in closing @3:53 you drop the pretense of your carefully constructed mask and say “You want to talk about a revolving personality, you’re a virtual merry go round of insanity, {{{{{just like Spammie’s posts}}}}}.”

So, you thought (or knew) that I was not Spammie from the start, but were instead just trying your usual trick of smearing anyone you may disagree with. Straight from the horse’s mouth, you have only managed to “out” yourself; could you be any more pathetic or clueless?

I will see everyone another day, LuckoDull seems to want the blog all to themselves this afternoon.

By Daniel

February 19, 2007 04:28 PM | Link to this

Goldie: Thanks, great post. Thant was Colbert’s finest moment. He was brilliant! I will never forget the Bush rictus when Colbert was weighing in.

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 04:29 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

Surprise!! The only newscasters I watch come on THe Lehrer News Hour and a few local broadcasters. I like the Newshour because it presents balanced viewpoints from a varied assortment of politicians, military experts, economists, poets, and experts in every field.

I have never seen nor heard your Colbert and don’t think that I would like to. Unlike you, I do not have to be told what to think.

By AJC.com /facts

February 19, 2007 04:31 PM | Link to this

Congratulations to Andy/Multiple ID Poster on your 2,000,000th re-load click on this website.

Anne thanks you. The liberal media thanks you. Your support is appreciated. We will make a donation to the NAACP in your honor.

By LMAO

February 19, 2007 04:35 PM | Link to this

Dusty what conservative Atlanta newspaper do you read?

By Midori

February 19, 2007 04:35 PM | Link to this

I heard about this story on NPR in the car.

It’s getting huge play.

Good.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 04:44 PM | Link to this

Even some Repugs in Washington understand who America’s prez really is, “he’s just like them…”

”This is why George W. Bush is so clear-eyed about Al Qaeda and the Islamic fundamentalist enemy. He believes you have to kill them all. They can’t be persuaded, that they’re extremists, driven by a dark vision. He understands them, because he’s just like them.

And when Ron Suskind wrote the part about the “we create the reality”, that tells it all about what the Repugs are trying to do to our news reporting organizations… we do indeed live in scary times in America!

By Dusty

February 19, 2007 04:48 PM | Link to this

LMAO

I don’t read a conservative Atlanta newspaper. What liberal Atlanta newspaper do you read (as if I didn’t know)?

By RE

February 19, 2007 05:03 PM | Link to this

Comments anyone, we are in an unwinnable war because we do not control the victory condition…

Here is an idea for you. It is about the Iraq war. The victory condition we have set out is that Iraq needs to have a stable pro-western government. No troops come home until this condition is met.

Now I would say that it is a huge blunder to have victory or defeat for your military decided upon by a foriegn country’s political leanings. Now amount of US military action will bring about this political solution, therefore they will be stuck in the crossfire without the ability to achive victory because they are persuing a bad premise for victory.

Also the idea that there could be any stable pro-western government in Iraq is far-fetched. 2 Generations of Iraqis have died either through direct military action in 1991 and 2003-present, or through perceived shortcomings of american policy including the abandonment of the shia after the gulf war in 1991 leading to thier massacre, starvation and hardship brought about by oil for food, and the lack of security leading to sectarian violence more recently.

I do not believe that the US is responsible for all of Iraq’s problems during the occupation, but if they are percieved to be by the iraqi people, it does not matter what the truth is. So in this enviornment, what possibility is there of a pro western government arising in Iraq?

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 05:07 PM | Link to this

By AJC.com /facts February 19, 2007 04:20 PM Everytime a weirdo clicks a Cox gets more money!!

So why you laying off?

By AntiRadical February 19, 2007 04:26 PM So, you thought (or knew) that I was not Spammie from the start, but were instead just trying your usual trick of smearing anyone you may disagree with. Straight from the horse’s mouth, you have only managed to “out” yourself; could you be any more pathetic or clueless?

I’m sorry but WTF did Spammie just say?

Could someone translate?

Surely he isn’t insinuating that I posted a thousand times under the “Spammie” label so that I could jack his, er, their name and pin it on Queen Radical?

Did she?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Daniel

February 19, 2007 05:13 PM | Link to this

Georgie Bush lied to get us into war. He lied about WMD, Iraq & Al Qaeda, Iraq & 9/11 and the threat to us. He lied about Iraq & Uranium from Niger. Congress should revoke the authorization for war. Bush is a deceitful fraud. He now wants 90 Billion! We borrow for war. Place a $5.00 charge on every gallon of gas to pay for the Iraq War. The war will end in eight days. All republican chicken hawks will evaporate. The cowards only want to borrow for war. They will send other people’s kids to die, while putting th bill on our children! They won’t serve themselves. That’s the definition of a a coward.

By Kurdish Stanzas

February 19, 2007 05:27 PM | Link to this

Iraq is not a war. It’s a symptom.

By Huge

February 19, 2007 05:31 PM | Link to this

Hey curly sucks! I found a new congregation for you!

Unfortunately the guy’s in south Florida, but he looks to be right up your alley! And besides Jim Jones and David Koresh are no longer in the biz!

Pastor with 666 tattoo claims to be divine

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/16/miami.preacher/index.html

Speaking of irrational, I had to laugh when last week BD responded to my request from any of the neo-cons about defining conservatism with this sound bite: Peace through Strength. Even for an empty-headed sloganeer like her, I thought she probably parroted that from somewhere.

Shonuff.

Turns out it was one of those mean-nothing, feel-good slogans that the neo-cons just adore from Ronnie Raygun. The original neo-con! Logical analysis? Not necessary. Reasoned diplomacy? No need. A great PR guy? You betcha!

I should have guessed! How laughably pathetic and predictable! Her definition is a slogan! And her hero was a sloganeer!

Reminds me of Hoover’s, “A Chicken in Every Pot. A car in every garage”.

And we’ve all learned what a stellar prez he was too!

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 05:32 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

Your very first post of the day employed this charming verbiage - …lick the anus of the Shrub Administration…

You’ll have to let us know what the Statuate of Limitations is to Google that phrase.

I know that history begins tomorrow for liberals, but for Google history is forever.

By Kurdish Stanzas

February 19, 2007 05:40 PM | Link to this

The surge is not an escalation of the war. It’s a symptom.

By Midori

February 19, 2007 05:40 PM | Link to this

PHOTO: Actor portraying George Washington in President’s Day ceremony

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 05:50 PM | Link to this

Hey Small:

Atlanta Urinal- Police believe satanists are `out there’ There have been a few instances of such crime alleged in the metro Atlanta area. The most notable case is in Douglas County Many police and prosecutors are convinced that devil worshippers commit crimes ranging from cruelty to animals to desecration of churches to murder.

You live in Douglas?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By AJC.com /facts

February 19, 2007 05:50 PM | Link to this

Now Andy/LuckoDull, you must only comprehend the items you want to. We are laying off paper staff, we are EXPANDING our AJC.com staff so you Dusty and RW have nothing to worry about. Your world is not going anywhere. We will be here for you.

By Huge

February 19, 2007 05:58 PM | Link to this

I disagree with Sen. Reid’s assessment that Bush’s invasion of Iraq is the biggest foreign policy mistake in the history of this country.

It has yet to top the disastrous fvckup called Viet Nam. But there is absolutely no doubt among all reasonable people, that both are colossal disasters. And the neo-cons are trying like hell to outdo LBJ in the area of foreign incompetence and put Iraq on par with that lovely little exercise in SE Asia.

Some consolation. Instead of McNamara we had Rumsfeld.

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 06:04 PM | Link to this

By AJC.com /facts February 19, 2007 05:50 PM We are laying off paper staff,

Not only that but only paper staff that are over the age of 55.

What’s up with the age discrimination y’all, hahaha.

You liberals are the Hardcore Racists.

Are the older people wise enough not to be pinkos anymore?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 06:04 PM | Link to this

Ho hum.

I see that Huge BlowHisTop has arrived to entertain us.

Blowhard,

Why don’t you post my entire comment which used the phrase “peace through strength” in its entirety?

I was making a point which you are doing a stellar job of proving.

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 06:07 PM | Link to this

What was I thinking with my 5:32 to rushncap?

I meant that “history begins THIS MORNING for liberals” not “tomorrow”.

Parrot,

Wow, what a shocking, incisive photo you dug up there. Really deep.

/sarc.

By The Real Deal

February 19, 2007 06:08 PM | Link to this

Wow— we all know what a big FLIP-FLOP that Mitt Romney is. Now, read what Bush-kisser McCain has to say about “Stuff Happens” Rumsfeld… wasn’t it just 2 months ago that he had words of praise for ole Rummy?

“I think that Donald Rumsfeld will go down in history as one of the worst secretaries of defense in history,” McCain said to applause.

Good grief— we’re one month into this new ‘08 campaign and the slimeyness from the Repugnants is, well, quite repugnant!

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 06:18 PM | Link to this

I thought that Rev. Ted Haggard claimed about 1 week ago that he had been “cured” of his homosexuality… apparently, that’s not enough — his church members are making him leave the state of Colorado! Apparently, the bigotry is ongoing at the New Life Church:

“We have done extensive fact finding into his lifelong battle with a “dark side.” We have verified the reality of that struggle,” said Stockstill. A struggle they say included multiple improper conversations, activities and relationships. “For the sake of Ted’s restoration, it is best for him to move out of Colorado Springs,” Stockstill said.

By Huge

February 19, 2007 06:22 PM | Link to this

Er bigot,

I think you meant statuette of limitations. (It’s for small minded folks).

Was there more to the slogan? Let me guess. “Victory through God’s Righteousness?” Or maybe it was “A Waist is a terrible Thing to Mind.”

I’m sure it was just more trite cr@p but go ahead, by all means, humor us and re-post it!

BTW. Any progress on that definition with specific examples of conservatism, neo-con?

If after another week or three of dodging and evading, maybe I’ll help you out. But it sure is entertaining watching you mopes twist in the wind!

And you really are one sorry loser if you can’t even explain in ANY detail what it is that you claim to be.

And would somebody please explain (in children’s terms) to the idiot neo-con KKKurly that laying off people over 55 is ageism not racism.

By Goldie

February 19, 2007 06:25 PM | Link to this

Huge— your post at 5:31 is a scary link… reminds me of what I’ve read about Joseph Smith and the Mormons in the 1800’s. Especially the part that says,

“De Jesus and his believers say their church — “Creciendo en Gracia,” Spanish for “Growing in grace” — is misunderstood. Followers of the movement say they have proof that their minister is divine and that their church will one day soon be a major faith in the world.”

If you’re interested in reading up on some of the Mormon history, a recent book by Jon Krakauer was written called “Banner From Heaven.” Those are some scary believers!

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 06:35 PM | Link to this

HBlah Blah Blah Blowhard,

Find the original post and post it. Okey Dokey jackass? Here’s a hint to help you find it - it wasn’t directed to you.

Put up or shut up, Gas Bag.

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 06:38 PM | Link to this

Goldilocks,

Harry Reid is one of those “scary believers”.

You do know who his is, don’t you?

By Daniel

February 19, 2007 06:41 PM | Link to this

There’s nothing to explain. They believe Georgie is the sovereign. They are un-American. They want to revert to a monarchy. Only, they want their guy in at all times. They fear democracy. They are afraid of the truth. They embrace the lie. They have to lie.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 06:42 PM | Link to this

Muffin — I can tell you what you were thinking. Nothing. Ever.

Yeah, I said “anus”. Sue me. And I don’t care if you look it up 7 years from now. Hell, if stalking me keeps you from doing further damage to this country, I feel very useful. Not that you or Stalk could really do much damage (severe damage comes from very intelligent people, like Rove, Cheney, etc), but hey, if I kept RW from strangling a puppy somewhere by driving him to distraction, I’ll take that as a good deed.

@@ — sucks to be exposed, hmmmm?

By RE

February 19, 2007 06:43 PM | Link to this

AHH

we are in a war where we do not control the victory conditions we have set. A huge military blunder.

Don’t worry, just keep talking about who used whos name

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 06:43 PM | Link to this

By Goldie February 19, 2007 06:25 PM Huge— your post at 5:31 is a scary link… reminds me of what I’ve read about Joseph Smith and the Mormons in the 1800’s.

Yep, those scary church people will make your child believe that Christ is Lord and Savior but those nice liberals will “lovingly” turn your kid into a pregnant sex toy with a life threatening STD.

By all means we should flee at the very sight of those evil Christians!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By jonny20

February 19, 2007 06:43 PM | Link to this

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 06:45 PM | Link to this

Typo corrections! Delete the H before Blah Blah Blah and change “who HIS is” to “who HE is”.

By huge

February 19, 2007 06:48 PM | Link to this

So Hillary thinks that the stars and bars should not fly over the South Carolina Statehouse grounds.

Her contention is that there is only ONE flag that ALL Americans should pay honor to.

Whaddya think, KKKurly? Bigot?

HaHaHa bigot! Are you so stuntingly stupid that you think I’d go back and review one of your sh!tty posts? Puhleeeesse.

Goldie,

Very cool! It’s hard to imagine that it’s the same Jon Krakauer, who summited (don’t have a cow bigot!) Mt. Everest and that wrote “Into Thin Air”.

Here is some more scary non-fiction about the wished-for theocracy that Bush and the neo-cons have foisted on this country.

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/TheDespoilingOfAmerica.htm

From Francis Schaeffer, who was then the leading evangelical theologian, who called Secular Humanism the greatest threat to Christianity the world had ever seen, the best quote is “Today we live in a humanist society. They control the schools. They control public television. They control the media in general.”

Give me a hallelujah, brothers and isters!

By Daniel

February 19, 2007 06:52 PM | Link to this

RE: That is the price of incompetence. we are at our maximum disadvantage. The “enemy” is at his maximum advantage. This is the result of right-wing money grubbers at the top. They love money (oil) more than America. They had to lie to get us into this mess. They continue to lie. Support the troops does not mean they sacrifice. In fact they make no sacrifice for anything. That’s left to the patriots.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 06:53 PM | Link to this

RE,

The straw man you put up is not the condition for any troops leaving, so there is no point in anyone discussing it with you. Even the parrots didn’t get on your silly bandwagon. Google “when the Iraqis stand up we will stand down” and have a pleasant evening reading.

Blowhard,

Everybody that you are so scared of on this blog looks at every issue and tries to decide what’s best. I know you monolith liberals don’t notice, but we on the right don’t always agree with each other here. Maybe the fact that we don’t have these hysterical outbursts like you do keeps you from seeing the truth.

I can guarantee you we aren’t about to coalesce around your definition of a conservative. It’s just like me calling you a liberal, it would be meaningless if we took it back to a classic definition of liberalism which is basically what is considered conservatism today.

By @@

February 19, 2007 06:54 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

Exposed?

I wouldn’t know anything about that.

You’re the one into porno.

So just how short is your projection anyway?

Nevermind. Not really interested, but I’m betting you’re looking down at it right now and wishing, aren’t you?

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 06:55 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

Do you think that the folks who run Google think that it’s “stalking” to use their search engines?

Are those billions of people “stalkers”? Is ML contributing to “stalking” by having archives of his blogs?

No one made you make a comment about “licking anus’”. You did it all by yourself, munchkin.

Gotta run. I do look forward to hearing more insanity and inanity from you, Blowhard and Goldilocks.

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 06:58 PM | Link to this

I think I’m about to give up trying to figure out what John McCain has become, but it’s still refreshing to hear him slam Rummy. McCain has gone from one of my favorite politicians to one of my least favorite ones over the past year or so, but this is nice.

The only question now is how many medals will Bush award Rummy.

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 06:59 PM | Link to this

BD,

That’s got to be about the 20th time Blowhard has referenced the post of yours that he cares absolutely nothing about.

Freaking weirdo!

By rushncap

February 19, 2007 07:01 PM | Link to this

Why is every freaking neocon on this board obsessed with my c**? I mean, I guess if they weren’t all old, ugly and stupid it would be kind of flattering, but jeeezus. It’s just creepy. Is sexual frustration a requirement for being a neocon parrot, or a perk of the job?

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 07:01 PM | Link to this

Lying Blowhard,

Before I go -

Why are you quoting me if you don’t care about my post? HMMMMMMMMMMMM.

Find the post or stop bloviating about it.

What a freaking loser.

By Huge

February 19, 2007 07:07 PM | Link to this

RW,

I agree that the neo-cons here aren’t about to coalesce around ANY definition of a conservative.

It simply doesn’t apply to any of you nor virtually all of today’s republicans.

But the point is that ALL of you NEO-CONS do merge around the same issues, but are just too embarrassed to say so. None of you even have the courage to even identify those principles.

But it matters not. Most non neo-cons know what they are and what it is that you are all about and have completely repudiated it.

In the next election, I see a death blow to it’s short-lived existence and then you’ll have to come up with yet another non-defined definition.

By Midori

February 19, 2007 07:08 PM | Link to this

You know what’s funny?

The cons always, ALWAYS, have to call names, but they want to try to turn it around on the ones that they are attacking.

It’s as if they are totally incapable of making a point without throwing some name calling in there.

Are you people so insecure of the veracity of your beliefs that you have to lace them with the pointless and childish name calling?

If you’ll note, I don’t embark on that road until they start it. I am well aware of the irony. But I refuse to let these self-appointed blog sentries get away with calling me out of my name and letting them get away with it. And pointing out their loathesome hypocrisy.

It appears that they patrol this blog just looking for a chance, any chance, to launch their silly and childish tactics.

They should all take their sentry skills and replace their dumb epithets with weapons and go fight this war that they are so gung ho about.

Believe me guys, this blog will be safe without you.

Trust me.

Go and be obnoxious over there, so you won’t have to be obnoxious over here.

Peace out.

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 07:08 PM | Link to this

McCain, trying to get some Dullards to vote for him:

“We are paying a very heavy price for the mismanagement _ that’s the kindest word I can give you _ of Donald Rumsfeld, of this war,” the Arizona senator told an overflow crowd of more than 800 at a retirement community near Hilton Head Island, S.C.

And it worked!:

By rushncap February 19, 2007 06:58 PM I think I’m about to give up trying to figure out what John McCain has become, but it’s still refreshing to hear him slam Rummy.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Huge

February 19, 2007 07:16 PM | Link to this

Oh my my. ricky wrong wing posits that I’m scared of these “independent thinking” neo-cons!

Greatest neo-con line of the day!

I’ve defended this greatest of all nations against other America haters. A few pu$$y neo-cons is hardly anything anything to be scared of.

You guys are the never-served, never-will-serve cowards on this blog and everyone who reads it, knows it.

Own your cowardice and immorality, bigoted neo-cons!

By LuckoDull

February 19, 2007 07:18 PM | Link to this

By rushncap February 19, 2007 07:01 PM Why is every freaking neocon on this board obsessed with my c**? I mean, I guess if they weren’t all old, ugly and stupid it would be kind of flattering, but jeeezus. It’s just creepy. Is sexual frustration a requirement for being a neocon parrot, or a perk of the job?

Maybe you should have thought before you gushed, no?

Hahahaha.

Why does rushncrap mistake an “obsession” with a source of much amusement?

It’s not very often that you find someone discussing, on a blog that was most likely made up of sixteen year old girls laughing their as-ses off at him, how satisfying and pleasurable his sex life is with Rosy and her five friends.

We really should be repulsed but it just goes to show you that Conservatives know how to have fun.

It’s like Anna Nicole never died, right rushncrap, as long as there are a few pics handy it’s just as good as the “real thing,” eh?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Kurdish Stanzas

February 19, 2007 07:33 PM | Link to this

The Iraqi Prime Minister shaved his head bald today………

By RW-(the original)

February 19, 2007 07:36 PM | Link to this

So who did you defend us from Blowhard? Perhaps when you say you defended “this great country” you’re actually posting from Hanoi. You often allude to being around that age, but you never really tell us what you did when you make these grandiose claims, do you?

If you really fought on our side in Vietnam, I thought you guys said you weren’t defending us from a damn thing just like you claim about Iraq.

Parrot,

When you show up unannounced at my blog and reel off a string of expletives in the middle of the night, how does that square with your innocent defender of civil discourse fairy tale you’re telling us today?

By Buy Danish

February 19, 2007 10:49 PM | Link to this

Princess Midori,

Such sanctimony from arguably the foulest mouth on this blog!

You make Amanda Marcotte sound like the Queen of England, but you’re upset because we call you “Parrot”, or “Vulgar Parrot” because of your filthy, vulgar squawking?

No wonder you’re all terrified at the idea of affirmative action programs being dismantled. You and your friends can’t function without them.

rushncap,

I’m not sure what the C** word was exactly. Cat? Cup? Car? Cab? Can?

You got me, but whatever it is, don’t flatter yourself. Nobody is interested in your “c**”.

By Peter

February 20, 2007 06:11 PM | Link to this

Why is Mike portraying Barney so small? How unkind! (No doubt the ASPCA has been inundated with e-mail.)