Mike Luckovich

By candide

January 5, 2007 08:04 AM | Link to this

Yes, the Baptists will find out there is drinking in Heaven, if any of them are allowed in, which is doubtful.

The old joke: a tour of Heaven. The Guide tells the tourists: this room is for Methodists, that one for Jews, that one for Muslims, the next one for Baptists, but be quiet, they don’t know anyone else is here.

By Nomad

January 5, 2007 08:07 AM | Link to this

Well dang Candide how can you talk with any knowledge about heaven when you do not believe it or God exists?

Just asking… NOMAD

By LuckoDull

January 5, 2007 08:08 AM | Link to this

Who cares?

Drunkards?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

Daley said past drug use should not be an issue in Obama’s campaign for president in 2008. That’s even though the freshman senator with the rock star image is poised to become the first presidential candidate to openly admit past cocaine use.

Didn’t you know the day would come, after years and years of speculation about Bush being a crackhead, with absolutely no proof of any such nonsense, that the first democrat crackhead would be no big deal at all?

And do you think they’ll ever mention the word “corruption” again?

That arrangement over the years has yielded millions of dollars in federal support for the contractors, businesses and universities, and hundreds of thousands in consulting and lobbying fees to Murtha’s favored lobbying shops, according to Federal Election Commission records and lobbying disclosure forms. In turn, many of PAID’s directors have kept Murtha’s campaigns flush with cash.

You libs are right, we do need some investigations.

By The Way

January 5, 2007 08:10 AM | Link to this

Someone needs to jump down on top of Rosie Odonnell and lay prostrate over her and save her from the onrushing Trump Train!!!

Trump gave the Subway Hero $10K. Was that for saving the guy who fell, or a bribe to push Rosie in front of the next train?

Sometimes, when a person bashes another, he reveals more about himself than the bashee.

Word.

By Owain Ozymandias Buck

January 5, 2007 08:11 AM | Link to this

Reminds me of another old joke:

what’s the difference between a Methodist and a Baptist? A Methodist will speak to you when you run in to them at the liquor store!

By Brian Curtis

January 5, 2007 08:12 AM | Link to this

Good heavens, this cartoon isn’t about Bush! NOW what will Dusty and BDanish complain about all day?

By Shawny

January 5, 2007 08:19 AM | Link to this

I say “who cares?” also. I think it isn’t a big deal to allow selling on Sundays, but at the same time, if you whine about it, then that reveals that you are just a poor planner (or drink way too much, or both). Loser.

By Brian Curtis

January 5, 2007 08:53 AM | Link to this

Shawny: Or else you, y’know, don’t want religion dictating public policy.

But I guess that’s a “loser” concern too.

By AntiRadical

January 5, 2007 08:56 AM | Link to this

Good toon ML; a real thought provoker. Use of ETOH is another area of mainstream Christian thought that has sometimes confused me.

Until the 20th century, papal wine was laced with cocaine (so was Coca-Cola and many other patent medicines). It had a mighty punch and was probably not used as a sacrement as much as an intoxicant. Wine has been an integeral part of many Christian services for centuries. Most Christian services that I have attended now substitute the politically correct grape juice for wine but many still use the real thing.

So how did ETOH get singled out for attention by the religiously based temperance movement during prohibition?

In other news, the report of Chief Justice Rehnquist’s addiction to Placidyl is not so much a reflection on the Chief Justice as it is an indictment of his doctors and the medical standards of the time. Placidyl is not an analgesic (pain reliever) it is a very powerful and addictive soporific (sleeping pill) on the same order as barbituates, quaalude, or doriden. Rehnquist probably had sleep deprivation issues associated with the pain, restlessness, nausea, secondary body chemistry impbalances, and infections, that most often accompany cancer and its’ treatment.

At the time that Rehnquist was prescribed this medictaion, safer less addictive agents for sleep had not been developed. Like amphetamines, the use of barbituates, quaaludes, doriden, and placidyl has been almost totally eliminated in current medical practice. They are too addictive and have far too many instances of untoward effects associated with them.

While I am no fan of many decisions passed down by Chief Justice Rehnquist, his problems with placidyl were very common side effects of this very harardous medication, not any shortcoming of his character.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 09:03 AM | Link to this

Does anyone want to know why the children in Georgia public schools are so hopelessly uneducated?

Our resident nitpicking “English teacher,” One Voice, wrote this yesterday in a comment:

{{{{{What you have shown are not a typographical errors, but rather a lack of knowledge.}}}}

Hysterically that sentence was part of a diatribe complaining about others not properly forming sentences.

Now anyone that ever deals with this punk knows that he will b!tch endlessly over any typo or misapplication of a word, with no regard to the fact that editing a comment in this tiny comment box is quite the chore.

Here’s what he said when the improper formation of that sentence was pointed out to him:

{{{{{Again, you have shown that you cannot discern between complete and incomplete sentences. That was a complete sentence, you idiot.}}}}}

And that, my friends, is why Georgia students are so woefully under educated.

By Eric

January 5, 2007 09:06 AM | Link to this

Wow! Shawny=perfection. I am SOOOO impressed.

By Mike

January 5, 2007 09:07 AM | Link to this

I have to kaugh at th AJC’s stable of liberal hypocrites regarding the Sunday blue laws. I think the blue laws should be rolled back too, but let’s not forget that this is the same group who wanted to ban smoking from private restaurants.

I guess the liberal pundits could claim that smoking is bad for public health and drinking is not, but that is absurd. The reason that Mikey, Tucker and Bookman are against smoking and for drinking is because they all drink and none of them smoke. These liberal hypocrites just want to re-engineer society to suit their own narrow vision.

By CJ

January 5, 2007 09:10 AM | Link to this

I think it’s pretty pathetic that demeaning God/heaven has become acceptable. Just more proof that Jesus is coming soon. I hope you all are ready-don’t let all the distractions of the modern world keep you from getting into heaven.

By AntiRadical

January 5, 2007 09:18 AM | Link to this

Mike- There appears to be a problem with second-hand smoke from cigarette smoking. I am unaware of an analagous problem with alcoholic drinks.

By Richard W.

January 5, 2007 09:24 AM | Link to this

The only people that want alcohol sales on Sunday are drunkards and people that can’t work calendars.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 09:27 AM | Link to this

AntiR,

Chief Justice Rehnquist had doctors over prescribing placidyl back in the 1970’s. The thyroid cancer that killed him was not a long term cancer. Did he have some other cancer that you know of or did you bring back a few Thai sticks?

By N-GA

January 5, 2007 09:27 AM | Link to this

Mike…when you use a counter-example in an argument, you are supposed to use one that at least approximates the other.

Your example has more than one flaw. First, this is not a liberal vs conservative issue. Most (if not all) cons posting on this blog say that Sunday liquor sales should be legal. They understand you cannot defend the indefensible.

Moreover, your example about smoking isn’t about buying cigarettes, just smoking them in a certain location on ANY day. The blue law being debated is about PURCHASING liquor (it is legal to DRINK on Sunday!!) on a SPECIFIC day.

Your argument wasn’t even a good try. See RW’s comment about the quality of Georgia education.

By Frank Malzone

January 5, 2007 09:36 AM | Link to this

I’s rather drink raw sewage from a prison septic tank than see the god and heaven that CJ’s headed straight for in a hand basket.

You, CJ, are a rube, and you will know the devil and his domain, for that devil is your god, and you pray to him everytime you open your flushtoilet mouth, you scumwadded piece of anal sweat.

I’m just kidding. :0)

CJ, You’re cool.

I like CJ. He’s a good sport. His posts are superior to most’s and his command of the language second to none, bar none.

By AntiRadical

January 5, 2007 09:39 AM | Link to this

RW- Sorry, I was unaware of the timeframe associated with Rehnquist’s use of placidyl. Perhaps his position of authority kept him up or he had other medical problems then. Since he saw a physician to have the placidyl prescribed, there must have been something going on.

Nonetheless, Rehnquist was a jurist and was unfamiliar with the dangers of soporific medication. The “sundowner’s sydrome” that has been reported in the press is a very common effect seen with this class of medication. Current medical practice uses this class of compunds very, very rarely; you could even say, not at all. Rehnquist was just the victim of immature medical practice; he was not a junkie.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 09:55 AM | Link to this

Only 3 states out of 50 prohibit alcohol sales on Sunday. Connecticut (surprising), Indiana (not so surprising), and Georgia (expected). I’m not much of a drinker, maybe a glass of wine every so often but I hate the fact that the religious wackos can get our government to do their bidding for them.

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 09:55 AM | Link to this

Anti-Radical,

Thank you for giving us the facts on Pacidyl. The problems Renquist had came from the early 1980s when doctors prescribed that drug for him. The information was secured when certain files were opened to the public under Freedom of Information Act.

This “revealed” problem had nothing to do with his recent death from thyroid cancer. That was what I assumed when I read the information but it was not. It was simply some newshound looking for information against Republicans and using the medical information of a dead man.

I appreciate the fact that you concluded that Renquist’s experience with Placidyl showed no shortcoming of his character.

On another subject, do you not consider drunk driving a problem somewhat similar to second hand smoke?

By w00t

January 5, 2007 09:57 AM | Link to this

lets get this party started…

“The House passed, 430-1, a package of rules aimed at demonstrating Democrats’ commitment to cleaning up Congress. Tomorrow, the House will vote on rules designed to end the anonymous sponsorship of pet projects, or earmarks, that have been quietly tucked into spending measures.”

All I can say is: It’s about time. I’m glad that they decided enough was enough and that something has to be done about it. hopefully this will get big business and greed out of congress for the most part. That and maybe it will help to get spending under control. 430 votes, at least they finally came together to work towards a greater good.

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 10:05 AM | Link to this

RW & Anti-Rad,

Sorry to repeat much of what you said. I was posting while your information was coming up. Ah well, great minds with but a single thought.(Ha!)

By Paul

January 5, 2007 10:11 AM | Link to this

Candide at 8:04 Just the other day you disparaged anyone who believes in “religion.” Now you know what goes on (and what will go on) in someplace called “Heaven.” Been hanging out with Pat Robertson?

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 10:13 AM | Link to this

PLP,

Your statement that only three states restrict Sunday liquor sales is a huge twisting of fact. For instance in Massachusetts you can purchase alcohol on Sunday only if you are in a county that borders a state that allows Sunday sales. Many states, like Pennsylvania, restrict what types of alcohol you can buy.

By Richard W.

January 5, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

I sure am glad ML knows what happens in heaven.

By Paul

January 5, 2007 10:17 AM | Link to this

w00t

Agree - some of the actions are long overdue - just shows how out of touch Republican leadership was in the last Congress.

But on to the question I asked yesterday: why no outrage that Speaker Pelosi’s first 100 hours plan mentioned nothing about Iraq (the reason so many on this forum said was the main reason for the Democratic victories in Nov) or repealing tax cuts?

By Shawny

January 5, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

The law does need to be changed. Sales on Sunday should be allowed.

All I am saying is that while I agree that it needs changing and I agree that limitations based on religion should be taken away (to Brian’s point), it isn’t that big of a deal because I buy my Sunday booze the day before. So what. How about getting riled up about something that really means something or has a real impact.

Going on a “crusade” against the current legislation soley on the fact that it is based on religion is about as pointless as instituting the legislation in the first place. It just ain’t that big of a deal.

Eric…huh? whatchutalkinboutwillis?

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

RW - do those instances make my statement untrue? Didn’t think so. There you go nitpicking again. The facts I stated are factual. You can buy alcohol in all states except 3 on Sunday. What part of that don’t you understand?

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 10:23 AM | Link to this

Hurrah,

I have solved the problem of liquor sales. I don’t “drink”.

(OK, RW. So I like a little Manichevitz with my Christmas fruit cake.)

By No not me!

January 5, 2007 10:26 AM | Link to this

CJ, I can’t wait for the rapture to come and take you of my planet!

By Paul

January 5, 2007 10:27 AM | Link to this

RW - the original

I don’t think it’s too surprising L is off Bush for a while and onto more local issues - whether consequential or not is open to debate. Given the national spotlight is on the new Congressional Democratic leadership, and given how the backtracking on promises made before the election, well’s not surprising. One can state with some surety if the Republican leadership had made commitments, then appeared to back out after winning election, this forum would have uberlibs screaming for Bush’s head again (I know, I know, Pres Bush doesn’t serve in Congress, but whenever did such nitpicky facts get in the way of a good uberlib hate?).

By candide

January 5, 2007 10:31 AM | Link to this

The real difference between a Methodist and a Baptist: a Methodist is a Baptist who can read.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 10:34 AM | Link to this

PLP,

If you want to claim that you aren’t twisting the facts and that any sale of alcohol means there are no restrictions then why is Georgia on your list?

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 10:49 AM | Link to this

So —

Is this truly a Bi-Partisan issue? I mean it seems that everyone on both sides of the fence agree that the laws should be changed to allow purchase of alcohol on Sunday! Wow!

I know this would drastically help attract Conventions back to Georgia.

1) I think Sunday alcohol sales should be permitted. It is basic seperation of Church and State, and on top of that the freedoms and rights of the individual. It’s not the right of the government to decide whats right for the individual unless we do plan on becoming a Nanny State!

2) Smoking laws versus Alcohol? Pulease — Smoking affects other individuals other than the smokers themselves. This is violating other peoples rights in my opinion. Laws should be cautiously passed allowing smokers their freedoms while protecting the liberties of others as well. Drinking affects just the one person who chooses to indulge. Should that person decide to get obnoxious, or drive drunk, well there are already plenty of laws to curtail that person from violating other peoples rights!

3) I also believe drugs should be legalized, (just like Neal Boortz), but that’s a another issue entirely.

Thomas

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this

Paul,

what do you mean “L is off Bush for awhile”? Just two days ago he had the symbol of our country, Uncle Sam, hanging by a noose around his ankle. That is not Bush per se. It is Luckovich’s effort to undermine anything positive representing our country. (See Bush cartoons, Pot ‘n’ Kettle “torturers”and Uncle Sam in noose for examples.)

Liberals say that is “humor”. I do not see any humor in demeaning the USA, the president or the troops. Luckovich has done all of that.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 10:52 AM | Link to this

Allow me to clarify my 10:34

PLP,

If you want to claim that you aren’t twisting the facts and that any sale of alcohol on Sunday means there are no restrictions to sales on Sunday then why is Georgia on your list?

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

RW - Georgia is on my list because I can’t go and buy a bottle of wine to go with my Sunday dinner on Sunday. That is true of all but 3 states. In other states it might require a bit of a drive but it’s at least in the realm of possibility. The fact that people can buy alcohol on Sunday on Georgia at a restaurant/bar is ridiculous. Promoting drunken driving is moronic.

By Brian Curtis

January 5, 2007 11:01 AM | Link to this

Sorry, Dusty, but it’s BUSH who’s making America look bad. Luckovich is just pointing it out for all to see.

Likewise, it’s BUSH who’s hurting our troops… not the media who expose what he’s doing to get them killed and maimed needlessly.

A real patriot would understand the difference between freedom and blind subservience. But then, you’ve never been a real patriot, have you Dusty?

By Paul

January 5, 2007 11:06 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

“Off Bush for a while” - in L’s case - is anything equal to or more than one day!

As I said on the day of the “hanging” cartoon - uberlibs complain when the US dictates to sovereign nations, then they complain when the US doesn’t dictate. I believe O’Reilly has a point - the discussion isn’t about policy, it’s about “hate Bush.”

I notice none of the left’s partisans have yet made any defense of the new Congress’s lack of action plans on Iraq. That’s to be expected.

I’m off on a trip - chat with you Monday.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

Paul,

Mark Steyn is recommending [Michael Crichton’s new novel “Next”]. (http://www.macleans.ca/culture/books/article.jsp?content=20070101138670138670)

If you’re looking for some non-fiction, Steyn’s “America Alone” is a must read.

By Shawny

January 5, 2007 11:20 AM | Link to this

This is interesting:

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/printedition/2007/01/05/edcourt0105.html

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this

Classic

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 11:35 AM | Link to this

Hey Dusty!

Cartoon that Doesn’t suck!

http://www.boondocksnet.com/gallery/keep_em.html

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Brian Curtis,

As usual, you like the “hate Bush” routine more than facing Luckovich’s defamation of our government.

If it were only Bush, why does ml draw our troops as torturers? Why does he draw the representation of our country “Uncle Sam” as hanging by his ankle?

Worry about your own patriotism, not mine.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 11:50 AM | Link to this

PLP,

You can buy a bottle of wine for your Sunday dinner here with a bit of a drive or a little ingenuity too. Do you know anyone with a military ID?

Don’t get me wrong, I would completely unrestrict sales 24 hours a day seven days a week. I’m merely pointing out that when a liberal spews a fact, it’s a safe bet they’re wrong.

By getalife

January 5, 2007 11:53 AM | Link to this

Here is another ml toon

By LMAO

January 5, 2007 11:56 AM | Link to this

Dear Mike, you are a big fat liar.

A couple days ago you announced right here on your very own blog that you were refreshed from vacation and ready to take on the world again. But here we are only one day later and no Bush! WHY?

Are you suffering from cartoonist block? Jet lag? Depressed about Gasper?

If I had re-subscribed to the AJC I would have cancelled again. In fact I have a renewal on my desk even as I type. No.

Its too bad. America has lost a hero. Maybe the AJC should hire a cartoonist that is not afraid of Bush.

FIRE MIKE NOW!!!

By getalife

January 5, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

RW,

Libs are wrong.

Oh, the irony.

Bwhahahahaha!

Stop, your killing me.

Too funny.

Please tell us when you were right about anything.

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Thanks for the sorry cartoon. It should be been called “Luckovich’s EGO”.

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 12:05 PM | Link to this

Nice PPL -

I liked this one as well from David Horsey.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=1507

By RE

January 5, 2007 12:07 PM | Link to this

I’m merely pointing out that when a liberal spews a fact, it’s a safe bet they’re wrong….

And the conservative knows a loophole to get around a law.

By getalife

January 5, 2007 12:13 PM | Link to this

um LMAO,

See the above post ^^^^^^^.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 12:19 PM | Link to this

Thomas - that one is good too. Thanks!

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 12:24 PM | Link to this

Fact: 3 states where you can’t buy alcohol on Sunday: GA, CT, IN.

RW is clinging to the fact that since you can buy alcohol at a restaurant/bar that you can in fact buy alcohol on Sunday in GA. That then forces you to either stay at the restaurant until the effects have subsided or drive under the influence. Since I don’t drink at restaurants that wasn’t even a consideration when I first posted.

Thanks to RW for pointing out that one must potentially break a viable law because of a riduculous law. And the loophole about the military ID is just ludicrous.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 12:27 PM | Link to this

“Don’t get me wrong, I would completely unrestrict sales 24 hours a day seven days a week. I’m merely pointing out that when a liberal spews a fact, it’s a safe bet they’re wrong.” -RW

Translation: Don’t get me wrong, I agree with you but since you’re a liberal I have to nitpick your statement and find a point to disagree with because my brain isn’t quite wired correctly.

By Treva

January 5, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

I am offended by LuckoDull’s comment that Obama is a crackhead. No one has insinuated that Obama or Bush ever used crack. So why would you decide to use that term when describing them? Bush’s frat brothers have given numerous statements that they did drugs with him. That is your proof. Just because Bush wants to act as if he has been a choirboy his entire life now that he is president does not make it true. We all know that his arrogant attitude is what has gotten our country in the situation it is in now.

From- A liberal who knows that you have to acknowledge your mistakes in order to learn from them.

By Goldie

January 5, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this

Yep, the Bible-thumpers in GA will continue to keep our state from ever coming out of the 19th century… “praise Jee-zus and keeping voting Republican”!

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 01:02 PM | Link to this

Treva - You must be new hear. LuckoDull, AKA Andy among MANY other names has been offending most of us for a long, long time. As you become more of a regular you’ll learn to ignore his posts. They’re a wast of time and energy. And don’t ever debate him. It’s an exercise in futility. His mom really needs to keep a shorter leash on him or monitor his meds more effectively.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 01:08 PM | Link to this

“Worry about your own patriotism, not mine.”

Mind boggling. Truly amazing.

Of all the people on this planet to write these words, it is almost beyond belief that they would come from such a sanctimonious, smug and intolerant person.

Yes, they are only seven little words, but I defy anyone to find me a bigger example, EVER, of the definition of the word hypocrite.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 01:21 PM | Link to this

Allow me to correct my previous post: Treva - You must be new HERE.

Sorry ‘bout that. Move along - there’s nothing to see here.

By getalife

January 5, 2007 01:23 PM | Link to this

Here in cajun country, you can buy liqour at the grocery store 7 days a week. It a red state, w loving, wingnut haven.

How bout them Tigers?

“Laissez les bons temps rouler!”

They do love to party.

By Never on Sunday

January 5, 2007 01:24 PM | Link to this

How long did the Democrats rule GA?

By LuckoDull

January 5, 2007 01:26 PM | Link to this

“Treva - You must be new hear.”

PPL the genius.

“As you become more of a regular you’ll learn to ignore his posts.”

Just like PPL hasn’t.

Obama had written in his first book, “Dreams From My Father” (1995), before entering politics, that he had used marijuana and cocaine (“maybe a little blow”).

Technically, Treva, you are correct, I should have called Obama a “cokehead.”

Huffington Post- What amazes me is that here we are, six years into Bush’s presidency, and the press still refuses to treat the longstanding stories about Bush’s cocaine use with the severity and scrutiny

I wish we could prove it, I wish we could prove it!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 01:30 PM | Link to this

Huge,

If I may add your name to the list:

Worry about your own patriotism, not mine.

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 01:42 PM | Link to this

Well Huge -

At least Dusty has occasionally formulated an intelligent thought pattern once in a while, but yes she apprently has a skewed idea of what “Patriotism” really is! If she sided with the ruling Government and it’s leader during the American Revolution, then The United States would have never been born!

But at least she’s not totally Brainless like Buy Danish who probably still believes that the “Union of Concerned Scientist” is a Lobbyist group! (lol).

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2007/01/03/thehotline.html#comment-913052

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2007/01/03/thehotline.html#comment-914050

Have a great Weekend Huge, getalife, PPL, Brian, and the rest of you “thinking for yourself” people out there. — I am off to spend a great weekend with My Girlfriend celebrating her Birthday.

I’m sure that when I’m gone that RW will start nit-picking, and Buy Danish will make some un-founded or un-proven retort, and Andy will create yet another lame name to cut and paste his favorite Neo-Con rags rhetoric into.

But thats how spin doctoring works — yah just gotta live with it!

Cheers and Beers`

Thomas

By Eric

January 5, 2007 01:42 PM | Link to this

I just want one of these Christians to point out to me, chapter and verse, their Biblical justification for no alcohol on Sunday.

And no not the ‘keep the Sabbath Holy Crap’ even Christians don’t do that… but SPECIFICALLY about no alcohol.

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 01:46 PM | Link to this

-=-

Oh LuckoDull - (AKA - Andy!)

Obama - admitted his drug problem and starightened out his life to become the good man (and leader) that he is today.

Bush on the other hand lies and denies his habit, and therefore not honest or honorable enough to come clean. the question that must be asked, did he straighten out his life or is he still a user.

Thomas

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 01:49 PM | Link to this

Et tu, Thomas..

I add your name to the list.

Worry about your own patriotism, not mine.

By Rock N Roller

January 5, 2007 01:50 PM | Link to this

From Wednesday’s @issue section:

Why are we allowing a bunch of Baptist preachers to control our choices and restrict our commerce? In a secular, pluralistic democracy, does the will of a few theocrats determine whether we can buy beer and wine on Sundays?

Well, yes. Because of the influence that religous conservatives weld over the Ga. General Assembly.

Come senators, congressmen Please heed the call Don’t stand in the doorway Don’t block up the hall For he that gets hurt Will be he who has stalled There’s a battle outside And it is ragin’. It’ll soon shake your windows And rattle your walls For the times they are a-changin’.

Come mothers and fathers Throughout the land And don’t criticize What you can’t understand Your sons and your daughters Are beyond your command Your old road is Rapidly agin’. Please get out of the new one If you can’t lend your hand For the times they are a-changin’.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 01:55 PM | Link to this

PLP,

No I don’t agree with you so you can’t do a translation right either. In Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Utah you can only buy low alcohol beer on Sundays. So much for your bottle of wine with dinner theory. There are multitudes of restrictions in many states.

For another perspective, I know a liquor store owner in Western Massachusetts that hates the law that was changed to allow him to open on Sunday. He doesn’t want to risk losing out to competition by choosing to close on Sunday while they’re open, but his sales haven’t increased at all. All he’s done is spread 6 days of sales over 7 and added a day of expenses.

By getalife

January 5, 2007 01:59 PM | Link to this

Have fun Thomas.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 02:10 PM | Link to this

Thomas the Talking Twit,

Yesterday I provided a link which proved that the “Union of Concerned Scientists” is a lobbying group.

Here is that link again, which despite your bluster, proves that I’m right and you’re wrong - yet again.

This time I’ll provide even more info if you can stop gloating over imaginary victories long enough to absorb it:

They have hired this firm to represent their interests.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 02:14 PM | Link to this

Eric,

This topic has come up several times over the last couple of weeks and I’ve yet to see anyone on either side saying the laws should stay in place.

Why don’t you go find a church to scream at.

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 02:16 PM | Link to this

Ohhh -

I’m on a List now! yay!~ Woohoo!~

Would this be a list of Heroic “Patriots” that defend the rights of the oppressed against tryranny and despotism? That beleives that Individuals should have their rights protected from being usurped by large powerful monopolies?

-= Or? =-

Is this some list of a Secret society, that marks people as traitors, to be sought out by the Secret government hit squads because they didn’t fall in lockstep with a select party and their leader. A Police State style list that says these are the enemys of the state, in defiance of a leader that wishes to empire build in the name of Freedom and (ahem) Patriotism!

Or is this your late Christmas list?

hugs

Thomas

By Thomas

January 5, 2007 02:25 PM | Link to this

Yes Buy Danish —

And I responded to that stupidity of yours here!

http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2007/01/03/thehotline.html#comment-914050

Duh!~

Maybe this will help;

UCS is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

UCS is a non-profit “Advocacy Group”

Thomas

(“If she will Buy Danish, then she will Buy anything! Just ask RW!”)

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 02:27 PM | Link to this

Thomas,

Enjoy your weekend! I didn’t even know gerbils celebrated Birthdays.

I love the new definition of nitpicking by the way. Who knew you libs would go so far as calling proving them wrong nitpicking? I’m pretty sure if you use a pictionary definition you’ll find a photo of stalker boy, though.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 02:27 PM | Link to this

Thomas the Talking Twerp,

Now that you’ve had time to read my links, here is further proof - a list of all the individual lobbyists who are lobbying for the Union of Concerned Scientists.

It’s quite illustrative that you refuse to see reality, but accept rumor-mongering about Bush as proven fact.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 02:35 PM | Link to this

Thomas the Talking Toddler,

This is for you. It’s all about an oh so tolerant liberal feminist professor and how she gave a student an F just because he was on the Duke Lacrosse Team.

Think about it before you have your next babble-fest about liberty and tyranny.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 02:35 PM | Link to this

“Don’t get me wrong, I would completely unrestrict sales 24 hours a day seven days a week.” -RW

That was exactly the point of my first post. Sounds to me like you were agreeing with me. Are you schizophrenic or what?

By RE

January 5, 2007 02:38 PM | Link to this

BD, please drop the global warming thing. Unitl you can find some shred of evidence disproving the conneciton of CO2 and temperature, you are wasting time.

The connection exists.

Any increase in atmospheric CO2 will increase temperature

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 02:38 PM | Link to this

No, Thomas,

You are on a list of long winded people who can’t think for themselves.

Worry about your own patriotism, not mine.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 02:50 PM | Link to this

“This topic has come up several times over the last couple of weeks and I’ve yet to see anyone on either side saying the laws should stay in place.”

Oops! Open mouth, insert foot.

By Richard W.

January 5, 2007 09:24 AM | Link to this

The only people that want alcohol sales on Sunday are drunkards and people that can’t work calendars.

By LuckoDull

January 5, 2007 08:08 AM | Link to this

Who cares?

Drunkards?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

You’re delusional if you think your “side” doesn’t include a lot of that sentiment.

IMHO, most of this self-righteous anger probably comes from “christians” and other neo-cons, who are dismayed at the ever increasing loss of power they once exerted over the local governments.

Lets all pray that it continues. (Don’t go off the deep end, neo-cons. The choice of verbs is sarcasm).

Like Rock N Roller quoting Dylan said, “Your old road is rapidly agin’. Please get out of the new one If you can’t lend your hand”.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 02:54 PM | Link to this

PLP,

If that was the point of your original post I would indeed be agreeing with you, but since that wasn’t what your original post said I pointed out the error of your ways.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 03:05 PM | Link to this

Huge buffoon,

Richard W is obviously using satire and LuckoDull said “Who cares?”

Your point, moron?

By Bill

January 5, 2007 03:22 PM | Link to this

The pariahs have returned to the blog. The scum de terre. BD, RW, little bitty Dusty, Scooter, @@ - the rest of the uncouth, unlearned, uncultivated commoners are baaack. Those disaffected, angry, bitter freaks who carry the torch of Republican hatred which oozes from their every pore and consumes their entire lives. The intellectually constipated disciples of hate, engaged in their usual mob mentality. Bush has set the world afire, but these gutless troglodytes have yet to notice. They seep like sewage into our culture. Living lives of quiet desperation while loud-mouthing on the blog from their dumpsters. None is even a fit subject for human moral judgment. The Little People. Rave on.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 03:25 PM | Link to this

Poor delusional RW. He proved nothing except that his elevator doesn’t quite go to the top. I stated that in only 3 states you can’t but alcohol on Sunday. I didn’t go far enough and state “for home use”. He follows up with all these weird exceptions like “low alcohol beer only” in some states and “not all counties sell alcohol” in some states, etc.

Just like a Bush appeaser to look for any tiny omission (for home use) and loophole (low alcohol beer only) to try and craft an opposing view.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 03:25 PM | Link to this

Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

Oh sorry, that was from a Monty Python movie.

Are you suggesting Richard W. and andy luckodull are for changing the law?

And don’t try your usual little weasely trick of trying to hide behind your words, “anyone SAYING the law should stay in place”.

RW, you’re ultimately going to have to see that you’re not on one of your demented right-wing sites for the mentally imnpaired where spinning and nit-picking are a way of life.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 03:46 PM | Link to this

Duh!~

{{Maybe this will help;

UCS is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

UCS is a non-profit “Advocacy Group”

Thomas}}

Thomas the tittering twit,

The Center for Consumer Freedom which operates Activist Cash is also a 501(c)(3) nonprofit group.

Advocacy groups lobby or hire lobbyists to get legislation passed that benefits them. The point is that the AP takes a press release from one of them and publishes it as if it were the undeniable truth for the benefit of gullible suckers like wOOt.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 03:51 PM | Link to this

Bill,

Don’t look now but your mouth is filled with excrement and every one of your pores oozes filth.

That’s what that Friday nite bath with clem, jean, and the rest of the gang is for!

Hooray! It’s almost clean up time!

By Proud Pinko Liberal

January 5, 2007 03:51 PM | Link to this

Sorry I won’t be here to follow up on RW’s latest spin and BS response. Duty calls. See you all Monday.

By RE

January 5, 2007 04:08 PM | Link to this

SO BD, seeing how you are calling people all kinds of names like gullible, suckers and twit, could you tell me if you believe if there is a connection between CO2 levels in the atmoshpere and temerature?

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 04:26 PM | Link to this

RE,

I’ll tell you what. If you can find one factual error in this assessment of the Union of Concerned Scientists, an anti-Capitalist group whose stock in trade is to peddle alarmist global-warming fairy tales, I’ll entertain you a little longer with your CO2 question (which I responded to yesterday, but I digress).

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 04:53 PM | Link to this

Bill at 3:22,

I am sorry you made the mistake of thinking this blog was the Jiffy-John. Would you head on down the road and find the correct place for your needs? Even the most disagreeable here would expedite your departure. Goodbye polution. Goodbye Bill.

By RE

January 5, 2007 04:59 PM | Link to this

BD, I could not care who that group is or who funds them. NAMBLA could be an advocate for lowering taxes, the nature of the group supporting an action does not change the validity of that action.

Just for clarification, you also do not believe in evolution either, right?

I think you may not be the best source for opinions on scientific matters, you just don’t think that way

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 05:12 PM | Link to this

PLP,

I just checked and found that low alcohol beer was in fact NOT wine.

Hoge Nitpicker,

As a purely technical matter I hadn’t seen Richard W’s post when I commented at 2:14 and I still think it’s satirical, but you are right. In three weeks of the topic being thoroughly gone over here and at Wooten’s there is in fact ONE post that says the law should stay in place. Happy Bozo?

By TommyT

January 5, 2007 05:31 PM | Link to this

Majority of Americans View Media Coverage of Iraq as Inaccurate- As can be seen, by a 61% to 36% margin, those who feel that the Iraq coverage is inaccurate say it is because the media make the situation there appear worse than it actually is.

By the balls

January 5, 2007 05:32 PM | Link to this

Dusty dusty bo busty, why dont you lick my testes, me oh my oh you’re an a-ho…DUSTY!!!

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 05:36 PM | Link to this

RE,

You said “the nature of a group supporting an action does not change the validity of that action”. WHAT????

Did you read about the Muslim American Groups who supposedly were giving money for Palestinean charities? Those charities were pseudo groups for terrorist activities which was known by both sides.

How does that fit into your definition?

How does NAMBLA, an organization to aid child molestors, have any validation in assisting those who perform crimes against children?

Your definition is too convoluted to have meaning for me. Straight forward is better.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 05:40 PM | Link to this

RE,

It is utterly amazing to me that you can belong to a group of hysterics who believes that farting is a threat to the Earth and then have the audacity to question my grasp of science.

I also think you are lying your as$$ off when you claim you don’t care who the advocacy groups are. You don’t care when they are Leftists, but I can guarantee you that if they are a so-called “right wing group” you’d care a lot.

By Midori

January 5, 2007 05:48 PM | Link to this

BD,

It’s only a threat when it’s done by certain people.

Hastert comes to mind.

By Dusty

January 5, 2007 05:48 PM | Link to this

balls @ 5:32.

It is pretty obvious that you don’t have any.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 05:51 PM | Link to this

RE,

You are really morphing into the blog equivalent of the guy that walks up and down the street claiming the world will end that day. You’ve been repeating a totally meaningless question over and over and over and….

Throughout the Cenozoic era there are many global climate shifts and the warm periods are accompanied by higher co2 levels. The Cenozoic era covers 60 some odd million years. Why is it our fault this time?

By the way, you might be interested to know that some of the biggest believers in evolution claim that the most aggressive evolutions occur during the warming periods. If you guys would let nature take it’s course maybe you’ll evolve a brain.

By RE

January 5, 2007 05:51 PM | Link to this

I will try to go slower for you.

The truth, falsehood, or validity of any issue is not affected by the type of people who support or oppose it.

Try it this way, the Nazis supported eugenics. The nazis are bad people. A person’s attributes are determined by genes. Because the Nazis supported that theory does not make it wrong just beacuse the nazis are bad people.

No matter what type of sidestepping or distraction you throw out there, you cannot get away from the fact that the temperature rises as CO2 levels rise. Any action increaseing the net amount of CO2 will also increase temperature.

Get it?

By Huge

January 5, 2007 06:02 PM | Link to this

Man, does it feel good to have a new Congress! Although there is virtually no debate that it will be a big improvement over the scandal-filled, unashamedly corrupt and largely inept neo-con led 109th, lets hope that the Dems have learned a few lessons along the way.

Castrating the lobbyists is a great place to start.

Speaking of which, testical matters aside, RW, it is good to see you defer, if only partially, when you’re “mistaken”.

And of course, I’m happy. You?

I’ll be happier when someone with some courage in our legislature challenges the Blue Laws and intolerant status quo here in Georgia as defined by the worst of the baptist extremists and other fundamentalists.

“Just like a Bush appeaser to look for any tiny omission (for home use) and loophole (low alcohol beer only) to try and craft an opposing view.”

Very well said, Proud.

It’s quickly getting to the point where “debating” ANYTHING of significance or import is becoming damn near impossible with these neo-cons.

Now that andy has been emasculated, we have significantly less mindless name-calling (but still too much) here, but it has been partially replaced by and ultimately merged with the most obtuse, meaningless responses and trifling challenges. (See BD’s “Earth Day/Lenin’s birthday” response to me from yesterday) In many cases. there is not even an attempt anymore by the neo-cons to disguise them as meaningful answers.

Luckodull’s watered-down animosity is a complete non-factor. BD’s affectations aside, she now simply claims “victory” out of left field from time to time. Dusty doesn’t even bother to deny her hyper-hypocrisy and RW finally seems to be adversely and dramatically affected by being joined at the hip with the religionists and anti-science crowd.

By One Voice

January 5, 2007 06:07 PM | Link to this

Ah, rw, just like in the field of science, the more you open your mouth about writing or linguistics, the more you show how devoid of knowledge you are. The error in my hastily written post last night was not a sentence formation error, but a completely different category, known as a “conventions error.” In revising the sentence before I posted it, I switched it from singular to plural and neglected to delete the singular indicator “a.” Out of the two categories, sentence formation and conventions, guess which area typos fall under? Yup, typos, like mine, fall under conventions. And everyone makes conventions errors, from college professors to journalists, all the way down to school kids and Buy Danish (although the latter two make far more). But sentence formations errors are a different story. Placing commas at the end of sentences is something that only remedial school children, and of course you, tend to do. I would expect to see average 8th graders form complete sentences with the same frequency you do, and most 11th graders at a higher frequency. My advice to you: avoid the comma splices. Paired with the silly content of your posts, your inability to form complete sentences makes you look, well, somewhat illiterate (as does Mary… er Granny’s inability to differentiate between “your” and “you’re”). Hope the advice helps, d*******.

By RE

January 5, 2007 06:10 PM | Link to this

YES!

RW gets it.

CO2 and temperature are linked.

and he belives the world is more than 7000 years old, it is an amazing day.

OK, now the next step in the logical progression. If higher CO2 levels cause higher temperatures as we have established, than what would happen if an action I undertook increased the amount of CO2 in the atmoshpere?

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 06:13 PM | Link to this

Does anybody find it sad and more than a little odd that moonbats, like 6:02 for example, can walk right up to the 2500 character count limit without ever uttering a meaningful phrase?

By Attention Idiot Huge

January 5, 2007 06:13 PM | Link to this

Dictionary.Com: No results found for testical.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 06:15 PM | Link to this

Too bad it took these people 3000+ dead Americans, tens of thousands of dead Iraqis and untold billions of dollars, before they could see that Bush and Co. were incompetent and as noted below, possibly criminal.

Senate Regrets the Vote to Enter Iraq

If the Senators knew then what they know now, only 43 — at most — would still vote to approve the use of force and the measure would be defeated. And at least 57 senators would vote against going to war.

The issue was brought home last month by Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., who delivered an emotional address on the floor of the Senate, saying he regretted having voted for the war.

“I, for one, am at the end of my rope when it comes to supporting a policy that has our soldiers patrolling the same streets in the same way, being blown up by the same bombs day after day,” Smith said. “That is absurd. It may even be criminal. I cannot support that any more.”

By Ahhhh, Huge and One Voice together again

January 5, 2007 06:15 PM | Link to this

How sweet.

Never very far apart, are we?

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 06:17 PM | Link to this

One Voice,

In other words you effed up in the middle of chastising me and want to claim it’s my fault. Typical punka$$ liberal,,,,,,,,

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 06:18 PM | Link to this

Huge waste of oxygen,

To paraphrase Gertrude Stein - A blowhard is a blowhard is a blowhard.

RE,

That Nazi/Eugenics analogy was a really poor choice to make your absurd and ridiculous point that it doesn’t matter who advocates what theories.

The Nazis used Darwin’s theories to justify Eugenics and the mass-slaughter of Jews.

That is a point that many of us correctly use to illustrate the perils of believing in Darwin’s theories.

By LuckoDull

January 5, 2007 06:19 PM | Link to this

The global transition from ice age to greenhouse 300 million years ago was marked by repeated dips and rises in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and wild swings in temperature, with drastic effects on forests and vegetation, the researchers reported in the journal Science.

300 million years ago my SUV was in the shop, RE, dullard.

Where’d all the CO2 come from back then, dinosaur farts?

Why don’t you do your part RE by not exhaling anymore?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 06:21 PM | Link to this

RE,

So you’re responsible for global warming!!,,,,!!….????

You’re actually very insignificant and it’ll probably shock you to know that I agree with rushncap on this one. We are fractionally responsible and I would say that fraction is so small as to be almost nil.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 06:22 PM | Link to this

TommyT,

Whats the point of your 5:31?

That 6 out of 10 thinks there’s a vast left-wing conspiracy?

So why aren’t the Bush’s war supporting, non-msm outlets laying some “good news from Iraq” on us?

Do you have some you can share?

Maybe not. And maybe because there’s so very little, that it’s damned difficult to find or report???

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 06:34 PM | Link to this

Maybe we only see bad news stories out of Iraq because possibly non-existent police Captain Jamil Hussein is so good at reporting phony stories to the AP.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 06:34 PM | Link to this

OV Stalker Boy,

YOU’RE a creep and YOUR mother must be mortified that she created a hateful, mentally-ill freak like you.

BTW, as I’ve said before, I’m not “Mary”, but I bet people call you “Mary” and “Nancy” all the time - at least behind your freaky back.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 06:37 PM | Link to this

You’re wrong, quoter from dictionary.com. Testical was the nephew of the Roman emperor Testicles and the son of Testes.

In lieu of any kind of cogent retort, nice paraphrase, bigot. Dumb and irrelevant, but nice…

By Huge

January 5, 2007 06:39 PM | Link to this

Shades of the Nixon White House?

The White House and the Secret Service quietly signed an agreement last spring in the midst of the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal declaring records identifying visitors to the White House are not open to the public.

The Bush administration did not reveal the existence of the memorandum of understanding until last fall.

The White House is using it to deal with a legal problem on a separate front, a ruling by a federal judge ordering the production of Secret Service logs identifying visitors to the office of Vice President Dick Cheney.

By RE

January 5, 2007 06:39 PM | Link to this

“CO2 goes up and temperature goes up. It drops and temperature drops,” Montanez said.

“It suggests,” she said, “that the normal behavior in major climate transitions is instability, erratic temperature behavior and carbon dioxide changes.”

Did you read all the way through the article?

300 million years ago man did not exist and thus had no effect on the climate. CO2 release is often due to massive eruptions releasing sequestered carbon into the atmoshpere.

Please understand, the eruption does not cause the climate to change, the increase in CO2 does. It does not matter what method is used to increase the CO2, the effect will be the same, increased temperatures.

Burning fossil fuels by the barrel is much slower than a cataclysmic eruption, but the effect is the same

It is just chemistry

By Huge

January 5, 2007 06:42 PM | Link to this

Some good new from the GOP front

Sworn in for a second term as California’s governor on Friday, Arnold Schwarzenegger called for an end to partisan bickering and a focus on innovative centrist policies.

Schwarzenegger cited a pioneering California law last year aimed at curtailing greenhouse gas emissions as a model of what he called “post-partisanship.”

“Post-partisanship is not simply Republicans and Democrats each bringing their proposals to the table and working out differences,” he said in his inaugural speech. “Post-partisanship is Republicans and Democrats actively giving birth to new ideas together.”

By RE

January 5, 2007 06:43 PM | Link to this

Nice timing on the Hussein story

RW I am sure it is just great over in Iraq, it’s is just the liberal medias fault because they hate Bush. Why don’t you move your family there?

By Attention Idiot Huge

January 5, 2007 06:45 PM | Link to this

You called RW “the nephew of the Roman emperor?”

That’s even weirder.

By Raymond

January 5, 2007 06:45 PM | Link to this

Bill obviously has deep insight into these neocon punks and it makes for good, refreshing reading. Look at them as they blather ignorantly on and on here.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 06:46 PM | Link to this

RE,

P.S.

The overall rise of about plus 0.5 ºC during the 20th century is often cited in support of ”global warming” (38). Since, however, 82% of the CO2 rise during the 20th century occurred after the rise in temperature (see figures 1 and 12), the CO2 increase cannot have caused the temperature increase. The 19th century rise was only 13 ppm (2).

By Huhe

January 5, 2007 06:48 PM | Link to this

A little mathematics for the neo-cons:

Maybe we only see bad news stories out of Iraq because possibly non-existent police Captain Jamil Hussein is so good at reporting phony stories to the AP = in many cases, there is not even an attempt anymore by the neo-cons to disguise them as meaningful answers.

To paraphrase Patches O’Houlihan in the movie Dodgeball: If you’re going to become true neo-cons, then you’ve got to learn the five d’s of debating: dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge!

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 06:49 PM | Link to this

RE,

The Iraqis have been denying for three months that there was anyone with that name in either their police or military and the AP hadn’t been able to come up with him. The story that triggered the search for this guy was a completely phony report of the burning of six bodies. Now it’s “oh here he is.” My you’re gullible.

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 06:52 PM | Link to this

Huge Gas Bag,

Nice plagiarizing at 6:39 and 6:42.

By RE

January 5, 2007 06:55 PM | Link to this

RW

Like I said, I am sure it is great over in Iraq, you should move there with your family

By Buy Danish (The original one and only)

January 5, 2007 06:56 PM | Link to this

Huhe’s back! He must have been changing aliases and screwed up when he typed in his name again.

Hmmmmmm. Maybe LD is right and he IS Stalker Boy.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 06:57 PM | Link to this

Huhe,

Maybe you should point out to your b-utt buddy OV that the “h” is right next to the “g” much like the comma is right next to the period.

By Huge

January 5, 2007 07:00 PM | Link to this

Furious typing results in more typos.

Oh well, it gives the neo-cons something to grasp on to.

Wierder than what, 6:45? Your shame at not even posting under your own name?

So as the week comes to an end, it has certainbly been enjoyable watching the scintillating intellect from the far-right drop another notch or five.

The loss of the elections and of andy has sent them into a severe tailspin.

That and embarrassing themselves over and over and over again on any matters of science.

Some of their highlights:

Cow farts are killing us

Incredibly, the earth’s orbit is not perfectly round

Lenin was the forefather of Earth Day

andy’s suv is not 300,000 years old

RW is sitting on, and refuses to share all of the good news from Iraq

Oh, this has been fun. See you knuckleheads next week!

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 07:03 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Huhe went to the Joe Biden school of writing.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 07:09 PM | Link to this

RE,

What great retort are you going to regale us with next? Maybe, “I know you are, but what am I.” or “Why don’t you enlist?”

Wouldn’t I likely end the world through global warming just by flying over there?

By Attention Idiot Huge

January 5, 2007 07:13 PM | Link to this

{{{{{“Wierder}}}}}} than what, 6:45? Your shame at not even posting under your own name?”

Not weirder than 7:00 was, that’s for damn sure.

By RW-(the original)

January 5, 2007 07:14 PM | Link to this

Huhe,

You wouldn’t need to do all that furious typing of your name if you didn’t keep changing it.

Maybe Huhe is the entire dirty bathwater crew too.

{{{{{{Oh, this has been fun. See you knuckleheads next week}}}}}} Translation-I’m changing names for my next post.

By LuckoDull

January 5, 2007 07:14 PM | Link to this

CNN runs tape of the same Iraqi bombing every day, all day long, without pause, with a different idiot talking head for each new hour.

What do you think Iraqis would think of Atlanta if all CNN ran was the courthouse killings tape or some other non stop slaughter story?

Are you liberals that dull?

The AJC is dredging up old stories and presenting them as new because Iraqis aren’t killing each other anymore in numbers significant enough to excite you dullards.

And you libs can’t see the bald faced defeatist agenda?

You really are some pretty simple people.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

RE: Would you move your family to Bankhead Highway?