Mike Luckovich

By LuckoDull

December 20, 2006 08:00 AM | Link to this

Let’s see here.

The democrats won the mid term elections on the issue of getting us out of Iraq.

In effect, Bush was able to sign the whole entire war, outcome and all, over to the liberals.

The libs, knowing full well that they didn’t mean ANY of their pre election anti war nonsense, that it was all a trick to make their base idiots happy, are now in their very own quagmire.

If they cut and run, which is what they promised to do, they will have become the biggest pansies in the recorded history of the world, eclipsing even Neville Chamberlin. They will be blamed with the total destruction of the Middle East, the loss of Russia and Isreal.

So here we are, children, you wanted the tough questions, you got them.

Should we attack Iran?

Bush is in over HIS head?????

Hahahahaha.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By Nomad

December 20, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

Luckodull - Please allow me to make one small correction in your 8:00 a.m. post. You stated that the Dems would have become the greatest pansies in recorded history of the world.

I believe you are wrong in this statement. Dems are already the biggest pansies in the world.

Small mistake, I know it happens to everyone.

Have a Merry Christmas.

NOMAD

By w00t

December 20, 2006 08:14 AM | Link to this

ooooooo, so it was all part of the master plan. Bush was to get in over his head and then pass off his mess to the democrats to make them look incompetent? I guess then they can be voted back into power and continue their world tour.

Bottom line is, bushy-tail caused all of this. So your “total destruction of the Middle East, [and] the loss of Russia and Israel” will be all his fault.

Thanks for ruining the world Bush and company.

By Shawny

December 20, 2006 08:16 AM | Link to this

Funny toon. Nice tie in with the Donald, his forgiveness of Conner, but Georgie instead.

Today’s toon does not suck, but because it is yet another presidential bashing, I am offering up the following bashing of another president that is pretty funny too. Hopefully, it meets Midori’s approval, as well as the previous presidential bashing I submitted two days ago. Non-partisan, of course.

http://www.townhall.com/funnies/cartoonist/PaulNowak/2006/12/1

By New Life Church

December 20, 2006 08:26 AM | Link to this

“In effect, Bush was able to sign the whole entire war, outcome and all, over to the liberals.”

Probably the stupidest comment ever on this blog. LuckoDull should use this Nancy Kerrigan line as his screen name “Why me? why me?”.

At least Andy didn’t whine all day, grow a pair LuckoDull.

By Brian Curtis

December 20, 2006 08:31 AM | Link to this

The cartoon is absurd because it suggests there’s still some way for Traitor Bush to come out of this situation with a shred of dignity.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 08:32 AM | Link to this

Totally tiresome ‘toon.

By Peter

December 20, 2006 08:34 AM | Link to this

EXCELLENT !

The chimp has never looked better (and the emperor has no clothes).

(sadly) In the face of the QUAGMIRE, Duh-bya has left himself no options.

By Truthman

December 20, 2006 08:39 AM | Link to this

So much name-calling from the neo-conmen this morning!!! Still smarting from November 7.

Wah, Wah, Wah!!

X-lent toon!

And, thanks to all you good, God-fearing Christians out there who prayed for Sen. Tim Johnson’s swift recovery. I mean, y’all run Jesus up the flagpole so much, and are such a culture of life, that I just know you had - and have - the compassion to pray for the recovery of one of our elected officials, right? None of you really liked that FAUX NEWS was gloating about the Repubs possibly holding on to the Senate, did you?

That wouldn’t be Christian, now would it?

BTW, in this time of Holiday spirit, let me say this: This LIBERAL could and would kick the living crap out of most of you neo-cons who spew your neanderthal drivel on this blog.

I AIN’T NO PANSY, CHA CHA!!! I can be as militant as need be, sucka!!

By Holiday Fruitcake

December 20, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

Well, well, well! Now the Bushbots are finally admitting that Iraq is a quagmire and the biggest mistake ever made by any administration.

Now the geniuses are falling back on their “master plan” to blame Democrats for the Chimperor’s misdeeds by alienating the American public, and engineering their own midterm election slaughter.

Wingnut Keyboard Kommandos have captured the Hillarycoptersand now they are going to turn their conservative mind control ray on the entire populace and hornswoggle them into believing the Democrats started the Iraq debacle and that the Republican party will now rise from the ashes like a mythical Phoenix.

With strategic thinking like that, is there any wonder that the American public has tossed these fruitcakes onto the rubbish heap of history?

By Jim Curtis

December 20, 2006 08:48 AM | Link to this

Republicans are a national disgrace. If they had any dignity left at all they would resign, go crawl back into their holes, and leave politics to those competent to serve.

By Political Foreskin

December 20, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this

Trump didn’t fire Miss USA despite her handling of her rack (Iraq).

With the Military Commissions Act, we’ll finally be protected from John Lennon. His box set of cd’s will now have a sticker warning that it’s only a theory that he was a singer posing as an terrorist, that he could indeed be an terrorist posing as a singer. I feel safer.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this

Totally tiresome twits too.

By Political Foreskin

December 20, 2006 08:55 AM | Link to this

The Holdout Juror: “If the leash dont fit, you must acquit”.

By Frank

December 20, 2006 08:56 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - President Bush, who has contended that the U.S. was winning the war in Iraq, said Tuesday for the first time that American forces were not winning there. He also said the military would be expanded to fight a long-term battle against terrorism.

INSANITY: Doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result.

Now Boy George wants to institutionalize his Iraq FUBAR for generations ot come.

By Another LIE

December 20, 2006 09:03 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - A White House laboring to find a new approach in Iraq said Tuesday it is considering sending more U.S. troops, an option that worries top generals because of its questionable payoff and potential backlash. President Bush said he is ready to boost the overall size of an American military overstretched by its efforts against worldwide terrorism.

Pardon me if I’m wrong, but didn’t this administration say something about letting the generals determine troop strength. Has this administration ever told us the truth about anything at all?

By lklwkejrwecf

December 20, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this

Now tomorrow, please draw something about Perdue’s worthless Florida swampland. I can’t wait until the IRS gets ahold of that sorry, lyin’ sack of … Hey, Mrs. Perdue, “It’s a shame,” your husband is a crook.

By Scooter

December 20, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this

ml in his brilliance, pens his 1,682nd version of a “Bush is stupid” cartoon.

By Lord Help Us

December 20, 2006 09:10 AM | Link to this

Luckodull - as much as we would like a new commander in chief, we are stuck with the one we have for another two years (I know, it is depressing).

Therefore, the decision to ‘cut and run’ will still be up to the Shrub and his incompetent cabal.

ALL you are seeing now is the stagecrafting about a ‘surge’ that will quickly produce some trumped up event that will be used to ‘declare victory.’

The Shrub will then, essentially, execute the Baker Commission recommendations.

It is, in fact, all about ‘managing the message,’ the SPIN if you please…

AND, the beauty of this is that ONLY a couple hundred additional brave service men and women will have to die in order for this ‘message’ to be managed in a way that provides some face-saving for this incompetent administration.

Makes you proud doesn’t it??

By Whadda Ya Expect from a Republican?

December 20, 2006 09:11 AM | Link to this

ALBANY, N.Y. - The majority leader of the New York state Senate announced that the FBI is investigating him and his private consulting business.

Joseph Bruno, who will be the state’s top Republican in January, said Tuesday he was told by the FBI in late spring that he was being investigated.

Republicans just can’t stay out of trouble with the law, can they?

By Peter

December 20, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this

Scooter - can anyone say “Duh-bya is stupid” too many times?

By Show me the Money

December 20, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is still struggling to get a handle on the unprecedented number of contractors now helping run the nation’s wars, losing millions of dollars because it is unable to monitor industry workers stationed in far-flung locations, according to a congressional report.

The real reason for Iraq wasn’t WMDs or even the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. This whole deal was just to crack open the Pentagon credit card without any oversight so that Republican benefactors can loot the treasury with impunity.

By Brian Curtis

December 20, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

Scooter: As long as there’s still a few thick skulls out there where the message hasn’t penetrated, it bears repeating.

Traitor Bush is a screwup. The evidence is overwhelming. Accept it; the Republican Party has.

By Dyin' to Support the War

December 20, 2006 09:29 AM | Link to this

Soldier Suicides in Iraq Rose Last Year

More proof of how well King George and his Republican cabal are REALLY treating our troops.

By Conservatives Kill Christmas Parties

December 20, 2006 09:38 AM | Link to this

LONDON (AFP) - The traditional office Christmas party, where alcohol-fuelled workers across the country vent the last twelve months of frustration, is a growing legal headache for employers. “Bosses need to protect themselves from the threat of litigation that can arise from such situations,” Done told the Personnel Today website.

Now the cons are gonna blame the libs for eliminating the office X-mas party. The truth though is that cons are always worried about gettin sued. Maybe if cons had clearer consciences they wouldn’t be so damn paranoid about litigation.

By RW-(the original)

December 20, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this

I see Queen AntiR of Yahoo has run out of Thai children to molest this morning.

Hey Saltker Boy OotMVoD or OotMV, or OV,

How come the big bad stalker boy calls out a woman at 7:13 one day knowing she cant respond, but when she does respond the next day you can’t get the smarmy little bastard to come out of hiding?

By Will Jones

December 20, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

Bush is a traitor. Did not the documented 202 visits, in a two year period, to the White House’s social entrance, many overnight, by homosexual prostitute James Guckert (AKA Jeff Gannon), not raise the suspicion of even the least patriotic or decent Republican…to say nothing of the proof of his 9-11 guilt in “The New Pearl Harbor,” by PhD Professor of Logic, David Ray Griffin, or http://www.youtube.com/viewplaylist?p=2AFEEBF0C352AA2C ? That he dodged the draft, that his father couldn’t recall his whereabouts upon hearing of JFK’s assassination, that his grandfather was Hitler’s banker, and that his family has fronted for the Rockefellers since they built Standard Oil on “murder and arson” really should have tipped off the dullest of us.

By Libs Kill Christmas Parties

December 20, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this

stupid comment…it is the libs that kill the parties. the cons want to eliminate frivilous lawsuits. the libs and their pet project, the ACLU, want anyone to be able to sue for anything.

idiot

By Another War Quagmire

December 20, 2006 09:52 AM | Link to this

LAZARO CARDENAS, Mexico - Soldiers trying to seize control of one Mexico’s top drug-producing regions found the countryside teeming with a new hybrid marijuana plant that can be cultivated year-round and cannot be killed with pesticides.

“These plants have been genetically improved,” he told a handful of journalists allowed to accompany soldiers on a daylong raid of some 70 marijuana fields. “Before we could cut the plant and destroy it, but this plant will come back to life unless it’s taken out by the roots.”

The new plants, known as “Colombians,” mature in about two months and can be planted at any time of year, meaning authorities will no longer be able to time raids to coincide with twice-yearly harvests.

The hybrid first appeared in Mexico two years ago but has become the plant of choice for drug traffickers Michoacan, a remote mountainous region that lends to itself to drug production.

Yields are so high that traffickers can now produce as much marijuana on a plot the size of a football field as they used to harvest in 10 to 12 acres. That makes for smaller, harder-to-detect fields.

Isn’t it about time that we extricated ourselves from this drug war quagmire, too? If we continue to make drugs more valuable through interdiction, we will continue to strengthen the narco-trafficers, force them to improve their product, and continue to promote lawlessness. Put it in the pharmacy and sell it through prescription; addicts need treatment, not imprisonment. The only way to stop the drug menace is to take the profit out of it!

By Peter

December 20, 2006 10:01 AM | Link to this

Will Jones - (I’m still waiting.) If the scenario of bringing down the WTC and attack on the Pentagon was so “well orchestrated” by the (incompetent) administration. Why did the hijackers not have Iraqi papers to draw a direct link to justify invading Iraq? Did they miss that detail? (How about the plan to make Duh-bya look smart on 9/11 flying aimlessly around the country when they “knew” the plan?)

By Phillip H

December 20, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

I agree with “Cons Kill Christmas Parties”. The real reason conservatives hate trial lawyers so much is that they are afraid of being caught and held accountable for their wrong doings. Paranoia is not a trait of innocent people.

By Luckovich Censors Chickenhawks

December 20, 2006 10:04 AM | Link to this

What, no Andi?

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

December 20, 2006 10:06 AM | Link to this

Who’s the goofy little simian with the crown, Mike?

Andi’s lover?

By I Voted for the War Even Though I'm a Sissy

December 20, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

I’m not too old to enlist, but I’d rather just blog for my country.

War is vewwwy scawwy to a gal like me.

By SwiftVoter

December 20, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

Bush was able to get out of Viet Nam, surely he can lean on his father to get us out of the Iraq Quagmire he got us into!

Why do so many of you take him for a complete nincompoop.

By Macho, Macho, Man

December 20, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this

LCC- Andy cut n run like all chickenhawks do when the shiite hits the fan…..all mouth and no cajones.

Rumor is that the Dems hit him with their liberal mind control ray so many times that he went off the deep end for good and is now playing the cop in a revival act of the “Village People”.

By getalife

December 20, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this

“Gingrich has written off Bush The only people left who are giving George Bush any credibility are those in the corporate media.”

And the idiotic wingnuts.

By Truthman

December 20, 2006 10:38 AM | Link to this

Hey, I hear the Insurgents are so happy with their attacks on American Soldier that they’ve adopted a new slogan to galvanize the people behind their cause!

It’s “Stay The Course!”

By SarahConnah

December 20, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

How pathetic!

Some earlier post’s this am cheer that their Buckaroo Bush has passed off this miserable mess HE CREATED to those who didn’t.

To paraphrase Lee Hamilton of the ISG:

This is a sick society and deteriorating rapidly!

Sick, sick, sick!

Curtsie!

By The Watcher

December 20, 2006 11:02 AM | Link to this

RW aren’t you supposed to be at work?

By Andy

December 20, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

WHen sarahConnah curtsied, she revealed that she aint got no panties on. Is it Britney? Paris? The panda?

Stay tuned. but I’m gonna have my Utube ready.

By RW-(the original)

December 20, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this

The Watcher,

No.

Was that part of what you pathetic losers calls informed dialog?

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 20, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

Despite UNANIMOUS disagreement from the Joint Chiefs of Staff on increasing troop levels, even though “his experts” (to whom he claimed he would listen) are telling him it’s just creating more targets, the Washington Post is reporting in an exclusive interview that Bush has ordered Gates to come up with a plan to increase troops. Anyone still supporting this moron is indeed a moron themselves.

By RE

December 20, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

I think the only strategy the GWB has for Iraq is to prolong it into the next presidency. In that way he, along with the usual right wing folks can try to blame the failure on the next president. THe truth is that he had complete control and discretion in fighting this war for 4 years. The results are his legacy

By Truthman

December 20, 2006 11:34 AM | Link to this

Al-Sadr: “We shall Stay the Course to drive out the crusaders!!”

See, “Stay the Course” does work…for the Civil Warriors in Iraq.

Gosh, one out of two would make you zillionaire in baseball. But, in politics, it makes you a pathetic piece of excrement!

By RE

December 20, 2006 11:41 AM | Link to this

Wait wait.

There are 2 different things going on here. Bush is going to expand the amount of forces in the Army and Marines. I think this is a very good idea, it is a long term plan and will take years to implement. Rumsfeld’s “Smaller, Faster, Lighter” idea of an army has been a disaster.

Now actually deploying those troops to Iraq would be useless.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 12:04 PM | Link to this

Truthman at 10:34,

I hear that liberals are so happy with their attacks on American Soldier that they are adopting a new slogan to galvanize Democrats behind their cause. The Commander-in-chief is their main target.

Instead of the old “cut-n-run”for liberals, it is now “Stay Our Course to Undermine America!” Hail to your local leader Luckovich.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 20, 2006 12:34 PM | Link to this

“I hear that liberals are so happy with their attacks on American Soldier that they are adopting a new slogan to galvanize Democrats behind their cause.”

Dusty you are a moron. Just where did you hear that from? Rush? Hannity? Boortz? It doesn’t matter because at the end of the day it’s us liberals who want our troops home and out of danger in Iraq. meanwhile you idiots who are cheerleading this war seem to want more and more troops killed. And for what? I still haven’t heard a good reason for being in Iraq yet.

By Truthman

December 20, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

Thank you, PPL, I could not have said it better than you!!

BTW, where can we get some of that new hybrid kind-bud? I should call Rush and ask him…LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By Republican Compulsive Spenders

December 20, 2006 01:32 PM | Link to this

The Outstanding Public Debt as of 20 Dec 2006 at 06:20:30 PM GMT is: $8,617,240,074,290.93

The estimated population of the United States is 300,512,639 so each citizen’s share of this debt is $28,675.13.

The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $1.34 billion per day since September 29, 2006!

Irresponsible Republicans continue to spend our tax dollars without any restraint or responsibility whatsoever. In January, the Democrats will be taking King George’s credit cards away so there is still hope for America, yet.

For our kids sakes, we can never let Republican compulsive spenders get their paws on a blank check ever again.

By Thomas

December 20, 2006 01:40 PM | Link to this

Greetings Everyone,

And I will say this quite clearly!

“Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!” I hope your holidays go very well… Peace on Earth and goodwill towards all men.

(Don’t ever expect me to bow down to political correctness, dogma, and other inane proper traditions garbage! I express my feelings period!)

Now on to world events;

Interestingly enough, our commander in chief now decides to increase our troops in Iraq. So I guess now the fanatics of Islam will have a target rich environment to shoot at during their civil war.

But at the same time this troop buildup is suppose to be a warning to nearby Iran? You have got to be kidding me!

What kind of warning?

Fear us Iran, because we failed in Iraq and Afghanistan? Sure! That should work. The psycopath leader in Iran will undoubtably be cowering at our international might in fear. I’m sure he will comply with dismantling his nuclear toys.

Meanwhile larger threats loom as we weaken our military might even more in this dust-bowl wasteland called Iraq.

How much more of our country’s money and military resources are we going to expend in this wasted venture for oil control?

And what will we do when we later have to fight real war in a country like North Korea, or maybe worse.

And how strong will our military be then, when we have used much of our high tech ammo against “Camel Jockeys” that can barely shoot back at us.

And how can we restore those munitions when we are in debt to our eyeballs in the world markets?

Just how much did it cost the taxpayers every time we fired a Cruise missile?

Well the answer is 1.5 million for the missile alone and that does not count the other expenses associated with the launching of it.

So I say this now:

Bush! Reduce our troops in Iraq and defend OUR country NOT THEIRS! We need America strong and prepared for future wars. Get our troops home, re-equiped, rested, and prepared. The world is less safe because of your failed foreign policy, so we better get ready at home now.

A major storm is brewing and we are at the very center of it!

Thomas

By "Tax and Spend" Republicans

December 20, 2006 01:41 PM | Link to this

SAQLAWIYA, IRAQ — An imam complained about a hole in the roof of a mosque punched by a Marine mortar round that malfunctioned. A teacher who raises poultry requested compensation for 500 chickens apparently scared to death by mortar fire. And a woman accused Marines of stealing jewelry and watches during a search of her home. Half a dozen Marine officers, including a lawyer, battalion and company commanders and an Arabic-speaking battalion executive officer, listened to the requests and several more.

If it’s Tuesday at the Iraqi police station in this farming community near Fallouja, it’s claims day, when Iraqis can make complaints against Marines and seek payment.

Marines have long given out such cash payments to Iraqis, an effort that dates to just after the fall of Saddam Hussein in April 2003.

Sounds like the Chimperor has got hisself a pretty good WELFARE program goin in Iraq, already. The Republican party is now just a carbon copy of the “Tax and Spend” Democrats of the 60’s!

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this

Great cartoon, Mike! As usual, right on target. However, does this mean we can get Trump to fire the Chimp?

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this

Shrubby is off by 1 letter on his slogan. It’s actually “Stay The Curse”.

By Wondering Why???

December 20, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

II will never profess to be a knowledgeable professor of world history. However, from the little that I’ve learned and heard about in this lifetime, it seems to me that the king, ruler or president would go to war with his troops. He either courageously stood at the front, charging forward, leading his troops into battle. In the middle, strategically watching what happens when the infantry engages the enemy or in the back when it was time to pull out the big guns and he was the one going after the throat of the enemy’s leader, sword/gun/spear/rock/sword raised. The point is, he (or she in rare instances) was there, on the battlefield. The war usually ended when the leader fell in battle. These high tech wars, you can have it! That’s why they go on and on without a purpose. Iran, Iraq, Palestine, fought before we got there, fought one another while we are there and will fight one another when we’ve gone. So I ask, what exactly is the point of this war? Bush will be in some cushy chair as pictured in today’s awesome photo, taking vacation and enjoying the holiday season while others are losing their lives on an hourly basis.

Why that is not frightening to (some) Rep’s and some Dem’s is beyond by comprehension. So what!! I’m a bleeding heart liberal… least that shows I actually have a heart!! I could actually get behind a war and a president that took up arms with his men to fight for what he (obviously) believes is right & just. Blindly yes, but knowing he was ready to put his fist up and not send me to do his dirty work…well that’s my rant and rave. I love the Bush Bashing cartoon’s ML keepin’ comin’ cause I’m so over him I can’t stand it! Now he wants to increase more ground forces?? I nominate him to go first! Get on his horse, make sharp his sword, gather his inferior gear, stop hiding behind his big mouth, and go to war…only then can the sideline peanut gallery call anyone Dem or Rep a pansy!… the audacity… the got darn nerve!

By joan

December 20, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this

You have a disgustingly small compassion index, second only to your loyalty to your country and its leaders. I know you helped vote this one out, but for heaven’s sake, try for a little perspective.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 02:30 PM | Link to this

Poor little liberal crybabies.

You can’t stand this and you can’t stand that.

You don’t want to spend a nickle more on our troops.

You can’t run backwards fast enough from terrorism.

You don’t have any leaders and you can’t follow the one brave enough to lead.

Keep up the cute little sayings and the dumb jokes. That’s all you have to offer.

By Midori

December 20, 2006 02:37 PM | Link to this

Dusty — it appears you are the only “crybaby” here.

All you do is whine and gripe, in between posting fictional conversations from fictional “liberals”.

By RE

December 20, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this

Dusty, I am interested.

What do you think we should do in Iraq?

Increase troops?

More international Nato support?

Regional discussions with Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia?

Move the troops out?

Stay the course?

Anything?

How about saying who it is we are fighting?

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 02:45 PM | Link to this

Well done, Dusty. Have you run out of meaningless slogans yet, or do we get to look forward to more enlightening one-liners from you?

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 02:47 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Too bad you aren’t a fictional crybaby. But alas, I see you are here for real to spread the good news of liberalism with the usual insults and insinuations. Too bad you have to copy what I say to have a point, crybaby. Try an idea of your own.

By Midori

December 20, 2006 02:50 PM | Link to this

Shawny,

your taste buds are highly suspect if you think that garbage cartoon you posted doesn’t suck. you need to get out more, it appears. TownHall? The resident wing nut looney bin?

By Midori

December 20, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this

Dusty, Dusty, Dusty,

again, you are the only one “crying” here.

why don’t you take your stupid crap up the road to Wooten’s. Then you and your kindred spirits can sit around and play pin the idiot catchphrase on the donkey?

By Shawny

December 20, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this

That’s weird. The link to the addt’l toon that does not suck has moved. Here is the original one, featuring our Cuban buddy:

http://www.townhall.com/funnies/cartoonist/PaulNowak/2006/12/2

And BTW, it doesn’t suck, as lucko’s toon of today also doesn’t suck, albeit (yet) another Bush bashie.

Pulitzer, schmulitzer.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

did you get all the test tubes washed and the floors swept in the lab? I knew you would come buzzing around after hours when you and the infamous “M” finished chores. Oh now, to hear the brilliance of your repartee!! The joy of it all!!

By getalife

December 20, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this

Yes, the whiny wingnuts are very whiny.

I guess when you are so wrong all the time, it has to sink in sometime.

Reality sucks for the whiny wingnuts.

By SwiftVoter

December 20, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this

Bush wants to hike troop strength…

The theory here is to solidify and stay the course.

You see, the more children that die in this war; the more our resolve to stay the course becomes.

Americans must sacrifice more to keep winning the war on terror.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

did you get all the test tubes washed and the floors swept in the lab? I knew you would come buzzing around after hours when you and the infamous “M” finished chores. Oh now, to hear the brilliance of your repartee!! The joy of it all!!

By Midori Mustache

December 20, 2006 03:10 PM | Link to this

BURRRRRP! Got Bush?

Put dat in your book

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:14 PM | Link to this

RE,

Just as I expected. You want ME to tell YOU just whom we are fighting. I’d say you are about four years behind.

Now go back to AJC home page and see if you can find a bit of information on Iraq, American troops, S** & Sunnis, terrorism, Congress, and the WAR!!! There. Get going.

What you really want is for me to say that I support America’s efforts in Iraq. Then you will say that I am all wrong. SOOO, nevermind. Nothing you say will convince me to be anti-American, anti-president & anti-troops. It is that simple.

By Thomas

December 20, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this

Dusty?

Running from terrorism?

What (so called liberal) here is running from terrorism? And tell me, just how do you win a war against terrorism? Where is the target to do battle with? How can you defeat terrorism with military might?

That is the one question that has never been answered here, (probably because it cannot be answered in the real world of war and combat strategy!)

I think at this point we need to leave Iraq not because of the (catchprase) “so called” war on terrorism, but more so we need to leave Iraq before our troops get caught in the crossfire of the impending civil war there. I frankly don’t want our troops playing Clay Pidgeons in a 3 way civil war between Sunni’s Shiites, and Kurds. Especially if this expands due to other nearby countries adding their own spin on things.

I do support our troops, and being in support of our troops means I do not want them to die needlessly and foolishly here, when a tactical retreat will keep them alive and strong for future battles.

Or do you remember Mc’Arthurs famous quote about making the enemy die for his country instead?

Thomas

By RE

December 20, 2006 03:26 PM | Link to this

So basically you don’t know who we are fighting and have no clue what to do

Just like our president

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 03:27 PM | Link to this

Sorry, Dusty, some of us have actual jobs, that actually contribute to this society. Parasites like you can only try to make fun of us for it.

By Midori

December 20, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this

Just like the pathetic wingnuts - can’t hold their own in an argument, can’t come up with coherent, viable points, so they are reduced to namejacking.

Isn’t that soooooooo pre-9/11?

Sad. Really, really sad. That’s all they have.

Sorta like, “I know I’m stoopid, but so are you”.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:45 PM | Link to this

Swiftvoter,

You are not too “swift”.

I assume that you are an American. But you are saying in effect that the more children die in Iraq the stronger American resolve becomes to stay the course. Are you saying that we LIKE to kill children? That troops are children?

Our troops are not children and the people fighting us are not either.

With patriots like you, who needs enemies.

By Brian Curtis

December 20, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

From Dusty: “Nothing you say will convince me to be anti-American, anti-president…”

Make up your mind. At this point, anyone who’s pro-Bush is anti-American. Which do you support?

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:49 PM | Link to this

No, RE,

YOU DON’T KNOW just whom we are fighting because you are fighting our president. You are just a typical liberal making excuses.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:55 PM | Link to this

Poor rushncap,

Gone to crying ‘cause he is working. Poor baby.

If you want to compare contributions to society, don’t start while you are still in the university system or college, whatever. Rushie, baby, you haven’t got a chance against me or most any other adult.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

Yes, Midori,

Why don’t you and getalife stop the name jacking and the multiple ids? It is a lot more honest to use your own.
Try it. You’ll like it.

By Midori

December 20, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this

I’ll bet ole Dusty was so pro-Clinton; pro-American that she went out and stocked up on cigars.

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 04:03 PM | Link to this

I’m not crying because I’m working Dustbunny. I’m merely pointing out that since you never have, you really have no leg to stand on.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 04:05 PM | Link to this

Brian Curtis,

Always the anti-American. I bet you rate 100% good material at al-Jazeera. Do they pay you for the propaganda or do you spread it out for free?

By Midori

December 20, 2006 04:08 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

I can’t “stop” namejacking, as I’m not doing it.

your ignorant crystal ball sure needs a tune up.

By Shawny

December 20, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

Stocked up on cigars…now that is funny and doesn’t suck (unlike a certain intern)

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this

What’s Bush’s approval rating now? Something like 6%? How’s it feel to be one of the dumbest, most gullible people alive, Dusty? Must be hella fun.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

You are all wrong again. But let’s see. You have a few years of study and a partime job and you want to tell the adults how to work and contribute.

That’s a good one, rushie. But keep on trying, little one. You may get a degree and a real job one of these days. Then you will learn what “contribute” really means.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this

Sorry, ol’ Midori,

Can’t think of a Clinton worth mentioning. Would you mind explaining all your references?

By Midori

December 20, 2006 04:23 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

just thought I would use references that you are right at home with.

Didn’t we hear about cigars constantly from you people the past 6 years? Why try to play ignorant about it now?

Did Ken Starr personally autograph your’s?

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this

Well, rushncap,

I was waiting for YOU to tell me how it feels to be the dumbest, most gullible person alive. Don’t ask me. You should know.

Bush’s rating is good at my house. Of course, we think for ourselves and don’t depend on polls. At some point in time, you will learn to think for youself. At least, I think so. Maybe..possibly….

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this

No, Dustbunny, I’m not telling “adults” anything, I’m telling you. Adults have reasoning capabilities, in general. You lack them altogether.

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

—- Well, rushncap,

I was waiting for YOU to tell me how it feels to be the dumbest, most gullible person alive. Don’t ask me. You should know. —-

Ooooh! What a comeback! Wow. But hey, everyone, Dusty wants you to think she’s an “adult”. And Shaq’s a midget.

By Midori

December 20, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

LOL, Bush has an 100% rating at Dusty’s house!!!!

What does your dog or cat have to say about that?

ROFL!!!!

Take THAT, American electorate!!!!!

LMAO!!!!!

Sing along with me Dusty: FOUR MORE YEARS!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

December 20, 2006 04:38 PM | Link to this

Ken/dra Starr, Dusty and a ceegar? Midori, that’s disgusting!

Thanks for the worst image ever on the Luckovich blog.

Still puking.

By Midori

December 20, 2006 04:45 PM | Link to this

Yo, Pope,

I wonder if Dusty has polled the spiders and dust mites yet? With a little help from them, Bush might gain a few more favorability points in her household - shooting his approval ratings literally thru her roof.

By George

December 20, 2006 04:49 PM | Link to this

Midori, shouldn’t that be four more wars!

By getalife

December 20, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this

Bush: “Hey, I want my image printed on greenbacks ASAP! For chrissakes, my mom’s already on the $1 bill!”

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this

Sorry, Midori,

Does not compute. Your specialty is the ignoble and ugly aka the Clinton White House. You dig the dirt. Not me.

Put your glasses on when you get over the hysterics. Bush is favored at my house but not 100%. That goes for all my family and the cat.

Your singing is off key as usual.

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this

Midori, please don’t insult the intelligence of spiders. Dustbunny’s household has to be entirely sterilized of any other creature but herself in order for Shrubby to retain his “pretty good” rating there.

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this

Golly Rednecks,

You are SO funny. Did you get your five minutes over at Little Five Points for the local folks trying to be “humorous”? Keep, trying, ol’ buddy. Maybe they won’t boo you off the stage next time.

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

December 20, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this

Obviously, Midori, Dusty has extended the vote to the vegetables in her vegetable drawer.

Let’s hope that none of them have been put to ill use like that poor ceegar you mentioned…

By Midori

December 20, 2006 05:07 PM | Link to this

the itzy, bitzy spider went up the water spout, but not before telling Dusty Bush is an ignorant lout……..

Gotcha, Rush :)

By Midori

December 20, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this

LOL, Pope

Dusty has forged a carrot coalition of the clueless :)

By Dusty

December 20, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

Aww rushie and ‘dori,

Spiders and dustmites, that’s not too clever. You can do better than that. I’m disapponted in the two of you. But keep trying.

I am off to “contribute to society”. Oh yes. I’ve tried my best to keep you liberals out of trouble and on the right track today. It’s a tough job but somebody’s got to do it. Now, stay out of trouble and wash behind your ears.

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 05:26 PM | Link to this

Contribute to society, Dusty? Isn’t it a bit early to go to sleep?

By getalife

December 20, 2006 05:28 PM | Link to this

Now you know why the call her “crusty the clown.”

By Mike

December 20, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this

Sigh. The partisan hack doodler strikes again.

Will Mikey (or Bookman and Tucker) ever criticize a Democrat?

By Jeffrey Gelinas

December 20, 2006 06:01 PM | Link to this

Although I cannot say I am a fervent supporter of our current president, don’t you think that attacking him about five out of every six days for the last six years is getting a bit old? With all of the happenings in the world and in politics (both liberal and republican), it occurs to me that there are obvious daily fresh targets withpout going to the old George W. Bush well so often. Face it, that well has indeed run dry. It just isn’t funny anymore. Do yourself a favor and find some fresh material. I believe the readership would appreciate it. Aside from the occasional death of a famous person in which you send them to the pearly gates, there really hasn’t been a lot to smile about with your comics in a long time. And if you feel the welcome pats on the back from the usual politically affiliated people, perhaps it would benefit you to know that there are many people who constitute the AJC readership who would be entertained by your talents much more if you would show some range rather than thumping the president again and again and again. It really ceased being funny long ago.

By Jeffrey Gelinas

December 20, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

Although I cannot say I am a fervent supporter of our current president, don’t you think that attacking him about five out of every six days for the last six years is getting a bit old? With all of the happenings in the world and in politics (both liberal and republican), it occurs to me that there are obvious daily fresh targets withpout going to the old George W. Bush well so often. Face it, that well has indeed run dry. It just isn’t funny anymore. Do yourself a favor and find some fresh material. I believe the readership would appreciate it. Aside from the occasional death of a famous person in which you send them to the pearly gates, there really hasn’t been a lot to smile about with your comics in a long time. And if you feel the welcome pats on the back from the usual politically affiliated people, perhaps it would benefit you to know that there are many people who constitute the AJC readership who would be entertained by your talents much more if you would show some range rather than thumping the president again and again and again. It really ceased being funny long ago.

By rushncap

December 20, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this

Mike, when a Democrat sends thousands of our young men and women to die in an unnecessary war, lies about it continuously for 4 years, and then acts like he’s the savior of the universe, I’m sure ML will find it in his heart to grant you your wish and criticize a Democrat.

Until then just be happy Shrub is not in jail.

Jeff, I find it funny. So do a lot of people here. But I happen to like black humor.

By Peter

December 20, 2006 06:15 PM | Link to this

Jeffrey - it did cease to be funny long ago, but the insanity continues … (don’t blame Mike).

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

December 20, 2006 06:24 PM | Link to this

The Donald is trying to get Miss America to give up drugs and kissing younger girls - I guess with Dumbya he’ll try to get him to give up boozing and kissing Jeff Gannon and smooching Saudi princes…

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

December 20, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this

Let’s all pray that Laura Bush’s skin cancer isn’t as malignant as her husband.

By Pope rednecks - Amerikkka's Al Qaeda I

December 20, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

A Curly carrot-topped coalition of the clueless…

By Midori

December 20, 2006 07:00 PM | Link to this

what happened to Crusty Dusty?

still polling her carrots?

By LuckoDull

December 20, 2006 07:04 PM | Link to this

Well, wasn’t this just so typical for the LuckoDull blog, we had seven, count them, seven brave and courageous liberals against one woman, and the liberals lost, hahaha.

rushncap: Not only can you not debate; you are also somewhat of a pile. Did anyone else not notice the absolute, unbridled joy in his comments as he attempted to abuse that woman, Dusty? We’re you in touch with your inner beastie while you were hysterically yelling at her, rushncap? Did you sense some raw, wet, hard fearlessness like you haven’t felt since the last time your sister beat you up?

Weirdo.

BTW, in this time of Holiday spirit, let me say this: This LIBERAL could and would kick the living crap out of most of you neo-cons who spew your neanderthal drivel on this blog. I AIN’T NO PANSY, CHA CHA!!! I can be as militant as need be, sucka!!

If that was supposed to be a battle cry, Truthgirl, maybe you should unlimp your wrist and come out from under the bed the next time you shriek it.

Don’t forget to check for Muslims first.

No wonder the zipperheads think they can beat us.

LONDON (AFP) - The traditional office Christmas party, where alcohol-fuelled workers across the country vent the last twelve months of frustration, is a growing legal headache for employers, blah, blah, blah Now the cons are gonna blame the libs for eliminating the office X-mas party.

Way to go, genius, blame a story from ENGLAND on the conservatives in America. You’re a true liberal, a real blooming idiot.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

By SwiftVoter

December 21, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this

Just a few days ago our fearless leader declared to the astonishment of all that we were actually winning the ‘war on terror’. Then I read yesterday where the Nincompoop in Chief ‘fessed up that indeed we are losing the war.

Who is flip-flopping now?

What Idiot started this damnable war?

Send in the twins if you want to escalate the debauchery Mr. Bush!

By SwiftVoter

December 21, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this

Remember this? The President will rely on what the Generals have to say about prosecuting the war…………….

Now it’s this: the President will NOT defer on the ‘balky’ military generals on war expertise(another general retires in protest).

The Republicans are now trying to define themselves as the Party of Change (but in reality they are defining themselves as Flip-Flops).

……nincompoopery at its best!

By Syd

December 22, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this

The guy Bush pardoned CONSPIRED to POSSESS MARIJUANA, the libs got the hangman’s noose out.

This is from ABC News:

“Former American fugitive Marc Rich was a middleman for several of Iraq’s suspect oil deals in February 2001, just one month after his pardon from President Clinton, according to oil industry shipping records obtained by ABC News. And a U.S. criminal investigation is looking into whether Rich, as well as several other prominent oil traders, made illegal payments to Iraq in order to obtain the lucrative oil contracts.”

Selling oil again, huh.