Mike Luckovich

By George

December 4, 2006 11:16 PM | Link to this

Boy, ain’t that the truth! Great toon ML……

.

By Bruce

December 5, 2006 08:07 AM | Link to this

You forgot Dickie boy !!1

By Mike

December 5, 2006 08:17 AM | Link to this

Another hyper-partisan cartoon from a hyper-partisan hack.

Does Mikey even know how to draw a Democrat? I guess not, as he hasn’t drawn one in years.

By Lord Help Us

December 5, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this

They all look pretty peeved at the incorrigible little delinquent, but, the look on Barney’s face is priceless!

By Mrs. Godzilla

December 5, 2006 08:24 AM | Link to this

Santa does not have enough coal for this bad boy.

(Is is just me or is the air fresher on the blog lately….)

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 5, 2006 08:25 AM | Link to this

Excellent toon ML! To the wingnut Mike: Yes Mikey knows how to draw Democrats. He did it all the time when one occupied the White House. Now a Republican occupies the White House. The difference is that the Republican is providing so much more material.

By candide

December 5, 2006 08:25 AM | Link to this

The Bush family takes the cake: years of degeneration typical of the WASPS. From Prescott Bush, a man of parts, to Dubya, a dunce — in only half a century!

Of course Barbara Bush, that b***, also had something to do with it. I suspect Dubya inherited mostly from her: her short hooked nose, her scowl, her tongue, and her deficient gray matter.

By Lord Help Us

December 5, 2006 08:45 AM | Link to this

Yes, Mrs. G, the air is fresher here now that most of the unemployable, narrow-minded, GOP sheep have followed their illustrious shepherd over to the Wooten blog.

One or two will pop over for a guerrilla hit at times, but then ‘cut and run’ back over to fantasy land where they stand less chance of being annihilated with logic.

Ironically, much like the ‘cleansing’ of Congress that is in process…

By Eric

December 5, 2006 08:46 AM | Link to this

This one really cracked me up. Thanks for the belly laugh, Mike!

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 08:52 AM | Link to this

Iraq is our 51st state. We can never, ever leave it any more than we can leave Iowa.

We are trapped. Think about it. There’s no exit possible, and there never was.

You see, we committed a violation of the laws of “might rules right”. Like the genocide in africa: that’s the way things are. We kill. We rule by killing. We used a third party, Saddam Hussein, to enforce the “might rules right” in Iraq for generations.

Then we broke the rule. We took Saddam out. Now, we’ve unleashed the once-squelched enmity of the ages, (securely contained in Pandora’s Box): a multi-dimensional oil spill of genocidal vendettas.

We cant leave and allow the genocide. We cant stay and watch the genocide.

We are trapped forever. The exit door was shut behind us as we waded into this.

Iraqia: the 51st state in a genocide hell.

Tell me there’s a way out. Show me any progression of logic that would expose a viable exit strategy. There’s none. We are there forever.

We leave: Regional war which will engulf and destroy us.

We stay: We get consumed by the hatred and destroy ourselves.

We are slowly sinking into oblivion in the middle east, with no possible way to get out.

That’s why the Iraqi Study Group is obsolete and naive. (just more W spin)

By Paul

December 5, 2006 08:54 AM | Link to this

Just another example of neolibs not accepting differences of opinion or interpretation - it’s all right/all wrong or all black/all white. If you have an opposite opinion, they launch personal attacks. When they can’t formulate a response based upon examining an idea, or when they “feel” they’ve lost the argument, we see hostile namecalling as exemplified by candide’s post.

Neocons/neolibs - two sides of the same coin. But neolibs make it personal.

By Lord Help Us

December 5, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

Paul,

Is stereotyping a neocon/neolib characteristic as well?

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this

You know something? Paul is RIGHT. Bush is never going to leave Iraq no matter what we do or say. Now, we can either take it laying down, or we can do something really pointless and stupid.

Like mail a million jock straps to the white house. or trick thousands of Mexican border crossers to trek to Bush’s ranch in Waco.

Who’s with me? Lets Do It!!!!

By Paul

December 5, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this

LHU

That is what I was trying to say - but personal attacks seem to me to be more characteristic of the neolib end. Neocons, I find, tend to hammer away at ideological positions.

By Cindy

December 5, 2006 09:24 AM | Link to this

Even the dog! Great toon, Mike! Many laughs!

By Mrs. Godzilla

December 5, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

Lord Help Us….nice to meet you.

Do you think we can find a way to help Paul?

By Paul

December 5, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

PF

Sidelight on the border crossers - a friend of mine meets other guys Sat mornnings for breakfast at a local cafe. The talk turned to illegals - not very kind characterizations. My friend said he was disturbed one morning by an illegal standing in his driveway yelling four-letter words at his house. When he opened the door he heard the guy yelling “work, work, work?”

I’ve never encountered an illegal begging for money.

Then again, a recent Congressional Accountability Office report estimates about a fourth of inmates are illegals. So there you are -

By Cindy

December 5, 2006 09:29 AM | Link to this

Geez, Paul. And I almost quit blogging here because of all the petty, obscene, ignorant insults I got from the neocons, rather than good debate.

By Paul

December 5, 2006 09:36 AM | Link to this

Mrs Godzilla -

Are you a “Compassionate Conservative” or an “I Will Show You The True and Only Way Liberal”?

Cindy - Didn’t mean the neocon/neolib characterizations as insults. I personally know people from both camps - and they seem to revel in it. It was merely an observation in line with your comment that it hinders political discourse.

By Boneheaded and Dumb Ain't No Way to Run a Country

December 5, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

Good toon but factually flawed. Boy George’s mommy and daddy got no better grasp of reality than the Chimperor himself does. None of ‘em are gonna listen to Baker or anybody else that ain’t gonna tell ‘em what they wanna hear, anyway. Bush is a perfect illustration of the difference between being determined and resolute, or just plain BONEHEADED and DUMB.

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this

You know something? Cindy’s RIGHT. The Neo-Newts aren’t going to stop calling us names no matter what we do or say. Now we can take this laying down or we can do something really pointless and stupid.

Like mail a million brassieres to Laura Bush’s winter home in Shreveport. or trick thousands of French maids into showing up to clean the white house bathrooms.

Who’s with me? Lets do it!!!

By Dusty

December 5, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

Luckovich is really hallucinating today. He not only insults the president, but the president’s mother amd father(a former president), and another man who has faithfully served this country.

Insulting those who serve is not the way to promote your opinion or your policy. Do you listen to those who insult your parents? Or do you even care?

The absolute grossness of some liberals such as Luckovich is a disgrace to all Americans. They make the whole country look like sweet takings for terrorists.

Americans who don’t even have the decency to discuss issues instead of personal vendettas are ruining the great concept of freedom in this country.

I have no use for insulting egomaniacs who draw and blog and curse the very principles and people of our government. You are a blight on every citizen, including yourself.

As Lady McBeth said “Out damn spot!”. I’m with her. Go away, those who despise this country and show it by hating those who serve to keep it free. You are the black spot on the hand of liberty.

By Paul

December 5, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

Cindy: ref. my 0915: B&DANWRC’s 9:37 is a better illustration of my point.

By Mrs. Godzilla

December 5, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this

Paul, I am a decent human being. A mom, a wife, a daughter. I also hold the secret to the best gravy in the world.

I live every day showing compassion to all and being skeptical of any human who claims to know the one true way.

And you?

By Paul

December 5, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this

PF - you’re in rare form today! Thanks for the laughs - when you wanted to send French maids to clean the White House bathrooms I had an image of Jacques Chirac in a maid outfit holding a toilet brush -

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 09:52 AM | Link to this

I want to expose a communications glich between Paul and Cindy. Paul said that Neolibs make debate personal and use invectives. Cindy then said that Neocons use invectives, and it almost made her geschtoppen der bloggenheimer.

But the Paul said that he didn’t mean to use invectives when he pointed out that neolibs use invectives, even though Cindy had not accused him of that, but instead accused neocons in general of using name calling tactics.

So that nuance of meaning is why the discussion on a blog never gets advanced.

we dont communicate. We simply wait for our turn to blog something pointless and stupid. Like suggesting that we mail a million fruit cakes to the white house for xmas. or trick thousands of jehovah’s witnesses into passing out literature at Camp David.

By regulator

December 5, 2006 09:54 AM | Link to this

Funniest and truest political cartoon I have seen in years, keeping jumping Mike.

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 09:56 AM | Link to this

Uh, dusty? W’s dog is not named Spot.

Dusty, Maybe you need to learn to sit…rollover….and BEG! (certainly you lifted your leg with that last post)

At least you went on the newspaper. (ajc.com)

Dusty: the blog dog.

By GodHatesTrash

December 5, 2006 09:59 AM | Link to this

Lady MacBeth was a crazy beotch with blood on her hands, just like you Dusty - you voted for the animal in the White House…

By Paul

December 5, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

Thanks, PF at 9:52, thanks for the clarification.

Re: your 8:52 - better late than never- take steps for true energy independence from petroleum - even if it means restricting choice (2 1/5 ton commuter cars with abysmal fuel mileage) or installing alternate energy production systems (now about that wind farm, Mr. Kennedy…).

By getalife

December 5, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

“Former President George H.W. Bush broke down in tears as he cited his son, Gov. Jeb Bush, as an example of leadership.”

Bush knows his family legacy is hated in the world and known as failures.

Whaaaaaa.

w and shotgun face cheney should resign in disgrace.

When you fail at your job, you get fired.

w a

By getalife

December 5, 2006 10:13 AM | Link to this

Paul,

As you can see, your fellow wingnuts have surrendered this blog.

They have cut and ran to wingnut Wooten’s blog.

I suggest you do the same or prepared to be bashed constantly.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

Great toon Mike.

w has lost Barney and Laura will turn on him when her meds wear off.

By @@

December 5, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

I’ve gotta say ml, you are a true talent with the old and wrinkled.

You could have made a line of congressional children waiting to see Santa. Anti-war and hawkish politicians. They’ll all walk away believing they can have what they want.

Here’s the true global reality. There are gifts you need and then there are gifts you want. What’s it gonna be?

Sack it or unwrap it? That is the question.

By Paul

December 5, 2006 10:27 AM | Link to this

getalife

What is a ‘wingnut’ and who is Wooten?

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 10:35 AM | Link to this

Getalife is the only one who bashes unfairly no matter how well the discussion progresses.

I apologize to all bloggers here for Getalife. He certainly represents no liberal position or attitude.

Getalife: recede, rescind and recidivize.

PS: were you “Randy Fauker” in a previous life on aol or yahoo?

By who_really_cares_anyway?

December 5, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this

Mrs. Godzilla,

I think we were separated at birth. ;-)

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 10:40 AM | Link to this

The dog Barney is helping to carry W. He’s straining to be a part of the bum’s rush toward santa. Great stuff!! I like that Mike Luchovich seems to have challenged himself to stay in a holiday mode and find the variations available for seasonal humor.

By Dusty

December 5, 2006 10:40 AM | Link to this

Paul,

If I may give you a correct answer. (Getalife can’t cut it!)

Wingnuts are what liberals call the people who can still think straight. Few “wingnuts” post at ml’s because of their delicate sense of smell and their adversion to repetitious insults and dull jokes.

Jim Wooten is a conservative editor at the AJC (There is still ONE!!) He has a sensible blog which has little attraction to liberals. When faced with reality and loyalty, they run away leaving their raunchy comments behind.

Just wanted to help out here. Now I am going CHRISTMAS shopping.

By Truthman

December 5, 2006 10:40 AM | Link to this

“PEACE WITH HONOR!”

“PEACE WITH HONOR!”

“PEACE WITH HONOR!”

Now, how many more men and women have to die before we get the “F” outta the Chimperor’s dirty war?

By getalife

December 5, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this

Well!

At least you did not tell me to stfu.

No, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 10:49 AM | Link to this

Crusty(the-clown),

You are allowed to post here for comedic value.

Do not p** me off or I will make you lose it like I made Andy lose it.

Happy Holidays!

By Paul

December 5, 2006 10:55 AM | Link to this

Thanks for the information, Dusty. Good shopping - keep the economy rolling - Merry Christmas! I’m about to leave on a business trip - later, all.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 10:57 AM | Link to this

Gates: US not winning the war in Iraq

OMG, WTF?

We have been lied to by w and others.

As a member of the reality based community, I would like to welcome Mr. Gates to the real world.

By bon scott

December 5, 2006 11:01 AM | Link to this

Great cartoon today Mike. Reality is many things.

Reality in Iraq is that we should just leave today, why do we care who gets killed and all wars turn out to be unnecessary anyway.

Reality at home is that nobody should receive less money than it takes to live comfortably and work should only be something done to fulfill your life. Since work is only to fulfill your life, anything over $100,000. per year should be given to the government to distribute to those that don’t feel the need.

Reality in global politics is that Cuba and Venezuela should be the models for our future as they are the only sustainable structures for lasting peace.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 11:01 AM | Link to this

that is absolutely the funniest toon yet!!!! that look on Barney’s face has me howling with laughter.

However, as others have noted, the mom and dad need a very real reality check too.

Appears Paul does as well.

Paul: Wooten is keeping your spot in the foxhole warm. Careful now - don’t step on one of Crusty’s sex toys lying around on the floor.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 11:06 AM | Link to this

Ladies and Gentlemen — I give you: Lil’ Bush

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

Midori

I can only assume you’re a far-left type who views anyone who doesn’t agree with you as a neocon. That’s based upon your shuffling me off to the far right based upon my characterization of neolibs as those who engage in personal insults as opposed to discussion, and the second reason is, well, your engaging in personal insults regarding me, Mr. Wooten and “Crusty.”

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this

bon scott -

Have you seen the review of the Syracuse professor’s book - related to an earlier discussion here - of how people who attend church (identified by some here as Dark Ages Conservatives) are more generous with their charitable giving than non-churchgoers (identified by some here as Enlightened Realists)?

Or, as was posited before: liberals are generous with other people’s money, conservatives with their own.

p.s. care to take bets on who responds with an argument, who responds with a personal attack?

By Midori

December 5, 2006 11:19 AM | Link to this

Paul,

your’e the one who came in here blasting people, er, “neolibs”, for calling names.

I was just trying to accommodate.

How’s that Christmas shopping coming?

Or is it you just couldn’t tear yourself away from this blog before posting your “whaaa, she called me a name” post?

By Midori

December 5, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

{{{{{{Or, as was posited before: liberals are generous with other people’s money, conservatives with their own.}}}}}}

if that were true, Bush’s tax cuts would benefit everyone - not just the mega rich.

also, the severe cuts to programs for the needy and others (soldiers in Iraq needing body armor) in order to accommodate such tax cuts for the mega rich wouldn’t have taken place.

maybe conservatives are “generous” with their own money because they got it from screwing over everyone else?

By candide

December 5, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

Tell it out! Bush and Cheney should be sent to Baghdad for trial on war crimes charges. They deserve to swing every bit as much as Saddam.

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

Mike,

One of your best in a while. This strikes satirically at the heart of the matter: we have a President who shuns reality being supported by those who refuse to acknowledge reality. It’s rather like modern theater of the absurd, except that people’s lives are at stake. Cynicism would say that Bush started Bush’s War as a ploy to get reelected because there is insufficient reason, other than the oil to invade a foreign country. The premises were specious at best when Bush determined that he was going to overthrow the sovereign head of another country, and once that had been achieved, there has been no true goal in a war that is costing We the People more than we want to pay in lives and money. While Bush reduced taxes, he has sponsored the most costly War in history. That sounds like a leader with no grasp of reality.

He has dismissed Colin Powell for objecting to Bush’s War; in retrospect, it would appear that he has dismissed Donald Rumsfeld for opposing the objectives (or lack thereof) of Bush’s War. I don’t think there’s any reasonable hope that we’ll see modifications in plans after the Iraq Study Group report is released. The United States is the most despised nation on earth. It will take years of careful diplomacy to overcome the damage he’s done to the world-wide reputation of our nation. Reality? He hardly knew you.

His record on human rights resembles that of third world dictator. Sating the demands of an overweening ego has been more important to this man than the needs of We the People. Bush has so little grasp on reality that he vetoed stem cell research. He has developed a fantasy plan for dealing with Social Security, and the Medicare Drug plan is so complex that it fails the test of reality; He plans, it is rumored, to cast aside all concern for the environment and drill in ”Alaska’s Bristol Bay, home to endangered whales and sea lions and the world’s largest sockeye salmon run.” He has failed to support raising the minimum wage. Then there’s his xenophobia. He has in typical Texan fashion supported raising the “biggest fence in the whole goldarned world,“ or words to that effect, and to what end? He has supported what may be the biggest blow to diversity since 1954 delivered his toadies on the Supreme Court. He is spending obscene amounts of money to persuade teen-agers to abstain from sex instead of teaching them the realities of sex.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

this place is like a totally new world without Andy and his spam and insults and lunacy and paranoia.

unfortunately some of his idiot friends still linger…..

By GodHatesTrash

December 5, 2006 11:25 AM | Link to this

All these conservative men - such whiners! Will one of them every grow a pair, or has conservative always meant castrated?

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

The Republican Congress under him has been the most corrupt in history. The gap between poor and rich gets bigger and bigger; the middle class is disappearing, in part, because jobs are being outsourced. His supporters, while their real income is declining, while their sons and husbands are being killed to support his mania, while their parents need assurance of Social Security, while they need stem cell research to deal with major medical issues, continue to support him slavishly.

He has no sense of reality, no knowledge of science (did I mention his denial of evolution and his support for teaching Intelligent Design, or whatever the current deception is?), at best a tenuous grasp on economics, no skill at diplomacy, and his supporters are just as blind, although the last election might indicate that large numbers are being to see that he has no grasp of reality. Well done, Mike.

By bon scott

December 5, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

Paul-Another reality is that we would be much better off without you religious zealots telling us how generous you are because you always want to throw your god in our face when you hand out a few crumbs.

A realist knows that the government should redistribute wealth as needed and outlaw private charity. Private charity always comes with strings attached.

By Green Eggs and Spam

December 5, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

Enter Midori.

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:32 AM | Link to this

Midori 9:11

Nah, I always give myself a healthy buffer before leaving on a trip, especially this time of year.

It’s interesting how you interpret a characterization of general behavior as an attack. If I were to say “engineers tend to respond in a linear fashion” or “ENFJ’s on the Meyers Briggs scale tend to analyze antecedents and offer several options while responding” or “type A personalities (non-sex specific) tend to want the bottom line” would that be an attack?

Dusty was the one heading out to shop. Mine’s about done. Thanks for asking.

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 11:32 AM | Link to this

I adore Midori!

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

Midori at 11:22 - the prof’s analysis cut across all income levels. Careful, a hyperpartisan can be defined as one who has a preconceived position and looks at facts in such a way as to validate the position.

I’m here for maybe another 30 min, but if you’d really, really like to discuss lack of body armor for Army/Marine forces resulting from tax cuts, I’d be more than happy to accommodate! Possibly the discussion could be a discussion without perjorative adjectives?

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

Paul (1114),

I found the conclusions of that study surprising but only in the abstract. The churches are organized; they do take charity seriously (which I’m glad to know) and the results are positive. The philosopher, Jesus, stated “do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” and “treat thy neighbor as thyself.” Valid philosophy, no matter the context. It is gratifying to know that the churches use their organizational structures to promote “do unto others.” Do I want to see charity totally privatized? Absolutely not.

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

bon scott 11:28 - there you go again, assuming that because someone makes an observation or asks a question he supports the position. You’ve done better than that, before.

As irritating as O’Reilly can be, one of his interviewing styles not shared by many is to have a guest (either spectrum) and have as a lead-in question a challenge to the guest’s position. Forces a clarification and support of the issue from the start.

Not many here would do well on an exam with the question “decribe the antecedents of the Great Depression” by responding with “Hoover was an idiot! Selfish people caused the crash!!!”

By Green Eggs and Spam

December 5, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

Paul,

You seem like a polite, intelligent, rational person. The so called left that reside in here have no desire to debate anything with you. Unless you are a far left “bush sucks eggs” liberal, you will be labeled a “neocon” and they will somehow surmise that you are a religious zealot even when you don’t bring up religion.

By Truthman

December 5, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

“Government wants permanent Moonbase by 2025.”

I nominate the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Rove families be the first permanent residents of said base.

Then, we’ll send Andy and @@ and Buy Danish and N-GA there and they can all live in honky heaven safely enscounced 240,000 miles from the rest of us!!

By Goldie

December 5, 2006 11:46 AM | Link to this

Really enjoyed today’s toon, Lucko! But I guess it would be way too much reality if, instead of facing Santa Claus, he was forced to face the 3,000 caskets that have arrived home from Iraq. Now that intervention might have put a stop to this insanity of his a few years ago…

By Midori

December 5, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

Paul,

you came in here, whining about people attacking and calling names.

don’t try to parse with me. try it on Dusty.

I’ve got to go to work. I actually can pry myself away from this blog.

Good bye.

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:49 AM | Link to this

Diogenes

Thanks for that thought. I don’t know many who trumpet their giving for all to hear. That illustrated the point Pres Bush made - European countries view “giving” as giving by governments - Pres Bush wanted to include private giving, much of which goes to the same causes (medical care and education in Third World, etc.).

On a related note, I am regularly amazed at those who attack tax cuts, yet, if they are beneficiaries continue to pay only the minimum tax their accountants can determine. Does not “fairness and justice” mean they’d pay income tax based upon what they thought was right, using their accountants’ number as a starting point?

By Paul

December 5, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

Green Eggs: succintly stated. Sadly true. I really must run - ‘bye.

By Naturalist

December 5, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

Midori howls at 11:01, like a caged animal.

She needs to be fed.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 5, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

This says everything you need to know about George Bush. He was warned in advance to be sensitive when talking to Jim Webb about his son. Webb’s son recently had a very close call in Iraq. Instead, the President was just a dick. No surprise. That is how he runs the country.

Via ThinkProgress: “But according to Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA), Bush was told that Webb’s son had a recent brush with death in Iraq and was warned to be “extra sensitive” when talking to the Sen.-elect.

Not only did Bush know about it, he was specifically briefed on the incident before meeting with Webb, and was cautioned to be extra sensitive in speaking with Webb about his son.

After such a briefing, Bush perhaps shouldn’t have been so surprised about Webb’s unwillingness to chit-chat about his son.”

The wingnuts have been apoplectic about Webb’s interchange with Bush. Of course, as usual, none of them hold Bush accountable.

Eleanor Clift from Newsweek offered what Webb might have said:

“Webb could have asked how the Bush girls are doing, partying their way across Argentina. He could have told Bush he was worried about his son; the vehicle next to him was blown up recently, killing three Marines. Given the contrast between their respective offspring, Webb showed restraint.”

Bush is leading us to defeat in Iraq. He’s making our country weak in the eyes of the world. He hasn’t caught the terrorists who attacked America. But, the right wing is offended that Webb was mean to Bush. They’re a pathetic bunch — and it’s not their kids who are over there fighting in Bush’s war.

By Green Eggs and Spam

December 5, 2006 11:59 AM | Link to this

Librals on bushes:

I do not like them in a box.

I do not like them with a fox.

I do not like them in a house.

I do not like them with a mouse.

I do not like them here or there.

I do not like them anywhere.

but I do like green eggs and spam.

By NightTrain

December 5, 2006 12:04 PM | Link to this

I think I understand the reason the left is so out of touch with reality, they think that Santa Claus IS reality. This explains a lot of their views. Some people just never out grow their childhood fantasies.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this

NightTrain,

That stuff will make you spew that crap you just puked up on this blog.

Get real loser.

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this

What RU saying, NightTrain, that’s there’s no Santa Clause? I suppose there’s no Civil War in Iraq Either. I’ll tell you what’s funny. Is the words that W latches on to. Words he’s never spoken in his life before, and words that he didn’t know were applicable to Iraq: words like, “Ideology”, and “Sectarian”.

That ignoramus didn’t even know there was a sunni/shia difference of Islam.

W’s a child.. He’s a loose cannon. He a dangerous president. (unelected).

The Saudi Royal Family is our true king. Ask Cheney about the Saudi Royal Family and you’ll get a look so fearful, that you’ll wish he had only shot you in the face.

By Cindy

December 5, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

Yes, I really enjoy this site much more without all of Andy’s trash littering the blog….this link, that link…when I want to read conservative sites I can go there myself. He never had anything intelligent to say for himself.

Funny how the neocons here still support “staying the course” when w and rummy have given it up.

I’ll be the first to admit I didn’t have the answers to that quagmire, but w’s course was so obviously the wrong one and none of the neocons here could offer anything better than “supporting the president”. If the ‘06 house cleaning election proves to have produced nothing more, it has gotten rid of Rummy and started dialog and brainstorming on alternative action in Iraq. I am very satisfied and the Democrats haven’t even taken office yet.

By Truthman

December 5, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this

Correction to Green Eggs and Spam:

Truthfully, we WOULD prefer all the Bushes in a box…in a cell in the International Court at the Hague to be tried for crimes against humanity…from Prescott on down to the Chimperor!

By rushncap

December 5, 2006 12:24 PM | Link to this

Can someone please, please explain to me why disliking Bush is so “wrong”? Can some neocon explain to me why disliking a man who has precipitated a regional crisis which has resulted in many thousands of death is above reproach? Can someone please tell my since when it’s wrong to dislike a man who has made wrong move after wrong move without bothering to either admit the fact or seek sager advise from those who know better? If we’re not allowed to dislike a man like that, then are we allowed to dislike anyone at all?

By Cindy

December 5, 2006 12:26 PM | Link to this

Don’t forget; the religious are obligated to tithe to their churches. The tithes at our church used to go to foreign countries, supposedly to help feed the hungry. But in reality, the funds were intercepted by rebel groups, or terrorists, so all that charity money went to fund weapons. I prefer to give my money to charities that aid US folks.

By Boris

December 5, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

I hate Bush, why can’t I hate Bush, Bush sucks and I hate him so why don’t you let me hate Bush…..

Comrade rushncap, you’ve been spouting the same mantra for years without any repercussions so apparently you are perfectly free to hate Bush or anyone else moron.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 5, 2006 12:46 PM | Link to this

Read PUNCHLINE OF THE CENTURY. It’s funny stuff.

By Shawny

December 5, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this

Redistribution of wealth for those making over $100k is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard of. All economies based on this communism eventually fail, unless there is something to prop it up (aka Venezuelan oil money). If there is no reason for anyone to work hard so that they can obtain more money, knowing that it will be taken away, then they won’t.

There is nothing wrong with disliking Bush. He has been deserving in many ways of the onslaught of caricatures. Matter of fact, for a mega-liberal toonist like Mikey, this is actually one of his better Bush slams.

However, if you grow tired of the same old, same old (Lucko Bush bashing toons), reference something from todays headlines in the link below for today’s cartoon THAT DOESN’T SUCK:

http://www.townhall.com/funnies/cartoonist/LisaBenson/2006/12/1

By rushncap

December 5, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this

li’l andy, darling, this is the adults talking. Run along.

By Green Eggs and Spam

December 5, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this

rushncap, no one cares if you like Bush or not, everyone knows! Ok?

As for the rest, please refer to my 11:43.

By RE

December 5, 2006 01:02 PM | Link to this

Very funny cartoon, best I have seen in a while

By Shawny

December 5, 2006 01:05 PM | Link to this

Here is an even better ‘toon:

http://www.townhall.com/funnies/cartoonist/PaulNowak/2006/12/2

I think Vlad is a bitter man because his last name sounds like pootin’.

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 01:15 PM | Link to this

James H. Webb’s (Senator-elect Jim Webb) novel, Fields of Fire is the best novel about the War in Vietnam that I’ve read. The Emperor’s General, while not the best WWII novel available, is certainly worth reading for its view of MacArthur. Lost Soldiers is set in Vietnam, years later. An interesting perspective, well worth reading. I recommend them all to you. He sure does set George Will off, which is not all bad.

http://www.jameswebb.com/

By Jenn

December 5, 2006 01:26 PM | Link to this

Shawny—- Thats more like it!!!

By getalife

December 5, 2006 01:39 PM | Link to this

Speaking of Webb:

“Not only did Bush know about it, he was specifically briefed on the incident before meeting with Webb, and was cautioned to be extra sensitive in speaking with Webb about his son.”

This shows w’s pathetic support of our troops. This lunatic must be held accountable.

By rushncap

December 5, 2006 01:44 PM | Link to this

li’l andy, darling, no one cares about your posts. Just chill.

By Taylor

December 5, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

Mike, I’m withholding comment on the ISG until they’ve presented their opinions. I’m pretty sure that it’s been a waste of taxpayers money.

Bush has made it clear what his intentions are in Iraq, and the Iraqi government has echoed his sentiments.

At this juncture, we have limited options and it’s time for this country to suck it up, offer constructive review of the situation, and get the job done.

On the Webb response to President Bush. I think that Mr. Webb could have just as easily replied that his boy was doing well but his Dad was eager for him to return home. That would have been a more civil response to a question of concern.

By Shawny

December 5, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

Rushie, what are you talking about? I haven’t seen any Andy posts yet.

By Opinions are like....

December 5, 2006 01:58 PM | Link to this

Re: who is more generous…..

“…This may be a variant on what Carl Sagan used to refer to this as the “brick in the toilet” question. He talked about one category of people, who think that environmental problems should be solved by voluntary changes in individual behavior. Others, he said, think that many such problems require a level of coordination that can only be accomplished through the state. He used water conservation as his hypothetical. People in the former group might put a brick in their toilet to save water with each flush but oppose centralized regulation aimed at ensuring broad-based compliance with water conservation efforts. (These are your religious conservatives, if you will, who will give money to private charities but oppose state intervention in the service of social justice.) On the other hand, people in the latter group, who favor state intervention to compel water conservation but are skeptical of the effectiveness of voluntary action in this regard, might support (or vote for) state regulation of water consumption but, in its absence, might not bother to put the brick in their toilet because they view the action as pointless without the broader coordination offered by state action. (These are your secular liberals who favor redistributive policies, even to their own financial disadvantage, but who, according to the book, are marginally stingier with their donations to charity.) Whether this story supports saying that people who put bricks in their toilets are the “true” environmentalists (or religious conservatives are the truly generous) and the people who do not but who vote for environmental interests are hypocrites strikes me as unanswerable apart from one’s views about the substantive merits of the beliefs underlying their decisions.”

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 5, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this

Taylor, you missed the point on the Webb/Bush story. Bush was told that Webb’s son had a close call when another vehicle near his was attacked and soldiers had died. Bush was being antagonistic when he asked “How’s your boy”. With a smirk no less. Webb was right to answer coldly. Webb’s self restraint was admirable. Prison or no prison I would have decked the moron.

By Proud Pinko Liberal

December 5, 2006 02:09 PM | Link to this

Taylor - I forgot to mention my 11:56 that explains a bit better.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 02:48 PM | Link to this

Me too. Webb showed remarkable restraint in that situation.

w was warned but he chose to pick a fight.

Webb would stomp a mud hole in w’s candy as-s.

By Green Eggs and Spam

December 5, 2006 03:00 PM | Link to this

get off the spam getalife. Bush was not being antagonistic. Webb was being opportunistic. You are FOS.

All you libs want to do is beat someone down.

By Lord Help Us

December 5, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this

Getalife, Don’t forget, ‘W’ was a VARSITY cheerleader.

An Ex-Marine like Webb is probably no match for a draft-dodging, cheerleading WARRIOR like Shrub.

I’d pay to see it though…

By getalife

December 5, 2006 03:14 PM | Link to this

This is karma for people like Green Eggs and Spam pos who bash the troops

FU POS!

LHU,

It would be #1 at YouTube.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this

it appears to me that Bush should have been a bit more civil himself. Is he exempt from civility? he went out of his way to confront Webb, as Webb refused to stand in the meet/greet/photo shoot line. But then Bush thrives on making a jerk of himself. Thinks it makes him “macho”.

Like Green Eggs and Spam. He/she thinks he/she is being “clever”, while very much looking the fool.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 03:19 PM | Link to this

Shawny,

why do you post those cartoons here? wouldn’t they be better appreciated elsewhere? the majority of us don’t come here to discuss stupid, jerkwad right wing cartoons.

By Green Eggs and Spam

December 5, 2006 03:19 PM | Link to this

get off the spam getalife. Bush was not being antagonistic. Webb was being opportunistic. You are FOS.

All you libs want to do is beat someone down.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this

Green Eggs and Spam certainly lives by his/her name.

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 03:25 PM | Link to this

No, we moderates want to see a man in office who has some modest sense of reality. His confrontation with James H. Webb resembled something from High Noon or a movie of that ilk. We moderates are worn out with the machismo of the man. We would like to see someone in office who is attentive to the concerns and needs of We the People.

By Dubya

December 5, 2006 03:49 PM | Link to this

“We’re not winning, but we’re not losing.” Brilliance being replaced by more brilliance in the Chimp defense dept. God bless Murcuh.

By Craig

December 5, 2006 03:58 PM | Link to this

Only a dumba-ss liberal would say that knowing Webb’s boy had a close call meant you shouldn’t ask “how’s your boy” that’s exactly what you should ask and Webb was just being a typical liberal pig.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

Craig,

oink

oink

snort

grunt

see, it takes a pig to know one.

By ROFLMAO

December 5, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Midori just called herself a pig.

At least she got that part right.

(:) Snort Snort Snort

By RE

December 5, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

Bush “how is your boy?”

Fair question, civil, no problems

Webb “I’d like to get them out of Iraq, Mr president”

Fair response, especially seeing how his kid was almost killed a few days beforehand. A civil response

Bush “that’s not what I asked you”

Nasty rude response to the father of a US service member in harm’s way. Completely inappropriate

Webb “that is between me and my boy, Mr President”

Very civil and restrained response after a nasty comment from GWB.

By Craig

December 5, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

I always knew Midori was a Babe.

By Craig

December 5, 2006 04:42 PM | Link to this

Webb “I respect the office not Bush”

Webb “I don’t want any picture of George W Bush on my wall”

Webb “I should have punched him in the mouth”

All this in response to the President asking him about his son’s well being.

Like I said, typical liberal pig. Like Midori

By rushncap

December 5, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

Shawny, I assumed “green eggs” was another one in long list of li’l andy monickers. Now that you mention it, however, Green’s posts seems a bit too lucid and a touch too un-embittered.

By Conservative Victory Dance

December 5, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

Conservatives WON the midterms. All we had to do was feed you moron libby-libs 6 years of George Bush and ya’ll fell all over yourselves trying to elect any conservative Democrat you could shake a ballot at. Hah, hah, hah, hah, hah……….LOSERS!

By nuff-said

December 5, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

Mikey: I love this cartoon. How do you dream up this stuff? May God bless America and the Democratic Party. The greatest institution for truth and decency in American history. May the Lord also bless the American people and particularly the Independent voters who made history this November past.
Finally, may the Good Lord look with favor upon Senator-elect James Webb and guide him in all his future endeavors. The American nation and the peoples of the world owe the Senator-elect a debt of gratitude. A debt larger than they could ever repay.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this

and as I said before, Craig, takes one to know one.

and to keep taking up for one.

you and Bush would look mighty good on a spit with an apple in your mouths, basting and stewing and simmering in your own hate and ignorance and stupidity.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

ROFLMAO,

Yes, I did get it right didn’t I?

I don’t mind getting in the sewer to take on similar sleaze and filth like you and Craig.

If I have to speak pig language to you, so be it.

Oink, oink scumbag.

It appears to be the only language you know.

By Craig

December 5, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this

Midori must be an ignorant pig instead of just a regular pig. I’m calling Webb a pig not taking up for him dunce.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

Craig knows all about pigs.

His mother brings home the bacon. As a matter of fact, she IS the bacon.

How was it like growing up eating slop and wallowing around in your own filth?

Oh wait — you still do eat slop and wallow in your own filth. My bad!!

By Midori

December 5, 2006 05:03 PM | Link to this

see, Craig, now you’re just not making sense.

let’s go back to your first language:

Oink??

snort, snort, oinky oink!!!

Snort!!!!!

Oink!!!!!!

By RE

December 5, 2006 05:03 PM | Link to this

Looking for that special Christmas gift to send to the whitehouse, look no further

By Dusty

December 5, 2006 05:16 PM | Link to this

Well,

I hope the people of Virginia now realize what they have sent to Congress in the form of(D) Sen.elect Jim Webb. As George Will put it quite succinctly, “Webb is a boor.”

As is well known now and reported by those attending a reception, Webb did not want to shake hands with the president in a receiving line and then was overwhelmingly rude when the president asked him a civil question about his son in Iraq. After the president tried to quietly get an answer about the son, Webb replied “That is between me and my son.”

Since we have a volunteer army in Iraq, Webb’s son must have chosen the military himself. How much good is Webb doing to insult the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces like he was a homeless vagrant on the street? None what so ever. It simply shows the inadequacy of this man Webb to make any decisions concerning the policies of this country or even possess common politeness. He undoubtably disgraced his son also.

We don’t need a male Cindy Sheehan in the US Senate. But it looks like we are going to have one. Here comes Jim Webb.

By Political Foreskin

December 5, 2006 05:21 PM | Link to this

Cartoon Idea: Show W as Santa, giving Iraqi children toy guns, and saying, “we used to play army when I was a kid, heh heh heh….”

By Huge

December 5, 2006 05:25 PM | Link to this

Though bigot and RW have cut and run after lil andykin’s castration, it looks like there’s a few “new” uber-angry neo-cons ready to join the fun! The insults are sure to fly, especially since that distasteful little election last month!

Please people! It’s the holiday season!

And don’t forget to put the X back in Xmas!!

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 05:41 PM | Link to this

Any man that gets George Will’s (that was not the first time Will has taken a shot at Webb) dander up can’t be all bad.

By Huge

December 5, 2006 05:48 PM | Link to this

“I hope the people of Virginia now realize what they have sent to Congress…Webb is a boor”

Is that the same kind of boor as a Vice-President who tells a US Senator to go fork himself?

Gotta love that selective neo-con memory.

I agree with GE&S; Bush was not being antagonistic. Where he gets it completely wrong, IMHO, is by saying Webb was being opportunistic. The campaign is over. My guess? Webb was just speaking his mind and not afraid to stand up to and speak his mind against another man, no matter his “rank”. Semper Fidelus.

There’s a new wind blowing, both in DC and across America. And it’s the kind that doesn’t suffer chickenhawk fools gladly anymore. Better get prepared for more, neo-cons…

CVD,

Believe that nonsense at 4:47 if it makes you feel better.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this

Webb wants his son to come home in one piece from Iraq.

A great father and a fighter.

You wingnuts can learn from this great American.

By Midori

December 5, 2006 06:01 PM | Link to this

(((((“I hope the people of Virginia now realize what they have sent to Congress…Webb is a boor”

Is that the same kind of boor as a Vice-President who tells a US Senator to go fork himself?))))

thank you so very much for that, Huge.

I suppose in Dusty’s mind, that comment and behavior made Cheney, “men among men”.

By Taylor

December 5, 2006 06:07 PM | Link to this

Proud Pinko Liberal, ViaThinkProgress. I’m not familiar with ThinkProgress. I’m assuming it is a Democratic site?

Their reporting may be a little skewed. No? Since I wasn’t standing in front of Bush, and no cameras caught the smirk I’ll stick with my original assessment if that’s O.K.

If there was some kind of warning, Bush may have felt the need to forego it and ask anyway out of legitimate concern or as an ice-breaker to a newly elected representative.

Webbs point could have been made after a civil reply to a question. Something like — My son had a close call recently, but he’s doing O.K. I sure would like him out of Iraq.

It’s really pretty simple when applied a real life scenario. Politics doesn’t have to be nasty.

I’ve also heard a Democrat aide comment that Webb is going to be a problem for the party.

By GodHatesTrash

December 5, 2006 06:07 PM | Link to this

Dusty prefers her senators to sniff the butt of Dumbya.

What a stupid rustic clodhopper she is. Pure trash.

By Buy Danish

December 5, 2006 06:18 PM | Link to this

Huge Sanctimonious Boor,

It figures that you don’t know the difference between using a vulgarity to a phony and insufferable horses’ a* (Leahy) who has behaved despicably to Cheney and Bush, and being rude to the President who earnestly and politely asked Webb about his boy.

The other difference is that when Cheney went on the Sunday shows to talk about the incident he was graceful and funny - another thing you are not.

By RW-(the original)

December 5, 2006 06:21 PM | Link to this

Diogenes,

No wonder you had to beg people to come over here and read your 11:24 and 11:28.

I don’t know what you’re looking for in a critique, but they seem to extremely vacuous and highly inaccurate arguments.

Next time you beg someone to read your posts how about posting something that doesn’t come straight out of a moveon.org campaign flier.

Huge,

Where are all these “new” posters you seem to be seeing here? Have you been in the eggnog early? All I see is a few conservatives that don’t post very often and the same old libs yelling “Bush sucks” at the top of their lungs. Heck even rushncap is over here asking you other moonbats why he isn’t allowed not to like bush. We’ve told you guys for months that if you swing the other way and don’t like bush, we don’t care. Just quit telling us all the gory details all the time.

By nuff-said

December 5, 2006 06:24 PM | Link to this

Jenna and Barbara are getting drunk and acting stupid while whoring around Argentina. How would we react if we knew they were in harms way like Jim Webb’s kid? George W. Bush is a dimwit. He thrives with a**kisssers sychophants. Neither of which describes Jim Webb.

By Buy Danish

December 5, 2006 06:25 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

So did all the fathers who had children in WWII. Do you think that in a similar situation would be a reason to be rude to FDR when he did nothing to provoke such a response?

We are all supposed to be Americans, but you can’t get it out of your head that Bush is the enemy, therefore you justifiy throwing civility out the window (and if you’re Huge Blowhard you compare apples to oranges).

I predict that Webb is going to be a one term Senator as his boorishness is legendary.

All Webb had to say was “Fine thank you Mr. President, I appreciate your asking” or something to that effect. That is the “Senatorial” thing to do.

By Curly Girl

December 5, 2006 06:28 PM | Link to this

Hi - it’s me - Andi.

By getalife

December 5, 2006 06:34 PM | Link to this

BD,

Wrong as usual.

Read the whole story idiot.

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

Rw,

That’s like your fatuous arguments over at Jim’s place. Mr Bluster, I presume? Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. And failing to provide a logical counter argument. Come on, RW, you claim to be so skilled at logical argument. Let’s see it in action. Do you even know the meaning of all those big words you use?

By RW-(the original)

December 5, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Maybe it’s time for little Chuckie Schumer to sit Webb down and give him his sickening little story about the great deliberative body of the Senate being the saucer that cools the coffee and all that other stuff he spews about how Senators comport themselves.

By Huge

December 5, 2006 06:41 PM | Link to this

Hey bigot,

I thought you and RW had lost your way and somehow mysteriously ended over at Wooten’s all day long! Wonder if it has anything to do with lil andykin’s getting his sorry nuts cut off?

Better choose your heroes and choose them well. They could be leading you straight into hell.

But it looks like you’re right at home with your new master - Markus. Wow! Now there’s a swollen guy for ya to be the new lapdog to! So enjoy your time over there. We won’t miss ya.

But it hurts me deeply that you don’t think I’m funny. I mean deeply. Because I’ve always felt you were hysterical!

And don’t forget bigot. This holiday season, put the X back in Xmas!

By Buy Danish

December 5, 2006 06:42 PM | Link to this

RW,

I see that Diogenes has now decided that Rumsfeld is an unsung hero.

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this

RW,

By the way. While I was at work the other day, my favorite librarian called to tell me she had found another book for you: “Etiquette for the Fanatic: 100 Tips on How to Appear Civilized.”

I drove over to check it out. I think it will really help you. Tip #35, for instance, sounds like something you could use: “Quit drooling when someone else enters the room.” Good advice.

By Huge

December 5, 2006 06:49 PM | Link to this

RW,

Perhaps you didn’t get around to reading my post last night about your b*** about the “Bush sucks” thing.

I asked you if you wanted everyone to pretend that he didn’t?

There were two excellent articles in todays ajc if you’d like some other perspectives.

Would this make you feel better? Bush doesn’t suck. He’s just a terrible president. Certainly in the running for worst ever unless something really, really, really good happens in the next two years.

Bad enough that it cost the gop BOTH houses of congress. Remember?

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Although I find you very humorous, I suggest that you not quit your day job until Ed Sullivan calls you to appear on his show.

By RW-(the original)

December 5, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Diogenes,

Your manifestos list talking point after talking point and you provide no factual basis for any of them. I have neither the time nor the inclination to take your laundry list and provide arguments for you.

You made the charges which makes you the de facto prosecutor. So Madame Prosecutor, make your case and then I’ll provide my defense or more likely the judge, which for reasons that she is impartial and blogs on both sites will be Buy Danish, will throw your case out as frivolous prosecution and sanction you.

Being the benevolent sort I am I’ll tell you that your idea that President Bush is a xenophobe that is trying to seal the borders is laughable. It’s one of the things my side of the aisle can’t stand about his policies and it is, in my opinion, the single biggest contributor to losing the last election for Republicans.

By nuff-said

December 5, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

Sore losers.

By Diogenes

December 5, 2006 07:00 PM | Link to this

Hey RW,

Did you get a chance to look at Rhetoric for the Fanatic, as I recommended. It’s still hard to tell where the rant ends and the attack begins.

By Buy Danish

December 5, 2006 07:03 PM | Link to this

Huge Blowhard,

Marcus is not my “new hero”. As I recall I mentioned his name once because posted an excellent link about segregated dorms, and I corrected him for referring to the heroes of the Revolutionary War as “anarchists”.

I may be his heroine, but that’s different.

By RW-(the original)

December 5, 2006 07:06 PM | Link to this

Huge,

I hate to break it to you, but I intentionally miss most of what you post. You have the ability to debate your points, but you choose to viciously slander Buy Danish and others and you basically ramble in and out of coherence trying to see how many insults you can pack into a post.

Whether or not Bush is a bad President really depends on what your issues are and the reason this blog has gone to hell is because the liberals here will never take an intellectually honest approach to an issue. The debate is always whatever Bush does is wrong and there’s really no point in staying here debating that anymore. His last midterm election is over, so if that’s what the luckovich blog has to offer I’ll blog elsewhere.

Buy Danish,

If you look at Dio’s alternating posts over the last two hours, she is the fastest changing manic-depressive in history.

By RW-(the original)

December 5, 2006 07:14 PM | Link to this

Dio,

Your reading shortcomings really aren’t my problem now, are they?

By Southern Girl

December 7, 2006 06:50 PM | Link to this

Reality always wins. Bush is now having to face it. I love the picture of Bush being carried by his family to face reality who he thought would be Santa Claus. I have always thought Bush’s whole mission was to outdo his father. Now his father has sent him a taste of reality. Great cartoon!