Mike Luckovich

By Nomad

December 1, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

Now this one is funny. I am glad to see that Mike can actually draw aomething that doesn’t bash Bush.

Yesterday’s ‘toon was funny too.

NOMAD

By Eric

December 1, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

But the honorable and highly intelligent mr bush looked into Putin’s soul and found a man of integrity. Guess he was wrong about that TOO!

By NightTrain

December 1, 2006 08:36 AM | Link to this

Eric,

I guess this means that you have found Putin guilty already? We need people like you presiding on our courts. We could save a lot of time, money and energy since you can tell who is innocent or guilty without any knowledge of the facts or of what really happened. Thank God for the Democrats.

By I Voted for the War Even Though I'm a Sissy

December 1, 2006 08:48 AM | Link to this

I want to go scotter pootin with Putin. I’m very gay.

By Edwin Williams

December 1, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this

I actually can see the point to this cartoon and I reluctantly gave a thumbs up to it, but like most of what Luckovich does, it is in poor taste.

By I Voted for the War But Can't Serve because my hair is too Curly

December 1, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

I have the brains of Curly, the personality of Moe, and the dashing good looks of Larry. I’m a one woman Three Stooges show.

Fairy Christmas!

By Midori

December 1, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

Nomad,

I take it you don’t think Bush deserves “bashing”?

After watching his pitiful, delusional performance in Jordan?

Yet you want to slam Luckovich?

Thank God the American people threw you people out of power.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this

Everybody relax, Bush has met with Putin and can attest to his intentions…

“I was able to get a sense of his soul, a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country,” - GWB, 2001

I know I feel much better now…

By getalife

December 1, 2006 09:55 AM | Link to this

Punches thrown in the Mexican Congress today. This is the result of fixed elections.

There are three Conservative leaders in North America and their agenda is the North American Union without Congressional approval.

This is why they will never secure our borders.

Where is the outrage?

By Midori

December 1, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

Getalife,

thought you might want to leave a message here

By Truthman

December 1, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this

W: “al-Maliki is the right man for Iraq.”

W’s intelligence people: “al Maliki is weak and can’t bring the clerics together to stop the civil war.”

Since I, as does Colin Powell, choose to live in reality, I venture to say the intel folks have a better handle on the Iraq situation than The Chimperor and the Bunker Boy!!

Treasonous schmucks!!

By getalife

December 1, 2006 10:35 AM | Link to this

Thanks Midori.

Will has forgotten Cheney’s famous words.

w does not deserve any respect.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 10:37 AM | Link to this

LHU,

Since you pooh-poohed my assertion a few days ago, here is a report on how [Sharia Law insinuates itself into Britain.]
(http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/014220.php)

Here is a column that details how Muslims are reconquering Spain

Spain’s leading archbishop, Cardinal Antonio María Rouco, is understandably concerned about the future: “Some people wish to place us in the year 711,” he has said. “It seems as if we are meant to wipe ourselves out of history.”

It’s interesting how the Socialists (“Progressives”) are enabling the destruction of human progress.

By Diogenes

December 1, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this

Mike

It’s funny, but it lacks the satiric bite of the Bush Memorial cartoon two days ago, which was one of your best in two or three months. In that cartoon you clearly showed the creation from intelligent design that is the Bush/Halliburton marriage. The bird cartoon is tepid: I think Mike Vick’s PR person has handled the whole thing beautifully and deserves a hand of applause.

Let me suggest that you’d best find a taster for your food for the next few weeks in case there’s some truth to your accusation.

Two or three days ago on your web site, someone made the asinine statement that “freedom from authoritarian control is something most humans should strive for.” However much that may reflect the “if you wish for it hard enough, it will happen” philosophy of the conservative faction, the reality is that people want strong leaders, leaders who can protect them from other strong leaders, even if it means the lost of personal freedoms. Such it has been throughout history. Individual rights have proven to be of far less importance than freedom from war (especially civil war, the very premise upon which Saddam’s dictatorship rested) and the terrors which accompany it. Putin is a good example of an authoritarian leader, supposedly “elected” by the people, who is reducing individual rights as he strengthens his hold on power. We Americans have no grasp of the realities of world politics; we’re too concerned with Mike Vick and his fingers. As I suggested above, you’d best find yourself a good food taster for the next few weeks.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 10:48 AM | Link to this

BD, your link didn’t work, but I noticed the website is something called ‘jihadwatch.org.’ I hate to judge a book by its cover, but I am willing to bet that is is an organization with a specific agenda and may or may not be interested in the truth.

Now, to your concern the other day that our constitution was in danger of being replaced with Sharia law…

I, for one, do not share this concern and see no indication of any components of Sharia law infiltrating our country.

Can you please list ANY components of Sharia law that have replaced ANY components of our constitution in…say…the last 200 years?

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 11:01 AM | Link to this

LHU,

Your head is stuck in the sand. If it can happen in Britain, and Spain, and Holland what makes you think it can’t happen here?

If it doesn’t happen it will be no thanks to people like you.

Here is the link - it is to Dhimmi Watch. Read through the archives and you might get a realistic picture of what is really going on in the world.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

We Americans have no grasp of the realities of world politics blah blah blah

Diogenes,

Speak for yourself please. You have no understanding of American History for starters, so how could you possibly understand world politics?

Try grasping the notion of American Exceptionalism for starters. If you devoted just a fraction of the amount of time you spend studying and defending Darwinism (30 years!), and obsessing about WalMart, to studying American history, you might be able to speak coherently on the subject.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

Excrement, BD, nothing but excrement.

A few unsubstantiated examples of people acting outside of Englands or Spains judicial system is hardly a crisis for in those countries or in ours.

AND, you avoided my question which I will repeat again to make it easier for you:

Can you please list ANY components of Sharia law that have replaced ANY components of our constitution in…say…the last 200 years?

If you cannot answer this simple question, ask yourself ‘why?’

By getalife

December 1, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

Yes BD,

It can happen here because we have drifted away from enforcing the laws and chose to work around them.

This is your people’s fault. Taking away freedoms is what the enemy wants and you buy into this bs. Get real.

Why don’t you just link to the lgf? It is the same crap.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

BD,

In my unappreciated role of trying to help educate you I will post a number of sections of Sharia Law so that you can identify those that have replaced any parts of the US Constitution:

-The Muslim man who is not currently a fornicator can only marry a Muslim woman who is not currently a fornicatress or a chaste woman from the people of the book.

-The Muslim fornicator can only marry a Muslim fornicatress.

-The number of wives is limited to one. In times where there the population if smaller than normal, such as times of war, up to four can be taken, but only if they are treated equally and with the consent of the first wife.

-The Muslim woman who is not currently a fornicatress can only marry a Muslim man who is not currently a fornicator. The Muslim fornicatress can only marry a Muslim fornicator.

-The woman cannot marry without the consent of her guardian. If she marries, her husband becomes her new guardian.

-The guardian may choose a suitable partner for a virgin girl, but the girl is free to contest and has the right to say ‘no’.

-The guardian cannot marry the divorced woman or the widow if she didn’t ask to be married.

-The number of husbands is limited to one.

-“Do not marry unless you give your wife something that is her right.” It is obligatory for a man to give dowry(gift)to the woman he marries

Yup, head for the hills! The Muslims are coming, The Muslims are coming…

By Diogenes

December 1, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Americans are no different. We work from a different philosophy, thanks to the briliance of our Founders, but we, too, want strong leaders; we, too, want stability and the freedom from chaos. The difference is that we use the ballot box to effect our revolutions. Other parts of the world use guns. We do not always grasp that critical difference. We have the freedom to quarrel (even anomymously over the internet) about our political choices with the assurance that we will hold a revolution in about two years. We Americans want strong leaders just as much as the rest of the world, observe our wonderful Mayor Franklin.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

Oh No, It’s worse than I thought…

-A woman who wishes to be divorced needs the consent of her husband. If he consents she does not have to pay back the dowry.

-A man who divorces a Pre-adolescent or post-menopausal women must wait three months before divorcing her to ensure that she is not pregnant.

-Under certain circumstances (abuse, for instance), the wife may ask a judge to separate the couple.

-If a man divorces his wife three times, he can no longer marry her again unless she marries another man and then divorces him.

Aaaaaaaaah! I say we all convert NOW to save orselves!

By @@

December 1, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

ml, what is it with you radical leftists and your conspiracy theories?

Noone has convinced me that this death was orchestrated by Putin (I do, however, watch him closely).

The close relationship between Boris Berezovsky and the Chechnyan militants is worth a looksee, don’t you think?

It’s beginning to sound all too radical and familiar. The “orchestrated war” theory that our own leftists here in the U.S. have so eagerly bought into. Bring down a sitting president through absurd accusations.

I’ll wait for a full investigation. Premature e-speculation just makes you look incapable.

There are differing opinions out there you know.

But I forgot…radicals don’t allow those.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

This one really got me worried:

-Under Sharia law non-muslims are goverened by the laws of their own specific communities however it codifies the treatment of dhimmis (Arabic) and rayahs (Turkish) in relation to the Muslim state and in cases of over-lapping jurisdiction. Dhimmis are distinctly second-class citizens in that they cannot serve in public office, cannot testify in court and must follow certain rules meant for their humiliation (such as the slap they must receive when they pay the jizya). The rules include privilege to practice their own religion, except for public demonstration of non-muslim religious practices and the right to convert muslims (denied, but the reverse is allowed). Dhimmi are also taxed additionally.

Holy Crap! BD is right…this is a grave and growing threat (why does that phrase sound familiar?)

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

BD, aren’t you and your ilk FOR this type of Sharia law?

-The homosexual receives the same punishment as an adulterer. This means, that if the homosexual is married, he/she is stoned to death, while if single, he/she is whipped 100 times.

I’m actually finding a number of components of Sharia Law that seem to comport to the desires of many conservatives…interesting…

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this

LHU,

Wake up. We are not an isoloated country. What happens in Europe, not to mention the Middle East, affects us whether we like it or not. It should also be a lesson for us, for if it can happen there, it can happen here.

This is from an interesting article on whether Islam is compatible with Democracy (Answer: no):

Is Islam compatible with democracy? Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner strongly disagrees with a plea for a ban on parties seeking to launch Islamic law in the Netherlands. “For me it is clear: if two-thirds of the Dutch population should want to introduce the sharia tomorrow, then the possibility should exist.”

Two central concepts in sharia are the notions of “blasphemy” and “apostasy,” both incurring the death penalty. These laws are incompatible with the ancient Western ideas of freedom of conscience and of speech. Thus, sharia is anathema to the goals of democracy. Sharia is also hostile to equality before the law, since Islamic law is based on the fundamental inequality between Muslims and non-Muslims, men and women, free men and slaves. Moreover, it does not provide any protection for minorities, since non-Muslims are supposed to be unarmed and their lives and property subject to the whims of Muslims at any given moment. Although Islam does contain the vague Koranic notion of shura, consultation, this has never been formalized or concretized, which means that there are no formal constraints on the power of the ruler under sharia. The only thing an Islamic ruler may not do is openly to reject Islam.

There is a difference between Christianity and Islam and it was Christianity (and other forces of enlightenment) that formed the belief structure of our Founders and blessed us with the greatest country and greatest system of government man has ever known.

It is perilous to pretend otherwise, and the fact that Islam and Jihad is a political movement more than a religious movement must be acknowledged.

You and others are so intent on bashing Christians and tearing apart the foundations of our culture that you are leaving the back door open for those who would return us to the 5th Century.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 12:09 PM | Link to this

LHU,

Please. Christians, and Americans in general are exceptionally tolerant people.

In your insular way, you would equate the fact that the vast majority of Americans draw a line in the sand at Gay marriage and make the incredible leap that we would stone them to death given the opportunity.

You are a fool.

By Nomad

December 1, 2006 12:12 PM | Link to this

Midori - Does he deserved to be bashed? Sometimes yes sometimes no depending upon your point of view.

I just get tired of reading the crap you post because most of it is tired ranting and inaccurate.

Thanks for asking, NOMAD

By Midori

December 1, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

Nomad,

if you’re so tired of reading my “crap”, then why read it? furthermore, why respond to it?

So now a simple observation is a “rant” and “inaccurate”?

See why I’m glad you morons are gone?

thank you for your, er, thoughts.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this

Diogenes,

Point 1:

The difference is that we use the ballot box to effect our revolutions.

Hitler was elected. All democracies are not alike. You are the one who proposed a theory that as human beings we all yearn for authoritarian government, hence the Nazis.

I say that that is a bunch of BS, unless you’re a liberal. Unlike other countries, our constitution was designed with a weak federal government in mind. Moreover our culture places a premium on the individual not on the group (or the mob).

Pint 2:

We have the freedom to quarrel (even anomymously over the internet) about our political choices with the assurance that we will hold a revolution in about two years

What a fatuous statement. Elections are not revolutions.

Point 3:

We Americans want strong leaders just as much as the rest of the world, observe our wonderful Mayor Franklin.

She’s not my mayor since I dont live in Atlanta, but I don’t think that what she did before the election, when she involved herself in race-baiting advertising was very wonderful.

Neither was her thwarted attempt to force politically-correct rules on a private club which is constitutionally protected to govern the way it sees fit, and her attempted intrusion into its affairs was an unwarranted breach of power.

Contrast what she attempted to do with the NSA wiretaps which are warranted by national security concerns. Does anyone else see a contradiction in the Left’s definition of abuses of power?

With the Left their agenda can be enforced by any means necessary as long as their vision of “the greater good” is satisfied.

I have to run. later…

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

Diogenes @ 10:44,

I wonder what brilliant contributor to this blog made that statement that troubles you so much that you have to bring it into your comment three days later and lie about the context of the comment. Please tell us!

By Diogenes

December 1, 2006 12:36 PM | Link to this

Thank you Buy Danish,

You provide me with more laughs than anything available on television. My doctor says that such belly laughs are actually good for old geezers.

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 12:37 PM | Link to this

Nomad,

Midori has a point, her comments are too vacuous to be labeled as rants.

By Diogenes

December 1, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

RW,

For the most obvious reason: it was pertinent. It demonstrates clearly how the conservatives have developed a fantasy world upon which they construct their ideology. That statement, “freedom from authoritarian control is something most humans should strive for” is fraught with fantastic denials of reality and could have served as a caption, so I used it to illustrate Mike’s delightful cartoon.

By the way, remind Mike to get a food taster. I just had a client call and I must away for a while.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this

Great Point BD!

If Two Thirds of the American people want Sharia Law to replace our current laws and our constitution, then, CONGRATULATIONS, you are correct…it would be possible.

Just for grins, how many people in this country do you think NOW would support the replacement of our constitution with Sharia Law??? (I’m betting it’s a few short of what is needed…)

Trust me…we have bigger fish to fry! Why don’t you find something REAL to worry about?

By Shawny

December 1, 2006 12:55 PM | Link to this

Nomad, I gotta agree. This makes 2 consecutive non-Bush bashing cartoons that don’t suck.

I also agree that the periodical bashing of Bush is warrented, but not for the reasons that M and other hatas believe.

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 12:55 PM | Link to this

Diogenes,

Your idea that all humans have a desire to be cattle is a far more fantastic denial of reality than anything I could ever write.

By Goldie

December 1, 2006 01:02 PM | Link to this

Poor sick Santa— a victim of another friend of Dubya’s. Remember, Putin is another friend that Dubya assessed was a good guy after he “looked into his eyes” last year— God help us all!

By Shawny

December 1, 2006 01:09 PM | Link to this

G… Here we go again. Take a non-Bush bashing toon with Santa and Putin as characters and tie it back to W.

W was wrong about Putin. He is very dangerous indeed, and slicker than a former president named William Jefferson.

By Jesus

December 1, 2006 01:11 PM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By Jenn

December 1, 2006 01:25 PM | Link to this

Shawny, I agree. Putin has those shifty eyes….

By Shawny

December 1, 2006 01:48 PM | Link to this

Feel that wind?

Some HUGE breeze just blew through. Lots of air in motion.

By Political Foreskin

December 1, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this

By June of 2007, the Iraqis demand total authority to ban Dixie Chicks songs.

By Political Foreskin

December 1, 2006 01:58 PM | Link to this

Cartoon Idea: Show the Pope visiting the Blue Mosque and flipping off heckling muslims, and then receiving a $20K fine from the NFL.

By Jenn

December 1, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this

PF,157, didn’t you just post that earlier in Wootens blog???

By @@

December 1, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this

Shawny:

That wasn’t a wind, it was a lingering fart.

By Jenn

December 1, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this

@@, ROTFL!!!!

By @@

December 1, 2006 02:35 PM | Link to this

A. Fart. Broken down into his psychological components.

A “malingering fart”.

Smell familiar? Come in. Sniff around, and then leave only to find that the smell is leaves with him.

Out for awhile.

By Midori

December 1, 2006 02:49 PM | Link to this

Hi Huge,

good to see you :)

By Midori

December 1, 2006 02:50 PM | Link to this

RW,

Don’t you have some blogs to hack, and then crow about your “prowess”?

That doesn’t keep you busy enough?

Maybe you should do a little wandering around with Nomad.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 02:56 PM | Link to this

Diogenes,

Perhaps you should change your name to NERO. You know - they guy who fiddled while Rome burned.

We have quite a few Nero’s on this blog, so you may want to grab it quick before Huge Bloward, and LHU appropriate it for themselves.

As for myself, I prefer not to die laughing.

By bon scott

December 1, 2006 03:13 PM | Link to this

By Huge - December 1, 2006 01:40 PM - Wow, what a hoot! You miss a few days here and you miss………….not much.

Got that right.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 03:23 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I rarely read LGF unless someone else links to it. I’d invite you over to check my computer’s history, but I’m afraid that JK next door might follow you in with her gun loaded so you’ll just have to take my word for it.

By LMAO

December 1, 2006 03:33 PM | Link to this

You’ve got to see it. Someone on the Wooten blog is doing a leftist version of Andy and Buy Danish are having a fit! They are going ballistic.

Its not so funny now is it RW? BD?

LMAO!! A true classic.

Funny thing is, its problaby Andy just trying to shut down the Wooten blog, like he does this blog! LMAO!!!

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Do you have a point or is this your usual sputtering? I answered your silly little rule question yesterday when the blog clearly said it was open for comments from 8 to 7 M-F and my comment clearly fell during that time frame.

Today the blog doesn’t say anything about posting hours, so since you’re here does that mean you’re hacking the blog?

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 03:57 PM | Link to this

LMAO,

When you liberals start all your spamming and name jacking it’s never funny. It wasn’t when you ruined this blog and it won’t be when you ruin Wooten’s.

Although in fairness Wooten’s blog pretty much blows anyway.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

LMOA,

Having a fit? Hardly. Pointing out a genocidal maniac and plagiarist in a very calm and reasoned fashion.

But hey, maybe you and Diogenes the Socialist Librarian should get together and party hardy tonight with a little nitrous oxide to break the ice. You both share a really odd sense of humor so I can pretty much guarantee that you’ll have a great time.

Bring a few of Luchovich’s cartoons with you, and don’t forget to invite Clem, Abe, Jean, Dave, and Robert.

Don’t forget your bathing suit and floaties!

By Dusty

December 1, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this

Somebody here is SOOO funny.

Wait until the unhinged ADVISOR comes here and starts raving about killing Americans, Jews, etc. etc. He is not even political, just paranoid. Your comparisons show your sick side, but this blog could get an even lower lunatic if you don’t watch it.

RW and Buy Danish happen to like logic, facts and honesty. That is the way they post. We need more like them.

By Jenn

December 1, 2006 04:30 PM | Link to this

Right on Dusty!

By LMAO!

December 1, 2006 04:42 PM | Link to this

Lets do the math…….

Advisor- Attention seeker, far fringe politics, raving lunatic, no real message, instigator

Andy- Attention seeker, far fringe politics, raving lunatic, no real message or logic, instigator, internet addict that takes this blog too serious.

They could be twins! LMAO

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 04:43 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Is paranoia contagious? Because there are millions of “Advisors” out there just champing at the bit to unleash their villainous demons.

For some strange reason these paranoids all share a kinship with Arabs and a seething hatred for Jews and Americans, and they like to chant this song called “Death to America!”.

Why is this do you suppose? Maybe the CDC is studying this phenomenon.

By Mike

December 1, 2006 04:59 PM | Link to this

Will Mikey ever draw a cartoon critical of a Democrat? Nothing on the Murtha/Hastings mess? I guess Mikey only is concerned about corruption if he can use it to attack Republicans.

By Andy"s Mom

December 1, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

Oh dear LM_O, how did you figure that out? Advisor is Andy’s twin brother.

They are not identical however. They have distinct personalities. Advisor didn’t need his fathers help with Dobson’s shower method like Andy did. Nope, Advisor was always playing football and stuff. My Advisor never sucked his thumb. Advisor did however wet his bed like my Andy (who still does.) Advisor did however get beat up a lot more, maybe.

Those 2 are always fighting, Advisor is sweet because he’ll help change a diaper or two. Andy is just Andy. Oh dear.

Anyway gotta go. First though I must say hi to Dusty, see ya soon hon, I’m on jury duty next week.

By @@

December 1, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Andy’s purpose has nothing to do with any of the leftists here, but he has everything to do with yours.

The AJC is a left-wing media outlet, and THEY are his objective. You’re just useful idiots that get in between him and his objective. He plays with your feeble minds, and he’s very good at what he does.

It’s me that’s LMAO at your need to compete and then blame Andy for your weakness.

Hysterical idjets.

By Lord Help Us

December 1, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

You mean there’s a method to Andrew’s madness? ‘I see no method…’(with apologies to Martin Sheen)

BTW: Did he have to check himself in after he ‘exposed’ himself yesterday?

By Dusty

December 1, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Paranoia is a wildcat fire of hate surging through the brain. It now seems to be spread by fundamentalist terrorists and governments using them to augment their own goals. But…..

One of many disturbing things about advisor is the fact that he is probably American. Yes, a home grown hate honcho spouting the old terrorism of the Nazis. If CDC has found a cure for paranoia, they’d better hurry with the treatment. advisor is far gone already.

By LMAO!

December 1, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this

So can anyone use this or any of the other blogs as a personal vendetta tool like Andy? Hijacking blogs is a legitimate protest?

Or is this just part of your dilutional partisan fantasy, that Andy’s cause is just, and therefore must be tolerated by all.

Do you think people are so stupid that they are blind to Andy’s objective? One that comes across to most as a bitter old loser that has nothing but his silly crusade? LMAO!

By RE

December 1, 2006 05:29 PM | Link to this

Guys, you all seem to be talking about this advisor guy. I read some of what he had to say yesterday and he seems like a whack job. I have not seen anyone here supporting his nutty little rants. Unlike little andy, no one is defending him because he is nuts.

By Dubya

December 1, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

Brilliant Brain Bush has returned from yet another embarrassing, humiliating trip abroad. Grinning, giggling, drooling his pitiful utterances about a world of which he hasn’t a clue. A world which he himself has set fire to, with much more to come. Stay the curse. We’re winning. We’re not leaving. Mission complished. God bless Murcuh. These are proud days in Murcuh. Sweet Jesus!

By Midori

December 1, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

so now the AJC is a “left-wing media outlet”?

crikey!!!

there was a segment on Olbermann last night, in which he revealed the looney toon right and their grasping at straws. All they have left is their outrageous conspiracy theories and warped imaginations.

That one rates right up with the rest of the straw grasping.

Speaking of warped imaginations, RW, I’m flattered - NOT - but I’m neither hackable nor a blog. Try Route 66 to get your kicks.

By Midori

December 1, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this

Yikes!!!

Andy exposed himself???

they make rulers that small?

By Political Foreskin

December 1, 2006 05:38 PM | Link to this

Cartoon Headline: By June 2007, the Iraqi government is going to take over total authority to ban Dixie Chick songs.

I’m not ready to make nice, I’m not ready to back down, I’m still mad as hell and I’m something something…dammit! I can never remember song lyrics. I hate myself. I hate the dixie chicks. I hate the world! NUKE IRAN!!!!

By Dusty

December 1, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

Poor little liberal lefties,

Still talking about Andy, huh? Still calling him names like a bunch of schoolyard kids. Why don’t you grow up?

Andy posted facts and their source. He also gave his opinion. He did answer name calling with some of his own. But he did not deal in fantasy (Andy’s mom), twisted facts like N-GA and many others give. He is not ashamed of his faith or his conservative support.

Some of you Halloween helpers and rumor riders ought to try a bit of integrity yourself. Your constant name-calling and non-factual posts are very boring and repetitious.

By getalife

December 1, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

RE,

You think he is bad. Check out this lovely exchange about freedom of religion over at the Huffington Post:

Attention to all Arab lovers- just know this, the harder you work to impose your sick twisted world view on us, we will work 1000 times harder to rid the world of these filthy rotten Arabs and their sick Koran. I spit on the Koran. By: RudolfHess on December 01, 2006 at 04:56pm

>

I like to take one page from the BUYBULL, ONe page of the Quoran, One page from the Tor

By @@

December 1, 2006 05:47 PM | Link to this

LYAO all you want. Who is your focus, and where is your focus today? I don’t recall Andy mentioning you guys much yesterday. Just offering balanced articles on a left-wing blogsite, and giving copyright credit with each link, followed by his unique commentary.

I just finished checking out The Advisor at Wooten’s. He/she is “stealing” someone else’s intellect and posting it as their own. I guess they are priveleged and entitled to infringe on copyrighted material.

By getalife

December 1, 2006 05:48 PM | Link to this

Oops, anyway it gets worse.

Talk about nuts, take a look at the HP’s comments.

By RE

December 1, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

under which post?

By Advisor

December 1, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

I don’t like conservatives. You all seem to like it here. Don’t like the Wooooten blog you say?

Well guess what???? I’m your worst nightmare. I’m going to AndyBlog this place for 3 months.

My agenda will be served. Forgive me for the colateral damage but i have a cause.

Alls fair right?

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 06:08 PM | Link to this

Midori,

How’s that remedial reading class working for you? Let’s hope it works!

By the way, if you have this page saved from your RSS feed it will generally open with a comment box no matter what time it is. So if I or Andy or Georgie Girl or anyone else opens the page and sees a comment box, why is that hacking?

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 06:15 PM | Link to this

@@,

It’s funny, but when I read “LYAO” I immediately thought “Lying your a* off”.

They are “lying” when these hysterical Losers falsely characterize Andy’s posts, so it works for me.

By getalife

December 1, 2006 06:23 PM | Link to this

RE,

This one

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 06:25 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Yeah, that’s pretty bad, but you should check out what those Imans have to say at the local mosque.

It ain’t pretty, and the difference between them and the few wackjobs at HuffPos is that the Imans are protected, make that “coddled”, by the media, academia, some members of Congress. They are also represented by the ACLU.

Oh! I almost forgot - unlike the HP wackos, they get a lot of funding from so-called charitable organizations, not to mention countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia.

By LMAO

December 1, 2006 06:25 PM | Link to this

Oh my God!! Thats really Andy in the hospital bed!!!!

ANDY HAS BEEN POISONED BY LIBERALISM!!!

The AJC is responsible for Andy’s condition!

Oh, the conspiracy!

By getalife

December 1, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

BD,

Speaking of whackos, Jim wants to share a foxhole with w.

Weird huh?

By @@

December 1, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish:

It works for me too. Some liberal on here keeps posting “You can fool all of the people, all of the time” or something to that effect.

I’d say a radical liberal has but to look in a mirror to find the fool.

Self-deception or liberal lies is a convenient tool, just like them.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

He said he would want him in his foxhole. I think that is a wise choice. Much wiser than relying on, say, Bill Clinton.

LYAO,

You have been poisoned by Liberalism. It’s creates a condition known as “Fools Disease”.

There is a cure, but you have to be willing to endure the pain of looking in that mirror @@ is talking about.

By I Voted for the War Even Though I am a Coward

December 1, 2006 06:50 PM | Link to this

When you get right down to it, I am just a worthless POS.

Fairy Christmas!

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 06:50 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Because of the delay, I need to clear up some possible confusion. My 6:25 was not a response to your link to the very sound Dennis Prager argument and all the Leftists who are flipping out about it.

History is so inconvenient when you’re a Leftist. That’s why the try to rewrite it all the time, or barring that, just erase it all together.

By The Three Stooges of the Luckovich Blog

December 1, 2006 06:57 PM | Link to this

Of course, Curly would be Andy. Bi Danish would be Moe, except Bi Danish has a mustache. RW is Larry. @@ joins this circle of jerks as Shemp. Dimwitted Dusty - Curly Joe.

By RW-(the original)

December 1, 2006 07:00 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

History begins each morning for a liberal.

Thanks Annie!

By getalife

December 1, 2006 07:04 PM | Link to this

BD,

Prager is an as-sclown and the oath does not mean anything after w trampled our constitution.

Do they even swear on the bible anymore or do they just swear to uphold the constitution which w has not?

They should swear holding the constitution not a religious book. Also, they should ban any attempt to take away any American freedom which your party loves to do.

It is pathetic.

By Buy Danish

December 1, 2006 07:14 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

Babble on.

Unless you had some chicks in Pakistan, you haven’t lost any rights at all. Even then there are no lost rights, just the possibility of a little less privacy.

I pity the poor agent who would be forced to listen in on your phone calls.

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:13 AM | Link to this

Paris Hilton cancelled an appearance at an awards show because she didn’t like the jokes the show’s writers gave her. Here is one of the rejects:

“I think Brittany is dislexic. She’s up for a role as a superhero, you know, the one who fights crime in her underwear and flies an invisible plane?”

By I Voted For The War But I'm a Coward

December 4, 2006 08:13 AM | Link to this

Where is the new Toon?

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:14 AM | Link to this

Another Paris Hilton rejected joke:

“But seriously, Brittany must be dislexic: She was trying to moon the paparazzi….”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:15 AM | Link to this

Another Paris Hilton reject:

“Brittany and I are best buds. But when we have a spat, we go to the limo and air it out.”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this

Paris Hilton rejected this joke too:

“I dont want to say Brittany is dumb, but she keeps letting me try to resuscitate the roadkill she brings in the limo.”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:20 AM | Link to this

Another Paris reject: “Hey Brittany! Leave the roadkill on the road!”

Another joke rejected: “I think Al Gore, the environmental guru, should chaperone our nites out. Brittany would never shoot a beaver with Al Gore in the limo.”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:23 AM | Link to this

Paris rejected this joke too:

“Brittany is such an inconsiderate limo passenger. She makes me sit in the wet spot.”

This joke too: “Brittany takes her love of animals too far. She’s always trying to rescue roadkill and she brings it in the limo.”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:24 AM | Link to this

Paris cancelled her award show appearance mainly for this joke: “The thing that makes me maddest is that foreigners think that all american women look alike.”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:27 AM | Link to this

Paris also rejected thematic song material for her next project: Here are some rejected lyrics: “Her face is a map of the world it’s a map of the world.”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:29 AM | Link to this

Paris didn’t like this open: “Actually the whole incident was a misunderstanding. I was talking to my little dog, but Brittany thought I meant her. I said, “Sit, roll over…..beg!”

By @@

December 4, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this

Nothing new ml? Are you using sick leave to Christmas shop?

PoliFore:

I just finished reading Wooten’s weekend comments. You are definitely into “recycling” bad jokes at least. Over and over, and over again.

There comes a time when all things recycled end up in the landfill.

That time has come and gone for your Britney jokes.

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:47 AM | Link to this

“sit…roll over…..BEG!”

By Political Foreskin

December 4, 2006 08:50 AM | Link to this

Hey @@: “Sit….roll over……BEG!”

By Republicans Just Wanna Have Fun

December 4, 2006 08:52 AM | Link to this

The Republican-led Congress will meet only for about another week before drawing to a close — as lawmakers prepare for the new 110th Congress set to convene on January 4 under Democratic control.

Having been blown out in the November 7 elections, Republican lawmakers are getting ready to hand over to Democrats some major unfinished business, led by what to do about the increasingly unpopular Iraq war.

Republicans are also leaving unfinished long-term government funding legislation, and appear unlikely to decide whether to extend popular tax credits that expired at the end of 2005.

Why would we expect the “Do-Nothing” Republicans to do anything, now? That’s probably good- at least the Democrats will have fewer of their screw-ups to fix in January!

By @@

December 4, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

PoliFore:

BEG? Naaahhhh!

I’m seeing your references to Britney’s flashing and wet spots.

Then I’m thinking…Ya know, that PoliFore, IS a “FLASHFLOOD”.

Eeeeewwwww!!!!!!!

By Score Another Loss for the Bush Doctrine

December 4, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this

CARACAS, Venezuela - Emboldened by a resounding re-election, President Hugo Chavez pledged to shake up Venezuela with a more radical version of socialism and forge a wider front against the United States in Latin America.

Anybody still wanna support the Bush Doctrine? Looks like the Chimperor has single-handedly solidified support for communist government all over South America. Maybe ‘Republican Red’ is really just another way to say, ‘WASHED-UP PINKO’! ! !

By Oral Hygiene for Filthy

December 4, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this

BERLIN (Reuters) - German sex educators plan to launch a spray-on condom tailor-made for all sizes.

Hey Filthy, there’s a new breath spray out for ya ! ! !

By Empires Require Emperors

December 4, 2006 09:23 AM | Link to this

BERLIN AND WASHINGTON - The American people rightly, and overwhelmingly, punished the Republican Party in the midterm elections, chiefly because of the Iraq war and the neoconservative ideology that helped bring it about.

Iraq is a disaster today partly because of the neoconservative fantasy that democratic nationhood can be built from scratch, at the point of a gun. This is crazed nationalist utopianism - and it is wholly alien to core Republican traditions.

Worse still, neoconservatism has endangered the core values and traditions of America itself. As Thomas Jefferson pointed out, empires require emperors. Instead of adhering to core principles of balanced budgets, smaller but accountable government, fiscal responsibility, local political control as the preference for governance, and a belief in the sanctity of civil liberties, Republicans have embraced highly centralized, militarized big government. The Founding Fathers would be horrified by the shameful excesses of such neoconservative folly: warrantless wiretaps, Abu Ghraib, Gauntánamo Bay, renditions, and torture.

Thomas Jefferson had the neo-cons pegged 250 years ago ! ! !

By Bush Teaching Muslims the American Way

December 4, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

CAIRO, Egypt - Heba Kotb is a conservative Muslim, wears an Islamic head scarf, and goes on television once a week to talk — frankly and in great detail — about sex.

The Bush Doctrine effects positive change in the Arab world…………sex ed on public TV. At leat the Arabs won’t have STDs when they hate our guts ! ! !

By Dusty

December 4, 2006 09:59 AM | Link to this

Well, we know ONE liberal knows how to cut and paste. He forgot to give the source of all his propaganda, of course. Must have taken a little time to think of five different id-s to dump all that trash on us. Oh well. At least it isn’t torture by jokes from PoFo.

By Relentless (and other LIES)

December 4, 2006 10:11 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - Unable to win Senate confirmation, U.N. Ambassador John Bolton will step down when his temporary appointment expires within weeks, the White House said Monday.

As late as last month, Bush, through his top aides, {{{{{{said he would not relent in his defense of Bolton}}}}}}, despite unwavering opposition from Democrats who view Bolton as too combative for international diplomacy.

Perino said Bush had reluctantly accepted Bolton’s decision to leave when his current appointment expired.

Our relentless leader has relented ! ! !

By Dusty

December 4, 2006 10:47 AM | Link to this

Rumor has it that Nancy Pelosi has asked Miss Manners to be our representative at the UN.

Miss Manners is well qualified in correct table settings. She will also give monogramed napkins to be used as white flags on tough decisions at all tea parties for UN members.

By I Voted for the War Because I'm a Chickenhawk

December 4, 2006 10:47 AM | Link to this

Too scared to fight myself, and now too scared even to blog anymore…

By THE MANAGEMENT

December 4, 2006 10:54 AM | Link to this

New cartoon is up. sorry for the delay