Mike Luckovich

By Yeah, He Was With Monica At That Time

October 13, 2006 06:16 AM | Link to this

I get it. The previous president gets a pass on all of his actions as soon as his eight year term is over but the current president gets blamed for hurricanes, airplane accidents and all sorts of nonsense that he has absolutely nothing to do with.

It’s almost like Ruth Bader Ginsburg is still on the Supreme Court, or something, how dare these Republicans criticize the effects of Clinton’s policies when he never did anything to begin with, right?

Is that what the pinko nation is trying to say, Clinton was the Oval Office carpet stainer and that’s it?

Georgie Girl: Look, I told you if you want to run with the big dogs that mommy was going to have to get you out of bed a little earlier than 7:58.

By It Was Clinton's Intern "Interviews" That Day

October 13, 2006 07:25 AM | Link to this

Well, if we’re going to get blamed for it anyway:

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of Justice- In the last day of his presidency, Bill Clinton granted 140 pardons and commuted 36 sentences (a scandal that came to be known as Pardongate), many of them to convicted felons who had paid large fees to Clinton associates. Like many of Clinton’s actions, these pardons raised ethical concerns and added to the controversies surrounding the Clinton Presidency and Hillary Clinton’s senate campaign.

Will Hillary resign in light of these new allegations?

And:

The fact that someone whose responsibilities included the security of the nation, would remove classified documents (whether they be copies or originals) without permission, on several occasions, is inexcusable. When a former National Security Advisor has such disregard for the integrity of documents and the rules and laws pertaining to their treatment, what can be said for his regard for the security of the nation and the safety those rules applying to classified documents protects?-TownHall

Cut

What is most missing from the left in America is an element of grace—of civic grace, democratic grace, the kind that assumes disagreements are part of the fabric, but we can make the fabric hold together. The Democratic Party hasn’t had enough of this kind of thing since Bobby Kennedy died. What also seems missing is the courage to ask a question. Conservatives these days are asking themselves very many questions, but I wonder if the left could tolerate asking itself even a few. Such as: Why are we producing so many adherents who defy the old liberal virtues of free and open inquiry, free and open speech? Why are we producing so many bullies? And dim dullard ones, at that.-PeggyNoonanOpinionJournal

By It Was Clinton's Intern "Interviews" That Day

October 13, 2006 07:26 AM | Link to this

Second, the president not only refused — “for about the fifth time” — to acknowledge that invading Iraq was a mistake. He got right back in their faces and affirmed, defiantly, that it was the right thing to do — and said he couldn’t wait until we could have an actual debate on this subject. He was daring Democrats to defend the Saddam regime, what with its use of WMD, its systematic torture and its burying alive of its own people — not to mention its support of terrorists.-TownHall

Cut

Americans know instinctively what’s at stake. “Look, the American people want to know, can we win — that’s what they want to know — and do we have a plan to win,” the president said. Administration critics, he added, fall into several categories. “There are some who say, get out, it’s not worth it. And those some of the voices, by the way, in the Democrat[ic] Party. Certainly not all Democrats, but some of the loud voices in the party say, get out,” the president said. “There have been some votes on the floor of the Senate and the House that make it abundantly clear we just have a different view of the world.”-WashingtonTimes

Cut

This is how you keep Kim Jong Il from proliferating. Make him understand that his survival would be hostage to the actions of whatever terror group he sold his weapons to. Any terrorist detonation would be assumed to have his address on it. The United States would then return postage. Automaticity of this kind concentrates the mind.-TownHall

By I Agree, Clinton Didn't Do Squat When He Was President

October 13, 2006 07:28 AM | Link to this

The 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bi-Equal Rights and Liberation sought to lower the age of consent for both homosexual and heterosexual sex. Is there any connection between that effort and their effort to gain access to all programs of the Boy Scouts of America? Why do homosexuals place so much emphasis on recruitment? Is it because they cannot reproduce?-TownHall

Cut

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By George

October 13, 2006 07:58 AM | Link to this

Do we leave Andy alone in his fantasy world or do we tell Andy that Clinton hasn’t been President for six years?

He is doing so well with his delusions that we might as well leave them alone.

By ed lorenzo

October 13, 2006 08:05 AM | Link to this

OVERHEARD AT THE WHITE HOUSE

“George, have you seen Luckovich’s cartoon today?”

“First Lady, by now you should know that I don’t cotton to anti-patriotic pink-liberal mush disguised as pen and ink cartoons. Besides Alberto tells me that Luckovich did not vote for me; at least that is what his secret poop sheet says”

“You mean you still collecting private information on our fellow citizens?”

“There is nothing that can keep Luckovich from making a nucular weapon in his ranch in Lake Lanier, First Lady. You ought to know that!”

“And where is Clinton come into all this?”

“Not only Clinton but also Gore who invented the Internet. From making internets to making nucular weapons is just a small step for mankind!”

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 08:07 AM | Link to this

Hey Midori,

I won’t be here today until very late, I hope that doesn’t ruin your day. On the bright side rushncap will finally be able to hold his own in a debate with me.

The After Dark entry for this cartoon is already posted and details the real Clinton legacy.

What a bereft party that only has Billy Jeff and Jimmah to look on as role models. Sad really….

By Mrs. Godzilla

October 13, 2006 08:07 AM | Link to this

so much for personal accountability…..

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 08:11 AM | Link to this

Georgie Girl,

Good point! President Bush should have fired every single person in the Federal government and started from scratch.

You guys are really deep thinkers aren’t you?

By @@

October 13, 2006 08:20 AM | Link to this

ml: Well ml, Clinton certainly served as a great role model for avoiding the truth. He continues to this day. Eyes bulging, red- faced, finger jabber, incoherent jabber-er.

You can’t really call him a “buck” though. A buck won’t rut without balls. Well….he did do a type of rutting. Hillary was holding his family jewels though.

I guess you could call it a three-way. No……make it a four-way. Osama was getting busy himself.

By Eric

October 13, 2006 08:32 AM | Link to this

New meaning for email symbols: @@ means idiot.

By IVAW Supports 'Appeal for Redress'

October 13, 2006 08:35 AM | Link to this

Many active duty, reserve, and guard service members are concerned about the war in Iraq and support the withdrawal of U.S. troops. The Appeal for Redress provides a way in which individual service members can appeal to their Congressional Representative and US Senators to urge an end to the U.S. military occupation. The Appeal messages will be delivered to members of Congress at the time of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in January 2007.

The wording of the Appeal for Redress is short and simple. It is patriotic and respectful in tone:

“As a patriotic American proud to serve the nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to support the prompt withdrawal of all American military forces and bases from Iraq . Staying in Iraq will not work and is not worth the price. It is time for U.S. troops to come home.”

IVAW- (Iraq Veterans Against the War)

By Mallory

October 13, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

Mike, GWB didn’t shift blame onto Clinton when he had the chance. Condi Rice didn’t respond to Hugo Chavez when he criticized our President.

This administration is tough and determined to defeat the enemy. I’d like to see them get tough with the leftwing snipers.

I’m passing the buck to you. When are people like you going to stop your nonsense and get behind our country in this global war on terror? Why do you insist on being such losers?

By @@

October 13, 2006 08:45 AM | Link to this

Eric:

I’ll be out till this afternoon. Can I count on you to tell Midori?

I’m sure I can.

By Mike

October 13, 2006 08:50 AM | Link to this

Hey Mikey! How bout a Harry Reid cartoon?

What’s the matter, not Republican enough to criticize?

By Mike

October 13, 2006 08:51 AM | Link to this

Another thing. When has Bush blamed Clinton for anything? I know that pundits have and McCain has, but Bush never has.

Keep on lying Mikey! Don’t let the facts get in the way of your spew.

By Randy

October 13, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this

Mike, can you really claim the moral high ground when your media favors this kind of bias? Bush has admitted to mistakes. Clinton had to be forced to admit his and only after he lied first.

Clinton’s mantra. Lie and hope you don’t get caught, count on the media for support.

By Mallory Ain't Got a Clue

October 13, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

If Mallory had ever stepped foot in Iraq they would have some idea of exactly who the ‘losers’ have been in this debacle ! ! !

If troops had been supplied with adequate troop strength, equipment, logistics, linguistic support, armor, basic rations, etc, etc, etc it might have been a different story but WE HAVE NOT BEEN SO SUPPLIED ! ! ! The Bush administartion tried to engage in a campaign of nation building on the cheap and has fallen flat on it’s keister in the process. Only a REAL loser supports war profiteers who can’t even accomplish basic logistical planning before engaging in an extensive military campaign ! ! !

Iraq Veterans Against the War

By George

October 13, 2006 09:03 AM | Link to this

RW

“Good point! President Bush should have fired every single person in the Federal government and started from scratch.”

Shoulda, coulda 6 years ago but didn’t. Deal with it.

By IMPEACH CHIMPY

October 13, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

Clinton took a deficit that Ronnie and Bush’s daddy spent 12 years making and turned it into a surplus. Where are we now after six years of Bushie Jr? We’re enjoying the highest deficit in history!

By gadem

October 13, 2006 09:13 AM | Link to this

Impeach Chimpy…you know neocons credit the surplus on the Republican controlled congress…I just don’t know what happened because they control the congress now and we are in a deficit…or it could be as one Conservative Radio Host told me, it was a “projected surplus” so it was not real money…and my response to him “Is it better to have a projected surplus or deficit?”..he politely hung up on me…neocons never let facts get in the way of twisting the truth. To comment on the cartoon, it is good but inaccurate. Bush has never criticized Clinton…he lets Faux News, and the other talking heads do that for him…that way he keeps his hands clean…

By gadem

October 13, 2006 09:18 AM | Link to this

Poor, poor Randy, when has bush admitted to mistakes…if he has, it has taken him 6 years to do so. I know you may not recall the 2004 Debates when a woman asked Bush what mistakes he had made and he could not even answer the question…that let’s you know something is wrong with him there. Most people can name at least one mistake that they have made on their job within the last month, and he could not name one that he had committed within 4 years?!?! He is a complete joke…the world can not wait 2 more years…I hope he is impeached with the rest of the neocon crowds.

By getalife

October 13, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

Great toon Mike.

The minority base of “nuts” loves w blaming Clinton.

Real Americans find it to be cowardly and pathetic.

Just goes to show you “the nuts” mind set is cowardly and pathetic.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 09:21 AM | Link to this

Well, I suppose this cartoon shows Mr. Luckovich occasionally reads through this forum for ideas. But to think the back and forths here reflect views across America is, I think a mistake. So the cartoon has resonance with not as many folks as one would hope.

Much of what I read here reminds me of last night’s interview with Scott Ritter on Bill O’Reilly’s show (now, there’s a jump-off for more fingerpointing). Subject was the Iran situation. O’Reilly asked a question, Ritter gave a quick summary of events from 1980 onward, O’Reilly responded with “that’s history, doesn’t help solve the problem now” and Ritter responded “Exactly” then went on with some solutions. It’s easy to rehash a version of history, challenging to say “this is what should be done from here on out.”

Oh, for all those who accuse O’Reilly of being a right-wing schill for Bush: Ritter was a WMD inspector in Iraq, extreme critic of the march toward war, high profile, met rhetoric with facts - then got arrested for - what- having sexual chatroom conversations with a 16-year old girl (really an undercover sting). His credibility was shot, no one would book him. Numerous allegations came out he was the target of political “dirty tricks” (no, I am not a conspiracy theorist). The case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal.

Point - O’Reilly never brought it up - a strange tactic for someone who’s supposedly a right-winger - tactics are to discredit the messenger and ignore the message. Instead, O’Reilly questioned him on his views of Iran (he’d just returned from a trip).

By Dusty

October 13, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this

This Luckovich cartoon is just plain sorry. There is nothing accurate or truthful about it. Just another Democratic propaganda piece to undermine the president with lies, the only way liberals can do it.

By Will Jones

October 13, 2006 09:27 AM | Link to this

Bush is a punk…dodged the draft as his JFK-killing Congressman-father’s help was able to slide his snake’s belly under the locked door when Guard and Reserve enlistments were officially closed. That’s why the Waiting List had to be jumped.

Now he’s had 202 known visits over a two year period through the social entrance of the White House by homosexual prostitute, and fake newsman, “Jeff Gannon.”

He is no man…nor is any male whose “gaydar” is so “defective” “he” isn’t able to see just how gay Bush is.

By Brian Curtis

October 13, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

I sometimes wonder how we were so lucky as to happen across a pure saint like Gee Dubya—a man who has never, ever made a single mistake in his entire life, and never could.

Just ask him! Or better yet, ask his fawning worshippers here. They’ll tell you: Bush has NEVER screwed up and never will. He’s an unblemished paragon, and everything he does is Right and Good. He can walk on water and heal the sick with a touch. Anything bad that happens when Bush is around must be Clinton’s fault. Or the media’s. Or terrorists. Or somebody’s. ANYBODY but Bush.

After all, why should he take responsibility for the consequences of his administration’s actions? It’s not like he’s in charge or anything.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 09:44 AM | Link to this

yawn….

By Will Jones

October 13, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this

Not only is Bush, with “Jeff Gannon” and the deviant initiation rituals for Skull and Bones, transparently homosexual, it is also transparently obvious that Bush committed 9-11. Mineta witnessed Cheney’s standown order in the WH’s bunker and testified to it under oath The photographic evidence at the Pentagon proves no 757 hit it, and the THREE skyscrapers in NYC are the only steel highrises to EVER collapse from fire…BECAUSE THEY WERE DROPPED BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Is not The Constitution important enough to preserve. Think of the millions who’ve taken the Oath or died to “protect and defend [it] from all enemies foreign and domestic”?

By Paul

October 13, 2006 10:01 AM | Link to this

yawwwnnnnn….

By Midori

October 13, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

you hit another one out of the ballpark, Mike.

Eric: you certainly nailed it.

Paul: regarding the Ritter incident. that was dismissed and no public record exists. Perhaps O’Reilly has a few too many falafels in his closet that hindered him from bringing it up?

By Ramble ON!

October 13, 2006 10:04 AM | Link to this

Mike—you have become sick with all this hate Bush crap and obviously blind now. Notice the amount of votes on each cartoons, they are decreasing. Scratch your head for a second an wonder way that is, you have lost touch with reality like the rest of these moonbats in your cave here.

You seem to be jealous of two people, George W and Monica L

By Todd

October 13, 2006 10:05 AM | Link to this

Ok, so if the previous administration is responsible for all of the bad things that happen and none of the good things that happen, then exactly how did Bush the Elder get so much credit for the economic turnaround under Clinton in the mid-nineties? I loved that argument then - if it were true, the republicans should build a monument to Jimmy Carter for making Reagan look good. If we have a democratic president who manages to end the Iraq war during their administration, these same wingnuts will claim that Bush was responsible for ending it.

I’d like to meet one rational person who thinks this administration has this country on the right track. I live in the Republican Disney World of North Fulton, and I can’t even find anyone there who thinks Bush has half a brain. That idiot disgusts me, and I’m ashamed we as a country were gullible enough to vote him in twice. He has nothing but contempt for what this country is supposed to stand for, and I have nothing but contempt for him.

By Dusty

October 13, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

Propaganda is one thing but pure hallucinations are another. Will Jones has fallen off the deep end. The mind is a sad thing to lose.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

Midori - not sure I understand the metaphor, unless you mean closet as in pantry? My point was, so many interviews begin with the host asking the guest “now about this embarassing incident in your life - we’ll get to your book later.” If O’Reilly’s purpose was to build up the Bush Administration, he could have hit Ritter with this incident in an attempt to damage his credibility. Instead, he kept his questions on topic - the Iran situation. They disagreed, but views were given.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 10:31 AM | Link to this

Paul: as in “skeletons in the closet”

Have you seen “Outfoxed”?

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Will Jones is probably a college student. Yep, this is just the sort of stuff that our impressionable youth are being taught.

Send your kid to college and he may come back a deranged, paranoid, ignorant lunatic.

I’m outta here. I’ve had all the Bush Derangement Syndrome that I can stomach.

By Randy

October 13, 2006 10:38 AM | Link to this

gadem, Is Bush responsible for your short memory too?

MalloryaGaC, Just recently General Casey said that he didn’t plan to ask for more troops and wasn’t sure if more American troops would lessen the violence in Iraq over the long term. Do you want a politically run war like Vietnam, or do you want a war where the politicians listen to the military?

Right now, the troops aren’t the primary target. Iraqis don’t want to be an occupied country. More troops would give that impression and put them at greater risk.

Efforts in Iraq are diplomatic & military. Diplomatic relations with the government & military support for the government.

The WH is looking to make changes in their Iraq policy.

Keep whining. There’s not much else either of you can contribute. I guess it’s because you’re Democrats.

Don’t vote Democrat folks. As you can see, they’re clueless.

By gadem

October 13, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

Poor, poor Randy or Andy, as I said it took Bush SIX years to admit to any mistakes that he has made…I can think of two you have made, I don’t really even know you.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 11:00 AM | Link to this

Democrat Values Voters and Finchie,

Before I go, I just had to post this for you all. This is from one of your most loyal “fringe” voting blocs - “Educators”. How many kids got an “A” do you think?:

{{Consider instruction given to children as young as 12 at a March 2000 conference sponsored by – now get this – the Massachusetts Department of Education. (At least Foley wasn’t paid to come on to kids…)}}

The conference was secretly taped. Here’s one exchange that took place between a student and an instructor:

((Educator: “What orifices are we talking about?”

(Student hesitates)

Educator: “Don’t be shy, honey; you can do it.”

Student: “Your mouth.”

Educator: “Okay.”

Student: “Your a*.”

Educator: “There you go.”

Student: “Your p***. That kind of place.”}}

Have a nice day.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:07 AM | Link to this

There is a new danger with Bush as Prez. Bush may try to buy ballots with bullets, that is, Bush may start acting like Caeser, who became emperor through conquests: starting wars just to win support at home.

Bush might get us entangled into a lose-lose, no way out, quagmire-style, Mexican-standoffish pyrrhic defeat.

He will be emboldened to do so by the pops in the polls he gets everytime he talks about national security. He may tweek the wrong nose, and use the word “crusade” again, or something equally diplomatically numbskulled.

We are in so much danger now, with the Bush loose cannon acting from an ideologically-based looser canon: He’s born again.

Lets see, when is W’s “born on” date? I know! It’s the very moment he realized how many votes he could get if he made the christian right HIS constituency. They have that moment on tape, folks, at a fund-raiser in Texas, when he ran for governor.

You can see the religious stupor immersed on his face as he is baptised in the dogma of pious polling and ballot benediction.

We are in trouble, my fellow americans, and it could be that we are in the last throes of a country. Our grand democratic experiment scuttled by a sell-out scoundrel who takes his refuge in religion and patriotism.

By Libs Like Gays, Hate Homos

October 13, 2006 11:08 AM | Link to this

By Will Jones October 13, 2006 09:27 AM Bush is a punk…dodged the draft as his JFK-killing Congressman-father’s help was able to slide his snake’s belly under the locked door when Guard and Reserve enlistments were officially closed. That’s why the Waiting List had to be jumped.

Bush risked his life flying fighter jets, racking up over 300 hours in a death trap, while CLINTON hid in Russia.

And whio is the chickensh-it liberals calling a draft dodger?

Now he’s had 202 known visits over a two year period through the social entrance of the White House by homosexual prostitute, and fake newsman, “Jeff Gannon.” He is no man…nor is any male whose “gaydar” is so “defective” “he” isn’t able to see just how gay Bush is.

Even if this were true, what does it matter to a filthy bastar-d pinko, rampaging around attacking homosexuals now.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

BLOG ALERT!!!

DONT CLICK ON SELL SWEDISH’S LINKS. THEY MAY CONTAIN VIRUSES.

I LEARNED ABOUT BLOGGERS LIKE RENT NORWAY THE HARD WAY!

LEASE SCANDINAVIAN BELONGS BEHIND BARS!!!

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this

Just what has Bush accomplished in his SIX YEARS as our PREZ?

Why doesn’t he talk about that?

Why should we vote GOP in November, Mr. Bush?

Regale us with your record, sir!!!!!

We’re waiting………………

By Producer

October 13, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this

Understand the facts: Clinton did nothing to defend the US from terrorism during his adminstration. He even made it so the CIA and FBI couldn’t even trade info and talk to one another.

He signed a bad deal with the N. Koreans that allowed them to begin to acquire the know-how to be where they are today.

With the many attacks on American interests overseas during his time, he did nothing! Ok, so he bombed one aspirin factory….wow! I’m so impressed.

Face it, he is and was a loser who was a disgusting guy, who was “pole” driven in more ways than one.

And now he is in desparate search of any legitimate “legacy” that can be manufactured by his apologists. And the current Dems are so tied to him that they’ll do anything to help.

Remember the very afternoon the articles of impeachment were brought against him? The Dems rushed to the White House to stand by “their man.” How many of them do you think were disgusted at having to stand there defending this guy? That was the day the Dems died politically. If Al Gore had had the political gonads to call for Slick Willie’s resignation, he’d be in HIS second term now and W would be only a former governor of Texas.

By Randy

October 13, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this

Oh come on Midori, Paul’s too intelligent to be outfoxed like you. Greenwald’s movie “Outfoxed” was a $300,000 left slanting effort funded by MoveOn.Org & American Progressive.

O’Reilly has criticized Bush plenty. Right & left commentators give opposing views all the time on Fox. Juan, Greta, Allen C. & Shepard are all liberals. It’s always funny to me how many leftist politicians decline to appear on Fox.

It’s only for the brave so it’s no wonder Democrats decline so often.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this

Look, people, I KNOW it’s a cliche to compare Bush to a baboon, but have you noticed how lately he’s been scratching under his armpits with both hands during news conferences?

What’s THAT all about?

He’s even pursing his lips like a gorilla does, and making noises like an orangatan.

Hey Bush: Pick a primate and stick with it!

By Brian Curtis

October 13, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

BD is right! That kind of education of impressionable young children should be left to our upstanding Republican legislators, not teachers.

By Shawny

October 13, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

AMF…good riddance. http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061013/airamericaradio_bankruptcy.html?.v=9

By Naked Emperor

October 13, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

TO: Clinton’s Intern “Interviews”

Did Clinton cause your painful HEMORRHOIDS OR did your head get stuck in your arse OR did you forget to use the Astroglide?

Silly monkey!

By Liberal Texas Democrat

October 13, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

Rep. Bob Ney pleads guilty to bribery It was Clinton’s fault

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

Nobody wants to appear on FOX NEWS.

FOX NEWS is the American Taliban’s Media Network.

The GOP’s entire existence depends on the arbitrary mystical plasma of the born-again pixelation across the widescreen electorate.

Bill Oreilly is a Mark Foley. The only difference is the difference between a page and an assistant: not much.

They will both burn in the hell they both point to in order to keep the RIGHT in the majority.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

Cartoon Idea: Show Sell Swedish as a zoo keeper, and she’s feeding bananas to the chimp (w), and she’s sweating from the sexual tension. Also show Scooter Libby’s caged bear, (featured in his beatiality-laced novel), smoking a cigarette, because Lease Denmark has already fed him.

Newt Ginrich wrote a novel with equally sexually explicit passages. Stick to be an obnoxious fat man, newt, but do get lost.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:32 AM | Link to this

Cartoon Idea: Show W screwing in a light bulb, and first lady Laura Bush says, “Of course it lights up, it’s the only thing that’s been screwed around here in a year!”

Then show Lease Denmark acting like the short-bussed, helmet challenged, simple-simon she truly is.

By Assclowniis Maximus

October 13, 2006 11:34 AM | Link to this

I tto watched the brave, no-spin O’reilly.

I found his talking points of great interest. In a nutshell he warned Americans that if democRATS took control of congree the hated Nancy Pelosi would enforce SAN FRANCISCO style values on America. (I for one, did not know the speaker had so much power!)

He then frightened me with clips of homos in strange dress dancing in the street.

He lamented that 43% of Americans didn’t know who she was and the tsunami of cultural damage she will release upon all Americans. I’m glad he brought this to my attention.

I will now continue my support for the GOP even amidst bad foreign policy decisions, scandal, fiscal irresponsibility, etc. Just to ensure Nancy Pelosi does not become speaker of the house!

By Truthman

October 13, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

Jon Stewart = Good!!

Stephen Colbert = Good!

Rush Pillhead = Going!

Sean Vanity = Going!

Mike Savage = Gone!!

At least the repug mouthpieces will have a Democratic Congress to attack after November 7.

With them running the entire country for the last six years, how is everything Clinton’s fault?

I can’t wait to read the posts here on the 8th!!

Ah, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,

By Idiot Liberal Name Jacker

October 13, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

Hi Everybody!: My mommy and daddy were idiot liberals voting straight democrat every election and they sent me to public school so I would become an idiot just like them.

I came to visit this blog because I thought Luckovich would be an idiot like me and I could trade anti American talking points and masterbate with my fellow traitors and just be happy reveling in our gay bashing and Al Qaeda appeasement.

But I never expected there to be so many different opinions, especially those that say America is good and people should take responsibility for their own lives. What are these people talking about, America is good?

I don’t like hearing these things.

But remember, I am a jack leg moron, a mouth drooling heathen, I blame everybody else for my problems and I want to raise your taxes so that the government is fat enough for me to sue over some stupid reason like global warming so that I can live off of your money.

I have to make these Conservatives stop with their opinions, you don’t need to be hearing about responsibility, but I’m too stupid to debate them, plus raising taxes is not a good argument and it costs us lots of votes!!

So what I have to do is jack their names, like Andy, and spread ignorance, which I know well, so that it confuses the other idiots like me.

If that doesn’t work then I’ll lie to you by saying the Conservatives links are infected and don’t open them.

It’s all I can do because I’m a hollow empty waste of a human being with no morals and no soul except for what the government provides me.

So you can believe me or you can believe the America is good crowd.

It’s your choice, no, I forgot, you have no choice under liberalism, never mind about that last part.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:39 AM | Link to this

Poetry Corner:

“Shoplift Canoli, with your nose pressed against the CRT, there is no audience for you today, only ignore”.

Snaps for my little poem. (snap snap snap snap snap snap)

By Good riddance

October 13, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

Too bad about Air America. Lefties just hate being talked down to. Quite unlike the fact-challenged fans of Reich-wing radio.

At least the Lefties still have their books, magazines and newspapers. You know, those paper thingies with all the little words that the dittoheads find so boring.

By Assclowniis Maximus

October 13, 2006 11:44 AM | Link to this

I must continue to support Mr. O, despite the liberal bashers on this blog.

O’reilly’s next guest (last night) confirmed what O’reilly had always suspected - A house led by democRATS will tie our President’s hand and WEAKEN America. They will try to persecute him, thus distracting him from real security issues.

Bill didn’t give his opinion but he seemed to think the President having his hands tied at this critical juncture in National security was not good.

You see, even if we are not pleased with the GOP electing democrats that will try to impeach and harass the President, will make us less safe.

Much like the hated Clinton’s impeachment (which led to the rise of the taliban and 9/11).

Yet I’m not sure I wholeheartedly agree with this - because that would logically mean the GOP was responsible for weakening America in the late 90’s, thus distracting and harassing BJ Clinton from doing his job and dismiss the claim Clinton failed America (which he did).

By Huge

October 13, 2006 11:44 AM | Link to this

“Bush has admitted to mistakes.”

Just like a neo-con to try and spin this load of crap.

Yeah, out of sheer embarrassment he finally and begrudgingly admitted to making a few tiny mistakes. AFTER DENYING MAKING ANY AT ALL FOR SIX YEARS! All the while the rest of the intelligent universe was neither deluded or amused by his intransigence and incompetence.

Go look it up, fool…

By Fox News Alert

October 13, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 11:46 PM

President Bush heads to Vietnam next month, making a question about that upcoming trip a must-ask when former Texas Lt. Gov. Ben Barnes spoke at the National Press Club in Washington Wednesday evening.

It was during the 2004 campaign that Barnes acknowledged that as speaker of the Texas House he had found a National Guard slot for young George W. Bush, then the son of a Houston congressman, during the Vietnam War. Barnes said he acted at the behest of a Bush family friend.

Any advice for Bush as he prepares for his first-ever trip to Vietnam long after the Guard stint that kept him out of the war?

“It’s a lot safer than it was when he didn’t go the first time,” Barnes quipped.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:53 AM | Link to this

There’s a big difference between Mel Reynolds hitting up on a seventeen year old and Foley hitting up on a seventeen year old, it’s called Reynold’s was a democrat!

Hah!

We don’t have to follow the rules, we just make them up.

And apply them to Republicans whenever we want.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

And this crap about blaming Clinton for the effects of his policy on America, what kind of sh-it is this?

Who do you think Clinton is, Bush?

Come on, he’s a democrat, he doesn’t have to undergo media scrutiny like Bush does.

Clinton lied to a grand jury but that’s tough titty, he’s a liberal and gets a pass. We call Bush the liar even though he’s only told the truth.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

“Will Jones is probably a college student. Yep, this is just the sort of stuff that our impressionable youth are being taught.”

“Send your kid to college and he may come back a deranged, paranoid, ignorant lunatic.”

That belief would certainly explain the lack of lucidity/education/intellect from the poster, notwithstanding the incredible education and accomplishments of everybody else in her clan…

By Huge

October 13, 2006 11:59 AM | Link to this

“Bush risked his life flying fighter jets, racking up over 300 hours in a death trap,…”

Yep, with W at the stick of any airplane, I’m reasonably certain the chances for someone’s death were very high!

By Andy

October 13, 2006 11:59 AM | Link to this

Plus, when are we going to start calling Bush a rapist? This has gone to long, it’s time for us to start. It is the ultimate in Chutzpa, we spent all those years defending Clinton of his serial groping, mashing and sexual assault, wouldn’t it be funny to smear Bush with that sh-it even though he’s never done it?

That’s what being a democrat is all about, lie and dissemble, fabricate and propagandize, cheat and steal.

Let’s get to work y’all!

By Huge

October 13, 2006 12:02 PM | Link to this

“Understand the facts: Clinton did nothing to defend the US from terrorism during his adminstration.”

Sure, numbnuts. The facts as your limited brain can understand them. Go back to Wooten’s or whatever rock you crawled out from under. Patently stupid comments like the one you started out with, don’t merit serious consideration.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 12:04 PM | Link to this

And what about Hillary, when are we going to start the stubby legged fat d**’s disinformation campaign?

What are we waiting for, you liberals aren’t scared are you? Remember, this bit-ch Hillary got away with murdering Vince Foster, taking $100,000 bribe for “cattle futures, steering defense contracts to campaign contributors and all the other ten year minimum felonies all because of your hard work!!

So let’s get out there and get this pig elected!!

By New World Order

October 13, 2006 12:04 PM | Link to this

Your war on terror Homeland Security tax dollars at work:

Bush threats lead agents to girl, 14

I especially like the part where the agents yanked the girl out of class without telling the school or her parents anything. Ooooo, big threat, this girl.

“Mr. President,” Cheney smirked. “A little chip here, a little chip there and before you know it, that annoying Bill of Rights will be all but forgotten!”

By Andy

October 13, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this

Man, we have just got to do something about this:

Break out the wintertime gear

And he we are wailing about global warming!

Get out there and say it don’t mean nothing, IT DON’T MEAN NOTHING!!!

By Truthman

October 13, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this

Q: What will separate the men from the boys?

A: Mid-term Elections!!!

Whoop! Whoop!!

By An Idiot Speaks

October 13, 2006 12:16 PM | Link to this

By Huge October 13, 2006 11:59 AM “Bush risked his life flying fighter jets, racking up over 300 hours in a death trap,…” Yep, with W at the stick of any airplane, I’m reasonably certain the chances for someone’s death were very high!

Don’t bother with any facts, just run your stupid liberal mouth, typical:

According to the Air Force Safety Center, the lifetime Class A accident rate for the F-102 was 13.69 mishaps per 100,000 flight hours, and the rate was especially high during the early years of the plane’s service. This poor safety record may have been due in part to a deadly flaw in the aircraft’s design that caused an engine stall and loss of control under a certain combination of angle of attack and airspeed frequently encountered during takeoff. According to a former F-102 pilot we’ve interviewed, this problem caused the plane to roll inverted and resulted in several fatal crashes.

By Cal

October 13, 2006 12:20 PM | Link to this

Hey Mike, how about one of your many mistakes.

Let’s take a look at your acknowledgment.

Pot to Kettle to you to Jihadist.

Typical liberal. Primed for defeat.

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 12:27 PM | Link to this

By Andy’s drunken clone - October 13, 2006 11:53 AM - There’s a big difference between Mel Reynolds hitting up on a seventeen year old and Foley hitting up on a seventeen year old, it’s called Reynold’s was a democrat!

And it had nothing to do with Foley’s campaign against child predators, his unusual attention to the Congressional page program, his partnership with kiddie-perv victim John Walsh, etc. etc.

It’s the hypocrisy, stupid.

Besides, the Repugs have an Army of media “gods” to do their dirty work. Rush, Hannity, the perv friendly Washington Times…

I’m sure they’ll do their best to highlight Democratic shortcomings both real and imagined. Mostly imagined.

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

-=-

Hey Cal! —-

Article in news today!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15249053/

Kettle Back at yah Pot!

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

Hey Cal!!

Pot to kettle.

Caution: Parental discretion advised.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

Randy,

speaking of “intelligence”. I think you were passed over when it was being handed out.

I didn’t say O’Reilly never criticized Bush - that was an assumption on your part so that you could have something to say while butting into grown ups conversations.

That was not the thrust of my point, donkey’s rear end.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

By bon scott October 13, 2006 12:27 PM By Andy’s drunken clone - October 13, 2006 11:53 AM - There’s a big difference between Mel Reynolds hitting up on a seventeen year old and Foley hitting up on a seventeen year old, it’s called Reynold’s was a democrat!

You’re right, finchie, I’m sorry for getting off track there.

Foley is a pervert! A homo! A wanna be boy scout troop master! Freak!

And any of you uptight wingnuts want to say anything about Mel Reynolds, democrat, and his sixteen year old lover who he did screw, you’re a freakin puritan! Quit looking in that man’s windows, it’s his right to privacy, it’s just about sex!

By Cal

October 13, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this

Hey Thomas & bon scott(jihadists), talk to your congressman and wait for the investigation before opening your jihadist enabling mouths.

Bwaaaahahahahaha!

By George

October 13, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

The buck finally stopped at one door.

WASHINGTON — Rep. Bob Ney pleaded guilty Friday in the Jack Abramoff influence-peddling investigation, the first lawmaker to confess to crimes in an election-year scandal that has stained the Republican-controlled Congress and the Bush administration.

I’m sure it will be followed by many more. tick tick tick

By Producer

October 13, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this

Great response, Huge. Your intellect is truly dazzling! LOL

Why don’t you enlighten us all with the offensive response that your BJ in Chief did in response to the following terrorist acts that targeted the US on his watch:

February 1993: Muslim extremists set off a bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center, killing six and wounding more than 1,000.

Spring 1993: Muslim extremists plot to blow up the Lincoln and Holland tunnels, the U.N. complex, and the FBI’s lower Manhattan headquarters.

November 1995: Muslim extremists explode a car bomb at U.S. military headquarters in Saudi Arabia, killing five U.S. military servicemen.

June 1996: Muslim extremists explode a truck bomb outside the Khobar Towers military complex, killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds.

August 1998: Muslim extremists blow up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224 and injuring thousands.

October 2000: Muslim extremists blow up the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole, killing 17 U.S. sailors.

The Hummer in Chief did nothing! The Democratic party has been against every major weapons system in the last generation that has attempted to strengthen the US. It’s like Zell said when talking about Kerry, “what are we going to use to defend ourselves, spitballs?” Yall’s track record is almost criminally laughable. Botton line is the Dems are cowards and appeasers. It’s a shame that so many of our fellow Americans actually agree with your party’s politics. And it is true, you guys may very well take both houses next month. It’s just sad.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 01:10 PM | Link to this

Hey Georgie Girl: Look at where the buck stopped here-

Atlanta Urinal-Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid would be well advised to stop thundering about corruption in the Republican ranks or crying “cover-up” over the GOP’s failure to promptly and appropriately deal with former Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) and his sexually explicit e-mails to congressional pages. Reid faces too many questions about his own behavior to crusade against the misdeeds of others.

Can’t sweep this one under the rug, eh, AJC?

When is Harry going to resign?

By getalife

October 13, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this

“A former deputy director of the White House office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives is charging that many members of the Bush administration privately dismiss its conservative Christian allies as “boorish” and “nuts.”

Finally, something we can all agree on.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:15 PM | Link to this

Producer,

are you going to challenge Huge to a duel next?

By RE

October 13, 2006 01:17 PM | Link to this

Lets try a writing assignment for the GOP crowd. Please complete this sentence;

North Korea’s recent nuclear weapons test was a success for the Bush administration because…..

By IMPEACH CHIMPY

October 13, 2006 01:19 PM | Link to this

“February 1993: Muslim extremists set off a bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center, killing six and wounding more than 1,000.”

Clinton caught the perps and they are now dojng time. By the way - where is Osama?

“Spring 1993: Muslim extremists plot to blow up the Lincoln and Holland tunnels, the U.N. complex, and the FBI’s lower Manhattan headquarters.”

Plot foiled - thanks President Clinton.

“November 1995: Muslim extremists explode a car bomb at U.S. military headquarters in Saudi Arabia, killing five U.S. military servicemen.”

And the Saudis are still Bush’s bestest friends.

“August 1998: Muslim extremists blow up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224 and injuring thousands.”

Clinton responds by attacking Osama’s training grounds in Afghanistan and a factory that intelligence said was being used to create explosives.

“October 2000: Muslim extremists blow up the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole, killing 17 U.S. sailors.”

Clinton didn’t respond largely because he would be out of office soon so he expected the next president to respond. Bush didn’t bother.

By getalife

October 13, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

“National Christian leaders received hugs and smiles in person and then were dismissed behind their backs and described as ‘ridiculous,’ ‘out of control,’ and just plain ‘goofy,’” Kuo writes.”

Amen.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:23 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Have you ever seen the movie, “The Three Faces of Eve”?

By gt engineer

October 13, 2006 01:28 PM | Link to this

i don’t find it shocking that so many ppl here are nutty limbaugh drones - just look at the ajc, written at the 5th grade level so that your average war loving, racist, suv driving, biggoted atlantan can read it.

i brought a ajc to a friend in new york and he read three of the articles, and just laughed! you literally have to water this stuff down to get them to read it…but more often they just turn to rush limbaugh…

its so sad…..no really sad. Georgia is last in education for a reason.

the class war is the thing that gets me….the ppl in the south are so dumb that the rich have them fighting their battle for them.

the rich have those poor poor idiots fighting against their own rights and against their own financial benifits. how much better could they possibly have it?

By Producer

October 13, 2006 01:29 PM | Link to this

Clinton’s responses were tepid at best. Sending one cruise missile into a vacated camp is laughable. He treated terrorism as a law enforcement problem instead of bombing the crap out of those responsible and then bombing them again and again. These animals need to be completely eliminated and at least Bush went in with balls and tried to defend this country’s interests. Perhaps if Clinton had been more agressive after the first World Trade Center attack, the others I listed wouldn’t have occurred.

By Angry Liberal Guy

October 13, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this

There will very likely be a lame duck session of congress following the November elections. Why in God’s name should Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH), an admitted criminal, be permitted to attend that session, vote during that session? The man just admitted to accepting bribes to influence his votes, and we’re going to let him vote some more? That’s a bit like giving Mark Foley a few more pages for his retirement.

He is now an admitted criminal.

What is he doing staying in the Republican Congress? Being permitted to vote AGAIN?

I’ll tell you why. Because the Republicans are afraid they may lose control of the congress and they’d rather leave in power a criminal, who takes bribes to influence his votes, than risk losing the seat.

So politics trumps ethics and morality and good government in the Republican party.

I’ll bet the Mark Foley child sex predator cover-up is starting to make a whole lot more sense right about now.

By Randy

October 13, 2006 01:32 PM | Link to this

Midori, My bad. You & Paul were having an adult conversation. It looks like the only intelligent adult, (that would be Paul) left in the middle of it.

You attempted to show some lame-a* conspiracy theory cooked up by Greenwald against Murdoch, Fox & Republicans. You FORGOT to show where Greenwald received his financing to make his left-wing attack against the Republicans. Withholding liberal BIAS is a no no when fair & balanced is the topic.

Only the stupid fall for that crap Midori, & you have definitely proven yourself stupid based on your comments & links.

The point can be found at the end of your wart infested witches nose. I just wanted to help excise your ugly liberal growth.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 01:32 PM | Link to this

By Midori October 13, 2006 01:23 PM Andy, Have you ever seen the movie, “The Three Faces of Eve”?

Hey Midori: Is it time for us liberals to make fun of the mentally handicapped like we do the homosexuals that we say we want to protect?

Cool!

You go first!

By Huge

October 13, 2006 01:33 PM | Link to this

“According to the Air Force Safety Center, the lifetime Class A accident rate for the F-102 was 13.69 mishaps per 100,000 flight hours, and the rate was especially high during the early years of the plane’s service.”

Yo, retard. It’s called sarcasm! Notwithstanding your inability to make subtle distinctions, your facts have zero to do with W’s competence or lack thereof in the cockpit.

Now, try to find some “facts” that state how many times a commander-in-chief can sh!t the bed in two terms. Let me give your little fact-finding mission some help with this one - try starting with 25,000 dead and wounded US troops…

Producer,

Looks like while I was out, someone else (thanks IMPEACH CHIMPY!) answered your childish question. Grow up and stop being such a republican shill. And I repeat, patently stupid comments don’t merit serious consideration…

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 01:33 PM | Link to this

Huge Dumb-a$$,

What is your point, you freaking moron? Do you want to be on record as agreeing with Will Jones - the deranged, paranoid, probably college “educated” Leftist lunatic?

Please let us know where you stand. Here is his post from this morning.(http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2006/10/13/thebuckstops.html#comment-734547)

Choose one you despicable POS:

a)Agree with Will Jones, he’s a genius!

b)Disagree with Will Jones, he is insane!

I’ll check in later for Huge Halfwit’s response…

By IMPEACH CHIMPY

October 13, 2006 01:35 PM | Link to this

Producer - you’re missing the point. Clinton at least tried. Can you honestly say that Bush’s attempts at capturing Bin Laden have been more than tepid? As the Chimperor himself said “I don’t know where he is and I really don’t spend much time thinking about it”. Had Clinton said that after Osama killed almost 3,000 Americans you Republicans would have marched on the White House with torches a blaze. As it is you almost did that over a BJ and one lie.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:37 PM | Link to this

Producer,

actually you sound like you’re the animal here.

perhaps it is you who needs to be bombed and bombed again.

By gt engineer

October 13, 2006 01:42 PM | Link to this

i like all this built up anti-clinton sentiment coming out…it is good for the dems

if you bigots recall, america loved clinton, and clinton loved america, america prospered and in his memory - kind words will be written…history will treat him very well, almost as good as kennedy. BY attacking clinton now, you are shooting yourself in the foot, even the most po-dunk ignornant georgia will remember how well he ran the country compared to dubya’s bismal attempt at leadership.

it must really anger you biggots to think about how poorly history will treat dubya….however you try to angle, dubya is the worst president in recent memory, even worse than bush 41.

so…go ahead and dis on clinton, america knows who has been screwing them these last few terms, all the clinton bashing will certainly back fire

By Huge

October 13, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this

“Understand the facts: Clinton did nothing to defend the US from terrorism…”

“The Hummer in Chief did nothing”

“Clinton’s responses were tepid at best.”

Well, you’re finally staring to make some progress, Producer.

I’m not in the business of educating far right wing extremist mopes, but here’s a little hint you should have learned way back in high school. When you start out with a statement that includes the words nothing, never, always, everyone, etc… you almost ALWAYS end up looking like an idiot.

Midori,

Don’t worry about this one. If it comes to a duel of wits, he’s off to a terrible start and only bound to look like the other mental light weight neo-cons here who have tried and failed.

By The Idiot Speaks

October 13, 2006 01:45 PM | Link to this

By Huge October 13, 2006 01:33 PM Yo, retard. It’s called sarcasm! Notwithstanding your inability to make subtle distinctions, your facts have zero to do with W’s competence or lack thereof in the cockpit.

Don’t get hysterical, you little weenie, it’s not the end of the world when you get made to look like an a-ss.

You really should be getting used to it by now.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:48 PM | Link to this

Randy,

your mommy is calling you. don’t forget to wash behind your ears.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to rejoin the adults.

Have a good nap, sweetie.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:52 PM | Link to this

{{{{{Hey Midori: Is it time for us liberals to make fun of the mentally handicapped like we do the homosexuals that we say we want to protect?

Cool!

You go first}}}}}

being that you obviously have so many personas, you certainly don’t need me to join in on the fun.

do you answer each other’s questions, too?

have fun you guys!! :)

By Justice

October 13, 2006 01:52 PM | Link to this

More evil detainees that deserve to be tortured and held without legal representation indefinitely.

Los Angeles Times October 13, 2006

17 Newly Freed From Guantanamo Arrive

By Times Wire Reports

Sixteen Afghans and one Iranian arrived in Afghanistan after being released from the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, an Afghan official said.

The Afghans appeared at a news conference alongside Sibghatullah Mojaddidi, head of Afghanistan’s reconciliation commission, which assists with the release of detainees from Guantanamo and the U.S. prison at the Bagram military base north of Kabul, the Afghan capital.

Mojaddidi said the freed detainees had served as long as four years and that most were not guilty. The released Iranian prisoner was handed over to the International Committee of the Red Cross, he said.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 01:53 PM | Link to this

Poor BD,

I guess she thinks I, or anyone else, for that matter, reads her convoluted talking points as though they mattered, or clicks on any of her links to god-knows where.

I simply enjoy taking the more ludicrous statements of hers (and there are no shortage of those!) and exposing her for the demented and hate-filled b!tch that she is.

The only thing I’m on record about is that she is a bigot. And that she dotes on me excessively.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

p.s. Andy - being that you’re the only one here who is truly mentally handicapped, will you be making fun of yourself?

:)

By Will Jones

October 13, 2006 01:55 PM | Link to this

Bush treason did 9-11. Read PhD Griffin’s “The New Pearl Harbor,” or watch “Loose Change 2.”

Bush’s father helped assassinate JFK six weeks after President Kennedy ordered the military’s withdrawal from Vietnam (NSAM 263).

Bush’s Knight of Malta grandfather financed Hitler and the Nazi Party after the Roman Catholic Council of German Bishops at Fulda approved voting for the Nazi Party. Google “Prescott Thyssen Auschwitz”

Bush’s have been Rockefeller lieutenants since Standard Oil was built on “murder and arson” in 1870’s Cleveland.

Bush’s flying lessons in a jet airplane in a Vietnam-free Air National Guard unit while 58,000 noble Americans were sent to die for the pope in Vietnam by his father’s hypocrisy in Congress do not constitute honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States.

Neither ad hominem nor any other logical fallacy in response to the above diminishes the provable truth presented.

By Shawny

October 13, 2006 01:56 PM | Link to this

It’s useless, Producer. They don’t get it. Never will.

And you are right…Slick Willie did little if any.

By Would Impeach Chimpy lie? YES!

October 13, 2006 01:56 PM | Link to this

THE PRESIDENT: Deep in my heart I know the man is on the run, if he’s alive at all. Who knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not; we haven’t heard from him in a long time. And the idea of focusing on one person is — really indicates to me people don’t understand the scope of the mission.

Terror is bigger than one person. And he’s just — he’s a person who’s now been marginalized. His network, his host government has been destroyed. He’s the ultimate parasite who found weakness, exploited it, and met his match. He is — as I mentioned in my speech, I do mention the fact that this is a fellow who is willing to commit youngsters to their death and he, himself, tries to hide — if, in fact, he’s hiding at all.

So I don’t know where he is. You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you. I’m more worried about making sure that our soldiers are well-supplied; that the strategy is clear; that the coalition is strong; that when we find enemy bunched up like we did in Shahikot Mountains, that the military has all the support it needs to go in and do the job, which they did.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 01:58 PM | Link to this

Huge,

I think you’re da bomb!! :)

By Producer

October 13, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this

If wanting to destroy those who wish to wipe out our western way of life, as they have publicly stated (“We won’t be satisfied until we’re standing on the roof of the White House”)then you’re damn right, I’ll take credit for being an animal.

I have had four work colleages who have been directly killed by terrorists (Pan Am 103 and Iraq and Afghanistan)so you might be able to understand my so-called “right wing attitude.

I’ll take that over pacifism any day.

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this

Possible History Of The Future:

Nuke detonated on US soil, believed to be Korean in origin.

Kim Jong aquired his Nuclear capability after restarting the PyongYang reactor and moving the fuel rods to their processing facility. Meanwhile Bush looks the other way as the USA has forces bogged down in Iraq fighting a “War on Terrorism”. History shows that the reason for that war was initially an attack on Iraq for having Weapons of Mass Destruction. Later intel reports that these Weapons did not exist, So Bush strategist spin the Wars reasoning to idealisms of “Liberation” and a “War against Terror” rather than having specific real targets or real reasons for the invasion. Many Iraqi’s were rounded up in mass sweeps, and tried as terrorist in military tribunals. Some were found to be terrorist but later many were found innocent as just being caught up in defense of their country. Many international laws were found to have been broken by the USA in holding these people hostage and torturing some.

Meanwhile much of the Congress itself was mired down with scandals, with much of it revolving around lobbyist Jack Abramof and the Casinos industry. Abramof ratted out many corrupt congressmen both Democrat and republican that had sold their office and votes for favors and money.

The culminations of the Bush Presidency is considered marred by scandal, an unjustified war, violations of the Geneva Conventions, alienation of friendly countries, and ignoring world events that eventually lead to Rogue States like the now “Unified Korean Continent” aquiring nuclear weapons.

And in the weather today we have a new cold front caused by greenhouse gasses melting the ice caps and distributing mass cold waves to normally warm areas of the world —

and today in sports —

Cheers —-

Thomas

By Huge

October 13, 2006 02:14 PM | Link to this

Hysterical?

Not prone to being overly dramatic are we suck? Why write intelligently and coherently when you can just spin, spin, spin. That’s OK, suck, some day when you grow up, you might just learn how to write like an adult.

And quit fixating on my a$$, you Foley-loving neo-con pervert…

By Angry Liberal Guy

October 13, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this

Even Bush’s “clean-up” guy says we can’t win in Iraq Why can’t the rest of you morons believe it?

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this

I don’t read what Danish says, but I make idiotic comments about her posts anyway - Blah Blah Blah because I’m a Huge Sanctimonious Pr!ck and for some unfathomable reason she doesn’t like me WAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!

Huge Halfwitted Liar,

This is what WILL JONES said, you freaking moron:

Do you agree with Will Jones or not?????????

If you want to ignore my posts, FINE with me. BUT, you cannot read a post, make an idiotic comment about it, and then pretend that you didn’t read it in the first place -just like a juvenile little punk - and expect anybody except Will Jones and friends to take you seriously.

By londonguy

October 13, 2006 02:18 PM | Link to this

Being new to this country I want to ask a dumb question. After reading these blogs it appears that Republicans have little grasp of history, geography and politics. Views are taken pre-formed and carefully packaged so no thought is required and no questions are allowed. Are Republicans not allowed to be educated in the USA?

By getalife

October 13, 2006 02:19 PM | Link to this

Baker’s plan is Murtha’s plan.

By Dusty

October 13, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this

Midori got that one right at 1:58..

Huge, I think you’re da BUM!!

By gt engineer

October 13, 2006 02:27 PM | Link to this

a rich ceo convincing a poor white southerner that it is in his best interest to vote republican is like a jewish israeli convincing a poor palestinian that it is in his best interest to give all his land away.

it just doesn’t happen right? well here in the good ole inbreed south it happens, a mark of true darwinism, these half retarded, unejumacated uga fans just get more convinced.

they willingly fight for the rich to have power over their poor a**es, the rich getting more money will benefit them somehow.

this being understood these sad individuals will soon enough lose this war on class

the only war dubya will ever win, the war on the middle class.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 02:30 PM | Link to this

“It’s useless, Producer. They don’t get it. Never will.”

You’re absolutely right, Shawny. We will never accept neo-con spin and talking points as substitutes for cogent and intelligent arguments. When exposed to the light of day, Producer’s blanket statements and “facts” just don’t hold up. The only thing that is obvious about most far right wing neo-con writers is that they confuse their beliefs for reality.

By Angry Liberal Guy

October 13, 2006 02:34 PM | Link to this

Bush Is Said to Have No Plan if GOP Loses. That’s because they are confident that they can steal this election too.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 02:36 PM | Link to this

Aw Dusty,

And to think that you used to write love poems to me.

Oh wait, those weren’t love poems they were awful and childish limericks espousing some demented political position. My bad…

Now, BD, There’s a gal who can write some love poems (and some really poignant, touching prose, as well) for you!

By N-GA

October 13, 2006 02:38 PM | Link to this

londonguy,

To answer your question asking if Republicans are allowed to be educated, I must tell you that no formal education is necessary if one’s only goal in life is to become a sociopolitical prostitute. Books have been written and films made that depict mindless automatons who follow the will of a fascist state. All decisions are made for them…when to eat, when to sleep, when to work, when to procreate, when to die…

Then there are the rest of us who cherish freedom, individualism, compassion for others, creativity, knowledge, and the things that make us different from one another…

By Shoplift Canoli

October 13, 2006 02:42 PM | Link to this

I think it’s getting so close to Miller Time, that I can safely open this bottle of beer and no one will think I’m being innapropriate. Miller Time officially declared at 2:40 eastern standard time on Friday, October 13, 2006.

HEY! It’s Friday the 13th. (is this just like the twilight zone or what?)

Boy, the Rent Norwegian was being particularly obnoxious today, but, you know what? Miller Time makes it go down easy like.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 02:42 PM | Link to this

Londonguy,

welcome to America!!!!

we need more like you!!

so astute!! :)

By @@

October 13, 2006 02:42 PM | Link to this

By RE October 13, 2006 01:17 PM

Lets try a writing assignment for the GOP crowd. Please complete this sentence;

North Korea’s recent nuclear weapons test was a success for the Bush administration because…..

My personal opinion is …….it shifted the proverbial (you know what) to somebody else’s plate. China, Japan, Russia & S. Korea. The thing is, they all have good reasons to react aggressively, but they’re limiting their response. Diplomacy or lack of concern?

South Korea is more inclined to think there may be something more along the lines of a conventional war between them and N.Korea.

S.Korea is angrier than the others. I would be too. The “Little Glow Worm’s” been lying about his golfing abilities.

North Korea also has golf clubs in cities including Pyongyang — where, according to the communist state’s official media, leader Kim Jong-Il scored 11 holes-in-one in his first attempt at golf.

Maybe he lied about the “nuclear” in his test-icles too. He’s claiming to have contained the fallout from his test-icles.

I thought I saw a big “poof” after the nuclear test-icles went off. Is Kim a big poof?

Only time will tell. Atmospheric test-icles are forthcoming.

I hope I passed your fill-in-the-blank test.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this

Hey suck,

If you want real hysteria, read that second 2:15!

londonguy,

No, though I can understand that you would infer that from the writings of these cretins.

However, the reality is that many republicans are not at all like these hate-filled extremists. They can see the good AND bad in their own political party and are not mere sheep or gop apparatchiks.

By Angry Liberal Guy

October 13, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this

londonguy - welcome to the US!

By Shoplift Canoli

October 13, 2006 02:44 PM | Link to this

you know, I’m trying to figure out why Sell Swedish acts like such a hormonal flush all the time. I wonder if she was a runaway bride. She ran away because her betrothed stopped speaking those sweet nothings softly in her ear…….WELL HE AINT NO HORSE WHISPERER!!!!!!

By Shoplift Canoli

October 13, 2006 02:45 PM | Link to this

Hey, N-Ga, which one are you?

By Peecee

October 13, 2006 02:48 PM | Link to this

Just take a look at the “Do you like today’s Cartoon” responses (88% “Yes” to 12% “No” at this writing) and you will see why the Al-Jezzera Chronical is loosing subscribers! I am one of them. These #$%&^*!@ are the same ones that will vote for the Pillsbury Doughboy for Governor. And really, is that the only thing you airheads can blame Sonny for? The infamous land deal? The Doughboy’s just mad ‘cause he was beaten to the draw on that one.

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 03:00 PM | Link to this

RW, I’ll read your book if you read (I’ll give you a choice):

Foreign Affairs by Paul Pillar

The Price of Loyalty by Ron Suskind

Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy by Bruce Bartlett

And I am being kind; your 3 choices are also written by conservatives.

By Randy

October 13, 2006 03:06 PM | Link to this

You libs are damn funny. Those of you who are graba$$ing your own backsides oughta quit. It’s embarrassing for you.

HA HA HA HA

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 03:06 PM | Link to this

Another classic toon, Mike. And again, you can tell by all the neocon tears on your blog.

They do get especially wound up when you are especially creative.

Quite on the defensive.

By Producer

October 13, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this

I have a great idea. Why don’t all of you Dems sit in the lotus position with flowers in your hair and sing “Kumbaya” and maybe those mean ol’ terrorists will go away and leave us alone?! Maybe some chanting, too?

Meanwhile let those who put themselves in harm’s way eveyday to try to kill the the waste products who threaten us do their job.

Deal?

By Andy

October 13, 2006 03:14 PM | Link to this

Excuse me if this psots twice, cartoon boy’s emachine must be overheating:

By Huge October 13, 2006 02:14 PM Hysterical? Not prone to being overly dramatic are we suck? Why write intelligently and coherently when you can just spin, spin, spin. That’s OK, suck, some day when you grow up, you might just learn how to write like an adult. And quit fixating on my a$$, you Foley-loving neo-con pervert…

Oh, don’t cry, you little sissy.

I’m sorry for being mean, I forgot, you liberals can call us Conservatives every nasty word in the book but we have to be nice to you Susies, or you’ll start bawling.

You may want to look back at who started all this, Sheila, before you go calling anyone “obsessed.”

By Angry Liberal Guy

October 13, 2006 03:14 PM | Link to this

On eight votes that supported veterans:

Every Democrat had at least a 50%, rating. 115 Democrats had a 100% rating, 49 Dems had an 88% rating and 29 Dems had a 75% rating. Republicans, on the other hand, everyone of which has backed Bush to the hilt on this war, voted against vets most of the time: Only 5 Republicans rated over 50%. One hundred and seventy rated only 25% - and two rate a zero.

Bring ‘em on. Indeed.

By Assclowniis Maximus

October 13, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this

PeeCee -

You are correct Sonny will never “loose” to the fat bastard. In fact “loosing” is not even in the GOP dictionary. Glad to see the ignorant democRATS going down once again. Also pleased to know the Al jeezera times will not be getting anymore of the dollars you’ve earned toiling over the fry machine.

You my friend are the true epitome of the red-state voter.

God bless.

By Rich

October 13, 2006 03:27 PM | Link to this

Mike, You may not like the way Bush delivers the truth, but the AJC’s blunders misrepresenting the facts don’t go unexcused. Your paper appeals to liberals with a vivid imagination like Will Jones up there. A liberal lunatic lost in time & space.

How can anybody take liberals seriously?

By Assclowniis Maximus

October 13, 2006 03:28 PM | Link to this

Production Assistant (aka gopher)

February 1993: Muslim extremists set off a bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center, killing six and wounding more than 1,000.

Spring 1993: Muslim extremists plot to blow up the Lincoln and Holland tunnels, the U.N. complex, and the FBI’s lower Manhattan headquarters.

Clinton was sworn into office Jan of 1993 - these are CLEARLY the senior Bush’s(41)fault! To busy fundraising and dealing with Perot than defending our country.

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 03:39 PM | Link to this

Londonguy, Welcome! You will find that the neocons on this blog are a very close minded group. Although both are conservative, Republicans are usually more open minded and intelligent than the neocons. It is a widening division on the conservative side of politics which is causing the more moderate Republicans and independents to lean left.

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this

By Andy’s Producer - October 13, 2006 03:08 PM - I have a great idea. Why don’t all of you Dems sit in the lotus position with flowers in your hair and sing “Kumbaya”…blah blah

So you think chanting “stay the course” over 3 years with a totally discreditited policy is more productive? I doubt that.

Meanwhile let those who put themselves in harm’s way eveyday to try to kill the the waste products who threaten us do their job.

So why aren’t YOU over there putting yourself in harms way?

Maybe you’re just waiting for the right assignment? One that allows you to go to Baghdad and still retain your chickenhawk ethics?

“Imperial Life in the Emerald City” draws a vividly detailed portrait of Baghdad’s so-called Green Zone that becomes a metaphor for the administration’s larger failings in Iraq. An insular, often blinkered approach to decision making; a reluctance to listen to experts; Pollyannaish expectations leading to inadequate allocations of resources and staff; a willful ignorance of Iraqi culture and history; and an obliviousness to realities on the ground: all are on unfortunate display in the Emerald City.

And that’s on a GOOD day. Meanwhile, you’ll have all the Bud and pork ribs you want. Nevermind those civilians. You know, the Iraqis we’re force feeding “democracy”. They’re all waste products anyway, right?

The author concludes that the last thing the Iraqis needed — or wanted — was a bunch of Americans trying to dictate the shape of the country’s future from within the walls of a gated community known as the Emerald City.

All courtesy of a President who just HATES it when he’s wrong…

By IMPEACH CHIMPY

October 13, 2006 03:44 PM | Link to this

“Clinton was sworn into office Jan of 1993 - these are CLEARLY the senior Bush’s(41)fault! To busy fundraising and dealing with Perot than defending our country.”

Good point. Clinto did a good job in cleaning up the Feb 2003 mess by inventigating, arresting, prosecuting and jailing the perpetrators. In other words he cleaned up after Bush 41. So where is Osama?

By the buck stops where?

October 13, 2006 03:50 PM | Link to this

Notice how quickly these conservatives take credit for the release of Iranian held hostages on Reagan’s inauguration day. As quickly as they deny bush’s responsibility for 9/11: 7 months into his presidency.

By Dusty

October 13, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this

There once was a guy named HUGE

who like to take refuge

in the thought that someone cared

about how he fared.

HUGE gets a love poem?

Someone’s mind is agoing.

Yet he loves to “critique”

with a Mighty Mouse squeak!

Do us a favor, dear boy,

Drop the phony intellectual ploy.

It isn’t working a bit.

Like I said, JUST QUIT!!

By Producer

October 13, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this

I was just waiting for a dipwad response like the one Bon Scott just made. Hey, bud, I AM “over there” as we speak fighting against those who’d harm out country everyday! 21 years worth of service!!! God, you libs are so predictable! How have you helped?

By Midori

October 13, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

I wonder which Andy will show up next?

will it be this one?

or this one?

or perhaps this one?

By getalife

October 13, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this

Where is “over there” Producer?

By londonguy

October 13, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this

I believe that in general Europeans are more aware of the difference between republicans and neo-cons than some Americans. If you should ever wonder why Europeans distrust neo-cons then check out their manifesto (Project For The New American Century) and the central premise - ‘Whatever Is Good For America Is Good For The Whole World’ Arrogant, never

By Liberal "Intelligence"

October 13, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this

By the buck stops where? October 13, 2006 03:50 PM Notice how quickly these conservatives take credit for the release of Iranian held hostages on Reagan’s inauguration day.

Well, aren’t you a freaking genius?

Who do you think got them released, coincidentally on the same day ——>Reagan “God Bless His Soul”<——- took office?

The killer rabbits?

By Huge

October 13, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this

Hey suck,

If you want some real hysteria, read that first 3:14! Suck, you are a disgrace even for an uneducated, unemployed Cobb county resident. And you call yourself a conservative. Now, that’s funny!

But I do have to hand it to you - you do know your POS computers. Lotsa experience?

Apparently Dusty the Clown has “dried up” and can’t get those creative juices flowing!! What, no limericks? No Iambic pentameter? Just grade school rhyming?

Welcome to the insane asylum Peecee!

You are probably the 23rd neo-con moron who has showed up here to whine about the cartoon and profess to cancel his AJC subscription.

As I’ve noted before, I’m not in the business of educating far right wing mopes, but the premise in your first sentence doesn’t even make any sense, son. If 88% of the respondents like the “scribblers” cartoons, why would they… Oh never mind, I don’t want to interrupt your little dream world.

However, I’m pretty sure that the AJC subscription dept. will be crushed to learn that you are no longer a faithful reader of the comic section…

By The AJC Is A Filthy Anti American Rag

October 13, 2006 04:16 PM | Link to this

By Producer October 13, 2006 03:52 PM I was just waiting for a dipwad response like the one Bon Scott just made. Hey, bud, I AM “over there” as we speak fighting against those who’d harm out country everyday! 21 years worth of service!!! God, you libs are so predictable! How have you helped?

My hats off to you, Bro.

I hope you know that we appreciate everything you have done for this great country.

By Producer

October 13, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this

All of my comments are posted under this name. I’m not sure where the entry “Andy’s Producer” came from under Bon Scott’s comments. I was puzzled by that too.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

londonguy at 2:18 (NGA at 2:38 - midori at 2:42)

“Being new to this country I want to ask a dumb question. After reading these blogs it appears that Republicans have little grasp of history, geography and politics. Views are taken pre-formed and carefully packaged so no thought is required and no questions are allowed. Are Republicans not allowed to be educated in the USA?”

If I may surmise, you’ve been in America long enough to have dropped numerous British-isms. Else you are really an American posing as a Brit for whatever reason (it’d be more effective in person - Americans are quite taken with accents).

I’d imagine a Brit would have said “silly” rather than “dumb.” The construct would have been “little grasp of your history” rather than “little grasp of history,” as a newly-arrived Brit would distinguish not all history is American history. Same with the “no thought is required and no questions are allowed” constuct. A rather difficult shift from a personal reference to a passive-voice reference to external authority. Again, not typically British. The last sentence almost fits the typically-used rhetorical style, but not quite. “To be” is much more American, the location reference would likely have been “America”, not “USA” and the ending to the rhetorical question would have been “are they?”

Well, welcome to the forum. London, Calif or London, Arkansas guy.

By Dusty

October 13, 2006 04:26 PM | Link to this

Poor Huge. Can’t read either. Sad case.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this

Bon Scott,

I’m with you on that Andy’s Producer’s point.

It’s just so obvious.

By The AJC Is A Filthy Anti American Rag

October 13, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

By Huge October 13, 2006 04:15 PM Hey suck, If you want some real hysteria, read that first 3:14! Suck, you are a disgrace even for an uneducated, unemployed Cobb county resident. And you call yourself a conservative. Now, that’s funny!

I’m not the one jumping up and down, shrieking out the exclamation points.

I didn’t get your thong in a wad, did I Sheila?

But I do have to hand it to you - you do know your POS computers. Lotsa experience?

Yeah, in what not to buy. Which would be anything the AJC is running.

I’ll stick to the thinkpad, thank you very much.

By Will Jones

October 13, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this

Ali Muhammed was an FBI operative under the Bureau’s full supervision when he taught the NJ Muslim’s how to make the bomb for the WTC. Kissinger and D.Rockefeller were on the BNL Board of Directors when the Buckhead yuppie had a $3B loan to Saddam Hussein pinned on him. America’s hope is in intelligence and historical awareness not cant and propaganda.

Death for Treason.

Expel Rome’s Fifth Column NOW!

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

Producer,

Thanks for your service. Don’t worry about bon scott, he’s a delusional psychotic freak that loses his mind and changes names every couple of months. The only thing consistent about him is his hatred of the military and their mission and we’ll take care of keeping him exposed right here.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 04:35 PM | Link to this

“You may not like the way Bush delivers the truth,…”

Oh yeah, Rich, that’s rich.

And what truth is that? The truth about WMDs and mushroom clouds? The truth about not being warned about our enemies using airplanes to fly into buildings? The truth about W’s claim that domestic wiretaps require a court order? The truth about Iraq and Al-Qaeda being in cahoots before the invasion? The list in practically endless. The guy is a politician, for gods sake! He’s a professional liar! And your naevity doesn’t change that.

I know that most educated people in this country just sit around and say to themselves: “You know that George Bush, sure reminds me of George Washington and does nothing but tell the truth!”

Wake up man…

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

Hey I have an idea!

Can you right wing “Great Americans” post us some of Bush’s grand success’s during his administration? Maybe I’m mis-informed about our wonderful leaders abilities!…

By Producer

October 13, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I have been all over the world since 1985 trying to combat those who’d harm us. Western Europe (Red Army Faction, Baider Meinhof), Eastern Europe (Iron Curtain-Eastern Bloc), Mid East (Al Quaida and others too numerous to list here)and presently Colombia. (FARC, Narcos, para-militaries)

As I posted a few blogs up the list, I had colleagues killed in Pan Am 103. These incidents have had a profound impact on how I personally view our current situation.

We can all take jabs at each other on here in semi-humorous and clever and funny ways, but the radicals’ desire to harm us in unmistaken. I prefer the direct action approach of getting them before they get us and punishing them harshly after they strike us. And in my way of thinking that means militarily. Other rational folks, like many who post on here, have other ideas and that’s fine.

So, that’s Producer’s mindset in a nutshell!

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

By getalife - October 13, 2006 04:00 PM - Where is “over there” Producer?

That’s a very good question. Hmmmmm…

By Producer - October 13, 2006 03:52 PM - I was just waiting for a dipwad response like the one Bon Scott just made. Hey, bud, I AM “over there” as we speak fighting against those who’d harm out country everyday! 21 years worth of service!!! God, you libs are so predictable!

Let’s see… The syntax; the condescending faux superiority; the sneering vagueness. I certainly know where “Producer” isn’t! And that’s in the line of fire.

Just another chickenhawk.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 04:41 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

I haven’t read Foreign Affairs by Paul Pillar, but I’ve read the other two. I hope you realize Bruce Bartlett is advocating for much stronger fiscally conservative values in his book, the last thing he wants is a bunch of liberals taking over.

Ron Suskind is hardly a conservative and was basically just a collaborative writer for a disgruntled Treasury Secretary that thought he should have been top dog on all the administration’s effort. His book seemed to have very little point to it and offered nothing but a rear looking view of problems with no forward looking solutions.

I’m not sure what book you say you are going to read, but if it’s either of the ones I linked at my site you will find them much more informative than Paul O’neil’s memoirs.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this

Paul,

There’s a London, Kentucky too.

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 04:49 PM | Link to this

By RW-(the aboriginal) - October 13, 2006 04:33 PM - Producer, Thanks for your service. Don’t worry about bon scott blah blah changes his name every couple of months blah blah and we’ll take care of keeping him exposed right here.

heh heh. As opposed to drunken wet-brain pederast defender Andy, who changes his name every few hours? And what’s this about “keeping me exposed”? Unlike you and your friends, I am NOT trying to hide.

Bottoms up, monkeyshines. I’ve got more compassion for the military in my little finger than you have in your whole house.

Have fun with you little sockpuppets!

By Producer

October 13, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this

Hey Bon,

We’re all waiting for you to enlighten us on YOUR contribution to this terrorism effort. I just posted mine! Your turn, boy! I notice you didn’t respond to my question. LMAO!

By Paul

October 13, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

RW- The Kentucky Colonel in a bowler?
There are just some visuals I really don’t need…

By Midori

October 13, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

Bush has to be the most unlucky person on Earth. It appears that he only hires people who harbor secret grudges, are incompetent, or both.

What are the odds?

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this

Producer (if you are truly who you say you are and not one of Andy’s Clones that litter this blog daily)

I congratulate you and those that serve our country. You guys are the ones that deserve this countries gratitude. I express my gratitude for your sacrifice to be away from family and friends so long and perhaps in harms way.

I cannot respect a President though that uses his office the way this President has, and places our military in harms way callously without the utmost support and supplies to succeed. The lack of troops in mubers in Iraq was pitiful. They expected you to do an impossible job there without some vital materials and resources while the administration’s buddys (such as Haliburton, and Bechtel) got no-bid contracts which they mis-used to bilk the american taxpayers for personal gain. Many of these contracts also mis-using funds meant to supply you the soldier in the field.

I also fear that when you return from Iraq, Afghanistan, or where ever you are, that the support at home will be pitiful as well. This administration and Congress has hamstrung the veterans programs at home including medical services, and other programs to make sure you are covered while away.

I point out that many of the people(troops) with you “over there” are of many american idealisms, and philosopys. There are Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Christians, Pagans, Jewish, Muslems, etc. all serving over there under the American flag.

I doubt that you will see the country against you like the veterans returning from Vietnam. Instead I think you will find most all americans respect you for the duty you have done in our name.

But you cannot expect every american here to respect this administration, as their policys have NOT made the world a safer place for our children nor yours.

Thomas

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this

Sybil bon fincie,

You showed all that dripping compassion of yours at 4:37 dumba-ss. Good timing too coming right after Producers post.

By londonguy

October 13, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this

Paul, Thank You for the wonderful critique of my use of language. I am in fact English, not a ‘Brit’. Being from England allows me to adapt readily to a new country. Since I work in Healthcare I find it easier to talk in terms that others are comfortable with rather than expect them to understand my mode of speech. I can always provide a translation for you in English if you requre it.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

((((((We’re all waiting for you to enlighten us on YOUR contribution to this terrorism effort. I just posted mine! Your turn, boy! I notice you didn’t respond to my question. LMAO!)))))))

hmmmmmmmmmm………

an “out of body” experience?

or did he forget to change screen names before posting?

I report; you decide.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this

londonguy,

Here, we’ll take care of the translation for you

By getalife

October 13, 2006 05:06 PM | Link to this

Internation blogging today.

We have one in Colombia.

One from London.

And the local “nuts”.

Mike’s blog is world wide.

By Producer

October 13, 2006 05:06 PM | Link to this

Thomas,

I began my efforts during Reagan’s second term. From what I’ve seen, strong military action and responses are all that terrorists respect and respond to. When we bombed Kadafi in 86, there was a temporary lessening in his efforts. And for whatever reason, whether it be damn fool luck or success in our military responses, the US hasn’t been hit domestically again since 9/11.

I don’t think that negociations or diplomacy will work with those who wish us eradicated from the face of the earth.

Are all Republican presidents right and all Dems wrong? Of course not.

I just favor the agresssive type of military approach that we’ve demonstrated many times over the last 20 or so years and much more so over the last five.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 05:06 PM | Link to this

londonguy: The style and content struck me as rather “unBritish” - as well as the tone, unless you happen to be one of those who read the Guardian. By the way - Tesco sell a wonderful loaf, lightly topped with seeds which is called a….?

By Jack This, Finchie

October 13, 2006 05:07 PM | Link to this

By Thomas October 13, 2006 04:36 PM Hey I have an idea! Can you right wing “Great Americans” post us some of Bush’s grand success’s during his administration? Maybe I’m mis-informed about our wonderful leaders abilities!…

Thomas: I probably should ignore you, as usual, and I feel as though I’m not going to get a reality based response in return but I can’t let this hang, it looks like we have no answer-

Tax cuts- An economic boom, one exceeding the Clinton/ Gore paper tiger, despite 9/11 and 2 monster hurricanes.

Freedom and democracy firmly planted in the Middle East- Not mass murdering Palestinian dictator Arafat hanging out in the White House, in the name of “peace.”

The resurgence of the Rising Sun- You crank pinkos are too stupid to see it but Bush’s handling of Korea 1) is straining relations with NoKo and China, 2) giving Japan all the reason in the world to become the swarming fanatical killer army that they were in the 30’s, this time with us as an ally. Can you say over run China, again?

Supreme and District Courts- Bwahahahaha. Your filthy pervert law making days are over.

Jobs Creation- just the fact that you degenerates haven’t been calling him “Hoover” lately is proof positive that 4.6 and 9 million are kicking your economy depressing as-ses.

Need more?

By Paul

October 13, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

RW - that was the best link posted here in quite some time. It went right to the top of my “Favorites” list. Thanks!

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 05:11 PM | Link to this

Parrot,

If I had to guess I would say that the unanswered question is from 3:52 asked directly to bonnie and left unanswered.

I don’t have to guess that you’re a braindead fool, nor does anyone reading.

By Jack This, Finchie

October 13, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this

If anybody knows what Midori is insinuating at 5:01 then you must be weird like her too.

RW: When you hear finchie whine and moan like a little baby about my clever little nicknames, do you think:

a) he’s p** because he can’t jack my name anymore?

b) that his little tiny brain gets sore trying to keep up?

c) both of the above?

By Cal

October 13, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this

Did anybody here get wind of the lawsuit filed by the two Minutemen attacked at Columbia U? They’re calling it a hate crime.

Columbia U hasn’t issued an apology yet.

One of the minutemen was a black guy.

That socialist indoctrinated rabble who call themselves progressives, called the black guy a house nger along with other racial slurs.

Those pompous little socialist racists.

This is gonna get interesting.

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 05:15 PM | Link to this

London Guy -

Here’s a playbook for you — Based on publications.

RW - (The American Spectator - of the Blog)

Dusty - (The 700 Club - of the Blog)

Buy Danish (The National Enquirer - of the Blog)

Andy - (The “schizoprenic” Dr Suess of the blog)

Hope this helps…

By Huge

October 13, 2006 05:15 PM | Link to this

So our overly dramatic little girl, suck has an eight year old thinkpad and dial-up? Who wooda thunk it.

And like I told you earlier, you Mark Foley loving little pervert, quit obseessing about my and everybody else’s underwear and our a*******es.

Go get laid, for gods sake. Offer up a bottle of Mad Dog and who knows, Dusty or BD may come over. It would beat yet another very lonely Friday night for ya suck…

By @@

October 13, 2006 05:18 PM | Link to this

Oh boy, Paul has another fill in the blank question.

It’s a test-icle. Right?

RE hasn’t passed me or failed me yet on my first test.

By @@

October 13, 2006 05:21 PM | Link to this

Wait a minute…..a poof.

Is the answer “a poof” Paul? That’s a british term.

I’m just jokin’ with ‘ya.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this

Paul,

You’re welcome. That was a gift from BigDaddy, God rest his soul. (or at least wake him up and get him over for a visit)

Andy,

I think it’s:

D) Jealousy, because he’s such a pitifully boring wanker.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 05:25 PM | Link to this

There’s also:

Thomas- (The make believe Hollywood mogul of the blog)

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 05:27 PM | Link to this

By Andy’s Producer - October 13, 2006 04:50 PM - Hey Bon, We’re all waiting for you to enlighten us on YOUR contribution to this terrorism effort. I just posted mine! Your turn, boy! I notice you didn’t respond to my question. LMAO!

Lookie here…. boy… I’ve done more than my fair share for Uncle Sam. I hate terrorists, too. That’s why I’m against the creation of “jihad recruitment and opportunity zones” like Iraq, which has been the single major accomplishment of the Bush administration’s “war on terror”. Go where the REAL terrorists are. (Where’s Osama?)

And if you’ll pardon my skepticism, are you really in the direct employ of the federal government?

By Paul

October 13, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

@@ - I gathered. Close, but no kewpie doll. But, given one of the more common associations of a “poof” following upon your joke test response of a “test-icle,” well, I really didn’t want to go there…

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

Jack this?

Tax Cuts an economic boon? - I’m sorry, but the Tax cuts have created a massive deficit, and the interest rates rising by the feds constantly was the only way it kept the market going by inflation. The housing boom being an example. Now the interest rates are stopped in rising, and of course the housing boom along with it. Sure this has caused markets to settle for the moment and even helped the gas companys lower the fuel for a bit, but something has got to give here. We now have a massive deficit, and a very high interest rate at the same time. Thats a big ol’ recession just waiting to befall the american economy. And if taxes are kept low then we will find it hard to pay the Interest on our national debt, much less the debt itself.

Freedom in the middle east firmly planted? Ok - Freedom at gunpoint is not freedom at all, and as soon as we take our guns and wlk away we will get shot in the back by those new found Freedom lovers. I suspect another dictator will take the place of Saddam the second we leave Iraq (after a nasty civil war)

You want to attack China? Yikes - can you say Nuclear Devurstation? I knew you could! Uhhm I suggest you watch the movie “The Day After”

Supreme Courts - Ok yah! - if you want all 3 branches under one rule with no debate while we rubberstamp policy through the door. Yep - bye bye - miss american pie, and our constitution itself. Just what our founding fathers warned us against when they founded this country!

Jobs creation?? — are you serious? Are you aware of the mis-calculations of Employment figures today because of the mass of Illegals in this country. Yeah lots of Jobs filled, and many of the same Social Security numbers used on those jobs. Yes we have lots of employment, but we also have (kinda weird) about the same un-employment as before. And guess which class group is unemployed or paid even lower salaries than ever before because of this Job status?

Well - at least you replied —
I’ll give you credit for putting in some honest debate.

Thomas

By getalife

October 13, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

“Jack Murtha is coming to Ohio to campaign for Dem Victoria Wulsin — and against “Mean Jean” Schmidt, the woman who called Murtha a “coward.” Murtha will invade Mean Jean’s district this coming Saturday. For Murtha, this may amount to more than run-of-the-mill campaigning. Last November, Mean Jean said: “Cowards cut and run, Marines never do.” Murtha, of course, was a Marine for 27 years.”

Karma.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

Sybil’s done so much for Uncle Sam that he can’t list a single one. finchie, being an AC/DC groupie and pretending to be John McCain’s neighbor aren’t really elements of “doing more than your fair share.”

But oooooohhhhh….bonnie hates terrorists, lying sos.

By Producer

October 13, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this

Just as I suspected. There’s your answer, folks!

And I don’t really care if you believe I’m a federal employee or not! I’ve listed my contributions for God and country.

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this

Producer, I joined the Army in 1976. My husband retired from the Army, I didn’t. Instead, I raised 5 kids. My democrat step father fought in Germany in the 1940’s as a company commander in field artillery. I hope you appreciate the sacrifice we liberals made. As we respect your current he!!. But we don’t have to respect this administration. We’ve paid our dues to believe in the freedoms of the constitution, not “heiling” the president. I don’t personally know a military person active or retired who has any respect for Rumsfeld. Had the US gone into Iraq appropriately manned and armored, my husband might have supported them as we supported them initially in Afghanistan. But knowing the he!! of not having adequate protection or manpower; knowing the power of the US military that was wasted; knowing the strength we could have taken but didn’t, he turned his back on them. My Dad, a Korean veteran, also thinks bush showed more weakness by his inability to go to war to win than had he dealt with Hussein in other ways. The poor leadership in this administration have sunk us in a mess worse than Vietnam.
Granted, we know that good things happen in Iraq. They happened in Vietnam, too. The whole point is that the management of both wars (or whatever you want to call them) has been pitiful at best. And who takes the brunt of this? Certainly not them; they have their moment of fame, their wealth, and their lives. They will retire peacefully and live happily ever after while thousands suffer for their inept political leadership.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 05:41 PM | Link to this

Bonnie Scott Government Worker,

Why didn’t you stop those planes from coming over here on 9/11 BEFORE we were in Iraq?

WHY WHY WHY?????

You’ll pardon my analysis, but if you were a government worker, perhaps that explains why we were screwed?

By Jack This, Finchie

October 13, 2006 05:43 PM | Link to this

just jokin’, to. October 13, 2006 05:34 PM but something has got to give here.

Look at the economic wizard posting his theories based on HOPE that something bad will happen.

How unserious.

You must work for the AJC “business” section

By Producer

October 13, 2006 05:43 PM | Link to this

“Where’s Osama?” I can tell you that we’re trying to get him, thank you very much. I’ll bet you were one of those libs screeching along with Howard Dean “Where’s Saddam” right before we pounced on his a** in 2003!

By Jack This, Finchie

October 13, 2006 05:49 PM | Link to this

Producer: I apologize for finchie/ bon scott, he’s despondent little wanker who comes here to seek affirmation of his debating skills but instead gets his as-s handed to him and has it used to wipe up the floor with.

Plus he’s a bald faced liar. The only “combat” this maggot has ever seen was when his little sister kicked him in the crotch after he tried to feel her up.

So do as I do and ignore this tosser, lest he has a meltdown ans starts jacking your name like he does mine.

By @@

October 13, 2006 05:50 PM | Link to this

Paul: Well a british friend of mind calls a small ottoman (something you put your foot on) “a poof”. But I guess you don’t want to go there either. I understand.

I’m just here for fun. It’s Friday.

See ‘ya.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 05:51 PM | Link to this

Cindy, I’ve spoken with a number of military folks who respect Rumsfeld - current Iraq debacle aside - for the following:

Pull up some articles from the first two years of the first administration. There was a lot of talk of “can Rumsfeld survive?” The reason was his program to “transform” the military. In brief, cancelling or suspending a number of the high-dollar, Cold War -era weapons systems in development - skipping a generation - and turning attention to the type of warfare we now see. He was savaged - threatened a lot of money and power. Senior military promotions are made running program offices that come to fruition - not cancelled. Those high-cost programs meant jobs in districts. He challenged much of the structure. Remember one of those retired Army generals who spoke out against Rumsfeld? At one time he was the program manager of the Crusader-a next-generation howitzer Rumsfeld cancelled. A bit of bitterness there.

The system he inherited (no Clinton bashing here, just the nature of the program development beast) is why we went into Afghanistan with hardly any Predators (Air Force had avoided them like the plague - ever wonder why the CIA was so involved?) - Special Operations Command was established over the fierce opposition of the general officer corps and why Hummers (a multiplatform jeep/truck replacement) were thrust into the role of unarmored combat vehicle.

So in that regard I’ll cut him some slack. Thank you for your observations.

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 05:51 PM | Link to this

-=- To Producer (5:06 pm)

I agree with you than an agressive stance must be taken with terrorist, but it should also be tempered with (ahem) “Real” diplomacy as well. Basically after you take some terrorist out there needs to be room for discussion with their leaders or we commit ourselves into a self destructive “forever-war” with everyone.

I am for aggressive strikes on Terror training camps, and of course stopping them when they attempt to strike. But we are only delaying the inevitable from being hit by a big strike again, as we bog ourselves down in Iraq. If all the terrorist were located in Iraq, then yes that would definitly be the place to be, but terrorist are located world wide. I don’t think our military can cover the entire world, do you?

Furthermore, by not having definitive targets in Iraq of just the terrorist, and by remaining there as an occupier, I fear that the hatred of “The Occupier” builds there until soon we have even more people in that country that will eventually despise us enough that they too will strap on the ol’ booming backpack.

I really think that the way to succeed is to have both tools, a strong military and a strong dimplmacy working hand in hand.

Reagan was good in that department and that is why he was great at world affairs, he just wasn’t too good with the national economy. But yes I liked Reagan too.

Just my thoughts — and of course subject to debate..

Thanks Producer

Thomas

By Jack This, Finchie

October 13, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this

Producer: Not only that but the full extent of his “government service” is to have applied for every single solitary welfare and public assistance program known to man kind.

By Producer

October 13, 2006 05:54 PM | Link to this

Hey Cindy,

I certainly respect what your family has done to help our contry. One party isn’t wrong and the other totally right. That’s a given. I have friends who are in the military special forces at this moment who think what we’re doing or trying to do is the most effective way to handle the current terrorist threat.

I certainly don’t have all the answers and I don’t make policy. Those decisons are made way above my pay grade.

I just try and implement what our bosses ask of us.

My family, too, was involved in Korea and WWII, so I know what having a family history of service is all about. I’m sorry to say I lost two uncles to military service in the 60’s. I certainly wish they had been around to watch me grow up.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 05:54 PM | Link to this

Producer,

If the past is precedent, if we ever do get Osama you can be sure they will be unduly concerned for his welfare and will be squawking about the torture he endured in the hands of the evil Bush cabal.

Bonnie Scott Sybil is particularly concerned with Habeus Corpus (not to mention his rabid opposition to NSA spying programs and other tools we might employ to find the MoFo).

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this

BD, Your true colors are showing. Now we know how you feel about the military, who are, after all “government workers”. We have said all along that if you really support the military, you can’t support how they’ve been treated during this Iraqi conflict. Next you’ll be blaming the military for the mess in Iraq.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 05:59 PM | Link to this

@@ at 5:50 - Would that be a poof on a poof?

By londonguy

October 13, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this

Paul, first I am from Arkansas, then I read the Guardian and shop at Tesco’s. At least you know enough about England to insult me. Anyway I prefer M&S and the Times. The Guardian readers (oxymoron?) tend to be several levels lower than AJC readers. Since this is the first time I have read these blogs I am pleased to see to see that there are some thinking people out there. When all is said and done the only thing that truly concerns about living in this country is the current willingness of many people to give up freedoms and liberties for no discernable gain. Do people not understand how a police state begins, that you should never have to fear your government. Not learning from history has painful consequences.

By getalife

October 13, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this

Man, “finch” really got into your heads.

Finch is not here “goofy nuts”.

Get off the dope.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this

@@ at 550- “a small ottoman you put your feet on” - what are you trying to do, instigate more Muslim rioting?!!?

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish —

I am against Torture - but frankly I think even we Democrats want Osama’s head on a silver platter!…

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this

BD, I can only roll my eyes. Not many people give two cents of how Osama will be treated. It is the unfortunate fact that many innocents have been put to torture and detained indefinitely. Torture has proven to be practically worthless. Yes, we got the wonderful information on Hussein’s WMD’s through torture, but aside from that…

By Rich

October 13, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this

It would appear that Huge dropped some of that false dignity he’s so proud of in his 4:35 post. His usual posts made me think he wore false teeth. Maybe he dropped those too.

Your post to me sounded like a 6th grade response.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 06:03 PM | Link to this

@@ at 550- “a small ottoman you put your feet on” - what are you trying to do, instigate more Muslim rioting?!!?

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

By Producer - October 13, 2006 05:43 PM - I’ll bet you were one of those libs screeching along with Howard Dean “Where’s Saddam” right before we pounced on his a** in 2003!

Actually, no. I was saying, “Why are we going into Iraq when the terrorists are still in Afghanistan?”

But thank you for asking.

By Producer

October 13, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

Thanks folks for an interesting day of discussions.

It’s close to dinner time here in Bogota.

I’m missing Georgia and the Fall season you are having.

Have a good evening!

I’ll check back later on and see if Bon has burned me in effigy! (sp?)

By Thomas

October 13, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

Laters all —-

Have a great weekend!~~

Remember to bundle up this weekend - going in the low 40’s tonight here in Je-aw-Jah’!~

Cheers —

Thomas

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 06:12 PM | Link to this

By drunken Andy - October 13, 2006 05:49 PM - Producer: I apologize for finchie/ bon scott, he’s despondent little wanker who comes here to seek affirmation of his debating skills but instead gets his as-s handed to him and has it used to wipe up the floor with.

Producer, Andy is handicapped. He uses a million names here, loves questioning people’s sex and sexuality, and adores bathroom analogies. Depending on how drunk he is, it can be very amusing..

Plus he’s a bald faced liar. The only “combat” this maggot has ever seen was when his little sister kicked him in the crotch after he tried to feel her up.

And there’s the scatterbrained personal insults. Drunken Andy knows nothing about me. Accusing someone of sexual assault is one of his regular responses. He thinks he’s clever. He’s just proving how vacant he is.

So do as I do and ignore this tosser, lest he has a meltdown ans starts jacking your name like he does mine.

AS you can see, he not only doesn’t ignore me. He sort of stalks me. Watch your back.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:12 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

Try reading this slowly. Repeat if necessary.

The point of my post to Bonnie Scott was that if HE was a government worker that could explain why we were attacked since HE is an incompetent, psychotic, loser.

I was not under the impression that Sybil was ever in the military.

Surely my “true colors” are consistenly red, white and blue - and only a whiny little baby like you could deduce otherwise.

Sheesh.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 06:14 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

I’ll try to do this as delicately as possible. The government thought Saddam had WMD back about a decade ago. We had a different President then and his or her name had a D behind it. Are you accusing the President we aren’t allowed to name of having tortured people to get the information about Iraq’s WMD?

By @@

October 13, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

Paul……? Let’s not be requiring “proof” of “poof”. I’m proceeding with caution.

I enjoyed your 5:51. I tried to put forth that same argument months ago. Nobody took me seriously.

I can’t imagine why.

Have a great weekend.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

londonguy: being from Arkansas, reading the Guardian or shopping at Tesco’s is insulting? I think not.

Without getting snippy, I might have - comparing Guardian readers - said “AJC editors” rather than “AJC readers.” Anyway, your comments do strike me as a bit unusual for someone from England - usually there’s a bit of reticence to jump in so boldly, with criticism, in a new social situation. Especially in another country.

Hence my doubts as to your nationality. Not that it makes much difference - it’s the message, not the messenger, that counts.

@@ and others who followed - the correct answer was “bloomer.” As in “Tesco’s seeded bloomer.” An answer that likely would not have been offered by someone of passing familiarity (or who quickly did a Google search). An answer not offered -

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

How rosy is the economy? Drunken Andy the pederast squints at the Dow and juiced jobless figures and says it’s great!

In Ohio, 63 year old man robs a bank and waits to be arrested. He wants to go to prison because he can’t find a job and wants room and board until he can get Social Security in 3 years.

“It’s a pretty sad story when someone feels that’s their only alternative,” said defense attorney Jeremy W. Dodgion, who described Bowers as “a charming old man.” “It’s not the financial plan I would choose, but it’s a financial plan,” Assistant Prosecutor Dan Cable said.

Get that? Both the defense and the prosecution understood. So did the judge.

Welcome to the Bush legacy on family finances. The Wal-Mart economy. And Repukes wonder why surveys show people are insecure about their jobs and their futures.

By Midori

October 13, 2006 06:21 PM | Link to this

Oct. 13, 2006 - The sense of desperation Republicans feel about the impending election has finally permeated the White House, where the president did the equivalent of a rain dance Wednesday sounding the drums for disaffected conservatives to please save the country from Democratic House Leader Nancy Pelosi. With North Korea and Iran emboldened, and Iraq spiraling into sectarian violence, Bush sought refuge in frat-boy banter about “high-priced news guys” in pinstripes.

Former secretary of State James Baker, a Bush family friend, is saying publicly that talking is not appeasing, and he’s urging more direct engagement with Iran and Syria, and probably North Korea. Bush has been disdainful of the people close to his father, but the world situation is dire enough that he seems to be bracing himself to accept Baker’s recommendations on Iraq, which are promised after the election. Most presidents want to distance themselves from their predecessor, even if they’re from the same party, but Bush’s differentiation from Clinton and from his father is profound, and we’ve paid a huge price as a country for Bush’s need to prove himself worthy of an office he was ill-equipped to hold.

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 06:21 PM | Link to this

londonguy, You really hit the nail on the head. Sadly, there are so many who have been raised in advantage who have never seen strife or gone without in this country. These people haven’t experienced a loss of freedom. And as such, their sanctimonious lifes are more important to them than the freedoms of our Constitution. Actually, most of the conservative bloggers have never experienced another country at all unless it was a stop on a luxury cruise. That is obvious by their sentiments. History happened in another time and in another country to them; they can’t relate. Americans have been spoiled. Some of us have an advantage of having some experience that taught us to hold our freedoms dear.

By Paul

October 13, 2006 06:22 PM | Link to this

Well, folks, I’m about to wrap it up for the evening. Enjoy the weekend - and if you have travel plans for Buffalo - check the weather report!

Cheers -

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:22 PM | Link to this

Cindy get a clue,

If they don’t care how Osama is treated then why are they so upset over how Khalid Sheik Mohammed was/is being treated?

While Osama provided the money and the training camps, Mohammed was the MASTERMIND of the 9/11 attacks and the rumor is that the CIA used waterboarding with him to get him to talk.

It worked.

By Andy

October 13, 2006 06:23 PM | Link to this

Cindy: Are you sure it wasn’t the French Army you were in?

I don’t seem to remember the United States army training on how to throw down the flag and run, leaving the fight to the woman and children.

Tell me, did you go through any “living under Nazi occupation courses?”

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:27 PM | Link to this

AWWWWWWW. Gay oddball finch still has a chip on his shoulder and is obsessing about Andy for the brazillionth time.

Rich,

You have Huge Phony Blowhard’s game down perfectly!

By Andy

October 13, 2006 06:28 PM | Link to this

By bon scott October 13, 2006 06:12 PM Drunken Andy knows nothing about me

Bipolar hypocrisy rolled into one sentence.

And this stroker is too mentally stunted to see it.

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 06:30 PM | Link to this

No. It is common knowledge that Hussein did have biological agents in the last century. However, in this century, we had inspectors in Iraq. They were inspecting in 2003 and had found no immediate threat. The 21st century iformation, other than what the administration propaganda, was that Hussein was not an immediate threat. Many, taught to respect the President, took him at his word, never believing that he would be so deceitful. I was taught that to be valuable imformation must be of the kind that you could take to court, so I questioned what we were fed. Bush, himself, has said that he was not in court, so that tells me he says what he can get away with. Unfortunately, that is a lot and the American people are getting smarter. It is a fact that a “source” used by this administration in their argument to invade Iraq was a tortured Iraqi.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 06:31 PM | Link to this

{{{{History happened in another time<———by Cindy}}}}}}

Now that is some profound liberal brilliance for you. Are you sure we’re the uneducated ones?

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:34 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

Why are you so freaking miserable?

You don’t know squat about the lives of the “conservatives” who blog here, so stop with the ridiculous, holier-than-thou pretentions.

What a crybaby.

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

No, Andy, not the French Army. And actually, I was fortunate to have had a professor who became a very close friend who taught me something about being under Nazi occupation. He was with the Dutch underground and was eventually captured…well, that is another story.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this

Michael Dukakis must have a new job as a Hanoi prison guard

By Huge

October 13, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this

Poor little richie,

All upset because with me because I besmirched the record of his precious W.

It’s not anybody’s fault but his own that he is arguably the worst commander-in-chief we’ve ever had. It must suck to be you when so very many other people can see what you refuse to.

As for dignity, this is a political blog you numbnut. I think maybe, like some of the other neo-cons here, you use the wrong words, from time to time, no? Maybe to you it is such a formal or grave situation that it requires that requisite formality, but you’re just a goof if you really think that.

I get the feeling that the 6th grade may have been the last grade that you didn’t sleep through. How can anybody take rich seriously?

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:38 PM | Link to this

RW,

Is it Ann Coulter who says that “history begins this morning for Liberals”?

By Cindy

October 13, 2006 06:40 PM | Link to this

RW, I was stating a position of the right here and yes, that was intended just like that.

BD, Unless you are writing fiction, your position and opinions gives you away. So, yes, I do know a lot about the bloggers. Your experiences are limited.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 06:41 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

In that 6:30 do you mean tortured Iraqi in a poetic sense? If not how about some credible back up for that claim?

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:43 PM | Link to this

I was taught that to be valuable imformation must be of the kind that you could take to court, so I questioned what we were fed

Cindy,

Please tell me that you weren’t in the C.I.A. or any other intelligence gathering service.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 06:44 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

That’s Ann, but I quibble with her a bit. A liberal can restart history with every ten minute news cycle.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this

“…the lives of the “conservatives” who blog here,…”

Wow, nice use of parantheses, bigot! She may finally be learning something.

The only thing “conservative” about these rabid bushbots is, er…, um… Damn, I thought there was something…

By getalife

October 13, 2006 06:48 PM | Link to this

Are all you “nuts” perverts?

WASHINGTON - Federal prosecutors in Arizona have opened a preliminary investigation of a camping trip Congressman Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., took 10 years ago that included two teenage congressional pages, a Justice Department spokesman told NBC News. NBC News first reported on the camping and rafting trip on Tuesday.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:49 PM | Link to this

{{Waaaaah. We weren’t told “the truth about not being warned about our enemies using airplanes to fly into buildings”}}

Huge Phony ignoramus,

Are you referring to the PDF that used incorrect information from 1999 when…you know who was President?

Of course you are!

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:54 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

You don’t know squat about history or my personal life, so you may take your false assessments and stick them up your whiny behiney.

Maybe mommie will take your temperature and read you a nice fairytale with a bad ending so you can keep on wailing to your hearts content.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Huge Rim*job,

I put the word “conservative” in quotes because that I was quoting Cindy.

Got that punk?

By Randy

October 13, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

Midori, Eleanore Clift, a closet lib wrote two books with her liberal husband “War Without Bloodshed,” a lofty notion, but not realistic, and “Madam President.” Would that be Madam Hillary? Condi I’d vote for.

Do you ever come with objectivity, or are you always looking for anything that can bash Bush?

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

Huge Parenthesis,

Lesson for the day:

”” is not ().

Thanks for the inspiration for a new name for you! I like it.

By Buy Danish

October 13, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

Huge Parenthesis,

Just seeing how many posts I can sneak in at the last minute to the most loathesome creature on this blog.

By Huge

October 13, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

How dare you impugn BD? Most who know her are extremely jealous.

She has a family that almost without exception has been educated in the most grand of our institutions, including Harvard and Stanford. They have accomplished magnificent feats in the fields of science and literature. Some have single-handedly eradicated infectious diseases! In a selfless act of heroism, one of her uncles single handely killed 300,000 Nazis in the Battle of the Bulge!

She has lived in posh central park condos as well as rubbed shoulders with the rich and famous in Europe, Asia and South America.

Interestingly, she is a direct descendant from Scandinavian royalty.

She will sometimes profess to some dislike of others examining her fascinating and well-lived life, but deep down she just loves the attention that she has so richly deserves.

We humbly salute her!

By bon scott

October 13, 2006 07:02 PM | Link to this

By Andy - October 13, 2006 06:28 PM - Bipolar hypocrisy rolled into one sentence.

Producer, you’ll quickly learn that Andy is multi-polar. He uses dozens of names, and often steals names from other posters. He’ll “borrow” yours, too. Just wait. This is why some regulars here are questioning your ID. Are you Andy? We’ll never know.

We call him drunken Andy because it’s the only rational explanation we have for his fits and lurches here. Pederast enabler is more recent. He thinks Foley was set up by those malevolent pages.

This, of course, is like blaming rape victims even when there are multiple witnesses.

And this stroker is too mentally stunted to see it.

See what I mean about his sex hangups?? It goes on and on….

His defenders here (RW, bi-Danish) are really strange, too. No matter what idiocy spews from Andy’s keyboard, they defend him. It’s nice to have friends, but with someone like Andy, REAL friends wouldn’t be enabling him all the time.

I’m off. See you Monday.

By Rich

October 13, 2006 07:05 PM | Link to this

I know Huge wanted to come with something better in his 6:37.

{{{All upset because with me because I besmirched the record of his precious W.}}}

Failed again.

By RW-(the original)

October 13, 2006 07:11 PM | Link to this

Randy,

There is nothing closeted about Eleanor Clift’s liberalism. She’s got all the talking points and even the sour look on her face that comes with wallowing in the misery of liberalism full time.

Look at Sybil b-itching about what he considers a mean sex reference and in the very next breath calling Buy Danish “Bi”, finchie you would be too pathetic for words if you weren’t so representative of your party.

I guess see you Monday means we’ll see you as Ed Sullivan over at Wooten’s. Pitiful loser.

By Huge Cry Baby

October 13, 2006 07:14 PM | Link to this

By Huge October 13, 2006 05:15 PM And like I told you earlier, you Mark Foley loving little pervert, quit obseessing about my and everybody else’s underwear and our a*es. Go get laid, for gods sake.

Susie: Why must you always drag homosexual sex in to these conversations about politics, you got something on your mind you’d like to share with someone?

Do you mind if that someone ISN’T ME?

Try one of your fellow freakos, they’ll probably be game.

That’s the problem with you little sissy liberals you start to love the people that are kicking your a-ss and making a slam fool of you, that sh=it is weird, you pinkos just can’t help but to subvert yourselves.

Sickos.

Have fun tonite, too, you little tosser.