Atlanta Opinion

By Lord Help Us

September 20, 2006 08:09 AM | Link to this

After years of listening to the painful rhetoric from the ‘Christian’ right regarding the moral decline in this country, it is illuminating to observe their unflinching rationalization of Bush’s push to legitimize the use of torture on human beings (most of which are also denied due process).

Shameful, immoral hypocrites who iexplicably view the left as immoral.

By IVAW Supports Gulf War Vets When Nobody Else Will

September 20, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

IRAQ VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR

By Help IVAW Defend American Soldiers From Republicans

September 20, 2006 08:13 AM | Link to this

IRAQ VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR

By Brian Curtis

September 20, 2006 08:15 AM | Link to this

I think it’s amusing to see the far right defend moral relativism, the very thing they got so outraged about when they accused liberals of it.

But now, it suddenly doesn’t matter what depths the U.S. sinks to, as long as we’re “not quite as bad as Saddam. Or Stalin. See, WE may do bad things, but they did horrible things, so that makes our bad stuff okay.”

Welcome to the relativist club, neocons!

By Mrs. Godzilla

September 20, 2006 08:17 AM | Link to this

Any compromise over torture is a deal with the devil that will come back and haunt us and our children.

We must be better than that.

By Republican Last Throes

September 20, 2006 08:25 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A suicide truck bomb slammed into a Baghdad police headquarters on Wednesday, killing seven and wounding more than a dozen in a deadly 24 hours that saw more than 45 killed in Iraq, including two American soldiers, authorities said.

If you believe in ‘last throes’ (or anything else that comes out of a Republican mealy-mouth), I have a sale on Brooklyn bridges this month that you may be interested in. Wanna hear another Republican fairy tale ? ? ?

By Mike

September 20, 2006 08:28 AM | Link to this

Wow! 7,998 cartoons in a row without criticism of a non-Repubplican or non-conservative!

That Mikey sure is a straight shooter. He is no partisan hack!

By RW-(the original)

September 20, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this

Would one of you shrieking moonbats please point to one item of torture that the President is pushing to have allowed?

You can’t do it because you’re lying, but I bet it won’t stop you.

By Buy Danish

September 20, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this

LHU,

Why don’t you share with us what your rules would be? Here is what is actually in play -

[Details emerged yesterday about the seven interrogation techniques the CIA is seeking to be allowed to apply to terror suspects…The techniques sought by the CIA are: induced hypothermia; forcing suspects to stand for prolonged periods; sleep deprivation; a technique called “the attention grab” where a suspect’s shirt is forcefully seized; the “attention slap” or open hand slapping that hurts but does not lead to physical damage; the “belly slap”; and sound and light manipulation.] (http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1874823,00.html)

WAAAAAAH!

I like this analysis by the Union Leader, entitled “Playing nice - A luxury we can’t afford”:

Last week these four Republicans joined Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee in voting to prevent CIA officers who interrogate terror suspects from being any rougher on said suspects than Mary Poppins would be…

More excerpts:

{{We are not at war with the al-Qaida Women’s Knitting Club. Even if we had all terror suspects flown first-class to Chicago and interrogated on Oprah Winfrey’s couch it would not reduce by one iota the enemy’s resolve to bring our civilization to a bloody end by the most barbaric means…}}

{{As author Richard Miniter wrote last week after visiting the prison at Guantanamo Bay, “America has never faced an enemy who has so ruthlessly broken all of the rules of war — yet never has an enemy been treated so well…}}

I’ve got it! We could offer them first class tickets to a C.A.I.R. banquet if they cooperate!

By MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

September 20, 2006 08:43 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Shiite militias are encouraging children — some as young as 6 or 7 — to hurl stones and gasoline bombs at U.S. convoys, hoping to lure American troops into ambushes or provoke them into shooting back, U.S. soldiers say.

Gangs of up to 100 children assemble in Sadr City, stronghold of radical anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army militia, and in nearby neighborhoods, U.S. officers said in interviews this week.

American soldiers have seen young men, their faces covered by bandanas, talking with the children before the rock-throwing attacks begin — and sometimes handing out slingshots so the volleys will be more accurate, the troops said.

“It’s like a militia operation. They’ll mass rocks on the last or second-to-last vehicle” in a U.S. patrol, said Capt. Chris L’Heureux, 30, of Woonsocket, R.I. “There’s no doubt in my mind that they’re utilizing these kids in a deliberate, thought-out way.”

Al-Sadr’s followers insist they are not organizing attacks by children. “Such behavior by Iraqi children is spontaneous and the natural reaction from innocent children who are witnessing horrible deeds committed by the occupation forces in Iraq,” Ali al-Yassiri, an aide to al-Sadr, told The Associated Press.

Stone the soldiers is a cute little street game for Iraqi children. Remember how King George and his merry henchmen have told us that the Iraqis welcome us as liberators? It’s just another republican LIE ! ! !

The reason Republicans keep this war so sanitized and restrict explicit photographic images is so they can continue to foist LIE after LIE on the American public so they can continue to make a few more war-bucks selling war supplies as long as the American public will allow them to. If a few more grunts get killed along the way, what the heck….they made their profit margin. MIS

By FACT CHECK ALERT

September 20, 2006 08:43 AM | Link to this

7,998 cartoons in a row without criticism of a non-Repubplican or non-conservative!

Sounds like Bush Speak.

By You're Right, Where Is America?

September 20, 2006 08:46 AM | Link to this

The treatment of enemy prisoners has been a major topic on the left, whether at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo or from “rendition” to other countries. Did the interrogation methods used in Pakistan to gain key information about the London airline plot violate Sen. John McCain’s strictures against torture? This is not merely an expression of sympathy for the enemy, it is a fear that under the pressures of war, Americans will regain their former “bellicose” attitudes and adopt methods of war as ruthless as those employed by the enemy, {{{They might even find a new determination to win — which is not a politically correct attitude}}}.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

The pinko times says:

Use of torture tactics to interrogate prisoners would compromise ideals that helped build nation-AJC

Look, everybody, the liberals are “patriots” today!

How about: Lack of “torture” tactics could lead prisoners to destroy nation?

Is that what you liberals hope for?

Cut

Queen Pinko says:

Democrats have been especially critical of the voter ID law, the most stringent in the nation. They suspect that it’s just another attempt by Republicans to put obstacles in front of voters who are likely to cast their ballots for Democrats; the poor and the elderly tend to be reliable Democratic constituencies.-Urinal

Quick: Name a financial institution that will cash a government check with out some form of ID?

If you have to register to vote could you not register for an ID at the same time, huh, huh?

Why do liberals fight so hard against legitimizing our elections?

If you liberals aren’t cheating then you aren’t trying, right?

By You're Right, Where Is America?

September 20, 2006 08:47 AM | Link to this

Yep, this “journalist” was just doing his “job:”

Let me repeat that: An Associated (with terrorists) Press journalist gets caught with an alleged al Qaeda leader and tests positive for bomb-making materials. That. Is. News. How does a news organization explain away its decision to sit on it for five months? Like this: “The AP has worked quietly until now, believing that would be the best approach.”-TownHall

Cut

Gay rights activist Rosie O’Donnell said, “Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America where we have separation of church and state.” Proof of this scurrilous statement is of course nowhere to be found, and were the subject matter not so grim, it would be comical. It blows the mind that those who tremble at the slightest perception of a crack in their imagined wall between church and state, should continuously alibi for the bloody supporters of Sharia, which advocates death for those who choose to follow man-made law.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

To understand what the pope actually said, one would have to stop and think, which is a colossal waste of time when there are infidels to kill. Thus far, people who claim to be fervent disciples of the religion of peace have shot a missionary nun in Somalia and demolished Christian holy sites in the West Bank and Gaza. All this just because the pope had the audacity to suggest that some Islamists tend to prefer violence to reason. Whatever gave him that idea?- RealClearPolitics

By You're Right, Where Is America?

September 20, 2006 08:47 AM | Link to this

Ding, ding, ding:

No, this is about us. The best book for illuminating what’s going on in the Muslim “street” isn’t some weighty treatise on Islam; it’s a short little tract called “White Guilt” by Shelby Steele. The book isn’t even about Islam. Steele focuses on white liberals and the black radicals who’ve been gaming them ever since the 1960s. Whites, he argues, have internalized their own demonization. Deep down they fear that maybe they are imperialistic, racist bastards, and they are desperate to prove otherwise. In America, black radicals figured this out a while ago and have been dunning liberal whites ever since.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

Ding, ding, ding:

One never knows how an election is going to come out, but it’s not surprising that he’s surging in the latest polls (USAToday Gallup has his approval rating suddenly up to 44%). Our conviction has long been that whatever the American people are, they are not dumb. They, in their millions, are watching this situation, and they are going to appreciate someone willing to put in a good word at the United Nations for the country they love.-NYSun

Cut

Ding, ding, ding:

Global warming is happening, but humans are not the cause, one of the nation’s top experts on hurricanes said Monday morning. Bill Gray, who has studied tropical meteorology for more than 40 years, spoke at the Larimer County Republican Club Breakfast about global warming and whether humans are to blame. Gray, who is a professor at Colorado State University, said human-induced global warming is a {{{{ perpetuated by the media and scientists who are trying to get federal grants}}}}.-ReporterHerald

By You're Right, Where Is America?

September 20, 2006 08:48 AM | Link to this

Yet the environmental left, no doubt animated by visions of a giant leap forward for Big Government, is eager to clamp controls on energy use. Citing the so-called “precautionary principle,” advocates of such controls argue that we must act even before all the facts are in. To delay is to risk catastrophe down the road, they assert. But insofar as the precautionary principle is valid, it might offer a strong reason not to act too quickly. The one thing we know about government, after all, is that it often gets things wrong - as it did with DDT.-RealClearPolitcs

Cut

Yeah!!

Yahoo warning over ads spooks investors The internet media company’s shares slumped by 11 per cent on the news.-FT.com

May your financial condition worsen.

This is probably why the pervert liberals think the economy is so bad; because Yahoo! sucks.

It’s all your fault spammer/ blog slower.

Cut

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By Buy Danish

September 20, 2006 08:52 AM | Link to this

Let’s try that link again.

Details emerged yesterday about the seven interrogation techniques the CIA is seeking to be allowed to apply to terror suspects…The techniques sought by the CIA are: induced hypothermia; forcing suspects to stand for prolonged periods; sleep deprivation; a technique called “the attention grab” where a suspect’s shirt is forcefully seized; the “attention slap” or open hand slapping that hurts but does not lead to physical damage; the “belly slap”; and sound and light manipulation.

By CONGRESSIONAL REPORT CARD

September 20, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 /U.S. Newswire/ — Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) released its second annual report on the most corrupt members of Congress entitled Beyond DeLay: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and five to watch).

CREW’s Most Corrupt Members of Congress:

Members of the Senate: Conrad Burns (R-MO), Bill Frist (R-TN), Rick Santorum (R-PA).

Members of the House: Roy Blunt (R-MO), Ken Calvert (R-CA), John Doolittle (R-CA), Tom Feeney (R-FL), Katherine Harris (R-FL), William Jefferson (D-LA), Jerry Lewis (R-CA), Gary Miller (R-CA), Alan Mollohan (D-WV), Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO), Richard Pombo (R-CA), Rick Renzi (R-AZ), Pete Sessions (R-TX), John Sweeney (R-NY), Charles Taylor (R-NC), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Curt Weldon (R-PA)

Five Members to Watch: Chris Cannon (R-UT), J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ), Dennis Hastert (R-IL), John Murtha (D-PA), Don Sherwood (R-PA)

Tally: Of the 25 most corrupt members of Congress, 21 are Republican, 4 are Democrats, and 0 are independent ! ! ! Sounds about right to me…..let’s chase the skunks out of Congress in November, Vote anything but Republican ! ! !

By You're Right, Where Is America?

September 20, 2006 09:07 AM | Link to this

What an absolute total loser, same as all of liberalism:

By Spammer/ Blog Slower September 20, 2006 08:43 AM BAGHDAD, Iraq - ————————>Shiite militias are encouraging children<——————- — some as young as 6 or 7 — to hurl stones and gasoline bombs at U.S. convoys, hoping to lure American troops into ambushes or provoke them into shooting back, U.S. soldiers say.

We’re talking basic comprehension skills here, this spammer is more worried about cutting and pasting the first article it comes to and blaming it on America.

F you, spammer. Stick it up your a-ss.

THE SHIITE MILITIAS ARE ENCOURAGING CHILDREN.

What the F don’t you understand about this, you filthy mofo?

You blame it on America, the world wonders what the F is wrong with us, and piles on.

Where is the outrage for THE SHIITES ENCOURAGING THE CHILDREN????????

Does it even concern you that children are being placed in mortal danger?

You are a filthy effing loser.

By getalife

September 20, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this

Torture is not American.

Where did my country go?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 20, 2006 09:12 AM | Link to this

I guess being half intelligent is not a major concern for some people:

By Lord Help Us September 20, 2006 08:09 AM After years of listening to the painful rhetoric from the ‘Christian’ right regarding the moral decline in this country, it is illuminating to observe their unflinching rationalization of Bush’s push to legitimize the use of torture on human beings (most of which are also denied due process).

It figures a lib would not know the difference between casual group sex and trying to prevent your family from being killed by a bunch of throat cutting savages.

By RW-(the original)

September 20, 2006 09:13 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Am I to understand from your link that we aren’t even going to use the wedgie or the purple-nurple under the new interrogation plan?

President Bush ought to push forward a plan that says detainees have to read the lunacy of the liberals on this blog. As long as they weren’t smart enough to figure out they were allies it would break them in a heartbeat, but that really would be torture I guess.

By Brian Curtis

September 20, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

Getalife: Our country is right where it always was… it’s just being held hostage by an occupying force that needs to be reminded who’s in charge.

Don’t give up on America—that’s exactly what the neocons want. Instead, remind them that they’re the traitors and we’re the patriots this November.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 20, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this

By getalife September 20, 2006 09:08 AM Torture is not American. Where did my country go?

Maybe if we WERE torturing people I could understand the whining.

But right now, the outrage in the world is SHIITES ENCOURAGING CHILDREN and Al Qaeda slaughtering innocent CIVILIANS in Iraq, and I don’t hear a peep from the pinkos.

Do they approve of these things?

Where has America gone to?

By Gutless Republicans USE Troops

September 20, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - The dimming outlook for significant U.S. troop cuts in Iraq means the Pentagon may soon face a difficult and politically sensitive decision: either make more frequent call-ups of some National Guard and Reserve troops or expand still further the size of the active-duty Army, defense officials say.

You can bet your sweet a$$ that Republicans aren’t about to start sending their pampered little rich kids off to fight and get killed. Instead they will continue to USE existing poor enlistees in continuous rotation so they can gutlessly avoid any political confrontation.

By getalife

September 20, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

BC,

True, I will never give up on our country but have on the neocons.

Their blind hatred mindset is hopeless. You can’t reason with these people. They do not see the reality and obvious failures they have caused. They never admit they are wrong. They can’t correct their mistakes without admitting them. Hopeless.

By Why Can't We Be Friends

September 20, 2006 09:27 AM | Link to this

NEW YORK - The United States tried Tuesday to salvage its plan to punish Iran with sanctions if it won’t back down in a nuclear standoff with the West, even as President Bush told Iranians he hopes that one day “America and Iran can be good friends.”

Uh, oh! The Chimperor is thinking about making some new ‘FRIENDS’. Last time he did that we got IRAQ. Occupied countries make such bossom buddies, don’t they ! ? !

By Eric

September 20, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this

It’s no surprise that our “Christianist” president wants to legitimize torture. He’s no different than the “Islamists” who torture their captives. He just puts a Christian spin on it. Why does he want to change the law anyway, he already ignores any law he disagrees with. Could it be that he’s just a tad concerned that when the dems take over the house he’ll be in deep criminal caca? I can’t wait for that. It’ll be a national holiday when that dimwitted moron ends up in jail.

By Randy

September 20, 2006 09:40 AM | Link to this

Get this through your head Mike, you moron.

America will always take the high road.

The enemy is trained to take the low road.

You liberals will always take the detour.

By Buy Danish

September 20, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this

RW,

When I read about “sound and light manipulation” I think of ’60s discos with those horrible strobe lights that flashed on and off.

As a compromise, maybe they could use that strobe light technique, but instead of playing American music, they could play culturally acceptable Middle Eastern music or the recorded shrieks and wails of chest-beating Arab women..

By Who To Believe?

September 20, 2006 09:42 AM | Link to this

THE SHIITE MILITIAS ARE ENCOURAGING CHILDREN. What the F don’t you understand about this, you filthy mofo?

OR

Al-Sadr’s followers insist they are not organizing attacks by children. “Such behavior by Iraqi children is spontaneous and the natural reaction from innocent children who are witnessing horrible deeds committed by the occupation forces in Iraq,” Ali al-Yassiri, an aide to al-Sadr, told The Associated Press.

Who to believe, Islamofascists or Republicans? Islamofascists may be extremist kook barbarians but they genuinely don’t appear to LIE even a fraction as much as the Republican extremist kook barbarians ! ! ! Everytime you see a Republican open its’ filthy mouth be prepared to hear another pack of LIES. Republicans keep trying to ‘Fool ALL of the People ALL of the Time’ ! ! !

By Paul

September 20, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

Gutless Republicans USE Troops: have you ever checked the demographics of the US military, including their racial, economic, geographic and educational backgrounds? Yes, I could provide the information but I tire of doing other people’s research.

Readers have likely guessed it isn’t as portrayed and they’d likely be in for a few surprises.

Relying on data to form opinions is so frustrating!

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 20, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats hoping to capture control of the U.S. Congress in this fall elections called on Tuesday for probes of the Bush administration’s Iraq rebuilding effort, which they likened to the government’s botched response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Anybody wanna bet that Congressional Republicans keep this one on ice until after November? Republicans keep thinking that they can ‘Fool ALL of the People ALL of the Time’ ! ! !

By Buy Danish

September 20, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this

Eric,

In case things don’t work out as you envision them on November 7th, I hope you have a big supply of anti-depressants handy, and the speed dial set to dial the nearest shrink.

And if being a “dimwitted moron” is enough to have criminal charges filed against someone, then you may also want to have a lawyer handy.

By getalife

September 20, 2006 10:01 AM | Link to this

BD,

Thanks to w, you do not have to be charged with a crime to be detained and tortured.

Just labeled a terrorist, like the gop calls voters.

BTW, you do not get a lawyer.

By US Military Demographics Checked

September 20, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

have you ever checked the demographics of the US military, including their racial, economic, geographic and educational backgrounds? Yes, I could provide the information but I tire of doing other people’s research.

And tell us, Paul, have YOU ever checked the demographics of the US military, including their racial, economic, geographic and educational backgrounds? Anybody that thinks that grunts are not almost totally composed of low/middle income enlistees in this day and age has definitely NEVER served a tour ! ! !

New York Times March 30, 2003 Military Mirrors Working-Class America By DAVID M. HALBFINGER and STEVEN A. HOLMES

…As the United States engages in its first major land war in a decade, the soldiers, sailors, pilots and others who are risking, and now giving, their lives in Iraq represent a slice of a broad swath of American society - but by no means all of it.

Of the 28 servicemen killed so far, 20 were white, 5 black, 3 Hispanic - proportions that neatly mirror those of the military as a whole. But just one was from a well-to-do family, and with the exception of a Naval Academy alumnus, just one had graduated from an elite college or university.

When you hear a LYING Republiscum open it’s filthy mouth, be prepared to hear another pack of LIES ! ! ! When they say they have data but won’t produce it because….. just assume that they are LYING through their slimy moss covered teeth, AGAIN. Republicans continue to think that they can ‘Fool ALL of the People ALL of the Time’ ! ! !

By RW-(the original)

September 20, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Maybe if we got them some gaudy chains and leisure suits they could put up with the flashing lights better.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for moonbat Eric to get out the anti-depressants when the Dems lose again. He’ll be too busy firebombing the Diebold offices.

gitmolife,

We sure do spend an awful lot of time and money shuttling lawyers back and forth to Club Gitmo for people that you claim don’t get lawyers. Hell they even use the legal envelopes to pass notes plotting attacks on our soldiers there.

By Paul

September 20, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

getalife: wasn’t this covered yesterday? Congress reauthorized the Patriot Act and “cleaned up” some of the more problematic areas. Courts will continue to review specific areas. Law distinguishes between US citizens and foreign persons. ACLU still has problems with the law but has not taken a single court action regarding specific violation of a citizen’s rights. The NSA Surveillance Program is a separate issue - suspected terrorist communications originating overseas. NSA is an analyis agency - does not have arrest, detention or interrogation authority.

New topic now or same song, same verse?

By Anti-Andy

September 20, 2006 10:19 AM | Link to this

“A DAY IN THE LIFE OF JOE REPUBLICAN”

Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some tree-hugging liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some stupid commie liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised.

All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer’s medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Joe gets it too.

He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe’s bacon is safe to eat because some girly- man liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.

In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some crybaby liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.

Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some environmentalist wacko liberal fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.

He walks on the government-provided sidewalk to the subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation costs because some fancy-pants liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.

Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some lazy liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe’s employer pays these standards because Joe’s employer doesn’t want his employees to call the union.

If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he’ll get a worker compensation or an unemployment check because some stupid liberal didn’t think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.

It is noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe’s deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some godless liberal wanted to protect Joe’s money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.

Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-mark

By RW-(the original)

September 20, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this

You can believe the lying sack of dung at 10:12 and his propaganda piece from the New York Times or you can go straight to the source and get the facts:

DoD tracks “representativeness” - as Gilroy calls it - very closely. And representativeness can take a whole host of forms - race, education, social status, income, region and so on. “When you look at all of those, you find that the force is really quite representative of the country,” he said in a recent interview. “It mirrors the country in many of these. And where it doesn’t mirror America, it exceeds America.”

By Anti-Andy

September 20, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

et federal student loan because some elitist liberal decided that Joe and the country would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe also forgets that his in addition to his federally subsidized student loans, he attended a state-funded university.

Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some America-hating liberal fought for car safety standards to go along with the tax- payer funded roads.

He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers’ Home Administration because bankers didn’t want to make rural loans.

The house didn’t have electricity until some big- government liberal stuck his nose where it didn’t belong and demanded rural electrification.

He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some wine-drinking, cheese-eating liberals made sure Dad could take care of himself so Joe wouldn’t have to.

Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn’t mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: “We don’t need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I’m a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of himself, just like I have.”-

By getalife

September 20, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

Things You Have to Believe to be a Republican

Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary. Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush’s daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney did business with him, and a bad guy when Bush needed a “we can’t find Bin Laden” diversion.

Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is Communist, but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony.

The United States should get out of the United Nations, and our highest national priority is enforcing U.N. resolutions against Iraq.

A woman can’t be trusted with decisions about her own body but multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind without regulation.

The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches, while slashing veterans’ benefits and combat pay.

If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won’t have sex.

A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle our long-time allies, then demand their cooperation and money.

Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy, but providing health care to all Americans is socialism. HMOs and insurance companies have the best interests of the public at heart.

Global warming and tobacco’s link to cancer are junk science, but creationism should be taught in schools.

A president lying about an extra-marital affair is an impeachable offense, but a president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy.

Government should limit itself to the powers named in the Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet.

The public has a right to know about Hillary’s cattle trades, but GeorgeBush’s driving record is none of our business.

Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you’re a conservative radio host. Then it’s an illness and you need our prayers for your recovery.

What Bill Clinton did in the 1960’s is of vital national interest, but what Bush did in the ‘80’s is irrelevant.

If you don’t send this to at least 10 other people, we’re likely to be stuck with more Republicans in 08, and remember: Friends don’t let friends vote Republican!

By Paul

September 20, 2006 10:25 AM | Link to this

US Military Demographics Checked: (yawn) - such a predictable response. Usually in a discussion, when a person states an allegation or premise and is asked for the facts that led to the statement, he provides the facts. Many in this forum seem to ask the responder to provide the facts, then insert a question regarding the responder’s personal background, as if this has some bearing on the topic.

Casualty rates to not mirror the general military population demographics (exposure to combat is generally by line Army/Marine units, some Air Force security forces. Bulk of AF/Navy personnel, by their very nature, are not exposed to combat conditions.

If you want to really have something to think about, not military background but currrent economic status, check the latest Congressional Accountability Office report on compensation, then compare those numbers (compensation value) to “educational and social” background.

By Buy Danish

September 20, 2006 10:27 AM | Link to this

Getalife,

The balls in your court.

We capture an al qaeda terrorist whom we think has plans to perform a massacre such as at Beslan.

What do we do?

Compassion is saving innocent people from dying, not whining about playing music too loudly in a cold room, or consuming yourself with worry that a Chechen terrorist doesn’t have access to an ACLU lawyer.

I’m going out now. I look forward to your solution to the realistic scenario I proposed when I return.

By RW-(the original)

September 20, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this

Well they can shut down the blog so that, God forbid, a rational discussion doesn’t break out at night, but unattributed spam is no problem whatsoever.

Later libs, you keep spamming while we campaign!

By getalife

September 20, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this

BD,

Send all wingnuts to Gitmo, you are terrorizing my country.

By getalife

September 20, 2006 10:37 AM | Link to this

Pot to kettle

By anita

September 20, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this

getalife, You Have Really Got The Right-Wing Nuts All Fired Up This Morning. You See They Can’t Follow Logic Or The Truth, It Confuses Them. The Sad Part Is They Are To Stubborn And Bullheaded “Like Their Leader”, To Listen. But Bless You For It Anyway. And I Will Send This To Ten In My Address Book.

Impeach Bush Now!!!!!!

By getalife

September 20, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this

Thanks anita.

By US Military Demographics Revisited

September 20, 2006 11:03 AM | Link to this

Casualty rates to not mirror the general military population demographics….when a person states an allegation or premise and is asked for the facts that led to the statement, he provides the facts.

I see, Paul, so according to you, our US Military is actually a racially, economically, geographically and educationally representative sample of the American population in its’ entirety. Our nation then only sends the low/middle income enlistees into combat assignments in which they skew the ‘casualty rate’ off the normal statistical curve, then? Yeh, right. So why is it that low/middle income enlistees suffer the highest casualty rates since the military according to you is so demographically balanced otherwise ? ? ?

Would you mind enlightening everyone as to what ‘facts’ that you have provided? I think everyone missed it, I know I did.

Republican shills are shameless in their feeble attempts to ‘Fool ALL of the people ALL of the Time’, aren’t they ? ? ?

By China Rescues Republican Tallywhackers

September 20, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

LONDON (Reuters) - Surgeons in China who said they performed the first successful pen-is transplant had to remove the donated organ because of the severe psychological problems it caused to the recipient and his wife.

Don’t worry Republicans, your good buddies over in China are working overtime to solve your ‘smallest’ problems.

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:13 AM | Link to this

Saddam Tossed From Court After Arguing

Email this Story

Sep 20, 7:56 AM (ET)

By SAMEER N. YACOUB and JAMAL HALABY

(AP) Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein reacts during his trail presided over by new chief judge… Full Image

Google sponsored links Seattle DUI Attorney - You Can Beat A DUI. (206) 931-9956. Experienced Attorneys 24 hrs/day www.Seattle-DUI-Lawyer.com

Saddam Hussein Trial - Judge tells Saddam Hussein he was not a dictator. CNN.com

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Saddam Hussein’s lawyers walked out of his trial Wednesday to protest the replacement of the chief judge, who had been accused of favoring the defense. The deposed leader also protested and was ordered to leave the courtroom.

Defense lawyers questioned the impartiality of the trial when the session began under Judge Mohammed Oreibi al-Khalifa in place of Abdullah al-Amiri, who was removed after he was accused of being too soft on the former Iraqi leader.

Al-Amiri told Saddam last week in court that “you were not a dictator,” and an aide to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said the judge’s comments were one reason for his replacement.

“The head of the court is requested to run and control the session, and he is not allowed to violate judicial regulations, ” Hussein al-Duri told Al-Arabiya television. “It is not allowed for the judge to express his opinion.”

When the session began Wednesday with al-Khalifa in charge, the defense lawyers questioned the impartiality of the trial.

“We don’t expect from this court established under the occupation authorities to be fair, so we decided to withdraw from this trial,” defense lawyer Wadoud Fawzi told the court, reading a statement on behalf of the defense team.

Saddam faces a possible death penalty if convicted on genocide charges over a military offensive against Iraqi Kurds in the 1980s.

Al-Khalifa said replacing the chief judge was an “administrative matter,” and that the court would appoint new counsel. Saddam said he wanted his lawyers to stay and protested against court-appointed counsel.

“This is our personal right,” Saddam shouted as he pointed his finger at the judge and pounded his fist on the podium. “You must deal with us as the law dictates.”

Al-Khalifa asked him to stop talking but Saddam refused, prompting

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:15 AM | Link to this

Dems do splits Showbizzers line up…for Arnold?

By GABRIEL SNYDER

Forget the war or the White House: No issue has divided Hollywood’s liberal activists like the upcoming California governor’s race between Arnold Schwarzenegger and Phil Angelides. Entertainment community donors who are normally slow to reach for their checkbooks for Republicans have been lining up behind Schwarzenegger’s re-election bid, much to the consternation of liberal activists loath to stray from the Democratic lineup.

The conservative Republicans who have sometimes clashed with Schwarzenegger have nowhere else to go in this November’s election, so the Schwarzenegger campaign has been laboring to make inroads in areas of support that a Democrat ought to consider the center of his base.

After all but ignoring Hollywood during his campaign to replace Gray Davis, Schwarzenegger has been reaching out to Hollywood liberals in his re-election effort. The latest bid for showbiz support (and checks) was Monday’s luncheon hosted by Sherry Lansing, CAA partner David O’Connor and Jerry Zucker at the Polo Lounge in Beverly Hills.

Before a crowd that included Sony chief Amy Pascal, Warner Bros.’ Alan Horn, power broker Skip Brittenham, thesp Dustin Hoffman and tenpercenters Jeff Berg and Bryan Lourd, Schwarzenegger pitched himself as an effective but nonpartisan executive while offering some self-deprecating charm.

“When I was an actor, I would have dreamed to speak to this kind of audience,” Schwarzenegger said. “I could have financed an entire slate of pictures.”

But the real point he wanted to emphasize was that, while most in the room may consider themselves Democrats, he’s on their side on issues like the environment, gay rights and hot-button topics like stem-cell research.

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:16 AM | Link to this

Lamont Calls Lieberman a ‘Turncoat’ Sep 19 6:18 PM US/Eastern

By DAVE COLLINS Associated Press Writer

HARTFORD, Conn.

Democrat Ned Lamont calls rival Sen. Joe Lieberman a “turncoat” in his latest ad. Not so, says the three-term Democratic lawmaker running as an independent, and he has some party support in Connecticut to prove it.

Lieberman welcomed the endorsements Tuesday from several local Democrats, including the mayors of the Connecticut cities of Norwich, West Haven and Waterbury. “This is part of a very encouraging trend that’s happening,” he said. “We now have a group of respected elected officials that are breaking away from Ned Lamont and are sticking with me.”

Last month, Lamont stunned Lieberman in the Democratic primary, seizing the party nomination from the incumbent with a campaign built on his anti-Iraq war message. Lieberman filed as an independent candidate to hold onto his seat while several local and national Democrats shifted allegiances to Lamont.

Lamont dismissed suggestions that Democrats remain torn between the two candidates.

“I don’t know if there is any rift,” Lamont said Tuesday, campaigning in Hamden, Conn. “I hear a couple of mayors or something are going their own way. That’s fine.”

Lamont received the endorsement of one of the state’s largest unions this week. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, representing 35,000 Connecticut workers, announced it would switch its support from Lieberman to Lamont.

Lamont’s campaign is spending $93,000 this week on a series of statewide television ads that call Lieberman a “turncoat.” One ad suggests that Connecticut residents should wear their coats inside-out to protest Lieberman’s general election campaign.

Lamont predicted the ads will appeal to his base and undecided voters. “It was a humorous look at a guy that’s been a lifelong Democrat who overnight changed his stripes,” he said.

Ken Dautrich, public policy professor at the University of Connecticut, said it’s important for both candidates to campaign for Democratic votes, but added that unaffiliated voters will likely decide the race. Lamont won 52 percent of the Democratic vote in last month’s primary.

“I think that’s a pretty good ind

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

Bush, Iran Leader Spar Over Nuke Standoff

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - President Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sparred over Tehran’s disputed nuclear program but managed to avoid a personal encounter as the 61st General Assembly got under way in the shadow of a military coup in Thailand.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan stayed on message during an emotional farewell address Tuesday, appealing to the world to unite against human rights abuses, religious divisions, brutal conflicts and an unjust world economy.

Annan, who is to leave office on Dec. 31, also warned that the failure to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will continue to raise questions about the U.N.’s impartiality and stymie its efforts to resolve other conflicts, “including those in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

The Mideast peace process was taking the spotlight at the United Nations on Wednesday, with ministers from the Quartet that drafted the stalled “road map” peace plan - the U.S., the U.N., the European Union and Russia - planning to meet. The Security Council also was scheduled to hold a ministerial meeting Thursday that Arab leaders hope will help revive the Mideast peace process.

(AP) Seats for the United States delegation are empty as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad addresses… Full Image

Jordan’s King Abdullah II said that until Israel ends its occupation of Palestinian lands and gives Palestinians their rights, the cycle of violence will continue in the region and its effects will be felt throughout the world.

“I come before you today with a deep sense of urgency,” Abdullah told the assembly. “Never has it been more important for the world community to act decisively for peace in my region.”

Bush tried to advance his campaign for democracy in the Middle East during his address to the General Assembly on Tuesday, saying extremists were trying to justify their violence by falsely claiming the U.S. is waging war on Islam. He singled out Iran and Syria as sponsors of terrorism.

By Paul

September 20, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this

US Military Demographics Revisited: you’re doing it again. Rather than provide your source (RW the original at 10:22 provided source, personal attack notwithstanding)you ask me (again) to substantiate your position (fyi, the individual services compile that data, report on it, and it’s aggregated at the DoD level).

Not “according to you” - I rarely make absolute statements, specifically in reference to a large, diverse institution such as DoD. I understood your assertion was the rich Republican power structure would shield their children from combat roles, would use “poor” people for combat and not further use Guard/Reserve units. (“Republicans aren’t about to start sending their pampered little rich kids off to fight and get killed. Instead they will continue to USE existing poor enlistees in continuous rotation so they can gutlessly avoid any political confrontation”). I just asked you for sources.

I then disinguished between demographics of those who sustain casualties and those who don’t - with a couple of reasons why.

So what I see is shrill rhetoric that can’t be substantiated. Oh, well. But if you’d like to continue, you may want to check the reenlistment rates for Guard/Reserve units and ponder why they are as they are, particularly as many units have seen multiple Iraq/Afghanistan tours.

By getalife

September 20, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

“Dear world,

Please accept my apology for what American has become.

Like all great powers, we became complacient. We stopped paying attention when our leaders told us that they knew how to fix everything that was wrong with everything. We were scared by the attack on our shores, those of us who had thought ourselves immune to such violence. We stepped back and said, “Yes. Do what needs to be done.” We trusted where trust was not due.

Of those who bothered to vote, nearly one half voted, twice, to enthrone a very unsavory character, and his cabal of miscreants, as the new generation of protectors of our freedom.

That same half, still frightened and confused, wrapped in a miasma of religious fervor and self-righteous anger, is still blind to the evil being done in their name. They continue to trust our government in spite of repeated examples of childish anger, and incompetent performance of the Constitutional duties which they have sworn to perform.

We did not understand that the Congress of this United States would pass a mammoth legislative package called The Patriot Act, without reading it. That act curtailed our freedoms, and even our rights to protest their loss.

We did not understand that our President would sign legislation while at the same time adding a fillip that he didn’t have to carry out the laws which that legislation enshrined. This total violation of his sworn duties still leaves many of us numb with disbelief, but does not seem to matter to that half who still accept anything this government does.

We still don’t completely understand how an American government can think torture is a justifiable act if done in the name of some imaginary war with no end in sight. We have a very hard time believing that our government would do such a thing, in spite of mounting evidence of the brutality our legal, legislative, and executive branches would foster on a world that we have been taught looked to us to uphold the standard of human rights.

We have a number of serious issues to be resolved in the next few weeks. An election that may wrest power from the stupid, ignorant and unAmerican Congress that wants to turn us into a 3rd world economy and a dictatorship of the brutal. A major challenge to the torture policy by some in that Congress who seem to have recovered a sense of what a horrible road we have started down. A battle to keep a mad man fr

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

Laura Bush is a REAL woman!! Better than that bi-tch Hillary!!

Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006 10:47 a.m. EDT Laura Bush: Release Prisoners in Myanmar

First lady Laura Bush on Tuesday called for Myanmar’s military rulers to release imprisoned pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and urged the U.N. Security Council to issue a swift resolution condemning the junta.

“The United States will work very hard with other members of the Security Council to get a good resolution about Burma,” Mrs. Bush told a panel of diplomats and Myanmar experts on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly meeting of world leaders. “The sooner the better.”

The Security Council recently placed Myanmar, also known as Burma, on its agenda - something the United States has been pushing for, despite opposition from some of Myanmar’s neighbors.

“It’s really important for Burma’s neighbors to speak with one voice,” the first lady said. While the United States believes strong sanctions are the best way to force change in the country, others favor discussions with the generals.

U.S. officials also want the United Nations to call on Myanmar to release Suu Kyi, who has been in detention for much of the last 17 years. She is among some 1,100 political prisoners.

“We want to see what we can do - is there anything we can do to make sure she as well as all the other political prisoners are released,” Bush said of Suu Kyi.

The U.N. Security Council held a rare briefing last year on political and social deterioration in Myanmar, but U.S. lawmakers want more done. They argue that isolating the junta should not be solely an American effort and have urged pressure be ramped up from China, Thailand and India, which they criticize for their economic ties with Myanmar’s generals.

In August, President Bush approved a renewal of sanctions against Myanmar, extending for a year import restrictions.

Zaid Ibrahim, a member of Malaysia’s parliament and the head of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ Inter-Parliamentary Myanmar Caucus, said governments in the region are fed up with junta.

“The only way we can hope for real change is when this regime cracks,” Ibrahim said. “Pressure works, although some people question that.”

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

The Pope speaks of faith!!! The Muslims shoot women in the back!!!

Pope Hopes Words Will Spark Faith ‘Dialogue’

Pope Benedict XVI said Wednesday that he has “deep respect” for Islam, but he did not offer an apology demanded by some Muslim leaders offended by the pontiff’s remarks in Germany last week.

The pope acknowledged that his remarks were open to misinterpretation, but insisted he had not intended to endorse a negative view of Islam.

“I hope that in several occasions during the visit … my deep respect for great religions, in particular for Muslims - who worship the one God and with whom we are engaged in defending and promoting together social justice, moral values, peace and freedom for all men - has emerged clearly,” Benedict said during his weekly audience at the Vatican.

The pope said he hoped his words would spark a “positive, even self-critical dialogue both among religions and between modern reason and Christian faith.”

At the University of Regensburg last week, Benedict cited the words of a Byzantine emperor who characterized some of the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad as “evil and inhuman,” particularly “his command to spread by the sword the faith.”

“This quote unfortunately lent itself to be misunderstood,” the pontiff said Wednesday. “In no way did I wish to make my own the words of the medieval emperor. I wished to explain that not religion and violence, but religion and reason go together.”

On Sunday, Benedict said that he was “deeply sorry” about the reactions to his remarks and that they did not reflect his own opinions. But not all in the Islamic world were satisfied by Benedict’s statement of regret.

The grand sheik of Cairo’s Al-Azhar Mosque, the Sunni Arab world’s most powerful institution, demanded that Benedict apologize more clearly.

“The pope has to apologize frankly and justify what he said,” Grand Sheik Mohammed Sayed Tantawi told papal and Egyptian Catholic representatives on Tuesday.

Before Wednesday’s weekly audience at the Vatican, the pontiff, riding in an open jeep, waved to the crowd in a tightly guarded St. Peter’s Square. At the end, the pontiff remained in the piazza to be greeted by some of the faithful.

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

Liberals, bad for business!!! Al Gore causes stock prices to drop like a rock!!!!!

Al Gore’s Current TV Teams Up with Yahoo!

Al Gore’s Current TV is going into partnership with Yahoo, Inc. to create four new broadband channels that debuted on Wednesday with a video made by Bono during U2’s last concert tour.

Like the Current TV network that the former vice president created with Joel Hyatt, the new broadband channels will focus on disseminating video created by young viewers.

“We expect this will be the premier video online experience,” Gore told The Associated Press.

One of the four channels, Yahoo! Current Buzz, is being produced by Madeleine Smithberg, co-creator of “The Daily Show,” and will “showcase the best of what’s buzzing the world and the Web,” the companies said.

The other channels will focus on action sports news, automotives and adventure traveling. The latter is where Bono’s video _ mostly about experiences with fellow band member The Edge _ is being featured. Yahoo was attracted to Current because it shares the goal of giving young people a voice on the Web, said Dan Rosensweig, Yahoo’s chief operating officer.

The four channels are separate and distinct from Current’s TV network, Gore said. But with Current only available now in 30 million of the nation’s 110 million homes with televisions, the deal promises to greatly increase the visibility of its content.

“The distribution reach and community of online viewers that Yahoo serves gives an unparalleled opportunity to connect the online video experience, including video-related content, with a mass audience,” Gore said.

The best user-created videos on the Yahoo! Current Network will be featured on Current TV each Monday afternoon.

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

Pinkos turning on pinkos!!!!! Even Ralph hates that bit-ch!!!!

Ralph Nader Attacks Hillary

Consumer activist Ralph Nader, not ruling out a fourth run for president himself, said Tuesday that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was already running for the White House and could face Sen. John McCain in the 2008 election.

“If she is a candidate in the Democratic primary with three other white men, she is going to win the primary,” Nader said during a campaign stop in Albany in which he endorsed Clinton’s Green Party challenger, Howie Hawkins, in this year’s New York Senate race. “Then, it’s down to her versus McCain.”

Nader, the Green Party’s presidential candidate in 2000, said he wasn’t sure who would win a Clinton-McCain showdown.

The three-time losing presidential contender said he would probably decide by the middle of next year whether to make another third-party run, but had no doubt about Clinton’s intentions.

“They are already planning her campaign,” Nader said. “There is no doubt in the world. You couldn’t get any odds in Las Vegas on this.” Nader complained that Clinton had sold out to corporate interests in pursuit of campaign contributions and political power.

“She’s become a profound corporate Democrat marching arm in arm with major corporate lobbyists toward the White House instead of representing the people’s interests,” Nader said.

Clinton campaign adviser Howard Wolfson declined to comment on Nader’s remarks.

Meanwhile, the anti-Iraq war activist who was crushed by Clinton in last week’s Democratic Senate primary said Tuesday he would not support her re-election bid and called on his supporters to vote against her.

By Off the Chain

September 20, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

Let’s Spam!!

^^^Republicans are off the chain again. They’re so cute when they go off the deep end. Kinda like a nest of itty bitty baby rattlesnakes. Goo, goo, daa, daa, hissss, hissss.

Next they’ll fall back on their favorite pastime, jacking names. They’ll have to find their reading glasses in order to jack their weiners, though.

By getalife

September 20, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

” A battle to keep a mad man from attacking yet another country that refuses to accept the dictates of an international control freak who uses fear and ignorance to brow beat a public which has yet to understand what is being done in their name.

Wish us well. None of us living have had to confront these issues on our own shores before. We are not good at disbelieving our government. Not because we are docile, but because we have been trained to think democracy could control our leaders. We are having a very difficult time accepting how very wrong things have gone.

Half of us still believe in the dream of freedom, respect for all peoples, and peace through diplomacy. We are working hard to convince the other half that things are off the rails.

In the meantime, know that there are still Americans who abhor what the Bush regime has done, and still plans to do, and we will do everything in our power to stop them.

A Sorrowful Citizen.”

By Midori

September 20, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

off the chain,

you are 100 percent correct.

these idiots should be kept in a cellar.

seems certain individuals are intent on disrupting this blog, come hell or high water

By Truthman

September 20, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

Hugo Chavez is addressing the U.N. right now.

Man, is he right-on about the Pax Americana Bush regime trying to remake the world into a neo-conman Christianist theocracy!!

Go Hugo Go!!

No, I don’t support Syria, but I do know truth when I hear it…That’s why I’m “Truthman!!”

By Let's Spam!!

September 20, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this