Mike Luckovich

By George

September 15, 2006 07:24 AM | Link to this

Great Toon ML! Either Dumbya thought that plan up all by himself or received it by divine intervention. Unfortunately the rest of us have to live with it then someone will have to clean up behind him after the next election.

Same sh*t different day. Andy will provide his dailey drivel and then the rest of the day will be an insultathon on the ML blog. Geez, what a way to waste a day.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 08:03 AM | Link to this

I guess hacking into the site really isn’t that big of a deal^^^.

Just to become a bug smashed on my windshield.

Cut

Look at the gigantic hairball that the dog coughed up right behind the flunky holding the piece of paper for no reason.

I got the part about the obsessed Bush Hatred; that I can see with my eyes closed.

What the hell does all the rest of this mean?

Cut

Now we’re talking:

What did Patrick Fitzgerald know, and when did he know it?- If the trip (to Niger) was classified for the vice president, why was it declassified for Mr. Wilson? Did Mr. Wilson violate any law by revealing his trip or did Mr. Fitzgerald choose not to know? Did Mr. Fitzgerald subpoena Ms. Plame? He could have asked her why, if she were truly covert, was she attending an Eastern Shore meeting in May 2003 with Democratic senators. Did Mr. Fitzgerald subpoena Mr. Wilson to attest he had never revealed his wife’s employment to anyone? If he had done so, he might have learned Mr. Corn’s source.- OpinionJournal

Frog march Fitzgerald?

Cut

“The Democrats now are incapable of answering a question on policy without mentioning Bush six times,” says pollster Kellyanne Conway. “ ’What is your vision on Iraq?’ ‘Bush lied us into war.’ ‘Health care? ‘Bush hasn’t a clue.’ They’re so obsessed with Bush it impedes them from crafting and communicating a vision all their own.” They heighten Bush by hating him.-OpinionJournalPeggyNoonan

Cut

This from the Urinal “Editorial” Board:

Perdue, Taylor may have {{{{{{{done nothing illegal,}}}}}} but voters still deserve higher standard from candidates-AJC

Really? Then how come we haven’t heard one word from you about “cattle futures?”

Maybe because of a double standard?

Or maybe because Hillary DID break the law?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 08:03 AM | Link to this

Republicans have to make this election about the Democratic Party and show America just who the Dems of 2006 really are. Mitch McConnell had it right when he said, “What they’ll do is cut and run in Iraq, they’ll raise our taxes and they’ll try to impeach the president.” Elizabeth Dole had it right, too. She said the Democrats will raise taxes and confirm judges who will threaten our values. The ACLU is the Dems’ farm team for judges like Ruth Bader Ginsburg. {{{{{It’s the anti-religious, pro-abortion ACLU that’s at the forefront of every court battle against the values most Americans share.}}}}} -RealClearPolitics

Cut

Records on file with the Federal Election Commission reveal that MoveOn.org, the far-left interest group, has “bundled” $168,591 for Bob Casey’s Pennsylvania Senate campaign. The problem? MoveOn is increasingly being accused of pushing an anti-Semitic agenda, as the folks over at Israpundit have documented in great detail here here.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

Somehow I don’t think this is what our feminist foremothers had in mind when they set about to liberate women from the patriarchy. Nothing much has changed when women are reduced to sex objects in exchange for T-shirts and trinkets, while men walk away with the cash. Boys smart, girls dumb. Way to go, gals.-TownHall

Regardless if they didn’t mean for it to happen, it’s what they got.

Girls going wild, nevertheless, has created a feminist conundrum. It’s difficult to make the case that women are gaining ground by exercising sexual autonomy when they’re essentially being ridiculed by men. This is not the first generation to awaken with a hangover and a “Say it ain’t so.” But it is the first to awaken with {{{{video footage of the night before}}}} — and for all time. For this and future generations, there’s no such thing as a memory hole for youthful transgression. Future congresswomen (and men) beware.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 08:04 AM | Link to this

News for idiots:

As to the war in Iraq, daily readers of first-line Internet news services such as Yahoo News know that this event has been reduced simply to body-count headlines. Yahoo News’s homepage at mid-day Wednesday: “Bombings, mortar attacks kill 39 in Iraq.”-OpinionJournal

Reduced to what your basic moron can understand.

Ain’t that right, Queen YAHOO!??

Cut

Instead of having any precise claim against America, these killers showed that their hurt arose from their own sense of envy and collective failure — as the now all too familiar references to “being humiliated” and lost honor in the tape attest. There is no doubt who al-Ghamdi and al-Shehri were — or what they were planning to do. Yet polls since 9/11 consistently reveal that most Muslims in the Middle East do not believe that al-Qaida, much less any Arab Muslims at all, carried out the attacks. Instead, Israel or the CIA is blamed. So the tape is also a chilling reminder that in this war evidence means nothing — superstition, bias and delusion everything.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

SUMMER 2006 TEMPS FAIL TO BREAK RECORD SET IN 1936

With fewer hurricanes too.

Maybe if you exaggerate it, you know, “it may not be getting warmer but BEWARE! be afraid, be very afraid!”

Cut

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By Mo' Def O'Cation (The Black Irish Rapper)

September 15, 2006 08:09 AM | Link to this

Hey You’re right Where’s Osama Spent Last Night with yo’ mama

Says you hate the kurds, shiites and sunnis Cuz’ you believe the press by the moonies

You wrap up in the American Banner Cuz’ you hate the folks whose skin is tanner

You really bring us all to tears Cuz’ you’re all about fears, queers and smears.

By mike

September 15, 2006 08:23 AM | Link to this

“Increased number of terrorists”?

Is this “fearmongering”? Is Mikey “trying to scare us” when he’s points out the threat from terrorists?

Of course, when liberals point out the terrorist threat, they are “speaking truth to power”. When Republicans do the exact same thing they are “fearmongering”.

Liberal=Hypocrite

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 08:26 AM | Link to this

Good morning Andy!

Did you see that “finch AKA Bon Scott” got BUSTED last nite?

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 08:32 AM | Link to this

I suppose its possible that this cartoon is pointing out the ABSURDITY of the the Left’s position on the Iraq War, but somehow I doubt it.

Mike Luckovich,

What is the MOTIVE for Bush “planning” to “increase terrorism”? Maybe you can break yourself away from dreaming up your next cartoon and share your moonbat, err “Moderate Democrat” reasoning with us.

By Goldie

September 15, 2006 08:39 AM | Link to this

“It’s the end of the world as we know it!”

Another beaut, Lucko — with Dubya’s policies to date, we’d be much better off letting his dog Beasley make the big decisions from now on… Beasley for commander-in-chief, dog bones for everyone!

By Goldie

September 15, 2006 08:43 AM | Link to this

Here’s one rational Texas candidate that all Americans can get behind

Go Kinky!

By The Way

September 15, 2006 08:44 AM | Link to this

I wonder if Bush knows yet what his war has unleashed on the world? The grim reaper wields a Shia scythe.

US polls since 911 reveal that most americans think Saddam did 911.

When we look at the Muslims, we are seeing ourselves. That’s why there’s no hope. Andy so loathes himself that he projects it on others, (as do all of the unhinged, lunatic fringe on a self destructing binge).

I’m ashamed that Andy might be an American. Ditto Sell Swedish, and Ditto RW. I apologize to the world for their crudeness, and just hope the 5.7 billion members of the “non-USA club” are kind enough to forgive us for harboring hate speaking devils like Andy, RW, and Sell Swedish.

It’s for certain that these trolls have broken laws included in the new Patriot Act and other Homeland Security provisions. Cant we imprison them under the old detainee rules retroactive to 911? It’s not fair that these horrid traitors are allowed to ruin Luckovich’s blog.

It’s unamerican.

By The Way

September 15, 2006 08:55 AM | Link to this

(o)

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this

The Way,

You’re the “troll” moron, and when you say this “When we look at the Muslims, we are seeing ourselves” include ME out of the WE part.

By Angry Liberal Guy

September 15, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this

BD, is the term “include me out” anything like “exclude”? Where did you learn to speak? The GW Bush Language Institute?

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 09:12 AM | Link to this

Lookie here at 8:44! A moonbat gets behind the Patriot Act, at least if they can use to enforce their silly little speech codes.

Freaking fascist!

(*)

By getalife

September 15, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

Great toon Mike.

Is the failed neocon plan the worst disaster in our history?

Time will tell.

The wingnuts here are obsessed with “finch” and he has not been posting here. Shows how crazy these wingnuts really are.

Lunatics.

By Naked Emperor

September 15, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this

I wonder if this was part of the Bush plan:

“Representative Bob Ney, Republican of Ohio, has agreed to plead guilty to federal criminal charges related to his dealings with the corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff.”

OR

The state’s highest criminal appeals court said Wednesday it would consider reinstating a conspiracy charge against former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, further delaying his felony money laundering trial.

THE PARTY OF NIXON IS FULL OF CROOKS!

By getalife

September 15, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this

W reading cracked magazine is too funny. LOL.

Even Barney thinks he is an idiot.

By Another Republicrook Bites the Dust

September 15, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - Abandoning months of defiant denials, Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, intends to admit guilt in the congressional corruption probe spawned by disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, according to Republican officials.

Ney, R-Ohio, is expected to plead guilty to at least one criminal charge, possibly by the end of the day Friday, these officials said, and become the first lawmaker to admit wrongdoing in the election-year investigation.

Typical Republican modus operandi. Deny, deny, deny, until they finally GO TO JAIL. We can’t afford to give the Republicrooks anymore blank checks to write. America can’t stand anymore of the ‘robust’ economy Republicrooks imagine they see after stuffing their pockets full of graft money.

Americans deserve an economy that is truely robust for real everyday working Americans, not just these thieves. Let’s get the Republican big, big, big government out of our pocketbooks come November. Throw the bums out ! ! !

By Eric

September 15, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

The only problem I have with this cartoon is that it makes ole Dubya look much smarter than he really is.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 09:23 AM | Link to this

The censors are everywhere around here. “The Way” wants free speech to be a crime, “Angry Liberal Guy” doesn’t allow synonymous phrasing, and ml’s computer removed my underscores.

gitmolife is still shrieking like a banshee, but I guess that isn’t the same thing.

By William Jefferson-Democrat Louisiana

September 15, 2006 09:27 AM | Link to this

Tell ‘em boys! We can’t allow corrupt politicians to stay in office. Throw the book at them I say. Don’t let them defend themselves. Git ‘em…GIT ‘EM NOW!

By Scooter

September 15, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

There sure are a lot of absolutes in your cartoon world ml.

NO WMD’s? There were 15 vials of assorted chemical agents found in an Iraqi scientist’s freezer, waiting for sanctions to be eroded away, so the WMD programs could be reconstituted. The liberal way I guess… let someone else take care of it and ignore the corruption it creates, whether it be our governments or the UN’s. I know, you wouldn’t have minded so much if we waited for Saddam’s plan to come to fruition and been forced to send our brave troops into some chemical clouds.

NO AL QAEDA / IRAQ TIES? There were non-collaborative ties between Iraq and Al-Qaeda. You can draw your toons and think the two would not have exchanged weapons to destroy their common enemy, The Great Satan. But, that would have been a huge gamble with Americans lives and one of the reasons your life’s work seems to consist of d-d-d-d-d-d-drawing c-c-c-c-c-c-c-cartoons.

Simply because Maliki went and spoke with the president of iran, and they are of the same sect of Islam, you conclude they are aligned, makes you an lopsided buffoon.

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this

ML’s cartoon gets it exactly right, of course. Bush the Chimperor has made so many bad decisions, in exactly the wrong order. He’s got a death wish. Too bad he’s so intent on shoving it down the country’s throat.

Andy (Drunk Resident Moran), I can understand why Bush is being criticized for ineptitude. After all, he IS the President. This PNAC disaster blossomed on his watch. But the “obsession” you see on the left with Bush pales in comparison with the obsession that you and your moran pals have with the Clintons. He hasn’t been President for 6 years. She never has been. And you’re fixated on cattle futures??? Get a life. Or buy one. I don’t care.

My dear Copenhagen neocon, speaking of obsessions, is your obsession about who I am an attempt to divert attention from what I write? Goodness, I’m THAT scary!!! I’m flattered. And you’re a lousy Nancy Drew. BTW, you don’t have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out who drunken Andy is here. And my name? Easy. In his profile somewhere else, Andy lists his favorite bands. GnR and AC/DC. Why a neocon poser like him would idolize musicians who epitomize criminal irresponsibility and drunken, anonymous sex is beyond me. No, wait! Silly me! He aspires to that lifestyle!! Well, he’s got the drunk part nailed down.

But I digress. Adopting the bon scott name seemed a fitting way to get a dig in. Worked beyond my wildest dreams!

Have another drink, Andy.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 09:33 AM | Link to this

The Management,

When does GEORGIE GIRL get the banning stick for HACKING into the blog this morning at 7:24 AM or does that only apply to conservatives?

By Chicken Little Republicans

September 15, 2006 09:36 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - Another member of the Bush family is getting cozy with former President Clinton. First lady Laura Bush joins the former president as a keynote speaker opening his three-day Clinton Global Initiative in New York next week.

Clinton has famously formed a close friendship with the current president’s dad. Clinton has been a repeat guest at the Kennebunkport, Maine, home of George H.W. Bush and his wife, Barbara.

Clinton also sparked curiosity when he was spotted at the White House last month. It turns out that he and the current president were having lunch, something White House aides said they do occasionally.

Now we know what’s wrong with the Chimperor. King George is under the Clinton voodoo spell. The little stinker must have smuggled in one of those Democrat mind control rays on the day of the Chimperors coronation. Run wingnuts the Hillarycopters are circling and the sky is falling. The sky is all ways falling from the Republican perspective, isn’t it ? ? ?

By Lord Help Us

September 15, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

Gotta love those ‘conservative,’ ‘Christian’ values:

“I continue to read and hear that we are facing a ‘different enemy’ in the war on terror,” retired Gen. John W. Vessey Jr., a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote in a letter to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) this week. “No matter how true that may be, inhumanity and cruelty are not new to warfare nor to enemies we have faced in the past… . Through those years, we held to our own values. We should continue to do so.”

Jesus must be so proud that these ‘Americans’ associate themselves with Him…

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

Tell me if you see what’s wrong here:

By Mo’ Def O’Cation (The Black Irish Rapper) September 15, 2006 08:09 AM Cuz’ you believe the press by the moonies

Followed shortly thereafter by this:

Cuz’ you hate the folks whose skin is tanner

Hatin on the moonies, by the left wing and thier loonies.

Rappin out their lies, because the truth the really despise.

Hit it. Cuz.

By Pandinga

September 15, 2006 09:40 AM | Link to this

George u suck Also part of my plan

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this

I see the Chimperor’s close personal friends in Pakistan are sending reinforcements to the Taliban:

Pakistan’s credibility as a leading ally in the war on terrorism was called into question last night when it emerged that President Pervez Musharraf’s government had authorised the release from jail of thousands of Taliban fighters caught fighting coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Bush’s foreign policy strategy is once again working like a well oiled machine.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 09:42 AM | Link to this

Bob to cop a plea today

Great timing, right before the elections.

By rushncap

September 15, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this

Scooter, do you long for the days when you at least had straws to grasp at?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

By The Way September 15, 2006 08:44 AM It’s for certain that these trolls have broken laws included in the new Patriot Act and other Homeland Security provisions. Cant we imprison them under the old detainee rules retroactive to 911? It’s not fair that these horrid traitors are allowed to ruin Luckovich’s blog.

Look at this psychotic liberal, wants to lock up fellow Americans because we make his little brain hurt but he wants to set free all of the people killing his fellow citizens.

What a waste.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

bonnie “Baghdad Bob” bigot,

Just because you and your friends are complete idiots doesn’t mean the rest of us are. There is no reason to distract attention from what you say because you have lost those EXACT same arguments over and over. Go back and read since you like to troll around other sites looking at profiles.

Buy Danish,

I think some of these losers finally figure out they’ve been beaten and just change their name to try again. It’s kind of like in Groundhog Day when Bill Murray keeps perfecting his pickup lines. The problem with finch/seeker/mirror/bonnie-bigot is that he never changes the dialog.

Then there are the rushncap’s that lose day in and day out, but are too stupid to realize it.

By Naked Emperor

September 15, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this

How could I have failed to redirect your attention to yet another recent PARTY OF NIXON’s criminals:

Former Representative Randy Cunningham, Republican of California, had pleaded guilty to accepting bribes from a military contractor. This scandal involved lobbyists paying bribes for “earmarks” — the special interest projects inserted into major spending bills by individual lawmakers, often anonymously and with little scrutiny.

One party rule = THE PARTY OF NIXON’s fascist state.

Can’t join the army due to that wide, yellow stripe down your back? Just run for office in the PARTY OF NIXON.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 09:54 AM | Link to this

Yep, they are too pitiful to own up to their own failures and blame Clinton

Pathetic losers.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 09:54 AM | Link to this

Let’s save everybody some time here:

Yahoo “news” front page

Just cut and paste all of these stories in order and then blame them all on Bush.

We get it already!

Save some freaking bandwith here!

Do you want me to cut and paste EVERY SINGLE FREAKING STORY OUT OF THE WASHINGTON TIMES AND BLAME IT ON HARRY REID?

I’m not that stupid.

I took ONE relevant story out of 50 from the Times this morning and SPARED EVERYBODY THE MINDLESS SPAM.

Could we get the same consideration?

By getalife

September 15, 2006 10:05 AM | Link to this

It is w’s fault, he is our fearless er fear pimping leader.

The gop is in power.

They are pathetic failures and can’t govern this great country.

They have created more damage than you or I will ever know but the future generations will be paying the price for their greed and low morals.

Keep cheering on the cheerleader.

Lunatic.

By Republican Justice

September 15, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

HONOLULU - TV reality star Duane “Dog” Chapman and two co-stars on his show were arrested Thursday in Hawaii on charges of illegal detention and conspiracy in the bounty hunters’ capture three years ago of a cosmetics company heir.

The charges stem from Chapman’s capture of Max Factor heir Andrew Luster on June 18, 2003, in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, said Marshals spokeswoman Nikki Credic in Washington.

Chapman’s capture of Luster, who had fled the country while on trial on charges he raped three women, catapulted the 53-year-old bounty hunter to fame and led to the reality series on A&E.

“You see what the American government is doing to us? They throw us in jail,” Chapman said in a federal courtroom. “I’m so upset about this.”

Dog, you should’ve known better than to go after one of the ‘richy, rich’ Republican perverts. The ‘Pervs in Power’ will always shelter one of their own ! ! ! Rich man’s justice.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

Andy,

My guess is that the “black irish rapper” is none other than “finch” who also posts as Bon Scott.

You may recall that “Finch” has an obsession with Moonies and particularly with the publisher of the Washington Times.

RW,

Bon Scott is not entirely gone yet, but we now have a really bad rapper to sing in his band^^. He already has Midori and Getalife singing in the chorus. All he needs is an audience that won’t boo him off the stage.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

Anybody want to tell me what this has got to do with ANYTHING????

Other than slowing this blog down to a crawl???

By Republican Justice

September 15, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

HONOLULU - TV reality star Duane “Dog” Chapman and two co-stars on his show were arrested Thursday in Hawaii on charges of illegal detention and conspiracy in the bounty hunters’ capture three years ago of a cosmetics company heir.

The charges stem from Chapman’s capture of Max Factor heir Andrew Luster on June 18, 2003, in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, said Marshals spokeswoman Nikki Credic in Washington.

Chapman’s capture of Luster, who had fled the country while on trial on charges he raped three women, catapulted the 53-year-old bounty hunter to fame and led to the reality series on A&E.

“You see what the American government is doing to us? They throw us in jail,” Chapman said in a federal courtroom. “I’m so upset about this.”

Dog, you should’ve known better than to go after one of the ‘richy, rich’ Republican perverts. The ‘Pervs in Power’ will always shelter one of their own ! ! ! Rich man’s justice.

By Lord Help Us

September 15, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

Yup, 3.5 years later everything is going to plan…

Police found 30 bodies bearing signs of torture Friday, the latest in a wave of sectarian killings sweeping the Iraqi capital despite a monthlong security operation. A U.S. Marine was killed Friday in Anbar province, and an American soldier was killed Thursday evening by a roadside bomb northwest of Baghdad, the military said. The soldier was the fifth to have died on Thursday, making it a particularly bloody day for U.S. forces. Violence has intensified over the past two days, with more than 130 people either killed by attacks or their bodies found dumped in the streets of Baghdad. All the bodies found Friday had signs of torture, and one that washed up on the banks of the Tigris River had been dismembered.

Portions of Iraq already serving as training grounds/sanctuaries for terrorists, Iran and Syria strengthened, Pakistan carving out its own Osama Bin Laden sanctuary…

Our ‘War on Terror’ has successfully created more terrorists, terrorist training grounds and terrorist sanctuaries!! Wasn’t that the goal???

Bush is BRILLIANT!!

By getalife

September 15, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

Just admit your party is destroying our country Andy and lets go from there.

Be a man for once in your life and admit their failures.

By The Way

September 15, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this

Andy is very emotional today. Oh, yeah, it’s the 15th…….ew.

By Republican Justice

September 15, 2006 10:19 AM | Link to this

Could we get the same consideration?

Who cares about Harry Reid except Democrats? But since you asked nice and want to act civil for a change, request granted. See ya’ll another day.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 10:21 AM | Link to this

Lunatic BD.

“finch” is not posting here.

Get it together, you are embarrassing yourself.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

Andy thinks it is okay if he spams but not us.

Hypocrite lunatic.

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 10:25 AM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) - September 15, 2006 09:47 AM - Just because you and your friends are complete idiots doesn’t mean the rest of us are. There is no reason to distract attention from what you say because you have lost those EXACT same arguments over and over. Go back and read since you like to troll around other sites looking at profiles.

Pompous AND delusional. A dangerous mix!!

You keep parroting the same arguments from the post 9/11 PNAC neocon playbook. Over and over and over again. And you’re not losing? You’ve already lost.

Hey, if Andy didn’t want his left wing, sex drugs and booze saturated tastes in music made public, he shouldn’t have put it in his profile.

Quick! Click here before the drunk changes it!

By Lord Help Us

September 15, 2006 10:27 AM | Link to this

I bet this frightens those terrorists…

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 10:33 AM | Link to this

getalife,

Are you saying that because Finch is no longer posting as Finch we should “move on”, or are you denying that Finch is Bon Scott??

By getalife

September 15, 2006 10:39 AM | Link to this

I am saying, guessing who is posting on a anonymous blog makes you look silly.

Attacking the messenger rather than the message makes look silly.

Not admitting your party’s failures makes you look silly.

Silly wingnuts.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 10:48 AM | Link to this

A relevant subject that has discussed on this blog several times, I’m taking a short section from the article to help make the point I want to:

For some 20 years I taught a number of foreign students from the Middle East in the United States, and sometimes noticed a disturbing tendency. Initial exuberance at America’s openness often was followed with deep uncertainty whether our rejection of traditional repression was healthy — especially in the permissive campus landscape of risqué female fashion, open homosexuality, easy mixing of the races and religions, atheism, sexual promiscuity, and drug use.

1) What prevents these Saudi students from walking or swimming across our imaginary “border” if they wanted to harm us, right now? If they “emigrate” will we not have at least a record of who’s here?

2) Even though we do need to cure our own internal sicknesses, listed ^^ above, I don’t agree that we should be changing our culture because of religious concerns of FOREIGNERS. America was formed as refuge for Christians and has carried that belief for 350 years. Visitors and new comers need to RESPECT that.

3) We are, despite the lunatics on the left, a good people. And we live in freedom with a respect for each other and a self imposed morality.

Why shouldn’t we expose these Saudis to that goodness? And hope that they adopt it for themselves?

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 10:50 AM | Link to this

getalife,

There is nobody posting as “Lunatic BD” or “Andy” here either. Why are you embarrassing yourself so getalife, why oh why?

Freaking hypocrite!

By Truthman

September 15, 2006 10:52 AM | Link to this

Go Dawgs! Go Falcons! Go Jackets!

Oh yeah, nice toon Mike!

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this

RW,

This is too funny = finch, oops, I mean Bon Scott takes a quote from you that notes that he has been trolling around checking out blogger profiles, calls YOU “delusional” and then proceeds to link to Andy’s profile.

Bon Scott OOPS finch,

Anymore red herrings to distract from the fact that YOU were busted? I’ve gotta run, but I’ll check in later to see what other unclever diversions you’ve dropped for the adamantly stupid people who fall for your lying BS.

BTW, the motto for the finch heraldic crest translates as “To have a conscience free from guilt”. How fitting! Lying is in your freaking genes.

Getalife,

That argument is absurd and pathetic, but not surprising as it is a perfect illustration of moonbattery.

How do you separate the message from the messenger when it comes to blogging? I guess that’s how you justify separating the statements of politicians from their actions and vote to erase history.

As for finch, I don’t debate the ideas of congentital liars once I discover what complete and utter freaking liars they are.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this

bonnie-bigot,

Didn’t your therapist tell you projection was a dangerous trait of yours when you had that whole “I hate General Seeker” meltdown?

By getalife

September 15, 2006 10:58 AM | Link to this

You mean despite the hypocritical lunatics on the right, we are good people.

Fixed it for you, lunatic.

BTW, the terrorists of 9/11 were from that country you love more than our country just like w.

Traitor lunatic.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 11:06 AM | Link to this

By the words idiot BD.

Your personal attacks shows how weak and pathetic your silly arguments really are.

You and your friends should post at blogs like the lgf to spew your hatred and bob your heads to Charles’ bs.

It must suk to have no morals or decency. I feel sorry for people like you.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

It is easier to type RW.

Why attack the messenger?

Why is our counterattack not okay?

Why not admit failure?

Freaking pathetic hypocrite.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

gitmolife,

finch is easier to type than bonnie-bigot too. Nobody is attacking the messenger, just pointing out who the messenger is as we deconstruct the same pathetic arguments they made under a different name.

Counterattack all you want, I know you think we are your enemy anyway because you lack the courage to face the real enemy.

I don’t really care to point out what a failure you are. That really would be attacking the messenger.

Now before you spew any more mealy mouth questions I’m out of here for some recreation.

Enjoy!

By I Solved The Mystery!!

September 15, 2006 11:31 AM | Link to this

It really isn’t finch.

It’s finch’s sister bonnie.

Oddity runs in the family.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 11:34 AM | Link to this

Have fun, me too.

I like this wingnut style of attack.

It is fun.

By Buffalo Bob

September 15, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

Scooter-

What the heck is a “NON-COLLABORATIVE TIE”. I have a non-collaborative tie with everyone who drinks water or needs oxygen to exist! Stupidest thing I’ve ever seen on a blog and i’ve seen plenty of stupid!

By Brian Curtis

September 15, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this

Bob: That one stuck out to me. I can just picture Bush saying:

“Look, Saddam and al-Qaeda, they both breathe oxygen. And they both live in hot, sandy places. Some of ‘em even speak the same language. It’s obvious they’re collaborat—oops, I mean, it’s obvious they had ties that made Saddam an imminent threat. 9/11, 9/11. Heh-heh-heh. It’s fun to be dictator—oops, did I say that out loud? I meant, God Bless America.”

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this

Pompous RW, cretinous Copenhagen and drunken Andy… I’m afraid it’s YOU who’ve been busted.

Your obsession with the ID of an anonymous blogger is a poor diversion. And pathetic!! As getalife points out, THIS IS AN ANONYMOUS BLOG!! Your lengthy and verbose whining doesn’t really divert attention from your illogical and dangerous support of Bush the Befuddled and his sociopathic handlers.

And you spew the same universally discredited arguments over and over and over again. Saddam had WMDs. Saddam and Osama were buddies. Iraq was a Muslim terror lynchpin. (It wasn’t. But it is now.) Stay the course. We must fight them there so we don’t fight them here. Blah blah blah…

I think it’s wonderful that most Americans now see your bs for what it is.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

Uh-oh:

The report disregards the May 7, 2003, decision of Clinton-appointed U.S. District Court Judge Harold Baer, Jr. that Baghdad backed the 9/11 attack. Baer awarded $104 million in damages from the Baathist regime to the families of George Eric Smith and Timothy Soulas, both killed at the World Trade Center. As Baer ruled: “I conclude that plaintiffs have shown, albeit barely, ‘by evidence satisfactory to the court,’ that Iraq provided material support to bin Laden and al Qaeda.”-NationalReview

By Scooter

September 15, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

Buffalo Bob, it was in this little thing called the 9/11 Commission Report. Yes many stupid things come out of Washington, but I was just repeating something. Does that help, smart guy!

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

LOL Bob! The US has “non-collaborative ties” with the North Koreans. That doesn’t mean we support them, approve of them or even like them.

By Quick

September 15, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

The Only terrorist that was successful and determine to attack on US soil is not reliant > because W wants to get rid of all Terrorist> even the ones who could care less about the US. > Well Great Plan If U could Only catch the One Terrorist that wants to attack the US> 5 long years of the GOP and BUSH talking LOUD and doing nothing>> nothing but spending the NEWS and taking photo OPS>> The GOP will steal candy from your mom and blame the Media and Clinton for them not doing there job>> U right-wingers_nuts>>

By Midori

September 15, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this

Looks like RW cut and golfed again today.

By Truthman

September 15, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this

Religion is the opiate of the masses!

By Truthman

September 15, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

Religion is the opiate of the masses!

By Midori

September 15, 2006 12:20 PM | Link to this

I wonder if RW, Andy and BD dream about Finch at night?

They sure are obsessed with him!!

By Jaydubya

September 15, 2006 12:31 PM | Link to this

Hey Mike,

Great cartoon again. I’m just so amazed at how good humor is wasted on right leaning readers. They can’t take or ascertain satire.

By Goldie

September 15, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

Rep. Bob Ney Agrees to Plead Guilty

Another “family values” squealing neo-con pig goes down — and there’s just too many Repugnant crooks to keep up with these days. Bring on the Novmeber elections!

By rushncap

September 15, 2006 12:54 PM | Link to this

RW declaring victory over me in absentia. I guess for his that IS a victory, since he never gets far when I’m around.

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 01:15 PM | Link to this

Once again, our DRM (Drunken Resident Moran) fails Reading Comprehension 101. Or maybe he thinks posting a paragraph from a National Review taken out of context is perfectly okay.

By You’re Right, Where Is Osama? - September 15, 2006 10:48 AM - A relevant subject that has discussed on this blog several times, I’m taking a short section from the article to help make the point I want to

After posting a paragraph from the column that describes how Arab students in the US are often confused by women who don’t do the chador, our rejection of government mandated religion, and our tolerance of guys who hold hands, DRM Andy concludes it’s silly to block 15,000 Saudi students from the US, because we need to show them just how gosh darn decent we are overall!

Why shouldn’t we expose these Saudis to that goodness? And hope that they adopt it for themselves?

But if you take the time to read the column by Victor Davis Hansen, you’ll see that he reaches an entirely different conclusion:

I have no doubt that the vast, vast majority of these students are wonderful people, but, given the one-eyed-Jack nature of the Saudi government, and the past utter ineptness of our own immigration service, I also have no assurance whatsoever that one more surviving Ghamdi or another Alhazmi is not among them — and just one in this war has been quite enough already.

If we really want to educate some Arab Muslims on the good USA life, I’d rather accept a few from Iraq. We’re far more likely to find young men and women there who haven’t had hatred of the US and Israel drilled into their heads at government run schools like the ones the Wahhabi Saudis control.

I win again, Andy. Have another drink.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 01:27 PM | Link to this

Arguing with bonnie Hitler, finch’s sister, is like arguing with an insane asylum resident, therefore I’m taking a pass on it.

Could someone please explain to that tw-at that I DISAGREE with Victor Davis Hansen, it’s not that hard to comprehend unless, of course, you’ve got sh-it for brains.

rushncrap: RW told everyone he was leaving, you move in for the easy slander.

Yesterday, you told no one you were moving on, RW just naturally finished kicking your socialist behind thinking you were still there.

Pot to Kettle?

By Allaina

September 15, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this

Another lunch hour another post Mr. Luckovich.

I watch the news and hear how the insurgency is always adapting to our methods and them to ours. It seems to be a war of wills and it’ll take time.

President Bush is consistent in his determination. He listens to General Casey & General Abizaid. He has confidence in his military leaders in Iraq. I don’t like it when our presidents allow politics to fight military battles.

There actually could be a strategy in play here with Iran. Not something he planned for but something that can be dealt with if necessary.

I would be terrified if Mr. Gore or Senator Kerry were sitting in that chair. I’m afraid this country would be in serious trouble right now if either of them had won.

Back to work.

By Midori

September 15, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this

Allaina,

you need to choose another beverage other than Kool Aid to wash you lunch down with.

By w00t

September 15, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this

LOL, I can see it now “New Talking Point: Iraq siding with Iran part of war on terrorism”

It was part of the master rac… er plan

Please that guy can see any futher ahead other than 5 minutes ago.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 02:36 PM | Link to this

finch,

If I say that I like Harry Belafonte music does that mean that I endorse his despicable politics?

That is a rhetorical question and does not need an answer. I only raise it to illustrate the utter bankruptcy and hypocrisy of your belief system, which includes the concept that if one listens to AC/DC one is automatically endorsing their private, off-stage behavior, and even assuming their bad habits.

I really hate to bring up past Presidents, but apparently this moonbat rule does not apply to your own heroes.

Team getalife,

I debated “finch” ad nauseum and kicked his butt on the issues. There is a limit to how much time I am willing to spend re-arguing the same thing endlessly, particularly if the person I was debating then pulls a trick of assuming a different blog persona and expects me to debate the same freaking issue all over again.

Is it a “personal attack” to point out how weird it is that while a blogger is using two different names one compliments the other on their “brilliant” posts?

Is it a “personal attack” when one discovers the lunacy of a blogger getting into an imaginary fight with its other blog persona?

Is there some moonbat rule that says we can’t point out how freaking bizarre that is?

Is there some moonbat rule that says it’s okay to lie about it when you get outed?

For you to try to claim some sort of moral high ground is beyond absurd, especially when you are endorsing lying and deception as an admirable tactic.

By Truthman

September 15, 2006 03:03 PM | Link to this

Jerry Lewis’ voice: Hey Andy!!

Every time the Chimp says “Iraq” he says “9-11” at least six times:

Why did we invade Iraq? 9-11!

But you said last week on Katic Couric that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11?

If we don’t fight them there, we’ll have to fight them here…9-11!!

“My job as president is to link 9-11 with Iraq?”

“You have to repeat the propaganda many time before the truth sinks in!”

9-11! 9-11! 9-11!!

You are right about one thing, though, there are more than 100 million Americans who hate the Chimp, the Dark Lord and Darth Rove! I’m proud to be one of them.

But, we progressives don’t go out and kill our enemies as do the repugs! We will “kill” them at the ballot box November 7…53 days from now!!

By Huge

September 15, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this

Good afternoon all.

I think I read where RW is out teeing them up this afternnon. Long and straight, RW, long and straight.

Even so, there’s something I wanted to clarify from the other night, which was his post to me: “I’m afraid it’s you followers of Gore that he thinks are stupid. Sorry to have to break that to you.”

I voted against Gore in 2000, so I guess I’m not much of an Al follower. So right back at ya, RW!

Seriously, as someone here (@@?) mentioned it, I’ve been checking out (I believe the operative word is lurking) the blog over at Wooten’s site the past couple of days and the news isn’t pretty! Although, there are numerous intelligent bloggers there, the situation overall is much the same as it is here. A little discussion/disagreement of issues with a whole lot of anger, name calling and general juvenile stupidity. Granted, the left/right mix is different, but the insane asylum being run by the inmates nature of it is not.

As I’m new to this whole political blogosphere thing, can someone tell me, is it like this everywhere?

By Midori

September 15, 2006 03:06 PM | Link to this

“Is it a “personal attack” when one discovers the lunacy of a blogger getting into an imaginary fight with its other blog persona?”

Well, is it, Danish?

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 03:15 PM | Link to this

My Copenhagen Cutie, it’s refreshing to know that you reject in principle any endorsement of “lying and deception as an admirable tactic.”

I think you should focus this newfound moral clairity on the Bush White House.

After all, the world that Bush and his handlers occupy is far more serious and life altering than the world inside an anonymous blog.

Perhaps you can discuss this over drinks with Andy.

Love and kisses, Bon

By getalife

September 15, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this

Um BD.

You tripping?

I do not see finch here and have not seen him in a while.

Seek help.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 03:29 PM | Link to this

“I debated “finch” ad nauseum and kicked his butt on the issues.”

I would say it was the other way around and like your party, you can’t admit failure.

Deal with it, psycho BD.

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 03:29 PM | Link to this

A change of pace from the neocon obsession with blogger IDs…

Did you see where a Georgia repuke group whose former head was arrested for flashing is attacking Mark Taylor? I think Taylor spokesman Rick Dent’s response puts the whining in perspective…

“The Southeastern Legal Foundation wants to investigate Lt. Governor Mark Taylor,” Dent wrote. “As long as they don’t take us to a state park, we’re fine.”

Let’s see… GOP stands for “Grand Ogling Perverts.” No, maybe it’s “Gross Old Pedophiles”…

Help me out, people!

By Scooter

September 15, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

Huge, ml’s blog used to not be this way. It was rather cordial with good discussions about a year ago.

Don’t get me wrong, you will see the typical compassion, understanding and generalizing of “the left” towards those that disagree with them. Eventually, too many conservatives adopted the same tactics and now we are where we are.

Heck, back then Getalife was even cordial, fun loving and protected by @@ (oka OO).

By Liberal Texas Democrat

September 15, 2006 03:44 PM | Link to this

Bon Scot, Help me out people! Sure, here you go Now I’m out of here before Andy, BD, and the rest start in. I don’t play with children. I just taunt them.

By w00t

September 15, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this

Some of you guys might like this.

Take the Republican or Democratic loyalty Quiz

By Huge

September 15, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this

Thanks Scooter,

Yeah, I can see thing’s were much more mellow here then. People didn’t seem so hung up on just villifying each other as much.

You know one thing you said that has often made me wonder about it. Your implication seems that the left has been guilty of these ad hominem attacks before the right “adopted the same tactics”. And, of course, they contend the very same thing, especially at the national level with Gingrich leading the way.

Personally I don’t care who “started” it and the whole thing reminds me of school children whining that so and so did it first! To me, we’ve lost a lot of our manners and civility along the way, and with it, benefical discourse.

But, even so, look at you and me. Although, we’ve only communicated a very few times, one thing seems obvious - we are probably on “different” sides of the fence on many issues, but that doesn’t mean we stoop to attacking each other for it.

By @@

September 15, 2006 04:08 PM | Link to this

Huge:

You might want to “Google” centrist blogs and take your pick. That is, if you are truly a centrist. There have been times when you seem to be, and then times when you don’t. One comes to mind, “Donk*lephant.” If you’re the *, go for it. Actually it’s spelled “Donklephant.”

Wooten’s has good days and bad. I try to make one comment a day. I made one early yesterday there and was “namejacked” and ridiculed by the left in numerous posts, and wasn’t even around to see them. Saw them late in the afternoon when I got home.

Happy hunting.

By Thomas

September 15, 2006 04:12 PM | Link to this

-=-

Greetings Boys and Girls (and other unknown critters)—-

Mike L —- Great Cartoon!

Lets add another line that Bush is probably thinking!

“Yes — While I have them all distracted by my political and war fiasco’s, my good buddies at Haliburton and the PNAC can rape Iraq of all it’s oil resources.. Mmmm —- Yes indeed! - All part of my plan!”

-=-

I figure afterwards - when the war gets really out of hand, that Darth Cheeney, and Emperor Bush can declare Marshall Law and cancel elections in the USA under the rules of a National Emergency so they can run the country until — well — uhhhm — until!

Thomas (It’s all about the Oil and Money folks!)

-=-

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 04:14 PM | Link to this

By LieGirl September 15, 2006 03:03 PM Jerry Lewis’ voice: Hey Andy!! Every time the Chimp says “Iraq” he says “9-11” at least six times:

You pinkos sure do get confused easy.

You know, Bush isn’t speaking french, maybe that’s the problem, you reckon?

I’ve always heard that “Iraq was part of the war on Islamic Fascism.” Unquote.

I don’t know where you developed this 911 psychosis.

Been to Huffington?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this

Scooter: I think it might have just been you getting “mellow” because I damn sure don’t remember it that way.

These pinkos jacked my name in the first hour or something like that.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 04:18 PM | Link to this

Midori,

The answer is………No. Unless you’re a moonbat.

Getalife,

That’s a neat trick. When you lose an argument you just change your name and then according to your coward’s rules whatever the person said in the past can’t be held against them.

finch*,

One more time, for the last time:

Bush did not “lie”. He did the best job that he could for this country with the information that he had available after 9/11. He continues to act in an honorable manner with our best interests at heart, and to take commendable action as our Commander in Chief.

Of course if you’re “finch” and then this is the alternative reality:

“By finch/May 10, 2006 05:05 PM”

{{Danish,}}

{{The basis for the moronic Iraq invasion had to be ego. Ego coupled with an $800 billion expense account and thousands of American lives.}} {{It sure wasn’t for the safety and security of the United States.}}

Let us know when you finally figure out who the real enemy is (besides Saudi college students).

*who finally admits to being “Bon Scott” after spending weeks lying about it

By Huge

September 15, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

@@,

“That is, if you are truly a centrist. There have been times when you seem to be, and then times when you don’t.”

I hear ya. Someimes I even confound myself! I guess I’m just a contrarian, who hates being pigeon-holed with any classification. I tend to waffle around the middle somewhere. Sometimes a little more left and sometime a little more right. And I know that politically, that is despised by many. Like I care! The one thing that really turns me off though is absolute extremism. Both sides seem ultra kooky and mildly dangerous.

I’ll check out Donklephant - it looks interesting. But for now, this little slice of hometown heaven seems to be my home.

I saw your first post over there but am still not clever enough to catch name-jacking, I guess. It’s really a shame that so many morons, from both sides, thrive on these blogs.

By Scooter

September 15, 2006 04:35 PM | Link to this

Huge, I agree the who started it argument is juvenille, but; one can only be called a fascist chickenhawk warmonger so many times and those understanding labels have been present since the beginning.

Andy, times were cordial and you were name jacked after approximately four months of civil discourse. At least that’s how I remember it.

I liked it when Big Daddy was posting, but the AJC’s postng delay ran Big Daddy off. I think some of his last words were Big Daddy demands to be heard now.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

By Thomas September 15, 2006 04:12 PM my good buddies at Haliburton and the PNAC can rape Iraq of all it’s oil resources.. Mmmm —- Yes indeed! - All part of my plan!”

Speaking of apeing the Huffington Post^^.

Seeing how it’s been like three and a half years now, when do you think they’ll start raping Iraq of it’s oil?

Who do you think Bush is, the french and russians during oil for food?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 04:42 PM | Link to this

A little stroll down memory lane, in response to some recent discussion:

By Andy

October 29, 2005 03:36 PM | Link to this

Sigh.

Fellow Conservatives: Let’s check our hostility at the door. The angry left has cornered the stuttering rage market, it is pointless to try to shout them down.

We need to present, in response to their childish outbursts, thoughtful and provocative arguments. For instance, when they dance around over the Libby indictment, just tell them, considering that the only election they’ve won in ten years was Cynthia McKinney’s, they better hope Rove gets indicted too.

These libs are pretty much shot out. All you have to do is look at cartoon boy’s latest to see how utterly devoid of coherent thought they are.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this

Just for you Huge:

By Andy

November 15, 2005 04:59 PM | Link to this

Alright Fellow Cons, here’s political debate lesson #1. When you are arguing with a pinko and they start to lose their side of it, they will begin to get weepy, talk about how divided we all are and try to reach out to you. Remember when Clinton used to get in trouble, he would come out to the podium and bite his lower lip? It’s the first thing they teach a lib in college. Whatever you do don’t fall for this. This is your sign to go for their throat, you have them vulnerable. It is the Republican’s #1 problem today; Bush gets suckered by it every time.

By Thomas

September 15, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this

Here ya go —-

The history of Halliburton’s other major contract in Iraq—the oil contract—indicates the need for skepticism. It is well known that Halliburton received its first oil contract (RIO I) as the result of a dubious no-bid contract ordered by top Pentagon officials (including Paul Wolfowitz)—a decision that was “coordinated with the vice president’s office,” according to a Pentagon e-mail uncovered by Judicial Watch.

The rest, as they say, is history. After getting a leg up on all potential competitors, KBR also used its incestuous relationship with the Army Corps of Engineers to extract a second no-bid oil contract (RIO II).

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this

By Copenhagen Cutie - September 15, 2006 04:18 PM - *who finally admits to being “Bon Scott” after spending weeks lying about it

You’re a real one trick pony, aren’t you?

Your refusal to engage on issues (like our stalwart ally Pakistan sending Taliban reinforcements into Afghanistan) while obsessing instead with name games leads to just one conclusion:

I’ve kicked your butt. You can’t argue with my facts. I win.

You’re welcome.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

Let’s try this real slow Thomas:

By Thomas September 15, 2006 05:04 PM Here ya go —-The history of Halliburton’s other major contract in Iraq—the oil contract—indicates the need for skepticism.

You said we were raping Iraq’s oil.

I said we were not raping Iraq’s oil.

You then said we are paying Haliburton too much.

Where is this leading?

By Huge

September 15, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this

Re the post of 4:48

I wouldn’t concern yourself with me reaching out to you! Maybe if you were the last person on earth. But then again probably not.

The fact that you used to act like a human being here, once upon a long time ago, is of no interest to me and is completely irrelevant. In spite of your best efforts to poison the well, others, including some conservatives here, don’t emulate your utter lack of manners and class.

In the few months I’ve been here, you have been nothing short of a hateful tantrum throwing juvenile delinquent. And to virtually everyone here epitomize the very worst of what these blogs have to offer. Those are the facts and they are indisputable.

Maybe with professional help you can return to some semblance of something other than an impotent rage-filled bully that you became in the three weeks between your two examples.

Get your sh!t together, learn to play nice and offer something other than sorry platitudes and then try again…

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 05:29 PM | Link to this

By Huge September 15, 2006 05:13 PM Get your sh!t together, learn to play nice and offer something other than sorry platitudes and then try again…

Nice history revision but I remember it a little bit differently:

I insulted cartoon boy and called your kind “pinkos” on the first day and haven’t let up since.

And I don’t plan on letting up today.

You’re the one who came in here amongst all the self indulgent gasbag pomp and circumstance talking about how you were going to change me, which in turn, led to a huge, no pun intended, slap down administered by yours truly.

I was rough with you, wasn’t I?

Why do I remind you of all this? Maybe because you have ME confused with yourself, I’m not the one who wants to be “civil,” or your definition of an overbearing blowhard, you are.

And you still keep trying: learn to play nice and offer something other than sorry platitudes and then try again

Give it up.

It ain’t gonna happen.

You’re just going to wind up getting stomped again.

By Thomas

September 15, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

Hey Osama’ —-

I didn’t say that - that was copied from another article about Haliburton getting no-bid oil contracts from the Bush administration—

Heres yah another piece of knowledge to chew on…

-=-

Mr. TIERNEY. OK. Now, when GAO issued yesterday’s report on LOGCAP [Halliburton’s troop support contract], one of their key findings was that the planning for the use of LOGCAP’s contract to support the troops in Iraq did not begin until after the fall of Baghdad. You looked at that report and didn’t make any objections or corrections, so we are assuming that is an agreeable statement with you? That is when the planning started, after Baghdad fell?

Mr. WALTER. For the work in Iraq, yes, sir.

Mr. TIERNEY. So it is a little astonishing to me, and I think to others, the planning for what is going to happen to our troops, their meals, their water, their housing, the essentials of life, their protection, all of that doesn’t even begin to happen until May 2003, after Baghdad falls, but in the meantime the administration had your company planning for Iraq’s oil infrastructure months before it had a plan how to support our troops. The GAO report also indicated that the Army failed to follow its own guidelines. The Army’s guidance recommends a comprehensive statement of work be developed in the early phases of the contingency planning. Can I take it that you were never charged by the Department of Defense to start the planning with respect to the support of the troops; and that it wasn’t a case of your delaying it on your own?

Mr. WALTER. In Iraq, yes. We were already involved in the planning in many other areas, in Kuwait, in Afghanistan, in Djibouti and other locations. So we have been working with the Army in many other locations.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Context my man context…We were discussing Big Al’s hot air campaign which you seemed to be backing, ergo “Followers of Al.” I don’t see how anyone could be a follower of Gore in the full spectrum of things, which probably explains why he is leading the Moonbat Party straw polls for the 2008 election. So I was not accusing you of being a fan.

By @@

September 15, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

Huge:

I offered you alternative sites where you could find what you’re looking for. Civil discourse.

The way I see it, you’ve removed your opportunity to complain about the level of discourse here. You made your choice of your own free will. If it’s civil debate you’re looking for, engage in it and acknowledge everyone else’s first amendment rights. You, and you alone are responsible for how “you” interact. But you have no say in how others do.

BTW, I’ve been through this before with you, haven’t I?

By getalife

September 15, 2006 05:38 PM | Link to this

Scooter,

I am the same cordial, fun loving character I have always been, just went to an Andy type attack blogging style.

It is all an act for a reaction.

Did my act work because I am tired of this charade? Hate makes me tired. I don’t see how Andy can do it everyday.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this

By Thomas September 15, 2006 05:34 PM Hey Osama’ —- I didn’t say that - that was copied from another article about Haliburton getting no-bid oil contracts from the Bush administration—

Can we finish the first argument please?

Every drop of oil that comes out of the ground in Iraq goes directly to their national treasury.

End of story.

Halliburton: Show me where you complained about Clinton giving Haliburton no bid contracts in Bosnia.

Haliburton is a specialty contractor, you government dependent college campus socialist perverts should study up on capitalism other than what teach is telling you.

By Huge

September 15, 2006 06:08 PM | Link to this

RW,

You’ve gottta be kidding me! He leads! I thought it was the junior senator from NY! Either way, wow…

I just find it somewhat implausible based on pollution, ozone layer issues, etc. how there isn’t one h&ell of a chance that human caused greenhouse gases are a big part of the problem. To me, it’s just too big of a problem to not take seriously. The bottom line is we most probably need to change our ways as humans or things are going to go real bad for us and this planet, don’t you think? Maybe, it’s inevitable, but maybe it’s not.

@@, I declined your offer. Haven’t we been through that before? You’re not asking me to STFU now are you? That first amendment really sucks, doesn’t it?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

These liberals want Republicans and only Republicans to be “civil,” it keeps us from kicking their as-ses when we fall for that crap:

1) Show me where one of these libs complained about the Bush assassination movie.

2) Show me where these libs ever even acknowledge that it was wrong to call Condoleezza Rice a “house slave” or whatever disgusting slander y’all came up with.

3) Tell me when it was you liberals said Dick Durbin was wrong to call our soldiers Nazis or where Murtha was told to quit prejudging guilt.

I can name thousands and thousands, Dean, Kennedy, etc, etc where you pinkos have been anything but civil, hell look at cartoon boy’s Pot to Kettle, what do you have on us? Me and a couple of stupid remarks like macaca?

You are fooling no one, well, maybe a few of us, but the rest see right through your bullsh-it.

Pis-s off.

By Collin

September 15, 2006 06:18 PM | Link to this

Luckovich, here we are again. Tell me, can you scribble up a solution to our geopolitical situation without a backwards perspective?

Of course you can’t. That’s why you’re a no-talent political cartoonist. Nothing to offer but hindsight & prediction.

Your head’s up your liberal a-ss today as usual. Breathe deep, but I’ll pass on the smell.

I’ll be back to see if you still stink Monday. I’m betting you will.

By Huge

September 15, 2006 06:27 PM | Link to this

Collin,

I’m betting you won’t be able to control yourself and your pathetic obsession with a freaking cartoonist. It’s a cartoon! It’s satire! It’s humor! It’s not meant to be taken seriously!

Boy, you hung-up “forward-looking”, “totally talented” neo-cons make me laugh!

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 06:28 PM | Link to this

Andy,

I think bonnie-bigot said Durbin was wrong back when he was finch, but I think he’s too invested in his latest delusion to point it out.

rushncap,

Do you always cower in the corner until whoever was kicking your a-ss is safely gone and then bravely stand up and say you’ll get them next time. Loser…

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:32 PM | Link to this

Colon,

Mike has won two Pulitzer’s, visited with Rumsfeld and attended Washington party pretending to be a bodyguard for Kissinger.

What have you done Colon?

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 06:34 PM | Link to this

Dear drunken moran…

Since you’ve spent so much time combing this blog’s archives for stuff, maybe you’d be so kind as to link to posts where “pinkos” here united in praise of the Bush snuff movie, or applauded the “house slave” (or whatever) slam against Condi.

Take your time. You’ll need it.

On the other hand, your rants slamming reasonable moderates here and in Washington as pinkos, commies, perverts, wankers, “meterosexuals” (LOVED that one!), bigots, racists, blah blah are quite legendary.

This is why you have the credibility of used Charmin’ among most of the people here. Your hate clouds your message. We can see through your bulls-hit.

Blow me.

By Victor

September 15, 2006 06:35 PM | Link to this

Arrest Bush. Execute Bush. In a large public square, in front of a worldwide TV audience. Then get back to improving the massive problems within our own “democracy.”

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:35 PM | Link to this

Still obsessing with “finch” RW?

Let it go man, it is becoming a sick, stalker like fetish with you.

How embarrassing for you!

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:39 PM | Link to this

Andy,

1) Should be fun to watch fiction like the ABC movie.

2)Huh?

3) Lost me.

Your losing it again.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 06:39 PM | Link to this

finch/bon scott/whoever the hell you are,

I engaged you on the issues for a very, very long time until you became a vicious, lying, backstabbing creep.

You didn’t win diddley squat, except perhaps the distinction of winning the “World’s Worst Liar Award”, beating out rushncap in the final tally.

Take that to the voting booth.

Huge,

You arrived out of nowhere with the most astonishingly smug, sanctimonious, hypocritical BS. You tried to BULLY us into following rules that you demanded we follow like a perfect little dictator. That’s why you were immediately called - Huge Ego, Huge Gas Bag, Huge Preacherman, Huge Pompous A*, Huge Phony, Huge Blowhard, et cetera.

Every name you were given described your posts to a tee. For YOU to lecture Andy about HIS blog behavior is a joke. But thanks for letting the real Huge out once again for us to see clear as a bell. While your political opinions may reasonably include left, middle and right depending on the issue, what matters is that you are not the nice guy you pretend to be.

Huge Pr*ick is the real you.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 06:40 PM | Link to this

{{{{{On the other hand, your rants slamming reasonable moderates here and in Washington as pinkos, commies, perverts, wankers, “meterosexuals” (LOVED that one!), bigots, racists, blah blah are quite legendary.}}}}}}<———-by bonnie-bigot

bonnie-bigot is the one that says things like “whoever this finch is he must be a beast” etc. So bonnie-bigot somehow has first hand knowledge of Andy’s posts from day 1, yet knows nothing of finch or seeker. That must have been some very selective shock treatment bonnie.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:43 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Calling American voters Al Queda types, appeasers or terrorists is okay with you?

By Dusty

September 15, 2006 06:44 PM | Link to this

Huge,

You may be laughing and you should. Your post is the most comical I’ve read today. Luckovich draws cartoons. Right. It is too despicable to be called satire. There is no humor involved. Just a burning desire to show how much Luckovich despises the president. He presents only his negative and biased viewpoint, seldom with any factual basis.

Maybe you think it is humorous to demean our president who represents this country around the world. I don’t. If Luckovich is scoring “points”, he is doing it against the country. So keep laughing, Huge, maybe you don’t like this country either.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:45 PM | Link to this

My, my BD, how very Christian of you.

Shees.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this

I’m holding my breath. Will any moonbat have denounced “Victor” by the time this posts?

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:47 PM | Link to this

Victor,

I am thinking it would be a record breaker on pay per view.

By Huge

September 15, 2006 06:47 PM | Link to this

Poor, poor VD, Blew a gasket so late in the week too. Such a shame, she was making such good progress…

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 06:48 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Why the hell do you care what I call someone you little freak? I thought you were the champion of free speech for all. Besides, you not being smart enough to tell who’s who around here really takes away from your message. Oh wait…you don’t have a message anymore. Nevermind.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this

crusty, crusty, crusty,

Do you have a sense of humor?

The hole world hates our President.

Blog to the world and tell them how wrong they are.

By Huge

September 15, 2006 06:53 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Let’s see if I’ve got this straight. ML has been the first political cartoonist to lampoon a president, right? And the reason there have been no others that preceded him in the last 200 years has been what exactly?

Grow up! This is the very thing that makes us strong, you fool! Not only does it not weaken us as a nation, it shows that unlike the murderous thugs we’ve had to fight forever, that we can make fun of ourselves! Maybe you neo-cons can’t, but it’s not healthy!!!

By Midori

September 15, 2006 06:54 PM | Link to this

oh, the irony: RW, The Original Kool Aid Drinker, calling someone a “freak”.

Oh, the humanity!!!

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 06:54 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Go back and read what you said to everyone when you first arrived and I think you’ll find that you invited suspicion as to your real character. If you really want civil discourse here you’ll have to especially cautious in your tone simply because of the way YOU started.

Buy Danish,

There’s your answer. Not only aren’t they denouncing it they are begging for the PPV rights.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

My, my RW,

The “angry right” is showing their a-ss today.

By Midori

September 15, 2006 06:57 PM | Link to this

Victor,

we need to invade his hometown, enslave his women and children, and convert him to sanity.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

Did any of these fair minded liberal denounce Victor? Of course not! On the contrary, it’s cheerleading time.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

By getalife September 15, 2006 06:43 PM Andy, Calling American voters Al Queda types, appeasers or terrorists is okay with you?

I’m one person.

One.

You libs are the ideology of hate Bush, the way of life of Bush sucks, you live it, you breathe it.

My personality is in response to you impugning my president and my country.

Republicans may feel the need to be nice and cooperate and get along, I disagree, but it’s a free world.

I, on the other hand, am going to stomp you liberals until you shut your depraved, treasonous little filthy mouths. There is nothing you can do about it, the truth is on my side.

I win.

As always.

By getalife

September 15, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

I know Midori.

His recreation time must not have went too well.

Shees.

By Bill

September 15, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

Victor, you’ve got a great idea there. It would show the world that there still exists an element of decency and responsibility somewhere in the U.S. Severe criminals like Bush need be severely punished for their high crimes.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

Squawking parrot,

You do realize that the only thing wrong with the Kool Aid was that it was laced with cyanide don’t you? Liberal policies at a time of war are the cyanide in the Kool Aid and I’m abstaining.

By Huge

September 15, 2006 07:00 PM | Link to this

I guess I’m unclear on the definition of moonbat (seriously!), but I’ll bite. Victor’s an idiot. (Either that or he’s a genius with sarcasm) But the former seems more obvious and doesn’t even need to be said. But I hope you feel better…

By getalife

September 15, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

Yes, the two God warriors fighting to the death on PPV.

How about that freaky?

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 07:03 PM | Link to this

RW,

Yep, from the poster who thinks this is funny:

{{“By getalife - August 23, 2006 04:56 PM”

“Does slaughtering a late term infant in it’s mother’s womb make you feel safer?”

“Yep, could be one of yours.”}}

Freaking Nazis.

By Huge

September 15, 2006 07:13 PM | Link to this

“Go back and read what you said to everyone when you first arrived and I think you’ll find that you invited suspicion as to your real character. If you really want civil discourse here you’ll have to especially cautious in your tone simply because of the way YOU started.”

Thats true but not the whole story, RW. And isn’t it more important how a man ends up rather than how hy starts out? I’ve been the only one here who has had the ‘nads to really acknowledge his own transgressions. I know it’s seen as a sign of weakness in this environment, but I don’t freakin’ care! I’ve screwed up a few times, sure. So shoot me! But I’m in here fighting for what I think is right; just like you and most of the others. And that’s a good thing, wouldn’t you agree?

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 07:29 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Lot’s of people have been civil to the new “Huge” myself included, but when you make a comment like you did to Andy at 5:13 it sounds like you are making demands against the freedom of others. Since that’s the way you jumped in to begin with it’s only natural that people would immediately remember the old Huge.

It’s not like people don’t change their persona around here. Others just change their name and then say EXACTLY the same things again, but I digress.

So fight away for your beliefs, that’s what we’re all doing. Just don’t expect people to take kindly to you making demands on how they conduct themselves. For all the grief Andy takes over his conduct he let’s 10 times that many unprovoked attacks against him go by. Maybe people don’t notice because the conservatives don’t sit around in a drum circle whining about the big bad blogger that was mean to them.

By bon scott

September 15, 2006 07:31 PM | Link to this

One trick ponys come in pairs, RW. Like your xenophobic, Arab hating friend, you’re just consumed with pointless identity conspiracies, aren’t you? Take your smarmy patronizing bloated ego and park it, RW. You’re not half as smart as you think you are. I win.

As for RW buddy Crusader Copenhagen, will your name game obsession recede by Monday? Probably not. Will you be able to match wits on issues? Hasn’t happened yet. Same old song and dance? I win again.

My prayers go to Andy the drunk, who’s been surprisingly lucid today. His rants still lack facts and logic and still reek of hate (and alcohol), but he’s been a bit more focused. Still, his parroting of the PNAC - Iraq/WMD - Saddam/Osama talking points continue. Man, what a broken record! I win by default, which takes most of the fun out of it.

And there they are. The 3 Stooges.

Wallow in your hate, morans. Obsess over your failed President. Soak yourselves in stupidity. Revel in your hollow, pointless arrogance. The rest of us will have a nice weekend, occasionally watching as your warped vision of America and the world continues to self-destruct.

Goodnight!

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 07:51 PM | Link to this

bonnie-bigot,

I know this is hard for you in your condition, but we ARE debunking your loopy theories even as we call you out on being finch.

It’s really easy. Every time bonnie-bigot posts just run a search on the AJC and you will find finch saying EXACTLY the same thing. Then if we need reference material we can just go to the sources we used the first 5 or 6 times.

If you had one ounce of sense you would see that we are trying to help you play your little fantasy game a little more effectively. Now change names and try to make it a challenge this time.

Do you play dress-up on the weekend? I can just picture you dressed as General Seeker and pretending to conquer Beaufort. Be careful goofball, Parris Island is in the neighborhood and some of those Marines might not understand that you are just a pathetic wannabe.

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 07:55 PM | Link to this

“Wallow in your hate, morans. Obsess over your failed President. Soak yourselves in stupidity. Revel in your hollow, pointless arrogance. The rest of us will have a nice weekend, occasionally watching as your warped vision of America and the world continues to self-destruct.”

Bon Scott/Sybil,

Look in the freaking mirror this weekend. That is you and Team Getalife to a tee^^.

It would be freaking hilarious if it wasn’t so freaking pathetic.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 15, 2006 08:14 PM | Link to this

RW: I’m starting to think that even finch finds finch to be a failed embarrassment and would very much like to shed the whole finch persona and become, well, bonnie.

That must be a totally shameful thing to look back on, that whole seeker/ Andy’s mom bout with insanity, especially how it ended with him completely flipping out and threatening all of our families.

It’s good that Bellevue has cut his blogging activities back to daytime hours, frankly I think they should monitor his internet usage much closer. After all, it is unsupervised interactivity that caused his breakdown in the first place and Lord knows we wouldn’t want THAT to happen again, now would we?

By Buy Danish

September 15, 2006 08:25 PM | Link to this

RW,

I forgot to ask “Bon Scott” if it was HE or one of his many OTHER personas that he claims I didn’t “match wits” with. I think he’s confusing himself.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 08:32 PM | Link to this

Andy,

You’re right, if I had been finch I would try to hide him in a memory hole too.

How about the new toon? President Bush asking Congress to clarify our position means that he wants to allow beheadings according to the idiot scribbler.

By RW-(the original)

September 15, 2006 08:41 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I’m sure he’ll twist himself into some confused mess again soon.

Andy,

finch did leave this blog and my blog right before the threat, but it came from the University of Georgia. There were three IP’s that were monitoring it all here in Georgia, so finch was probably in on it but too chicken to do it himself.

By @@

September 15, 2006 08:52 PM | Link to this

I hope this isn’t considered hacking, it’s an open window so…..

Huge:

Me tell somebody to STFU? Hardly! I’d love to sometimes, but it’s not my style. I do allow others the freedom to do so though.

The point I was trying to make is that you’ve accepted the terms here. Just don’t “pretend” to be above the fray. You’ve presented yourself “tattered” on too many occasions to declare yourself righteous and taking a higher road.

Hell, Collin wasn’t even addressing anyone, but you felt compelled to respond. I see he chose not to. I guess it’s how he’s chosen to participate. Looks like he didn’t want to talk to you. I did see him take a hit at a couple of people on his first appearance. Now he just comes in, tells ml what he thinks of him and his cartoon and moves on. Good for him, but others have more to add. Fair enough!!!

Thanks for stopping by Collin. Read you Monday.

And the game continues….

By Huge

September 15, 2006 09:41 PM | Link to this

I thought Midori’s paraphrase at 6:57 was very witty and funny!

RW, From your use of parentheses in the first line of 7:29 to the excellent second paragraph, it attests that you have a fine sense of nuance and a mastery of this on-line world.

And to me, you perfectly captured the essential debate with “sounds like you are making demands against the freedom of others”! Isn’t this exactly what we do as “free” and “civilized” societies? We make demands on the freedoms of others. And ourselves. And there, my friend, is the rub.

What is tolerance and what is to be condemned? There’s a very fine line that society “defines” at any given time. And we as a people, have these socially accepted lines, that “we” don’t want crossed, at least in many cases. So we have common and other “laws” that we use to define such things. And still we have abortion, assisted suicide, capital punishment and countless other issues that we can’t seem to conveniently define, don’t we? And much of the hullabaloo here and elsewhere is about this very thing.

So, of course, I know some people are going to be unhappy. On BOTH sides. Let them be PO’d; I’m not running for office. I don’t relish pointing out someone is a bold face liar and, IMO, has “virtual” virtues when they address me. But I certainly wont shirk away from it either. I “arrived out of nowhere” (good one, BD) just because I’m interested in promoting good citizenship, good governance, liberty and justice for all, and stuff like that.

And so what that he occassionally has thick skin? It’s not even noteworthy unless it’s for a particularly noble reason. Think ghandi. And besides, most decent people “get” that THAT much hate is completely counterproductive anyway. He’s just the resident on-line poster boy for jerks incorporated, so when I “make demands of him”, I’m not trying to make them change, I’m just trying to make outcasts of them all.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 16, 2006 10:45 AM | Link to this

Sorry, it’s deer season again, I was in the woods. I’ll try to get something out this afternoon.

In the meantime, let’s take a poll:

Who would you rather read on this blog, me or Huge?

Thank you in advance for your participation.

By George

September 16, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this

Definitely Not You Andy!

By RW-(the original)

September 16, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this

I’m sure people have their favorites that they like to read here, but most of those people don’t post. I would say Andy because he’s consistent if our choices are he or Huge. This Huge version 3.2 isn’t so bad, but the earlier versions are awful.

One thing for sure, we won’t be seeing GEORGE anymore since he has already hacked the new cartoon. That is if the AJC means what they say.

By George

September 16, 2006 02:17 PM | Link to this

Hey Mini-Me. If the AJC meant what they said then you wouldn’t be posting here on the weekend.

By RW-(the original)

September 16, 2006 02:46 PM | Link to this

Sorry Georgie Girl, I’m still posting from access before 7:00 yesterday. It’s not my fault that the server is accepting them.

You, on the other hand, have hacked into a thread that has never been open.

Bye!

.

Of course you won’t actually get banned because they would never get rid of a raving moonbat around here.

By Buy Danish

September 16, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this

“I’m interested in promoting good citizenship, good governance, liberty and justice for all, and stuff like that.”

Huge Fascist,

Sure you are:

{{By Huge

August 1, 2006 07:30 PM | Link to this

“It’s a shame people like you can’t extend that same courtesy to us Christians.”

@@, for the second time: “We have the purpose of preventing bigots and ignoramuses from controlling the education of the United States.” I intend to do JUST THAT.

I truly don’t care which mythology you believe in or which deity you talk to. I only care when your more zealous brothers in christ try to ram it down my throat at every opportunity. I care when they try to rub my face in it when I go the courthouse. I care when they pollute young minds in public schools with their nonsense. I care when they give not a single solitary dam about this planet (there is a better world awaiting them, right?) I care when they take the cherished and beautiful pledge and taint it by changing it to serve their own self-serving interests. I care when they kill each other and the rest of us by the zillions.

It always amuses the h&ll out of me when christians pretend to be the victims of intolerance. And the televangelists! Let’s not even go there! Think about it; if I tried to open an atheist “church”, there would be thousands of the lambs of christ coming out of the woodwork to stop it. Think about an openly and proudly atheistic candidate for ANY office trying to have a voice over the religious screamers. Spare me your pathetic requests for tolerance and understanding when your organization, at its worst, has so precious little.

I bear no malice towards you or any of the “faithful”. I just hope that in 50 years, religion is a non-factor. Maybe then this planet will have a real chance.”}}

Sounds like YOU get to decide everything, and you actually think YOU can do it too!

You know, you really should read “Godless” by Ann Coulter. It’s all about YOU!

By RW-(the original)

September 16, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this

If anyone wants to discuss the disgusting trash ml has scribbled for the weekend fishwrapper, I’ve posted a thread here

This has a link back to the cartoon above this one, the one that should be called Pot to Kettle II. You may know it also as the thread that GEORGIE GIRL HAS HACKED into.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 16, 2006 05:44 PM | Link to this

They understand it in New Hampshire but they have their heads up their as-ses in Atlanta:

This is a new kind of war waged by a ruthless, extremist enemy that cares nothing for Geneva Convention niceties. The enemy is out to impose its religious views on the western world in general and the United States in particular and it attacks innocent women and children as well as our men and women in uniform. {{{And if the latter are taken prisoner, they are burned, butchered or beheaded.}}} Sen. McCain is fighting the wrong war when he equates stateless Islamic jihadists with nations with whom we have fought in the past. You don’t read Miranda rights to barbarians or worry about “what the world thinks” when you are fighting an enemy that is out to destroy you. If McCain can’t understand that, New Hampshire citizens must question why they should support him for President.-UnionLeader

Cut

Apparently, the CIA sadists cranked up the volume on some Red Hot Chili Pepper recordings and Zubaydah broke. Wouldn’t you? Now, I am not making this up. The dreaded torture machine that is the Bush administration unleashed the Red Hot Chili Peppers on an Al Qaeda big shot. How could they? According to the article, Zubaydah gave up a number of his fellow killers, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11. But come on, the ends do not justify the means. Using the Chili Peppers is beyond the pale. –TownHall

Learning how to be libs:

Instead of having any precise claim against America, these killers showed their hurt arose from their own sense of envy and collective failure — as attested to by the now all too familiar references to “being humiliated” and lost honor on the tape.-WashingtonTimes

Their hurt?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 16, 2006 05:44 PM | Link to this

Learning how to be libs:

Effigies of the pope have been torched by mobs, although the irruption has also included unintended drollery; a spokeswoman for the Musharraf dispensation in Pakistan observed yesterday that {{{{“anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence.”}}}}-OpinionJournal

That^^ is almost as good as “Bush Sucks but you Conservatives aren’t being civil.”

Psycho.

Cut

“Prisons are about rehabilitation and punishment,” Adm. Harris told me in a phone conversation last week, reiterating a point he had made a few days earlier in a briefing for visiting journalists here. “What we are about is keeping enemy combatants off the battlefield… . The enemy combatants that we have here were captured on the battlefield or running from the battlefield, and they were engaged in combat operations against Americans, and in many cases killed Americans. What we’re trying to do here in Guantanamo is simply keep them off the battlefield, because we know that many of them would go back to the fight.”-OpinionJournal

Which is where liberals and John McCain want them, back on the battlefield killing American soldiers.

Cut

What a contrast to the likes of Pelosi and her fellow Democrats. Indeed, the one thing that may break the midterm election fatigue/indifference/malaise and put Republicans in a winning position is the contrast the Democrats offer to Santorum-style maturity. Turn a microphone on some Democratic leaders: That might be what makes the difference and keeps the GOP in power in Washington. The president’s Sept. 11, 2006, speech may prove to be a brilliant political move. Not directly because of anything he said — but because of what they said afterward.-TownHall

Let everyone hear how “civil” they are, hehehe.

Cut

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 17, 2006 08:28 AM | Link to this

Anybody ever seen this Baghdad to Washington oil pipeline the Queen Pinko seems to know all about?:

For the love of oil, U.S. spills blood in Iraq-Urinal

Or is this just blooming ignorance at play?

I coulda swore all oil coming from Iraq was given directly to the Iraqi’s, someone want to correct me?

Besides which, if we were awash in illicit Middle Eastern oil, WHY IN THE HELL IS GAS AT $3 A GALLON.

You liberals are pretty stupid, you know it?

Maybe if you let us DRILL RIGHT HERE AT HOME, then we wouldn’t have to buy their oil, gosh.

Cut

From all of the senseless deaths in America, the murders, cellphone and drunk drivers and sexually transmitted diseases, I wonder why the AJC puts the deaths of US soldiers, killed giving freedom to others, on the front page of their “news” paper?:

A father’s grief, visible- Robert Stokely knows two things about time: It is fleeting, and it is without end. His days with his son were cut short when Michael died in Iraq at 23.-AJC

Parading corpses through the street to make a political statement?

No one finds this to be just a little tawdry?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 17, 2006 08:29 AM | Link to this

In 2000, the President’s Council of Economic Advisers estimated the excessive costs of the tort system nationwide were $136 billion — equivalent to a 3 percent tax on wages. Using their methodology, excessive costs would today exceed $198 billion, representing a yearly tax of $2,654 on a family of four.-WashingtonTimes

And the tort lawyer infested liberals go after Walmart, what a joke.

Wal-Mart saves the average American family more than $2,000 a year or more. While consumers benefit from low prices, Wal-Mart succeeds. And as Wal-Mart succeeds, lots of people and industries succeed along with them.-WashingtonTimes

Bigshot lawyers cost you money, Walmart saves you money, who do the democrats get in bed with and who are they fighting against?

John Edwards is a what? A democrat and a tort lawyer.

Joe Biden is campaigning against who? Walmart.

Starting to become clear?

Cut

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 17, 2006 08:36 AM | Link to this

But maybe Ms. Newman intuited that Atta’s real targets weren’t the symbols of American mightiness, but of what that mightiness protected: people like her, bohemian, sexually unorthodox, a minority within a minority. Maybe she understood that those F-16s overhead—likely manned by pilots who went to church on Sunday and voted the straight GOP ticket—were being flown above all for her defense, at the outer cultural perimeter of everything that America’s political order permits.-OpinionJournal

Which of course means the liberals are fighting against themselves in the war on Islamic Fascism, but we already knew that.

“It is deeply disturbing to learn that a staff member of 10-term Congressman Ben Cardin would keep a blog chronicling racial prejudices toward Lt. Gov. Steele and others,” Sellers said. “This is the kind of attitude and gutter politics that Marylanders are sick of and why they are ready for change.”-Breitbart

It’s not deeply surprising, though.

Cut

Civility, liberal style:

Soros Compares President Bush To Nazis-YouTube

Cut

Funeral Crashers; was it Ann Richard’s funeral or a Bill Clinton legacy workshop?:

Tearful Clinton Escorts Richards’ Casket-MyWay

Cut

Sunday Vent:

Mindless lemmings will think, “Hey, look what the Republicans did, they lowered gas prices! I’ll vote for them.”

Moonbat liberals will forget that the more expensive summer smog reducing blends of gasoline, which THEY SHOVED DOWN OUR THROATS IN THE FIRST PLACE, are no longer needed due to the cooler weather.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 17, 2006 03:30 PM | Link to this

Let’s do two from Steyn:

The proper tone for 9/11 commemorations is to be sad about all the dead — “the lost” — but in a very generalized soft-focus way. Not a lot of specifics about the lost, and certainly not too many quotes from those final phone calls from the passengers to their families, like Peter Hanson’s last words before Flight 175 hit the World Trade Center: “Don’t worry, Dad. If it happens, it will be very fast.” That might risk getting readers worked up, especially if they see the flight manifest:-ChicagoSunTimes

“Peter Hanson, Massachusetts

“Susan Hanson, Massachusetts

“Christine Hanson, 2, Massachusetts”

And then his own personal experience with liberal “civility:”

Passivity is far slyer and more lethal than rabid Bush hatred. Say what you like about the left-wing kooks but they can still get a good hate on. Sure, they hate Bush and Cheney and Rummy and Halliburton and Fox News and Rush Limbaugh rather than Saddam and the jihadists, but at least they can still muster primal emotions. Every morning I wake up to a gazillion e-mails from fellows wishing me ill, usually beginning by calling me a “chicken hawk” followed by a generous smattering of words I can only print here peppered with asterisks, and usually ending with pledges to come round and shove various items in a particular part of my anatomy.

I should post the whole column.

Cut

David Warren, commenting powerfully on the “Pope” “contraversy:”

By turning the story back-to-front, so that what’s promised in the lead — a crude attack on Islam — is quietly withdrawn much later in the text, the BBC journalists were having a little mischief. The kind of mischief that is likely to end with Catholic priests and faithful butchered around the Muslim world. Either the writers were so jaw-droppingly ignorant, they did not realize this is what they were abetting (always a possibility with the postmodern journalist), or the malice was intended. Th

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 17, 2006 03:31 PM | Link to this

If Edsall is symptomatic, liberalism is lost in a time warp, thinking in antiquated categories. Edsall approvingly quotes a Democratic activist’s opinion that there are twice as many angry conservatives as there are angry liberals: “Liberals by their very nature don’t get as angry as conservatives do.” Edsall, who evidently has not noticed the vitriol of the liberal blogosphere, is so blinded by his own anger he misperceives Republican realities.-RealClearPolitics

Liberal “civility.”

Cut

Over the past three decades, conservatives have been procreating more than liberals — continuing to seed the future with their genes by filling bassinets coast to coast with tiny Future Republicans of America. Take a randomly selected sample of 100 liberal adults and 100 conservative adults. According to an analysis of the 2004 General Social Survey — a bible of data for social scientists — the liberals would have had 147 kids, while the conservatives would have had 208. That’s a fertility gap of 41 percent. Even adjusting for other variables like age and income, there is a gap of 19 percent.-SFGate

Bye- bye pinkos.

Cut

Once John Conyers, democrat, Michigan, settles into the big chair, he’ll fulfill his promise to bring articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush, based on a shoebox full of conspiracy theories downloaded from the Internet regarding the start of the Iraq War. That will delight the fanatical Bush-haters, no small group, for sure.-DetroitNews

I’m sure it will be a very “civil” proceeding.

By test

September 26, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this

test