Atlanta Opinion

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 08:15 AM | Link to this

Hey Honu, Peggy Noonan is back:

Flight 93 flight attendant Ceecee Lyles, 33 years old, in an answering-machine message to her husband: “Please tell my children that I love them very much. I’m sorry, baby. I wish I could see your face again.”-OpinionJournal

Cut

ABC apparently felt sufficiently chastened to change the Berger segment after Democratic officials complained. The network said Thursday that the scene would be toned down, according to the Los Angeles Times… That said, Americans are smart enough to know that what happened on 9/11 was in the works long before the Bush administration took office. No amount of protest will change the fact that some of the dots now clearly visible were available for connecting during the Clinton administration.-RealClearPolitics

We can’t admit mistakes because we’re liberals so let’s make a big fat fake documentary and sit around and watch it with our heads up our as-ses. In your own little bubble.

Apply this to global warming. Now you know where I’m coming from. It’s all about agendas, to hell with the United States.

You can keep it ABC, thanks for freeing up my Sunday and Monday nights for better, more reality based activities.

Cut

Democrats treated the 9/11 Commission Report as a sacred document. Information from the report was used over and over again to beat up on President Bush. Opponents of the President quoted commission findings frequently and they scored some political points. Thwack! An ABC mini-series based on the commission report, and even blessed by commission chairman Thomas Kean, is planned to air next week on the September 11 anniversary. Clinton administration officials and liberal bloggers are outraged by the portrayal of the Democratic administration, which is based on information from the same report they loved so much to selectively quote.-TownHall

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 08:15 AM | Link to this

But, by our lights, the president’s three recent speeches, taken together and bundled on top of Mr. Bush’s previous words and deeds, add up to an approach to the strategic questions facing this country that will be remembered for generations. They underline the fact that this administration has moved miles beyond the intellectual and moral confusion of the Clinton years. Mr. Bush’s speeches also pose an implicit question: Have other American politicians made the same progress?-NYSun

Cut

Let’s see what the liberal’s side of the war on facism is up to:

I’ve just come across an article in the Egyptian weekly, Roz Al-Yusuf, titled “Hezbollah’s Children’s Militias.” Reading it, set my hair on end. Hezbollah has recruited, says the article, 2,000 children between ages 10 to 15 for the armed militias in the Hezbollah affiliated Mahdi Scouts youth organization, founded in May 1985. The youngsters, according to the Egyptian weekly, are trained to become suicide bombers. In fact, Hezbollah refers to them as “martyrs.”-WashingtonTimes

Cut

Ironically, the Hamdan decision has given the administration a rare opportunity to exploit. Opponents of the administration’s handling of detained terrorists — which roughly includes civil-libertarian fanatics at the ACLU and a majority of the Democratic caucus — have been able to hammer their points precisely because the White House felt it was not bound by congressional oversight. While the Supreme Court decision has forced Mr. Bush to go to Congress, it has put the Democrats on the spot to explain to the American people why terrorists deserve the same rights as American citizens.-WashingtonTimes

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 08:16 AM | Link to this

In all, it appears a substantial number of plots were foiled because of the CIA interrogation program. They included attacks not only in the U.S. but on targets such as a U.S. Marine camp in Djibouti and the U.S. consulate in Karachi. Mr. Bush said that information from the program played a role in the arrest of “nearly every” senior al Qaeda member in U.S. custody. These detainees have proven invaluable to our general understanding of their organization and have helped the U.S. decipher captured documents and computer records and identified voices on recorded calls.-OpinionJournal

Cut

The vast majority of Sunnis are fighting not for ideology but for a share of power and (oil) money. A deal with them is eminently possible and could co-opt enough Sunnis to greatly shrink the insurgency. Even now, the insurgents have the capacity to massacre civilians and kill coalition soldiers with roadside bombs, but they have never demonstrated the capacity for the kind of sustained unit action that ultimately overthrows governments and wins civil wars.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

In Iraq, hardline Sunni leaders finally alarmed by what they have wrought are becoming interested in talking peace, and al-Qaeda is suffering heavy losses among its leadership and its ranks. Iran’s puppets there, the Shia militias, are a growing threat that must be brought into line, as violently and mercilessly as necessary. Again, pressure must be brought to convince Teheran of the error of its ways. Iraq’s democratic forces, growing stronger every day, must be given every opportunity to prevail if we want our efforts there to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

Allowing a march to devolve into a circus where immigrant rights become inextricably entangled with pet issues of the far left, however, only serves to further convince those with conflicted feelings about immigration that this categorically is not their struggle.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

By Healthy Bowels

September 8, 2006 08:32 AM | Link to this

The first two or three posts every day on Mike’s Blog, work as well for me as a couple of cigarettes and two cups of black coffee did in the old days.

Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy really mooooves me!

By LIARS Then and LIARS Now

September 8, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - A Senate analysis of intelligence-gathering activities leading up to the invasion of Iraq is certain to rekindle an election-year debate on the justification of going to war.

The intelligence committee issued a portion of its analysis, labeled Phase I, on prewar intelligence shortcomings in July 2004. But concluding work on Phase II of the study has been more problematic, because of partisan divisions over how senior policymakers used intelligence in arguing for the need to drive Saddam from power.

Last November, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada forced the Senate into a rare closed-door session to discuss the delay in coming out with the new data.

The 400-page report to be released Friday covers only two of the five topics outlined under Phase II. Much of the information — on the intelligence supplied by the INC and Chalabi and the overestimation of Saddam’s WMD threat — has been documented in numerous studies.

But Rockefeller said the report would show how the “administration pursued a deceptive strategy, abusing intelligence reporting that the intelligence community had already warned was uncorroborated, unreliable and in some critical circumstances fabricated.”

In other words, the Republicans have been stalling any inquiry into the lead up to engagement in Iraq in order to keep us all in the dark because if we find out the truth abouth how they trumped up pre-war ‘intelligence’, they know we’ll hold them accountable. Republicans can’t let an honest independent inquiry happen and let the chips fall where they may because they are LIARS now and they were LIARS then ! ! !

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

I said “cut” so it did:

Today’s cartoon the doesn’t suck!

By Republicans Use Our Troops as Political Pawns

September 8, 2006 08:45 AM | Link to this

KABUL, Afghanistan - A suicide car bomber struck a convoy of U.S. military vehicles in downtown Kabul on Friday, killing at least 16 people, including two American soldiers, and wounding 29 others, officials and witnesses said.

The blast, near the U.S. Embassy, came as NATO chiefs appealed for member nations to send reinforcements to combat resurgent Taliban militants fanning the deadliest violence in five years. A top British general said the fighting in volatile southern Afghanistan was now more ferocious than in Iraq.

While King George jerks us all off in Iraq, our troops in the real battle ground of Afghanistan are undermanned, ill supplied, and left to fend for themselves. Republicans have NO concern for our troops other than the use they can make of them as political pawns ! ! !

By @@

September 8, 2006 08:45 AM | Link to this

Thanks Andy for making me cry first thing this morning with your Noonan link. I’ll enjoy my liberties here while I still can…

{{{Then he said “Let’s roll.”}}}

{{{This is what I get from the last messages. People are often stronger than they know, bigger, more gallant than they’d guess. And this: We’re all lucky to be here today and able to say what deserves saying, and if you say it a lot, it won’t make it common and so unheard, but known and absorbed.}}}

When it comes to terroristic threats against our nation, it’s a shame we can’t absorb the concept of “Let’s roll”.

For the liberals I guess “rolling downhill” is their concept of courage.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 08:57 AM | Link to this

If you want to educate yourself about everything that is going on , Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) gave an excellent summation of current events on C-Span yesterday.

No spin, just the facts and I could not believe a Republican was telling it like it is. He pulled no punches and stated the neocon failures. His conclusions are the same as mine because it is the truth.

Also, The Dems introduced the security act. It is not just rhetoric, it is an actual plan. Clinton and the Dems introduced it yesterday and she stood out among the best of the Dems. Check out Kerry on Hardball last night and he is bashing w like he has never before. The Dems have grown a spine.

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 08:58 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq - A roadside bomb in Baghdad and a mortar attack on Shiite pilgrims south of the capital killed five people Friday, authorities said, a day before tens of thousands of people were expected in the Shiite holy city of Karbala for a religious festival.

A roadside bomb also struck an Iraqi army convoy in a village near Karmah, 50 miles west of Baghdad, killing four Iraqi soldiers, police said.

An American soldier died after being wounded in a roadside bomb explosion south of Baghdad, the U.S. military command said. A British soldier died Thursday of injuries sustained when his patrol came under fire in Qurnah, about 35 miles north of Basra, on Tuesday.

The 10 deaths came a day after U.S.-led forces turned over control of Iraq’s military command to the Shiite-led government, a key step toward the eventual withdrawal of foreign troops.

+++But the ceremony in Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone only transferred authority for one of Iraq’s 10 divisions and its small air force and navy, and it remained unclear how quickly Iraqi forces would be prepared to take over security.+++

Insurrgent are still not having their “last throes” that Republicans LIED to us about then and they continue to LIE to us now when they said that military control was turned over to Iraqi forces yesterday. Today we learn that this purely ceremonial occasion “only transferred authority for one of Iraq’s 10 divisions and its small air force and navy”.

Republicans are pulling off their best Pinnochio act in order to pull the wool over our eyes before November but they forget an important o

By @@

September 8, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this

Let’s take a closer look at Rockefeller’s complicity and treasonous behavior shall we?

When you’re feet get held to the fire, it burns.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this

Looks like there is a real war in Afganistan. I guess the liberals will have to clean up that mess too.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

By @@ September 8, 2006 08:45 AM Thanks Andy for making me cry first thing this morning with your Noonan link. I’ll enjoy my liberties here while I still can…

I know, Peggy Noonan always gets me tore up. It’s amazing to read someone who cares more about innocent Americans then they do the cutthroats scumbags that are trying to kill us.

She’s a rarity.

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

CAIRO, Egypt - Al-Jazeera broadcast Thursday a previously unshown video of the preparations for the Sept. 11 attacks, in which al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden is seen meeting with some of the planners in an Afghan mountain camp.

That’s funny, the Republicans told us that Iraq was responsible for harboring the 9/11 murderers. Maybe they were on vacation in the Afghan mountains when they shot this tape, huh ? ? ? They’re still trying to ‘fool ALL of the people ALL of the time’ ! ! !

By Grim Reaper

September 8, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this

Great stuff, Luckovich! Scathing. Brutal handling of Tom Cruise and the paparazzi. the insult to the panda was almost too much to bear, get it? bear?

Andy, nobody, and I mean nobody, except your fellow cheek-spreader, @@, is eating your cheese.

I hope you two have good families to protect you from mature adults who would ravage you in person if they knew the nonsense and hate speak you publish in this blog.

May god have mercy on your souls.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 09:10 AM | Link to this

By Queen YAHOO! September 8, 2006 09:04 AM That’s funny, the Republicans told us that Iraq was responsible for harboring the 9/11 murderers.

Anybody besides Queen YAHOO! want to show us where this is at?

This is for everybody to see, right here. If I started posting bald faced lies about democrats and liberals, one of the Conservatives in here would correct me.

If I saw a Conservative posting outright falsifications, I would correct.

If you have no integrity you have nothing.

Conservatives are not pieces of filthy garbage like you liberals are.

You wallow in filth.

By Sean loves Dick

September 8, 2006 09:12 AM | Link to this

Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts By William Rivers Pitt

The fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks is less than two weeks away, but the avalanche has already begun. Oliver Stone's film "World Trade Center" has been advertised in all corners and is being screened across the nation. CNN has announced that it intends, on the 11th, to rebroadcast all of the coverage of the attacks from 8:30 a.m. until midnight. If you don't have cable, they say, you can watch it for free on the CNN web site. ABC intends to mark the occasion in far more grand a fashion. Starting September 10th and ending September 11th, the network will show a miniseries titled "The Path to 9/11." According to reports from early screenings, the writer/producer of the miniseries, Cyrus Nowrasteh, has crafted a television polemic intended to blame the entire event on President Clinton. Nowrasteh, an outspoken conservative of Persian descent whose family fled Iran after the fall of the Shah, spoke last year at the Liberty Film Festival, described by its founders as Hollywood's first conservative film festival. Govindini Murty, actress, writer, and co-director of the Liberty Film Festival, wrote a review of "The Path to 9/11" for the right-wing online news page FrontPageMag.com. In the review, Murty states, "'The Path to 9/11' is one of the best, most intelligent, most pro-American miniseries I've ever seen on TV, and conservatives should support it and promote it as vigorously as possible. This is the first Hollywood production I've seen that honestly depicts how the Clinton administration repeatedly bungled the capture of Osama bin Laden." FrontPageMag, it should be noted, held a symposium back in May to argue that the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which were never found despite being the main reason for invasion, were actually spirited out of Iraq by Russia on the eve of the 2003 attack. So it goes. Leaving aside the wretched truth that the far right is once again using September 11 to score political points, the facts regarding the still-lingering effort to blame the Clinton administration for the attacks must be brought to the fore. Nowrasteh, at several points in his miniseries, rolls out a number of oft-debunked allegations that Clinton allowed Osama bin Laden to remain alive and free before the attacks. Roger Cressy, National Security Council senior director for counterterrorism in the period 1999-2001, responded to these allegations in an article for the Washington Times

By Sean loves Dick

September 8, 2006 09:13 AM | Link to this

Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, “These are very controversial provisions that the [Clinton] White House wants. Some they’re not going to get.” ….[Hatch] also said he had some problems with the president’s proposals to expand wiretapping. — CNN, July 30, 1996 So Bill Clinton, rather than just breaking the law as Bush did (then again, perhaps this is why Bush broke the law - he knew from history that the Republicans controlling the congress would oppose his efforts to expand wiretapping), decided to go to the Republican congress in 1996 and ask them for increased authority to do more eavesdropping in order to stop the terrorists - stop September 11. Senior Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, one of the GOP’s top picks for the Supreme Court and a GOP committee chair, objected. The Republicans stopped President Clinton from getting all the tools he needed to stop the next September 11 - well, no, actually they opposed giving President Clinton all the tools he needed to stop the actual September 11. Could September 11 have been stopped if the GOP had given President Clinton the tools he requested to stop Osama and Mohammad Atta from killing 3,000 people in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington? Maybe we need to ask the Republicans up for re-election why they wanted to appease the terrorists? Quote: President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess. “We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue,” Clinton said during a White House news conference. But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures.—CNN, July 30, 1996 There’s even an audio clip of President Clinton practically begging the Republicans to give him the tools he needed to stop Osama and the terrorists. Trent Lott said no. Orrin Hatch said no. Do these men really deserve to run the Congress during a time of war? How about addressing this?

Link

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this

By Grim Reaper September 8, 2006 09:09 AM May god have mercy on your souls.

So what “god” are you talking about, Wanker?

My God doesn’t comdemn people to hell over some menial democratic talking points.

You liberals live in a strange little world.

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 09:16 AM | Link to this

Time to eat your words, Andy.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!! - September 7, 2006 07:00 PM - When did I say the “Kurdish” marshes? I said “their” marshes^^^ look up yon way, you little feminist. Do you libs realize that everything that is said gets archived?

I sure do! But alcohol has damaged your brain so much, you can’t remember what you wrote, are too stupid to check, and too arrogant to admit just how dumb you are.

By You’re Right, Where Is Osama? - September 7, 2006 12:04 PM - The Kurdish people, after having been abandoned by the UN and Clinton, are now living free from terror, with virtually no casualties suffered since the invasion. Their marsh has been restored and the environmental damage has been halted.

And there you have it. Multiple blatant lies in one sentence. You’ve ignored your slander about Clinton abandoning the Kurds (he didn’t). But you insist you never mentioned “their” (the Kurds) marsh.

There you go. You did. Your incredible stupidity concerning history and geography are equalled by your hysterical refusal to admit that… once again… you blew it.

By the way, the Shaat al Arab of the Marsh Arabs remains as desolate today as it was in 2003.

You are incredibly dumb. You are a liar. There is no logic to your posts. Everything you say is questionable. And you’re a drunk.

Blow me.

By @@

September 8, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this

There was somebody on here that was closely following the COC.

Here’s a little something they may want to look over.

Since last fall, Cantwell (D) has helped persuade Senate appropriators to set aside $9.6 million - known as “earmarks” in congressional parlance - for a dam project benefiting two clients of Dotzauer’s firm and $2 million more for the biotechnology company Inologic also represented by his firm.

As to the cartoon…Cruised right past it…boring…and not a good likeness of Tom…the Panda is good though.

Is ml a raving liberal?

Does a panda dump in the woods?

Andy’s “Cartoon that doesn’t suck” had some hair on it though. Funny!!!

By Sean loves Dick

September 8, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

Let’s try this again…

[ Clinton, 9/11 and the Facts By William Rivers Pitt

The fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks is less than two weeks away, but the avalanche has already begun. Oliver Stone's film "World Trade Center" has been advertised in all corners and is being screened across the nation. CNN has announced that it intends, on the 11th, to rebroadcast all of the coverage of the attacks from 8:30 a.m. until midnight. If you don't have cable, they say, you can watch it for free on the CNN web site. ABC intends to mark the occasion in far more grand a fashion. Starting September 10th and ending September 11th, the network will show a miniseries titled "The Path to 9/11." According to reports from early screenings, the writer/producer of the miniseries, Cyrus Nowrasteh, has crafted a television polemic intended to blame the entire event on President Clinton. Nowrasteh, an outspoken conservative of Persian descent whose family fled Iran after the fall of the Shah, spoke last year at the Liberty Film Festival, described by its founders as Hollywood's first conservative film festival. Govindini Murty, actress, writer, and co-director of the Liberty Film Festival, wrote a review of "The Path to 9/11" for the right-wing online news page FrontPageMag.com.](http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/083006J.shtml)

By Sean loves Dick

September 8, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this

Let’s try this again…

GOP Congress blocked Clinton push for anti-terror legislation.

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

Republicans have to have Clinton as their strawman in order to throw the focus off the REPUBLICAN failure to capture bin Laden AFTER 9/11 when he was cornered in Tora Bora and King George had to have his Iraqi cowboy moment instead.

According to the Republicans, Clinton was supposed to be clarivoyant and foretell the 9/11 attack before his tenure in office was through, but Bush who let bin Laden go free AFTER the event was blameless.

Republicans are still trying to ‘fool ALL of the people ALL of the time’ ! ! !

By Sean loves Dick

September 8, 2006 09:27 AM | Link to this

Cheney hints at links between 9/11 and Iraq.

Horowitz claims link

GOP Lawmaker links the two…

What say you now, sAndy?

By w00t

September 8, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

“To hell with the United States”, Isn’t that slogan of the Republican Party?

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

By bonnie scott September 8, 2006 09:16 AM But you insist you never mentioned “their” (the Kurds) marsh.

My goodness, what a tosser. It’s so clear to the whole world that Bonnie had to put “Kurds” in brackets and “their” in quotation marks to make sure she got her lie across to everyone:

“their” (the Kurds) marsh

What an unbelievable idiot.

Like I said, and you can see it all right here^^^, when did I say “Kurdish Marshes?”

By Sean loves Dick

September 8, 2006 09:30 AM | Link to this

my goodness, i stink at links…

Freaky GOP likes to lie

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 09:39 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Updated figures from Iraq’s Health Ministry show there was no significant decline in violent deaths in Baghdad last month, but the U.S. military insisted Thursday the murder rate in the capital had fallen by 52 percent.

Now here’s a real quandry, who to believe…the Iraqis themselves or Republican military sympathizers giving their opinions about the Iraqis themselves? Looks to me like Republicans are still trying to ‘fool ALL of the people ALL of the time’ ! ! !

By @@

September 8, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this

Well lookee lookee, the ever so enlightened U.N. realizes their shortcomings too late, but continues them to this day. They’re still trying to negotiate with terrorist nations who are thumbing their nose at them.

U.N. Unveils Counterterrorism Strategy

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The president of the U.N. General Assembly unveiled a long-awaited strategy to combat terrorism, the result of a year of often bitter work to meet world leaders’ demands that the United Nations help its 192 members fight the scourge.

Much of the strategy, distributed Thursday, repeats previous commitments - for example, promises to implement earlier General Assembly and Security Council resolutions. It also makes promises that are ambiguous and difficult to fulfill: promoting the rule of law and “a culture of peace;” meeting the Millennium Development Goals; encouraging dialogue between people of different faiths.

A scourge? Is that like an epidemic. 192 countries? So it’s like….global? Long-awaited? Let’s see, does that include acts before the GWB Administration?

Can anybody say “Oil for Food?”

Reconfirm John Bolton. It looks like he’s making a difference in the (U)nited (N)ullity that the liberals place so much confidence in.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

Acctually Marsh Arabs are really their own people with different traditions.

“Who Are the Marsh Arabs and Where Are They?”

“The Marsh Arabs, put simply, are a semi-nomadic people whose unique way of life, until recently, has remained unchanged for 5000 years. Until the 1980s, there were around 100,000 Marsh Arabs who inhabit the wetland region of the confluence of the mighty Tigris and Euphrates in Iraq. The land that they once called home used to cover an area of 600,000 square miles.”

“The Marsh Arabs are directly descended from the Sumerian and Babylonian cultures which have long since disappeared from the area the Mi’dan currently inhabit. As an ethnic group, they predate the flood described in the Sumerian epic Gilgamesh and they have been left, more or less, to their own devices. All the great empires that have traipsed through the area have left the Marsh Arabs alone. The inhospitable marsh lands have proved effective in keeping the Marsh Arab culture intact and unwanted visitors out.”

“After the First Gulf War (1991) Saddam Hussein aggressively revived a program to divert the flow of the Tigris River and the Euphrates River away from the marshes in retribution for a failed Shia uprising. The plan also systematically converted the wetlands into a desert, forcing the Marsh Arabs out of their settlements in the region. Less than 5% of the marshes remain today.”

Even today, the marshes are no near where they were previously.

So, Andy was really wrong.

Andy = failure, hypocrite, jerk

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - President Bush is casting the war on global terrorism as the central issue of the midterm elections. But it’s a risky political strategy.

The approach carries reminders of failures in Iraq, prisoner treatment at Guantanamo Bay, warrantless wiretapping at home and Osama bin Laden’s endurance abroad.

Republicans haven’t done jack shiite domestically except try to throw the borders open to a brazillion ‘guest workers’, completely drop the ball in regards to disaster management, and try to turn our ports and air terminals over to foreign interests. All they can do is try to ‘fool ALL of people All of the time’ by harping about terrorism but too bad for them that they have FAILED miserably at that, too ! ! !

By Eric

September 8, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this

So Tom Cruise’s baby is responsible for 9/11?

Why don’t we invade the Scientology Compound?

By Eric

September 8, 2006 09:55 AM | Link to this

So Tom Cruise’s baby is responsible for 9/11?

Why don’t we invade the Scientology Compound?

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 09:55 AM | Link to this

Jeez Louise, I’ll post the link again. Just for you, drunk Andy, since everybody else gets it.

By You’re Right, Where Is Osama? - September 7, 2006 12:04 PM - The Kurdish people, after having been abandoned by the UN and Clinton, are now living free from terror, with virtually no casualties suffered since the invasion. Their marsh has been restored and the environmental damage has been halted.

No quoation marks in the original post. No reference to the Marsh Arabs either. The pronoun ‘their’ clearly refers to the Kurds and their imaginary marsh. The archives don’t lie.

Why don’t you just admit that you don’t have a clue and forego further humiliation.

THEN you can have another drink. And blow me.

By Eric

September 8, 2006 09:56 AM | Link to this

So Tom Cruise’s baby is responsible for 9/11?

Why don’t we invade the Scientology Compound?

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 09:56 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - Dovetailing with President Bush’s war-on-terror message, a conservative advocacy group released a television ad Thursday warning that many critics of the war in Iraq “would cut and run in the Middle East, leaving al-Qaida to attack us again.”

When did Republican ex-President George Herbert Bush (cut n run from Gulf War I) join the Iraq war critics ? ? ? Could it be that Republicans are still trying to ‘fool ALL of the people ALL of the time ? ? ?

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 10:02 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - President Bush will make a prime-time address from the Oval Office on Monday to mark the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

King George SHAMELESSLY stands on the bodies of the 9/11 victims in order to feather his party’s political nest ! ! ! The Chimperor lets bin Laden go in Tora Bora so he can play cowboy in Iraq, denying the 9/11 victims any measure of justice, and then defiles their memory on prime time. Republicans have NO honor ALL OF THE TIME ! ! !

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 10:02 AM | Link to this

w00t, it was kind of you to do the research for drunk Andy. I’m sure that he’ll regard your facts on the Marsh Arabs as part of some pinko liberal plot.

What little credibility he might have is reduced to zero when he can’t admit he’s clueless. He’s great (in a primitive way) at cutting, pasting and linking… but a chimp can do that, too.

It’s when he expresses his own booze saturated thoughts that he falls flat. He’s just a sexist racist sot.

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 10:07 AM | Link to this

WooT,

Re your 9:47-

Are you saying we just should have left Saddam Hussein in power so he could kill more of his own people (and ruin the environment)?

Dead Rock Star,

What exactly did Prez Clinton do for the Kurds??

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

HANOI, Vietnam - U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Friday the United States was committed to helping Vietnam join the World Trade Organization.

Let’s see, according to the Republicans, when America cut n run from Vietnam, we abandoned a society striving for freedom to the communist hordes when we had already ‘won the war’. They ignore the fact that the insurrgency in Vietnam was thereby denied its’ greatest recruitment tool (American occupation) and that Vietnam has since gravitated toward a free market system BECAUSE WE LEFT.

Now King George wants to bestow favored nation trading status on the Vietnamese communist hordes. Could it be that the Republicans are still trying to ‘fool ALL of the people ALL of the time’, once again ! ? !

By w00t

September 8, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

BD, don’t get involved with post you’re unfamiliar with. I’m not going to take my time and hold your hand and explain it, or myself. Go back and read through the blog.

Moron.

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON - The former No. 2 State Department official said Thursday he inadvertently disclosed the identity of CIA employee Valerie Plame in conversations with two reporters in 2003.

So the Republicans weren’t snide little back stabbers afterall (to hear them tell it now). They were just INCOMPETENT and unable to keep state secrets just like they have been unable to do so ‘ALL of the time’ ! ! !

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 10:24 AM | Link to this

Senate Balance of Power: GOP 49 Dems 45 Toss-Up 6

The Tennessee Senate race is getting closer and Rasmussen Reports now classifies the Corker-Ford race as a “Toss-Up.” Previously, it had been rated “Leans Republican.” This reduces the number of states in the Republican or Leans Republican categories to 49. Forty-five (45) Senate seats are favored to remain in Democratic hands while 6 are now in the Toss-Up category.

Oooooo, the Republicans are feeling their spincters pucker. The Democrats have the House sewed up and they’re closing in on the Senate, too. If this keeps up, the Republicans might actually have to listen to the voice of SOME of the people SOME of the time’ instead of trying to ‘fool ALL of the people ALL of the time’ ! ! !

By Put-Put Republicans

September 8, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this

WASHINGTON (AFP) - With rising gas prices an increasing number of US drivers have hopped on scooters, long a favorite in parts of the world familiar with pricey gasoline.

King George really is working on the energy CRISIS afterall. He is single handedly reviving the scooter industry for the next generation ! ! !

By Truthman

September 8, 2006 10:54 AM | Link to this

Jeez, what a bunch of schoolyard bully wannabees!!

Why can’t y’all just debate and not resort to name-calling?

Yes, I’ve called people a few names and I’m not proud of it. When I write in this blog, I try to have cogent points to argue my POV.

Name-calling doesn’t achieve anything - sort of like the entire Bush regime.

Peace…really!!!

By @@

September 8, 2006 11:08 AM | Link to this

I’m hosting a variety of issues that are of interest to me today. I’ve commented on the cartoon and there’s not much more that can be said in that regard…however:

Helping Katrina’s Victims

This kind of collective action can also help the poor increase the minimum wage, reduce discrimination, create unions that can negotiate higher wages and promote financing for the self-help programs that Mr. Williams touts.

Mayor Nagin did such a wonderful job of helping the poor pre-Katrina, and he’s still failing to this day. Barber is making great strides in his state.

Now a party that wants to “discourage an individual’s dependence on government” (Republicans) and not “encourage an individual’s dependence on government” (Democrats) would take a different approach.

States Must Find Welfare Recipients Jobs States are rewarded for efforts to succeed, not rewarded for efforts in doing nothing.

No fear of a socialist/communist government when you encourage individual responsibility. Their votes can’t be bought through government entitlement programs, something the Democrats advocate.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

By bonnie scott September 8, 2006 09:55 AM Jeez Louise, I’ll post the link again. Just for you, drunk Andy, since everybody else gets it.

It still says “their.” Not “Kurdish.”

I appreciate you reading my posts for me and putting thoughts into my head.

Turn about is fair play, right?

Jeez Louise, I’ll post the link again.

So this means bonnie has admitted to being a man at one time until it got a sex change that went awry.

So now bonnie is a morphodite.

Thanks for sharing that with us bonnie.

Tell us how stupid the poor are, racist.

By TRANSLATIONS R US

September 8, 2006 11:16 AM | Link to this

SAYS: BLOW ME

MEANS: I’m so inarticulate OR I’m starting my Christmas list

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this

By ALWAYS Ignorant ALL of the Time September 8, 2006 10:12 AM Let’s see, according to the Republicans, when America cut n run from Vietnam, we abandoned a society striving for freedom to the communist hordes when we had already ‘won the war’. They ignore the fact that the insurrgency in Vietnam was thereby denied its’ greatest recruitment tool (American occupation) and that Vietnam has since gravitated toward a free market system BECAUSE WE LEFT.

Or maybe they got done killing all their people?

What a moron.

By What a difference....

September 8, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

….a mini-series makes.

Senate Minority leader Tom Daschle later called the decision to pull the show “appalling.” CBS “totally collapsed,” he told National Public Radio.

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

WooT,

Freaking Idiot. I have read through the blog for 2 days now.

I’m trying to figure out what the POINT of your posting a sympathetic bio of the Marsh Arabs is since you are SO OPPOSED to our being in Iraq and keep asking Why?! Why?! Why?!

Here is what whistling in the wind Jay Rockefeller (D Intelligence Committee) said opn the Senate floor about Iraq being an imminent threat and a terrorist state when he voted YEA for the Lieberman/McCain resolution:

There has been some debate over how “imminent” a threat Iraq poses. I do believe that Iraq poses an imminent threat, but I also believe that after September 11, that question is increasingly outdated. It is in the nature of these weapons, and the way they are targeted against civilian populations, that documented capability and demonstrated intent may be the only warning we get. To insist on further evidence could put some of our fellow Americans at risk. Can we afford to take that chance? We cannot!

{{The President has rightly called Saddam Hussein’s efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction a grave and gathering threat to Americans. The global community has tried but failed to address that threat over the past decade. I have come to the inescapable conclusion that the threat posed to America by Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction is so serious that despite the risks — and we should not minimize the risks — we must authorize the President to take the necessary steps to deal with that threat. And so I will vote for the Lieberman/McCain resolution.}}

Et cetera, et cetera.

Dead Rock Star finch,

How drunk do people have to be before they’ll give you a BJ?

Freaking loser.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

Okay wingnuts, here is a speech by a Republican with on spin , only the truth

Read it before you spew the propaganda because this guy gets it.

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

Yup, W has really helped those Iraqi’s:

In 2002, before U.S.-led forces entered Iraq, the Baghdad morgue averaged 15 shooting victims a month, morgue officials have said. Gianni Magazzeni, chief of the U.N. human rights office in Iraq, which tracks casualty figures from Iraq’s government, confirmed Thursday that the government-run Baghdad morgue had reported 1,536 dead for August.

Let’s see, body counts averaging 15 per month now up to 1,500 per month. Are they still greeting us as ‘liberators…’

By There isn't enough alcohol on the planet...

September 8, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

….to get drunk enough to blow finch.

Watch this video and ask yourself how Billy and The Libs are going to spin out of this one

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

@@, September 8, 2006 11:08 AM- Their votes can’t be bought through government entitlement programs, something the Democrats advocate.

Since Clinton accomplished the greatest reduction of governmental welfare rolls EVER with ‘welfare to work’ (which the Republicans failed to renew) this is just another Republican attempt to ‘fool ALL of the people All of the time’ ! ! !

The real truth is that the Republicans have been bought and paid for with lucrative governmental CORPORATE WELFARE contracts that DWARF even LBJ’s ‘Great Society’ programs. Take a look at the budget deficit under Bush vs Clinton for the TRUE story, unless you want to hear more Republican tomfoolery ! ! !

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

The incompetence of this Administration is truly frightening…

Yet we now know that the Bush administration allowed itself to be distracted from that task as the months passed after 9/11. Gary Berntsen, the CIA officer in charge of the operation, told me a year ago that he knows for certain that bin Laden was trapped in Al Qaeda’s Tora Bora hideaway after the fall of Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers in late 2001. As Berntsen records in his 2005 book “Jawbreaker,” bin Laden told his followers, “Forgive me,” and apologized for getting them pinned down by the Americans. But Bernsten says, the Pentagon refused to put in the necessary troops. This account is corroborated by Bernsten’s then boss, CIA senior officer Henry Crumpton (now the State Department’s counterterrorism chief), who made clear to Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney that America’s Afghan and Pakistan allies couldn’t take out bin Laden. “We’re going to lose our prey if we’re not careful,” Crumpton told Bush and Cheney, according to Ron Suskind’s new book, “The One Percent Doctrine.” Numerous accounts have also established that, shortly after Tora Bora, the president began diverting Special Forces troops, Predator drones and other resources involved in the hunt for bin Laden to Iraq.

It’s The Competence, STUPID!!

By ALL of the People ALL of the Time

September 8, 2006 11:34 AM | Link to this

Republishill, -Or maybe they got done killing all their people?

I guess THAT is why King George wants to bestow favored nation trading status on Vietnam now; because the communist hordes have killed everyone else and gravitated toward a free market economy. Yup, that sounds like the work of commie pinkos to me, how about you ? ? ?

Republicans will never stop trying to fool ‘ALL of the people ALL of the time’ will they ? ? ?

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

ATPATT,

Let’s try to keep this really simple for the simple minded:

Richard Armitage was a member of the State Department, under Colin Powell. He was NOT in the freaking White House which is what you all have been claiming.

I’ve got to run know, but later on I will find the link where just last JOHN KERRY exposed a CIA operative, not in idle conversation, but during Senate confirmation hearings in front of the whole freaking world.

Pot to Kettle moron?

By w00t

September 8, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

BD, I’m not afraid to ask the question “why”. I just do not go blindly following someone just because they say “trust me”.

If you must know, I posted that link to prove to Andy that he is a freaking moron and that he had no clue what he was talking about. In no way shape or form was it said or IMPLIED that we should have left Saddam in power. However, you can say that it was Bush Sr. fault for what happened to the marsh Arabs. The Bush Sr. Administration pushed for a Shia uprising to overthrow Saddam and his government from power. Because we gave them little, if no backing the shia’s failed and were punish and killed by Saddam. Part of the punishment was the draining of the Marshes and farm land areas.

So stop trying to turn a simple “fact” post into a witch hunt about your president.

Moron.

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

ATPATT,

Maybe it’s because JOHN KERRY’S Forbes cousin want the rights to certain businesses in Vietnam, and because of that JOHN KERRY has been lobbying for a change in status?

I’ll get that link for you too.

Gotta run. I promise you I’ll be back later with some facts to confuse you Useful Idiots.

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 11:48 AM | Link to this

By Buy Danish - September 8, 2006 11:18 AM - How drunk do people have to be before they’ll give you a BJ?

Good question. How drunk were you?

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

By ALWAYS Ignorant ALL of the Time September 8, 2006 11:34 AM Republishill, -Or maybe they got done killing all their people?

Where does it say Bush is right, you waste of humanity?

You said Vietnam “reformed” because we cut and run, you filthy maggot.

That is what’s full of sh-it.

I don’t agree with Bush, you can’t understand that because YOU are the one with your head up the democratic party’s a-ss.

Little feminist robutt.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 11:54 AM | Link to this

“We must not forget that the 9/11 terrorists came principally from Saudi Arabia, not Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, or Syria. Iran has never in modern times invaded her neighbors, yet we worry obsessively that she may develop a nuclear weapon someday. Never mind that a radicalized Pakistan has nuclear weapons; our friend Musharraf won’t lift a finger against Bin Laden, who most likely is hiding there. Our only defense against this emerging nuclear threat has been to use, and threaten to use, weapons that do not meet the needs of this new and different enemy.”

By truth be told

September 8, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

By There isn’t enough alcohol on the planet… - September 8, 2006 11:27 AM - Watch this video and ask yourself how Billy and The Libs are going to spin out of this one

That video doesn’t prove anything. Except that Predators take lousy video.

From an operational perspective, acting on that Predator feed would have been difficult. 3-7 hours is a reasonable timeframe to send missiles that way. Unfortunately, to saturate the Tarnak Farms (to provide a reasonable kill probability if he remained in the area) would require a huge number of missiles. Without establishing a pattern with a reasonable expectation that he would remain in the area, then a missile strike would be very risky. If it failed, then Bin Laden would be tipped off and greatly increase his security making future attempts much more difficult. A second failed attempt to kill him would have many other negative repercussions as well. A Special Forces strike team was, at the time, virtually impossible logistically due to basing and aircraft range limitations (to say nothing of overflight permission), especially considering the force needed to kill hundreds of terrorists in the camp.

So a decisionmaker in this situation is faced with a choice: Conduct a relatively low probability-to-kill missile strike or collect further intelligence on patterns of behavior, travel, etc. to ensure success in a future strike. If it were me, at that time, I probably wouldn’t have ordered a strike either. With 20/20 hindsight I might have tried, but killing Bin Ladin in 2000 would not have prevented the 9/11 attacks as the operation was already underway.

So that video proves squat. Just another bizarre effort by the Bush pukes here to deflect blame from the American President who let 9/11 happen. On his watch.

By Truthman

September 8, 2006 12:04 PM | Link to this

Why are you neo-cons such poor spellers?

Probably because most of you never went to college, which explains your narrow worldview and fear of anything or anyone different.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

By Truthman September 8, 2006 12:04 PM Why are you neo-cons such poor spellers Probably because most of you never went to college, which explains your narrow worldview and fear of anything or anyone different.

Why are liberals such busy body blog nannies and gossips. Are you sitting in the beauty shop with your blue hair up under the dryer, truthie?

Is your life so empty and devoid of meaning that people who don’t have the luxury of having an editor to check their work have to fall under your watchful eye?

By Jay not jay

September 8, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

Nice ‘Toon! I like the title. Reminds me of the rubbish posted by the left on this site.

Looks like woot and bon scott have a school girl crush on Andy still. I’m sorry Andy, these school girls have a hard time dealing with reality. Maybe one day they will learn that you don’t really give a shi/t what they say and give it up already. Well bon scott may not, this has been going on for how long now? Sad.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this

Time to educate the wingnuts:

“In the late 1970s and the 1980s the CIA spent over $4 billion on a program called “Operation Cyclone.” This was our contribution to setting up training schools in Pakistan and elsewhere, including the U.S. itself, to teach “sabotage skills.” The purpose was to use these individuals in fighting our enemies in the Middle East, including the Soviets. But as one could predict, this effort has come back to haunt us, as our radical ally Osama bin Laden turned his fury against us after routing the Soviets. It is estimated that over 12,000 fighters were trained in the camps we set up in Afghanistan. They were taught how to make bombs, carry out sabotage, and use guerilla war tactics. And now we’re on the receiving end of this U.S. financed program— hardly a good investment.”

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this

Besides which, truthie, you little feminist harlot, the freaking owner of this blog posted on the very first day a lower case misspelled diatribe about how great liberalism is, that the Conservatives immediately jumped on and have been debunking ever since.

Where were you then, you metrosexual?

By Truthman

September 8, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-geiger/bill-to-cripple-taliban-db28976.html

I don’t know if I linked this, but the Repugs tried to block a Democratic effort to get funding to eradicate Afghan poppy fields. I guess they love their illegal drugs and the the money the Taliban make from those drugs.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

By Truthman September 8, 2006 12:13 PM I don’t know if I linked this, but the Repugs tried to block a Democratic effort to get funding to eradicate Afghan poppy fields. I guess they love their illegal drugs and the the money the Taliban make from those drugs.

Isn’t this an affair of the Afghan Government? Are the liberals NOW saying that we should impose our will on the way these people live their lives?

What’s next, you want us to take prisoners and put them in jails? Interrogate them? Try them? Expand the holding capacity of club Gitmo?

Harlot.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 12:24 PM | Link to this

Andy, is that all you’re good for, calling people “metrosexuals” and “feminist harlots”?

Didn’t kids use insults like that back in elementary school? “ooooh, you’re a GIRL!!”

I guess when you’re left grasping for straws, that’s all you have left.

Why don’t you get out of here and let the big boys post, play times over.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this

By w00t September 8, 2006 12:24 PM Andy, is that all you’re good for, calling people “metrosexuals” and “feminist harlots”?

woosie: Is that all you are good for, nipping at my ankle like some scrawny little mutt?

Don’t you have ANYTHING intelligent to share with us, only hysteria?

You metrosexual feminist.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Do you agree with this Republican?

By Scooter

September 8, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

This blog has become a wonderful example of the true intellect of our mental superiors, keep’em coming. ml should be proud.

By RW-(the original)

September 8, 2006 12:45 PM | Link to this

wOOt,

There have been plenty of times where all the conservatives on this blog have announced they were leaving for the days and you “big boys” don’t have a freaking word to say. The only thing you libs are good for is sniping or promoting socialist programs and dragging down our military.

I’ll be gone for the rest of the day and Buy Danish is already gone for a while. See if you can do something impressive and I mean here on the blog not out on 85 threatening to jump off a bridge if Rumsfeld doesn’t resign.

By TRANSLATIONS R US

September 8, 2006 12:47 PM | Link to this

SAYS: a whole lot of pyscho-sexual slurs

MEANS: closet case in mamma’s snuggies

By Truthman

September 8, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

I’m all for catching and trying the bad guys as long as we do it WITHIN THE LAW.

Americans are no better than the Radical Islamist we fight if we do not adhere to the rule of law.

Are you neo-cons afraid of doing things “by the book” as Joe Gannon would say?

By rushncap

September 8, 2006 01:03 PM | Link to this

Considering that li’l andy does not have a job, a girlfriend or a life, yes w00t, that is all he is good for. But you already knew that.

RW, going to stand in line at the Social Security office again?

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this

Along with the aluminum tubes, mobile biological weapons, uranium ore from Niger, pilotless drones for spreading chemical weapons, etc., etc…Here goes yet another one of Bush/Cheney’s ‘justifications’ for war:

It discloses for the first time an October 2005 CIA assessment that prior to the war Saddam’s government “did not have a relationship, harbor, or turn a blind eye toward Zarqawi and his associates.”

Man, how could any administration be SO wrong SO often…

It’s The Competence, STUPID!!!

By getalife

September 8, 2006 01:05 PM | Link to this

RW,

According to this Republican it is you and your ignorant cheerleaders bringing down the military:

We have a troop shortage, morale is low, and our military equipment is in bad shape, yet the neo-cons would not hesitate to spend, borrow, inflate, and reinstate the draft to continue their grandiose schemes in remaking the entire Middle East. Obviously a victory of this sort is not available, no matter what effort is made or how much money is spent

Read the whole thing and you just might learn something.

By Truthman

September 8, 2006 01:05 PM | Link to this

I’m all for catching and trying the bad guys as long as we do it WITHIN THE LAW.

Americans are no better than the Radical Islamist we fight if we do not adhere to the rule of law.

Are you neo-cons afraid of doing things “by the book” as Joe Gannon would say?

By Sorting out liberal bs...

September 8, 2006 01:10 PM | Link to this

….is a full time job.

For instance, “truth be told” rightfully tells us that Clinton was scrambling around trying to find a missile to shoot and I don’t mean the one he wags around at every woman he thinks he controls. I think our missiles are a little precise than “truth be told” lets on, but I digress. So with no plan in place to go after Bin Laden, Clinton just had to let him have his dinner party. Never mind that he was there about three days and the missile window was 3 to 7 hours.

So you see the libs have lied about so many things that even when they attempt the truth it just shines the light on another of their lies. As “truth be told” shows us, Clinton wasn’t doing a damn thing about capturing or killing UBL.

By Honu

September 8, 2006 01:19 PM | Link to this

Hi Andy – thank you! I thought it was just me not being able to access her site anymore, and was too embarrassed to ask what I was doing wrong (again!) The WSJ needs to let us know when their writers take a month off. Perhaps she was just making sure Lieberman read her advice :-)

P.S. Did you see the message I left for you at RWs regarding David Warren? (Think it was a few nights ago.)

By getalife

September 8, 2006 01:21 PM | Link to this

“Clinton wasn’t doing a damn thing about capturing or killing UBL.”

Total lie and bull-s**.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

By Truthman September 8, 2006 01:00 I’m all for catching and trying the bad guys as long as we do it WITHIN THE LAW.

You’re all for bashing Republicans regardless of whether you have to love something you loathed 5 minutes ago or if your actions and words harm America.

You stupid feminist liberals are OUT of power and that is all you crave, like a bunch of junkies. Same as a drug addict, you will rape, rob and murder to get your next fix.

And fighting against YOUR OWN COUNTRY means nothing to you.

You’re an Al Qaeda concubine.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 01:29 PM | Link to this

By rushncap September 8, 2006 01:03 PM Considering that li’l andy does not have a job, a girlfriend or a life, yes w00t, that is all he is good for. But you already knew that.

Rushncrap: Do you even have the slightest clue? The whole premise of pinko liberalism is “not having a job” and “standing in line at the Social Security office.”

Now you’re against that?

If I was unemployed, that would mean you talked me into being a pinko, bwahahahaha.

Ain’t gonna happen.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 01:31 PM | Link to this

Andy, did you read this post from SSDD yesterday?

“From “The Declaration of Independence”… it’s a little piece of U.S. history the Bush-Bots seem to have never read… the most germane section I have extracted below for your review. See how it pertains to today’s discussion:

“Prudence indeed, will dictate, that Governments long established, should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shown, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.”

Do we need to CHANGE OUR WAYS? Meh. Worked for 200+ years hasn’t it? Hasn’t it? Do we need to remove a despot… yeah. Time’s come. Tony Blair is waving the white flag. “Gee Golly Dub” should follow suit. You’ve failed America. You’ve failed History… hahahaha… failed History. Like it’s a course! Cause that was probably true! Ok, nm. Onward. We CANNOT be a free peoples if we are under the rule of such a tyrant. So many citizens (hello, polls?) have said they are NOT satisfied with THIS administration. They want the ADMINISTRATION to acknowledge their concerns and DO SOMETHING. Nil is done. Nothing has changed. Why are we “staying the course” if the CITIZENRY wants the “course” to change?! “Because we stand behind the president!” Grrrreat. Is that what you plan on telling your grandchildren? We “stood behind him and watched America dissipate. Sorry. Mulligan. Ya’ll should really plan better this time!”

This is OUR TIME. I plan on getting it right. Not watching some fool and his cronies destroy what Jefferson fought so hard to achieve. At one time, we were the greatest nation on the planet. ONCE. Not anymore. Now we just seem like short-sighted, war mongering, roman-empire-following, tyranny of mindless robots! What really chaps my arse is that from this point on, history will say it was “America” that got us into this. NO. IT. WASN’T. It was the Repugnicans and their reckless “leader”. The rest of us actually paid attention in school. History taught us to behave in the World Arena. Not show our a$$ at every turn!”

By Why would someone have to...

September 8, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this

….wait all day at the Social Security office?

I know, I know! It’s run by the government. The same government that thumb sucking morons, like that socialist punk Russian in here, want to have educate you and provide your health care.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 01:35 PM | Link to this

Basically it says right there in black and white that we the people have the RIGHT to question our government, and to go as far as to replacing it.

Are you going to question the Declaration of Independence now too?

No one is fighting against their country. They’re asking for accountability, and they want the president and the government to answer to their wants and needs. Look at the latest polls, people are not happy. Terrorism isn’t even number one on the list. People are more worried about their, jobs, homes, and pay than anything else. Still, the president doesn’t listen and our government just sits there twiddling their thumbs. Nothing is getting down HERE in the UNITED STATES, where you and I live. That what people want. They want safety, but they have needs here at home.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 01:37 PM | Link to this

“Instead we continue to hear the constant agitation for us to confront the Iranians with military action. Reasons to attack Iran make no more sense than our foolish preemptive war against Iraq. Fictitious charges and imaginary dangers are used to frighten the American people into accepting an attack on Iran. First it may only be sanctions, but later it will be bombs and possible ground troops if the neo-cons have their way. Many of the chicken-hawk neo-conservative advisors to the administration are highly critical of our current policy because it’s not aggressive enough. They want more troops in Iraq, they want to attack Syria and Iran, and escalate the conflict in Lebanon.”

This guy rocks.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 01:39 PM | Link to this

By Honu September 8, 2006 01:19 PM P.S. Did you see the message I left for you at RWs regarding David Warren? (Think it was a few nights ago.)

Yes, I saw it a day or so late. The thing I found so amazing about the column was how liberals are so violently allergic to the very idea of offering their lives in the defense of the United States and their fellow citizens.

They would cower and whimper their way to safety and leave the women and children to fight the terrorists.

By Why do bet wetting libs...

September 8, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this

…drag other peoples comments around day after day?

Actually there are several reasons. They have nothing else to do because they are all employed by the government and don’t bother doing their real jobs. They also don’t have the creative thought capabilities of a fruit fly so they copy everything over and over.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 01:48 PM | Link to this

wha wha wha… Actually SSDD is a friend of mine, so you can kiss my as-s. It was posted only ONE time, and that was yesterday.

Thanks for playing, please try again.

By The writing on the wall

September 8, 2006 01:53 PM | Link to this

The neo-com fantasy-spinners at Disney would love to sugarcoat history. Revisionism is the Bush dynasty’s tool. It’s a tactic that will haunt them.

It’s not the inaccuracies of “The Path to 9/11” that make ABC’s mini-series so upsetting. It’s the situation on the ground in Afghanistan now.

This television movie about the rise of Al Qaeda comes at a time when the Taliban is flaunting a resurgence in Afghanistan. Sept. 11 drove the United States to clean out that terrorist hole-in-the-wall, once and for all. After all the lessons learned from Sept. 11, the Taliban is back and growing stronger while the American military there seems as bogged down as it is in Iraq, powerless to check the spiraling violence.

Hindsight is heartbreaking and disturbing to watch, even in a made-for-television movie. But it’s even harder to take when those steps continue to contaminate the present.

You remember Afghanistan? And the Taliban? And al Qaeda? And Osama? No, Bush and his groupies can’t be bothered.

Wher’s Osama?

By Shawny

September 8, 2006 02:02 PM | Link to this

Lord Help Us linked to: “In 2002, before U.S.-led forces entered Iraq, the Baghdad morgue averaged 15 shooting victims a month, morgue officials have said. Gianni Magazzeni, chief of the U.N. human rights office in Iraq, which tracks casualty figures from Iraq’s government, confirmed Thursday that the government-run Baghdad morgue had reported 1,536 dead for August.”

And commented, “Let’s see, body counts averaging 15 per month now up to 1,500 per month. Are they still greeting us as ‘liberators…’”

Well, let’s see…prior to removing Saddam, the dead were simply tossed into mass graves after Saddam’s cronies gassed them or hit them with chemicals. At least now, they get to go to a morgue.

By Shawny

September 8, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this

Lord Help Us linked to: “In 2002, before U.S.-led forces entered Iraq, the Baghdad morgue averaged 15 shooting victims a month, morgue officials have said. Gianni Magazzeni, chief of the U.N. human rights office in Iraq, which tracks casualty figures from Iraq’s government, confirmed Thursday that the government-run Baghdad morgue had reported 1,536 dead for August.”

And commented, “Let’s see, body counts averaging 15 per month now up to 1,500 per month. Are they still greeting us as ‘liberators…’”

Well, let’s see…prior to removing Saddam, the dead were simply tossed into mass graves after Saddam’s cronies gassed them or hit them with chemicals. At least now, they get to go to a morgue.

By Collin

September 8, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

Looks like you liberals have been left on your own. Maybe you’d like a little reading material so you can brush up on your arguments. They’re all there, just pick one losers.

You guys are scarier than any terrorist.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this

I’d rather be a liberal than a fear spreading, warmongering, troop killing, gullible, uneducated, brainwashed, robot moron.

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 02:25 PM | Link to this

Shawneeeeeee,

‘At least now they get to go to a morgue’

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Man, you’re KILLING me…

Yup, that’s what separates us moral folk from the scum of the earth…we give innocent victims a proper burial. I know that makes me glad we’re in Iraq…

Get back under your rock.

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 02:35 PM | Link to this

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!! - September 8, 2006 12:21 PM - (By Truthman - … the Repugs tried to block a Democratic effort to get funding to eradicate Afghan poppy fields. I guess they love their illegal drugs and the the money the Taliban make from those drugs.) - Isn’t this an affair of the Afghan Government? Are the liberals NOW saying that we should impose our will on the way these people live their lives?

Andy, drunker and more incoherent every post. The US is ALREADY trying to impose it’s will on the way Afghans live their lives. Not very successfully, I might add. (See: Taliban resurgence; Osama still free).

Oh, wait! I get it! CONSISTENCY!! Along with not facing the Taliban and al Qaeda problem in Afghanistan, the BushGOP doesn’t want to face the drug issue either!

It truly is the incompetence.

And you STILL haven’t retracted your claim that the Marsh Arab’s home (NOT Kurdistan) has been “restored”.

Or your claim that Clinton didn’t help the Kurds.

Have another drink, loser.

By Shawny

September 8, 2006 02:37 PM | Link to this

no, stupid. The point is that there were no counts of bodies in the Saddam era. There were plenty of deaths.

By Collin

September 8, 2006 02:42 PM | Link to this

Woot,

The facists you want to support through appeasement: Fear spreading Warmongering Troop killing

The socialist/communist you dream of becoming. They’re requirements stupid: Gullible Uneducated Brainwashed Robot moron

You’re a prime candidate. A useful idiotic tool for the Democrats. I left you with your manifesto. Be sure and find your arguments in the left margin. Every frikkin’ one of them.

By w00t

September 8, 2006 02:51 PM | Link to this

Whoa, good comeback Collin, don’t hurt your self straining your GED educated brain.

Typical neocon BS: “You’re either with us, or against us.”

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 02:55 PM | Link to this

By bonnie scott September 8, 2006 02:35 PM Andy, drunker and more incoherent every post. The US is ALREADY trying to impose it’s will on the way Afghans live their lives.

Look you little morphodite, bonnie, freeing people from religious tyranny and imposing our will on them are two entirely different actions. It figures a depraved feminist metrosexual would be unable to distinquish right from wrong, It’s all about your little pee pee, ain’t it?

Just because you are too stupid, and I guess too sexually deviant, to make heads or tails of this basic comprehension exercise, does not mean that you should yell out your ignorance in a crowded room.

By Midori

September 8, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

The right wing kooks are so flustered they’ve resorted to posting under different names.

You morons can run, but you can’t hide.

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this

Yup, those Iraqi’s should be grateful, darnit!

We’ve replaced Saddam/Oday/Qusay/Baath/Sunni death squads using the chemical weapons we gave them with Shiite militia/Sadr/Iranian backed death squads. And, of course, allowed a persistent insurgency comprised of those same Baathist/Sunni groups to grow stronger and stronger.

I don’t understand why we are not being greeted as liberators?

You’re doin’ a heckuva job, Bushie…

It’s The Competence, STUPID!!

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this

ATPATT,

John Kerry the Leaker:

{The outrage over Plame) seems stranger still in light of the fact that the aforementioned Senator John Kerry is himself guilty of outing CIA Agent Fulton Armstrong several weeks ago at a confirmation hearing for UN Ambassador Nominee John Bolton.}

The CIA had asked that the agent’s name be withheld, but that did not stop Kerry from inserting it into a question to Bolton: “Did Otto Reich share his belief that Fulton Armstrong should be removed from his position?” In answering the question Bolton replaced “Armstrong” with the pseudonym “Smith,” but of course the damage had been done.

John Kerry and “normalizing” relations with Vietnam:

{{In 1991 the Senate created the Select Senate Committee on POW/MIA Affairs to investigate the possibility that U.S. prisoners of war and soldiers designated missing in action were still alive in Vietnam. Acting as chairman, Kerry helped persuade the group to vote unanimously that no American servicemen still remained in Vietnam. In doing so, he helped begin the process of normalizing U.S.-Vietnamese relations.}}

But Kerry’s participation in the Committee became controversial in December 1992 when Hanoi announced that it had awarded Colliers International, a Boston-based real estate company, an exclusive deal to develop its commercial real estate potentially worth billions. Stuart Forbes, the CEO of Colliers, is Kerry’s cousin.

Note that the last blurb is from a Dem website, so it’s possible that it’s all a lie. Ha Ha.

By Shawny

September 8, 2006 03:27 PM | Link to this

I didn’t say it was any better now. You linked to a spin article that implies that there are a lot more deaths now. Who knows how many deaths there were before. No one was counting the ones in the piles.

And a BWAHAHAHAHAHA to you Midori. It is evident that I am a newbie to this considering the initial double posting. Friggin pay attention.

By Scooter

September 8, 2006 03:28 PM | Link to this

I thought the Iraqis nominated and elected their own leaders, rather than we gave’em.

By Fox News Alert

September 8, 2006 03:29 PM | Link to this

Evidence continues to accumulate that the Bush idiots misplanned the “liberation” of Iraq. Bungled it. Sent young Americans to die in a sucking sandpit. Incredible incompetence that defies comprehension.

From this morning’s Hampton Roads (VA) “Daily Press”:

Months before the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld forbade military strategists from developing plans for securing a post-war Iraq, the retiring commander of the Army Transportation Corps said Thursday.

In fact, said Brig. Gen. Mark Scheid, Rumsfeld said “he would fire the next person” who talked about the need for a post-war plan.

It gets worse.

Rumsfeld ordered planning for the Iraq war to begin just months after 9/11. He was living the Downing Street Memo motto: Fix the facts to support the policy. And dumb civilian that he was, he never grasped the possibility that at least some Iraqis might resent the destruction and occupation of their country:

“In his own mind he thought we could go in and fight and take out the regime and come out. But a lot of us planners were having a real hard time with it because we were also thinking we can’t do this. Once you tear up a country you have to stay and rebuild it. It was very challenging.”

I can’t WAIT until that scene is depicted in the upcoming expose, “Iraq: Dubya’s Disaster, or now the Neocons screwed up the nation and the world”.

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 03:33 PM | Link to this

MADori,

You mean like Bon Scott>>?

Sheesh.

finch (Dead rock star wannabe),

YOU are the one who publicly fantacizes about getting BJS from drunken MEN. I wonder what your “wife” thinks about your weird little fantasy.

Of course it occurs to me that YOU probably did give Bon Scott a BJ and it was the best night of your life.

Freaking groupie.

By Shawny

September 8, 2006 03:33 PM | Link to this

Your mother sews socks that smell.

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

Scooty-Pooty,

Read it again and get someone to help you with basic comprehension…

By Midori

September 8, 2006 03:44 PM | Link to this

would someone PLEASE pry that bottle of vodka out of Buy Danish’s hands?

PLEASE?

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this

I’m a raging hetero, my Copenhagen cutie.

You don’t remember? I should have known.

You weren’t that good anyway.

By Shawny

September 8, 2006 03:53 PM | Link to this

Want to hear something funny? Bill Clinton asking someone else to tell the truth….. BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Yeah, I want some Cheesy Poofs!!!

By Midori

September 8, 2006 03:55 PM | Link to this

Exclusive!! Selected scenes from “The Path to 9/11”

By Scooter

September 8, 2006 03:57 PM | Link to this

(((We’ve replaced Saddam/Oday/Qusay/Baath/Sunni death squads using the chemical weapons we gave them with Shiite militia/Sadr/Iranian backed death squads.))) yeah and…

Did you read Fox New Alert’s link?

“We really thought that after the collapse of the regime we were going to do all these humanitarian type things,” he said. “We thought this would go pretty fast and we’d be able to get out of there. We really didn’t anticipate them to continue to fight the way they did or come back the way they are.

“Now we’re going more toward a civil war. We didn’t see that coming.”

While Scheid, a soldier since 1977, spoke candidly about the days leading up to the invasion of Iraq, he remains concerned about the American public’s view of the troops.

He’s bothered by the nationwide divide over the war and fearful that patriotism among citizens will continue to decline.

“We’re really hurting right now,” he said.

Scooty Pooty… are you serious?

By Midori

September 8, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this

Clinton Lie = 0 deaths

Bush LieS = ………. still counting

By Miller Time Dreams

September 8, 2006 04:02 PM | Link to this

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq?

To protect the underwriter’s liability in the reconstruction. If we cut and run, then the insurance companies would have to pay out anyway, so the army will stay put: for that reason and that reason alone.

Saudi underwriting? That would explain why clinton didn’t dare kill osama with saudi royalty in the vicinity, now wouldn’t it?

Iraq reconstruction fact: You dont set that much committed money and resources in motion without underwriting. Fact.

Think for youself once in a while, but as a patriot I cant let anyone continue thinking they know what’s going on when they really dont.

Dont follow the money, follow the underwriting. (the U).

Sell Swedish follows the O. RW follows the P.

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 04:03 PM | Link to this

Bon Scott,

You’re a “raging hetero”? Freudian slip?

finch,

You’re a “raging hetero”? Freudian slip?

There^^ - I’ll make it easier for everyone to follow along with your weird little role-playing games.

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 04:20 PM | Link to this

My dear Copenhagen Cutie,

You’re so CUTE when you’re mad!!

But I’m sorry. It’s over. You’re just to sloppy when your three sheets to the wind.

Now… tell us again how Andy’s absolutely right about the Kurd marsh people (what’s that?), and Clinton encouraging the elimination of Kurdistan, and how Baghdad’s safer than ever, and al Qaeda and Saddam are linked, and why he can ignore posts that illuminate just how positively and gloriously stupid and misinformed he is.

Oh, and while youre at it, let’s hear you explain why it’s okay for Andy to request sexual favors from people who disagree with him, but anyone else who uses his approach is ewwie-gooie!

Hey, it’s Friday night. You and Andy can suck on that 1 liter jug of Fleishman’s vodka and blow eachother!

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 04:30 PM | Link to this

By Silly Pinko Alert September 8, 2006 03:29 PM Rumsfeld ordered planning for the Iraq war to begin just months after 9/11.

Well, so much for the moonbat theory that the “neocons” started planning for Iraq’s invasion the day Bush took office.

Maybe Rummy won’t allowed to play, y’all?

Or is it just another pile of contrived liberal bullsh-it?

You idiots are beyond help, in the throws of PMS, captive to your inner feminine feelings.

The United States has plans ready to invade and secure CANADA, you goofballs.

And every other country in the world.

To say we went into Iraq without a plan is like saying Bill Clinton fought terrorism tooth and nail in the 1990’s.

It’s just ridiculous.

By rushncap

September 8, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

Don’t know if anyone’s posted this fact yet, but yet another blow to Bush’s pre-war blather: WASHINGTON - There’s no evidence Saddam Hussein had ties with al-Qaida, according to a Senate report on prewar intelligence that Democrats say undercuts President Bush’s justification for invading Iraq. Bush administration officials have insisted on a link between the Iraqi regime and terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Intelligence agencies, however, concluded there was none.

I guess pointing out lies is “unpatriotic”.

By Collin

September 8, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this

Woot, I’ve seen you quoting the Declaration of Independence here to three days now. Independence from the British crown.

Have you ever read The Federalist Papers? They’re the foundation on which our Constitution was written. Did you know that the government was not structured in such a way as to provide for your personal needs? It was to provide you with infrastructure, promotion of commerce, and above all, national security from foreign invasion?

In exchange you get to vote, right to a trial by jury of your peers & the privelege of paying taxes. Your dissent should be evident in your vote. During war, your dissent becomes a burden and threat to your fellow Americans.

You’re really good at being a burden.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 04:45 PM | Link to this

By bon scott September 8, 2006 04:20 PM Hey, it’s Friday night. You and Andy can suck on that 1 liter jug of Fleishman’s vodka and blow eachother!

Danish: It’s quite obvious that this thing is bitter and despondent, possibly over a faulty sex change operation, I think?

You know how easily the feminists sucker these metrosexuals, getting them to fall in love with eachother, it looks like it fell for some BS about getting in touch with his inner female.

Too bad it went to Canada to get fixed.

By Buy Danish

September 8, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this

finch,

Most people just say “blow me” which is just another way of saying “Eff You”. You’re the only one I know who tries to get the person drunk first, and assumes the name of a dead drunk rock star.

Gotta run.

Can’t wait to see what your next role will be.

Bon Scott,

Most people just say “blow me” which is just another way of saying “Eff You”. You’re the only one I know who tries to get the person drunk first, and assumes the name of a dead drunk rock star.

Gotta run.

Can’t wait to see what your next role will be.

By rushncap

September 8, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this

Collin, come on, you’ve never read the Federalist papers. Spare us.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

By rushncap September 8, 2006 04:37 PM Don’t know if anyone’s posted this fact yet, but yet another blow to Bush’s pre-war blather:

That’s real good rushncrap, cite sources from YAHOO! that the United States has no evidence of Al Qaeda/ Iraq ties, even though BUSH NEVER SAID THEY DID.

Blooming idiot.

Let’s try the YAHOO!/ rushncrap method of reporting the news:

My friend said you punched that woman right in the mouth, rushncrap.

What have you got to say for yourself, you woman abuser?

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!! - September 8, 2006 04:30 PM - To say we went into Iraq without a plan is like saying Bill Clinton fought terrorism tooth and nail in the 1990’s. It’s just ridiculous.

The point is, you moran, is that while Rummy was demanding the specifics of an Iraq invasion (as detailed in the Hampton Roads “Daily Press” link), he didn’t care squat about the Iraq OCCUPATION. He was a boy trying and failing to do a man’s job.

Very much like you.

Have another drink.

By rushncap

September 8, 2006 04:55 PM | Link to this

Poor danish, reduced to sex “insults”. She really is perfect for li’l andy. Wonder what their brood would look like. Obviously spineless and with walnut-sized brains, but would they have 4 legs or none?

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this

Man, can you imagine for just a moment the foaming at the mouth hysteria, calls for impeachment, constant investigations, screams for a ‘exit plan,’ etc., etc. these wingnuts would be engaged in if this mess was the result of a Gore/Lieberman or Kerry/Edwards administration?

I mean, I remember that at one time these same dung beetles were absolutely convinced that failure to impeach Clinton for lying about a BJ would lead to the end of our ‘nation of laws.’

Truly amazing hypocrisy…

By Lord Help Us

September 8, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this

These SAME buffoons thought the Clinton’s firing of the travel office (remember Travelgate?) was a MAJOR constitutional crisis!!!!

These same narrow-minded imbeciles thought a stupid land-deal-gone-bad in Arkansas was worthy of 8 years of investigation and umpteen million taxpayer dollars.

These same cerebrally challenged retards thought Paula Jones was just a ‘good little Christian girl.’

Hopeless I say…HOPELESS

By Collin

September 8, 2006 05:41 PM | Link to this

rushncap, Is your 4:50 comment a different method you’ve chosen to call anybody and everybody a liar. Just make that the conservative anybodys. You always ignore the blatant lies of your fellow liberals here. I’m always amazed at the crap they post as truth. I guess you don’t have a problem eating their crap.

A friend recommended reading them, and I’m half way through them. Of all people on this site, you could benefit from them. You’re one of those feel good effeminates that believes all you have to do is put it out there and everybody will snatch it up with good intentions. I guess that’s why I see you get raped so often by your intellectual superiors here.

You’re a teaching assistant from what I’ve seen. Tell me, are you getting laid by your professor?

Calling people liars is really infantile. Problem is you haven’t yet proved it. In my case you can’t. Do you ever get tired of looking stupid, or is it just a habit you can’t break?

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 05:50 PM | Link to this

Someday, my saccharine little Copenhagen Cutie, you’ll have to tell me who this finch person is.

You and your friends are clearly losing sleep over him. Does he stalk you in your dreams? He must be one heck of a threat to your marginal intellects for you to feel so threatened by him. Heck, he’s probably revelling in your obsession! If you were smarter, you wouldn’t be giving him such satisfaction.

Was he SOOO good at exposing the failure of the Iraq War, the so-called war on “terrah”, and the overall incompetence of BushCo (and the stupidity of its supporters) that you took it personally? Rather thin skinned of you.

And since you and your friends, spearheaded by this Andy drunk, brought up the insulting sexual putdowns first, and delighted in them until they were used against you, don’t you think it’s quite ironic that you can’t take what you dish out?

Go f yourself.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this

What a wanker:

By Lord Help Us September 8, 2006 05:22 PM These SAME buffoons thought the Clinton’s firing of the travel office (remember Travelgate?) was a MAJOR constitutional crisis!!!!

So now it’s O.K. with you union boy pinkos to fire government employees with no just cause and replace them with a political crony that costs more money?

These same narrow-minded imbeciles thought a stupid land-deal-gone-bad in Arkansas was worthy of 8 years of investigation and umpteen million taxpayer dollars.

{{{In a 1996 trial, the McDougals and Jim Guy Tucker, Clinton’s successor as governor of Arkansas, were found guilty of fraud in the case}}} So it’s alright with you pinkos to defraud the government, eh?

Just something we should overlook, right?

These same cerebrally challenged retards thought Paula Jones was just a ‘good little Christian girl.’

Oh, so now we find out that Paula Jones deserved to have some depraved pervert pull his d-ick out and try to shove it in her mouth.

I wonder if your feminist friends know you feel that way.

Should I tell them?

Or do they already know you are full of sh-it?

By N-GA

September 8, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this

Who is this Collin? He appears and insults, with no earned street cred. Attacks Rushncap, one of the most cogent posters on the blog, then w00t. Hopefully I’m next.

I suspect he too will be chewed up and left for the feces he so admires. He belongs to that ever-shrinking brotherhood of neo-con losers who have underestimated the resiliency that is the character of the American people…who will throw out the fascist usurpers starting in November.

If you look at the GOP candidates running for office, you can’t help but be reminded of ML’s toon illustrating the Titanic with rats trying to swim from it. How prescient.

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!! - September 8, 2006 04:51 PM - That’s real good rushncrap, cite sources from YAHOO! that the United States has no evidence of Al Qaeda/ Iraq ties, even though BUSH NEVER SAID THEY DID.

Well! Let’s take a quick peek in the wayback machine and… what DO we have here??

WASHINGTON — President Bush yesterday defended Vice President Dick Cheney’s assertion this week that Saddam Hussein had longstanding ties with Al Qaeda, even as critics charged that the White House had no new proof of a connection.

I know, Andy, I know. You’ll simply refuse to acknowledge this fact, or even this post. It’s your classic MO.

You can’t handle the truth.

Now go f yurself.

By Midori

September 8, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this

N-Ga,

he does sound an awful lot like Andy, doesn’t he?

wonder which of those twins is the “evil” one?

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 06:14 PM | Link to this

By N-GA September 8, 2006 05:57 PM Who is this Collin? He appears and insults, with no earned street cred.

Yea, Collin, didn’t you know that if you want to participate in this blog you have to tell everyone you are a “millionaire” and that you’re reliant on government provided health care.

Sarcasm/ off.

You have to be full of sh-it so that the liberals can relate to you.

By getalife

September 8, 2006 06:14 PM | Link to this

Colon is named for what spews out of his diaper when a Muslim says boo, unlike Andy the bedwetter.

By Mitchell King

September 8, 2006 06:18 PM | Link to this

Let's get back to this cartoon. For once I actually like ML's cartoon. I read that the panda was in labor for 35 hours, but the baby was the size of a stick of butter. I'm a man and I think I could give birth to a stick of butter and she is the size of a bear? There are some serious design flaws with Panda's. They only eat one type of food, don't like to mate, and can barely get pregnant. When they do give birth they frequently ignore their babies. Maybe we should just watch natural selection at work.

By Mitchell King

September 8, 2006 06:18 PM | Link to this

Let's get back to this cartoon. For once I actually like ML's cartoon. I read that the panda was in labor for 35 hours, but the baby was the size of a stick of butter. I'm a man and I think I could give birth to a stick of butter and she is the size of a bear? There are some serious design flaws with Panda's. They only eat one type of food, don't like to mate, and can barely get pregnant. When they do give birth they frequently ignore their babies. Maybe we should just watch natural selection at work.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

Tonite’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this

By bonnie scott September 8, 2006 06:05 PM Well! Let’s take a quick peek in the wayback machine and… what DO we have here??WASHINGTON — President Bush yesterday defended Vice President Dick Cheney’s assertion this week that Saddam Hussein had longstanding ties with Al Qaeda, even as critics charged that the White House had no new proof of a connection.

Look, he/she, I’ll go slow enough this time so even a tosser like you should be able to keep up:

By rushncap September 8, 2006 04:37 PM Don’t know if anyone’s posted this fact yet, but yet another blow to Bush’s pre-war blather: WASHINGTON - There’s no evidence Saddam Hussein had ties with al-Qaida, according to a Senate report on prewar intelligence that ——————>Democrats say undercuts President Bush’s justification for invading Iraq<—————————————.Ding, ding, ding, ding.

He didn’t use that as justification to invade Iraq, loser. Are you trying to give him a pass on WMD, is that what this is all about?

Have you reached agreement with us that WMD was found and now you have to find another excuse, is that it?

Besides which, it’s a baldfaced lie (as always, with what ever comes out of a liberals mouth) you pervert feminists can’t just make Salman Pak and the practice jumbo jet go away like the 911 documentary on ABC.

This is real life dic-khead.

By Collin

September 8, 2006 06:40 PM | Link to this

N-GA, If street cred is what you have. No thanks. I’ve seen your challenges one time too many. I’ve never witnessed anything so stupid in my life.

rushncap has been a good read on occasion, problem is it’s not often enough. Calling people liars when you can’t prove it is careless and stupid.

midori, No, I’m not Andy, but then you’re ignorant enough to believe anything, so is it any wonder you’re paranoid?

getalife, I said it earlier, you socialist dreamers scare me more than any terrorist ever could or would.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 06:41 PM | Link to this

By Mitchell King September 8, 2006 06:18 PM There are some serious design flaws with Panda’s. They only eat one type of food, don’t like to mate, and can barely get pregnant. When they do give birth they frequently ignore their babies. Maybe we should just watch natural selection at work.

You’re absolutely right, Michelle, it’s a wonder they haven’t “evolved” into a better species, ain’t it?

By Pinko China makes the real pinkos happy !

September 8, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

“I’ve never witnessed anything so stupid in my life.”

Don’t be silly, you have read Andy’s pinko drivel.

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

It’s official. Andy, your latest post on Bush and his claim that Saddam and Osama were buddies (which you insist he never did) is just plain incoherent.

Too bad there’s no cure for alcohol induced brain damage. I guess I should stop teasing you about your drinking. I almost feel sorry for you.

Almost.

By rushncap

September 8, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

Half way, Collin. Wow, congrats. And yes, I’ve read them, along with some (not all) anti-Federalist papers.

Was your whole long diatribe a build-up to your gem about me supposedly having sex with someone? Took you that long to set up that “joke”?

And I was not calling you a liar. You’d have been a liar if you said “I read the Federalist papers”. You didn’t. I simply called attention to that fact. If I were calling someone a “liar” you’d know it. Now go blow something that moves.

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 8, 2006 07:13 PM | Link to this

By bonnie scott September 8, 2006 06:59 PM It’s official. Andy, your latest post on Bush and his claim that Saddam and Osama were buddies (which you insist he never did) is just plain incoherent. Too bad there’s no cure for alcohol induced brain damage. I guess I should stop teasing you about your drinking. I almost feel sorry for you.

O.K. I’ll give you the reader’s digest version since you are such a mental basket case:

You’re full of sh-it.

Easy enough to understand, wasn’t it?

Everybody else: Look at this wanker’s post^^ and tell me who you think is “hitting the bottle.” Remember what I say about frisking the liberal first.

By the way, bonnie, thanks for agreeing that there was WMD found in Iraq. I know how hard it must be for you to admit you’re wrong, even though you’ve had so much practice.

By Collin

September 8, 2006 07:22 PM | Link to this

rushncap, Semantics won’t cover up your bad habit of calling people liars. Why would I recommend somebody read something that I haven’t read myself? Maybe I could have recited them to Woot on this blog? That’d do it right?

When someone is trying to point something out, what finger should they use?

In response to your 6:59 it would be my middle finger.

Where’ve you been since 4:55? You moved.

N-GA, I’ve watched you make a fool of yourself over Andy. Is that what you’re talking about?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 8, 2006 07:22 PM | Link to this

As usual, Clinton figures that the rest of us are too stupid or lazy to look it up for ourselves. And having read the complete report when it came out more than two years ago, I think it is an inescapable fact that a vacillating, equivocating administration had more than one opportunity to take out terrorist mastermind Bin Laden, but blew it.

We always hear you weenies harping on “where’s Osama” unless of course, we are talking about the first president that missed him:

“He expected the missiles to fly. When the decision came back that they should stand down, not shoot, the officer said, ‘We all just slumped.’ He told [the commission] he knew of no one at the Pentagon or the CIA who thought it was a bad game. Bin Laden ‘should have been a dead man’ that night, he said.”

And here’s one reitred military general that I bet you pervert pinkos don’t make a big deal out of what he thinks:

Lt. Gen William Boykin, a founding member of the elite Delta Force, told the commission, “…opportunities were missed because of an unwillingness to take risks and a lack of vision and understanding.”

You’re right, metrosexuals, where is Osama?

By bon scott

September 8, 2006 07:32 PM | Link to this

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!! - September 8, 2006 07:13 PM - Everybody else: Look at this wanker’s post^^ and tell me who you think is “hitting the bottle.” Remember what I say about frisking the liberal first. By the way, bonnie, thanks for agreeing that there was WMD found in Iraq. I know how hard it must be for you to admit you’re wrong, even though you’ve had so much practice.

Hearing voices again, are we? I never said that Iraq had WMDs. But you’re deep into your booze fueled fantasy land. Saying Bush never claimed a Saddam-Osama link. Then denying it. Saying Clinton helped kill Kurds, then ignoring evidence he protected them. Saying the Kurds lived in the marshes, then saying you never said it. (oh it was so DELICIOUS posting those links to your fibs!) Saying the “allies” restored the marshes, then ignoring evidence they didn’t.

And so on and so on.

And spewing drivel like “I know how hard it must be for you to admit you’re wrong, even though you’ve had so much practice.” What the hell does THAT mean? You make no sense whatsoever.

Have another drink. I’ll leave you to your weekend postings. I guess it keeps you off the streets and out of trouble. I’m going to relax, play some tennis, do some yardwork, watch a little football… you? You’ll stay holed up in your closet, swilling vodka, feeling clever because you post off hours. Enjoy yourself.

Oh, and blow me.

By N-GA

September 8, 2006 07:44 PM | Link to this

Collin,

The only person making a fool of themselves is Lying Andy (the Bed Wetter), until now. You join him as a fool. My challenges are genuine. He thinks he can “swift boat” someone by calling them liars and such. When I call him on what he says, he runs like the coward he is. You simply prove your complete and utter stupidity when you comment on my challenges to the Bed Wetter. BTW….if you have $100,000 to wager on those same bets, let’s hear from you….loser.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 8, 2006 08:03 PM | Link to this

By bon scott September 8, 2006 07:32 PM Have another drink. I’ll leave you to your weekend postings. I guess it keeps you off the streets and out of trouble. I’m going to relax, play some tennis

Let’s take a poll, does anyone really give a flying F whether bonnie is going to put on her skirt and chase little yellow balls around this weekend?

Freaking weirdo.

You’re right, I take it back about you being a drunk, most of the drunks I’ve known we’re pretty cool and had far more going for them than you do.

You’re nothing but a depraved pervert metrosexual, enslaved by the feminist movement in service to fighting against your own country.

If that’s not bizarre enough for you, than why would anyone even bother with you?

Bonnie?

By RW-(the original)

September 8, 2006 08:27 PM | Link to this

One of the problems with this blog is that with so many libs changing names nobody recognizes and welcomes an intelligent new poster like Collin.

Welcome aboard Collin! It appears you have read and not posted and I really wish a lot of the other readers out there would join in.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 8, 2006 08:45 PM | Link to this

Mark Steyn, tearing it up:

Well, exactly. They supposedly spent years working on it to get it absolutely right, to get the absolute truth, and then they’re frantically staying up late the night before it broadcasts snipping out ten minutes here and there, because Bill Clinton and Sandy Berger and various other Clintton apparatchiks object to this or that line here and there. I mean, that makes them look pathetic, it makes ABC, I think, look ridiculous, in fact, because there’s hundreds of these tapes out there. People are going to know exactly what lines were cut and what weren’t cut, and I don’t even think it works for the Democratic Party, because it reminds people that in fact, when…if you’re of a conspiratorial bent about 9/11, and a lot of people are, the only guy who’s actually been discovered to be destroying evidence is old Sandy Pants himself, Sandy Berger.-HughHewitt

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 9, 2006 04:14 PM | Link to this

I would have never have thought of this without the help of the Urinal:

A new study surmises that among Christians in the United States —- particularly Baptists, Pentecostals and Catholics —- there is a significant relationship between being religious and being obese.-AJC

This coming from the Constipation’s “faith” and “values” section; “Don’t think about accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, you’ll become a pig if you do.”

I’ll have to remember to measure my a-ss tomorrow before I go in the Sanctuary and then measure it again when I come out.

Maybe if Christians were to strap on suicide vests and kill infidels, the Al Jazeera Constitution would give them a free pass like they do for Islam, no?

Cut

Either these liberals think you are stupid or these liberals are stupid; pick your choice:

Bush had no intention of putting enough troops on the ground to rout the Taliban and catch Osama bin Laden; he didn’t plan to spend the money or make the commitment to rebuild Afghanistan; he didn’t have the vision or the patience required to resurrect a failed state. So it comes as no great surprise that, five years after Sept. 11, Afghanistan has reverted to a caldron of violence and corruption, a haven for jihadists and narco-terrorists, a miserable backwater teeming with contempt for central government authority.-QueenPinkoAJC

I’m going with the first choice, Mother Lib knows how stupid and easily led the pinko nation is:

————->NATO<———- Struggles to Maintain Control of Southern Afghanistan-JamestownFoundation

Not only is Queen Pinko being blatantly dishonest by placing the blame where it doesn’t belong, she’s covering for the same multilateralism that these libs pushed so hard for.

It only took a month for multilateralism to fail, go figure, the French defending another country, he-ll they can’t defend themselves.

You know, I’m taking back my choice and changing it to Cynlib being an idiot.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 9, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this

CAPITOL HILL Sep 8, 2006 (AP)— A Senate intelligence committee report says there’s no evidence Saddam Hussein had a relationship with terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi or his al-Qaida associates before the Iraq war.-A BS

Really?

National-security adviser Sandy Berger suggested that the U.S. send just one U-2 flight, but the report says Clarke worried that even then, Pakistan’s intelligence service would warn bin Laden that the U.S. was preparing for a bombing campaign. “Armed with that knowledge, old wily Usama will likely boogie to Baghdad,” Clarke wrote in a February 11, 1999 e-mail to Berger. The report says that another National Security Council staffer also warned that “Saddam Hussein wanted bin Laden in Baghdad.”-Powerline

Cut

Located in the Gulf of Mexico 270 miles southwest of New Orleans and 175 miles offshore, the Jack #2 well was drilled to a total depth of 28,175 feet (more than 5.25 miles). The drill pipe descends first through 7,000 feet of water and then another 21,000 feet below the sea floor. Costing more than $100 million, the Jack #2 well extends through numerous rock and salt formations hundreds of feet thick and between 24 million and 65 million years old.-WashingtonTimes

Windfall profits, eh?

Cut

Today’s cartoon that doesn’t suck!

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 9, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this

This is not an exhaustive list. And while we do not know what proportion of al Qaeda’s senior ranks are dead or in jail, Zawahiri must write letters to associates to find out whether his messages have aired on al-Jazeera. Al Qaeda has spawned imitators and affiliates, which trade on its radical infamy. But the ability of bin Laden and Zawahiri to plan and execute terrorism seems to have been massively degraded, and it shows in the fact that five years later there has been no major terrorist attack in the U.S., nor any, anywhere, comparable in scale to the attacks of that day.-OpinionJournal

Ahehehehehehe. Yes, Where Is Bin Laden?

Cut

One of his main goals now, also like Truman, is to institutionalize some of his antiterror policies by putting them on firmer legal and political ground so future presidents can use them. That’s what his speech this week on military tribunals was mainly about, and the same goes for warrantless wiretaps and CIA interrogations of al Qaeda suspects. For all of the controversy they’ve caused, Mr. Bush is convinced that the next president will be grateful to have these tools. And despite all the partisan rancor surrounding them, Mr. Bush’s legacy in defending them is likely to be lasting.

When I put to him the criticism made by Newt Gingrich, among others, that the U.S. security bureaucracy is too slow and unwieldy, he couldn’t rebut it fast enough. “I disagree strongly,” he says. “We were stove-piped in the past. We had an FBI whose primary responsibility was white-collar crime or criminality. We had a CIA that couldn’t talk to criminal investigators. And we’ve changed all that.”-OpinionJournal

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 9, 2006 05:58 PM | Link to this

Thousands of America’s young men and women are hunting extremists in dangerous parts of the world. They have brought the end of two cruel and dangerous regimes, and they continue to plant the seeds of liberty in their place. Their noble duty is a difficult one, but one they take on freely so that generations from now, Americans will not have to gather on anniversaries like this, questioning why evil men took still more of their loved ones away.SaltLakeTribuneDonaldRumsfeld

Contrast that^^ to what the Jolly Green Goofball has to say:

Third, we are threatened not just by gun barrels, but by oil barrels. The great treasury of jihadist terrorism is Mideast oil. We fund both sides in the war on terror every time we fill up our gas tanks. We must liberate the Middle East from the tyranny of dependence on petroleum, so that the region is no longer isolated from the global economy. Nothing will change if autocratic regimes are kept in power by pumping prosperity out of the ground and paying off their own people with petrodollar welfare checks. We must end the empire of oil. We need a comprehensive strategy to break our oil addiction.-BostonHeraldJonhBandaidKerry

Notice how Bandaid Kerry has no plan^^, just a hot air release.

Cut

Why can’t we Americans wise up and see the Islamic fascist threat? I blame the news media first, and irresponsible politicians like Howard Dean second. The hatred the committed left-wing press has for President Bush is almost unprecedented. The liberal media is obsessed with Bush and devalue him 24/7. This means that even when the president is correct on policy, the Bush haters will not admit it. They have succeeded, especially overseas, in convincing millions of people that Bush is the world’s greatest threat, not the fanatical Muslim jihad.-HumanEvents

By Bin Laden Makes Pinkos Happy!!

September 10, 2006 02:21 AM | Link to this

Tribute to 9/11

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 10, 2006 05:55 AM | Link to this

Warning! Do NOT click on the above link^^^ in the 2:21 post!

I have no idea why someone would feel the need to make that statement but YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 10, 2006 06:05 AM | Link to this

By the way, AJC, whoever posts gore like that using other people’s names should be banned from here, don’t you think?

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 10, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this

Look at Sunday’s cartoon from our boy and think to yourelf how a “news”paper that can’t print and deliver it’s product on time has the nerve to call anyone “incompetent.”

Cut

Senator Jay Rockefeller, democrat, went a step further. He says the world would be better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq — even if it means Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq.-C BS

Cut

It’s no secret that former Clinton administration officials, including the former president himself, are quite sensitive to questions about their response, or lack thereof, to al Qaeda’s attacks on America. It’s also indisputable that the Clinton White House had at least three chances to capture bin Laden, but didn’t do anything. That’s not “right-wing propaganda.” It’s called history, and one thing that Clintonistas have never been very good at is coming to terms with history.-WashingtonTimes

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 10, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

As it enacts new rules for military commissions, Congress—as well as the public—should keep two overriding principles in mind. One: While the jihadists detained at Guantanamo Bay must have due process of law before they can be criminally punished, they are not—despite a billowing cloud of confused reasoning, misleading testimony and downright propaganda—entitled, under the U.S. Constitution or relevant international law, to the same level of procedural protections enjoyed by the lawful soldiers of sovereign states. Two: The methods of warfare employed by unlawful combatants in the war on terror fully justify extraordinary trial rules.-OpinionJournal

Cut

When a liberal obstructs America from producing it’s own oil, this must be what they want:

Last year, the hemorrhage of cash flowing abroad to pay for crude oil imports topped $230 billion; this year it could easily reach $300 billion. But there’s another aspect of this outflow of capital — some portion of every dollar we spend on imported oil finds its way into the hands of nations who wish us ill. Oil money is funding groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and al Qaeda, enabling them to plan and perhaps execute the next September 11-type attack. It is also oil money — much of it from Saudi Arabia — funding the madrassas or Islamic schools that spread the radical, militant Islamist viewpoint that gave us the Taliban and September 11 and is now feeding civil strife throughout the Islamic world.-WashingtonTimes

By You're Right, Where Is Osama?

September 10, 2006 10:29 AM | Link to this