Mike Luckovich

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

My daughter is currently serving in Iraq and, as part of her responsibilities, reads much of the propaganda disseminated there by our enemies. She noted in a recent letter that several pieces urging the killing of more Americans quote Sen. John Kerry (D.-Mass.) to the effect that as more Americans die, U.S. domestic pressure to get out will increase.-HumanEvents

Extracting acts of treason from you maggot liberals has become the enemy’s strategy. They play you for the fools that you are. The World and The United States would be better off if you would just shut your filthy little mouths.

Cut

The American Civil Liberties Union forum-shopped this lawsuit, handed it to a reliably left-liberal Jimmy Carter appointee in Detroit and got its desired result. It probably didn’t count on the extreme intellectual embarrassment of Judge Diggs Taylor’s opinion, however, which is now being noted by left and right alike. The Washington Post called the opinion “neither careful nor scholarly” and “long on throat-clearing sound bites.” A writer for the hard-left Web site Daily Kos called it “poorly reasoned and totally unhelpful.”-WashingtonTimes

It doesn’t take much to impress cartoon boy.

It looks increasingly like this episode will end up damaging the anti-surveillance crowd’s prospects. If this was the best result forum-shopping could produce, it only serves to reinforce the notion that opponents of NSA surveillance stand on far shakier legal ground than they admit.

We do appreciate it.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 08:11 AM | Link to this

Those in the new government and leaders of civil society in Iraq are putting their lives on the line every day to advance a democratic society. And it is this that our enemies are most afraid of — not U.S. forces but a real democracy in the Middle East that would showcase human rights, women in politics and the rule of law. And they fear that this “worst-case scenario” could prove to be contagious.-WashingtonPost

Only a sicko, depraved liberal could be against that concept.

Cut

Why even have a UN?

In short, it is delusional to think that either the United Nations or the Lebanese military will contribute much of anything to the disarmament of Hezbollah. For the time being, the sides will return to the old pattern: terrorist provocations, half-hearted Israeli retaliatory strikes and U.N. condemnations of Israel. That could change if Iran decides to act on President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s apocalyptic calls for Israel’s destruction.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

The Iraq War is one that is still very much worth fighting. It represents not only the Iraqis’ best chance for a democratic society, but also all that of other people living in the Middle East. It is our best opportunity for removing the oppressive regimes that foment the breeding grounds for terrorism. Sadly, the American electorate of today is not what it was three decades ago. Worse, Ned Lamont and the Netroots, like the Vietnam protesters before them, are in the process of raising America’s white flag of surrender.-AmericanSpectator

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 08:12 AM | Link to this

Martin Peretz, editor-in-chief of the New Republic and a good liberal, wrote this: “The Lamont ascendancy, if that’s what it is, means nothing other than that the left is trying, and in places succeeding, to take back the Democratic Party. Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Maxine Waters have stumped for Mr. Lamont….we have been here before. Ned Lamont is Karl Rove’s dream come true. If he, and others of his stripe, carry the day, the Democratic Party will lose the future, and deservedly.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

Ned Lamont is a nobody with money who became the tool of the MoveOn.org crowd and has managed to demonstrate to the world that there is no room in the Democratic Party for candidates or office holders who disagree with the far left belief that our country is the source of all evil in the world. The boys and girls who lionized Che, Mao and Fidel in the 60s and 70s have grown up and are now championing suicide bombers and telling us that the rulers of nations like Iran and North Korea are really just misunderstood. Their own country appalls them and they are convinced that if it weren’t for the United States, the world would be a far safer and more pleasant place.-HumanEvents

Cut

“Public land should be public land,” Mrs. Clinton was quoted as saying in The Brooklyn Paper, a community weekly. “It’s not luxury housing we need. We absolutely need affordable housing.” Senator Clinton, who had a chance to live in Brooklyn Heights but chose to split her time between a $2.8 million mansion in Washington that recently underwent an expansion and upgrade that cost an additional $900,000, and a $1.7 million, 5-bedroom house with a swimming pool in the Westchester town of Chappaqua, has the luxury of being against “luxury housing.”-NYSun

She gets the palace, you lowlifes get the shack.

By George

August 21, 2006 08:27 AM | Link to this

Nobody is against the surveilance program!

NOBODY! So let’s stop with all the false accusations.

The question is… Why shouldn’t the President follow the rule of law and get a warrant. That is the LAW! The FISA court even makes it so easy to do! The administration can FIRST wire-tap THEN 72 hours AFTER the fact, they can go back to the FISA court and basically say, “Here’s who we spied on and here’s why… please retroactively approve what we have already done.”

In the 29 years of the FISA courts, there have been over 5000 requests for wire tapping and all but four requests have been approved.

So the REAL question is why does the Bush administration want to wire tap without ANY paper trail???

George

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 08:33 AM | Link to this

Bush’s attempt to bypass the secret FISA courts to implant wiretaps that would otherwise have been perfectly legal is just another example of the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Rove cabal’s crude dismissal of the Constitution.

Guess what?? Arrogance breeds contempt.

Which is why 70% of Americans wouldn’t trust Bush to empty the kitty box.

Nice cartoon, Mike. You know you’ve hit a nerve when Cracker gets to foaming at the mouth again!

Can you say civil war in Iraq, Cracker?? Do you see civil war that wouldn’t be if the US wasnt there? Sure you can!!

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 08:43 AM | Link to this

By George August 21, 2006 08:27 AM So the REAL question is why does the Bush administration want to wire tap without ANY paper trail???

Well, actually, the real question is why do you depraved liberals want to hamstring our national security with all kinds of pointless regulations.

So that it fails, Americans die, you score points against Bush.

Pull your pants up, Georgie.

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 08:33 AM Nice cartoon, Mike. You know you’ve hit a nerve when Cracker gets to foaming at the mouth again!

Yes, nice cartoon, let everyone know who’s side you’re on in the War On Fascism.

Can you say civil war in Iraq, Cracker?? Do you see civil war that wouldn’t be if the US wasnt there? Sure you can!!

This marks the 3rd year in a row that YOU have been saying civil war, without one actually happening, why do you need me to squawk your BS for you?

You’re doing just fine, loser.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 08:44 AM | Link to this

So did anyone see “Why We Fight”?

“The World and The United States would be better off if you would just shut your filthy little mouths.”

Andy, do you want a king as president? Is that what these countless Cut and Paste are trying to tell us? I guess that will make you feel safer with your blanky and night light. I mean is this all you are capable of? You can’t live along side your fellow Americans if they don’t support your ideas and your president? If so, you are a sad and shallow little man.

I hate the phrase “If you’ve got nothing to hide, then what is there to worry about.” Like that justifies the illegal wire tapping

By Craig

August 21, 2006 08:47 AM | Link to this

Creep seeking missle (sic)- Why can’t you just spout your lame points without the racial slurs? If you had ever been the target of racism you wouldn’t so blithely toss around words like “cracker.”

By Mrs. Godzilla

August 21, 2006 08:49 AM | Link to this

Yessir, Mr Bush , I feel safer because you have illegally wiretapped Quakers. Maybe we’ll get that great recipe for pork chops and cream gravy.

I feel safer since you’ve illegally wiretapped peace activists. I won’t miss any sleep worrying if they stole the magic markers they used to write their protest placards.

I feel safer every time I or Mr. G are overseas and we call to talk to our kids and hear the click, click, click in the backround. Maybe the NSA will water to dogs and mow the lawn.

This administration has never had its eye on the ball. Never.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 08:50 AM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 08:44 AM “The World and The United States would be better off if you would just shut your filthy little mouths.”

What don’t you understand? They enemy is counting on your mouth. You can’t possibly be that stupid. You are fighting for religious extremism, REAL religious extremism, you moron.

STFU.

Little sissy.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this

The dictator is probably using the wiretaps to listen to the Dems and his critics to silence them.

Why else would he not get a warrant?

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 08:56 AM | Link to this

Just like a neocon apologist to scream “hamstringing with regulations” over illegal warrantless wiretaps. What a sorry excuse for an American.

Everybody else is saying civil war in Iraq, Mr. Cracker. Lots of Republicans. You can too. Just try.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this

By getalife August 21, 2006 08:53 AM The dictator is probably using the wiretaps to listen to the Dems and his critics to silence them. Why else would he not get a warrant?

What a ridiculous premise, that the democrats would say something that anyone would want to listen to.

How silly.

You can go to any lame O lib website and hear “Bush Sucks.”

Why sneak around?

By RW-(the original)

August 21, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

Mrs, G,

If you’re hearing a click, click, click in the background of your calls you might want to check in with the commune staff. That’s not the way digital monitoring works.

Cackling chorus,

Why doesn’t someone find an actual plaintiff if all this nefarious wiretapping is going on?

Here’s another little civics lesson for everybody whining about the “King.” We have three coequal branches of government, why do you want to make the executive branch subservient to the others? Isn’t it you that is trying to rewrite the Constitution?

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

The Emperor has no clothes, getalife!!

And neither does Mr. Cracker. What a bedwetting idiot.

Who needs a Constitution anyway?? (sarcasm)

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 08:56 AM Just like a neocon apologist to scream “hamstringing with regulations” over illegal warrantless wiretaps. What a sorry excuse for an American.

Carter and Clinton were both NOT hamstrung by “regulations.”

Why does it matter to you now, loser?

Everybody else is saying civil war in Iraq, Mr. Cracker. Lots of Republicans. You can too. Just try.

I can SAY that you are a half intelligent, reasoned person but that doesn’t make it true, obviously.

You’ll still be a hysterical little sissy.

By George

August 21, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this

All except for Andy of course. He is always lost.

WASHINGTON — Republicans have lost their way when it comes to many core GOP principles and may be in jeopardy heading into the fall elections, Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. says. Hagel, a possible presidential candidate in 2008, said Sunday that the GOP today is very different party from the one when he first voted Republican. “First time I voted was in 1968 on top of a tank in the Mekong Delta,” said Hagel, a Vietnam veteran. “I voted a straight Republican ticket. The reason I did is because I believe in the Republican philosophy of governance. It’s not what it used to be. I don’t think it’s the same today.”

By w00t

August 21, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this

Wow, bring up a few good points and they turn into a quivering pile of goo.

“STFU.

Little sissy.”

Nice, real nice. Do you talk to your mother with that mouth?

By RW-(the original)

August 21, 2006 09:32 AM | Link to this

Islam enjoys a large and influential ally among the non-Muslims: A new generation of “Useful Idiots,” that Lenin identified as those who lived in liberal democracies and furthered the work of communism. This new generation of Useful Idiots also lives in liberal democracies but serves the cause of Islamofascism—another virulent form of totalitarian ideology.

Useful Idiots are naïve, foolish, ignorant of facts, unrealistically idealistic, dreamers, willfully in denial or deceptive. They hail from the ranks of the chronically unhappy, the anarchists, the aspiring revolutionaries, the neurotics who are at war with life, the disaffected alienated from government, corporations, and just about any and all institutions of society. The Useful Idiot can be a billionaire, a movie star, an academe of renown, a politician, or from any other segment of the population.

Hat tip: Buy Danish

By getalife

August 21, 2006 09:35 AM | Link to this

McCain has positioned himself to “stay the course” after W.

Hagel is taking the other route. Hagel can talk but will he do anything? My guess is he is just like Specter.

By @@

August 21, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this

ml: I like to watch how you draw Bush’s ears. Sometimes they’re twice the length of his body in your cartoon world. Today they are somewhat proportionate. I’m thinking that you know this ruling holds very little “legal ear wax”.

Romney golden to GOP in blue state. There’s gonna be a lot of independents looking for a middle of the road candidate. Cindy, meet Mitt.

But then we are talking about my home state of California.

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this

“…why do you want to make the executive branch subservient to the others? Isn’t it you that is trying to rewrite the Constitution?”

Nothing of the sort. In fact, it’s you and the other Bush-nuts who want to turn the President’s office into the most powerful branch of government. One with no accountability.

The cry of “unitary President” says it all.

It is you who are trying to rewrite (more accurately destroy) the Constitution.

So much for checks and balances, eh?

Please check your delusions of dictatorship someplace else, thank you.

By RW-(the original)

August 21, 2006 10:09 AM | Link to this

Creep,

It’s only you hysteritics running around crying “unitary President.”

If any Federal judge makes a ruling and that should be final, why do we need a Supreme Court or appellate courts for that matter? Is that just for rulings you don’t like?

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 10:13 AM | Link to this

RW,

Thanks to you and Danish for the great description of America’s “useful idiots”. It isn’t hard to identify them. They appear on every political blog just like they do here.

We have those who hate and vilify our elected president, despise every action taken to protect our country against terrorism from airports to communications, disrupt Republican meetings, and support our war efforts by protests, cut’n’run efforts and even fabricating phony military records for the president.

Then the useful idiots wonder why a majority of Americans think they are AGAINST the country. That triggers the old stuff about how good is dissent.

Well, good buddies, that old saying rings pretty true.If you aint FOR us, you’re AGAINST us. And I am talking about our country.

By Think Tank Timmy

August 21, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

RW and Andy, and the other HezTROLLah trash that blogs on this board love to quote the Terrorists in Iraq to make their points.

The Republicans and the terrorists hate liberal freedoms equally, and have merged into one enemy of liberty, justice and the American way.

We Democrats will never betray our founding father’s insistance that a government is for the people, by the people, and of the people.

Bush/Cheney and the other high priests of the American Taliban can sell out the founding fathers all they want.

Eventually even Benedict Arnold got caught and ran. Caught and ran. Cut and run! Bush/Cheney cut and run! They flip flopped on Mission Accomplished. FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP

FLIP FLOP

FLIP FLOP

FLIP FLOP

By getalife

August 21, 2006 10:20 AM | Link to this

Hey Mike,

We require your assistance on Wooten’s blog.

“By getalife

August 21, 2006 10:13 AM | Link to this

sct,

I wish we could ask Mike Luckovich.

He would know. I doubt Jim would admit bashing Clinton during war time.”

By getalife

August 21, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this

How about the rest of you wingnuts. Did you support Clinton in a time of war? Be honest wingnuts.

By RW-(the original)

August 21, 2006 10:50 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Amil Amani did a great job of summing up today’s useful idiots. Hopeful he’s indicative of Iranian clear thinkers that will ultimately help us transform the Middle East.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 10:54 AM | Link to this

OMG, W is an idiot. I had to change the channel.

Unbelievable, people support this idiot.

Wow.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 10:58 AM | Link to this

“RW and Andy, and the other HezTROLLah trash that blogs on this board love to quote the Terrorists in Iraq to make their points.”

Useless Think Tank Idiot:

Pop Quiz! Who made the following DNC talking points:

“(The U.N. Security Council) has been created to help with peace and justice, but we see that it is not responding to atrocities. If we search for the root causes, we see the hand of the British and the Americans. People - innocent people are being killed.”

“I am very saddened to hear that 1 percent of the total population is in prisons, and 45 million people don’t have a healthcare coverage. That is very sad to hear.”

“His approval rating is dropping every day. Hatred vis-?-vis the president is increasing every day around the world. For a ruler, this is the worst message that he could receive. Rulers and heads of government at the end of their office must leave the office holding their heads high.”

Howard Dean?

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 11:01 AM | Link to this

Getalife,

What war are you referring to? The war on crime?

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 11:06 AM | Link to this

Danish, those are not “talking points”. Those are facts. I’m sorry you seem to think that facts have a Democratic slant, but maybe that can be the beginning of recovery for you. Next step: recognizing that facts are more important than ideologies.

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 11:08 AM | Link to this

More than 3,500 people were killed in Iraq last month, the highest monthly civilian toll since the war began.

People are deserting entire neighborhoods in Baghdad and Basra. Millions of middle and working class Iraqis have fled to the “safety” of Syria and Jordan.

But its not a civil war. Bush said so.

By RW-(the original)

August 21, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

rushncap,

The first “fact” says that the root cause of ALL atrocities are the British and Americans.

Do you really want to agree with Amadinijihad on that one?

By getalife

August 21, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

Well the Iraqi plan for security is to ban vehicles.

Well, there is a gas shortage and no oil coming out of Iraq (why is that? 130, 000 troops can’t protect the oil supply , or could it be Cheney’s plan to raise prices?) so I guess it is a plan.

By Mrs. Godzilla

August 21, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

I see SCARED people.

If we could harness the power of fear we wouldn’t have needed a war for oil.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

The North Vietnamese were thankful for the help they received from the American left, saying that they couldn’t have “won” without our pinkos.

Al Qaeda has stated that since they can’t be the United States on the battlefield, they will continue to suicide bomb and car bomb innocent people until the American left can “win” the war for them at home in the U.S.

And these depraved pinko liberals STILL say things like this:

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 11:08 AM More than 3,500 people were killed in Iraq last month, the highest monthly civilian toll since the war began.

Useful idiots or not?

In the service of some 7th Century religious fanatics.

Who would kill them at the drop of a hat.

Raise your hands idiots.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

“Danish, those are not “talking points”. Those are facts”

rushncap,

Thanks for proving my point.

As you are the deranged useful idiot perfectly described right here, you are the one who needs to go into “recovery”.

The first step for you might be to recognize that Socialism is an “ideology” and that you are a foot soldier for Islam.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

Andy,

Time to change the diaper.

Pathetic scared coward.

Grow a spine.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 11:32 AM | Link to this

Danish, now you’re accusing a Jew of being a “foot soldier for Islam”. I hope you realize what a hopeless retard you are, and go back to talking about the only thing you actually know anything about: your little snot-noser’s golf score. Leave this “politics” thing to the big boys and girls.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

Andy, more people are dying now in Iraq than ever before. Can you really say that this is progress? How is Iraq better off now than before? How many years ago was the “mission accomplished” yet our troops are being killed every day? We’re still having to deal with road side bombs and IEDs. There is growing secular violence everyday?

I think they were better off with Saddam. At least he knew how to run the country. I think we should give it back to him.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

Oh please, wingnuts are the defintion of “useful idiots”.

They support the biggest idiot this country has ever seen.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Idiots are capable of all sorts of stupid things Rushncap.

Your ideology and belief system is conditioned by Marxism, and by your own admission you are a “secular Jew” so it looks like Marxism wins.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

Want proof that Al Qaeda’s strategy is working?

Just ask an useful idiot:

By w00t August 21, 2006 11:38 AM Andy, more people are dying now in Iraq than ever before. Can you really say that this is progress?

Let me guess, idiot, we should surrender to Al Qaeda, right?

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

Come on, Danish, I’m trying to engage you at your level. What did your kid shoot this weekend? We’re all dying to know.

Getalife: I don’t think I’d call them “useful”…

By Cindy

August 21, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

No only like it, Mike; Love it! Finally somebody is out there trying to protect the U.S. Constitution.

Hey defending the constitution is in the Presidential Oath. Can they get Bush for lying under oath?

By U.S. Constitution

August 21, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

Andy, Do you know me at all? As a refresher, I protect American’s freedoms. Without that we would be like any other dictatorship. Throw me out if you want safety at all costs, but you will also lose freedom.
Safety within me (the constitution) is easily attainable and protects the citizens just as well with the plus of allowing them to remain free.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this

ANDY, you are truely LOST.

For the past year or so they have been saying THOUSANDS are killed each month. I believe it was said that 17,000 were killed just this year alone.

I guess thats an acceptable loss to you, but what about those peoples families? Oh, but wait, according to you they are all crazy so who cares.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 12:06 PM | Link to this

Why dont you take a look here Andy

30% of civilian deaths occurred during the invasion phase before 1 May 2003.

Post-invasion, the number of civilians killed was almost twice as high in year two (11,351) as in year one (6,215).

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

You can’t engage me at my level. You are effectively deaf, dumb and blind.

Getalife,

You’ll have to come up with something new and original to describe conservatives because that term is already taken.

Can you do it?

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

By U.S. Constitution August 21, 2006 11:56 AM Andy, Do you know me at all? As a refresher, I protect American’s freedoms. Without that we would be like any other dictatorship. Throw me out if you want safety at all costs, but you will also lose freedom. Safety within me (the constitution) is easily attainable and protects the citizens just as well with the plus of allowing them to remain free.

I know you better than you know yourself.

Describe what the “Commander In Chief” means.

Bush has taken liberty with the spy program LESS than what Clinton did, Clinton doing it for CIVILIAN purposes.

You are not a suicide pact, moron.

By @@

August 21, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

I do like to keep a close eye on the “Radical Left’s King George” out of concern for his useful tools. Not an obsession, just an observation.

I’ll call him misguided & diabolical:

Most populations of the world are uncomfortable, to put it mildly, with this formulation of sexual-political rights — but of course, such queasiness didn’t stop the {{{Canadian government from funding Stella; the sex group also acknowledges funding from George Soros’}}} Open Society Institute.

That’s George Soros, socialism at it’s best. People are entitled to contract HIV/AIDS.

How do you pay for their medical care? Why with Universal Health Care of course, supplied by the government, which BTW was never intended to be a responsibility of government. But when you walk the slippery slope of liberalism, the banana peels are all over the path. Oops!!!

By History

August 21, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this

CUT AND RUN?

WHO WAS PRESIDENT WHEN THE US RAN FROM VIETNAM?

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:12 PM | Link to this

Bush said he is NOT leaving Iraq while he is President without total victory.

Bush is a MAN.

Bush is NOT a useful idiot to Al Qaeda.

By Constitution

August 21, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this

If you aren’t for me; you are against me.

Those who support illegal activities under my written rights should join the jihadists.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:15 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this ANDY, you are truely LOST. For the past year or so they have been saying THOUSANDS are killed each month. I believe it was said that 17,000 were killed just this year alone.

Clown, moron, useful idiot, it is still less than how many were killed by Saddam.

WTF, what is it with these depraved liberals?

If they hate seeing people die, let’s take a look at Iran, you sick little mofo, is it alright in your masturbatory little life that they get killed?

F O.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 12:15 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Trying to pull children as bait into this debate is about as low as they come. But that is where you are. A secular Jew? NO. A disgrace to all Jews. You don’t have any loyalty to anybody or anything except yourself. A typical misfit with an overbearing opinion of yourself.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this

By History August 21, 2006 12:11 PM CUT AND RUN? WHO WAS PRESIDENT WHEN THE US RAN FROM VIETNAM?

Oh come on, be serious. What a waste.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

My goodness, now Nixon was a pinko democrat, great.

What else are libs going to make up as we go?

By candide

August 21, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

If Bush intends to stay in Iraq til he leaves office we need to make him leave office sooner.

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 12:25 PM | Link to this

I see where Mr. Cracker thinks Al Qaeda is behind the thousands of Muslim on Muslim murders in Iraq.

What a delusional idiot.

To the factions fighting in Iraq’s civil war, American casualties are now peripheral.

But Mr. Cracker would rather see Americans die while Iraqis play whack-a-mole with eachother than see Americans chase after real terrorists.

Like Al Qaeda.

Why does he hate Americans? Especially Americans in uniform? Why does he want to see Al Qaeda attack our country again?

By getalife

August 21, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Check out this toon

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Cindy,

Is that you playing like you are the Constitution? Sounds like it.

Why don’t you play with your dolls instead of using the Constitution for liberal play time?

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 12:30 PM | Link to this

Bush is a MAN alright!

He refuses to ask for directions, wont accept any that are offered, and has too much pride to admit he might be wrong.

Thanks, Mr. Cracker!

By Forgotten Truths

August 21, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

Has everyone forgotten that much of what happened on 09/11 was “predicted” and “detected” during the Clinton administration? And nothing was done about it??! Liberal or conservative, either way, terrorism struck at ALL of our nation, EVERY one of us.

I am happy that the terrorists tried their most recent operation in England and not in the US. Great Britain is NOT opposed to profiling in their security operations — which is one of the main reasons they thwarted the attempt on the six planes. Do you really think the US could have stopped those planes again— especially with all the b*tching moaning about profiling, wire taps, and ‘invasion of privacy’. TAP MY PHONES! I don’t care, do it — you’ll get a pretty good laugh when you hear me telling jokes, swapping recipes and planning my upcoming weekend! Just as long as you tap the bad guys too- and figure out what they’re planning!

I don’t care if you pull me out of a security line to frisk me because of my dark hair and eye color- or because of my last name. Just keep me from being on a plane that blows up or crashes into a building and I’ll be grateful!!

By getalife

August 21, 2006 12:34 PM | Link to this

Lets see, China and Russia said STFU. Iran and North Korea said check out my new nukes.

And now for the Mexican invasion

Didn’t I say it was very dangerous to have this idiot in office?

Hey, he still has Canada for now. The rest of the world is treating us like their b-itch!

Wake up wingnuts!

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 12:25 PM I see where Mr. Cracker thinks Al Qaeda is behind the thousands of Muslim on Muslim murders in Iraq.

You’re right, for once this decade.

I need to give Iran and Syria some credit.

I stand corrected.

It’s still half of what Saddam killed and you Jack Offs called him “contained” bwahahahahaha.

F O.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 12:42 PM | Link to this

“Clown, moron, useful idiot, it is still less than how many were killed by Saddam.

WTF, what is it with these depraved liberals?

If they hate seeing people die, let’s take a look at Iran, you sick little mofo, is it alright in your masturbatory little life that they get killed?

F O.”

Can you do anything useful other than calling people names? You are like a four year old throwing a fit in a toy store.

Also way to change the subject. Iran has nothing to do with what I said about the deaths in Iraq, and on top of that I do not think people are killing each other on a level like this in Iran. They seem to have somewhat of a stable government even if the president is crazy.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

Oops ,I may have changed the channel and missed this bomb:

Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. George Bush just said so. Expressly. For the first time.

Wow.

By Craig

August 21, 2006 12:46 PM | Link to this

Creep-Is there are a reason that you continue to use racist terms and don’t even acknowledge that is was brought to your attention? It must be that you are a willful racist or an ignorant fool. Congratulations.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 12:42 PM Also way to change the subject. Iran has nothing to do with what I said about the deaths in Iraq, and on top of that I do not think people are killing each other on a level like this in Iran. They seem to have somewhat of a stable government even if the president is crazy.

It has everything to do with it, Useful.

How can you be concerned with Iraq deaths in 2006 but not in 2002?

Are you really that weird?

I’m sorry, I like to get a good laugh every now and again, of course you’re that weird.

And useful.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this

By getalife August 21, 2006 12:44 PM Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. George Bush just said so. Expressly. For the first time.

I missed the part when he EVER said they were.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this

Can someone please report this freak “Cracker”, I’m sick of seeing him telling people to “F Off”. That’s really shallow, and mean spirited.

Andy people are trying to have a normal conversation with you and you resort to name calling and bashing. How Mature.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this

This is what being an useful idiot is all about:

WASHINGTON (CNN) — In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.(-CNN Don’t get a hard on getalife, it’s old news)

Unless, of course the going gets tough.

Then they undermine the very thing they voted for.

Cut and run.

By Rawena

August 21, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this

Thank you for being at the AJC and balancing out the likes of that awful Jim Wooten!

You should do a ‘toon of him. I would parody his appearance as a queen if I could draw.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 12:59 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 12:50 PM Can someone please report this freak “Cracker”, I’m sick of seeing him telling people to “F Off”. That’s really shallow, and mean spirited.

I’m sick of hearing you liberals whine like a bunch of big fat babies, in service of our sworn enemies, while we have troops in the field.

F O.

You addressed me first, useful idiot.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

Cracker, lets not forget that the Senate and Congress were both lied to. False intelligence was used as the pretext for war. Also, September 11th and the war in Afghanistan were used as pep rallies to get public support for the war in Iraq.

No WMD’s, no ties to Al Qaeda. What has this war in Iraq gotten us? I really want to know. What has the war in Iraq solved for the United States and the PEOPLE of the United States?

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

Mr. Craig,

I am simply showing civility by addressing Midori Want a Cracker as Mr. Cracker.

I’m polite that way.

I’ll grant you though, that it’s more respect than he shows other people here.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 01:05 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

In idiot rushncap’s childish narrow mind since golf is a capitalist pig sport that ruins the environment anyone who excels at it must be “snot-nosed”.

Rushncap is doing really important work, don’t you know. And he wants us to take politics out of the hands of grownups and put it into the hands of “boys and girls”.

From this I infer that we should just use the “election” results from elementary schools where teachers like him can “guide” the students in the voting process.

The other idiot du matin, Cindy, is an important Whistle-Blower who as far as I can tell lost her job at the Pentagon when she said “naneey naneey boo boo” as she walked by the pictures of our Commander in Chief and Secretary of Defense. But for that error in judgement she was highly qualified to entrust with our national defense.

By Midori

August 21, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this

Is it me, or does Andy become stupider and more incoherent by the day?

By Forgotten Truths

August 21, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this

1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a. Superman b. Jay Leno c. Harry Potter d. a Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by a. Olga Corbett b. Sitting Bull c. Arnold Schwarzenegger d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by: a. Lost Norwegians b. Elvis c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

During the 1980’s a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by: a. John Dillinger b. The King of Sweden c. The Boy Scouts d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by: a. A pizza delivery boy b. Pee Wee Herman c. Geraldo Rivera d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by: a. The Smurfs b. Davey Jones c. The Little Mermaid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by: a. Captain Kidd b. Charles Lindberg c. Mother Teresa d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by: a. Scooby Doo b. The Tooth Fairy and The Sundance Kid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by: a. Richard Simmons b. Grandma Moses c. Michael Jordan d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by: a. Mr. Rogers b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill’s women problems c. The World Wrestling Federation d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by: a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd b. The Supreme Court of Florida c. Mr. Bean d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

In 2002 the United States

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:10 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:00 PM Cracker, lets not forget that the Senate and Congress were both lied to.

“Lied to” by the useful idiots at the CIA, namely weapons of mass destruction expert Valerie Plame.

Stupid a-ss.

F O.

What has the war in Iraq solved for the United States and the PEOPLE of the United States?

If we see this through to the end, like adults, like men, the people in the Middle East will get to live the SAME LIFE THAT YOUR STUPID A-SS TAKES FOR GRANTED, FREE FROM RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION.

Which for some reason pis-ses you sicko liberals off.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 01:11 PM | Link to this

Andy does deserve any respect.

He is wrong on everything, will not admit it, and spews names more than any blogger here.

Do onto others………….

By Midori

August 21, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this

Creep Seeking Missile,

Andy likes to use other people’s names. Just like he likes to use other’s thoughts. He has none of his own. Original ones, that is.

When his blog first started, he would name jack constantly, and try to point the blame elsewhere. He, and others, waged this huge campaign to try to paint me as the name jacker.

The guy is just a hopeless fool. I really don’t care about him using my name, or a variation of it. Especially when you look at the bright side. He could be in his basement making a fertilizer bomb.

Plus, everyone knows who he is just by the stupid comments he is determined to keep making.

He is truly comedy relief.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

Ok, so forgotten truths, we just go over and wipe out all the “Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40”? I guess that really means the killing of all the Muslims, because they could really be lying to you. Will that solve all our problems? I guess then we can go and claim the oil as ours with all of them gone.

Like I said last week, we need to find a way to change their perceptions of Americans and the United States. You’re not going to stop terrorist if you can’t change their ideas. Killing them and bombing women and children only fuels the fire.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:19 PM | Link to this

By getalife August 21, 2006 01:11 PM Andy does deserve any respect.

“Doesn’t,” useful idiot.

I don’t ask for any respect, I’m not a big fat pus-sy, ignorantly worried about my “feelings.”

F O.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 01:23 PM | Link to this

Cracker, someone needs to Ban you ASAP. You are nothing but trouble for this blog. Civilized discussions cannot take place with your constant rhetoric.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:25 PM | Link to this

By Midori August 21, 2006 01:13 PM When his blog first started, he would name jack constantly, and try to point the blame elsewhere. He, and others, waged this huge campaign to try to paint me as the name jacker.

Do the libs EVER tell the truth?

About anything?

Mike Luckovich’s blog has ARCHIVES, y’all.

What the means, I’m talking down to you useful idiots now, is that you can go back and check ANYTHING that has ever been posted here.

Everytime, EVERYTIME, that I try to use the name “Andy” it gets jacked by the liberals. EVERYTIME.

I would love to use my name, I have nothing to hide.

When you pervert, depraved liberals start acting like adults, let me know.

Until then, F O.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 01:27 PM | Link to this

Come on, Danish, what’s your snot-noser shoot this weekend? I’m trying to throw you a bone here by discussing something you have the power to comprehend, and all you’re doing is sniping back at me. Not very nice at all.

By Roll Over

August 21, 2006 01:27 PM | Link to this

Iraq has WMD. No, it doesn’t Flip Flop Flip Flop Flip Flop Iraq is the cause of 9/11. No it isn’t. Flip Flop Flip Flop Flip Flop

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:16 PM Ok, so forgotten truths, we just go over and wipe out all the “Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40”?

I’ve read his post twicw and I don’t remember seeing where he called for “all Muslim males between the age of 17..” to be killed.

If you had a brain, you would understand that there is one more pertinent circumstance in all of the incidences that he lists.

They were all sworn to jihad.

Jihad: Kill all infidels.

Infidels: You and I.

Now this I agree should get them killed.

F O.

By Forgotten Truths

August 21, 2006 01:35 PM | Link to this

Dear w00t,

God forbid profiling to make this country safer. I am not saying all Muslims are bad, I would NEVER say that!!

I am attempting to show that “Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40” are responsible for most of the terrorist attacks on the United States.

“What stopped last week’s terrorist attack was ethnic profiling. We don’t know the details of the British intelligence work that nabbed the 24 Muslims because The New York Times has not been able to obtain that classified information and publish it on its front page yet. But it is a fact that you could not catch 24 Muslim terrorists by surveilling everyone in Britain equally. I think a planeful of Arabs would attract attention — except from people who had recently completed a government training program teaching them not to notice anyone’s appearance.”

So, to ensure we never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, US airport security screeners have no longer been allowed to profile certain people. They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the security details, 85-year old people with metal hips, but leave Muslim Males between the ages 17 and 40 alone lest they be guilty of profiling.

And w00t, about your statement that “you’re not going to stop terrorist if you can’t change their ideas”. I dont’ think we can change their ideas— that is why they are called “fanatics” — have you read the articles the AJC has done on Jill Carroll?? She spoke of 5 year old children running around promiting the fanaticism— already saying they were ready to be martyred!!

“Without the ethnic profiling going on outside of airports, no security procedure currently permissible inside airports would have prevented a terrorist attack that would have left thousands dead. We have to target the fanatics themselves. Baby formula doesn’t kill people. Islamic fascists kill people.”

By w00t

August 21, 2006 01:36 PM | Link to this

You guys watch this?

“BUSH: The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.

QUESTION: What did Iraq have to do with it?

BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?

QUESTION: The attack on the World Trade Center.

BUSH: Nothing. Except it’s part of — and nobody has suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a — Iraq — the lesson of September 11th is take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody’s ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq.”

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:36 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:23 PM Cracker, someone needs to Ban you ASAP. You are nothing but trouble for this blog. Civilized discussions cannot take place with your constant rhetoric.

“Civilized” “discussions,” hahaha.

By Rawena August 21, 2006 12:57 PM Thank you for being at the AJC and balancing out the likes of that awful Jim Wooten! You should do a ‘toon of him. I would parody his appearance as a queen if I could draw.

You crack me up, useful.

Your definition of “civilized” must be a food fight with strained vegetables, thrown from your high chair.

Thanks for the laugh.

F O.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 01:42 PM | Link to this

ANDY, you DUMB STUPID SOB, read THIS:

Like I said last week, we need to find a way to change their perceptions of Americans and the United States. You’re not going to stop terrorist if you can’t change their ideas. Killing them and bombing women and children only fuels the fire.

Can you understand that? CAN YOU? What were are doing now in the middle east is further fueling their cause and breeding more extremeist Muslims. They very fact of us being over there is causing this hatered. This is something that did not occure over night. Someone did not just go, “Hey, lets kill Americans because I do not like them.”

HISTORY has caused this, and mainly the west’s involvement with the Middle East.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:48 PM | Link to this

So what, pray tell, is so hard to understand about this?

Nothing. Except it’s part of — and nobody has suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a — Iraq — {{{{{the lesson of September 11th is take threats before they fully materialize}}}}}, Ken. Nobody’s ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq.”

Threats like France saw Greenpeace being right before they sank an unarmed vessel.

Threats to his career that Ted Kennedy saw from driving off the bridge with some woman locked in the car as he swam away.

Threats that Hillary saw from Vince Foster disclosing her lesbian tendencies.

None of these people took it lying down, they fought back.

Why shouldn’t the United States?

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:42 PM Can you understand that? CAN YOU? What were are doing now in the middle east is further fueling their cause and breeding more extremeist Muslims. They very fact of us being over there is causing this hatered. This is something that did not occure over night. Someone did not just go, “Hey, lets kill Americans because I do not like them.”

NO I CAN’T!!!

You need to read the Koran, useful. We’re marked for death or slavery regardless of where we are “at” as you so hysterically shreik.

Why do Muslims religious fanatics oppress other Muslims, huh, huh?

Why do they push brick walls over onto Muslim homosexuals????

Why do they bury their own women up to their necks in the sand and stone them slowly to death.

Do you approve of this?

You, useful idiot, are arguing for the religious slavery of entire nations, moron.

F O.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 01:58 PM | Link to this

Promote peace not violence

This is one brave woman.

By Craig

August 21, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

Creep-I’ll accept that as long as it stops whenever Andy changes names again. It sure seems that it has been going on for a lot longer than he has used that name though and it’s either spreading or you are using multiple names. I’m a 64 year old black man raised in the deep south, if I use the name “Creep want a black man” are you going to call me n&&r?

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

A British-based Muslim radical appeared to back suicide bombing yesterday when he claimed that dying for your beliefs was ‘just’. Dr Azzam Tamimi told an 8,000-strong crowd that standing up for your principles was the ‘greatest act of martyrdom’. The 51-year-old was speaking at the ExpoIslamia convention in Manchester.

Do you find this to be normal, useful w000t?

Is it copastetic with you for religious fanatics to blow themselves up, taking as many innocents as they can with them?

On a side note, should not someone have “martyred” that speaker right after he said what he said? With a bullet in his scummy brain?

By w00t

August 21, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

Still trying to tie Iraq to Sept 11th… There was NO reason to go into Iraq. The WMD claims were based on false intelligence or claims that were several years old. I think it’s funny that people forget that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA sold IRAQ AND SADDAM chemical and biological weapons for the use in the Iran-Iraq War. Of course we thought he had WMD’s we had the receipts to prove it. However, the ability to produce and use chemical and biological weapons had all been destroyed after the first Gulf War.

So what threats where there? What was there to “fully materialize”? The way I see it, you cant put the lives of thousands of solders at risk because of a “hunch” you have.

By Forgotten Truths

August 21, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this

To my dearest, disillusioned w00t,

What Kool-Aid have you been drinking?? We are not going to “change their ideas.” The hundreds of years of fanaticiscm, propoganda/teachings, and dysfunctional upbringings of Muslim terrorists are NOT going to be changed by a P.R. campaign attempt to make Americans seem like everybody’s friend and/or nice little buddy. THEY HATE US. Everything about our lifestyles, our governments, our families, our freedom of speech, our women who are allowed to show their hair, their ankles, god forbid - a belly button!!

It’s not just Americans, my dearest ignorant w00t. They want to kill essentially ANYONE who does not believe in their teachings. Oppress their women, beat their religious ‘truths’ into anyone who will listen. Human rights abuses happen in many countries, but never to the proportion and the magnitude of what is happening in Iran and other Islamic countries in the name of religion. All the Islamic countries have signed the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights; despite that gross violations of human rights happen in almost all of them.

So, w00t, if you are so intent on changing the fanatic-Muslim perception of the Western world, you better hop on an airplane with a couple million copies of the Bible of Judaism or the Bible of Christianity or the “Bible” of Kabbalah - whatever you choose!! Just go and try to teach a new religion to a group of people who have been preaching the same thing for hundreds of years. And then we will probably watch your be-heading on the television.

By w00t

August 21, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this

Like I said Andy/Cracker/whatever you go by today, you have to change their ideas. Most of this is caused by many muslims following Sharia law.

“During the 19th century the history of Islamic law took a sharp turn due to new challenges the Muslim world faced: the West had risen to a global power and colonized a large part of the world, including Muslim territories. Societies change from the agricultural to the industrial stage. New social and political ideas emerged and social models slowly shifted from hierarchical towards egalitarian. The Ottoman Empire and the rest of the Muslim world were in decline, and calls for reform became louder. In Muslim countries, codified state law started replacing the role of scholarly legal opinion. Western countries sometimes inspired, sometimes pressured, and sometimes forced Muslim states to change their laws. Secularist movements pushed for laws deviating from the opinions of the Islamic legal scholars. Islamic legal scholarship remained the sole authority for guidance in matters of rituals, worship, and spirituality, while they lost authority to the state in other areas. The Muslim community became divided into groups reacting differently to the change. This division persists until the present day”

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 02:07 PM | Link to this

The complete absense of WMDs in Iraq has obscured another simple fact: even if Saddam had some WMDs, he was no threat at all to either America or its allies. He invaded Kuwait once, got his behind kicked, and since then never bothered to threaten any of his neighbors, much less any significant American interest. Even with some WMDs an invasion of Iraq would not have been worth the risk, the lives, the regional instability. Saddam was never a “Hitler”, as some of the more hysterical neo-cons want to claim, he was a regional kingpin, a big fish in a fairly small pond. He has neither the means nor the opportunity to cause America any serious or even minor harm. Even with crappy intelligence, this much was pretty clear before the war ever started.

By Forgotten Truths

August 21, 2006 02:07 PM | Link to this

To my dearest, disillusioned w00t,

What Kool-Aid have you been drinking?? We are not going to “change their ideas.” The hundreds of years of fanaticiscm, propoganda/teachings, and dysfunctional upbringings of Muslim terrorists are NOT going to be changed by a P.R. campaign attempt to make Americans seem like everybody’s friend and/or nice little buddy. THEY HATE US. Everything about our lifestyles, our governments, our families, our freedom of speech, our women who are allowed to show their hair, their ankles, god forbid - a belly button!!

It’s not just Americans, my dearest ignorant w00t. They want to kill essentially ANYONE who does not believe in their teachings. Oppress their women, beat their religious ‘truths’ into anyone who will listen. Human rights abuses happen in many countries, but never to the proportion and the magnitude of what is happening in Iran and other Islamic countries in the name of religion. All the Islamic countries have signed the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights; despite that gross violations of human rights happen in almost all of them.

So, w00t, if you are so intent on changing the fanatic-Muslim perception of the Western world, you better hop on an airplane with a couple million copies of the Bible of Judaism or the Bible of Christianity or the “Bible” of Kabbalah - whatever you choose!!

Just go and try to teach a new religion to a group of people who have been preaching the same thing for hundreds of years. And then we will probably watch your be-heading on the television.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 02:07 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:59 PM So what threats where there? What was there to “fully materialize”? The way I see it, you cant put the lives of thousands of solders at risk because of a “hunch” you have.

So you mind if we invade Iran?

They are telling us about the bomb they want so bad and have said they would use it.

Warmonger.

By Think Tank Timmy

August 21, 2006 02:10 PM | Link to this

ANDY and RW: I’ve noticed that you stop posting five times a day, the same times every day, suspiciously around call to prayer time in Mecca. Now I’m not saying that proves that you’re HezTROLLah trash, but it does prove that you post from the AL KA KA GAY MEN’S CHOIR, which lives in caves, worships Osama Blow Laden, and who teaches entire herds of goats to baaa along to classic jihad campfire songs like, “Cum baa ewe”, and “Blow, blow, blow your goat”.

Shame sirs.

I SAID SHAME!!!

By w00t

August 21, 2006 02:12 PM | Link to this

Yeah, hundreds of years…. considering that most if not all say that Islam is a religion of peace. Like the above post says, you did not see Islam like this until the 19th century. I wonder what drove them crazy…hmmmm.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 02:14 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 02:04 PM Like I said Andy/Cracker/whatever you go by today, you have to change their ideas.

Useful: What, pray tell, were we doing to “upset” them while Clinton was in office?

Or Carter before the hostage crisis?

Was it the flowers and free love that drove them to attack our embassy?

By Polly

August 21, 2006 02:18 PM | Link to this

Craig, It is the fault of my owners; you know “Polly want a cracker”. I am supposed to “parrot” that by repeating it back; kind of like ditto as in heads. (Speaking of which, check out LEFT TURN ONE MAN’S JOURNEY FROM DITTOHEAD TO DEMOCRAT by Jason Zasky) There has never been any intension in having anything racial involved with this.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 02:19 PM | Link to this

What drove them to attack our embassy was our unwavering support of a corrupt and viciously violent shah.

Don’t worry, li’l andy, this is the last thing I’m saying to you today. You don’t need to bother with a page-long rant.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this

This is one down hill debate. I had a sandwich for lunch that had more meat in it than this blog.

Traitors, yes, traitors like Woot who’d rather dump this country than fight terrorism. It isn’t NICE to say traitors but it is truthful. They fit the definition.

Cindy who’d rather have terrorists talking to each other here than let our protectors listen to terrorist plans.

Midori, Candide and Getalife who think the war on terror is against conservatives.

The list goes on. Nor should we forget their idols. Luckovich and Cindy Sheehan do their part in aiding those who fight against us.

What a fine time they have running down the country. Sorry, Jim Wooten, you tried to have an enjoyable blog but the same “old” extremists rush every opportunity. Takes the fun out of it.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 02:24 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:23 PM Cracker, someone needs to Ban you ASAP. You are nothing but trouble for this blog. Civilized discussions cannot take place with your constant rhetoric.

By Think Tank Timmy August 21, 2006 02:10 PM ANDY and RW: I’ve noticed that you stop posting five times a day, the same times every day, suspiciously around call to prayer time in Mecca. Now I’m not saying that proves that you’re HezTROLLah trash, but it does prove that you post from the AL KA KA GAY MEN’S CHOIR, which lives in caves, worships Osama Blow Laden, and who teaches entire herds of goats to baaa along to classic jihad campfire songs like, “Cum baa ewe”, and “Blow, blow, blow your goat”.

By George

August 21, 2006 02:26 PM | Link to this

Hey Cracker,

What you fail to realize is…. The endless power you gleefully hand over to George Bush will someone be handed over to a Democratic president.
Maybe even a liberal democratic president! Heck, maybe even a liberal female democratic lady president!!!

When that day comes, you will be the first one screaming about how the president’s powers should be curtailed.

George

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 02:28 PM | Link to this

By rushncap August 21, 2006 02:19 PM What drove them to attack our embassy was our unwavering support of a corrupt and viciously violent shah.

We gave the Shah’s a-ss up like a hot potato at the first sign of any trouble. It was downright spineless the way we abandoned him. Carter was “president” by the way.

Don’t worry, li’l andy, this is the last thing I’m saying to you today. You don’t need to bother with a page-long rant.

Look at this little sis-sy, useful idiot, throw a bomb and then run and hide.

Pus-sy.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 02:36 PM | Link to this

Wooten and Luckovich,

Their thoughts are different but their blogs are the same. One goes for the other. Wish I could say that isn’t true.

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this

Ms Dusty, you scum wallowing hypocrite…

“Sorry, Jim Wooten, you tried to have an enjoyable blog but the same “old” extremists rush every opportunity. Takes the fun out of it.”

Long before his blog was even a gleam in Mr. Wooten’s eye, un-American reactionary trolls like you and Ms Danish and Mr. Cracker were here spewing your hate and filth and lies and insults.

And now you get all self-righteous and hurt because somebody’s giving what they got?

You are dumb as a post. Probably a leftwing plant, too. Your mission is to make all conservatives look really bad.

Am I right?

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 02:53 PM | Link to this

Was Iraq in 2003 as big of a threat as Iran or North Korea? It was not.

Iran and NK actually had nuke factories then. We knew that in 2003. At worst, Iraq had a pile of low grade uranium. No factories. We knew that in 2003.

What was so threatening about Iraq? Or was this all because Saddam had tried to kill Daddy Bush? Allegedly?

Bush is actually being paid off by Bin Laden!! U read it here first! Bush started the Iraq war to divert attention from Osama so Osama could plot train and plane bombings without distractions. Logical, no?

You are such a man, Mr. Cracker. Just like your hero, Mr. Bush Jr. Won’t ask for directions, wont accept advice or criticism, and God forbid that anyone tell you that youre wrong. So very very wrong.

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 02:59 PM | Link to this

Mr. Cracker makes it up again.

“We gave the Shah’s a-ss up like a hot potato at the first sign of any trouble. It was downright spineless the way we abandoned him.”

Clearly, you weren’t around then. Or too young to read. You are such a wet behind the ears goosestepper.

How were you gonna stop 60 million Iranians who wanted the Shah dead? Bomb ‘em into the stone age?

Yeah, that’s exactly what you would have done. Destroy Iran to save it.

Go F yourself moran.

By George

August 21, 2006 03:07 PM | Link to this

Speaking of idiots!

For 10 minutes, the talk show host grilled his guests about whether “George Bush’s mental weakness is damaging America’s credibility at home and abroad.” For 10 minutes, the caption across the bottom of the television screen read, “IS BUSH AN ‘IDIOT’?” But the host was no liberal media elitist. It was Joe Scarborough, a former Republican congressman turned MSNBC political pundit. And his answer to the captioned question was hardly “no.” While other presidents have been called stupid, Scarborough said: “I think George Bush is in a league by himself. I don’t think he has the intellectual depth as these other people.”

Wasn’t Joe one of the Dubya’s buddies?

By getalife

August 21, 2006 03:09 PM | Link to this

Whats the matter Dusty?

You want us to hush like that hypocrite Wooten?

Did you support Clinton during his war?

Did you spew when Delay and Newt were crying after the first month?

Are you a hypocrite too?

Do tell.

By Give 'em up

August 21, 2006 03:10 PM | Link to this

Give ‘em up just like Bush 1 did the Kurds to Saddam. That’s the real reason we will stay mired. A dynasty of failures, but laughing all the way at the uneducated people voting for them.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 03:12 PM | Link to this

Talking about Pot to Kettle.

Andy calling someone a pus-sy.

Change your diaper again Andy, it stinks up in here.

Smells like pi-ss.

By Goldie

August 21, 2006 03:51 PM | Link to this

“Sorry, Jim Wooten, you tried to have an enjoyable blog but the same “old” extremists rush every opportunity. Takes the fun out of it.”

Dusty— for all of your whining, you hit the nail on the head as to why this blog goes “downhill fast.” It’s you, Andy/Whiner and a handful of right-wing extremists who come here and try to take a dump on this blog day after day, ad nauseum. Why not go to some blog where your pearls of wisdom are more appreciated? You and your extremist friends are so boring — is that your point in coming here? You’ve certainly made the point that you’re all hopeless reich-wing suckups…

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 03:57 PM | Link to this

Creepy, Getalife, and baby George,

Oh please do keep on with the vulgar, unverifiable and unbelievable nonsense you throw out here every day. It gives us a clearer picture of your character. And wow, what a mess.

No need to keep on waving that big white flag. Terrorists already know where you stand and they will be right over. That is until they hear from George Bush. Then they change their minds. The President is making this country strong and protecting even you rattlebrains.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this

Answer the questions crusty.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 04:03 PM | Link to this

I bet crusty was waving her white flag when Clinton decided to go to war.

Didn’t you crusty?

By Midori

August 21, 2006 04:07 PM | Link to this

Dusty— for all of your whining, you hit the nail on the head as to why this blog goes “downhill fast.” It’s you, Andy/Whiner and a handful of right-wing extremists who come here and try to take a dump on this blog day after day, ad nauseum. Why not go to some blog where your pearls of wisdom are more appreciated? You and your extremist friends are so boring — is that your point in coming here? You’ve certainly made the point that you’re all hopeless reich-wing suckups…<<<<<<<

Goldie,

I’ve asked that question of them, and was immediately hit with a chorus of “free speech”

go figure.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 04:10 PM | Link to this

Ummmm, yes, the only reason the terrorists aren’t knocking on our houses is because the pretzel-choker has them all intimidated. Dusty, honey, I’m not a terrorist. I’ve not had any military training. I’ve never shot an AK or made a bomb. And even I don’t fear Shrubby. Even I look at that smirking moron and think “man, I could take that little $hite down in a minute, unless he outruns me on his bike”.

By Midori

August 21, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

you are cracking my sides here.

Get em!!! :)

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 02:53 PM Bush is actually being paid off by Bin Laden!!

Alright Cindy, whatever you say (whooaaa! What a moonbat.)

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 02:59 PM How were you gonna stop 60 million Iranians who wanted the Shah dead? Bomb ‘em into the stone age?

For a moonbat you sure hit that one right on the dam-n head.

We gave up the Shah like he was the plague, you blooming useful idiot, THAT SHOULD HAVE APPEASED THE MUSLIM FANATICS RIGHT THEN AND THERE, which was my point, loser.

But it didn’t appease them AT ALL, they hate us because WHO WE ARE.

F O.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 04:16 PM | Link to this

Oh Goldie,

Hey that’s a pretty good one…”hopeless reich-wing suckups”. The DNC will be proud of you. I bet they will put a bonus in your paycheck.

Getalife, poor baby,

I don’t have a white flag. All mine are red, white and blue. You remember, don’t you? You had one long time ago. But I think you traded it in for your white one.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this

Oh Midori,

I am so sorry. That was your tripe that I credited to Goldie. You two sound exactly alike. But I will give you all the credit, because I don’t think you get paid by the DNC. Naw, you pass out this stuff for free.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this

Red, white and blue, Dusty? Any reason you’re stockpiling French flags?

By Midori

August 21, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

we all know why Dusty doesn’t use a white flag — shows too many stains when she diddles herself with it.

By Thomas

August 21, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

“I wish… to see maintained that wholesome distribution of powers established by the Constitution for the limitation of both [the State and General governments], and never to see all offices transferred to Washington where, further withdrawn from the eyes of the people, they may more secretly be bought and sold as at market.”

By Midori

August 21, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

now, now, Rushncap. Now she has to think about an hour to come up with a “witty” retort.

can’t you just envision the smoke coming out of her head?

IT’S GONNA BLOW………..

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 04:34 PM | Link to this

Goldie, it really quite simple.

Danish, Dusty, Cracker and such are gold plated trolls. They’re not into dialogue.

Hey Cracker, tell me exactly how bombing Iran into the Stone Age in 1979 would have made the world in 2006 a safer place?

It it sort of like invading Iraq in 2003 made the world a safer place??

Thought so. You are such a dumb troll.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

We are glad to know that you are totally incapable of any kind of physical engagement, although we guessed that some time ago.

But you are a wee bit mixed up as usual. We are FIGHTING THE TERRORISTS, not the president of the United States. I know it is hard to keep all those facts straight. Please try. Otherwise you will lose your lab assistant job and be back in the janitorial department.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Getalife keeps talking about supporting Clinton during the war, yet he never tells us what war he’s talking about.

I think he’s talking about the Civil War between croats/serbs+muslims where we carpet bombed from 50,000 feet, but I’m not certain.

There was also the “racist war” that a bunch of Leftists babbled on about at town meetings to discuss what to do about Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and all those WMDs, but I don’t know if that’s it either.

Then there was the war with the warlords in Somalia, but he cut and run from that one. How about the Rawandan genocide, um, civil war where we stood by and did nothing because it wasn’t really a genocide according to Madeline Albright? There were all sorts of attacks on our embassies and military but we never engaged in war as a response to those acts of aggression.

I’m sure I’m missing something. If Getalife doesn’t answer maybe you can help me out here. I wonder if he’ll let us know by the end of the day because the suspense is killing me.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this

Now, Now, Midori,

No vulgarities. There are ladies present. Unfortunately, you are not one of them.

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this

By Creep seeking missle August 21, 2006 04:34 PM Hey Cracker, tell me exactly how bombing Iran into the Stone Age in 1979 would have made the world in 2006 a safer place?

I’m not into theories like you moonbats are, swimming in your fever swamps, besides, like I said before, THAT WAS NOT MY ORIGINAL POINT YOU BLOOMING USEFUL IDIOT.

You’re the one who made that crap up, moron.

F O.

P.S. Invading Iraq has made the United States a lot safer than what Clinton left behind, thank you very much.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

No, Dusty, I’m quite capable of “physical engagement”. I just don’t have military training. And yes, I know we’re fighting the terrorists. One good step in the right direction would be to get rid of our current President and get ourselves someone whose greatest accomplishment in life isn’t failing to die from a pretzel. You know, someone with a brain, someone with a bit of humility. Someone who is qualified.

By @@

August 21, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

Midori:

I don’t think you’ll find Dusty lowering herself to your level of witty thought.

{{{By Midori August 21, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this}}}

{{{we all know why Dusty doesn’t use a white flag — shows too many stains when she diddles herself with it.}}}

You’re brand of wit can be found in the sewer of “radical left-wing blogsites”. Dusty won’t go there.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

What is the catch here? French flags? You mean for those 200 troops that France is going to send to Lebanon when they suggested that each country should send thousands? Of course they are not but they still want to be in charge?

Sounds like they have a big bunch of liberals in France. Do you ever blog over there, Rushie?

By getalife

August 21, 2006 04:55 PM | Link to this

Duh, crusty.

I know you did not support Clinton on anything.

You are a hypocrite like your fellow wingnut moonbats.

You could give a crap about the troops, so stop the bs.

Pathetic hypocrite.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

You never answered my question as to why you stockpile French flags, Dusty. Why is that? Embarassed?

And no, my French is not good enough, unfortunately, to blog in it.

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

“Even legal experts who agreed with a federal judge’s conclusion on Thursday that a National Security Agency surveillance program is unlawful were distancing themselves from the decision’s reasoning and rhetoric yesterday. They said the opinion overlooked important precedents, failed to engage the government’s major arguments, used circular reasoning, substituted passion for analysis and did not even offer the best reasons for its own conclusions. Discomfort with the quality of the decision is almost universal, said Howard J. Bashman …”—news story, New York Times, Aug. 19

That’s all it takes to give cartoon boy a woody.

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

You are a whiz at history. There were all kinds of Clintonian battles. It is hard to choose which one Getalife prefers.

Actually there was some sort of historic engagement that was famous. Was it the Monica Mop-up or something like that? Maybe Getalife meant that one.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Stop fantasizing about ml and change your diaper.

Smells like poop up in here.

Nasty.

By Thomas

August 21, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this

In the end — You have already lost the war against terrorism when you have allowed the terrorist to change your way of life.

Their tactics are to create terrorism and fear amongst us all and to divide us from each other. Many of you are so afraid of the terrorist that you beg on your knees that the heads of government take your freedoms away one by one in the hope that this will afford you protections. You want a government with total control over everything that moves in our society so that the government can stop any evil, sin, or conflict. In the end you will gladly press into service a monarchy, police state, or despotism to replace this free society we have now. You will destroy the very fabric of what a free society is, and simply hand over your rights and control to the governement because they sell the idea so well that they should rule you completely!

Yes - and the terrorist win!~

(food for thought)

“If we find our government in all its branches rushing headlong… into the arms of monarchy, if we find them violating our dearest rights, the trial by jury, the freedom of the press, the freedom of opinion, civil or religious, or opening on our peace of mind or personal safety the sluices of terrorism, if we see them raising standing armies, when the absence of all other danger points to these as the sole objects on which they are to be employed, then indeed let us withdraw and call the nation to its tents. But while our functionaries are wise, and honest, and vigilant, let us move compactly under their guidance, and we have nothing to fear. Things may here and there go a little wrong. It is not in their power to prevent it. But all will be right in the end, though not perhaps by the shortest means.” —Thomas Jefferson to William Duane, 1811. ME 13:29

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Your question had no point so I couldn’t answer it. You sound more like Getalife every day. A liberal trait?

By getalife

August 21, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this

You know our country has lost her soul when a President said he invaded and killed for no good reason.

I feel for the future generations caught up in this insanity.

They will have to pay the price for our sins.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 05:15 PM | Link to this

crusty,

Your embarrasing yourself. I busted you. So what, we already knew your character.

Deal with it hypocrite.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 05:18 PM | Link to this

And you, Dusty, have absolutely no sense of humor. Conservative trait?

By Dusty

August 21, 2006 05:19 PM | Link to this

@@,

Nice of you to say such kind words to a gold plated troll. How about that? Ol’ Creepy said so. And if a liberal calls any of us a gold plated troll, we must be doing something right. Atleast he didn’t call me a liberal. That IS insulting.

I’m going now to feed the starving crew. Cheers!

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this

Thomas,

Oh please, spare us the hyperbole. No conservative that I know of is down on our knees begging to have our rights taken away from us - not even close - and if anyone looks to the government as the great savior, that would be liberal Democrats.

We do want to live and we want to take the most prudent means necessary to conduct a war on many fronts, and the best means to do that is through intelligenc which UNDENIABLY prevents the massacre of human beings.

Moreover, if you’re going to quote Thomas Jefferson, how about a little refresher course in the Barbary Pirates and the First Barbary Wars. History tells us what he thought about appeasing terrorists. Wouldn’t you know it that Congress did not share his wisdom?

Use for the money came in 1785, when the Dey of Algiers took two American ships hostage and demanded $60,000 in ransom for their crews. Then-ambassador to France Thomas Jefferson argued that conceding the ransom would only encourage more attacks. His objections fell on the deaf ears of an inexperienced American government too riven with domestic discord to make a strong show of force overseas. The U.S. paid Algiers the ransom, and continued to pay up to $1 million per year over the next 15 years for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. Payments in ransom and tribute to the privateering states amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

The only humor that you possess is this sort, spelled with a “u”

A useful idiot possessed of all 4 humours:

Bile, black bile, yellow bile and phlegm - that’s you to a tee. How lucky we are to have made your acquaintance, Ralph.

I will not be discussing golf or children with you because you know nothing about either subject and you have no desire to learn anything, so what’s the point?

By RW-(the original)

August 21, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this

Just my usual unbiased observation of course, but it seems like day in and day out the conservatives here are willing to debate whatever the news of the day is and the moonbats are only screaming “Bush sucks” and wondering why everyone doesn’t bow to their brilliance.

I see you libs are unabashed racists too.

By rushncap

August 21, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

Hey, golf is the only thing you know more than me about, Danish. I was just giving you a chance to be the knowledgeable one, for a change.

By Thomas

August 21, 2006 05:41 PM | Link to this

Ohh —

I agree with Jefferson there - no doubt! Congress ruled in error concerning that situation indeed!

You cannot appease terrorist (of any sort) nor’ bow down to their will. Nor can you bow down to our leaders as if they were our liege as well.

But the one thing you seem to be willing to do Danish (or at least most the Bush Believers here do), is to allow our president total immunity, and the ability to keep all things secret from not only the american people, but also the other two branches of government as well. The judges ruled correctly here and I support their view!

I also believe that the Justice system should also be watched like a hawk as well in all matters of state. That is also a great point in our system where government control can become one sided and dangerous.

With both those points said, (and opposing in this case at that), I beleive the President should follow the existing rules of order concerning wiretapping and not try and do things behind an (un-nessecery) veil of pretended needs. What he is doing is un-needed when he can do the exact same thing by the current law and protocol. And on top of that it is establishing a dangerous environment for potential executive abuse.

The Congress should always be allowed to see what the president is doing or has done in (our) name. Or has our current President decided that Congress is the enemy? Has he decided that only he and his PNAC allies are the only hope for our country?

No I think our president see’s himself as the only one who should hold all the marbles just because he can and no one has stood up to him until now!

Laters everyone — Time for me to go play in traffic.. (and with my big tank that can be fun!)

Thomas (not a Jefferson)

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

{{By rushncap

August 21, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this

Red, white and blue, Dusty? Any reason you’re stockpiling French flags?}}

{{By rushncap

August 21, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

You never answered my question as to why you stockpile French flags, Dusty. Why is that? Embarassed?}}

Dusty,

Rushncap thinks he has a sense of humor, and his attempts are on display^^here. Are you doubled over laughing yet? Me neither.

What IS funny is that rushncap thinks that he is SO witty and urbane that he makes a poor joke and then repeats the same stupid line a second time just in case we missed his brilliance the first time.

BTW, that Monica debacle I neglected to mention could be called “The War against Ken Starr”, but I don’t think that’s what Getalife is after either.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 05:46 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

I will give you physics. That’s it.

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 05:49 PM | Link to this

By Thomas August 21, 2006 05:05 PM In the end — You have already lost the war against terrorism when you have allowed the terrorist to change your way of life. Blah, blah, blah. Yes - and the terrorist win!~

The terrorists have already changed the way we live, you sap. Notice how the New York City skyline is just a bit different than it was on 2000?

Been through the airport lately without having to get undressed and felt up?

Got any idea how much of your tax money has gone into the terrorist threat?

And the thing about it is, what sets you liberals apart from any other normal functioning human being, is that Bush himself could be listening to every word you say and unless you talk about blowing up a building THERE AIN’T SH-IT THE GOVERNMENT CAN DO TO YOU.

It’s been 4 years plus of terror war, heard of anyone getting busted for dope after a homeland security surveillance?

You libs and your bed wetting ENDANGER ALL OF US for no good reason except to score stupid political points against Bush.

F O and die.

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

Thomas,

There was only ONE judge in this Thomas, so I don’t know what “judges” you support. One lifetime appointee thinks that she has the powers HISTORICALLY entrusted to our Commander in Chief which has been upheld time and again by Judges plural. Is that what you want?

Congress WAS kept informed of the NSA program et al- all of it.

By Thomas

August 21, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

Want a Cracker Andy?

Has anyone pointed out how pathetic you are?

LOL

By getalife

August 21, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

No thanks Andy,

I could not eat a cracker with that awful smell.

Please change your diaper!

By w00t

August 21, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this

Andy, Andy, Andy, cant you find more of a constructive way to talk to people without having to resort to “F O.” It’s really not good form when people here want to have a normal discussion. Every day you bring this form down to new lows.

Yes, I think many of us know how much has been spent on “The War On Terror(tm)”. To be honest, its obsurd. We’re wasting all this money on defense and for what? What we need to be spending it on is the betterment of our people. For example improving our education system, health care, etc.

Also, if we would have “stayed the course” in Afgahinstan and found Osama in the first place we wouldnt have been at war for the past 4 years. You know, I don’t think we’ve been at war for the past 4 years now. I think we’re starting to fight a war for the Iraqis now.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

August 21, 2006 06:03 PM | Link to this

Judge throws out terror charge in Padilla case I just thought I’d fly by and drop this on ya’ll

By mike

August 21, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this

Mike doesnt seem to care that the judge’s ruling was viewed as poor legal reasoning, even by opponents of the wiretapping program.

I wonder if Mike will ever draw a cartoon that criticizes Iranian leaders or terrorists. It seems that like the rest of the AJC board, Mike prefers to limit all criticism to Republicans.

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this

Something tells me the pervert libs don’t like hearing the truth, they get upset^^^.

“Michael Moore’s the only one who’s said anything about the book,” Schweizer said. Do As I Say notes that although Moore claimed in his book Stupid White Men he doesn’t own stock because corporations exploit workers, he actually owns quite a lot — including several shares of the reviled Halliburton, before he sold it for a 15-percent profit and invested in other defense contractors.-NationalReview

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 06:12 PM | Link to this

By w00t August 21, 2006 06:02 PM Andy, Andy, Andy, cant you find more of a constructive way to talk to people without having to resort to “F O.” It’s really not good form when people here want to have a normal discussion. Every day you bring this form down to new lows.

Ummm, yeah:

By w00t August 21, 2006 01:42 PM ANDY, you DUMB STUPID SOB, read THIS:

F O and die.

By elton

August 21, 2006 06:16 PM | Link to this

Criticize someone besides Republicans? Who would Luckovich criticize? The French for reneging on the troop promises for Lebanon? China for providing cover for Iran and North Korea? Hezbollah for declaring victory in the ashes of Lebanon?

Nope, only Americans (Republican Americans) deserve criticism. Who says liberals hate America ;)

By Creep seeking missle

August 21, 2006 06:28 PM | Link to this

I see Danish has renewed her membership in the fudging and outright lying contingent…

“Congress WAS kept informed of the NSA program et al- all of it.”

That’s right, and members of Congress, Republicans (like Spector) and Democrats told the White House privately that it might be breaking the law.

They kept quiet about their criticism, like good patriots. The White House schmucks ignored their questions, like the arrogant SOBs they are.

It took the media to spotlight this flagrant abuse of executive authority. Now the emperor really has no clothes, and he’s never looked better.

FYI - legal eagles may be criticizing the mechanics of the decision against eavesdropping, but most aren’t criticizing the conclusion. Ignoring the FISA court was illegal.

We are a nation of laws. We are a nation of checks and balances. We are not a nation of autocrats, plutocrats or dictators.

I respectfully request that the brown shirt types here (like you) who dont like this leave immediately.

By getalife

August 21, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

They do deserve it elton. You should write a song about it like Neil.

Here are some words:

“Impeach the President”.

You likey?

By Buy Danish

August 21, 2006 07:13 PM | Link to this

RW,

I think you’re right. Creep Seeking Missile is finch.

CSM aka Finch,

Here we go again - the “liar liar” routine. Congress was informed, so what’s the lie? For a bunch of congentital prevaricators, you useless useful idiots sure love to throw that “lie” word around. Funny how you never substantiate your charges with actual facts.

Spector and….?? If it’s his way or the highway, then who would the autocrat be?

Tex,

What’s your point about that creep Padilla? Jumping for joy, cowboy?

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 07:13 PM | Link to this

GOP Fundraising Outpaces Democrats “Our phenomenal fundraising in July is the product of our members’ hard work and the support of Americans who want leaders with a record of accomplishment and a positive vision moving forward,” Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said in a statement. “It stands in sharp contrast to the Democrats, who spent the month of July raising dollars by exploiting the deaths of U.S. soldiers.”-Breitbart

By Getalife Want A Cracker?

August 21, 2006 07:27 PM | Link to this

Greenland’s glaciers have been shrinking for the past century, according to a Danish study, suggesting that the ice melt is not a recent phenomenon caused by global warming.

By Walks Like a Duck

August 22, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this

Hah! This is a good one. A judge decides that wiretaps are illegal….hmmmmmm…let’s look at this one shall we?

While I can appreciate her weighing in on the merits and spirit of our great freedoms, the beauty of the Jefferson era, the wisdom of those years, the promise of hope….ahhhh, but WE don’t live in that era now do we?

One can only hope that the next plane that is hijacked, the next building that falls, will be occupied by no other than the aforementioned judge and those that would stump for such a short sighted ideal. With any luck, they will actually be IN the plane that HITS the building.

Regretably, it will probably be full of mere mortals such as you and I, quietly serving the public majority, going to and from work and basically harming no one….

Folks, there are two worlds. The world we wish for and the one we actually live in. Based on recent events, one could reasonably argue that I’m right on this and the Judge was well…wrong? Dead wrong.

Quit rolling the dice with American lives. Frankly, we are tired of dying wholesale while someone is worried about a few wiretaps. Tap me all you want, I’ve nothing to hide!

Besides, 2,600 dead US servicemen can’t all be wrong, now can they?

Adieu

By washington lawyer

August 23, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/bestlaywer13/trial-lawyer.htm trial lawyer new york city [url=http://mywebpage.netscape.com/bestlaywer13/vioxx-lawyer.htm]vioxx lawyer[/url] [url]http://mywebpage.netscape.com/bestlaywer13/virginia-lawyer.htm[/url]http://mywebpage.netscape.com/bestlaywer13/west-palm-beach-lawyer.htm wisconsin lawyer http://mywebpage.netscape.com/bestlaywer13/worker-compensation-lawyer.htm wrongful death lawyer