Luckovich cartoon changes address!

Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.

The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.

Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:

Thinking Right

Jay Bookman

OpinionTalk

Woman to Woman

Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2006 > August > 17 > Entry

Technology advances

By Mike Luckovich | Thursday, August 17, 2006, 06:16 AM

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Do you like today's cartoon?
  No
  Yes


Voter Limit: Once per Hour
View Poll Results

Permalink | Comments (216) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon

Comments

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 08:03 AM | Link to this

For someone with a blog server that runs at a speed of a 386, cartoon boy has some nerve bringing up Dell’s technology problems.

And for being a member of an ideology based on not searching Arab males because of the hurt feelings that may result, it sure does seem odd that a pinko could draw our airport security as naïve.

If Muslim males can’t control their urge to kill the rest of us, the only airplanes they should EVEN see are B52 Stratofortresses flying over their caves.

It is typical of liberalism though, mandate the most ridiculous rules in the world and then blame Bush for everything being so stupid.

Can we racially profile now, Mikey? Is that what you want?

Cut

Some people think this war is a joke.

The written transcript is wrenching, the tape difficult to listen to more than once. “Are they going to be able to get somebody up here?” Mellisa Doi, 32 years old, celebrated her last birthday two weeks beforehand, asks. “Of course, ma’am. We’re coming up for you,” the female operator replies. Later on, as smoke thickens at Doi’s location, the 83rd floor of the South Tower, her desperation rises. “I’m going to die, aren’t I?” she says. “No, no, no, no, no,” the operator says. “Ma’am, say your prayers. You’ve got to think positive because you’ve got to help people get off the floor.” Melissa Doi’s words are heard only for about four minutes of the 24-minute tape.”Ma’am, stay calm,” the operator gently repeats again and again as she tries to comfort Doi, even as her words are met only with a chilling silence on the other end of the line.-NYSun

I don’t. Cut But if the government refuses to deal with the real risks —thousands of illegal entries/overstays every day— the hyper-reactions around airports are almost designed to invoke scorn. Put money and men into intelligence and smashing the cells. Wage the war with vigor and seriousness. Be prepared for bad things to happen. But don’t treat free people as idiots. Airplanes crash and we still fly. Millions have used the Tube since 7/7. We want to win, and we aren’t stupi

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

“There’s no maybe in his voice”

Da TRUTH!! Bush has been saying the same drivel since 9/11, and the global terra just gets worse.

Maybe if there WAS a maybe… as in “maybe we should try something different?”

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 08:17 AM | Link to this

“The number of roadside bombs planted in Iraq rose in July to the highest monthly total of the war, offering more evidence that the anti-American insurgency has continued to strengthen despite the killing of the terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. … “Senior administration officials have acknowledged to me that they are considering alternatives other than democracy”…

Insurgent Bombs Directed at GI’s Increase in Iraq

Buncha White House loonies start a debilitating war in a place where anti-US terrorism didn’t exist and whaddya get?? An explosive growth industry. Explosive, get it? Why do they hate America?

By w00t

August 17, 2006 08:22 AM | Link to this

Hey, turbo, we are working on new nuclear plants. Take a look

They are going to add two new units to Plant Vogel.

As far as the cartoon goes, it is a joke. Say it with me now “J-O-K-E”. I wouldn’t necessarily call it “dell’s problem” as it is mainly a problem with certain batteries manufactured by Sony. So, get over your self, this cartoon wasn’t about how bush sent us off to war for no cause.

By the way, you’re not going to “kill” and idea any time soon. What this country should try to do is change the perceptions and ideas the Muslim world has of the United States.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 08:23 AM | Link to this

Another great toon from the mind of ml.

This says it all

Enough said.

By Goldie

August 17, 2006 08:26 AM | Link to this

Andy/Whiner— your hatred for America and its Constitution is a burning fire for you, huh? Our freedom of speech is one of the things that makes us different from other countries. That’s why we allow Arab-Americans to march in our streets and say what they want about Hezbollah. That’s also the reason why your friends in the KKK are allowed to say the ugly things they say. But it seems that if you had your way about it, it would only be the voices of the KKK and their ilk that we’d be allowed to hear, yes?

By Goldie

August 17, 2006 08:31 AM | Link to this

Yes, “there is no maybe” in Dubya’s voice, and that’s why we have the biggest foreign policy disaster in American history: the Iraq occupation. There was never any “maybe” for Dubya in considering any other options for removing Saddam Hussein — it’s all about war, war, war for the WAR PARTY.

And it will always be about war and its profiteers as long as we have the War Party in control of Congress.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 08:35 AM | Link to this

By w00t August 17, 2006 08:22 AM By the way, you’re not going to “kill” and idea any time soon. What this country should try to do is change the perceptions and ideas the Muslim world has of the United States.

1) Are you advocating the United States be forcefully brought under Islamic Sharia law?

2) Do you have your head up your a-ss right now, shouldn’t you pull it out and breathe?

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this

Check out this headline

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 08:46 AM | Link to this

Nice touch having Michael Moore flying along. They must be heading into Dearbornistan.

By the way, the banned laptops at the same time they banned liquids.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 08:50 AM | Link to this

Is comprehension that much of a problem for you liberals?:

By Goldie August 17, 2006 08:26 AM Our freedom of speech is one of the things that makes us different from other countries. That’s why we allow Arab-Americans to march in our streets and say what they want about Hezbollah.

What do you think I’m trying to say with that article link?

You freaking liberals are too stupid to even consider the other side’s arguments, you just shoot your ignorant mouths off with out thinking.

WTF:

{{{{{Then there is moaning that the West treats its Muslim immigrants unfairly, despite evidence to the contrary. After all, Muslims build mosques and madrassas all over Europe and the United States; yet Christians cannot worship in Saudi Arabia or have missionaries in Iran. Western residents or immigrants in most Arab nations would not dare demonstrate on behalf of Israel. But in Michigan last week, largely Arab-American crowds chanted “Hezbollah” — despite that terrorist organization’s long history of murdering Americans.-RealClearPolitics}}}}}

Unquote.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 08:54 AM | Link to this

By George August 17, 2006 08:41 AM The insurgents must be in their last, last, last, last, last, last throes.

Wasn’t this same sissy whining about the impending invasion of Iran yesterday?

Keep it up, numb nuts, you’ll get what you asked for.

We fight Iranians in Lebanon, we fight them in Sadr City.

You’re right, dic-khead George, it’s time to fight them in Iran.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

Yes, George is an idiot

Andy Andy wants him to start another failure.

Enough said.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

RW,

They also banned I-pods, so passenger “Goldie” sitting in the front aisle seat would not be able to listen to “Chairman Mao’s Books on Tape”. Waaaaah.

By @@

August 17, 2006 09:01 AM | Link to this

“Al Qaeda type voter”:

I’ve read your Prescott link and it seems to question whether the word “crap” was actually used by Prescott.

But it’s obvious the word “crap” excites you so much that facts don’t matter. You just enjoy throwing “crap” around for everyone to see and so does the HP.

Just an observation.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this

@@,

Bush is not the problem. He will be gone in two years if not sooner.

The problem is the people who vote for and support such a tragedy for our country.

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

Sorry, Bush apologists! iPods and Laptops have not been banned on US flights. You don’t read much do you??

Hey cracker!! Get me rewrite!! There are no Iranians fighting in Sadr City. They have 10s of thousands of Iraqis there who already want to kill Americans. Who needs a bunch of Persian speaking imports?

You people are so lame!! And you lie constantly, like alcoholics. No wonder you’re 30% and dropping!! Have another drink.

By Dusty

August 17, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

The number of outright lies you post gets more ridiculous every day. When are you going to stop using those old propaganda lines KKK, occupation, War Party, profiteers and disaster? Of course you are pointing at the Republican president with your lies. ONLY Democrats are heaven sent in your life.

It would be nice if you remembered you are an American and not gush out the words terrorists are so eager to hear. Try to overcome the brain washing.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 09:14 AM | Link to this

Is comprehension that big of a deal with liberals?:

By “Al Qaeda type voter” August 17, 2006 09:01 AM Yes, George is an idiot. (Got that one right.) Andy Andy wants him to start another failure.

Let’s see, Andy sez we are ALREADY fighting Iran, so Al Qaeda’s Bit-ch sez Andy wants to start “another.”

Is it education?

Hereditary?

Upbringing?

Lack of responsible parents?

A premeditated will to make your country fail?<——————————————-!!!!!!!!!

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 09:15 AM | Link to this

In other words, @@, RW, Andy, BD, and Dusty are the problem.

Just terible Americans, so what should we do with these people?

We must address the root cause of today’s insanity.

If we want to suppress the voters, these failed Americans are a good place to start.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

“1) Are you advocating the United States be forcefully brought under Islamic Sharia law?” Oh, yes, defiantly….

What I’m trying to get through to you is that maybe we have ourselves to blame for the hatred of the United States some Muslims share. We go into their countries, take their oil, meddle in their governments, sit on their “Holy Land”, and kill their people and for what? It’s all about oil. In 1953 we (the CIA) helped to over throw the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, because he nationalized his countries oil industry. Britain became upset with the nationalizing of the oil company and placed a massive embargo on Iran putting further pressure on Iran’s fragile economy. Britain then came to the United States looking for help. So we declared Iran a communist state. The prime minister was replaced by an even more oppressive government which eventually led to the Iranian Revolution.

Fast forward to 1980 and Iran and Iraq go to war with Iraq and Saddam getting backing from the United States and other Western Governments. This was done because we feared that Iran would export its Islamic Revolution to other Middle Eastern nations. President Ronald Reagan decided that the United States “could not afford to allow Iraq to lose the war to Iran”, and that the United States “would do whatever was necessary and legal to prevent Iraq from losing the war with Iran.” We began to sell Iraq equpiment, conventianal and chemical weapons and gave them intelligence to support the war on Iran. Twenty-four U.S. firms were involved in exporting arms and materials to Baghdad. Donald Riegle, Chairman of the Senate committee that made the report, said, “UN inspectors had identified many United States manufactured items that had been exported from the United States to Iraq under licenses issued by the Department of Commerce, and [established] that these items were used to further Iraq’s chemical and nuclear weapons development and its missile delivery system development programs.” He added, “the executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think that is a devastating record.” citation“>http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php)

So, of course Iraq had WMDs. We had the receipts to prove it. However, they

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

Creep seeking a missile,

It’s possible that Ipods and laptops are in fact allowed for domestic flights, since I read that they were banned in the LA Times. (one of your moonbat bibles)

That being said, does the passenger set pictured here look like a domestic flight?

By w00t

August 17, 2006 09:30 AM | Link to this

So, of course Iraq had WMDs. We had the receipts to prove it. However, they had long since been destroyed after the Gulf War in 1991. Western Countries had Supplied Iraq with the means of conduction chemical and biological warfare. Saddam later went on to invade Kuwait because of his massive war debt with the country. Relations with Iraq were unchanged up until this point. That is until Iraq invaded oil rich Kuwait which the United States gets a great deal of its oil from.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 09:39 AM | Link to this

Basically, we send mixed messages to the middle east. We’ll support you in some areas so long as it supports the interest on the Unites States. If you go against us, we’ll put sanctions on your country or invade you starving and killing your people.

Why do you think the Iranian president talks the way he does? He’s seen this first hand as he is a veteran on the Iran-Iraq war. People need to open their eyes and see what is going on around them. Its as if people in this country don’t know history. Many of them don’t even remember what they did last Monday.

There is a better way to do things.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 09:39 AM | Link to this

See what idiots these liberals are:

What I’m trying to get through to you is that maybe we have ourselves to blame for the hatred of the United States some Muslims share. We go into their countries, take their oil, meddle in their governments, sit on their “Holy Land”, and kill their people and for what?

Don’t forget your little rant about the crusades or is that what the censor cut off?

You may be enough of a dic-khead to believe that the United States, because we pay the Islamic looneys 20 times what their oil is worth, should get blown up like we did on 9/11.

I don’t.

That’s why your party is out of office.

Everything is a grievance, real or make believe, for you depraved liberals.

The rest of us are tired of your pity parties.

Grow up.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this

Woot,

We BUY their oil idiot. There’s no point in reading any more of your manifestos if you can’t even get that basic fact straight.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this

Andy, or who ever you are today, you need to pull the covers from over your head. Wake up, we live in a GLOBAL community today. You need to get it out of your head that this world, this planet Earth is ALL for you, because it’s not.

We pay high prices for oil because of things WE do. Our country uses more gas than anyone else in the world, we chose to drive everywhere, we drive huge SUV’s that get bad gas mileage, and we have no real forms of public transportation. You have your self and the people you vote for to blame for this problem. It is no one else, or no other countries fault other than our own.

The “blew us up” for the very reasons I posted earlier. How is that so hard to see. Its ideas, not people that want to kill us. They have been developing over the last 2000 years and primarily in the last century. Stop being a so blind to what’s going on around you. Stop letting people tell you how to live or what to believe in. There is more to this world than just the United States.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this

So Prescott is the newest leftist hero. Maybe he should murder a bunch of folks and you guys would immortalize him on t-shirts.

John Gibson of Fox News says he is going to title his next book “Bush Eats Babies” because he can write about whatever he wants and the title will have the entire moonbat nation buying it. Looks like he has a point.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this

“Woot,

We BUY their oil idiot. There’s no point in reading any more of your manifestos if you can’t even get that basic fact straight.”

Thanks, but I think anyone with a brain would understand that was implied in the post. Thanks for playing.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 09:57 AM | Link to this

Is comprehension that big of a deal to these depraved liberals:

By w00t August 17, 2006 09:49 AM We pay high prices for oil because of things WE do.

We pay high oil prices because we don’t drill for as much oil as we use, idiot.

Supply and demand?

Free market economy?

What the hell did they teach you at the re education camp?

The “blew us up” for the very reasons I posted earlier.

Which makes it all good for you.

But not for me.

We left the Taliban alone, what did it get us?

Is that what you WANT?

Pi-ss off.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 10:10 AM | Link to this

You’re right it is supply and demand. Our demand far outpaces the supply. We dont drill anymore because the United States does not have many reserves left. Even if we did drill it would be a short term solution and things would go back to the way we are now in the long run.

Our best bet as a country is to develop new technologies and get them to the market as quickly as possible. That’s what the US used to be about was innovation, and we need to be known for that again. Why do you want us to keep having such a dependency on oil anyway? Why do some countries have cars that get 51mpg and nearly 800 miles per take of diesel?“>http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/road_tests/index.htm?id=99) Is it something that they don’t want us to have here in the states? Wouldn’t you want a car that got 51mpg and only had to fill it up once a month?

We left the Taliban alone? When did this happen? If I remember, wasn’t it Bush that called of the search for Bin Laden. The mastermind of 9/11 and the guy who got us into this mess in the first place. Why aren’t you kicking and screaming at Bush, asking why he called of the search for the guy that directly attacked America on her own soil? Isn’t that a disgrace?

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

Bush could s-hit in these democracy killers mouths and they would call it ice cream.

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

cracker, you want to show me how many Iranians that the US has killed in Sadr City? How about how many Iranians killed by the Israelis in Lebanon? If there were, don’t you think Bush and Tel Aviv would be screaming about it?? Hmmmm?

Sure, Tehran shovels money Sadr City’s and Hezbollah’s way. But they’re not exporting jihadists. No need. The home-grown variety, inspired by US idiocies, suffices quite nicely.

You are so delusional. And a moran. Have another drink.

And funny, the cartoon looks like a domestic flight to me. Detroit to Miami maybe?

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 10:19 AM | Link to this

Gee, I hope that last post did not upset the democracy killers.

I meant to say Bush could take crap in their mouths and they would call it ice cream.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this

What a Wanker:

By w00t August 17, 2006 10:10 AM the United States does not have many reserves left

And:

We left the Taliban alone? When did this happen?

From 3500 B.C. to late in the year 2001?

Bye bye nut job.

Go debate the other loonies in your ward.

I’m through here.

By Andie, you're a fine girl

August 17, 2006 10:29 AM | Link to this

Andy, what a good wife you would be

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this

Cracker is correct.

The US did not leave the Taliban alone. Up until months before 9/11 the US supported it.

Yes, George Bush sent $$ to the Taliban.

Whoops!!

Cracker, youre not really through here, are you?? Come back after youve had that drink.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 10:35 AM | Link to this

Your boy Cheney

By w00t

August 17, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this

Oh, so effectivly you’re including all Muslims in with the Taliban. Oh, thats brilliant, they can all take the blame then.

According to normal people, the taliban came into power shortly after of the Soviet-backed Democratic Republic of Afghanistan in 1992 and ruled primarily from 1996 to 2001.

But, I guess they have time machines.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 10:42 AM | Link to this

WooT,

Are you moonbats having a “Who’s the biggest freaking idiot contest” today?

Sorry moron, but “We TAKE their oil” means we don’t buy it, so I don’t BUY your Marxist BS which is getting PROGRESSIVELY more nauseating. Like this gem:

“Its ideas, not people that want to kill us.”

I’m curious about one thing - was your professor one of the 1,000 who signed lettera in support of Hezbollah?

CSM,

Since you don’t know the difference between “International” and “Domestic” flights, I hardly think you’re qualified to speak about anything more complicated than “boxers or briefs”.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 10:42 AM | Link to this

excuse me,

According to normal people, the Taliban came into power shortly after the overthrow of the Soviet-backed Democratic Republic of Afghanistan in 1992 and ruled primarily from 1996 to 2001.

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this

This is reason to take out the World Trade Center????:

By Creep seeking missle August 17, 2006 10:30 AM Cracker is correct.The US did not leave the Taliban alone. Up until months before 9/11 the US supported it. Yes, {{{George Bush sent $$ to the Taliban}}}

I’m done with you too, whackjob, have a ball.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

To whom it may concern:

Soldiers from Iran killed in Lebanon Bodies of Revolutionary Guards said found among Hezbollah dead

From REUTERS - Iranians among Hizbollah combat dead: TV

WARNING: At least half a brain is required to comprehend these news stories. Do not attempt if you are uncertain as to whether you possess the necessary equipment. Unintentional emotional harm may result.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

Ok Danish, so they want to kill us “just because”? They have no motive behind their hatred for us? Is that what you’re trying to tell me? There is nothing that they are taught or learn from our actions that would make them want to kill Americans? I guess to you they kill because they are Muslim?

Ok, for my earlier post, “we buy their oil…” so your panties don’t get all in a knot.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 10:59 AM | Link to this

“I don’t respect people who see things headed in the wrong direction
and because of their membership in the [national] culture of obedience
they keep their mouths shut.”
—Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson

Me either Mr. Anderson.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 11:02 AM | Link to this

There were news reports that came out saying that members of the Revolutionary Guards were going to Lebenon in support of Hezbolla. Iran stated that they did not officially support it but would not stop them from crossing the border.

Still trying to hunt the story down.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 11:02 AM | Link to this

“Remember how after 9/11 O’Reilly, Hannity, and Coulter blamed Clinton because he did not catch bin Laden after the1998 embassy bombings?

If Clinton was a failure because he failed to capture Osama after three years, what does that make Bush and his five-year track record of ignoring Osama?”

A complete disaster.

By Dusty

August 17, 2006 11:03 AM | Link to this

al Quesda Type Voter,

You are right about one thing. WE, as in @@,RW,BD,Dusty and Andy are the problem here.

YES INDEED. WE THROW A MONKEY WRENCH INTO YOUR FANTASY LIBERAL CRACKER CROAKING ANTI-AMERICAN CIRCUS.

You would love to have it to yourself to dispense propaganda like smog in the morning. Get all primed with Luckovich “cute” little pictures.

I guess you are always surprised that some of us remember that we are Americans. But ding ding ding you are supposed to be too. How about that!! You forgot, didn’t you?

By rushncap

August 17, 2006 11:05 AM | Link to this

Wonderful, Mike. Really awesome way to tie in the 2 news. You damn talented people…

By w00t

August 17, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

Trust us, thigns are getting “better” in Iraq!

“During the month, 3,438 Iraqis were killed — 1,855 because of sectarian or political violence and another 1,583 from bombings and shootings. Nearly 3,600 Iraqis were wounded, the official said.”

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Did I upset you?

Good.

Try this one pos democracy killer:

“Plame’s lawyer plans to use a legal precedent that allowed Clinton to be sued while in office to force Cheney and Rove to testify in a lawsuit brought by Plame and her husband.”

Yes, place those criminalsunder oath and grill them for weeks!

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

AJC..How about a cleanup in aisle 10:16. Even gitomolife realizes he went too far with that one.

finch*,

Are you now saying all Arabs look like OBL on a standard domestic flight? Are you saying that terrorists are often found in Detroit? If yes to that one, I suspect whichever idiot it is that complains about that will be along to chastise you shortly.

Note to idiot that defends Dearbornistan: I apologize in advance that I can’t tell you apart, so rather than try to figure out if it was woof, or huhe, or lhu, or rushncap,…..I’ll just leave it at moonbat idiot.

*Creep seeking a missle (sic)

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 11:15 AM | Link to this

““Its ideas, not people that want to kill us.”

WooT,

Ideas inspire people to kill, idiot, but it still takes a human being or an animal to accomplish the act.

Furthermore, If you believe this, then why are you arguing with Andy about the Taliban? Hmmmmm? Isn’t it the IDEAS of Islamofascism, which have been around a lot longer than the Taliban that united them in their 5th century vision? Was George Bush around in the 5th Century? How long have there been Mad Mullahs cutting off heads, and stoning people to death? How about the 1940’s Afghanistan? Gosh, I think FDR might have been in power then, so let’s blame him or Truman!

Whose fault is it, except their own freaking culture? If you want to take the blame, go right ahead, but include me out.

By "Al Qaeda type voter"

August 17, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

And that is how you bait bloggers amateurs.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 11:19 AM | Link to this

“Al Qaeda type voter”

Damn right! Let’s get Lyin’ Joe Wilson and his “undercover” wife on the stand under oath and put an end to their little wet dream of bringing down the government. Too bad treason isn’t a crime anymore.

By @@

August 17, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this

Al Qaeda Type Voter:

I think there’s a possibility that your simple mind can’t comprehend complex issues.

Khalilzad said Iran could stoke {{{more}}} violence among the Shiite militias as the end of the month draws nearer.

No matter how much you want to believe that you are “the Middle Eastern” mind (your posting name), people like Khalilzad understand it better. The distinct difference between him and you is that he’s on our side. You’re on the enemy’s side.

BTW, I see {{{hope}}} for Iraq within that link. You’ll see what you want to. I’m betting it will be all things negative.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

CSM at 10:16 “And funny, the cartoon looks like a domestic flight to me. Detroit to Miami maybe?”

RW,

It’s possible that “CSM” thought that the guys in Arabic dress were Cubans. There is a slight resemblance to some of their favorite revolutionaries and we’re living in a “global community” so how we dress is irrelevant.

By George

August 17, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

*We fight Iranians in Lebanon, we fight them in Sadr City.

You’re right, dic-khead George, it’s time to fight them in Iran.*

Gee Andy, don’t you mean someone elses kids will be fighting then in Iran. You are, of course, too important sitting there behind your keyboard to do such things.

Like I said yesterday.

Well let’s see, do I support the Democrat “Cut and Run” strategy or the Republican “Lie and Die” strategy. Hmmm that is a tough one.

At least with the Democrats I’ll live to fight another day.

Andy wants everyone else to die for his ideals just because he wants it and he won’t do it himself.

What a loser!

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

RW: By RW-(the original) August 17, 2006 11:11 AM finch,Creep seeking a missle (sic)

Nah, finch had more sense, which isn’t saying very much at all.

We won’t be seeing that filthy little loser around here from now on, not since he authored that threat on all of our families. I don’t believe he’s welcome anymore.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

WooT,

I posted a news report yesterday about Indonesians wanting to go to Lebanon to help Hezbollah, but they were told not to worry because the U.N. was going in to do the job.

Jihadista all over the world are just dying to get in on the action and it’s YOUR fault.

By Dusty

August 17, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

RW

Al Quada type Voter, Gitmolife and Getalife are one and the same?

I wouldn’t have commented on his posts if I had known. His reasoning went rabid some time ago. He’s way too “far gone” now.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

George,

Once you cut and run from a fight because you’ve made up some excuse that the reason isn’t quite up to your standards, you will always find an excuse. Yours is the path to slow death and dhimmitude, I’ll take someone that rolls up their sleeves and does the hard work now thank you.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 11:33 AM | Link to this

Well, “Islamofascism” isn’t really the correct term to use in this context. However, Sharia Law which Islamofascism is based off of is better used. Sharia Law did not start to develop until the 19th century due to a changing world from agricultural to industrial economies and the decline of the Ottoman Empire. Even the word “Islamofascism” did not appear to 1990. So relatively speaking this is a new term. Islamofascism or Sharia itself did not come to be without the direct intervention of Western cultures.

If you don’t care for the truth then don’t ask for it.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Just like the creep looking for a shoulder fired missile might not be finch, but sounds like him. AQtv may not be gitmolife, but sounds just like him. You really can’t tell these moonbats apart other than by writing style anyway. They are just a bunch of sharrots*.

*sheep/parrots

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

Comprehension, again, sigh:

By George August 17, 2006 11:24 AM At least with the Democrats I’ll live to fight another day.

Not if they were in the World Trade Center, they didn’t.

Moron.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

RW, Bush LIED, plain and simple. He said Saddam and Iraq had direct connections to Al-Qaeda. Months later he “clarified” that he didn’t remember making a statement like that. He said there were WMDs which there were none. How many more people have to die for all these lies? How much more money has to be spent on his lies? They said there was no chance of civil war, and yet a top military official stated that was his greatest fear, that the country would slide into a civil war.

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

Soldiers from Iran killed in Lebanon

Just another unsubstianted claim from a fringe website. Ho hum. Tel Aviv and DC are hot to trot the “Tehran funds terrorists” line in official statements.

That might even be true!

But no such government claims about how many Iranian corpses in Sadr City and Lebanon.

I guess because there aren’t any?

I really liked your Reuters reference! You trust their stories as much as their photos… dont you? Hardeharharr!!

Cracker, re: your 10:46… are you saying somebody here believes 9/11 was funded by Bush?

Wait!! I guess YOURE saying it, which makes you kind of stupid. Bush did give $$ to the Taliban, though. A facts a fact.

Who’s the wanker? Have another drink.

Right Wing… we know you don’t read much. Don’t fly much either, do you?

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 11:42 AM | Link to this

Woot,

Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah. Take out the “ofacism” part if that makes you feel better.

Who is your professor and where do you go to school? I just want to know so I don’t send my kid anywhere near that particular institution of dumbed-down learning.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this

RW,

I don’t know about CSM being finch, but I’m positive that al qaeda voter is getabrain. It’s that irrepressible desire for a fascist dictatorship that gives it away.

Sharrots is a good description.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 11:51 AM | Link to this

wOOt,

I’m so sick of refuting your sharrot talking points that maybe you have worn me down.

I’ll just go through this once and leave you to plan your next anti-American march.

Saddam and Iraq had many documented connections to Al Qaeda. Go back to 1998 and find out why Clinton bombed the aspirin factory in Sudan for a start.

There have been many things found in Iraq that would kill lots of people, including you if you want to take possession of them for storage. Call them what you want, but dead is dead.

Iraq itself may end up being our downfall if we keep listening to you losers that want to call it a distraction and get out. It may also be our downfall if we listen to Republicans that think it is simply a war in one country. This is a regional war and we need to start fighting it that way.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

Danish,

Would you rather my thinking be: I’ll do what ever and believe what ever the president and his administration tells me? Should I go sit down in front of Fox news or listen to Rush so that I can be brainwashed in the ways of a “True American”

God forbid we have people in this country that have their own ideas and make up their minds based on what they read.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

“I really liked your Reuters reference! You trust their stories as much as their photos… dont you? Hardeharharr!!”

RW,

Do you think he’s been perusing your website?

CSM,

Why don’t you tell us what MSM news organization you favor. I was sure that Reuters would be one of your favorite propaganda organs, but now that it says something that proves that you’re an ignorant idiot, you’ve dumped them.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

Creep,

It’s ml’s cartoon di-ckhead. Would you like to climb down off your ridey horse and tell us who it pictures?

By Huge

August 17, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this

I saw where The Great Bumper Sticker Debate of 2006 raged on until late in the evening yesterday. What a hoot! These poor loony republicans are certainly a laughable bunch. So utterly deperate to “win” an arguement they’ll babble among themselves for hours!

There were many of the predictably ridiculous and juvenile after hours comments, but this one really stands out:

“Many people may have bought new cars, as Buy Danish brilliantly points out”

Really, RW. Brilliantly? And danish in the same sentence?!! Your threshold for brilliance is obviously terribly low. Not much of a surprise there though.

But whatever the reason, it’s nice that there are so many fewer of those I Suck for W stickers (except apparently in suck’s posh neighborhood or again, in his delusional mind).

A bit more surprising is ricky’s twisted logic and hatred for the mooslims in Michigan. I’ve never defended Dearborn, unless you can point that out to me. All I’ve done is call a spade a spade, or in your case a bigot a bigot. Looks like you’ve joined that christofascist club. Congratulations! All you’re lacking for full membership now is Dusty and @@. So, go on if you must, keep recruiting for your little hate club!

As for Huhe, he is my evil cousin/alter ego. No. Just kidding. Nothing that sinister. Just a typo. But thanks to all of you knuckleheads for noticing!

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Even the DUmmies were b-itching about the Reuters photos. Of course they think KKKarl Rove put the photographer up to it to discredit the media. Besides I think the creep was talking to Andy on that point.

Let’s hope he finds his “missle” soon. Whatever the hell that is. Knowing these libs it’s probably a euphemism and he’ll be cleaning his keyboard soon.

By w00t

August 17, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

RW, this was over TWO YEARS AGO:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ID/3909150/

“Secretary of State Colin Powell reversed a year of administration policy, acknowledging Thursday that he had seen no “smoking gun [or] concrete evidence” of ties between former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida.”

“The “most problematic area of contact between Iraq and al-Qaida were the reports of training in the use of non-conventional weapons, specifically chemical and biological weapons.” Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had been present in Baghdad, and an al-Qaeda affiliate organization that identified itself as the “sworn enemy” of Saddam Hussein had operated in northeastern Iraq in an area under Kurdish control. There was no evidence proving Iraqi complicity or assistance in an al Qaeda attack. The report criticized the CIA for its lack of human intelligence resources in Iraq to assess the country’s ties with terrorism during the time prior to 2002.”

Read the section about it if you’d like:

By George

August 17, 2006 12:09 PM | Link to this

*George,

Once you cut and run from a fight because you’ve made up some excuse that the reason isn’t quite up to your standards, you will always find an excuse. Yours is the path to slow death and dhimmitude, I’ll take someone that rolls up their sleeves and does the hard work now thank you.*

Anyone but you of course RW.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this

By the way,,,,,gas prices are down $.15 a gallon over the last week. Since a $.02 jump warrants a screaming headline about the skyrocketing prices, shouldn’t this be front page above the fold?

By Midori Want A Cracker?

August 17, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this

I agree with Rush!:

“The leftists are a bunch of spoiled brats who have descended into the first stages of madness.”

Now this I know for sure.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

WooT,

You are entitled to you own opinions. You are not entitled to your own facts.

If you listened to Rush you’d get NEWS stories that you don’t hear anywhere else, and if you have the brain to absorb them you’d be much better informed than you are now.

Try it out. He’s on as we speak. Thanks for the reminder.

By "Bunkers R Us"

August 17, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

Listen up!!! If you are a liberal and afraid of what Jihadists have in store for you, come on down to Bunkers R Us.

In just 12 hours we can deliver & install the security which you desperately seek & need; and all within the confines of a liberal’s salary.

Just think about it. If you’re down in your bunker, can the government find you to pay those taxes to support this war? Nope. You can hunker down & opt out in a comfortably temperate bunker installed by professionals at a minimal cost of only $10,000.00. Now that’s a real savings when comparing value.

Yessiree, a bunker is the way to go for all you liberals. Financing is available through the RNC. Be the first in line for your Israeli style bunker. If you’re unable to qualify for financing, then move to Israel. Bunkers there can be purchased on a time share plan. When the Jihadists are quiet, you can cozy up in an Israeli bunker. When they’re wreaking havoc, you’ll be asked to evacuate so that you can get acquainted with the enemy.

Come on down to see us at “Bunkers R Us” today.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 12:25 PM | Link to this

wOOt,

So a story from two years ago where someone changed their mind means that he was lying four years ago?

You kooks just take any straw you can grab at to fit your little stories don’t you?

Frankly I find it a little odd that a group of people (al Qaeda) was able to go into a country they had been sworn enemies of and had never, never, never, had any dealings with, but were able to instantly set up a network of safehouses and communication networks, have an ample supply of weapons at their disposal, and were never turned in by their “sworn enemies.”

By w00t

August 17, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

“If you listened to Rush you’d get NEWS stories that you don’t hear anywhere else, and if you have the brain to absorb them you’d be much better informed than you are now.”

Well there’s a conundrum. It’s a question if I want to listen to “slanted news” stories.

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 12:39 PM | Link to this

Warrantless wiretapping is illegal. Well, DUHH again!!

Ignorance of the law is no excuse! Bush could have gotten all the secret wiretaps he wanted if he’d just followed the rules. But he’s just too danged important to do that!!

Moran!

Speaking of morans, if Saddam and al Queda were so tight, and if there really were WMD arsenals in Iraq, how come Bush hasn’t said a word about them for almost 2 years?

Kind of like Bush never talks about all those batallions of Iranian corpses?

They don’t exist!!

Morans, please pick up your current Bush/Cheney playbooks and talking points. The ones you are using now have been severely compromised and are now outdated.

By Buy Danish

August 17, 2006 12:42 PM | Link to this

WooT,

I’m sure you get your fill of slanted news stories already.

I’m off to the pool before it rains. Here’s a question for you to ponder:

Why did Bin Laden issue a fatwa against Salman Rushdie and why is Theo Van Gogh dead?

By Creep seeking missle

August 17, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

Speaking of gas prices…

Any one of you morans want to explain how a partial shutdown of the Alaska pipeline leads to a drop in pump prices??

Kind of puts a monkey wrench into your arguments for ANWR, etc… doesn’t it?

I’ll catch you after your liquid lunch….

By Huge

August 17, 2006 12:45 PM | Link to this

Hey does anybody the rules about promoting an organization on this blog? I’ve learned and gotten involved with a group that I would like to recommend, but don’t want to get in hot water with the blog police at the ajc. It is non-political and is something that anybody could contribute to, in various ways, and really help a soldier or marine overseas.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 12:51 PM | Link to this

Just when you thought Dems couldn’t get any more foolish they come out and talk about how wonderful it would be to make it impossible to stop a plot like the one last week in London. You people truly are dumber than a bag of hammers.

By RW-(the original)

August 17, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

Huge,

You could always try the user agreement which is linked right here on this very page. Hint: start at Blogs FAQ