Mike Luckovich

By Let's Ask Wooten

August 11, 2006 08:25 AM | Link to this

I like the Atlanta Urinal, they’re so much fun. Now they got us fighting the “War on People:”

Twenty-four {{{people}}} were arrested overnight Wednesday in London and other parts of Britain in connection with the plot. U.S. intelligence officials said authorities moved quickly after learning the plotters hoped to stage a practice run within two days, with the attack expected just days later.-AJC

If you want to know if these people were Swedens, Latvian’s or maybe even test tube babies then don’t look to the front page of the Al Jazeera Constitution.

Apparently it matters not who they are in this jumbled up little war that we are trying to cut and run from.

If only they had been 24 Christians or Jews, then there would have been no doubts, no doubt at all……

Cut

Recognizing the enemy of today allows one to see that fighting Islamist insurgents in Iraq is not a “distraction” from the war on terror, and that Palestinian Arab terrorists are not “freedom fighters” whose war is confined only to a patch of land. Yesterday’s arrests in England mark victory in an important battle, but neither the exposure of this plot nor law enforcement’s ever improving ability to thwart others of its kind mark a permanent victory. Such a victory will be possible only once we can all bring ourselves to speak the name of the enemy we face.-NYSun

Or we could run our heads up our a-sses like they want us to do at the Atlanta Urinal.

By Let's Ask Wooten

August 11, 2006 08:26 AM | Link to this

U.S. picked up the suspects’ chatter and shared it with British authorities; new federal alert warns that peroxide-based explosives could also be employed in future attacks in the U.S.-Time

Cut

We shudder to think what would have happened in the coming days had the New York Times gotten hold of British or American airline antiterrorism investigations prior to yesterday’s arrests.WashingtonTimes

Cut

Let’s emphasize that again: The plot was foiled because a large number of people were under surveillance concerning their spending, travel and communications. Which leads us to wonder if Scotland Yard would have succeeded if the ACLU or the New York Times had first learned the details of such surveillance programs.-OpinionJournal

By Read It Quick Before The Censor Wakes Up

August 11, 2006 08:27 AM | Link to this

Mr. Lieberman’s loss reduces the size of the Democrats’ tent to that of a pup tent. The message it sends is that only those who conform to the left-wing fundamentalist worldview will be allowed in. Is that a message Democrats want to take into future campaigns? Do they wish to pervert John F. Kennedy’s vision and instead say that the United States will pay no price, bear no burden and go nowhere in the defense of liberty?-WashingtonTimes

Cut

The morning after Lamont’s victory, for instance, Michael “Fats” Moore posted a note on his Web site to Democratic candidates that is a threat without the veil. He specifically targeted Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and John Edwards, all likely presidential candidates in ‘08.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

Atlanta Constipation “business” section headline:

Watchdog: BP was warned about pipes-AJC

Hell, I got a fake headline too:

Pinko Liberals warned of no excess oil capacity, refuse to drill, cite Caribou’s feelings.

Mine has more truth to it.

P.S. I thought liberals and Algore didn’t use oil???

By getalife

August 11, 2006 08:38 AM | Link to this

Lying POS GOP

Pathetic.

By What Does "POS" Stand For?

August 11, 2006 08:46 AM | Link to this

getagrip: So what would you like to call “cut and run?”

“Coddle and appease?”

“Enter into dhimmihood?”

“Sheep To Slaughter?”

By Will Jones

August 11, 2006 08:48 AM | Link to this

Wise up, Americans!

Bushes have been working for Rockefellers for four generations…and Standard Oil was built on “murder and arson.”

Rockefellers’ family bank is the Vatican’s correspondent bank and “Big Oil” is Roman Catholic.

Bush’s grandfather called himself Episcopalian but was a member of the papal fraternity whose members openly claim to run the Vatican…and who supplied 2,000 passports to Hitler’s SS to “skip” Nuremberg: The Knights of Malta.

Four of the first seven heads of the CIA were Knights of Malta including McCone, who was in charge when the CIA killed JFK to send us to die in Vietnam…six weeks after Kennedy’s NSAM 263 ordered us out.

Bush’s father was CIA outside Dallas on the phone with a “tip” seventy-five minutes after the kill “but can’t remember” where he was when he heard President Kennedy had been shot…neither could Nixon or E. Howard Hunt.

We’re paying through the neck for gas but it’s a rigged game and we’re risking going back to feudalism if we don’t put this Oil White House under the jail for treason on 9/11 and in Iraq…along with their fascist clients in the Oil Industry.

Watch “Loose Change 2” or read “New Pearl Harbor” by David Ray Griffin, PhD, if you aren’t already “through with doubt.”

By N-GA

August 11, 2006 08:51 AM | Link to this

The difference between the wing-nuts and the rest of the planet on the oil issue is simple. The wing-nuts want to pump more oil so that those in power can rake in more obscene profits. The rest of the world prefers a solution that includes both energy conservation and alternative energy usage.

It’s embarrasing when a so-called third world country (Brazil) is able to address its dependence on oil that is imported while the technologically advanced USA cannot.

By getalife

August 11, 2006 08:58 AM | Link to this

This is the way the POS GOP fights terrorism

Feel safer?

By liberal scientist

August 11, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this

Yesterday was SO nice without the bed wetter sharing his mountain of neanderthal nonsense.

By N-GA

August 11, 2006 09:03 AM | Link to this

Getalife,

The GOP has to resort to “swift-boating” Murtha by lying…a typical GOP strategy since they target voters who don’t ever ask questions.

Of course Andy, the Bed Wetter simply sidesteps the issue of the GOP lying because he is guilty of using the same technique.

One of the groups they (the GOP) target is the elderly. They are easily influenced, don’t do much research, listen to their preachers, are strongly patriotic, and are very likely to vote. What I do is work with the elderly on an individual basis, pointing out the lies and proving to them what the truth really is. You won’t believe what the reaction is. REAL ANGER!! And then they go out and tell all their friends. When they realize the GOP has been using them to create a fascist administration, they go ballistic. And now its even easier because the price of oil is hitting them in the wallet.

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

So N-GA, who doesn’t even know how voting works in Georgia, is out teaching the elderly about fascism is when the government doesn’t institute price controls.

If this old goat isn’t lying as usual, then these elderly folks are probably being polite and getting a real good laugh when he leaves.

Goat, how do they take it when you tell them Brazil is a much better country than the US?

By Fake But Stupid

August 11, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

By N-GA August 11, 2006 08:51 AM The difference between the wing-nuts and the rest of the planet on the oil issue is simple. The wing-nuts want to pump more oil so that those in power can rake in more obscene profits. The rest of the world prefers a solution that includes both energy conservation

You libs have called for energy conservation almost as long as you’ve been making up stories about being a war hero in Vietnam. When is it going to start? Will Algore be the first to move from his 10,000 sq. ft. mansion into a studio apartment?

Duma-ss. Child.

By N-GA August 11, 2006 09:03 AM Getalife, The GOP has to resort to “swift-boating” Murtha by lying…a typical GOP strategy since they target voters who don’t ever ask questions. Of course Andy, the Bed Wetter simply sidesteps the issue of the GOP lying because he is guilty of using the same technique.

I didn’t say sh-it about Murtha one way or the other. All I did was ask what you libs would like to call “cut and run” since you seem so offended by it.

Blow me.

Do we have to get Wooten’s head to spin again?

By There are reasonable questions & then.....

August 11, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

There are http://www.hugequestions.com/.

Is our resident “Huge Blowhole” a conspiracy theorist?

Thanks Will.

By Truthman

August 11, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this

Three months, neo-cons, just three more months and then you’ll all have a bunch of new “enemies” to pour you misguided enmity upon as we, the progressive common sense folks takd back our Congress from the neo-con haters.

Andy & Danish and Let’s ask Wooten and @@, Y’all must feel like th Shrub during 9/11 or Katrina: You know it’s happening, but you’re completely impotent to do anything.

We’re taking back Congress! We’re taking back Congress!!

Na-nanny-boo-boo!!! There’s nothing you can do!!

Ha, Ha, Ha!!

You love W’s war so much? Why don’t YOU go fight it.

Here’s the number to the Atlanta Military Entrance and Processing Station at Fort Gillem: 404-469-3090.

With W’s war going so swimmingly, the Army has upped it’s recruiting age limit to 42 AND is back to accepting CAT IV recruits just as they did in Vietnam! That way, you’ll fit right in!!

Please sign up now so we can reduce the number of people in the shallow end of the gene pool! I’m certain W will show up at your funeral!!

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

liberal scientist,

If you would like we can provide you links to plenty of moonbat sites that only allow one point of view.

To ml’s credit he prefers to have both sides represented. Probably because he thinks leftists can say anything other than STFU, but I guess he’s naive in that way.

Everybody else,

Do you ever wonder why so many on the left complain about articles being linked by conservatives here? They call them trash or a pack of wingnut lies, but they never tell you what these lies are. All you ever hear is a claim that they should be able to determine for you what you should be allowed to read. Oh and then they call people that want to freely let both sides be heard fascists.

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 09:39 AM | Link to this

Is the world more safe or less safe since Bush took office?

Is the US more safe or less safe since Bush took office?

Is the US more respected and admired around the world or less respected and admired around the world since Bush took office?

Do US citizens have more freedom or less freedom since Bush took office?

Is the governing of our country more efficient or less efficient with the GOP majority in all branches of gov’t?

Such simple questions with such obvious answers…

It’s The Competence, STUPID!

By I'm Sure It Was

August 11, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this

By liberal scientist August 11, 2006 09:02 AM Yesterday was SO nice without the bed wetter sharing his mountain of neanderthal nonsense.

I can imagine it was great, all you mentally crippled liberals sitting up in here slobbering, without interruption, the same anti American bullsh-it all over your drool covered bibs.

Kinda like this:

By Truthman August 11, 2006 09:34 AM We’re taking back Congress! We’re taking back Congress!! Na-nanny-boo-boo!!! There’s nothing you can do!! Ha, Ha, Ha!!

I’ll try to be nice today, haha.

By More Safe

August 11, 2006 09:49 AM | Link to this

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 09:39 AM Is the world more safe or less safe since Bush took office?

More safe by far.

Such simple questions with such obvious answers…

Then why can’t you figure it out on your own?

By N-GA

August 11, 2006 09:59 AM | Link to this

Well, Andy (the Bed Wetter) aka RW (the Real Wanker) have to resort to more lies and slander because that is all they have. Poor Andy just repeats the same lies over and over again. I guess he is simply too stupid to come with anything new and interesting.

Now we know that Andy and the Shrub have something in common…chronic bed wetting. One could conclude that Andy has terminal diaper rash, because his momma certainly won’t change his Depends.

By getalife

August 11, 2006 09:59 AM | Link to this

N-GA,

Very true. There is something seriously wrong with the people supporting the GOP after all their failures. I am thinking they are paid or just terrible people who do not give a s-hit about their country.

If they did care about their country they would want oversight for this failed government. The solution is simple, a Dem majority just for accountability.

By @@

August 11, 2006 10:06 AM | Link to this

I watched a “brit” interviewed last night. He maintains residences here in the U.S. as well as the U.K.

Comment: “There is a lot of expansive surveillance allowed in the U.K. which is restricted here in the U.S. by the left-wing of the Democrat Party as well as defenders of Civil Liberties out of fear of a police state.

They asked this guy from the U.K.:

“When you are residing in the U.K., do you and the citizens there feel as though you are existing in a police state?”

His answer. “NO”, while there a few citizens who express their concerns, the majority feel the surveillance is necessary to protect them from attack.”

Will:

This guy is a freaky bazillionaire, what’s he doing in your Democrat Party?

I like the new name….”THE SHADOW PARTY”.

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

I’m shocked, SHOCKED that the mountain goat is calling me a liar without pointing out any lie. Actually I’m not shocked, the Brazilian goat just thinks you are stupid enough to take his word for it.

getalife,

Before you line up your conspiracy theories about my future absence, I will likely be golfing this afternoon. If the rains come maybe I’ll come back and help you understand that eating your own is not the best way to achieve a Dem majority.

By Midori

August 11, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

RW,

why do you always “cut and golf” when the going gets tough?

By Fake Life, Real Wanker

August 11, 2006 10:19 AM | Link to this

By N-GA August 11, 2006 09:59 AM Poor Andy just repeats the same lies over and over again. I guess he is simply too stupid to come with anything new and interesting.

Followed by this, of course:

{{{Now we know that Andy and the Shrub have something in common…chronic bed wetting. One could conclude that Andy has terminal diaper rash, because his momma certainly won’t change his Depends.}}}

And this:

{{{By N-GA August 11, 2006 09:03 AM Of course Andy, the Bed Wetter simply sidesteps the issue of the GOP lying because he is guilty of using the same technique.}}}

And this:

{{{By N-GA August 10, 2006 10:11 PM Well it doesn’t take much for this blog’s resident bed wetter (Andy aka RW) to come out and say dumb crap with no facts, no debate, just hanging his stupidity on his sleeve for all the world to see and smell. What a pathetic little wanker Andy is…but everyone knows that already…even the other wing-nuts.}}}

Pot To Kettle Syndrome?

Wanking too much Syndrome, hairy palms?

By Truthman

August 11, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this

May you hit your ball into a den Water Moccossins, RW!

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 10:24 AM | Link to this

Midori,

Good one!

By getalife

August 11, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this

Midori,

He says he “cuts and golf” on Fridays now but you know how they lie.

By Blog Dawg

August 11, 2006 10:43 AM | Link to this

Yeah, why does RW have to “Putt and Run” when the going gets tough?

Hope RW gets the ball past the Windmill this time.

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 10:45 AM | Link to this

You caught me getalife. I’m really getting together with my oil cabal to come up with a way to raise prices faster. Speaking of which, is there some kind of law that gas price signs have to be manual? <———-that is an actual serious question if someone knows.

truthman,

What is a “Moccossin” and what do they want with golf balls?

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

Blog Dawg,

We’re supposed to play near the home of a rich Democrat, there won’t be any windmills.

By Let's Ask Wooten

August 11, 2006 10:54 AM | Link to this

Reality has once again inconveniently burst the antiwar, anti-security, anti-American balloon, just as the November victory ballrooms were being booked.

Just as central casting was whipping the articles of impeachment into shape. The high crimes and misdemeanors of George W. Bush include: hunting down terrorists, detaining them, interrogating them, penetrating their communications, and following their money.

By Truthman

August 11, 2006 10:59 AM | Link to this

Oooooh. Thw Shrub is “Penetrating” terrorist.

Is Rick “man-dog” Santorum acting as Yentl for W’s homo-erotic “penetrations” of terrorists?

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 11:06 AM | Link to this

Moveon.org’s founder was on Colbert last night. Nice guy, really liked him. Glad to be a member of his organization.

By Brilliantly Simple

August 11, 2006 11:25 AM | Link to this

Which is why the pinkos can’t follow along:

Perhaps it is possible to hermetically seal an aircraft cabin from bombers willing to die with their victims; it is not possible to seal off entire democratic countries, bursting with unguarded targets. The only way to win is to suck the air out of jihad by driving the regimes that support it out of power or out of the terror business.-NationalReview

What is so hard to understand?

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 11:25 AM | Link to this

rushncap,

Assuming you mean Eli Pariser he wasn’t the founder of moveon.org. Just once can you come in with an accurate fact?

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

By contrast, Democrats were nearly split, with only 46 percent agreeing that America is generally a fair and decent country, and with 37 percent saying America is not a generally fair and decent country. Only 48 percent of Democrats said they thought that the world would be a better place if more countries were like the United States.

Democrats constantly complain that the nation has never been so divided, but consider that half of them think the statement that America is a good country is a divisive remark.

Sounds like she has them pegged once again.

By Let's Ask Wooten

August 11, 2006 11:44 AM | Link to this

Any death — enemy or friendly, accidental or deliberate, civilian or soldier — favors the terrorists. The Islamists have no claim on morality; Westerners do and show it hourly. So, in a strange way, images of the dead and dying are attributed only to our failing. If ours are killed, it is because those in power were not careful (inadequate body armor, unarmored humvees, etc), most likely due to some supposed conspiracy (Halliburton profiteering, blood for oil, wars for Israel, etc.). When Muslim enemies are killed, whether by intent or accidentally, the whole arsenal of Western postmodern thought comes into play. For the United States to have such power over life and death, the enemy appears to the world as weak, sympathetic, and victimized; we as strong and oppressive. Terrorists are still “constructed” as “the other” and thus are seen as suffering — doctored photos or not — through the grim prism of Western colonialism, racism, and imperialism.-NationalReview

By Midori

August 11, 2006 11:46 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

I caught Eli on last night’s Colbert as well.

Must agree with you, he’s a stand up guy.

Colbert had a good time ribbing him.

It was a great show.

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

Oh wow, RW, for the first time in months you got me. I’m sorry, I meant “executive director”.

Wow, are you going to throw a big party now, invite all your friend, knock back a keg of Schlitz?

By RE

August 11, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

Just for clarification, anyone using quotes from Krauthammer, Kristoff, or nearly any one writing for the National Review needs to remember that these guys have been wrong about just about everything they predicted for the last 5 years.

By Midori

August 11, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this

The only thing Annie has “pegged” is her legs.

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

{{{{Oh wow, RW, for the first time in minutes you got me. I’m sorry, I meant “executive director”.}}}}

There you go rushncap, I fixed that for you!

By Midori

August 11, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

you’ve nailed it, RE

By @@

August 11, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

rushncap:

I don’t know who “you” saw on Colbert, but of course you would be proud to be a member of MoveOn.Org. It’s “the socialist” in you.

Q: What is the Shadow Party ultimately trying to do?

A: Soros said his number one goal is to unseat Bush.” It’s social justice, is the way you describe it. What they want is a form of socialism.

We’ve also described the radical components of the Soros operation. This is not just something you talk about in electoral terms, as though it is the usual special interests coming together. At the base of this is a grass-roots movement which has actually bankrupted the city of New York, which they did by loading the welfare roles. The core of it was called the National Welfare Rights Organization and their strategy was to recruit people to the welfare system in order to break it.

It’s a world wide “utopia” rushncap. Can you figure out what the “fly in the ointment” of this shangri-la would be? I’m thinking not, because you have a “malleable mentality”, a degree in MBS=(Mushy Brain Syndrome), a “convenient radical tool”.

Congratulations.

I can’t hang around for you to beat me up. Maybe Danish or Dusty will show up. If not, take your best shot at the “conservative guys” here. I’ll check in later to see how you did.

By Really?

August 11, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this

By RE August 11, 2006 11:47 AM Just for clarification, anyone using quotes from Krauthammer, Kristoff, or nearly any one writing for the National Review needs to remember that these guys have been wrong about just about everything they predicted for the last 5 years.

Then it shouldn’t be too hard to name, let’s say, one of those mistakes?

You’re on the clock, clown.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 11:59 AM | Link to this

{{By N-GA/August 10, 2006 05:22 PM}}

{{Danish in la-la-land}},

{{In response to your 11:25 post, I say that you citing a single person who supports the Viet Nam war as proof that it was a good thing is beyond stupid. There are millions of people around the world who marched against the war. Your completely empty-headed remarks are one of the things that make your side of any debate on this blog hysterically amusing…but not nearly as funny as yesterday’s posted link to the Bedwetter article….lmao!!!!}}

N-GA aka all the POS bathtub crew,

Pitiful attempt^^ at twisting my words and trying to sound intelligent, moron. The story I cited “proves” nothing except that, despite your best efforts to silence us, you do not hold a monopoly on the writing of history, or in determining our future as a nation.

What a nice contrast the story about the patriotic S. Vietnamese woman was, while you were going through your daily blah blah blahs about Bush being a “divider” and Andy being a bedwetter!

I thought it was refreshing to hear from someone who has a different opinion than you. I know that sort of thing enrages you liberal fascists.

It is heartening to hear from someone who lived under the horrors of Communism, makes no apologies for evil, and who recognizes America’s greatness amidst the noisy and dangerous din of negativity and hatred coming from your side.

Re your million man peace march analogy, I guess that according to POS N-GA, because hundreds of thousands of IslamoFascists burn American flags that proves that they are right?

Freaking Idiot.

AJC MANAGEMENT: Can we have our italics back?

TA Rushncap,

Stuff it^, honey.

Gotta run.

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 12:00 PM | Link to this

RW, I don’t need you fixing my language. You couldn’t spell “cat” if I spotted you a “c” and an “a”.

Are you always such an a$-shole, or is this TGIF talking?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

Deranged Moron: You’re still on the clock from my 9:39 questions. You only answered one and (of course) with no facts to back it up with…

Waiting…

By Pay Attention, Sissy

August 11, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help Us August 11, 2006 12:07 PM Deranged Moron: You’re still on the clock from my 9:39 questions. You only answered one and (of course) with no facts to back it up with…

Yeah, like your little wimpy questions provided a challenge or anything like that:

———>By More Safe August 11, 2006 09:49 AM By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 09:39 AM Is the world more safe or less safe since Bush took office? More safe by far. Such simple questions with such obvious answers… Then why can’t you figure it out on your own?<—————

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 12:22 PM | Link to this

The 9:39 “questions” are all subjective and can be answered either way and supported by any set of observations at the whim of the person stating them. i.e. long term/short term analysis.So there is really no point in spending any time on them.

On the other hand the 11:47 is a straight forward accusation that the writer should easily be able to back with fact if there is any truth to the allegation. So the challenge to the 11:47 is valid and the 9:39 is simply fluff for weak minds.

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 12:26 PM | Link to this

Please don’t be so threatened, Deranged Moron…they really are simple questions.

My answers to these questions are intuitively obvious to all but the truly stupid (oops, I guess that explains your difficulty)…

Still Waiting…

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 12:30 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

Put down the 1960 book of insults for Kindergarten students and try to use the brain God gave you man. It’s not too late, run from that hell hole science lab and talk to some real people for a few minutes. You’ll probably get your a-ss kicked a few times, but in the long run it will be good for you. Go for it my man!!! Take the weekend and head down to Salter Path or somewhere like that, but please leave the c-a-t book in the dorm.

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 12:30 PM | Link to this

Au Contraire, RW (crispy)…

The first two questions, doubtless can be contorted by the pretzel logic of the narrow-minded.

However, their are ample sources to affirm my answers to the last 3.

They are just not facts you are equipped to handle…

By Truthman

August 11, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

Hey neo-condoms!

Why don’t y’all subscribe to the Augusta Chronicle?

It’s editorial staff is just as inbred, bigoted and warmongering as you.

You can read it right after Sun Myong-Moon’s Washington Times - another “beacon of hope” for the neo-conjobs!!

Are any of you neo-condoms willing to send you kids to Iraq…I thought not!!

By RE

August 11, 2006 12:42 PM | Link to this

here you go

I do not have the time to look through all the documents, here he makes 12 points, at least 6 of which are completely wrong.

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

LHU,

Did you by any chance notice that you didn’t provide any answers?

The last two are easily as subjective as the first two. The middle “question” is just plain silly. I prefer that we don’t subject ourselves to John F’ng Kerry’s global test which only makes us sitting ducks. Get back to me the next time a country is in true danger of losing it’s sovereignty to an enemy it recognizes and doesn’t come to us for help.

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 12:54 PM | Link to this

RE,

It looks to me like all twelve of those statements were true when written. Your “proof” was published July 25, 2003, before all you radicals started doing everything you could to damage US credibility and put down the possibility of popular uprisings. The kids in Iran aren’t planning to get themselves slaughtered by counting on a bunch of pantie waist pacifists like you. Try supporting America and let’s get this job done, then you can go back to demanding free child care.

Much to the disappointment of the moonbat population I’m heading out to the beauty and serenity of Berkely Hills Country Club.

By Truthman

August 11, 2006 12:54 PM | Link to this

Three more months!! Three more months

nanny-nanny boo-boo!! Neo-cons will be on the run!! Just as your precious DeLay, Frist, Cunningham, Abramoff, Reed…the entire “culture of corroption.”

I smell the neo-con fear!!

Nanny-nanny boo-boo!! Ha, Ha, Ha!!

Really sticks in your crawl, eh, RW?

Send ‘em to the Hague and try ‘em all for crimes against humanity.

BTW, it was a MUSLIM who told the British authorities about the terror plot. But, of course, that’s too advanced for you hate-mongers to realize.

Nanny-nanny, boo-boo!!!

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

Cool, Great Link RE!!

How can one person be so wrong on so many points (other than the wingnuts here…but, maybe that’s why they like Krauthammer)

Okay, the 11:56 challenge has been obliterated by facts. RW (crispy) and the Deranged Moron continue to obfuscate on the 9:39 challenge.

Yup, you have been whupped!

It’s The Competence, STUPID!!

By REally?

August 11, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this

By RE August 11, 2006 12:42 PM here you go I do not have the time to look through all the documents, here he makes 12 points, at least 6 of which are completely wrong.

RE: Lebanon and Israel were at “peace” in 2003 you blooming idiot.

You’ve got to be kidding me on the “6 out of 12” right?

You can’t be that stupid, it’s almost impossible.

By Huge

August 11, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

“Original tip about plot came from Britain’s Muslim community, according to British intelligence official”

Uh oh! The bigot is not going to like this one little bit. But I doubt this news will affect it’s view on killing ALL of them for good measure anyway. So the plan remains the same - start will England, then move on to Michigan. Or is it the other way around?

By RE

August 11, 2006 01:01 PM | Link to this

RW,

Just for clarification, what is the job now and how do we get it done?

for review, the job was to get the WMD then it was to overthrow sadam then it was to bring democracy to iraq then it was to build up the iraqi military to sustain itself

Now I think it is something along the lines getting in the middle of a civil war. and of course finding the iraqi military units that are more loyal to a sect than to national unity, which seems to be a majority of the troops we have trained and armed. SO what do we have to do to get that job done?…..Stay the course?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this

Hey, Bush’s pledge back in 2000 that we could have tax cuts and STILL have a surplus was true when he said it…For about six months.

Man, the wingnuts have a LOW threshold for ‘The Truth.’

It’s The Competence, STUPID!!

By I'm Sleepy

August 11, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help Us August 11, 2006 12:26 PM Please don’t be so threatened, Deranged Moron…they really are simple questions. My answers to these questions are intuitively obvious to all but the truly stupid (oops, I guess that explains your difficulty)…Still Waiting…

Look, man, I made several attempts but I dozed off halfway through your first question.

Only through crossed, unfocused eyes was I able to completely get through it, and then I fell to the floor laughing.

Why do you put me through things like this?

Bush is actually fighting our enemies instead of just standing by while they slaughter all of us like Clinton and Carter did. This presents an opportunity for you panty waist socialists to ask ignorant weakling questions like, “is the world safer, weep, weep.”

You know, p***y, it used to be considered a sign of maturity to not let your emotions totally control your thoughts and actions. They called it Manhood, you wouldn’t know anything about it.

Ask any adult, they’ll tell you.

By Blog Dawg

August 11, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this

Israel and Lebanon were NOT at peace in 2003. Obviously Iran/Hezbollah have been living the jihad for generations and this latest explosion has been planned for years. They must have built tunnel fortresses all over southern lebanon.. Israel will need years to clean it all up. This is what they want: a sustained ground assault committing Israel to war so that eventually the other Arabs countries will be forced by the populace to join in.

Obvious to me. Dont be such a naivity, save that for the nativity. Not even Jesus can save us now. Unless it’s really the antichrist in disquise. I heard he has a peace plan.

Kiss your a** goodbye, sirs.

By We Can Play Games

August 11, 2006 01:12 PM | Link to this

By Huge Wanker

August 11, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

“Original tip about how I like it in my rump came from Britain’s Muslim community, after all I’m their bit-ch, according to British intelligence official”

Uh oh! I’m not going to like this one little bit. But I doubt this news will affect my view on getting humped by ALL of them for good measure anyway. So the plan remains the same - I will start getting humped in (will?) England, then move on to Michigan. Or is it the other way around? It doesn’t matter to me!

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this

That’s okay, Deranged Moron…

Everyone here knows you are a mental midget and are unable to answer very simple questions.

Go back to sleep now, precious, and try not to wet the bed again…

By RE

August 11, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this

REally, More of those points are incorrect or less? You really did not express what you were saying, just kind of had an outburst

By "Peace" You Idiot

August 11, 2006 01:21 PM | Link to this

By Blog Dawg August 11, 2006 01:07 PM Israel and Lebanon were NOT at peace in 2003.

When Krauthhammer made the statement it was true. Hezbollah was not firing rockets across the border and kidnapping Israeli soldiers.

Maybe you maggoty liberals are reading a different article but I did not see in there about “happily ever after.”

You’d have to be an idiot, well I guess we do have that covered, to believe anything Clinton said about the Middle East either.

I don’t seem to recall you pacifist p-ussies wailing and gnashing your pinko teeth back then.

It didn’t matter until Bush became president?

By I Said You Were Wrong

August 11, 2006 01:26 PM | Link to this

By RE August 11, 2006 01:13 PM REally, More of those points are incorrect or less? You really did not express what you were saying, just kind of had an outburst

You’re wrong. Do you understand this?

You are judging an article from 2003 by today’s events.

Is this not any easy game to play?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 01:37 PM | Link to this

Deranged Moron. Man, are you stupid…

Go back and reread your 11:56 post ( that I am sure you wish you could take back ) where YOU issued the challenge.

Reread the challenge YOU ISSUED and (unless your head is six feet up your a**e) you will know that your little heiney has been spanked.

Fess up, try to be a man (I said ‘try’)…

By Predictions are wrong?

August 11, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

1-have been

2-has been

3-has intensified

4-reversed and became

5-is leaving

6-has started

7-have been established

8-having been eliminated

9-no longer having

10-has gone quiet

11-is quiet

12-have been restarted

Predictions?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

Actually, let’s take this new ‘don’t judge things in the past by today’s standards’ out for a little spin…

-Now, the wingnuts can’t possibly judge the Clinton administrations actions in the 90’s by the post 9/11 standards.

-And, how can we possible fault Bush’s Iraq War strategy when we had no idea how incompetent Rumsfeld would turn out to be. We can’t judge him by the 2003 standard.

-And, how can we criticize Ronald Reagan’s selling high tech weaponry to IRAN during the 80’s by today’s standards.

-And, how can we fault Bush 41 for helping build, arm and train Saddam’s army back in the 80’s when we had no idea he was a torturer and serial human rights violator.

Man, oh man, I could go on forever. I love the wingnut threshold for competence. It’s so easy to be right all the time…

By Blog Dawg

August 11, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this

Can we blame Rummy for the 10K year old civil war that always was in Iraq? If there wasn’t sectarian civil war, there was ethnic civil war.

Iraq is the Tigris Euphrates cradle of civil-war-ization.

No amount of military genius could have prevented the pandora’s box of strife unleashed when we went into Baghdad.

The Iraqi civil war will live another 10K years.

LETS GIT!!!!

By Huge

August 11, 2006 02:28 PM | Link to this

Looks like the sphincterly obsessed bigot got its panties all in a wad. Oh well, if the cork fits… How’s that blind, impotent rage working out for ya, bigot?

“BP’s board and London-based executives were informed of widespread corrosion at the UK oil giant’s Alaska field two years before the company was forced to shut it this week, citing “unexpectedly severe corrosion”.”

“On May 22 2004, Chuck Hamel, an advocate for BP workers in Alaska, took the charges directly to Dr Walter E. Massey, chairman of the environment committee of BP’s non-executive board of directors.”

What? Some punk wants them to maintain the pipeline? And cut into the fatcat’s profits?! I dont think sooo….

By N-GA

August 11, 2006 02:29 PM | Link to this

It’s so much fun to toy with Andy, the Bed Wetter. All of the bloggers here have seen my challenges to him. I will still wager him $100,000 that I am what I say I am. Of course, Andy runs like crazy from my wager. All you can see of Andy is the yellow streak down his back as he tries to get away from his lies. But they stick to him like his urine-crusted underwear.

What a pathetic loser…and he is not ashamed of himself because he does it all behind the anonymity of cyberspace.

By Thomas

August 11, 2006 02:30 PM | Link to this

Dear Bush

Concerning Iraq —

As Larry the cable guy would say - It’s about time to:

Get Er’ Done!

By Huge

August 11, 2006 02:41 PM | Link to this

Hey RW(the fake)!

Here’s example number three! You do remember your idiotic request for “the 5 examples”, don’t you? I thought so.

By What A Stroke August 9, 2006 04:01 PM

I want to KILL Muslims, you’re the one that wants them up your butt.

Starting to feel a little stupid and dirty, rick? How’s that support for the blind, impotent rager working out for ya?

By Mrs. Godzilla

August 11, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this

Just put off driving until October. Surprise, the prices will come down.

By Blog Dawg

August 11, 2006 02:52 PM | Link to this

N-GA, you know, winning a debate with Andy is about as praise worthy as winning a debate against Ann Coulter’s recycled douchebags, man. And smells the same.

Arguing with an ungapped, synaptically challenged neural failure is no way to succeed at blogging, senor…. At most, you will only succeed in being a moron.

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 02:55 PM | Link to this

Man, the going got tough, the wingnuts tried to lie/obfuscate their way out of it, it didn’t work and they…cut and run.

How poetic…

By Watching a Self-Made Spectacle

August 11, 2006 03:19 PM | Link to this

Will all you liberals please stand up and give the old goat N-GA a huge round of applause? He must need some additional stroking. The personal strokes he’s giving himself don’t seem to be cuttin’ it. Can the rest of you morons lend him your hands.

It’s a pathetic display, but I guess he just can’t help himself.

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 03:30 PM | Link to this

Speaking of Pathetic…

By Still Waiting

August 11, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help Us August 11, 2006 01:37 PM Deranged Moron. Man, are you stupid… Go back and reread your 11:56 post ( that I am sure you wish you could take back ) where YOU issued the challenge.

Don’t tell me what I did you little panty waist.

I’m still waiting for you weakling liberals to show me where Krauthhammer or any other Conservative your fellow pinko named has been wrong.

You have not shown me yet.

We are in the middle of a war, give it a chance.

By Still Waiting

August 11, 2006 03:35 PM | Link to this

By Predictions are wrong? August 11, 2006 01:54 PM 1-have been

This would be your opinion 1- 10. Mine differs from yours.

Krauthammer was right.

Next?

By Who Will Help You?

August 11, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 01:54 PM Actually, let’s take this new ‘don’t judge things in the past by today’s standards’ out for a little spin… -Now, the wingnuts can’t possibly judge the Clinton administrations actions in the 90’s by the post 9/11 standards.

So your Punk a-ss thinks it’s O.K. to kill Jews as long as there’s a democrat in the White House.

I got it.

By Midori

August 11, 2006 03:39 PM | Link to this

LOL

Andy slices, he dices, he ducks, he dodges.

ROFL!!!

You guys (N-GA, Huge, LordHelpUs, Blog Dawg) all deserved a 20 gun salute :)

By We Can Play Games

August 11, 2006 03:41 PM | Link to this

By Huge Wanker

August 11, 2006 02:28 PM | Link to this

Looks like the sphincterly obsessed bigot is fixing to get my panties all in a wad. Oh well, if the cork fits… That’s how I like it, with a little rage when you pump me.

What? Some punk wants to lay pipe in me?? Well come on with it.

By Andy

August 11, 2006 03:42 PM | Link to this

Good one, Midori!

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 03:43 PM | Link to this

“BTW, it was a MUSLIM who told the British authorities about the terror plot. But, of course, that’s too advanced for you hate-mongers to realize”

Huge Liar and Truth Twister,

I am well aware of the fact that a muslim was instrumental in preventing the slaughter of thousands of innocents. Great!

Now if we could get a few hundred million more on board, along with the Leftist wankers like you who piddle away here, and the influential MSM, we might be able to win this war on “terror” in short order and have……..PEACE on Earth!

Freaking idiots.

P.S. At the risk of speaking in cliche’s, my very good friend when I lived in S.C. in 2001 was a Trinidadian Muslim, educated in Canada. She was terrified that she would be deported after 9/11 because she loved America. I wish I could say the same about you despicable POS punks.

P.P.S. While we are acknowledging the contribution of a muslim in preventing a hideous massacre by deranged Islamofascists, it might be a good time for YOU to show YOUR thanks and appreciation to Tony Blair and George Bush.

I’ll check back later for your thank you notes.

By Fake Life, Real Wanker

August 11, 2006 03:49 PM | Link to this

By N-GA August 11, 2006 02:29 PM It’s so much fun to toy with Andy, the Bed Wetter. All of the bloggers here have seen my challenges to him. I will still wager him $100,000 that I am what I say I am. Of course, Andy runs like crazy from my wager. All you can see of Andy is the yellow streak down his back as he tries to get away from his lies. But they stick to him like his urine-crusted underwear.

My Lord what a pitiful spectacle, some sorry a-ss bragging on himself in a unanimous blog. What a true, total wanker, if you looked in the dictionary, this stroke’s picture would be right next to the definition of Wanker.

I asked Wooten. He was too ashamed to even admit he knew your molesting little a-ss, who can blame him?

Now what, I have to start calling freaking people’s houses and asking them about some jack off on a blog?

This is the same sh-it you’d expect some pervert to do in a park, what a loser.

Midori seems impressed with you, wanker, why don’t you see if you can get whatever weird satisfaction you seek out of her a-ss?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 03:56 PM | Link to this

Ahhh, a battle of wits against the Deranged Moron.

‘So your Punk a-ss thinks it’s O.K. to kill Jews as long as there’s a democrat in the White House.’

How in the wide world of sports did you come up with that???

Your Peashooter against my Howitzer. Give up before you soil yourself (again…)

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this

Andy, sweetcheeks, do you sing those church hymns on Sunday morning with that same mouth?

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

@@, do you have a crush on Soros, or something? You can’t stop talking about the guy. What, is he cute, is he good in bed, does he have a bad-boy exterior but looks like he secretly has a soft inner being?

RW, again, first remove head from ar$e, then talk to me. I don’t have time to go exploring redneck North Carolina this weekend. I have more pressing things to do than that. And yes, I talk to lots of “real people”. You know, there are real people outside your trailer park, believe it or not.

Danish, what, only time for one single b!tch comment before someone’s taking you for a walk to your favorite hydrant?

By Midori

August 11, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this

he really IS a uniter!!

By Midori

August 11, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this

you guys realize, of course, that when Andy completely blows it ain’t going to be a pretty sight?

CLEAN UP ON AISLE 4 :)

By Who Will Help You?

August 11, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 03:56 PM Ahhh, a battle of wits against the Deranged Moron.‘So your Punk a-ss thinks it’s O.K. to kill Jews as long as there’s a democrat in the White House.’ How in the wide world of sports did you come up with that???

Ummm….

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 01:54 PM Now, {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{the wingnuts can’t possibly judge the Clinton administrations actions in the 90’s}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} by the post 9/11 standards.

Your the wanker that said it.

If you think the Middle East was a calm soothing oasis during the 1990’s then you’re right, we have nothing else to talk about, cause will need to get you to the freaking psychiatrist.

And since I don’t remember you wanker liberals whining about it then, during Clinton’s watch, it must have been O.K.

Either that or you are taking political advantage of Bush being in office.

Which is it?

{{{{Your Peashooter against my Howitzer. Give up before you soil yourself (again…)}}}}

Why can’t you liberals leave your little pee pees out of the discussion?

By Nucular

August 11, 2006 04:17 PM | Link to this

Don’t be fooled. Them British don’t no nuthin bout no tearists. Listen up to a real fool. They jus try to copy me. The Deemocracee an Furedom an God-fearing Christeeanity I brought to them Eyerockies. An the herojism of my miltary career. An the bravery of the Bushes in thee Schiavo case. An stemcell killing of thee humanbeingsanallthatsillystuff. An look at wat our Jew buddies are doing agin in the Middul Eest. I luv ta watch other people kill. Reminds mee of my natl guard gutsy days hiding in Bama. An mee an mah FiBI boys got all them tearists in Myamy too. God, I luv it all! Thee action. Thee smell. Brang it on! Bless Jeesus. God bless Mercah! An all thee brave Repugs who make it such a mitie miltary power twoday. See our clerk typists in Eyerocky. See our rapists an body burners. I dew luv hit so! Keep brangin it on!

By Andy

August 11, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this

Good one, Midori!

By Let's Bet

August 11, 2006 04:23 PM | Link to this

If anyone blows up first, it will be that Gay Bait Huge.

He’s already threatened fellow bloggers with violence, what a loser.

Hope he doesn’t have access to sharp objects.

Giving 10 to 1.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this

I meant to post this earlier from the Leaky New York Times”:

{{“But there were acts of kindness, too. At Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, a woman arrived for a Delta flight carrying a tube of lipstick. It was her favorite shade, she told an airline employee, and she could not bear to throw it away.}}

“She would not get on the plane,” said Lucia Grooms, a Delta employee. So Ms. Grooms took the treasured lipstick and agreed to mail it. She stood in line at the airport post office with a silver tube of gloss, an address scrawled on a napkin and a few wadded dollar bills that she said the passenger had pressed into her hands.

How many mangoes that this egocentric woman who wouldn’t board the plane without her lipstick wouldn’t get out of New Orleans before Katrina, blames Bush for everything, and wants to impeach him for the Patriot Act and NSA wiretaps? How many people missed their flight while she held everyone up for a freaking lip gloss?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this

Deranged Moron: You have got to get yourself an education if you want to participate here.

The comment about The Clinton Administration’s actions in the 90’s being judged by Post 9/11 standards was a juxtaposition of your desperate attempt to defend Charles Krauthammer’s 2003 predictions about the Middle East by saying it was unfair to judge him by today’s standards.

Goodness, boy, if you can’t keep up, stay back a grade…

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 04:26 PM | Link to this

li’l andy, to give odds, you’d have to have some money. I don’t think people take bets in food stamps, dawg.

By Clark

August 11, 2006 04:27 PM | Link to this

Hey. I see old Hog Man Danish is still on vacation in a different dumpster in a different neighborhood, while molesting what he calls his “kid.” Bet that’s “kid)s).” Now there’s a real American with a real life. Some guys get all the luck. Most of us are naive. We thought Hog Man limited his family molesting to Christmas Eve. Goes to prove the family that plays together stays together.

By N-GA

August 11, 2006 04:34 PM | Link to this

Just another poll telling us what we already know

By Predictions are wrong?

August 11, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

It was clearly posted at 1:54 that there is not a single prediction in Krauthammer’s 2003 article. If people can’t tell the difference between a statement that says what is going on right then and a prediction then they are just hopelessly ignorant.

By Who Will Help You?

August 11, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 04:25 PM Deranged Moron: You have got to get yourself an education if you want to participate here. The comment about The Clinton Administration’s actions in the 90’s being judged by Post 9/11 standards was a juxtaposition of your desperate attempt to defend Charles Krauthammer’s 2003 predictions about the Middle East by saying it was unfair to judge him by today’s standards. Goodness, boy, if you can’t keep up, stay back a grade…

To which I juxtaposed that if your lame a-ss can judge Krauthammer on the Middle East then Clinton must wrong to.

Idiot.

As soon as you admit that Clinton was wrong, despite what his lackey said the other day, then I lost the debate, for Krauthammer would also be wrong.

Sorry I got over your head there.

I thought maybe you could hang with me.

By Puhleeze

August 11, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

By rushncap August 11, 2006 04:26 PM li’l andy, to give odds, you’d have to have some money. I don’t think people take bets in food stamps, dawg.

What, pray tell, can you, liberal arts professor, tell the rest of the world about an honest days work?

The mere thought brings great gales of laughter from deep within me.

Keep up your little fantasy world rushncrap, if you ever get a taste of reality, it’s gonna hurt.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

I posted twice today before you chirped in. Since you are interested in personal details, would you like my agenda?

Dropped my kid off for golf this morning (score 35 for 9 holes) while I went on to play some tennis. Lunch at the Yacht Club, miscellaneous errands, finished my book, going to a friend’s art gallery opening shortly…

Gosh, my life sounds like Ted Kennedy’s!

Sucks to be you, doesn’t it schoolboy?

Clark,

Do you want the truth or do you just want to wank? See^^to Rushncap for the truth.

BTW, Eli Pariser lives in Vacationland too. These Libs may be Socialists, but they like to live the good life while they formulate their plans to rob you blind and build windmills for other people’s neighborhoods.

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

I’ll take the Clinton Administrations’ record against the Bush Administrations’ record ANY DAY.

By almost any objective criteria, the Bush Administration is a failure. By almost any objective criteria, the Clinton Admnistration was a success.

History will not be kind to the Bush Administration (and it’s painfully ignorant enablers)

Read it…Know it…Love it…

By @@

August 11, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

Do you have a crush on RW & Andy? You just can’t seem to stop talking about those guys.

Me and George Soros???? You’ve gotta be kidding. “Your” King George is old enough to have wooden teeth. Pleeaaaghhh!!!!

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

No Danish, does not suck to be me. Why do you think I envy the empty life of a useless piece of $hite like yourself? You know how depressing a life whose meaning revolves around the golf score of some snot-noser is? I have been brought up to enjoy being a productive, useful person. I enjoy the fact that I’m trying to make this a better world. You obviously enjoy being a b!tch with a sequoia up your as-s. To each his own.

By Who Will Help You?

August 11, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 04:51 PM I’ll take the Clinton Administrations’ record against the Bush Administrations’ record ANY DAY.

I have no doubt about that, junior.

Clinton’s policies directly brought us 9/11 and I know you pinkos are into that dead American thing.

You positively hate us killing the bad guys, it’s the source of your hysteria, loser.

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 05:11 PM | Link to this

@@, I never talk about, or to, li’l andy. Today’s message to him was the first one in days. As for RW, he’s gay? Did not realize that, but sorry, baby, I’m straight.

And it’s OK if you’re in denial. Do you have posters of Soros up on your wall?

By Lord Help Us

August 11, 2006 05:11 PM | Link to this

Deranged Moron:

Try not to forget Reagan/Bush’s selling of high tech weaponry to Iran and the high tech weaponry, training and assistance they gave to Saddam during the 80’s and early 90’s when you come to your conclusions about the ‘policies that brought us 9/11.’

Oh, and don’t forget, the Bush Administration did not even have terrorism on its ‘top ten list’ prior to 9/11. It wasn’t even on the agenda.

Ignorance is ugly and you are the king of ignorance…

By @@

August 11, 2006 05:25 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

Well {{{you}}} are the one always seeking out RW & Andy (in archives), not vice-versa. Are you sure you’re straight? Maybe you’re in denial.

Go ahead….let the “truthout”. You are a “gay socialist” and proud of it.

By rushncap

August 11, 2006 05:33 PM | Link to this

Yes, @@, I’m a gay socialist… and you’re a necrophiliac Nazi. Nice to meet you.

By Who Will Help You?

August 11, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

By Lord Help You August 11, 2006 05:11 PM Deranged Moron: Try not to forget Reagan/Bush’s selling of high tech weaponry to Iran and the high tech weaponry, training and assistance they gave to Saddam during the 80’s and early 90’s when you come to your conclusions about the ‘policies that brought us 9/11.’

You’re not so bad after all, wanker.

I believe Saddam had alot to do with 9/11 to. Thanks for the back up.

By the way, you are still definitely not a foreign policy scholar but with some work maybe you’ll be able to understand some day and, then again, probably not, but anyway:

Ronald “God Bless His Soul” Reagan gave Iraq, not Iran junior, so that they could be more efficient in their endeavor to kill Iranians, which was a goal of his Administration. This was wisdom that only a Conservative could come up with, the libs would have surrender to which ever country accepted first.

Which your pacifist panty waist a-ss would have barked like a circus seal over.

By WTF?

August 11, 2006 05:48 PM | Link to this

So Lord Help Us says that Saddam brought us 9/11. Where are all the outraged moonbats reading him the liberal creed about Iraq being the Garden of Eden under Saddam and the only place on earth that had no terrorists?

By Will Jones

August 11, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

Will:

This guy is a freaky bazillionaire, what’s he doing in your >>>Democrat Party?

Ain’t “my” party: as should all good Americans be, I’m independent.

I vote “lesser evil” ‘cause both parties are owned by the same Rockefeller/Roman Catholic fascist plutocracy.

Death for Treason!

Bush did 9-11.

By @@

August 11, 2006 05:56 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

There now, I’ll have to guess you feel better. How can I possibly be a Nazi when I’m so opposed to “your” King George.

I’ve never been to a funeral viewing, close my eyes when I drive by auto accidents. My daughter wanted me to attend some exhibit of dead cadavers with her this weekend. Her professor recommended it.

No thanks. Not into anything dead.

Hey, you’re a college TA. Are you recommending I go? Do you find them interesting?

No matter…..can’t do it, just can’t.

Come to think of it, Soros looks like a cadaver…and…he’s a Nazi. Pleeaaaggghhhh!

By getalife

August 11, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

I told you to check the financial numbers. They are using two sets of books.

One for the wingnut moonbats, Clinton’s was wrong too.

By Clive

August 11, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

Good stuff, Nuke, good stuff - and way over their dirty little heads. I recently returned from a 3 month biz trip thru Europe, something I do every 2 years and have done for decades now. Have many close friends and relationships there. Always we were embarrassed by the image of the typical slovenly, ulcultured, loud, obnoxious Ugly American. But people in those countries managed to identify and compartmentalize such geeks. Those days are now gone forever. We (Americans) are generally despised everywhere and properly so. Courtesy strictly of the words, actions, deeds of the Bush Scum. More than a century of positivity and goodwill just wiped off the face of the earth by those bastards. Intellectual, moral, ethical criminals. And such will never change. The world moves too fast and people are too unforgiving of such high crimes. Locals prefer NOT to dine next to Americans these days, or even shop with them. It’s a great time for you subhuman righties to try to collect coin enough to travel. Observw what you scum have wrought.

By What An Idiot

August 11, 2006 07:21 PM | Link to this

By Clive August 11, 2006 07:01 PM I recently returned from a 3 month biz trip thru Europe. Always we were embarrassed by the image of the typical slovenly, ulcultured, loud, obnoxious Ugly American. Locals prefer NOT to dine next to Americans these days, or even shop with them.

You reckon it might just be YOU?

Blooming idiot.

What a stupid, obnoxious, total loser.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 07:38 PM | Link to this

Rushncap honey,

Tsk Tsk. You sound a little angry, but then again, when do you not? You just ooze unhappiness and rage, rushncap.

I don’t know exactly what you think you’re doing to “make a better world”, but you’re clearly failing miserably. It helps to get your own house in order first.

I find it very telling that you get “depressed” by the joy I take in spending the summer with a lovely, and not in the least bit ‘snot nosed’ child. Didn’t your parents take pride in your accomplishments, rushncap? Isn’t that human nature, or do you have some revolutionary view of the value and purpose of children?

Maybe a good shrink could figure you and your pitiful condition out, which is sort of Schadenfreude in reverse.

Jive Clive,

Oh yes, I’m sure the Europeans just love a genteel sophisticate like you. You must be hanging with the ones who like to throw rocks through the windows of Starbucks. What a Renaissance man you aren’t.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 08:05 PM | Link to this

WAI,

Wasn’t that a Classic Clive Comedy moment!

He must like Europe in part because they love bathtubs and anything communal. Party time in the youth hostel! Woohoo!

By RW-(the original)

August 11, 2006 08:59 PM | Link to this

I didn’t think it was possible, but apparently the libs around here get even stranger when I’m gone. Well except the bathtub crew, they never change.

Hhge comes up with what he calls example #3 of a 5 part challenge. A few simple problems would be that I know it was a matter of weeks ago when I asked for these examples. At the time he said they could all be gathered each and every day. I don’t recall ever seeing example 1 or 2 and 3 was from two days ago. Assuming there are no context problems, a huge assumption with the lefty liars around here, that would mean Hugo was giving us a prediction phrased as the past.

That wouldn’t seem that strange until reading today that the left, led by RE and LHU has no clue what a prediction even is.

All are of course cheered on by the silly parrot. Midori want a cracker?

rushncap has some odd idea that if a gay person is attracted to someone that makes the object of their affection gay. I’m not really surprised because the left applies this odd theory to anything. We don’t call rushncap a socialist just because he hangs around a bunch of socialist professors. No, we call him a socialist because he is.

Danish in Vacationland,

I see that you were given the same description I was by the little commie rushncap. If I might offer my psychoanalysis, rushncap often makes the most childish of insults (c-a-? etc.), but the fascination with Redwood trees and backsides is telling. Poor little commie rushncap views us as scary giants, so if he wasn’t so obnoxious we should take it easy on him. He’s just a scared little boy that is petrified of people with big minds, ideas, and ambitions.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 11, 2006 10:55 PM | Link to this

WAI,

I just realized the Jive Clive said he was on a 3 month “biz” trip.

Ha Ha Ha. Doing what? Selling coals to Newcastle?

I’d wager a gazillon mangoes that he was on sophmore summer vacation from UGA or some similar location. Or maybe just watching the Travel Channel and BBC World News.

What a wanker.

By What An Idiot

August 12, 2006 06:13 AM | Link to this

Danish: Either that or he was laid up in Amsterdam get wasted and “window shopping” for some European “friends.”

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 12, 2006 07:11 AM | Link to this

Does this not say it all about liberals in Atlanta?:

WWII gains lost? I just watched the movie “Saving Private Ryan” for the first time in years. What a shame so many young men died so bravely during World War II so that 60 years later middle-class Americans can fund lavish lifestyles for the members of Congress and corporate CEOs.-LetterToTheEditorAJC

Could there be any better definition of the thoughts of a pinko?

And the Atlanta Urinal published it.

Cut

Why are they arresting Muslims instead of “people?”

LONDON — Arrests of young Muslims in a terrorist plot to blow up U.S.-bound passenger jets soared yesterday, with Pakistan and Italy rounding up dozens of suspects. Britain froze bank accounts of 19 of 24 persons arrested a day earlier.-{{{{{{{{{WashingtonTimes}}}}}}}}}

Because the newspaper that published the story isn’t a Politically Correct suicide rag like the Al Jazeera Constitution is.

Cut

As Blair struggles to do the right thing by deporting at least some islamofascists and silencing a few preachers of hate, why aren’t we Americans shutting their Waahabi-funded schools and mosques and deporting those who preach hate, sedition, Sharia law for all and the overthrow of the government? We had better overthrow them before they overthrow us. Who can doubt their ultimate objective?-TownHall

By This Gosh, I Hope Doesn't Ruffle Midori's Feathers, Er, Scales

August 12, 2006 07:12 AM | Link to this

What a real man knew:

In each of the world wars, the enemy and the tactics used to defeat them have differed. What doesn’t change is the need to stand up to those who perpetuate evil on the world. Ronald Reagan said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”-WashingtonTimes

Cut

What a real President knows:

Facism very accurately describes the philosophy of al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and many other stripes of Islamism around the world. All the elements are present. The ideology is chauvinistic, regarding non-Muslims as a lesser breed of expendable or contemptible dhimmis and infidels. It favors autocracy and severe social and economic restrictions, as did the Taliban. It demands the total subordination of the individual to the group — sometimes manifesting in murderously suicidal deaths like the fiery destruction Britain’s would-be bombers sought. This is not mainstream Islam, of course. It is a corruption of the faith.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

You voted for the moonbats, right?

WASHINGTON — Old-line Connecticut Democrats who backed insurgent candidate Ned Lamont against Sen. Joseph Lieberman were appalled to see their candidate flanked at his Tuesday night primary election celebration in Meriden, Conn., by two contentious African-American political activists from out of state. On either side of Lamont during his victory speech were the Rev. Al Sharpton of New York and the Rev. Jesse Jackson of Chicago. Each nodded affirmatively as Lamont spoke, giving the impression that they were his close advisers.-TownHall

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 12, 2006 05:32 PM | Link to this

“The terrorists attempt to bring down airplanes full of innocent men, women and children,” Bush said. “They kill civilians and American servicemen in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they deliberately hide behind civilians in Lebanon. “These killers need to know that America, Great Britain and our allies are determined to defend ourselves and advance the cause of liberty,” Bush said. “With patience, courage and {{{untiring resolve}}}, we will defend our freedom, and we will win the war on terror.”-NewsMax

Cut

Ned Lamont’s victory over Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut primary was a triumph for the European wing of the Democratic party. So it’s fitting that Lamont is pro-carrot. It was impossible to go to Europe during Bush’s first term without getting a lecture about the utility of carrots, the futility of sticks, and the Bush administration’s regrettable neglect of the former and unfortunate proclivity for the latter. So Lamont is an appropriate spokesman for what one might call the Bugs Bunny caucus that now dominates the Democratic party.-WeeklyStandard

Cut

Pat Buchanan, just like a pinko:

Was the Atlantic bomb plot merely inspired by 9-11, or actually supported or directed by al-Qaida? Was any nation-state involved? What caused second-generation Pakistani Brits to consider a diabolical mass murder? What was their motivation besides a massacre? What did they hope to achieve beyond the killing?-TownHall

Me oh my oh why oh WHY?

What a joke.

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 12, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

Still, as the limit of permissible casualties continues to shrink, Western officials will be left with two options: First, they can choose not to respond to terrorist attacks. This would be both unlikely and unwise. Second, they can reconsider the efficacy of assassination. As military historian Michael Oren noted in a Washington Post commentary on July 14, terrorist “leaders remain extremely reluctant to pay for terror with their own lives.” The same could be said of their sponsors.-AEI

Either that or kick their door down and shoot them like dogs.

Both ideas work for me.

Cut

History echoes again as the afternoon fades. The IDF captures more Iranian equipment every day - including a sophisticated missile-control system pre-programmed to fire on cities throughout Israel. And the Israelis know that Iranian officers are present on the battlefield - they’re anxious to kill or capture them.-NYPost

Question is, are they even fighting Hezbollah anymore or just Iranians?

And am I the only person in the whole entire world that sees something seriously wrong with this idea?

Iran isn’t on the Israeli border, Jews do not “occupy” any part of Iran at all.

Think about it.

Cut

Retail sales came in at 1.4 percent for July, way above Wall Street expectations, while core sales excluding autos, gas and building materials — a number that feeds directly into GDP — increased 0.6 percent. Over the past three months, core sales rose 6.7 percent at annual rate, and in the past year they’re up 7.4 percent. Excluding autos alone, sales have gained 9.2 percent in the last 12 months. That’s big-time._RealClearPolitics

And all this coming amidst the drag of high energy prices.

By RW-(the original)

August 12, 2006 07:25 PM | Link to this

News from Dearbornistan, I wonder if Huge Mullah was there

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 13, 2006 07:04 AM | Link to this

Ah, Queen Pinko, the Al Jazeera Constitution’s resident “Foreign Policy Expert:”

The plotters, arrested by British authorities, have no apparent connection to Iraq or Saddam Hussein, by the way.

Gosh, I wonder if that’s because Bush put Saddam into jail and made Iraq a free democracy?

Anyway, at least there’s some hope inside the pages of the Urinal, albeit in the “Vent:”

An American Embassy takeover and hostages held for 444 days. You call that better results?

Cut

The Atlanta Urinal has taken it’s eye off the “War on People” and started an unnecessary conflict over their Daddy Algore’s loss in the “War on Texans:”

Texas men arraigned in Michigan terror case

Of course with names like- “Othman and Maruan Awad Muhareb, both of Mesquite, Texas, and Adham Abdelhamid Othman, of Dallas” there are no other discerning features of these men that we need to be concerned with, just that EVIL TEXAS LINEAGE.

Cut

The Atlanta Constipation has some key advice for one of the democratic party’s constituency:

FBI experts trawl Web for pedophiles

So BE CAREFUL when you’re out there shopping for little boys, never trust who’s on the telephone.

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 13, 2006 03:13 PM | Link to this

University students at centre of terror plot- The recruitment of Muslim students at British universities to take part in terrorist attacks is at the heart of the alleged plot to blow up passenger jets, it is feared.-Telegraph

It looks like the Islamic loonies figured out where they could find the most easily led suckers to go along with their suicide plot, a veritable showroom full of saps like rushncrap.

Cut

These extremists are drawn both from our educated classes and the Muslim underclass. {{{{The first alienated group seems susceptible to radical recruiters on university campuses}}}}, the latter to firebrands they meet in mosques or in prison. There they are fed the lines that the West is evil and corrupt. They are urged to look at a culture of binge drinking, reckless hedonism, moral laxity and materialism. They see little of the advantages to our society of freedom of choice, of religion, of individualism and of equality. Nor is it good enough to claim that extremism is fostered by poverty. Although Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are struggling to do as well as some other second or third-generation immigrant groups, many of the recruits are from relatively privileged backgrounds.-SundayTimes

Cut

Omar Sheikh was a promising LSE {{{student}}} from a comfortably middle-class Anglo-Pakistani family. {{{{On a humanitarian mission to Bosnia in 1992,}}}} he was recruited into a life of terror. In July 2002, he was sentenced to death in Pakistan for his role in the beheading of an American journalist, Daniel Pearl.

It’s an honour for a family to have a son who abandons his {{{useless studies}}} to consecrate himself to the life of jihad.”

Detecting a pattern?

What are we teaching our children?

Or better yet, who are we trusting to look after our children?

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 13, 2006 03:14 PM | Link to this

In the mid-20th century the core constituencies of both the Democratic and the Republican Parties stood foursquare for America’s prosecution of World War II and the Cold War. Today, as the Connecticut results suggest, it’s different. The core constituency of the Republican Party stands foursquare for America’s prosecution of the global struggle against Islamofascist terrorism—and solidly on the side of Israel in its struggle against the same forces. The core constituency of the Democratic Party wants to stand aside from the global struggle—and, as the presence of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton at Mr. Lamont’s side on election night suggests, is not necessarily on the side of Israel. It’s not your father’s Democratic Party.-OpinionJournal

Cut

Some folks have responded to the news of the British arrests by saying that of course they are against the terrorists. But they follow that compulsory disclaimer with a long anti-Bush rant — which is a handy way of removing the heat from where it belongs. I hate to repeat this, but: The Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks happened before Iraq. The embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania happened before Iraq.

Clearly, while multiculturalism has many benefits, the United Kingdom’s impassioned culture of inclusion has failed to staunch Islamic fanaticism — and the Left should take note. It also doesn’t help, as Ayers noted, that the British political asylum system welcomes immigrants, and then hooks them up with a welfare system that bankrolls men “who sit around all day at the mosque cursing the foreign policy of the nation they live in.”-RealClearPolitics

Cut

We have not yet begun to fight. And many among us still dream of avoiding this war altogether. It can’t be done. Because our enemies - Hezbollah, al Qaeda, Islamist militias, regimes in Iran, Syria and elsewhere - are determined to confront us. We’re going to learn the hard way. But we’re