Mike Luckovich

By @@

August 9, 2006 08:09 AM | Link to this

Put a couple of jihadists peeking in from behind the sofa; a Lamont button on the politician sitting left; a toddler on the right, and you’ve got a cartoon that depicts reality. The self-serving interests of the “extreme left-wing” of the Democrat party.

Title for the cartoon “Sunshine Lollipops & Rainbows”.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

August 9, 2006 08:10 AM | Link to this

Washington, D.C. - A new shocking tell-all book by George W. Bush’s childhood nanny claims that the president wet his bed throughout his entire adolescence and beyond. No, it doesn’t have anything to do with today’s cartoon, which is right on and very funny. It was just a weak childish “I hate ‘merica liberal moment for which I do not apologize. Think of it as a gift to all who call themselves conservative in this neighborhood. It made me laugh like a rushbaugh on Oxycontin.

By candide

August 9, 2006 08:16 AM | Link to this

Isn’t it interesting that the Right has tried to make Ned Lamont out as a dangerous left-winger and radical? Hell, he has made millions the capitalist way and shows no signs of being a leftist. He is just disgusted with Bush’s catastrophic failures, as any decent person would be. The Right is the Crazy Part of our nation, authoritarian, up-tight, falsely patriotic, self-righteous, redneck pious, and stupid. Just the kind of people who need to be institutionalized.

By Lord Help Us

August 9, 2006 08:19 AM | Link to this

I bet another ‘bed-wetter’ shows up soon on this page…

By getalife

August 9, 2006 08:34 AM | Link to this

McKinney and Lieberman are history.

Thank you Ga. and Ct.

Now for the GOP and the rest of the career politicians.

For our country, republicans should stay at home in November. We need a Dem majority for accountability for the failed W administration. After, they are held accountable and they undo all the failed policies and start enforcing the laws, we can finally move forward and in the right direction.

Things are looking better.

By Reality Sandwich

August 9, 2006 08:52 AM | Link to this

.

Cartoon Idea: Show Al Queda Training Camp cadets cheating on a test by looking at secreted firecrackers in order to find the answer to the one question on the test: “What do you do when you see an infidel?”

By rushncap

August 9, 2006 09:10 AM | Link to this

God I hate being up this early. Oh well. At least McKinney and Lieberman are gone. That makes things a touch better.

By Dusty

August 9, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

No wonder the Democrats are losing out left and right.

Liberal Texas Democrat and Lord Help Us are only concerned with who wet their bed as a child, a problem they probably had.

Candide gives us the latest word from the “Institution”, place of residence.

Getalife is celebrating the fact that two Democratic primaries are over and the Dems lost one “nut” and picked up an anti-war (but I support the troops!!) candidate.

Poor babies. They gotta have SOMETHING to celebrate.

By Reality Sandwich

August 9, 2006 09:32 AM | Link to this

Caroon Idea: Show W, as only mike can portray him, as a fly who landed on the big pile of you-know-what that is Iraq, and show Uncle Sam with a fly swatter with the words, “nov. ‘08” on it.

Caption: Our President is fly, dawg.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 09:38 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Running against another Democrat seems to be the only way a Democrat can win an election. It’s kind of like a Spring training game.

By Gosh, I Hope This Doesn't Upset Midori

August 9, 2006 09:42 AM | Link to this

Reuters is not entirely innocent. If an amateur in photography like Mr. Johnson can discern fakery, why couldn’t Reuters’ professional editors? The answer lies in media bias. Reuters, for example, won’t call terrorists “terrorists.” Media bias is not a conspiracy, but something worse, a consensus. This consensus prevents reporters and editors from acting as professionals. We’ve seen this with Dan Rather and the “60 Minutes” forged documents purporting to show George W. Bush as an Air National Guard slacker. Reuters editors saw in the doctored photographs what they believed to be true, and didn’t bother to analyze or question.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

But hearing a Connecticut Democrat on the local radio across the Long Island Sound sneering that Joe Lieberman is the Senator “from Israel”…In truth? I almost ran off the road. I feel sorry for Democrats. Sort of. The party of FDR, Harry Truman, and JFK has come to this? More to the point, a member of the party that had Harry Truman recognize Israel literally within minutes of its announcing its existence is now of a mind to defeat a senior Senator…because he’s Jewish?-AmericanSpectator

Cut

One commenter on the influential blog DailyKos.com wrote, “as everybody knows, jews ONLY care about the welfare of other jews; thanks ever so much for reminding everyone of this most salient fact, so that we might better ignore all that jewish propaganda [by Lieberman] about participating in the civil rights movement of the 60s and so on.”-NYSun

By Gosh, I Hope This Doesn't Upset Midori

August 9, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this

A July 18 event in suburban Detroit eerily resembled a Nazi rally circa 1938. One noted speaker, Osama Siblani of the Congress of Arab-American Organizations, whooped, “We know that the president is being bought by the Zionist lobby! We know that the Congress is being bought by the Zionist lobby!” When a Muslim speaker unveiled a portrait of Hezbollah’s Terrorist-in-chief Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, the crowd erupted into extravagent hoots and hollars.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

Although evolutionary biologists think they have deep-sixed creationism, for me, despite my lack of interest in God, their books are the closest thing I know to church. DNA switches are neat. But they do not tell the whole story, and based on what I have learned from evolutionary biologists at this point, I know of no more tantalizing evidence for a Grand Creator than an infinitesimal blob of goo becoming a little girl.-NYSun Mr. McWhorter is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

Cut

The good news is that Sunni insurgency is exhausted and there is plenty of internal chatter questioning just how long they can keep up the pace of the violence. Their equal numbers in mayhem, the Mahdi Army militias, have descended into a chaotic grab for money, rather than a concerted effort to wage a civil war. The latter are not Hezbollah, and they can be confronted and scattered relatively easily. Secure Baghdad, and those who stand against the state will be demoralized and broken, and the middle-class will be tempted to risk retaking their country back from the hooligans.-NYSun

By Midori

August 9, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

RW,

Do you realize the abject stupidity of your 9:38?

OK, in a primary, WHO ELSE is a Dem to run against?

I think @@ and Dusty are rubbing off on you — that “joke” is completely stupid.

Sorry; it had to be said.

By Midori

August 9, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this

I hope this doesn’t upset Andy, but what is there to upset?

You’re a buffoon. A mockery. A completely clueless, childish and irrelevant entity.

Have fun spamming, moron.

I have work to do.

Have a good day.

Perhaps I’ll check in later to marvel more at your cut and paste skills.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 10:01 AM | Link to this

Midori,

It’s an illustration of the illusion the Democrat party has become. Of course they only run against each other in a primary and it bolsters the illusion they can win. I just think it’s funny, sorry to upset you so.

By Jeep

August 9, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

Lieberman’s behavior in 2000 and now (making sure he is on the ballot regardless of the voting outcome)is witness to how addictive power can be. He is determined to be a powerbroker in Washington regardless of election results. Joe, step down and go to a 12 step program. Your addiction has a desperate quality.

By RealDem

August 9, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

By RW-(the original) August 9, 2006 09:38 AM | Link to this Dusty, Running against another Democrat seems to be the only way a Democrat can win an election. It’s kind of like a Spring training game.

I have saved this amazing quote to my hard drive, to be re-played and enjoyed later. THANKS, DUDE!

By Jeep

August 9, 2006 10:17 AM | Link to this

Lieberman’s behavior in 2000 and now (making sure he is on the ballot regardless of the voting outcome)is witness to how addictive power can be. He is determined to be a powerbroker in Washington regardless of election results. Joe, step down and go to a 12 step program. Your addiction has a desperate quality.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this

Andy,

Thank you for your excellent links!

This one should also be dedicated to Huge Gas Bag, rushncap, getalife and others, not just the psychotic parrot:

“Simply being against the war in Iraq or in Lebanon is not enough. One must actively come out in support of the “resistance,” the codename for terrorists. Considering the Sunni insurgency is led by Saddam Hussein’s former fascist Baathists and Al Qaeda in Iraq, the anti-war gang doesn’t seem too picky about who it crawls into bed with: terrorists, fascists, communists, it hardly matters. All that matters is that the U.S. is defeated.”

“Anti-War Whores”??

By getalife

August 9, 2006 10:21 AM | Link to this

It is painfully obvious we need to reverse the course instead of staying the course.

The GOP are too greedy to govern this great country and there must be a Democratic majority for accountability.

Let us return to only worrying about a President getting laid instead of more destruction of the world.

Conservatives stay home in November for your country, your party has failed America.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 10:26 AM | Link to this

RealDem,

Please be sure to give it proper credit and context.

By @@

August 9, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this

I dropped in at DailyKos yesterday for a good laugh and a look at liberal minds or lack thereof. One poster amongst the mundane discussion said “I hate…hate…hate…hate Republicans”.

I thought about cutting and pasting it for all the liberals here at ml’s so they could save themselves the difficult effort of thinking too broadly.

Is Midori at 9:46 the same Midori who couldn’t comprehend yesterday why a Lamont win in Connecticut would hurt the Democrats?

I hope she doesn’t have to work too hard today.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 10:42 AM | Link to this

Woo-hoo! Love this ‘toon, Lucko!

No matter what happens now for Connecticut, this is a wake-up call to ALL incumbent Senators and Reps. in Congress… your seat is not guaranteed this year!

By Truthman

August 9, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this

Jesus never said “blessed are the warmongers.”

Jesus never said “blessed are the rich and powerful.”

Jesus never said “blessed are the bigoted, hateful people who believe themselves more worthy than the other peoples of the world.”

Moral: If you aren’t living the Beatitudes, you are NOT a Christian.

By Dusty

August 9, 2006 10:45 AM | Link to this

RW,

Midori and RealDem are really DIM. Poor old Midori thinks we don’t know what a “primary” is. Misses the point. Screams and hollers.

And after the primary in Connecticut, Getalife thinks the whole country is one big Democratic success.

They do get joy in small places.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 10:47 AM | Link to this

Jeep,

Speaking of 12 step programs, perhaps you can get Ted Kennedy to take your advice.

As for desperation, the fact that you posted the same message twice indicates a certain urgency to be heard. At least you don’t type everything in caps, so I thank you for that.

By RealDem

August 9, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

Big [Cyber] Bear Hug for Truthman! Let’s keep repeating that, Brother, and hope they listen before it’s too late.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

Isn’t this sweet? Maybe this is part of what I meant about a Lamont win being a good thing

The money quote:

{{{{To every Democratic Senator and Congressman who continues to back Bush’s War, allow me to inform you that your days in elective office are now numbered. Myself and tens of millions of citizens are going to work hard to actively remove you from any position of power.}}}}

{{{{If you don’t believe us, give Joe a call.}}}}

GIVE US BACK OUR ITALICS!!

By getalife

August 9, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

“I’m fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in.” George McGovern

Yes, indeed.

General Pace:

“The Shiite and the Sunni are going to have to learn to love their children more than they hate each other!”

Change that to : “The US and Israel and the Muslim world are going to have to learn to love their children more than they hate each other!”

Words to live by.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

I like your reminder, Truthman!

Just like the Moral Majority is neither, same thing for the Christian Coalition…

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

I guess Goldie doesn’t want to be left off the dim bulb express either talking about how prescient ml’s toon is. I guess they think CyMc lost because she was such a strong supporter of the President or the war.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

Seeing is not believing. At this rate the errata column at the Times may exceed the “news” coverage.

AP, N.Y. Times raising the dead? News agencies run photographs of ‘deceased’ who ‘appear alive’

{{Notice the “body” in the back who appears to be sitting upright in this AP photo

An Associated Press photograph of a “dead man” who is sitting upright underneath a sheet and a New York Times series that appears to have one man as both rescuer and victim are prompting more questions about U.S. media coverage of the Mideast conflict.

The AP photo shows half a dozen “bodies” in a row on the ground and covered by sheets, with what appears to be a young boy standing on some rubble in the background.

It is among the latest U.S. media photographs of the Mideast war to fall under suspicion. Another photograph of a “body” that was described by the New York Times as having been pulled from the dusty rubble of a building, although there was no dust on the body, also was being reviewed.

The AP caption described the scene as bodies of Lebanese residents in the southern village of Oana. They are, the caption says, “laid covered after they were removed from under the rubble of a demolished building … that was struck by Israeli war plane missiles.”}}

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 10:58 AM | Link to this

What’s today? To paraphrase Lennon & McCartney:

“It was 20 years ago today, Tricky Dick was sent on his way!”

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 10:59 AM | Link to this

Oops, a better paraphrase for Lennon & McCartney would be:

“It was 30 years ago today…”

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 11:00 AM | Link to this

getalife,

Why don’t you monkey around with Kennedy’s “ask not” quote and you can make it say “Send all your money to freeloaders in Louisiana” and call it words to live by.

By candide

August 9, 2006 11:00 AM | Link to this

It was Golda Meir who said the Arabs would have to learn to love their own children more than they hate Israelis.

She, by the way, was sacked because she did not prepare for an Arab attack properly. In the last years of Sharon’s power he failed to anticipate the Hizbollah growth in south Lebanon. He did nothing until it was too late. The Israelis have shown that they are not supermen, just like everyone else.

I do suspect Lieberman’s intransigeance has something to do with his Zionism but that doesn’t explain why other Jewish legislators, House and Senate, do not collaborate with the Bush fascists like Lieberman.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 11:05 AM | Link to this

Danish in Vacationland,

Here are the slides of the very clean blown up “body” in the New York Times, including the shots of him picking through the rubble before his untimely demise.

Nice touch dropping “dead” with your cap neatly tucked under your arm too!

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 11:05 AM | Link to this

Danish— if you’re not an “Anti-War Whore”, I guess you’re just a plain ole War Whore.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 11:08 AM | Link to this

More Faux Fotos

{{AP Beirut photo faces questions}}

{{Woman appears ‘mourning destruction of her home’ in two photographs allegedly taken two weeks apart in different locations; foreign media remains largely hostile to Israel… A woman has made two appearances in photographs used by the Associated Press and Reuters, allegedly wailing over the destruction of her Beirut home. US bloggers have however noticed that photographs were taken two weeks apart from each other, according to times stamps on the images, and that the photographs were taken in different locations.}}

The money quote:

{{“Either this woman is the unluckiest multiple home owner in Beirut, or something isn’t quite right,” noted the author of the Drinking From Home blog.”}}

CUT

Attention all Desperate Dems

Out of work? Looking for a change of scenery? Why not apply to be models for Hezbollah news stories^^. Maybe Niketa can put this suggestion on the AJC Jobs Blog!

CUT

AJC: Can we have our italics back?? We wouldn’t want you to be sued for the improper attribution of quotes.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

“I guess they think CyMc lost because she was such a strong supporter of the President or the war.”

You need a refresher course for reading, RW— I wrote about ALL incumbents, not just those that support W. If you knew anything about anything, you’d know that McKinney was an incumbent… but we’re always having to explain everything to you here on the blog, aren’t we?

By getalife

August 9, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

candide,

The Israelis can drop all the bombs they want but the Hezbollah are dug in with tunnels and IED’s along the main roads.

Not as easy as they thought just like Iraq.

By Oh Great, The Truth

August 9, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

By Truthman August 9, 2006 10:44 AM Jesus never said “blessed are the bigoted, hateful people who believe themselves more worthy than the other peoples of the world.”

That’s nice, I’ll consider that the next time I pray or when I’m in Church Sunday and you’re at the gay bathhouse.

You should study the part of the Bible about false prophets and the Pharisees, sweetheart.

You’d be alot more credible and save alot more souls if you weren’t giving the Islamic jihad the fat pass like you are.

By You're Welcome

August 9, 2006 11:15 AM | Link to this

Danish: Blurb #1 at 9:43 was just for you to help your “Detroitistan” tussle with Huge Wanker.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this

CyMc sings, if you stayed up for the “concession” speech the is but a tiny highlight.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

You also wrote that in the context of how it related to the brilliance of ml’s toon, so maybe you should learn something about effectively communicating your thoughts.

What’s that??? You have no independent thoughts??? Never mind then, we’ll just muddle through your endless babbling.

By truthiness

August 9, 2006 11:23 AM | Link to this

Google on “doctored campaign photos”. The results could make a person conclude that Republicans have a near-monopoly on doctoring photos for political advantage.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

“You should study the part of the Bible about false prophets and the Pharisees, sweetheart.”

So, please do tell us all what Jesus had to say about “false prophets and the Pharisees”, etc. I believe those issues were from the Old Testament, which really has little to do with what Jesus preached about. Just like he said nothing about homosexuality nor that we should believe that abortion is murder nor that we should kill off our enemies… you Old Testament, flat-Earth believers need to stop calling yourselves Christian, if you don’t believe in what Jesus had to say. Such as:

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.”

By Goldie The "apostle"

August 9, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

Goldilocks: Look, I’m not going to get into a Biblical history lesson with a heathen like you, but, despite what you say, Jesus dealt with the Pharisees quite often and warned of false prophets like “Truthman.”

Read the Book of Romans for your discussion on “homosexuality” and quite a few other eye openers, Mrs. Hsyteritic.

By getalife

August 9, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

Goldie,

The so called “Christians” using religion to kill others are the worst hypocrites on the face of the earth.

This is true in the Muslim world too. Religion of peace is what should be promoted not violence.

The solution is simple. Stop using religion to kill others.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

Andy/Whiner— HA, “the Book of Romans”! Now those were some real peace-loving folks, those Romans, huh?

Why would any follower of Jesus want to read what the Book of Romans had to say for problem-solving in the world?

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 11:48 AM | Link to this

You’re correct, Getalife — and Jesus certainly had a lot to say about hypocrites, didn’t he?

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

{{By getalife August 9, 2006 10:51 AM}}

{{“I’m fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in.” George McGovern}}

Getalife,

I’m fed up with terrorists of all ages who strap suicide vests on toddlers under the advice of their spiritual advisors whose aim is to kill every “infidel” on the planet.

If we listened to you and George Mc Govern [(D)loser] it wouldn’t just be enclaves like Dearbornistan that I’d be worried about. How do you like the sound of Atlantastan, New Yorkistan, San Franciscostan, and so forth?

Peace out.

Goldie and Getalife,

I just love (cough cough) you libs who hate Christianity yet go around quoting Jesus whenever it suits your agenda.

I myself make it a rule never to quote Jesus here, but I can logically assume that, peacemaker or not, he wouldn’t just want us to sit around and let Jews and Christians be massacred by barbarians whose ultimate goal is to destroy the whole lot of us.

And may I remind you that our own Civil War was not technically a religious battle, but it was a noble fight for freedom and certainly had a Christian undercurrent. Hence The Battle Hymn for the Republic.

Note the use of the word “Battle” in the hymn’s title, along with her references to Christ. Do you think Julia Ward Howe was a “War Whore”?

Shall I give you more examples of YOUR hypocrisy and stupidity?

Freaking idiots.

By getalife

August 9, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

Yes, these are the type of bad people you are talking to here on this blog.

They are blood thirsty and scared.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this

I forgot to make a cartoon comment. Howard Dean is whispering sweet nothings in CyMc’s ear -

“DIEBOLD! DIEBOLD!”

By Thomas

August 9, 2006 12:06 PM | Link to this

Boy —

The current administration should really adhere to this philosophy and wisdom… It is true wisdom!

========================

Nor am I less persuaded, that you will agree with me in opinion, that there is nothing, which can better deserve your patrionage, than the promotion of Science and Literature. Knowledge is in every Country the surest basis of public happiness. In one, in which the measures of Government recieve their impression so immediately from the sense of the Community as in our’s, it is proportionably essential. To the security of a free Constitution it contributes in various ways: By convincing those, who are entrusted with the public administration, that every valuable end of Government is best answered by the enlightened confidence of the people: And by teaching the people themselves to know and to value their own rights; to discern and provide against invasions of them; to distinguish between oppression and the necessary exercise of lawful authority; between burthens proceeding from a disregard to their convenience and those resulting from the inevitable exigencies of Society; to discriminate the spirit of liberty from that of licentiousness, cherishing the first, avoiding the last, and uniting a speedy, but temperate vigilence against encroachments, with an inviolable respect to the laws.

By Sigh

August 9, 2006 12:09 PM | Link to this

By getalife August 9, 2006 11:40 AM The so called “Christians” using religion to kill others are the worst hypocrites on the face of the earth.

You libs are the ones who dragged Religion into it^^^, look up.

I’m just defending my beliefs, as I am not a spineless pinko submitting myself, and loved ones, to the slaughter.

You, fool, can peacefully submit to getting your head sawed off, what ever floats your boat.

Goldilocks: If only Romans had anything to do with the Romans, haha.

Try reading it instead of just shooting your mouth off.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 12:15 PM | Link to this

“Danish: Blurb #1 at 9:43 was just for you to help your “Detroitistan” tussle with Huge Wanker.”

Awwww, isn’ that cute. One bigot standing up for another one. Although one is very, very proud of his bigotry and the other tries to pretend she’s not. Or does she? This may go down in blog history as one of the most pathetic excuses ever written:

“YOU bragged that you actually knew some Christians. I said BFD since most Americans are Christians. I said that the only way you could NOT know any Christians was if you lived in a cave, or a place like “Detroitistan” which is NOT teeming with Christians.”

Bigoted on so many levels and so pathetically dumb! Does this woman really believe that Detoit has some sort of a christian shortage? Of course, she doesn’t - she just has a deep burning hatred for muslims, even for Americans that have done absolutely nothing to deserve her scorn, and this is how she chose to show it. And that stupid little dork suck had to bring up the bigot’s embarrassment again. Tsk, tsk. Not much of a real friend…

No wonder so many Americans, who don’t care about a person’s heritage, just their character, are repulsed by these hate-mongering republicans…

If she had even the tiniest amount of class, she’d do a completely un-republican thing and admit to her despicable characterizations and then apologize to all of the fine muslim-Americans in Michigan. Yeah, like THAT would ever happen!

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this

Thomas,

Would you like to give us a hint where your quote came from?

By Truthman

August 9, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

As always, attack the messenger!

It’s so much easier to go through life with all manner of assumed boogeymen so you can prop up your “why is whitey such a victim these days,” and, “Things were so much better in the 50s” mantra (Ask blacks and women how peachy the 50s were).

Love is better than hate!!

Peace is better than war!!

Also, “Oh Great the Truth,” you’re the perfect neo-con. Attack and demonize gays so it’s easier to hate them, just as Cheney the Dark Lord and Rove the swine-humper tell The “W”armonger to do.

I’m your worst nightmare, OGTT, I’m a straight progressive who is qualified on the M-16 and can hit a target from 250+ yards.

I’m liberal and I’M ARMED!!!

By Huge

August 9, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Hey bigot! In case you missed it last night:

I found these. I’m guessing there are at least a handful more of these christian churches too! And I’ll bet they even have jews there in Detroit! But watch out for those damn sneaky liberal canadians!

http://detroit.citysearch.com/find/directory/detroit/210/383/page1.html?init_search=1

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

A liberal with an automatic weapon threatening to shoot up cyberspace. Does anyone still really wonder why we laugh at you libs?

Hey clown, see if you can hit your hard drive in the middle of your next post so we can see how big and bad you are.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 12:36 PM | Link to this

“I myself make it a rule never to quote Jesus here, but I can logically assume that, peacemaker or not, he wouldn’t just want us to sit around and let Jews and Christians be massacred by barbarians whose ultimate goal is to destroy the whole lot of us.”

Dane in Fantasyland— your words are so ignorant on so many levels. You can’t “logically assume” anything if you don’t understand what Jesus’ message to the world was to begin with.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 12:38 PM | Link to this

The so-called “Christian Coalition” is neither Christian nor a coalition.

By getalife

August 9, 2006 12:39 PM | Link to this

Speaking of laughing

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

Danish in Vacationland,

It seems like Huge Mullah is trying to say that even one living Christian or Jew is too many. Where have we heard that one before?

By Midori

August 9, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

ROFL!!!

Getalife!!

where did you get that??? :)

By The truth about E.D.?

August 9, 2006 12:45 PM | Link to this

“Great Balls of Fire” at 12:21…..

Funny stuff, a liberals violent nature.

By Goldie

August 9, 2006 12:45 PM | Link to this

If McGovern had won in ‘72, maybe we wouldn’t have Texistan today either… and the world would be so much better in many ways. Tens of thousands of Americans would not have been slaughtered in Viet Nam, for one. Instead we had Tricky Dick with his “secret plan” to win that war, which only meant that more carnage had to occur before he finally ended it.

By What A Stroke

August 9, 2006 12:45 PM | Link to this

By Huge August 9, 2006 12:15 PM “Danish: Blurb #1 at 9:43 was just for you to help your “Detroitistan” tussle with Huge Wanker.” Awwww, isn’ that cute. One bigot standing up for another one.

I get it, if the libs don’t like you pointing out people who want to kill Americans and Israelis then they label you a “bigot.” It may work up in their tiny little mind…..

This brings us to the events of this past week in central Londonistan where tens of thousands of Britains — many British Muslims — paraded through the streets, waving Hezbollah flags and chanting, “We are all Hezbollah!” And “Bush: World’s #1 Terrorist.” The powwow was organized by the Stop the War Coalition, a group formed to oppose the U.S.-led war on terror, and which seems intent on importing the tensions and conflict of the Middle East to Europe and Main Street USA — not least by inviting Jew-hating rabblerousers as guest speakers. Such rallies are taking place all over the free world. {{{{{A July 18 event in suburban Detroit eerily resembled a Nazi rally circa 1938.}}}}} One noted speaker, Osama Siblani of the Congress of Arab-American Organizations, whooped, “We know that the president is being bought by the Zionist lobby! We know that the Congress is being bought by the Zionist lobby!” When a Muslim speaker unveiled a portrait of Hezbollah’s Terrorist-in-chief Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, the crowd erupted into extravagent hoots and hollars.

It is what it is, just because you choose to stick your head up your own a-ss….

Maybe they want “peace” just like you moron pinkos do?

By candide

August 9, 2006 12:46 PM | Link to this

WWJD? Nothing, he’s dead.

By Thomas

August 9, 2006 12:47 PM | Link to this

LOL —

Yep great photo catch there getalife — (grins)

Well Hannity does like his name everyhere doesn’t he?

By I Just Have To Ask

August 9, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this

By Truthman August 9, 2006 12:21 Also, “Oh Great the Truth,” you’re the perfect neo-con. Attack and demonize gays so it’s easier to hate them, just as Cheney the Dark Lord and Rove the swine-humper tell The “W”armonger to do.

I think I got this figured out, but if being gay is alright then what is wrong with “swine humping?”

Oh my, oh my.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

Here you go Midori! Maybe you should stay there and read a bit too

I’m sure that vulgar signs are the key to your electoral future so please keep putting them out there.

By Oooops, Missed This One

August 9, 2006 12:51 PM | Link to this

By Truthman August 9, 2006 12:21 PM I’m your worst nightmare, OGTT, I’m a straight progressive who is qualified on the M-16 and can hit a target from 250+ yards.

Would Jesus “approve” of you shooting that M16, there Truthy?

And implying a threat of bodily harm upon my person?

I thought you were a peacemonger?

Only when it’s convenient?

By Huge

August 9, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

“It seems like Huge Mullah is trying to say that even one living Christian or Jew is too many. Where have we heard that one before?”

Hey! You forgot canadians!

Just keep painting. You and your hero-bigot suck will find a corner just behind you!

By Gosh, We Would Just Love To Hear

August 9, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

By Goldie August 9, 2006 12:36 PM Dane in Fantasyland— your words are so ignorant on so many levels. You can’t “logically assume” anything if you don’t understand what Jesus’ message to the world was to begin with.

So what, pray tell, would the “message” be?

By rushncap

August 9, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

TopFive isn’t usually this funny. But the #2 reason had me cracking up. We now have the hands-down winner for “worst treat ever”.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

Look how many blue states you had back in 1972

By getalife

August 9, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this

Midori,

A blogger at Crooks and Liars.

Live TV is great. Fair and balanced.

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this

Goldie,

My words are ignorant?

I’ll ask you one more time: Was Julia Ward Howe a “War Whore”? Until you can answer that simple question there is no point in communicating any further with an idiot who manages to be both Useful and Useless.

Huge Masturbating Mullah,

Do you ever stop your endless, mindless wanking? If anyone needs to apologize, it’s Moderate Muslims who are letting their religion be hijacked by a bunch of fanatics.

Do you think that allowing, even encouraging, a population of Hezbollah supporters to emigrate and preach the destruction of America and Israel is a groovy idea? Is it bigoted of me to point out the dangers inherent in this sort of cultural invasion, or are you an Open Borders advocate?

Since it’s in the news now, try reading about Lebanon’s history. Hint: It used to be a Christian nation. I’ll make it easy for you - start with this interview with Brigitte Gabriel.

Look at Lebanon now. Is it still the “Paris of the Middle East”? Is there a “Christian shortage” in Lebanon? How about in Bethlehem?

Try getting off your phony pulpit and learn some history. Freaking ignorant moron.

RW,

Uh, I’m thinking Hitler and Almadinijead, but are you thinking one of the other bloggers?

By Truthman

August 9, 2006 01:01 PM | Link to this

Hey, the neo-con religious wrong has been killing pro-choice doctors and talk show hosts for years!!

Just look at the neo-con posts! They always want to kill the messenger!!

You know, we progs want peace, but the neo-cons say we’re “aiding and abetting the enemy.”

So, the neo-cons want to kill all the progs so they can have their little white fantasyland full of lawn jockeys, cotton and slaves.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this

Danish in Vacationland,

It does seem to be a ubiquitous statement from tyrannical dictators and their leftist enablers. Sorry for opening up an endless list.

Huge Geographical Theologian,

Do you know the difference between religion and nationality?

By Huge

August 9, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this

“I get it, if the libs don’t like you pointing out people who want to kill Americans and Israelis then they label you a bigot.”

Boy! I never knew Detroit was such a dangerous place and “teeming” with these suicide bombers!

It must be exhausting to keep constantly misinterpreting so much of what you see and hear in the world. And it must take an enormous amount of energy to twist and spin like that!

But go ahead keep pretending that we’re not talking about your, and your new student’s, hate and bigotry, we’re ACTUALLY talking about me not wanting the people who kill americans and israelis pointed out! Yutz.

Aw, what the heck. Better to kill ‘em all, just in case, right, bigot? Maybe then, you and Ann Coulter can “repopulate” ALL of Michigan with your kind of christians… So no, fool. As always, you most definitely do not get it.

By Midori

August 9, 2006 01:12 PM | Link to this

thanks, but no thanks RW.

I wouldn’t soil my monitor by clicking on your crap.

that’s all you have to offer: crap.

perhaps you should worry about your own party’s political future, ya think?

oh yeah, that’s right. in your world, under your party’s guidance, everything is just peachy. we’ve turned the corner. the insurgency is in it’s last throes!!! Democracy is blooming like an Outback onion!!! Bush has restored honor and dignitude to the white house!!! Halliburton RULES!!!!

By Midori

August 9, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

thanks for that link.

I liked the Coulter one :)

By What A Stroke

August 9, 2006 01:18 PM | Link to this

By Huge August 9, 2006 01:07 PM It must be exhausting to keep constantly misinterpreting so much of what you see and hear in the world.

Pot To Kettle?

I hate to break the news pinko but Israel was attacked FIRST, you blooming idiot.

You, Wanker, are more than welcome to carry yourself to the gas chamber and climb aboard peacefully. Have fun.

LEAVE ME AND MY FAMILY OUT OF YOUR SPINELESS PEACE LOVING BULLSH-IT, if you don’t mind.

We don’t need to feel good about ourselves, we NEED TO BREATHE.

By getalife

August 9, 2006 01:18 PM | Link to this

How many more will die for nothing?

By Thomas

August 9, 2006 01:18 PM | Link to this

“I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all.” —Thomas Jefferson to Francis Hopkinson, 1789. ME 7:300

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 01:21 PM | Link to this

Huge Ostrich,

I’m off to the beach in my little town that predates the Revolutionary War. The tide is high, and I intend to enjoy it before some muslim emigre’s who hate America demand a separate beach for the chaderi-wearers.

In my absence, I trust that you will read the Brigitte Gabriel interview about Lebanon that I kindly linked for you.

When I return, I look forward to your comments. I predict that you will either be cheering the present situation in Christian-Lite Lebanon, or you will finally realize that I’ve been right all along and you’re nothing but a wanker after all.

Goldie,

I know it was a difficult challenge to answer my simple question. Since you haven’t responded, I’ll just assume that the answer is “No, Julia Ward Howe was not a War Whore”, and that you admit that your interpretation of the New Testament is your own personal interpretation and not necessarily the last Word on the subject of war, peace, and Christianity.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 01:36 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Talk about close minded. Are you scared you might learn that Rove didn’t really get indicted if you go to an objective site?

By Huge

August 9, 2006 01:40 PM | Link to this

“Do you know the difference between religion and nationality?”

I think one has something or other to do with where one’s from. The other is about the baby jesus and stuff like that, right?

But please, educate me, oh enlightened one!

“Do you think that allowing, even encouraging, a population of Hezbollah supporters to emigrate and preach the destruction of America and Israel is a groovy idea? Is it bigoted of me to point out the dangers inherent in this sort of cultural invasion, or are you an Open Borders advocate?”

Keep on spinning it. You are just painting yourself closer and closer to that corner.

Oh, and guess what, bigot? I used to be opposed to the idea of a wall or “fence” along the border (seemed a little too Berlin-like for me). But I do think it’s now time to build one. As a soverign nation, we have the right and responsibility to know who is coming into this country. However, lets face it, much of this debate from the republican side is anti-mexican, anti-canadian, anti anybody and everybody hatred cloaked in national security talk/fear mongering. The same way you blather on about the countless Hezbollah emigrants in Detroit. Practical solutions, including having human intelligence in the mosques, etc. seems like a far more efective approach than your heavy-handed gestapo-like war whore leanings.

Read my reply to your mentor at 1:07. Those last three paragraphs are for you, as well.

By dubya

August 9, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

Don’t ever forget: “Democracy n Freedom are on thee march in Eye-rock. Raping too. God bless Murcuh!”

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

Huge idiot,

Not exactly, but it’s a start. It was you that said Christians, Jews, and Canadians goofball.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this

“I hate to break the news pinko but Israel was attacked FIRST, you blooming idiot.”

WTF? When this loon is cornered, he often uses this typical republican ploy. Come up with an entirely off-subject item to deflect attention away from his bigotry and complete inability and fear to debate the subject at hand.

So in this particular instance he spins the conversation away from the topic of the danish bigot’s “analysis” that Detroit is being overrun with muslim suicide bombers to the completely out of the blue observation that Israel was attacked first.

Again, WTF? Probably comes straight out of Karl Rove’s playbook, that national best-seller “Political Lies/How to Cut and Run”.

Again, I stand by my assertion that DiV is so hatefully anti-muslim that she sees Michigan as not much more than being infested with Hezbollah murderers. And suck loves the company…

By What A Stroke

August 9, 2006 02:17 PM | Link to this

If anyone should speak of changing the subject maybe the wanker could look in the mirror and see for himself.

I pointed out that people are openly protesting Israel’s existence in Detroit and you, wanker, went to calling me and Danish a bigot.

Blow me.

WTF is the first thing you got right since you brought your putrid little a-ss out into the daylight, although not in the right application.

You, wanker, are free to fantasize about those people in Detroit only wishing to bend you over and make “love” to you.

I got a different understanding of what they want.

Deal with it.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this

RW,

Oh! I see where you’re going with this one now. And man o man, your simple mindedness can be pretty exasperating at times, but I still luv ya!

The canadian reference was due to Motown’s proximity to the border you twit! And the bigot’s hatred is not limited to just religions, as you know…

By @@

August 9, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this

Well I knew that Canada was liberal, but I didn’t know they would go this far:

So it has. On Sunday, 15,000 Quebecers, mostly Lebanese-Canadians, marched for “justice and peace” in Lebanon. That sounds benign, but in fact the march was a virulently anti-Israel rally, and scattered amongst the crowd were a number of Hezbollah flags and placards. Leading the parade were Bloc Quebecois chief Gilles Duceppe, Liberal MP Denis Coderre, PQ chief Andre Boisclair, and Amir Khadir, spokesman for the new far-left provincial party, Solidarite Quebec.

They’re posing the question to their readers “Do you think our politicians should march in support of Hezbollah?”

A quick word from the radical left-wing environmentalists in Canada and the U.S. If your angry, the solution is to blow things up.

On Sunday, the SQ seized computer files from the Journal de Montreal to trace an email the paper received, Butz said.

The email blamed oil firms for holding consumers hostage while making big profits, damaging the environment and financing wars in places like Iraq.

We can’t shoot ‘em. Can we at least put ‘em at the curb for pick up?

By Huge

August 9, 2006 02:35 PM | Link to this

“…before some muslim emigre’s who hate America demand a separate beach for the chaderi-wearers.”

So much for her pretense to be anything other than a bigot. Wave that hate flag high and proud! And if, on the off chance, you see any turbins out there, be sure to turn them in to the local authorities, OK? Nazi…

“I pointed out that people are openly protesting Israel’s existence in Detroit and you, wanker, went to calling me and Danish a bigot.”

Nice try, idiot.

Those americans don’t have any right to protest! It says so clearly in the Constitution - you may never protest aginst anything republican, christian or jewish. So go ahead, suck. Nuke ‘em. That’s what you’d really like to do, isn’t it? Damn the innocents. It’s their fault for living there. And like I said you and Ann and assdane can eventually kill off everybody not just like you. Ughhh!

And thanks but no thanks, on your offer for f******o. A bigot and a promiscuous pervert to boot. Do you have nightmares about forced anal sex with persians, lil andy? Reminds you of your days in prison, doesn’t it? Priceless!

By Midori

August 9, 2006 03:12 PM | Link to this

uh huh.

Huge, it doesn’t take long to see thru the Master Moron:

WTF? When this loon is cornered, he often uses this typical republican ploy. Come up with an entirely off-subject item to deflect attention away from his bigotry and complete inability and fear to debate the subject at hand.

next he’ll attack your use of font size and typeface.

By Blog Dawg

August 9, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this

Troll Interrupted, much?

RW, Danish, Huge, Goldie, Getalife: YOU ARE POSTING TOO MUCH. WE GET IT, YOU HAVE SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO SAY ALL DAY LONG.

Such wisdom and wit, and eloquence and insight!!

We are not worthy. WE ARE NOT WORTHY!

Now all five of you: Take your hands off the keyboard. Push away from the computer. Stand and walk toward the door. Take a walk.

Let someone else blog.

By Midori

August 9, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this

amazing how “Blog Dawg” left Andy out of his/her little “outburst”

By getalife

August 9, 2006 03:46 PM | Link to this

Blog Dawg in the house.

Who let the dawg out?

Thanks for that terrific insight.

Please tell us more of your opinion on the cartoon.

I think it is spot on as usual. Mike is very talented.

Your thoughts?

By Dusty

August 9, 2006 03:50 PM | Link to this

BlogDawg,

Got your badge and whistle ready? Got your bullet proof vest on? You need to stick a big pin in the hot air balloon Huge.

Be careful. He’s loaded and the vulgarity is poisonous. RW and Danish simply try to staunch a bit of it but there’s so much.

It’s a tough job being blog policeman ‘specially in a neighborhood like this one. If you can banish the blight here, we’ll promote you to a better blog, somewhere like Wooten’s.

By Isn't Midori cute?

August 9, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this

Pretty bird, pretty bird. Squaaaaawwwwwwkkkk. Squaaaawwwwwwkkkkk.

By What A Stroke

August 9, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this

By Huge August 9, 2006 02:35 PM Those americans don’t have any right to protest! It says so clearly in the Constitution - you may never protest aginst anything republican, christian or jewish. So go ahead, suck. Nuke ‘em. That’s what you’d really like to do, isn’t it? Damn the innocents. It’s their fault for living there. And like I said you and Ann and assdane can eventually kill off everybody not just like you. Ughhh!

When did I say all of this? Are there two Andys now? Must seem like it to you over matched liberals.

I’ll just step aside and let y’all post for me, wind me up and have me say all kinds of stuff like what Hitler thinks or maybe some Pol Pot greatest hits. Oh yeah, you already have done that, it’s exactly why I can’t post using my own name.

Never mind.

{And thanks but no thanks, on your offer for f**o. A bigot and a promiscuous pervert to boot. Do you have nightmares about forced anal sex with persians, lil andy? Reminds you of your days in prison, doesn’t it? Priceless!](R)

Look, man, I know it’s hard to keep track of these complicated deals that you spin for me, but remember, I want to KILL Muslims, you’re the one that wants them up your butt.

^^^Can’t recall what you just said?

By Midori

August 9, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this

yes Andy.

I am pretty cute, aren’t I?

Now, finish your drink

By Midori

August 9, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Andy. Stand right here. Move over just a little bit. Perfect.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

Midori, When I first found this little place a couple of months ago, I was amazed that people like suck of many names and the bigoted dane seemed to get away with their awful name-calling and juvenile diatribes with almost complete impunity. And, its true that many of us non-republicans, to our discredit, responded in kind.

But there was absolutely no doubt in my mind that like so many other cases in this country now, these extremist republicans, who cloak themselves in terms like conservatives, were the primary reason this blog is something little more than an excercise in childish temper tantrums. And much more importantly, their insane desire to turn this nation into 1930’s Germany.

I’m sure that in their ultra-angry and self-righteous minds those here are just parroting the countless examples they have to follow: Limbaugh, Hannity, Boortz, Coulter, O’Reilly, Liddy and on and on and on, ad nauseum. (there must be dozens, maybe hundreds more of these talking heads that I don’t even know, but I’m sure they do!)

I warned lil andykins that the choice was his. Either turn down the hate speech or be prepared for what was coming. And for the most part, to his credit, he did eliminate some of his most foul names and expletives. But he continued to act like a school yard bully with a major league bug up his a*s, and to this day, he defiantly and proudly continues with his aberrant and sociopathic behavior and speech.

And although he has a lot of sickening ideas, his four sycophants are to me, the most nauseating. They merrily skip along with him, NO MATTER HOW DESPICABLE HE GETS! (Remember RW’s challenge to me to provide five examples of andy’s hate speech! I still laugh over that one!)

I truly believe that other than danish, the others are not terribly fond of his garbage-filled shenanigans, but their blind republican ideology forces them all to consider him a strong and valuable ally.

I have some moderate, intelligent and reasonable gop friends that I know either personally or through business, and make no mistake about it, they are not even remotely similar to these thugs. We can have heated but rational and respectful disagreements over issues, like Iraq. Numerous times I have been the only non-republican in a roomful of people, but I’ve never felt that I would ever compromise my beliefs to accomadate the majority. Nor would I ask them to compromise theirs.

By Veterinarian

August 9, 2006 04:35 PM | Link to this

Midori, All veterinarians can spot a psychotic parrot when we see one, not just Andy. You do like it when somebody calls you cute, don’t you? Pretty is as pretty does and there ain’t nothin’ pretty about you.

Hell, you’re not even entertaining with all your stupid cartoons. But just keep believing you are dear. Your psychosis is good for the Republican party.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 04:36 PM | Link to this

So I take no pleasure in publicly embarrassing these people, but appeasement and silent approval only emboldens them in their efforts to ruin this country.

By I'm Tired Of Getting Threatened By These Punks

August 9, 2006 04:43 PM | Link to this

By Huge August 9, 2006 04:29 PM I warned lil andykins that the choice was his. Either turn down the hate speech or be prepared for what was coming.

Anytime. Anywhere.

By Let's Clarify Something

August 9, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

And for the most part, to his credit, he did eliminate some of his most foul names and expletives.

If anything, your little f*g-got a-ss has made me MORE foul mouthed.

There is NOTHING you silly, ignorant little liberals can tell me that I would EVER listen to, NOTHING.

By @@

August 9, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this

Huge:

I’ve never quite understood where you get off warning anybody how they can deliver their thoughts.

There was a time when you viewed me as a pretty nice “guy” (although I was a girl). I haven’t changed who I was then in your perceived view of me. I have, however, gotten tired of the vile and redundant hate speech from the left here. You’ve attacked me with hatred and name-calling just like the rest of the liberals here for the last couple of months. It really is childish of you to ask everybody to choose sides as if we’re playing kickball or something.

If you find reasonable conversation with your gop friends outside this blog, and prefer them to the conservatives here, why do you keep coming back?

There have been many moderate liberals here who have been able to respond to conservatives and maintain their self-respect and dignity in the process. You’re not one of them though.

By Scooter

August 9, 2006 04:53 PM | Link to this

“but appeasement and silent approval only emboldens them in their efforts to ruin this country.”

Does that apply to terrorists?

By What Is It With This Psycho Sh-it?

August 9, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this

What kind of freaking loser comes to a political blog and says sh-it like this?:

I warned lil andykins that the choice was his. Either turn down the hate speech or be prepared for what was coming.

What a total freaking loser, someone could get so far out of line, so dam-n WEIRD, sick in the head to say something like this.

Did I embarrass your punk loser a-ss that bad?

By @@

August 9, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this

Great catch Scooter!!!!!

By Huge

August 9, 2006 05:07 PM | Link to this

“If anything, your little f*g-got a-ss has made me MORE foul mouthed.”

Personal responsibility - republican style! But it is interesting to note that this anally-obsessed impotent wretch has attributed this power to me.

For my next trick I wil infect suck with Tourette’s syndrome!

“There is NOTHING … that I would EVER listen to, NOTHING”.

And then! I will cure his deafness!

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this

Is this huge idiot trying to somehow pretend to be sane, and even more laughable, moderate? Who is it that keeps issuing threats around here? Who is doing the non-stop name calling? Who is it that stereotypes everyone here?

BTW, huge you never came up with the five examples either so laugh all you want, loser.

By @@

August 9, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this

I’ve had my intelligence insulted by liberals here, my sense of humor. I’ve been told who I should hang out with, to read more intelligent literature, that I couldn’t possibly produce an intelligent child. I’ve been told to abandon my faith for the sake of intelligence.

Puh-leeze, it has become t*t for tat all because liberals won’t tolerate heated debate? But yet again…they fail to acknowledge any responsibility for their own intolerance of diverse opinions.

Freakin idiots. <————-I enjoyed that.

By Loser Liberals

August 9, 2006 05:25 PM | Link to this

Every single one of these liberals is just a stalker waiting to snap.

A psycho loser just waiting to bust out.

Pitiful.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 05:29 PM | Link to this

“Anytime. Anywhere.”

How’s that blind, impotent rage working out for you? Frustrated? Want to go kill some moooslims?

Just picture lil andy at the working end of a rifle. Ready. Fire. Aim.

@@, My only b***h with you is your unwillingness to denounce hate-speech ONLY because it comes from one of your own’s poltical party!

You and I only butt heads, when you come to sucks defense for the indefensible. Otherwise, you are quite reasonable and moderate. Though I still have not a clue why you think I included yourself with the likes of Coulter and Falwell recently.

You’ve called yourself a reformed liberal, and that explains the vast dissimilarity between you and these gop thugs. You don’t like that I stand up to his crap. And that really surprises me. Do you really approve of the non-stop fggot as, blow me, eat sh1t and die ultra-violent, racist, homophobic, bigoted diatribes from the frustrated sociopath? I just can’t believe that you do. Rationalize it away, if you must, but I will not.

By @@

August 9, 2006 05:33 PM | Link to this

Huge:

Why can’t you be honest with yourself and us? What you really want is for conservatives to STFU so that everyone would have to read the gigantic ego <——- Huge, go on and on about his vast knowledge in hopes that everyone would adopt his opinion.

It’ll never happen Huge. Get over yourself!

By Weird, Freaking Weird

August 9, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

By Huge August 9, 2006 05:29 PM “Anytime. Anywhere.” How’s that blind, impotent rage working out for you? Frustrated? Want to go kill some moooslims?

By Huge August 9, 2006 04:29 PM I warned lil andykins that the choice was his. Either turn down the hate speech or {{{{{{be prepared for what was coming.}}}}}}

Stalker.

By Obsessed With Andy

August 9, 2006 05:51 PM | Link to this

Again.

Just like every pinko interaction with society, they all end in a restraining order.

I’m that good. There is no doubt about it what so ever. My sole stated purpose, I don’t know how many times I’ve said it, is to drive you liberals crazy.

Just like this, for instance:

But he continued to act like a school yard bully with a major league bug up his a*s, and to this day, he defiantly and proudly continues with his aberrant and sociopathic behavior and speech.

It is so easy.

I can’t think of one, ONE freaking liberal that hasn’t snapped and gone psycho.

I have no idea how many gallons of foam I’ve caused these pinkos let out of their mouths.

Hundreds?

Thousands?

How many blood vessels have I popped in your foreheads, come on, be honest?

By Huge

August 9, 2006 05:54 PM | Link to this

“Who is it that keeps issuing threats around here?” Suck. “Who is doing the non-stop name calling?” BD. “Who is it that stereotypes everyone here?” You.

“BTW, huge you never came up with the five examples either so laugh all you want, loser.”

Oops! Look at that - RW just called me a name.

RW, you really are pathetically blind to what you don’t want to see. But just to humor you, here are two from today, that fall into one of his favorite categories - kill the f*gs:

By What A Stroke August 9, 2006 02:17 PM Blow me. You, wanker, are free to fantasize about those people in Detroit only wishing to bend you over and make “love” to you.

By Let’s Clarify Something August 9, 2006 04:47 PM “If anything, your little f*g-got a-ss has made me MORE foul mouthed.”

So, RW, you support homophobic hatred too, eh? How much longer will you put up this charade that you don’t see much of his writing as hate-speech?! Why do you feel so compelled to stick up for such a mean-spirited thug? It just doesn’t seem like you. WHY! You know why - he’s politically like you. Nothing more, nothing less…

By @@

August 9, 2006 05:56 PM | Link to this

Huge:

You really don’t have a clue about my faith, but your arrogance makes you think you do.

Can I hold you accountable for your support of the indefensible comments made by the liberals here. Can I hold you accountable for anything other than who and what you are?

It’s free frickin’ speech. If you don’t think it’s something that should be tolerated then move to a country where it’s not.

I’m tired of you. You give yourself far too much credit for being reasonable and tolerant. You’re not reasonable at all when you won’t allow people to speak freely.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

By @@ August 9, 2006 04:50 PM “why do you keep coming back?”

By @@ August 9, 2006 05:33 PM “Why can’t you be honest with yourself and us? What you really want is for conservatives to STFU…”

Does anyone here see just a little bit of a problem with these two posts? Isn’t this the pot calling the kettle black? (Now that will really infuriate the ml haters!)

Why, @@, do you resort to intellectual dishonesty when the heat gets turned up? I love to discuss/argue politics! Why would I want you to STFU? I just won’t let your buddies act like spoiled 12 year old brats without telling them so, and you hate it. So sue me…

And for goodness sakes, woman, quit trying to convince yourself that these people are conservatives!

By @@

August 9, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this

Huge:

You never responded to this question posed by a moderate conservative. Care to tell us why?

By Scooter August 9, 2006 04:53 PM

{{{“but appeasement and silent approval only emboldens them in their efforts to ruin this country.”}}}

{{{Does that apply to terrorists?}}}

You attack fellow Americans but give terrorist and their sympathizers a pass, do you????

By Two Faced Liberal Hypocrite Loser

August 9, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this

By Huge August 9, 2006 02:35 PM Do you have nightmares about forced anal sex with persians, lil andy? Reminds you of your days in prison, doesn’t it?

So, RW, you support homophobic hatred too, eh? How much longer will you put up this charade that you don’t see much of his writing as hate-speech?! Why do you feel so compelled to stick up for such a mean-spirited thug? Blah, blah, blah.

Your little face turning red, psycho?

Little hot under the collar?

By Midori

August 9, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Stevie Wonder could see it.

Does anyone here see just a little bit of a problem with these two posts? Isn’t this the pot calling the kettle black? (Now that will really infuriate the ml haters!)<<<<<<

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

Huge fool,

There is nothing contradictory with @@’s two responses to you when you read the full comment and context. Your dishonesty doesn’t allow you to do that, but anyone else reading can see it.

Furthermore, when have you EVER discussed a topic? I’ve looked and I can’t find any evidence that you have ever done anything but pompous name calling in the most vile language possible. It’s true that you often tell us how much you know and how much you like to discuss these things, but you NEVER come through.

Now this is ml’s blog to run as he sees fit, but since you seem to want to make rules for people you should follow that rule and leave. <————-That’s also what @@ was saying. See? It’s your choice, but it is time for you to put up or shut up about what you think you know.

By @@

August 9, 2006 06:23 PM | Link to this

Huge:

Convenient omission?

{{{By @@ August 9, 2006 05:56 PM}}}

{{{Can I hold you accountable for your support of the indefensible comments made by the liberals here?}}}

Well Huge, whaddya say? Is it possibly because you have a “personal” problem that you want to spread all over this board to restrict any opportunity for discussion that you don’t view as reasonable?

It sure looks like it to me. You’re “trying” to do a heckuva job Hugo. We’re just not in favor of dictatorships, we conservatives.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

And by readers I specifically mean to exclude squawking parrots.

Midori want a cracker?

By @@

August 9, 2006 06:32 PM | Link to this

Thanks RW. I figured anybody with half a brain could spot the dishonesty.

And then there’s Midori, maybe a 8th of a brain could be attributed to her. But she’s always so eager to ride on someone’s shoulder and squawk.

Midori:

Did you ever comprehend what RW was saying about a Lamont win being bad for the Democrats? Apparently not. No surprise though.

By @@

August 9, 2006 06:38 PM | Link to this

Huge:

I’d like to use Midori as an example of how a person needs to learn coping skills.

Midori, at every opportunity, will attack me. Be it directly or indirectly.

Do I demand that she stop? Noooo.

That’s called tolerance. I don’t ask you to make her stop either. You’re Hugely ignorant of this coping skill, and Midori isn’t you.

Got it?

By rushncap

August 9, 2006 06:49 PM | Link to this

@@, you demanding that someone else stop attacks on you is like Mike Tyson climbing into the ring and demanding that the other guy stop punching him. It’s ridiculous, but failure to do so is not a virtue or a moral high ground that you want it to be. It’s merely acceptance of reality. If you dish it, demanding that others don’t respond in kind would be delusional, and disingenuous lunacy.

By @@

August 9, 2006 06:49 PM | Link to this

Midori:

Just in case you didn’t catch the compliment…I gave you one in my 6:38 post.

I won’t be looking for one in return though. I don’t suffer from that kind of insecurity.

You’re welcome.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 06:57 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

As quiet as you’ve been today you still come in making a fool out of yourself at 6:49. Un-freaking-believable.

Sucks to be you schoolboy.

By Huge

August 9, 2006 07:04 PM | Link to this

“You attack fellow Americans but give terrorist and their sympathizers a pass, do you????”

Oh yeah, that’s me @@! Just an old Vietnam-era veteran giving those terrorists a pass! I celebrate whenever an american killing scumbag is killed, you fool. My patriotism is beter than your patriotism! Na ne na ne na, Knothead.

“…when have you EVER discussed a topic?”

Me thinks, RW has recollection problems. I’ve brought up discussions on medical marijuana that lasted most of an entire day. It was ironically the one and only time that suck and I agreed on anything! Remember that Mr selective memory RW? Even today, I said I favored physical border security in the hopes that would start some dialogue. But the blind ragers must have completely missed that!

I have brought up many times the scurrilous behavior of today’s politicains. YOU and your goons never DISCUSS those issues. You just see them as an attack on you and respond with vitriol.

So save your nonsense for your fellow dupes.

OK, blowhards! I’m off to the gym. I’ll try to help you “conservative” (HA!) mopes with your critical reading and reasoning skills later…

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 07:13 PM | Link to this

Huge pothead,

If you managed to spend an entire day talking about medical marijuana I must have been bored to tears and slept through it. I didn’t mean to impugn the integrity of your political brilliance. Now that I know you can discuss pot all day I have a better idea where you’re coming from. Enjoy the 7/11 err…gym.

@@,

Don’t you just the “era” caveat?

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 07:15 PM | Link to this

“I warned lil andykins that the choice was his. Either turn down the hate speech or be prepared for what was coming.”

RW,

Yep, Huge Mullah sounds a lot like Almadinijead. I wonder if 8/22 is the target date for Huge too?

CUT

Huge Fatuous Fathead,

My comment about the chaderi-clad women wanting their own beach is based on something you are completely unfamliar with: Knowledge of history and current events.

I know you hate to click on little blue lines, but before you open your Huge ignorant Fat Mouth one more time, why don’t you try learning something, just once?

Here’s a preamble - “Truth is not Bigotry”

A snippet, and I couldn’t have said it better myself:

“If they want to live here, they should remember that they are owed nothing more than what every other immigrant who came before them received: an opportunity to make a life for themselves here and to be loyal to the nation who welcomed them. If they want to live here, then they should be pledging allegiance to the United States, and not pledging allegiance to its demise. Too many of them who carry the Islamist mindset have been permitted to migrate here. It is unacceptable. In my book I’ve compiled numerous examples of Muslims who have migrated to Western lands and have publicly demonstrated their disdain for Western culture. If they’re that unhappy, then they should know that we have survived as a nation without them for 230 years, and that they are free to head back home.”

Moving right along, here’s the skinny on segregated beaches in non-Muslim countries

Is Rome too far away? How about demands for segregated gyms for Muslim women in the U.S. or segregated basketball in our public schools?

I could go on forever, but hopefully there is one brain cell active in that pigheaded brain of yours that can “assimilate” some of the info I have provided^^.

P.S. I forgot to ask you yesterday - what was that weird incoherent rant about papa

By @@

August 9, 2006 07:19 PM | Link to this

rushncap:

Where in the blogosphere did you come from and why, exactly, are you standing in the line? I read your comment “in reality”. “Really,” I did.

Now what?

Nevermind…..

Thanks for posting though.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 07:27 PM | Link to this

If anyone is tempted to take the Huge crybaby at his word about how he so desperately tried to start a discussion of fencing today, (The barrier not the foils I believe) read his comment at 1:40. He starts the attempt at beginning this civil conversation with, “Oh, and guess what bigot?”

Yes poor crybaby hugo (ht/ @@) was just trying to start a pleasant conversation.

By Two Faced Liberal Hypocrite Losers

August 9, 2006 07:43 PM | Link to this

Robin “Two Bottles Of Vodka” Williams making fun of Limbaugh’s use of Viagra, of all things:

Next, Williams moved on to more drug references: “Where was he staying in the Caribbean? Club Medicated?”

Have fun in rehab, Two Bottles.

By definition, could liberal and hypocrite be the same thing?

By @@

August 9, 2006 07:56 PM | Link to this

Will somebody please tell me that Huge didn’t just say “na ne na ne na ne” in his 7:04 post.

Please say it ain’t so Hugo.

Is that the type of political discourse you prefer?

By @@

August 9, 2006 08:06 PM | Link to this

Maybe I should have asked Huge if that was the type of “age-appropriate” discourse he preferred.

Let’s see, that usually comes around the age of 4 or 5.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 08:19 PM | Link to this

@@,

It appears that is what he resorts to when “Hey bigot, talk nice to me” doesn’t work.

By Two Faced Liberal Hypocrite Losers

August 9, 2006 08:24 PM | Link to this

Mike Wallace (See B.S.) Says Iranian President an ‘Impressive Fellow’

Is it the Jew hating that impresses Mikey?

Or maybe the threats on America?

Or maybe Mikey’s just a depraved little pervert?

By Danish in Vacationland

August 9, 2006 09:10 PM | Link to this

Huge Boring Blowhard,

I’ll make this very easy for you, and the rest of us. Tell us what day you first logged on here at MLs, we’ll review the archives, and we’ll get back to you with a review of your scintillating, thought-provoking performance.

As I recall, the very first time you showed up you barged in like a pompous, sanctimonious a*****e, and when we didn’t immediately kiss your feet the real, not quite so “moderate”, you revealed itself in no short order.

P.S. that was “Papa-razzi” from my last post. Got caught in the 2500 character limit.

By RW-(the original)

August 9, 2006 11:59 PM | Link to this

Maybe the government should just get huge to tell them where not to look and head straight there. Dearborn? Why would you look in Dearborn? Huge Mullah said there is no problem there.

By Gee, I Hope This Doesn't Upset getagrip

August 10, 2006 06:18 AM | Link to this

What we need to do now is reassess the current environment and modify our tactics and strategy as necessary to deal with the escalating chaos and, just as important, take Iran out of the picture. These are not impossible objectives. We still enjoy a tactical “window of opportunity” in which to take decisive action. But it does mean unleashing our full military capabilities. A measured response will not get the job done. As in most wars, if you want to win you must bring overwhelming force into play.-WashingtonTimes

We are already fighting them in Iraq and Lebanon, why not fight them in Iran?

It’s the only way we are going to win.

Cut

The Democrats, who are in the grip of their party’s leftist, anti-war pacifist wing, have played into the GOP’s hands on this one. Defining their party’s national security posture by how fast they would pull out of Iraq does not instill confidence that they are prepared to do whatever is necessary to keep America safe. Nor does their opposition to warrantless surveillance of terrorist phone calls, terrorist bank accounts and strengthening the anti-terrorist Patriot Act.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

I trust that most of my fellow Americans are as shocked as I am over this turn of events. There is no longer a rational dialogue between the two major parties, or even within the Democratic Party itself. The deranged babbling of the Soros-MoveOn.org loonies is now the only language spoken.-HumanEvents

By Gosh, I Hope This Doesn't Ruffle Midori's Feathers, Er, Scales

August 10, 2006 06:20 AM | Link to this

This is the sort of megalomaniacal hubris Dean’s Democracy for America and liberal blogs embrace as an article of faith: The whole American political culture is corrupt, except when their candidate wins. America’s democracy is ailing and faded, except when their candidate wins. Self-funded, wealthy candidates are the bane of politics, except when they happen to be the candidate of the netroots.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

The Associated Press quickly published a story by Lolita Baldor and Devlin Barrett titled, “Rumsfeld Snub of War Hearing Draws Fire,” in which the first sentence said that Rumsfeld, “…essentially said he was too busy to testify at a public hearing….raising a new furor on Capitol Hill over the three-year-old conflict.” But the “furor” was only in the minds of the AP reporters and editors. Rumsfeld never said he was too busy to bother with the Senate. The story quoted only Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy.-RealClearPolitics

Manipulating the news against Republicans, they way they always have.

Cut

Like a candidate brandishing embarrassing rhetoric from an opponent’s past, Clinton aides were seeking and shaping partial Rumsfeld quotations to make sure their boss avoids being Liebermanized. The Clintons are famous for “the permanent campaign,” and Hillary was pursuing it last week while forgoing serious debate over Iraq.-RobertNovakRealClearPolitics

By Gosh, I Hope This Doesn't Ruffle Midori's Feathers, Er, Scales

August 10, 2006 06:21 AM | Link to this

The Pinko Times just keeps driving on with the fake pictures.

Page A12 of the Urinal shows a Lebanese man cradling a bag that supposedly has his “son” in it.

How does anyone know that isn’t the body of a dog in the bag?

What’s this a-sshole doing parading the “son” he failed to evacuate to safety around in front of the cameras like some staged event?

Why does the AJC show only the Anti Semite side of the story, the version Geobbels would present?

Cut

The letter in the German newspaper shines a clarifying and sobering light on a strategy that, like terrorism itself, is used precisely because it works. In an age in which many organizations and even some countries are prepared to sacrifice their own civilians in the service of killing ours — and are prepared to do so by situating their weapons, even weapons of mass destruction, in places of human habitation — we have to be ready for more Qanas. We have to be ready to place the blame for such Qanas on those who engineer them. We have to learn how to expose the depraved but effective logic that will make those Qanas happen. And we have to learn how to fight a war that’s built on that logic even if we can’t always be absolutely sure that innocents won’t suffer as a result.-NYSun

Cut

The AJC staff submitted “Vents” are easy to spot:

BP (Big Problem) has demonstrated it is worthy of Dubya granting drilling rights in ANWAR. Not!-AJC