Luckovich cartoon changes address!
Mike Luckovich’s cartoon has moved to a new ajc.com address. Click here to view and bookmark.
The new format features a larger version of Mike’s cartoon for the day and allow readers to vote. There are also links to recent Luckovich cartoons and special galleries.
Bloggers who want to comment on issues in the news are invited to blog at any of our four other Opinion blogs:
Home > Opinion > Mike Luckovich > Archives > 2006 > July > 11 > Entry
North Korea
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Permalink | Comments (271) | Post your comment | Categories: Editorial Cartoon





DEL.ICIO.US


Comments
By BUSH AND ROVE ARE LYING CRIMINALS
July 12, 2006 08:06 AM | Link to this
Novak: Rove was a source in outing Plame“>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060712/apongocastpe/cialeak_novak)
WASHINGTON - Now that Karl Rove won’t be indicted, now that the president won’t fire him, now that it really doesn’t matter anymore, more details of the leak investigation trickle out. In his latest syndicated column released Wednesday, columnist Robert Novak revealed his side of the story in the Plame affair, saying Rove was a confirming source for Novak’s story outing the CIA officer, underscoring Rove’s role in a leak President Bush once promised to punish. (edited . you cannot post someone else work. provide a link. perhaps, quote a graf. but more than that is usurping someone else’s work, a violation of copyright)
By Ricky
July 12, 2006 08:08 AM | Link to this
Once again a cartoon from Lucko that is not based on fact, just his ideological views.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 08:13 AM | Link to this
The political right will view ML’s toon as a “severe provocation”.
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this
N-GA, what do you view N Korea firing weapons as? Do you think they were doing just for fun? If you are going to bash the right then at least offer a solution.
By Donovan Coley
July 12, 2006 08:20 AM | Link to this
Once again, this cartoon depiction proves the disrespectful agitation by the AJC’s staff towards America. They try so hard to imitate the New York Slimes. Shameful.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 08:33 AM | Link to this
The only WMD threat we have is Saddam Hussein. We need to invade Iraq and find his stash of WMDs, or the terrorist win, man. Mike Luckovich is wrong. It’s not N. Korea, it’s Iraq.
We need to get UN support for a war against all the 911 terrorists who met with Saddam in the 1990s and are hiding nukes and anthrax and nerve gas in Baghdad.
This is the only real threat left in the world, and we need to go in there. Yes, it will cost American lives, but the price of freedom is death, and I think as long as it’s your son or daughter, Bush is okay with it, his daughters are tax exempt, bullet proof, and 80 proof (apparently).
This plan came to our beloved president on 911 as he was reading “Mein Pet Kampf” to school kids. His GooseStepford Wife, Laura, had packed him a lunch with jello pudding that day, so he stayed to enjoy it with the kids.
We need to support an invasion of Iraq now, yes it will cost trillions, but so what? we’ll just use trickle down tax cut voodoo economics.
All true patriots will rally behind me and this idea. Mike, you are way offbase about N. Korea. Hell, they’re just a bunch of pajama wearing, near sighted, midgets. they dont have no nukes, nor any way to deliver them even if they did have them, nor the balls to use them even if they did have a viable rocket. Getting real sick of your misdirection here, Mike Luckovich.
George Bush’s truth is giving us so many Germane Peepholes into the Furor.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 08:37 AM | Link to this
Moderate Voice:
I offered a detailed solution several days ago. I’ll use a little of what I said now.
India fired a missle yesterday. Pakistan a few weeks/months ago. France, Israel, Iran, Russia, China and the USA fire them. The USA cannot continue to tell sovereign nations what they can or cannot do, especially “at the point of a gun”.
What should we do? First, we should publically ignore Korea and its leader. He is seeking notoriety. Second, we should privately take economic action.
Now, this is the hard part. We should refuse to send any additional aid in ANY form to North Korea. Sending them “humanitarian aid” in the form of wheat and rice allows them to feed their people while allowing them to continue to spend money on nuclear programs. We should also refuse to trade with ANY COUNTRY that trades with North Korea. Yes, that includes France, China, etc. No imports or exports. PERIOD.
I suspect that GWB would veto any such legislation. The USA seldom puts its money where its mouth is. We don’t want to do anything that would be “anti-business”.
For many trading nations, the USA is their largest customer (importer) for their products. Given a choice, I feel they may decide that North Korea isn’t worth the sacrifice.
Your thoughts?
By Bionic Blonde
July 12, 2006 08:37 AM | Link to this
Actually the cartoon illustrates the duplicity, deceit, and flipping/flopping of an administration without a moral center. Sure are a lot of people filled with hate for free speech expressing hostility on this issue. We are stuck with a crowd in charge who has no idea how to use government to benefit nor defend effectively its own citizens. Really sad…
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 08:39 AM | Link to this
Where are the hysteretics to scold the first poster today? Now that looks like a manifesto.
Of course it’s also a lie. Here’s the real source. The OotMVoD, gadem crowd has no problem with lies.
When does Joe Wilson go to jail for revealing this classified information in a public document?
By ToonFan
July 12, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this
You guys take this stuff too seriously. I like ML’s cartoons - they make you think. You may disagree with his opinion, but at least the toon did its job - provoke discussion and debate.
Some people are just too thin-skinned, close-minded, and overly righteous to understand what it means to think of both sides of a given issue.
Rock on, Mike!
By Andy's One And Only
July 12, 2006 08:41 AM | Link to this
You want to talk about taking advantage of some soldiers death and using them for political purposes, the AJC is treating the mutilation video of Kristian Menchaca and Thomas L. Tucker as news:
U.S. bodies reportedly on video- An al-Qaida-linked group posted a Web video Tuesday purporting to show the mutilated bodies of two U.S. soldiers, claiming the group killed them in revenge for the rape-slaying of a young Iraqi woman by American troops from the same unit.-AtlantaJournalConstitution
These pieces of sh-it do not name the soldiers so that it appears that more of our troops have been abducted and mutilated.
A supposed “news” organization can’t get a story right a day after it was broken?
The AJC can go to hell.
You liberals have nothing to say about using soldiers deaths, nothing.
Cut
The July 4th launches were seen as a message to the United States, another effort to boost Kim Jong Il’s international prestige and angle for attention and aid. But the chances that North Korea will credibly threaten the United States in the foreseeable future are remote. Japan is demonstrably already in range, and Japan’s government is in no mood to play games with Kim.
Japanese officials said Monday they believe negotiations may not be the answer to the Korean problem. Dawn over Tokyo.
“If we accept that there is no other option to prevent an attack … there is the view that attacking the launch base of the guided missiles is within the constitutional right of self-defense. We need to deepen discussion,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said.-RealClearPolitics
Any of you Neolibs want to bet against Japan?
Cut
This perfectly sums it all up:
Since January, when Palestinians voted for Hamas, the Palestinian Authority has been governed by a terrorist organization whose raison d’etre is the destruction of a neighboring country. Now that Israel has concluded (reasonably, in our view) that it cannot abide living next door to people calling for its annihilation and firing rockets at its citizens, regional
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 08:49 AM | Link to this
N-GA, it is not just the US telling N Korea that they can’t fire missiles, it is the world community. The difference between N Korea and the other countries you mentioned is the leadership. We can rationally not expect them to use their nucs against another country. That is not the case with N Korea. As for cutting off aid, I am all for that. That country is not far from economic collapse. The fear then for S Korea is that the refugee crisis will crush their economy. This is a good discussion and does not have a viable solution that can be encompassed in one sentence.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 08:55 AM | Link to this
VOTE FOR RALPH REED
HE HAD ME AT ‘HALO’
By Ludacris Like A Liberal
July 12, 2006 08:55 AM | Link to this
By N-GA July 12, 2006 08:37 AM India fired a missle (missile) yesterday. Pakistan a few weeks/months ago. France, Israel, Iran, Russia, China and the USA fire them. The USA cannot continue to tell sovereign nations what they can or cannot do, especially “at the point of a gun”.
Has France, Israel, Iran, Russia, China killed 5 million of their own citizens and threatened their neighbors with violence?
I like the way Wanker N-GA glibly overlooks the genocide issues and puts the US on the same moral footing as North Korea.
What a stroke.
Now, this is the hard part. We should refuse to send any additional aid in ANY form to North Korea.
Humanitarian Aid is the right thing to do but sending them cash bribes and nuclear technology, like Billy Clinton did, is the wrong answer.
I don’t blame cartoon boy, Neolib, or this Tosser N-GA on trying to dig themselves out of the mountain of evidence and bureaucratic blunders that the Clinton/ Albright as-sholeiocation left behind, it is rather embarrassing that North Korea just didn’t fall in line with Jimmy Cawter’s plans and dreams.
So let’s blame Bush for it.
Only problem is, Wanker, is that Bush is doing what’s right.
And it’s killing these Neolibs.
Isolate this clown.
Hang him out to dry.
What’s he gonna do about it? Shoot another missile into the ocean?
Bwahahahahahahahaha.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 08:58 AM | Link to this
All the discussion about the improvement in the deficit leaves too much truth unsaid.
For example, the deficit does not include the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq. That is not a condemnation of the administration. All administrations have been guilty of doing this.
They say that these conflicts are unplanned, therefore cannot be included in a budget that did not plan for them. Well, this conflict has been going on for what, 39 months now…with no end in sight. I would say that we should start “planning” the expenses for Iraq.
In any event, it is a distortion of the truth to say the deficit is improving.
Meanwhile here in Geargia the state coffers are filling up, on taxpayer money. This money is coming directly from the state gasoline tax which is calculated as a percent of the price per gallon as opposed to a fixed amount per gallon. As a direct result, Georgia went from being the state with one of the lowest gasoline prices to a state where gasoline prices are among the highest in the Southeast. The Governor, responding to a query about this, said that there would be no adjustment this year. Hence, keep that windfall coming in, at the expense of the taxpayer.
Just a little truth.
By Joe Wilson Gave His Wife Up, Hahaha
July 12, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this
This is the only thing you need to know about 8:06 or any other BS the left has for you:
Robert Novak- I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”
Sucker Libs.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 09:00 AM | Link to this
We should surrender to the N. Koreans, and then sign over our global debt, (10 trillion bucks, man), to them. Then we declare war on N. Korea, nuke them to hell along with the debt.
Voila! We’d be in a Utopian debt free super economy of SUVs, disney movies, and supersized french fries!
War is a terrible thing not to profit from.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 09:07 AM | Link to this
Moderate Voice,
On the one hand people say that Kim Jong ll is irrational. Others say he is as sly as a fox. In either case, it is simply conjecture to try to predict his use of nuclear weapons. He already has the bomb(s). The current issue is how could he deliver them. It could be a missile or a suitcase.
But I think the real question should be: What circumstances would most likely cause Kim Jong ll to use his nuclear capability?
IMHO, I believe he would most likely consider using a nuclear weapon if he were attacked…and his first target would be Seoul.
Thoughts?
By Dusty
July 12, 2006 09:10 AM | Link to this
Well, nothing new today. Another sorry cartoon. First commentator gives us a long “trial” on Rove and finds him guilty, of course. Only, Rove is not on trial. Just doing his job.
N-GA says it is all very simple. Just starve North Korea to death.
Pat-Foski tries confused sarcasm to show us the evils of Bush, etc., etc.
Bionic Blond (Goldie?) carries on the liberal Bush boohoo.
Andy give us news excerpts to keep us informed. He will soon be called many star*studded names. As will RW.
So much fun. So little time. See ya later.
By Bernie
July 12, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this
Hey Andy’s One and Only. Talk about using soldier’s deaths; this Administration uses the death of soldiers every minute of every day to justify this bogus War on Terror. Soldiers are being used as mere props in this insane theatre of macabre; as Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, et al enrich themselves and their cronies in the Military Industrial Complex, and Big Oil. There is no regard for the soldiers who are over there, fighting an ill defined enemy, with no real plan except what appears to be fomenting Civil War.
But wait, there’s a light at the end of this very dark tunnel; according to Administration, for the thousanth time they’ve turned the corner in Iraq. How many times can one turn the corner until it’s painfully obvious that they’re merely spinning us in circles?
Hey, but keep on waving your stupid flag from the safety of your (I’m sure) white-bread privileged perch in front of your computer screen; it’s so easy to talk like a big man and support this insane war from there.
By gadem
July 12, 2006 09:23 AM | Link to this
RW I was not even logged in and you already miss me….I am a man, but I know you like men, but I don’t play for that team RW. Anywho, I think todays cartoon is hillarious. Pokes fun at the “flip-flopping” that this administration does. I really could careless about who RW and Andy marry because it is there private business. (Truth be told, if either one of them find another man that will occupy their time, this blog will be a lot better)
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 09:25 AM | Link to this
N-GA, I disagree on Jong. His primary goal is self-sustainment. I think he fired the missiles to get attention and to give the impression that we shouldn’t mess with him. I don’t think he will ever use the nuclear bombs because he knows that it will mean the end of his regime.
By Oh, Good, The Whole Entire Huffington Post, Thanks finch
July 12, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this
I guess when your little mind is totally overwhelmed, don’t read an article, just post the whole entire webpage:
Huffington Post- Robert J. Elisberg Bio 07.11.2006 50 Easy Questions to Ask Any Republican (95 comments)
Hey, at least simpleton seeker didn’t post the 95 comments too.
By @@
July 12, 2006 09:29 AM | Link to this
Well don’t this just say it all. Idealism rules their day, problem is…it’s not realistic considering the lunatics out there.
Like the Fabians of old, the U.N. bureaucrats believe that if you can simply keep an issue from dying, then sooner or later you’ll prevail—if for no other reason than simply outlasting your opponents.
Paralysis by analysis.
By Overlooking Something, Bernie?
July 12, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this
By Bernie July 12, 2006 09:22 AM Hey Andy’s One and Only. Talk about using soldier’s deaths; this Administration uses the death of soldiers every minute of every day to justify this bogus War on Terror. Soldiers are being used as mere props in this insane theatre of macabre
So what justification do you have for the 85,000 Americans who have been murdered since 9/11?
You got your panties in wad over 2500 brave volunteer soldiers, which I doubt if you really even give a flying f’k about them, how can you just totally overlook the 85,000?
Seems a little odd of you, don’t it?
Do these people in America not merit your concern?
By time for the truth
July 12, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this
Beholding the party of hate’s unhinged anti-Bush bollocks on here is just too funny. Realising that their obsessive, impotent, moronic distortions will never amount to anything other than than vacuous cyber ranting is priceless.
It was sick Wille Clinton and the incompetent narcissistic wanker Carter with their desperate/pathetic placating of N KOrea that paved the way for this current situation. Now the leftist scum are again blaming Bush for their cynical, deeply flawed political expediency that as expected exposed them for the cowardly sound bite seekers they are.
Luckovich’s intellectual dishonesty and shameless Bush hate is now a national joke, but clearly reflects the far left AJC’s line. Happily no one else printed “that” cartoon, and the AJC’s plummeting circulation figures doubtless took a further hit.
Hopefully another twisted lefty will post a 500 bullet point rant about Bush. Just imagine the twisted hate involved in doing that - I’m still LMFAO off at the slightly shorter rants above.
I love lefties, they only exist to be laughed at and pilloried by their conservative betters, and bless em, this doltish approach ensures that the increasingly shrill leftist dems - having lost both the house and senate under the perjurer in chief sick Wille, will struggle to get either of them back.
By rushncap
July 12, 2006 09:39 AM | Link to this
And Dusty babbles on as usual without saying anything of substance or even mild interest. Why don’t you tell us about your son’s golf scores some more, Dusty? I’m sure someone might care.
N-GA, the solution to the North Korea situation may well wind up being military. If South Korea gets provoked, the world community may wind up having to support a war there. I’m not looking forward to that, but it does not seem like Kim Jong Il will ever bother with diplomacy. His track record there is worse than Bush’s.
By Eric
July 12, 2006 09:43 AM | Link to this
Another excellent cartoon based on fact!
By Ask any Republican
July 12, 2006 09:44 AM | Link to this
Oh, Good, The Whole Entire Huffington Post, Thanks finch …..
listen, LITTLE BIRDIE BOY, glad to see you DID read the entire article.
Job well done…now if we can just work on your comprehension, then perhaps you would be able to answer the questions.
By gadem
July 12, 2006 09:44 AM | Link to this
Andy you could care less about the 85,000 or the 2,500 soldiers that have been killed. So please drop the act. If you cared about the 85,000 that have been killed I think you would want to find some viable solutions, rather than just posting neocon talking points.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 09:44 AM | Link to this
rushncap,
I know you can’t resist the urge to try to beat up on any woman that comes along, but it’s Buy Danish’s son that is an up and coming star golfer.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 09:45 AM | Link to this
Did anyone watch Dean on the Daily Show last night? I found it interesting that he concludes that the neo-cons and their sycophants are authoritarians. Imagine that. The discussion went into the direction of ultra-leftist authoritarians (communists) and ultra-rightest authoritarians (fascists). While Dean seemed to deny that the current crop of right-wing authoritarians were fascists, he did refer to them as neo-fascists.
He was promoting his latest book, “Conservatives Without Conscience”. I find it more than interesting when an individual who was directly involved in the Nixon Watergate scandal calls for the impeachment of George W. Bush. Karma??
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this
N-GA, to call anyone in this administration a fascists is rhetoric, pure and simple. Dean is just looking to score easy political points. It is just as bad as Limbaugh calling people in the Clinton admin socialists. Dean is just doing what he thinks is his job as DNC chairman.
By gadem
July 12, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this
Tftt, it seems to me that you need to seek out the truth.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this
rushncap,
I think the most likely scenario would be North Korea invades South Korea in order to avoid being overthrown by a starving populace.
Unfortunately, any military conflict there would likely provide more fodder for this administration. How long do you think it would take Cheney to set up detention camps for suspected Chinese and Korean collaborators? They would have no rights, of course because they wouldn’t be wearing any uniforms.
By KZ_ Guy
July 12, 2006 09:51 AM | Link to this
How dare Bush blame the NY Times for leaking secret information on banking transfers when his * own Chief Of Staff* broke the law. Bush once said who ever was responsible for leaking the CIA agent’s identy would be punished. He didn’t say unless it is a member of my staff. Bush is very scary. He does not believe in any rules and he talks out of both sides of his mouth.
By rushncap
July 12, 2006 09:52 AM | Link to this
Oh jesus. Can’t keep you neocons straight. Thanks, RW. I guess I cared about any of it a little less than they thought.
By @@
July 12, 2006 09:57 AM | Link to this
I liked Dusty’s observation of N-GA’s solution to N. Korea. Only a liberal would think they can rage against the starvation in Darfur and then dictate who should be starved.
They reserve it as their privilege.
Absurd.
By I Hate To Break Your Heart
July 12, 2006 10:02 AM | Link to this
By Ask any Republican July 12, 2006 09:44 AM Oh, Good, The Whole Entire Huffington Post, Thanks finch …..listen, LITTLE BIRDIE BOY, glad to see you DID read the entire article. Job well done…now if we can just work on your comprehension, then perhaps you would be able to answer the questions.
As soon as a saw fifty items on one subject I knew that it could be anyone of you wankers, so I just scrolled past it.
I mean, really, you don’t see how ridiculous you liberals are?
We can see right through you, remember?
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this
VOTE FOR RALPH REED
HE HAD ME AT ‘HALO’
By tiff
July 12, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this
Mike, To heck with all those psycho Bush-bots, your cartoons are humorous and truthful. Bush invaded a country that was no threat to us, a country he knew could not defend itself against us. When it comes to Iraq he is the figure in your cartoon, saying cross this line,now this line. But with North Korea, he shows us who is the real coward, he is. We should all respect our president, and pray for him to do the right thing as he lead us and our country. We should still be able to express our concerns and opinions when it comes to this unjustified, war in Iraq. Let’s all see if he can put the real terrorist “Kim Jong” in a hole, like he did that rat Saddam. Let him prove to us he is a real leader. “NOT”
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 10:05 AM | Link to this
We need to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein, who tried to kill Bush’s dad.
N. Korea is a red herring.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 10:06 AM | Link to this
Hey, I hate to break your heart, can you see THIS…….
By gadem
July 12, 2006 10:07 AM | Link to this
That is right @@, in your mind everyone should starve. Because it is their fault that they were not born with…d-a-m-n poor people, don’t you just hate them.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this
No problem rushncap, I know you guys really suck when it comes to facts about any subject so I’m always here to help.
For future reference, it’s Dusty’s sons that are protecting the rights of punks like you to spew your hatred of our great country.
By Is It Bush WWho Can't Speak English?
July 12, 2006 10:09 AM | Link to this
Or is it liberal democrats who can’t understand it?
By KZ_ Guy July 12, 2006 09:51 AM How dare Bush blame the NY Times for leaking secret information on banking transfers when his own Chief Of Staff broke the law. Bush once said who ever was responsible for leaking the CIA agent’s identy (identity) would be punished. He didn’t say unless it is a member of my staff. Wank, wank, wank.*
Now you tell me what this says:
WASHINGTON, July 18 - President Bush said today that he would fire anyone in his administration who has broken the law<—————————————- in the unmasking of a C.I.A. officer two years ago.-Plamegate
Like I always say, when a lib calls someone ignorant it’s because the lib is the one who’s ignorant.
By @@
July 12, 2006 10:10 AM | Link to this
This one is for Midori.
Are those ^^^ “lines in the sand” really the “little toothpicks” that Bill used on Monica?
Let me know what you think.;-)
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 10:11 AM | Link to this
pat prepuce,
I can’t help your boy Ralph out this time, I’ll be voting in the Democrat primary. If you can get him through I’ll help you out in November.
By gadem
July 12, 2006 10:19 AM | Link to this
Andy, initially Bush stated that he would fire anyone that leaked her name, then he changed it to broken the law. Another “flip-flop” but that is too be expected by a hypocrite like Bush.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 10:24 AM | Link to this
@@,
If you decide to research the blog to find where I have ever mentioned Darfur, it will be a fruitless exercise except that it will keep you from posting. Also, I fail to see where you or Dusty have suggested ANYTHING to resolve the issues on the Korean peninsula.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 10:26 AM | Link to this
Following my interview with the primary source, I sought out the second administration official and the CIA spokesman for confirmation. I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”
I don’t think President Bush can fire Wilson or the book publisher.
By @@
July 12, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this
gadem:
You need to be talking to N-GA on the starvation issue, or you need to re-read my post, and comprehend it this time.
By gadem
July 12, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this
Now RW that is sad that you would knowingly vote for a crook like RR
By gadem, Liar
July 12, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this
By gadem July 12, 2006 10:19 AM Andy, initially Bush stated that he would fire anyone that leaked her name
Your more than welcome to show me where and when he said that, cause I missed it. I believe the rest of the world also missed it, most likely because it wasn’t said.
Don’t give me anymore whining, crying jags from the sissies at PMSNBC like they are the word down from the mountaintop. I don’t do bullsh-it.
Keep your feminine feelings to yourself.
By Ask any Republican
July 12, 2006 10:39 AM | Link to this
i hate to break your heart
rather a ridiculous wanker than a wingnut, neocon, facsist, lemming, follower, chicken hawk, liar, yellow christian, big red, fake patriot, fear monger, war profiteer, frustrated old goober like you.
gee, i thought name calling would feel better.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 10:41 AM | Link to this
gadem,
If it’s not too much trouble would you get me the court case #’s and details on RR’s convictions? Does an honest word ever come from you?
By @@
July 12, 2006 10:43 AM | Link to this
Well N-GA, did you get the gift I left you on last night’s thread? I don’t mind research, and I suppose I could go looking for a comment you might have made on Darfur. If I find proof though, you’re likely to deny the obvious.
I think N. Korea has gotten their a*s in a crack by drawing attention to themselves. Let the talks take place, but denying humanitarian aide would not be diplomacy. If you want to turn this into Bush’s fault, nobody can stop you. But the way liberals keep excusing absurd behavior by tyrranical individuals is strange to me.
I’m thinking you couldn’t even get a job with the U.N. following your thought process. Now that’s sad.
By gadem
July 12, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this
30 September 2003 (http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030930/dctu064_1.html): “Remarks by President Bush to the Travel Pool After Meeting with Business People” in Chicago, IL: “I know of nobody — I don’t know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information. If somebody did leak classified information, I’d like to know it, and we’ll take the appropriate action. And this investigation is a good thing. “And again I repeat, you know, Washington is a town where there’s all kinds of allegations. You’ve heard much of the allegations. And if people have got solid information, please come forward with it. And that would be people inside the information who are the so-called anonymous sources, or people outside the information — outside the administration. And we can clarify this thing very quickly if people who have got solid evidence would come forward and speak out. And I would hope they would. “And then we’ll get to the bottom of this and move on. But I want to tell you something — leaks of classified information are a bad thing. And we’ve had them — there’s too much leaking in Washington. That’s just the way it is. And we’ve had leaks out of the administrative branch, had leaks out of the legislative branch, and out of the executive branch and the legislative branch, and I’ve spoken out consistently against them and I want to know who the leakers are.”
By What's A "big red"
July 12, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this
I know most of the moonbat fever swamp slurs but that one escapes me.
gadem, your a deluxe moonbat, clue me in.
By cliff
July 12, 2006 10:52 AM | Link to this
Man, Mikey sure has a Woody for Bush
By gadem
July 12, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this
RW I said a crook. So someone has to be convicted of something before they are considered a crook. Well, well, well, that is a flip-flop on your part as well. It is known what RR did, and for you to defend him makes you look dishonerable.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this
Fire this gadem, you freakin’ goofball.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 10:57 AM | Link to this
Hey look!!!!! They got Rove after all
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA….
By gadem
July 12, 2006 11:02 AM | Link to this
RW fix your links before you start calling someone a goofball. Don’t you have some “high powered” e-bay decisions to make? Don’t you have to go and give one of your “vendors” a rating?
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 11:04 AM | Link to this
gadem,
cue Val Kilmer voice from Tombstone If you thought I was dishonerable (dishonorable) I just don’t think I could bear it.
and cut…
Is something a flip-flop just because it comes from an avowed liar like yourself or should I expect some proof?
By gadem
July 12, 2006 11:08 AM | Link to this
And RW please tell me what the difference is between William Jefferson in Louisiana and RR? Both took bribes of some sort. As I recall you were all but for public castration of Jefferson. Hypocrite!
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 11:09 AM | Link to this
Man you guys are in full blown STFU mode today aren’t you.
If anyone besides the goofball is having trouble with the links let me know. They aren’t from a site that blocks you and they work fine here.
By Rick
July 12, 2006 11:09 AM | Link to this
Okay,Ask any Republican,here goes.
1 Cut Taxes,Took out Saddam,Replaced the administration that is responsible for North Korea having nuclear weapons,taken the Supreme Court to the right,got a medicare drug benefit,attemted to fix social security and driving you leftist crazy makes for great entertainment.
2No
3 Who knows? That doesn’t mean we can quit now.
4 Not his job.The people in Florida seemed to have figured it out.
5 Pretty bad. Since the same people are still in charge of New Orleans,what did you expect?
6 Don’t know.
7 Yes
8 Not as much as the liberal courts. My “conditions” are pretty good by the way.
9 According to you guys forged documents he was a big slacker when he was there .Make up your mind.
10 What? Why would I want him to?
11 No. But revenues are up!
12Yes
13 Yes
14 He’s not the one obsessed with division.That is a trait of the left.Black-white, rich-poor you name it.
15 All out media assault.
16 No
17 NYB
18 NYB
19 Cause I’m not some terrorist a—hole calling my “friends” in Iraq.
20 Yes
21 Canadians arn’t showing up by the millions to work for two bucks an hour.
22 Yes
23 Depend on where you live.
24 No. By the way,if weddings and war are the same thing to you,consider divorce.
25 If half of Washington already knows,why not?
26 Who knows?
27 I don’t try to have it both ways depending on who I’m talking to.
28 In Iraq. They have found hundreds although the msm havn’t botherd to report it.
29 Hiding under some womens skirt no doubt.
30 No,cut spending.
31 Some of them,not all.
32 Some of the same things you just listed .
33 If the people there wanted to starve me to death? Sure.
34 Doubt it.
35 Two, the drunk liberals and everyone else.
36 Very good.
37 No I wasn’t. Don’t get me started on Cinton and Bin Laden.
38 Bush doesn’t drink as far as I know.
39 Your anti Christian bigotry is not nice.
40 No.
41 No,he is a typical TV husband. A total idiot incapable of doing anything without his wife showing him how.
42 Yes.
43 They are.We are forced to stay because of the insugency.
44 Stupid question
By @@
July 12, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this
I’m finding myself spending a lot of time reading those “radical leftwing blogs”. I’m laughing while I read them, and then laugh even harder when I come to ml’s and see people using their content as “truth”.
“Truthout”, boy I could have fun with that word. Contradictory?
I wonder how gadem would define it? gadem?
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this
gadem,
Why am I not surprised that you are wrong again.
I said Nancy Pelosi had no business trying to push William Jefferson (D-LA) out of his committee post because he had not been charged with a crime. He still hasn’t by the way and when/if he is he deserves a fair trial.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 11:16 AM | Link to this
VOTE FOR RALPH REED
HE HAD ME AT ‘HALO’
By gadem
July 12, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this
RW, face it you are a hypocrite and liar!
By I Guess gadem Is, Like, Clueless
July 12, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this
By gadem July 12, 2006 10:44 AM 30 September 2000 (http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030930/dctu064_1.html): “Remarks by President Bush to the Travel Pool After Meeting with Business People” in Chicago, IL: “I know of nobody — I don’t know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information<—————————————————-. If somebody did leak classified information, I’d like to know it, and we’ll take the appropriate action.
What’s the matter, whacko, did you open the Fitzmas presents a tad early?
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this
gadem,
You are a lost cause, but your delusions are pretty funny. I hope you’re just an idiot because I would hate to be laughing this hard at someone that couldn’t help it.
I just showed you my consistency which you say makes me a hypocrite and a liar. Is the definition that I have to just buy your bs to avoid being these things?
By @@
July 12, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this
And you are sooooooo evil RW….
By RW-(the original) July 12, 2006 10:57 AM | Link to this
Hey look!!!!! They got Rove after all
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…
for outing “Truthout”. What’s a truth “seeker” to do now?
By gadem
July 12, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this
So her identity was not classified information? Andy it is the 12th, so I thought that the money from you disability check would be gone by now. You are still buying that Thunderbird crap…..
By Danish in Vacationland
July 12, 2006 11:42 AM | Link to this
rushncap,
If you don’t care about my kid - fine - don’t bring it up! Frankly I’d prefer you not be attempting to micro-manage my life anyway.
Just one thing - please tell your nosy soulmate, the mad professor OOTMVOD, not to insist that he serve in the military at the age of 12. Okey dokey?
And while you’re at it you might want to pass that^^ on to your other Red Diaper Baby Camp friends who insist that supporting the Iraq War while not reporting for duty automatically makes one a “Chickenhawker” (unless you’re Hillary Clinton of course).
And the next time some sanctimonious liberal goes on and on about how his kids are brilliant, and how he is raising them to be socially conscious secular saints who are being raised to hate Republicans, can you complain to HIM first instead of exclusively bitching about MY satirical mocking of the original fatuous post?
Finally, the next time you want to boast about your PhD in Field Studies and all the important work you do while you complain about what I do with MY son during HIS summer vacation, I hope you don’t mind if I call you out for being an arrogant, meddling fool.
You don’t tell me how to lead my life, and I won’t tell you how to lead yours.
Deal?
By getalife
July 12, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this
God, wingnuts are so freaking gullible.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this
@@,
Before getalife cut and ran from the blogging world he had a post where Midori was imitating Meg Ryan’s Sally after that “story” came out.
I’ve got it pasted over here in the archives somewhere, but I’ll paraphrase.
getalife, Midori here. FITZMAS HAS ARRIVED!!!!!! Karl Rove has been indicted!!!!
By I Guess gadem Is, Like, Clueless
July 12, 2006 11:50 AM | Link to this
By gadem July 12, 2006 11:40 AM So her identity was not classified information?
I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”<—————————————————
Classified, Bwahahahahahahaha.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 11:56 AM | Link to this
@@,
you try entirely too hard. face it. your “jokes” suck. not only do they come across as severely retarded, they make absolutely no point.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this
Honu,
If you happen to be lurking I left you a note at the post we were talking on last night. You might want to look there before you go to some of the other AJC sites.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this
RW,
did you save the post from yesterday?
You know, the one that completely busted your sorry behind for the blood drenched pics on your blog?
And yes, Fitzmas has arrived. The more we know the more you and your “buds” like like traitorous vermin that you are.
Keep right on fighting the good fight.
Loser.
Conservatism has noticeably evolved from its so-called modern phase (1950-94) into what might be called a postmodern period (1994 to the present), and in doing so it has regressed to its earliest authoritarian roots. Authoritarianism is not well understood and seldom discussed in the context of American government and politics, yet it now constitutes the prevailing thinking and behavior among conservatives. Regrettably, empirical studies reveal, however, that authoritarians are frequently enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, antiequality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian, and amoral. They are also often conservatives without conscience who are capable of plunging this nation into disasters the likes of which we have never known.
Now THAT is truly a Meg Ryan moment.
John Dean certainly has your number, doesn’t he?
Traitors and lowlifes to the core.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this
RW, the original Lemming,
Honu certainly struck a nerve, didn’t he or she?
Back to John Dean’s points.
You have to wait for someone to tell you how to react to the news, then you all shout it out in unison - regardless if it makes sense of not.
Joe Wilson outed his own wife
How bloody stupid and moronic does that sound? Or look?
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this
Run that by me again, John:
empirical studies reveal, however, that authoritarians (READ: CONSERVATIVES) are frequently enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, antiequality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian, and amoral. They are also often conservatives without conscience who are capable of plunging this nation into disasters the likes of which we have never known.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 12:09 PM | Link to this
getalife,
Your story poses a bunch of innuendo and suspicion, and then comes to the conclusion that since Novak didn’t address those things it must mean he and Rove are masterminding a grand cover up.
I won’t even mention that they were supposed to be “covering up” for what Joe Wilson freely placed in his Who’s Who in America bio. oops I guess I just did and you call US gullible?
By @@
July 12, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this
Midori:
Ruffle, ruffle. Can you give me the “dick-tionary’s” definition of “Truthout”? gadem seemed to have trouble with that one.
RW:
I remember well, the post at Getalife’s, I followed up at “Truthout” until I could have my laugh. It was a good one, but not a surprise.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:12 PM | Link to this
Since we are posting stuff from other blogs, I thought RW would like this lil entry:
By Honu
July 11, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this
RW – Until now, nothing has ever driven me to respond to anyone on Mike Luckovich’s blog, (can’t say that tomorrow) although I’ve probably lurked here since it’s inception – I’m familiar with the regulars’ views and can usually, grudgingly, see both sides of the arguments.
At 10:05a, you posted a link to your website. On the site, there is another link to something called the Jawa Report and by now, everyone has probably been there to see the spoils of the Iraqi war in all its glory. So now I just had to ask you – what purpose does it serve to keep this link up on your otherwise reasonable website? What purpose do the photos of mutilated servicemen serve? What purpose to keep them on-line, along with the video, when even Michelle Malkin (who I am sure is one of your modern-day heroines) requested they be removed from a site similar to Jawa? (The other site complied, by the way.)
Did you think these photos and the video would sway me to your way of thinking? Did you think I’d be so outraged that I’d be leading the charge to do away with all liberal-thinking individuals (or anyone against the war), or ban them from Mike’s blog, or ban Mike from Mike’s blog, or kneel down and profess my allegiance to all things republican? Did you?
Well, here’s what you’ve done. If I were on the fence before today, you managed to push me into the other yard. This war is ugly. This administration is uglier. And you, RW, for posting that link, are ugliest of them all.
By Yes, I Agree, Joe Wilson Is A Blooming Idiot
July 12, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this
By Midori July 12, 2006 12:05 PM Joe Wilson outed his own wife How bloody stupid and moronic does that sound? Or look?
He’s an idiot like you are, you know, birds of a feather flock together.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this
Midori,
I know you aren’t very good at these things, but I’ll try to help. All the posts, well all the ones that you libs don’t get vulgar in, are already saved right here.
I bet you don’t care that what you just wrote about both the post from yesterday and the content on my blog are bald faced lies. Do you guys ever tell the truth? You sure use the word in your websites a lot.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this
Hiya Getalife,
you can tell when you get under RW’s skin.
Just toy with the hypocrite some more - I want to see his head explode.
He is, after, all the original, isn’t he?
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this
Midori,
Actually no. Honu turns out to be a really fine person, it’s a shame that he/she will have to be tarnished by the likes of you glomming on to them.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this
RW,
Wingnut Novak’s stupid story is he found her name in Who’s who and called the CIA to see if she worked there.
His primary scource is still unknown.
Come on RW, you are smarter than that.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:20 PM | Link to this
@@, Andy and RW:
this is all I need to know about you wastes of human life:
empirical studies reveal, however, that authoritarians (READ: CONSERVATIVES) are frequently enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, antiequality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian, and amoral. They are also often conservatives without conscience who are capable of plunging this nation into disasters the likes of which we have never known.
HAHAHAHAHA
The pot trying to call the kettle black.
thought you’d like that RW; You sure use it a lot.
you wouldn’t know the truth if it bought you lunch.
Which, by the way, I’m off to get.
Let me leave you with this other gem:
By Honu
July 11, 2006 06:39 PM | Link to this
Hi RW — I much preferred your 5:41. Please, don’t start attacking me, too. While I appreciate that you didn’t mention our soldiers by name, I still can’t get past the fact that you would put that link on your otherwise reasonable (operative word) website. Just remove it, okay? And I’ll stop with my so-called faux outrage on this one. (I preferred passionate response).
hypocrite alert — I’m the one who is outraged that photos of our mutilated service personnel are being used to make a political point. For all your passion against Mike’s Pot to Kettle, how is this any different?
sounds like Honu is onto something, eh?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It’s as obvious as the swastika carved on your forehead
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the afternoon.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this
A jerk who posts vulgar pictures has the nerve, the GALL, to call someone vulgar.
RW puts the “hip” in hypocrite.
Scumbag.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 12:25 PM | Link to this
My Role in the Valerie Plame Leak Story by Robert Novak Posted Jul 12, 2006
In my sworn testimony, I said what I have contended in my columns and on television: Joe Wilson’s wife’s role in instituting her husband’s mission was revealed to me in the middle of a long interview with an official who I have previously said was not a political gunslinger. After the federal investigation was announced, he told me through a third party that the disclosure was inadvertent on his part.
Following my interview with the primary source, I sought out the second administration official and the CIA spokesman for confirmation. I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”
Why are you guys so dense? You can always just make up a new story and move on instead of sticking with Fitzmas and making yourselves look like bigger fools than you already do.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this
Midori,
Not only hypocrites but very gullible too. There are many RW’s out there.
I emailed the drudge stupid story on Novak and it posted. 270 gullible posts until this:
“Just heard on the local news (DC) regarding the Valerie Plame kerfuffle. The anchor said that Karl Rove WAS a source for Bob Novak. No mention of Who’s Who or the fact that Karl provided supporting evidence.
And I just caught a glimpse of Tavis Smiley on PBS mentioning that there were no WMDs found in IRAQ.
The moonbats are not going to change at all….”
By gadem
July 12, 2006 12:38 PM | Link to this
RW these were some of your exact post referring to William Jefferson…..
By RW-(the original) May 24, 2006 09:27 AM | Link to this Only in JoRo’s fantasy world would arresting people for committing crimes be considered some nutty right wing activity. JoRo, here’s a clue for you. Most people think it’s a good idea to catch criminals and don’t find it mean-spirited at all. By RW-(the original) May 24, 2006 10:06 AM | Link to this Where have I heard something about rotting food and lining your pockets with ill-gotten cash…. …Ah yes…$90,000.00 wrapped up and disguised as food in the freezer of William Jefferson (D-LA)
Face it you are a hypocrite and a liar.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this
I guess the wingnuts do not remember when Novak stormed off CNN stage after Carville laughed about his Who’s who story.
Funny stuff.
By I Just Heard...
July 12, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this
getagrip: Hey, I just heard Tom Sullivan say on the Rush Limbaugh show that most people don’t like being lied to and played for a sap, that’s why CNN and PMSNBC have lost so many viewers.
You have your sources, I have mine.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 12:46 PM | Link to this
Iraq is a total mess
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 12:47 PM | Link to this
Here was my response to Honu on what Midori has cut and pasted at 12:12
Here is my response to Honu on the post that Midori copied here at 12:20
There are several other responses to members of Midori’s cackling chorus found below those responses which explain why this is neither political nor hypocritical. Contrary to Midori’s slanderous comments about my web site there are no pictures or videos of these events posted at my site and there never were
Here is the post in question along with the comment section where you can see the truth about both the post and my interaction with Honu
By Rush is an entertainer....
July 12, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this
See that is the problem. People actually believe this addict.
Why in the world would this guy need viagra on a trip with four men?
By Gosh, Fitzgerald Is Lockimg Them Up Left And Right
July 12, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this
Millions upon millions upon millions of wasted tax dollars, to hell with budget deficits, and the best he can come up with is tricking some aide into confusing his story.
Don’t you libs feel shorted?
What, tell me, what will you do with all that confetti and champagne?
Why, oh why couldn’t you have appointed gadem as prosecutor when you had the chance? You could have locked up all of Pennsylvania Avenue and saved the taxpayers the cost of the investigation.
But no, no, here we are stuck with CNN false stories and our Zanax prescriptions.
Such is the life of a pinko liberal.
By They are failed American...
July 12, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this
They listen to Rush and believe him.
Freedom, who needs it, we are scared.
Worst Prsident ever can do no wrong.
By Ask any Republican
July 12, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this
Dueling Quotes
“Facing increasing criticism on Korea, Tony Snow lashed out at Clinton. Snow accused the Clinton administration of going to North Korea with “flowers and chocolates.” He said the Clinton strategy “failed” and President Bush had ‘learned from that mistake.’” —Tony Snow, http://www.thinkprogress.org/
Let’s review the facts: 1. George H. W. Bush: one to two bombs’ worth of plutonium
2. Bill Clinton: zero plutonium
3. George W. Bush: 4-6 nuclear weapons’ worth of plutonium. —Think Progress, http://www.thinkprogress.org/
The big difference is Clinton didn’t get richer every time he created a crisis. By letting North Korea and that Hand* in Iran have nukes, Bush can say we need that horse*t Star Wars shield that doesn’t work to protect us from his many failures.
By Another Mike
July 12, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this
Fitzgerald decides not to prosecute Rove. Novak confirms that Rove was one of his sources for the Plame story.
Accordingly, Rove joins the ranks of the Unindicted Co-Conspirator. This was a popular activity during the Watergate era.
Another book by John Dean Together with the resurgence of the Unindicted Co-Conspirator confirms that we did not learn from history, so we are repeating it.
The incidents between US troops and civilians that are leading to court martials remind us of the court martials during the Viet Nam war and the experience of the Soviet army in Afghanistan. We did not learn from history, so we are repeating it.
The combination of an irrational leader in North Korea and the cries of Pinko when anybody questions our president are reminiscent of the 1950s. Since we didn’t learn from them, I guess we have to go back and live through them.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this
Methinks Honu maybe Midori.
LOL.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this
gadem,
Why did you leave out what that was a response to? Could it be that you didn’t want people to know the “arresting for committing crimes” was in fact discussing arresting people for illegal activity and that the first post you pasted was about that and not William Jefferson?
If you’re going to play this game you might want to practice.
By Thomas
July 12, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this
Seriously — about the only hope of any control of the Kim Jong issue is by economic sanctions at this point.
Invade North Korea? Not a chance with our military (and national budget) Stretched too thin. please remeber that they can actually hit our planes and bring many down unlike our Iraqi’ foes (ahem) technology.
Get China to control their mad dog? Nope - we have no influence in China now that we are in debt up to our ears to them. Now where do you think that huge deficit of our budget is owed too? Well a very large chucnk of that money is owed to those slant eyed guys we are buying cheap goods from! Yes we are in debt to China!
Nuke them — Sure why not? Lets light that world wide candle. At least after that point there wouldn’t be an environment for the environmentalist to scream about now would there. Of course there wouldn’t be Suv’s or much of anything left to enjoy either. That is unless you realy want to cook on rocks and eat cockroaches!
Those of you that think Bush had nothing to do with the current North Korea situation obviously didn’t keep up with events during the early years of Bush - so here’s a refresher.
1) Via a treaty arranged By President Clinton, the USA is supplying Oil to North Korea for them to Produce Electricity. This is in exchange for North Korea shutting down their (existing) nuclear reactors. this is a temporary arrangement while the USA helps build 2 light water reactors (reactors that do not produce bomb grade nuclear by-product in the process) These reactors would eventually replace North Korea’s heavy water reactors that were originally producing their electricity. Those (older) reactors would be dismantled after the new reactors had been built.
2) Bush comes into Office. Bush does very little on the dplomacy front instead taking a hard-liner stance with other countries such as North Korea. The inspections however continued on the (shutdown) North Korean reactors. Note these reactors also had cameras constantly monitoring the seals. During the inspections the inspection team were told by North Korean officials that they still had a nuclear weapons research program going. They did not however have fissionable materials to work with, they were just doing basic scientific research towards the development of nuclear weapons.
3) When Bush was informed of the fact that North Korea still had weapons research in violat
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 01:03 PM | Link to this
getalife, Midori has been known to post under several different names.
By Liberal Texas Democrat
July 12, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this
“You got your panties in wad over 2500 brave volunteer soldiers, which I doubt if you really even give a flying f’k about them, how can you just totally overlook the 85,000?”
On a very personal level, a personal response
In the 35 years I’ve been retired from the Army and done nothing to disguise scars from injuries to my head and neck, I’ve learned that comparisons of the combat-injured to persons mugged — or run over crossing the street — are to be expected.
I’ve accepted the discomfort in others when meeting someone who’s returned from a horrific place they can’t imagine.
I understand when they seek comfort by assuring themselves that what they see is the result of fate, and not the conscientious effort on anyone’s part to carry out orders given in their name — ostensibly for the protection of their freedom and security.
When conversations progress to the scars, failed wars and injury, I understand. From the flow and timbre of talk to body language that draws back I understand that what they’re saying is, “It wasn’t me who sent you. I’d have done things differently.”
I no longer explain that comparing combat injuries to criminal violence or traffic accidents denigrates the efforts of law enforcement and trivializes the service of our military.
Such explanations to these persons are as useful an endeavor as nailing Jell-O to a tree.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this
Speaking of unindicted co-conspirators. Does this one get a pass in the land of the moonbats?
By getalife
July 12, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this
Andy,
Reminds me of the millions spent on Clinton to find out he got a b*****b.
Libby is still going to trial and we found out W has no credibilty.
Money well spent.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:12 PM | Link to this
this is how conservatives “win” elections
Bush and Karl Rove exports democracy.
Come on RW, you are smarter than that.
wanna bet?
Honu turns out to be a really fine person, it’s a shame that he/she will have to be tarnished by the likes of you glomming on to them.
awww. poor widdle baby. he can dish is out but can’t take it.
Sorry, but I’m all out of pacifers you wimp ignorant bastard.
Yes, Honu IS a fine person!!!! Got your sorry a** pegged!!!!
By Honu
July 11, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this
RW – Until now, nothing has ever driven me to respond to anyone on Mike Luckovich’s blog, (can’t say that tomorrow) although I’ve probably lurked here since it’s inception – I’m familiar with the regulars’ views and can usually, grudgingly, see both sides of the arguments.
At 10:05a, you posted a link to your website. On the site, there is another link to something called the Jawa Report and by now, everyone has probably been there to see the spoils of the Iraqi war in all its glory. So now I just had to ask you – what purpose does it serve to keep this link up on your otherwise reasonable website? What purpose do the photos of mutilated servicemen serve? What purpose to keep them on-line, along with the video, when even Michelle Malkin (who I am sure is one of your modern-day heroines) requested they be removed from a site similar to Jawa? (The other site complied, by the way.)
Did you think these photos and the video would sway me to your way of thinking? Did you think I’d be so outraged that I’d be leading the charge to do away with all liberal-thinking individuals (or anyone against the war), or ban them from Mike’s blog, or ban Mike from Mike’s blog, or kneel down and profess my allegiance to all things republican? Did you?
Well, here’s what you’ve done. If I were on the fence before today, you managed to push me into the other yard. This war is ugly. This administration is uglier. And you, RW, for posting that link, are ugliest of them all.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:14 PM | Link to this
getalife, Midori has been known to post under several different names.
ooooooooo - we’re back to “that” again.
and which “names” would that be?
logic has never been you people’s strong points.
I post, in my own name, on here and never once tried to represent myself as anyone else.
NEVER.
stop trying to project your crap onto me. That’s you people’s one-trick pony.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 01:15 PM | Link to this
getalife and Moderate Voice,
Midori may well post under other names, but I believe Honu is sincere. If you read the comment section at my blog that I linked above you will see that. I could be wrong though because the only thing libs are good at is pretending to be something they’re not.
getalife, you were there last night so you’re just basically trying to incite trouble. The folks at lgf were still talking about you last night on their post about Wilson being the source of Plame’s outing. They actually think you are still there using a different name.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this
No, getalife.
“Honu” is not me.
You should know by now that I leave the name jacking to the jack a**es on the right.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:23 PM | Link to this
Poor widdle RW, the original lemming.
He is now reduced to having to run another poll.
Is Midori Honu?
is Honu Midori?
Or are they two different people who see thru RW the Original Lemming and think RW is a lying hypocritical sack of feces?
I think I’ll go with the last option.
By If You Did Actually Serve...
July 12, 2006 01:26 PM | Link to this
I find it hard to believe because no true soldier would ever consider abandoning their “brothers” in the field. I’ve never heard one of you obvious leftwing pacifists, supposed veterans, ever address our soldiers as “brothers.”
By Liberal Texas Democrat July 12, 2006 01:04 PM In the 35 years I’ve been retired from the Army and done nothing to disguise scars from injuries to my head and neck, I’ve learned that comparisons of the combat-injured to persons mugged — or run over crossing the street — are to be expected.
You are consumed, both physically and mentally, by your emotions. Because of this you are endangering the lives of every man, woman and child that live in this country. You are giving aid, comfort and motivation to our enemies and they have taken advantage of your lack of resolve.
Your lack of courage.
It is beyond reason to use the deaths and suffering of the courageous young men that bravely volunteer to protect not only those too weak to protect themselves but also the citizens of Iraq from a barbaric, fanatical ideology of killers, killers that prove their lethality to us on a regular basis, by killing our innocents.
Our soldiers deserve our respect, our honor and our unquestioned resolve for their mission.
They don’t deserve some weak kneed back stabbing socialist fomenting acts of treason against them.
They don’t need your “help.”
My fellow Americans, I have a task for those with the courage and fortitude to take it. I have a message that needs not fall on deaf ears. A vision the blind need to see. I am not a political man nor one with great wisdom. I am just a soldier who finds himself helping rebuild a country that he helped liberate a couple years ago. I have watched on television how the American public questions why their mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters are fighting and dying in a country 9000 miles away from their own soil. Take the word of a soldier, for that is all I am, that our cause is a noble one. The reason we are here is one worth fighting for. A cause that has been the most costly and sought after cause in our small span of existence on our little planet. Bought in blood and paid for by those brave enough to give the ultimate sacrifice to obtain it. A right that is given to every man, woman, and child I believe by God.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:27 PM | Link to this
While we have diverse political beliefs, we are united in our rejection of these policies. Through the wide-scale distortion of words (from “Healthy Forests” to “Mission Accomplished”) and both the manipulation of media (the photo op) and its suppression (the hidden war casualties), the Bush administration has demonstrated disdain for the responsible use of mass media, language and the intelligence of the American people. While it may be an insignificant gesture, we stand against these distortions and for the restoration of a civil political dialogue.
Now I suppose RW and Andy will firebomb the place.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:29 PM | Link to this
more “conservative” democracy in action
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this
Midori, anyone that believes that everyone on one side of a political discussion is wrong is a blind partisan. And before you flip out and say something about me being a right wing lemming or something else witty like that, it goes for the right too. Neither party is right on every issue.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:36 PM | Link to this
here you go, poor widdle RW. Midori will make it all better. poor widdle a**wipe, caught up in his web of hypocrisy and lies
By @@
July 12, 2006 01:37 PM | Link to this
GWB has no aspirations of becoming another Hitler.
This guy seems well educated and laid back. I’ve said it before and I’m inclined to agree with him.
The European Union is a new political contraption, and we Europeans have the same problem in identifying it as does the United States. Is it a federal state in the making? Is it a confederation plus? I suggest it is an experiment in a form of governing a group of countries for which we have not yet found a name. And the same, I suspect, is true of the position of the United States in the world. So, illuminating though it is, the attempt to fit the United States into historical patterns of empire is ultimately misguided. The United States is not in transition from hegemony to empire. The world is in transition to new forms of political organization, whose outlines can be dimly perceived, but whose frontiers cannot yet be fixed.
It’s global growing pains. Everybody is experiencing them. It can’t be defined as anything else, but they are “nagging pains”.
But there is no place for Jihadists in this world equation.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 01:41 PM | Link to this
My bad, Midori.
I apologize.
RW is correct. I am trouble. Just ask the lizards at the lgf. They still miss me. LOL.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this
This is no distant story. It holds a personal note for me, this possible gang rape and murder of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl by American soldiers. The story has been hitting the media for the past week and a half, and—as of today—the New York Times reports that six soldiers might be implicated.
The personal note is that I have been gang raped by American soldiers. (See my “War and Sex” article for my description of this experience in my past.) The cold fear of male violence never entirely leaves raped bodies. Unexpectedly, things surface, and this story is triggering those things in me—phantom rape pain, jumpiness, feeling startled if a man comes too near. Since I am used to reading about rape, living with it, writing about it, even experiencing it, why such an impact from this one incident?
It may be because this is the first time the “R” word has surfaced in Iraq. In our three-year occupation of that country, is this the only time our men have raped? Given their war/rape record elsewhere, it would be hard to believe. It is a real puzzler to me that the U.S. Military is admitting to this possible rape of one Iraqi girl when they have done little, if anything, to acknowledge the rapes of thousands upon thousands of other girls by our soldiers during wartime. Widespread violation of girls took place in Vietnam. (One vet I know said it was so common the men called it SIMR, Standard Issue Military Rape.) After WWII, rape by American soldiers in Europe was “extensive,” according to the Oxford Companion to American Military History. Rape of French girls by our men was so widespread that General Eisenhower actually had to acknowledge it was going on. He did nothing about it, of course, but he did admit it was happening. Our men produced roughly 200,000 Amerasian children upon the bodies of destitute Japanese girls after WWII—an indication that massive rape of prostituted/brothelized bodies was going on in the Pacific. During the battle of Okinawa, our boys raped a whole village of women and girls too sick and weak to even run away from them.
Wartime rape/prostitution is common, the norm. Why is the military only taking note of this one incident, when the bodies of hundreds of thousands of girls have been sexually brutalized by our military?…
and the rapists are cheered on here by conservatives. the filt
By Let's do some fact checking, shall we
July 12, 2006 01:50 PM | Link to this
By Midori July 12, 2006 01:14 PM | Link to this getalife, Midori has been known to post under several different names. ooooooooo - we’re back to “that” again. and which “names” would that be? logic has never been you people’s strong points. I post, in my own name, on here and never once tried to represent myself as anyone else. NEVER.
stop trying to project your crap onto me. That’s you people’s one-trick pony.
OH REALLY???
By Andy Sucks
March 6, 2006 12:22 PM | Link to this
Surely you have a suggestion as to what he should do to keep you libs happy?
Yup.
Him carrying his incompetent a* back to Crawford would make me very happy.
Very happy indeed.
That and keeping his dumb looking face off my television.
By Midori
March 6, 2006 12:23 PM | Link to this
Surely you have a suggestion as to what he should do to keep you libs happy?
Yup.
Him carrying his incompetent a* back to Crawford would make me very happy.
Very happy indeed.
That and keeping his dumb looking face off my television.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:56 PM | Link to this
The Moderate Voice is anything but moderate:
Weenie is a very sensitive guy, and it angers and saddens him that everyone isn’t just as sensitive as he. An admitted male feminist, Weenie is ever vigilant against anti-progressive attitudes. Though he seldom comes into personal contact with the working classes, he keenly feels the pain of their oppression nonetheless . Weenie’s chief antagonists are Troglodyte, Evil Clown, Capitalista and sometimes Ideologue. Because of his natural petulance Weenie can easily be goaded into battle, but he is encumbered by a tendency to throw temper tantrums when severely pressed.
Maybe he should change his name to the Moderate Weenie?
By Midori
July 12, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this
Now, RW has many faces.
Here is one of them
Artful Dodger is a nimble and elusive Warrior. When strongly attacked he changes the subject with a diversionary counterattack. For example, if in a moment of pique his opponent refers to him to him as a “sonofabitch”, Artful Dodger will not only demand a public apology for the insult to his own mother, but will castigate his opponent on behalf all mothers everywhere. Knowing full well that staying on topic works to his disadvantage, Artful Dodger will not allow himself to be pinned down.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:01 PM | Link to this
this is Andy
Evil Clown is very quick with a joke, but his jests always have a barb. He has little patience for in-depth discussions and will often disrupt exchanges between serious forum participants by introducing irrelevant topics, fatuous quips, and offhand comments. His greatest thrill is to taunt and humiliate weaker or more plodding Warriors with his snappy ripostes. Not a particularly powerful Warrior, Evil Clown will attempt to avoid defeat by accusing his attacker of having no sense of humor
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this
Dusty and Buy Danish
Cyber Sisters are an extremely fierce confederation of fighting females who act something like a shrill Greek chorus, echoing and amplifying one another’s voice until their foes retreat in disarray. They are generally leaderless, but anyone who challenges one Cyber Sister can expect to be savagely attacked by the others. Only the most powerful and battle-hardened of Warriors is strong enough to weather a Cyber Sisters attack.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 02:04 PM | Link to this
“For a nation that cannot hold its commander-in-chief responsible is something other than a democracy.” — John Dean
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 02:05 PM | Link to this
Midori,
It appears you have confused the fact that once a discussion goes on past “Bush sucks” and you no longer understand the conversation, for someone else changing the subject.
Not to change the subject, but are you real sure you’ve NEVER posted in another name.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:05 PM | Link to this
@@, they’ve got your number
For Coffee Klatch the discussion forum is a social gathering - like Mah Jong or Wednesday morning canasta club. Coffee Klatch prefers a friendly, chatty environment and almost always limits her participation to non-technical forums. Whether inadvertently or by design, Coffee Klatch prepares the battlefield in her favor by making it soggy with pleasant, but vapid messages - her favorite phrase often being, “thanks for sharing”. This renders the battlefield rather slow going for swifter and more powerful Warriors. CAUTION: If war does break out she will shed her benign facade and attack mired Warriors without remorse.
They forgot to add that your sense of humor is totally lacking and that it sucks.
By Goldie
July 12, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this
Bush’s insistence on continuing the quagmire in Iraq is only serving to embolden our real enemies— North Korea and Iran. They see every day how all of our military resources are being squandered in W’s “war on terrrrrr” in Iraq. What a waste of American lives and $$$$$$$$$ (representing the HALF TRILLION DOLLARS spent so far). And all we hear from this failed administration and its war policy is “we’re turning another corner”!
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:08 PM | Link to this
another side to Andy
Enfant Provocateur likes to stir up trouble because…because, well…just because. This species of Flame Warrior is almost always young and male - it could be just a hormone thing.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 02:10 PM | Link to this
Well I guess this blog is done for the day. Once Midori starts spamming it’s pretty much a matter of when, not if, they’ll shut it down.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this
the other face of RW
Palooka will battle anyone, anytime, anywhere - he seems to love it, even though he always takes a beating. After a terrific pounding at the hands of, for example, Kung-Fu Master, he’ll just struggle to his feet and wobble back into the ring. His astonishing ability to absorb punishment leads one to suspect that during his long Warrior career Palooka has taken a few too many punches. Often, as an act of mercy, Nanny will step in to stop the fight.
and @@ and Danish are his nannies.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this
VOTE FOR RALPH REED
HE HAD ME AT ‘HALO’
By getalife
July 12, 2006 02:15 PM | Link to this
Reality in Iraq
Rumsfeld does not get it. It is about revenge.
By candide
July 12, 2006 02:16 PM | Link to this
I guess Barbara Bush never read the “Boy Who Cried Wolf” to young Dubya.
He’s have learned more from that story than from the nonsense in the bible.
By @@
July 12, 2006 02:20 PM | Link to this
Midori:
I liked this description you gave of me much better. I still laugh when I think about it. It was funny!!!!!
I LIKE HOW LITTLE MIKE LUCKOVICH (PULITZER PRIZE WINNER) DRAWS THE TEACHER IN THIS EDITORIAL CARTOON….SHE’S AN OLD HAG, WITH HER TITS HANGING DOWN TO HER WAIST LINE…
( * ) ( * )
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
TOO FRICKEN’ FUNNY!!!! THAT LUCKOVICH IS A CRAZY NUT, BUT HE’S VERY GOOD AT WHAT HE DOES….LOL
You were rockin’ on this ^^^ one.
By Ricky
July 12, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this
What a surprise Midori and candide both start posting at about the same time. Coincidence?
By Ricky
July 12, 2006 02:26 PM | Link to this
getalife, Cafferty is a hack. There is a reason he is as old as he is and a bit player at CNN. Have you ever seen him say something good about a conservative? He is as bad as Midori or any other blind partisan.
By Goldie
July 12, 2006 02:30 PM | Link to this
Andy-Whine, RW and other neo-con cohorts—
When you want to accuse Joe Wilson having “outed” his own wife, you should know that Robert Novak found Wilson’s wife’s name in “Who’s Who In America”, not the fact that she worked for the CIA. That revelation came from Karl Rove. And I’m sure you know this already and but will still continue to insinuate that Wilson “outed” his own wife.
How pathetic you small-minded little minions are!
A partial quote from Novak’s column today says:
“Following my interview with the primary source, I sought out the second administration official and the CIA spokesman for confirmation. I learned Valerie Plame’s name (emphasis added) from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America”.”
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:40 PM | Link to this
Ricky,
isn’t it about time you gassed up the Mystery Machine?
How can you, of all people, call someone “partisan”?
Scrappy Doo is awfully offended.
My sincerest gratitude to Andy for the cut and paste lessons:
They were not good losers. So when they lost the White House in 1992 they began what would be an unrelenting and extended series of attacks on the Clinton presidency, which reached their peak when Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky was revealed in early 1998. At that time I began receiving an increasing number of requests for television interviews, and Silent Coup was all but forgotten publicly (and we were in settlement discussions). While I had no idea then whether the president was telling the truth about his relationship with Lewinsky, it was clear to me that the First Lady was correct in her contention that there was a vast right-wing conspiracy attempting to destroy the Clintons, for I still had a number of knowledgeable conservative contacts. Because each of the various scandals of the Clinton White House-the travel office firings, Whitewater, Vince Foster’s suicide, the Paula Jones lawsuit, and the Lewinsky affair-was predictably declared by Republicans to be “worse than Watergate,” I felt someone needed to set the record straight. In reality, these scandals, even collectively, did not come close to Watergate in their seriousness. So I began to speak out. I did not speak as a partisan, but rather as someone who understood the difference between the Clinton and Nixon scandals, as well as the gravity of impeachment. (I was well versed in this topic because I had once studied the impeachment and trial of Andrew Johnson, and, of course, had firsthand knowledge of the Nixon proceedings.)
Hang on Ricky - I knew I found your alter ego. I’ll have it up in a second.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this
Ahhhhhhh. Here’s Ricky
Profundus Maximus eagerly holds forth on all subjects, but his thin knowledge will not support a sustained assault and therefore his attacks quickly peter out. Profundus Maximus often uses big words, obscure terms and…ahem…even Latin to bluff his way through battle..
By gadem
July 12, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this
Goldie Andy will never get it, and RW will lie his way out of it. They are a lost cause. You know that they are part of the 23% that will follow Bush to hell.
By The Moderate Voice
July 12, 2006 02:44 PM | Link to this
Goldie, you are critizing people for not knowing facts, but you post incorrect facts as well. Novak’s primary source was not Rove. He himself has said that. I also am sure that you have read the article by newspaper icon Bob Woodward that said there was no damage done to any active CIA operatives in the field due to the “leaking” of Valerie Plame’s job.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 02:46 PM | Link to this
What a surprise Midori and candide both start posting at about the same time. Coincidence?
Candide - the jig is up!!! Looks like wer’e busted.
Ricky gassed up the Mystery Machine, pat Velma and Daphne on their rears, put on his cravat, and has once again cracked the case wide open!!!!
Oh, the horror!!!
@@, I keep telling you hon. Give it up. You sound stupider with each post. Stop trying so hard. Maybe you should stop forcing it.
By @@
July 12, 2006 02:47 PM | Link to this
Midori must have had all of our profiles on file. The time span between posts would indicate that she did.
Is Midori keeping a file on the bloggers here. Midori, are you really J. Edgar?
By Ricky
July 12, 2006 02:49 PM | Link to this
Midori, the difference between me and you is that I can admit when conservatives are wrong and make a mistake. For instance I have said several times that there have been errors made in Iraq and Bush has spent too much money. You however refuse to admit that anything a conservative does is a good idea or that a liberal has ever done anything wrong.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 02:53 PM | Link to this
Goldie,
The name was in Wilson’s entry in Who’s Who. This was the same name she supposedly used under cover. What this proves is that she wasn’t undercover at all.
Now if you want to see how this all started, look no further than Joe Wilson lying to Nicholas Kristoff and the New York Times about being sent by Dick Cheney.
Do you expect the administration to just accept any lie you tell about them? Two things here, one the administration got the truth out to you (I thought you claimed to like that) and two I thought you were all for leaks to the press.
By @@
July 12, 2006 02:57 PM | Link to this
Spam…“the force behind Midori”.
Her brain food.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this
What’s the matter gadem? I exposed your little trick of cutting and pasting two different topics to make it seem as if you were right and now you’re just going to get whiny on us?
On an unrelated note to the blog:
Has anyone been able to tell there was a full moon this week?
By Two Down- BUSH to go
July 12, 2006 03:00 PM | Link to this
Reports: British banker found dead
LONDON - A British banker who was questioned by U.S. authorities in connection with the Enron scandal has been found dead, British media said Wednesday. The man’s body was found Tuesday in a park in east London, but police declined to identify him.
The Royal Bank of Scotland, however, sent condolences to the family of Neil Coulbeck, one of the bank’s senior employees who had been questioned by the FBI in the case of three British bankers facing Enron-related fraud charges. The British Broadcasting Corp. and other media outlets also identified the man as Coulbeck, 53.
More Republican pond scum now making the world a better place.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this
OMG. How gullible can you be?
Ricky,
Do you actually believe Jack is the only one reporting bad news out of Iraq?
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this
Moderate Voice,
I agree that Novak’s original/primary source has not yet been disclosed in public…just to the Grand Jury. I am not sure that Bob Woodward still can be viewed as an impartial journalist. You may call him an icon, if you wish. Even if no active CIA operatives were damaged, the justice system need only determine if, by disclosing Plame’s CIA function, was the LAW broken?
I think the justice department and the American voter should also look at the motive behind the disclosure of Plame’s identity. I think everyone agrees that it was done to discredit Wilson. Is that an egregious abuse of power? I think it is. Should someone be impeached? Your thoughts?
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 03:03 PM | Link to this
@@,
Midori had to do something to spam the blog and get the comment section away from her latest lie being exposed at 1:50.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 03:06 PM | Link to this
RW - I noted the full moon during the last televised Braves game…but I have not seen it even here in the mountains.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this
Goldie Andy will never get it, and RW will lie his way out of it
he can’t even do THAT right.
By One Nation Under Bush WithOUT Liberty and...
July 12, 2006 03:10 PM | Link to this
Iraqi leader warns biased media outlets
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq’s prime minister warned television stations Wednesday against broadcasting reports that incite violence, saying he will not hesitate to shut them down.
The statement by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to Iraq’s parliament came amid an increase of biased reporting by Shiite and Sunni television stations that focus on the suffering of their communities — often with little mention of the other.
“Television channels, mosques, journalism, and people in the streets are all inciting in a way that this present government cannot control,” al-Maliki said.
This would be Bush’s FREE and DEMOCRATIC Iraq. We sure can’t have those dirty ‘churches’ and ‘people in the streets’ talking in a way ‘the present government can’t control’ ! ! !
By Dusty
July 12, 2006 03:13 PM | Link to this
Racists are cheered on by conservatives. filth
That is an absolute lie. Your terrible experience does not give you the right to indict the whole military or conservatives.
Never have I read so many enemy inspiring falsehoods as Midori is putting out about American troops and conservative Americans.
The American military is vigorously investigating every report of rape. None are being overlooked. Any person who implies that rape is as common as basic training is speaking with a twisted mind.
According to the news, a 14 year old girl was raped in Iraq. The main participant has been arrested and others are being investigated.
A fourteen year old girl was raped in Atlanta last week. Does that mean that every man in Atlanta aims to rape fourteen year olds? NO, of course not. And the same goes in Iraq. A sociopath may turn up in any large group of people but it does not mean that ALL of them are that way.
Our troops are over there fighting to do what is right. For someone to sit at home and indict the whole group is criminal. The troops may think that everybody at home has gone crazy.
To unload the tragedies of life on a blog is very sad. A terrible experience. You need more help than we can give. But dumping on society and the military of our country will not help. (Calling me names will not help either.)
By Thomas
July 12, 2006 03:15 PM | Link to this
Just In ——
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/shared-gen/ap/OtherUSGovermnent/LobbyistProbeTribe.html
And what timing as our Dear Ralph Reed goes for the golden ring in Georgia elections.
In my best (worst) HoneyMooners voice Hey Hey Ralphie Boy — better not quit the Day Job!
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 03:15 PM | Link to this
I think everyone agrees that it was done to discredit Wilson. -by N-GA
Count me out of that idiotic statement. Correcting someone’s lie may discredit them in the public eye, but they were already discredited for lying to begin with. Not to mention that the lie in this case had a serious chance of undermining the duly elected government of the United States.
Motivations for that initial lie should be as fully investigated as this so called leak and if criminal intent to undermine the government is found then trials should follow.
By Goldie
July 12, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this
Not the Moderate Voice— you may want to read Novak’s column in its entirety before claiming that Rove is not a source. Novak clearly states that Rove was a source. And maybe you should spend more time reading for your source material instead of posting the usual right-wing propaganda here on the blog.
My Role in the Valerie Plame Leak Story
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this
Midori had to do something to spam the blog and get the comment section away from her latest lie being exposed at 1:50.
and what lie would that be, RW the Original Lemming? Is it a “lie” because “you” say so? I don’t think so. We all know what a lying gasbag you are. So don’t even try to go there. Projecting again, RW the Original Lying Gasbag?
why can Andy “spam”, and I can’t?
when Andy posts his little diatribes, you applaud them. Yet you try to deride mine. Spoken like a good little Nazi.
Heck, at least mine make sense.
I’m doing a public service with my information. Letting posters and visitors know what a bunch of demented morons you and your pack of wild eyed lemmings are.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 03:17 PM | Link to this
RW,
I guess you missed it the first time I posted it so I will try again.
A copy of Who’s Who sat on Henry’s anchor desk Thursday, leading some bloggers to speculate that Novak suspected Henry planned to ask him about Plame’s name in it and used Carville’s remarks as an excuse to walk out. That’s how Carville saw it. “Bob’s got a lot going on in his life, and that book was sitting on the desk like a barf bag, just waiting,” he said.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this
RW the Original Lemming,
having read that 1:50 I can state that you’re an even bigger lying hypocrite than I imagined.
You and Andy can’t do better than that?
By Waffle, Waffle, Waffle, Waffle
July 12, 2006 03:24 PM | Link to this
U.S. will give detainees Geneva rights
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration, called to account by Congress after the Supreme Court blocked military tribunals, said Tuesday all detainees at Guantanamo Bay and in U.S. military custody everywhere are entitled to protections under the Geneva Conventions.
White House spokesman Tony Snow said the policy, outlined in a new Defense Department memo, reflects the recent 5-3 Supreme Court decision blocking military tribunals set up by President Bush. That decision struck down the tribunals because they did not obey international law and had not been authorized by Congress.
This would be the usual Republican tactic, blame whatever it is on someone else. When Bush blames the mostly Republican Supremes though he is blaming only himself. Keep your eye on the ball, the Rovian slimemeisters are slicker than Slick Willy ! ! !
By Dusty
July 12, 2006 03:31 PM | Link to this
My last post was to Midori.
It was about RAPISTS not racist. There you go.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:31 PM | Link to this
Let’s see, I want to make RW happy, and bring his delusions and lies to life.
therefore, I must choose an alias worthy of his “detection”.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
how about: RW is an ignorant sh*tstain?
or better yet: RW, the original sh*tstain?
nah.
Think I will be the better person and continue to post under my OWN name, and continue to laugh at the idiots claiming otherwise.
I have more integrity in a single strand of hair than you have in your entire body. That’s why I don’t have to resort to your games and allegations of name jacking. I leave that practice to you losers.
Unlike you morons, I don’t have to hide behind alternate screen names. Filthy cowards that you are. I suppose that’s why you keep trying to hurl those allegations my way.
Cowards do what cowards know. And you can’t fanthom anyone else not being like you.
Idiot.
Moron.
Jerk.
Imbecile.
Coward.
By @@
July 12, 2006 03:33 PM | Link to this
RW:
I don’t recall that original incident with Midori. But I’m glad she brought attention to it with her “brain food”.
I think she may be trying too hard.
By getalife
July 12, 2006 03:34 PM | Link to this
Novak should go back on CNN with Carville and let him try to pull the same BS he tried last year before storming off and getting a time out.
He will be on Fox News.
Go figure.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 03:34 PM | Link to this
Midori,
I didn’t say don’t spam the blog, I just said you were spamming the blog. Maybe one of the professors here can explain the difference to you.
I’ll take the part about why it’s a lie. If you make the comment that you have NEVER posted in another name and someone posts an example of you doing just that, then it shows that you lied.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 03:35 PM | Link to this
RW, From the National Journel:
*President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president’s interview.
Bush told prosecutors he directed Cheney to disclose classified information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson.
Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said.
But Bush told investigators that he was unaware that Cheney had directed I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff, to covertly leak the classified information to the media instead of releasing it to the public after undergoing the formal governmental declassification processes.*
Straight from Bush’s mouth: “….but also discredit Wilson…” It seems, RW, that you don’t believe your own Fuhrer.
By What Would One Expect from a BUSH Nominee
July 12, 2006 03:36 PM | Link to this
Judicial nominee acknowledges oversight
WASHINGTON - President Bush’s nominee to an appellate judgeshipacknowledged missing the appearance of a conflict of interest in four cases in which he is accused of ruling on litigants in whose companies his family held stock.
Terrence Boyle, Bush’s pick for the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., said Wednesday that his aides’ routine screening of cases for conflicts of interest “missed” the appearance in these instances.
Sure, this was just FOUR more in the long, long list of Bush ‘HONEST’ mistakes. People wake up, this is the most corrupt, propagandized administration that America has ever endured. Bush makes NIXON look like a saint ! ! !
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this
Midori,
Know you’re sounding as silly as you did when you tried to weasel out of that one the day you did it.
It’s all Andy’s fault!
By More Good News from the Leakers In Chief
July 12, 2006 03:43 PM | Link to this
Agency recovers from computer break-ins
WASHINGTON - The State Department is recovering from large-scale computer break-ins worldwide over the past several weeks that appeared to target its headquarters and offices dealing with China and North Korea, The Associated Press has learned.
Investigators believe hackers stole sensitive U.S. information and passwords and implanted backdoors in unclassified government computers to allow them to return at will, said U.S. officials familiar with the hacking. These people spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the widespread intrusions and the resulting investigation.
The Bush administration certainly is ‘transparent’, just unintentionally so ! ! !
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this
Midori,
You have no integrity at all, not in a little hair or anywhere. This is where the exchange that you busted yourself on started.
Now you would like us to believe that you responded to Buy Danish and somebody named Andy Sucks gave the exact same answer one minute before you did. It was hilarious further down when you accused Andy of copying your answer and posting it himself. Did I mention that the comment from Andy Sucks came before the one from Midori and it was a direct response to Buy Danish?
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 03:52 PM | Link to this
N-GA,
Would you like to provide a link where we can see if “discredit” is a quote from the President’s own mouth as you call it or a turn of a phrase in a writers story?
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:54 PM | Link to this
AWWW
Now RW is mad at me.
pout
snicker
guffaw
By Here's How BUSH Gets War
July 12, 2006 03:55 PM | Link to this
Elderly to see hike in Medicare premiums
WASHINGTON - The elderly will face another double-digit rise in their Medicare premiums next year, resulting in monthly payments of nearly $100.
The projections assume that Congress will reduce Medicare payment rates for physicians by about 4.7 percent next year. Many analysts don’t believe such a cut will occur, and that means the cost of the insurance would go higher than current projections.
*Sorry, Mom and Dad, I didn’t know that when I voted for King George that I would be making it impossible for you to buy health insurance. The Chimperor Does have HIS priorities straight, though. No cuts in pay to big bucks Republican donaters like Doctors. Let the poor elderly supply the war bucks he needs for “Mission Accomplished” photo ops. Slick, very very slick ! ! ! *
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:56 PM | Link to this
cheer up, RW.
don’t be mad.
it’s not your fault that your’e a lying, insufferable pig. It must be in your genes.
go take it out on your Mom.
Slap her once for me.
Isn’t that what cowards do?
By Midori
July 12, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this
I believe in karma:
MSNBC’s studios in Washington are on Capitol Hill, not far from the Senate side of the Capitol building. A core group of on-air consultants were placed on various shows throughout the day, but during the impeachment hearings and the trial, a few of us were requested to stay on the set with the anchors as long as official proceedings continued. During the many hours I was in the studio or the green room, I probably spent more time talking with legal analyst Barbara Olson than anyone else. Barbara, who was tragically killed on the 9/11 flight that crashed into the Pentagon, was smart, savvy, engaging, and never shy, least of all in her opinion of the president and his wife. “I really hate the Clintons, and I want to run them out of town,” she told me. Barbara, who frequently made calls on her cell phone during breaks, made it impossible not to overhear her conversations, and she explained to me that she was receiving talking points from her network of conservative Republicans, who were observing all of the media’s coverage of the impeachment proceeding. “Do you really believe you can remove a popular president?” I asked her during the hearings. “Absolutely. It’s a done deal,” she said. “How about the Senate?” I asked. “We’re working on it,” she replied with a conspiratorial smile and a wink. I had little doubt, from the time I spent with Barbara, that votes had already been counted in the House of Representatives, and nothing was going to stop them from voting for impeachment. There were simply too many Democrats in the Senate, however, for the Republicans to muster the requisite two thirds for a guilty verdict and removal. The entire undertaking was designed to tarnish Clinton, and the Democrats.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:02 PM | Link to this
Conservatives without conscience do not have horns and tails; if they did they would be easier to identify. Many of them can be quite pleasant, but at heart they are tough, cold-blooded, ruthless authoritarians. They are limited in their ability to see the world from any point of view other than their own, and they are narrow in their outlook. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney are prototypical conservative leaders without conscience. The excessive secrecy of the Bush administration, in particular, was apparent even before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but because the mainstream media ignored this issue, I wrote about it myself in Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush. Unlike the consequences of Nixon’s secrecy, those of Bush and Cheney have been lethal. Realizing that only a partisan would remain silent, I wanted to make people aware of what was happening, for I recognized that this was a dangerous presidency. In Worse Than Watergate I did not analyze Bush and Cheney’s behavior, because I was not sure then what was driving them. However, after studying the matter, I believe that one can reasonably conclude that how they think, their policies, and their style of governing are based to an alarming extent on their own authoritarian personalities, which tolerate no dissent, use dissembling as their standard modus operandi, and have pushed their governing authority beyond the law and the Constitution.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:03 PM | Link to this
RW,
get used to it.
If Andy can do it, I can do it.
At least my linked story is interesting, and has a point.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:05 PM | Link to this
Conservatism is not inherently moralistic, negative, arrogant, condescending, and self-righteous. Nor is it authoritarian. Yet all of these are adjectives that best describe the political outlook of contemporary conservatism. I make these observations not as an outsider, but as a conservative who is deeply troubled by what has become of a treasured philosophy. Conservatism has been co-opted by authoritarians, a most dangerous type of political animal.
By Howard Dean
July 12, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this
Thank you Midori, on befalf of the entire Democratic Party. You are a glorious ambassador for the left. Can you write some speeches for me?
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:07 PM | Link to this
How do people-particularly those who have never put their life on the line for their country-engage in, or condone, attacks on Senator John McCain’s life-defining experiences as a Vietnam POW or question Senator Max Cleland’s courage in building a new life after his loss of three limbs in Vietnam? What causes them to dispute Senator John Kerry’s valor during voluntary combat duty in Vietnam or to contest Representative Jack Murtha’s war record in Vietnam? Do they believe that by belittling the competence of White House counsel Harriet Miers, by forcing her to withdraw as a nominee for the Supreme Court, they are engaged in legitimate political debate? Why do they remain silent, or even defend, a president who has shamed the nation forever by endorsing an unprecedented and unnecessary use of torture against our enemies? These questions have clear answers. My aim is to explain how and why these conservatives operate as they do, with the thought that others may realize that this current breed of authoritarian conservatism, the behavior of both authoritarian leaders and their credulous followers, constitute a hazardous way for politics and governing. In fact, these people cannot be trusted to exercise the powers of government responsibly.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:10 PM | Link to this
Bush Brags About $296 Billion Deficit and Kool-aid Repugs Cheer
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this
By Midori July 12, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this I believe in karma
There you have it folks. Midori thinks 3000 of our fellow citizens were given the choice of burning to death , leaping to their death, or being killed in a horrific crash just because Barbara Olson was a Clinton basher and karma wanted to get her.
By Phil
July 12, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this
Let’s cut the crud. I see where the infamous name of one cowardly “SEMPER FI” once again hits this blog. Several months ago Steve humiliated this fake Marine day after day until he finally cut and ran. Offered him repeatedly $1000 cash to supply a DD214. Plus multiple contact methods.
Ol SEMP disappeared. But reemerged under another name. Probably “@@.” Pretending to be a female or even his own wife. He/she/it is just another tough-talking, never-served wingnut hero on this blog. They stain our society daily.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:19 PM | Link to this
I would be more than happy to, Howard. However, this is not a “speech” I’ve posted excerpts from.
It’s a op ed piece written by John Dean.
I find it completely credible in that John is a conservative. Who better to tell us what has happened to conservatives than a conservative?
Now, back to that speech.
I’ll write it only if I can call RW some more choice names. Andy, too.
By Goldie
July 12, 2006 04:20 PM | Link to this
{A good analysis of Bob Woodward’s involvement in “Plamegate”](http://mediamatters.org/items/200511160013)
By Abe
July 12, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this
We’ve got to take care of the N Korean threat. I’ve got it! Iraq is supplying N Korea with WMDs. Send our well-trained, highly disciplined troops into Iraq to git that Saddam guy. That’ll do it.
By It's Obvious That Today Is Loony Left Day
July 12, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this
Even crazy finch is here, all the moonbats are out in force:
By Waffle, Waffle, Waffle, Waffle July 12, 2006 03:24 PM U.S. will give detainees Geneva rights
Psycho, Psycho, Pyscho is more like it.
Gee, I wonder what happened to drive the pinkos over the edge, waht pray tell has emptied the fever swamps?
I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”
Bwahahahahahahahahaha.
No Fitzmas presents, ever!
Wilson’s entry carries over about 5 lines to the next column, which is why it cuts off in mid-sentence at the end. The relevant text is “m. Valerie Elise Plame, Apr. 3, 1998,” which not only appears in the 2003 edition, but ALL editions from 1999-2005!
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this
Midori thinks 3000 of our fellow citizens were given the choice of burning to death , leaping to their death, or being killed in a horrific crash just because Barbara Olson was a Clinton basher and ….
RW - It’s all Bill Clinton’s fault.
By Here's How BUSH Gets a Few More War Bucks
July 12, 2006 04:24 PM | Link to this
Elderly to see hike in Medicare premiums
WASHINGTON - The elderly will face another double-digit rise in their Medicare premiums next year, resulting in monthly payments of nearly $100.
The projections assume that Congress will reduce Medicare payment rates for physicians by about 4.7 percent next year. Many analysts don’t believe such a cut will occur, and that means the cost of the insurance would go higher than current projections.
Sorry, Mom and Dad, I didn’t know that when I voted for King George that I would be making it impossible for you to buy health insurance. The Chimperor does have HIS priorities straight, though. No cuts in pay to big bucks Republican donaters like Doctors. Let the poor elderly supply the war bucks he needs for “Mission Accomplished” photo ops. Slick, very very slick ! ! !
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:25 PM | Link to this
Phil,
they are a detestable, lying, cowardly bunch aren’t they?
take RW for instance.
He’s trying to put John Dean’s words in my mouth, then claim that I applauded 3000 people being killed.
If he can’t directly deal with a fact, he just makes stuff up.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he isn’t Simple, er, Semper Fi. Or @@.
By There Was No Crime, Hahahaha
July 12, 2006 04:26 PM | Link to this
Everybody knew about that stupid b-itch, I mean, Valerie:
That Fitzgerald did not indict any of these sources may indicate his conclusion that none of them violated the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.
Maybe you’ll get the Republican President in 2008, who knows moonbats, it’s something to rant about for 3 years, anyway.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:27 PM | Link to this
Andy,
you’re just mad that I cut and paste better than you do.
P.S.
It’s all Bill Clinton’s fault.
By Mental Case Midori, Rattling That Cage Door
July 12, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this
By Midori July 12, 2006 03:16 PM why can Andy “spam”, and I can’t? when Andy posts his little diatribes, you applaud them. Yet you try to deride mine. Spoken like a good little Nazi. Heck, at least mine make sense.
Let’s vote on that:
By Midori July 12, 2006 02:03 PM Dusty and Buy Danish Cyber Sisters are an extremely fierce confederation of fighting females who act something like a shrill Greek chorus, echoing and amplifying one another’s voice until their foes retreat in disarray. They are generally leaderless, but anyone who challenges one Cyber Sister can expect to be savagely attacked by the others. Only the most powerful and battle-hardened of Warriors is strong enough to weather a Cyber Sisters attack.
This woman has some major issues.
By One of the Majority's Voices of Dissent
July 12, 2006 04:42 PM | Link to this
Midori,
While you are on the subject of RW’s hypocrisy (along with his other generally bad behavior) did you catch how he had been attacking N-GA for posting the Department of Defense reports on fallen soldiers and then yesterday posted the link to the video of the two mutilated American soldiers himself? What’s worse is that RW claims that N-GA’s actions were for “political purposes,” but his weren’t. Even though this was clearly not the case and RW’s exploitation was obviously for political purposes, he refuses to admit it just because he says so. These republitards are great entertainment.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this
Midori,
I’ll retract that when you show me that “I believe in karma” was a part of John Deans words in that post.
The fact is you can’t because the words were yours and you attached them to 9/11. Spin it all you want.
By What A Dumb A-ss
July 12, 2006 04:45 PM | Link to this
My goodness, I set out to take apart this freaks screaming comments and look at the very first one:
By Here’s How BUSH<——————- Gets a Few More War Bucks July 12, 2006 04:24 PM Elderly to see hike in Medicare premiums WASHINGTON - The elderly will face another double-digit rise in their Medicare premiums next year, resulting in monthly payments of nearly $100. The projections assume that Congress<—————- will reduce Medicare payment rates for physicians by about 4.7 percent next year.
What a blooming idiot. This is so typical of the left, they don’t even read their own bullsh-t, they just rush it out so they can blame Bush.
Panty waist wards of the freakin state.
Mental Midgets.
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this
Zidane says Materazzi insulted mother and sister
PARIS (Reuters) - Zinedine Zidane said on Wednesday he was provoked into head-butting defender Marco Materazzi during the World Cup final because the Italian insulted his mother and his sister.
In an interview with French television channel Canal Plus Zidane also apologised to children and fans but did not regret the attack that led to his sending off.
The French captain reacted to the insult by ramming his head into Materazzi’s chest in the second period of extra time of the match that ended 1-1. Italy won on penalties.
“He (Materazzi) pulled my shirt several times and I told him that we could swap shirts at the end of the game if he wanted to,” Zidane said in the live interview.
“He, then, pronounced very tough words about my mother and my sister. I tried not to listen to him but he kept repeating them,” Zidane said.
Wasn’t Andykins telling us just yesterday about what a callous brute this “Frenchie” was. In Andy’s Republican multi-valued world, defending your Mother and Sister’s honor would be a BAD thing ! ! !
By Why Wouldn't This Be The CIA's Fault?
July 12, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this
By More Good News from the Leakers In Chief July 12, 2006 03:43 PM Agency recovers from computer break-in WASHINGTON - The State Department is recovering from large-scale computer break-ins worldwide over the past several weeks that appeared to target its headquarters and offices dealing with China and North Korea, The Associated Press has learned.
Why does Bush get blamed for this? I thought the CIA was in charge of security?
The CIA said in a statement last week that omitted Mary McCarthy’s name that the officer was fired for discussing operational intelligence matters with journalists
Oh, they’re too busy leaking secrets to guard any secrets.
What kind of password was used for this administration?:
Scientist: Clinton Administration Gave China Top Nuclear Secrets
Gave not had stolen.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 04:53 PM | Link to this
Rut Roh.
RW’s [Ferrous Cranus]is showing(http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/Assets/ferrouscranus.jpg)
Ferrous Cranus is utterly impervious to reason, persuasion and new ideas, and when engaged in battle he will not yield an inch in his position regardless of its hopelessness. Though his thrusts are decisively repulsed, his arguments crushed in every detail and his defenses demolished beyond repair he will remount the same attack again and again with only the slightest variation in tactics. Sometimes out of pure frustration Philosopher will try to explain to him the failed logistics of his situation, or Therapist will attempt to penetrate the psychological origins of his obduracy, but, ever unfathomable, Ferrous Cranus cannot be moved.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this
Here’s my response last time OotMVoD made his assinine charges. There’s one over there from Danish too, I’ll go get it.
By RW-(the original)
July 11, 2006 10:07 PM | Link to this
OotMVoD,
I really shouldn’t bother to respond since you have ignored every inquiry I’ve made, so feel free to stop reading and I’ll just say this for anyone sane and rational that wants to see it.
N-GA went through a litany of posts saying the Iraq war was a big mistake and profanely abusing anyone that disagreed. He then began posting the name and rank of dead soldiers. That is a political statement designed to sway people to one side.
Luckovich posted a cartoon comparing the United States to al Qaeda and yesterday the liberals on this blog all started in saying President Bush is just as bad as any of our enemies.
My post purports to show that ml and the liberal posters here are wrong. I’ve done it by showing the evidence. That is a quest for truth and not political in the least.
The only reason you think my post is political is because it reveals a truth you don’t want seen.
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this
By What A Dumb A-ss July 12, 2006 04:45 PM Bush<=>Congress…Mental Midgets.
Dear Mental Midgets (nice signature): Sure, the REPUBLICAN congress does NOT march in ‘lock-step’ (or should I say ‘goose-step’) with REPUBLICAN King George. Riiiiiiiiight, Mental Midgets, right ! ! !
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 04:59 PM | Link to this
Deliverey for the mad professor:
By Danish in Vacationland
July 12, 2006 12:29 AM | Link to this
OOTMVD,
For someone who doesn’t care where I vacation, you certainly show a lot of interest in the details of my life - just like a good little stalker. As usual you have it all wrong, so don’t buy any plane tickets to any Aryan compounds because you won’t find me.
For you, a little squirt who right off the bat told me that I was ignorant because I didn’t know who an obscure character called Granny Weatherall was, and who told me how Christ and I were going to get along at the end of my life, to then turn around and call me arrogant, defines arrogance - and impudence.
You are fresh out of college and think you know everything, but you have neither the wisdom or experience to know diddley squat beyond the propaganda you’ve been fed. Your contemptuous remarks to @@ about her work perfectly illustrate your know-it-all, know nothing, punk attitude.
Your pretense that most Republicans are fine and dandy in your view except for the likes of me and Ann Coulter, and that were it not for this blog you would be unaware of “the filth that worms its way through society” is about as fake as it gets.
Don’t you pretend to be a student of history? You’ve never heard of the filth called Al Qaida? My posts are poisonous, but ML, who compares our soldiers to Al Qaida’s butchers is a great guy?
You’re so wet behind the ears that I bet even your hapless students see through you. Maybe you could have a second career selling snake-oil to the miserable.
By If You Had A Brain
July 12, 2006 04:59 PM | Link to this
By Andy Values July 12, 2006 04:47 PM Wasn’t Andykins telling us just yesterday about what a callous brute this “Frenchie” was. In Andy’s Republican multi-valued world, defending your Mother and Sister’s honor would be a BAD thing ! ! !
I was illustrating the bald faced hypocrisy shown by you ignorant jackleg cripples on the left by pointing out that this so called “refined” Frenchie had to resort to force, just like a “crude” American would.
Since you got your head in your a-ss, you can’t figure this out on your own, you have to be tutored like a little idiot.
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this
By Why Wouldn’t This Be The CIA’s Fault? July 12, 2006 04:52 PM Why does Bush get blamed for this? I thought the CIA was in charge of security?
It’s so very reassuring that King George isn’t in control of the CIA (or anything else it seems).
By One of the Majority's Voices of Dissent
July 12, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this
Okay here’s one back at Granny,
It is you who seem to have a strange obsession with trying to figure out my background, even though all I do is repeat the boasts that you have voluntarily made about everyone around you, as if they somehow give you credibility. Sorry, you’re still a pompous hag. Don’t give up your dayjob as a stay-at-home-do-nothing-housewife to become a detective, because as usual, you’re far off with your assessments. I finished college a long time ago, although in one sense I’m still “in” college, at a level you’ll never attain. And I’ll take academic knowledge over your backwoods revival propaganda any day. I guess I’d rather be “wet behind the ears” in your eyes than emulate you, a living relic of archaic mythology, fascism, and feudalism all rolled into one. And no, all Republicans are not fine and dandy; there are just few as repulsive as yourself. Enjoy your target practice.
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this
By If You Had A Brain July 12, 2006 04:59 PM I was illustrating the bald faced hypocrisy shown by you ignorant jackleg cripples on the left by pointing out that this so called “refined” Frenchie had to resort to force, just like a “crude” American would.
Waffle, waffle, waffle, waffle ! ! !
By Thomas
July 12, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this
-=-
What?
Are there really that many Morons here that truly believe Joe Wilson outed his wife’s secret job as a CIA operative? ——
Oh wait — hmmm I guess there are….
Fact Vs Fiction
1) The Who’s Who book list the name Valerie Plame (Joe’s Wife by her Maiden name). this is not her CIA code name or some such stupid non-sense, and no where does the book list her work and duties with the CIA. This is why Carvelle and Crew were so ready to laugh in Robert Novak’s face at such absurdities. It does not exonerate those that actually did out Valerie Plame’s CIA job publicly. Karl and the mis-information office of Cheney were the ones that leaked Valeries job position (illegally) to the public. Doesn’t matter what the reason it was still illegal to release info of that nature.
2) Robert Novak had already testified, but that testimony was not made public until today. Today he announced that Karl Rove was a source (aka-leak). He did this because Karl Rove is now immune to further prosecution. So basically the guilty have gotten off scott free yet again. Looks like “Scooter Libby” will pay for all the sins of the PlameGate leakers.
3) This is not over yet as one other person who has not been named by Novak or the prosecutors is still listed as being involved. Hmmm now I wonder who that could be and why this person has been saved for last. Could it be that this leaker is very high up on the foodchain. That would be my reasons for waiting this long gathering conclusive facts as a prosecutor.
Now I have had the priveledge of having Robert Novak (and Stanton Evans) as journalism instructors before,- so I can speak with experience that this man is very shrewd when it comes to legal issues. I can actually understand him storming out of the CNN debate when such issues come up and he is under orders not to discuss current legal actions that he has testified at. That at least was good that he upheld his oath, even if he did it in a not so wise fashion.
Novak is very conservative and of course biased in his opinions and journalistic endeavors, but at the same time he has never said he was otherwise. That was what made Crossfire a great debate show as there were two sides of the fence truly debating real world issues rather than the garbage we see nowadays such as Hannity and others, that are nothing but Hacks and “Yellow Jo
By One of the Majority's Voices of Dissent
July 12, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this
RW,
Just because you say it’s so doesn’t make it so. You’re just not bright enough to recognize that you’re viewing both N-GA’s actions and your own through a biased prism. You may say your posting of that video was not for political purposes, but any objective observer (except for the clueless @@) would see through your BS. Here, I’ll spell it out for you in your own hypocritical words: “My post purports to show that ml and the liberal posters here are wrong.” Are you too dense to realize that in denying a political purpose you admitted your political purpose? Fool.
By @@
July 12, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this
Has anybody here counted how many times N-GA has returned from a short vacation, inviting bloggers here to come drink at his refreshing spring of knowledge.
Gift #2
By N-GA March 3, 2006 06:41 PM | Link to this
All you uber-patriots don’t have a DD form 214 between you, but you castigate real veterans while supporting an administration of draft-dodgers. I can only imagine what George Washington would have thought of you “patriots”.
Forget it N-GA, there’s nothing refreshing or new about you. I can smell the sulphur you emit from miles away.
Phil/^^^???:
You obviously missed Semper’s reply to Steve. It was a “where and when he could pick up your check”. Sorry, but I think it was Steve who ran.
Since then Semper suggested that Jim Wooten serve as intermediary. Get in touch with Stevie boy. I’ll leave a window open for after hours posting. Semper can give you the details. I don’t really know how he’d like to handle it. I’ll let him tell you himself.
By See What I Mean About Ignorance
July 12, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this
Every thing is Bush’s fault but he’s not in charge:
By Andy Values July 12, 2006 05:02 PM By Why Wouldn’t This Be The CIA’s Fault? July 12, 2006 04:52 PM Why does Bush get blamed for this? I thought the CIA was in charge of security? It’s so very reassuring that King George isn’t in control of the CIA (or anything else it seems).
When you get up in the morning, wanker, and the guy that screwed you in your behind is gone, even though he said he “loved” you, do you blame Bush for it?
When you’re jacking off and your come spills on mommies carpet and makes a big stain, is it Bush’s fault?
Do you take responsibility for anything or are you just a crippled ward of the state?
By getalife
July 12, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this
If W was a man of his word, Rove should be fired.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 05:21 PM | Link to this
OotMVd,
When you show me the Conservatives that are comparing the United States to al Qaeda I will happily include them in my derision. So my post is not political, it just happens to go to an issue that only afflicts one side and I would venture to say it only afflicts a tiny percentage of that side so once again you’re wrong.
I can’t help it if you don’t like your world view exposed to the light of day, but that isn’t my problem anyway.
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 05:26 PM | Link to this
By See What I Mean About Ignorance July 12, 2006 05:13 PM When you get up in the morning, wanker, and the guy that screwed you in your behind is gone, even though he said he “loved” you, do you blame Bush for it?
When you’re jacking off and your come spills on mommies carpet and makes a big stain, is it Bush’s fault?
This would be Andy’s “refined” religiosity speaking ! ! ! You use that Republican multi-valued mouth in church, Andykins ? ? ?
By Let's Go Slow This Time For The Cripple
July 12, 2006 05:27 PM | Link to this
By Andy Values July 12, 2006 04:58 PM Sure, the REPUBLICAN congress does NOT march in ‘lock-step’ (or should I say ‘goose-step’) with REPUBLICAN King George. Riiiiiiiiight, Mental Midgets, right ! ! !
It is Congress’s decision you moron, Bush has nothing to do with it. I’m just reading your post back to you because I guess you are too ignorant to read it yourself.
BTW, you do not have permission to use that name^^, Jack Off. Remember, I am the legend, you are the wanker. With some more work, maybe someday you will be a legendary wanker.
It’s something to shoot for, loser.
By Sorry About Fitzmas, Y'all
July 12, 2006 05:31 PM | Link to this
This must really suck, you pinkos had so much riding on it:
I learned Valerie Plame’s name from Joe Wilson’s entry in “Who’s Who in America.”
Oh, well. Back to the fever swamps.
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this
By Let’s Go Slow This Time For The Cripple July 12, 2006 05:27 PM It is Congress’s decision you moron, Bush has nothing to do with it. I’m just reading your post back to you because I guess you are too ignorant to read it yourself.
Riiiiight, Andykins, King George has vetoed how many of the Republican Congessional proposals? That would be NONE ! ! !
By Answer The Question, Wanker
July 12, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this
By Andy Values July 12, 2006 05:26 PM By See What I Mean About Ignorance July 12, 2006 05:13 PM When you get up in the morning, wanker, and the guy that screwed you in your behind is gone, even though he said he “loved” you, do you blame Bush for it? This would be Andy’s “refined” religiosity speaking ! ! ! You use that Republican multi-valued mouth in church, Andykins ? ? ?
Why are you evading it? Are you ashamed?
That’s not a bad thing, shame, it’s like the first step to recovery.
By Liberal Texas Democrat
July 12, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this
“It is beyond reason to use the deaths and suffering of the courageous young men [sic] that bravely volunteer to protect not only those too weak to protect themselves but also the citizens of Iraq from a barbaric, fanatical ideology of killers, killers that prove their lethality to us on a regular basis, by killing our innocents.”
Whoa there buckaroo. That’s not what I was doing and you know it. You know that the entire blog I posted was dealing with the comparison of criminal activity and accidents to the service of soldiers who are wounded in combat.
Tell me sir, exactly how does that work? You go on about any number of victims of crime or accident compared to any number of battlefield casualties you like. Using your own words without cut and paste explain: Comparing the murder of say a crack whore by her pimp or dealer, to the death of say a battlefield nurse blown apart by an i.e.d. How does that comparison elevate or demonstrate respect for the service of the nurse? Does not the comparison of a battlefield injury to the result of criminal activity or drunken stupidity neglect the fact that the service member was following orders? Does it not say Buck up soldier. Just be thankful you didn't have to show the ambulance driver your Blue Cross Card.? When my father was alive he discussed this issue with me and reminded me that after WWII his brother, who was awarded a bronze star and purple heart in North Africa", never had to deal with like comments. He said he figured it was because people felt we lost the war in Viet Nam, and it made them feel better to believe that what happened to service members could very well of happened to them at home.Again sir, in your own words without the potty mouth, innuendo, or cut and paste, what is the value of such comparisons? When you make them, or quote those who, who is really seeking to benefit politically from the battlefield sacrifice of others? In your own words, Why would you want to encourage domestic criminals by trumpeting to the world on this blog that Iraq is safer than The United States of America? When was the last time you approached an Atlanta patrol man and asked him face to face in a clear and un-waivering voice, “Why can’t you make Atlanta as safe as Bagdad?”
By Bob
July 12, 2006 05:42 PM | Link to this
Hey, that’s a great idea! We’ll send our very finest troops to Iraq, led by those military heroes, Bush and Cheney. Then we’ll give em Democracy, which they don’t want, and shove it down their throats in the name of “Christ.”
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this
By Answer The Question, Wanker July 12, 2006 05:37 PM Why are you evading it? Are you ashamed?
That’s not a bad thing, shame, it’s like the first step to recovery.
Sorry, Andykins, I do not share your sexual proclivities, or your subsequent shame. Wallow in your own mire, oh “refined” one ! ! ! Question answered.
By @@
July 12, 2006 05:46 PM | Link to this
OMG Andy, your second paragraph at 5:27 has provoked me to tears of laughter. It really doesn’t get any better than that. But I’ll be waiting & watching.
By Midori
July 12, 2006 05:50 PM | Link to this
before I go for the day, I just want to tell Andy and RW the Original Lemming that they are complete hacks. and cowards.
see you scumbags tomorrow.
and I will STILL be posting in my own name.
and I still WON’T resort to another name in order to post. the same as today. the same as yesterday. the same as tomorrow.
you see, I don’t fear you. I’m not a coward like you. I’m woman enough to own up to my words, and to say to you what’s on my mind.
But because you two are gutless, cowardly pricks, you can’t understand that. Because you’re cowards. In your minds, I “have” to hide behind another name in order to tell you that your’e lying hacks and full of manure.
F*ck you. Both of you.
Cowards.
By Look At What ABC Is Saying
July 12, 2006 05:54 PM | Link to this
July 12, 2006 — Mikhail Gorbachev is generally regarded as the man who broke down the “iron curtain” that separated the communist world from the West and thawed the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.-ABC “News”
Huh, I didn’t know that. Learn something everyday from these libs (sarc/off.)
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this
@@,
I was thinking of using that paragraph from Andy as the “picture” for whatever the scribbler churns out for tonight’s after dark post.
By Thomas
July 12, 2006 05:56 PM | Link to this
-=-
Hey —-
* Sorry About Fitzmas, Y’all *
What are your trying to say there? You are making very little sense in your comments…. You keep taking soundbite like quotes to make a non-point here.
-=-=-
If you read the text completely and follow the info you find that - Robert Novak states that {Karl Rove “Confirmed” that Joe Wilson’s “Wife” was the (CIA) operative that sent Wilson} on that infamous yellow cake fact finding mission (at the request of Cheney’s office).
At this point Novak knew it was Joe Wilson’s wife but not her name, So he did a simple search through the Who’s Who (and probably many other resources) as a good journalist would do, and got her actual name.
Like Duh’=-
By You Are The One Who Brought Up The Soldiers Deaths
July 12, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this
By Liberal Texas Democrat July 12, 2006 05:39 PM
Not me. I’m mature enough to know that in a world where 45% of our population hates us so much that they tell the most terrible lies about the United States, lies that incite other people to want to kill us, we are going to lose some soldiers protecting ourselves.
If you were ever a soldier, you might be able to understand the part about Duty, Honor and Country.
But you don’t.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this
Bye Midori, here’s hoping you will be just as pleasant tomorrow! Maybe we can overlook that little March 6th incident and move forward to the next time you got caught.
By No Shame
July 12, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this
House Democrats use image of soldiers coffins in Campaign Video…
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 06:06 PM | Link to this
Thomas,
Since earlier you stated as categorical fact that an illegal act occurred in revealing her job and now you claim that Rove is the perpetrator of that act, when does Fitzmas start?
Is it possible that you aren’t quite as factually accurate as you think?
By Andy Values
July 12, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this
Andykins is sooooo reliable ^ ^ ^. First he misdirects, then he slimes, next he reslimes, then he spams and finally turns tail and runs. Predictable as a rat in a maze. Hey, Andykins, maybe it’s still not too late for you can to get a real job as a lab rat. Oh yeh, too ‘intellectual’ for the “refined” one.
By Liberal Texas Democrat
July 12, 2006 06:12 PM | Link to this
I no longer explain that comparing combat injuries to criminal violence or traffic accidents denigrates the efforts of law enforcement and trivializes the service of our military.
Such explanations to these persons are as useful an endeavor as nailing Jell-O to a tree.
Proving my point *If you were ever a soldier, you might be able to understand the part about Duty, Honor and Country.
But you don’t.*
By Look At This Wanker Neolib
July 12, 2006 06:15 PM | Link to this
Passing the Buck- Burned by his bitter Iraq experience, Bush is eschewing leadership and hiding behind the skirts of multilateralism.-Michael Hirsch, Newsweek
Let me get this right, it’s wrong to invade other countries, you should always try to negotiate or only act multilaterally unless the liberals sense that we are trying to negotiate a solution and then they want us to invade unilaterally.
I guess these libs don’t know we can see right through them.
Either that or they think every one is as stupid as “Andy’s Rules,” that’s probably it, you can pull any kind of sh-it on an idiot like that, he’s a sap.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this
LTD,
When you want to italicize more than one paragraph you need to do them separately.
By Thomas
July 12, 2006 06:24 PM | Link to this
Actually - and categorically even - an unlawful act was committed in revealing a CIA operatives identity (for any reason) publicly as it is a national security issue. But by the events that transpired Fitzgerald has decided not to prosecute Karl Rove for his part in it. If you believe Novak’s statements (and I do) then in reality Karl was not the initial person that released the fact that Wilson’s wife was a CIA operative. According to Novak, Karl Rove only confirmed the information of what had already been told to Novak about Wilson’s wife, and it was further confirmed later by the CIA contact after Novak had aquired her name from the Who’s Who. That CIA contact had tried to convince Novak not to take it to press. But of course it was.
Whoever initially revealed Valerie’s job position in the CIA is the one that will eventually have to answer to a crime by the prosecutor, but that day may never come as we all know in the scheme of politics and government sometimes laws get ignored.
I was responding to the garbage post made by “Sorry About Fitzmas, Y’all” who posted at 5:31…. his post was aimed in response to my earlier post.
By More Great Bush Economic News
July 12, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this
Report: Disney slashing jobs, film output
LOS ANGELES - Walt Disney Co. will substantially reduce its work force and slash its annual output of films from 18 to eight — cutbacks greater than Hollywood had anticipated, it was reported Wednesday.
This would be another of those industries that are growing by leaps and bounds under Bush voodoo economics !
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 06:33 PM | Link to this
Thomas,
I wasn’t trying to butt in to your private conversation with “Sorry About Fitzmas, Y’all” sorry about that.
There are quite a few people, including Victoria Toensing that helped write the controlling statute, that disagree with your “fact” that an illegal act was committed.
By What Do You Expect, They're Liberals
July 12, 2006 06:33 PM | Link to this
When I told a New York Observer reporter that my only regret was that Timothy McVeigh didn’t hit the New York Times building, I knew many would agree with me — but I didn’t expect that to include the New York Times. And yet, the Times is doing everything in its power to help the terrorists launch another attack on New York City._HumanEvents
By Birds (and Crooks) of a Feather Flock Together
July 12, 2006 06:33 PM | Link to this
Dignitaries mourn Lay at memorial service
HOUSTON - Former President George Bush and his wife, Barbara, were among the mourners Wednesday at a memorial service of Enron Corp. founder Kenneth Lay.
Lay’s memorial service drew some of the high-profile guests who were close to him before he was convicted in May of fraud and conspiracy for lying to investors and the public about the energy company’s financial health before it collapsed in 2001.
Anybody in the least surprised ? ? ?
By More Great Bush Economic News
July 12, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this
Dow ends down 121, Nasdaq ends down 39
NEW YORK - Stocks plunged Wednesday as a broker’s downgrade of Dell Inc. and higher oil prices aggravated Wall Street’s worries about a shaky start to second-quarter earnings. The Dow Jones industrial average sank more than 121 points.
Yup, this would be our “robust” Bush voodoo economy is all it’s glory ! ! !
By Utterly Ridiculous, Just Like A Liberal
July 12, 2006 06:40 PM | Link to this
By More Great Bush Economic News July 12, 2006 06:26 Report: Disney slashing jobs, film output LOS ANGELES - Walt Disney Co. will substantially reduce its work force and slash its annual output of films from 18 to eight — cutbacks greater than Hollywood had anticipated, it was reported Wednesday. This would be another of those industries that are growing by leaps and bounds under Bush voodoo economics
So what, pray tell, did Bush do? Tell them to make a gay cowboy movie?
By More Great Bush Economic News
July 12, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this
U.S. trade deficit increases in May
WASHINGTON - A record jump in the price of imported oil pushed the trade deficit to $63.8 billion in May, offsetting robust overseas sales gains by American companies.
On Wall Street, stocks dropped sharply after a separate report showed that weekly oil inventories fell to their lowest level since early March. That raised the prospect that the U.S. will have to import even more oil.
The price of foreign oil jumped by the largest amount since the run-up to the first U.S.- Iraq war in 1990, and America’s trade imbalance rose 0.8 percent from a revised April deficit of $63.3 billion, the Commerce Department said Wednesday.
The monthly deficit was the sixth-largest ever.
Yahooooooo! Let’s borrow some more WAR BUCKS for our children’s, children’s, children to try to repay ! ! ! You can pump the economy with MASSIVE borrowed deficit spending but sooner or later somebody’s got to pay the bills. Voodoo economics 101.
By Danish in Vacationland
July 12, 2006 06:47 PM | Link to this
It’s review time for the Mad ProFessor! My apologies in advance for the length of this post, but this is a final exam:
By One of the Majority’s Voices of Dissent/July 11, 2006 09:43 PM
Danish,
Blah Blah Blah…Luckily, few Republicans show the disdain for their fellow man that you do, or the blatant self-centeredness.
OOTMinorityVOD,
So glad you’re back! Tell me proFessor, what do you call this if not “disdain for their fellow man”?:
By One of the Majority’s Voices of Dissent/July 11, 2006 10:57 AM
Midori,
Blah Blah Blah…John Zogby… Blah Blah Blah…Currently Bush is at 35% amongst WalMart shoppers- a very bad sign considering that his base is standing there in line purchasing Cheetos, Kenny Chesney CD’s, and Nascar teeshirts.
Turn the page, and see more disdain for his fellow man, including for MOTHERS who are raising their children, in addition to an unusually juvenile display of jabberwocky:
By One of the Majority’s Voices of Dissent
July 12, 2006 05:04 PM
Okay here’s one back at Granny,
It is you who seem to have a strange obsession with trying to figure out my background, even though all I do is repeat the boasts that you have voluntarily made about everyone around you, as if they somehow give you credibility. Sorry, you’re still a pompous hag. Don’t give up your dayjob as a stay-at-home-do-nothing-housewife to become a detective, because as usual, you’re far off with your assessments. I finished college a long time ago, although in one sense I’m still “in” college, at a level you’ll never attain. And I’ll take academic knowledge over your backwoods revival propaganda any day. I guess I’d rather be “wet behind the ears” in your eyes than emulate you, a living relic of archaic mythology, fascism, and feudalism all rolled into one. And no, all Republicans are not fine and dandy; there are just few as repulsive as yourself. Enjoy your target practice.
Ha Ha Ha!! Where to begin?
First of all, I have never shown ANY interest in your personal life. It wasn’t until you posted some educratic statistics a few weeks ago that I silently deduced that you were a “teaching professional”, a conclusion that was confirmed by RW and never disputed by you.
Since you are so sophomoric in your self-expression I erroneously assumed
By getalife
July 12, 2006 06:48 PM | Link to this
I guess W is not a man of his word and gave Rove a raise for the leak.
At least we know W has no credibility.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 06:49 PM | Link to this
Well waddaya know:
WASHINGTON — A Texas Indian tribe filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday alleging ex-lobbyist Jack Abramoff, former Christian Coalition leader Ralph Reed and their associates engaged in fraud and racketeering to shut down the tribe’s casino.
The Alabama-Coushatta tribe of Livingston, Texas, alleged the defendants defrauded the tribe, the people of Texas and the Legislature to benefit another of Abramoff’s clients — the Louisiana Coushatta tribe — and “line their pockets with money.”
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 06:50 PM | Link to this
Vote for Ralph Reed
HE HAD ME AT ‘HALO’
By More Great Bush Economic News
July 12, 2006 06:54 PM | Link to this
Citgo to stop selling gas to U.S. stations
CARACAS, Venezuela - Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum Corp. has decided to stop distributing gasoline to some 1,800 U.S. stations, shedding a lackluster segment of its business while forcing the owners of those stations to find other suppliers.
That will mean that over the next year Citgo will cease distributing gasoline in 10 states and stop supplying some stations in four additional states, Citgo spokesman Fernando Garay said Wednesday.
Chavez has long claimed that parts of Citgo’s business produce losses for Venezuela and constitute a subsidy for the U.S. economy.
Cowboy diplomacy at work ! ! ! Thanks King George.
By N-GA
July 12, 2006 06:55 PM | Link to this
Another Repub bites the dust: Former state schools superintendent Linda Schrenko was sentenced Wednesday to eight years in federal prison and ordered to pay more than $400,000 in restitution for her part in a scheme to swindle taxpayers out of more than $600,000.
By @@
July 12, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this
RW:
You could save yourself looking for pictures. Just post Andy’s paragraph for every cartoon. The AJC’s pulitzer prize winning cartoonist will be “Andy’s Moonshot”. That “in your face ml” technique I enjoy.
Goodnight Midori. Comb your feathers before tomorrow.
By Political Foreskin
July 12, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this
Danish’s last post was swimmingly smart, with plenty of onomatopoeia, alliteration, and even a pinch of poetry. He has demonstrated time after time that he is the go to guy when a blog starts to bog down. We owe this great man a debt of gratitude, in fact, never, in the field of human endeavor has so many owed so much to so one a person that he takes up the slack of the slackers who owe him for their very cyber virtuality.
Bravo SIR!!!
By I'm An Idiot
July 12, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this
The stock market closed down one day!!!
It’s Bush’s fault!!
The sun went down tonite!!
Bush did it!!
By I'm An Idiot
July 12, 2006 07:03 PM | Link to this
Everything’s Bush’s fault, I can’t think for myself:
Citgo to stop selling gas to U.S. stations
CARACAS, Venezuela - Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum Corp. has decided to stop distributing gasoline to some 1,800 U.S. stations, shedding a lackluster segment of its business while forcing the owners of those stations to find other suppliers.
That will mean that over the next year Citgo will cease distributing gasoline in 10 states and stop supplying some stations in four additional states, Citgo spokesman Fernando Garay said Wednesday.
Chavez has long claimed that parts of Citgo’s business produce losses for Venezuela and constitute a subsidy for the U.S. economy.
Cowboy diplomacy at work ! ! ! Thanks King George.
By King George Has Got 'em on the Run
July 12, 2006 07:03 PM | Link to this
2 dozen Iraqi Shiites abducted, killed
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Gunmen seized two dozen Shiites from a bus station after separating them from the crowd in a predominantly Sunni area Wednesday, killing them and dumping their bodies in a nearby village — the latest in a series of brazen attacks.
Did Cheney say that the insurrgents were in their last throes or did he say the Bush administration was in IT’S last throes? These guys barf up so much double-speak it’s a major undertaking to translate anything they say. We must’ve misunderstood him the first time. Sorry Dick, we apologize for thinking you said the insurrgents were in THEIR last throes.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 07:06 PM | Link to this
Polly Prepuce,
Buy Danish is a woman. Don’t you wish your liberal chicks could kick a-ss like that?
By Danish in Vacationland
July 12, 2006 07:06 PM | Link to this
Passing the Buck- Burned by his bitter Iraq experience, Bush is eschewing leadership and hiding behind the skirts of multilateralism.-Michael Hirsch, Newsweek
Plagiarism alert!! Just a few weeks ago I (Buy Danish) said that the Left was “hiding behind the skirts of multiculturalism”.
Will CNN take my call?
RPV (The man of a thousand feces),
You’re shocked that Ken Lay’s wife went to his funeral?
WOW! No wonder you shout all the time. You are easily shocked.
RW,
I think that Midori is not the warrior she thinks she is. Clearly she lost a big battle against this “Cyber Sister” by posting the same (stupid) message to me as “Midori” and “Andy Sucks”. What she lacks in wit, she makes up for in muscle and profanities, but in this war it is wits that wins the day. Between You and Andy, she is at wits-end trying to distract from her (latest) lie. Bwahahahahaha.
By Danish in Vacationland
July 12, 2006 07:37 PM | Link to this
Polly Prepuce,
Why thank you, Sir! I’ll take it as a compliment even though there was not much, if any, onomatopoeia or alliteration, and I am not the man you thought I was.
Not a slacker either, but that is just a minor detail.
By RW-(the original)
July 12, 2006 08:33 PM | Link to this
The North Korea post has been updated at he after dark site. It now has cover art using Andy’s classic response to the impostor.
Be sure to click on Andy’s text to see the visual when you visit.
By I Usually Don't Brag
July 12, 2006 08:41 PM | Link to this
But I liked this one. Plus I know it will drive you libs freakin crazy:
By If You Did Actually Serve…
July 12, 2006 01:26 PM
I find it hard to believe because no true soldier would ever consider abandoning their “brothers” in the field. I’ve never heard one of you obvious leftwing pacifists, supposed veterans, ever address our soldiers as “brothers.”
By Liberal Texas Democrat July 12, 2006 01:04 PM In the 35 years I’ve been retired from the Army and done nothing to disguise scars from injuries to my head and neck, I’ve learned that comparisons of the combat-injured to persons mugged — or run over crossing the street — are to be expected.
You are consumed, both physically and mentally, by your emotions. Because of this you are endangering the lives of every man, woman and child that live in this country. You are giving aid, comfort and motivation to our enemies and they have taken advantage of your lack of resolve.
Your lack of courage.
It is beyond reason to use the deaths and suffering of the courageous young men that bravely volunteer to protect not only those too weak to protect themselves but also the citizens of Iraq from a barbaric, fanatical ideology of killers, killers that prove their lethality to us on a regular basis, by killing our innocents.
Our soldiers deserve our respect, our honor and our unquestioned resolve for their mission.
They don’t deserve some weak kneed back stabbing socialist fomenting acts of treason against them.
They don’t need your “help.”
My fellow Americans, I have a task for those with the courage and fortitude to take it. I have a message that needs not fall on deaf ears. A vision the blind need to see. I am not a political man nor one with great wisdom. I am just a soldier who finds himself helping rebuild a country that he helped liberate a couple years ago. I have watched on television how the American public questions why their mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters are fighting and dying in a country 9000 miles away from their own soil. Take the word of a soldier, for that is all I am, that our cause is a noble one. The reason we are here is one worth fighting for. A cause that has been the most costly and sought after cause in our small span of existence on our little planet. Bought in blood and paid for by those brave e
By I Usually Don't Brag
July 12, 2006 09:01 PM | Link to this
(Ooops, Clarification, the words that ordinary citizens are expected to be shot down on America’s streets are not mine.)
But I liked this one. Plus I know it will drive you libs freakin crazy:
By If You Did Actually Serve…
July 12, 2006 01:26 PM
I find it hard to believe because no true soldier would ever consider abandoning their “brothers” in the field. I’ve never heard one of you obvious leftwing pacifists, supposed veterans, ever address our soldiers as “brothers.”
By Liberal Texas Democrat July 12, 2006 01:04 PM In the 35 years I’ve been retired from the Army and done nothing to disguise scars from injuries to my head and neck, I’ve learned that comparisons of the combat-injured to persons mugged — or run over crossing the street — are to be expected.
You are consumed, both physically and mentally, by your emotions. Because of this you are endangering the lives of every man, woman and child that live in this country. You are giving aid, comfort and motivation to our enemies and they have taken advantage of your lack of resolve.
Your lack of courage.
It is beyond reason to use the deaths and suffering of the courageous young men that bravely volunteer to protect not only those too weak to protect themselves but also the citizens of Iraq from a barbaric, fanatical ideology of killers, killers that prove their lethality to us on a regular basis, by killing our innocents.
Our soldiers deserve our respect, our honor and our unquestioned resolve for their mission.
They don’t deserve some weak kneed back stabbing socialist fomenting acts of treason against them.
They don’t need your “help.”
My fellow Americans, I have a task for those with the courage and fortitude to take it. I have a message that needs not fall on deaf ears. A vision the blind need to see. I am not a political man nor one with great wisdom. I am just a soldier who finds himself helping rebuild a country that he helped liberate a couple years ago. I have watched on television how the American public questions why their mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters are fighting and dying in a country 9000 miles away from their own soil. Take the word of a soldier, for that is all I am, that our cause is a noble one. The reason we are here is one worth fighting for. A cause that has been the most costly and sought after cause in our small span of existence on our li
By Danish in Vacationland
July 12, 2006 09:04 PM | Link to this
Attention Chavez loyalists,
Will someone please tell CITGO’s ad agency to cancel their advertising? This ad message is currently running on Fox News:
How do you measure a company? Do you look at where they’ve been? Do you look at what they’ve done?(1)
We’re looking forward to the future, providing steady, secure access to the largest liquid reserves in the Western Hemisphere for generations to come.(2)(3)
CITGO for the road ahead
(1)We don’t really mean that. We’re trying to put a pretty face on the fact that CITGO is controlled by a Communist dictator who loves Harry Belafonte and hates our American Republic.
(2) We will provide this essential fuel to generations to come if you agree to Chavez’ every demand, including getting someone prettier to kiss than that hideous toad, Mother Sheehan. Sharon Stone is a step in the right direction.
(3) We hope you noticed the part about “the largest liquid reserves” hint hint when we cut off the supply and hold you hostage.
By Semper Fi
July 12, 2006 10:47 PM | Link to this
Phil, my wife tells me you’ve been shooting off Steve’s mouth for him. If you want to put your money where Steve’s mouth is here’s the deal.
Make your check out to Operation USO Care Package for $1,000. Send it to Jim Wooten at the AJC. I’m sure his address is somewhere on this blog. I’ll notify him it’s on the way. He can contact me when it arrives. The AJC has my e-mail address with my name. The name on my DD214 has the same name. I’ll show up at Jim’s office with my DD214, VA I.D., pictures in country in uniform. I’ll take a check from you or anyone else who is up for the challenge. Otherwise you can shut the f*** up.
Let’s see who runs now a*****e.