Mike Luckovich

By test

June 26, 2006 11:15 PM | Link to this

this is a test

By Test

June 26, 2006 11:34 PM | Link to this

Tim Hudson is a Punk!

By Tim

June 27, 2006 12:26 AM | Link to this

You try it in the Bronx

By Andy’s One And Only Post Today, Hahaha, Wankers

June 27, 2006 08:03 AM | Link to this

The national media is a power-hungry institution. It maintains its power to determine what is important in American politics and government by making dupes of the American public. The “duping” occurs though media opinion polling.

To preserve their agenda power, the mainstream media have an ace in the hole: opinion polls. By asking the right questions of the public, the media can validate the legitimacy of their agenda focus by claiming the public has a similar view.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

John Snow, Treasury Secretary, to the Treason Times:

You have defended your decision to compromise this program by asserting that “terror financiers know” our methods for tracking their funds and have already moved to other methods to send money. The fact that your editors believe themselves to be qualified to assess how terrorists are moving money betrays a breathtaking arrogance and a deep misunderstanding of this program and how it works. While terrorists are relying more heavily than before on cumbersome methods to move money, such as cash couriers, we have continued to see them using the formal financial system, which has made this particular program incredibly valuable.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

“If today’s liberals cannot rouse as much passion for fighting a movement that flings acid at unveiled women as they do for taking back the Senate in 2006,” Mr. Beinart writes, “they have strayed far from liberalism’s best traditions.”

Its leading light these days, Rep. Jack Murtha, is fresh from proposing that we police the Middle East from Okinawa with a rapidly deployable force the Pentagon hasn’t invented yet.-WashingtonTimes

Cut

The editor of the Times writes to readers that “nobody should think that we made this decision casually, with any animus toward the current Administration.” That protestation is hard to credit when nearly every word written on the war by the Times’ editorialists and its publisher reeks with the very animus the editor denies. The newspaper has done courageous reporting from the Iraq theater, but nothing else it has done since the fighting started suggests that it counts itself as among those thinking primarily of the safety of our troops and the success of their mission. The fact is that the American people want to win this war. They are saddened at every defeat, angered at every compromise of our secrets, joyous at every victory. And the question Americans are asking today is what happened that their hope is no longer primary at the New York Times?-NYSun

We know the answer, believe me.

Cut

AS HE FOUGHT TO TRANSFORM New York City, the New York Times editorial board and liberal interest groups denounced him every step of the way. Giuliani’s style of forcefully stating his position and going on the offensive during press conferences will win him the respect of conservative primary voters who are fed up with pandering Republican politicians. In fact, this may be the main factor that ends up separating him from McCain, whose reputation as a maverick has been built on taking positions that made him into a liberal media darling.-AmericanSpectator

Cut

Do stand up for the heartland values that millions of Americans again endorsed in 2004 with the re-election of President Bush and ignore the editorial pages of the New York Times. Mainstream America does not support the liberal left’s social policies and conservatives should never be ashamed to fight for traditional values. This should be a constant drumbeat as it forces the left to show their true colors, from abortion on demand to gay marriage; as Rush Limbaugh says, “When liberals are out of power that is when they really get entertaining.” Conservatives should force the left to be themselves and show the American people that conservative values are mainstream values.-HumanEvents

Cut

Senator McCain’s crime appears to be that he is a conservative,” reported Niall Stanage in the New York Observer. “The protesters’ absurd rationale is that having the Senator at the ceremony is not compatible with the institution’s commitment to freethinking.

Defined in undiluted Orwellian terms by those seeking to bar McCain from campus, “freethinking” means that everyone’s free to think in the same way, free to become all the same, ideologically, adhering to a groupthink straightjacket that can’t tolerate hearing from a semi-conservative politician for half an hour.-AmericanSpectator

Baby democrats, wallowing in their infantile ignorance.

Cut

So much for the anti Bush schtick:

By Bruce Bartlett

From what I read on the blogs these days, most Democrats believe that their party’s single biggest problem is that it is not tough enough. Their solution is to be ever more shrill and hysterical in attacking Republicans. As a Republican, I think this is wonderful. It just makes Democrats look like kooks, and forces moderates to vote Republican.

Actually, I think the Democrats’ biggest problem is simple ineptness — they just aren’t very good at coming up with politically attractive ideas and marketing them effectively. I even have a theory about why this is the case.-RealClearPolitics

Cut

Did I actually just read this?:

“Ninety percent of the young’uns don’t know where Afghanistan is,” he blustered, failing to note that “The Daily Show” viewers are, statistically speaking, more informed about current events than his own audience (Bill O’Reilly), according to a study by the nonpartisan Annenberg Public Policy Center.-AJC

Define “current events.” That’s what I thought.

Cut

Why are the libs always “surprised” by good news? Is it because they’ve been forecasting doom and gloom for so long they started to believe themselves?:

In surprise, new home sales climb-AJC

Cut

Elitists liberals think they know what is better for your children than you, the parents, do. They want your children raised by the liberal ethos, which today is hedonistic, socialistic and indifferent, indeed hostile, to America and the Judeo-Christian ethic. They wish to replace centuries’ old family traditions that work with their version of how life should be lived. That way, their crudity and permissive chauvinism will not stand out. No one will be left who can reproach.

So as to diminish family rights, elitist liberals assert that American families are red-neck types incapable of doing good by their children, acting brutally to their own children. It is a blatant falsehood and indicative of how liberals view other Americans.-HumanEvents

By Will Jones

June 27, 2006 08:05 AM | Link to this

Such irony! A local agent of the corporation which willingly produced 600 “Black Raven” gas vans used to murder 600,000 innocent civilians for Hitler’s “Einsatzgruppen” has the temerity to place a full-page ad expressing “moral outrage” over anything.

None but false patriots, philistines, reprobates and the wilfully ignorant fail to recognize that Mike Luckovich’s “Torture” cartoon is precisely and prophetically correct.

As true American’s Our Motto is Annuit Coeptis: “Divine Providence Blesses Our Endeavors.” The pursuit of righteousness, above reproach, is the only path to the moral authority The American People deserve and require.

Thanks AJC for allowing Mike Luckovich to lead the way!

By Think B-4 You Speak!

June 27, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this

Careful Will - The lunatics have been kinda quiet, we don’t want to wake them.

By Mike

June 27, 2006 08:29 AM | Link to this

It appears Lucko had his pee-pee smacked and had to revert to much tamer cartoons. Its a shame too, because all he was doing was showing his true beliefs. But hey what can you do.

By Getitright

June 27, 2006 09:12 AM | Link to this

Mike has got to go,

Mike has got to go,

Mike has got to go…

By gadem

June 27, 2006 09:18 AM | Link to this

Getitright, is your moniker referring to your attempts to get your brain right?

By The Sad Truth

June 27, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

Sometimes the truth hurts. The torture cartoon is one of those times. Sad but true. We are becoming what we are fighting and the conservatives simply don’t care. Who would Jesus torture?

By getiton

June 27, 2006 09:30 AM | Link to this

the mistake that cookiecutter conservatives make is thinking that all liberals (those who think Bush is weak, the war is a horrible mistake and the economy sucks unless youre rich) are cheering Murtha Kerry Kennedy etc.

They will know in November just how misplaced that tunnel vision is. And I cant wait.

By LovethatMike

June 27, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this

I thought this mornings cartoon was about the governor’s race. You people need some serious help. Get some therapy, or better yet talk to your minister about your problems. By the way Mike, great cartoon. I don’t start my day without you.

By buff

June 27, 2006 09:34 AM | Link to this

I am a big fan of elrushbo, the majarushie of talk radio, but this is hilarious

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/26/limbaugh.viagra.ap/index.html

By Midori

June 27, 2006 09:57 AM | Link to this

Hi Buff!!!! :)

I heard about that last night.

By Harold

June 27, 2006 10:00 AM | Link to this

Big Guy or Fat Cat?

By buff

June 27, 2006 10:07 AM | Link to this

Hey, Midori, I have been gone for a long time; my mother died one month to the day after Pop did. I feel fine about it, mess them both, but I hope to live as good and long a life as they did. My son goes back to Iraq in a few weeks. Hey, got a new wine for you to try “Fat Bastard.” The Rush thing is hilarious. I would assume he was afraid to have his name on the bottle, now it will be all over the media. I cannot wait to hear him today, if he is back from vacation

By @@

June 27, 2006 10:11 AM | Link to this

Well Buff, I’d say that was a “very limp” attempt by the media to show Rush in a less than flattering light. The MSM could use a little viagara themselves. Maybe it would put a little “lead in their pencils” dont’cha know.

Read your post too late to respond last night. Thanks for letting Cliff use your computer. His post was worth reading.

By Welcome Back Buff

June 27, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this

Good to hear from you. Shake your son’s hand for me.

By Rednecks - America's Al Qaeda

June 27, 2006 10:20 AM | Link to this

I’d like to hear from all you closeted ‘pubbies out there about what’s going on with your boy -

The Rush thing - do you guys think he was trading the ‘blues’ for oxy? What does a ‘bottom’ need viagra for?

By getalife

June 27, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this

buff is the stuff,

Rush is a funny entertainer. How embarrassing for the big guy.

Sorry for your loss buff and tell your son thanks.

By RaisinBran

June 27, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this

Mike should get a another Pulitzer. Mike should get a another Pulitzer. Mike should get a another Pulitzer.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 10:34 AM | Link to this

I thought this guy just spoke off the cuff and would take on any question…

At the second event, Clinton spoke and answered preselected questions for an hour, urging the students to work together to fight poverty and promote tolerance.

I guess that would mean one question if he only spoke for an hour.

“All this bitter partisanship has been poison for this country,” he said

Are you calling off all your cronies with their 501C slander sites?

Clinton said it is “unconscionable” that the United States has not toughened car emission standards, and he objected to the president’s efforts to permanently repeal the estate tax. An estate tax on the richest one percent of Americans could raise $25 million to $40 million a year, enough to wipeout extreme poverty around the globe in a decade.

Bill next time you’re at your Presidential library and massage parlor ask somebody why you didn’t do this while you were President for eight freaking years. While you’re on these topics why don’t you get in touch with Warren Buffet and ask why he insists that the $37 billion he is giving away should be used in a way that doesn’t allow it to be taxed in any way.

As for the cartoon, I guess when you can’t think of any way to trash the U.S Military with a cartoon like Pot to Kettle you just draw a giant TV. ml if that gets any bigger you can just draw an ink blot.

By finch

June 27, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this

Yes, welcome back buff. I’m glad you know your folks lived long and remarkable lives. We should all be so lucky. And a hat tip to your son.

Rush’s detention is a real zinger. Last night, Olbermann gleefully described him as a “comedian”, which I guess is another way to say entertainer, which he is.

I almost feel sorry for the guy. Almost. And that’s all I’m going to say about it

By gadem

June 27, 2006 10:41 AM | Link to this

Do you neocons ever like to focus on the task at hand rather than bringing up last weeks news. Since we are talking about past issues, let’s talk about you Dummy in Chief relying on incorrect information to use as just cause for a senseless war. Or let’s talk about how he still has no war strategy that is a little more current of an event, and the fact that the Iraqi people want the US to leave. Is it some sort of Neocon code of honor that you guys never admit when you are wrong or caught in a lie. Is that one of the commandments that you guys found in on the lost sea scrolls?

By getalife

June 27, 2006 10:45 AM | Link to this

I am wondering if Saddam snuck out with the prison release or they will give him a pardon.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

We all need to give up on RW. When ML does a tame toon about local politics (Democratic candidates, at that), RW simply crawls all over him. ML has a lot more material from Ralph Reed he can use, but he hits on the dems…c’mon RW, give it a rest. We all know that RW stands for Real Wanker.

By Chuck

June 27, 2006 10:52 AM | Link to this

What’s so funny about Rush trying to bring back into the USA a large unmarked bottle of viagra? It seems he has a penchant for collecting unmarked bottles of all manner of drugs. Sounds like he’s got a real problem.

By Mike

June 27, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this

gadem, do you enjoy lumping all people you don’t agree with into one group? Everyone in the world swore the same incorrect information was correct. His war strategy is to provide security for the Iraqi government until they can secure themselves. It is working. Troop levels are continuing to be reduced and real progress is being made in Iraq. Malaki seems like a guy that has taken the problem by the neck and is offering real solutions to their situation. The Murtha-Kerry group has no plan. They don’t care what happens in Iraq after we leave. They just want to take the opportunity to use this for political positioning. Did you hear Murtha’s answere on where to redeploy the troops to? It would be laughable if is wasn’t so sad. How about we get away from the tired rhetoric and actually discuss the issues.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 10:54 AM | Link to this

gadem,

More and more information is being declassified that show Iraq/Al Qaeda connections and weapons that have been found, but not made public. So no lie and how is claiming that happened in the past forward looking anyway?

As General Casey has said, there is a plan and it’s working to the point that areas are being pinpointed that we can turn over in full. Before long we will be leaving with honor and leaving behind a shining example for the rest of the Middle East.

How’s that future boy?

Here’s a nearer future event, when you wake up November 8th you will see that you have had your a-ss kicked once again so go ahead and start looking forward to your “we wuz robbed” stories.

By @@

June 27, 2006 10:57 AM | Link to this

Commenting on TODAY’S TIMID CARTOON or HARPOON. You get to choose ml. I know I will.

Of course the “fluffy” (politically correct term for “fat”) lady on the sofa is upset. She’s the one holding the remote. Her Republican husband has to get up to bring about a change in the stations and he’s in good shape.

Tim Taylor(D) will lose from a “remote” (removed from the interests of the Georgia Voters) control position. Kinda like Democrats in D.C..

RW:

Exploring the left coast media, I found liberal absurdity in San Francisco of all places. Damn Republican capitalistic philanthropists. You can read over the liberal crap (a lot of that) and get to the point. You tend to do that very well and I’m learning.

By getalife

June 27, 2006 11:03 AM | Link to this

RW,

The Dems started their own commitee on prewar intellegence.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 11:04 AM | Link to this

N-GA,

Either Cathy Cox or Mark Taylor will win the honor of going down to certain defeat in November. Frankly I’m very fond of Cathy Cox so I find it offensive that ml implies that she is the only one playing rough, but in the grand scheme these two’s race to see who loses is completely insignificant.

It certainly doesn’t rise to the level of using a cartoon called Pot to Kettle to say that United States is exactly the same as Al Qaeda, which is what you so happily give ml a pass for. Why do you hate your country so much?

By Dusty

June 27, 2006 11:09 AM | Link to this

gadem,

We try not to talk too much about the liberal propaganda put out by people like YOU. It is kinda like “news” in the Inquirer. Most of it isn’t true.

Luckovich wandered over into “aid and comfort for the enemy” with his great yearning for fame. We didn’t like that. Even some liberals didn’t like that. Your complaints don’t erase the ignominious “Pot to Kettle” as Luckovich joins the ranks of Fonda and other betrayers of this country.

They are citizens but my respect for them is minimal.

By finch

June 27, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

RW,

More and more information is being declassified that show Iraq/Al Qaeda connections and weapons that have been found, but not made public.

You know I think the Iraq (Saddam)/Al-Qaeda (Osama) link is malarky, so I won’t beat that horse.

But if this information has been “declassified”, why hasn’t it been “made public”? Why isn’t it being shouted out by the Bush administration? Where are Dick Cheney’s and Tony Snow’s PowerPoint presentations?

By getalife

June 27, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

Rush is not very smartLOL.

By Retroactive Flashback

June 27, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this

Mark Taylor is so fat, that when he rides the dark horse, he philly-busts

By Retroactive Flashback

June 27, 2006 11:15 AM | Link to this

Mark Taylor is so fat, that his opponent never gets a chance at the red herrings in the debate.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 11:16 AM | Link to this

RW…er, Andy:

I served my country as a soldier when it needed me and it is because I love my country so very much that I must oppose the fascism of the neo-cons. They are doing everything they can to marginalize the Judicial and Legislative branches of government, and their goal is to create a fascist state that has an appearance of democracy, but in reality represents only those few who can afford their form of government-for-sale.

How have you served your country, Benito?

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 11:16 AM | Link to this

getalife,

It’s very appropriate that your link to Democrats starts with the words “Crooks and liars”, in the future we will all know that it’s the Democrats that best fit those descriptions. Some of us already know it.

By @@

June 27, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

You know, I don’t think I’ve ever given anyone a “hat tip”. “Reading through the liberal crap”. ^^^ “Hat Tip” Semper Fi.

I was a liberal, in the worst sense of “the word,” and I have come to see the light.

By Retroactive Flashback

June 27, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this

Mark Taylor is so fat, that he not only initiates pork barrel legislation, he is the pork barrel, you know, he really gets the barrel rolling

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

finch,

The precursor footprint of these chemical weapons is very easily traceable. Since France and Russia are very likely sources, it could cause huge international problems to trumpet that even though it could help President Bush in the short run. This is why the Bush administration fights to keep these things classified even though he could selfishly release it.

You should be thankful that you have a President that is more interested in doing the right thing and trying to balance the need for our allies against that of causing great harm to the world for his own personal poll ratings.

President Bush has always said that his Presidency will be judged by historians long after we’re gone and he is absolutely correct about that. I thank God everyday that we are no longer being run by a poll driven egomaniac.

By Retroactive Flashback

June 27, 2006 11:25 AM | Link to this

Mark Taylor is so fat, that at Thanksgiving, there’s never anything left of the Turkey’s Caucus

By Retroactive Flashback

June 27, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

Mark Taylor is so fat, that he eschewed Willy Horton ads

By getalife

June 27, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

RW,

John is a good guy at that site.

I have been reading how our government is passing laws to do away with borders and a main superhighway to merge us, Mexico and Canada into one large open trading business model.

Have we merged with these countries? I do not understand.

By RE

June 27, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

RW, are you pushing those weapon finds that Santorum was pushing? Are you talking about the chemical weapons that were buried during the Iran Iraq war that were found?

Keep beatin that dead horse, I am sure those WMDs are just about to be found.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

N-GA,

As I have stated here many times I was not in the military. If you choose to say that means I’ve done nothing for my country that is your right, but I would say that I am doing more right now to counter the likes of you than I would have done in the window of time I would have been eligible for service.

As I recall Andy did serve in the Armed Forces. Now if you really want to hump someone’s leg go ahead, I won’t respond further to that. If you want to show some maturity I’ll be happy to discuss the issues with you.

By Retroactive Flashback

June 27, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq?

Cut one

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq?

Cut one

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq?

Cut one

What is the mission of US troops in Iraq?

Cut one

By What Doesn't This Wanker Understand?

June 27, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

N-GA Wanker, I don’t need to brag on my military service nor do I need to make up stories like you do, di-ckhead.

Besides which, military service does not make one bit of damn difference to the debate on a political blog, you moron, ignorant animal.

Last time I looked, America was a free country and everyone is entitled to their opinion, regardless off how much you clown liberals would like to silence everyone.

Stick it.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 11:37 AM | Link to this

As I recall Andy did serve in the Armed Forces

er, the Salvation Army doesn’t count.

By buff

June 27, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

Thanks to all of you for your kind words and welcome backs. I love Rush, but this is still funny. Taylor v. Cox, yawn. Governor Bubba will roll in November. Both Taylor and Cox shied away from the gay lobby, so, who will they vote for? not Bubba. Hey, I quit listening to Boortz; got sick of hearing him talk about his plane, etc. The new guy on WGST, Denny Schaeffer is pretty good, but he is on vacation this week. Man, the Braves suck. Cliff took his wife shopping but will probably be back on my PC later. I hope he remembers to use his name, and not mine

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 11:41 AM | Link to this

RW, errrr Andy,

You are the idiot that equates criticism of this administration with hating America. That kind of leap in logic can only be spouted by a fervent fascist who wants to stifle free speech. Anyone who is truly objective would agree that most of the hate-speech comes from the far right.

By Here's A Way To Serve Your Country

June 27, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

RE: Why don’t you check the lethality of those 500 WMD that have been found by bathing yourself in what’s inside of them?

All kidding aside, what else did the “weapons inspectors” miss?

And did they miss these little jewels on purpose?

You know, like CNN, not noticing the murder, rape and torture Saddam was doing, so that they could stay in Baghdad and continue to accuse the United States of murder, rape and torture?

By Think B-4 You Speak!

June 27, 2006 11:48 AM | Link to this

BAGHDAD, Iraq — One of Iraq’s largest Sunni Arab groups endorsed the prime minister’s national reconciliation plan on Tuesday, and the government announced new benefits aimed at paving the way for freed detainees to return to their normal lives. — FoxNews

Yeah that’s a brilliant idea! We shouldn’t unleash the animals until the rotors of the last helo are spinning on the way out.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 11:49 AM | Link to this

N-GA,

they’ve turned it into a cottage industry.

Anyone who is truly objective would agree that most of the hate-speech comes from the far right.

By RE

June 27, 2006 11:49 AM | Link to this

Did RW really just equate his typing on a blog with military service.

Delusional.

By It Figures I Have To Explain This

June 27, 2006 11:53 AM | Link to this

By N-GA June 27, 2006 11:41 AM RW, errrr Andy, You are the idiot that equates criticism of this administration with hating America.

You are also free in America to dispute any opinion that you disagree with, you stupid savage. You can dispute what I say, however futile that may prove to be, anytime you want to get slapped down for it, Wanker.

Look, the libs you profess to agree with and love, would put your a-ss in a box and bury you in the ground if they felt it would keep a baby bird from being harmed.

Just because you are too stupid to understand this does not mean you can inflict your ignorance on the rest of us without paying a price for it.

Take it like a man, you p-ussy.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

buff,

When you get ready to post for the last time before Cliff would be on just click “no” on remember me before you post.

RE,

I’m not specifically talking about any particular weapons find. Pre-1991 weapons would not seem to be problem exposing their origin. If you ever wonder why your party isn’t trusted look no further than this blog where all the libs try to jump on some tiny piece of the puzzle to nitpick. At least finch asked a sensible question to elicit a response. Know it alls, like you, will never be taken seriously.

N-GA,

Whaaa…..

Midori,

What’s wrong with the Salvation Army? They provide tremendous amounts of beneficial services to help people in need.

By RE

June 27, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

Let me get this straight, we went to iraq to get rid of the 20 year old chemical weapons from the Iran-iraq war? I just don’t think that is worth a billion and a half dollars per week

By One of the Majority's Voices of Dissent

June 27, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this

Midori,

I don’t think playing the sailor in the Village People qualifies as military service for Andy. He may have “serviced” some sailors, but that doesn’t qualify either.

By Think B-4 You Speak!

June 27, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this

RE - We just figured that since we sold them to em in the first place, we might as well recoup our investment - being that they didn’t use them and all.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 12:06 PM | Link to this

RE,

Listen up child and I’ll try one more time:

The entire body of what I do now is probably more beneficial to this country than what I <——— would have done as a brainwashed moonbat in the military in the post-Vietnam 70’s. Got it this time?

By AntiRadical

June 27, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

Good toon ML. I wonder if America will ever see another day when political campaigning will be free of attack ads and swiftboating.

This blog had its’ own introduction to the later with MLs cartoon “Pot to Kettle”. It is encouraging to note that obviously, the far-right radicals are few in number and must spread their efforts over many venues; hence, their appearance for only a day. I doubt, afterall, that they all suffer from attention deficit disorder.

Nice link to Limbaughs latest “problem”, Buff. It is telling that the man has again demonstrated an inability to adhere to the laws regarding prescription drugs. Disregard for law and societies norms are a classic indicator of an addictive personality disorder.

When such personalities are denied their “drug of choice” (in Limbaughs case “Oxycontin”), it has been my professional experience that they will invariably revert to other addictive personality traits such as over-eating, satyrism (male sexual addiction), over-work, thrill-seeking, etc.

The only “treatment” having even partial measures of success for such profound personality disorders is conversion of a religious nature via “12-step methods” employed by Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous, Over-Eaters Anonymous, etc. Even though the manifestations of the personality disorder (which is the root cause of the expressed self-destructive acts) are wildly varied, the treatment is virtually identical for all.

Sadly for Limbaugh, the key to success in 12-Step treatment is humility. The first step in these programs is to have the humility to accept the fact that one has a deep-seated personality disorder that they alone can not control.

On those occasions that I have heard Limbaugh, he doesn’t appear to have an excess of humility, so I fear that he has little hope of success. Most often, these patients must pursue their addictive personality traits to oblivion (what addicts call their “bottom”). His apologists serve him quite poorly by enabling his self-destruction.

We should feel very sorry for Limbaugh. His is a solitary, wretched existence that none of us would wish on our very worst enemy, regardless of their political affiliation.

By getalife

June 27, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this

Let us not forget the $8 billion missing with no investigation.

By RE

June 27, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this

RW, I do not think our government wants to show who manufactured the pre 1991 weapons either. I do remember a certain sec def going over and meeting saddam prior to chemical weapons being used in the iran-iraq war though. but maybe you are right, they don’t want to embarass france by showing who made those weapons. That makes a lot of sense, the Bush Admin is always careful not to offend france.

By buff

June 27, 2006 12:14 PM | Link to this

Rush began his show today by saying “How did bob Dole’s luggage get on my plane?” RW, does Mikey turn off his blog at times? It was down last night

By Midori

June 27, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this

One of the Majority’s Voices of Dissent,

can’t you just picture him in his cute little sailor suit, singing “Macho Man”?

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

RE,

That’s very common knowledge so I don’t think you can turn that one into some great coverup. Not that you won’t try.

buff,

Wankers like N-GA & Midori started crying and spamming the blog so ml shuts it down at night and on weekends. There is always this site that carries forward the cartoon and is open 24/7. Some people have figured out ways to post here anyway, but several people you “know” show up there.

By @@

June 27, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Just a quick look before I go. I’m seeing petty points of “military service” used to score. Isn’t it hysterical liberals, like ml, (yours) who see our servicemen as petty with his POT TO KETTLE cartoon.

Midori/N-GA:

As to the hate speech from the right. My memory serves me very well and it was one of the gnats that swarmed around you liberals one night who posted this “admirable”? link to get back at me for something I said that they didn’t agree with. Any comment you two would like to add to the gnats?

See….I don’t forget! How convenient for you lefties that you do. Check the archives.

RE:

I’ve always liked what you have “had” to contribute here, but by your comparison (service vs. non-service), I would need to be developmentally delayed in order to teach Special Education students. So…do you think I’m developmentally delayed? You’ve commended me in the past for my choice in professions. Has your opinion of me changed as well?

All liberal “hate speech” on that “open door” (@@ is developmentally delayed) will be filed in my memory for future use if necessary.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 12:30 PM | Link to this

Wankers like N-GA & Midori started crying and spamming the blog so ml shuts it down at night and on weekends

you lying sack of sh*t - leave it to you.

scumbag.

the only spam on this board comes from one person, and you know who that person is - especially since you continue to praise him for spamming.

I’m well aware of you people’s penchant for creating your own reality. it appears lying like a bald faced dog goes hand in hand with your creations.

Dumb bastard.

What makes you think you can tell lies on people and they not go unchallenged?

Filth.

By Think B-4 You Speak!

June 27, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

For the last time - Pot to Kettle had nothing to do with the military, so stop trying to use the military as your pawn. We know how much some people like too, but it’s getting old and boring.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

Neo-con Republicans, the party that just loves to hate……

Ann Coulter

Rush Limbaugh

Sean Hannity

Karl Rove

Bill O’Reilly

George W. Bush

Dick Cheney

Donald Rumsfeld

Paul Wolfowitz

Richard Perle

Condi Rice

By Midori

June 27, 2006 12:33 PM | Link to this

@@,

carry that crap down the hall somewhere and try to convince someone else.

You “patriots” have turned hate and hate speech into a cottage industry.

One example of the left does not negate that fact.

How long do you think people will sit idly by and NOT respond in kind?

Go suck a mango.

By RE

June 27, 2006 12:34 PM | Link to this

RW, it is amazing to me you think the origin of the weapons is being covered up, yet you seem to forget that the GOP has the house senate and executive branch locked up. How do you still blame everything on the dems? Good point about that 8billion missing. I wonder where that investigation will lead?

By getalife

June 27, 2006 12:39 PM | Link to this

buff,

You can thank “Andy” for the new rules.

By RE

June 27, 2006 12:40 PM | Link to this

Um, @@, what are you talking about?

RW equated bloggin on the internet to military service, which I find a little nuts. You do not have to serve in the military to be patriotic, nor does it make you a better person. I have known folks who were jerks before they went into the military, and nothing really changed. I have also known some that were excellent people before they went into the military, and again, nothing changed, they are still excellent people. But equating military service to bloggin as a pastime is insane

By seeing through the smoke

June 27, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

I’d be more inclined to believe something about the WMD if the government, as it now exists, believed more in a transparent government. It seems to me that they hide things just to hide them without any real reason. If they found WMD, why not tell us that, instead of hiding and hinting and changing the focus of the “war” to a battle for Iraqi freedom?

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

RE,

If you would take a breath before you respond it would be much appreciated.

What does control of the Senate, House, and Executive branch have to do with not wanting set off international chaos? (I’ll help you with this one-If Clinton was in office any information that would help his polls would be released with no regard to consequences. But that doesn’t seem to fit your misinterpretation of what I said.)

Where do you see that as me blaming the Dems? and lastly, It wasn’t me that brought up this silly “missing 8 billion dollars”. That money is probably sitting in Ray Nagin’s sandbag and fan fund.

Midori,

Glad to see you can still take a joke. With a filthy mouth like yours you ought to start swapping spit with Mothra.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this

What we really have on this blog is a person afflicted with multiple-personality disorder.

First we have RW (Real Wanker). He tries to takes the high road on moral and intellectual issues, but invariably his Andy side rears its head. It is possible to converse with him civilly on most occasions.

Andy (The Bed Wetter), also has numerous other sobriquets. He/she tells lies, makes baseless accusations and cuts-and-pastes as a form of masturbation. It is this persona most likely to go postal. A once active member of the KKK, he barely escaped with his &%#@’s when they discovered that he liked to )@8& with his neighbor’s $@&^’s.

Buy Danish - The feminine persona of this trilogy, she adores RW as a teacher and father-figure, but loves Andy (in the biblical sense). What she lacks in intellect she more than makes up for in her attempt to be more shallow than Ann Coulter.

By blogging using all three personalities, the individual behind this facade is able to draw three paychecks from a neo-conservative non-profit, swift-boat-like shadow organization dedicated to the silent overthrow of these United States.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 12:51 PM | Link to this

RE,

I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt once that you missed this.

By RW-(the original) June 27, 2006 12:06 PM | Link to this RE, Listen up child and I’ll try one more time: The entire body of what I do now is probably more beneficial to this country than what I <——— would have done as a brainwashed moonbat in the military in the post-Vietnam 70’s. Got it this time?

Pretending you didn’t see that again will basically tell everyone here more about you than you probably want to give out. There are still people here that consider you borderline normal.

By RE

June 27, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

Ray Nagin has the missing 8 Billion. I hope that is a joke, but who knows, you seem out of touch with reality to the point you might believe that.

The Admin and the GOP has publically blasted every country involved in the oil for food program, but now they are afraid to upset anyone by tracking where the weapons came from. Delusional.

By @@

June 27, 2006 01:01 PM | Link to this

Aaahhhh Midori/N-GA, you are both so very predictable. Thought I’d hang around for the fireworks. “Truthout” to the two of you.

RE:

My point is, you don’t have to serve in the military to be able to support the military. Word and deed are both ways to support. There are military servicemen who have their own blogs so that their feelings can be read.

I just thought your response was unlike the RE that I have always appreciated here.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this

RE,

Please provide the link to the Administration blasting these countries over Oil for Palaces because, frankly their reluctance to do so is one thing that has irritated me all along. Maybe I’ll be happier with them after you pony up.

I see where there could be reasons for not making a weapons connection public, but not OFF/P.

By Scooter

June 27, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this

Iraq’s army was primarily armed with weaponry it had purchased from the Soviet Union and its satellites in the preceding decade. During the war, it purchased billions of dollars worth of advanced equipment from the Soviets and the French [6], as well as from the People’s Republic of China, Egypt, Germany, and other sources (including Europe and facilities for making and/or enhancing chemical weapons). Germany [7] along with other Western countries (among them United Kingdom, France, Spain (Explosivos Alaveses), Italy and the United States) provided Iraq with biological and chemical weapons technology and the precursors to nuclear capabilities (see below). Much of Iraq’s financial backing came from other Arab states, notably oil-rich Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

By This Can't Be That Hard To Understand

June 27, 2006 01:07 PM | Link to this

By RE June 27, 2006 12:40 PM Um, @@, what are you talking about? RW equated bloggin on the internet to military service, which I find a little nuts

RE: If you were able to form a thought beyond “Bush Sucks” maybe you might be able to understand what RW was saying and, as a bonus, you wouldn’t be such a putz.

Imagine in you can being a soldier in the desert thousands of miles from home with enemy bullets whizzing by you. Would you A) want to think the citizens of the country you are fighting for are behind you 100% and doing everything they can to support you or B) want to think the citizens of the country you were fighting for would do your a-ss in just so they could win a few seats in the Senate?

I’m sure you need to think about this, take your time, get back to me with your answer.

By buff

June 27, 2006 01:13 PM | Link to this

N-Ga, outside of Coulter, do you have any examples, presented in a true and honest context, of Limbaugh, Hannity, Rice, etc. being hate-filled, or using such language? And, you could have put Michael Savage on your list. I ask you because I listen to Limbaugh and Hannity somewhat regularly, and they aer not hate-filled. So, please present evidence. And using humor, even sarcastic or ironic humor, is not hate

By getalife

June 27, 2006 01:18 PM | Link to this

Dear wingnuts,

May I suggest a real church

By Midori

June 27, 2006 01:21 PM | Link to this

and may I suggest a new ‘entertainer’

By Midori

June 27, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

now I see where RW spends his Sundays.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this

Midori,

I fixed your link for you this time. Did you ever fix the coma inducing link you claimed to have yesterday?

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this

I think everyone on this blog can agree on this: SOMEDAY all American troops will be withdrawn from Iraq.

I further suggest that all posters on this blog agree that the war on terror will never be completely over. There will always be terrorists somewhere.

Now then, when all American soldiers are back from Iraq, will there still be a bunch of people repeating the following: “We are fighting them over there so that we don’t have to fight them here.”? But then we won’t be fighting them “over there”.

But then again, by that time we will probably be fighting them in Iran, or North Korea, or Pakistan, or Syria, or all of the above.

My point is that fighting is not ALWAYS the answer (unless you are a graduate of the Rand Institute of International Studies).

We fought the Italians, Japanese, and Germans until they were defeated…now we trade with them. They are our allies.

We fought the North Koreans to a standstill …now where are we?

We fought the Chinese (in North Korea), now we have a larger trade deficit with them than with any other country in the world.

We fought the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong insurgents until we had to give up, now we are investing hundreds of millions of dollars in their country and moving toward granting them greater trading rights with the U.S.

Fight and win…fight and lose…perhaps we need to try harder to seek other solutions. Perhaps we would spend less money…perhaps we would lose fewer soldiers…perhaps we will just keep on killing one another…..

By getalife

June 27, 2006 01:31 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Here is the latest news:

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 01:40 PM | Link to this

getalife,

You forgot this one:

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

By finch

June 27, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this

RW,

I was looking for an answer to why Iraq/Al Qaeda connections and weapons had been found and “declassified”, but not “made public” by the White House, since these connections would support their rationale for war. And I’m still wondering.

Instead, you mentioned the French, Soviet (Russian) etc. links to Iraq’s weapons and WMDs. And you suggested President Bush is staying mum for diplomatic and strategic reasons about these links. Off topic, but credible.

But since you brought it up…

The US, as much as anyone, helped Saddam create those WMDs, including the ones used to kill Kurds and Iranians.

Is this the reason the Bush administration is silent about those corroded old WMDs?

By Midori

June 27, 2006 01:44 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

can they be ANY more hypocritical?

I heard about Rush last night on Olbermann - there’s a news story saying that Viagra wasn’t the only drug he was caught with.

How many wives has Rush had, 4? 5?

It’s starting to make sense now.

Those good ole “family values” and all that.

I heard about the Repubican “cut and run” plan on Sunday’s talk shows.

Funny how no one is calling it that now that the administration has adopted the idea.

I’d like for RW to call into Mike Malloy’s program one night. he’s always looking for a wingnut who has the courage to debate him.

RW the Original Keyboard Kommando - Here’s your golden opportunity to show us liberals what an erudite debater you really are.

Don’t make me pull my “bok, bok, bok” card. Come on, prove me wrong.

Bok.

Bok.

Bok.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 01:47 PM | Link to this

Fitzmas HAS arrived Moron.

I can’t wait to see Dick Cheney vapor lock on the witness stand.

Bok.

Bok.

Bok.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 01:49 PM | Link to this

RW, the Original Keyboard Kommando,

how about a poll to determine how many days there are in Fitzmas?

Bok.

Bok.

Bok.

By Think B-4 You Speak!

June 27, 2006 01:52 PM | Link to this

This Can’t Be That Hard To Understand - The answer is “C” Neither.

By getalife

June 27, 2006 02:01 PM | Link to this

RW,

Hey getalife, Midori here. Karl rove has been indicted!! Fitzmas has arrived!!!!

Link please. LOL.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 02:02 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Who the hell is Mike Malloy?

finch,

I’ll let you read the rest of my responses to your posse and if you still have questions I’ll have to answer them at ml After Dark or here later. I’m heading over to Cox until late this evening.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 02:10 PM | Link to this

Finch,

more ‘WMD’ have been found!!!

RW has a carton of expired milk in his fridge.

By @@

June 27, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this

Just dropping by, very busy today.

By N-GA June 27, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this*

*What we really have on this blog is a person afflicted with multiple-personality disorder.

Boy oh boy….I will agree with that ^^^ statement. Please read this 12:48 post in it’s entirety and then compare it to your 1:30 post. From what I’m seeing, there is a distinct difference in personalities there.

They’re trying solutions in Iraq. But I’ve had my eye on “Irrational Radical Islamofacism” long before Bush was President, and I think part of the solution is “bringing them to their knees”. Be equally as aggressive in our efforts as they are in theirs. Short of cutting their heads off on the internet for all to see of course, along with other abominable acts of “terrorism” not only against us, but their own people as well.

And, yes….here is another opportunity to stick it to ml. What was the name or names of that cartoon. Oh yea! Originally, before it was changed by the AJC, it was Pot to Kettle.

Panties for ml anyone?

By Larry Taylor

June 27, 2006 02:22 PM | Link to this

As a longtime and loyal reader of the AJC, I am writing to express my outrage over the offensive political cartoon by Mike Luckovich published on June 22, 2006. Mr. Luckovich certainly has the 1st Amendment right to express his contempt for America, but for the AJC to give him a platform and public forum to spread such vile hatred is inexcusable. No doubt your editors would be quick to respond if one of your employees had denigrated African-Americans in print by using the “N” word or referred to the gay community in disparaging terms. Luckovich’s cartoon equating the U.S. Government with the evil actions of Al Qaida is no less offensive. I am calling on the editors of the AJC to take action. I strongly urge the AJC to suspend Luckovich, publicly denounce this cartoon, and offer a public apology for failing to exercise your editorial responsibilities.

Larry Taylor

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this

getalife,

That’s pretty funny smart a-ss. :-)

You do realize there are ways to go back and get old web pages as they existed at another point in time don’t you?

By getalife

June 27, 2006 02:32 PM | Link to this

RW,

Oh no, you are on to me:

That’s pretty funny smart a-ss.

By RW-(the original)

June 27, 2006 02:43 PM | Link to this

OO,

I sent you a message, I’ll check with you when I get back.

getalife,

I looked and Midori was right. That milk carton was from back in early 2002 with a message from Joe Wilson on the side asking if anybody had seen his wife the CIA agent.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 02:53 PM | Link to this

RW,

obviously Scooter saw her, cause he couldn’t wait, per Cheney’s orders, to tell the entire staff of the AJC, Washington Post, NY Times AND The Enquirer.

F*cking blabbermouth.

And a traitor to boot!!!!

RW, you are reverting to your alternate reality again.

Just because YOU say Valerie Plame was not convert, and just because YOU say that her husband “outed” her, does not make it so.

Not only that, it’s stupid as h*ll, too.

By Midori

June 27, 2006 02:55 PM | Link to this

Joe Wilson on the side asking if anybody had seen his wife the CIA agent.

Jealous?

Why don’t you aspire to being more than a Keyboard Kommando, then?

Don’t take it out on her because she made something of her life - that is until those deviants in the Bush White House chose to disgustingly and treasonously out her for political game and payback.

By mike imperial

June 27, 2006 03:02 PM | Link to this

I just read your explanation of the torture cartoon. let me tell you something. If you don’t have at least one person mad as hell and all po’d at you, you aren’t doing your job. Keep up the good work

By Midori

June 27, 2006 03:02 PM | Link to this

RW,

Your unit patches were delivered to me by mistake. I know you are anxious to sew them on your uniform, so I’m fed-exing them to you to avoid further delay

By 'achmed

June 27, 2006 03:12 PM | Link to this

Mike L. Osama is very angry that we have yet to receive your monthly Al Qaeda support check and he may take you off his newsletter list. Please submit immediately. Praise to Allah, Praise to Osama, Praise to the AJC, Praise to Mike Luckovich, Praise to the NY Times

By Goldie

June 27, 2006 03:15 PM | Link to this

Another fabulous editorial, Lucko — the primary season has certainly arrived in GA! I’m looking forward the Dem primary winner (whether Taylor or Cox) to get going with the “what’s Sonny done?” ads…

And hey, how about that Oxycontin Limbaugh — once a illegal drug trafficker, always an illegal drug trafficker, I suppose. Were the terms for his probation not specific enough regarding carrying or using illegal prescription drugs?

But, really — his poor wife… I forget, is she the 2nd or 3rd wife now? Having to put up with the “hillbilly heroin” addict for all those years, and now she’s been disgraced by the hillbilly having to obtain Viagra illegally. Just amazing…

By Goldie

June 27, 2006 03:24 PM | Link to this

I wonder how many of the right-wingnuts here remember the fate of the Soviet Union after they overstayed their welcome in Afghanistan in the 80’s? They went broke, financially and militarily — but who needs d@mn history lessons when America has Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld at the helm and leading the way?

By Here You Are, Treason Times

June 27, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information … concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States … shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both [emphasis added].

But not hung by the neck, dammit. We need to change the law.

Until then, I guess ten years will work…

By cliff

June 27, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

I have spent little time here, but it seems that there are some on the left who hate Bush more than Al Qaeda

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 03:57 PM | Link to this

I think this qualifies Rush Limbaugh as a hater and a hypocrite…although everyone already knew he was a hypocrit. Rush avoided the draft during Viet Nam because he has a congenital wart on his butt. (BTW: Paul Hackett was running for office as a Democrat):

RUSH: [Hackett] was in the Civilian Affairs Unit, and this is a Washington Post story (it says here) from July 30th. “A lawyer and a major in the Marine reserves, Hackett volunteered last year to serve in Iraq and spent seven months there in the civilian affairs job, including service around Ramadi and Fallujah. He returned to Ohio in March, decided to jump into the race for Portman’s seat, seeking to become the first Iraq war veteran elected to Congress.” So he volunteered to serve, spent seven months in a civilian affairs job. What is that, since you’re — did you say you’re a Marine? CALLER: I’m in the Navy, sir, Navy lieutenant. RUSH: Navy. What is a civilian affairs job? You tell me. CALLER: Civilian affairs is just basically a public affairs job where they interact with the civilian authorities from a military perspective. It’s a military liaison, if you will. RUSH: Oh, it’s a military liaison. Is it a combat position or not? CALLER: Negative. It is not a combat position. … RUSH: Okay, call him a staff puke if that’s what you want, but civilian affairs, staff puke. Bottom line is he’s running a fraudulent, deceptive campaign, and the Democrats are saying this is a bellwether election.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 04:03 PM | Link to this

Cliff,

Your homework assignment is to explain (in 500 words or less) why Bush is less of a threat to the average American than Al Quaeda. You must cover economics, civil liberties, extended reserve call-ups, delayed discharge from service, social security, health care for Americans, immigration, pollution, rising violent crime, bird flu, poverty, the decline of education in America relative to the world, trade imbalance, and gay marriage.

By พวกหัวรุนแรงตรงข้าม

June 27, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this

ใครก็ตามพูดไทยหรือไม่?

By @@

June 27, 2006 04:16 PM | Link to this

N-GA:

I think the fact that cliff has two sons serving in the marines in Iraq is all he owes you.

Cliff:

@@ gives you permission to pass on N-GA’s homework assignment.

By true patriot

June 27, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

I see that well known legal scholar “Here You Are” has decided to act as prosecutor, judge and jury in the case of the New York Times. He’d be excutioner too, if he could.

But why stop there? Since you have no concept of innocent until proven guilty, much less due process, why not cut to the chase and say you want to be the big banana!

We (the sane majority) hope that you, and only you, is pilloried by the same justice system when youre pinched for anything. Trials are so darn time consuming. And jurys? Cant trust them.

The rest of us will continue living the life of liberty and independent thought in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

And thank you New York Times for exposing the Bush bunch for the despotic gang of fools that they are. Please ask them if theyve made any progress finding Osama bin Landen… or the real killer in the O. J. murder case.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

@@…I never said Cliff owed me anything. He expressed an opinion, and I responded. I assert that there is a valid argument to be made for either position.

For example, if GWB is shown to be wrong regarding global warming and mercury pollution, then the consequences over the long term are quite serious, even deadly. There are intellectual aspects to this argument that even you may not comprehend.

By cliff

June 27, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

N-Ga, I find it futile to even try to make a point with someone of your intellect, or lack of. Your whole point is absurdity. If you really think Bush is more dangerous than terrorists you are truly lost, and no amount of reason or evidence would change your insect-sized brain. As for your laundry list, most of those economic issues should be dumped by the government. And, what the hell did the Dems do on those issues when in office? In closing, I spent 37 years in the United States Army and do not need some left-wing American-hating p-ussy gutless wimp giving me assignments. You freaking arrogant, lying piece of feces. You want to meet up somewhere vomit bag? I ani’t got much going on this evening

By Oh, Please, Spare Us

June 27, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

By true patriot June 27, 2006 04:29 PM Since you have no concept of innocent until proven guilty, much less due process, why not cut to the chase and say you want to be the big banana!

You mean like you “true pinkos” did for our Marines at Haditha?

Lowlife.

By buff

June 27, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this

Let me step in here, N-Ga, Bush has not been charged with violating American’s civil liberties. And, why haven’t the Democrats offered up legislation on that issue? As for health care, gee, what did Billy do. The economy is great, and if you are poor in this country it is your own fault. Education, as a professional educator, I point to the big ed lobby, NEA, that controls the Democratic Party as a big part of the problem. Imigration, yeah, Bush is wrong on that one. And, I stronlgy suggest you NOT meet up with Cliff

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 04:55 PM | Link to this

Cliff,

I met your kind when I was a GI…an ignorant REMF who crapped every time he heard a loud noise. Were you at My Lai, or did you manage to cover up all your boo-boos?

I guess people like you really love to hang around guys like Rush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney, AWOL Bush, Saxby Chambliss, and all the other guys who managed to avoided any real service. Me, I’ll stick with Max Cleland, John Kerry, John McCain and the rest of my veteran brothers who don’t spit on one another, no matter what their politics.

By Scooter

June 27, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this

True Patriot,

UBL is in Afghanistan somewhere and ^^^^^ there Goldie said history shows us it is stupid to fight in Afghanistan.

I wonder how many of the right-wingnuts here remember the fate of the Soviet Union after they overstayed their welcome in Afghanistan in the 80’s? They went broke, financially and militarily — but who needs d@mn history lessons when America has Bush/Cheney and Rumsfeld at the helm and leading the way?

I actually agree with her on that one.

What prevents us from [calling] a general alert is that the country has no mountains in which we can take refuge and no forests in whose thickets we can hide…

There is no doubt that the space in which we can move has begun to shrink and that the grip around the throats of the mujahidin has begun to tighten. With the deployment of soldiers and police, the future has become frightening.

Any more questions, you patriot?

By Dusty

June 27, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

I read this blog and become very angry.

This is the dirtiest, prejudiced, unAmerican,politicized, mindless, psychotic blog I have ever read. It should be called Mad Dog Liberals on the Loose.

The military are pictured as the equal of crazed torturers. The President is drawn and pictured as a blubbering moron as he leads the country through difficult times. Various professionals are ridiculed for their jobs. Patriotic citizens are blasted as brainless. Lies are as common as house flies. Concocted accusations against conservatives are drawn up for any occasion.

This blog has become the liberal garbage can of accusations and anti-American behavior. I am ashamed for our country.

We should be very sad that we have citizens of this calibre. Luckovich has opened the lid on the garbage can. He belongs inside with the rest of the muckrakers. The country is being undermined.

Don’t let your children read this junk. The language is filthy and the hate for country flows freely. Let your children grow, realizing in maturity, that we live in the greatest country in the world, not the scumbags’ version presented by these twisted brains.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this

Buff,

Arlen Spector (Republican) is holding hearings as we speak concerning Bush and civil liberties. As far as Bill and health care, its hard to do anything when the other party controls congress. Look at Bush…his party has controlled congress since 198…what? And he still hasn’t fixef Social Security, Medicare, or our oil/energy problem. All we hear are excuses, but the Republicans haven’t delivered.

Having taught graduate school, I believe the problems are not the NEA’s. The vast majority of school systems are managed locally with help from the state and with oversight from the federal government. Certainly there are school districts that excel and others that fail miserably. It would seem relatively straightforward to determine what makes some successful and others pathetically lacking.

By @@

June 27, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this

Buff:

You can’t keep asking Democrats what their grand plan was or is. Their only response will be “We wanna suck. It’s our turn dammit, someone stole our opportunity in 2004. We coulda sucked reaaalllly bad. Better than Bush”. Only in their dreams Buff, only in their dreams.

I also want tickets to the N-GA/Cliff Bout. Place a bet on Cliff for me.

I’ll have to pick them up later though because I’m on the road again.

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 05:24 PM | Link to this

There is plenty of outrage on this blog to go around. But I have not seen much said about the Iraq plan to grant amnesty to those Iraqis who have killed and maimed coalition troops. Is this going to be the end result of a failed policy? When its all said and done, what will it all have been for?

That’s what I have asked myself since 1975. What did my friends die for? I’m sure Max Cleland and millions of others as the same question. And there has never been a satisfactory answer. And there never will be. After more than 30 years the anger is still there. And don’t blame just the Democrats. If you’ve been to The Wall, you will see the first death was 1959.

Either party could have ended the bloodshed, but they didn’t. And I’ve been an Independent ever since. And I don’t condone Saxby Chambliss airing commercials saying that Max Cleland is soft on terror. He has apologized for that (after the election), but Chambliss took all the deferments he could get until the war was over. Meanwhile he became a millionaire.

So I support our troops…spend the money and give them armor and anything else they need. But I refuse to support the person who sent them there.

By The Possibilities

June 27, 2006 05:31 PM | Link to this

Wanker N-GA, just think, if you go meet Cliff and he busts all your teeth out, you could grow a beard and really be a b-itch then.

You’d be the delight of the barracks again.

By Steven Rucker

June 27, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

It is obvious you have never stared into the face of something truly evil. When you do, then and only then will you understand that moral equivalence is a myth. It is a concept for the naive. You are not to be criticized. You are to be pitied. When people like those who butchered defenseless prisoners in their care take control, people like you are among the first to die. Free speech has no meaning to them.

By buff

June 27, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

N-Ga, Cliff can speak for himself, but, he is gone for a bit, but you do not make Sergeant Major of the Screaming Eagles by being a REMF. He was decorated with the Silver Star at Hamburger Hill and the Bronze Star at Firebase Ripcord. He was in the first Iraqi War, and did one tour in 2003 back over there before retiring. And, he has more Purple Hearts than John Kerry

By buff

June 27, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

Rush may have his a$$ in a sling, but he was funny today. He began his show by wondering how Bob Dole’s luggage got on his plane, then said his doctor musinderstood him when he said he was worried about the next “eLection.” Later he said he thought they were blue M&Ms from the Bill Clinton Library.

By buff

June 27, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

N-Ga, you mention Viet Nam. I read General Giap’s bio of the war and he said that the North could never have won without the left and the media in America. I wonder, is the same thing happening again? I truly believe that there are some in this country who want us to lose in Iraq, just as they did in the Nam

By No to Big Bush Government

June 27, 2006 05:56 PM | Link to this

N-GA: The problem Neo-Cons have is that they erroneously think that they control the entire Republican party. They have no idea that many mostly Republican voters (me) and independents are equally disgusted with the Bush administration’s many mis-steps, gargantuan spending, and big government.

They delusionally think that the majority of criticism of the Bush Whitehouse comes from Democrats. While I will probably vote Democrat in Nov and 2008, I certainly do not embrace much of their ideology. I now view them simply as the lesser of two evils. In my opinion, no third party has a chance at this time.

Neo-Cons do not even know who their enemies really are; they are the Republican, Independent, and Democratic parties. This kind of leaves them out in the cold without a sweater. Do you blame them for being so rabidly angry and taking out their frustrations on Democrats alone?

By buff

June 27, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this

By No To

Can you provide me with a thoughtful definition of a Neocon? And, is Newt one? Thank you

By finch

June 27, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

buff,

I truly admire Rush for his self-marketing talents. Seriously. Nobody’s better, except possibly Howard Stern.

By No to Big Bush Government

June 27, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this

Buff: I tink NeoCon is a sound bite that there is no standardized definition of. I use it to refer to the extreme right segment adopted by the Republican party that has no ability to compromise and run an effective governing body politic.

I’m sure that you can see that this is not a group that I would place Gringrich within. Newt is certainly outspoken and well-spoken but it was his leadership that allowed the Republican party to work in some accordance with the Clinton administration in an often non-partisan relationship.

I feel that the checks and balances that each placed on the other was largely responsible for the prosperity that existed during Clinton’s tenure. Big government was effectively ham-strung and it showed.

By Treason Times, democrat Party Toady

June 27, 2006 06:30 PM | Link to this

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), no Bush administration-toadie he, said it best: “Nobody elected The New York Times to do anything. The New York Times is putting its own arrogant, elitist, left-wing agenda before the interests of the American people. The time has come for the American people to realize and The New York Times to realize we’re at war and they can’t be just on their own deciding what to declassify, what to release.”-BostonHerald

By N-GA

June 27, 2006 06:42 PM | Link to this

By No to Big Bush Government:

I am conservative when it comes to spending taxpayer $$, states’ rights, defending the USA, and smaller government.

I am liberal when it comes to helping those who genuinely need help, paying taxes to match any government spending, privacy, and staying out of the business of other countries.

A truthful analysis of the causes of 9/11 point to American policy in the Middle East. I DO NOT condone the terrorists’ actions of 9/11, but I do understand why they did it.

America wants cheap oil, wants to support Israel (no matter what they do), is willing to marginalize the Palestinians even though the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Golan Heights has been denounced by virtually every country but the US and Britain, and supported Middle east governments that were corrupt in order to achieve stability in the area (to guarantee a continuous supply of oil)…if the US (either political party) had pushed Israel to return the occupied territories, then 9/11 might not have happened.

If another super power tried to force another form of government on American citizens, what kind of reaction could they expect? I expect the reaction would be violent. There was a movie where Russia defeated and occupied the USA. Some young Americans fought as partisans (without uniforms) and used whatever weapons they could. Few neo-con supporters ever try to put themselves positions that allow them to understand the perspective of others. But I am sure you can imagine how they would react to being occupied….nuff said.

By Newt Gingrich Speaks

June 27, 2006 06:45 PM | Link to this

The MRC found that between May 17 and June 7 ABC, CBS and NBC aired 99 stories on the alleged military misconduct — a full three and half hours of coverage in three weeks. But when it came to covering the heroism of our soldiers, these same networks gave that story only 52 minutes of coverage - 52 minutes in almost five years. Fourteen of the 20 Americans who received the highest recognition for bravery in the war on terror weren’t mentioned by the networks at all.-HumanEvents

By Goldie

June 27, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

This is the dirtiest, prejudiced, unAmerican,politicized, mindless, psychotic blog I have ever read. It should be called Mad Dog Liberals on the Loose.

Dusty— you need to look long and hard in the mirror before you start slinging your slime, because you’ve definitely contributed your share of “prejudiced, unAmerican” and “psychotic” rants here on the blog the past few weeks. And this was happening way before Lucko’s cartoon of June 22 was printed, so you certainly can’t blame him for all of your hatred that you’ve posted for Americans here day after day.

By Kissing Hillary's A-ss Will Do That

June 27, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes is reportedly “on the warpath” about his network’s recent ratings slide – and has given notice to staffers that he’s willing to clean house, according to a report in Broadcasting & Cable.-NewsMax

I got nuthin for that a-ss.

By Goldie

June 27, 2006 07:00 PM | Link to this

Newt is a whiner, just like Oxycontin-Viagra Limbaugh!

By Buy Danish

June 27, 2006 07:08 PM | Link to this

By Midori/June 27, 2006 05:32 PM

why can’t you cartoon haters go post in the appropriate thread?

Dumb AND outraged is not a good way to go thru life.

Midori,

I found this ^^from you at precisely the appropriate thread, namely ML’s “take” on the nationwide brouhaha over Book on Torture, formerly known as Pot to Kettle.

Now I’m intentionally posting this at the “wrong” thread, just to irritate you.

And speaking of Pot to Kettle, what do you call it when you post an outraged post about absolutely nothing?

N-GA,

Are you writing some sort of novel or screenplay with characters based on RW, Andy and myself?

Knock yourself out, but please remember that what you are writing is pure fiction. I wouldn’t want you to get spurned by Oprah like James Frey for deceiving your audience into thinking that it is a true story.

You can thank me later for my generous and kind advice.

By Can The Libs Get Anymore Ridiculous?

June 27, 2006 07:32 PM | Link to this

So being conceived and born makes you gay?:

Womb environment ‘makes men gay’

I must have been hatched from an egg.

And here I always thought there was no way that Wanker N-GA could have a mother.

First time I’ve ever been wrong.

By Rebecca

July 4, 2006 01:25 PM | Link to this

You know that the size of the “Big Man” is the elephant in the room that no one will talk about. I think it’s a pretty good play on words, but too—he is a good representative of the obese society that surrounds all of us and is increasingly growing! He should win on BIG votes alone.

By Another Test

July 5, 2006 03:21 PM | Link to this

Test