Mike Luckovich

By DavidU

April 21, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this

What can I say….Hilarious!

By RW-(the original)

April 21, 2006 09:23 PM | Link to this

On another thread people were asking “How is it you say the left is trying to destroy America?”

While I don’t think you could give a better answer than what ml is advocating here. Military factions aligning and being given control over our government from within having no fear of facing an electorate will make us a third world country faster than Cindy Sheehan can plant one on Hugo Chavez.

Some insight on the subject

By DavidU

April 21, 2006 09:27 PM | Link to this

Come on…..This was genius!

Air Command had to actually check to make sure. :)

By getalife

April 21, 2006 09:30 PM | Link to this

This poo will pass.

By Mike Parker

April 21, 2006 09:42 PM | Link to this

WOW!

When the President leaves it all up to the generals, the Wingnuts cheer.

When the Generals push the blame up the chain of command for NOT listening, The Wonderful World of Wingnuts wine and cry.

I hear another dying mackerel flip flopping.

The Generals know how to run a war or they don’t. Rummy can run a press conference. With a huge amount of swagger.

By WashingtonState

April 21, 2006 09:58 PM | Link to this

RW,

I have to agree with you that it is a dangerous precedent to allow the military to have a significant say in domestic policy. It is up to the president to purge his administration of incompetents, not the military. Rumsfeld had offered to resign several times. It was probably pro forma, but the president should have taken him up on the offer. Defenestration is too good for the man.

By Kevin

April 21, 2006 10:00 PM | Link to this

What is being advocated in this cartoon will result in even greater danger than what we now face. The military operates as a unit. If it is encouraged to do otherwise, it ceases to function effectively in defending our nation.

Be careful what you advocate!!!

By @@

April 21, 2006 10:39 PM | Link to this

Well I hope I’m looking at the same Kevin that called me a man today. I read your link and I have to say…it looks like Rumsfeld is trying to apply some innovative thinking for future encounters which won’t look like what we’ve seen in the past.

But then I am a WOMAN, Kevin, so I’m depending on my instincts. I don’t feel comfortable changing boats in midstream.

On a personal note. As retired military, my Dad wouldn’t accept change well. I can’t count the number of times I had to police the front lawn in a “duck-squat” position. Once military, always military, but the world around us changes.

By Buy Danish

April 21, 2006 11:04 PM | Link to this

Mike Parker,

How many Generals does it take to be right? Is it somewhere around the number of angels who can dance on the head of a pin?

There are around 9,000 Generals. We’ve heard from 6 naysayers, and quite a few Rumsfeld supporters (like Tommy Franks for instance).

Please tell us so the magic number so I can enjoy my wine before I cry: “Mike Parker smells like fish wrap!”

By Buy Danish

April 21, 2006 11:14 PM | Link to this

RW,

Yep, it looks like the anti-war, anti-military, just say no to the ROTC Left is now all for a military coup d’etat.

By Jay not jay

April 21, 2006 11:14 PM | Link to this

Good grief ml, what story are they throwing Rummy off? Looks kinda mafia-ish to me.

By Spike

April 21, 2006 11:17 PM | Link to this

Hey! RW, Zell, Puke Danish, Andy, Dusty, others of you cowards, yesterday was Hitler’s birthday. Why weren’t you celebrating here? No guts. In other words, with you it’s “BE a Nazi - just don’t use the word.”

By @@

April 21, 2006 11:17 PM | Link to this

And the generals appear to have enjoyed way too much pasta. Mafia-ish?

By Buy Danish

April 21, 2006 11:23 PM | Link to this

Jay not Jay,

It kinda reminds me of Saddam throwing people off of rooftops.

Somehow I don’t think that’s the image that ML had in mind. The last thing he would want is to remind us of what an evil psychopath Saddam is.

OOPS!

By RW-(the original)

April 21, 2006 11:34 PM | Link to this

@@,

That must have tough for ml trying to scribbler the Generals as the ones doing the right thing, but still having to make them look like slobs since they are military.

By Jay not jay

April 21, 2006 11:38 PM | Link to this

@@, he must have given her a foot massage…

By @@

April 21, 2006 11:43 PM | Link to this

Wordplay:

Nutz - The radical left have none.

Nutzi - The radical left’s mental state.

Nazi - Communism, one step beyond Socialism, the goal of the radical left.

Well, there you have it. Spike is confused!!!

RW:

Mike does like to spread his disrespect to encompass all things. I guess he wants to “Be All That He Can Be”.

By Buy Danish

April 21, 2006 11:47 PM | Link to this

Spike,

Darn it all Spike. You blew our cover.

Here we conservatives are, ostensibly supporting Israel and fighting the Islamofascists that want to destroy it, but then you come along and let the cat out of the bag that what we are really NAZIs.

How smart are you go figure out that we are secretly conspiring to take over Israel and grab the beachfront property for ourselves and Haliburton.

That’s the real reason we went to Iraq! It wasn’t about the oil at all! We needed a foothold in the Middle East to launch our condo invasion.

WOW! You’re amazing.

By @@

April 21, 2006 11:50 PM | Link to this

JayNot:

Who got a foot massage? I’m mad, I’m the one that had to police the front lawn in a ^^^ “duck squat”.

By RW-(the original)

April 21, 2006 11:50 PM | Link to this

@@,

I answered a question mgc asked you over at my place. Maybe you can coax him over here to blast a few of the tree “eaters.”

By Jay not jay

April 21, 2006 11:57 PM | Link to this

@@, it’s in Pulp Fiction. Good stuff.

By Midori

April 22, 2006 12:00 AM | Link to this

Ah, I see the 30 percent are still here, basking in their fearless leader’s glory.

you people put the nut in Wing nut.

By @@

April 22, 2006 12:03 AM | Link to this

RW:

He’d probably get way too frustrated over here. He wouldn’t be able to spell anything right. I’ll invite him though.

Should I call Cindy too? That’ll make three of us Ca-li-for-nians.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 12:04 AM | Link to this

Spike,

Here’s something for you and your imaginary friends to play with.

By Dave

April 22, 2006 12:05 AM | Link to this

Right Spike. One other difference between Hitler and RW & the other slob freak Repubscums you mentioned: Hitler had a brain. And at least a limited amount of guts.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 12:10 AM | Link to this

Midori, you put the left in loosey. Lefty loosey. Any time blow jobs or wankers are involved, up pops Midori. Its like clockwork.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 12:13 AM | Link to this

Midori,

If you should ever find yourself in Las Vegas look around and ask yourself. If most people were right about things they have very little knowledge of would those places be quite so lavish?

By @@

April 22, 2006 12:13 AM | Link to this

JayNot:

I never saw Pulp Fiction. Did Travolta dance in it? If he did, I’ll have to watch it for no other reason than to “watch him dance”.

RW:

You’re right, one Furry Fuehrer will be sufficient for one poster under multiple names.

I’m having a terrible electrical storm here and my dog is going crazy. Time to go.

Nite Guys!

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 12:21 AM | Link to this

Yes, @@ you just have to see it. With a good buzz.

By Spike

April 22, 2006 04:09 AM | Link to this

BD - You can bet your bloated butt I am! Fanpuckingtastic.

By Al

April 22, 2006 04:13 AM | Link to this

@@: I wasn’t aware. You don’t seem like much of a lady. Why is that? I know the policing the damned yard caper quite well, but that didn’t do this to you. Did it?

By candide

April 22, 2006 05:35 AM | Link to this

Stop blaming Rumsfeld. The evil demon is Bush. He got elected, he needs to be eliminated.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 22, 2006 05:57 AM | Link to this

Good Toon

By Dr. Randall Norris, PhD

April 22, 2006 06:45 AM | Link to this

Great idea for a cartoon. Caricature of George Bush with arms around Cheyney and Rumsefield. Caption reads: “The Polls Are Wrong!”President Bush says, embracing those who still support his presidency!

By Kevin

April 22, 2006 07:16 AM | Link to this

Sorry @@. I don’t stop by that much so I didn’t know you were female.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 07:49 AM | Link to this

What a scandal, the dems always get the really big ones:

The CIA did not reveal the identity of the employee, who was dismissed Thursday, but NBC News reported last night she is Mary McCarthy.

That was the WaPo leaking her name.

And here’s Drudge outing her political affiliation with her state department appointment:

17 June 1998, TEXT: SANDY BERGLER (Pants Stuffer, Clinton Criminal Obstructor) APPOINTS MCCARTHY SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR INTELLIGENCE- And senior director on NSC Staff for intelligence programs

Washington — National Security Advisor Samuel R. Bergler (Pants Stuffer) announced June 16 the appointment of Mary O’Neil McCarthy as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Intelligence Programs.

See what I mean about these wormy Clinton liberals undermining the United States from within?

This woman should rot.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 07:55 AM | Link to this

By @@ April 22, 2006 12:13 AM I never saw Pulp Fiction. Did Travolta dance in it? If he did, I’ll have to watch it for no other reason than to “watch him dance”.

You should see Pulp Fiction because it is one of the best movies ever, even though I don’t remember Travolta dancing…

By sleestak

April 22, 2006 08:01 AM | Link to this

The cartoon shows rumsfeld saying “Do whatever it takes to win the war” sorry people if we are going to win this war on islamic fascists then withdraw from iraq and lets start attacking their allies in the USA 1st YOU know, like the left wing socialist “nazi” luckovich!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 08:02 AM | Link to this

BTW, this Dana Priest who won the PP prize for splashing CIA secrets across the front page of all the world’s “news” papers, has an obligation as a citizen of the United States to report this leaked information to the proper authorities and get it vetted before he publishes it.

There were crimes committed, no doubt about that.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 08:14 AM | Link to this

Luckovich and his boss, Cynthia Tucker (a Pulitzer finalist herself for commentary), are the source of many reader complaints. Their critics accuse them of all manner of evil —- from slandering the president of the United States

Are we trying to say they don’t slander the President? Hmmm.

The irony for me is that nothing could be further from the truth. Tucker and Luckovich give generously of their time to charitable causes and are decent, down-to-earth people. Tucker has mentored several young girls from disadvantaged backgrounds and is a doting daughter, aunt and cousin. Luckovich and his family took in friends from New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. When an AJC employee is retiring and he’s asked to honor them with a cartoon, he doesn’t hesitate to volunteer.

Your honor, although this man is a hopeless pervert, who can’t keep his hands out of his pockets, he’s real jam up at the Friday night bake sales!

I got an idea Angela, let’s put a webcam on Queen Pinko and follow her through life’s day to day activities, that way we can be the judge of her character, not just be forced to take your word on it.

After all, the only impression I have is of an anti American, immoral Clinton shill, who would like nothing better than to raise taxes back to 70% and collapse the economy of the United States. And then put every body into “work” camps, for the common good of the state, of course.

By Eric

April 22, 2006 08:20 AM | Link to this

The left is trying to preserve America, not destroy it. It’s the right who will destroy America in their selfish attempt to maintain power, make the rich richer and destroy the middle class….you Fumb Duck!

By Souldrift

April 22, 2006 08:22 AM | Link to this

LSAL, in that same piece about Luckovich and Tucker, it reads “The best editorial writers and cartoonists provoke thought, spark discussion and, at times, infuriate. Few do this better than Luckovich and Tucker.”.

I suppose you disagree with that? How would YOU define a good editorial writer, one who toes the administration line? One who writes or draws work that doesn’t move anyone? Sorry, I don’t think so.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 08:28 AM | Link to this

$75-a-barrel oil hurts stocks, Tom Walker - Staff- Saturday, April 22, 2006

Excellent example of what I mean when I say that if you can’t make it in this booming economy, you might just be an ignorant whining pinko who should look to the mirror for fault.

To say that stocks are “suffering” now is awfully specious, but I’ll give that one up.

Want to bet oil stocks aren’t “suffering” right now?

Moron liberals….

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 08:36 AM | Link to this

Good toon ML. Are the Generals throwing Rumsfeld out of the window or are they engaging in a “Brokeback” moment with obligatory “fresh air”?

Rumsfeld is really doing the best job that can be done considering the circumstances (extended occupation of a hostile territory). It is not his fault that he has been given a job that appears doomed to failure no matter who is in charge of it. Calls for his dismissal are purely political.

By @@

April 22, 2006 08:54 AM | Link to this

DavidU:

I just viewed Mark Ecko’s statement at Still Free.com. I have great appreciation for graffitti as an art form when it is solicited and used legally. My problem with Mark’s statement is that it is misinterpreted and used by young people to deface public property. Some aren’t quite as talented as others and only want to display profanity on private property.

Houses in a new subdivision in my area were recently tagged by some kids from a nearby school as well as some businesses. Guess who had to pay for the damage?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 09:00 AM | Link to this

The best editorial writers and cartoonists provoke thought, spark discussion and, at times, infuriate. Few do this better than Luckovich and Tucker.”

Why this is seen as a pinko attribute is a sure sign of the mental illness of the moonbat. Aren’t these liberals the ones that are claiming the debate in America is “too divisive?”

Honest, healthy debate on U.S. policy matters, by example, should be like this: “I think the marginal tax rate should be 15% not 20%.” The two sides of the discussion can then present their arguments in a comprehensive, rational manner.

Discourse on the left, of which includes Mother lib and cartoon by, consists of this: “Let’s impeach Bush.” Or “Let’s impeach Rumsfeld.” It’s stupid, unproductive, out of touch with reality, political partisan nonsense that, by design, is meant to keep the looney socialist moonbats fed full of red meat.

The only natural reaction of a Conservative patriot to these acts of treason should be anger, it is understandable and completely acceptable.

Where is the value to the country in all this so called left wing inspired debate? What benfits are being hashed out? There are none. I can show you the harm, legion of it.

Give praise to our returning troops, Angela Tuck, they are the ones who made America great. They deserve it. A couple of turncoat elite anti American snob journalists don’t.

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 09:11 AM | Link to this

I see this cartoon as just asking for a new Secretary of Defense. Rumsfeld’s critics aren’t saying that the “generals should run things.” The criticism of Rumsfeld (coming from the left and the right) is that he’s too stubborn and doesn’t listen to what his generals tell him. I don’t hear anyone calling for a military coup (I’ve lived during military coups and this is not the rhetoric that is said). The generals who are currently speaking out are retired, they are no longer in the chain of command. They are questioning his wisdom and competence as a leader and not his authority. They are calling for a new civilian leader, not a military one.

They have a right to speak their minds just like any other citizen.

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 09:13 AM | Link to this

I just filled my car up yesterday. There went all the tax cut (and then some)! I wonder if anyone is paying less tax than they did under Clinton because I am not. I’m not in the low/middle class brackets so maybe they are doing better than I. The President is certainly no friend to the upper brackets as the libs would claim.

My caucasian landscaper gave notice last week. It appears that he can’t compete with illegals who don’t pay any taxes, keep business licenses, or pay for workers comp so he has retrained for a skilled labor job and will thereby make a better life for his family. Is that a bad thing?

Maybe illegals are giving the native born the incentive to get an education and improve themselves thereby improving our society? Yes, I enjoy the benefit of cheaper labor but illegal labor isn’t really that much cheaper. That nickel and dime stuff really doesn’t impact my bottom line. Anyone who is affected probably isn’t particularly solvent to begin with.

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 09:16 AM | Link to this

@@- I agree, even if the city gives them art ‘space’ some will still tag private property. And like you said, that is the problem. Artist are overshadowed by those who participate in acts of vandalism.

I still thought the spoof was brilliant.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this

Absolutely correct:

If women enjoy selling their bodies, have at it, but don’t call it liberation and don’t demand respect for it. Why? Because men will never respect women who doff it or sell it for a buck.

At the risk of offending the International Union of Pimps and Ho’s, here’s one of the jungle’s unpleasant truths: No decent man wants his wife, mother, sister or daughter to be a stripper - even if he’ll pay to watch someone else’s. And therein lies one of this episode’s lessons.

This is where society has gone so far bad, where liberalism has worked it’s evil to our very core, it used to be the “no decent man wanted anybodies wife, mother, sister or daughter to be a stripper.”

Where are the decent, mature men at nowadays?

Not at the liberal women’s meat market, that’s for sure.

By Buy Danish

April 22, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

LS&L -

This assertion about the alleged Duke rape victim was the stunner for me:

Her credibility is already being called into question because she is a single mother.”

In other words, if only she didn’t have a child out of wedlock she’d be 100% credible.

Right!

Oops, I’d better explain that sarcasm because some people are too dense to get it. What that really means is, Wrong!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 09:25 AM | Link to this

AntiRadical: Despite the rain, I’m headed out into the yard to plant the spring flowers in my sculptured landscape, which is a product of my labor. There is nothing to it, a few hours a week plus it’s a good work out.

And, I’m not perpetuating the need for illegal immigrant labor. While I’m not going to kill and clean my own chickens, limiting the available jobs that “Americans won’t do” helps to cut down on the number of people “needed” to do them.

And all of the related problems those people cause.

By Buy Danish

April 22, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

Eric/Clint/Spike/Clem/Jean/Ray/Ralph…

The only thing you want to perserve is Marxist marmalade.

Eat it!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 09:30 AM | Link to this

Danish: That is a big ball of liberal wax you’ve rolled out. Look at the cover of “News” week, at PMSNBC’s website, the woman holding the evil child that won’t let her sleep.

The libs are actively campaigning against our children now.

By Buy Danish

April 22, 2006 09:40 AM | Link to this

Anti-R,

Here’s what I suggest:

By The Pirate

April 22, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

Ahh… I see the Mutual Admiration Society of the Brown-Shirt Right Wingnutz™ gathers early…

Question… do you froth at the mouth when you scribe this crap? Republicrats… sheez…

By Huge

April 22, 2006 10:05 AM | Link to this

Yet another example of that oxymoron - compassionate conservatism. All hail Ronald Reagan!

The Food and Drug Administration said Thursday that it does not support the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

The FDA said in a statement that it and other agencies with the Health and Human Services Department had “concluded that no sound scientific studies supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no animal or human data supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use.” (Wonder why that is? Can you say Merck, Pfizer, etc…?)

The statement contradicts a 1999 finding from the Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, which reported that “marijuana’s active components are potentially effective in treating pain, nausea, the anorexia of AIDS wasting and other symptoms, and should be tested rigorously in clinical trials.” (Like most cons. “Don’t confuse me with the facts”)

A rabid congressional opponent of medical marijuana,” Rep. Mark Souder, R-Indiana, asked the FDA to make the statement. (Why do so many of these morons come from Indiana?!!)

There is abundant evidence that marijuana can help cancer patients, multiple sclerosis patients and AIDS patients. There is no scientific doubt that marijuana relieves nausea, vomiting, certain kinds of pain and other symptoms that don’t respond well to conventional drugs, and does it more safely than other drugs.

Screw the GOP and their lies…

By Buy Danish

April 22, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

David U,

I’m going with the Krauthammer over David U.

Why should we listen to Anthony Zinni over Tommy Franks? Do you see the problem with your analysis? We could play the blame game forever and the media would love it, but it’s a really dangerous precedent to set.

When a few members of the military call for a new civilian leader, and attempt to usurp the Constitutionally derived powers of the elected civilian Commander in Chief, then that is effectively an attempted military coup.

Maybe your confusion comes from having lived in a “Banana Republic” and not a “Representative Republic”?

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 10:13 AM | Link to this

LS&L- I don’t believe there is any job that Americans won’t do (for the right price). It is my experience that the providers my spouse has interviewed who appear to be illegal (don’t ask, don’t tell) have only slightly lower salary demands than those who appear to be native blue collar types. I currently employ the later mostly because I require bonding/workers comp that illegal “cheap” labor is never able to afford it seems. One accident or theft would wipe out 10 years of labor discounts, afterall.

Of course any wise consumer will usually not go with a low bid (invariably more expensive) unless they have sterling references (rarer than hen’s teeth).

Personally, I despise yard work and pay quite well to avoid it. Hell, I don’t care who does it as long as it isn’t me. Currently, it takes 3 workers half a day at my place- not this guy! It would be very foolish of me to do this work when I can make 50 times as much engaging in my own chosen vocation.

I prefer to maintain my fitness through fun activities and dietary control since my off time is more limited than that enjoyed by others. My bad.

I understand the many concerns regarding illegal labor but I’m mostly not all that taken with the stance of either side. There are many variables (such as providing incentives for lower wage earners to improve themselves) that will never be looked at when this issue is debated in the political arena.

Rather illegals stay or go and how they do so just really doesn’t impact me personally and I remain skeptical regarding their societal impact one way or the other.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 10:13 AM | Link to this

Sheez, Pirate, instead of trying to become more self sufficient, maybe you should just make some “demands”, Dem Solution

By i-r-o-diM

April 22, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this

Whatdayathink, The Pirate’s parrot tells her what to think and say?

By getalife

April 22, 2006 10:24 AM | Link to this

[“The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy.”]

It looks like Iraq is not a war, it is a conspiracy. There must be accountability for those involved.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 10:33 AM | Link to this

small: Yesterday the Food and Drug Administration issued a statement reaffirming its opposition to the medical use of marijuana, declaring that “no sound scientific studies supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no animal or human data supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use. There are alternative FDA-approved medications in existence for treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana.”

That help any?

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 10:38 AM | Link to this

BD- A military coup is driving a couple of tanks thought the doors of the White House, shooting Rumsfeld in the head and then telling Pres Bush that you suggest he resigns and declare so-and-so as the new President.

Writing a book or going on CNN when you are retired criticizing the Secretary of Defense (Not even the President, but the non-elected, appointed official) is called free speech and their opinion on the mess. Rumsfeld’s opinion is they are anti-change and there is no mess. Bush can take which ever opinion he wants, he’s chosen to ignore the call for a new guy and keep Rumsfeld. Great, mean while one side is criticizing the decision and the other side is calling it a military coup, and insult to military coups. ;)

“Krauthammer”?? The guy from Fox News?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this

AntiRadical: I guess the whole hypocritical act of importing another nation’s entire class of working poor and then bit-ching about not doing anything for the poor eludes you, then you must live on top of a mountain somewhere, totally out of touch, and should disclaim that fact within your posts.

Paying for health care, school and housing these non tax payers is a whole new excuse for the socialists to raise our taxes, which harms the economic output of the whole country and will eventually trickle down to the individual, which in turn will start another tax hike cycle of unemployment benefits and the like.

Liberalism never ends.

By The Pirate

April 22, 2006 10:48 AM | Link to this

JnJ - don’t align my presence with either ‘side’ please, the Right Wingers lie & steal and the Leftist gang cheats. The ‘two party’ political system is a joke, albeit a bad one…

“Politics is the gizzard of society, full of grit and gravel, and the two political parties are its opposite halves - sometimes split into quarters - which grind on each other. Not only individuals but states have thus a confirmed dyspepsia.” — Henry David Thoreau

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

BTW, Isn’t it quite telling that the so called environmental experts, lovers of the ozone, protectors of faraway Alaskan Wastelands, defenders of forests and trees, detest yard work so much?

How in the he-ll can they claim to know anything about nature from inside of their car babbling on the cellphone?

By Mike

April 22, 2006 10:57 AM | Link to this

A lot of sources are reporting that according to the recently unclassified documents,Iraq under Saddam was deeply involved with Osama and terrorism.If you want to see, go to google and type in “Iraq unclassified documents Osama”and precede from there.I suppose this may or may not be true but I wonder why the media is ignoring it?

Maijuana should be legal cause Lord knows alchohol is responsible for so much worse.I don’t know anyone who gets stoned and wants to fight everyone in the room.

As for the invasion of ILLEAGAL ALIENS not “migrants”,They are like a bad marriage. We got along fine before a million or so a year started walking across the border.Why would we not be able to get along after we put a stop to it?

By Huge

April 22, 2006 10:58 AM | Link to this

Suck, Not a bit… Like most of the anti-progress ideas, they don’t work very well. But that doesn’t really matter to most on the fringes, they just want to believe what they want to believe; the actual truth be damned…

From the same post (for those who can’t stay focused) - There is no scientific doubt that marijuana relieves nausea, vomiting, certain kinds of pain and other symptoms that don’t respond well to conventional drugs, and does it more safely than other drugs.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 11:01 AM | Link to this

Pirate, that’s cool, I just haven’t seen you so politely attacking any lefties.

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

LS&L- I would have to agree with Huge regarding the potential benefits of marijuana. The problem with the raw drug of abuse is that it is non-standard so it cannot be titrated clinically even though it has no LD (lethal dose) ratio and appears to be free from the phenomena of acquired tolerance.

You may be unaware that the active ingredient in marijuana (delta-9 THC) is already being used in the clinical setting under the trade name “Marinol” (it’s use is currently restricted to AIDS and other intractable cancer patients here in the USA). “Sativex” (delta-9 THC in nasal spray form) is used in Britain and Canada for the treatment of neuropathic pain in Multiple Sclerosis patients, AIDS, etc. These are standarized medication that have the same potency in every dose.

Marijuana in raw form should remain a Schedule I narcotic due to its’ variable potency but the FDA release is facetious considering the fact that they are already approving the active component for use in the clinical setting and it is being used with excellent result by tens of thousands of patients every day.

My personal clinical experience is that it is far less debilitating and addictive than the alternative (opioid narcotics). I believe it to be more efficacious in the treatment of certain autoimmune disorders, AIDS, MS, and cancer.

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

Mike- Yes: Saddam-Philippines-OBL

No: Saddam-9/11-OBL

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

After months of political deadlock, Iraq’s parliament convened Saturday and filled top leadership posts, starting the process of putting together a new government aimed at pulling the country out of insurgency and sectarian strife.

Great News. Keep it moving along, Keep it moving along.

By getalife

April 22, 2006 11:11 AM | Link to this

They say that because there is a so called war on drugs and they can’t go against policy.

It does help and I will volunteer for the next study.

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this

LS&L- The argument can be made that illegal workers do pay unseen and well as overt taxes. Since, they work for lower wages, the disparity between what they make as an illegal and what they would make as documented is a profit captured by our society that can be viewed as an unseen tax burden that they pay. There are many aspects of this issue that are overlooked and I find protestations of both sides mostly unconvincing.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

There is no scientific doubt that marijuana relieves nausea, vomiting, certain kinds of pain and other symptoms that don’t respond well to conventional drugs, and does it more safely than other drugs.

That’s what the study in 1990 said, it is not what the FDA stated, the FDA is basically refuting that, for those of you who “can’t stay focused.”

Example: Glaucoma, used to be accepted that marijuana was not a cure but a therapeutic treatment, until the civilized world realized that elderly people are the ones getting glaucoma, we are going to make them smoke pot?

As always, the BIG BAD PHARMACUTICALS! found an alternate medicine and everything was cool, except in small’s mind, cause he wants cheap weed.

Now if we can argue it from that position, which is reality based, instead of this made up liberal bulls-hit about curing cancer, I agree, alcohol is far more damaging, weed makes every one chill, it should be legal.

By getalife

April 22, 2006 11:25 AM | Link to this

My personal clinical experience is that it is far less debilitating and addictive than the alternative (opioid narcotics).

The doctors will not refill precriptions for these drugs after a certain period of time to keep patients from getting addicted.

From my personal experience, I agree.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

gal: It is hypocrisy. The war on marijuana causes many more problems than it solves. How can you justify alcohol then throw someone in jail for smoking marijuana?

By Dusty

April 22, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

Good comments, today. But I am having trouble with Luckovich’s truly imaginary but (liberal hopeful) cartoon. Maybe you can help me.

Are retired generals from the armed forces still considered part of active service or truly RETIRED from the military? I thought when you retired you no longer made decisions for that which you left unless it is benefits.

Rumsfeld is NOT retired. Why would any one think his decisions should be based on the opinions of retired generals when there are thousands more retired generals?

DavidU, when they throw you out a window at work, what will you call it? Window cleaning?

Luckovich surely does like to present the old “worst scenario” of impossibilities.

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

Dusty- I call it: How many times can you draw a group of generals standing around discussing how they disagree with Rumsfeld? Before you have to draw it differently.

Later

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

Back in the bad old sixties, when they were trying out the protocols for treating lymphomas and chilhood leukemias, all the kids lost weight and maintaining adequate nutrition was a real problem. There were always a few teenagers who seemed to continue growing and gaining despite the nastiest chemical cocktails. Turns out, they were using marijuahna.

By @@

April 22, 2006 11:41 AM | Link to this

Marijuana doesn’t make everybody chill. It made me “freeze up” in a paranoid state. Now that would allow Getalife to have his way with me. I wouldn’t be able to resist.

Just for fun!!!!

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 11:41 AM | Link to this

LS&L- Marijuana does not “cure” any disease. It is a paliative treatment like morphine and is more effective in many diseases as I mentioned. Smoking it is another detrimental problem with the raw drug of abuse. Standarized Big Pharma prepared preparations of its’ active component (Marinol & Sativex) are administered orally or through nasal insnufflation. They have been in use for many years now.

By Mike

April 22, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

OK LSL I admit it. I just like “cheap weed”but is that any worse than admiting that I like to drink beer? Just so you know I am a big time conservitive. My posistion is that government should stay out of peoples business if its not hurting anyone else. If marijuana is any more harmful than cigarettes it is only because it is illeagal.

By DavidU

April 22, 2006 11:46 AM | Link to this

BD- I got the Krauthammer reference now, so ignore my question above.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

Did anyone read 1776? (Is that too pop culture?) There is always difference of opinion between generals in the implementation of war strategy.

By finch

April 22, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

This aint the first time that Generals have disagreed with civilian leadership at the Pentagon. It won’t be the last.

Where’d the pot thread come from?? I’ll join with the gang that says marijuana’s a lot less dangerous than booze, and might as well be a controlled substance instead of totally illegal. And glaucoma doesn’t just hit old people. I know this from personal experience.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 11:53 AM | Link to this

AntiR: That’s why I used the word “thearaputic.” And you are correct, BIG PHARMA! will provide the most efficient cost effective, most powerful drug for every symptom whether it is Mary Jane or some other compound.

On another “science” related subject, if you libs think showing me a picture of a crocodile is going to make me deny the existence of the Blessed Creator, you’ve blown a freakin gasket, hahahaha.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 11:54 AM | Link to this

Suck,

For once, you gave a good, thoughtful link (about the stripper and the lacrosse team.) Why did you have to ruin the moment by adding your hateful little comments? The “decent” men in these girls lives are usually the reason the girl has ended up stripping or whoring in the first place. And they aren’t all liberals either.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

finch, you made it back! Did you see an oasis out there?

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 11:57 AM | Link to this

If marijuahna were legal, who would fill the jails? All the war on drugs has accomplished is to raise our taxes. Another example of Republicans trying to legislate morality and intruding in private matters.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 12:00 PM | Link to this

There were some recent studies that showed that early marijuahna use was tied to an increased incidence of schizophrenia, so it may not be entirely harmless.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 12:01 PM | Link to this

Oh WS, so all the Dems are all pushing for legalization?

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

For those who ask how I can support legalization of marijuahna while pointing out that it is not entirely harmless, put it in the context of the millions who die every year by smoking and drinking. The difference is that the liquor and cigarette people have huge lobbies that carry a lot of clout in Washington. Marijuahna is kinda like Schiavo. Our friends ont the right taking things a little to far.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

Jsy not jay,

Are you kidding me? We are living in an era of puritanism and Democrats are politicians. They don’t want to offend anyoneher. Maybe once the bad taste of government in our private lives has subsided, we might see some honesty.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

WS, I agree, but “an era of puritanism”? Have you been to Atlanta lately or read the ajc?

By getalife

April 22, 2006 12:25 PM | Link to this

@@,

I can’t compete with this guy

Nice picture finch, I put up that link.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Jay not jay,

That is not inconsistent. Look at Ashcroft and the statue of Lady Justice for an example on the other side. Or look at the actions of the FCC in recent years. There has always been a double standard between what people say and what they do. Right now, the prevailing wind is more towards censorship and trying to control “indecency” by legislation. When a society buys into this concept, I would call it puritanical.

By Dusty

April 22, 2006 12:34 PM | Link to this

Hmmm.

I don’t know about “the government should stay out of people’s business if nobody is harmed.”

Basicly a good concept. But think about it. People make the laws. The government enforces them.

You buy illegal marijuana from a crook because you “need” it. The bankrobber robs the bank because he “needs” money. He doesn’t harm anybody. Should the “law”(government) ignore one and arrest the other?

Ok. I’m just playing lawyer. How about changing the laws instead of breaking them.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 12:39 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Good point. When the laws are changed at the state level, we get the federal government stepping in and trying to enforce federal statutes against marijuahna. Is this the people making the laws?

By Daniel

April 22, 2006 12:40 PM | Link to this

gal: Another lazy fat republican on the dole!

By Huge

April 22, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this

AntiRadical, Great information! Thanks!! This is exactly the reason I brought this topic up - I knew it could spark some lively and intelligent debate! Again, thanks.

getalife, Exactly! And, hence my reference to the father of this misguided “war on drugs”.

LS&L, we are going to make them (the elderly) smoke pot? No, we’re just not going to allow far-right, backwards thinking idiots to put those people in jail if they choose to smoke it and get some real relief from their suffering. It’s a human concept called compassion. Unlike this Now if we can argue it from that position, which is reality based, instead of this made up liberal bulls-hit about curing cancer. Apparently he made up that one.

Now here’s where our resident on-line psychopath (a person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive behavior without empathy or remorse.) really stumbles over his tongue yet again:

As always (stupid premise to begin with), the BIG BAD PHARMACUTICALS (sic)! (The “big bad pharmas” have saved countless lives and done enormous good. On this issue, however, I believe they’re wrong) found an alternate medicine and everything was cool, (To whom? Post this under living in delusion) except in small’s mind, cause he wants cheap weed. (The old last-resort fall back on personal attacks, insults, etc… when his argument is simplistic and weak).

By getalife

April 22, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this

Daniel,

The President of China’s visit did not go well. Just another day for this administration.

Lets hope he does not want his money back right away. I think it is around 80 billion.

By Daniel

April 22, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this

This administration has run up a debt larger than all prior debts combined!

By Joe Roman

April 22, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this

My opinion of this administration couldn’t possibly be any lower. That being said, I don’t believe these Johnny-come-lately generals deserve any monuments on The Mall. The military has always been about saying nothing but yes to anyone and everyone who can get you promoted and/or move you into an assignment you want. If any of these generals had been the kind of people they’d like us to think they are, they would have resigned on the spot and blown the whistle on the morally and intellectually bankrupt gang that led us into the mess in Iraq the minute they saw it coming. BUT NOOOOOOOOOOO! They were too interested in their precious careers to care about their country or the troops who actually had to pay the price for their complicity. From day one of Basic Training, the military likes to carry on about Moral Courage, but as we used to say in Vietnam, “It don’t mean nothin’.”.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 01:00 PM | Link to this

BTW LS&L, I specifically said your were an on-line anti-social and agressive. I don’t know you personally and can’t speak to your “off-line” behaviors.

AND, we FINALLY did agree on something I agree, alcohol is far more damaging, weed makes every one chill, it should be legal.

Yeah for us!!! Let’s go get high and discuss it further…

By @@

April 22, 2006 01:10 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

Oooohhhh what I could do with your link of Cheney!!! But I’ll have to leave it up to your imagination. It is just tooooo tempting and risque’.

Now what was it they used to call Clinton?

I’m only up for mischief today. No serious discussion. That makes me dangerous to myself.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

Suck,

Even the pope has acknowlegded that Evolution is scientific concept that Rligion has to contend with. Like many intelligent religious people, he doesn’t see any problem with the idea of a Creator using evolution as one of his tools to create. Life is just not as simple as you would like it to be.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

small: Speaking of delusional, your 12:50 is textbook. You claim to celebrate the open, honest discussion but then turn right around and ignore every valid point that the FDA has made. And champion the opinion of a small fringe group because it falls in line with your minority make believe beliefs. That’s anti social, homeboy, not me, I’m with the majority, as usual.

Argue Mary Jane from the stupidity stand point, sweetheart, you can understand it better and people just can’t dismiss it as bullsh-it, like the FDA has done with the medical position.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 01:19 PM | Link to this

Daniel don’t work out too much.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 01:20 PM | Link to this

BTW, your fat drunken dumba-sses like Ted Swimmwer Kennedy are were your Mary Jane obstruction is at. Lawyers don’t make the smack without the court cases, the dems don’t get their angelic innocent babae in the woods trial lawyer multi million dollar donations, the little sweethearts. They put you in the slammer so that they can get votes.

If there is one thing Bill Clinton did build, it was prisons.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 01:30 PM | Link to this

Suck,

Try and be coherent. Run that last post by us again in plain English.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 01:44 PM | Link to this

WashingtonState,

Here is Andy’s last post in Cockney if that helps you:

BTW, yor fat drunken dafta-sses like Ted Swimmwer Kennedy are were yor Mary Jane obstruction is at. Loryers don’t make the smack wivout the bloomin’ court cases, the chuffin’ dems don’t cop ffeir angelic innocent babae in the woods trial loryer multi million dollar donations, the wee sweeffearts. They put yer in the bleedin’ slammer so that they can cop votes. If there is one fin’ Bill Clinton did build, it were prisons.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 01:51 PM | Link to this

The far-right AND far-left are both culpable of this backwards thinking regarding pot. Injesting pot is NOT evil. Making it damn difficult to get when it’s just a weed that has been shown to have these helpful properties is.

And our main arbiter? The infallible FDA; politicized beauraucrats trying to make ethical decisions based partially on the support of reactionary bias, outright greed and ignorance.

And how sad the simple “I’m with the majority on this one so that makes it (and me) right.

Free your mind instead and change the world (for the better)…

And don’t call me Shirley…

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 02:05 PM | Link to this

Huge,

I don’t really give a sh*t what the FDA says because that is not really the issue. The point is that people should be able to choose their own poison. By what arbitrary criteria do we decide that alcohol and nicotine are societally acceptable, but marijuanha is not. The only difference is that a lot of powerful business interests are lined up behind alcohol and cigarettes. Is that going to be our criteria? It’s good for business. BTW, when my wife had chemotherapy about 10 years ago, a nurse practitioner at one of the foremost cancer institutes in the country told her to smoke some grass because none of the miracle medicines they were giving her helped her nausea and loss of appetite. The marijuanha worked.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 02:14 PM | Link to this

RW,

It makes as much sense as the original post. BTW, you asked me about an incident at Sea-Tac a couple of threads back. I was tardy in replying because I was vacationing on the Florida panhandle at the time. My reply was something to the effect that there was a Starbucks in each of the terminals at Sea-Tac, so I suspected the two air traffic controllers on duty at the time were taking a coffee break. I was shocked at the damage that the last hurricane season did all up and down the panhandle, even as far as Cape San Blas. A lot of houses falling into the sea. I didn’t see any signs that they were going to extract the oil sitting off the coast anytime soon. In fact, they were making the areas available for leasing smaller and smaller. People are pretty desparate. They are piling up sand in front of their houses in an attempt to ward off damage from the next season. Somehow, I doubt it will work.

By Mike

April 22, 2006 02:20 PM | Link to this

The reason people are harmed over drugs is BECAUSE it is illegal.You only have to look back at prohibition to see what happens when the government criminalizes things like this.All hell breaks loose,the jails fill up,there is enormous expence to the taxpayers and the government is denied a huge source of tax revenue. Meanwhile,useage levels remain the same.I DON’T NEED THE FDA TO SAVE ME FROM MYSELF!

By Joe Roman

April 22, 2006 02:21 PM | Link to this

Oh goodie! Now that the Iraqis have some new puppets at the top, they can get back to doing what they really enjoy, killing American soldiers. Rummy’s brilliant strategery is bearing fruit. He got four of our GIs killed in Bagdhad today with a roadside bomb. If ol’ Don just keeps them riding around, sooner or later they’ll all be dead. That seems to be the Bush administration’s idea of troop reduction.

By Mike

April 22, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this

And by the way,Pot is the best (and only effective)hangover medicine known to man.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 02:23 PM | Link to this

WashingtonState,

I saw your answer on the other thread. Thanks, but in all seriousness it would seem like that should be a story that would get some follow-up at least in the Northwest. I used to fly to Alaska a lot and we often had late night changes at Sea-Tac. Funny how you think things are so much more safe when the traffic is the lightest.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 02:27 PM | Link to this

Did the 4-20 celebrations take on a life of their own or something?

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 02:28 PM | Link to this

RW,

It is kinda scary. Makes you wonder how often things like that happen that you never hear about. I haven’t seen any follow up stories, but I hope the FAA is investigating.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 02:28 PM | Link to this

small: I’ll make you a deal; right after you show me where 1.3 million abortions a year are necessary for the “health of a woman” then I’ll believe one thing that any left wing “research” group has to say. Or that abortions are “safe, legal and rare.” Until then, the government makes more sense to me.

Once a liar, always a liar.

By conservatives Molest America's Children

April 22, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this

Seeing as I’m a guest in Mike’s blog I’ll show him the courtesy of commenting on the cartoon. It’s not a belly laugh, just a chuckle and grin.

By @@

April 22, 2006 03:13 PM | Link to this

This guy is proud of what he’s doing and with each thread, signs off “Keep on Rockin in the Free World” I like his attitude!!!

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 22, 2006 03:31 PM | Link to this

The Army released statistics showing that 12.9 per 100,000 U.S. soldiers committed suicide in 2005, up from 11.0 per 100,000 in 2004. The 2005 suicide rate was the highest for the Army since 13.1 per 100,000 in 1999. The Army is the largest service in the U.S. military and provides most of the troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

Weakest excuse of the year:

Martin Anderson, the 14 year old teen beaten to death by guards in one of Florida’s “boot camps,” was said to have died of Sickle Cell trait. Sickle Cell trait is a harmless carrier state for Sickle Cell anemia. I hate to think that Jesse Jackson is right in saying the teen was killed because of the African-American trait.

By dusty

April 22, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

Oh great. Mike says “I DON’T NEED THE FDA TO SAVE ME FROM MYSELF.” Good!

I hope he is saving money to pay for health problems so often associated with drug intake. That he will not expect medical care from any government paid or assisted facility because he can save himself.

The same goes for alcohol and tobacco. Taxpayers are all for this do-it-yourself healthcare. They are tired of paying for the healthcare and other damages of those who insist on their indulgences, legal and illegal.

By Pat

April 22, 2006 03:55 PM | Link to this

There’re a few people here who really do upset RW’s little wee-wee and he doesn’t know what to do. Funny.

4 more GI’s slaughtered by Bush in Iraq today. Go git um, you Repub heroes!

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 04:07 PM | Link to this

dusty,

Any argument about the health care costs of marijuanha use is doomed to failure. Compared to the costs of overindulgence in food, alcohol, or nicotine, you are looking at a drop in the bucket. Maybe 100,000,000th? Now talking methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin use, you have a case.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

dusty,

About the only good reason to argue against marijuanha use is moral turpitude. Then we get back to the issue of whether government has the right to legislate personal morality.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this

If the facts that it affects short term memory, lowers sperm count, seems to abolish ambition, isn’t great for your lungs, and is associated with schizophrenia when used early in life aren’t enough to get someone to think twice about using marijuanha, then more the fool him. But having government make it a crime is like making eating at McDonald’s more than once a week a crime.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Dusty, This is a good time to pull out the turnip sandwiches, they are good and healthy.

I’m popeye (or Daniel) the sailor man, I’m popeye the sailor man!

By Cryin'Bubba

April 22, 2006 04:27 PM | Link to this

Why dont yew librils jest dew what we due here in the SOUTH and us repuplicens in the red staates due to. Meth.

By Buy Danish

April 22, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this

DavidU,

You may say that it’s not a coup, but ML’s cartoon sure looks like one.

It’s called a “bloodless coup” BTW, Glad you backtracked on Krauthammer!

Pirate,

Why don’t you take a long walk off a short pier at Walden Pond? Or if there are no piers handy, just gaze at your reflection long enough and you will suffer the same fate as Narcissus.

By dusty

April 22, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this

Washington State,

Most people who go to hard drugs start with the ever so innocent marijuana. It is illegal. The time to talk about legislating personal morality is before laws are made.

Federal statutes are made by legislative enactments. And where does the legislature come from? Citizen voters.

I am not deciding about the morality of maurijuana users. I am simply saying they are breaking the law NOW. Food and tobacco indulgences are also running up healthcare costs but they are NOT illegal.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 04:35 PM | Link to this

Thanks Bubba ignorant, its the red states

By Huge

April 22, 2006 04:39 PM | Link to this

The same goes for alcohol and tobacco. Taxpayers are all for this do-it-yourself healthcare. They are tired of paying for the healthcare and other damages of those who insist on their indulgences, legal and illegal.

Another good point, Dusty. Marijuana use is a real problem for some. Teenage “supposedly in high-school” waste-oids and lazy, mindless drop out adults, for example. And the health risks (and costs) from smoking it cannot be denied. I don’t advocate smoking pot, I just don’t think Reefer Madness mindsets work, either. Surely, the answer lies somewhere in between and like most important social issues facing us, there are plusses and minuses. (Unless, of course, you know who is correct in his “assessment” that everything the enemy liberals say is wrong.

By Cryin'Bubba

April 22, 2006 04:45 PM | Link to this

Eggsellant Maps Jay, no tise how all them ther red ones meens that it is a meth cryses coun-tee. It baad hear. reel bad

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 04:45 PM | Link to this

dusty,

I don’t disagree with the last part of your argument, but the first part is a non-starter. The main reason people go on to hard drugs from marijuanha is because we have made it illegal. Instead of controlling the use of marijuanha like alcohol or nicotine, we have pushed it underground. It has become part of the harder drug culture. It used to be that people were fairly casual about marijuanha use and sales, but now the same people that sell marijuahna sell other drugs, particularly meth. Meth is the real scourge of our culture right now. If your statement about marijuanha leading to other drug use were true, you would have to same the same for alcohol and nicotine, both of which are drugs that satisfy the same needs as marijuanha.

Right now, the biggest reason someone would be a fool to use marijuanha is that if they are caught, it could be a felony. That seems to be getting the cart before the horse.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 04:46 PM | Link to this

Looks like someone has cut and run on this “dopey” debate. Virtually everyone else has made fine contibutions to the discussion. He’s on to yet more evil liberal social problems…

small: I’ll make you a deal; right after you show me where 1.3 million abortions a year are necessary for the “health of a woman” then I’ll believe one thing that any left wing “research” group has to say. Or that abortions are “safe, legal and rare.” Until then, the government makes more sense to me.

That last sentence says it all. Hopeless…

And Dusty, I agree that if people don’t like the law, they should work to change it. Right on, girl, that’s the American way!

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this

Huge and Dusty,

The law has been changed in a couple of states, but the feds don’t seem satisfied with that.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

Well Bubba, take your a-ss back up to the hills of Vermont and enjoy yourself.

By dusty

April 22, 2006 04:59 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Don’t know much about Reefer Madness. Is that when mj smokers progress to a heavier habit?

Something in between? Hard to see that. Kinda like saying avoid wrecks by putting something in between. Like what?

AS to saying that everything the enemy liberals say is wrong. Not everything. Just those that DO NO AGREE with me. Right, Huge?

By Reggie

April 22, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this

The generals comments have nothing to do with the right or left. They are only stating the fact that Rumsfield is a 21st version of Robert McNamara that will also run up the body count in a badly mismanaged, deceptive manner. I was a soldier for over 2o years and I could care less about the politics. I deeply care about those silent souls zipped in body bags. Period.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 22, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

A recent letter appearing in Stars And Stripes, the newspaper of, by, and for the military overseas. [Retired generals courageous Regarding recent articles about retired generals calling for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s resignation: “Whatever our commanders on the ground tell us they need, they will get.” So sayeth (and repeateth and repeateth) the Bush administration and its secretary of defense. Unfortunately, with time, this mantra has become more and more hollow, political and fabricated. America is learning the truth from firsthand sources, generals involved directly with the invasion of Iraq and the war. This “revelation” is a significant “vote” of no confidence, with the military starting to express a public voice of mistrust for the present civilian leadership at the Pentagon. Civilian control of the military is mandatory for our American democracy to move forward and succeed. However, the perversion of this civilian control for partisan, political purposes cannot be tolerated. History will show that these courageous although unusual actions by our retired generals are worthy of the designation “profiles in courage.” Saul B. Wilen
CEO, International Horizons Unlimited
San Antoni}(http://www.pstripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=36612)

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 22, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this

Corrected link to Stars And Stripe Letter

By dusty

April 22, 2006 05:19 PM | Link to this

Jay not Jay,

You are a sweetheart!!! You remembered my turnip sandwiches. Oh what fond indigestion.

Did I tell you that I have improved my party menu? It is now rutabaga hor’d’orves and pig foot souffle’. For dessert there’s mango & mushroom parfait with escargot topping.

We’ll have to get the crowd together again. This gourmet gal is ready to COOK!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this

When I say that libs are pathological liars, this is what I mean:

By Liberal Texas Democrat April 22, 2006 03:31 PM The Army released statistics showing that 12.9 per 100,000 U.S. soldiers committed suicide in 2005, up from 11.0 per 100,000 in 2004. The 2005 suicide rate was the highest for the Army since 13.1 per 100,000 in 1999. The Army is the largest service in the U.S. military and provides most of the troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Is not the whole purpose of this post meant to make it seem as though the war in Iraq is causing these young men to take their lives?

Consider this: The suicide rate for U.S. males age 20-24 is 27.2 per 100,000. That’s 2.5 times more than what it is for those in the Army.

So it is actually better for our young men to join the Army and fight against Islamic terrorists.

So why would a pinko try to twist the facts so they appear to be opposite of what they really are?

Is this how they normally present their case?

By Daniel

April 22, 2006 05:24 PM | Link to this

LTD: Thanks for the “Dissent is Patriotic” post.

By Jay not jay

April 22, 2006 05:26 PM | Link to this

let’s do it Dusty, I’ve got a Huge sausage and some alphalpha (sp) sprouts for the Vermont mountainiers.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 05:32 PM | Link to this

Liberals Suck And Lie,

Not to mention that LTD’d post shows this as an increase over 2004, but still lower than 1999 and tries to blame the Iraq war for it.

I’m going to blame the Iraq war for stalling the beginning of my vacation and my subsequent job search, maybe then I can get some moonbat publications to pay for the whole thing while they angle for interviews with me.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

By Huge April 22, 2006 04:46 PM Looks like someone has cut and run on this “dopey” debate. Virtually everyone else has made fine contibutions to the discussion. He’s on to yet more evil liberal social problems…

small: That’s real sweet of you to think of me but, actually, I have bigger fish to fry than your measly little miracle marijuana cure all debate.

By dusty

April 22, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

Liberal Texas Democrat,

From generals to privates, people who serve in the military should be honored for their service to the country.

General MacArthur had this to say: “Old soldiers never die. They just fade away.”

We have now old retired generals who do not want to fade away. They still want to direct the military. Very sad because they have already missed that opportunity. I prefer to listen to those on active duty who are facing the enemy.

By getalife

April 22, 2006 05:43 PM | Link to this

Flip : You are unpatriotic to speak out against the war in Iraq.

Flop : You are unpatriotic not to speak out against the war in Iraq.

Look for more CIA and intelligent officials to become patriotic.

Most Americans already are patriotic. The others, well, you decide….

By Huge

April 22, 2006 05:49 PM | Link to this

Washington State, You’re right! And, even now, the GOP gov of Alaska wants to “staighten’ things out. (I really do crack myself up)

Dusty, Close, It was a famous propaganda flick from the 30s and later became a cult classic. http://www.reefer-madness-movie.com/

Your point about avoiding wrecks kinda lost me. What did you not get?

… Not everything. Just those that DO NO AGREE with me. Right, Huge?

Not at all. I’ve agreed with numerous “other” points of yours on this topic. You are the one who is much more intransigent.

You are a reasonable person, but sometimes you feel compelled to run to his royal arrogance’s defense (like he’s not capable?!) and say similar twisted things like the statement above.

Because, you don’t feel the same as I do on some topic, doesn’t mean I think less of you. It might mean just the opposite. I think less of you if you can’t argue your position reasonably and with intelligence in an effort to convince me. Otherwise, what’s the point? I believe that resorting to temper tantrums and minless insults is counter-productive and have tried, and will continue to try to change the culture here.

I have said here before that he does have some interesting and informative info to share. But way too much of the time he’s just a foul-mouthed boor… And you tacitly endorse this behavior simply because you are closer politically.

By Daniel

April 22, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this

Dusty: Not hardly. They are not that old! Some are younger than I am! Next, have you ever heard of Dwight D. Eisenhower? He was a retired general when he spoke out against the “Military Industrial Complex”. The fat republican party has lost its way. These men (there will be more) are patriots. America is bigger than one man, and one greedy political wing. They are speaking because they have had to bury the results of the mistakes of incompetents. Or, they could sit by their computers like the “Tubby Brigade” heroes of the “Keyboard Konflict”.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

The point is that half the time nowadays we seem to take our eye off the ball — or the target — in the war on terror, finding more time to discuss the who-leaked-what, cryptic document than the beastliness of a clique that has pledged to destroy the (corrupt, immoral, infidel, you name it) West, with maximum loss of life. Millions — why shouldn’t they kill millions of us?

They yet might. It depends, in part, on our capacity for self-delusion. Who’s the bad guy around here these days? Don Rumsfeld? Zacarias Moussaoui? The semicomical aspect to the whole matter is that the ultimate head of the U.S. military effort in Iraq inspires more disdain than one of the conspirators who helped destroy 3,000 American lives.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 22, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

From America’s Independent Newspaper serving America’s Military, another letter that will make LSAL and his posse think it’s published by the AJC.

“Generals must step in Grand jury evidence from Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald almost certainly proves that President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney exposed undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame by leaking selected portions of a report that seemed to rebut criticism for invading Iraq. Cheney aide “Scooter” Libby, indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice, testified that he met with reporters to leak this information. The reporters testified that Libby did reveal the agent’s name. The most recent Gallup poll showed that 63 percent of Americans believe that Bush acted illegally or unethically in the “Plamegate” affair. If not prosecutable, exposing an agent is a national security betrayal. Bush’s subject-changing lie that he declassified information so the “American people could know the truth” is irrelevant. Bush’s “declassified” information was cherry-picked from a report that in subsequent paragraphs discounted that same information. It’s news to the CIA, the Pentagon and Congress that a presidential leak equals declassification. The special prosecutor states that the “presidential leak” was a vendetta against the CIA agent’s husband, who disputed Bush’s false justifications to invade Iraq. Bush’s similar plans to bomb Iran with tactical nuclear weapons are documented by Seymour Hersh in the April 4, 2006, New Yorker magazine and The Washington Post’s Tom Ricks. The too-familiar goal to control oilfields by U.S. energy companies with Halliburton no-bid contracts is again called “regime change.” Cheney’s daughter, heading the State Department’s Iran-Syria Operations Group, controls $80 million to develop this agenda. This radical endangerment of national security and world stability reportedly caused several Joint Chiefs of Staff to threaten resignation. They are disgusted at the brazen incompetence of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney. Bankrupting the treasury, creating crushing debt, and sacrificing lives to reward friends with war profits will persist until our bullied generals stop it. M.D. Wooldridge
Berlin

By dusty

April 22, 2006 05:54 PM | Link to this

Jan not Jay,

Oh delicious—a Huge sausage and alphalpha sprout saurkraut! You are really cookin’!

We must party soon. RW is crime-fighting and doesn’t have a single cri-me’ to his credit. We need to cheer him up with some good food.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 22, 2006 05:59 PM | Link to this

LSAL, Dusty, RW-the original, you guys are so predictable. I’m almost ashamed of myself. Thanks! I bet some people that if I posted without comment the link to the story about suicide in the army that ya’ll would react just as you did, foaming at ya’lls mouth while attempting to put words in mine. I’m off to Houston now, and a decent steak dinner. Thanks!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 05:59 PM | Link to this

Dusty: I guess you have been chosen to be an intermediary, apparently. Could you convey back to the other party that alot of pinko libs have tried just about everything they could think of with me and all it got them was broken over my knee like the weak little sisters that they are.

It’s a much wiser course of action to steer clear of this mean motor scooter and hope you don’t p** me off.

Unless, of course, you like getting whooped.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this

LTD: Of course, hon, you were just sharing some general information with us, right?

BTW, it may surprise you but I also agree with your link that Rove or Cheney probably did out Plame but that there was no crime. Fitzgerald knows that as sure as the day is long. She recommended her gimp liar husband to investigate France’s claim of uranium shopping and she became an integral part of the story when he outed a supposedly secret mission in the freakin New York Times. What was the Administration supposed to do, stand around looking stupid?

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 06:10 PM | Link to this

LTD,

If you know that we would expose your story as bs with or without your commentary why do you think it is about you. Every comment I’ve seen pertains to the link itself. Maybe everybody ignores the portion that you personally contribute because it is so vapid.

Huge,

Someone can’t come to another’s defense and simultaneously give tacit approval.

No offense, but I get a very creepy feeling anytime you try to be nice to someone.

By Dusty

April 22, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

Now Huge,

I admit. I missed the “T” in DO NO AGREE. (Would you like it sweetened or unsweetened?)

As to the wreck analogy, there is nothing you can put between vehicles already on a rapid path to collision. The same goes for drug addiction. There is not much you can put in between the beginning and the end.

Now, royal arrogance defense? I have never defended Kerry and never will. That’s your impossible job. I support our strong and resilient President, George W. Bush.

Cheers!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 06:15 PM | Link to this

It’s Earth Day, you silly pinkos!

Go on outside and pat your mexican yard boy on the back for doing such a good job with your little piece of the planet. After all, the Earth wouldn’t survive without our cheap labor!

By Huge

April 22, 2006 07:03 PM | Link to this

Nice try on the Kerry dodge, Dusty. But no deal. You avoided the salient point of that paragraph, correct? But it does appear that he appreciates that “you have been chosen” to run interference for him.

Your wreck analogy is so fatalistic. I believe there is a great deal “to put in between the start and end” to find a middle ground between jailing pot smokers/ needlessly denying it to those who desperately want it to relieve their suffering, and at the same time demanding reasonable limits from society.

Hold that line girl! I’m sure soon Danish and maybe a couple of others will come to bolster your defense of King Liberals Suck And Lie.

BTW, I voted against Kerry. Even though he put his life on the line in combat for his country so you, and I, can say what we do. (unlike our current office holder) We need more than strong and resilient, but it is two of his better qualities. But, who, to reiterate, was hiding out in Alabama at the time stumping for some GOP hack…

RW, No offense taken, but that creepy feeling probably says more about you than me. My beef is with LS&L and his tirades, not you.

By King Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 07:15 PM | Link to this

Works for me.

By Dusty

April 22, 2006 07:30 PM | Link to this

Huge,

That was no dodge. Kerry is the most royal arrogance I can think of in this country. Well, maybe Ted Kennedy or Hillary might also qualify.

I am not an intermediary for anybody. I represent MYSELF. I don’t take assignments or censorship.

If you have anything to say to LS&L, tell him. He is quite capable of speaking for himself.

So you don’t recognize all branches of military service? The president served just as honorably as did Purple Heart bandaid Kerry. More so after their service. Bush didn’t run off to France to say how bad Americans were in Viet Nam. Kerry did.

Now what were the salient parts of your paragraph? I didn’t see any.

By @@

April 22, 2006 07:35 PM | Link to this

Huge:

What are you going to do with LS&L when you get him? Have you ever asked yourself that question?

He’s been the same since the first day I came onto this site. He’s not going to change and he shouldn’t have to. He’s always had that abrasive since of humor that is appreciated by many, despised by others.

May I say that your sense of humor has improved, but this pursuit of someone who will evade you at every turn seems rather futile from my perspective.

Personally, I like the way he digs a little deeper for the unforeseen consequences as well as how he puts the obvious out there for those who missed it.

As JayNot would say…”You gotta enjoy it with a buzz,” or just chill!!!

My personal favorite is, “Let life flow through you, not on you.”

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 07:35 PM | Link to this

Huge,

I don’t know or care who it says something about, but I bet I’m not the only one that gets creeped out by you. Call it hinky if you prefer that to creepy. (That’s my crime fighting term of the day)

Dusty,

I’m getting good at this. I bought some fence boards and a gang tagged the store I got them from. These Gwinnett cops are some psychic wizards.

By Midori

April 22, 2006 07:44 PM | Link to this

[Hey, Dusty, Andy, @@, RW

By Midori

April 22, 2006 07:45 PM | Link to this

Hey, Dusty, Andy, @@, RW and Buy Danish are FAMOUS

By @@

April 22, 2006 07:45 PM | Link to this

Make that “evade” as in like a fox (smart like a). Just in case you saw an opportunity.

And make that since “sense”.

By i-r-o-diM

April 22, 2006 07:48 PM | Link to this

Must have had a “brain fart”.

By King Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 07:50 PM | Link to this

Hey Midori

By Dusty

April 22, 2006 08:01 PM | Link to this

RW,

My crime fighter vocabulary is nil. What happened when the gang tagged the store??? And the cops knew errr what?

This sounds like a WonderWoman achievement to me. Don’t let SuperMan get ALL the credit.

By Buy Danish

April 22, 2006 08:11 PM | Link to this

RW,

Dittoes on the creepy description. Smug too.

Huge,

I don’t give a rat’s rearend about debating the pros and cons of marijuana, or whether or not it should be legalized. It’s a really boring subject in my opinion particularly since it’s been discussed to death since the Sixties.

By Dusty

April 22, 2006 08:11 PM | Link to this

Hey, Midori is INFAMOUS.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 08:24 PM | Link to this

Years from now, the world will judge the U.S. not by whether it is gone from Iraq (it probably will be) but why:

Did we leave because we had accomplished what we set out to do, or did we simply give up?

The latest signs of progress show we are getting closer to success. That’s all the more reason to make it clear we are staying, and not to encourage enemies into thinking that they simply need to wait a few more months until America loses patience.

Unless, of course, you are a lib and you want your country to be humiliated.

By Joe Roman

April 22, 2006 08:25 PM | Link to this

Kids and others still in the process of growing and maturing have no business messing with alcohol or recreational drugs of any kind. I was around when pot and psychedelics began to enter the mainstream. At first, it was only the twenty and thirtysomething college types who were involved and some older people too. It was only when the high schoolers got into it that things got out of control. Think of it in terms of a nice, sophisticated adult cocktail party. As long as the guests as nice, sophisticated adults, it’s a fun party and everyone has a good time. Imagine if a bunch of teenage idiots crashed the party. They’d ruin it, right? That’s exactly what happened to the recreational drug scene. To this day, if you can keep the teenage idiots out it, it’s a fun party. Get the picture?

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 08:33 PM | Link to this

Huge,

You are not dealing with a person who has a full deck there. The last time I interacted with him, he was trying to tell me that Puerto Ricans couldn’t be real Republicans. I am not sure how he came to that conclusion, but leave you to draw your own inferences.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 08:59 PM | Link to this

April 23, 2006, New York Times

Colleagues Say C.I.A. Analyst Played by Rules

Which translated from pinko to english means that “we are guilty too, so let’s deflect blame from her and maybe they won’t investigate us.”

Too bad, lib, get ready to go down.

By getalife

April 22, 2006 09:05 PM | Link to this

Yes, I agree.

The leaks are bad especially with W, Cheney, Libby and Rove involved.

Too bad, criminals, get ready to go down.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 09:12 PM | Link to this

@@, I’m not out to get him! I don’t even want to get him! I just think it’s crazy to not call him on this. He’s been the same since the first day I came onto this site. (Consistent, yes. But not really an excuse) He’s not going to change and he shouldn’t have to. (agreed and begrudgingly acknowledged) He’s always had that abrasive since of humor that is appreciated by many, despised by others. OK, its hopeless.

It can be argued that since we almost always disagree, I should support this “sense of humor”. I believe that most reasonable people dismiss hate speech (and there is absolutely no denying that is what we’re talking about) as that of a madman, even if the point is occassionally valid.

My motives are not suspect to some here, but I still contend that the discourse improves without the Bushit. (couldn’t help myself on that one!)

When I first discovered this blog about a month ago, the pages we’re practically filled with the most vile and stupid name-calling. There was, and is, certainly some intelligent and entertaining debate, but hate speech basically ruled. He’s the worst of the lot, though at least two others, (including a dare-I-say-it liberal who also act like on-line juvenile delinquents) are no better. I don’t even count the occassional drive-by flamer idiot and they should have no real effect.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 22, 2006 09:36 PM | Link to this

small: What a clown- but I still contend that the discourse improves without the Bushit. (couldn’t help myself on that one!)

I got an idea. Why don’t you shut TFU with the self righteous nonsense. I usually don’t advocate censorship, but you are an exception. You’ve all but confessed that you don’t like what I say, claiming falsely that I “tirade,” but your beef is with the content of my “tirades,” if not, where does the “Bushit” come from?

You are a typical dumba-ss liberal, too “high and mighty” to realize that the same thing you complain about is exactly the same as you do.

Bozo.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 09:40 PM | Link to this

Washington State, My inferences are that he is, as I’ve said before, a pious fraud, demonstrable by his ever-growing catalogue of venomous statements that scream a need for an anger management class (or ten).

Yet I haven’t even addressed his penchant for making, shall we say, “wacky” statements. We can all do it from time to time, but he shows an uncanny ability to never admit someone else could be right (even on the smallest issue) and that he might actually be wrong,about anything. Childish, in my opinion, that’s all.

Ironically, parallels could be drawn between him and the current west wing occupier on both accounts

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 09:52 PM | Link to this

@@,

What do you think of this?

By @@

April 22, 2006 09:57 PM | Link to this

Huge:

Pleeeeeze, must we go over this again? I’ve been here since December. I came with a purpose. That purpose is now complete. I’m still here learning things I never knew or was even interested in before. I’ve got to say that LS&L takes me to sites and then offers his opinion, which is often times enlightening. I don’t care how he delivers it, it’s the information that I appreciate. I read just about everything from everyone’s links. If something peaks my interest, I research further on my own.

If you reprimanded vile things said by others here, I might buy your argument that you weren’t out to get LS&L. I’ve seen you reprimand one person from the left, that’s it. Maybe there were others that I missed, I don’t know.

You’re making this hard work for yourself when it doesn’t have to be. I’m afraid I’ve got some bad news for you. As long as I’ve been here, no individual’s viewpoints have been changed. If that’s your objective, this may be the wrong forum for you.

You can’t ask people to engage only on your terms. I’ve got nothing else for you. That’s it. It’s free speech and individuality. It’s understood by everyone else here, I don’t understand why you don’t get it.

By @@

April 22, 2006 10:06 PM | Link to this

WashingtonState:

I’ll read it and get back to you. I’ve witnessed some awfully sweet marriages between individuals with disabilities. Especially individuals with Downs Syndrome.

Love lifes are great for them too. I may have some reservations about children, but let me read it first.

Quite a few parents have the girls with Downs Syndrome sterilized for their own protection. It is somewhat understandable given their naivete’.

By WashingtonState

April 22, 2006 10:13 PM | Link to this

@@,

I realize that sterilization is fairly common in young girls with developmental disabilities. That is why I found this article interesting. It makes sense in the context of what we are trying to accomplish with the disabled since we de-intitutionalized them.

By @@

April 22, 2006 10:23 PM | Link to this

I’ve got to register with the NYT. But we sure were backwards in our thinking with institutionlization (is that a word?) We can all learn from all the admirable qualities they have to offer. Unemcumbered in so many ways. Ironically so.

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 10:33 PM | Link to this

@@,

Here are some bugmenot.com sign in codes for NYT. In case you don’t feel like registering.

By AntiRadical

April 22, 2006 10:39 PM | Link to this

@@- You said a mouthful there. I work in pediatric hemo-oncology. There are no lib/con, Rep/Dem children. Just one big happy brood. Everytime I lose one a little of me dies, too. The loss of innocence is the greatest of life’s tragedies.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 10:48 PM | Link to this

You’re right @@. Hate speech is free speech. I got it. Thanks.

By @@

April 22, 2006 10:55 PM | Link to this

RW:

A little late, but appreciated. I guess I’m going to be “buggedalot”. I’ve got soooo much to learn. Family reunion with my cousin tomorrow.

WashingtonState:

The story made me sniffle. “We’re going to wait until marriage, it wouldn’t be good before that.” Soooo sweeeeet.

Some of the other things concerned me, but let me ponder. If you see me on, just give me a shout-out.

Nite Guys!

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 10:57 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Why don’t you enlighten us with your detailed description of hate speech? Thanks.

By Huge

April 22, 2006 11:32 PM | Link to this

RW, Even today, our courts have a hard time with the actual definition of hate/free speech. And the First Amendment is purposely vague. (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.) I’ve already tried. Didn’t you read the posts from earlier today? Here are two excellent links: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hate%20speech http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

By RW-(the original)

April 22, 2006 11:52 PM | Link to this

Huge,

When YOU say something is indisputably hate speech then YOU should be able to define it. Since you can’t I’ll just go with my first instinct and give you clown status.

By Dusty

April 23, 2006 12:04 AM | Link to this

Well, RW,

I am thinking about some of the things @@ and Washington State said about institutionlization. In their work, perhaps a home like atmosphere works well. But what bothers me are the homeless who are obviously mentally ill and on the streets.

I cannot see how these people are expected to attend mental health clinics, secure medications and take them on a regular basis. Perhaps @@ and WS could give me ideas of how that works in other states. Observing the street scene and an occasional volunteer trip to a “soup kitchen” in Atlanta makes me wonder.

I just watched that old movie “Trials at Nuremburg”. Such a great movie and reminder of the atrocities of Nazi Germany. That one really makes you think about what happened to those who did not fit into their description of normal.

Sorry to get off subject here. G’nite!

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 12:15 AM | Link to this

Huge,

You’re a sanctimonious prig, and I find nearly everything you say hateful.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 12:16 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

Goodnight! I hope you didn’t violate any hate speech codes in that post. If you look at the definitions provided up ^ ^ ^ there, it looks like it’s something liberals decide happened when they get weepy eyed so you probably did.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 01:07 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

The problem is that there are no resources available for those homeless, mentally ill you were writing about. They were thrown out of institutions and put back into communities which didn’t have the resources or the willingness to deal with them. @@ and I were talking about children and adults who are not mentally ill, but mentally defecient. Mental illness is still a tabu subject in our society. We deal with it by ignoring it. Look at the V.A. and post traumatic stress disorder if you want a good example of how that works.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 01:10 AM | Link to this

BTW, I agree with Huge. Suck regularly crosses the line on issues of race and engages in hate speech as a matter of course. I suspect he doesn’t know of any other way of communicating.

By Huge

April 23, 2006 01:21 AM | Link to this

When YOU say something is indisputably hate speech then YOU should be able to define it. Since you can’t I’ll just go with my first instinct and give you clown status.

Maybe you want to rethink that. I posted a link to the freakin’ dictionary definition as my reply! Why else would I even reference it and the second link? It’s not that hard.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 01:30 AM | Link to this

This idea that Andy is a racist that regularly engages in “hate speech” is such an easy thing to say, but I bet it’s a lot harder to back up. Since nobody seems to be able to define it how about some examples? Cut and paste or link these examples and let’s see. Since WashingtonState and huge say it is Andy’s primary means of communication it should be easy.

Once you guys have provided 5 or 10 examples we can discuss it.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 01:42 AM | Link to this

Here is Huge Clown’s definition of hate speech from the dictionary no less:

Bigoted speech attacking or disparaging a social or ethnic group or a member of such a group.

The second link is one of those obtuse and amorphous wiki links so it will have to be discounted. So present your evidence.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 01:50 AM | Link to this

RW,

I’ll amend my statement. He is a racist and also regularly engages in offensive speech. The last time we discussed this, you said he was an individual and entitled to his own opinions, but that you didn’t necessarily support him. That time had to do with his posting a link to sex felons from a predominantly black county and saying that they (blacks) were responsible for most sex crimes. When I called him on it, he stated that he really meant Mexicans were responsible for most sex crimes. Like that was an improvement. More recently, he was incredulous that Puerto Ricans had a Republican party and then dismissed them because he doubted that they delivered any votes for Bush. After all, they are just Puerto Ricans and not Americans. I can’t cut and paste those instances because they are off the board now. As for offensive speech, pick any of his posts.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 01:52 AM | Link to this

On second thought, liberals are a social group, so, yes, Suck regularly engages in hate speech.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 02:05 AM | Link to this

WashingtonState,

First, We (as in you and I) have never discussed this because I don’t get involved in this petty game of who said what that was offensive. I may have said anyone has a right to be an individual, but that would be as far as that went. I’ve just gotten tired of the whole “hate speech” bs that people love to hide behind these days.

Second you can cut and paste any of that because every single thing that’s ever been posted on this board is still in the archives.

Third do you really want to stay with the idea that liberals are a “protected” group? The problem is that we all know they think that, you’re just supposed to pretend that isn’t what you mean. They might pull your membership card or something.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 02:14 AM | Link to this

RW,

Your definition said nothing about a “protected” group.

“Bigoted speech attacking or disparaging a social or ethnic group or a member of such a group.”

I would say the same to any a**hole who came around posting trash about conservatives on a regular basis. In fact you probably remember me doing just that earlier this week.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 02:16 AM | Link to this

RW,

You are welcome to search the archives. I am off to bed.

By Sam I Am

April 23, 2006 02:19 AM | Link to this

Yeah, RW’s a racist. One need only go back a few months to resd it. He’s also deeply troubled by a certain few here. I do belive that RW, like a certain amount of other loudmouths for whom this blog is their lives, is a self-hating homophobic homosexual. Wants to be outed to enjoy a normal enough life, but knows he’ll lose his “friends” in the process. A tough decision. One he is unable yet to make - so he plays this ridiculous role here. You’re doing just a heckuva job RW.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 02:24 AM | Link to this

Sam I Am, I wasn’t calling RW a racist. I have heard nothing on this blog to indicate he is. We were referring to Andy.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 02:32 AM | Link to this

WashingtonState,

It wasn’t my definition it was Huge Clown’s dictionary. “Protected” is a catch all term. I have no desire to search the archives for something you say happens with every post. I don’t know if you do or don’t do that blasting both sides business because as I mentioned I don’t get into that type conversation normally. I really do think everybody has a right to say what they feel. Goodnight

Sam I Am A Wanker,

Care to back up the fact that I’m a racist. As has been pointed out every word is there for the searching. As the not so great movie maker once almost said, “Bring me the head of RW-(the original)”

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 02:52 AM | Link to this

RW,

Anyone can post anything they want, but when they are offensive, it rapidly reaches the point where all people are doing is trading insults. Maybe I don’t hang around blogs enough, but that seems to me to be a tremendous waste of time and energy.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 03:08 AM | Link to this

WashingtonState,

It always comes back to who defines offensive and who has the right to claim they were offended and shut the other person up.

Anyone that thinks any venue is a waste of their time should probably find a different venue. There are hundreds of places you can go and not run the risk of dissent or being offended. There are also ways to discuss issues here, but it takes not getting consumed by the white noise (there I go with another racist comment) and picking out who you are discussing things with. I thought you went to bed.

By WashingtonState

April 23, 2006 03:22 AM | Link to this

RW,

I did, but couldn’t sleep. You are right about the white noise. I guess it just takes practice. There are a few of you I enjoy here, so I guess I will have to learn to put up with the rest. As for who defines offensive, I guess it is the person who is being offended. But you have to admit that if I said half of what Andy said, you would be offended. I don’t mind dissent, but I do take offense at being gratuitously insulted.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 03:39 AM | Link to this

Washington State,

Without relating it to what somebody else may or may not say you would have an awfully difficult time offending me. At least in this new age victim class definition of offense.

If someone p-isses me off and I choose to fight back on that level or vice versa I’m perfectly willing to match wits as long as that battle lasts and when it ends leave it.

Nobody likes being gratuitously insulted, but it happens to most of us on the right a lot more than it does to anyone else. We just don’t start crying for someone to protect us.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 03:50 AM | Link to this

BTW, I am going to bed. Nite.

By Jeremy S Hobbs

April 23, 2006 04:27 AM | Link to this

I was watching an episode of Law & Order, and the topic dealt with Gay Marriage. The Prosecutor was trying to get a witness to testify against his life partner whom he had married in New Jersey. The Prosecutor went to the Supreme Court and had their marriage dissolved because it was not the intent of the founding fathers that two men should be legally married. Later the witness refused to testify and was held in contempt because the prosecutor dissolved everything that he and his partner had accomplished. What is this world coming to? It sickens me by the constant bickering over Gay Marriage. Many people say that homosexuals do not value a relationship due to the inability to remain in a relationship for a long period of time. I ask, Can you blame them? America offers no means of stability for gay couples. People say that it is an abomination in the eyes of God. Here’s what I think. We are all God’s children. For ALL have sinned and come short of the Glory of God. And furthermore, He who is without sin, cast the first stone. I have heard of churches not allowing gay members. That in itself is a sin. Anyone who comes to hear the word of God, must know “ALL ARE WELCOME.” I know there is only One who will judge me and the same shall judge us all. We as Americans need to learn to love one another. People try to use religion all the time as a basis for discontent towards homosexuality. Homosexuality has existed all throughout history. Alexander the Great, Plato, Socrates, even one of our Presidents was rumored to have been an homosexual. Homosexuals today are battling the same fight as African Americans did years ago. Equality in all. When are we going to stop acting like heathens and start acting like humanitarians. I support the right for all men and all women to be equal. Whatever their sexual preference is, that’s their business. This is America, Land of Opportunity. I have several gay friends and I must say that they are some of the most wonderful people God has graced this earth with. Every Man and Woman deserve the right to find the one they love and marry them. If gay marriage or civil unions were allowed, I do believe there would be more stability in homosexuals lives. We cannot afford to close doors to anyone. For if we do, how can we honestly say, Freedom for All?

Jeremy S Hobbs 1511 12th Street Columbus Georgia 31906 706-570-6830

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 07:11 AM | Link to this

RW: Thanks for the back up but this Clueless in Seattle ain’t even worth wasting breath on. He is a mental lightweight, offering a child’s opinion in a man’s world. And look, unlike him, I can offer examples:

By WashingtonState April 22, 2006 11:54 AM Suck, For once, you gave a good, thoughtful link (about the stripper and the lacrosse team.) Why did you have to ruin the moment by adding your hateful little comments? The “decent” men in these girls lives are usually the reason the girl has ended up stripping or whoring in the first place. And they aren’t all liberals either.

By Liberals Suck And Lie April 22, 2006 09:17 AM This is where society has gone so far bad, where liberalism has worked it’s evil to our very core, it used to be the “no decent man wanted anybodies wife, mother, sister or daughter to be a stripper.” Where are the decent, mature men at nowadays?

This dude is unable to comprehend that my post was aimed at all men. And he has taken it upon his self righteous blow hard liberal nanny a-ss to scold me for something that’s over his head.

Typical pinko.

Sorry, I’ve got nothing for him.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 07:29 AM | Link to this

Queen Pinko is off in the fever swamp this morning:

“We had a discussion in policy-planning about actually mounting an operation to take the oil fields in the Middle East, internationalize them, put them under some sort of U.N. trusteeship and administer the revenues and the oil accordingly. That’s how serious we thought about it,” he said.

So when, you reckon, we’ll actually like do that?

This is awfully pulitzer, to go and blame Bush for something he hasn’t even done.

I don’t know why I even bother, this AJC has some major mental issues at play, but didn’t this lib not advocate giving driver’s licenses to all the illegal immigrants? Can’t we make the connection between more drivers and more oil on our own? Or are we counting on our readers to be a bunch of goofball moonbats, willing to lap up any anti Bush nonsense?

(Hey small, blow me!)

By Disillusioned Republican

April 23, 2006 07:43 AM | Link to this

Mr. Hobbs - You mentioned the lack of stability in homosexual relationships as if heterosexual relationships were some sort of benchmark. It seems to me that with the divorce rate nearing 50%, the anti-gay folks don’t have a dog in that race. People are people and sexual orientation has nothing to do with how stable a relationship is or isn’t.

By Theeny

April 23, 2006 08:14 AM | Link to this

It’s ironic how far this blog has strayed from the topic of the featured editorial cartoon. Boy there are some angry people out there!

By Bushwhacker

April 23, 2006 09:00 AM | Link to this

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sharply criticized the Bush administration Saturday for refusing to declare a pre-emptive federal disaster for California’s fragile levees.

Guess the “Terminator” is afraid he won’t “be back” come election day and needs to put some distance between himself and “The Great Republican Boat Anchor”, George W. Bush. More rats are jumpin’ ship, ML.

By Pinko Andy

April 23, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

Yes, there are a couple of angry ones out there.

Our real enemy Osama seems to have popped up again today, Andy. We’ll have to see what our intelegence agencies say about the authenticity of the tape (like they authenticated every other one). Saaaay, why haven’t we captured him yet?

WashingtoneState and Huge, it’s that “Change the subject to avoid answering your questions” thang Andy (LSAL) engages in. Typical coward, bully, wingnut mindset. No accountability, no responsibility, no friends, no future. Why do you think he’s on this blog every day, all day?

About the cartoon…It’s political satire, folks! that’s the other thing wingnuts don’t get. Humor. Satire. They all take it so personally, and then go and blame a Clinton. I’ve said it before, but I don’t get it. They must not have a funny gene???

And Andy, you say Pulp Fiction is one of the best movies ever, but you don’t remember Travolta dancing? That’s what made him famous, again. The fact that he did dance. Oh, did I forget to say “out of touch” along with bully?

We’ll just call you wingleberries. ttfn

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 09:40 AM | Link to this

Typical loser liberal:

By Pinko Andy April 23, 2006 09:20 AM

About the cartoon…It’s political satire, folks! that’s the other thing wingnuts don’t get. Humor. Satire. They all take it so personally, and then go and blame a Clinton. I’ve said it before, but I don’t get it. They must not have a funny gene???

And Andy, you say Pulp Fiction is one of the best movies ever, but you don’t remember Travolta dancing? That’s what made him famous, again. The fact that he did dance. Oh, did I forget to say “out of touch” along with bully?

Gee, I wonder if I was joking about Travolta?

And as far as not having a life, at least mine isn’t reduced to stalking one person on the internet.

Too stupid to have children so they have to discipline and scold the whole rest of the world.

What is with these nag liberals? They have zero to add to the discussion, they just come on here and critique what other people are doing. And then bit-ch about Bush invading their right to privacy.

It’s almost unreal how FU these liberals are.

(Hey small, blow me!)

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 09:45 AM | Link to this

Liberals Suck And Lie,

Your welcome, but you don’t need or probably even want the backup. I was mainly trying to get somebody to realize how out of control this “hate speech” label has become.

First Huge Clown gives a link to a dictionary since he has no clue what he is talking about and then was completely baffled when I didn’t accept that. When he came back with this, I posted a link to the freakin’ dictionary, I knew the concept was forever lost on him and WashingtonState proved how ridiculous that definition is when he said liberals are a social group so thus protected.

The way they accept that “freakin’ dictionary” definition you would think it was an act of Congress…err scratch that these are libs we’re talking about, I should say they act as if the Supreme Court or the New York Times had decided this.

Frankly I think it’s rather offensive that there are actually people that believe that on day three of ml’s scribbling we could still be commenting on the cartoon like of bunch of robots. To use another moonbat favorite, I’m saddened that someone thinks going off topic is ironic. Somebody break out the clown’s dictionary.

By @@

April 23, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

Watching a movie only to see Travolta dance is a woman’s thing. Andy was being funny when he let me know that that wasn’t why he watched the movie.

I got it Andy, and I’m “Slow OO.”

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

@@,

I really thought after 24 hours without a Travolta/dancing comment that everybody knew Andy was joking, but I guess there is always somebody ^ ^ ^.

By Stuart Smalley

April 23, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this

Hello everyone! It sure looks like my friends on the right sure could use a great big cyber hug!!! You lefties need to stop being such big fat meanies. Republicans need love too you know.

Rw and Andy, you both need to go to your hotel bathroom and look in the mirror. Don’t let the meanie lefties spoil your blog vacations. What you will see is someone that has his own unique qualities! Hardly worth getting your feelings hurt by the libs. Now both of you put on a happy face

YOU ARE SOMEBODY.

By @@

April 23, 2006 10:34 AM | Link to this

RW:

I saw it as a “very long reach” to discredit Andy’s intelligence.

By getalife

April 23, 2006 10:56 AM | Link to this

Flip : The angry “left”. Flop : The angry “right”.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 10:57 AM | Link to this

Al Franken,

Why don’t you direct your sarc to St. Huge C. Sodapants. He’s Mr. Sensitive don’tcha know.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 23, 2006 10:58 AM | Link to this

“”By Liberals Suck And Lie April 22, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this LTD: Of course, hon, you were just sharing some general information with us, right?” No, I was setting you up, and you walked right into like Dick into quail. As far as answering anything further you say I don’t bother with people who wear their hate as a moniker,

RW first you hop in LSAL’s side car and post this “By RW-(the original) April 22, 2006 05:32 PM | Link to this Liberals Suck And Lie, Not to mention that LTD’d post shows this as an increase over 2004, but still lower than 1999 and tries to blame the Iraq war for it.” Thinking, I guess to bolster his rant. Then you post “LTD, If you know that we would expose your story as bs with or without your commentary why do you think it is about you. Every comment I’ve seen pertains to the link itself. Maybe everybody ignores the portion that you personally contribute because it is so vapid.”

I did not contribute any personal opinion with regards to the link, there was nothing I contributed to the link to ignore. Neither I, nor any portion of the linked item ever attempted to blame the Iraq war for it. You were sucking up to LSAL and his potty mouth response that began with “By Liberals Suck And Lie April 22, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this When I say that libs are pathological liars, this is what I mean: ”

The information in the link was provided by the military, hardly a bunch of “libs” or “pathological liars” and reported in a fair and factual way in a stand alone news item on Yahoo. Because LSAL read a piece that illustrates that service persons are less than the holy warrior image he ascribes to, and because it was brought to his attention by a self proclaimed liberal he went ballistic as predicted. RW, you chimed in almost immediately afterward. now, you go ahead and click, click, click away. It’s too beautiful a day for me not to be heading for the beach.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 11:06 AM | Link to this

LTD,

Enjoy yourself at the beach and I hope you enjoyed your steak. Are you related to Bob Graham?

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 11:13 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

We had a guy that posted as Sodapants here that was a fantastic contributer. Sodapants would have already ripped Huge Clown into tiny little pieces.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 11:13 AM | Link to this

Tex,

Don’t get sunburned and watch out for bullies who may kick sand in your face.

You may want to check the ozone levels before you take off, and watch out for sharks, and little crabs that bite little Lib toes, and jelly fish. And don’t forget the bug spray.

A day at the beach is filled with hazards.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this

A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants.

RW,

That was Chuckles the clown’s song. That’s what I meant by sodapants - I didn’t realize that there was a Sodapants the Destroyer!

I’ll just have to change Sodapants to Turdpants.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I linked an example for you at my place.

By getalife

April 23, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

“sodapants” was nuttier than “sad as hell”.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

O.K., LTD, I’ll change my liar diagnosis. Let’s make it insanity:

Because LSAL read a piece that illustrates that service persons are less than the holy warrior image he ascribes to.

I won’t get into the fact that there is no way that a veteran would post thoughts like this, I’ll just stick to the fact that LTD is a nutcase. Soldiers commit suicide at a lesser rate than the general population, which I believe, does make them better. Who can argue that it does not?

As for the earlier excuse, how about if we let your post speak for itself?:

The Army is the largest service in the U.S. military and provides most of the troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This is a direct connection to the “evil” war on terror. Again, how can a sane person even argue differently?

P.S. BTW, Faux was the first to post this liberal BS for those of you keeping score, they tied the soldier’s suicide rate directly to the war without giving up the fact that it is lower than the general population.

(Hey small, blow me!)

By Huge

April 23, 2006 01:36 PM | Link to this

Boy! It looks like those angry hornets are really buzzing now!

Some here have a lack of familiarity and understanding of the dictionary and other reference materials and their purpose that it’s practically palpable.

For example, referring to the Wikipoedia reference obtuse (Characterized by a lack of intelligence or sensitivity) is REALLY a stretch. To throw it under the rug so it will have to be discounted merely because someone doesn’t like or agree with the material is just juvenile. The article is actually quite comprehensive and intelligent. Read it and see for yourselves.

And using the word amorphous (Lacking definite form; shapeless) is silly and just a case of trying to sound intelligent.

And finally this Third do you really want to stay with the idea that liberals are a “protected” group?, which changed to this when caught making the whole thing up “Protected” is a catch all term. Good job Washington State.

But this really says it all: The way they accept that “freakin’ dictionary” definition you would think it was an act of Congress Funny, but most people I know, do accept the dictionary as valid and accurate. Oh, silly me.

Yet, the post of 3:39AM is a case of actually hitting the nail exactly on the head. Nobody likes being gratuitously insulted, but it happens to most of us on the right a lot more than it does to anyone else.

Although one could rightly construe this as the victim mentality that the poster disparaged in the same contribution, it goes to the very core of the discussion.

I would say it’s safe to say that libs outnumber their opponents on this blog by a fair margin. I’ve never counted, but this seems consistent with my experiences here.

And, more than a few of them, are notorious and idiotic flamers, as well. They are in my opinion, equally useless and small-minded. And unlike El Suck & Lie they don’t even contribute anything relevant. So, in that regard, they’re even worse in my book.

I beleieve that because the far-right wing feels so outnumbered, they are compelled to defend each other EVEN WHEN IT’S NOT WARRANTED. Some try to pretend they have no interest in this topic, but can’t control their emotionals enough to resist pitching in their little insults after awhile, as well. Useless to furthering intelligent debate…

Someone on the right once spoke of an inclusive and diverse big tent that ostensibly included me. I guess that tent isn’t really big enough after all.

Now the weak are vilified and the wicked glorified…

By Dusty

April 23, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Took you a dozen paragraphs to say that you feel a little left out.

That’s getting sorta carried away, isn’t it?

Try commenting on something other than the people who contribute here.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 02:12 PM | Link to this

Huge Clown,

Your dictionary definition of hate speech could literally apply to anyone and has no basis in legal fact.

If you don’t think Wiki is amorphous and suspect you are naive at best. It changes constantly and not always with accuracy in mind.

If you don’t think “protected” is the proper term for anyone that can’t be spoken about the same way some other person can be spoken about please feel free to provide a different more applicable word.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 02:14 PM | Link to this

Huge,

I hate your laborious writing. It’s just not worth muddling through - it’s like a very long joke without a punchline.

Maybe you could hire yourself an editor.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 02:18 PM | Link to this

Huge,

I hate to say it, but can you please learn to control your emotionals!

I almost missed that classic malapropism and only caught it by chance. Must be my lucky day!

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 02:33 PM | Link to this

Since I sense some pinkos still blinking their eyelids, let me deliver the punchline:

I was too busy watching Uma Thurman dance to notice John Travolta, get it?

This may cause some further confusion amongst the liberals but it is not my job to explain that real men don’t watch other men dance.

(Hey small, blow me!)

By Dusty

April 23, 2006 02:45 PM | Link to this

This from Mrs. Malaprop…..

There once was a malapropism

Who tried to follow fascism.

But he lost his grip

And made a big slip

And fractured his poor little ‘ism.

(OK, ok, back to the drawing board!)

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 03:03 PM | Link to this

Hey, I guess this is the joke of the day: li’l andy seems to think that he’s a “real man”. Woohooohooo! That’s a knee-slapper.

By Bushwhacker

April 23, 2006 03:10 PM | Link to this

U.S. Regular Conventional Retail Gasoline Prices (Dollars per Gallon)

Souce: US Department of Energy, Regular grade, All areas.

2/22/99 (Clinton’s 8th Year In Office)- $0.885

4/17/06 (Bush’s 6th Year in Office)- $2.764

BIG BUSH GOVERNMENT AT WORK!

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 03:12 PM | Link to this

My theory on liberal insanity is starting to grow some legs:

In his first new message in three months, bin Laden said the West’s decision to cut off funds to the Palestinians because their Hamas leaders refuse to recognize Israel proved that the United States and Europe were conducting “a Zionist crusader war on Islam.”

Yea, everything was just hunky dorey when we were paying them.

This just proves the point that Bin Laden has been dead for years now and some stupid pinko at the New York Times is making up messages for him. Only a moron liberal would use a government assistance as a grievance.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 03:14 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

How would you know what a real man is?

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

I knew Clinton’s presidency seemed awfully long and painful. Knowing that he was in his 8th year in 1999 and didn’t leave until 2001 explains alot.

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 03:43 PM | Link to this

I own a mirror, Danish. I also visit my parents often. I also have many male friends. You want me to continue?

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

bushwacker,

So if John Kerry hadn’t lost to W, we’d have cheaper gas now?

Dusty,

Some people say,

That a very good way,

To control one’s emotionals,

Is through daily devotionals,

but that turning to Wiki,

can make one’s life icky.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 03:53 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

No thanks. The clues you’ve provided so far is enough to convince me that you don’t cut the mustard.

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 03:57 PM | Link to this

No, Danish, only someone as stupid as you would attempt to cut mustard. The rest of the world will keep squirting it.

Meanwhile, I’ll keep running circles around you and li’l andy and embarassing you whenever I have the time and desire.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 04:02 PM | Link to this

Sun Times Steyn:

And yet, amazingly, we’ve survived. Why? Because in 1970 the planet stopped its very slight global cooling and began to undergo very slight global warming. So in the ’80s, the doom-mongers cast off their thermal underwear, climbed into the leopardskin thongs, slathered themselves in sun cream and wired their publishers to change all references to “cooling” to “warming” for the paperback edition. That’s why, if you notice, the global-warming crowd begin their scare statistics with “since 1970,” an unlikely Year Zero which would not otherwise merit the significance the eco-crowd invest in it.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 04:05 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

Only someone as stupid as you wouldn’t know what “cut the mustard” means.

You have never embarrassed anyone here except for yourself, and it’s the one thing you excel at.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this

rushncap: Only someone as stupid as you would run circles around someone, that’s what dogs do. Maybe that’s why it’s so easy for Danish and I to make you look like a blooming idiot.

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Awwww, good one, Danish. Took you a while to think of the comeback, though, points deducted. Oh well, I’m done with you for a while, I’ll leave you to stew in your own verbal feces. And, yes, I do know what “cut the mustard” means. It’s something that very old people say. Not even my parents are old enough to use that expression.

Oh, and li’l andy, if you ever make me look like an idiot, please do let me know. I’ve always been interested in the precise moment that hell freezes over. I have my reasons why. So please let me know if this ever happens.

By Bob

April 23, 2006 04:29 PM | Link to this

Breaking news from the White House today. “OBL is on the run!” Jesus, how childish and pathetic can those people get? How childish and pathetic can you people get?

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 04:30 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Be careful about running around in circles. Like the Dodo bird, you might disappear up your own arse*hole.

By Truett Cathy

April 23, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

Eat Mor Pijin!

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 04:43 PM | Link to this

LS&L,

These are facts known about rushncap:

He grew up in a Communist country. He’s Jewish. He’s young. He runs around in circles. He thinks he’s a real man. He wants to know when hell freezes over (he has his reasons). He doesn’t like expressions that old people say.

Can you think of any more biographical details?

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 04:44 PM | Link to this

Isn’t rushncap just so stunningly brilliant today? Aren’t we all so lucky to have such an academic genius in our midst? Don’t you feel the anticipation of hearing his next scholarly remar…. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

By Fartful Dodger

April 23, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

Danish is so old she farts dust.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

The most recent examples of you being made to look like an idiot are at 4:05 and 4:06 today, but shortly before that at 3:43 was proof positive.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 04:51 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

He has a mirror, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s one of those reversible make-up mirrors since we know he uses the mirror to prove his manhood.

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 05:24 PM | Link to this

Damn Apple Chill…

Why are you so interested in my biography, Danish? Are you going to stalk me now? I mean, I couldn’t care less what you are, all I need to know is that you have the intelligence of a roadkill weasel.

Oh, and RW, I see your a$s is still sore from me ripping you a new one. Put some ointment on.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 05:33 PM | Link to this

RW,

That 3:43 is just too hilarious.

Can’t you just picture rushncap hanging out with his male friends, (doublesided mirrors) in hand, doing God only knows what exactly, before …going to visit his parents?

What a man! Maybe he could help write a sequel to Real Men Eat Quiche.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

Geez you try to do someone a favor by pointing out what they asked to have pointed out and they start yelping like a hit dog. Next thing you know he’ll be running around in circles again

By getalife

April 23, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

Andy,

I thought you said he is dead

“We took our eye off the ball when President Bush decided to go after Iraq instead of Osama bin Laden,” Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said on CNN.

Duh, and Andy thinks we should leave it up to the experts.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

RW,

I forgot to add that rushncap is “sexually liberated” to his bio fact sheet. How could I forget that?

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this

Wow, RW, you’re one sore loser. I take pity on you for one night and point out that all your arguments are $hite, and you can’t deal with it for the life of you.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this

He who has provoked the shaft of wit, cannot complain that he smarts from it. -

Samuel Johnson

If that’s too old for rushncap’s taste, maybe Cartman has something to say on the subject.

By Fartful Dodger

April 23, 2006 05:47 PM | Link to this

How can you tell when Buy Danish is wearing panty hose?

When she farts her ankles swell.

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 05:51 PM | Link to this

Oh, were it that I provoked anyone with a wit. Unfortunately, getalife is not here, so all I have provoked is a few quarter-wits, who together still don’t add up to a single wit.

By Fartful Dodger

April 23, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish’s ass* is so tight, when she farts only dogs can hear it.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

getalife: It’s sort of eerie how the New York Times seems to know all about Bin Laden and his latest hit recording.

Even if the upper level flunky is still alive, he’s up in a cave somewhere not daring to stick his freakin head out because of all the Hellfire missiles flying by. Some life.

Either that or Bush has him in the basement of the White House waiting for November, HaHaHaHaHaHaHa.

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this

I get it, rushcap is a moonbat so when he said he wanted constructive criticism he really wanted someone to come along and tell him how wonderful he is. rushncap maybe you need to have the boys over or go visit Mom.

Does anybody remember this whuppin’ he’s talking about or is he like Evander after the last few fights?

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 06:02 PM | Link to this

Artful Codger,

Why don’t you try directing your humor towards something I said, and then try to find some original material?

rushncap,

In order to recognize wit it help to have you wits about you. Which you don’t.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Let me tell you a little about myself. I’m a 55 year old black woman, all of my ancestors went to Harvard and my brother went to Stanford. I think very highly of myself even though intellectually, I was never able to live up to the standards of the men in my family. I am a religious extermist, think Pat Robertson or David Koresh. My political views are in opposition to everything that is beneficial to African Americans, but I don’t care because I’m trying my best to become a WASP. Logic is not one of my strongpoints, as you are well aware. Is that enough information for you?

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

By getalife

April 23, 2006 05:35 PM

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 05:51 PM | Link to this

Unfortunately, getalife is not here,

Where’s that Guiness link when you need it?

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 06:10 PM | Link to this

Excuse me, I have some telemarketing to do. Even though I love to spend all my time at work blogging on this site instead of trying to sell people the “magic sweeper” like I’m supposed to be doing, if my boss finds out I’ll be in trouble. I’ve only sold three magic sweepers today. It’s now dinner time, so it’s the perfect time for me to get some sales- I can interrupt families at dinner to make my pitch. Yes, that’s me; if I’m not annoying someone on this blog, I’m annoying some family’s privacy. That’s capitalism. Anything for the almighty dollar and the almighty Jesus. Can I interest you in some Holy Water?

By rushncap

April 23, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

RW, of course you wouldn’t “remember” the whupping you got. Why would you want to? If I got bi-tch-slapped that badly I’d do my best to forget it too. And, no, I never asked for “constructive criticism”. That can only come from someone I respect. And I have about as much respect for you as I do for the denizens of public urinals.

Danish — did you just use a variation of “I know you are, but what am I”?? Are you siking down to li’l andy’s level finally?

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 06:13 PM | Link to this

I be so smart I write things like this: “In order to recognize wit it help to have you wits about you. Which you don’t.”

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 06:19 PM | Link to this

Look’s like the chickensh-it liberal is back, Midori? 6:04, 6:10, 6:13.

By Fartful Dodger

April 23, 2006 06:21 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish’s husband never farted before he got married. He didn’t have an asshole yet.

By i-r-o-diM

April 23, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

I have to namejack to get noticed. But I really don’t get noticed cause I used somebody else’s name. Dumb…

i-r-o-diM. Sorry!:{

By El Liberals Suck and Lie

April 23, 2006 06:30 PM | Link to this

I am Andy. My Asian rent-a-bride ran off with an illegal Mexican farm worker two weeks ago, so I’m p!ssed. Since my wife is no longer here to support my blogging habit, I had to move back into my mom’s trailer and she drinks all my beer and smokes all my cigarettes with her new boyfriend, who is two years younger than me. I can’t even play Dungeons and Dragons in peace with the 12-year-olds in the trailer park because my mom’s boyfriend smacks me around and embarrasses me. I’m p!ssed!

By King Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 06:44 PM | Link to this

Congratulations to Danish, RW and myself, we won. The liberals have admitted defeat. They have been so thoroughly outmatched and had their as-ses whooped so bad, all they can do now is hide behind our names and mock us.

How weak amd impotent.

By King Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 07:09 PM | Link to this

Stop discriminationing me! I’m going to have my imaginery lawyer arrest you, you pinko liberal wanker!

By King Liberals Suck And Lie

April 23, 2006 08:09 PM | Link to this

Is this why the pinkos don’t like Bush, because the woman in his life aren’t claiming that he groped, molested or raped them? Is this a sign of liberal greatness that Bush just doesn’t have?

By Discounted Liberals

April 23, 2006 09:05 PM | Link to this

Ten Edicts of Osama’s Recent Tape They’re looking for liberals.

7. Arab Liberals: Jihadists must silence the Arab and Muslim liberals. (A list has been established, but it wasn’t aired).

Take our liberals, please!

By Cmack

April 23, 2006 09:47 PM | Link to this

Turn of the shrew!

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 10:16 PM | Link to this

The right answer is:

“Ask all you want. The answer is, NO!.”

By Discounted Liberals

April 23, 2006 10:20 PM | Link to this

They don’t like intellectual elites either.

It’s dangerous to be too smart in Iraq.

By Buy Danish

April 23, 2006 10:26 PM | Link to this

Hey! Discounted Liberals,

How did you get your 7 number to stay in? I had a 5 before mine and it turned into a bullet point.

By Nucular

April 23, 2006 11:00 PM | Link to this

8 more dead. But we’re WINNING! Democracy & freedom are on the march in Iraq & everywhere. God bless Murcuh!

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 11:03 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

Try it with no space like this I hope:

5.Danish

as oppossed to with a space

5. Danish

By RW-(the original)

April 23, 2006 11:08 PM | Link to this

Well maybe you just had to put the number inside the italics code.

test

5. Danish

By Discounted Liberals

April 23, 2006 11:32 PM | Link to this

The Dutch need to douche.

By i-r-o-diM

April 23, 2006 11:37 PM | Link to this

But I just can’t help myself. Bright ideas blind me.

By King Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 04:42 AM | Link to this

Specter suggests ‘windfall’ tax on oil April 24, 2006 The government should consider a tax on oil companies if they make excessive profits amid rising gasoline prices, a leading Republican senator said yesterday.

Government has created this mess, you would think the last people in the world we want working on it is Arlen Specter. If I was an oil exec, I’d jack the price up to $5 a gallon just because Specter opened his stupid pinko mouth.

Let’s try drilling for oil, increasing supply and creating surpluses, unless, of course, you want to keep playing stupid liberal games and driving the price up.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 05:06 AM | Link to this

But all of this is now past tense, and the White House, as well as senior staff at the Departments of Justice, State, and Defense, are attempting to identify possible leakers among their own career staffs with access to information that might be helpful to Democrats or the press.

Of greatest concern is the Department of Justice, the nexus of many terrorism and national security cases that would involve the White House, Defense and State Departments, as well as briefings on Capitol Hill to congressional leadership.

“We know we have people leaking materials. It’s been an ongoing problem, but until someone has taken the first step, and the McCarthy case would appear to be the first step, it’s hard to move against career staff,” says a current Defense Department staffer. “We have an IG looking at all kinds of things right now. Perhaps we’ll get some movement.”

Smoke those libs out.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 05:09 AM | Link to this

McCarthy is not, as one pundit said, a courageous American citizen exercising her First Amendment rights against an outrageous government policy. If there are no restrictions enforced by law, then there are no secrets. McCarthy is a traitor, someone who leaked top secret information and damaged our national security, risked the lives of Americans fighting a war, and disrupted our relations with nations that had been working with us against a new kind of enemy. McCarthy was an employee, not a policy maker. She has never been elected by the American people or appointed by the President to a position that would have entitled her to disclose that information.

She violated her highest duty because her political beliefs were opposed to the policy that the President had established. Her disclosure was politically motivated. She wanted to thwart the policy of the President, and she achieved her goal by committing a felony. McCarthy should be prosecuted and punished to the fullest extent the law allows. As should her fellow CIA leakers and manipulators of policy.

Amen.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 05:12 AM | Link to this

The liberal media is so consumed with its hatred for George Bush that it has lost any sense of loyalty to our nation. This year it gave its highest professional award — the Pulitzer Prize — to Dana Priest for her CIA prisons stories and to James Risen, the New York Times reporter who wrote the stories that revealed the NSA terrorist surveillance program. There is not even a debate among the press about whether these reporters should be chastised instead of rewarded. To the contrary, these Pulitzer Prizes make every reporter more eager to discover and publish America’s secrets regardless of the consequences to our soldiers and our nation.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:03 AM | Link to this

So maybe there is some truth to the idea that you and your enemy can have alot in common, that being everyone wishing liberals would shut up, but the real question of Bin Laden remains unasked:

So what did you think of “BrokeDick Mountain?”

By Huge

April 24, 2006 07:11 AM | Link to this

No Dollar, er…child, Left Behind. The Republican family values graft machine just keeps rolling along…

Nearly four years after she lost the Republican primary for governor and more than a year after being indicted, Schrenko will stand trial on charges that she helped steal more than $600,000 in federal funds meant for deaf students. Prosecutors allege that she funneled about half the money to her unsuccessful campaign and that $9,300 of it went for a face-lift.

By Republican Family Values

April 24, 2006 07:43 AM | Link to this

Schrenko theft, conspiracy trial begins this week

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 24, 2006 07:59 AM | Link to this

What the hey, here’s a drive by cut and paste ala anyone you don’t like: “60 Minutes Transcript, 4/23/06

BRADLEY: [In October 2002,] the CIA had made a major intelligence breakthrough on Iraq’s nuclear program. Naji Sabri, Iraq’s foreign minister, had made a deal to reveal Iraq’s military secrets to the CIA. Tyler Drumheller was in charge of the operation.

DRUMHELLER: This was a very high inner circle of Saddam Hussein, someone who would know what he was talking about.

BRADLEY: You knew you could trust this guy?

DRUMHELLER: We continued to validate him the whole way through.

BRADLEY: According to Drumheller, CIA Director George Tenet delivered the news about the Iraqi foreign minister at a high level meeting at the White House.

DRUMHELLER: The President, the Vice President, Dr. Rice…

BRADLEY: And at that meeting…?

DRUMHELLER: They were enthusiastic because they said they were excited that we had a high-level penetration of Iraqis.

BRADLEY: And what did this high level source tell you?

DRUMHELLER: He told us that they had no active weapons of mass destruction program.

BRADLEY: So, in the fall of 2002, before going to war, we had it on good authority from a source within Saddam’s inner circle that he didn’t have an active program for weapons of mass destruction?

DRUMHELLER: Yes.

BRADLEY: There’s no doubt in your mind about that?

DRUMHELLER: No doubt in my mind at all.

BRADLEY: It directly contradicts, though, what the President and his staff were telling us.

DRUMHELLER: The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy, to justify the policy.

BRADLEY: Drumheller expected the White House to ask for more information from the Iraqi foreign minister. He was taken aback by what happened.

DRUMHELLER: The group that was dealing with preparations for the Iraq war came back and said they’re no longer interested. And we said, “Well, what about the intel?” And they said, “Well, this isn’t about intel anymore. This is about regime change.”

BRADLEY: And if I understand you correctly, when the White House learned that you had this source from the inner circle of Saddam Hussein, they were thrilled with that.

DRUMHELLER: The first we heard, they were. Yes.

BRADLEY: But when they learned what it was that he had to say, that Saddam did not have the capability to wage nuclear war, weapons of mass destruction…?

DRUMHELLER: They stopped being interested in the intelligence.

BRADLEY: The White House declined to respond to Drumheller’s account of Naji Sabri’s role, but Secretary of State Rice has said that Sabri, the Iraqi foreign minister-turned-U.S. spy, was just one source, and therefore his information wasn’t reliable.

DRUMHELLER: They certainly took information that came from single sources on uranium, on the yellowcake story and on several other stories that had no corroboration at all, and so you can’t say you only listen to one source, because on many issues they only listened to one source.

BRADLEY: So you’re saying that if there was a single source and that information from that source backed up the case they were trying to build, then that single source was okay, but if it didn’t, then the single source was not okay because he couldn’t be corroborated.

DRUMHELLER: Unfortunately, that’s what it looks like.”

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 08:00 AM | Link to this

Oh Goody!

Huge Clown has morphed into RPV and now we get to read the same story twice.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 08:48 AM | Link to this

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on LTD.

Rather apologized in September for a “mistake in judgment” in relying on apparently bogus documents for a “60 Minutes Wednesday” report charging that Bush received favorable treatment in the Texas Air National Guard three decades ago. But the apology followed 10 days in which Rather and his network doggedly defended the story despite mounting evidence, some of it assembled by Internet bloggers, that the memos in question could not have been written on an early 1970s government typewriter. CBS asked former attorney general Dick Thornburgh and former Associated Press chief Louis D. Boccardi to head an outside inquiry.

Let me define “STUPID”……LTD and anyone else who watches SeeBS and fails to SeeBias.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this

It figures that the libs would trust national security to the CIA/ See BS/ 60 Minutes, like it’s their big overriding concern to keep America safe:

McCarthy was not alone among the CIA’s analysts and decision makers. As I have written many times, the CIA has been in open revolt against the President since 9-11. Failing to foresee the fall of the Soviet Union, the terrorist attacks before, including and after 9-11, and just about everything else that mattered, the CIA has been an utter failure in the mission it was created to perform. Instead, it has been operating covertly against the government by mounting operations such as the Joe Wilson Niger trip, which was planned and performed only to discredit the President’s position that Iraq was seeking uranium for a revived nuclear weapons program. CIA bureaucrats have been spending a lot of time and effort to discredit the President while fighting against the change that will transform it from the failure it has been to an agency that can meet the needs of a nation at war. And in doing so it has fueled the opposition press with these leaks.

If you libs want to be stupid, go ahead, but don’t involve the safety of the nation in your blooming ignorance. You are the only people in the freaking world that doesn’t associate CBS and Dan Rather with irrelevancy. The National Guard fake memo was the ultimate act of a child and CBS let it slide and even affirmed it with the “fake but accurate” BS. It’s almost comical, except for the fact that we all know CBS is rotten to the core.

See BS and anyone who quotes them are anti American POS.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 09:10 AM | Link to this

Democrats stuck on stupid. A viable candidate committed to national security, and the DNC shoots themselves in the foot. God help ‘em, for they know not what they do.

By Jesus

April 24, 2006 09:20 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By getalife

April 24, 2006 09:37 AM | Link to this

Since the current administration is not credible and you can’t believe anything they say, their 30% supporters have the same credibility problem.

Their rhetoric is laughable and nothing else.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

I know you libs don’t like to read links, but try to think in progressive terms like Rummy. Self-serving generals aren’t looking after you, they’re looking after their self-serving butts or budgets. Take your pick!

By Republican Family Values

April 24, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this

We all know that sooner or later the Republicans will have to have the Democrats clean up their messes, just like they always do. Looks like they are already tapping Joe Lieberman to start the job! ^^^9:10 (SOS)

By Huge

April 24, 2006 10:04 AM | Link to this

David Koresh?!! Now there’s a blast from the past! I saw an earlier post where that repulsive religious madman was actually referred to as an inspiration!! (Fortunately, he’s toast; otherwise he could run with that other demented oddball Robertson on the fire and brimstone ticket.) Its hard to believe, in this day and age, that anyone would model themself after that…

Branch Davidians believe that Koresh will someday return to Earth. Some hoped, based on Daniel 12:12, that this would occur 1,335 days after his death: December 14, 1996. The Hidden Manna faction believed that it would take place on August 6, 1999, then October 20, and now March 2012. Other survivors avoid date-setting. David Koresh said that he would come back when an earthquake has occurred in the town. (or when hell freezes over, whichever comes first!)

By Dusty

April 24, 2006 10:07 AM | Link to this

This “General” story is getting older than the generals. What could Luckovich be sketching up this morning? Do you think his “inspiration” goes like this?

Let’s see. Hardly any Repub stories. Oh, yeah. Schrenko! Great!

How about a feather boa, lotsa lip gloss, high heels, taking food out of the mouths of poor starving school children. Yeah, that’s it! And put a picture of the president on the wall behind her.

Hey, Tucker, Bookie, does that sound good to you? No? Not Bushie enough? OK. I’ll dig up something with the Chinese president. There wasn’t anything but that doesn’t matter. I’ll think of something.

Dum de dum! Let the Pulitzers come!

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 10:09 AM | Link to this

Wow, such progress in Iraq! I mean, we’re only down to 7 bombs in Iraq today. Woo hoo! Single digits (so far) baby. I’m very sorry I ever doubted Rummy, Shrubby and Darth Cheneus.

By getalife

April 24, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

I told you their rhetoric is laughable and always wrong:

OBL is not dead Andy.

Then there is this

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this

small: That was a fake poster, using Danish’s name, that found David Koresh to be an inspiration. You are reveling in the make believe world of the pinko liberal, fake life, full of lies and deception.

Having fun?

By Dusty

April 24, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

Yeah, Rushncap, woo hoo!

Why don’t you just say “Lose the conflict in Iraq!? Make USA look bad so liberals can win an election. Lose! Lose! Bring ‘em home. Cut ‘n’run. Woo hoo!”

Your cute little names are so impressive. I’m sure you’ve got more. But nobody really cares. You are just the standard loser.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 10:25 AM | Link to this

By getalife April 24, 2006 10:15 AM OBL is not dead Andy.

Hey, at least you libs have something to be happy about this morning.

I’m proud for you. Really.

By RW-(the original)

April 24, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this

rushncap,

This rash of bombings in Baghdad today wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that Iraq finally made some real progress toward forming their unity government, now would it?

By Fartful Dodger

April 24, 2006 10:30 AM | Link to this

Republicans must all suffer from acute constipation since none of ‘em give a crap about America, just the booty they make from war profiteering!

If Dusty’s ass gets anymore jiggly, Bill Cosby’s gonna stick a spoon in it.

By getalife

April 24, 2006 10:31 AM | Link to this

Ann’s new book launches on Devil’s Day

By Fartful Dodger

April 24, 2006 10:36 AM | Link to this

President Bush is staying the course in Iraq. He must have 85 pound cajones. Since he weighs 170 that makes him only half-nuts!

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 10:37 AM | Link to this

Awww, Dusty, what, the “li’l andy school for neocon brainwashing” got out early today, and you’re the only one left?

For the record, we have different approach to losing. When I see we’re losing, I say to myself “Hey, what can we do to win?” And in this case, getting rid of everyone responsible for this colossal failure is the first step. It’s the easiest and most obvious step, but one without which the rest cannot be taken. You, on the other hand, when you see that’s we’re losing, say to yourself “Well, it’s unpatriotic to admit reality, so let me instead circle the wagon and support to the grave those who are responsible.” Differences of approach, Dusty. The real loser is the person who is obviously losing but is refusing to admit that fact. And that is you.

By Dusty

April 24, 2006 10:39 AM | Link to this

Artless dodger,

Your mouth is so dirty that dogs wouldn’t lick your face.

Are you Rushncap’s twin?

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this

Only a “stuck on stupid” liberal like RFV would see a moderate democrat like Lieberman, capable of drawing votes from moderate conservatives and democrats alike, and shoot himself in the foot like the DNC with his “stuck on stupid” post at 9:50.

He’d probably like to see a “Kerry Kinda Fonda” candidate lose-r.

By Dusty

April 24, 2006 10:49 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

While you are on recess at libby’s little retreat for losing liberals, let me answer you.

We have won in Iraq. The Reconstruction takes time and sacrifice. If you had any faith in the abilities and freedom of your own country, you could see it. But your head is so stuck in liberal propaganda, you prefer to lose what we have won. Don’t ask for my sympathy. I consider your choices less than patriotic.

By i-r-o-diM

April 24, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

All I can do is fart and hope people find the smell alluring.

i-r-o-diM, Sorry :{

By getalife

April 24, 2006 10:53 AM | Link to this

Not proud Andy.

Ashamed we had to veer off course to Iraq instead of getting him.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 10:59 AM | Link to this

It was Huge who said he didn’t like namejackers. Now we see why. They make him look stupid and that’s not compatible with his huge ego.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 11:17 AM | Link to this

To quote Dusty: “We have won in Iraq.”

I mean, what do you do with a person who insists, no matter what, that 2+2=22? With a logical person, you can talk. You can debate. You can bring up points, evidence, logical arguments. With someone like Dusty… well, the best you can do is shake your head and just pray that your own children don’t have birth defects or single-digit IQs.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

rushncap: Your putting the cart before the horse aren’t you?:

best you can do is shake your head and just pray that your own children

Don’t you like have to have sex with a woman first?

By Dusty

April 24, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Have no worry. None of my children have birth defects and none are out carrying protest signs. Some are working and some are finishing their education, like the one who is getting a PhD in bio-science.

Your main contribution to the war effort has been name calling. I don’t consider that points, evidence or logic. Liberals think that is the only way to enhance our government and encourage the troops. Cut’n’run is your banner.

I did not think we could snap our fingers in Iraq and have a Cinderella rebuild. We did win the war. The Iraqis are building a government. You can dismiss that as losing. I don’t. But I can use logic.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 11:45 AM | Link to this

Mary McCarthy’s position — the post from which she is likely to have learned the most sensitive information at the heart of the leak controversy — was inside the CIA’s inspector general’s office. This is the unit that investigates internal misconduct. This is the unit to which government employees are encouraged to report government abuse or illegality so it can be investigated, potentially reported to Congress, and prosecuted if appropriate.

That is, it is the legal alternative to leaking national secrets to the media.

It is, therefore, the process that has to be protected if our intelligence community is to have credibility with the public and with the foreign intelligence services on which we are so dependent. If it becomes just another Washington sieve — a place where people who comply with their oaths and exercise professional discretion may nevertheless expect to find the information they confide trumpeted on Page One of the Washington Post — we are guaranteed to have much more leaking. And much less security.

Cleaning government’s own house in such weighty matters is one of the principal reasons why we have federal law enforcement.

Let’s use it.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 11:47 AM | Link to this

li’l andy, I’m not going to expain about the birds and the bees to you on here. Ask your mommy.

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 11:49 AM | Link to this

The selection of a compromise prime minister in Iraq is a major victory for that country’s fledgling political class, and for the Bush administration. Purveyors of doom on Iraq now have some explaining to do: If the country is in the midst of a full-scale civil war fatal to our project there, how is it that elected representatives of the major factions were able to sit down and hammer out an agreement on the top positions in a national unity government? Iraq pessimists act like they have a special immunity from ever having to recalibrate their view of the conflict, as they instead move on to the latest iteration of their metaphysical despair.

Either that or they’re blooming idiots.

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

(Fortunately, he’s toast; otherwise he could run with that other demented oddball Robertson on the fire and brimstone ticket.

Huge Clown,

Not only are you a sanctimonious prig who can’t tell a fake entry from a real one, but you’re a Huge idiot too.

How many innocent children died at Waco to turn Koresh into “toast”? Could you be any more stupid?

I don’t think you are in any position to call someone else a “demented oddball”!

By getalife

April 24, 2006 12:07 PM | Link to this

Let’s use it.

This is where I agree with you.

Leaks, corruption and ethics to clean up Washington.

By Huge

April 24, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

My bad. It’s hard to keep up with all of the little brats around here… Speaking of which; It was Huge who said he didn’t like namejackers., Are we to infer this ship in distress does. Again, hard to believe…

Alas, matey - no bites on the Koresh thing? I would have loved to see some of his closet supporters and the local hate speech gang (oops! there’s that word again!) take the bait…

By Elian Gonzalez

April 24, 2006 12:23 PM | Link to this

Thank God Clinton didn’t arrest David Koresh in Waco instead of burning all those innocent children alive. His and Reno’s bloodlust might have forced them to murder me otherwise.

By Huge

April 24, 2006 12:23 PM | Link to this

Hey Dusty, Why not the Schrenko story? It’s a current and valid topic for discourse, no? Some here probably voted for her. Scary…

In 1994, Schrenko, a former teacher, became the first woman to win statewide elected office in Georgia and the first Republican to run the state’s education agency. She was re-elected in 1998 and was considered a leading candidate for governor in 2002.

Obviously, the democrats have no monoply on corruption, either at the national level or here in Georgia.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 12:36 PM | Link to this

In response to Huge’s Koresh comment. Or do you see this as a nibble?

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

How many innocent children died at Waco to turn Koresh into “toast”? Could you be any more stupid?

Stop while your “a head”. You’re outmatched.

By RW-(the original)

April 24, 2006 12:37 PM | Link to this

Huge Clown/Idiot,

Linda Schrenko is going on trial right now. If guilty she should be punished to the full extent of the law.

Any more pearls of brilliance you’d like to share with us?

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

I sure wouldn’t want to be this CIA leaker Mary Mcarthy, Dana Priest, Joe Wilson or, for that matter, a recent pulitzer prize winner. This whole nasty little sordid liberal affair is fixin to come clean. All of these anti American rats are going to be smoked out of their rotten little pinko garbage pile.

This is going to be like shooting pinkos in a barrel.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

Sadly a “Huge” fish in a little pond just waiting to be scooped up by Eagles.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 12:48 PM | Link to this

li’l andy, isn’t it your naptime yet?

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 12:49 PM | Link to this

Alas, matey - no bites on the Koresh thing? I would have loved to see some of his closet supporters and the local hate speech gang (oops! there’s that word again!) take the bait…

Demented Oddball (HUGE-I’m talking to you),

First off, are you “the Pirate” by any chance? I mean, what’s up with the ship lingo? I’m trying to connect Waco to ships and try as I might, I can’t do it.

Secondly, you got 2 bites - one from me and one from Elian Gonzales and the result is that you are now an official member of the Castrati Party.

Hope the bathtub crew will still let you join them for the weekly hoisting of the Jolly Roger.

If not, being a Castrati must be PROTECTED under Federal Disability laws, so if they kick you out of the tub, you can always file a lawsuit alleging discrimination AND hate speech.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 12:56 PM | Link to this

Huge used his Schrenko story to counteract LS&L’s link on the Dana Priest leak. Only Huge could find any correlation between the two.

One story jeopardizes national security for our allies as well as us. The other a “theft by taking” scandal pending investigation. Huge is picking petty points to make his Huge points.

Stop it Huge, your embarrassing the other liberals here.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 01:11 PM | Link to this

Can’t rushncap join the Castrati Party too? His posts have been pretty pathetic this morning!

By Huge

April 24, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

Listen carefully now and try to use some logic. Koresh is repulsive because HE had such a big hand in getting those people killed. Can you not read? Do you not understand clearly, written standard English. Maybe you want those children and other innocents dead as a way of making your stupid point, but that’s your deal.

You hear and see only what you want to hear and see. But it really is telling about you to try and make connections where there are none. Quit using the stupidity and evil arguement as your primary weapon. Have you no soul, no remorse, nothing but your hatred for people with differing ideas?

Koresh wanted to martyr himself. That he did it the way he did, just fuels your blood lust and righteous indignance at everyone else, in this case, the federal agents, some of whom were murdered by this creepy gang.

By Huge

April 24, 2006 01:29 PM | Link to this

First jimmy swaggert, then rush limbaugh, and now ann coulter. Man, it s fun to watch these lying do-gooder GOP types get caught red-handed doing the VERY things that they abuse others for. The absolute heights of hypocrisy, but heroes to some anyway. Go figure…

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this

This is what taking on the United States Army will get you:

Thus, it is no surprise that bin Laden now seeks to direct his movement’s energies elsewhere, both to the Palestinian Authority and Sudan. In the Al Jazeera excerpts bin Laden pays a great deal of attention to the latter, calling on his followers “to prepare all that is necessary to fight a long-term war against the Crusader thieves in western Sudan.”

From a cave, your boy is talking about kicking as-s in Sudan. This dude really is a pinko.

By Huge

April 24, 2006 01:42 PM | Link to this

OK. Off to go make money. Talk among yourselves while I’m gone.

By Dusty

April 24, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Since you mentioned my name, I don’t care to remain on your “blotter”.

Shrenko is what you might call a common criminal. It was greed not politics that was her downfall. RW explained it to you.

Luckovich is a political cartoonist. He seldom goes for the little folk, or “grabbing at straws”. Schrenko is a straw.

Let us wait a while and see what comes up next.. In the meantime, I am busy doing something useful.

By B.P.O.E

April 24, 2006 01:47 PM | Link to this

Happenings: Weekly meeting of the “Twice” support group. A self support group that tries to come to grips with the devastating guilt and depression that inflicts people who voted for George W Bush twice.

Where: Marietta Elks Lodge

When: Tonight, 7:30

Special note: Get there early! They only have room for 150 and they fill up early.

By test

April 24, 2006 01:49 PM | Link to this

test 1@1:48

By test

April 24, 2006 01:50 PM | Link to this

test 2@1:50

By test

April 24, 2006 01:55 PM | Link to this

It’s a date…screw the AJC Webmaster @ 1:54. Are we having to wait while Mike doodles?

By test

April 24, 2006 02:06 PM | Link to this

“Dat Damned Ol’ Scribbler - Dat Pulitzer Price Winner” by Test #4

What does he care if de world’s got troubles? What does he care if de land ain’t free? Dat Ol’ Scribbler Dat damned Ol’ Scribbler He mus’ know sumpin’ But don’t say nuthin’, He jes’ keeps rollin’, He keeps on rollin’ along. He don’t plant taters, He don’t plant cotton, An’ dem dat plants ‘em Is soon forgotten, But Ol’ Man Scribbler, He jes’ keeps rollin’ along

By test

April 24, 2006 03:00 PM | Link to this

Let’s do this right…

“Dat Damed Ol’ Scribbler - Dat Pulitzer Prize Winner”

Lyrics: Test #5

What does he care if de world’s got troubles?

What does he care if de land ain’t free?

Oh Dat Scribbler

Dat Damned Ol’ Scribbler

He mus’ know sumpin’ But don’t say nuthin’,

He jes’ keeps rollin’,

He keeps on rollin’ along.

He don’t plant taters,

He don’t plant cotton,

An’ dem dat plants ‘em

Is soon forgotten,

Dat Damned Ol’ Scribbler,

He jes’ keeps rollin’ along

Thankya, thankya very much.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 03:26 PM | Link to this

OH MY GAWD!

McKinney, a Democrat, came out swinging against the Bush Administration, reiterating her criticisms of the President on the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and Iraq War.

“Now we’re talking about a nuclear strike on [Iran],” she told reporters. “This is something the American people can’t even imagine”.

Cynthia, in your wildest imagination, you couldn’t come up with a brain per chance? We didn’t think so!!!!

By Republican Family Values

April 24, 2006 03:51 PM | Link to this

Elian Gonzales 2004

Seems like Elian is taking Karate lessons, has a girlfriend, loves his life in Cuba, and IS LIVING WITH HIS FATHER instead of distant “relatives” here in the USA.

Those with Republican Family Values really, really, HATE that!

By Parthenia

April 24, 2006 03:53 PM | Link to this

I ask again, WHERE ARE THE CYNTHIA MC KINNEY CARTOONS? Surely there’s enough fodder there to merit at least one humorous cartoon. Bring it on!

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 24, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this

Bush’s approval ratings slide to new low Poll: Only one-third say he’s handling his job well

By candide

April 24, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this

A lot of our problems could be eased if we de-criminalized rape.

By test

April 24, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

test

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this

Al Qaeda drew a line in the sands of the Sunni Triangle, and the United States Army and Marines walked right across it. First, al Qaeda tried to kill Americans, per bin Laden’s orders. It largely failed. Then al Qaeda went after America’s allies, and succeeded only in turning public opinion against itself in every Muslim country it attacked. After thirty months of battlefield defeats and political embarrassments, bin Laden won’t even mention Iraq in one of his rare public utterances, and he rallies his troops to fight a war where American soldiers aren’t. How humiliating. How delightful.

Al Qaeda has lost in Iraq, and bin Laden is desperate to change the subject. He and his organization are at grave risk of being discredited, and when that happens it will be much harder for al Qaeda to attract recruits, raise money, or deal with governments.

Hat tip to TigerHawk, who only forgot to add one thing to a very excellent thesis:

Bush kicked that as-s. Yeeesssss!

By El Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 05:42 PM | Link to this

Features daily newscast with Michelle Malkin

That’s reason by itself to tune in!

Washington, DC {PRWEB via PR Web Direct} April 24, 2006 — Hot Air (http://www.hotair.com), the world’s first conservative Internet broadcast network, launches today. Founder and CEO Michelle Malkin leads a multi-talented, tech-savvy staff on the cutting edge of the Internet video/TV convergence.

By El Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

Alright you POS pinko liberals, go to Google.com, type in “failure” and click on “I’m Feeling Lucky.” That will shut you piece of sh-its up about Bush’s 32% approval rating.

By Buswhacker

April 24, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

Yup, Al Qaeda is quaking in their boots. People who present international press releases usually are just really cowering in fear don’t you know. The Islamic community hates ‘em so much that they won’t even touch the $25 million dollar bounty offered for bin Laden.

Yup, Bush kicked that as-s. Yeeesssss!

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

SOS, I’m not planning to castrate anyone. If you want that performed, use your teeth. I’m more into mentally emasculating the likes of you, li’l andy, Dusty, Danish and RW. But even that is getting difficult, as there seems to be nothing left to emasculate any more. I mean, we have Dusty and li’l andy declaring that we have “won in Iraq” on the same day as 7 bombs killed 10 people in Baghdad (injuring 80), and at least 15 people were killed in other bombings around the country. If this happened in America, they would be screaming “Apocalypse!”. Since it happened in Iraq, they’re screaming “Victory!” There is no need to emasculate these people. They have no dignity or brain left.

By getalife

April 24, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

Andy, I did the google thing and got this.

By RW-(the original)

April 24, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this

getalife,

What do you know about this guy?

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 06:07 PM | Link to this

Huge/RFV still don’t/doesn’t get it. Now I’m embarrassed for him/them. There’s not enough dirt to cover his/their Huge f*** from this morning.

For those who think conservatives are a bunch of “meanies”. NO, we won’t be the ones with the shovel. Huge/RFV are doing a great job all by himself/themselves.

rushncap’s circumcision at birth was obviously done improperly and he seems to be suffering from some sort of irritation.

Candide, a liberal needs to explain her post 5:05 post for everyone here. Should be interesting!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

04/20/06 FOX Poll: Gloomy Economic Views; Bush Approval at New Low Thursday, April 20, 2006

In addition, views on the economy are glum; most Americans rate the current economy negatively, and twice as many say it feels like the economy is getting worse rather than better. These are just some of the findings of the latest FOX News national poll.

I really don’t give a flying f about your silly a-ss polls because apparently the people they ask these questions must be losers, like you libs in here.

Negative economy?????

By getalife

April 24, 2006 06:14 PM | Link to this

I am heartened by all the killing in Egypt today. I was feeling kinda low.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 06:18 PM | Link to this

You’re not a “bunch of meanies”, SOS. You’re a bunch or idiots. There’s a palpable difference. Some, like yourself, and those on this board, are belligerent meanies, but that’s merely a subset, albeit a rather large one. I will not even go into your curiosity about my supposed circumcision. It is a shame, however, that they didn’t cut nearly high enough when they performed your father’s. Cheers!

By Bushwhacker

April 24, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

I don’t know about you but hearing bin Laden speak gave me a woody. I played with my weiner all afternoon until it started to get raw. Maybe tomorrow it will be better.

By getalife

April 24, 2006 06:22 PM | Link to this

6:14 not mine.

RW,

You mean this guy?

I will take the fifth on this one.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 06:24 PM | Link to this

Errr, li’l andy, did you notice who took the poll? It was Fox, and if there is a more right-wing quasi-respectable organization out there, please let us know. Hell, if even the Fox poll finds that people are p**…. wow. Shrubby is getting some seriously historical disapproval ratings. At this rate maybe even andy or Danish will remove heads from rectums (recti?) within a year or so, and see the light. I’m not holding my breath, but I figure stranger things have happened, right?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:27 PM | Link to this

S.O.S: Never mind rushncap, he longs for the days of Saddam when the rape rooms were in business and the wood chipper/ mass grave shop was open 24/7. This American success and freedom p** his stupid socialist a-ss off, as I’m sure you can tell.

Plus he’s a wanker, so there is really no help for him.

By RW-(the original)

April 24, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

getalife,

That’s the one. I figured you were an investor in Jaguar’s.

By Bushwhacker

April 24, 2006 06:34 PM | Link to this

6:20 not mine^^^. In case anyone has missed it “the Pirate” has also posted under “Monkey Watch” and likes to stir things up here between the libs and cons. This is what they do for “fun”. Glad I can add a little amusement for them if that’s all they got!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this

rushncap: You thinking that Faux news is “conservative” might be because you are a sap. I’ve given hundreds of examples of liberal sis-sy BS that they post and also predicted that they will endorse Hillary in 08. O’Reilly is a masher, a cad who gropes his office help like a certain pinko president did.

When I see that the poll respondents find the economy to be “gloomy” I know that the people are failures who probably shouldn’t be answering questions about things they don’t even understand.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 06:43 PM | Link to this

li’l andy, if you think I read all, nearly all, most, or many of your posts, you’re far more delusional than I thought. Tell me, does your Welfare check pay for your internet connection, or do you camp out at the local library all day? There is no way you could be holding down an actual job considering how much you’re on here.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:44 PM | Link to this

Sunday, April 23, 2006 Emanations from a Cave’

7. Arab Liberals: Jihadists must silence the Arab and Muslim liberals. (A list has been established, but it wasn’t aired).

While the moron American liberals cheer him on.

By Buswhacker April 24, 2006 05:53 PM The Islamic community hates ‘em so much that they won’t even touch the $25 million dollar bounty offered for bin Laden

Useful idiots are alive and well.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:48 PM | Link to this

Bushwhacker you piece of sh-it. You’re the one that’s been jacking all along. Only a stinkin pinko like you would do it.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 06:48 PM | Link to this

rushncap, just reach down there and scratch it or wack it. We’ll turn our heads. If you’re going to moan and groan though, let us know. We’ll have to cover our ears too.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this

Windfall profits?:

Is it taxes? Nooooooo. Although they remain a huge part of the cost of gasoline, they have crept up only slowly in the last three years. Taxes cost you about $0.42 per gallon on average. So the next time you hear Sen. Chuck Schumer (D.-N.Y.) worrying about the price of gas having an impact on “working families,” such as those who I imagine work for him, just remember that the Federal government could lower the price of gas $0.184 per gallon overnight, if it simply suspended the excise tax it impacts upon those poor working families. State governments could reduce the cost by more than $0.22, if they really wished to.

41 cents a gallon. 41 cents a gallon regardless of what a barrel of oil costs. Who’s “gouging” who?

By @@

April 24, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this

Today was a beautiful day. Blue skies “white” sun!

Why am I looking at the same cartoon?

By rekcaHwhsuB

April 24, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

I’m just a worthless pinko liberal who has to name jack to get their rocks off.

rekcaHwhsuB Sucks and Lies. :{

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

I haven’t held down a job since I got fired from my job as a mall security guard for excesive “frisking.” That’s why I purchased my Asian (minority) bride, so I could have her clean houses, earn $250 a week, and keep my internet service going. Since she ran off with the Mexican, I’m back in mom’s trailer. Do you have a problem with that, you peace of sh-it? Its the American way- Milwahkee’s Best, Marlboro cigs, and America’s Most Wanted on the tube. With those going for me, I can stay on here 24/7, you p*y liberal pinko @#$%^&*&.

By Bushwhacker

April 24, 2006 07:04 PM | Link to this

You know, I can’t tell if the 6:48^^^ is Suck or not. The Pirate has him nailed to a tee if it’s a jack.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:06 PM | Link to this

By rushncap April 24, 2006 06:43 PM li’l andy, There is no way you could be holding down an actual job considering how much you’re on here.

By rushncap April 24, 2006 10:09 AM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 10:37 AM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 11:17 AM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 11:47 AM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 12:48 PM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 05:53 PM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 06:18 PM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 06:24 PM

By rushncap April 24, 2006 06:43 PM

What was I saying about liberal hypocrisy, that these libs were too stupid to realize they scold other people for things that they also do?

Moron.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:06 PM | Link to this

My name is Andy. I’m an idiot and completely obvious. No matter what name I use, even when I’m being a namejacking wanker, everyone can tell it’s me because no one else is as fouled mouthed, misguided, and just plain stupid; no one’s even close. I am an embarrassment to my long-gone Asian bride and my tobacco-chewing, trailer-park queen mother. I’m the only one who doesn’t see it. Ignorance is bliss.

By The Pirate

April 24, 2006 07:07 PM | Link to this

Oh Mr Bushwacker - guess again BriteBoy™, as I’ve not posted here as anyone other than The Pirate. I have no interest in attending to multiple digi-id’s, or misleading anyone for that matter…

OTOH, go ahead and assume what you’d like - you’ve evidently got everything figured out already as it stands. A little advice - take a clean rag and wipe down your keyboard. It’s that thingy sitting in front of the terminal with all the keys. Are you a manager or something? Sad proof of the Dilbert principle…

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:09 PM | Link to this

Rest easy, Bushwanker, I be not a pinko, trust me.

All wankers are libs and all libs are wankers, you know?

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:11 PM | Link to this

I’m proud to be in the 32% of America that still have their heads halfway up George Bush’s rectum. We are the only chosen ones left and the rest of you piece of sh-it pinko liberals will be left here when the rapture comes this summer.

By Bushwhacker

April 24, 2006 07:13 PM | Link to this

rekcaHwhsuB @ 6:56- ok that just HAS to be suck, I think?

Jacker, libs don’t fall off the deep end like cons do. Sorry to disappoint.

PS- the Suck from 7:01 is way too obvious.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:18 PM | Link to this

All wankers are libs and all libs are wankers. All conservatives lack a basic education. All conservatives are religious extremists. All conservatives pretend they have morals but lack in moral fiber. All conservatives pretend to value life but will be the first to root for the taking of lives. All conservatives are no different than Muslim fanatic lunatics.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:21 PM | Link to this

It looks like I’ve obviously upset one of the dimmer liberals in here for what ever reason. Watch their ignorance blossom as they attack me because they are too stupid and dense to intellectually defend themselves.

Is it Midori, rushncap, Gadimlib, it could be any of these dumba-sses, who knows?

Who ever it is, they have surrendered to my vast intellectual ability, I win again.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:26 PM | Link to this

It is kind of funny, the only other people that fall for this ignorant liberal name jacking is ignorant liberals. They contribute to liberal ignorance by being too stupid to distinguish in between a dense hopeless liberal and the superior intellect of the Conservatives. I encourage you wankers to use this Liberals Suck And Lie name to make absolute fools out of your fellow dumba-ss liberal pinkos. You make us Conservatives look good.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 07:29 PM | Link to this

No! Don’t come home, just send money.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:30 PM | Link to this

I’m am so smart. How can the rest of you not see that? I am infallible. I have George Bush and Jesus on my side, not to mention RW and Danish. Enough said. Piece of sh-it.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:32 PM | Link to this

One person and I have the libs all twisted up in their ignorance. Anybody can see that they are too stupid to defend themselves all they can do is hide behind my name and display their stupidity. And you have to be ignorant to fall for it, Bushwanker.

I win again. I am the scourge of liberalism, they can’t deal with me.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:33 PM | Link to this

Us Conservatives look good as we drag our knuckles across the ground and worship figments of someone else’s imagination.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:36 PM | Link to this

Ignorant pinko liberal pinko stupid ignorant wanker liberal ignorant stupid pinko dumba-ss ignorant liberal stupid pinko dumba-ss piece of sh-it.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:39 PM | Link to this

Poor little wanker, are you getting tired of me dancing in your a-ss? I am good at making you liberals look like the stupid clowns that you really are. It hurts hearing how sorry you are, doesn’t it? I’m kicking your a-ss, aren’t I? You can’t deal with me, I’m too good for you.

By getalife

April 24, 2006 07:39 PM | Link to this

I saw a good illegal immigration protest sign today.

“Its illegal stupid”!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:41 PM | Link to this

Everybody knows that Liberals Suck And Lie and if they don’t then let’s get some stupid moron liberal to post it up their for me. You are too stupid to see that you are my bi-tch.

I’m good.

By rushncap

April 24, 2006 07:41 PM | Link to this

li’l andy, you post about 10 to 20 times as much as me. That’s the difference between us there.

SOS, I have no idea why you want me to masturbate in front of you, but I’m not about to do that. Why don’t you go to the nearest corner and take out a $20 bill, and see what happens. Good luck.

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 07:42 PM | Link to this

The antidote to rushncap! A blog called “Done with Mirrors”

Real men hate Islamofascism.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:43 PM | Link to this

Come on, little wanker, let’s put it up there where they can see it, that Liberals Suck And Lie. Let’s stick it right at the top of Luckovich’s webblog, we’ll show him for liking the open honest debate in here. Let’s make him proud.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:45 PM | Link to this

I am NOT an animal! I”m a man dammit!!!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:46 PM | Link to this

Let’s show them, wanker. Keep posting my name, idiot, let’s get it up there where all the people coming to the AJC can see that Liberals Suck And Lie, you pinko genius.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:48 PM | Link to this

Oh, and I almost forgot. Piece of sh-it!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:49 PM | Link to this

What’s the matter, little wanker, did I kick your as-s again? Time to crawl back under your slimy little pinko rock until it is safe to come out and be a big bad brave wanker? To steal my name behind my back like a real lib would?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:53 PM | Link to this

Pinko commie liberal. At least Buy Danish knows what it’s like to be a REAL man.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:55 PM | Link to this

There you go, you little wanker, get that Liberals Suck And Lie up there at the top, let’s keep it right out front. Show everybody how smart you are, how considerate you are, to come in here and mess with everybody else because you don’t like what they say and you are too stupid to do anything about it. Show us your ignorance.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 07:55 PM | Link to this

Suck: Mommy, why do those mean people keep picking on me?

Mommy: It’s OK, Pookie, they’re all going to rot in hell.

Suck: But Mommy, why can’t they see that I’m always right?

Mommy: They’re just being normal, Snookums. (Rolls her eyes and thinks, Jeez, what a little retard)

Suck: How come they don’t idolize George Bush like we do?

Mommy: When you get a little older, I’ll explain it you, but it’s got sometyhing to do with some evil concept called democracy.

Suck: Well, when daddy gets home I’ll tell him and he’ll kick their asses, right?

Mommy: We can only hope, Honey Buns, We can only hope.

By mgc

April 24, 2006 07:55 PM | Link to this

Liberals Suck And Lie - do have a problem with touching yourself too much? You use the word wanker way too often. You should seek help for that.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 07:58 PM | Link to this

Come on lib, Liberals Suck And Lie, remember? Stick with the message here. Don’t get tired now and say some more nasty things so everybody knows what a real wanker is.

Show them how I’m kicking your a-ss. Let everybody know you can’t deal with me, I’m too good.

By mgc

April 24, 2006 08:03 PM | Link to this

You are right, Libs suck and are wankers!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:03 PM | Link to this

Let’s show cartoon boy how this is done, let’s make his blog irrelevent. Let’s post a bunch of crap just because we are too ignorant to contribute and our little pinko liberal brain is too underdeveloped to fight back with proof. Let’s make this a playpen for dense moron liberal children, after all, Liberals Suck And Lie.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:06 PM | Link to this

Let’s show our liberal lack of maturity to everyone, we can’t compete with the Conservatives so we will wreck this place with our blind ignorant rage. Let’s show the AJC how stupid it is to expect liberals to be able to conduct themselves like adults, to be able to not spaz out in their stupid mindless anger.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:08 PM | Link to this

Let’s show everybody how immature and ignorant liberals are, make them proud of you. Show them how they should join you in your ignorant pointless rage, surrendering intelligence to childish liberal tantrums. Prove to us all how much better Conservatives are.

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 08:08 PM | Link to this

From my 7:42, time to get serious:

According to the Moroccan-born MP, anti-Belgian racism is rife among Muslim street gangs. “This murder stinks of racism,” he said. “There is a growing group of criminal Moroccan and Turkish youths who go after victims who look like infidels. We have to fight racism in all its varieties, whether by the immigrants or the native community.” What Ahidar says is common knowledge but only he may say so. If a native Belgian makes such comments he or she risks being taken to court for racism by the authorities’ racism watchdog CEOOR, an instrument used by the government parties to silence political opponents.

HugeClown,

Does this qualify as a hate crime in your demented oddball Wikibrain?

Did you use Wiki to come up with the happy thought of the day that Koresh was “toast”?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:09 PM | Link to this

Mock Conservatives because they are better then you are. Why else would you do it? You are a failure and it is all that you have. You have lost. You are a loser.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 08:11 PM | Link to this

Looks like I’m going through a bit of a rough patch lately, so I thought I’d try and cheer myself up. I saw this demotivational poster and thought it was perfect (for me).

COMPROMISE

Lets agree to respect each other views, No matter how wrong yours may be.

BTW, I’m considering a job as a US ambassador. Does anyone think this is the wrong job-thingy for me?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:11 PM | Link to this

It’s people like you that have dragged the democratic party down to what it is today, out of power, losers. You liberals cannot control your neck bulging stupid rage, your vein popping ignorance. All you can do is mock and lose.

By GaDemLib

April 24, 2006 08:13 PM | Link to this

Suck,

Have you lost it completely? I log on after dinner and I find an hour of you arguing with yourself. We all realize you’re not bright, but look back over what you have posted the last hour. You are truly retarded.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:13 PM | Link to this

It must really suck to be so hopeless, to be unable to do anything to defnd yourself but some stupid playground taunt and hissy fit. You should be so proud, you ignorant failure, go on and call the government, see if they’ll come out and save you. Loser.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:16 PM | Link to this

You hate America because you couldn’t make it without America taking care of your every need. And you despise being so helpless. You think lashing out at good and trying to make it bad is going to even things up for you, you are wrong. You will always be a failure, mocking me because I’m better then you proves it.

By i-r-o-diM

April 24, 2006 08:18 PM | Link to this

I should never have eaten all those beans. I’m full of beans. Now I’m farting all over the screen hoping everybody blames it on the other guy whose names I post under.

I didn’t do it, he did.

i-r-o-diM. Sorry!:{

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 08:21 PM | Link to this

To self: Where’s rw and bd when I need them? I’m taking an absolute a$$-pounding here and those fools are doing nothing to stop it! I need to find some other toadies to replace those idiots. There not very smart, but they can be useful little worms. Bwahahahahah!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:23 PM | Link to this

See what I mean about the only ones stupid enough to fall for the wankers are wankers?:

By GaDemLib April 24, 2006 08:13 PM Suck, Have you lost it completely?

Aren’t you other libs just so proud of your fellow failure making an as-s out of another lib?

Losers.

By kjhfoIfh;'p]ok

April 24, 2006 08:25 PM | Link to this

“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” Suck, you have an admirer. Like what you see?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:25 PM | Link to this

I can come to this blog and argue intelligently, you liberals can’t. Just by mocking me, you prove that you are intelectually deficient, I am smarter, so by all means, keep showing everybody how stupid liberalism is.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:27 PM | Link to this

This is truly liberalism at it’s finest. Losers who can’t make it in the real world so they have to act like somebody else and live in a fake world. Just like the wanker is doing. It’s life sucks so bad it has to use mine, because I’m better.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 08:29 PM | Link to this

Suck: Mommy, I keep having this terrible nightmare that this November is going to be just awful for us.

Mommy: Don’t worry baby wingnut, we’ll get that Swift Boat crowd into action, lickety split.

Suck: But what if their lies aren’t enough?

Mommy: Don’t forget, baby andy, we’ve still got Carl Rove up our sleeve (or is it a*?)

Suck: But this just too important, Mommy! The fate of the entire world rests upon another of us controlling everything.

Mommy: Now, don’t you worry your little head, little one, world domination will be ours! Bwahahahaha!

By GaDemLib

April 24, 2006 08:31 PM | Link to this

Suck,

How about we just reprint the whole thing: Have you lost it completely? I log on after dinner and I find an hour of you arguing with yourself. We all realize you’re not bright, but look back over what you have posted the last hour. You are truly retarded.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 24, 2006 08:34 PM | Link to this

Don’t stop now, remember, Liberals Suck And Lie. Everybody is saying it!

It must be true!

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:36 PM | Link to this

Why can’t you stop it? I know Liberals Suck And Lie but why must it be repeated over and over again. I hate this. Enough people know already, alright?

By GaDemLib

April 24, 2006 08:37 PM | Link to this

Suck,

I love this line from your 8:25 post: “you are intelectually deficient, I am smarter”. So you are trying to insult someone else’s intelligence, yet you can’t spell a basic word and don’t know where to put periods. I do have to hand it to you, as retarded as you are, you certainly do provide loads of entertainment (in addition to the loads of bullsh!t).

By 839290474857473873093280948701923480

April 24, 2006 08:38 PM | Link to this

“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” Suck, you have an admirer. Like what you see?

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:39 PM | Link to this

This is neat, I saw some soldiers who just got back from Iraq walking down the street, they were dressed in their uniforms, and I spit on them from behind a store display. Hit that little pri-ck right in his eye. I laughed so hard, I almost wet myself.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 08:39 PM | Link to this

Suck: Mommy, I had another dream, although this one wasn’t so bad. I dreamt that my real father was Hitler.

Mommy: To self: Oh God, how am I going to hide this one from the little twerp?

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:43 PM | Link to this

I had a really bad date last night as usual. I got kinda drunk, tried to tell the dude no, I can’t remember his name, but he just told me to shut up. He came in my face and on my back and then left.

I guess I should stop picking up guys at the pro abortion rallies.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:46 PM | Link to this

I don’t know what I’m going to do if this Iraq war succeeds. We need more soldiers killed or maybe an attack on America so we can shove Osama down Bush’s throat. If he keeps on like this, freeing all of these people from tyranny, we’ll never get elected to anything again.

Go Al Qaeda!

By 839290474857473873093280948701923480

April 24, 2006 08:46 PM | Link to this

Well, well, well. Now Suck imitates the jacker (Midori 8:39).

“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” Jacker, you have an admirer. Like what you see?

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 08:47 PM | Link to this

My goal for world domination is near. (No way am I going to let those Mooslims, beat me to that payday)

Henceforth, ALL future posts must be under my name. At first,it will be confusing for you pieces of sh-it, but you’ll soon see the wisdom of my ways. I AM WOMAN, HEAR ME ROAR! (Dammit! Note to self: Think before speaking!)

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:49 PM | Link to this

Wouldn’t it be great to be back in the White House? I think Al Gore would make a better groper than Kerry would, although no one can live up to Billy’s rep. He was a real rapist, he didn’t take no for an answer. I’m pretty sure Al would cave at the first sign of a struggle.

Oh well, maybe Hillary will win and we can fill the west wing with d** and lesbos. Hillary is a Bush Hog!

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:52 PM | Link to this

Dammit! I knew that guy got me pregnant. I can feel the little sh-it kicking inside of me. I need this to stop. He must be 8 months old, this thing is huge. I’ll go to the “doctor” tomorrow and have him drill a hole in it’s head and suck the brains out. Ain’t womens lib great?

By Candide

April 24, 2006 08:55 PM | Link to this

I’m going to work at the abortion clinic tomorrow! I got a job! The “doctor” Had me reach up a womens pus-sy and pull the babys legs off to see if I had the stomache to work for him. It was kind of icky but it was neat too, the little sucker squirmed when I squished it’s head. That mommy was sobbing but I laughed at her and told her to get on the pill, stupid bit-ch.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:56 PM | Link to this

It’s a good thing I periodically check this blog now and then.

I always have to see what is being said either about me, or in my name.

I see the scumbag peice of filth is at it again.

You really need to grow up.

If you are too chickensh*t to say whatever is on your mind, that’s your problem. My problem is you attributing it to me.

You are lower than whalesh*t. I’ll wager you come from a whole family of scumbags at that.

You’re a coward to boot.

By Eric

April 24, 2006 08:58 PM | Link to this

I picked up another stupid lib woman at the anti war rally. Or was it the socialist party, I forget. She was real game to my Bush sucks routine, she got all hot and bothered. I took her back to her apartment, slipped her some roofies and busted that as-s. No birth control there. Let’s see how much that ho really likes abortions.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 08:58 PM | Link to this

By the way Andy - everyone knows it’s you.

It just fits your personality, and your mode of operation.

You don’t spend enough of your worthless life on this blog posting in your own name?

Now you have to post in mine.

One thing I’ll give you — at least this time you’re not trying to place the blame on me.

Worthless trail of slime that you are.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:02 PM | Link to this

I see I was wrong - you are once again trying to imply that I’m playing this stupid, childish, mentally deficient game.

You are so very transparent.

Not very original, either.

No wonder you worship Bush.

Loser.

By Ken

April 24, 2006 09:03 PM | Link to this

I was at the college campus in Berkely today passing out fliers for the NAMBLA chapter, they were printed by the ACLU, free speech advocacy at work, I admire them so much. This dude said he knew where a couple of young boys were playing at and later this afternoon we are going to try and lure them away. I can’t wait, I’m so excited. This is how it should be in the world not the evil repressive hateful world that George Bush wants.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:04 PM | Link to this

You libs are a bunch of pinkos, stupid perverts, morons, pinkos, mexican lovers, liars. I am intellijent!

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:06 PM | Link to this

I’m just so hopelessly stupid, I just happen to be here at all the right times, the jacker goes, I come. It’s my vast liberal intelligence, empty and ignorant. Maybe none of you other stupid liberals will notice.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:07 PM | Link to this

I said I’m intellijent, dammit! Aren’t you people listening?! Isn’t anyone listening?

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:08 PM | Link to this

Oh, well, post away if you must. I’m going to the airport, I heard more soldiers are coming back from Iraq. We are going to spit on them and call them baby killers. That will show Bush.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:09 PM | Link to this

I know it’s you Andy, I know it is. Who’s Andy, anyway? When has he posted in here? I’ve never seen that name before, I must be stupid for saying it. It isn’t like I jack that name all the time, is it?

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:10 PM | Link to this

Those gutless toadies of mine! Where the hell is that puke bd when i need him, her, it? And that rw just runs and hides when the shiite hits the fan. Maybe I should have allowed them to think for themselves. Dammit all!

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:11 PM | Link to this

I’m the wanker, I’ll admit it. I’m a kook and a loser, I troll all the moonbat websites and I hate Conservatives. This is all I can do, jack names and post stupid immature things because I’m a failure, living in a fake world. Have pity on me.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 09:12 PM | Link to this

Who did what to whom? Somebody’s right here.

Wankers’ Anonymous. They/He/She should join. It really is pathetic. When the temperature rises under boiling water, the water evaporates?

When the going gets tough, liberals take a hike and assume someone else’s identity? They really are sensitive. They have nothing to offer but childish tantrums when they lose control? Why don’t they just step away and take a break?

You people were dishing it out pretty good to LS&L, he’s not wanking away.

This is amazingly stupid.

By 839290474857473873093280948701923480

April 24, 2006 09:16 PM | Link to this

Don’t worry Midori, everyone knows it’s Andy on one of his rants. He’s the only idiot that the jacker has ever been able to provoke. He knows that Andy is the dimmest bulb in the pack so he’s always an easy score when he can’t get a rise out of anyone else.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:16 PM | Link to this

It is kind of obvious how I’m always here when my name gets called out, ain’t it? I’m hoping you other liberals are too stupid to notice that when the name jacker posts, I don’t. And when I’m here, the name jacker is gone. I know you pinkos are morons, look at GaDimLib, who will ever figure out my stupid immature game?

Plus, it makes me get excited to jack off names!

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:16 PM | Link to this

If I can just keep posting for a few more hours I’ll outlast those damn lib pervert, pinkos. Then I’ll show them who is the boss here.

By Midori

April 24, 2006 09:18 PM | Link to this

Aren’t y’all having fun playing my stupid mindless liberal game? I hate what Conservatives say, I’m going to shout them down. If you are in here to have an open honest discussion with other people that’s too bad ain’t it? I’m a pig, you just have to deal with me and my anti social anger cause I’m gonna jack when I hate what I hear.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:20 PM | Link to this

Hallelujah! At least one of my flunkies has come to help! I’m going to have to keep an eye on that SOS. He could come in handy, though he may have bigger plans. Don’t trust him.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:29 PM | Link to this

Where the fock is that mad as zell stooge? I could really use him about now. He’s the only one of my morons that has what it REALLY takes. Dammit, andy, stay calm! I’m not losing control, I’m not losing control

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 09:37 PM | Link to this

Suck: I don’t feel so good. Those mean people are calling ME mean.

Mommy: It’s just your “mean gene” acting up. Try using your funny bone instead.

Sucks: To self: B!tch, I don’t wanna use my funny bone.

Mommy: Maybe you could just give up that nasty habit and find something else.

Suck: But Mommy, this is all I’ve got!

Mommy: OK, OK. Whatever you want, boo boo.

By Jacker

April 24, 2006 09:41 PM | Link to this

839290474857473873093280948701923480,

How right you were at 9:16. Very astute observation, although I’ve gotten Danish, @@, and Dusty on a few occasions. RW just disappears, but that’s just as good as far as I’m concerned.

Idiot Andy, Once again, I’m not Midori and the other jacker(s) isn’t(aren’t) either.

By Shoop

April 24, 2006 09:52 PM | Link to this

Is Midori enjoying sex on the internet with Liberals Suck & Lie?

Be gentle with her son, she’s imbalanced you know. I’ve seen it before.

By S-O-S

April 24, 2006 09:59 PM | Link to this

Well, he is wanking away, but I can understand why. It takes a second to figure it out.

You liberals don’t know how to deal with life. It’s a good thing you aren’t running this country.

Give ‘em hell LS&L, they deserve it.

By 839290474857473873093280948701923480

April 24, 2006 10:03 PM | Link to this

Hey Suck- Midori was posting on the new thread at 9:05 when you were being jacked at 9:04 here. If you were half a man you would go over there and apologize, MORON!!!!

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 10:05 PM | Link to this

That post from 9:41 was absofreakinglybeautiful! My hats off to you!

By @@

April 24, 2006 10:09 PM | Link to this

Huge, is that you? Will you ever learn? I had a feeling this would happen after reading the postings today.

You missed on a namejacker today. Soooo what! I knew it was you with this comment:

Very astute observation, although I’ve gotten Danish, @@, and Dusty on a few occasions. RW just disappears, but that’s just as good as far as I’m concerned.

You really need help. I mean reaaalllllyyy need help.

By RW-(the original)

April 24, 2006 10:11 PM | Link to this

Jacker,

I bet ml is happy that your only goal here is to run everyone else off. Nice guest!

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 10:13 PM | Link to this

Damn, now I’m getting caught in my own sh!t with those frikkin time stamps. I didn’t even think of those little fockers!

Just hold on for a little longer, They’ll go away in the morning. Please let them go away in the morning.

By Liberals Suck and Lie

April 24, 2006 10:40 PM | Link to this

Thank god, @@! I never thought it would get this bad! Those other little weasels were no help at all. He’s pretty smart, but he’s not really one of us and I think there’s something focked up about him. I’m so tired.

By Buy Danish

April 24, 2006 11:13 PM | Link to this

@@,

I don’t know - it could be Mirror Boy too. He’s always bragging about winning imaginary brawls, when he is clearly just battling demons.

Maybe Huge is just Mirror Boy’s mirror image?

By @@

April 25, 2006 07:37 AM | Link to this

Quick post before work. Nobody may even see it, but what the hell. The first 9:16 P.M. post shows that he/she/they still don’t get it. LS&L succeeds everytime and they help by reacting. Like LS&L says, he (LS&L) wins.

It’s funny in a way, but I can’t help but associate it with the “developmentally delayed” children I work with. They react to external stimulus. But their cognizant skills are either limited or missing altogether. So what’s the jacker’s excuse? Are they missing the ability to reason. It would appear so.

Maybe I could get the jacker-s enrolled at my school.