Mike Luckovich

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 14, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this

Why give cash? The libs will believe anything you tell them, anyway.

By getalife

April 14, 2006 09:34 PM | Link to this

Happy Easter Mike!

By RW-(the original)

April 14, 2006 09:37 PM | Link to this

Saddam would want a much more substantial rabbit and I agree with Andy. If you want some BS story in print for the moonbats to lap up just get a peace sign flashlight, shine it into the night sky and they will beat a path to your door, take you to all the best c-ocktail parties, photograph you for the cover of Vanity Fair, and give you a seven figure book deal.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 14, 2006 09:50 PM | Link to this

Anybody want to go fetch the wanker or should we live him over yonder, wildly posting his stupid conspiracy theories to an empty room?

Yep, I agree, let’s leave him there.

By RW-(the original)

April 14, 2006 09:53 PM | Link to this

In celebration of the Easter weekend, here’s someone that likes to dress for the occasion.

By rushncap

April 14, 2006 10:04 PM | Link to this

I shiver at the thought of asking this, but do you have any backup for your claim that Clinton said we would find “hundreds of thousands” in mass graves? Nevermind, that’s too hard. By the way, the death toll for the Balkan war was… drumroll please… over 100,000

Do you EVER get tired of being wrong, RW? Or do you just feed off of that?

P.S. Gotta love them neo-cons: when you find a mass grave it’s not “massive” enough, unless, of course, the grave was found by a fellow neo-con. P.P.S. RW, I see you quickly shut up about the Clinton claim that I backed up. I’ll take that as a “cut-and-run” argument — i.e. post some BS, get called on it, ignore that point from then on.

By @@

April 14, 2006 10:05 PM | Link to this

Just in time for a new cartoon and I have no idea what it is about. Outta the loop on this one.

By DavidU

April 14, 2006 10:08 PM | Link to this

Double Post Not sure if anyone already linked to this. but Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) had a great speech about Iran and Iraq, just a week ago.

Washington sees Iran as a greater threat than Iraq ever was, a threat that cannot be ignored. Iran’s history is being ignored, just as we ignored Iraq’s history. This ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation of our recent relationship to Iraq and Iran is required to generate the fervor needed to attack once again a country that poses no threat to us. Our policies toward Iran have been more provocative than those towards Iraq…

By RW-(the original)

April 14, 2006 10:16 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

A quick look at the five posts ahead of yours reveal no conversation whatsoever. Please try to keep your place. If you are talking about your absurd little dodge about nuclear weapons over on the other thread you have no more idea than I do where Russia’s nukes are or were.

By rushncap

April 14, 2006 10:24 PM | Link to this

I really hope those are new sneakers you’re wearing, RW. Even they are in danger of falling apart at the speed you’re running from me. Next time do your research. Or sit at the kids’ table. Your crap won’t cut it with me.

By RW-(the original)

April 14, 2006 10:31 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

So you do know the whereabouts of Russia’s nukes?

By MK

April 14, 2006 10:35 PM | Link to this

Yet another Swiftboating, where will it end? Perhaps when they accuse little pinko of being human. Or, of having a life.

By rushncap

April 14, 2006 10:36 PM | Link to this

Yeah, Russia. Also, some in the Ukraine.

By finch

April 14, 2006 11:09 PM | Link to this

@@,

ml’s making fun of the NY Post’s legendary “PAGE SIX”, the gossip section that everyone in NY, LA and DC denies reading, even though they all do.

PAGE SIX is now at the center of a tawdry extortion scandal.

By finch

April 14, 2006 11:11 PM | Link to this

David U… I really like this Ron Paul guy. A Republican who detests neocons. Applause.

“Intervention just doesn’t work. It backfires and ultimately hurts American citizens both at home and abroad. Spreading ourselves too thin around the world actually diminishes our national security through a weakened military. As the superpower of the world, a constant interventionist policy is perceived as arrogant, and greatly undermines our ability to use diplomacy in a positive manner.”

Thanks for the link. A very good read.

By Jay not jay

April 15, 2006 12:45 AM | Link to this

Those EARS, they show up in every ‘toon.

By RW

April 15, 2006 03:09 AM | Link to this

Another great Marine victory in Iraq. Just like I’ve been telling you, we’re winning. Just a small handful of disgruntled insurgents remain to be easily mopped up.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:52 AM | Link to this

Mexican boycott targets U.S. firms

MEXICO CITY — “Nothing gringo,” warns the rallying cry of Mexican activists calling for a boycott of all U.S. businesses south of the border on May 1.

How about the ones north of the border?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:55 AM | Link to this

Generals defend Rumsfeld By Rowan Scarborough THE WASHINGTON TIMES April 15, 2006

Several retired generals who worked with Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, including a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, yesterday decried calls for the secretary’s resignation from other retired officers.

By Souldrift

April 15, 2006 07:08 AM | Link to this

Bye Bye, Rummie!

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 08:05 AM | Link to this

Souldrift,

Don’t hold your breath. On second thought, go right ahead.

Bye Bye Souldrift!

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 08:09 AM | Link to this

Cruel and unusual punishment as defined by Libs.

I have an idea! Why don’t we put these libs in charge of Al Qaeda interrogations. Maybe if we give all the prisoners a shopping cart and show them how much we love them, they’ll spill the beans about Bin Laden’s location.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 15, 2006 08:23 AM | Link to this

“By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 14, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this Why give cash? The libs will believe anything you tell them, anyway.”

The most definitive statement to date of the value of quotes and or links provided by LPASIS … and straight from the horses mouth.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 15, 2006 08:24 AM | Link to this

“By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 14, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this Why give cash? The libs will believe anything you tell them, anyway.”

The most definitive statement to date of the value of quotes and or links provided by LPASIS … and straight from the horses mouth.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 08:51 AM | Link to this

Pres. Bush cannot fire Rumsfeld, it would mean admitting the messed up. And that’s not good politics and bad PR over in Iraq. So Rumsfeld stays….unfortunately.

By Eric

April 15, 2006 09:06 AM | Link to this

It’s not the libs who believe every lie that comes out of the mouths of Limbaugh, O’Reilly and Hannity. Every liberal I know seeks the truth and then decides issues for himself. It’s the wingnuts who allow themselves to be told what to think. Pitiful. Another good one, Mike!

By Eric

April 15, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this

It’s not the libs who believe every lie that comes out of the mouths of Limbaugh, O’Reilly and Hannity. Every liberal I know seeks the truth and then decides issues for himself. It’s the wingnuts who allow themselves to be told what to think. Pitiful. Another good one, Mike!

By Eric

April 15, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this

It’s not the libs who believe every lie that comes out of the mouths of Limbaugh, O’Reilly and Hannity. Every liberal I know seeks the truth and then decides issues for himself. It’s the wingnuts who allow themselves to be told what to think. Pitiful. Another good one, Mike!

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 09:17 AM | Link to this

Parsing Ron Paul, whose manifesto reads like something out of The Onion:

There is little resistance to the rising clamor for “democratizing” Iran, even though their current president, Mahmoud Almadinejad, is an elected leader.

Suuuuurrre he was elected - after they disqualified the 1300 other opposition candidated.

Already the coordinating propaganda has galvanized the American people against Iran for the supposed threat it poses to us with weapons of mass destruction that are no more present than those Saddam Hussein was alleged to have had.

Uh-huh. Whatever.

The longtime Neo-con goal to remake Iraq prompted us to abandon the search for Osama bin Laden

So all those special forces guys are just hunting for Easter eggs.

Yet some Iraqis, who dream of stability, long for his authoritarian rule.

Uh-huh. Just like Kerry said the “Peasants” in South Vietnam really didn’t care if the Communists took over.

Common sense tells us the war in Iraq soon will spread to Iran. Fear of imaginary nuclear weapons or an incident involving Iran.

Imaginary weapons. Okaaaaaaaay.

I smell an expanded war in the Middle East, and pray that I’m wrong. I sense that circumstances will arise that demand support regardless of the danger and cost. Any lack of support, once again, will be painted as being soft on terrorism and al Qaeda

Sniff sniff. I smell Iran+Hezbollah+Islamic Jihad+Iraqi “insurgents”. No connection to state-sponsored terrorism. Nope - all in our imagination.

We have been forewarned that “all options” remain on the table.

How dare we prepare for all possibilities!

The hostage crisis and overthrow of the Shah by the Ayatollah was a major victory for the radical Islamists

Thank you Peanut for helping to depose the Shah and throwing your weight behind the Ayatollahs!

The sad truth is that the supposed dangers posed by Iran are no more real than those claimed about Iraq…There is no evidence of a threat to us by Iran, and no reason to plan and initiate a confrontation with *her.*

I love this. Nothing to worry about and use the feminine to describe Iran to subtly reduce the threat. I realize that this is how we USED to refer to nations, boats, and hurricanes, but what ever happened to non-gendered speech like he/she/it like the Left invented?

If Iran had a nuclear weapon, why would this be different from Pakistan, India, and North Korea having one? Why does Iran have less right to a defensive weapon than these other countries

Okay, here we get to the moral-relativism argument. India and North Korea - No difference between the two countries.

If Iran had a nuclear weapon, the odds of her initiating an attack against anybody— which would guarantee her own annihilation— are zero. And the same goes for the possibility she would place weapons in the hands of a non-state terrorist group

Well, if you’re a rational life-revering American this would make sense, but we’re dealing with someone who thinks he’s the Mahdi and is prepared to die for virgins (or is it raisins)?

How many of us would remain complacent if someone like Timothy McVeigh had been financed by a foreign power!

Um. Could it be that he was? Read The Third Terrorist by Jayna Davis and read the newly translated papers coming out of Iraq. Hint: Iraqi agents in the Philippines.

Paul disagrees with Michael Ledeen on this: “You can’t have freedom in Iran without bringing down the Mullahs.”

Freedom is just around the corner. Uh Huh.

Secretary of State Rice recently signaled a sharp shift towards confrontation in Iran policy as she insisted on $75 million to finance propaganda, through TV and radio broadcasts into Iran.

We can’t use the media. Oh No! This is a terrible waste of resources. Let the Iranofascists speak uninterrupted.

First, Iran doesn’t have a nuke and is nowhere close to getting one, according to the CIA.

So now we believe and trust in the CIA - the same CIA that we don’t trust on Iraq?

If you’re looking for a real kook with a bomb to worry about, North Korea would be high on the list. Yet we negotiate with Kim Jong Il.

No, actually that was John Kerry’s idea - unilateral talks. We’re not doing that thanks to Bush/Rice/Cheney. We’re in 6 way talks (not to be confused with a simultaneous 6 way).

Pakistan was never inspected by the IAEA as to their military capability

So are we for or against the UN? I guess we have to wait for their approval to take action, but keep in mind that they are completely incompetent.

Believe it or not, I’m done!

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 09:19 AM | Link to this

Eric,

Maybe if you repeat the lie often enough they’ll believe you.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 09:25 AM | Link to this

Buy Danish, your snotty attitude concerning the homeless reminds me of the Michigan Ave. socialite who, while passing by a homeless person, tells a friend, “I just dont understand! Why don’t they just go to their summer homes?”

You define “compassionate conservative”. That, and your glee over Abu Ghraib torture proves that you lack a soul.

Fire Rumsfeld the impaler. Impeach Bush the bumbler. No more US deaths in Iraq or Iran. America first.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 09:28 AM | Link to this

BD- Maybe you should implement the advice you gave Eric: “Maybe if you repeat the lie often enough they’ll believe you.”

Imaginary weapons. Okaaaaaaaay.

Iran does not have Nuclear Weapons.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 09:31 AM | Link to this

David U,

YET. You want to wait until they do?

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this

The lives and actions of people are their own responsibility, not the government’s.

From Rep Ron Paul’s website

Could we fairly conclude that he is kook Libertarian? If the “lives” of the American people are not the responsibility of the government, then why have a Defense Department? I guess we could delete the protect and defend requirement from the Presidential oath and just leave it at serve.

I like some Libertarian principles, and I’m all for limited Federal government, but I would never advocate that it abrogate ALL responsibility for its citizens.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 09:46 AM | Link to this

More of what passes for intelligence in today’s leftist bubble:

No more US deaths in Iraq or Iran. America first.

Today’s bumper sticker brought to you by “seeker”, translated this appears to mean, “Kill us here first!”

DavidU,

I posted this for you on another thread, but I wanted to make sure you didn’t miss it.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 09:48 AM | Link to this

BD - repeating more lies.

Suuuuurrre he (Almadinejad) was elected - after they disqualified the 1300 other opposition candidated.

See any anti-Almadinejad protests by Iranians inside or outside Iran? Nope. Neocons only like democracy when “their” candidate wins.

So all those special forces guys (in Afghanistan) are just hunting for Easter eggs.

I remember when finding Osama was a Bush top priority! Not anymore. Blue smoke and mirrors. Oh, and lies. Cant forget the lies.

Sniff sniff. I smell Iran+Hezbollah+Islamic Jihad+Iraqi “insurgents”. No connection to state-sponsored terrorism. Nope - all in our imagination.

Iraqi Sunnis and Iranian S-hit-tes can’t STAND eachother. They don’t even speak the same language. And remember the 10 year Iran-Iraq war? Watch out! The BOOGIE-MAN WILL GET YOU!!

Thank you Peanut for helping to depose the Shah and throwing your weight behind the Ayatollahs!

More hyperbole. The Shah’s overthrow was brewing during Nixon-Ford. It would have been easier to stop a sunrise.

No, actually that was John Kerry’s idea - unilateral talks (with North Korea). We’re not doing that thanks to Bush/Rice/Cheney. We’re in 6 way talks (not to be confused with a simultaneous 6 way).

Nice way to warp the question with your answer. The US IS talking with North Korea while it resorts to threatening Iran. Paul is absolutely correct: “If you’re looking for a real kook with a bomb to worry about, North Korea would be high on the list. Yet we negotiate with Kim Jong Il.”

I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Rep. Paul is spot on. BD, I’m so happy that you are among the distinct minority of Americans who thinks America just can’t ever have enough wars.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 09:57 AM | Link to this

• Wardlaw said, that case stands for “the proposition that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the state from punishing an involuntary act or condition if it is the unavoidable consequence of one’s status or being.”*

Seeker,

You don’t know anything about my attitude toward the homeless, except that I think it is absurd to say that they can be allowed to do whatever the hell they want wherever the hell they want.

I lived in NYC and I know what that extreme view of civil liberties brings you:

Liberty for the homeless, while the rest of the citizenry are at their mercy. I’ve been attacked by enough crazed drunks, psychos and drug addicts to know that that ACLU view is nothing but anarchy.

Now if one is to logically follow Wardlaw’s statement to its logical conclusion, then we have to throw out DUI arrests as it is not the drives fault that they have had too much to drink, especially since a great deal of the arguments were based on the concept that addiction is a disease - just like venereal disease.

Moreover, I never said ONE WORD about Abu Ghraib. The prisoners that I was JOKING about are in Guantanamo Bay.

You vote for compassion and chaos; I vote for compassion and civil order.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 09:58 AM | Link to this

Ok fine, let go invade Iran. Like Andy has said; in about 2 weeks we will have won the battle against their military because fact is we are that much better than anyone else. But then what? We already saw in Iraq how freaking impossible it is to get a handle on guerilla warfare, specially when its religiously motivated.

So now we are stuck in Iraq fighting pockets of insurgents 6+ years running, add to that the new resistance in Iran, and hey now Syria is p** so they are next on the list right? Afganstan is still some thrid world country, plus Hamas is now a democratic power of Gaza (not only against us because we are pro-Israel, but hey we just engineered the world to stop funding their new government so their allegiance religiously and financially are now tied to even more extremist goals) and is just directing everyone in the middle east to flood Iran and Iraq to help the cause against those imperialistic Americans, defamers of Mohamed or whatever they call us.

What should have happened is we should have stayed only in Afghanistan, after our only goal which was OBL/Taliban. Put all the Iraq resources into rebuilding that country to show the US economic power of what democracy and capitalism can do for a country. But instead we went off to fight in Iraq, split our resources, Afghanistan now has a democratic government who’s just as backwards as the Taliban was minus the beheadings, the Taliban is still running around, Iraq cannot decided how to split the political pie three ways and refuses to, and Hamas who was elected is being left out to collect money from whom ever it wants.

We made the Palestine situation more volatile, and placed more American troops in the middle east (You know one of the pet peeves of Islam extremist, while we bombed to the stone age 2 countries). Yep all we need is to invade Iran. We need to do everything and anything possible to stay out of Iran, and when those options run out, make up new ones. Rebuild what we broke, that’s enough of a task as it is.

By Bushwhacker

April 15, 2006 10:00 AM | Link to this

“Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is.” —Texas Governor George W. Bush, April 9, 1999, on the US intervention in Kosovo by President Clinton.

Which side of Bush’s face did this one come from? Talkin’ the talk but never walkin’ the walk defines REPUBLICAN.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

RW- With both Prior and Woods on the DL and the Cubs still managed to win 6 out of 9 out of the gate? Heck, I’ve been practicing my World Series championship celebration dance on a daily basis (sometimes twice during day games). :)

By getalife

April 15, 2006 10:11 AM | Link to this

Now that is what I am talking about

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 10:12 AM | Link to this

Maybe from this side or from this side of his mouth. I could keep going back, but the two constants are the Presidents plan and the lefts blindness to it.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 10:16 AM | Link to this

See any anti-Almadinejad protests by Iranians inside or outside Iran?

Seeker,

Why don’t you try “seeking” some knowledge?

Worldwide protests 2004

A clue to what happens when one does protest in Iran is found here:

Iranians will gather for the commemoration of the July 9-14, 1999, Student Uprising of Iran and its legacy. They will show their rejection of the Islamic republic and cherish the memories of those fallen during the bloody governmental crackdown on the 5 glorious days of students protests.

If you are curious about exactly what happened during and after the 1999 protests they keep referring to, look here

By Bushwhacker

April 15, 2006 10:19 AM | Link to this

“Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life.” — Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 10:22 AM | Link to this

getalife,

How is that possible? I thought we had abandoned Afghanistan and turned it back over to the Taliban. Does this mean that the moonbat lazy-boy pilots on this blog are a few fritoes short of a chili pie?

By Bushwhacker

April 15, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

“I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over-extended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today” — Rep Tom Delay (R-TX), 1999.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 10:25 AM | Link to this

The students were careful to emphasize their commitment to peaceful change and continued to believe in the possibility of democratic change from within the government. For this reason, they remained loyal to Khatami and elected a string of reformists to parliament in 2000. For a time, it seemed as if their revolution from within was working.

But, in fact, the atmosphere inside Iran grew more stifling. The ruling clerics, maneuvering to protect their conservative way of life, closed reformist newspapers, arrested and tortured opposition leaders, and dispatched their young religious vigilantes, known as Bassijis, to break up student demonstrations. The reforms Khatami seemed to represent had all but disappeared.

Seeker,

I guessed you missed this Frontline episode.

And this more recent Frontline

By Bushwhacker

April 15, 2006 10:27 AM | Link to this

“You can support the troops but not the president.” — Rep Tom Delay (R-TX), 1999.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 10:28 AM | Link to this

Look everybody, our spammer has changed names. I guess I’ll go do some roadwork and scroll past the latest batch of recycled quotes when I get back.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 10:43 AM | Link to this

Maybe there is hope for Iran. But FINCH says that the vast majority of Iranian people support the Mullahs.

I’m confused. Who should I believe?

Meanwhile Rep Ron Paul opposes assisting these groups by countering voices in the media. Too expensive apparently. Not our government’s responsibility.

Nope - we should just stick our head in the sand like a South Park cartoon character and let the Mullah’s power increase exponentially without opposition.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 10:55 AM | Link to this

Ho hum…. Hats off to the tiny western democracy movement by Iranians. Its the thought that counts. But, like it or not, Ahmadinejad and supporters have the support of the “masses”.

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran’s ultraconservative president — spurning international outrage over his remarks about Israel — joined more than a million demonstrators who flooded the streets of the capital and other major cities Friday to back his call for the destruction of the Jewish state.

Ahmadinejad and the mullahs are doing a bang-up job of focusing Iran on “external enemies” like Israel and the US. And the US is going to just stroll in and bounce them out? Will we be greeted with cheers when we nuke their nukes?

Yes, I can see it now… “Mission Accomplished” banners all aflutter in the streets of Tehran as US troops are showered with flowers and candy! The mullas in Mashhad and Qum kissing Old Glory as they embrace religious liberty, freedom of speech and so on.

Just like Iraq!

Dream on. But it’s dreams like this that get Americans needlessly killed.

By Huge

April 15, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

Bushwacker, Great quotes from that humiliated little corporate whore from Texas! (No, unfortunately not that one!)! In his own demented way, he was foretelling the future.

In fact the second one is so good, I’m going to post it again!

“You can support the troops but not the president.” — Rep Tom Delay (R-TX), 1999. (Sounds dangerously like a “pinko” to me)

A fascinating insight to the mind of a hack (a politician who belongs to a small clique that controls a political party for private rather than public ends) who puts allegiance to political party above loyalty to the nation…

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

I’ll explain it simply, Danish, as to who you should believe: the Iranian people. You know, the ones who very recently voted in a super-hardline Ahmadinejad over his far more moderate and West-friendly opponent. This after years of a very moderate presidenship, so you can’t even argue they don’t know what they’re missing. Hey, figure American imperialism next door had something to do with those results?

By Huge

April 15, 2006 11:13 AM | Link to this

Bushwacker, Great quotes from that humiliated little corporate whore from Texas! (No, unfortunately not that one!)! In his own demented way, he was foretelling the future.

In fact the second one is so good, I’m going to post it again!

“You can support the troops but not the president.” — Rep Tom Delay (R-TX), 1999. (Sounds dangerously like a “pinko” to me)

A fascinating insight to the mind of a hack (a politician who belongs to a small clique that controls a political party for private rather than public ends) who puts allegiance to political party above loyalty to the nation…

By Joe Roman

April 15, 2006 11:15 AM | Link to this

Rumsfeld must have his suits made with trapdoors in the trousers. That way, the generals can have quick access whenever ‘Don’ requests it.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 11:21 AM | Link to this

Ahmadinejad and the mullahs are doing a bang-up job of focusing Iran on “external enemies” like Israel and the US

Gosh, he sounds just like, like, er, um, a …Leftist!

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 11:27 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Sure dude, just like the 99% of Iraqis who “voted” for Saddam Hussein.

BTW, where do you come up with this hackneyed “American Imperialism” stuff. Dusting off your old copies of Workers World Daily?

Are you one of the old style Russians who are still in love with the promise of Communism?

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this

You really have lost your mind, haven’t you, Danish?

By Huge

April 15, 2006 11:33 AM | Link to this

Seeker, Your mentioning the famous “flowers and candy” reference by “Shotgun Dick” (who probably watched a lot of WWII movies on TV while he had other priorities than military service!) reminds me of this from Al Franken:

They told us when we invaded, we’d be greeted with sweets and flowers. They left out the crucial modifier: “exploding”.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this

Iran elections were pretty free, Danish, sorry to break it to ya. Previously they had elected a moderate President who urged cooperation with the West. He did not have much power, but he had the chance to be elected, and was. This time around, the more moderate candidate lost. You have some info as to the elections being rigged? By all means, bring it!

Imperialism means acquiring foreign territories to further the possessions of the home country. This is what we did with Iraq — we needed their oil. Yes, America is dangerously close to becoming an empire. Truth hurts, huh?

I’m one of those Russians who hates Communism with the passion that you have no comprehension of. Which is why I’m a Democrat: I like freedom, I like honesty, I like governments that take care of its people. I’ve lived under Communism. Republicans are a lot closer to it that Democrats.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 11:43 AM | Link to this

That’s right, BD! Ahmadinejad MUST be a leftist because he’s against nuclear power, favors separation of church and state, endorses dialogue and negotiation over saber rattling, supports the decriminalization of drugs, backs abortion rights, and is a champion of free speech.

Right?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 11:58 AM | Link to this

The Islamic terrorists, murderers of the innocents, are calling out their b***-es:

At a Friday prayer sermon in Tehran, senior cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Janati simply branded the US as a “decaying power” lacking the “stamina” to block Iran’s ambitions.

They know the punka-ss liberals just as well as I do.

Funny thing is, just like a sissy pinko, a rushncap or a finch, these religious extremist killers will find out the hard way about American resolve. Our punks are the mouthy ones giving the world the wrong impression.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 12:02 PM | Link to this

P.S. To you pinko libs and your pimps the Iranians:

Iran Leader: Israel Will Be Annihilated

The president of Iran again lashed out at Israel on Friday and said it was “heading toward annihilation,” just days after Tehran raised fears about its nuclear activities by saying it successfully enriched uranium for the first time.

Israel can kick your a*-es just as sure as we would, I hope we let them.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 12:08 PM | Link to this

Jesus Christ, andy, we have cnn.com, we don’t need you to repost every news story on here.

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

Hang in there, Buy Danish. Glad you can stand the smell.

Never have I read so much anti-Americanism put out by diminished, pornographic minds of so-called liberals. Politics is one thing but this junk goes to manic posturing. They are the volunteer group for subversion.

I am all for a two party political system in this country. But, if these demented kooks represent the Democrats, the foundations of our country’s political system are crumbling. What is worse, these paranoid lefties DON’T EVEN CARE.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 12:12 PM | Link to this

Look, duma-ss, rushncap, if I want to use a news source to illustrate a point I’m making, what do you want me to do, tell everybody what time I saw it on the Clinton News Network? Moron.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 12:13 PM | Link to this

Ooops, let the censor get me:

The Islamic terrorists, murderers of the innocents, are calling out their bit-ches:

At a Friday prayer sermon in Tehran, senior cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Janati simply branded the US as a “decaying power” lacking the “stamina” to block Iran’s ambitions.

They know the punka-ss liberals just as well as I do.

Funny thing is, just like a sissy pinko, a rushncap or a finch, these religious extremist killers will find out the hard way about American resolve. Our punks are the mouthy ones giving the world the wrong impression.

By clark

April 15, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

Angel Man;

You missed a good oportunity to call it the Cartoon News Network. But then I forgot about your hard-on for Clinton, so it makes sense.

amen.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

That’s right, BD! Ahmadinejad MUST be a leftist because he’s against nuclear power, favors separation of church and state, endorses dialogue and negotiation over saber rattling, supports the decriminalization of drugs, backs abortion rights, and is a champion of free speech.

Seeker,

Did someone just hijack your name?

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 12:23 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

I’m glad to see that you oppose Communism after living under it.

You still seem to be stuck in that era however. Maybe you read the New York Times and believe everything that is printed there?

They did a really fine job of enabling Stalin and Communism. They’re not Republicans.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 12:27 PM | Link to this

Danish, you have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m sure that’s not the first time you’ve heard it, but I’m just confirming it for you. None. You should really go on and at least finish high school. It’ll do you good.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

BTW if you like “freedom” as much as you claim, then do you support the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness that is part and parcel of the Democrat Party vocabulary?

Do you support the STFU wing of the party? You know - the ones who won’t let conservatives speak on college campuses, and are all for personal freedom, but oppose freedom of speech?

By seeker

April 15, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this

Funny thing is, just like a sissy pinko, a rushncap or a finch, these religious extremist killers will find out the hard way about American resolve.

Just like those Iraqi killers were crushed by the US invasion 3 years ago. Golly! We sure showed THEM, didnt we? Why, Fallujahs a shopping and dining paradise today! The beaches of Basra beckon! The highway between Amman and Baghdad looks like I-85! And Abu Ghraib? A theme park thats a must see! The water-board ride is downright death defying!

And all the pluses of an occupying power in Iraq will soon bless Iran!!

Right.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 12:29 PM | Link to this

This is just unfair and too obvious of a name jacking.

I’m one of those Russians who hates Communism with the passion that you have no comprehension of. Which is why I’m a Democrat: I like freedom, I like honesty, I like governments that take care of its people. I’ve lived under Communism. Republicans are a lot closer to it that Democrats.

Even rushncap isn’t stupid enough to believe something as outrageous as that.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 12:31 PM | Link to this

Stuff it, RW, before you make me wipe you out again. You’re not on my level, so don’t tangle with me. You really don’t want last night to repeat.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 12:32 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

From Human Rights Watch, here’s a little bit about those “pretty free elections” in Iran.

I don’t know, you’ll have to tell me - maybe compared to elections under Stalin or Castro they’re kinda sorta free?

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

What the hell are you babbling about now? Spouting off and declaring yourself right might work in your campus circle jerks, but it falls a little flat in the real world.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 12:42 PM | Link to this

OOOOOOH “Don’t Mess with Rushncap” is a tough guy! Must be used to getting his way with no dissent. Maybe he’s a former Soviet Commissar and lived both under and over Communism?

How to explain his bellicose tone? This is not how peace-loving Democrats behave?

Or is it?

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 12:47 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

That is exactly how “peace loving” Democrats act. Allowing no dissent is their idea of a free and open society. Rushncap does make a good spokesman for that mindset.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

RW, did you buy those new sneakers so you can run some more yet?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 12:52 PM | Link to this

seekling: Welcome to 2006, have a seat allow me to get you caught up-

Abu Umar, who was killed by U.S. forces in a March 27 raid near Baquba, northeast of Baghdad, “formed specific relations” with al-Qaeda leaders including the terrorist group’s top two commanders, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, Major General Rick Lynch told reporters in Baghdad yesterday.

We haven’t killed an “insurgent” Iraqi in Iraq in so long we probably don’t remember what they look like, they are the ones that surrendered to the TV cameras.

Maybe Al Qaeda will have enough foreigners to send to Iran, maybe they won’t, you diaper wearing moonbat.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this

Excuse me for a while. I have to get back to telemarketing. I need to call a family while they’re eating lunch and try to sell them a credit card “insurance” package. I’ll be back after my slick sales pitch. I love Republicans and the free market system.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 12:59 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

I’m not really sure I can compete with your shoe fetish, you may have me on that one.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 01:03 PM | Link to this

Well the one thing I didn’t think rushncap would do would be to wave the white flag of name-jacking. I guess you have finally found something I was wrong about.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Everyone knows that RW has a fetish for Danishes!

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 01:18 PM | Link to this

I’m done abusing the mental midgets on this board for today. It’s far too beautiful outside to continue. I wish you all the best of luck, lord knows you’ll need it. Sayonara.

By Sayonara

April 15, 2006 01:57 PM | Link to this

You dropped something.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

We haven’t killed an “insurgent” Iraqi in Iraq in so long we probably don’t remember what they look like, they are the ones that surrendered to the TV cameras.

That’s kind of the problem, dontcha think? We’re not killing the insurgents in Iraq. They’re killing us.

April 15 (Bloomberg) — Two Marines were killed and 22 wounded while operating in al Anbar Province on April 13, bringing U.S. military deaths to almost 40 this month.

Soooo… Iraq is secure, eh? And Iran will be JUST as secure…

Right?

By Zoo Keeper

April 15, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this

Where did all the monkeys go? This blog is no fun without Suck, Danish, RW, @@, and Dusty (see no evil, hear no evil, speak no- well forget that). This is like going to the zoo to look at empty cages. Come back Simians; you’re the entertainment around here!

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 03:58 PM | Link to this

seekling:

Family mourns Iraq vet shot to death in Atlanta Friday, April 14, 2006

While Atlanta police are searching for a gunman and motive in the shooting death of an Iraq war veteran, his relatives are wondering how the DeKalb man could survive a dangerous tour of duty overseas but lose his life at home.

Sooooo… Atlanta is secure, eh?

Ignorant Bas-tard.

By Jamie

April 15, 2006 04:08 PM | Link to this

how soon everyone forgets the people behind 9/11

By seeker

April 15, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this

Sooooo… Atlanta is secure, eh?

Sweetheart, I never said anything about Atlanta… whatever ARE you talking about??

After all, we all know Iraq is far more dangerous than Atlanta for Americans, dont we?

*Two Marines were killed and 22 wounded… bringing U.S. military deaths to almost 40 this month.

Now, I dont have the numbers handy, but I reckon Atlanta is a far sight safer..

And Iran will chew up American boys and girls even faster than Iraq is!

And you just cant wait, can you?

Right?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:03 PM | Link to this

seekling: Try this little exercise, morphodite:

Chicago- 2,862,000 people Atlanta- 860,000 people Los Angeles- 2,850,000 people New York- 8,104,079 people Close enough, total 14,000,000 approx.

Iraq population- 25,000,000 people

Americans killed in Iraq, 2005- 846 includes accidental deaths, etc.

Americans killed in 4 American cities, 2005- 1,537.

Safer in Atlanta, eh?

That’s right almost half the population numbers and double the number of deaths.

I can just imagine the number of injuries related to assualts, fights, etc.

Hell, I’d rather live in Baghdad.

Moron. I thought you libs were supposed to be know it alls? Could it be the news you get?

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 05:04 PM | Link to this

Seeker,

Why don’t you save the rhetoric and say what you mean?

Seeker does not support the war in Iraq even though his Congress and his president voted for it.

Seeker does not support American troops. He says “Iran will chew up American boys and girls even faster than Iraq.” He is talking about the best armed forces in the world.

Seeker will tell any lie that is detrimental to our military’s effort. Example”We are not killing the insurgents in Iraq.”

Seeker believes that being against everything American is not anti-Americanism.

Go, Seeker, and join Zoo Keeper in shoveling out the cages. What goes out there is better than what you are throwing out here.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this

By The Way, were is the outrage over the American urban quagmire? Are not these inner city mayors patting themselves on the back for their falling crime rates? Rates that surpass a country supposedly in the throws of a “civil war?” Why aren’t their pinko protests, hysterical libs screaming bloody murder, moonbats calling for Shirley Franklin’s impeachment? Why are these kooks focused on Iraq, when the real tragedy is in the streets in front of their little pinko ghetto?

What’s up with dat?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:21 PM | Link to this

Atlanta Women’s Medical Center

Reasonably priced abortions (surgical and medical) through second trimester. Habla espanol. Accepts most insurance plans, Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express, ATM/Debit Cards, Personal Checks, Money Orders, Certified Bank and Travelers Checks, and Cash (exact amount). Discounts for planned parenthood and students. LIBERALS WELCOME!!!!!

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:24 PM | Link to this

Journalists strive daily to keep bias out of news pages Angela Tuck - Staff Saturday, March 25, 2006

Yesiree Bob.

Cheneys get $1.9 million tax refund! Deb Riechmann!! - Associated Press!!! Saturday, April 15, 2006!!!!

Ummmm, that’s on 1.95 million in income in which he paid 529,000 in taxes. Roughly 28% tax rate.

Heinz Kerry Hiding $45 Million in Income, Paid Just 1.2% in Taxes Teresa Heinz Kerry earns approximately $50 million in annual income, ten times what she revealed on tax forms released late Friday, according to the New York Times. The staggering sum generated a mere 1.2 percent federal income tax

Billionaire Bush-basher George Soros says the wealthy should pay higher, more progressive tax rates. But he holds the bulk of his money in tax-free overseas accounts in Curacao, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.

Hypocrite liars.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:29 PM | Link to this

The Conservatives are kicking a-ss if this is the best the jackers can come up with:

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 15, 2006 05:21 PM | Link to this Atlanta Women’s Medical Center

Does this even make sense? Maybe just to the dumna-ss posting it?

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 05:29 PM | Link to this

Little Pinko,

Your logic yet again is highly suspect, if not completely nonexistent. There may be 25,000,000 people in Iraq, but there are not 25,000,000 Americans. There are only roughly 140,000 American troops, so your thinking just doesn’t work. The sources you sited for American cities show 1500 deaths out of a population of 14,000,000. In Iraq there have been 2500 deaths out of an American population of never more than about 140,000. It’s pretty obvious Iraq is more dangerous. Now if you want to factor in the Iraqi population, the 25,000,000 you mentioned, then you have to also factor in the number of Iraqis killed, which is probably somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000 people. To compare the violence in American cities to Iraq is just plain foolish. Once again, you’re an idiot. You said you wanted to go to Baghdad; go ahead. There’s no one who’s better off with you here.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 05:32 PM | Link to this

To quote li’l andy Hell, I’d rather live in Baghdad.

Please, go ahead. I don’t think many on this board will mind. You won’t last a month (idiots get killed off pretty quick — that’s Darwinism for ya), but at least it’ll spare this board.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

GADumas-sLib: We are talking American deaths, moron. More Americans get killed in the inner cities than do in Iraq. That is a simple fact that you can’t wish away. Is it O.K. with you that people get gunned down in American streets but not O.K. if they get killed in Iraq??? Are you sick or what?

I’m not that stupid anyway, you libs can’t pin inner city deaths on George Bush, so you don’t give a s-hit. You wouldn’t care about dead American soldiers if it wasn’t political, piece of sh-it.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

If you are going to compare the number of military casualties you have to compare them not to the number of Iraqis but rather to the number of US troops deployed in Iraq. Or else your comparison makes no sense.

But I agree, The US would take 2 weeks, 3 weeks tops to militarily conquer Iran, now to actually bring the peace? What was Pres Bush’s latest approximation for Iraq? In the next presidents term was it? So basically 6-7 years, thus around 2012 we could hope to be done with the insurgency in Iran; but then that would be if you trust the word of Pres Bush when it comes to foreign affairs.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:38 PM | Link to this

O.K. you’re right, let me rephrase that: I’d rather walk through the streets of Baghdad then I would down Moreland Avenue, you twa-t.

The pinkos created Moreland, Bush created Iraq, there’s hope for Iraq.

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Here’s your quote: “Seeker does not support the war in Iraq even though his Congress and his president voted for it.”

My question: Are you a retarded 14-year-old?

Presidents don’t “vote” on wars. Congress voted on it based on false intelligence Bush knowingly and willingly leaked. He knew the information was trumped up lies, so he literally spread lies to get his war started. Then he lied about spreading the lies. Yes, you Republicans are full of family values and full of sh!t. Your president should be impeached.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

Little Pinko Angels….- post @ 5:12pm, was that you? Sure you are against it, but I doubt you’d give it any type of PR.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 05:41 PM | Link to this

Nevermind^

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

Yes, you Republicans are full of family values and full of sh!t.

So what are you? A pedophile? A fa-g? You like sheep?

How can someone be against family values, think about this for a second. Oh, never mind, we are dealing with liberals.

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

Little Pinko,

Okay, just American deaths: In American cities 1,500 deaths out of a population of 14,000,000. In Iraq 2,500 deaths out of an American population of 140,000. You’re not real bright, are you?

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

GaDimLib,

I will ask you the same question I asked Seeker.

Why don’t you just save the rhetoric and say what you mean?

You and Seeker sound so much alike.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:47 PM | Link to this

DavidU: Ain’t it great to have people waste your time like that? They add so much to the discussion, don’t they?

By seeker

April 15, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

Dusty darling, youve got it backwards…

I weep when out boys and girls are killed in the Iraq meatgrinder. But you and your bellicose friends seem to delight in giving more Americans one way tickets to the hereafter. And now you want to send them to Iran too? I dont know why you hate them so much. What did they ever do to you?

Oh, and not so innocent, please invest in a calulator. In round numbers there are 125,000 Americans in Iraq, give or take a couple. They’re dying at the rate of around 700 a year. Give or take a few.

Find me an American city with a comparable violent death rate. Have fun!

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

GaDumna-ssLib: Alright, let’s simplify this so that you can understand the situation. More Americans get killed in 4 American cities per year than do in the whole entire country of Iraq regardless of population.

And you piece of shi-t libs don’t care because you can’t blame Bush. Your sorry as-s users of these soldiers deaths for political purposes. That’s the real truth, scumbag.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 05:59 PM | Link to this

seekling: You would rather let the women and children fend for themmselves like they did on 9/11, right? Let’s not let the volunteer army protect us, let’s make the women jump out of burning skyscrapers. We can sing KumBayaah at their funerals.

Maggot.

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 06:01 PM | Link to this

Little Pinko,

Again, you’re not real bright, are you? I am not saying I’m against “family values;” I’m saying you Republicans don’t have any. You talk about them all the time, but your party is full of criminals, child molesters, liars, etc. The list goes on. It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure out the point I was making. As a matter of fact, it shouldn’t even have taken a reasonably ignorant person to have figured it out, so I guess you don’t even pass that bar. You win the prize for most idiotic idiot. Congratulations, moron.

By getalife

April 15, 2006 06:03 PM | Link to this

I know why.

Christians are scared to death of Islam and Muslims.

You can read it at the lgf and reg. is open.

By Big Bad Elephant

April 15, 2006 06:06 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

I took care of the zoo keeper. SPLAT.

Now this is what should have been the headline:

The Cheneys reported adjusted gross income of nearly $8.82 million and donated about $6.87 million to charity

Bill and Hill? Can you match that?

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 06:07 PM | Link to this

Idiot,

Once again, let me simplify this for you. If you want to count the whole country of Iraq, then you have to count the Iraqi’s killed there also, so we’re talking at the absolute least 53,000 killed, and it’s probably closer to 100,000. Even the most ignorant Republitards wouldn’t make the comparison you are trying to. Are you really just a liberal name-jacker trying to make Andy look stupid? He really doesn’t need the help, but thanks anyway.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

getalife,

What’s your point?

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 06:13 PM | Link to this

getalife- I don’t know much about Coptic Christians, except that they reside in Egypt going back to biblical times. Anyone have info?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

Abortion Pills Online

Discreet European source for abortion pills. Reasonably priced, no prescription needed, one week delivery. No age limits because it’s not controlled by American authorities. Children of conservatives welcome!

By getalife

April 15, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

DavidU,

There was an outbreak of violence in Alexandria today.

Holy war batman!

By Robert

April 15, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

Great now we have moved on from spaming the blog with child molestation cases, to abortion commercials.

Does that help discussion on either ‘side’?

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 06:29 PM | Link to this

Alright, I’m getting nowhere with this putz wanker. Could somebody else explain to this moron that 1537 is more than 846? WTF?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 06:35 PM | Link to this

Alright, I was trying to be nice but if you must use my name, if you are so shallow that you can’t come up with your own persona, if you are such an absolute failure that you devote all of your time to what I have to say, then use this name^^^.

By getalife

April 15, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

My point is there are roughly 1.4 billion muslims What I read at the lgf is no tolerance to a different religion.

I think this is very dangerous, especially with our leadership.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 06:42 PM | Link to this

seekling: You would rather let the women and children fend for themmselves like they did on 9/11, right?

Gosh, innocent! I was under the impression that NONE of the 9/11 hijackers were Iraqi.

So what’s your point?

And you really REALLY need a calculator. Or learn how to count. Is it true that you’re a product of ‘no child left behind’?

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this

getalife- If it’s the same as the 1999 riot, then one of the stabbed victims is going to be sent to jail…..For being Coptic and getting in the way of a p.issed off Muslim and his knife.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 06:50 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I still don’t get your point except you seem to have found some humor where none exists.

I do thank you for leading me to his unbelievable but true story though, which I’ll call Islamic Don’t “You Dare Say It” Terrorists

Works are underway to eliminate the expression “Islamic terrorism” from the EU’s current dictionary.

Both the EU and Europol have been seeking a new concept for some time for the expression, “Islamic terrorism”.

Many experts believe that the words “Islam” and “terrorism” must not be used together, and concluded that the use of such expressions “alienates” Muslims in Europe.

Let’s hear some ideas! I’ll start -

How about Islamic Bunny Wabbit terrorism during Easter week.

Then I’d suggest we move to Mohammed’s Followers Spring Rage Frolic, followed by Allah’s Summer Genocide, and Mohammed’s Autumn Horn-a-Plenty Jihad Harvest, until we finally get to *Islam’s Nuclear Wintercapades.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 06:53 PM | Link to this

gatalife,

No tolerance from whom? Christians or Muslims?

I know to most observers this must seem like a really stupid question, but considering how Christians are The Great Satan for many of the posters here, it is a fair question and I can honestly say that I don’t know for sure what your answer will be.

Now that’s scary!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 06:55 PM | Link to this

seekling: Simpleton, Al Qaeda didn’t hit us with a nuke on 9/11 because they didn’t have one. Since Iran claims to be close to producing the bomb it makes it even more imperitive that we do something to stop this from happening so that our women and children don’t suffer a horrible, agonizing death from burns or radiation.

This is not a hard decision to make unless you are a clown, which of course you are.

By seeker

April 15, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

Hey! A flash from the past! February, 2003 to be exact, a little over a month before the Iraq invasion. That’s when Paul Wolfowitz, then Deputy Defense Secretary told Congress how painless the war would be! Take it away, Wolfie!

In his testimony, Mr. Wolfowitz ticked off several reasons why he believed a much smaller coalition peacekeeping force than General Shinseki envisioned would be sufficient to police and rebuild postwar Iraq. He said there was no history of ethnic strife in Iraq, as there was in Bosnia or Kosovo. He said Iraqi civilians would welcome an American-led liberation force that “stayed as long as necessary but left as soon as possible,” but would oppose a long-term occupation force. And he said that nations that oppose war with Iraq would likely sign up to help rebuild it. “I would expect that even countries like France will have a strong interest in assisting Iraq in reconstruction,” Mr. Wolfowitz said.

For this, Wolfowitz was given a medal and sent to the World Bank by Bush!! Wowee!!

Now why would anyone, with even half a brain, support any future military action proposed by the Bush circus?

By getalife

April 15, 2006 07:00 PM | Link to this

Ah, such an arrogant attitude toward others. Here is the truth.

Nobody is better than anybody.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 07:02 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

I doubt that I can find a link for Holy War Batman! but I did find this

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 07:07 PM | Link to this

From most clippings I just read, Muslims and Coptics seem to “riot/fight/abuse each other/whatever you want to call it” once a year, all things considered that’s amazing! Opposite religions, one out numbers the other by 90%, living in a country that does not separate church and state….and they only fight once a year? Heck, They should probably go teach Shiites and Sunnis how to live in one country with 2 religions and them maybe take a swipe at the whole Palestine/Israel conflict.

By WashingtonState

April 15, 2006 07:14 PM | Link to this

I got a question. Who are we gonna have plan the next war? Is this one going well enough that we want the same people to plan it or do we need some new blood? Just curious.

By getalife

April 15, 2006 07:15 PM | Link to this

Well, I found this.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 07:18 PM | Link to this

WashSt.- I don’t think Pres Bush can afford to fire Rumsfeld (It would be admitting that it’s going bad in Iraq), so unless they find a dead hooker in Rumsfeld’s closet. He’s running the Iran attack.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 07:22 PM | Link to this

Let’s see, the democrats escalated the war in Vietnam, got 58,000 men killed and ran screaming from there , abandoning an ally, right when they had the war won.

Bush has removed a dictator who was grinding up 100,000 of his own citizens a year, freeing 25,000,000 people from tyranny giving them voice in their own government, all at the amazingly low, but sad cost of 2400 American lifes, and we are not going to surrender this to a rag tag bunch of chickensh-it foreign car bombers.

Yep, let’s let Bush plan the Iranian war, I’m cool with dat.

By WashingtonState

April 15, 2006 07:42 PM | Link to this

Hey Suck, Wasn’t it you who challenged me to find just one more general who didn’t support the conduct of the war so far? Back then, I cited two. How many more do you want now?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 07:49 PM | Link to this

Cynthia Tucker has had an out of body experience and I find it quite hilarious:

I was to find men willing to help him paint, lift, scrape, fill, dig. The pay was hardly exorbitant — $6 an hour. But it seemed reasonable for unskilled labor.

The going rate for construction work, even in Bama, is like $15 an hour, minimum. And here’s Clueless wielding $6 like it will open the kingdom to retirement.

This is so deliciously pitiful. How many times has Queen Pinko gone on record about the minimum wage being too low? I thought Bush was the hideous miser, starving infants and sending the elderly out to the garbage dump to scrounge for dinner?

Are these libs immune from seeing their own hypocrisy? Do they even care?

These are men (the poor, idle blacks in Cynthia’s hometown, or actually, some dudes not stupid enough to sweat over $6 an hour) who can no longer count the military as an option because it doesn’t want them.

Really? Then what was this all about?:

Working class fight war while well-off defend it- Cynthia “Mother Lib” Tucker, 3/26/06

Unreal.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 07:55 PM | Link to this

Generals defend Rumsfeld By Rowan Scarborough

Several retired generals who worked with Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, including a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, yesterday decried calls for the secretary’s resignation from other retired officers.

“I think what we see happening with retired general officers is bad for the military, bad for civil-military relations and bad for the country,” retired Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs.

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 08:01 PM | Link to this

Idiot Andy (or dead-on wanker),

Okay, let’s try something called a “percentage.” You probably won’t understand the concept, but let’s give it a go.

American cities: 1,500 out of 14,000,000 is 1/100 of 1 percent or 1 out of every 10,000 people who are mudered.

Americans in Iraq: 850 out of 140,000 is 6/10 of 1 percent or 1 out of every 165 soldiers killed.

Let’s review. In America, 1 out of 10,000 murdered. In Iraq, 1 out of 165 killed in action. You are an idiot.

If you notice, none of your Republitard brethren are coming to your defense because they realize how stupid your argument is. You will argue any conservative point regardless of how utterly nonsensical it is. It’s a wonder Bush hasn’t pinned a medal on your dumbas$ yet.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 08:18 PM | Link to this

Look, numbnuts, 1537 is still more than 846 anyway you look at it. You can put the lib nuance to it all you want. More Americans were killed in 4 American cities than were in the whole entire country of Iraq. It’s a fact, dick-head.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 08:19 PM | Link to this

Ernie Chambers is Nebraska’s only African-American state senator…..[the] driving force behind a measure passed by the Legislature on Thursday and signed into law by the governor that calls for dividing the Omaha public schools into three racially identifiable districts, one largely black, one white and one mostly Hispanic. The law, which opponents are calling state-sponsored segregation, has thrown Nebraska into an uproar, prompting fierce debate about the value of integration versus what Mr. Chambers calls a desire by blacks to control a school district in which their children are a majority.

Segregation? Why? Why? We are moving backwards people….backwards.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 08:20 PM | Link to this

GaDemlib,

Considering the fact that most of these American cities are run by Democrats, and have been for years, the cities should be little crime-free socialist oases.

On the other hand we are constantly treated to stories that Iraq is a hopeless quagmire in the middle of a full out civil war with the only unified cause being the killing of American soldiers.

I think under these circumstances your percentages aren’t doing so well.

By GaDemLib

April 15, 2006 08:26 PM | Link to this

Idiot Andy,

If you to were make the assumption that you are now making, that being in Iraq is safer than being in New York or Atlanta, to a veteran who has actually been there, they would kick your lilly white as$, which is exactly what they should do. You are unbelievably dense. No wonder no one will employ your pathetic loser as$.

By DavidU

April 15, 2006 08:30 PM | Link to this

GaDemLib- I don’t think you’ll get a “Oh! ok you are right” from anyone here. Even if it is simple math. Accept and move on to the next topic.

By Huge

April 15, 2006 08:32 PM | Link to this

To GDL and LSL:

Math problems? Call 1-800-[(10x)(13i)2]-[sin(xy)/2.362x].

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 08:49 PM | Link to this

GaDumas-sLib: I tell you what, I’ll go to the nearest military installation and I’ll share my theory with the soldiers there under one circumstance- That you go to HE Holmes and share your ignorant counter argument with the first democrat you see.

Could you videotape your encounter? We would all love to see it.

Idiot.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 08:58 PM | Link to this

Here is the truth. Nobody is better than anybody. Getalife,

If that’s what you believe, then we have gotten to the root of your warped thinking.

Let’s see - Mass murderer or innocent child. The child is no better than the murderer. Ronald Reagan no better than Abu Musab Al Zarqawi.

Let me ask you a simple question - Which would be BETTER:

Living under the Taliban or living under George Bush?

Here’s a little brain music to help you answer the question.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 08:59 PM | Link to this

A Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army sent the following email in response to David Ignatius’ assertion in the Washington Post yesterday that 75%+ of senior military officers want to see Rumsfeld gone:

However, I can tell you that beyond the Beltway in dusty and dirty places like Ft. Benning, Ft. Stewart, Ft. Hood, Ft. Campbell and Ft. Bragg, where officers wear BDUs instead of Class Bs that there are tens of thousands of Officers, Commissioned/Warrant/Non-Commissioned, that would go to hell and back for this Secretary.

OOooooorrrraaaaahhh!

By finch

April 15, 2006 09:07 PM | Link to this

This place has careened off topic far more than usual! Fascinating.

What I’ve learned today: Nobody’s changing any minds… Suck REALLY needs to bone up on his math… DavidU gets applause for bringing up interesting stuff (what is with the Omaha schools?), and Dick Cheney must have the worst accountant in the US! He let the feds keep nearly $2 million in withholding? Ouch!

And Suck, I’m so glad I’m in your thoughts. I think you’re cute too.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 15, 2006 09:11 PM | Link to this

finch: When I said simpleton, how did you know I was talking about you?

By getalife

April 15, 2006 09:15 PM | Link to this

What a silly question:

Living under the Taliban or living under George Bush?

There are cajuns here, no Taliban.

I would prefer to be living in a country where our leaders do not lie to us like we are a bunch of gullible wingnuts.

It would be nice if we had a government for the people and not for the Corporations and lobbyists.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 09:32 PM | Link to this

Sorry, Danish, living under the Shrub or under Taliban are, fortunately, not the only options available. Hopefully the American people will come to their senses (if any are left) and vote in someone less corrupt and not insane. Mind you, I’m not very optimistic, but there is a chance that in 2006 and 2008 we will give these idiots the boot.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 15, 2006 09:32 PM | Link to this

I like Sucks name. Now that I have stolen it from him, I think I’ll keep it. Har, har, har, har.

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 09:47 PM | Link to this

Getalife,

What’s with you? Back on the meds again?

You are living under the best government in the world and all you can do is act like YOU DON’T LIKE IT.

Do you really want to side with those who dishonor your government, your military and your ELECTED officials? Have you forgotten 9/11? Wakeup, Getalife. Wake up.

By @@

April 15, 2006 10:06 PM | Link to this

Getalife:

Cajuns are fond of two things:

They love to party (eat, drink & dance).

They have a positive outlook on life and they vote Republican.

Enjoy “the party” Getalife.

By finch

April 15, 2006 10:16 PM | Link to this

getalife,

I’d say you are very much awake and alert! A true patriot never blindly follows his or her nation’s leaders.

And “my country right or wrong” is a concept that has no place in a true democracy.

I salute you. Keep up the good work.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 10:17 PM | Link to this

• You are living under the best government in the world and all you can do is act like YOU DON’T LIKE IT. * I’m sorry, Dusty, wherever did you get the idea that we’re living under the best government in the world? Hannity told you so?

• Do you really want to side with those who dishonor your government, your military and your ELECTED officials? * They are NOT one single entity. It’s not only possible, but in this case advisable to dishonor some. For instance Bush dishonors our military by lying to them, and by sending them to die for no good reason. Therefore it is perfectly acceptable to dishonor him.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 10:30 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Do you mind if I criticize you for using too many commas?

Now on to something really important - can you PLEASE tell us where the best country is!! You can keep the exact location a secret - just give us a few hints.

I love mysteries!

By finch

April 15, 2006 10:42 PM | Link to this

I’ll grant Dusty this…

US citizens do live under the best government in the world.. but that’s all relative, isn’t it? And I reserve the right to question authority.

To paraphrase Winston Churchill: “It has been said that democracy in the US is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

I like that.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 10:42 PM | Link to this

You can criticize me if you point out where I used comas that were not grammatically correct. Until then, probably not.

*Now on to something really important - can you PLEASE tell us where the best country is!! * I’m sorry, I thought we were talking about the best government. I guess I got that idea when you said “You are living under the best government in the world”. But, hey, that’s just me. I like to read. I also like being honest. It’s not for everyone, obviously.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 10:46 PM | Link to this

A true patriot never blindly follows his or her nation’s leaders.

finch,

I see that you have been well-trained in politically correct gender welcoming speech. You have Cornell to thank for that, no doubt.

You may want to send a little note to your favorite Republican, Rep. Ron Paul, and get him up to date on this very sensitive topic.

He had the audacity to refer to Iran as “her”!

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 10:50 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

You are so right. As you said, “living under the Shrub or the Taliban are not the only options”.

In a great burst of goodwill, I will be glad to help you find “an option” with all kinds of lovely people, not those senseless old Americans like you mentioned.

Take your pick and hurry to find your happiness. We have a fruit basket ready for your departure.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 10:51 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Wrong:

Sorry, Danish, living under the Shrub or under Taliban are, fortunately, not the only options available

Right:

Sorry, Danish. Fortunately, living under Shrub or the Taliban are not the only options available.

Psssst. Where is the best government?

By Dan

April 15, 2006 10:54 PM | Link to this

There is really no such thing as “using too many commas.” Some people enjoy writing in the same manner in which they speak - for effect. It’s quite proper. You, of all geeks, should be giving us grammar lessons.

I love the subject of “family values.” The family values which I teach my children are to NOT have the family values of the average Republican. That’s a high priority of importance.

By getalife

April 15, 2006 11:03 PM | Link to this

Yes, you would have to be high not to see the real world in which we live.

I love this country and know we can do better. It is our duty as citizens to try hold our government accountable.

It is great to see people like finch and rushncap trying to explain this but know it is falling on deaf ears. No, I am off the meds, wide awake and feeling as good as possible. Thanks for asking.

By rushncap

April 15, 2006 11:04 PM | Link to this

Dusty — are you a complete dolt? Let me get this straight: you think that the only 2 options for America are Shrub or Taliban?? You are nuts.

Danish — are you the same thing as Dusty?

P.S. Thank you Dan.

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 11:08 PM | Link to this

That’s OK, Dan.

Just don’t teach your children the family values of the average Democrat.

Such injustice cannot be tolerated.

By getalife

April 15, 2006 11:13 PM | Link to this

You are nuts

Well, I have been trying to get Andy to seek treatment for the war on libs in his head.

He thinks libs are the enemy.

By Dusty

April 15, 2006 11:16 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

I must be a dolt. I was quoting what you said. Now that IS plain foolishness.

By finch

April 15, 2006 11:17 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

You’re scraping the bottom of the barrel when your core argument is centered on punctuation and pronouns.

That’s the best you can do? I’m disappointed in you.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 11:21 PM | Link to this

Dan,

Sorry you don’t get the joke. It’s kind of inside and even Rushncap doesn’t get it.

Rushncap,

I am not Dusty, and I never said that there were only two options. My challenge was based on this statement by Getalife: Here is the truth. Nobody is better than anybody.

I disputed that. You can take the time to scroll up and find it as I can’t be bothered.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 11:24 PM | Link to this

finch,

At this point you’ll have to go up^^^, possibly even a few days to get it.

Dusty and RW know what I’m talking about.

I’m off to bed.

By Buy Danish

April 15, 2006 11:30 PM | Link to this

Correction! RW and @@ get it. I’m not sure about Dusty.

By @@

April 15, 2006 11:31 PM | Link to this

Dusty and RW know what I’m talking about.

And so does “Slow @@ or OO”.

By getalife

April 15, 2006 11:31 PM | Link to this

Yes, I said it because they seem arrogant.

Also, I think Andy’s mental illness maybe contagious.

By RW-(the original)

April 15, 2006 11:50 PM | Link to this

finch,

AND I’m disappointed in you for not keeping up with the punctuation AND wording police.

By Steve

April 16, 2006 02:01 AM | Link to this

DAN: I thank you as well. On both topics, I couldn’t agree more.

I was born into hi upper-class Republicanism. The word “Democrat” was lower than low. As a young adult I spent several years of activity in big-city Repub dinners, meetings, functions. I witnessed people I’d known since childhood, gone to school with, interacted socially with, checking their everyday masks at the door - enjoying an evening of vicious and obsessive hatred, bitterness, envy, God knows what else, against anything/anyone NOT Republican. I quickly pruned those ugly bastards out of my life and probably became their worst enemy - as I knew them so damned well.

The experience made me teach my own kids to always keep an open mind and to read, study, analyze matters of importance. To NEVER join in with a political dogma of any kind. To never say, “Well, how should I vote on this issue? Let’s see what The Party says I should do.” To always form their OWN opinions based on the intelligence and methodology with which they have been provided. Today they are well-adjusted, content, positive, contributing citizens of this country, with strong, ever-learning opinions and the ability to back them up. No hatred and chronic negativity in their lives, resultant of such as that which the Repub Party - and other organizations - has/have evolved into. Their lives are full and successful. A result of a proper learning process. Nite.

By Val

April 16, 2006 02:31 AM | Link to this

Amen, Steve. Amen. Very nice.

Would seem like an easy, reasonable thing to do and way to teach and insure the enrichment of our future.

Yet more than half of Americans ignorantly, angrily, blindly blunder thru life while leaving their filthy debris behind for all of us to live with and clean up.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 06:18 AM | Link to this

What’s up with dis?

By Dan April 15, 2006 10:54 PM The family values which I teach my children are to NOT have the family values of the average Republican.

By Steve April 16, 2006 02:01 AM The experience made me teach my own kids to always keep an open mind and to read, study, analyze matters of importance.

By Val April 16, 2006 02:31 AM Amen, Steve. Amen. Very nice.

This is one poster obviously, that’s not the point, if not “family values” then what are you teaching your children? How to be transgendered? Is this the love that you choose to bestow on them, the “open mindessness,” a life of meaningless empty sexual perversion?

Or are you annointing yourself for sainthood? Are you better then Republicans, you don’t never make mistakes, do you?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 06:31 AM | Link to this

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.- John 3:16.

God loves you whether you are a lib or a Con, whether you are right or wrong, whether you like George Bush or you hate George Bush. None of that matters on this Blessed Day Of Forgiveness. He gave His Only Son because we are not perfect, we are not free of sin.

The only thing we have in common is that we are all God’s Children. Give Praise to Him on this Day of Salvation, for His Gift of Eternal Love for You.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 07:39 AM | Link to this

As a liberal I can’t trust you to be telling the truth when you write; ” By Liberals Suck And Lie April 16, 2006 06:31 AM | Link to this For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.- John 3:16.

God loves you whether you are a lib or a Con, whether you are right or wrong, whether you like George Bush or you hate George Bush. None of that matters on this Blessed Day Of Forgiveness. He gave His Only Son because we are not perfect, we are not free of sin.

The only thing we have in common is that we are all God’s Children. Give Praise to Him on this Day of Salvation, for His Gift of Eternal Love for You.”

After beginning the entire blog with, By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 14, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this Why give cash? The libs will believe anything you tell them, anyway.

You sir, have no credibility You can stand by the first thing you wrote, or make lame attemps to explain how what you wrote is not what you meant. What I look forward to is yet another fowl mouthed reply from the good Christian in you.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 07:40 AM | Link to this

As a liberal I can’t trust you to be telling the truth when you write; ” By Liberals Suck And Lie April 16, 2006 06:31 AM | Link to this For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, so that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.- John 3:16.

God loves you whether you are a lib or a Con, whether you are right or wrong, whether you like George Bush or you hate George Bush. None of that matters on this Blessed Day Of Forgiveness. He gave His Only Son because we are not perfect, we are not free of sin.

The only thing we have in common is that we are all God’s Children. Give Praise to Him on this Day of Salvation, for His Gift of Eternal Love for You.”

After beginning the entire blog with, By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 14, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this Why give cash? The libs will believe anything you tell them, anyway.

You sir, have no credibility You can stand by the first thing you wrote, or make lame attemps to explain how what you wrote is not what you meant. What I look forward to is yet another fowl mouthed reply from the good Christian in you.

By AntiRadical

April 16, 2006 07:42 AM | Link to this

183+ Posts and not one regarding the content of this toon. Is it that obtuse for everyone? New York Post Page Six is well known for it’s dirt dealing exposes. This toon lampoons the Post’s recent scandal where frequent Page Six contributor Jared Paul Stern is reputed to have tried to blackmail supermarket billionaire Ron Burkle for $100,000 plus a $10,000-a-month stipend in exchange for going easy on him in Page Six. Does anyone on this blog read anymore or is this now the “I just look at the pictures” crowd?

I think the problem is much more onerous, though. The entire country is so politically fragmented and divisive that anything without a party spin is not worthy of consideration. In digression, I have to wonder what is the cause. I am not exactly a young man but I have never seen a time where the citizenry and political parties have been so polarized.

Maybe if people actually did a little reading and kept themselves aware of current issues, there would be more productive discourse in our society as well as in the political arena!

By Robert

April 16, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

AntiRadical;

Page Six, is a glorified National Enquire. NOT INTERESTING. But thanks for policing the board.

By getalife

April 16, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

No, the problem is too many people read gossip crap and do not read about current events.

As far as policing this board, it is like the Congressional ethics truce. You do not report mine and I will not report yours. In other words, do as you please.

By Buy Danish

April 16, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this

I was born into hi upper-class Republicanism

Steve,

What is a “hi” upper-class? It appears that your education is not befitting your elevated social stature.

No hatred and chronic negativity in their lives, resultant of such as that which the Repub Party - and other organizations - has/have evolved into.

Apparently you were inspired by Winston Churchill’s - “This is the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put.”

Alas, as you are not Winston Churchill, when you write that way it just sounds “lo” class with “hi” class pretensions.

By Buy Danish

April 16, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

finch,

Sorry, but Steve^^^ left the door so wide open I just couldn’t resist.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 10:08 AM | Link to this

“What is a “hi” upper-class? It appears that your education is not befitting your elevated social stature.” This from a man who supports a man born into an upper class Connecticut family … Yale I believe, only to ask questions such as, ” Is our children learning?” But, I dare not go further as I fear an avalanche of Bushisms.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 10:09 AM | Link to this

“What is a “hi” upper-class? It appears that your education is not befitting your elevated social stature.” This from a man who supports a man born into an upper class Connecticut family … Yale I believe, only to ask questions such as, ” Is our children learning?” But, I dare not go further as I fear an avalanche of Bushisms.

By Buy Danish

April 16, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this

CMAC CMAC

You can try to change the subject, but it doesn’t change the fact that Steve is a pretentious wanker. He’s the one posting here, not W.

BTW, could you change your name? I find it “offensive”. Just playing by the Left’s rules…

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 10:34 AM | Link to this

By Buy Danish April 16, 2006 10:23 AM | Link to this CMAC CMAC

You can try to change the subject, but it doesn’t change the fact that Steve is a pretentious wanker. He’s the one posting here, not W.

BTW, could you change your name? I find it “offensive”. Just playing by the Left’s rules…

Nope.

By @@

April 16, 2006 10:35 AM | Link to this

I don’t think Bush ever claimed to be from “hi-upper class”. There’s the distinct difference between people like Steve and President Bush.

I’m just a commoner and so proud to call myself that.

By Buy Danish

April 16, 2006 10:50 AM | Link to this

@@,

You’re exactly right. Unlike Steve and the so-called “elites”, Bush is remarkably unpretentious and humble.

By Buy Danish

April 16, 2006 10:51 AM | Link to this

CMAC CMAC,

Typical liberal.

By James

April 16, 2006 11:02 AM | Link to this

If for one moment you think that “W”ever thought of himself as a “commoner” —- well, you have your head where it shouldn’t be!

By Buy Danish

April 16, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

Speaking of pretentious wankers, here is my profile: My father went to Harvard, his father went to Harvard, his father went to Harvard, his father went to Harvard, his father went to Harvard (and took an active role in hanging the Salem witches, a type of religious fanaticism I still carry with me to this day). My brother went to Stanford. What does that make me? White. Arrogant. Pretentious. The underachiever in the family. A cracker. A Republican. A religious extremist. Discriminatory. An old hag. White. A conservative b!tch. Someone with a priviledged, unrealistic perspective. Not nearly as bright as I think I am. I win the pretentious award.

By Buy Danish (the original)

April 16, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

close, but I’m black and female.

By finch

April 16, 2006 11:28 AM | Link to this

Grammar police! Grammar police! Hide! Duck! Omigawd the punctuation and pronoun commandos are loose! We’re doomed! Doomed, doomed as doomed can be!!!

BD, I couldn’t resist either, so here’s another Churchill quote, even better than the one I posted in democracy:

“Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure the tides and hurricanes he will encounter. The statesman who yields to war fever must realize that once the signal is given, he is no longer the master of policy but the slave of unforeseeable and uncontrollable events.”

A happy and glorious Easter to all.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 11:35 AM | Link to this

fake Danish,

I’ll be kind this time and won’t point out your factual, grammatical or spelling errors.

If Steve really were who he claims he is, he wouldn’t mangle the english language the way he did at the precise moment that he trys to impress us.

By DavidU

April 16, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

Some 200 Iranians have volunteered in the past few days to carry out “martyrdom missions” against U.S. and British interests around the world if Iran is attacked, a hard-line group said Sunday.

Well at least they are not focused solely on the US, so that’s basically 100 martyrs divided equally per country, right?

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 16, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

TONY Blair has told George Bush that Britain cannot offer military support to any strike on Iran, regardless of whether the move wins the backing of the international community, government sources claimed yesterday.

By getalife

April 16, 2006 12:18 PM | Link to this

I think England may have some investments in Iran

By Andy

April 16, 2006 12:19 PM | Link to this

King of Kings! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! And Lord of Lords! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! And He shall reign for ever and ever, For ever and ever, forever and ever, Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

Ooops, pardon me, I’m just carrying a tune…

By getalife

April 16, 2006 12:37 PM | Link to this

Looks like England has corruption too:

Police probe ‘government contracts for donations’ SCOTLAND Yard is to investigate claims that multi-million-pound government contracts were handed out in exchange for donations to the Labour Party.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 16, 2006 12:41 PM | Link to this

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican Party is in serious danger of losing political ground in November elections if it does not enact reforms that eliminate waste and hold the federal bureaucracy to higher standards, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said on Sunday.

By Dusty

April 16, 2006 01:38 PM | Link to this

Hey…I want to play Elite for the Day. May I?

My Easter bonnet with the blue ribbon on it is worthy of elitist recognition.

That Steve is hogging the spotlight. Deserves no applause whatsoever.!! Boo…

By Huge

April 16, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

LSL, IF you really posted this, then read on. I cannot allow this to go unregarded.

*By Liberals Suck And Lie April 16, 2006 06:31 AM | Link to this …God loves you whether you are a lib or a Con, (note the little l and the capital C - right out of racist books from the sixties where they used a little b for blacks and a capital W for whites) whether you are right or wrong (interesting choice of words), whether you like George Bush or you hate George Bush. (also note the use of like and hate, rather than like and dislike) None of that matters on this Blessed Day Of Forgiveness. He gave His Only Son because we are not perfect, we are not free of sin.

The only thing we have in common is that we are all God’s Children. Give Praise to Him on this Day of Salvation, for His Gift of Eternal Love for You.*

This is a near perfect example as to why so many reasonable people are uber suspicious of the far-right religious segment of our society. This man is unquestionably the most foul-mouthed, hate-filled, arrogant and intimidating guy in this entire site. Many among us have deliberately said stupid things to p!ss others off, and that is not an excuse. But he is definitely in a category of an exceptional few. His posts are more often than not punctuated with the most vicious personal verbal attacks he can come up with. This is a fact, it is not debatable. And, worse yet, he creates an environment where there are quite a few others more than willing to join in with sophmoric “counter-attacks”. THIS ISN”T A WAR PEOPLE!!!

I fully expect after this “holy” day, Brother Andy to renew with fervor the constant debasement of others who dare have differing opinions and speak them out loud, the needless and hateful name calling, and his angry at the universe spiel. An act? Maybe. But it shouldn’t be condoned. It’s a shame too, because he really does have some interesting and relevant stuff to say.

Of course, typically his “posse comitatus” of three or four will be right there to rush to his defense and try to help gloss things over. (For example: “I don’t find Andy particularly obnoxious”, which is an incredible but true post from a few days ago!) And I absolutely expect a few to make the usual comments or flame me now, with yet more baseless personal attacks, until He returns to finish the job. Without, of course, any discussion or reasoned response to the topic (much less looking for common ground). I.E. Anger management and being a pious fraud.

You want forgiveness, Andy? Just look around at some of your fellow human beings and ask for it. It’s called humility. All of us can use a little (or a lot) more…

By Dusty

April 16, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

For AntiRadical (so he will feel better about comments on the ‘toon..)

Oh rabbit rabbit rabbit,

You’ve lost out, dagnabit.

You paid just a peep

For journalists to reap.

Now your reputation has really HAD IT!

Oh, well, happy Easter.

By @@

April 16, 2006 02:14 PM | Link to this

Aaahhh Churchill, a well-rounded man in more ways than one.

“An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last.” Sir Winston Churchill

By getalife

April 16, 2006 02:22 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Yes, Andy has the contagious mental illness I will call “party before country”.

He has demons in his head screaming the “libs are the enemy”.

Have pity for this sick man. I do.

By DavidU

April 16, 2006 02:26 PM | Link to this

The Dutch, immigration, religion, cartoons and much more. A world problem.

Eventually this problem will make it’s way over to the US like all problems do and I wonder how we will react to it (I’m talking about a wave of immigrants of Islamic faith, not 9/11). The Dutch applied multi-culturalism completely and it did not work. Spain tried to preserve it’s identity at all cost but that was under a military dictatorship, And it’s just in as bad a shape as any other European country. The UK has tried a mix of both extremes and nothing.

How do you stir in a religion like Islam into the US melting Pot? Do we give it a state like with the Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) and then just kind of ignore it? or do we hope to keep it in small numbers in their own little cities like the Amish?

How to deal with a problem with roots going back to the bible, Isaac and Ishmael, that no one throughout history has been able to solve?

By Dusty

April 16, 2006 02:40 PM | Link to this

Huge,

Many overbearing paragraphs to teach Andy humility? Isn’t that a bit officious?

Andy loves this country and fights for it verbally every day on this blog. If he speaks in ways you don’t like, there are many others who are equally outspoken. But you didn’t mention them.

Blogs are not noted for strict censorship and judges. There is no job opening right now. Suppose you just grin and bear it!

By AntiRadical

April 16, 2006 02:44 PM | Link to this

Thanks Dusty. Your post is the third out of 214 that has anything whatsoever to do with the blog topic.

I have no qualm with digression from the topic (we all do it all the time), but good manners I think at least merits a mention of the host’s work. After that, I personally feel that I have acted as a good guest and then feel free to pursue tangental topics. Everyone else is, of course, free to practice their own etiquette as they see fit.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 02:53 PM | Link to this

David U,

We are under no obligation as a country to let in hordes of people whose culture shares nothing in common with ours, and who have no intention of melting.

Multiculturalism is a very dangerous thing and we would be wise to discourage all claims to the contrary.

By @@

April 16, 2006 02:55 PM | Link to this

I commented on the cartoon by stating that I had no idea what the topic was about. After finch explained it to me, I researched it.

I do however, think it is more detailed, artistically, than any of ml’s other works. O.K.?

The topic, once researched, doesn’t really surprise or interest me though.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 02:58 PM | Link to this

Dusty,

Huge is the name of a poster so boring,

That to make one simple point takes him all morning.

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 03:02 PM | Link to this

It’s true, Dusty, Andy does love this country. He just happens to hate all those who inhabit it.

By getalife

April 16, 2006 03:23 PM | Link to this

Especially the “pinkos”.

Country before party is the cure.

By Dusty

April 16, 2006 03:24 PM | Link to this

DavidU,

I see you are trying to stir a breath of fresh air here.

As to the acceptance of immigrants of any religion, our best hope is to teach and follow the law with confidence.I am not trying to tie in illegal Latinos here but I do think the law must be followed.

You mentioned Mormans and Amish. I don’t believe they are breaking any laws. Not any more. No polygamy. As far as I know they are good citizens.

American Muslims were not in the news until 9/11. All Muslims are NOT terrorists and all terrorists are NOT Muslims. Do I need to mention Oklahoma City?

You see, I still believe in democracy and equality under the law. Europe IS having many problems. I cannot draw concrete conclusions there. But Isaac and Ishmael? Abraham was their father and had great faith. Perhaps that is what we need to bolster our own system.

By lol

April 16, 2006 03:25 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish, your family must be real proud of you, wasting your life away blogging here 24/7. (Btw, you forgot to mention in your little profile that your’re fat.)

By Bushwhacker

April 16, 2006 03:56 PM | Link to this

Gingrich Worries About GOP Chances in Nov.

Captain Obvious to the rescue.

By Dusty

April 16, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

Rushncap,

The people ARE the country. That’s what it is all about. Andy can speak for himself but hate is not the objective.

Andy does have a short fuse and you liberals love to light it. And vice versa. All of you like the sparks. Keeps you awake.

Buy Danish,

I think you are not adoring,

The one who is so boring.

Must go now. See you later, alligator. After while,__! (Cliche time!)

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 04:01 PM | Link to this

By Huge April 16, 2006 01:54 PM LSL, IF you really posted this, then read on. I cannot allow this to go unregarded.

Opinions are like a-ssholes, everybody has one.

This huge goofball is a pretentious little son of a bi-tch. I’m proud that he’s able to elect himself the morality judge of this blog and lord over the behaviour of all the other participants. It’s just like a busy body liberal, minding everybody’s business but their own.

If you want to talk about rude, what do you call being focused on your wee wee as the center of your existence and shoving your little fixation down the throats of the rest of the world whether we want to know about it or not? What gives you the right to destroy society and culture claiming special rights for the way you choose to get your rocks off?

If you liberals are excusing any behaviour that comes down the pike so that no one’s feelings get hurt, then what is the supposed harm that I am causing with my coarseness? Don’t I have the right to act however I want to, Mr. Free For All? Mr. Self Righteous?

(The lowercase spelling is a lack of respect, that’s why pinko is spelled that way. And no, I do not hate Blacks, you race baiting piece of sh-it.)

getalife: Liberalism is a sin, an affront to humanity, a disgusting feelgood past time that could wind up costing us the United States of America. Of course, liberals are the enemy.

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 04:16 PM | Link to this

Liberalism is a sin, an affront to humanity, a disgusting feelgood past time that could wind up costing us the United States of America. Of course, liberals are the enemy.

Ah yes, li’l andy in a nutshell. It’s too bad we don’t have national healthcare, otherwise he’d be able to get treatment for his condition.

By DavidU

April 16, 2006 04:16 PM | Link to this

BD- I agree multi-culturalism has many problems, in the Netherlands however they went to extremes trying to make it work. Giving Catholics, Protestants and Muslims their own everything, basically segregating each group from each other in order to keep their religious cultures intact. While not allowing them nor teaching the newest immigrant (who the government had imported as labor) to be ‘Dutch’. I understand when you say we are not “obligation as a country to let in hordes of people whose culture shares nothing in common with ours” but in my opinion I don’t believe that honors the principles which created this country, specially if it’s based on just being a Muslim.

Dusty- I brought up Ishmael and Isaac, because if you believe in the Bible, Torah or Koran. The brothers are the beginning of the divide between Jews and Arabs or Muslims and Christians (crusades) they are where it all started. So I was just trying to point out how far back the issue goes with no solution created

You are right terrorist and Muslims are different things, and I did not mean to suggest they were, just that faith and religion are problematic topics for a country to deal with (Catholics and Protestants in Ireland are an example). American Muslims are still a relatively small minority, but as their numbers increase (naturally or through immigration) we as a nation could be faced with the same problems that Europe is facing right now. Currently between ‘regular’ Americans there’s a political and cultural divide that is focused on values specially those derived from religion (and that’s between people of basically the same faith but varying degrees). Personally I think the saving grace here in the US will be the fact that we have not marginalized Muslims economically or religiously, as Europe has done. And that will help interweave them into the fabric of America.

I brought up the Amish and Mormons, because of their culture and faith and their peculiar path to assimilation.

By Andy's Mom

April 16, 2006 04:23 PM | Link to this

You people need to stop!! Why must you instigate a fight with my Andy on this holy day?

This was the first time in a long, long time that we were able to roll Andy away from the computer so he could participate in a nice family gathering. Then you go and start ‘egging’ him on. Now he is being mean on Easter and Jesus will be mad at him. Imagine what Jesus must think of my Andy cussing on this holy day.

You people ought to be ashamed. ITS EASTER!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 04:28 PM | Link to this

Here we have a real problem but have you ever heard a lib speak out against this “religion?” You won’t because libs are chickensh-its.

But this raises an interesting point. In other religions, spiritual leaders recognize they must practice what they preach, i.e., they must observe and, by personal example, lead the same kind of life they encourage their flock to lead, or else be held accountable by their followers for failing to do so. However, this point seems lost on these extremist imams and their followers. In an attitude more reflective of “do as I say and not as I do,” not a single imam extremist has yet to strap on a suicide belt to sacrifice his own life in furtherance of the cause of Islam. Nor is there any report of an imam’s offspring doing so. While relentlessly preaching selfless acts of suicide by their fold, these same imams selfishly fail to practice what they preach — an absence of accountability their followers have failed yet to grasp and question.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 04:55 PM | Link to this

And, ironically, what helps make suicide bombings effective is the press coverage they attract. The mainstream media do not depict even the most vicious attacks on civilians as atrocities that should inspire outrage and fortify resistance. Instead, the media suggest the attacks be seen as evidence the “insurgents” are succeeding and the U.S. failing in its obligation to “stabilize the security situation.”

The terrorists “play our own media with a shrewdness that would be the envy of many a political party,” British Prime Minister Tony Blair said recently. “Every act [of] carnage adds to the death toll. But somehow it serves to indicate our responsibility for disorder, rather than the act of wickedness that causes it.”

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

Lol,

Wow, you slay me!

To borrow a line from MTV (I’m trying to find a reference that you might understand):

You are so stupid it takes you 2 hours to watch 60 minutes.

Hat Tip: My 11 year old son who’s WAY smarter and funnier than you are.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this

LS&L,

Great post, Andy! Tony Blair is the closest thing to Winston Churchill we have right now for quotable quotes.

DavidU,

Until 1965 and the liberal Democrat Ted Kennedy’s disastrous utopian vision, we were very careful to keep the numbers of new immigrants in proportion to the existing population. BTW, you forgot to include the word melt when you quoted me.

We can also be thankful that the welfare state has not expanded any further, as that is another source of Europe’s problems.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 05:16 PM | Link to this

Some Sunday Steyn:

It’s not the world’s job to prove that the Iranians are bluffing. The braggadocio itself is reason enough to act, and prolonged negotiations with a regime that openly admits it’s negotiating just for the laughs only damages us further. The perfect summation of the Iranian approach to negotiations came in this gem of a sentence from the New York Times on July 13 last year:

“Iran will resume uranium enrichment if the European Union does not recognize its right to do so, two Iranian nuclear negotiators said in an interview published Thursday.”

Got that? If we don’t let Iran go nuclear, they’ll go nuclear. That position might tax even the nuanced detecting skills of John Kerry.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

From the Ny Times no less:

AS the No. 2 general at United States Central Command from the Sept. 11 attacks through the Iraq war, I was the daily “answer man” to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. I briefed him twice a day; few people had as much interaction with him as I did during those two years. In light of the recent calls for his resignation by several retired generals, I would like to set the record straight on what he was really like to work with.

Mr. Rumsfeld does not give in easily in disagreements, either, and he will always force you to argue your point thoroughly. This can be tough for some people to deal with. I witnessed many heated but professional conversations between my immediate commander, Gen. Tommy Franks, and Mr. Rumsfeld — but the secretary always deferred to the general on war-fighting issues.

Thus, for distinguished officers to step forward and, in retrospect, pin blame on one person is wrong. And when they do so in a time of war, the rest of the world watches.

Like I said just recently, time is on the side of the Conservative. No matter how many lies or false accusations the libs throw around, they always get outed by the truth. Always.

By getalife

April 16, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this

Liberalism is a sin, an affront to humanity, a disgusting feelgood past time that could wind up costing us the United States of America. Of course, liberals are the enemy.

Admitting you have a problem with liberals is the first step in your treatment. You have worked past the denial stage and this is a step in the right direction.

There is hope for you just keep repeating, “liberals are not the enemy”. This will quiet the voices in you head. Other Americans are not the enemy just because they do not agree with you.

Just think, liberals have goverened this country before and will again.

By DavidU

April 16, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this

Liberals S&L- I think then Americans deserve to know the order and timetable of the next 12-13 countries in the Middle East that we will attack.

Afghanistan, then Iraq and now Iran. That’s 3 at a rate of about 10 years lets say. After that who are the next group of three? This is the conflict that never Ends it seems…

By Jay not jay

April 16, 2006 05:46 PM | Link to this

Maybe the EU should step forward and take care of the mess in their own back yard?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 05:52 PM | Link to this

getalife: I’m already well into the cure regimen, getting the truth out. The truth will take care of you libs for good. You can’t silence us anymore.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this

General Bush’s lose-lose Iranian war options. Andrew Sullivan- There is something unreal about the bellicose statements coming from some sources in the Bush administration towards Iran.

So this f-ag thinks that Bush is being “bellicose” towards Iran, eh? Welcome to the world of the lib, Bizarro Land.

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 06:01 PM | Link to this

How old are you andy? 6?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 06:07 PM | Link to this

rushncap: You got something against 6 year olds, you little sissy?

By getalife

April 16, 2006 06:08 PM | Link to this

Wow Andy,

I am impressed with your last post:

getalife: I’m already well into the cure regimen, getting the truth out. The truth will take care of you libs for good. You can’t silence us anymore.

Very civil.

No “pinko” or other personal attack.

I believe you are cured.

Your welcome.

By Huge

April 16, 2006 06:15 PM | Link to this

Dusty, …Isn’t that a bit officious? Perhaps. And a great word! I’d like to think I fit the archaic definition, rather than the modern, but you’re probably right.

…fights for it verbally every day on this blog. If he speaks in ways you don’t like, there are many others who are equally outspoken. But you didn’t mention them.

By name, no. But you know I know who they are. And I know you do too. If I think it will help, I am not afraid to do so. And the word “outspoken” although technically correct infers frank not hate speech. The conversations and ideas shared here would profit enormously with a lot more civil discourse and respect, which this crude behavior most certainly is not. As for “many others who are equally…” that is debateable but probably not incorrect. And you know I’ve been the one person here who has addressed them about their classless behavior as well.

You and I disagree on some things but we have found a way to get past the acrimony and anger, and I look forward to talking with you. Dusty, I’m not being insincere and I don’t want to be a blog judge or censor. You may think me pompous, but I’m sick of this stuff and I have the right and desire to try to change it.

Together, as Americans we can make things better! (Battle Hymn of the Republic fade out…)

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 06:16 PM | Link to this

No, andy, I have nothing against you. I just wish you’d grow up. Some grow up, alas, too fast, and some don’t seem to grow up nearly fast enough.

By getalife

April 16, 2006 06:17 PM | Link to this

Well, maybe it is an incurable disease and needs more work.

Speaking of truth

Talking about starting another invasion is insane.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 06:25 PM | Link to this

Liberals Suck And Lie

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this

Time Ragazine’s ten best senator’s list, are we sure this isn’t David Letterman’s list?

Thad Cochran Kent Conrad Dick Durbin Ted Kennedy Jon Kyl Carl Levin Richard Lugar John McCain Olympia J. Snowe Arlen Specter

Thanks alot, I just blew iced tea out of my nose all over the 21” LCD monitor, this is a prank, right? Ted Kennedy? Mrs. Alito’s masher? Mr. Alito’s Ho?

Olympia Snowe, RINO? What has she ever done, except vote all in with the libs? Oh, I get it.

By Liberal Texas Democrat

April 16, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

“On the ground in Baghdad, U.S. commanders tasked with training and equipping Iraqi security forces acknowledge that the Iraqi police rolls are riddled with members of Shiite militias. These militias are allied with such powerful clerics as Muqtada Sadr, who controls the Mahdi Army that twice in 2004 fought street battles against U.S. troops in the Shiite holy city of Najaf.”

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 06:38 PM | Link to this

By rushncap April 16, 2006 06:16 PM No, andy, I have nothing against you. I just wish you’d grow up.

I’m sorry, I must correct errors when I see them, it’s a habit, you mean “shut up” don’t you?

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Liberals Suck And Lie,

I love this part of your Steyn link:

Bill Clinton, the Sultan of Swing, gave an interesting speech last week, apropos foreign policy: “Anytime somebody said in my presidency, ‘If you don’t do this, people will think you’re weak,’ I always asked the same question for eight years: ‘Can we kill ‘em tomorrow?’ If we can kill ‘em tomorrow, then we’re not weak, and we might be wise enough to try to find an alternative way.”

If I have termites in a small portion of my house I can always wait a few years to deal with them, knowing full well I can still kill them then even if it means tearing down my house to do it. Nice strategy Bubba, I think I’ll stick with W on this one.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 06:57 PM | Link to this

LS&L,

Henry Luce must be rolling over in his grave!

And may I be the first to say, touche’ for you excellent jab at that nasty s.o.b. known as “Rushncap”.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

By AntiRadical April 16, 2006 07:42 AM | Link to this 183+ Posts and not one regarding the content of this toon. Is it that obtuse for everyone? New York Post Page Six is well known for it’s dirt dealing exposes. This toon lampoons the Post’s recent scandal where frequent Page Six contributor Jared Paul Stern is reputed to have tried to blackmail supermarket billionaire Ron Burkle for $100,000 plus a $10,000-a-month stipend in exchange for going easy on him in Page Six. I wonder how much the White House paid him to keep silent about the Bush Twins.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 07:01 PM | Link to this

Hey everybody! Huge said: *I’m sick of this stuff and I have the right and desire to try to change it.

Huge,

Have I mentioned that your prissy and long-winded lectures are really tiresome, if not downright nauseating?

I’m Sorry to disabuse you of your flawed understanding of our rights as Americans, but there is not right to change what you personally disagree with.

You have “the right” to say pretty much hatever you want. You do not have the “right” to effect change - although you are welcome to try your damndest.

I’ll give you one point for recognizing a great hymn in “The Battle Hymn of the Republic”. However, while Julia Ward Howe really was saint-like, you are just a sanctimonious a*ss and I have no doubt that she would find you insufferable.

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 16, 2006 07:07 PM | Link to this

OOPS on previous post ^^^ AntiRadical comments should be in quotes, closing after the words easy on him in Page Six. Then my question I wonder how much the White House paid him to keep silent about the Bush Twins. follows.

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 07:20 PM | Link to this

I’ve often wondered how much PageSix was paid to go easy on CMAC in reference to all those public indecency complaints about him.

Oddly enough he was only showing his face.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 07:26 PM | Link to this

Actual headline at Faux, looks like the Easter party is well underway:

Tehrean Treatens West With Homicide Bombers

Or maybe they are overcome with fright, the thought of vast hordes of exploding Iranians has them quaking in their boots.

Me, I’m proud the Wacky President Of Persia is letting us know his plans so that when something does blow up, we know who to bomb back to the stone age.

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 07:28 PM | Link to this

George Bush is a ridiculous piece of s** who deserves death by his own policy of torture. The f*** turd will be s** out of the body politic and go down in history as evil.

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 07:29 PM | Link to this

George Bush is a ridiculous piece of s** who deserves death by his own policy of torture. The f*** turd will be s** out of the body politic and go down in history as evil.

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 07:29 PM | Link to this

George Bush is a ridiculous piece of s** who deserves death by his own policy of torture. The f*** turd will be s** out of the body politic and go down in history as evil.

By Steve

April 16, 2006 07:31 PM | Link to this

BD: It means the good fortune of lotsa money and formal social status, and the finest schools. Wonderful luck. All things about which you would have absolutely no knowledge. Thankfully, my education began where yours leaves off. And it shows every time you open your mindless, filthy, slovenly little mouth. You’re a typical punk. Be gone like the insect that you are. You are one of the lowest forms on this strange blog. A true inferior. I think most everyone knows that. I don’t read your useless, hate-filled offerings. It is Easter, hayshaker, thank God that I made an exception for you this day! Time to crawl into your oily little bed. Bye now.

By DavidU

April 16, 2006 07:33 PM | Link to this

Iran will donate $50m (£28m) to help fund the Palestinian Authority, after the withdrawal of aid from the West, the Iranian government has announced

I was wondering what was taking them so long to do this…

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 07:37 PM | Link to this

I guess you could say I was just tri-jacked! That’s pretty impressive.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 07:38 PM | Link to this

CMAC, CMAC, CMAC,

I think we got it. got it. got it.

Huge,

A perfect opportunity exists for you to use your holier-than-thou speech against an idiot liberal namejacker.

Go for it!

AntiR,

Do you really count up all the posts and check to see who did or did not comment on the cartoon du jour?

You’d be a perfect socialist government bureaucrat!

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 07:44 PM | Link to this

No, andy, once again you’re wrong. I wrote exactly what I meant to say. I repeat: I wish you’d grow up. There are no errors in the preceeding statement.

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 07:51 PM | Link to this

Oh, really, Danish? Pray tell, what “job” did andy do on me? Inquiring minds want to know.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 07:58 PM | Link to this

rushncap, dild-o boy: That wasn’t figurative you twa-t.

By @@

April 16, 2006 08:12 PM | Link to this

If Steve doesn’t read Buy Danish’s posts, how does he deem them to be useless and hate-filled?

By @@

April 16, 2006 08:19 PM | Link to this

By Conservatives Molest America’s Children April 16, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this*

This toon lampoons the Post’s recent scandal where frequent Page Six contributor Jared Paul Stern is reputed to have tried to blackmail supermarket billionaire Ron Burkle for $100,000 plus a $10,000-a-month stipend in exchange for going easy on him in Page Six. I wonder how much the White House paid him to keep silent about the Bush Twins.

The birth of another liberal conspiracy theory. And we saw it first, here.

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 08:19 PM | Link to this

job

.

jab

Just in case anyone besides rushncap doesn’t know the difference.

By Huge

April 16, 2006 08:21 PM | Link to this

Starts out good. Opinions are like a-ssholes, everybody has one.

But then, alas… This huge goofball is a pretentious little son of a bi-tch. Nice. I’m proud that he’s able to elect himself the morality judge of this blog and lord over the behaviour of all the other participants. It’s just like a busy body liberal, minding everybody’s business but their own. Seems more liberal to just stand by and allow hatred to fester…

If you want to talk about rude, what do you call being focused on your wee wee as the center of your existence and shoving your little fixation down the throats of the rest of the world (no one has ever accussed this guy of being brilliant) whether we want to know about it or not? What gives you the right to destroy society and culture (huh?) claiming special rights for the way you choose to get your rocks off? (again, huh?)

…Don’t I have the right to act however I want to, Mr. Free For All? You do indeed and I have the right/obligation to point out that your hate speech is not acceptable. You know, again, that old silence being acceptance, thing.

But it just keeps getting better and better. (The lowercase spelling is a lack of respect, that’s why pinko is spelled that way. And no, I do not hate Blacks, you race baiting piece of sh-it.)

Nice try, charlie but Starkist wants only the freshest tuna. Your using the small and capital case words as you do reflects your mirroring of the technique not the content of that publication. More discerning minds would not stumble over this subtle but important distinction.

And this, of course, is the grand finale:

getalife: Liberalism is a sin, an affront to humanity, a disgusting feelgood past time that could wind up costing us the United States of America. Of course, liberals are the enemy.

He really speaks dangerously like a modern day mini-Hitler. And this, I swear, will never be allowed to stand without challenge.

And only one of the gang stepped up to take a bullet for their hero. But unfortunately he/she is reduced to children’s rhymes and names and this: You do not have the “right” to effect change - although you are welcome to try your damndest. Clearly, you have already given up something extremely valuable. I never will. Come and join me.

By Huge

April 16, 2006 08:26 PM | Link to this

*A perfect opportunity exists for you to use your holier-than-thou speech against an idiot liberal namejacker.

Go for it!*

OK, OK. They’re gutless and and usually stupid. What else do you need?

By rushncap

April 16, 2006 08:35 PM | Link to this

I’m sorry, RW, are you carping on misspelling now? Have I reduced you to this? Gee, funny how there is no mention in your post of the 2 grammatical mistakes Danish made in the sentence I was quoting… wonder why!

Oh, and andy, I think my estimate of your age was far too gracious: I don’t think even 6 year olds (at least mature ones) use epithets like “dild-o boy”. Wow…

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 08:37 PM | Link to this

Normal people (<——Andy), however, understand that the “precautionary principle,” often invoked by enviros as a reason to act before all the evidence is in, also requires us to take into account the distinct possibility that government will get things wrong. They may also remember the predictions of prominent scientists in the late 1960s that population growth would lead to mass starvation by the 1980s, or Hollywood’s pornographic delight in the horrors of “nuclear winter” if Ronald Reagan didn’t cave in to massive protests, fanned by Moscow, demanding unilateral disarmament in the 1980s.

Oh yes, and then there was the famous Newsweek cover story in 1975 asserting that meteorologists “are almost unanimous” that the earth was headed towards a new ice age. The reaction of the environmental pessimists, along with the doomsters in the media, has not been to rethink their position but to redouble their scare tactics.

By Stan

April 16, 2006 08:41 PM | Link to this

Danish, RW, Sucky, Pinko, et al:

Jesus is dropping by here later tonight. You are grotesquely lost. But I’ll do what I can for you.

By neocons suck

April 16, 2006 08:44 PM | Link to this

What an incredible blast of sewage I see from the right wing fascist a-ss-ho-les here! BWAAHAAHAA! They can’t change any minds in the real world— their former friends run when they approach! Spouses and children abandon them in disgust! Left with no audience in the real world for their effluent dribblings, they cower in cyberspace, scanning the web for the scribblings of the few dirty sots anad sods who share their hatred, and then gather here for a pathetic circle jerk of hate! Hate for everyone who doesn’t look like them, dress like them, think like them, vote like them, pray like them!

BWWAAAAAHHAAAAHAAAHAAAAHAHA!

The chairs, and even the sheets of these betwetters are soiled with the secretions of their shuddering, stuttering loathing of everyone and everything that doesn’t toe their disgusting, hateful jackboot party line.

I’m thankful I’m not in the same room with them. The enormity of the smell would kill!

And here’s the REALLY funny part!

Fortunately for sane Americans, these loathsome afterbirths with modems spend all day and all night, slouched over keyboards, jacking eachother off to multiple climaxes revolving around their fascist fantasies. Over. And over. And over again. Non stop. Round the clock. Look at their constant, countless posts! They really, honestly, truly have NOTHING BETTER TO DO WITH THEMSELVES!

Yes, that’s you “Liberals Suck”, and “RW”, and “Pinko Angels”, and “Danish”! I guess this blogs a blessing! Your self destructive but otherwise harmless spew jobs are contained here. Real Americans can laugh at your hijinks (if they choose to look!), as you cavort inside the monkey-cage you’ve built.. all.. for.. yourselves!!!

Oh, and we do laugh! We laugh very much!!!

BWAAAHHHHAHHHHAHAHAHHHHH!!!!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 16, 2006 08:53 PM | Link to this

Alright, so if I knew what small was talking about at 8:21 maybe I would have something for it.

I did gleem one bit of info from all that hot air. That pretentious, pompous bulls-hit is overwhelming and inconsequential. Not only is not allowed to stand, it is already falling. Anybody can see that.

Why is Hollywood losing attendance?

Why is the pinko media losing viewers?

Why can’t democrats win any elections?

Why is Church attendance sky rocketing?

You lose.

By RW-(the original)

April 16, 2006 08:59 PM | Link to this

Poor rushncap,

When Danish said Andy took a “jab” at you and you asked what kind of “job” did he do on you, it may be attributed to many things, your boorish arrogance comes to mind, but it isn’t a simple spelling error.

So no, rushncap, I am not harping on spelling errors, just your insecurity.

By Huge

April 16, 2006 09:00 PM | Link to this

What an incredible blast of sewage I see from the right wing fascist a-ss-ho-les here! Ad nauseum…

This guy obviously didn’t read my “holier-than-thou” post! He must be Andy’s evil cousin and alter-ego. Even their names are similar!!

Drop the childish crap, come up with something relevant, or move on…

(OMIGOD, DUSTY! I AM THE BLOG CENSOR NOW!!!)

By clark

April 16, 2006 09:04 PM | Link to this

neocons suck just spent 15 minutes b.itching about people who b.itch, Loser. Grow up. If you want to have a converstion about anything have it, if not use your mouse and keyboard and go to another webpage. This is a public blog people post their opinion, some like it, others don’t; Deal with it. If you are looking for people with the same opinion as you, so that you can feel great about your ideas and get patted on the back go to RedState.com or DailyKos.com. I hope you can figure out which one is for you on your own.

And before you start b.itching about me being a conservative, save it. I’m Cindy Sheehan-like liberal.

By Fred

April 16, 2006 09:05 PM | Link to this

Yes, Danish, you really are a worthless chunk of excrement. It is Easter. Today, like every other day, you and your ilk should drop to your knees and thank whatever Pig God you pray to that you can hide here behind anonymity.

Such is your life: losing and hiding.

By clark

April 16, 2006 09:11 PM | Link to this

Angel man;

Forgot the amen.

amen

By Huge

April 16, 2006 09:16 PM | Link to this

Alright, so if I knew what small was talking about at 8:21 maybe I would have something for it.

Is this just a cowards way of pretending to all of a sudden, not be able to understand English? And a way out of addressing, much less debating, any of the facts or statements?

And then on to the usual red-herring, designed to draw attention away from the central issue:

Why is Hollywood losing attendance?…

And another fluorish at the end!

You lose.

No, Andy, we all lose…

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this

Steve (not Forbes),

The best explanation that I can come up with for your absolutely horrendous writing skills is that you are Tony Soprano’s Brown “educated” daughter. She too has “wealth”, “social status” and “advantages”.

Yep, sounds just like you.

By finch

April 16, 2006 09:38 PM | Link to this

If this blog were in tehnicolor, I think I’d be blind now. Or at least I’d need glasses.

Sigh. New age liberal that I am (I bet I catch flak for that!) I guess free speech rules! But I am NOT gonna call anybody names tonight. Meantime, food for thought…

Replace Rumsfeld

*David Ignatius - Washington Post - 4/16/06

“When I recently asked an Army officer with extensive Iraq combat experience how many of his colleagues wanted Rumsfeld out, he guessed 75 percent. Based on my own conversations with senior officers over the past three years, I suspect that figure may be low.

“But that isn’t the reason he should be replaced.”

(and now for the money quote)

“As bad as things are in Baghdad, America won’t be defeated there militarily. But it may be forced into a hasty and chaotic retreat by mounting domestic opposition to its policy. Much of the American public has simply stopped believing the administration’s arguments about Iraq, and Rumsfeld is a symbol of that credibility gap. He is a spent force, reduced to squabbling with the secretary of state about whether “tactical errors” were made in the war’s conduct.”

Ignatius has serious chops, by the way. He covered the CIA and the mideast for the Wall Street Journal before heading to the Washington Post in 1986. Dismiss him at your peril.

And before the usual suspects resume flaming me for being some pinko peacenut, I’ll say again that while I’ve always had serious doubts about Iraq, the US is there, and cannot leave until the job is finished. So there.

Fire away!

By @@

April 16, 2006 09:55 PM | Link to this

I can’t deal with the delay on this site.

Before I go for the night, I’d just like to say that there is information (links) and then there is “Stuff”.

Ever get the feeling that your stuff strutted off without you?

By Fred

April 16, 2006 10:19 PM | Link to this

Danish. Give it up, geek. You’re hopelessly outclassed and over your head. You are a bad joke. Anyone can see that. Also, you never have anything whatever to say. Just another fat, undereducated slob, angry at the world. Imagining that the rest of society is to blame for your lifetime of personal failures and bitterness. You are a low-life. You are precisely where you belong. Digging yourself a deeper hole. Insanely jealous of all those who are so far “above” you - and that’s most people. Don’t respond - you’ve already been deleted. How pleasant it would be to drag you by the neck out into the sunshine and…. Ummm.

By Dane

April 16, 2006 10:29 PM | Link to this

I’ll echo that for you, Freddie! BD is a complete waste and less. Typically lacks the shame to be humiliated. Obviously never recognizes it. Always found it interesting that some scum go thru life that way. Pitiful without ever knowing it. Geez.

By Buy Danish The One and Only

April 16, 2006 10:44 PM | Link to this

Freddie,

Is your last name Krueger by any chance?

You’re an effing nightmare.

By CAIR package

April 16, 2006 10:57 PM | Link to this

Fred/Dane/Stan/vile

What’s the matter? Do they only teach you four letter American names in terrorist training camp?

“Pig God”? You need to go back to blend and meld school. Pig God would be a Rad Muslim thing.

You’re all busted.

By Huge

April 16, 2006 11:04 PM | Link to this

Is your last name Krueger by any chance? You’re an effing nightmare.

Very clever comeback, Danish!

Fred and Dane, or whoever you are tonight, does your mother know you’re up this late? Either way, do you have anything significant to share with the crowd? (P.S. Drivel doesn’t count.) Didn’t think so…

By finch

April 16, 2006 11:55 PM | Link to this

If the anger here could be molded into a weapons system, our nation would never have to fear anything again!

I’m gonna go watch “South Park”….

By Jean

April 16, 2006 11:55 PM | Link to this

What a lovely Easter. I’ve always had the pleasure of knowing some of those who were “born to the manor.” Have known many born into poverty thru race or circumstance and have had little chance in life. Know plenty of others who have chosen to live in the gutter - many right here on this blog. Very few in life are “born to the sewer.” Danish is an exception. With his twisted mind and 6th grade education, he hungrily thumbs through his little paperback dictionery, trying to put words together which don’t fit. Tries to compete here but never does. Such a little “man.”

By Fred

April 17, 2006 12:12 AM | Link to this

Hey HUGE. From under what rock did you crawl? HUGE what? Certainly nothing between your ears. Totally nothing between your loins. Empty intestinal fortitude. Matter of fact, no guts at all. I don’t visit you tiny people very often, so I’ve been spared whatever putridity you have vomited up in the past. But looking at today’s renderings, you typically have/are nothing…nothing at all. Another weakling in our midst. Conceived and born in a mensroom urinal of a cheap neighborhood bar. You’ll fit in nicely w Danish, Pinko and their friends. You wish to flock weeth the bull, you weel surely get thee horn! Grow up and continue on your familial gutter missions. You will never know anything more than you know right now. The curb height will always obscure your tiny vision. Another HUGE insult to humanity. You are now gone.

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 12:59 AM | Link to this

RW, I ask again: have I reduced you to this? If so, I guess technically I should be sorry. I’m not, but you know what I mean…

I guess when you can’t win the contest of ideas you start carping about someone misreading “jab” for “job”. Well, hey, as long as you have something left to hold onto, RW, you’ll be OK.

By WashingtonState

April 17, 2006 01:47 AM | Link to this

Happy Easter all. Here’s some food for thought. Good article for all to read and digest.

By RW-(the original)

April 17, 2006 04:18 AM | Link to this

le rushncap,

Si vous devez gagner un point minuscule pour vous sentir meilleur au sujet de vous-même puis de se sentir libre pour me feindre a mal compris votre erreur.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 04:48 AM | Link to this

Another good story about part D medicare, even after the pinkos wrote it off as a failure:

* For months, stories about Mr. Bush’s Medicare prescription drug program were uniformly negative: Seniors found the sign-up process too confusing, few were applying for the program, and the cost savings, if any, were minimal at best.*

But now the story is that scores have signed up, 29 million at last count, and a large percentage of seniors say they are saving a great deal on the drugs they purchase through the discount program

The libs lie, we tell the truth.

BTW, how long is the David Ignaticious WaPo story going to get re dated and posted like it is new? Is that all you have, finch?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 05:24 AM | Link to this

The Wall Street Journal has been getting alot of airtime here lately, mostly about Republican political “problems,” let’s see how much of a respected source they are this morning:

So when did Generals cease to be responsible for outcomes in war? We ask that question amid the latest calls by certain retired senior military officers for Donald Rumsfeld to resign over U.S. difficulties in Iraq.

The anti-Rumsfeld generals have a right to their opinion. But there’s a reason the Founders provided for civilian control of the military, and a danger in military men using their presumed authority to push elected Administrations around. As for Democrats and their media allies, we can only admire their sudden new deference to the senior U.S. officer corps, which follows their strange new respect for the “intelligence community” they also once despised. U.S. military recruiters might not be welcome on Ivy League campuses, but they’re heroes when they trash the Bush Administration.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 17, 2006 06:16 AM | Link to this

One of the surest ways to tell a Conservative from a lib is that a Con loves children and libs hate them:

The cult of the child Brendan Casey - For the Journal-Constitution Monday, April 17, 2006- What is this pestilence, we hear you ask, that has spread throughout the metro area and indeed threatens to engulf an increasingly affluent north metro area? The answer is: Children!

When you pinkos are old and lonely, it will dawn on you that this ain’t all about you.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 17, 2006 06:38 AM | Link to this

All that pinko hot air about winning back the House, about the “culture of corruption, blah, blah, blah, here’s the first election out of the gate:

Polls are not good predictors of turnout - only elections are. Last week, we had a special election in the 50th district of California, whose Republican congressman resigned in disgrace and went to prison. In 2004, the 50th district voted 55 percent for George W. Bush and 44 percent for John Kerry. Last week, the district voted 53 percent for Republicans (there were 14 candidates, the winner among whom goes on to a June 6 runoff) and 45 percent for Democrats. There were only two of them, and the leader, Francine Busby, got 44 percent of the vote - the same percentage as Kerry. That may be 1 percent higher when the last absentees are counted.

Ooooohhhh, tell us so more scary predictions, libby.

By suck still sucks

April 17, 2006 07:01 AM | Link to this

We know how much Repugs love children! They love children a tad too much according to all the lovely posts here about right wing pervs!!

The fat lady is still warming up in San Diego, and so is disgust over Repug arrogance and greed!

Busby’s getting 44 percent of the vote in a district that has only 30 percent Democratic registration was no small feat.

Chillin’, dude! My champagne is chillin’! Just like Duke Cunningham’s as-s!

By Huge

April 17, 2006 07:42 AM | Link to this

I don’t visit you tiny people very often,…

Excellent! Go Find a blog better suited to you - one, where you don’t have to contribute anything but stupidity and childish babble…

By Buy Danish

April 17, 2006 07:51 AM | Link to this

Jean,

Fred is waiting for you in the tub. Hurry - the water is getting cold.

Before you go, you may want to learn something. The correct phrase is “To the manner born”.

I won’t call you an ignoramus because we have new rules about civil discourse.

By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet

April 17, 2006 07:52 AM | Link to this

By Huge April 17, 2006 07:42 AM Excellent! Go Find a blog better suited to you - one, where you don’t have to contribute anything but *stupidity and childish babble8…

By suck still sucks April 17, 2006 07:01 AM We know how much Repugs love children! They love children a tad too much according to all the lovely posts here about right wing pervs!! The fat lady is still warming up in San Diego, and so is disgust over Repug arrogance and greed! Busby’s getting 44 percent of the vote in a district that has only 30 percent Democratic registration was no small feat. Chillin’, dude! My champagne is chillin’! Just like Duke Cunningham’s as-s!

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 17, 2006 07:55 AM | Link to this

“By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 17, 2006 06:16 AM | Link to this One of the surest ways to tell a Conservative from a lib is that a Con loves children and libs hate them:”

Oh, they sure do!

By Buy Danish

April 17, 2006 07:58 AM | Link to this

Sand storm, pollution envelop Beijing

Anyone want to place cyberbets on whether or not the Chinese will be able to control the weather in time for the Olmpics?

They can blame it on Bush, but then what?

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 17, 2006 08:02 AM | Link to this

One of the surest ways to tell a Conservative from a lib is that a Con loves children and libs hate them:

Senior District Judge Warren Urbom on February 5, 1999 pp. 101-154 resulting in Urbom awarding attorney John DeCamp’s client—pedophile victim Paul Bonacci, $1 million dollars in damages for sexual abuse in a case against convicted GOP activist Larry King, who sang the national anthem at the 1984 and 1988 Republican national conventions.

By Buy Danish

April 17, 2006 08:06 AM | Link to this

This hints at why educrats make lousy Governors.

Worthington Elementary School Principal Angie Marquez imposed the lockdown March 27 as nearly 40,000 students across Southern California left classes to attend immigrants’ rights demonstrations.

Marquez apparently misread the district handbook and ordered a lockdown designed for nuclear attacks.

By Buy Danish

April 17, 2006 08:11 AM | Link to this

finch,

I wanted to donate my 2 cents on the David Ignatius story last nite but my computer went crazy.

My reading of that OP-ED is that Rumsfeld doesn’t have a good P.R. machine and gets low poll ratings.

Is that how you suggest we run our military?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 08:14 AM | Link to this

By Conservatives Molest America’s Children April 17, 2006 07:55 AM “By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 17, 2006 06:16 AM | Link to this One of the surest ways to tell a Conservative from a lib is that a Con loves children and libs hate them:” Oh, they sure do!

I’m sorry, I forgot there were liberals around. I didn’t explain that message of love with them in mind, I don’t stayed focused on my wee wee like they do, devoting my whole entire life to getting my nuts off.

When I say “love” and this may confuse you pinkos, I’m talking about nurturing, guiding and teaching about life, not molesting them or seeing them as a pain in the a-ss, like liberals automatically do, the very first thing they think of.

I know that liberals can do the sickest things imaginable, like stick their reproductive organ into another man’s digestive tract and then think they are better than anybody else because of it. It’s called hypocrisy, that’s why you will see them point out the failings of the individual, acting like no lib has ever sinned, while they ignore the teachings of the real perverts like NAMBLA or their buddies the ACLU.

It’s mental.

By Huge

April 17, 2006 08:28 AM | Link to this

You go Shep! He is the one good ones (he was absolutely fantastic during the Katrina coverage). And why? Because he’s moderate, not a ranting extremist, like most of the others on that network. (hey, maybe they really are Fair and Balanced?! Nah…)

*Shep Smith Embarrassed by O’Reilly’s ‘War on Easter’?

Apparently not everyone at Fox News buys into talk of a ‘War on Easter.’

On Thursday, Fox daytime anchor Shephard Smith seemed barely able to mask his scepticism over the idea that Easter is “under attack.” (He was introducing a segment about a German man who wants to ban chocolate Easter bunnies due to their health risks.) Smith even threw in a subtle dig at Fox culture warrior Bill O’Reilly.*

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this

These libs will tell you how smart they are and, trust them, the Earth is warming up and we are all gonna die. But, have you ever seen a computer server that just totally locks itself up as often as cartoon boy’s does?

When you libs are able to install server software that works, get back to us about the environment, alright?

By clark

April 17, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this

Sucky; Mike can’t even type , what make you think he knows how to run a server. He draws the cartoons, that’s it.

amen

By getalife

April 17, 2006 09:04 AM | Link to this

Hannity er Andy,

Mike got locked up?

By Conservatives Molest America's Children

April 17, 2006 09:26 AM | Link to this

Carry on Suck, but your “buddy” Pinko invalidated anything conservatives have to say to or about liberals at the every start of this blog. April 15, 2006 08:24 AM | Link to this “By Little Pinko Angels, So Innocent, So Sweet April 14, 2006 09:22 PM | Link to this Why give cash? The libs will believe anything you tell them, anyway.”

According to everything you’ve posted around here there’s not a bit of difference when in comes to liberals and according to your buddy Pinko it matters not what you say, they’ll believe anything ,,, ergo it matters not what you say. I can’t bring myself to believe you.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 09:35 AM | Link to this

So increasingly Democratic officeholders and candidates are trying to bring the bloggers inside, to make them feel included — and to blunt their criticisms. For example, in recent months the blogs have been quite angry at House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, feeling that she has been ineffective at fighting back against Republicans and fearful that she will support the regulation of political speech on the Internet. In March, the DailyKos held a poll of its readers asking whether they approved of the job that Pelosi, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, and Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean were doing. The readers loved Dean; 84 percent approved of his performance. They were so-so on Reid, who scored a 50 percent approval rate. But they couldn’t stand Pelosi — just 19 percent approved of her performance.

Crackpots weighing in a the moonbats, interesting. It figures Dean is the champ.

Not long ago, a political scientist referred to Moulitsas as a “kingmaker.” To which another blogger, Mickey Kaus, replied, “Oh yeah? Name the king.”

Article at National Review subscriber site, Byron York.

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 10:02 AM | Link to this

Gingrich Concerned About GOP’s Fortunes

Captain Obvious to the Rescue!

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

Key senator bucks Bush, urges US-Iran talks

Breaking with President George W. Bush’s insistence on a multilateral approach through the U.N. Security Council, Sen. Richard Lugar (R, Indiana) said direct U.S. talks with Iran would be useful as part of a broad dialogue on energy.

The “united” Republican front! These guys can’t even agree between themselves how to fix their messes, they have to ask Democrats. The “What’s YOUR plan?” defense!

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 10:18 AM | Link to this

E-Mail Said to Link Abramoff, Safavian

The e-mails show that Abramoff and Safavian, then chief of staff at the General Services Administration, were in frequent contact, played golf often and traded workplace gossip. Abramoff showered Safavian with offers of meals, invitations to parties as well as the trip to the fabled St. Andrew’s golf course in Scotland.

Naw, Abramhoff had ties into the Bush administration? Geez, who woulda guessed?

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 10:37 AM | Link to this

McCain knows who to ask for advice!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 10:37 AM | Link to this

One of the more idiotic arguments in favor of open borders is that, due to the declining birthrate of our selfish society, we need millions upon millions of impoverished foreigners to rush in to support our bleating aging baby boomers in their extended and lethargic retirements.

The only correct thing about this argument is that it recognizes that Social Security is simply a pyramid scam, always in need of increasing numbers of young new victims to tax in order to support the old (and the “disabled”) at a level far beyond their average contributions.

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 10:38 AM | Link to this

RW - si tu ne peux pas gagner la guerre des idees, tu essayes de gagner avec les choses insignificant. Felicitacions! Je tu donne cette victoire.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this

As you no doubt know, illegal aliens and their handlers plan to hold their next Senate intimidation rallies on May 1, better known as the Marxist holiday of “May Day.” The May Day campaign will consist of yet more anti-law-enforcement marches and a nationwide “boycott” of shopping. The aim of the boycott is to demonstrate the purchasing power of the 11 million immigration criminals demanding amnesty. The boycott will also include a general strike by immigration criminals, who are being encouraged to skip work that day. Now it appears that illegal aliens are here to just skip the jobs that no American is willing to skip.

If the boycott and strike are successful, this means that May 1 will be A DAY WITHOUT ILLEGAL ALIENS! Lines will be shorter. Clerks will all speak English. Businesses that have been honest enough to hire legal residents will be poised to finally enjoy a competitive advantage! It will be morning again in America. Every actual American should make a point to get out and support those businesses and counteract the criminal boycott movement.

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this

Scalia Stands by Decision in Cheney Case

Conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Wednesday called his 2004 decision not to recuse himself from a case involving Vice President Dick Cheney the “proudest thing” he’s done on the court.

Scalia refused to step aside from deliberations in the case, rejecting arguments by critics who said his impartiality was brought into question because of a hunting vacation that he took with Cheney while the court was considering the vice president’s appeal.

In the world of Republican values, taking a hunting trip with the participant in a case you are sitting in judgement on is NOT a conflict of interest. Ah, those Republican values, you gotta love their consistency!

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 10:46 AM | Link to this

Wow

No, really, we’re making progress in Iraq! 50 casualties at a time. I guess they ran out of flowers between Tigres and Euphrates, and are greeting liberators with gunfire.

Oh, and andy, that’s for 133,000 troops. As opposed to Atlanta, which has well over a million people, but you consider more dangerous. Any chance you gonna keep your offer to go to Baghdad?

By Midori

April 17, 2006 10:55 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

you rock!!!

keep slapping them up side the head — some sense is bound to creep in .

and they think the only people who have problems with Bush are liberals

By clark

April 17, 2006 10:59 AM | Link to this

sucky;

I like how the article ends with the communist term; COMRADES.

amen

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 11:07 AM | Link to this

Thanks, Midori. :) Good to have fans.

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 11:10 AM | Link to this

Hi Midori- Haven’t heard from you for awhile. Thought you got run off by the Cons using you as a scapegoat for the jacker. I personally always thought that it was a reverse psych operation by the Cons to paint themselves as once again the downtrodden and put-upon innocents that we all know they AREN’T. Glad to see you back.

By Jesus

April 17, 2006 11:26 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By RW-(the original)

April 17, 2006 11:30 AM | Link to this

rushncap,

I think you should redirect your message of victories in the realm of insignificant babble to the French speaking name-jacker.

Dominique de Name-jacker,

Appearing to be on my side doesn’t make your name-jacking activities any more welcome than the rest of the wankers.

Midori,

Instead of this unending parade of stories saying Democrats will win because of Republican problems see if you can find a story that says Democrats may win an election because people like their ideas. It would be easier to find the Loch Ness monster.

By getalife

April 17, 2006 11:40 AM | Link to this

Andy is now pink oh!

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 11:42 AM | Link to this

Wow, RW, the name-jacker got me. I was really wondering why someone like you would do something so educated and creatively unusual as speak French. I’m glad to hear that you didn’t. My low opinion of you remains in tact, thank god.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 11:52 AM | Link to this

Let’s see, google, Atlanta, assualts, rapes, battery: Results are 7,922 violent crimes, I couldn’t get battery to come up, so let’s add 10,000. 17,922 divided by 365 days per year that equals 49.1 injuries per day in Atlanta. So technically, moron, Atlanta is tied with Baghdad, but that’s just for today. Tomorrow, Baghdad will be calm.

Yes, I would still rather walk through Fallujah than Ponce De Leon.

By RW-(the original)

April 17, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

Rushncap,

Oddly we find ourselves in agreement. I would much prefer that you have a low opinion of me as well.

By Kevin

April 17, 2006 12:11 PM | Link to this

The Democrat party are racists when it’s convenient. An alienation of their party’s principles but democrat voters will defend them and vote for them without questioning. Pot and kettle.

As a conservative who votes Republican, I can honestly say that my party has never betrayed my principles.

By Bushwhacker

April 17, 2006 12:26 PM | Link to this

Bush Countdown Clock

1008 days, 11 hours, 34 minutes, and 49 seconds left.

This, too, will pass!

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 12:55 PM | Link to this

You don’t have to worry on that account, RW. You’d have to post something intelligent AND back it up wit facts and references for me to change my opinion of you. Empirical evidence suggests that you are capable of neither, so you’re safe for now — my opinion of you will remain merely 2 steps above andy and 1 step above Danish.

andy — just like you to compare deaths to “violent crime”. Obviously you know you’re being disingenuous, you simply don’t care. Please go take that stroll around Fallujah. You keep promising us, but seem to be far too wimpy to deliver on it.

By LOCAL NEWS

April 17, 2006 12:58 PM | Link to this

Minimal. Yesterday HUGE, one of the latest members of The Castrated Gang, took giant steps towards being inducted into The Scum of The Earth Hall of Fame. The committee is attempting to schedule ceremonies quickly enough so that Huge can experience at least one ejaculation from somewhere other than his mouth. Updates to follow.

By getalife

April 17, 2006 01:08 PM | Link to this

Principles?

Lie, cheat, steal and kill are not things you want to teach the children.

Criminals!

By Dusty

April 17, 2006 01:14 PM | Link to this

Well, Bushwacker, Midori and Rushncap,

I am surprised that you are here posting. I thought you would be over at Jane Fonda’s place begging her to go around the country protesting the war. You know. In good Democratic fashion like she did before.

Oh well, you’ve still got Ms. Sheehan to carry out your ANTI-War protest efforts. Are the bumper stickers ready? You know——” SHEEHAN WILL ‘CAN’ THE BUSH MAN”. Or that other banner which says “Democrats support the troops every Leap Year”.

We thank Ms. Fonda for giving us the thought behind Democratic plans, i.e. The Sheehan plan. That’s the ONLY Demo “plank” we’ve heard so far.

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 01:23 PM | Link to this

Was there a point to your post, Dusty?

By dubya

April 17, 2006 01:41 PM | Link to this

Welcome to a fresh new week of bitterness and jealousey from the chickenhawks. It’s never a question of “if” new felonious Bush lies will be revealed, it’s “How many.” Times are getting better as he and his pansy thugs implode.

By Dusty

April 17, 2006 01:50 PM | Link to this

Yes, Rushncap, there IS a point to my last post. But you have to be able to read to get it.

By gadem

April 17, 2006 01:58 PM | Link to this

Most neo-cons are such hypocrites and xenophobic babies it is truly a shame. Since I have been on this blog Andy spews no opinions of his own, but only cut and paste news articles from opinion sections that support his twisted view.

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

Are you suggesting I can’t read, Dusty? If so, please elaborate. It would be helpful for you to give some backup to that claim… oh, wait, sorry, you’re a neocon, your backup is always “cause I said so” (or “cause Bush said so”, which is inapplicable in this case). Sorry. I’ll stop picking on you for a bit, then.

By Dusty

April 17, 2006 02:10 PM | Link to this

No, Rushncap, you have to keep up by reading something besides blogs. On the main news page of today’s ajc.com are statements from an interview with Jane Fonda. You wouldn’t doubt the words of your own beloved and liberal AJC and your own beloved and liberal Jane Fonda, would you?

By sct

April 17, 2006 02:29 PM | Link to this

Dusty, this question has been ignored thousands of times on this blog but NEVER answered. I will give it another try.

Why was it ok for Republican leadership to criticize American involvement in the Yugoslavia war, but consider it treason when anyone criticizes the Iraq war?

By Kevin

April 17, 2006 02:39 PM | Link to this

getalife, I don’t know how old you are but financial corruption in congress has been going on since time immemorial. That doesn’t make it right, it just makes it SOP which citizens are willing to ignore. Don’t put too much hope into financial scandals in Congress turning the tide.

Since this seems to be a recent revelation for you, I’m going to assume you are a liberal out to get Bush/Republicans or you are six years old. In either case, why aren’t you in school educating yourself.

Well, nevermind the education, liberal academia will see to it that you are indoctrinated into following the party’s pablum. At least try to think with your brain and not your emotions.

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 02:45 PM | Link to this

Dusty, my question wasn’t “what were you referring to?” (of course I’m aware of Fonda’s comments), it was “was there a point?”. These are 2 markedly different questions. Obviously you cannot tell the difference. So it seems to me that of the 2 of us, it is not I who needs some reading comprehension lessons. Wouldn’t you agree?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 02:48 PM | Link to this

By LOCAL NEWS April 17, 2006 12:58 Minimal. Yesterday HUGE, one of the latest members of The Castrated Gang,

Believe me, this as-shole thinks that small is a Conservative, small talks a little on the intelligent side so LOCAL NEWS can’t understand him and tags him as a Republican.

rushncap: Just for informational purposes, Irate you just above finch and 3 percent below Midori (although that lead is shrinking,) you little fa-g.

I’ll take a stroll through Fallajuh right after you venture down Bankhead. Wear your skirt.

By getalife

April 17, 2006 02:56 PM | Link to this

Kevin,

May I suggest some reading to view my opinions before you spew what you think you know about me.

I have been on this blog for a while so you may go back and read my views. Here is a little hint about me:

I think that people who believe in party instead of country have a mental illness and will end up like this guy

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 02:57 PM | Link to this

I’m sorry, are you under the impression that the word “fa-g” is an insult?? As I was saying, grow up…

By Midori

April 17, 2006 02:59 PM | Link to this

LOL,

Candy Andy gave me a rating!!!!!

I should be so honored.

You’re just p** that Finch and Rushncap whups your a* on a daily basis.

And the kicker is they use LOGIC and FACTS. And that frustrates the hell out of you.

I just come along to give them a pat on the back — I have no intention of getting into a back and forth with you.

Unlike you, I have a life. And a great sense of humor.

By Dusty

April 17, 2006 03:03 PM | Link to this

sct,

I have not heard your question numerous times.

There were no protest marches against the Yugoslavia War led by Republican leadership. Did I miss something that seems to be lost in history?

I didn’t mention treason but obviously you thought of it when you try to combine hate for the commander-in-chief with claims of support for American troops in Iraq. Most people do not think that combination is possible since it encourages the enemy.

We have not abolished free speech. I was referring to Jane Fonda and Cindy Sheehan, both liberals who abuse free speech during war time.

I used the word “abused”. But here is what my dictionary calls treason:the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the GOVERNMENT of the state to which the offender owes allegiance.

Answer your own question,sct, so you can stop diggin up the past and observe the present.

By RE

April 17, 2006 03:03 PM | Link to this

With all the talk about bias in the media, here is a story that reports just on what happened without any mention of political affiliation.

Gov. Ryan

No mention of party at all. Very good fair reporting. Oh yeah, he is a republican

By Midori

April 17, 2006 03:05 PM | Link to this

Getalife!!!

you devil you!!!

that link is HILARIOUS!!!!!

Thanks for the laugh :)

By RE

April 17, 2006 03:06 PM | Link to this

With all the talk about bias in the media, here is a story that reports just on what happened without any mention of political affiliation.

Gov. Ryan

No mention of party at all. Very good fair reporting. Oh yeah, he is a republican

By getalife

April 17, 2006 03:07 PM | Link to this

[Of course, this guy has a classic case of the mental illness](http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/shared-blogs/ajc/luckovich/entries/2006/04/14/easterbunnygo.html#comment-401683

He thinks the “libs are the enemy”.

By getalife

April 17, 2006 03:12 PM | Link to this

Of course, this guy has a classic case of the mental illness

He thinks the “libs are the enemy”.

By Peter Wallace

April 17, 2006 03:21 PM | Link to this

HOORAY for Mike! Congratulations on getting another PULITZER PRIZE! You deserve it!

By Morgan

April 17, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this

AJC’s Luckovich wins Pulitzer

CONGRATULATIONS ! ! ! !

(well deserved)

By Peter Wallace

April 17, 2006 03:23 PM | Link to this

HOORAY for Mike! Congratulations on getting another PULITZER PRIZE! You deserve it!

By sct

April 17, 2006 03:24 PM | Link to this

So you don’t believe in free speech Dusty?

Its either free speech or not. We either have the right to protest or we don’t. Why do you hate American values such as these so much?

Do you think that only politicians have the right to criticize the government? Why was Delay allowed to protest a war but not Sheehan?

Lott, Delay and company have special rights to speak out against a President, but we the people don’t, how absurd. I thought Republicans were against “special rights”.

Why Dusty do you hate America so much? This isn’t communist China.

By getalife

April 17, 2006 03:27 PM | Link to this

Way to go Mike!

You deserve it!

By Shoop

April 17, 2006 03:29 PM | Link to this

I wish I could go back and find those two days where Midori’s humor was all over this site. It was found somewhere between crazy ranting and hysterical (not the funny kind) laughter. It was scary! I was kinda worried that she may harm herself. It went something like this HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHA YOU WANT MORE? HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH I’M LOVING THIS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAD ENOUGH? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Scary stuff. Went on for two days.

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

Woo hoo! Go Mike. Congrats on the Pulitzer. Wonder if this will temporarily shut up some of your critics.

By getalife

April 17, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

Midori,

Your welcome.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

Midori: For someone who has a life, you sure did jump on your response to me awfully quick. It’s almost as though you were lurking in the shadows, so to speak.

To say that finch and rushncap use logic and facts is to open up a whole new chapter in the history of bizarro world. I guess the only remaining question is are you going to be the wicked witch of the west again, in this new fairy tale?

BTW, rushncap has closed within 2 percent of you, your mouth is what really frustrates me. Besides, I like that little f-ag, in a non sexual way, of course, he takes his beatings like a man.

By Mrs. Godzilla

April 17, 2006 03:33 PM | Link to this

Congratulations Mike! Well Done!

By Laura

April 17, 2006 03:35 PM | Link to this

CONGRATULATIONS to Mike on his second Pulitzer Prize…..and take that all you naysayers. I’ll bet you haven’t received national attention for anything and you are just bitter!

By SWATLien

April 17, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

Congratulations, Mike! Winning your second Pulitzer is absolutely awesome. You deserve it, your commentary is brilliant. You bring belly laughs (does this make me look gay? I thought I’d never stop laughing), tears (don’t let them forget New Orleans), gasps (back of the bus). You never fail to make us think, evaluate and introspect.

By finch

April 17, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

Applause for Mike! Well deserved!!

A left handed thank you to Suck, who puts rushncap, Midori and me on the same lofty pedestal! I’m honored to be in such company! Speaking just for myself, I’m proud and humbled to have caused you so much cognitive dissonance!!

getalife, your devious link had me choking!!! You realize you’re probably going to hell for that, don’t you??

By Laura

April 17, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

CONGRATULATIONS to Mike on his second Pulitzer Prize…..and take that all you naysayers. I’ll bet you haven’t received national attention for anything and you are just bitter!

By DavidU

April 17, 2006 03:37 PM | Link to this

States are helping public schools escape potential penalties by skirting the No Child Left Behind law’s requirement that students of all races must show annual academic progress. With the federal government’s permission, schools aren’t counting the test scores of nearly 2 million students when they report progress by racial groups, an Associated Press computer analysis found.

No Child Left Behind?

By Walt

April 17, 2006 03:38 PM | Link to this

Shouldn’t sAndy, RW, and Pusty be flapping their gums over Natalie Holloway now?

Isn’t that today’s big story on FauxNews?

Seems her white-trash parents were all wrong but that’s no big surprise given these mush headed idjits along with Shemp and Company were the one’s leading the calls for boycotting Aruba and sending in troops and whatever else they could think of to divert the country from Bush and Cheney and he of the supercooled underwear.

psssst… sAndy, it’s satire, don’t let your pea-head explode too badly…

By Oh The Humanity

April 17, 2006 03:43 PM | Link to this

Just today someone brought up the fact that Mike is not a very good typer. This will certainly tarnish the fact that Mike has just won his second Pulitzer Prize. Thats right instead of 2 time Pulitzer winner he will be forever known as a lousy typer. Oh the humanity, oh the humanity!

By Buy Danish

April 17, 2006 03:50 PM | Link to this

rushncap,

My feelings for you too remain intact. You’re tied with N-GA at the moment - another nasty s.o.b. As time goes by, you may move up a notch. We shall see…

Meanwhile, I have absolutely no idea why you don’t get the point of Dusty’s Jane Fonda post. It is clear as a bell to me.

Of course since the word “jab” confounded you, it is understandable why concepts more complex than “Bush sucks!” would leave you completely flummoxed.

By clark

April 17, 2006 03:50 PM | Link to this

Oh The Humanity ;

The comment was to show that the reason the site takes forever to show posts is not Mike’s fault. He doesn’t handle the server, and he himself said he can’t type.

If you gave reading comprehension a try back in HS, it might have helped. But I think it might be too late now.

By finch

April 17, 2006 03:51 PM | Link to this

I hereby grant all neocon, homophobic reactionary posters (you know who you are!) all rights to cut and paste the following:

What a shock! The pinkos at Pulitzer gave Luckovich a 2nd tin star! His treasonous “art” is subversive, pro-communist, leftist and anti-American! His constant mocking of President Bush is seditious! He should be hung! Er, hanged! He’s the reason the US is stuck in Iraq, why Osama is still free, and why Michael Jackson isn’t in prison! A disgrace!

(Donations accepted!)

By Lucy Liberal

April 17, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

Yea!! Yea!!! Kick A*! Mike L. for Pres.!!

Yeaaa! Yeaaaa! Woops, I think I might have wet myself.. Rushncrap, can you or one of your cronies come change me?

By RE

April 17, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this

Finch, I think you left out that Luckovich is also responsible for the runaway spending in congress, gay marriage, and funneled money from Jack Abramoff to the democrats

By Huge

April 17, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

You’ll fit in nicely w Danish, Pinko and their friends.

I didn’t even notice this little piece of brilliance in Freddie’s ramblings!

Boy, if the poor clown only knew…

By Huge

April 17, 2006 04:39 PM | Link to this

Local news???

Yet another typical “drive-by drivel” flunky, or just as likely someone afraid to use their real posted name… Gutless and childish.

Contribute something/anything to society or move on…

By rushncap

April 17, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

Are you suggesting I can’t read, Dusty? If so, please elaborate. It would be helpful for you to give some backup to that claim… oh, wait, sorry, you’re a neocon, your backup is always “cause I said so” (or “cause Bush said so”, which is inapplicable in this case). Sorry. I’ll stop picking on you for a bit, then.

By Republican Family Values

April 17, 2006 04:49 PM | Link to this

Jury Finds Former Ill. Gov. Ryan Guilty of Racketeering and Fraud

George Ryan (Republican Governor, Illinois)

Ryan’s term in office was marked by a scandal involving the illegal sale of government licenses, contracts and leases by state employees during his prior service as Secretary of State; in the wake of numerous convictions of former aides, he chose not to run for reelection in 2002. In December 2003 he was indicted on 18 federal racketeering, fraud and conspiracy charges. His trial got underway in September 2005. The scandals are widely believed to have hurt the chances for Republicans to hold the governorship; Attorney General Jim Ryan (no relation) lost to Rod Blagojevich in the 2002 election, ending 25 years of Republican governorships.

Bye, bye, to more Rupubliscum!

By Midori

April 17, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this

CONGRATULATIONS MIKE LUCKOVICH!!!!

The prize for editorial cartooning went to Mike Luckovich of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

By Midori

April 17, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this

CONGRATULATIONS MIKE LUCKOVICH!!!!

The prize for editorial cartooning went to Mike Luckovich of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

By Dusty

April 17, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I am glad you knew what I was talking about at some point back in this blog. What a fruitless effort to explain anything to people who don’t plan to listen in the first place. I should know better.

Anyway, we now have a serious contender for a place on the future Democratic Presidential ballot. Mike Luckovich for president!! Why not? Democrats usually bring somebody who is good at comical politics and bizarre outpourings. Yep! Mike’s da man!

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 05:16 PM | Link to this

George Ryan, A “Republican” that pardoned all of the death row inmates in Illinois before he quit the governor’s office.

It’s the only way a pinko can get elected anymore is by claiming to be a Republican.

By Jean

April 17, 2006 05:19 PM | Link to this

DANISH: The ignorance you display. No, little boy, the “phrase” speaks of “manors,” not “manners.” You idiot. What would you know of such things? Why would you step out of your sewer and speak? the “phrase” in hundreds of years old and refers to those of considerable substance. You know not this or anything else in that you are functionally illiterate. A guy was sure right yesterday when he referred to you, Huge, RW, the rest of you, as worshipping your “Pig Gods.” None of the lot of you understands THAT term either. You scum are a terrific argument for the augmentation of retro-abortion. Now shut up and (literally) go play with your children. Over & out.

By Huge

April 17, 2006 05:19 PM | Link to this

Evangelist Jerry Falwell on Monday lost a Supreme Court appeal of a case that sought to shut down a Web site with a similar name but opposite views on gays.

Poor pathetic Jerry. Reminds me of O’Reilly arrogantly (everyone knew he was wasting his time with a frivolous case) suing and losing his case against a well known comedian turned radio host for using the words fair and balanced in a book title.

Like many out there on the fringes, these two are birds of a feather - very passionate about their opinions, just not too bright…

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 05:26 PM | Link to this

George Ryan, A “Republican” that pardoned all of the death row inmates in Illinois before he quit the governor’s office.

It’s the only way a pinko can get elected anymore is by claiming to be a Republican.

By RW-(the original)

April 17, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

Who has the big tent now. In our tent apparently we have Dusty, Danish, Andy, DavidU, & Huge. Now there is a diverse grouping.

In the other tent we have a very large and full bathtub, with rushncap, finch, and Midori running back and forth with towels and not an independent thought in the bunch.

Congrats ml.

By Republican Family Values

April 17, 2006 05:34 PM | Link to this

LSL- It’s the only way a pinko can get elected anymore is by claiming to be a Republican.

More of that good ole’ Republican solidarity and party loyalty! Angels till they get convicted, then thy are “Democrats” in sheeps clothing. I wonder how long it will take for Bush, Cheney, et al to be transformed into Democrats!

It’s got to be the work of those pesky Hillarycopters. They are turning good Republicans into Democrats now. They have a secret ray gun installed in those birds you know!

Hillarycopters

By clark

April 17, 2006 05:39 PM | Link to this

LOL…suck quickly discredits this long time republican as a pinko now that he’s a felon. Over at expose the Left, they are discrediting Newt as a liberal too.

Funny how loyal republicans are, must be those family values installed at an early age. Love thy Republican, until he does something embarrassing, show support but once he gets called out on his stupidity, then stop pandering and donating to him and pass him off as a pinko. It’s hard to take these neocons seriously sometimes. Not only do they cherry pick passages in the bible to pass of as social policy, but also cherry pick who they support depending on the indictments.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 05:42 PM | Link to this

I really didn’t think this would be that hard to figure out:

John McCain calls himself a Conservative. !!??!! Get it?

No? A Republican would not pardon any death row inmates. He would let God do that.

Starting to make sense?

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

clark: Aren’t you the same pinko that says I never fault Bush for anything?

Amen.

By clark

April 17, 2006 05:53 PM | Link to this

Ok so a Republican is: Easy on Business, enjoys large gov’t and a huge deficit, is pro illegal immigration, anti-gays, war conscious, in Kanye’s words “hates black people”, bad on education, against campaign finance reform (McCain is pro), loves his bible, loves Mexico, is loyal (well unless there’s an indictment) and follows his gut. What else am I missing for Bush? People help me out!

Or is this a changing definition depending on who is embarrassing your party?

By clark

April 17, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

amen x2 (for the one before)

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 05:56 PM | Link to this

Various things that a pinko really truly believes:

Hillary Clinton is a moderate.

Mike “cartoon boy” Luckovich is a centrist.

Dana Priest deserves a “prize” and not a pile of rocks at Leavenworth.

That “republicans” pardon death row inmates.

That the democrats will win back Congress in 2006, HaHahaHaHaHaHahHahhahahhahha.

By Republican Family Values

April 17, 2006 05:56 PM | Link to this

RW might say (if he weren’t biased)- Andy, you may want to redefine “Republican” and “George Ryan” but you don’t get to. Snark, snark, snark.

By DavidU

April 17, 2006 06:06 PM | Link to this

RW- It means I am a perfect moderate, can be confused for both a Dem and a Rep. Though I register as a Dem, but regardless….

As long as I don’t become Ann Coulter Rep or Cindy Sheehan Dem, I will be ok.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 06:08 PM | Link to this

Kanye West, shees.

Amen.

By RW-(the original)

April 17, 2006 06:11 PM | Link to this

Enron, Global Crossing, Healthsouth, etc…all thrived on their ability to operate with impunity while a Democrat occupied the White House. They bilked their customers, screwed their employees, and ruined their stockholders portfolios.

Then an “easy on business” Republican takes office and their little house of cards comes crashing down and they have traded the boardroom for a courtroom.

By @@

April 17, 2006 06:12 PM | Link to this

clark:

I don’t know how many times I have watched the liberals do a complete turn-about on a Republican when he starts saying what they want to hear or what serves their purpose. Remember Brownie? And now Newt, please.

Brownie, according to the liberals was an incompetent boob until he started blaming the administration for the Katrina fiasco. Newt was a womanizing a-sshole until he began talking about Iraq in the negative.

I’m sure there are others, they aren’t coming to mind right now. I’m too busy laughing at all the drooling over ml and his recent win on the next thread.

It’s amazing how people can belittle themselves in the reflection of a minor celebrity.

By RE

April 17, 2006 06:20 PM | Link to this

@@

I still think Newt is a womanizing a-sshole.

It does not mean he is an idiot though.

Gotta go, time for a 6pack

By clark

April 17, 2006 06:25 PM | Link to this

@@;

Expose the Left is a web site to expose the Dem party, get it? It’s Rep bashing Newt.

RW;

So what’s your point? I’ve said it before; Clinton was the perfect Rep -keeping with their original values of small gov’t, low deficit, easy on business-, that’s why you guys hate him so much. He was better at being a Rep than you guys are. Except for the blow job part that was very Dem. Monica Lewinsky, on the other hand was very Rep looking.

amen

later

By Huge

April 17, 2006 06:36 PM | Link to this

In an era when the word hero getws thrown around somewhat cavalierly, this guy was the real deal:

Race in Pat Tillman’s Honor Raises $350K

By RW-(the original)

April 17, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this

clark,

Don’t be redefining who is a Democrat and who isn’t, the spam pervert(RFV) might come after you.

In the meantime this is what clark calls Expose the Left bashing Newt. This could be a bashing so tame it almost seems like Ian is really bashing the press that misquoted Newt.

By Buy Danish

April 17, 2006 07:09 PM | Link to this

Jean (to the Pig Sty Born),

I say that To the MANNER born is the original and correct form of the M word.

How much would you like to bet that I am right and you are wrong?? I’ll bet you one million cyber dollars. Do you want to see my bet, raise me, or fold?

Hint: Hamlet. William Shakespeare.

Let me know when you’re ready to bet and I will gladly show my hand.

By @@

April 17, 2006 07:32 PM | Link to this

RE:

A Friday night six pack on a Monday? I still see Newt as an intelligent man, a cunning politician as well. I’d still vote for him if he ran.

Enjoy! I’ve got to go watch the drooling over ml next door.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 17, 2006 07:33 PM | Link to this

Yes it will:

Tuesday April 18, 5:06 AM Rumsfeld says of resignation calls ‘This too will pass’

US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld dismissed calls for his resignation by a group of retired generals, telling conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh that “this too will pass.”

By Chuck

April 17, 2006 10:29 PM | Link to this

Way to go, Big Al. I’ve got a truck picking up a couple of these inferiors late tonight. Taking them out to…Deep River. God bless Bush’s Murcuh.

By Janet Johnson

April 17, 2006 10:56 PM | Link to this

Mazel Tov, Mr Luckovich. You make us better and I’m so thankful for that and for you! Thank goodness the Pulitzer committee “gets” that.

By Ray

April 18, 2006 01:34 AM | Link to this

Danish. I’ll answer for Jean lest she not view this crap. You are a piece of s—t. Real proud of it too. Wrong author, wrong book, you complete imbecile. It has everything to do with mansions, large houses, manor houses, and those who lived/still live within them, plus the very essence of their lives and styles. You’re too grossly ignorant to learn these things, and I shan’t direct or help you. You ARE a living pigstye. No - hold that - pigs have strong morals and ethics within their society. You are less than 6th grade material, punk. I’d shove your very own fist up your rectum. “Bet”?? What would a lifetime loser like you have to bet?? “Show (your) hand”??? You HAVE no hand. You’re a coward, a boor, a bitter buffoon without a job or a life. You’re of no further interest to me - if I wanted your “hand,” within 20 minutes I’d have, you, your location, your entire dishonorable family and its background. Like they say, “Stay in your proper place.” And the “MANOR” is assuredly not it. Your type has never even been permitted to pick up the “droppings” within the manor. You are an insult to the white race, whitetrash. You little people need to learn to talk strictly…among yourselves. I’m all for segregating the white race - from the lower portion of the white race wherein we find such as you. We had that not long ago. Eat your heart out, hillbilly. You’re NEVER going anywhere other than your current stench. You can’t outrun that.

By WashingtonState

April 18, 2006 02:23 AM | Link to this

For all those who really want to know how the Medicare drug plan is going, here is an analysis of progress to date from the New England Journal of Medicine. It is time to stop reading administration press releases look at the facts. As always, the Bush administration shows itself to be living in an alternative universe that has no basis in reality.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 18, 2006 04:52 AM | Link to this

As with every government program people that don’t deserve are grabbing what they can and it is harming those “entitled” to part D:

Under the law establishing the drug benefit, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services can call for extending open enrollment into Medicare Part D by declaring a “special enrollment period” for exceptional circumstances.

In early April, HHS said people who qualify for the low-income subsidy meet that exceptional circumstance, and they will be allowed to enroll in plans after the May 15 deadline. Those seniors must have an income below 150 percent of the poverty line and have limited assets.

The exception, Norwalk estimates, could affect about 2 million people. But to grant that exception to all 43 million eligible Medicare beneficiaries “undermines what Congress put into place.”

And also, as always, libs whine and b*** at the first sign of discomfort, lying like rugs. Real upstanding citizens you pinkos are.

By Liberal Elite

April 18, 2006 07:38 AM | Link to this

PULITZER! Congratulations, Mike! You’re the best thing going in the AJC!

By kimberly

April 18, 2006 09:02 AM | Link to this

CONGRATULATIONS Mike! You ROCK! Woo-HOOOOOO!

By Brian Curtis

April 18, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this

Don’t you people understand Dusty’s point? Criticizing the President is treason. That’s why Dusty, Suck/Andy, and all the rest of the neocons are proud to be labeled traitors for when they were so doggedly howling for Clinton’s head a few years back.

Congratulations on the Pulitzer, Luckovich. It seems the Pulitzer committee still remembers the point of journalism: to expose uncomfortable truths instead of serving as a cheerleader for those in power.

By Liberals Suck And Lie

April 18, 2006 01:48 PM | Link to this

By Brian Curtis April 18, 2006 09:22 AM It seems the Pulitzer committee still remembers the point of journalism: to expose uncomfortable truths instead of serving as a cheerleader for those in power.

Well, thank you Brian, for proving my point exactly. The pulitzer prize is a partisan political sham.

For once we agree on something.

By HG3

April 18, 2006 01:49 PM | Link to this

Mike, congratulations on the Pulitzer. Glad to see that there are some who still recognize quality when they read it. Best of luck going forward.

By Bill Lee

April 18, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this

Hey Mike,

I heard on the radio this morning that you won the Pulitzer Prize!! Congratulations!! I really enjoy your cartoons, and wonder how you think those things up every day. Anyways, just wanted to give you a much deserved pat on the back.

By WashingtonState

April 18, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

Suck,

The New England Journal article is written by and for doctors who are concerned about their patients. It is all well and good to talk about how many people have been helped, but there is a lot of concern about the ones who fell between the cracks. Read the article before you condemn it as the whinings of liberals. I don’t think that doctors are a particularly liberal group. Perhaps you want to add them to your hate list anyway?

By Buy Danish

April 18, 2006 05:43 PM | Link to this

This should make Candide and others happy: B.C. and A.D. are on their way out in Kentucky.

Liberal Academia is determined to erase all traces of Christianity from our historical past

By rushncap

April 18, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

So, Danish, as an atheist I have no problem saying “a.d.” and “b.c.”, though, obviously they are pretty arbitrary to me. Why do you have a problem saying “c.e.” and “b.c.e.”? Does that make you lose faith in Jesus?

By Huge

April 18, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this

In the latter years of the 19th century, Joseph Pulitzer stood out as the very embodiment of American journalism. Hungarian-born, an intense indomitable figure, Pulitzer was the most skillful of newspaper publishers, a passionate crusader against dishonest government…

Here are a couple of great quotes from one of those partisan politicial sham award winners:

Domestic policy can only defeat us; foreign policy can kill us.

Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

By Huge

April 18, 2006 08:05 PM | Link to this

Just heard the prez say “we take gas price gouging very seriously and will vigorously investigate charges”.

Reminds me of OJ saying after his aquittal that he would dedicate himself to finding the “real” killer.

Wonder how that’s going…

By WashingtonState

April 18, 2006 08:58 PM | Link to this

Buy Danish,

I wouldn’t get too worried about it. Judging from our acceptance of the metric system, it will be a long time before anyone succeeds in making a change to our calendar system. And the metric system change actually makes sense.

By Huge

April 18, 2006 10:37 PM | Link to this

Love him or hate him, Olbermann is one funny hombre.

During a recent broadcast, Keith Olbermann declared nationally syndicated radio host Neal Boortz the winner of the day’s “Worst Person in the World” honor for saying, as Media Matters for America noted, that Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) “looks like a ghetto slut,” following a March 29 incident in which McKinney allegedly struck a police officer at a Capitol Hill security checkpoint. Boortz also said that McKinney looks “like an explosion at a Brillo pad factory,” “like Tina Turner peeing on an electric fence,” and “like a shih tzu.” Noting that Boortz claimed on his website to be entitled to his criticism of McKinney’s hairstyle because of the “years of ‘bald remarks’” he has endured, Olbermann responded, “OK, endure this one: You’re a bald racist.”