Mike Luckovich

By Don Corleone!

November 28, 2005 06:57 PM | Link to this

Mike, Vernon is my boy but I LOVE your cartoon!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 06:58 PM | Link to this

ml, Clothes please!! I’ll buy you crayons or pencils or whatever you need to just draw some clothes.

Man, even the Christmas tree leans left in a luckovich cartoon.

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 07:05 PM | Link to this

This probably got lost on the monster thread. Fits better here anyway

By Fake But True Andy

November 28, 2005 07:07 PM | Link to this

More homo erotic cartoons of men, not to say there is anything wrong with that!!! It just seems like an obsession, that’s all.

By buff

November 28, 2005 07:39 PM | Link to this

Andy, he certainly does seem to have a thing for partially dressed or nude men. I am going to have a psychologist prof friend of mine do an analysis of the preceding cartoon

By Fake But True Andy

November 28, 2005 07:59 PM | Link to this

Buff: Make sure you show your friend the one of the President Of The United States, The Commander In Chief Of The Armed Forces, The Leader Of The Free World without his clothes sitting in a throne. There are hidden messages in these cartoons.

I know Dick Cheney’s whip is in their somewhere..

By buff

November 28, 2005 08:04 PM | Link to this

Andy, that is really a good idea. I am stunned that Looney-Tooney-Lucko is so interested in sadomasochism, male nudity, and other power issues. Plus, he seems to have an inclination toward Gothic thoughts and features. I will have her do an analysis because her area of expertise is deviant behavior. She is a big liberal, but, she is honest in her work

By getalife

November 28, 2005 08:23 PM | Link to this

buff, so it was kid. Too bad but there is nothing wrong with looking. Yes, they are having Mardi Gras this year and should be wilder than ever. The New Orleans Zoo reopened and 66,000 attended last weekend. Still cleaning the debris and stinks to high heaven.

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 08:33 PM | Link to this

getalife,

They reopened the New Orleans zoo? Is that the fence around Baton Rouge? Sorry, buff.

By getalife

November 28, 2005 08:42 PM | Link to this

Why do ya’ll hate Mike so much, I know you do have a sense of humor.

By getalife

November 28, 2005 08:49 PM | Link to this

Vernon Jones: moonbat, pinko lib or pervert?

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 08:51 PM | Link to this

getalife,

Look at the posts^^^up there^^^. I’m offering art supplies, Andy and buff are helping ml with a psychoanalysis. Doesn’t sound like hate to me.

By buff

November 28, 2005 08:53 PM | Link to this

RW, no problem about insulting Baton Rouge, a dirty, nasty high-crime city. It has all the bad things about New Orleans, but none of the good EXCEPT LSU!!!

get, I do not hate Lucko, just have no respect for the little liar. He claims to be an “Independent.” The only thing he is independent of is being unbiased.

And, I do have to wonder about his fascination with sadomaschochism and male nudity. That is his business, but….

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 08:57 PM | Link to this

buff,

I don’t know about all of Baton Rouge, but the best of these is the one in Red Stick

By getalife

November 28, 2005 09:02 PM | Link to this

Fake thinks there are hidden messages in his drawing? RW thinks he can’t afford crayons and buff wants to do psychoanalysis?Looks like ya’ll are his friends.

By tigerman

November 28, 2005 09:18 PM | Link to this

RW, I have eaten there, it’s ok, but, I think it is overrated. Mansur’s, an up-scale place, is outstanding, and there is a bar outside of the north gates of LSU, The Chimes, that has the best Shrimp and Corn Chowder going, but only on Fridays. Their crawfish etouffee is also good, plus, on weekends that have eggs sardou. A great tradition of mimosas and bloody mary’s on the weekends. Those people can do some food. But, they can sure screw up a good cut of beef; they want to smother it in sauce, crawfish tails or lobster.

Tabby’s Blues Box is also a great place to go, but white boys best be gone by 11:00 PM

By tigerman

November 28, 2005 09:27 PM | Link to this

Rw, that tigerman is me, I sue that on the uga blog. Ralph’s’ does have a great vodka martini

By buff

November 28, 2005 09:29 PM | Link to this

Sorry, RW, I forgot to change it again. I need to open another window or quit this silly business and focus on the Steelers and the Colts

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 09:35 PM | Link to this

tigerman,

There are dozens of better places down in that area. I just meant Baton Rouge had the best of the Ralph and Kacoo’s.

tigerman, Quit s-c-rewing around on the UGA blog.

and finally buff,

Thank goodness I wondered who the h-ell was responding like I knew them.

By getalife

November 28, 2005 09:42 PM | Link to this

I am guessing that this is some sort of project for a class at your school?

By buff

November 28, 2005 09:47 PM | Link to this

Andy, RW, I linked the main Looney-Tooney-Lucko page to my psyc prof friend and she said she would look at them tomorrow, and, I also sent it to an art prof for perusal

By getalife

November 28, 2005 09:52 PM | Link to this

The last monster thread would make an interesting subject in a political class or psychoanalysis. Now back to the college women.

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 10:02 PM | Link to this

buff & getalife,

A psychoanalysis of the monster thread should start with “Joe Roman”. He showed up late and in five posts he became completely incoherent.

By getalife

November 28, 2005 10:08 PM | Link to this

How dare the tigerman mention Brookwood and not mention my Parkview Panthers on the UGA thread.

By getalife

November 28, 2005 10:33 PM | Link to this

It ain’t my job to define anything for you jerks.

He does seem a little upset but you and Andy seem to have that effect on people.

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 10:39 PM | Link to this

getalife,

According to somebody else that showed up late (john from mayberry or something) Andy and I don’t even exist.

How could we upset so many people if we are only figments of their imagination?

By getalife

November 28, 2005 10:51 PM | Link to this

RW, John in Mableton says Andy is ml and Just ignore them; you cant argue with a figmant of some non-existing entity.

Wow makes my head spin, wait, that is the morphine. I better go to bed.

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 10:59 PM | Link to this

getalife,

If you just quoted “john” properly, he is saying that we are figments of the imagination of something else that doesn’t exist.

Sorry man, no wonder your head is spinning. I’m going to start looking for a soft landing myself.

By Dusty

November 28, 2005 11:02 PM | Link to this

Oh no mo torture, Luckovich. I’ll tell you anything you want to know. But Vernon Jones in errr…hearts’n’skivies? The Geneva Convention says you cannot do that. I hope Amnesty International hears about THIS!

By buff

November 28, 2005 11:17 PM | Link to this

Hey, get, sorry about that, Parkview has a fine program, I LOVE football, even high school football.

Do you guys have any guesses about what my psche friend will say abou tLTL?

By RW-(the original)

November 28, 2005 11:32 PM | Link to this

buff,

She will say he exhibits a deep understanding of the underlying problems with political discourse in America. And though he tends to bias toward a point of view he holds out his ideas for public inspection thereby showing a willingness to be open.

She will tell you his use of metaphoric male nudity and domination in the short term could be perceived as a sort of deviance, but that in the big picture they only present a window of the times.

She will say that his cartoons have no meaning on their own, but only show the myopia of the person interpreting the drawing and it’s message.

In short, she won’t say a thing.

By Dusty

November 28, 2005 11:46 PM | Link to this

Buff, most of the college professors I know are liberals. And liberals certainly like Luckovich. But psychologists do have a lot of nice words to describe some unpleasantries of the mind. I myself can’t think of too many nice things to say about Luckovich. Just don’t like his politics.

You are one that makes these blogs interesting.

By Dusty

November 28, 2005 11:56 PM | Link to this

Wow, RW,wish I’d said that! You will have to hang our your “shingle” (or maybe you already have). I’m impressed.(And I definitely have some “myopia” with Luckovich. Uh oh!)

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 12:07 AM | Link to this

Dusty,

I think you are also one of the figments of some non-existing entities imagination.

Remember the old days of this blog when you and I just talked to each together at night?

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 12:10 AM | Link to this

together=other. Maybe buff’s friend can look into that.

By Dusty

November 29, 2005 12:49 AM | Link to this

Ah, yes, RW, I am definitely a imaginational figment still trying to lose a few pounds off my existing entities. Staying up late hasn’t helped a bit. But the company is good. Well, almost. That Bill !! You didn’t do the poor letter editor any favor with that link. You suffer these insufferables better than I do. Call it night-owl stamina.

By lost-cities

November 29, 2005 03:57 AM | Link to this

Lukovich, man, though your cartoons remain brilliant, you’ve got to implement some form of comment moderation or ranking on your blog. Hard to filter the signal from the noise.

Best, -rns

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 06:10 AM | Link to this

The AJC has an opinion piece today titled “Iraq pullout won’t cheapen sacrifices” with a picture of flag draped coffins for effect. It is written by a teacher from Roswell, your ordinary citizen speaking out kind of deal. May I take this opportunity to remind everybody that Georgia’s SAT scores are like, what, 50th in the nation? Maybe Ms. McCuskey should focus her attention on reading, writing and arithmetic?

I know this is the wrong forum but I’m hoping to not disturb Bill and get him started. He must have posted 50,000 words yesterday, half of them were mine. And those were the only ones I understood.

By buff

November 29, 2005 07:05 AM | Link to this

Andy, you are one funny man

By Bill

November 29, 2005 07:45 AM | Link to this

Morning Andy: As always, anyone who disagrees with you is not doing their job, a liberal, a democrat, unpatriotic, incomprehensible, or twisting your words back at you. Perfect impression of political double-speak; good dog. Somebody give Andy a biscuit as I won’t have time to trade barbs today and wouldn’t want him to feel attentionless.

By Toby Cash

November 29, 2005 07:54 AM | Link to this

A very biased person trying to influence Georgians with his pro Democrat Party Philosophy.

By Voice of Reason

November 29, 2005 08:06 AM | Link to this

I heard they were creating an AA-like group for bloggers now. I received a solicitation notice this morning asking for names to invite to the group. I could only think of three.

By Bill

November 29, 2005 08:17 AM | Link to this

Sorry Toby. Democrats far worse than Republicans. If Iraq had been their idea, they would be behind it to the 9’s. Since it’s not, they use it as a political whipping boy against the Republican party (remember the Dems are the guys who first escalated ‘Nam). While I have voted Democrat; it takes a particularly onerous Republican candidate (Nixon) to drive me to cast a protest vote for the Dems. Let’s not lose sight of the fact that neither party has the interests of the American people at heart. They are each too busy feathering their own nests. Sadly, the Republican party bought a pig in a poke with the current situation in Iraq. We would have to killed half the Middle East and Indonesia to make a dent in the number of terrorists or their base of recruitment. We simply don’t have that kind of reach/power. It doesn’t take a Dem to see that, now.

By BR

November 29, 2005 08:23 AM | Link to this

Andy, you STILL haven’t cited an instance of widespread voter fraud in GA that the voter ID law would have remedied. I guess I’m dropping this, because it’s clear you can’t do it.

ID or not, you still can’t vote 10 times in one day. That’s the reason there are voter registration lists and provisional ballots that must be verified. But, since you’re a crazy wingnut, you probably haven’t thought through things like details.

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 08:31 AM | Link to this

My Goodness: Bill finally said something that I can understand and half agree with-

We would have to killed half the Middle East and Indonesia to make a dent in the number of terrorists or their base of recruitment.

The part I don’t agree with is that we should only kill half. I think we need to kill all of them. Just an opinion!!

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 08:37 AM | Link to this

BR, you babe in the woods: Have you ever heard the pinko saying “vote early and vote often?” Exactly what do you think that means? Maybe people using the names of the deceased to vote?

By Voice of Reason

November 29, 2005 08:38 AM | Link to this

That’s the spirit Andy! Aren’t you one of the one’s complaining about civilians being killed and using white phosphorous?

By Wild Sects

November 29, 2005 08:49 AM | Link to this

You wingnuts ought to be singing Mike’s praises. If it weren’t for him and this forum you would all have nothing to do but color and play with your ball and cups. You all sure do spend a lot of time here. Do you have jobs?

By webmistress74

November 29, 2005 08:50 AM | Link to this

Brilliant!

By Pinko Liberal

November 29, 2005 08:57 AM | Link to this

The Republicans never came up with one instance of voter fraud at the polls to justify their want for voter IDs. The only voter fraud that was was carried out was by Republicans using abenstee ballots.

By BR

November 29, 2005 08:59 AM | Link to this

I repeat, Andy, you STILL haven’t cited an instance of widespread voter fraud in GA that the voter ID law would have remedied. I know you can’t, but it’s funny to see your nonsensical responses.

It’s good to see that you support an unecessary additional obstacle to voting.

By Johnson

November 29, 2005 09:02 AM | Link to this

Does Mike every do a positive cartoon? All he does is bash people with his pictures. Especially during the holiday season we need more positive influences. His is a wasted talent, the trained olympian who goes around beating up old ladies. Mike’s drawings reflect his own unhappiness with himself and his sad little universe. He should start being positive and help others to improve his outlook. Merry Christmas Mike, cheer up.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 09:04 AM | Link to this

To me the voter ID law makes sense. Why shouldn’t you have to show some form of picture ID to vote? You have to show one to write a check, to buy a gun, and to get on an airplane. Voting for things as important as governors, senators, and presidnets should be fool proof. If they government can provide an easy way to get ID’s for those without, it shouldn’t be a problem.

By BR

November 29, 2005 09:06 AM | Link to this

Johnson, these are political cartoons designed to get a reaction and spark debate. This blog wouldn’t be so heavily trafficked otherwise.

By gttim

November 29, 2005 09:09 AM | Link to this

RW (who obviously has no life) writes: Man, even the Christmas tree leans left in a luckovich cartoon.

Wrong, dummy. The tree is leaning towards the right, it’s right. Your perception is just wrong. I doubt you view anything correctly, however.

By BR

November 29, 2005 09:13 AM | Link to this

Ricky, the problem is that the government can’t find an easy way to provide ID’s for those without. Writing a check isn’t a fundamental rights like voting. The state doesn’t have dmv offices in every county and it only has one of these mobile ID busses that Perdue was touting. There are something like 159 counties in GA and less than half have a dmv office. And have you ever been to a dmv office lately? You can’t get out of there in less than half a day. And to get one for free, the state wanted to make you sign this demeaning affidavit declaring yourself indigent. What if you don’t think you’re indigent, but you also don’t think you should have to pay to vote? Would you be lying by signing the affidavit?

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 09:15 AM | Link to this

BR, so what is your solution? What kind of proof would you have voters show to prove their identity?

By BR

November 29, 2005 09:29 AM | Link to this

Ricky, my point is that there wasn’t evidence of a problem that this law would have remedied, so why create more obstacles to voting? The overwhelming majority of the fraud allegations involve absentee ballots, which were excused from the requirements of the law. There hasn’t been a documented case of voter impersonation at the polls in the last four years. The systems we have in place now are doing their job. I concede that we maybe need to take a look at the absentee voting process, but I don’t think we need to impose additional obstacles on a person’s right to vote if it is an unecessary one.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 09:37 AM | Link to this

BR, so you have no problem with someone walking in and just saying I am who I say I am so let me vote. You should have to show a picture ID to vote. Do you really think there has been no fraud at the polls? I am sure it happens on both sides. We should be proactive and take steps to stop it before it happens.

By Jesus

November 29, 2005 09:42 AM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!!

By BR

November 29, 2005 09:49 AM | Link to this

Ricky, currently, if you have absolutely no form of identification you have to vote by provisional ballot, which must be later verified within a certain time window after election day in order to be counted. There is already a system in place for the situation you mentioned. Again, why create an additional obstacle to voting that affects primarily the poorest people in the state if it is an unecessary one? I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one.

By Eric

November 29, 2005 09:54 AM | Link to this

Looks like Fake and buff are the only ones who find this drawing to be erotic. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

By Murf

November 29, 2005 10:08 AM | Link to this

Hey Jesus, what are the charges?

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 10:09 AM | Link to this

Eric: Seeing naked men all the time is just normal for you? Not that there is anything wrong with that!!!

BR: It is obvious that you are Cynthia Tucker. You feel that people should be able to show up at the polling place with a box full of ballots from their “neighbors” and “relatives,” don’t you? Why can’t you fight for your beliefs under your given name, why must you assume an identity? Are you afraid of losing this issue?

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 10:17 AM | Link to this

Voice Of Reason: This is 5 times in the last 24 hours that you have asked me if I have a life. I have become an obsession for you, haven’t I? Can’t you think of anything else besides me?

By Oh The Humanity

November 29, 2005 10:20 AM | Link to this

Andy said…”Why can’t you fight for your beliefs under your given name,”

If that fails just use the chicken cowardly republican way and use an absentee ballot. If that doesn’t work, use the Supreme Court.

By BR

November 29, 2005 10:23 AM | Link to this

Andy, you STILL haven’t cited an instance of widespread voter fraud in GA that the voter ID law would have remedied. You’ve already lost on this issue, Andy. Namecalling won’t help you.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 10:32 AM | Link to this

Republicans bought Morals and Family Values back to America…..

By Voice of Reason

November 29, 2005 10:57 AM | Link to this

Andy - Don’t flatter yourself! I didn’t ask if you had a life, I noticed that you didn’t. That was last week. I don’t recall worrying about your social life at all in the past 24 hours.

By Murf

November 29, 2005 10:58 AM | Link to this

Jesus, only crooks and adulters get impeached!!!

By gadem

November 29, 2005 11:06 AM | Link to this

Murf that pretty much sums up Dubya right there….is he a crook? Well he is aiding his friends to steal from the poor. Is he an adulterer? Not likely? But he is a liar in my book…lying by ommission of the truth is still a lie in my book.

By buff

November 29, 2005 11:10 AM | Link to this

Eric, if it was just this cartoon I would not be wondering about Looney-Tooney-Lucko, rather, it is the persistent thread of his ‘toons that are strange

By buff

November 29, 2005 11:14 AM | Link to this

gadem, can you offer some examples of your claim?

Well he is aiding his friends to steal from the poor.

By Murf

November 29, 2005 11:21 AM | Link to this

Aiding his friends to steal from the poor? What goes through you people’s heads?

By gadem

November 29, 2005 11:22 AM | Link to this

Let’s see…the Exxon’s of the world made record profits last quarter. I would make him seem as if he understood the plight of the common man, by launching an investigation into this. We were told that gas prices were up because the cost to refine oil into gasoline was more. See in my opinion I would have a little more respect for him, and view him as a “common man” if this would happen.

I know businesses should profit, but don’t take advantage of a situation to make a profit.

By Talon News

November 29, 2005 11:22 AM | Link to this

I’m with you buff! (I love the name Buff ;)

Lib Luckovich likes to draw people with little or no clothes on, I LOVE IT! Mike, if you weren’t such a pinko commie lib I could easily get you a job at the White House. You would fit right in at the WH.

Jeff O~O

By gadem

November 29, 2005 11:26 AM | Link to this

Murf, What goes through you peoples head when you don’t question anything that this administration does. None of “you” people had a problem questioning Clinton, but when it comes to questioning Bush “you” people act as sheep.

By buff

November 29, 2005 11:28 AM | Link to this

gadem, my point is that it is not “stealing”

By buff

November 29, 2005 11:31 AM | Link to this

gadem, to continue: Are you claiming that laws were broken? And, if so, which ones?

By Duke Cunningham

November 29, 2005 11:38 AM | Link to this

Hey buff, I’m a God-fearing, conservative Republican and I love stealing from poor people.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 11:40 AM | Link to this

Duke Cunningham is an embarrassment. He should go to jail, no doubt about it. I know you libs were overjoyed when that news broke. Nancy Pelosi probably did a victory dance. We will see what happens at the election booth.

By buff

November 29, 2005 11:41 AM | Link to this

Duke, in Neal Boortz’s next book he is going to write a chapter on punishing the poor

By Duke Cunningham

November 29, 2005 11:43 AM | Link to this

Rick: no we won’t, not if you and I can keep all of those poor, colored people from voting.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 11:44 AM | Link to this

Buff, only moral laws. If no judicial laws were broken I guess it is ok then…last i checked, adultery was not a judicial law, and “you” people wanted Clinton to be publicly stoned. Don’t change the rules in the middle of the game.

By sct

November 29, 2005 11:46 AM | Link to this

Ricky some of us were overjoyed because it further proved that this moral, family values facade the Republicans cast is just another Republican marketing scheme. All hat, no cattle.

By buff

November 29, 2005 11:48 AM | Link to this

gadem,I was against the moral crusade against Prez Clinton

By Murf

November 29, 2005 11:48 AM | Link to this

When have I ever said I don’t question Bush, I question a lot of things, but there is no way you can compare him to Slick willy!

By Duke Cunningham

November 29, 2005 11:51 AM | Link to this

Buff: sure you were. You are against it now because it suits your argument now. I’ve heard so many conservatives say that after the fact that I’m now amazed that Clinton was ever impeached.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 11:59 AM | Link to this

gadem,

The oil companies profit margin remained consistent. Do you realize the government makes about 4 times as much per gallon as the oil companies.

(note for the likes of “gttim”, the Christmas tree leans stage left.)

By buff

November 29, 2005 12:00 PM | Link to this

Duke I was against the moral crusade against Clinton; I never said I was against his impeachment. He used the weight of his office to deny a woman her day in court.

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 12:00 PM | Link to this

Voice Of Reason: I run a successful business, have time to watch football games, read the news from several different sources, slaughter innocent woodland creatures, maintain my urban landscaping, attend church services every week, contribute to this blog and I still have time left over to read your silly pinko posts. I’m sorry to hear that you are unable to manage but a few tasks at a time.

Thanks for asking, though!

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:03 PM | Link to this

If Clinton was impeached, we should definately impeach Bush….and that is being lenient…he should be tried as a war criminal.

By Duke Cunningham

November 29, 2005 12:06 PM | Link to this

Andy: stop your lies. You run no business, and you certainly could never run a successful business. Clearly your existence is defined by this blog, and you have no time to do anything else.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 12:08 PM | Link to this

Perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering etc., etc.

Doesn’t everyone know these are only crimes if you wear an “R” behind your name.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:14 PM | Link to this

So Buff, is that kind of like passing a law to deny those harmed by guns their day in court? I mean really, don’t change the rules in the middle of the game. Should gun companies be held liable for some gun deaths? Yes if they are found negligent.

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 12:15 PM | Link to this

Oh yeah, Duke, you busted me out. Your crystal ball has told you everything about me. Let me see what mine says about you-

Duke is wearing a lace teddy with a pink garter and stiletto heels. He has a blow up doll of cartoon boy and he is slowly removing the doll’s clothing. If only Bill Clinton and John Kerry would burst into his room the fantasy would be complete…

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:17 PM | Link to this

Andy, judging by your demeanor, you need to increase the number of Church Services you attend. You fit the perfect example of someone who calls themself a Christian, but has no tolerance for others.

By Seth

November 29, 2005 12:18 PM | Link to this

RW, no, they are crimes no matter your affiliation. So are you going to advocate pursuing Libby, Rove, Delay, etc. as fiercly as Clinton was?

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:20 PM | Link to this

Of course not Seth…see Clinton was an Adulterer, that is a ten commandment, but they erased the ones about lying and bearing false witness.

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 12:21 PM | Link to this

gadem: O.K. pinko, I’ll bump up my church service attendance to twice a week. Will that satisfy your busy body, nosy little liberal gossip hole?

By buff

November 29, 2005 12:22 PM | Link to this

gadem, that is lawful legislation. You may find it immoral, but it certainly went through the process

Andy, have you ever been wild boar hunting? My son is trying to get me to do with him

Well, bloggers, off to what they call a “working luncheon,” which is really just a boring meeting

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 12:23 PM | Link to this

gadem, it is the proper Christian way to reject all gays. It is also the proper Christian way to reject liberal, pro-abortion ideology. I don’t have to be tolerant of all that nonsense.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:23 PM | Link to this

It is clearly evident that most Bush supporters are hypocrites…when the teams change, the rules all of a sudden change. Lying and cheating are ok, taking bribes, victimless crime…adultery, now that is WRONG

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 12:27 PM | Link to this

Seth,

They are being pursued far more than Clinton. Although you have conveniently mixed different cases.

Your Fitzmas investigation has gone on for over two years with everyone except Judith Miller cooperating. Clinton tried every legal trick in the book to deny Paula Jones her day in court and to claim that executive privilege placed him above the law.

In the case of Delay, Ronnie Earl has had a movie crew following him around to speeches where he cheers the crowd with tales of bringing down Tom Delay.

By all means, pursue away. Just quit convicting in advance.

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 12:27 PM | Link to this

Everybody give a warm welcome to my pinko stalker. He finally got out of bed, it was a late night at the strip club..

gadem, it is the proper Christian way to reject all gays. It is also the proper Christian way to reject liberal, pro-abortion ideology. I don’t have to be tolerant of all that nonsense.

What’s the matter pinko? Am I bringing to much truth for you libs to deal with straight up? Do you always have to go p-u-s-s-y when the going gets rough?

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:28 PM | Link to this

Andy, those Christian values are just oozing through your keyboard. Please let me know who your pastor is so that I will not visit your church one sunday. I may get lashes because my hair is too long.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 12:32 PM | Link to this

gadem, you sure love to make sweeping comments about all conservatives. Most of us agree that lying, taking bribes, adultrey, etc are wrong and should be punished. I have no problem with Duke Cunningham going to jail, he should. The people on the right that refuse to admit Bush has done anything wrong are just as guilty of being hypocrites as those on the left that refuse to admit that the right can do anything wrong.

By Voice of Reason

November 29, 2005 12:34 PM | Link to this

Andy - You are funny! I couldn’t care less what business you claim to run or the level of your christianity. But do you feel better after getting that out there? And whatever a pinko is, I’m probably not one.

Reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw this weekend at Sams Club. “My son served in Iraq so yours could party at college!” But I would make one directly for you that says, “I served in Iraq so you could run your fat mouth about sh!t you have no clue about!”

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:35 PM | Link to this

No Andy you do not, but you will have to be accountable judgement day for your views. If you are comfortable with your relationship with the Lord, then I am happy for you. I have always been taught that you love your neighbor. Your way of thinking has been around for years and just evolved. Don’t believe me, just replace gays with Blacks, and liberal pro-abortion ideology with abolitionist…you get the idea.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 12:39 PM | Link to this

Ricky I am not making sweeping comments…atleast I was not trying to. I know there are nut jobs on both sides. Just like there are nut jobs in every ethnicity. Unfortunately when you support one side or the other those that are more moderate get lumped in with the nut jobs.

By Haywood

November 29, 2005 12:42 PM | Link to this

Andy, how often do you have to “urban landscape?” I have to about every two weeks, or it gets kind of itchy.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 12:48 PM | Link to this

gadem, when you say “most Republicans” you are lumping everyone together. As a conservative, people like Andy don’t speak from me and hopefully most of the lefty nuts on here don’t speak for you. We can have a good discussion based on fact about anything and it adds to the political culture of our society. However, when you let the nuts on either side drag you down by their stupidity you are only hurting them.

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 12:53 PM | Link to this

gadem: So you think that was my post at 12:23? I didn’t make that silly childish statement. I know it fell under my name but guess what dude, you were spending your time addressing some other lib. How does it feel to mutually m-asturbate yourself with that other pinko? Do you enjoy wasting your time with immature cickens-h-i-t like that?

By Heather

November 29, 2005 12:58 PM | Link to this

Buff: I have been reading the blog for the past few days and noticed that you think Mr. Luckovich has some sort of problem with nude men. Would you care to explain to America your remarks where you were salivating over an under age student in one of your classes. Boy, talk about sick and breaking the law as well. Oh, I guess the law doesn’t apply to good, upstanding guys like you. Ha! Ha!

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 01:02 PM | Link to this

Heather,

I think “buff” said he went to lunch, but if he is a professor at KSU I doubt his student would be under age.

By Marita

November 29, 2005 01:10 PM | Link to this

IMPEACH BUSH NOW!

By kimberly

November 29, 2005 01:10 PM | Link to this

I think Lucko’s use of nudity is a way of depicting people for who or what they really are underneath their pretenses. Most people are a lot less savory once you peel away the facade. It kind of goes with the whole political satire motif.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 01:12 PM | Link to this

All Democrats now say our plan in Iraq is a good one and it is working

Well, it would be all Democrats if the “culture of corruption” rules were applied.

By queenie

November 29, 2005 01:14 PM | Link to this

LOL. This is by far the funniest one yet. The only thing missing is the arrogant smirk.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 01:17 PM | Link to this

Since we seem to be stuck on talking about corrupt politicians today, how about Charles Schumer. He had two of his staffers caught illegaly obtaining the credit report of a Repbulican senate candidate. Schumer claims no involvement but is paying the defense fees for the two employees. It goes both ways people. Most big name politicians are corrupt. There are only a couple on both sides(Lieberman, McCain) that I have any respect for anymore

By Marita

November 29, 2005 01:23 PM | Link to this

Most big name politicians are corrupt. There are only a couple on both sides(Lieberman, McCain) that I have any respect for anymore.

Ricky: Are you saying that you no longer respect Bush/Cheney?

By Seth

November 29, 2005 01:25 PM | Link to this

Ricky, as a side note, adultery isn’t a crime and shouldn’t be punished by itself. It may be something prohibited by the 10 commandments, but there’s a difference. I think atheists should be able to engage in adultery all they want. The other stuff you said, I definitely agree with.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 01:28 PM | Link to this

Marita, I don’t respect any politician that is in bed with special interests groups. I agree with this administration on most things, but not all. What I don’t respect is when politicians base their decisions on votes not principal, like Bush is doing with the border issue or Hillary is doing with the war. I respect Bush for following his principles on Afghanistan and Iraq. So to answer your question I respect them on some individual issues, but not all.

By Ricky

November 29, 2005 01:30 PM | Link to this

Seth, in most states adultery is a crime. Why do you think it is such a big deal in divorce procedings?

By gadem

November 29, 2005 01:31 PM | Link to this

I agree Ricky…Most politicians are corrupt. With money and power, comes corruption. But it is up to citizens that question authority to hold them accountable. We can not allow those that are the most outspoken to speak for all of us, that actually feel that the politicians serve the people….not the other way around.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 01:35 PM | Link to this

Adultery is a moral issue not a crime punishable by a judicial proceeding. Bigamy is another story. Bigamy is a crime.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 01:37 PM | Link to this

Ricky there are old laws on books that make the most assanine things a crime. In some states, to kiss a woman in public is a crime.

By Marita

November 29, 2005 01:40 PM | Link to this

Good answer Ricky.

By Seth

November 29, 2005 01:44 PM | Link to this

Ricky, hmm I guess you’re right. It seems that adultery is on the books as a crime here in Georgia (16-6-19). I think that’s appalling and hope that it’s one of those old draconian laws that is never enforced. I’ve never heard of a criminal adultery conviction in GA, and I’m not sure that it’s a crime in “most states.” It’s only a big deal in divorce cases to figure out how to divide property and award alimony and such, but that is a separate issue from whether it is a crime. With the GA sodomy laws getting struck down by the Supreme Court as violating privacy rights, I can’t believe this adultery law would stand up if ever challenged. It probably hasn’t been challenged because it’s not prosecuted.

By Seth

November 29, 2005 01:49 PM | Link to this

Ricky, it seems that “fornication” (16-6-18) is also a crime in our state. These are the kinds of law that politicians will never repeal for fear of being perceived as “anti-family” but are hopefully never enforced.

By Conscientious Observer

November 29, 2005 01:52 PM | Link to this

Quick observation! Lies of omission are media tactics of the AJC, what think you of that?

BR: Accusations of voter fraud (intimidation tactics) were launched by the Democrats during the Bush/Gore campaign. If it was so obvious to them then, why are they fighting so hard against a solution. That in and of itself causes me to be suspicious that it probably exists for their benefit.

Bill: If the fence post up your a-s-s is causing your pain, get off of it. One side or the other, but not on the fence post; it causes you to be disoriented.

Now, to the cartoon. According to the AJC’s account from the victim, his intent was to have double-the-fun. Two women at one time reflects a lack of moral fortitude & self-discipline; something we see far too often in our elected officials. Sorry guys, you’ll probably disagree with me on this one but I’m just a traditionalist.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 01:53 PM | Link to this

Ricky,

I’m really surprised that the libs have you playing their “adultery” game.

At 12:08 I linked the entire text of the two successful articles of impeachment. The word adultery never appears, nor does any description of adultery appear.

Bill Clinton was not impeached for adultery.

The left plays this game to make it sound like a trivial matter.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 02:01 PM | Link to this

RW, I think Ricky can have a conversation without you leading him in what to think. To correct you, it was Murf that started the conversation about Adulterers being impeached…now who is playing games?

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 02:01 PM | Link to this

Another prisoner has escaped in Atlanta. These guys are really perfecting this prison transport thing.

By buff

November 29, 2005 02:01 PM | Link to this

Heather, as I posted earlier I am curious about the continued thread of Lucko. And, I wasn’t salivating over the beautiful coed, just admiring her, and she is of legal age. Is Jimmy Carter the only one who “lust in my heart?”

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 02:04 PM | Link to this

gadem,

Where did I say who started talking about adultery?

Showing someone where to read facts is not leading them in what to think. If he reads the impeachment articles and thinks they say anything about adultery, fine.

By BR

November 29, 2005 02:08 PM | Link to this

Conscientious Observer, the voter ID law, if upheld, does not in any way address voter intimidation tactics. It’s not and has never been touted as a solution to voter intimidation tactics. Your point is completely irrelevant.

By Conscientious Observer

November 29, 2005 02:08 PM | Link to this

Afterthought, I have a lot of those. Old age I am guessing. R.W.-Ricky-Buff & Andy: you guys did a great job last night along with Semper Fi in dealing with Bill. The truth is a powerful thing for those who are familiar with it. But I have to give Bill credit for being “eloquent” in his delivery.

By Seth

November 29, 2005 02:13 PM | Link to this

RW, Ricky and I were having a civil discussion about adultery and whether it is/should be a crime. We were not discussing Clinton. Your wingnut paranoia is pathetic.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 02:20 PM | Link to this

Well RW, This is what you said… Ricky,

I’m really surprised that the libs have you playing their “adultery� game.

At 12:08 I linked the entire text of the two successful articles of impeachment. The word adultery never appears, nor does any description of adultery appear.

Bill Clinton was not impeached for adultery.

The left plays this game to make it sound like a trivial matter.

Now by this comment, I took it as if you were saying that a liberal started the conversation…i may have been using context clues too much..

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 02:23 PM | Link to this

Seth,

As “gadem” pointed out, the genesis of the adultery conversation begin with a reference to Clinton and impeachment.

For what it’s worth I don’t think it should be a crime either.

BTW, most computers have a scroll function.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 02:25 PM | Link to this

Conscientious Observer,

I think that you may be afraid of seeing the truth for yourself…but then again truth is all relative…

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 02:28 PM | Link to this

gadem,

Those “context clues” will get you every time.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 02:32 PM | Link to this

Now this is a good read

I know that he will be the next person to die of character assasination….I will be watching O’Reilley tonight for the S**T to hit the fan.

By Abby Normal

November 29, 2005 02:42 PM | Link to this

Wouldn’t it be cool if there were a bird flu that only killed Republikkkans?

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 02:50 PM | Link to this

gadem,

Wilkerson has been running around saying those things for quite awhile. Why would it be considered new today?

(and how did you get “assasination” past the filter?)

Test: assume or a-s-s-u-m-e

By gadem

November 29, 2005 02:51 PM | Link to this

A bird flu to kill all the nut jobs….now that is what I call a virus.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 02:58 PM | Link to this

RW I guess call it “pinko” luck to get assasination past the filter….I know it is not new but I think the cracks are showing in the armor more and more each day.

By buff

November 29, 2005 03:01 PM | Link to this

gadem, have you seen the movie “Team America: World Police?” It was created by the South Park team

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 03:02 PM | Link to this

Looks like the human garbage that you libs love to stick up for has struck again. It is funny how they can’t distinguish between pinkos and wingnuts; they want to kill us all. Keep talking your nonsense; maybe someday our enemy will believe it.

Peace Activists Kidnapped

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 03:02 PM | Link to this

gadem,

It looks like the filter is off or at least has been changed to make some sense.

The comment about waiting for that tool O’Reilly to report on it tonight made me think you thought it was new. Must have been one of those “context clue” things.

Test: arsenal or a-r-senal

By gadem

November 29, 2005 03:10 PM | Link to this

now they blocked you on that one RW…what is the deal with Raggedy Andy? Why is he so mad…I think Andy needs a hug or a woman. Andy, newsflash, it is ok to have sex. you will not burn in eternal damnation if you have sex with your significant other.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 03:18 PM | Link to this

Andy,

Believe it or not Midori linked a story on the Franken thread that lays out a great case for that voter ID stalker that’s been after you.

By Fake But True Andy

November 29, 2005 03:18 PM | Link to this

gadem: The punks that did the kidnapping go by the name “Swords of Righteousness Brigade.” We should be giving them something for their “brigades” a-s-s. But no, we have to be nice because the United States is overrun with pinkos. You expect me to be happy??

Some cheerful news: Bush says “It Would Be a Terrible Mistake to Leave Iraq.” He then added “The U.S. will not withdraw.”

Staying The Course

By gadem

November 29, 2005 03:27 PM | Link to this

Andy why don’t you enlist or go over there and show those assanine terrorist what real American Men are made of…and write back and let us know how it goes.

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 03:32 PM | Link to this

gadem: Why don’t you just come out from under your bed and support the troops that are already there, pinko? Then I wouldn’t have to go.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 03:44 PM | Link to this

I support them…I wish they could all come back home safely…i will come out from under the bed just as soon as you come out of the closet (wink wink) but anywho, you continue to call everyone a coward. I want to see you man up and go fight the good fight Andy.

By Heidi Fleiss

November 29, 2005 03:49 PM | Link to this

Gadem: Andy wanted to work on my stud farm but he is over the hill. He is probably feeling rejected.

By Conscientious Observer

November 29, 2005 03:51 PM | Link to this

Gadem: That which “is” relevant is the absolute certainty with which accusations were made and their determination to resist a solution. I agree with you, there has been no proof, but just the accusation of fraud began the polarization in this country. It is a simple solution to a simple problem. The strong resistance has made me even more inclined to support the drive for voter I.D. How can the obvious become so complex?

And your right, truth is relative to the source, but when they can support it with facts, it becomes more credible.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 03:53 PM | Link to this

Andy you are truly a joke…you talk a good talk, but first sign of trouble you run.

By Heather

November 29, 2005 03:58 PM | Link to this

Andy: You talk the talk but do you walk the walk?

Who the heck is Vernon Jones for us non Georgians?

By gadem

November 29, 2005 03:59 PM | Link to this

Conscientious Observer, I honestly think changing it would be good, but also change the requirements for absentee ballotts.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 04:01 PM | Link to this

Vernon Jones is a taller version of Victor Hill. Vernon Jones is the CEO of Dekalb County. He has serious problems…he reminds me of…

By buff

November 29, 2005 04:11 PM | Link to this

Jones calls himself “Mr. CEO and goes nowhere without body guards. He has an ego the size of Texas, has been accused of rape andother offenses toward women, but he has a lot of political juice

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:11 PM | Link to this

Heather,

Vernon Jones

Known for having quite the sexual appetite, kicking the Red Cross out of DeKalb county (Atlanta area) during Hurricane Katrina relief, keeping a larger security staff than the Governor, and insisting on being called “Mr. CEO”.

By gadem

November 29, 2005 04:15 PM | Link to this

RW, Mr. CEO definately has an inferiority complex….Now Victor Hill, he just has that short mans complex.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:24 PM | Link to this

gadem,

Sheriff Victor Hill, aka Walking Small.

To be played in the movie by this guy

By gadem

November 29, 2005 04:29 PM | Link to this

No that is funny…Gary Coleman has anger issues as well.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:31 PM | Link to this

Andy,

More about those “peace activists”

Apparently they were trying to document war crimes committed by the U.S. military. I wonder if they will turn down being rescued by the people they call criminals.

By buff

November 29, 2005 04:35 PM | Link to this

Wasn’t Gary Coleman the one into toe-sucking? Not saying anything wrong with that if that is hoe gets his/her kicks

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:40 PM | Link to this

buff,

…and then (fill in the blank) said, “Well that’s not my toe either.”

By buff

November 29, 2005 04:44 PM | Link to this

RW, oooooh Say, I am curious as to what you bloggers think about governments banning smoking in restaurants. I think the market should decide and that the owner should be able to set policy. And, I am a former nicotine addict

By gadem

November 29, 2005 04:49 PM | Link to this

I think it sould be up to the owners…if they lose business that will be on them…but being realistic they will lose business regardless.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:50 PM | Link to this

buff,

I hate the smell of smoke, but the Government has no business getting involved here.

They like to claim that “the people” want this. If that were true any restaurant owner in their right mind would open smoke free establishments.

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 04:52 PM | Link to this

Alright, I’m back, I’ve been in meetings all day at the fake job that BR and Voice Of Reason telepathically know I don’t have.

What is with these libs and there bogus “do you walk the walk” nonsense? Why, I’m here right now fighting America’s real enemies, aren’t I? The terrorists are two bit punk savages who want to die, they get their phony strength from the pinkos at the AJC and the other assorted pacifists. The Army can handle them, no problem. That leaves you war losers as the ones who need to be taken out.

Just a thought!!

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 04:53 PM | Link to this

RW: I pray that the terrorists don’t give those peace activists some real war crimes to document.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:54 PM | Link to this

If I had to guess, “gadem” is a Democrat, “buff” is a Libertarian, and I am a Republican.

We all think the owners should decide, so where did this BS about the will of the people come from?

By buff

November 29, 2005 04:56 PM | Link to this

Fellow bloggers, have a good evening. My lovely bride is dragging me to hell in a few minutes, hell aka Barrett Parkway

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 04:57 PM | Link to this

Andy,

They only want to document war crimes by the U.S.

By buff

November 29, 2005 04:59 PM | Link to this

RW, I think you are right

By gadem

November 29, 2005 05:02 PM | Link to this

Buff you have my sympathy…Barrett is a beast…try 278 Paulding County is CRAZY!!!!

By Obsessed With Andy

November 29, 2005 05:10 PM | Link to this

RW: I’m talking about the terrorists separating the peace activists from their heads. That would be a real “war crime.” Individual American soldiers rarely lose their composure in combat, but when they do it is never against bound and blindfolded women.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 05:17 PM | Link to this

Andy,

I know, hopefully that won’t happen. If it does I’m sure it will be reported as our fault anyway.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 05:20 PM | Link to this

How do you suppose this will get reported in the AJC?

My guess is it will focus on the first sentence of the next to last paragraph.

By sickoftheneocons

November 29, 2005 05:30 PM | Link to this

Interesting link RW, gas prices in my neighborhood dropped to a low of $1.89 a gallon for regular unleaded as of yesterday. More money in my pocket instead of in my tank which I like. What I don’t like is that money that is being saved is being pumped back into the economy in the form of consumer purchases but still isn’t enough to offset government spending.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 05:36 PM | Link to this

sickof…,

If only we could get somebody in office that really would cut government spending. Republicans are spending like old school Democrats and Democrats say everything is under funded.

That’s the real quagmire!

I think this one might be a fake

By sickoftheneocons

November 29, 2005 05:38 PM | Link to this

I’m thinking collage work on that pic RW.

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 05:40 PM | Link to this

sickof…,

An Ann Coulter image search turns up all kinds of interesting work.

By sickoftheneocons

November 29, 2005 05:41 PM | Link to this

That pitiful spending bill that cut, what $57 billion over 10 years! Symbolic at best, and yes, the Dems are crying over where the cuts came from. When are people going to realize that military and entitlement spending are NEVER gonna decrease. The cuts have to come from somewhere and we just have to live with some tough belt-tightening. No pol will propose any REAL cuts because America still has the attitude of spend spend spend away!

By sickoftheneocons

November 29, 2005 05:42 PM | Link to this

On Coulter, I’ve discovered that. :)

By buff

November 29, 2005 05:44 PM | Link to this

RW, Gadem, suspended sentence; we are going to Barrett Parkway, aka hell, during the day tomorrow. Yes, Paulding County is going to be like Cobb someday.

RW, I too have hate smoke, but hate government intrusion even more.

Economists knew that lower confidence was caused by gas prices. Interesting, that people say that “their” life is ok, but think that others are in trouble. I think it si teh negativity of the media, which the American public laps up like honey

It is troubling the amount of consumer debt we have. My wife runs a retail business and says it is “charge, charge, charge,” “Can I apply for financing?” “No payments or interest for a year, sure I will buy.” Now, if someone really needs to make a purchase and can use the sellers money, that is good economics.

Personally, I learned a long time ago to use credit cards as charge accounts; pay them off off monthly.

By buff

November 29, 2005 05:57 PM | Link to this

RW and Sick, you are both dead on about spending. Pols just want to buy votes to keep their power, both parties. I think we are doomed because the American public is more interested in CSI, Desperate Housewives, and ‘rasslin.

By sickoftheneocons

November 29, 2005 05:57 PM | Link to this

The thing I’m afraid of with this type of government intrusion is where does it stop? Smoking is as bad for your fellow man as it is for you, that was the whole purpose upon implementation of the ban, was it not? Well automobiles are just as dangerous, why not ban them? Alcohol? Abortion (bad for the fetus/embryo)? Crosswalks, pornography, guns, video games (seizures)? When and where does it end?

By buff

November 29, 2005 06:01 PM | Link to this

Hey, Lucko, how about a funny ‘toon of Charles Walker getting sentenced to ten years of prison time? For you non-area bloggers, Walker is a former state senator nailed on corruption, fraud, I think, and some more charges. He used to be really powerful when the Dems ran Georgia. He is black, so, it may have been racism

By RW-(the original)

November 29, 2005 06:44 PM | Link to this

sickof…,& buff,

Since you are both in a college atmosphere I thought you might like this.

Sheehan is getting paid $11,000 for the hour-long talk, while Rutter will receive his standard fee of $600 for his presentation, Dromgoole said

Nice use of student fees, and fair distribution as well.

By Pinko Liberal

November 30, 2005 10:11 AM | Link to this

Speaking of outrageous fees, Ann Coulter charged the Allachua County, FL Republican party $30,000 to speak at their event. They only raised $20,000 for the event and still said that it was a rousing success. Republicans are so good at fuzzy math.