Updated: 9:44 a.m. September 30, 2008
Most of Georgia delegation opposed bailout from the get-go
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Monday, September 29, 2008
Washington — When it came to persuading most of the Georgia lawmakers to buy the $700 billion plan to steady the financial markets, the Bush administration and House leaders never even came close.
On the eve of Monday’s vote, the opposition was already hardening among Georgia’s seven Republican House members, as several gathered in the office of Rep. Phil Gingrey of Marietta to compare notes.
From that point, it became clear that not one of the state’s Republican representatives would be coming to the aid of his party or president on the biggest vote on the economy in their careers. As Rep. Paul Broun of Athens put it, perhaps least delicately, “This bill is a big cow-patty with a marshmallow stuck in the middle, and I’m not going to eat that cow-patty.”
Members had all felt the effects of a torrent of phone calls and e-mails overwhelmingly opposing the plan. Gingrey said the public was outraged that they might be “bailing out the very culprits [on Wall Street] whose egregious behavior put us into this situation,” and he added that he sympathized with that view.
Sure, there were also frightening predictions made by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and others about a market meltdown if Congress didn’t act and act quickly.
But the G-7, as the Georgia Republicans call themselves, were unmoved as they milled around the “Georgia corner” of the House floor, not long before Monday’s vote.
Gingrey, just before he voted against the bill, said he was unmoved by the administration’s forebodings: “I think that they have helped create a panic situation by saying, ‘Godzilla is a block away, you better get ready.’”
A last-minute call from the Republican leader’s office Monday had no effect on Gingrey. And when House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, took the floor and urged that members do “what is in the best interest of our country” and vote for the admittedly “imperfect” bailout plan, he failed to rally the Georgians.
As Gingrey put it, “Our leadership — they weren’t elected by the people in our districts.”
“Something needs to be done” to steady the markets, Gingrey said. But he added that a better plan could be drawn up in the next week or two that would fit the Republican ideals of free enterprise solutions.
“We simply cannot preserve our free market economy by sacrificing the very principles that underlie it,” Gingrey said in a statement issued after the bailout measure had been defeated by a 228-205 Vote.
Three of Georgia’s six Democratic representatives also voted against the plan.
“My instincts led me to be in opposition from the very beginning,” said Rep. Hank Johnson of Lithonia. He sat on the House floor through nearly four hours as lawmakers debated the massive proposal. But he was already convinced that the Paulson plan would not “stop the record foreclosures” and would amount to “trickle down economics,” he said.
Like other lawmakers, Johnson said his office has been flooded with calls and e-mails — about 1,000 altogether. “I think there may have been two or three people who called to support it,” he said.
Moreover, the gas shortage in the state didn’t help, he added. With Georgian having to wait in long lines for gas and pay big prices when they finally fill up on the way to work, that could be “partially responsible for the people’s desire not to bail out Wall Street,” he said.
But there was something else. Johnson, a strong opponent of the war in Iraq, was hearing echoes of President Bush’s argument to send troops to fight there. “We have heard this tune before, when the president rushed to Congress and demanded that we do what he wants, when he wants it, all with dire consequences,” Johnson said.
Johnson had no second thoughts, even after watching the stock market tumble by 777 points when the Paulson plan was defeated.
“The stock market has reacted unfavorably,” he said. “But the stock market can turn itself around, and I suspect it will.”
Johnson predicted that Congress would be back in a few days working on a new plan, one that he said would “protect the folks on Main Street and our financial markets.”
Only two Georgians, both Democrats, voted for the plan. Rep. Jim Marshall of Macon went against the strong current despite being in a competitive race for re-election.
“Some members of Congress simply don’t understand the exposure and the threat,” he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
He said he had no desire to “bail out the jerks” who caused the financial chaos. “But I am absolutely willing to try to avoid almost every single economist has said — and that is an imminent crash of the credit markets — which all economists agree means that we head almost certainly into a depression.”
Rep. Sanford Bishop of Albany was the only other Georgian who voted yes for the measure, which he said was “necessary to prevent a deepening of the financial crisis currently gripping the nation.”
Staff writer Jim Galloway contributed to this report.




DEL.ICIO.US









Comments
By Helen
Oct 1, 2008 9:47 AM | Link to this
I will not vote for anyone who oppose the bailout. The bailout might to be amended to include homeowner who are lose there home thay way some owner will be protected. But we are losing jobs small business are closing because they pay the mortgage. Please vote for the bail ou I will not vote for anyone who did not vote for the bailout and I will start a campaign to get those senator who oppose the bailout out of office. People are hurting. The well-to do is not hurting but the middle class is. VOTE FOR THE BAILOUT
By Craig
Oct 1, 2008 9:03 AM | Link to this
this plan is like putting a net out to stop a speeding train. it will have to stop of its own momentum.
By sbxixt
Oct 1, 2008 8:38 AM | Link to this
wcsteercpxmnxozoibpzmuzibyqapn
By frazier
Sep 30, 2008 7:34 PM | Link to this
I keep reading about companies having to borrow to meet payroll.
Say WHAT???
Any company who is borrowing regularly to meet the payroll is on the way to demise, and frankly, were I an employee of that company, I'd be job hunting!
This country needs to get back to reality.3000 dollar TV's? Who the heck needs that if it means it's REALLY going to cost me closer to 5000 by the time I pay off the plastic?
Cut up all but one credit card which is kept for emergencies only, it's really easy to get used to living within your means, and yeah, it means no instant gratification, it means actually saving money for major purchases, so easy once you start, biggest benefit is the lack of stress at the end of the month when you wonder how you're going to eat after paying all the plastic bills!
By frazier
Sep 30, 2008 7:32 PM | Link to this
I keep reading about companies having to borrow to meet payroll.
Say WHAT???
Any company who is borrowing regularly to meet the payroll is on the way to demise, and frankly, were I an employee of that company, I'd be job hunting!
This country needs to get back to reality.3000 dollar TV's? Who the heck needs that if it means it's REALLY going to cost me closer to 5000 by the time I pay off the plastic?
Cut up all but one credit card which is kept for emergencies only, it's really easy to get used to living within your means, and yeah, it means no instant gratification, it means actually saving money for major purchases, so easy once you start, biggest benefit is the lack of stress at the end of the month when you wonder how you're going to eat after paying all the plastic bills!
By Mad Taxpayer
Sep 30, 2008 6:09 PM | Link to this
Saxby Chambliss is an idiot if he votes for this bill and expects to be re-elected.
This bill will not fix anything in the economy. It is a straightway bailout of the bad gamblers on Wall Street that will transfer wealth from the working middle class to protect the ill-gotten gains of the monied elite. Why else would the Washington elite be so franticly trying to shove it down our throats?
By HS Teacher
Sep 30, 2008 5:23 PM | Link to this
I just came back from VOTING. I did not vote for anyone who opposed the Bail Out. I thought I would be able to retire at the end of this school year. Now, I don't think that is possible.
I may have to work an additional 3-5 years to make up for what I have lost in the last few days in a "safe fixed account".
By j
Sep 30, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this
Chambliss is quoted as saying "...banks aren't making auto loans." If banks had not begun making risky loans on used cars, cars would not be so expensive today.
Same with housing. If up-front- cheap credit wasn't available, average houses could have never sold for such quickly inflated prices as the did five years ago.
Pay off your credit card, tune up your car, and pray.
By Julie
Sep 30, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this
The only reason anyone in Congress opposes the bailout is because they're trying to get re-elected, to preserve their own pensions and their own paychecks, while the rest of us lose our pensions and our paychecks due to job losses. The Congressmen are extremely self-absorbed and not thinking in terms of the betterment of our country!
By Joe in Villa Rica
Sep 30, 2008 4:45 PM | Link to this
Just say NO to the Bail out -no one is bailing me out! Check out Obama and his ties to ACORN and their stiff arming techniques on lending institutions - and the FED who put a gun to the heads of mortgage bankers to make risky loans. This is a race issue - call it like it is!
[1 2 3 4 5] next
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.
Request a comment be removed