Home > Political Insider > Archives > 2008 > November > 09 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USGingrich says he’d serve as GOP chairman — if the RNC wants him
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Newt Gingrich has let it be known that, if Republicans want him, the former U.S House speaker is willing to serve as chairman of the national party and lead it out of the wilderness it’s blundered into.
The question is whether the 168-member Republican National Committee is open to the match.
“If a majority of the RNC thought he was needed, he would accept that appointment,” said Randy Evans’ Gingrich’s close friend and legal counsel. “He fully appreciates the urgency of the moment.”
What might strike some as coyness is in fact caution. The odds are stacked against the former Georgia congressman, for several reasons.
For one thing, six days after the election of Barack Obama and substantial gains by Democrats in the House and Senate, Republicans have yet to decide whether a serious overhaul of the party is required.
If a revolution is in order, then there’s the small matter of which side is issued the pitchforks, and whose castle is to be stormed. Is this a fight to purge moderates, or a battle to expand the tent?
“The RNC has to do some soul-searching and decide what level of change is necessary,” Evans said. “If that answer is bold, energetic change led by someone who has done it before, then Newt would be a good choice.”
If the party is eying a shift toward the middle, Evans added, “that isn’t Newt.”
Though he retains his reputation as a polarizing figure, Gingrich served as a sideline strategist for the GOP during the presidential season. He pointed McCain to the issue of offshore drilling. But Gingrich also helped generate skepticism over the Wall Street bailout — which McCain and other Senate Republicans supported.
A Gingrich chairmanship might get loud support from the GOP’s talk-radio contingent. The former House speaker has close ties to the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Neal Boortz.
But the RNC is a different, often parochial animal, made up of the top three members of the GOP establishment in every state and U.S. territory, plus the District of Columbia.
The RNC is scheduled to make its decision in January, shortly after Obama’s historic inauguration. Had John McCain made it to the White House, committee members would have deferred to his choice.
But without White House clout, past elections have shown that the RNC prefers — though is not required — to choose from within its ranks. And the 65-year-old Gingrich is not an RNC member.
Moreover, while President Bush still searches out new lows in popularity, the RNC is peopled with those who helped him win two elections — and many remain loyal. Yet Gingrich, seeing Bush squander the fruits of his ’94 revolution, has been ruthless in his criticism of the out-going president.
A sifting of the ashes will begin in Miami with a Wednesday meeting of the Republican Governors Association. Gingrich and other candidates will be there to buttonhole party leaders in small, private conversations.
Those interested in the job include Saul Anuzis, chairman of the Michigan GOP, and Katon Dawson, the South Carolina chairman. The current RNC chairman, Mike Duncan, also seeks another term.
One potential candidate who has taken himself out of the race is RNC member Alec Poitevint of Bainbridge, who chaired the successful McCain campaign in Georgia. Poitevint said he’ll concentrate on the re-election of Saxby Chambliss to the U.S. Senate.
Pointevint wouldn’t tip his hand on who he intends to vote for in January. But he said any candidate interested in the chairmanship job needs to prove his mettle — by showing up in Georgia to help Chambliss through the runoff.
Sue Everhart, the state GOP chairman and another RNC member, in previous conversations hasn’t expressed enthusiasm for a Gingrich chairmanship. But Georgia’s third RNC member, Linda Herren of Atlanta, said making Gingrich the official voice of the GOP would be fine by her.
“There were too many deals cut with the Democrats. We have no rudder,” Herren said. On the other hand, she said, if Gingrich really wants the GOP chairmanship, a front-porch strategy won’t cut it. She’s already been lobbied by a half-dozen candidates.
“Newt - if he wants to do it, he’ll have to start pedaling now,” Herren said.
Photo credit: Associated Press
• Full election coverage: News, photos and more
• Get instant notification of Political Insider updates: Sign up on Twitter
.JPG)
-1.JPG)
Services »
Comments
By kenney
November 9, 2008 5:11 PM | Link to this
a hypocrite pls
By Jude
November 9, 2008 5:31 PM | Link to this
Might be better for the GOP to get someone with character.
By catlady
November 9, 2008 5:35 PM | Link to this
Yeah, get him AND Bob Barr to really have a fine ticket (TIC). Sleezeballs, both. Maybe Saxby can advise them on how to win.
By Darryl Moore
November 9, 2008 5:49 PM | Link to this
Barr and Gingrich…two racist…the GOP will become the GOR (grand ole racist) party!!!
By Page
November 9, 2008 6:00 PM | Link to this
Catlady and Moore, considering how Gingrich demonstrated his strong party loyalty by throwing Barr under the bus when Barr lost that primary against John Linder some years ago… I think your ticket is about as likely as a Gingrich-Cynthia McKinney matchup.
By JRI
November 9, 2008 6:23 PM | Link to this
Gingrich is a genius. The republicans would be foolish not to make him the lead. This is exaclty like 1992. Gringrich can lead the charge in 2010 like he did in 1994.
By DJ
November 9, 2008 6:26 PM | Link to this
Absolutely - bring on the Lizard. And PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE - work hard to purge the moderates from the party. That will ensure that republicans remain in the minority for another 40 years - just like last time.
By Copyleft
November 9, 2008 6:29 PM | Link to this
It’s so cute that Newt thinks he’s still relevant.
PLEASE put this man front and center of your new, reborn Republican Party… pretty please?
By Reality
November 9, 2008 6:38 PM | Link to this
Newt Gingrich has proven his inability to maintain “loyalty” to his friends / family. 1. First Wife 2. Bob Barr 3. George W. Bush Do U truly believe this is the RIGHT person to reform a disinfranchised party?
By CHIP S
November 9, 2008 6:40 PM | Link to this
To the hateful-
Do you believe in Democracy or not?
Yes we are a Republic, but do you believe in democracy within our republic?
By jon
November 9, 2008 6:48 PM | Link to this
Darryl Moore @ 5:49
You have absolutely no evidence that Gingrich or Barr are racists. The current strategy of Democrats is to sling the racism charge at anyone who disagrees with them. Pitiful.
By Kevin
November 9, 2008 6:50 PM | Link to this
Newt is a quitter. He walked out on the country just like he walked out on his former wives. I’m ashamed to admit that I voted twice for the quitter.
By Kay
November 9, 2008 6:55 PM | Link to this
Newt sure ain’t great on the personal side - no argument there but he is so much smarter than the rest of the idiots in Washington! This guy is a fabulous student of history (most don’t have a clue about our country’s fantastic history). He is correct to be furious with Bush over squandering the opportunity of a lifetime for the Republicans. After a taste of Obamapolitics, we are going to need someone of Newt’s determination and drive to make it happen. People were unhappy in America and they thought OBambi was the solution (change - but what kind of change?). When they wake up and smell the burning toast, it’s going to get very interesting in our country. Everyone thinks Obama is going to take away any need for personal responsibility in their lives. Now, even OBambi can’t do that!
By M
November 9, 2008 6:57 PM | Link to this
I don’t think the Republicans are smart enough to tap Gingrich as their leader. The party has consistently demonstrated (over the past 10 years) that they don’t have the intestinal fortitude to differentiate themselves from the socialist Democrats. Gingrich does. It is apparent to me, already, that the Republicans learned no lessons from the debacles of the 2006 and 2008 elections. I can draw no other conclusion than to anticipate that the party will continue to kowtow to the popular press and the religious right rather than boldly stand firm against the steady movement toward a socialist USA. If you think I’m an extremist, look up the comments made by Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, made in 1960 after meeting with Khrushchev. Khrushchev’s predictions are taking place right before our eyes and we are doing NOTHING about it! One would think the Republicans would step up to prevent the evolution, but they have not. The situation is disgraceful. I have no confidence in the decision-making ability of the Republicans whatsoever.
By John
November 9, 2008 7:07 PM | Link to this
Newt Gingrich?? Is this a joke?? He sure is!!
By Kay
November 9, 2008 7:10 PM | Link to this
M - Sadly, I think you are correct. America has been totally dumbed down. I am totally convinced of it. Interestingly, socialism has worked for no one. Socialist countries have begun to realize it and are changing. But what does the USA doing? Moving towards socialism. It’s totally scary. I am going to fight, fight, fight against it for my children and my future grandchildren. I will not give up or give in. Our forefathers fought and we will too! Make your voice LOUD and CLEAR!
By JohnnyTide
November 9, 2008 7:10 PM | Link to this
I lost all faith in Newt because he voted to impeach Clinton when he was doing the same thing. It’s hard for me to say that as I graduated from high school with him, attended to the same college and he was just one good all around guy.
By Rolltide23
November 9, 2008 7:11 PM | Link to this
If Newt was so smart, he would have still been in the Republican Loop. Its something about Republican Males cheating on their wives. McCain & Newt. The Republican Party is getting desperate. How about letting Herman Cain lead the GOP? He would make a good choice.
By Darryl's an idiot
November 9, 2008 7:12 PM | Link to this
Gee Darryl, I just wonder if you are bright enough to define ‘racist’ without having to look it up? Well, I’ll make it easy for you…please see Rev Wright, Obama’s pastor for decades. Ever heard the term “takes one to know one”? Makes me “so excited” about my next president. You may want to look at the mess and scum in your kitchen before looking or accussing someone else’s.
This country is going to be in a very difficult position in two years if Obama allows extreme leftist liberals like Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to get their way in congress with all the wasteful spending and proposals they have in mind.
Social Security retirement is one of the worst and inefficient financial plans anyone could create, but this was created with government. Your lousy party wants to expand government. Now that your party has created a dreadful retirement plan that forces everyone to be in, they now want to get in the middle of healthcare. How bad do you think they’ll screw this one up?
They’ve already screwed up education where we get the least and spend just about the most. Way to go Dept of Education and Teachers Unions…what sorry political party do they support? It looks like yours.
Then there is the “bank bailout” on Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac. Gee, who came up with that and pushed this failing plan through? Gee, none other than the Clinton’s. Who oversaw this failure? Gee, Barney Frank was the Chariman of the Finance Committee who happens to be a Democrook from Massachusetts.
I don’t know if Newt Gingrich is the answer for the GOP, but I do know he has far more character, honesty and intelligence of what’s best for the country than any public figure previously mentioned.
All Dem’s want to do is gain more power for themselves which is what other awful governments and countries have done across the pond. We don’t need that crap here.
By Rolltide23
November 9, 2008 7:14 PM | Link to this
If Newt was so smart, he would have still been in the Republican Loop. Its something about Republican Males cheating on their wives. McCain & Newt. The Republican Party is getting desperate. How about letting Herman Cain lead the GOP? He would make a good choice.
By SPuds
November 9, 2008 7:15 PM | Link to this
Who really gives a ** what the republicans do?
By TW
November 9, 2008 7:15 PM | Link to this
Didn’t Newt serve his fifth wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital fighting cancer?
Bsides, the GOP will continue to sink as long as it hold onto the old crew that wrecked our country, of which Newt was one.
By SPuds
November 9, 2008 7:18 PM | Link to this
Who really gives a ** what the republicans do?
By Fat Tony
November 9, 2008 7:23 PM | Link to this
Newt…Newt…Newt…!
By Ken
November 9, 2008 7:29 PM | Link to this
I agree with Kay. There is very little anyone of character would choose to emulate of Newt’s personal life. However, the man is a political genius and has learned well the lessons of our political past. Those that would choose to cast dispersions upon his character do so because it is easier to attack the man than stand toe-to-toe with him on the issues. Of course, when you consider how the left chooses to swoon over our new president-elect, it is easy to understand their preference for style over substance.
By Rolltide23
November 9, 2008 7:29 PM | Link to this
Here is a another good idea. The guy whom the GOP loves so much and has done nothing wrong GEORGE BUSH should lead the GOP. Does Republicans like GEORGE BUSH? Sean Hannity,Neal “Bozo” Boortz and Rush “The drug addict” nevers mentions the guy name.
By Rolltide23
November 9, 2008 7:30 PM | Link to this
Here is a another good idea. The guy whom the GOP loves so much and has done nothing wrong GEORGE BUSH should lead the GOP. Does Republicans like GEORGE BUSH? Sean Hannity,Neal “Bozo” Boortz and Rush “The drug addict” nevers mentions the guy name.
By go away
November 9, 2008 7:35 PM | Link to this
i thought you died. just go away
By Ken
November 9, 2008 7:36 PM | Link to this
I agree with Kay. There is very little anyone of character would choose to emulate of Newt’s personal life. However, the man is a political genius and has learned well the lessons of our political past. Those that would choose to cast dispersions upon his character do so because it is easier to attack the man than stand toe-to-toe with him on the issues. Of course, when you consider how the left chooses to swoon over our new president-elect, it is easy to understand their preference for style over substance.
By The Snark
November 9, 2008 7:37 PM | Link to this
Oh yeah, Newt is a real genius. It took him what, two years, to squander the Republicans’ gains from the 1996 elections? Bill Clintom ran circles around him. If the Republicans turn to him, they will wander in the wilderness for another decade. Last weeks’ election shows pretty clearly that the nation is looking for more moderation, not less.
By Kay
November 9, 2008 7:45 PM | Link to this
McCain cheating on his wife? Hadn’t heard that one. Frankly, he doesn’t look up to it to me (do you really think that is of great importance to him at this point?!). Even if it were true, that would make him SOOOOOOOOOOOOO different from other men in the Republican or Democratic party (or the general populus), now wouldn’t it?
By Kay
November 9, 2008 7:50 PM | Link to this
Hey Rolltide23….did you actually get a diploma from Alabama? Just curious.
By al
November 9, 2008 7:53 PM | Link to this
we don’t want him…we want young, strong leadership of people with character and morals.
By Fall of the Republic(ans)
November 9, 2008 7:55 PM | Link to this
I like Newt. I think what he did in the 90’s was why I became a Republican in college. But the party has changed so much since then that it really needs to take the time and figure out its direction or this election is just the tip of the iceberg. The party needs to look in the future for future leaders, not relying on past successes as the sole way for party survival. The party seems to no longer stand for fiscal responsiblity, family values, and hands off government. GOP no longer stands for Grand Ole Party, it now means Greedy Old People to many. How is Newt going to change that? How is the Republican Party going to attract minorities, youth, etc. to the party when this election the the McCain/Palin stomps looked like klan rallies while Obama’s looked liked the United Nations? The Republican Party needs to have room foe all of us.
By Kay
November 9, 2008 7:59 PM | Link to this
Al - I’m with you…in an ideal world. That seems to be a very tall order for some reason.
By DnA
November 9, 2008 8:06 PM | Link to this
Newt will be 70 something years old in 2012. Why o why are the Republicans so insistent on running dinosaurs? Please, can’t the Republicans find a kid, some fresh air to run? Not some old rag who’s only rebuttal is to shut down the guvmint if things don’t go his way? Repub’s need to scour talent in the college ranks now. If not the Dems will own this country forever.
By Rolltide23
November 9, 2008 8:10 PM | Link to this
Kay, Iam your classmate. Apparently you do not remember me. Let clear up my statement, McCain cheated on his first wife when she was seriously ill. John and Cindy were hanging out together. What a maverick he is. Not to mention the 5 navy plane crashes John was involved in. What a maverick. John had relations with Joe “Banano” Babino the mafia. What a maverick he is. Not to mention the Keating Five trial. The “Mac” is back. Yea right.
By Rolltide23
November 9, 2008 8:14 PM | Link to this
Kay, Iam your classmate. Apparently you do not remember me. Let clear up my statement, McCain cheated on his first wife when she was seriously ill. John and Cindy were hanging out together. What a maverick he is. Not to mention the 5 navy plane crashes John was involved in. What a maverick. John had relations with Joe “Banano” Babino the mafia. What a maverick he is. Not to mention the Keating Five trial. The “Mac” is back. Yea right.
By Dan
November 9, 2008 8:20 PM | Link to this
Good choice.
Newt would be a crappy, CRAPPY presidential candidate, however he’s a creative thinker and the perfect leader for the party.
Morals and character went out the window with Bill Clinton, let’s just win some elections.
By John
November 9, 2008 8:22 PM | Link to this
PLEASE, please, please pick that whiney, lying, cheater as the new GOP chairman. That is, if you want no one to take you seriously.
By 'Cuda 12
November 9, 2008 8:27 PM | Link to this
Either Newt Gingrich or Fred Thompson - the party needs to get back to the basics, and they need someone who isn’t afraid to speak up.
By bobby
November 9, 2008 8:29 PM | Link to this
We need Newt!
www.TheRepublicanUnderground.com
By Bill Walling
November 9, 2008 8:32 PM | Link to this
Buyer Beware!!!!!!!!
By nat turner
November 9, 2008 8:35 PM | Link to this
I am willing to be King of Amazon Island . Those gals gotta be tired of taking orders from other women .
By Bill Walling
November 9, 2008 8:35 PM | Link to this
Buyer Beware!!!!!!
By bobby
November 9, 2008 8:37 PM | Link to this
We need Newt!
www.TheRepublicanUnderground.com
By asdfasf
November 9, 2008 8:42 PM | Link to this
I think Sarah Palin would be an excellent choice.
By Newagegop
November 9, 2008 8:49 PM | Link to this
Newt was the only real conservative leader in DC and since he left the GOP morphed into Democrat lite. While his personal life has much much to be desired, his mind was brillant. Last time I checked Newt had a balanced budget, welfare reform, and a booming economy.
Newt was a great leader of the resistance. Unfortunately once he took the GOP to the mountaintop, the GOP left him there. They were no longer interested in reform, they just wanted to be “establishment”.
For all his personal negatives, the country was made greater for his service. I believe the GOP could use his service once more. No republican leader since has had anything approaching his vision or intellect.
Reagan and Gingrich were the 2 greatest conservatives in the last 50+ years.
By Newagegop
November 9, 2008 8:51 PM | Link to this
Newt was the only real conservative leader in DC and since he left the GOP morphed into Democrat lite. While his personal life has much much to be desired, his mind was brillant. Last time I checked Newt had a balanced budget, welfare reform, and a booming economy.
Newt was a great leader of the resistance. Unfortunately once he took the GOP to the mountaintop, the GOP left him there. They were no longer interested in reform, they just wanted to be “establishment”.
For all his personal negatives, the country was made greater for his service. I believe the GOP could use his service once more. No republican leader since has had anything approaching his vision or intellect.
Reagan and Gingrich were the 2 greatest conservatives in the last 50+ years.
By Newagegop
November 9, 2008 8:51 PM | Link to this
Newt was the only real conservative leader in DC and since he left the GOP morphed into Democrat lite. While his personal life has much much to be desired, his mind was brillant. Last time I checked Newt had a balanced budget, welfare reform, and a booming economy.
Newt was a great leader of the resistance. Unfortunately once he took the GOP to the mountaintop, the GOP left him there. They were no longer interested in reform, they just wanted to be “establishment”.
For all his personal negatives, the country was made greater for his service. I believe the GOP could use his service once more. No republican leader since has had anything approaching his vision or intellect.
Reagan and Gingrich were the 2 greatest conservatives in the last 50+ years.
By butch
November 9, 2008 8:52 PM | Link to this
i’ll do it. i will be on the right of right on all physical policies.
By GTJohn
November 9, 2008 8:55 PM | Link to this
How about Alan Keyes. He has character and is intelligent. I agree Newt is very smart but so is Alan and he will tell you the truth, even if you won’t like it.
By Rufus
November 9, 2008 8:56 PM | Link to this
The reason the Republicans have lost so miserably in the last two elections is exactly why the GOP needs a take-no-prisoners leader like Gingrich. The party has moved so close to the left-of-center position it has become almost indistinguishable from centrist Democrats. The American people need a better choice than two Democrat Parties. Gingrich is the only one capable of rebuilding the GOP to its 1994 prominence.
By Steve
November 9, 2008 9:02 PM | Link to this
There is an obvious dislike of Newt by Liberals and he has some personality flaws, unusual for politicians, indeed; however, he is an intelligent, original thinker and an excellent speaker. Dislike by the Liberals is another positive factor. Granted, Obama has one of those characteristics. But Republicans need a real leader to rebuild the GOP, not an American Idol Personna. If the Republicans pick a moderate like McCain, they should resign themselves to being a minor wing of the Democratic Party. If they want to rebuild a Conservative Party Platform; Newt, or a similar person would be a wise option.
It is interesting how the libs overcome deficiencies in grammar with hatred and passion with their commentary.
By zeke
November 9, 2008 9:03 PM | Link to this
There is no better choice! If the current republicans had not wasted the agenda and reforms put forth by Newt, the dems would be banned in exil! The only reason the republicans lost in ‘06 and ‘08 is that they fell into the big spending championed by the democrats! The republicans need to get back to their conservative ideal of strict Constitution agenda, low taxes, less spending especially on social programs, and, personal responsibility!
By Daniel
November 9, 2008 9:04 PM | Link to this
Newt Gengrich??? THE VERY MAN WHO HELPED RUN THE REPUBLICANS OFF THE TRACKS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I needed a good laugh.
By Reality
November 9, 2008 9:17 PM | Link to this
Are U serious! Alan Keyes is a mental case waiting for a padded cell. He is a lost soul, I would not associate him with any party seeking victory today or in the future. This is the sole reason Republicans are in a state of hopelessness, they continue to select leaders that have their own agenda that has not and will not benefit the party as a whole. Sorry! Pls select again, Alan is not a winner!
By AZfederalist
November 9, 2008 9:28 PM | Link to this
Moving to the middle worked so well in 2006 and in this election cycle, didn’t it? We let the media and Democrats pick our candidate, the one they all said they liked and admired: John McCain. Yeah, liked and admired, as someone that the democrat nominee could defeat — they were never going to vote for him. Why vote for Democrat-Lite when you can get the real thing if that is what you are after.
How about returning to those principles that led to landslides in 1980 and 1984 and the first return to power in congress for the Republicans in 1994?
Who better to do that than the architect for 1994? Newt would be a good pick.
By AZfederalist
November 9, 2008 9:34 PM | Link to this
Moving to the middle worked so well in 2006 and in this election cycle, didn’t it? We let the media and Democrats pick our candidate, the one they all said they liked and admired: John McCain. Yeah, liked and admired, as someone that the democrat nominee could defeat — they were never going to vote for him. Why vote for Democrat-Lite when you can get the real thing if that is what you are after.
How about returning to those principles that led to landslides in 1980 and 1984 and the first return to power in congress for the Republicans in 1994?
Who better to do that than the architect for 1994? Newt would be a good pick.
By hop
November 9, 2008 9:43 PM | Link to this
It is interesting how the ajc spotlights the two losses of the gop in the state races,but fails top mention the dems lost in toccoa. bottm line a huge net one gain in the general assembly.
this was a huge democratic swing in the nation,but not much to speak of in georgia.
By hop
November 9, 2008 9:47 PM | Link to this
It is interesting how the ajc spotlights the two losses of the gop in the state races,but fails top mention the dems lost in toccoa. bottm line a huge net one gain in the general assembly.
this was a huge democratic swing in the nation,but not much to speak of in georgia.
By Jeff
November 9, 2008 9:58 PM | Link to this
Careful, your hatred is starting to show. Of course, you think hatred and racism can only be on the right.
By Buddy Truitt
November 9, 2008 10:01 PM | Link to this
The Democrats made Howard Dean ” The Obnoxious ” their party chairman and you see where they are now , but honestly , the Republicans are not smart enough to see the need for Newt , that is why they are where they are now.
By bjay
November 9, 2008 10:22 PM | Link to this
GOP Chairman: Michael Savage
By Jeff
November 9, 2008 10:23 PM | Link to this
Careful, your hatred is starting to show. Of course, you think hatred and racism can only be on the right.
By bjay
November 9, 2008 10:27 PM | Link to this
GOP Chairman: Michael Savage
By My Two Cents
November 9, 2008 10:36 PM | Link to this
Newt is smart. The Republicans need someone to attempt to get them out of this mess. By 2012 all of you Obamites are going to be so sick of his crap even you will be wondering where the change went.
By Richard
November 9, 2008 10:36 PM | Link to this
Gingrich is not an accepted conservative and yes, there are character issues. The Republican Party must be rebuilt at the grassroots level, not in Washington DC. The RNC refused to listen to its people across the country and stuck us with a RINO candidate that was a sure loser, and as we predicted, he lost. There are other real conservatives to “run” the party, but we down here Georgia and people in other states will make that decision. This is critical for conservative Republican support.
By Ol South
November 9, 2008 10:38 PM | Link to this
This just in. It’s foolish to keep looking backward to 1980, 1984 or 1994. Look to the future and Newt should not be part of that new leadership. The key to winning is be a conservative and sell your self as a moderate. The party must be inclusive. It’s disgraceful to be kwown as the party of the south; most people across the country will regard you as the civil war party. Minorities (of any kind) and young educated whites don’t feel welcome in the GOP. Now the painful part. The party does not need leadership from Georgia. The fact that Georgia voted for McCain does not suggest Georgia politicians should be leading any remake of the party because the vote on Tuesday was a repudiation of the party and Georgia politics. The party need to be redefined. Stop being led by Rush, Neal and Hannity. Seperate the party from Fox News and others who is pimping the party for profit. Noone who voted for Obama (which was a majority) watches Fox News because of how unfair and unbalanced it is perceived. The party should not be viewed as an extension of Fox News. Their comments are often viewed as racist and insensitive and always attributed to the republican party and conservatives which negatively influences how the party is perceived. Stop trying to find leaders. That will take care of it self. After all the democrats were sure as hell not looking for Obama. The ideas of Obama is what won the people and the election. Take the party back at the grass root levels and make it the people party again. McCain, Bush, Rhoves, Newt, Rush, Neal, Hannity and all the others are viewed as leaders because they were smart enough to be the mouth piece of what the people wanted. Take the GOP back!
By Joseph
November 9, 2008 10:40 PM | Link to this
There are two choices for RNC Chairman in my opinion. Chip Saltsman and Michael Steele are the 2 best candidates for this job. Although Steele might run for Governor of Maryland instead.
By Dot
November 9, 2008 10:42 PM | Link to this
The lables being applied to Gingrich are ridiculous, He divorced and remarried, ant charges against him were 100% dismissed Thr lable sleazeball hardly applies to him, He is guilty of far less than most other sitting legislators. Can anyone tell me why they think he is a horrible person?
By morehouse
November 9, 2008 10:45 PM | Link to this
Mr. Gingrich, could’ve been president but he wanted,a pleasurable sexual experience instead of civil service.
By Ol South New
November 9, 2008 10:46 PM | Link to this
This just in. It’s foolish to keep looking backward to 1980, 1984 or 1994. Look to the future and Newt should not be part of that new leadership. The key to winning is be a conservative and sell your self as a moderate. The party must be inclusive. It’s disgraceful to be kwown as the party of the south; most people across the country will regard you as the civil war party. Minorities (of any kind) and young educated whites don’t feel welcome in the GOP. Now the painful part. The party does not need leadership from Georgia. The fact that Georgia voted for McCain does not suggest Georgia politicians should be leading any remake of the party because the vote on Tuesday was a repudiation of the party and Georgia politics. The party need to be redefined. Stop being led by Rush, Neal and Hannity. Seperate the party from Fox News and others who is pimping the party for profit. Noone who voted for Obama (which was a majority) watches Fox News because of how unfair and unbalanced it is perceived. The party should not be viewed as an extension of Fox News. Thier comments are often viewed as racist and insensitive and always attributed to the republican party and conservatives which negatively influences how the party is perceived. Stop trying to find leaders. That will take care of it self. After all the democrats were sure as hell not looking for Obama. The ideas of Obama is what won the people and the election. Take the party back at the grass root levels and make it the people party again. McCain, Bush, Rhoves, Newt, Rush, Neal, Hannity and all the others are viewed as leaders because they were smart enough to be the mouth piece of what the people wanted. Take the GOP back!
By morehouse
November 9, 2008 10:47 PM | Link to this
Mr. Gingrich, could’ve been president but he wanted,a pleasurable sexual experience instead of civil service.
By PR
November 9, 2008 10:47 PM | Link to this
newt is a has-been. the last things the republicans needs is an extremeist. that’s why they lost the election to begin with. everyone was fed up with bush and sarah palin was downright scarey. newt would be just as bad. the republicans need to come back closer to center if they want to win. the electorate will not vote for the extreme right!
By morehouse
November 9, 2008 10:47 PM | Link to this
Mr. Gingrich, could’ve been president but he wanted,a pleasurable sexual experience instead of civil service.
By DB
November 9, 2008 10:59 PM | Link to this
Would Mitt Romney ever be considered? The GOP could certainly use a turnaround expert to help them return to their conservative roots.
By Brad
November 9, 2008 11:00 PM | Link to this
The Republican party is so stupid! It’s because of their shift to the middle that they are losing. The more they do that the more they pi$$ off the conservatives they depend on. To me that is the reason McCain lost. It’s was hard to get excited when your choice is the lesser of two evils. Until the Republican Party pulls it’s head out of it’s a$$ it will continue to lose.
By Brad
November 9, 2008 11:02 PM | Link to this
The Republican party is so stupid! It’s because of their shift to the middle that they are losing. The more they do that the more they pi$$ off the conservatives they depend on. To me that is the reason McCain lost. It’s was hard to get excited when your choice is the lesser of two evils. Until the Republican Party pulls it’s head out of it’s a$$ it will continue to lose.
By rinoplastered
November 9, 2008 11:41 PM | Link to this
The Gingrich Revolution failed because Gingrich allowed the RINOs to regain their committee chairmanships. Arlen Spector, et al should have been purged after the Republicans regained their congressional majorities.
One thing this election taught us: RINOs LOSE ELECTIONS! Bye Bye Mr. Shays (CT-last GOP in New England)! Bye bye Libby Dole (NC - gun control is ok). And good riddance to you, John McCain! Please don’t drag Palin down with you.
If the GOP allows EVEN ONE RINO in the reorganized party’s leadership, they’re finished.
NO MORE RINOS!!
By secondit
November 10, 2008 12:12 AM | Link to this
By morehouse November 9, 2008 10:47 PM | Link to this Mr. Gingrich, could’ve been president but he wanted,a pleasurable sexual experience instead of civil service.
Mr. Newt - Morehouse is right. What we need is less of your kind. Teach effective strategies for winning and stay out of the limelight. You said you thought it was your turn to be financially rewarded when you wrote your book. Take the money, use it for all the things you would like, need, etc. Do not become the focal point of the party and give our political enemies such a target rich environment as your countenance would provide.
By fresca
November 10, 2008 12:16 AM | Link to this
In article- Yet Gingrich, seeing Bush squander the fruits of his ’94 revolution, has been ruthless in his criticism of the out-going president. JMO- Like alot of us Republicans have. The moderate Republicans needs to leave. They’re too left of center and has hurt the party big-time.
By EEvil Genius
November 10, 2008 12:23 AM | Link to this
Given the frothing from the liberal corner, the prospect of Newt at the RNC helm might not be a bad idea. He would certainly be better than the last few chairmen, but that’s not much of a stretch.
However, I longed for Michael Steele to be RNC chair in 2006. Given a choice, I’d pick Steele. He’s a man of great integrity and a strong conservative.
By Freddy
November 10, 2008 12:37 AM | Link to this
Qoute: JohnnyTide “I lost all faith in Newt because he voted to impeach Clinton when he was doing the same thing. It’s hard for me to say that as I graduated from high school with him, attended to the same college and he was just one good all around guy.”
Errrrrr……..
Clinton wasn’t impeached because he was porking a fat intern. Clinton was impeached because he lied UNDER OATH during his sexual harassment trial. ( from when he molested another porker)
Clinton also suborned perjury by asking Monica to lie under oath for him.
That’s why Clinton was impeached!
That’s OK, you’ll see another impeachment sometime in 2010, because I can almost guarantee Obama will do something that will harm this nation terribly, and break some laws.
By Freddy
November 10, 2008 12:43 AM | Link to this
Qoute: JohnnyTide “I lost all faith in Newt because he voted to impeach Clinton when he was doing the same thing. It’s hard for me to say that as I graduated from high school with him, attended to the same college and he was just one good all around guy.”
Errrrrr……..
Clinton wasn’t impeached because he was porking a fat intern. Clinton was impeached because he lied UNDER OATH during his sexual harassment trial. ( from when he molested another porker)
Clinton also suborned perjury by asking Monica to lie under oath for him.
That’s why Clinton was impeached!
That’s OK, you’ll see another impeachment sometime in 2010, because I can almost guarantee Obama will do something that will harm this nation terribly, and break some laws.
By Robert Chiles
November 10, 2008 1:14 AM | Link to this
Newt as the RNC chairman is a great proposal. Duncan is a poor excuse as a leader, and is responsible for trashing the Republicans. Yea, Newt made mistakes, but I think he repented. We need a new contract with america. We need to save the USA if its not too late. Newt is one a few Reagan conservatives left. I think he sees future in Sarah Palin also. Bobby Jindal is another outstanding leader. Lets go, lets get this thing back on track now.. . Bob
By Bill
November 10, 2008 1:29 AM | Link to this
Barr and Gingrich…two racist…the GOP will become the GOR (grand ole racist) party!!!
Hey Darryl , What kind of a racist idiot are you? These people are not racist YOU are because you dont agree with Republicans! Your Democratic Party in the past has caused more racsism in this country than anyone! So STFU big mouth!
By Dave
November 10, 2008 3:35 AM | Link to this
The term racism is thrown out too much these days. Lets look at some facts. Blacks are approx. 12% of the population and voted 95% for Obama. Whites are what put obama over the top. Blacks that are opposed to obamas views still voted for him because he is half black (ie Colin Powell). So racism abounds in the US. It is just most apparent in BLACKS.
By Dave
November 10, 2008 3:38 AM | Link to this
The term racism is thrown out too much these days. Lets look at some facts. Blacks are approx. 12% of the population and voted 95% for Obama. Whites are what put obama over the top. Blacks that are opposed to obamas views still voted for him because he is half black (ie Colin Powell). So racism abounds in the US. It is just most apparent in BLACKS.
By Ed
November 10, 2008 4:20 AM | Link to this
Think positive
To the rest of the G8 I say, where are your black leaders, you all call us racists. If there is a silver lining in all this, i think i just found it. we Americans elected a black president ahead of all of you phony liberals. Unfortunatly he happens to be a socialist, but at least we have overcome the race barrier, and with a little luck we will survive it, and become a better nation for it. The black pride over this could have a very positive effect on the black community, their belief in America has been restored. Now all we need to do is get back to conservative basics. The corrupt MSM is collapsing and the Dems are bound to self distruct in the next 2 years, we will retake the Senate, and in 2 more years the presidency. Sarah Palin for RNC Chair person.
By michael
November 10, 2008 6:51 AM | Link to this
Sara Palin would be the best selection to head the RNC.
By rplat
November 10, 2008 6:52 AM | Link to this
Newt is the only one currently available with the guts, intellect and courage to get us out from under this leftist regime the “enlightened” voters dumped on us.
By rplat
November 10, 2008 6:53 AM | Link to this
Newt is the only one currently available with the guts, intellect and courage to get us out from under this leftist regime the “enlightened” voters dumped on us.
By michael
November 10, 2008 6:56 AM | Link to this
Sara Palin would be the best selection to head the RNC.
By S. Shiver
November 10, 2008 8:00 AM | Link to this
What about George W. Bush as head of the RNC?
By William Messer
November 10, 2008 9:04 AM | Link to this
Newt would have been elected President should he have chosen to run. We need him now to run the RNC.
By trp
November 10, 2008 9:14 AM | Link to this
As many, I also state that the GOP would be better off installing an unknown than to go back to the old base. They didn’t do what they should have done when they were in before, so why trust them now. Behind the scenes assistance would be welcome, however their ego’s wouldn’t permit it. With them, a NEWLY formed Party would fair better. thanks
By Douglas
November 10, 2008 10:00 AM | Link to this
Let him who has not sinned throw the first stone. I love how people want to hate Newt because he cheated. Was it wrong? Yes. I am sure that we have all done something that we are not proud of. He has not coward down from what he did. Newt is a GREAT American. I would love for Newt to take the job. The problem with Republicans is that they are no longer conservative. I personally do not identify with the Republicans anymore. They don’t hold onto the values and ideals that they once did. NEWT, JINDAL, PALIN, ROMNEY… all fine examples of what we need representing our country in such a time of dispair. Our Republic is at question. Do we love our nation and want to prosper or do we want to become like the Roman Empire and fail. The Roman Empire lasted only 250 years and we are at 233 right now. At this rate I am not sure that we will test that mark. I pray and hope that NEWT or someone with the same ideals and values that he holds will step up and make the kind of change that we need.
By windyjo
November 10, 2008 10:40 AM | Link to this
It’s so sad to listen to both sides on anything anymore. They are sounding more and more alike. Look at the Democrats and Republican issues on character. WE ARE ALL HUMAN! WE ALL HAVE CHARACTER FLAWS! GET OVER IT. Newt Gingrich is a historian and a very smart guy. His personal life is not the issue. The Republicans need to decide what direction they need to go in. Stay the “Grand Old Party” or respond to the vast majority of the Consrvatives in the Party. Palin was the only thing that kept McCain close. This election wasn’t a blowout for Obama or the Dems. No 60 seat majority. Of course they probably can count on the RHINO Republicans, including McCain, too vote their biddings. MAYBE IT’S TIME FOR A CONSERVATIVE PARTY with Palin, Newt, Haley Barbour, Bobby Jindal etc. Republicans and Democrats be damned.
By windyjo
November 10, 2008 10:44 AM | Link to this
It’s so sad to listen to both sides on anything anymore. They are sounding more and more alike. Look at the Democrats and Republican issues on character. WE ARE ALL HUMAN! WE ALL HAVE CHARACTER FLAWS! GET OVER IT. Newt Gingrich is a historian and a very smart guy. His personal life is not the issue. The Republicans need to decide what direction they need to go in. Stay the “Grand Old Party” or respond to the vast majority of the Consrvatives in the Party. Palin was the only thing that kept McCain close. This election wasn’t a blowout for Obama or the Dems. No 60 seat majority. Of course they probably can count on the RHINO Republicans, including McCain, too vote their biddings. MAYBE IT’S TIME FOR A CONSERVATIVE PARTY with Palin, Newt, Haley Barbour, Bobby Jindal etc. Republicans and Democrats be damned.
By windyjo
November 10, 2008 10:48 AM | Link to this
It’s so sad to listen to both sides on anything anymore. They are sounding more and more alike. Look at the Democrats and Republican issues on character. WE ARE ALL HUMAN! WE ALL HAVE CHARACTER FLAWS! GET OVER IT. Newt Gingrich is a historian and a very smart guy. His personal life is not the issue. The Republicans need to decide what direction they need to go in. Stay the “Grand Old Party” or respond to the vast majority of the Consrvatives in the Party. Palin was the only thing that kept McCain close. This election wasn’t a blowout for Obama or the Dems. No 60 seat majority. Of course they probably can count on the RHINO Republicans, including McCain, too vote their biddings. MAYBE IT’S TIME FOR A CONSERVATIVE PARTY with Palin, Newt, Haley Barbour, Bobby Jindal etc. Republicans and Democrats be damned.
By Jim in Chicago
November 10, 2008 10:50 AM | Link to this
GOD please let the RNC have enough sense to put Newt in charge. I’m envisioning another CONTRACT With AMERICA (1994).
By Jim in Chicago
November 10, 2008 11:02 AM | Link to this
Hey DJ - what moderates? what is the definition of a moderate? - someone who doesn’t stand for anything, no strong convictions. In the words of Aaron Tippet - You have to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything. I have respect for Liberals that can passionately debate their point of view. Can’t say the same about the **Wishy Washy Moderates”.
By EC Sedgwick
November 10, 2008 11:40 AM | Link to this
The next Republican leader sure won’t be from Georgia if the above bull s** is any indication. So much hate. So sure every thing is going to hell.I voted republican twenty eight years in Cherokee and Cobb county Georgia The republican party has inacted the Patriot act,by passing FISA, torture. secret prisons,eliminating Habes Corpus,Gwantonamo. I can continue. Point is. I voted for Mr Obamma and wish him well. He seems to be a reasonable man,that of which is lacking in the above mentioned canidates for Republican leadership positions. Me Obamma has two years and then I will decide if he is worthy of supporting again.
By Chucky Schmucky
November 10, 2008 12:00 PM | Link to this
Anybody know the name of the current head of the RNC? Mr. Invisible has done a great job, hasn’t he?
On the other hand, we’re supposed to reject somebody with a track record of having developed ideas, including a campaign based upon those ideas, and having delivered on them — including balanced budgets and huge majorities.
No, we wouldn’t want somebody like that. After all, unlike the current head of the DNC, Howard Dean, Newt is “polarizing.” And Newt represents “hate,” while Dean brings us all together.
What a bunch of knuckleheads on this forum.
By Eric Arthur Blair
November 10, 2008 12:21 PM | Link to this
Msg by By EC Sedgwick, November 10, 2008 11:40 AM | Link to this.
Putting aside your awful grammar, which leaves no doubt as to the party you support, if your big issue is civil liberties, why on earth would you support the leftist agenda?
While you p-i-s-s and moan about aggressive efforts to protect the public from terrorists, you just go right along with the Fascist left’s trashing of the Constitution/Bill of Rights — constantly attacking free speech rights, attacking gun rights, destroying property rights, perverting equal rights, eliminating states’ rights, and on and on an on.
The fascists’ next target will be union members’ right to vote in secret and then they will shut down conservative talk radio. Then comes the Marxist economic agenda.
So, while you’re mindlessly wringing your hands over the government’s efforts to protect you, you sit there with with a vacant, buck-toothed grin on your face as the fascist left attacks the Constitution and PROMISES to further restrict free speech, free thought, free association, property rights, the right to bear arms and all the rest.
Nimrod.
By Aunt Pitty Needs An iPhone
November 10, 2008 12:53 PM | Link to this
Bail out ‘wingnut talk radio! Only then does Newt have half a prayer at anything other than museum relic of times done gone.
By Aaron Burr V. Mexico
November 10, 2008 1:30 PM | Link to this
As a moderate, I stand for something.
I stand for not letting either the liberal wackos or the conservative wackos ruin my country.
By EC Sedgwick
November 10, 2008 2:37 PM | Link to this
So, while you’re mindlessly wringing your hands over the government’s efforts to protect you, you sit there with with a vacant, buck-toothed grin on your face as the fascist left attacks the Constitution and PROMISES to further restrict free speech, free thought, free association, property rights, the right to bear arms and all the rest.
I look forward to the the day. Maybe I will be an oberfhuer or what ever.
By jpetz
November 10, 2008 2:42 PM | Link to this
Gingrich is not the right person for the job of RNC chairman. Newt is a known hypocrite who prefers outrageous attacks of opponents rather than a spirited exchange of ideas. His so-called 1994 revolution was rooted in the meanest attack dog politics ever witnessed. If that is what the GOP thinks it needs to become relevant, they are sadly mistaken.
By Steeles The Man
November 10, 2008 2:59 PM | Link to this
Steele for RNC Chairman
By carole
November 10, 2008 3:22 PM | Link to this
I cannot stand to see nor hear Newt Gingrich. He is a blowhard who believes himself to be some sort of intellectual. But 80% of the time, his predictions are wrong.
In 1994, he tried to blame Democrat morals for the Susan Smith tragedy. Is this the type of person the RNC wants to lead the GOP out of the wilderness? If it is, I hope they enjoy the fresh air the wilderness is known for because under Newt they’ll be getting lots of it.
By t-bird
November 10, 2008 5:50 PM | Link to this
If the liberals vilify him, he must have something going for him. Who cares if he’s not popular among the slime of Washington?
I’d prefer he just keep writing and speaking. Say what you will about his Democratic-ally inspired (but strangely condemned by same) personal life, the guy gets it and can inspire.
Move the tent back where it was. It’s drafty out here.
By Nick O
November 10, 2008 6:01 PM | Link to this
Newt Gingrich is brilliant and Steele would be a great second. Not exactly alike, but close enough. I confess that while I voted the ticket it was because of Governor Palin. Any mail fron the RNC went in the trash. Did not give a dime. Has anyone checked to see what the RNC raised before McCain and After McCain? We allowed the wrong person to get the nomination. Where the hell is the polling when you need it. Use the pollsters to narrow the field. We can not let another cycle go without answering the lefties.
By Jeff in MN
November 10, 2008 6:57 PM | Link to this
Newt is a good man who has engineered REAL change in the past. Can he do it again? Sure he can, as soon as he goes back to his conservative roots and leaves the Global warmning, “watermelon agenda behind him…
watermelon = green on the outside, Red on the inside…
By the Deets
November 10, 2008 8:08 PM | Link to this
How will the Republicans attract young voters and Latino’s?!?… Stand by CONSTITUTIONALLY CONSERVATIVE, common sense principles.
The Alinsky-Left inherently understands this and prefer facile opponents in debate. It’s quite easy to dispatch your opponents if they agree with any tenet of your position.
Dems get strong support of their base because, at the end of their lies, they stand by their PROGRAZI/socialist principles.
We can’t out-commie the commies.
Btw, Nazi’s are on the LEFT(socialism is part of their name). Intellectually honest anarchists are on the right. Chew on that ill-Liberals.
By jerry
November 10, 2008 8:37 PM | Link to this
I have not heard the mention of a name from a very successfully Conservative state. Our chairwoman, this text will be bolded Tina Benkeiser.
By jerry
November 10, 2008 8:47 PM | Link to this
Well that didn’t work.
By jerry
November 10, 2008 8:48 PM | Link to this
Well that didn’t work. Yryying this,Tina Benkeiser!
By marine43
November 10, 2008 10:43 PM | Link to this
I lost all respect for Newt when he bought into the global warming scam!They can all kiss my furry behind. They sold out this country. So now we have to let this socialist , screw us up for 4 yrs! I’m truly disgusted with the sheeple in this country.
By KJ
November 10, 2008 10:57 PM | Link to this
Gingrich was great for his time. But he demonstrated that is over when he went over to the libs. He and Nancy P. looked so cute sitting on the couch together. Conservatives and moderates separate on our ideologies. Screw the RINO’s. Let the moderates and libs keep it. We need a New Conservative party.
By Disgusticated
November 11, 2008 5:21 AM | Link to this
What they call “moderate” these days is pretty darn left of centre. The Republicans not only need to put the boots to all the “moderate” RINOs, but also to differentiate themselves from the Libertarian Party. Conservatives — moral and fiscal — are not a minority in America. But the more the GOP “widens the tent” the faster those conservatives run for the exits.
Surely I am not alone in encountering so many conservative people who outright refused to vote in this last election because f the choices involved (I wasn’t happy about it, but it illustrates the passion with which people are turning away from this “moderate” Republican Party).
So, absolutely I agree that Gingrich would be an excellent choice to lead the Party out of it’s current mess. Nobody ever liked him, but he understands the problem and has proven before that he can get the job done. That’s what counts..
Also, we need to do something about those open primaries.
By Disgusticated
November 11, 2008 5:43 AM | Link to this
What they call “moderate” these days is pretty darn left of centre. The Republicans not only need to put the boots to all the “moderate” RINOs, but also to differentiate themselves from the Libertarian Party. Conservatives — moral and fiscal — are not a minority in America. But the more the GOP “widens the tent” the faster those conservatives run for the exits.
Surely I am not alone in encountering so many conservative people who outright refused to vote in this last election because f the choices involved (I wasn’t happy about it, but it illustrates the passion with which people are turning away from this “moderate” Republican Party).
So, absolutely I agree that Gingrich would be an excellent choice to lead the Party out of it’s current mess. Nobody ever liked him, but he understands the problem and has proven before that he can get the job done. That’s what counts..
Also, we need to do something about those open primaries.
By Disgusticated
November 11, 2008 5:50 AM | Link to this
What they call “moderate” these days is pretty darn left of centre. The Republicans not only need to put the boots to all the “moderate” RINOs, but also to differentiate themselves from the Libertarian Party. Conservatives — moral and fiscal — are not a minority in America. But the more the GOP “widens the tent” the faster those conservatives run for the exits.
Surely I am not alone in encountering so many conservative people who outright refused to vote in this last election because f the choices involved (I wasn’t happy about it, but it illustrates the passion with which people are turning away from this “moderate” Republican Party).
So, absolutely I agree that Gingrich would be an excellent choice to lead the Party out of it’s current mess. Nobody ever liked him, but he understands the problem and has proven before that he can get the job done. That’s what counts..
Also, we need to do something about those open primaries.
By Carl in TN
November 11, 2008 1:48 PM | Link to this
I think Fred Thompson would be a FAR better choice as RNC chair.
His character is above reproach…
By Carl in TN
November 11, 2008 1:53 PM | Link to this
I think Fred Thompson would be a FAR better choice as RNC chair.
His character is above reproach…
By R Stewart
November 11, 2008 5:02 PM | Link to this
It’s Reaganism stupid!!! The RNC needs to get their heads out of the proverbial dark hole and listen to the voice of the base of the party and the majority of those not in the party. Less government, lower taxes, project a strong America, the rights of the individual matter, etc. Walk the Reagan walk. Talk the Reagan talk. America will listen and will vote for you in droves.
By dr_donn
November 11, 2008 7:06 PM | Link to this
Strange!!! I just heard Newt tell Sean Hannity that he want nothing to do with heading up the GOP. He said his plate is full and he is not interested in giving up what he is doing to do something else.