Home > Political Insider > Archives > 2008 > April > 27
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Democrats send out robo-calls, hunting for candidates
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Despite the prospect of a Barack Obama surge, Republicans in Georgia say they’ve got evidence that Democrats are scrambling for candidates to put on the November ballot.
On the weekend before qualifying begins, Republicans say they’ve discovered that Democrats are sending out robo-calls hunting for candidates.
And — surprise! — Democrats said late Sunday they indeed initiated a weekend hunt for candidates, in three specific House districts in rural Georgia. The Republican seats are occupied by Richard Royal of Camilla, Bill Hembree of Winston, and Jay Roberts of Ocilla.
Asked if such last-minute pleas are effective, Georgia Democratic Party spokesman Martin Matheny frankly said he didn’t know. They’ve never done it before. Matheny said Democrats are simply mimicking a Republican tactic.
“We figure if the GOP does it, we should do it, too,” he said.
Republicans didn’t provide my colleague Aaron Sheinin with the sound, but they gave him the script, which Matheny confirmed as authentic.
Here ‘tis:
“Good evening. I’m calling from the Democratic party of Georgia. With Georgia’s Legislature now adjourned, you should know that your Republican State Representative, XXXX, voted to cut death benefits for police officers in your county.
“He also supported creating over 175 new taxes, even the tax on the food you buy your family. XXXX and the Republicans in Atlanta have failed to fully fund our schools, save emergency rooms from bankruptcy, even provide tax relief to Georgia families.
“If you are tired of politics as usual or think you or someone you know can do a better job at representing your values, give us a call. You can reach us at 1-866-507-2008.
Said Sue Everhart, chairman of the Georgia Republican party:
“They’re claiming there is enthusiasm on the Democratic side in legislative races. The truth is they are forced to resort to paid robo-calls to recruit candidates in a frantic, last ditch effort just hours before qualifying. Shameful attacks delivered through paid robocalls isn’t hope or change; it’s the discredited style of politics that has caused Georgia voters to reject the Democratic Party.
Permalink | Comments (9) | Post your comment |
Documenting the media migration to separate corners
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Slowly but surely, you and your television are making your way back to the 18th century and those glorious, early days of the Republic, when wigs sat upon Whigs and political campaigns were little more than scorched-earth libel competitions.
Anyone with cable TV — virtually everyone, in other words — has sensed this for some time. Now someone’s come up with the numbers that show just how real the movement is.
Barry Hollander is an associate professor of journalism professor at the University of Georgia. He’s good at crunching numbers.
Hollander recently took five national surveys, conducted from 1998 to 2006 by the Pew Center for the People and the Press, and mushed them together to create an eight-year look at America’s political viewing habits.
What he documented was a quiet stampede.
In 1998, 27 percent of Republicans and 25 percent of Democrats tuned in regularly to Atlanta-based CNN. Eight years later, the number of Democrats had risen to 29 percent.
But the number of Republicans who tuned in to CNN had shrunk to 19 percent. Gosh, where do you think they went?
Over the same period, Fox News’ share of Republican viewers jumped from 14 to 36 percent.
Hollander documented a media shift among Democrats to friendly sources, too, but the most dramatic change has occurred among Republicans. And, possibly, among more casual consumers of news.
“Republicans have dramatically dropped news sources that they perceive as being biased against their position. They’ve completely fled into Fox and have left CNN, broadcast news and all the others,” Hollander said.
Outrage over alleged liberalism could explain this, except for one inconvenient fact. Republicans, Hollander said, have even dropped C-SPAN, which — because of its verbatim approach — is widely considered neutral in content.
Something larger is happening, the University of Georgia professor asserts. “People have always hung out with people like themselves,” Hollander said. The water-cooler world that most people live in is a huge echo chamber of attitudes and ideas.
“It was always thought that the media was the savior in this,” Hollander said.
In days gone by, before the Internet and before Ted Turner, three broadcast networks captured the attention of 90 percent of Americans. Our favorite uncle, CBS’ Walter Cronkite, spoke to us as a single group, sometimes telling some of us what we didn’t want to know.
Big Media would intrude and interrupt — like the high school cafeteria lady who heaped on the Brussels sprouts, whether they were wanted or not.
But no more. Cable TV and the Internet have set a world of choices before us, which permit us to avoid the unfamiliar, uncomfortable or objectionable. Facebook and MySpace allow us to build ever-larger empires of like-minded friends. On-line newspapers encourage you to customize the news that appears on your computer.
And no one is in the mood for Brussels sprouts.
Hollander said many of those not into politics — who once were forced to include some debate in their diet — have dropped news outlets altogether, preferring a world of 24-hour make-believe and entertainment.
Those most interested in political news, nearly all partisans by definition, are slowly gathering behind red and blue networks.
“I have no doubt that Fox and CNN know what’s going on, and are playing to it,” Hollander said. They’re marketing data is better than his, and more up-to-date — but they’re not sharing.
The media migration that Hollander documented explains CNN’s current resurgence against Fox. The Atlanta-based network has invested heavily in its coverage of the never-ending, Democratic soap opera that pits Hillary Clinton against Barack Obama.
“If [Republican John] McCain were still battling [Mitt] Romney, you would see Fox going up,” Hollander said.
But Hollander offers little hope for the future. “We’re slowly inching our way back to a partisan press,” he said.
We’ve been there before. Newspapers in the late 1700s and early 1800s were largely party mouthpieces that supplied the talking points of the day. Even the much-worshipped George Washington was damned as a traitor — by an outlet controlled by the equally venerated Tom Jefferson.
The penny press destroyed the party press, by proving that there was profit in a newspaper that could talk to everyone at once.
But history has a circular sense of humor, and now it’s the broadly appealing media — newspapers, radio, news magazines and broadcast TV — whose bottom lines are hurting.
Niche is the profitable future.
Speaking of which: On Monday and Tuesday, two Georgia ex’s — Jimmy Carter and Newt Gingrich — will make back-to-back appearances on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.”
They’re the future. Enjoy.
Permalink | Comments (4) | Post your comment |
‘Bubba’ McDonald says he’s running for PSC
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The Gainesville Times says Lauren “Bubba” McDonald declared on Saturday that he wants his seat on the Public Service Commission back.
McDonald is one of the first to announce plans to replace Angela Speir, the woman who beat him in 2002. Speir surprised many last week when she said she wouldn’t run for a second term.
Services »
