By Illegal Americano

April 8, 2008 5:31 PM | Link to this

Impeach Bush and ship Bob Barr and Neil Boortz to ole mexico

By Brittanicus

April 8, 2008 5:35 PM | Link to this

When the new President steps into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, then we will be seeing the 12 to 20 million getting a path to citizenship.

Once a new amnesty is signed into law, then nobody will be able to stop the next tsunami of destitute, uneducated illegal humanity pouring across our borders. A new amnesty will be seen as an open door, for yet another future welcome to the world of the poor.

American taxpayers are sick and tired of supporting the rest of the world. Never mind that Assemblywoman Mimi Walters, a Republican from Oceanside, said illegal immigrants cost California taxpayers an estimated $9 billion each year.

If this financial atrocity is happening in Los Angeles, what must it be costing your city, county or state?

Tell, no DEMAND your representatives to co-author THE FEDERAL SAVE ACT?

Keep calling your Congressmen today, toll free numbers include 18778516437 and 18662200044, or call toll 12022243121 AND REGISTER YOUR OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to keep our country from enforcing its immigration laws!YOU!

And only YOU, can stop this travesty of our Immigration laws?

By Gary

April 8, 2008 5:40 PM | Link to this

Hispanics are HERE. Boortz and Lou Dobbs make their living by appealing to American’s hate and fear and loathing of Mexicans. Boortz is a leech who sucks racist poison from his own soul and infects and infests our national awareness with the remnants of our unthinking reptile brain’s darkest reaches of negativity about the very real presence of our Hispanic brothers in our midst. Boortz is pure evil, and he measures his american dream by how much hate and fear he can inject into our culture. In his radio delivery, a listener can detect Boortz’s inflections and overtones of his own feelings of superiority and common sense judgements about Mexicans. It makes me sick. Enjoy your money, Boortz. You’ll regret every penny on judgement day, when our christ returns. He wont know you. Hate is your invisibility cloak. Boortz.

Hispanics are HERE. Love them. My mother in law loved Boortz.

By Jesus Hernandez

April 8, 2008 5:40 PM | Link to this

All for one and one for all, we our all human beings love is the answer not fear and hate

By Wackolibhack

April 8, 2008 6:06 PM | Link to this

It is Bush’s fault that there are illegals. I hate Bush!!!

By American worker

April 8, 2008 6:22 PM | Link to this

First of all, it is clearly racist to even mention borders or permission to enter the U.S. - protected borders is something only other nations can get away with.

Immigration laws? RACIST AND HATEFILLED PROFILING OF HISPANICS!

But…the problem took 20 years at least to develop, no one should expect the illegal immigration mess to be straighened out over night.

Illegals are leaving Georgia because of the enforcement of existing laws…lets try that on a national level for 20 years before we repeat the amnesty of 1986….or elect an open borders Libertarian who has no clue.

By lucky

April 8, 2008 6:38 PM | Link to this

Corporate corruption wants the cheap labor. Other forces want the drugs. The situation is outrageous and we need our soldiers on our borders.

By Barr - fme

April 8, 2008 6:51 PM | Link to this

Barr wants to do another amnesty and all of the Libertarians want open imigration? http://www.lp.org/issues/immigration.shtml

Uh…yeah, that should bring about 5 billion people here looking for a better life.

Vote for Barr…if you want Mexico el Norte!

By Gary

April 8, 2008 6:52 PM | Link to this

BOORTZ!!!!

By Jason

April 8, 2008 7:13 PM | Link to this

If you wanted a Libertarian candidate who defends our borders and maintains our soverignty, then you should have voted for Ron Paul when you had the chance. I blame all of you who didn’t vote for him for the situation we’re in now - a choice between Amnesty McCain or Amnesty Obama!

By Jose Jimenez

April 8, 2008 7:24 PM | Link to this

That’s what happens when too many “unwanted” debark on someone’s back yard. Look at Clayton County. What a mess it has become and it’s not only because of all the latinos who have landed there. A few is unnoticeable, but when it grows out of proportion, hate ensues.

By RonPaulnomore

April 8, 2008 7:34 PM | Link to this

Join us for the rally to get our money back from Ron Paul. I used to believe that Ron was the only candidate that could do anything. I found that the only thing he was good at was stealing my money for his congressional race. We are meeting in the empty parking lot on Jekyll every Sat. to blow up our blimp in protest of Ron Paul’s theft. Join us this Saturday.

By Churchill

April 8, 2008 7:38 PM | Link to this

Jason, Ru Paul was running as a Republican. Maybe that was his problem. Everyone knew he was a Libertarian and not enough Republicans bought what he was selling. Therefore, the fall of Ru Paul.

By catlady

April 8, 2008 7:50 PM | Link to this

I still have some hope for border security, punishment of employers, and removal of those found breaking the law, as they surface. If we decide to “legalize” some of the folks who are already here, it should be on a very selective basis, with lots of penalties paid. (For example, parents who have not been supportive of their children’s education would NOT be candidates for legalization. Folks who have been arrested are NOT candidates for legalization.)

I also think we should not make children born of a mother here illegally an automatic citizen.

Lest you think I hate Latino folk, I do not. I have taught hundreds (literally) and most of them are terrific—good parents, hardworking etc. They could be candidates for legalization if they can jump the other hoops.

I just don’t think we can reward behavior we want extinguished, and expect it to work.

By Jesse Ventura

April 8, 2008 8:20 PM | Link to this

Abort Bush the General is covering his hide so he can pass his mess to the next Prez after all he is the decider

By David

April 8, 2008 8:21 PM | Link to this

C’mon Bob Barr, take the Tancredo stance on illegals, it’s the only way you will get real conservative support in 2008. I was pretty excited about your run until I heard the Boortz exchange.

By Crap

April 8, 2008 8:27 PM | Link to this

I was ready to vote for Barr and now I read this.

Our country is done.

I wish I was older so I could die a natural death before this country becomes third world.

By Jesse Ventura

April 8, 2008 8:45 PM | Link to this

Donate your loins to science, crap.

By Will Jones

April 8, 2008 9:10 PM | Link to this

Barr is CIA is Roman Catholic Fifth Column…which is why an element of the CIA killed Kennedy and King, and why Barr acts as if he doesn’t know Bush committed 9-11.

Rome’s published stratagem for taking over the U.S., besides the proof of their assassinating us, from Meriwether Lewis and Lincoln to JFK and MLK, and installing homosexual draft-dodgers like Bush in the White House, is promotion of illegal immigration. Their National Pastoral Plan for Hispanic Ministry is available for all to read confirming this charge.

Until the American People wake up to the Anti-Christ in our midst their agents like Bush, Barr, Boortz, and McCain will continue to divide and conquer us.

Learn Our Founder, Thomas Jefferson’s prophetic wisdom, that Atlanta be the New Jerusalem leading America back to its rightful place in the community of nations: theamericanfundament.blogspot.com

By howard

April 8, 2008 9:24 PM | Link to this

It is very simple, take away the reason they are here. Stop employment at the employers doorstep. When illegal immigrants are stopped arest them. If no work and they know they will be deported and lose what they have, they will gather up their things and leave. It’s called enforcement. By the time the next president is here and starts to do something, there will be 30 million. That is we must fight harder and press the politicians. When they start to worried about losing their jobs they will come around.

By Churchill

April 8, 2008 9:36 PM | Link to this

The reason they are here is because the Mexican economy sucks. That’s why they come here in droves. The Mexican government and people seem to get a free pass. I know it is in vogue to blame the US for everything, but geesh!!!! Have any of you ever been to Mexico City? The place is a dump. It is not our fault they can not get their …acts together. Close the borders, or at least deport those we can catch.

By AfroDawg

April 8, 2008 9:57 PM | Link to this

Date line 2/15/2018, red phone in the Whitehouse rings at 3AM, president Juan Ramos sets aside his Corona and taco———bueno.

By TW

April 8, 2008 10:03 PM | Link to this

What if God is sending us the immigrants to see how we’ll treat them?

By RJ

April 8, 2008 10:03 PM | Link to this

VIVA MCCAIN

By Gary

April 8, 2008 10:08 PM | Link to this

No, the reason mexico is here is because this is Mexico. It was Mexico for 10K years, man. Then because of the opportunities provided any nation builders when military dictators can sign into law binding territorial secessions, (and another example of why our commander in chief needs to be a civilian), we simply took it. from louisiana to oregon, man. We simply took it. Grant, our greatest general ever, was shocked at the land grab and considered it foul.

By Churchill

April 8, 2008 10:28 PM | Link to this

Mexico was paid for the land. It was a legal purchase. We did not take it!! If you would like to discuss the Mexican-American War, fine. But brush up on your facts. The area of Texas and disputed lands just west and north of that area, was decided by force, but the rest was purchased. If you don’t like the force part, then take it up with the Texans… I dare you. But CA most of the southwest was purchased. Those are the facts.

By AfroDawg

April 8, 2008 10:41 PM | Link to this

Trinkets,beads, and fire water can hardly be considered legal tender for a purchase, oh my gosh, I’m confusing transactions, my bad.

By Churchill

April 8, 2008 10:55 PM | Link to this

The United States has a Bill of Sale. It was and is legal. Unlike, the immigrants.

By Liberal Daisy

April 8, 2008 11:18 PM | Link to this

I’m sure there is room for everyone, Jesus loved the poor and so can we, give them time and they will assimilate and add another color to our great melting pot.

By Bob Dole

April 8, 2008 11:20 PM | Link to this

I’m Bob Dole and Churswill needs to lay off the viagra

By Tancredo

April 9, 2008 12:29 AM | Link to this

Nobody can out Tancredo Tancredo

By AfroDawg

April 9, 2008 12:44 AM | Link to this

I hope that Bill of sale hasn’t been finagled,twisted, and contorted to the advantage of certain groups as much as the Bill of rights has.

By hypocrats

April 9, 2008 12:59 AM | Link to this

It’s the racist mob again.Lets get the Irish,Italians,Chinese,Mexicans,Indians,germans, and so on.Wait is the mexicans again round 2.Sorry I,forgot the japanese. The mob is at it again.But of course some of you are to young or stupid to acknowledge the history of this great nation.No great because of the mob.Great because of immigrants Whom despite being persecuted, whenever some thing goes wrong they remain strong on their principals.

By Will Jones

April 9, 2008 3:36 AM | Link to this

This is an organized invasion by the force America’s Founder identified as the Anti-Christ.

Openly known to be descended from caesars and popes, the “elite” families which oversee that socio-economic juggernaut, through intrigue and assassination, have managed to sit in the same castles on the same hills in Europe for two and three thousand years, and is known as the Black Aristocracy - Google “aristocrazia nera” and hit “translate.”

Their American agents hold membership in the Knights of Malta, forming Rome’s “Fifth Column” to subvert the Whig/Anti-Roman Catholic Jeffersonian Revolution through assassination, false war and cultural perversion.

The Rockefellers, which built Big Oil on unredressed murder and arson, are the Vatican’s correspondent bankers - receiving the Monday-morning cashflow from the largest income stream in history - and the Bushes have been their lieutenants since 1870’s Cleveland, and the finance of Adolph Hitler and the Holocaust.

Never wonder why no one seems to be able to stop illegal immigration at our sovereign borders? Watch “No Country for Old Men.” The psycho killer is a metaphor for Rome and we are the dumb yokels putting our heads up to his cattle killer.

The criminals have stolen our country and can only be stopped by the unified People…E Pluribus Unum.

Bush did 9-11. Read “The New Pearl Harbor” if you care to know the truth.

theamericanfundament.blogspot.com

By Ron Paul Supporter

April 9, 2008 6:39 AM | Link to this

Ron Paul STILL has our votes here in NC, the most democrackkk corrupted state in America - NC has surpassed even Louisiana and New Jersey in CORRUPTION.

RON PAUL is the ONLY conservative to vote for.

Our other choices are simply embarrassing. Obakarama, Hitlery, or McCaint? ALL CRAP! NONE QUALIFIED!!!

By Immigrant

April 9, 2008 8:42 AM | Link to this

I am an immigrant in this country. I came here legally. Letting people come here illegally and letting them stay will mean the abolishment of the rule of law in America. Every one of the 12 to 20 million should be encouraged to head back home to re-unite with their families in Mexico or wherever else. Mexico does not put up with illegals, why should America? Amnesty to illegal is a slap in my face as someone who respected America’s rule of law.

By Jason

April 9, 2008 8:51 AM | Link to this

“we simply took it. from louisiana to oregon, man. We simply took it.”

Dennis Hopper, is that you?

By Gary

April 9, 2008 9:14 AM | Link to this

Wrong, churchill. The Mexican War, when we invaded Mexico, provided the “offer they couldn’t refuse” when they signed the bill of sale. You see, Uncle Sam assured them that either their flag or their signature would be on that contract.

By Craig

April 9, 2008 10:04 AM | Link to this

Odd how no one is addressing the key point - punish the AMERICANS breaking the law. Ignorant people are quick to scream “law breakers” to the ones crossing the border but no one wishes to punish those ‘patriotic flag-waving’ types who are repeatedly breaking the law by employing these people. It seems no one realizes this is a supply and demand issue. Kill the demand for low wage labor by throwing out HEAVY fines and revocation of licenses to the AMERICANS breaking the law and cheating the rest of us out of tax money. If it becomes so risky and costly to hire illegals, the demand will drop off. No demand means the illegals go look elsewhere. Simply put, this is a proper solution to getting rid of those currently here. God forbid we EVER think of punishing our fellow Americans who are breaking the law.

By mlmvh

April 9, 2008 10:05 AM | Link to this

Boycott Absolut vodka! Look at the outrageous ad that was placed in Mexico -

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,346964,00.html

By Gary

April 9, 2008 10:42 AM | Link to this

Nonsense, Craig. This is not a law and order issue. this is not an immigration issue. We have to face the reality of millions of Hispanics in our midst. They are here, sir. Your logic would start civil war here. You dont even understand the implications of any of your ill-conceived remedies. Any overture except a welcoming hug is going to destroy this county.

Have you hugged a senorita today? ( or in your case, a senor?)

By Craig

April 9, 2008 11:01 AM | Link to this

Gary, besides your obsession with “man love”, you missed the point. For those crying about punish the law breakers, they failed to address the fact that Americans are breaking the law just the same. But nothing is said about punishing them. If it is a law and order issue, you must punish all law breakers. These people cannot argue this is a ‘law and order’ issue unless everyone breaking the law is punished.

By David C

April 9, 2008 11:12 AM | Link to this

PUT EMPLOYERS IN JAIL, DEPORT 1000 ILLEGALS A WEEK, WATCH THE PROBLEM GO AWAY! McCAIN WILL OPEN THE BORDERS AND REPEAT AMNESTY OF 1986 in his first year- those are the orders from the real bosses. Corporate America.

Barr knows less about this issue than he does about handling a rifle in his basement!

By Moral High Ground

April 9, 2008 11:18 AM | Link to this

1) We purchased our territory from Mexico, but what option do you have when your country is under occupation? It is like pointing a gun at the head of someone to sign a document. There was no question the Mexican acquisition was imperialist.

2)There is NO Roman Catholic conspiracy, alright? You are an idiot if you believe that…sheesh. Think logic. Logical explanations for every situation you put forward are available. Conspiracies are rare; happenstance convergence of interests is common, and often occurs in unforeseen ways.

3) I think everyone would agree that the first priority would be to close the border, then locate all illegal immigrants already in the country and force background checks. The question afterwards is do you deport them all or not? I for one do not think amnesty would be that big of a deal IF the border were closed down and all immigration regulated properly thereafter. You can’t just deport them all. I would suggest first creating policies to citizenship in exchange for service in the military right after closing the border. They would be illegals in the US on the fast track to citizenship and helping to allow the US to fights its wars(no matter how immoral they are, we shouldn’t suffer a troop deficit). But this can be sorted when illegal immigration is ended.

By Been There

April 9, 2008 11:41 AM | Link to this

We tried amnsety…it doesn’t work!

It sounds nice, BUT: How do you “run a background check on more than 20 million people when their home countries are so corrupt/ How do you run a background check using the US crime records when the illegal sall have six aliases they have used when run through our jails?

No, the answer is slowly making them go home on their own, like they are from Ga, Az, Ok, and here in Colorado. All of these states have proven that enforceing the law deters illegal immigration…by punishing the employers and the illegals….it is called ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT. GOOGLE IT!

We need to stop acting like this is unstopable…it isn’t. We need to act like Mexico does ENFORCE THE LAW!

By Liberal Daisy

April 9, 2008 3:06 PM | Link to this

Tear down the walls of this oppressive government, embrace the human race, eliminate the military, spread peace and love, we all our connected this hate has got to stop get off your sofa and volunteer, collecting your money for what, reality kicks in death shows up and you have left a legacy of bigotry for your future kin, tear down the prisons and open up education for all. Peace

By Jose

April 9, 2008 8:53 PM | Link to this

Cezar Chavez, worked to deport illegal aliens. He encouraged Latino/Americans and legal aliens to report the criminals. He even started Minute Man style patrols of the border to stop the illegal aliens from getting in.

These criminals depress wages, cause taxes to go up, and hurt the lowest income Americans the most. President Eisenhower cracked down on the criminals and millions of them who didn’t get caught self-deported. It would work again.

By Bob

April 10, 2008 3:35 PM | Link to this

I’m a legal immigrant. I don’t see this issue as about racism, but about respecting the laws of the country you want to live in. I followed the rules. Why can’t the rest of you…?

By Reverand Donchabelieva

April 10, 2008 6:48 PM | Link to this

i’m a illegal alien, I love it hear, except for the food. I work hard and send dinero to my familia. I pray for US.

By DK in Tucson

April 11, 2008 11:57 AM | Link to this

Darn: I hoped that Barr would be our guy to control the borders and deport the illegals. I have front row seat to the economic insurgents still flowing in. Guess I stick with Scooby Doo for President. Never McCain the open borders champion and certainly no Dem will ever secure our nation.

By GAConservative007

April 11, 2008 8:39 PM | Link to this

By “protest” voting, DK, you are in fact voting for either Barack or Hillary Rotten Clinton. Let us not repeat the mistake some of us made in 1992 by voting for Perot.

By Dick the Lesbian

April 12, 2008 3:03 PM | Link to this

if racist white repubs turn out in numbers then mccain is the man, however the youth could shock and awe and bring obama for the youth don’t fear blacks and gays like the neocons who profess to follow jesus christ. I’m praying for the kids.

By Galoco_lee

April 12, 2008 8:49 PM | Link to this

America’s foundation is based on the rule of Law. What part of illegal don’t we understand. The laws exist they simply need to be enforced!

THE INHERENT AUTHORITY OF LOCAL AND STATE ENTITIES TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAW

The authority of local and state law enforcement to enforce immigration law is an inherent power of local and state jurisdictions. Former Attorney General John Ashcroft “announced the unequivocal conclusion of the Department of Justice Office of Legal Council (OLC): arresting aliens who have violated either criminal provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or civil provisions of the INA that render an alien deportable ‘is within the inherent authority of the states.’” As sovereign entities possessing “all residual powers not abridged or superseded by the U.S. Constitution,” the states possess what are known as “police powers,” which are “‘an exercise of the sovereign right of the government to protect the lives, health, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the people…’ Manigault v. Springs, 199 U.S. 473, 480 (1905).” State power to enforce federal law derives from the status of the states as sovereign entities. One sovereign can assist another sovereign in the enforcement of its laws. The only restraints on these powers would come from specific prohibition in the U.S. Constitution, or preemption by Act of Congress. Neither apply in enforcement of immigration law.

Abundant case law confirms this inherent state authority to enforce immigration law. The U.S. Supreme Court, as recently as March 22, 2005, unanimously ruled that police did not violate a woman’s constitutional rights by inquiring about her immigration status while searching her residence. The Supreme Court made clear in its ruling that police officers do not need reasonable suspicion to ask a suspect for his or her immigration status. This is an important development in the law. Previously, the circuit courts had assumed that reasonable suspicion was necessary to inquire about immigration status. The Supreme Court in this case, Muehler v. Mena, equated inquiry about immigration status with inquiry about name and date and place of birth. In Mena, a search warrant authorized a search of the premises where Iris Mena resided for deadly weapons and evidence of gang membership. Mena, asleep in her bed when law enforcement arrived, was handcuffed and asked her immigration status. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Vasquez-Alvarez, 176 F. 3d 1294, 1295 (1999) recognized the “preexisting general authority of state or local police officers to investigate and make arrests for violations of federal law, including immigration laws.” (The quote is from the opinion itself.) In that case, a police officer of Edmond, Oklahoma, arrested the defendant “based solely on the fact that Vasquez was an illegal alien.” In Vasquez-Alvarez, an INS agent requested an Edmond, Oklahoma, police officer to investigate a situation involving a suspected drug transaction. The suspect admitted to the police officer that he was an illegal alien, and the arrest was made solely on that basis. Other recent cases upholding the arrest authority of state and local police in immigration law violations include United States v. Favela-Favela (Tenth Circuit), Lynch v Cannatella (Fifth Circuit), and United States v. Rodriguez-Arreola (Eighth Circuit.) In the Favela case, a local police officer noted a passenger not wearing a seat belt. After stopping the van, he noticed twenty people inside. The driver admitted that his passengers were illegal. The driver and passengers were taken into custody. Upon being summoned, INS agents took charge. Eighteen of the twenty passengers were deported, and the driver was convicted of transporting illegal aliens. In Lynch, Jamaican stowaways on a Mississippi River barge were detained for several days by the Port of New Orleans Harbor Police. This detention was upheld by the Fifth Circuit. In Rodriguez-Arreola, a South Dakota state trooper asked the immigration status of the occupants of a car stopped for speeding. The passenger admitted he was illegal. The officer placed the illegal alien in custody to await INS processing. Initially, the trooper and INS considered the detention part of an administrative procedure. The Eighth Circuit upheld the legality of the arrest, implicitly recognizing the authority of state law enforcement to make an administrative (or civil) immigration arrest. Kris W. Kobach, formerly with the Office of Legal Counsel of the Justice Department under Attorney General Ashcroft, and now professor of law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law, cites five examples of congressional action manifesting an intention not to preempt inherent state and local arrest authority. These actions are in essence invitations by Congress to local and state law enforcement to help enforce the nation’s immigration laws. The five are: 1) Section 287(g) of the INA (8 V.S.C. 1357(g), providing for written agreements with state and local law enforcement agencies to provide training and assistance in immigration law enforcement; providing, however, that a written agreement is not necessary for local and state authorities to enforce immigration law; 2) Congressional authorization for reimbursements to states for the detention of illegal aliens (8 V.S.C. Section 1103(a)(9), and for their arrest, transportation, and detention (8 D.S.C. Section 1103(c); 3) the Law Enforcement Support Center (LESC), serving as the principal point of contact for local and state law enforcement with INS/ICE; 4) Formerly designated “Quick Response Teams” to further facilitate INS/ICE response to immigration arrests made by state and local police; and 5) Express congressional barring of “federal, state, and local entities from preventing their officials from exchanging information with federal immigration authorities regarding the immigration status or citizenship of any individual.” (8 D.S.C. Section 1373 and 8 US.C. Section 1644). All of the congressional actions enumerated above are post 1990. It should be borne in mind that all state and local action to help enforce immigration law is entirely voluntary. In fact, rather than impose costly burdens on state and local entities, “it has been the regular practice of the federal government to reimburse such agencies for any detention costs incurred.” At least 47 criminal offenses are found in federal immigration law. Misdemeanors include entry without inspection (crossing the border illegally or without authorization), failure to comply with the registration requirements, and making knowing false statements on a registration application. Illegal reentry is a serious felony. Illegal reentry applies to aliens who have been denied admission, deported, or departed under a voluntary departure order. Most smuggling activities are felonies. Document fraud (such as forging, counterfeiting, or altering documents) and benefit application fraud (false or fraudulent claims or representations to obtain an otherwise valid document) are also felonies. Overstaying a visa is only a civil, deportable offense. Civil offenses are not insignificant, however. All four of the 9/11 hijackers who were stopped by local police prior to that fateful day were in violation of civil provisions of the INA (Immigration and Nationality Act) only. Actually, considerable overlap exists between civil and criminal provisions of immigration law, and it would be very difficult in practice to require a police officer to distinguish between them in making arrests. No such knowledge is required, for local and state officers have ability to arrest for both civil and criminal violations of immigration law.

By BigLib

April 12, 2008 10:43 PM | Link to this

Yeah, well… it is mean to enforce immigration law, and it may be bad for the environment. If you build walls or fences some rabbits other “animals” may be blocked from hopping across the border. So there. Plus, more poor people= more democrat voters.

Real Democrats Support Open Borders

By The Love Hack

April 13, 2008 9:47 AM | Link to this

Anyone notice how the new rich homes going up look like fortresses and military compounds? Revolution is coming, maybe even civil war. They obviously are planning for it. The root cause? The best of both worlds, racism and classism.

As globalization mixes our cultures, our fears are simply too much and we clash, first over religion globally, and here at home over race and class.

I always suspected that the turn of the century would bring chaos, and of course the gloom and doom of the internet dates on New Years Day, 2000, were the ironic and moronic fruition of my suspicions.

No, when people have nothing to lose and see the injustice of institutional conspiracies to disable the american dream, then chaos ensues.

Bush made laws to disable our constitution under the guise of fighting one or two terrorists. We are already sitting ducks for any new fascist regime that manages to convince us he’s the one we’d like to have a beer with.

My inner-patriot called. He wants his country back.

By Wackolibhack

April 13, 2008 11:40 AM | Link to this

It is Bush’s fault that The Love Hack likes to play the race/class card. Bush invented the race/class card. I hate Bush.

By Will Jones

April 13, 2008 12:12 PM | Link to this

Birthday Greetings for Our Founder and Prophet Thomas Jefferson. Let us honor him by reviewing the Whig Historical analysis he and the Framers employed for Covenant as the New Israel.

www.theamericanfundament.blogspot.com

Death for Treason

Annuit Coeptis

By Bush Twins

April 13, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this

We survived the Bush Whitehouse and all we got were these lousy wet t-shirts!

love, the bush twins

By Smitty

April 16, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this

Libertarian?

Sounds like global Communism with the cornucopia of services we give immigrants & their children, nothing libertarian about that.