Political Insider

By Neels

March 3, 2008 6:03 PM | Link to this

While Jekyll was developed with a mandate to protect 65% of the island, the state decided in 1950 that Jekyll should be developed as a resort and provide public beach access. And with that they mandated self sufficiency. The Initiative to Protect Jekyll and Chapman are wanting to “save” a state park that hasn’t operated as a state park since 1949. Their legislation would basically create another subsidized state park, and keep the homeowners on the island in their “private club” within a state park. I assume all of the island residents houses are “affordable” to the average Georgian! At $450k and up, I am just sure that they are.

By Fix-it-up

March 3, 2008 7:58 PM | Link to this

As someone who lives on Georgia’s coast, I can tell you that Jekyll is a DUMP! But, the Yankees that live on Jeykll are glad that it’s a DUMP because that also means that nobody wants to go there. So, they get what amounts to a taxpayer subsidized private island! Somebody please fix that place up and stop making me pay for an island that I can’t afford to live on!

By Round HE, Fuse VT

March 3, 2008 8:51 PM | Link to this

It was quite a spectacle. Not even the fattest of cats have ever dared to call a state senator a liar, to his face, in an open committee meeting, until now. Even more incredible was the committee members permitting it! Those authority basta—s are incredibly arrogant, especially since what Senator Chapman said about their keeping secret books is true and can be proved, even though they think they’re too powerful to have to respond to legal open records requests. There are ways. Sonny can only protect then so far. Nothing would please me more than seeing them in one of Sonny’s jails.

By Greg

March 3, 2008 10:27 PM | Link to this

It is true that Jekyll Island is in need of fixing up. But Jekyll could easily generate the revenue needed for its sustenance by replacing or refurbishing hotel properties in the existing developed footprint. The Town Center proposal is too much of a good thing. Such aggressive, large-scale development (which includes 300+ condos and timeshare units) would alter the essential character of the island.

As for the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island, it is comprised in the majority by visitors to the island, not island residents.

By Neels

March 3, 2008 11:06 PM | Link to this

Actually the “hidden” money Chapman makes his claims about was state bond money that was accounted separately b/c they were capital projects not operational. Since they were one-time project specific “grants”, they were not reported in the same manner. Chapman was comparing apples to oranges, and was hauled out on the turnip truck he rode in on!

The Initiative may be supported by visitors, but it is run by residents with an agenda. One look at the web-site “survey” spells out the bias toward keeping the status quo and not presenting the long-term needs of the island. Slapping paint on 1950s motels, and even rebuilding them won’t solve the problem long term. For the island to survive it needs a huge revenue increase, or subsidies from the state (which they won’t get).

As for Fat Cats, if any of us had an extra $350m to throw into a project like this - our friends would be Governors and Presidents too. It just goes with the territory! I am an average coastal Georgian, and even I can claim to know 2 former Governors, and a number of members of the Legislature & Congress. It kinda goes with having friends!

By test

March 3, 2008 11:19 PM | Link to this

test

By Examiner

March 3, 2008 11:25 PM | Link to this

Mr Porter’s bank is not looking so healthy these days. Sort of like Charter Medical some years back. I hope Jekyll’s finances fare better.

By Tony

March 3, 2008 11:26 PM | Link to this

Nothing better than some payback and appreciation for all of the money and resources the Reynolds family has given Perdue & Co. It’s all about repaying the Linger Longer crew and everything they’ve done for certain high ranking state officials. Nice to see the spoils system works at the expense of the taxpayers.

By janie Hopwood

March 3, 2008 11:27 PM | Link to this

What I don’t get is that my Senator was one of the ones on that committee, and of the four hundred calls he received about this issue only three were against the bills, according to is office, however, he chose to vote against the bills. So, what happened to representing the people who elected you? What is happening to our state that the only thing legislators care about is money? Why is their party affiliation more important than what is right and good for the people of Georgia. I think the whole bunch in Atlanta is acting like kindergardeners on the playground. Wait, I take that back, the kids play better and don’t act so juvenile. Dang right I am going to Remember in November. My legislator ignored me and most of of the people in this district. Yeah, I will remember.

By test

March 3, 2008 11:38 PM | Link to this

test

By susan

March 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Link to this

I don’t live on the coast—but Jekyll Island owns a special place in my heart. Maybe some people don’t see the beauty in nature that I see. How I wish they could. What I would like to see for Jekyll is for the beach—the open shoreline—to remain as it is now. Replace or renovate the hotels and businesses that already exist—(some are oceanfront). If there is still a need for some other kind of businesses or more hotels build them on the west side of the island (it was good enough for the millionaires). That way the beach remains open to everyone and provides a true setting for a natural beach experience. This beach is rare in today’s world—and—yes—I would like to protect it—because I love it. And—no—my love and my beach—are not for sale at any price.

By OneForTheRoad

March 4, 2008 7:16 AM | Link to this

As though I need More Reasons to vote AGAINST Chip Pearson. Just look into the crap that he and his senate ilk helped create at LHR Farms. Visit www.ngass.com to learn more. Remember to vote against Cagle, Pearson and the rest of those running that are Incumbent Republicans.

By Bunny

March 4, 2008 7:46 AM | Link to this

If you want to go to an overcrowded beach and get stuck in traffic on an island, go to St. Simons! Jekyll has long been a haven for those of us who just want to enjoy the beach and the natural coastal environment without all the commercialization, and it should stay that way. It’s one of a kind and offers economic accessibility that other coastal venues do not. Renovation of existing hotels is all Jekyll needs - it doesn’t need to become another St. Simons, we already have one.

By Connie

March 4, 2008 8:23 AM | Link to this

There is enough development in Georgia, enough disregard for Georgia’s valuable natural resources, enough disregard for species other than our own. Let’s prove that we can conserve and preserve, instead of just pave, pollute, and destroy. We are stewards of Jekyll Island. Let’s act like it.

By Diane Bryant

March 4, 2008 8:48 AM | Link to this

I have never been as disheartened about the political process as I have been in regard to the situation on Jekyll Island. My husband and I have followed the situation closely and been actively involved in trying to make our position heard. No one is listening. We are giving away our State Park and paying them to do it. We are allowing the development of the last open beachfront and maritime forest on the eastern coast. We need revitalization of the island but this is not revitalization it is hand in your pocket thievery. Take a look at who is voting for the development and who are the financial supportors of the people in position to vote. The developers, Linger Longer, or more specifically Reynolds, will benefit financially in a big way. They are the supporters of these greedy politicians. The voters of Georgia will long remember who stabbed the citizens of our state in the back. Chip Pearson committee’s names will long be remembered. Take a look at how they voted, along party lines. They know what side their bread is buttered on. Ben Porter and the JIA have not been good stewards of our island. They got into bed with Daddy Warbucks and don’t want to get out. Senator Chapman has represented his constituents and this state well and for him to be called a “liar” is inexcusable. The figures are public record. Come time for reelection the voters will remember who not only allowed it to happen but actively gave away our State Park.

By Save Jekyll

March 4, 2008 8:56 AM | Link to this

Jekyll is beautiful and many of the guest that visit come back year after year for the beaches that are not cultered with condos and hotels. I would hate to see Jekyll wind up over crowded like the Otter Banks (where I vacationed as a child - can’t stand it now). Or worse end up as confussing and ugly as Hilton Head, St. Augustine or Tybee (which has become really flithy). Jekyll is a romantic spot which offers the Jekyll Island Club Hotel and others that with renovation are getting better. We want the new hotels on the south end but only where the three that were demosihed once where. Not cutting of the maritime forrest that only exist on barrier islands. Protect the beaches if not for the natural beuty for the Loggerhead sea turtle that nest and hatch yearly (people, light and noise scare the females from nesting). Lets not be responisble for killing off a remarkable speicies by taking away one of the two islands they use most. I agree the convention center needs work. I do not want to see the original 9 hole golf course disappear because that is historic to the Club era - the Gilded Cage era. I would hate to see the play ground we raised money to build by the putt-putt and even the putt-putt to go. I moved to the Brunswick area right before 911 in 2001. I stayed because of the 22 miles of hiking and biking trails, the nature and natural beauty and charm of Jekyll. It is far from a dump. If you cannot apperciate natural beauty and biking, and beaches that are perfectly clean and the wonderful fact that cell phones don’t work much of the time - then stay away, we don’t want or need your business. And I am no Yankee that moved her. I am a southerner born and raised to apperciate places like Jekyll that are not commercialized. The point of a vacation is lost on the baby boomers and more recently my generation - X and the one that follows me. A vacation is to relax, unwind and for Jekyll that is what it offers, a chance to ride a bike or hike 22 miles of paths, sit and tan on the beaches, put away the cell phone - you don’t need it, you didn’t always have it, and RELAX! No needs long lines of shops and crappy restaurants with servers that are there seasonally to mike a buck and don’t care to make you the local or the guest’s meal special. Leave Jekyll to be a timeless classic of natural beauty and leave it as a State Park or even better - turn it into a National Park, make the rule even more difficult of what can be done. Even better, only develope where buildings currently are, build nothing further. Just do not take away from Beachview Road - a view of the beach for almost your entire ride. Yankees and southerners alike, wealthy or poor love Jekyll as it is, as many of my guest at the hotel are horrified at what might become of Jekyll. Build a shop or two with a restaurant on some of those parking lots - BUT DO NOT BUILD HOTELS AND CONDO. We fear the fate of Sea Island, once open to vistors and public, completely private - if you don’t have millions stay off is the way I view it. Sad that this world has become profit greedy and cannot save the last island from a fate worse than death.

By Ruth Vicent

March 4, 2008 9:38 AM | Link to this

I have my list of those who are ignoring what the citizens of Georgia want for Jekyll & also of the ones fighting for our rights. I will keep this list, look at it at voting time & also in future years when what they have brought about will manifest itself in another Hilton Head or even worse, another Sea Island where the citizens cannot even enter without an ok. Having seen Jekyll over the years since our young married times of cooking out and enjoyed the island with our families, I can look back at the north-end picnic areas that are now closed off to most of the autos, there are only a handful of parking places there now. The picnic area on the north-end beach-side is no longer there. It had a bathroom & picnic tables before. The only picnic area now is at the Dune’s area. I had already thought that the motels along the beach-frontage were too many.In riding our bikes nearly weekly over on Jekyll, we see more tree cutting & mowing more area along the bike path all the time. On the south-end, although we love the new bike-path, it is DEVELOPMENT of the south-end. There is some new cutting through from the beach-side of the old bike path now. I believe that is to passify us with them trying to take away our old beach-side bike path. I BELIEVE that we are being deceived by a bunch of charlatans, but that is just my humble opinion. Taking the public parking over will be SO stupid. We see this parking area packed full & even overflowinf each time a major event happens over there. Oh yes, we will remember.

By Sandy Keeler

March 4, 2008 9:45 AM | Link to this

Jekyll Island is an almost perfect place. I live in SE Georgia and consider it MY state park. Let’s not destroy it in the name of ‘improvement.’ Will we look back one day and see that we had paradise, only to replace it with pricey condos and hotels?

By beachlady

March 4, 2008 9:59 AM | Link to this

As a native of Brunswick, who hopes to return there someday, I mourn the impending loss of what Jekyll was meant to be. No one needs a million dollar condo with gourmet kitchen to enjoy the last great unspoiled public beach on the East Coast. Why take a development akin to Smyrna Market Village and plop it down within feet of the high tide mark? Yes, Jekyll needs a new hotel or two, a couple of decent seafood resturants and maybe a better grocery store - but otherwise it is a slice of heaven. JIA mismanagement has brought us to this point - and not without some scheming from those who now stand to profit. I was on Jekyll last weekend - had to wait in line to pay my $3 parking fee and saw at least 100 bike riders and more folks on the beach. Don’t fix what isn’t truly broken. Any legislator who stands up for Jekyll and the rights of the average Georgian is a hero in my book!

By Richard Coddington

March 4, 2008 10:15 AM | Link to this

By Dick Coddington

I was hopeful that more senators whould appreciate the beauty of Jekyll Island and help preserve that beauty by passing Senator Chapman’s bills. Unfortunately most of you chose to ignore the people and go the route of those looking to make a large profit at the expense of Jekyll’s beach. I do wonder what safeguards are in place if, and very possibly when, the time-shares and codo’s DO NOT sell as planned, forcing the developers to use their own money to complete the remainder of their proposed development. Using a little common sense with a scaled back project would be in the best interest of all.

By OM

March 4, 2008 10:34 AM | Link to this

A life long Georgian, I love Jekyll, it might need a little sprucing up, but I hope we can protect it’s natural beauty. I live 45 miles away from it and my family of 6 frequent it at least 20 times a year. I am also a member of the Republican party, I plan on making the Republican’s aware of my displeasure when they ask me for contributions this year!

By Sharon

March 4, 2008 10:45 AM | Link to this

I would like to say that I can’t believe that our senators would not represent us, but unfortunately I can believe it. Since Perdue came in they have done nothing but look at the coast with dollar signs in their eyes. Why can’t we keep our heritage and culture? that’s what makes us Georgia. They are taking that away from us and assimilating us into the condo culture. Jekyll should remain affordable for Jekyll which is the LAW. Just renovate the existing hotels, that’s all it needs. It’s like we are reverting to the 1950s mindset of tear everything down and build new. Now they realize how much the originals would be! WE VOTED YOU IN…WE CAN VOTE YOU OUT.

By Rickster

March 4, 2008 11:00 AM | Link to this

We should all take this as a living lesson as to how those we put in office become arrogant, abuse power, serve monied interests (e.g., developers), and work against the interests of those who elected them. I have been watching this issue very carefully. In November I will vote against any candidate who voted against Senator Chapman’s bills and/or who supports the transformation of Jekyll into a developer’s money-pit. I see this issue as a litmus test to identify the “real” constituents of our elected officials. Do they work for the people — or developers?

By Craig

March 4, 2008 11:22 AM | Link to this

Very disappointed, albeit not surprised that the politicians put business interests 1st at Jekyll Island. We don’t need another Hilton Head on the coast. I’m a registered voter and I will remember this action come election time. Jerks !

By Bert

March 4, 2008 12:00 PM | Link to this

When do we start respecting the rights of Georgia citizens and not just the Big Money Greedmongers like Linger Longer—-otherwise known as the Reynolds Group who contribute mightily to Perdue, Bush, and the like.

How dare the JIA hacks appointed by Perdue call an elected official such as Senator Chapman a liar? I hope Senator Chapman sues—and we should all contribute to such litigation. Of course, they have no evidence to support their claims of his lying.

Should we now go to a Starbucks at Unicoi? Maybe a McDonalds at Brasstown Bald? We could give Perdue a percentage of the profits from each—-does anyone believe he will not profit from turning the jewel of Jekyll Island into costume jewelry?

Let’s vote all legislators out who supported this rape of one of our best State Parks.

By mary

March 4, 2008 12:10 PM | Link to this

Georgians just need to look to the south to see how Florida (my state) has ruined most of its barrier islands with overdevelopment. A recent FL study of the economic value of ecotourism showed a five-fold increase in retail sales in areas where wildlife-watching was a priority. I hope Georgia proceeds slowly on the Jekyll Island issue, as not only is the island of importance to the state residents, but is a NATIONAL historical treasure. We Floridians love Jekyll!!! At least we no longer have the monopoly on corrupt government officials controlled by developers.

By michael E. Cooley

March 4, 2008 12:18 PM | Link to this

To the Georgia legislature: I hope the elected officals of this state have noticed that the public is, finally, becoming more involved, nationally and in the state of Georgia. We are more than tired of having the public interested given over on a platter to a few for their benefit. Jekell Island is a state property that should be developed for all the citizens of this state. The best sort of development is the least development. Semi-natural envrioments are rare today, in 25 years they will be more so and the more precious to all of us. Act for all of us not for narrow political and personal gain.

By Frank Z

March 4, 2008 12:42 PM | Link to this

As a life long member of the GOP and very active in the local GOP, I am saddened by the behavior of GOP elected officials in this matter. They did not listen to reason and disregarded what is in the best interest of those who elected them. They and those few who support their position have resorted to ad hominem attacks on Sen Chapman and to a deliberate distortion of the JI residents’ position. None of us has ever insisted on a status quo. We all agree that revitalization is essential. It is the nature and extent of Linger Longer’s plan that we find objectionable. Sen Chapman’s bills would have corrected the deleterious effects of the current plan while accomplishing the revitalization goal. There are also those who imply that residents have a personal financial interest in opposing the LL plan. As happened on St Simon, should there be extensive development on JI, the sale value of our residences will increase significantly.

By Clint

March 4, 2008 1:26 PM | Link to this

I have been visiting Jekyll since I was twelve and I am now thirty-three. The history and natural beauty of the island is remarkable. I also enjoy the quite of the island. I agree that updates and upgrades are nesseccary, but please for the sake of my young child and future generations to come, protect the integrity of this rare treasure we are fortunate to possess. I woudl certailny vote against anyone who is willing to compromise its integrity.

By DB

March 4, 2008 2:03 PM | Link to this

I’ve been coming to Jekyll for over 25 years and am now 33 with 3 children of my own. The manner in which the “re”development project has been handled is disappointing; most visitors are repeaters and love the island for its intrinsic beauty and solitude rather than the bustle that most other beaches provide. Minor renovations are fine, but anything futher runs the risk of creating another Hilton Head, St. Simons, Amelia, etc. I’m not ready to take that risk and plan on holding my Senator (Mullis) accountable. Those that think Jekyll is overpriced now with homes at $450m + has their head in the sand. Beach property at these prices is VERY low, and also keep weekly rentals affordable. The mediocre accomodations are worth the beauty, peace, and quiet. The proposed project needs to be scaled back dramatically with no additional rooms and certainly no upscale condos, etc.

By Marshall

March 4, 2008 2:31 PM | Link to this

As a lifelong Georgian I have long enjoyed the natural beauty of Jekyll Island as my family took regular trips to the Jekyll coast. The unspoiled, undeveloped beach and the abundance of nature found on the island are what attract many visitors to Jekyll Island year after year. The arrogance and ignorance of our elected officials in their mishandling of this natural treasure is indeed reprehensible and will not be soon forgotten. I can certainly promise that I will be voting against any of our elected officials who failed to act in the interests of their electorate and their state and chose instead to allow for the raping of Jekyll’s coast so that a few already filthy-rich individuals could make even more money, while irreversibly destroying Jekyll’s beauty for future generations.

By Susan

March 4, 2008 2:51 PM | Link to this

I’m disapointed in the senators who chose to ignore those who put them in office by voting against over development of Jekyll Island. We do not live on Jekyll but visit often and do not want to see the island become a spot for private development. It all appears to be a pay back at the expense of the visitors to Jekyll. The voters will remember in November.

By Tricia Compton

March 4, 2008 3:27 PM | Link to this

I have camped at Jekyll with my grandparents since I was a child and now enjoy taking my 3 children to the island. My family loves Jekyll and its quiet paradise where one is made to enjoy the outdoors and get away from technology. We always have a nice rest when we visit. I am a stay at home mom, so on our limited income, it is great to vacation there. Also, I like that it is not a party place for youngsters. Let’s keep it the jewel of GA and not the infamous place like Panama City.

By C. Joseph

March 4, 2008 3:50 PM | Link to this

The debate about affordability should rightly address whether we can afford to visit the Georgia Coast, not whether we can afford to live there. So, it is irrelevant whether this campaign is driven by those who live on Jekyll. This issue effects all of us that visit the island. And as someone who visits on an annual basis, let me say that it is the only GA island that offers so much for so little. Nowhere else can the middle class vacationer access open, isolated stretches of beach together with affordable housing. The Georgia senators would do well to heed the call to protect the island from greedy developers and profiteers who will turn it into another St. Simon or worse Amelia Island and ruin it for future generations. I don’t see it as run down and decrepit - I see it as charming and full of local character. It is fine the way it is. Leave Jekyll Island alone!!

By John

March 4, 2008 3:56 PM | Link to this

As a registered voter I am extremely dismayed by the fact that the Jekyll bills met with such resistance. I am sick of profit hungry developers who are ravaging our forests and public areas. I’m disgusted with the spinelessness of our politicians on this issue. I will remember those who fought the bills to protect Jekyll and will vote against them. What really makes me angry is that the taxpayers, the poor, and the middle class are going to have to foot the bill for Linger Longer Communities’ absurd plan that we rejected from the beginning.

By GAconcernedcitizen

March 4, 2008 4:18 PM | Link to this

It is appalling that the Jekyll Island Authority could support a state-of-the-art sea turtle center to help save these endangered creatures and then suggest placing 3000+ condos, shops and stores directly proximate to one of the last remaining sea turtle nesting sites on the East Coast. What are they thinking?

Further, the Jekyll Island Authority board’s award to Trammel Crow includes a $ 10,000,000 tax break to encourage this developer to build on highly desireable beachfront property! A developer needs $ 10,000,000 worth of tax breaks to place a hotel/condo complex directly on the beach? Trammel Crow must be dancing in the street! And now the Authority has the nerve to suggest that it hasn’t been able to make a profit for years? What a surprise! When the Jekyll Island Authority makes poor financial decisions and irresponsibly gives away $ 10,000,000 of taxpayer money, it needs to correct its own mistake. Instead the Authority cries poor and expects taxpayers to make up the difference by funding $ 84,000,000 worth of infrastructure for yet another developer — Reynolds Linger Longer. What are they thinking?

Legislators who subscribe to this type of conflicting, addled and downright incompetent logic will not have my vote in November.

By Rachel

March 4, 2008 4:39 PM | Link to this

As a Republican, I hang my head in shame at the behavior of the Republican members of the senate committee who lacked the moral fortitude to vote as requested by hundreds of callers. My family and I love Jekyll Island and would like to see it spruced-up and polished. Remember this fellow Georgians; Jekyll Island is a STATE PARK! Hello!! Linger Longer’s plan will restore Jekyll Island to its historical status: for millionaires only.

By Jack

March 4, 2008 5:06 PM | Link to this

Disappointing to see our elected leaders disregard the will of the people.

If they don’t think it is the will of the people, try putting the issue on a ballot.

This is not how representative government is supposed to work.

By Bitter EX democrackkk

March 4, 2008 5:53 PM | Link to this

Why dont Ya’ll needle the Federal Reserve Bank to donate all needed funds to do whatever you want done there carte blanche. After all Jekyll’s histoire includes the privitization of the nations money supply into the hands of a wealthy few, and disguised as a ‘federal’ agency. Turning Jekyll into a dream island would be small payback to the monetary oppression that was manifest from Americans there in 1913. The FED needs correction. READ all about it.

“The Creature of Jekyll Island” by Griffin.

google it, and listen to it online!

Then google/watch:

‘AMERICA: Freedom to Fascism’ by Aaron Russo

www.FreedomtoFascism.com

Read, study, learn.

By Lynda B.

March 4, 2008 7:10 PM | Link to this

Will someone please tell me at exactly what point elected officials became “leaders.” These people are not our “leaders,” they are our SERVANTS. They are supposed to be representatives of the people. It should send up red flags when only developers and elected officials support this plan. The people are clearly against it. The only fair thing to do at this point is to put the development of Jekyll Island question as a straw poll on the November ballot. That would prove how unpopular this plan is in this state. Or don’t the politicians have the guts to do that?

I didn’t vote for Jeff Chapman when he ran for State Senate the first time, but you can bet your boots I will when he runs for re-election. And he is the ONLY incumbent I will vote for! Hang in there, JC. The people love ya! Thanks for being a great elected official by actually representing your constituents.

By S. Miller

March 4, 2008 7:16 PM | Link to this

My husband and I visit Jekyll a couple times a year. It’s a rare and special place to enjoy nature and relax with your family. Tacky, overdeveloped islands are a dime a dozen. What a shame to ruin such a unique and pristine environment.

By BWebb

March 4, 2008 8:00 PM | Link to this

Typical Republican politics if you ask me… choosing money over doing what’s right, selling off (and destroying) God’s creation for a few bits of gold, catering to the wants of the wealthy at the expense of everyone else, etc… I say throw the whole Satin-spawned bunch out!

By Mike

March 4, 2008 8:07 PM | Link to this

Follow the money, friends. And don’t let the theives get away with it.

By jjohnson

March 4, 2008 8:56 PM | Link to this

I have been visiting Jekyll for over 30 years beginning when I was only 10. I now take my family to visit as many as 6 times a year. My wife and I were married there in 1999. We are able to vacation wherever we wish. We do not choose to go to Hilton Head or Amelia Island we choose to go to Jekyll. I am not an enviromentalist, but have always been a lifelong Republican who used to be proud of that fact. I have seen our government sell out the will of the people of Georgia to generate revenue. I will not support any official who voted for the Linger Longer proposal.Renovation on the existing footprint of the Hotels and convention center is needed. The abomiation proposed for this island is not. This island belongs to the people of Georgia, let us vote on its future. I will abide by outcome of their decision.

By Sue

March 4, 2008 9:47 PM | Link to this

Whatever happened to the idea of preserving the “footprint” of Jekyll Island? The proposed revitalization plan is so extreme that it borders on the ridiculous to most of us who visit the island. Perhaps it appears reasonable to those who plan to profit from the exploitation of our pristine island. Looking at the overdevelopment of other barrier islands up and down the East Coast should be proof enough that we should not indulge in the rape of Jekyll Island’s natural beauty, wildlife nesting areas, and maritime forest. What are our elected officials thinking? All that comes to mind is greed. A scaled-down revitalization plan that includes replacing the hotels that have been demolished in their existing “footprints,” and rebuilding or refurbishing the convention center should provide adequate revenue to sustain the park, which is the whole point of the revitalization isn’t it? People visit this park for its natural beauty, not for beachfront shopping, especially since it will affect nesting areas and the maritime forest. Georgians will remember when we vote in November and, sadly, in future years, those who contributed to the demise of a natural treasure.

By Larry

March 4, 2008 11:08 PM | Link to this

My wife and I have been vacationing on Jekyll for over 30 years. When we were younger it was the only place that we could afford to take our children on a beach vacation. We have many fond memories of our visits there. I do not recall ever having been to Jekyll without seeing some sort of youth gathering. The sponsors of these youth groups(churches, schools, youth organizations) choose Jekyll because it is a clean, safe and most importantly affordable place to gather. In my opinion the proposed development will destroy Jekyll as a site for youth groups to gather. My wife and I visited Tybee Island last winter and have no desire to ever go back. It was crowded, dirty and over built. You could not see the ocean for the buildings. Parking was hard to find and not convenient to the beach. This is what the Jekyll Island Authority would like to see happen on Jekyll. The JIA has lost site of who their primary clientel is. They are going to destroy the very things that most people go to Jekyll to enjoy. I have had several e-mail exchanges with Sen. Ross Tolleson (R) Perry on the Jekyll Island issue. His concern was the loss of convention business because of the poor condition of the hotels on the island. I am not opposed to the renovation or rebuilding of the hotels on the existing footprint on Jekyll but I fail to see how the addition of hundreds of new condo’s will contribute to increased convention business. Although there are many private residences on Jekyll now, they should have never been built to begin with, but what is done is done. We do not need to to repeat this mistake. Building condo’s and time shares in a state park using the excuse of economic development sets a very dangerous presedent. If it can be done at Jekyll what is to stop them from doing the same at Unicoi or Vogel State parks or any other for that matter? There are so many things wrong with this development that I could go on for ever, but I will close by saying that at its most basic level this is nothing more than an attempt to convert public property into private hands for private profit covered up with the pretty words economic benefit.

By corie

March 4, 2008 11:13 PM | Link to this

It is a sad day in politics when the bills to protect Jekyll is defeated. I really hoped that people would see the big picture of what exactly was going on, but appraently it is true that people only wish to see what they want, or what money they are getting for it. Yes Jekyll does need to get fixed up, no doubt about that, but not this way. It should have been brought to the public ALOT better then it was in the beginning. But there are always hidden agendas. I loved the way that Jekyll was, it was always inviting to the public, and yet you always felt a little secluded, it was not a big touristy place, which was nice. You could relax. But that will soon all change..for the worst not the better.

By diffdrummer

March 4, 2008 11:44 PM | Link to this

This is a little like bringing coals to Newcastle because of all of the comments which indicate understanding of The Jekyll Crisis.

The primary issue is destruction of the environment through over-development.

The secondary issue is quality of leadership provided by yet another controversial Governor-appointed board.

If you care about the environmental protection of The State of Georgia, please look carefully into activities of The Jekyll Island Authority.

Please contact the Governor and legislators who refused to bring the Jekyll issue to light on the legislative floor. Plan to express your dissatisfaction, or, better yet, run for office and do it yourself!

By Daniel White

March 5, 2008 7:00 AM | Link to this

I attended the Senate Committee meeting and was shocked at the inability of the Republican Senators to grasp the consequences of their actions regarding Jekyll Island. I witnessed the wholesale transfer of a State Park into the hands of private developers for profit. I heard that room rates would triple under this proposal and that beachfront access would be denied to those who cannot affors to stay there at these inflated Republican room rates. I witnessed JIA members calling Senator Chapman a liar. Just another day at the office for the folks running this state. Outrageous.

By Sam

March 5, 2008 8:12 AM | Link to this

Sickening isn’t it? Careful who you vote for. I think that this is exactly why those eco-terrorism people are gaining support.

By C.C.

March 5, 2008 8:27 AM | Link to this

Please retain Jekyll Island’s natural beauty and affordability for all Georgians. A simple formula will generate more income for the Island:

Rehab a few of the hotels (some of which are already beachfront properties). Spruce up the golf courses (where are the maintenance workers?) and; Retain the existing beachview (which is priceless and precious to all visitors).

By sandra

March 5, 2008 8:34 AM | Link to this

The super rich abandoned Jekyll after the second world war. The state of Georgia bought it and built a causeway, put in water and sewer infrastructure and a convention center, and opened the island to hotels, all to allow the not so rich to enjoy the beauties of the coast. Now that the people of Georgia have paid through their tax money for the development of this area and the rich have spoiled all others, the rich want it back. David and Bathsheba. Shame on those who colluded to kill Uriah.

By Tim Brown

March 5, 2008 8:44 AM | Link to this

We will remember this in November at the ballot box. As a life-long Georgian who has vacationed numerous times at Jekyll, honey-mooned at Jekyll, attended many conferences at Jekyll, and brought numerous school groups to Jekyll Island, I am very disheartened at the short-sidedness of many of our politicians. The Georgia legislature is determining an irreversible destructive path for Jekyll and seems to have as its goal to both harm the peaceful and natural environment and put a vacation experience at Jekyll out of the reach of the average Georgian. We seem to be paving a path back towards the millionaires club of the Jekyll Island of the past. I am afraid that without current legislation passing my family will no longer be able to afford Jekyll and that the beauty of the island will be forever erased. Oh, the current real estate developers will profit greatly, but not the average Georgian. We will remember this in November at the ballot box.

By michelle

March 5, 2008 9:42 AM | Link to this

And so the old joke goes—a developer walks out onto a pristine piece of land, one with a beautiful view, and says to himself “How can I make money off this”. After the recent votes concerning Jekyll Island, I believe we should add republican legislators to the joke. Jekyll Island is a state park. As a citizens of Georgia, Jekyll Island is our state park. How dare the legislators elected to represent us, sell our state park to the highest bidders.
As voters, none of us should forget who sold our last piece of undeveloped beach out from under us.

By Dan Hope

March 5, 2008 10:43 AM | Link to this

While I do agree with those who question private homes on Jekyll Island, the more I hear about the current controversy, the more angry I get. First, the Jekyll Island Authority selected the Linger Longer Company without a reasonable, rational, or defensible process. Money, political payoffs, and friends in high places seemed to be the criteria used. Second, Linger Longer made no attempt to include a well thought out method of public input in their design process. Third, the entire drive to “improve” Jekyll Island seems all too familiar… does anyone remember Sonny Purdue’s Oakey Woods windfall? Fourth, if a town center is considered crucial to the success of this questionable project, why does it have to be built on the beach? There is ample room where the current small shopping center sits and on the land behind it for the town center. And, fifth why are elected state officials once again refusing to abide by the laws passed by their predecessors and by the wishes of the majority of their constituents?

By victoria S.

March 5, 2008 11:30 AM | Link to this

I also agree that Jekyll is far from a dump. I love what I call its “humility”. There is a sense of stepping back in time, here as well as biking, hiking and the natural beauty of the ocean, sand, saw palmetto and live oak glades.

I am falling in love with the Georgia that you, who complained that Jekyll was a dump, might not appreciate. I want untamed nature to be valued… appreciated, and to be here for all our future generations.

So much of Jekyll is so accessible, that it feels like a “people-accepting” island. All classes, as I think the campground on the island so well communicates.

Jekyll had a history of exclusivity. The state park was put in to keep that exclusivity from taking over our coastline, to prevent the very rich from hogging the view, profiting from (and ultimately destroying) the natural beauty the park is there to protect.

But come on folks, what state park gives us great shopping opportunities or private hotels? We’ve done enough privatization in this purported state park setting. Let us draw a line in the sand now, keep our priorities straight

I think most of us that are speaking up care about a way of life that IS for the the less-moneyed American. I am glad that this place does NOT attract huge crowds. Here we are invited to accept ourselves, to get out in nature, and to appreciate what is NOT commercial or exclusive in a beach setting.

Maybe it is enough to keep the businesses that are there already… and help them refurbish. Keep beach development to its current footprint, with improvements. What if there were friendly collaborations between Linger Longer’s moneys (that is what Georgia wants to benefit from, right?) and existing businesses, that allowed the entire community (tourists, residents and commercial interests) to benefit. A real master plan that didn’ t just allow a private interest to take over….

Let Linger Longer invest in current history, rather than erecting new, expensive man-made structures that not only “clean up” nature so it is almost unrecognizable. Let’s not create new buildings and a rich tier here at what is supposed to be a state park. There is a danger in attracting those who come because they WANT to spend big bucks, and live in luxury, be entertained, go shopping….

Let’s not create exclusive pockets on Jekyll Island, like the days of yesteryore. Look what happened to yesteryore luxury. It became only sustainable using big money and energy to maintain it. Isn’t that contra to the state-park model?

As uncommercialized as possible. Jekyll is a place to relax and BE..: that 22 miles of paths beckons me, I don’t need more infrastructure. I just want to explore the beaches, relax and enjoy the nature center too, knowing that the nature center doesn’t have to report dwindling native species because commercial interests were allowed to ignore all of what stewards of nature are finally learning, as they go about their business of understanding and allowing nature to coexist with man.

I agree with the previous writer, a Georgian and resident of the coast who loves Jekyll for its essential IS-NESS, what is essential about Jekyll that countless visitors value.

He/she said, ” Leave Jekyll to be a timeless classic of natural beauty and leave it as a State Park or even better - turn it into a National Park, make the rule even more difficult of what can be done. Even better, only develope where buildings currently are, build nothing further. Just do not take away from Beachview Road - a view of the beach for almost your entire ride. Yankees and southerners alike, wealthy or poor love Jekyll as it is, as many of my guest at the hotel are horrified at what might become of Jekyll. Build a shop or two with a restaurant on some of those parking lots -”

I would only include the word new, in this person’s final sentence.

” BUT DO NOT BUILD new HOTELS AND CONDOs,”

Please, fellow Georgians, let us not erode to quickly the very NATURE that has gives us a chance to really see an essential landscape and piece of human history in Georgia.. These essential are what give it credibility for being called a state park. Indeed, state Parks in Georgia often successfully marry resource preservation AND context for people of all socio-economic groups to enjoy the natural surroundings.

By mike

March 5, 2008 11:41 AM | Link to this

How could anyone actually believe that taking an undeveloped, accessible, state owned beach— and replacing it with 6 stories of condos and shopping—is in the best interest of the average Georgian? Only someone who has something to gain financially I suppose…

By Connie and Bill

March 5, 2008 11:59 AM | Link to this

Chapman’s three bills failed to receive a fair hearing. The Chairman was intent to let the bills die in committee. The vast response from concerned Georgians got it out of committee. The senators who voted for the Beach Town Center rather than preserve for the citizens of Georgia will be remembered come November. Note of thanks have gone to those who voted “YES” This environmental site-beach—should never been considered. This HUGH development is for the rich not for the average Georgian. Our children’s children will never forgive us (the citizens) for allowing this to happen to their State Park.

By Nancy Hunter

March 5, 2008 12:20 PM | Link to this

We have taken a wrong turn somewhere. How very sad that the natural beauty of our state can actually be sold. I ask our legislators to please reconsider the fate of Jekyll Island - the consequences of your decision cannot be undone later.

By Amy Barbe

March 5, 2008 12:27 PM | Link to this

Jekyll Island is a state park, and I love going there to enjoy the unspoiled natural enviroment. Many schoolchildren across the state also are able to take advantage of the learning opportunities available on the island. Having visited several islands on the coast of GA and northern FL recently, I continue to be drawn to Jekyll for its laid back atmosphere and lack of tourist hotspots. I would love to see the existing facilities updated, but the plan proposed looks more a RAPE of the environment. I will REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER.

By Susan L

March 5, 2008 12:35 PM | Link to this

When elected officials fail to listen to voters and truly represent them, as Sens. Pearson, Carter, Hooks, Jackson, Mullis, Murphy, Rogers, and Schaefer failed to do when presented with legislation about Jekyll Island, voters have to responsibility to re-elect them or support their legislative efforts. I am sure their actions of Feb. 28 will be remembered by voters on election day.

By Dennis

March 5, 2008 1:06 PM | Link to this

How can this give away of “Georgia’s treasure” be anything but an inside political “You feather my pocket, I’ll feather yours.”

No doubt the Reynolds folks and the executives at Linger Longer and the politicians who voted to give away the island to unneeded and unwanted commercialization all go to church on Sunday and sing, “Jesus loves the little children; Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight [until it comes to money].”

You don’t have to be a blind conservative not to see it, just an ignorant one to deny it.

By jekyllLover

March 5, 2008 1:32 PM | Link to this

Who voted not to protect Jekyll Island (Senator Chapman’s Senate bills):

Chip Pearson, R-Dawsonville, 404-656-9221 (He did not vote but opposed the bills)

Joseph Carter, R-Tifton, 404-651-7738

George Hooks, D-Americus, 404-656-0065 (He voted against two bills)

Bill Jackson, R-Appling, 404-656-404-656-5114

Jeff Mullis, R-Chickamauga, 404-656-0057

Jack Murphy, R-Cumming, 404-656-7127

Chip Rogers, R-Woodstock, 404-463-1378

Nacy Schaefer, R-turnersville, 404-463-1367

Who voted to protect Jekyll Island:

Robert Brown, D-Macon, 404-656-5035

Ed Tarver, D-Augusta, 404-656-0340

By Vicki

March 5, 2008 3:15 PM | Link to this

It is humiliating that those elected by us chose to ignore the sentiments of their consitutents, and not protect Jekyll. This election, I will not have forgotten that these senators let down the folks that elected them. This island does not belong to the Governor or the JIA! The JIA should act as its steward, not its destoyer. If Linger Longer development takes place, you might as well rename the island, since it would not even resemble the natural island so many treasure. Perdue Island.

By Charlie

March 5, 2008 3:27 PM | Link to this

My family, friends and I have been visiting Jekyll for many years. It is a serene place of unpretentious natural beauty and one of a kind. If it goes down the route of commercial development it will, in a very real sense, be lost forever. One person posted a message that called it “a dump.” I can only wonder why someone would describe this lovely island in such a harshly negative way, but I’d suggest anyone who feels that way could just go to St. Simons a couple miles to the north if they prefer to enjoy something more developed and upscale. Fix Jekyll’s budget priced hotels up, but otherwise leave it like it is for future generations. Significant commercial development will not only upset the low key and unpretentious feel of the place, but it could set a precedent for future development. I’ve talked to several other regular longtime visitors about this, and have not as yet encountered anyone who agrees with the pro-development point of view. This may be anecdotal but I have a strong feeling it’s the prevailing opinion. If nothing else, I believe that development plans should be put on hold till we can determine what the people of Georgia want. And I think they want Jekyll left pretty much as it is. And I think that is something that should be respected, despite the profits big commercial development would bring to some.

By susan shingle

March 5, 2008 7:13 PM | Link to this

“And that Government of the people,by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the earth”!

Lord have mercy on these terrible politicians,they are far from representing us!!

Tyranny!!

By Ralph Shingle

March 5, 2008 7:21 PM | Link to this

“They’ve paved paradise,put up a parking lot”!

By angela

March 5, 2008 8:41 PM | Link to this

When I heard the Economic Development Committee had killed the Jekyll bills, I sat down and cried. I was angry, hurt, and disappointed that those voting to kill the bills could go against the will of so many of the people. I have been visiting Jekyll Island since I was a child, as I grew up nearby, and continued my visits when I moved to NE GA. I enjoy the peace and quiet of Jekyll, the bike paths and walks on the beach. So much of this development angers me. This summer my family and I were witnesses to a nesting sea turtle and her trip back to the ocean - and what a wonderful site of nature! I hurt to think that these wonderful creatures may not return to Jekyll amidst the lights and noise of the new development. I am angered at the knowledge that Beachview Drive will no longer follow the beach, that the condos will be built on the beach (and too high priced for many Georgians), and the public parking on the beach will be no more. I’m concerned about how the next phase of development will affect other wildlife on the island. It upsets me to think that my children and grandchildren will not be able to continue to enjoy the Island in the same way that I have. If you want to vacation/visit/live where there is development on the beach, go to St. Simons, Hilton Head, and other over-developed beaches, but leave Jekyll Island alone! You who voted against these bills have lost sight of the fact that you were elected to represent the will of the people, and those who were appointed to the JIA were appointed to protect this island. You have also lost sight of the fact that this is a State Park and should be made available to all.

By Lou

March 5, 2008 8:48 PM | Link to this

I know it doesn’t count for much anymore, but my kids and their kid and my dogs have enjoyed Jekyll Island for over 30 years. We can’t afford much time or money to get away and hook up with nature, so Jekyll meant a lot - being able to live simply and quietly and enjoy the natural landscape. A place to live simply and quietly, and embrace a life very different than our usual urban milieu, if only for a day or so. It has meant the world to us and I know it will now be changed, and tainted.

By Rove08

March 5, 2008 8:53 PM | Link to this

Yes, Angela we all lament the extinction of the sea turtle here in Palm Beach. The liberals even made us turn out our outdoor lighting, so that the turtles cannot see to mate. It is a travesty. I hear that there might not be enough turtle shells to replenish my salad bowl collection this year.

Where are the turtles?

By Wackolbhack

March 5, 2008 8:57 PM | Link to this

It is Bush’s fault that Jekyll is being developed. I hate Bush!!

By MY

March 5, 2008 10:07 PM | Link to this

It is amazing what these politicians can get away with. Tens of thousands of georgia citizens expressed their displeasure with the Linger Longer development plans for Jekyll. I grew up in the area and know a lot of people that live there. Everyone agrees that Jekyll needs some sprucing up. They also agree that the current plans are way over the top and I never heard any public support for those plans. Why will the officials that WE elected not listen us? Who are they realy working for? Shame on all of the self serving politicians that ignored the people that put them in office.

By MY

March 5, 2008 10:07 PM | Link to this

It is amazing what these politicians can get away with. Tens of thousands of georgia citizens expressed their displeasure with the Linger Longer development plans for Jekyll. I grew up in the area and know a lot of people that live there. Everyone agrees that Jekyll needs some sprucing up. They also agree that the current plans are way over the top and I never heard any public support for those plans. Why will the officials that WE elected not listen us? Who are they realy working for? Shame on all of the self serving politicians that ignored the people that put them in office.

By waw

March 6, 2008 5:55 AM | Link to this

Like teachers, the state flag, water, transportation, what would Roy have done? We asked for it, now we’ve got it. This is the party of the next vice-president? No way! Zell thinks these are fine folks, wait until they get ready for “Reynolds’ Vistas of Young Harris”.

By Doug

March 6, 2008 10:02 AM | Link to this

There is a House bill stuck in Sub-committee that can still help to protect the Jekyll we all love!!! It is HB 1289. Call Rep. Terry Barnard - the Chairman of the State Institutions and Property Committee – and Rep. Calvin Hill, who has been appointed to head the HB 1289 subcommittee, and urge them to give the bill a hearing and vote NOW.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Terry Barnard: 404-656-5138 (administrative assistant Susan Ruthven) Calvin Hill: 404-656-0129 (administrative assistant Jan Brown)

Please do this TODAY—-the bill has to have a hearing by March 11 or it will die as the other one did.

By Tom S

March 6, 2008 1:51 PM | Link to this

I live in the N. GA Mountains (in Chip Pearson’s district!) and visit Jekyll to bird at least twice a year. I also bird Saint Simons and most of the GA coast. Jekyll is the ONLY place on the coast with anything but crappy and over-priced development. So - let’s fix the junk hotels and add a restaurant or two, but KEEP the undeveloped character of Jekyll. No reason not to raise the daily fee a buck while we’re at it. Once Linger Longer and its paid politiians get their way, the last unique beach on the GA coast will be gone forever. November advice - vote against the incumbent.

By Erika

March 7, 2008 8:14 AM | Link to this

For me, who is a frequent visitor to the island, Jekyll is a little paradise; I would hate to see more destruction of the present natural areas; But I would love to see improvemnt of the hotels and that ugly stip mall with under quality restaurant. No further destruction needed by the hope for quick profit developers.

By Patricia Lane Petelle

March 7, 2008 1:48 PM | Link to this

I have visited Jekyll Island every summer since I was a child. I go back for the quiet natural beauty and the uncrowded beaches. I go back because I have always felt that it was my island, since it belonged to all of the people of Georgia. Now I understand that it belongs to the politicians and the developers who could care less about the island. If our “leaders” are so clueless as to be ready to pave over yet another barrier island in pursuit of the almighty dollar, then it is time to find new leadership. Fix up the existing hotels and leave the rest of Jekyll alone! “Only when the last tree has died and the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught will we realize that we cannot eat money.”

By carol sue

March 8, 2008 12:24 PM | Link to this

A senator or representative is supposed to “represent”, not REAP. So get the message folks and “Update, not Upscale.”

By John

March 10, 2008 8:25 PM | Link to this

I don’t know why anyone is surprised by the actions of the Decepticans running this state. Since they became the majority, EVERYTHING they have done has been a give-away to their friends and contributors! The latest is a big property tax break for forest land owners (like Sen. Tolleson) that will lead to YOUR property taxes rising to make up the difference! Everyone should check the AJC website every day of the legislative session to witness their shenanigans! Their LAST considerations have been the interests of the people of this state and the natural resources we have left. I fully expect causeways to the rest of our barrier islands in our future as long as they remain in power. As for Jekyll, I’m not very optimistic that we can do much at this point to stop the rape of this important resource. We can vote the jerks out of office, but can we actually stop this abomination? And I’m not very confident that the average Republican voter is intelligent enough to see through their tactics. Guvna Stumpy and Co. want us all to just shut up and “trust” them to do the right thing. Just like we should do away with all regulations and just trust the corporations to not devastate our environment, mislead us, sell us defective or dangerous products, overcharge us, etc. Sorry, I’m just not that trusting a person and I don’t tend to shut up!