New rules ready for ‘No Child’
New regulations, announced by Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, seek to improve the nation’s dropout rate.
Associated Press
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Washington —- Education Secretary Margaret Spellings announced new rules Tuesday aimed at improving the nation’s dismal dropout rate —- one in four students.
Schools and states now must track and lift the graduation rates for all students, including minorities and students with disabilities.
“In this country today, half of our minority students do not get out of high school on time. That’s outrageous,” Spellings said.
A school might have a high graduation rate but still have a low rate for black or Hispanic students or for kids with disabilities. Making schools responsible for progress in every group of students puts pressure on schools to improve.
The new rules are an attempt to extend the No Child Left Behind education law to the high school grades, and they come in the waning days of the Bush administration, which made the law a signature domestic achievement.
“No Child Left Behind is largely about grades three through eight —- there’s not a lot of power in the law as it relates to high school,” Spellings said in an interview.
“We haven’t really tackled high school accountability, and this is a giant step toward doing that,” Spellings said.
She announced the rules in Columbia, S.C., a state where the graduation rate mirrors the national average of 73 percent. South Carolina has set a goal of 88 percent.
Under No Child Left Behind, schools have to meet annual targets for improving graduation rates.
But states are allowed to set their own targets for improvement. And more than half the states have targets that don’t make schools get better, according to a study last week by The Education Trust, a children’s advocacy group. In some states, all that’s required is that schools don’t do worse.
South Carolina, despite graduating more kids, only requires schools to do as well or better than they did the year before.
The federal government cannot force states to set more ambitious goals. But it can make states uncomfortable by holding schools accountable —- publicly —- for failing to graduate more students.
“The power of the spotlight is what’s important about No Child Left Behind,” Spellings said.
The new rules do two things to shine the spotlight on school dropouts:
> States must track dropouts, along with graduates and transfers, using the same reporting system. They currently use a hodgepodge of methods that make it hard to compare states, and the National Governors Association has recommended a uniform tracking system.
> Schools, starting with the 2012 school year, must meet those targets for minority groups and kids with disabilities, as well as for the overall student population, to satisfy the yearly progress requirements of No Child Left Behind. Schools that don’t meet yearly goals for every group of students face consequences, such as having to pay for tutoring or replace principals.
Schools will be judged on whether children finish high school with a regular diploma in four years. The secretary of education will consider exceptions for kids who take five or six years to graduate, such as students who are learning English or those with disabilities.
But Spellings wants the pressure on schools to graduate students in four years.
Congress tried to address the dropout crisis as lawmakers prepared to rewrite the education law last year. But the rewrite stalled, and Spellings moved ahead with new rules.
Reaction to the new rules was a bit tentative on Capitol Hill, where No Child Left Behind has grown unpopular.
Delaware Republican Rep. Mike Castle, a member of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, called the rules a “foundational first step.”
He added, “The fact remains that No Child Left Behind as a whole is in need of reform, and I hope it is at the top of the agenda in 2009.”
The country’s governors, while they proposed a uniform tracking system like that in the new rules, raised concerns when Spellings first proposed the rules in April.
Governors didn’t envision the tracking system being used by federal officials to hold schools accountable, the NGA said at the time. The group has not said how it views the new rules.
> ON THE WEB: No Child Left Behind: www.ed.gov/nclb/



DEL.ICIO.US

