Brian Nichols' defense team wants to conceal from public view one of the most crucial steps in his trial because he contends it is prejudicing potential jurors against him.

In court papers filed Wednesday, Nichols and his lawyers asked Superior Court Judge James Bodiford to bar reporters from the courtroom until a jury is selected for the death penalty trial.

The request troubled some experts because, in effect, it meant a shroud of secrecy would cover the process of deciding who would be an acceptable juror —- the process that often decides the fate of a case.

"I hope there is not a serious chance that the judge would grant that request," said Ron Carlson, a professor at the University of Georgia's law school.

"It would feed suspicion about what is happening behind closed doors."

Bodiford plans a hearing today on whether to ban the news media as well as on the defense lawyers' demand that he slow down jury selection because it is a too arduous schedule.

The lawyers say they are "physically and mentally exhausted" from the 10-hour-a-day, six-day-a-week schedule the judge has set.

Stephen Bright, who defends death penalty cases across the South, said the defense has a legitimate argument, though it is a difficult one to make since the law favors open proceedings.

Bright, who is the director for the Southern Center for Human Rights, said he once persuaded a Mississippi judge to block the media from covering jury selection in a highly publicized case in the 1980s.

"It is one of the few cases where the judge barred the press," he said. "Nothing compares to Nichols ... but frankly, I don't think there is a snowball's chance in hell that the request would be granted."

The Nichols case has been the center of controversy since last year, when the previous judge delayed the case because the state had refused to pay the defense lawyers or reimburse their expenses after their tab passed $1.2 million.

Bodiford has said the media coverage is necessary to restore public confidence in the case.

But Nichols' legal team contends that the concern for public confidence is now outweighing Nichols' right to a fair trial, though almost all the 100-plus potential jurors questioned so far were familiar with the case.

Prosecutors say Nichols overpowered a Fulton County sheriff's deputy at the courthouse, took her gun and killed the judge who was presiding over his rape case and the court reporter.

He then shot and killed another deputy who pursued him when he escaped and killed an off-duty federal agent later that day.

Nichols has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.

His defense team, which cited the past court controversies as damaging to their client, contends the media are "saturating the jury pool with prejudicial and inflammatory reporting" through quoting the statements of potential jurors.

While the filing Wednesday didn't cite examples of inflammatory reporting, stories have quoted potential jurors suggesting Nichols be tortured, spoken of the repetitive and time-consuming questioning by lawyers and reported the defense request that television cameras not show Nichols during a hearing because he thought his beard might make him look too sinister.

The defense also contended the judge has jeopardized justice by acquiescing to broadcast video needs.