The Supreme Court's decision affirming Americans' right to defend themselves with guns is high-caliber recognition of one of the country's most sacred amendments, lawmakers, hunters and other firearms enthusiasts said Thursday.
The decision, said Georgia sportsman Glenn Dowling, was as welcome as it was overdue.
|
"We've always thought it [the amendment] was the right thing," said Dowling, executive vice president of the Georgia Wildlife Federation, a hunting and fishing advocacy and lobbying group. "It's a cornerstone of our American way of life."
Even a representative of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence found reason to support the justices' decision.
The ruling is a "common-sense approach to guns," said Valerie Hartman Levy, president of the Metro Atlanta Million Mom March. The organization is a state chapter of the Washington-based Brady organization.
The court, she said, clarified firearm use in self-defense cases. "I find it extremely heartening," she said.
The decision triggered happy responses elsewhere, too.
"The Bill of Rights states what an individual's rights are," said Mickey Wright, owner of Artistry in Nature Taxidermy in Paulding County. Wright, 51, has been shooting since he was 8.
"It states what our natural rights are," he said. "It grants rights to people as individuals."
Others weren't as exuberant.
The ruling will be the subject of countless lawsuits that try to define where guns are prohibited, predicted Alice Johnson, executive director of Georgians For Gun Safety.
"Gun groups will be suing to test all kinds of state and ... local ordinances limiting firearms.," she said. "It means many of these questions won't be answered for many, many years."
Others, including Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, didn't question the panel's wisdom. He called the ruling "very good news."
"Today's [Thursday's] decision by the Supreme Court strengthens and upholds our fundamental right to bear arms," Cagle said. "The millions of law-abiding citizens in our country are promised in the Constitution the ability to protect and defend themselves."
'Very important'
Lawmakers were quick to issue news releases lauding the court.
"The Supreme Court confirmed our constitutional rights today," said state Sen. Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock), who supported Georgia legislation allowing people with concealed-weapon permits to carry firearms in state parks and restaurants that serve alcohol, so long as they don't drink. The new law takes effect next week.
"As Americans," he said, "we should celebrate this historic decision and finally put to rest the notion that government can so callously take away a right guaranteed to us as U.S. citizens."
The court gave a broader interpretation of who can use a gun for protection, said Cumming sportsman Joe Schuster, "and that's very important."
"The court said you don't have to be in a militia to own a firearm," said Schuster, who routinely hunts and shoots with his three sons.
Cumming businessman Doug Clayton, who owns Bulls Eye Marksman Gun Club, was feeling good about the decision, too.
"Everybody's happy," Clayton said, his words punctuated by the muffled pops of firearms in his indoor range. "It wouldn't be champagne being splashed [in celebration], but beer. But since we're a gun shop, we don't have any of that here."
Dent Myers also was happy — to a point, anyway.
"I'm amazed at this ruling," said Myers, owner of Wildman's Civil War Surplus Shop in downtown Kennesaw, where in 1982 a law was passed that every head of household must own a firearm. That law is still on the books.
"I'm glad that it happened," Myers said of the ruling, "but I'm cautious. I think there's something afoot. I think there's an ulterior motive to make us complacent."
Staff Writers David Markiewicz, Doug Nurse, Yolanda Rodriguez and Jim Salzer contributed to this report.
Vote for this story!

Watch a video of fans re-enacting their favorite parts of Beyonce's Atlanta concert.

Vote for your favorite Mike Luckovich editorial cartoons on local new, politics, celebrities and more!

Boredom and lack of money are the mothers of invention when it comes to lawn games such as lawn Scrabble.

Our new travel story contest centers on your most romantic vacation tales. Tell us, lovers.

Husband and wife architects created a modern house that's still warm and inviting.
Comments
By sumwit4u
Jun 30, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this
I hope I'm Very wrong, but consider this, especially in light of what is important to those inside the "beltway" and those running to be there: It's election time. I forget our numbers but there are many millions of NRA members with money and many friends. Both Obama and Hillary are mouth-foaming liberal, no guns allowed folks. McCain is a war hero. O & H can't fight Mcain on this issue. McCain folks are OK either way with the gun or anti-gun crowd. (POW). The candidates have to get this pesky "Bill of Rights" thing out of the way before November, esp the dems. I THINK the percentage of us gun-people are about 80% of the U.S. MANY of us are very vocal, too. So here's the plan-- get the (Appointed-for-life)Court do the deal. Gun nuts get their way and when the Court rule (FINALLY) on this and give us one of our rights back.
This makes it a non-issue. FOR NOW. Wait long enough for one of them to warm the presidential chair. Then the bunch who REALLY run the Country, the ACLU, steps up with another well-planned gun suit. The High Court rules again--this time outlawing guns for everyone except cops and the military,
reversing or watering down this ruling. PRESTO--NOBODY can carry guns except for a few hunters in the middle of Montana during designated seasons (Maybe 2 weeks per year) Gun manufacturers go out of business--no demand. Rapes murders and burglaries go back up, BUT the Constitution is still intact because you can have a gun, if you can find one, to take to Montana once a year to shoot deer (If they haven't all starved from over-population. Now we have the ACLU's wise policy of "if you want a gun, go steal it just like in the good ole days. If you get shot coming into somebody like me's house, then sue me for all I've got for shooting you. Back to square one for another decade or two and continue to demonize guns on TV and children"s books. 'Nother decade--no more guns except the criminals' kids, now grown with the stolen guns Dear old dad stole back when he was a kid.
I sincerely hope that I'm just a paranoid old fool who wrote this stupid old letter.
By sumwit4u
Jun 30, 2008 4:44 PM | Link to this
I hope I'm Very wrong, but consider this, especially in light of what is important to those inside the "beltway" and those running to be there: It's election time. I forget our numbers but there are many millions of NRA members with money and many friends. Both Obama and Hillary are mouth-foaming liberal, no guns allowed folks. McCain is a war hero. O & H can't fight Mcain on this issue. McCain folks are OK either way with the gun or anti-gun crowd. (POW). The candidates have to get this pesky "Bill of Rights" thing out of the way before November, esp the dems. I THINK the percentage of us gun-people are about 80% of the U.S. MANY of us are very vocal, too. So here's the plan-- get the (Appointed-for-life)Court do the deal. Gun nuts get their way and when the Court rule (FINALLY) on this and give us one of our rights back.
This makes it a non-issue. FOR NOW. Wait long enough for one of them to warm the presidential chair. Then the bunch who REALLY run the Country, the ACLU, steps up with another well-planned gun suit. The High Court rules again--this time outlawing guns for everyone except cops and the military,
reversing or watering down this ruling. PRESTO--NOBODY can carry guns except for a few hunters in the middle of Montana during designated seasons (Maybe 2 weeks per year) Gun manufacturers go out of business--no demand. Rapes murders and burglaries go back up, BUT the Constitution is still intact because you can have a gun, if you can find one, to take to Montana once a year to shoot deer (If they haven't all starved from over-population. Now we have the ACLU's wise policy of "if you want a gun, go steal it just like in the good ole days. If you get shot coming into somebody like me's house, then sue me for all I've got for shooting you. Back to square one for another decade or two and continue to demonize guns on TV and children"s books. 'Nother decade--no more guns except the criminals' kids, now grown with the stolen guns Dear old dad stole back when he was a kid.
I sincerely hope that I'm just a paranoid old fool who wrote this stupid old letter.
By Hirameagle
Jun 27, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this
I'm happy that the court confirmed what was obvious....that individuals have the right to defend themselves....with guns , if necessary. That individuals have the right to own guns and not as part of some government organization!
What is amazing and dumbfounding to me is that four (4) members of our Supreme Court could read the Constitution, Bill of rights and all the supporting writings from the era when these founding documents were written...writings by those who wrote these documents and others from that time and determine that the 2nd Amendment is not an individual right!!! Folks, those are appointees who are quite willing to "interpret" the Constitution to fit their own views and that is DANGEROUS!! If a liberal gets the Presidency in this upcoming election, we'll have more of that kind appointed...those who are very willing to rewrite the Constitution with their rulings to suit their own views!!
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.
Request a comment be removed