Register now, it's free! |
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/20/08
More than a year before Georgia's historic drought demanded the Atlanta area's attention, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers accidentally released about 22 billion gallons of water downstream from Lake Lanier in 2006, while trying to save taxpayers $138.
[ Submit your comments below. ]
Pouya Dianat/AJC | ||
| A view of lone island near the Lake Lanier Islands as tourists will slowly start to pack the water ways with boats as the warm summer months approach. | ||
Pouya Dianat/AJC | ||
| An aerial of Lake Lanier, which still appears water starved even after several heavy rains in the past few weeks. | ||
David Tulis/AJC | ||
| A mix-up over a metal pulley cost Lake Lanier, pictured here last month, 22 billion gallons in 2006.
| ||
|
That's the cost of a simple metal pulley the Corps decided not to replace when workers thought they fixed a gauge that measures the water level at Lanier, the Atlanta area's main source of drinking water.
Because of a miscommunication over whether that part was replaced with a different-size pulley, the Corps calibrated the gauge incorrectly, according to a Corps investigative report obtained under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. As a result, the gauge indicated the lake level was higher than it actually was, causing the Corps to release too much water downstream over a 52-day period ending in June 2006.
Though homeowners in the area squawked about the rapidly receding lake, Corps officials didn't notice because staff turnover left no one in the area familiar with the lake, said the brigadier general who made the report.
In the end, it was some unidentified, insistent residents who led to an immediate tightening of the spigot, an embarrassing news release from the Corps, the proper setting of the gauge, a tongue-lashing from Gov. Sonny Perdue, and the installation of redundant gauges at many Corps projects.
At the time, no one could predict the lake's nearly 2-foot drop would be part of a whopping 19-foot drop over the next months, capped with a near-total outdoor watering ban across the region and a record low for the lake.
However, that doesn't mean Lanier would have those 22 billion gallons today — or would have when a watering ban was declared last fall — state and federal water experts say. That's because the water was stored in lakes downstream and was used in conjunction with even more water released from Lanier. In short, the water would have been released eventually and would all be gone by now.
Still, the blunder raises questions about the stewards of our drinking water as we enter the third year of a drought that is not expected to end anytime soon.
The Corps releases water from Lanier for a variety of needs downstream, including power generation and to support two species of mussels protected by the Endangered Species Act. Under long-standing pressure from Georgia officials, the federal government lowered its required releases in November, and last week said it is considering lowering them even more on June 1.
The lake level is about 1,057.5 feet above sea level, or 13 feet below full.
The Corps' error is detailed in a 191-page investigative report. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution formally requested the report on Nov. 26 under the federal Freedom of Information Act. More than four months passed before the Corps provided a heavily redacted copy. The Corps eliminated from the report all the names of those officials responsible for the mistake, several pages of findings, and descriptions of exhibits.
Here is what the report says:
The mistake happened in December 2005 when Corps officials replaced a part on the lake-level gauge. When they did the work, they did not replace the pulley, part of the original equipment installed in 1961. The Corps called the equipment's manufacturer, Portland, Ore.-based Stevens Water Monitoring Systems Inc., and asked how to calibrate the equipment. A technician from the company recommended a setting based on the assumption that the pulley had been replaced with one of a different size in use today, the report surmised.
"The underlying reason for not replacing the pulley was an effort to be good stewards of taxpayer resources," said Brig. Gen. Bruce Berwick, commander of the Corps' Great Lakes and Ohio River Division, who was tapped by the Corps to lead the investigation. "Obviously, in retrospect, given the importance, it probably would have been a good thing to do."
Because the pulley didn't need to be replaced, the Corps could have saved $138 and still gotten the setting right if there not been a miscommunication with the manufacturer.
Stevens Water company officials declined to comment.
The Corps started investigating only after local residents complained that the lake level appeared too low, Berwick's report says. Asked why the Corps never noticed the lake level going down, Berwick blamed it on staff turnover.
"Because of recent turnover and loss of experience at that project, there wasn't anyone there who had a great familiarity with what the lake looked like at various levels," Berwick said.
Because the gauge indicated the lake level was higher than it actually was, the corps said it released an excess 420 million gallons of water a day over 52 days to boost water levels in the Chattahoochee River and the Apalachicola River.
The lake lost 1.9 feet of water over that time frame, falling more than five feet below full level. The lost water equals what the Atlanta metro area consumes from Lanier and the Chattahoochee in 118 days, according to the Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
In a June 17, 2006, news release, the Corps referred to the accident as a "gauge error" and "calibration error." Three days later, state officials, steamed by the mistake, filed a lawsuit against the Corps over how it manages Georgia's lakes, hoping to force the federal government to keep more water in Lanier.
"By this mistake, they essentially created a 'man made' drought on top of a natural drought," Gov. Perdue said of the gauge error during an Aug. 8, 2006, congressional hearing about the Corps' performance.
Since it discovered the mistake, the Corps has installed additional gauges at the lakes it manages in case others fail.
"The lesson was learned, I think, not just for Lake Lanier but for the Corps," said Brig. Gen. Joseph Schroedel, commander of the Corps' South Atlantic Division, which includes Lanier. "I can tell you, at least within the division here, we took the lessons learned from that and said, 'Whoa, let's go make sure that we have redundant... gauges at all of our systems.' "
Vote for this story!
More on ajc.com
- GEORGIA'S WATER CRISIS: Outdoor rules could change in July
- State: Drought will worsen so keep conserving
- Thirsty lake will probably get thirstier
- Northeast area up to 'extreme' dryness
- Can't blame corps for all water woes
- Lanier at a low, with drought likely to worsen
- LAKE LANIER
- GEORGIA'S WATER CRISIS: Agency OKs drop in Lanier releases
- Federal agency OKs reducing reservoir releases
- Lake Lanier gets to keep more water
MOST POPULAR STORIESSearch AJC Archives
Search staff-written and other selected articles.
Advanced search




DEL.ICIO.US



Comments
By Tim
Apr 22, 2008 12:14 PM | Link to this
Thanks John,
I am an engineer as well, so once the conversation heads toward a conspiracy by the U.S. Government to defy the laws of the natural world, I have to comment. It seems to me that if these fools had any sense at all, they would just make claims that couldn't be proven. When we have a video to prove Conservation of Energy, a rubble pile to prove Conservation of Mass, and up to 80 floors of rubble with no explosives, Det Cord, etc. what we have is a building that was hit by an airplane, and summarily fell to the ground. Road Dog would be ok if he had said Elvis planned and executed it. If he had said the Israelis trained a Manchurian Candidate to fly the planes into the building, he might get some fools believing him. BUT, stupid is as stupid does. Once the lies start, he just has to keep them going with wild eyed conspiracy fanatics.
By John
Apr 22, 2008 10:05 AM | Link to this
Tim
Very well said. There are certain people who would rather belive in a vast evil conspiracy than confront the real evil that exists in front of their faces. I'm an engineer - not a doctor so I can't explain this mentality. Unfortunately, I also can't figure where he is coming from technicaly. Perhaps it is Al Gore science? There is no discussion with these folks and their "ipso facto" nonsense. But Americans need to stand up for honesty and truth. Road Dog has every right to say what he thinks. And so do we. the truth always wins eventually.
By Tim
Apr 21, 2008 10:08 PM | Link to this
Road Dog -
I'm not sure what your whacked out brain is trying to tell us. Is it that Newton's Laws have been circumvented by the U.S. Government? Did they make a building fall faster than 9.8m/s/s? Did the U.S. Gubment time delay the destruction of Building 7, or did the structural instability caused by the crashing down of two HUGE buildings make it unstable enough to eventually collapse?
Road Dog, you are an absolute Tool Bag. What happened on 9/11 followed the general laws of physics. You have NO CLUE what you are talking about. Go down to Ga. Tech and enroll in a 1st year Physics class fool. And WHY oh WHY does every SINGLE conspiracy nut bag turn out to be a Democrat? Just goes with the territory I guess.
By Tim
Apr 21, 2008 9:29 PM | Link to this
You guys aren't completely getting it. The $138.00 part that let out 22 billion gallons of water is a droplet compared to what they were letting out every day both before and after that stupid mistake. They were generating 6 hours a day, and sometimes twice a day even when the water level was critically low and they knew it. People in Alabama, South Georgia and Florida don't need the water. They just don't want to lose their right to it for the future. This water is WASTED for three reasons: 1. Clams 2. Sturgeon breeding 3. Floating Barges.
Since the Corps has so much turnover, maybe Georgia needs a regulator inside the dam operations to keep foolishness to a minimum.
By John
Apr 21, 2008 3:43 PM | Link to this
road dog
thanks for playing Mike
I'm sure you need to get back to reading Catcher in the Rye now
By road dog
Apr 21, 2008 3:28 PM | Link to this
John, it's now really obvious that you can't answer any real questions and now you change from your attacks to comedy as your smoke screen, a classic signature .. ipso facto .. you've proven my point ..have a great day.. I have much larger fish to fry than someone that unable and incapable of answering real issues. I shan't be back to waste anymore of my time.
By John
Apr 21, 2008 3:16 PM | Link to this
road dog
darn - you caught me; I am a governemnet shill
George Bush and Dick Cheney pay me to browse web sites and use my engineering talents to debunk the statements of brilliant people like you
for more info, visit www.tryin2foolucuzgotnuttinbetter2do.com
also - I am dating Condi Rice
By mike
Apr 21, 2008 3:03 PM | Link to this
This idea that nearly every unintended action is a "mistake" drives me crazy. Choosing the wrong detergent might be a mistake. Taking a "left" instead of a "right" at the light might be a misake. Releasing 22 billion gallons of water is not a mistake. It's a crime and the person or people responsible should be held accountable. One of our society's problems is that no one ever seems to be accountable for anything anymore. Maybe people would pay more attention if they were held accountable.
By Peg
Apr 21, 2008 2:56 PM | Link to this
In reading these comments, I thought about the number of ACOE people Iıve been in contact with over the last 35 years and remembered almost all as being hardworking, well educated people doing the best job possible on a shoe-string budget.
The fact that one gadget was not purchased to save money is a good example of shoe-string thinking and while the proverb ıWant of a Nailı also comes to mind, hindsight is always 20-20.
It must be hell to be a government employee. When things go well and the many supports services we take for granted run safely and smoothly, as they usually do, nobody notices.
When something goes wrong, your head is on the line.
Most of us do good work in our respective jobs but none of us are perfect: would you really want to have the accountability level in YOUR job that is based on the whims of a poorly informed public?
Interested in what the ACOE does and what the job salaries and requirements are? Try these sites:
http://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=army+corps+of+engineers&l=GA&start=10
http://www.usace.army.mil/
By road dog
Apr 21, 2008 2:54 PM | Link to this
john, please explain to us how a 110 story building comes down in 8.9 seconds, faster than free fall .. or explain why building 7 came down in the afternoon of 9/11 ... you're the one that needs a mental evaluation sir ... since all you can do is an ad hominem attack, it's very clear to all reading this that you are either stupid or a government shill .. or both
[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] next
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.
Request a comment be removed