The Braves wouldn't want Gwinnett County's new baseball stadium to be named, say, Pepsi Field.

[Post a comment on this story below.]

Lee Tucker is negotiating the contract for the Gwinnett Convention & Visitors Bureau.

More Gwinnett Braves news: Ballpark figures for new Gwinnett stadium Permit issued for stadium grading work to begin Fast facts on Gwinnett Braves Recent headlines: Beyers challenging Winegarden for judgeship  Big sports complex approved in Buford  Silverio guilty in home invasions     • Gwinnett County news

And that has made for a thorny issue in finalizing a contract between the Braves and Gwinnett on the stadium that the county plans to build for the Atlanta team's top minor-league affiliate.

According to contract drafts obtained under Georgia's Open Records Act, the Braves are seeking the right to block the county from selling stadium naming rights to competitors of some companies, like Coca-Cola and Delta Air Lines, that have exclusive sponsorship deals with the team.

Gwinnett has resisted the Braves' pitch on this point because it could result in lower naming-rights revenue for the county. Negotiations continue.

Although both sides express confidence the issue will be resolved, both also say it's an important point.

"We're well past any kind of deal-killer stage, if you would ... but I think it's a fair characterization to say this is the biggest issue upon which we are still negotiating," said attorney Lee Tucker, who is negotiating the contract with the Braves for the Gwinnett Convention & Visitors Bureau.

The county, which will own the stadium, has empowered the GCVB to develop the facility and to enter into a contract with the Braves.

Braves executive vice president of business operations Mike Plant said the team needs to protect significant, long-standing connections that some companies have with its brand.

"It'd be difficult for us to agree to a [conflicting] deal in the soft drink category — with Pepsi, for example," Plant said. "We have a long-term and very substantial relationship with Coke."

Plant would not name other sponsors the Braves seek to protect. "It's a small list," he said, "and one that we have said to [Gwinnett] we have to protect now that a [minor-league] team is going to be 35 miles north of us."

From Gwinnett's standpoint, reducing the field of potential naming-rights partners is problematic because the county is counting on that revenue stream to help pay stadium debt. "The most important point is, we want to be able to market naming rights to the stadium to as broad a pool of partners as possible and to generate as much from the sale of naming rights as possible," Tucker said. "The concern would be that to the extent you limit the pool, that potentially limits the [value]."

Groundbreaking on the $45 million stadium, where the Braves plan to move their Class AAA affiliate next year, is tentatively planned for next month. The county plans to borrow $33 million to fund the construction around April 1. Tucker said it's his understanding the contract with the Braves needs to be finalized at that time.

The Braves and Gwinnett signed a letter of intent and a term sheet in January, and have been negotiating details of a definitive contract since.

The term sheet did not address the issue of the Braves' existing sponsors. But in one draft of a proposed definitive contract, the Braves sought the right to veto potential naming-rights partners in any of 14 categories in which the team has an exclusive sponsorship deal. The categories ranged from home improvement to hospitals, from supermarkets to telecommunications.

Plant said the Braves, in subsequent negotiations, have reduced the number of categories in which they are seeking veto rights.

Said Tucker, the GCVB attorney: "I think it is a major issue, certainly, but I think it is one where we can be creative and work through."

If naming rights are sold by the county before Aug. 31, 2009, the term sheet calls for the Braves to receive $350,000 annually from the sale and for Gwinnett to receive the rest. The breakdown changes if naming rights are sold later.

A feasibility study commissioned by the county estimated the naming rights would fetch $650,000 to $750,000 per year in a long-term deal. But Gwinnett is hoping for more: An internal financing document projected the county's portion at $500,000 per year, meaning the name would have to sell for at least $850,000.

THE STORY SO FAR

Previously: Gwinnett County announced in January it will build a stadium where the Atlanta Braves' Class AAA minor-league team will play beginning in 2009.

The latest: Gwinnett and the Braves continue to negotiate a definitive contract. The Braves are seeking to limit potential stadium naming-rights partners.

Next: Gwinnett tentatively plans to break ground on the stadium, near the Mall of Georgia, next month.