An attorney for four Clayton County school board members argued before a state administrative judge Wednesday that the only thing his clients are guilty of is being black.

Judge Michael Malihi will now determine if there is any evidence Clayton board members Michelle Strong, Sandra Scott, Lois Baines-Hunter or Yolanda Everett violated the law and should be removed.

Clayton County schools headlines:

• Photos: Timeline of Clayton schools' woes

• AJC editorial: Less hope

• Student exodus costs Clayton schools $27M 
• Students: School dress policy 'not cute' 
• Uniform dress policy in all Clayton schools 
• Board member says colleagues broke the law 
• Clayton runoff will fill 2 school board seats 

Read the full report to SACS:
• Part 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 (Large PDFs)

• Read SACS' report (PDF)

• Photos: Non-meeting | Angry parents | 400 protest
• Clayton County news

Are the Clayton school board members victims of racism?
Yes
No
Voter Limit: Once per Hour View Poll Results

Malihi, of the Office of State Administrative Hearings, finished taking about 40 hours of testimony Wednesday and hopes to make a ruling by the end of the month.

On Wednesday, board attorney Rodney Moore accused five white Clayton County residents of trying to remove the board members because of race.

“There is no violation of law, and there’s been no malfeasance proven. There is no law against not getting along,” Moore said after the hearing. “It’s about being black and being subject to human error.”

The residents have asked Gov. Sonny Perdue to remove the board members, alleging they violated the state ethics code and Open Meetings Act when they put the school system’s accreditation at risk.

The residents called on witnesses who alleged at the administrative hearing that board members had a coach fired, illegally closed meetings, arranged votes, bickered, engaged in name-calling, misspent money and committed other violations.

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools cited similar behavior after it investigated Clayton County’s schools and will decide by Sept. 1 if the district remains accredited.

“I think if SACS found the board dysfunctional, that’s the way it is. I don’t think a leopard changes its spots,” attorney Robert Oliver, one of the residents, testified.

School board attorneys denied all of the allegations except the bickering and shouting and said no school district in the state follows the open meetings law precisely.

Moore spent Wednesday questioning the residents about their motives.

“None of these school board members you filed a petition to remove represent your district,” Moore told one of the residents during the hearing. “As I look at the table, I see five white petitioners against four black defendants.”

Moore did not elaborate on the race allegations during the hearing or afterward.

The residents, who all live in District 6, initially sought to remove seven board members. Norreese Haynes, David Ashe and Rod Johnson are exempt from the complaint because they are no longer on the board.

“Last time I looked, Ashe is Caucasian,” Oliver told the judge. “We didn’t pick and choose. If we would have made it racial, he wouldn’t have been named at all.”

The judge scolded Moore after he made a comment accusing the residents of trying to bring back “the good old days.”

“If you can stay away from those comments, I would appreciate it,” Malihi told the attorney.

The residents — a retired Clayton teacher and four attorneys — said Moore’s statements were ridiculous.

“I taught 150 children a year for about 20 years. I want all of those children to be proud of where they went to school and not shun that they went to Clayton County [schools],” petitioner Dyane Simons, a retired Clayton middle school math teacher, said outside the hearing. “I taught children, not color.”

The residents and school board attorneys have until Tuesday night to file briefs with the judge, who then will make a recommendation to the governor.