Nichols trial penalty phase to stretch on
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Friday, November 28, 2008
Jurors in the Brian Nichols trial have persevered since Sept. 22, hearing dozens of witnesses before convicting him of four murders and other charges in the Fulton County Courthouse shootings.
Now, as the penalty phase of the trial unfolds, they may have at least another two weeks to go.
Week 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2
• Opening arguments
• Interactive graphic: Timeline of shootings
• BLOG: Discuss the verdict
RECENT STORIES
- Hired defense psychologist caught off guard
- Nichols' mother calls him easygoing, 'a gentleman'
- Nichols says he was at war with U.S. government in taped confession
- Ashley Robinson says Nichols tried to recruit her
- AJC's full trial coverage
RELATED LINKS
“All indications are [that] it will be the week beginning Monday, December 8,” Judge James Bodiford recently told the 12 men and women.
“It’s important that I not rush the lawyers,” Bodiford said.
The panel is 10 1/2 working days into hearing testimony on whether they should impose the death penalty on Nichols or order him to spend the rest of his life in prison. It took 32 court days for them to convict him of 54 counts in the case, disregarding his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.
“I want you to take whatever time you need [in deliberations on Nichols’ sentence],” said Bodiford, a Superior Court judge in Cobb County since 1994.
Bodiford added: “This case is the longest case I’ve ever presided over.”
Since Nichols admitted early on that he committed the crimes, the sentencing portion of his trial has long been the most anticipated.
“From Day One, the focus [of the trial] was on whether he lived or died,” said Gary Parker, who resigned for health reasons after being the lead attorney on the Nichols defense team. “It has to be this long.”
Parker has decades of experience in capital defense.
“The things the state offers are things to make a person’s life seem of less value by showing he’s bad,” said Parker.
Prosecutors called 37 witnesses over seven days in their effort to portray Nichols as an evil man who will always be dangerous and should be put to death.
Their presentation included victims’ relatives describing how they have suffered since the killings of Judge Rowland Barnes, court reporter Julie Ann Brandau, Fulton Sheriff’s Deputy Hoyt Teasley and U.S. Customs agent David Wilhelm.
The defense argues Nichols should live out his life in prison, rather than be put to death, because childhood experiences and bad parenting turned him into a murderer.
“No person’s life can be fully assessed by one act or deed, whether it’s a good one or a dastardly one,” Parker said. “We are the products of the influences of our lives. It is important for a jury to know all of those things about a person’s life.”
Nichols’ lawyers portray him as damaged but not necessarily dangerous now. They want to show Nichols as a teenager and a young man. They called witnesses, including his longtime best friend, Zachery Dingle, who broke down in tears when he recalled learning of the shootings.
Dingle, who runs group homes for troubled teenagers in Baltimore, said Nichols’ positive influence and leadership qualities helped keep Dingle goal-oriented while they were in school. He said Nichols was dominated by two strong professional women — his mother, Clarita Nichols, and his former girlfriend, whom he was on trial for allegedly raping when he escaped and committed the courthouse shootings.
“The prosecution can put on any evidence that provides reasons for imposing the death penalty and the defense can put on anything [seeking] fairness and mercy,” said veteran death penalty defense attorney Jack Martin.
Despite Nichols’ guilt, Martin said, his lawyers have to show Nichols is “not just evil incarnate, but a flawed human being.”
By Georgia standards, Nichols’ sentencing trial is running long.
“It sounds mighty long,” said retired South Georgia Judge Walter McMillan, who presided over about 15 death penalty trials. “I guess they figure if you keep it going, maybe something good will happen.”
McMillan noted that it took only two weeks to convict and condemn Jerry Scott Heidler of murdering a married couple and two of their seven children in their home in the town of Santa Claus, a 1997 case that received heavy news coverage. Half of that time was spent picking a jury.
An attorney who had a role in the defense of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh agreed the Nichols’ sentencing trial is long, even by federal court standards. The sentencing phase of the McVeigh case lasted less than three weeks; McVeigh was executed in 2001 for the 1995 murders of 11 people in the truck bomb explosion at the Alfred B. Murrah Federal Building.
Kevin McNally, director of the Federal Death Penalty Resources Council Project and the attorney for more than 50 death-penalty defendants, said a lengthy sentencing phase can be justified. “The jury needs to know more than what they know from the headlines and guilt phase,” McNally said.
That means time and looking under “big rocks” for mitigating details of a defendant’s life and looking for “every grit and grain to give them pause to think and reflect.”
“It may just be that small thing that is the basis for them to vote and say, ‘Naw, I can’t kill that person.’ “
Staff writers Steve Visser and Jeffry Scott contributed to this article.



DEL.ICIO.US






