AJC HEALTH NEWS

Doctors often put their trust in placebos, study finds

Chicago Tribune

Friday, October 24, 2008

If your doctor has prescribed antibiotics for the flu or told you to try B12 vitamins for fatigue, those treatments were probably just a placebo — an unproven therapy offered with the hope you’d feel better if you took something.

Treatment with placebos is far more common than you might think, according to a new national survey in which 46 percent to 58 percent of U.S. physicians admitted using placebos regularly. Only 5 percent said they tell patients explicitly that they are doing so.

Enlarge this image

istock

Related health articles:

DOCTOR IS IN

doctor's hand coming out of a laptop screenWhy worry?

THINNER YOU

fat thighsLose weight. Together.

“Frankly, I was astonished,” said Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, director of the National Institutes of Health department of bioethics and a co-author of the report published Friday by the British Medical Journal. The survey was sent to 1,200 internists and rheumatologists; 679 responded.

Placebos harness the mysterious power of the mind to heal the body; their benefits come from the positive expectations of the patient rather than any physical mechanism. The classic examples are sugar pills, saline injections and other treatments that seem to inspire confidence even though they are inert.

But the physicians surveyed were far more likely to use active agents as placebos, including over-the-counter painkillers, vitamins, sedatives and antibiotics.

What classifies them as placebos is the context. If the recommended treatment hasn’t been shown, physiologically, to work for the condition in question, that’s a placebo.

While apparently common, treating patients this way is controversial. Two years ago, the American Medical Association said it was wrong to use placebos without a person’s knowledge. Some experts consider placebos unethical because they can involve a measure of deceit.

But other experts make a case for what they call “benevolent deception” — letting a patient believe she’s getting a useful treatment because, paradoxically, it might work.

Say a person with a viral upper respiratory infection walks into a doctor’s office and demands antibiotics even though there’s no evidence that these medications, which fight bacterial infections, do anything to help viral illnesses.

“Most of the time, I’ll tell patients, ‘You really don’t need an antibiotic.’ But if someone’s really nervous or distressed, I’ll write a prescription, asking them to wait a day or two and then take it if they don’t improve,” said Dr. John Hickner, a professor of family medicine at the University of Chicago.

“I guess I do it because if they think it will help them it may, indeed, have a placebo effect,” said Hickner, who co-authored a report on Chicago doctors’ use of placebos that appeared this year in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Several studies have found that patients respond positively to placebos upward of 30 percent of the time, though others conclude the effects are minimal. Meanwhile, many patients suffer from conditions for which there are no scientifically proven treatments, including respiratory disorders, chronic pain and gastrointestinal distress.

“Doing anything at all tends to help people feel better,” said Dr. Farr Carlin, assistant professor of medicine at the University of Chicago and a co-author of the new study.

Physicians often say something like, “I don’t really have faith that this will make a lot of difference, but go ahead and try it and see if it makes you feel better,” said Dr. Eric Ruderman, an associate professor of medicine who specializes in rheumatology at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine.

That’s a way of walking the line between “I don’t think this will help you” — a statement that could undercut the placebo effect — and “I’m pretty sure this will help,” which wouldn’t be true.


Kudzu Services » Find the right people for the job