Home
>
Blogs >
Movies & TV blog
>
Archives
>
2006 >
September
September 2006
By Zack McGhee | Monday, September 18, 2006, 12:36 PM
Clumsily written but stylishly directed and expertly acted mystery showcases Egoyan’s talents for sex — but it’s never sexy (which is emotionally truer during a ménage, don’t you think?) — and intrigue. It’s about a fictional, past-their-prime comedy duo (Colin Firth and Kevin Bacon) and a talented young journalist (Alison Lohman, unfairly derided by most critics, gives it her best shot) who wants to uncover the truth about their involvement in the death of a young college student 20 years earlier. Plenty of nudity and uninhibited rumpy-pumpy got it slapped with an NC-17, but it’s considerably sadder and gentler than you’d expect, and not the least bit erotic. The big reveal is a tad dissatisfying (as The Big Reveal always is), but the ending is poignant, and it’s a wonder to look at.
Permalink
|
|
Categories:
Movies
By Zack McGhee | Monday, September 18, 2006, 12:35 PM
Ruthlessly convoluted noir-style mystery is merely the latest exhibit in the case against Brian De Palma, who hasn’t made a genuinely good movie since The Untouchables almost 20 years ago. Alas, I must confess I haven’t actually seen The Untouchables, which could mean Mr. De Palma has actually never made a good movie, since his earlier movies of note — Carrie, Blow Out, Scarface, and Sisters — are all terribly interesting, but also plenty problematic. (How is it, then, that I’m always excited for the next one?) This one is a particularly potent misfire, since almost nothing goes right: De Palma makes a mockery of his fine cast, wastes a dynamite story by colliding it with at least three or four others, and can’t even seem to get his trademark (usually stolen) shots off competently any more (his Steadycam moves are blurry, not elegant and in focus like they used to be). As the titular character, however, Mia Kershner ought to win a Supporting Actress Oscar; she’s the only one — behind or in front of the camera — to get The Black Dahlia right.
Permalink
|
|
Categories:
Movies
By Zack McGhee | Monday, September 18, 2006, 12:34 PM
McGuigan caught a lot of flak for ripping off Pulp Fiction with this gleefully audacious thriller, but first-time screenwriter Jason Smilovic’s dialogue is actually wittier than any of Tarantino’s. Unfortunately, its plot is also needlessly convoluted. Slevin starts out strong, I’ve gotta give it props for its key twist (even though you don’t see it coming, you do see it coming, right?), and there’s a pair of sterling performances here by Josh Hartnett and Lucy Liu. Trouble is, once you find out where it’s going, it just goes there, predictably hurtling us toward its inevitable destination. C’mon, fellas… it’s s’posed to be about the journey, remember?
Permalink
|
|
Categories:
Movies
By Zack McGhee | Monday, September 18, 2006, 12:33 PM
Almost as good as Citizen Kane, though it feels as much like Robert Wise’s best movies (especially — and strangely — The Haunting) than anything from Welles (conspicuously aloof in the final product). You can sense the tardiness of every fade-in, the prematurity of each dissolve. That said, I’m not sure I could take 2+ hours of it, since in spite of it’s greatness, it’s not actually about much. Happy ending just feels tacked on; stop it after Orson’s final voiceover.
The Magnificent Ambersons is currently available on Time Warner Cable’s inDemand channel 200.
Permalink
|
|
Categories:
Movies
By Zack McGhee | Saturday, September 16, 2006, 12:30 AM
Insufferable band of man-children have ongoing (since college, apparently) and endlessly selfish battle with adulthood, while their (mostly ignored) wives/girlfriends do all the heavy lifting when it comes to — oh, i dunno — their shared responsibilities (children, other such nonsense). I didn’t stick around for the final tally, but I’m guessing it was something like: Arrested Adolescence, 1 million; Maturity, 0. Wilkinson/Danner add insult to injury. And don’t even get me started on The Worst Possible Use of “Hide and Seek” Ever…
Permalink
|
|
Categories:
Movies
By Zack McGhee | Monday, September 11, 2006, 09:32 AM
Is it just time to accept it? To let go?
“Family Guy” used to be one of the best shows on TV. Its first three seasons (it was canceled once or twice) gave us fifty hilarious episodes. When it came back last year, it was slow to start, but there were some gems in its fourth season. (I’m especially fond of “Brian Goes Back to College…” and “The Fat Guy Strangler”.) But at the end of that season, which wrapped up earlier this year, “Family Guy” deteriorated at a rapid pace. “Untitled Griffin Family History” was undoubtedly the nadir — the first episode I didn’t even finish watching, it was so terrible.
So last night for the fifth season premiere, I hoped for a revival. And we got an OK episode, but hardly the home run I was hoping for.
Is “Family Guy” dead?
Permalink
|
|
Categories:
Family Guy
.JPG)
-1.JPG)
Services »
