Dayton Daily News education reporter Scott Elliott writes about schools, kids, teaching and learning.
Home > Blogs > Get on the Bus > Archives > 2008 > February > 04 > Entry
Let’s try asking education questions
Here’s one way to get the presidential candidates, who had largely switched topics from education to issues like the economy and health care, to talk about schools again — ask them education questions!
That’s what three out of a total of nine San Francisco Chronicle readers did when the paper arranged for them to pose questions to Barack Obama.
Thank you Geoff Geiger, Cory Haynes and Anthony Cody!
Geiger started off with a question about what Obama would do to solve difficult problems that American children face. Obama talked a lot about health care for all kids in his answer, but also touted his plan for supportiing early childhood education from birth to age five with federal dollars.
Haynes said he felt our education system widened the divide between the “haves” and “have-nots” in America and asked how Obama would address those disparities. In response, Obama said No Child Left Behind had the right goals, but has been poorly executed. He talked up his plan for raising teacher quality and teacher pay to attract more good people to the profession, and said he would work with governors to create new assessment models that are more useful to educators.
In a perfect follow up, Cody asked what other sorts of tests Obama envisioned that might replace the flawed standardized tests states currently rely on for accountability. Obama described a future in which kids would not be judged just on single-day tests, but instead on a variety of factors, such as “writing samples or reading samples, mathematics assessments, assessments of science or history knowledge, or even musical performances.” Other factors used to judge kids might include attendance and even classroom behavior.
This put me in mind of the portfolio assessments that looked at a collection of student work that Kentucky and a few other states tried — with limited success — in the 1990s.
It’s nice to see Obama talking about education again and starting to explain in more detail what some of his proposals might look like in practice.
This post also appears on the Education Writers Association’s Education Election blog.
(Image credit: AP)
Permalink | Comments (4) | Categories: Tracking Barack Obama
Comments
By School Supporter
February 8, 2008 9:25 AM | Link to this
Here you go. Questions 1-4: Both Mike Huckabee and Hillary Clinton claim to have improved education in Arkansas, which is now just slightly below average. Which of the two candidates made the most cost-effective changes? Have they both failed to ensure adequate science education to Arkansas students? Are there no best practices for incorporating evolution into science curricula that won’t alienate parents and taxpayers from public education? How can the President ensure NSF-funded science education programs result in improved science education for America’s schoolchildren?By Rich
February 7, 2008 4:00 PM | Link to this
Dave, I’m flattered by your comment. I would be THRILLED to have the chance to ask Obama or anyone else this question. It’s a bit depressing, though, to see that no one else thought enough of this issue to develop any other questions. Polls always show “education” near the top of public concerns, so where are all the questions from everyone else?By Dave
February 6, 2008 6:39 PM | Link to this
What would it take to get media credentials for Rich? I’d LOVE to have the candidates answer those questions!By Rich
February 5, 2008 9:25 AM | Link to this
I’d like to ask Sen. Obama (and all the other candidates) this: “Education in the U.S. has traditionally been a state and local concern, with a limited federal role. Where would you draw the line between state/local and federal control of our public schools? Should there be what is essentially a national curriculum and common standards across the entire country? If so, how would this be implemented, and how would you then address funding issues so that all schools and students have adequate resources to meet these nationalized goals?”