The Real Deal

Home > Real Estate > Archives > 2006 > November > 22 > Entry

No housing bubble, just a soufflé



Bubbles burst, soufflés flatten. So says University of Central Florida economist Sean Snaith, who denies that the housing market is in a bubble.

He prefers a culinary analogy: Snaith sees the run-up in housing prices as a soufflé, which rises until it’s done, then loses some hot air. Here’s his analysis of the housing soufflé, from UCF’s latest Florida economic forecast:

“The housing soufflé reached its peak in 2005. It has subsequently come out of the oven and has been cooling significantly. Housing starts will continue to fall off in 2007 and 2008, as mortgage rates continue their slow climb and housing inventories are finally sold off.

“This has been a fundamentals-driven expansion in the housing sector (as opposed to a speculative bubble), and, as long as the fundamentals remain solid, the soufflé will not collapse. There is no sign that the demographic, macroeconomic, and financial underpinnings of the housing market will completely dissipate. In terms of prices, there will be some cooling, and the highest points of the soufflé are now settling. As we look beyond 2006, the loftiness of the soufflé will continue to give way, as mortgage rates rise. Barring any reversals in the ingredients of the soufflé, the talk of a national housing bubble will just seem like a lot of hot air.

“Some economists’ dubious predictions of a housing-induced recession are being proven wrong. Currently, the most pessimistic predictions expect prices to fall 10 percent to 20 percent in some areas. If these predictions come to pass, it would hardly be indicative of a bubble bursting. If the Nasdaq had only fallen by 10 percent to 20 percent from its peak, would we be referring to it today as the dot-com bubble?”


Permalink | Comments (255) | Post your comment |

Comments

By maxmoose03

November 22, 2006 06:57 PM | Link to this

Good blurb.

Folks, please READ the above before you argue with me. I don’t make the news.

It’s just agreeing more each day with what I have posted on these blogs for weeks. :-)

By ...

November 22, 2006 08:15 PM | Link to this

Maxmoose, we know you are a cheerleader :-)

And we know you’re doing damage control so that people don’t think that the market is too bad and they will start buying again.

So as long as we know where you come from, it’s all good…

By maxmoose

November 22, 2006 08:38 PM | Link to this

Mr. Dots, I am interested in knowing your interpretation of Jeff’s last blurb, in which the NAHB states that prices in South Florida are actually UP this year, not down.

How do you suppose they made such an egregious error? Is it a conspiracy? Do I have them in my back pocket, or vice-verse?

After all, I know from the wisdom you have manifested on the blog that prices are down at least 200% this year.

How do you explain it?

By ...

November 22, 2006 09:24 PM | Link to this

I am not interested in conversing with you, Mr. Maxmoose.

Feel free to interpret this as my humble acceptance of your striking intellectual abilities, if that makes you feel better.

By maxmoose03

November 22, 2006 09:42 PM | Link to this

You initiated the converstion, I merely responded out of politeness.

It appears I’m dealing with a ditz intstead of dots.

By DOI

November 22, 2006 09:54 PM | Link to this

The RE gains experienced during 2004-5 was GREED-DRIVEN. Plainly, lay people caught on that throughout 2000-4 RE underwent a steady fundementals-driven expansion and decided to cash-in. Many other dynamics happened,which cannot fit in here.

By INTERNET MADAM

November 22, 2006 09:56 PM | Link to this

Max I followed you all the way to this blog just to say wow I’d like to meet you. Are you single Max? You are all what you say you are because I know someone with almost the same exact background which you posted. You are for real allright.

You excite me Max. Here I am taking a break from the kitchen, smelling my pumpkin pies baking in the oven and decided to get some entertainment and what do I find but the man of my dreams writing here. Have my soft Christmas jazz music playing in the background and wow there you are. But before I go on dreaming anymore about you, tell me please if you are single. Contrary to what Rich R will say about me, I do have my ethics. If you are married, your wife is a very lucky woman. I do have a special someone but he nows lives in Palm Springs. You might say Max that this real estate market has separated many happy couples who are looking to be reunited again, whenever this market turns around. That is the real toll of the 2006 real estate market for people still here during the holidays. There are so many unhappy couples this holiday season who will not be spending the holidays together. For all those couples separated and not celebrating the holidays united due to real estate market slowdown, let’s hope 2007 will bring them together again. Cheers.

By maxmoose03

November 22, 2006 11:56 PM | Link to this

MADAM: Do you know me? Maybe you know the guy whose profile I copied. Writing operating systems? Gee, he sounds like a barrel of laughs.

Unfortunately, my dear, I only date quadrupeds, and I gather that you are a biped. Besides, my antlers would probably knock over your Christmas tree.

Besides, you are apparently well known to the blogging community, and I daresay some are watching with great glee to see how this adventure unfolds. Let’s give them nothing to talk about.

I am not sure what the real estate market has to do with couples being separated — can you fill me in on this?

Meantime, thank you for your kindness, especially on a day when I have repeatedly had to deal with generation-Y nitwits, who think making a show of their poverty, their stupidity, and their ignorance is “playin’ with ya, man.” :-)

On a down note: does today’s date mean anything to anyone but me?

By TANC

November 23, 2006 05:47 AM | Link to this

IMHO Professor Snaith is simply describing the “degree” to which housing values in Florida will drop. He states that he believes prices may fall more in 2006 and even in 2007 as inventory is worked off. He takes issue with the word “Bubble” as he believes that a 10 to 20% drop is not indicative of a bubble bursting (using the dot.com analogy).

If you’re a new homeowner who had the unfortunate luck of buying at the top, a 10 to 20% drop will feel like a bubble bursting. Especially if it is eroding all of the equity you have or puts you upside down. Upside down is not a very comfortable place to be and unfortunately many people are there now. Couple that with excessive insurance increases and RE taxes rising signficantly after you’ve bought and you won’t be feeling very good about things.

I would be highly suspicious of any report from the NAHB or NAR that says prices in SFL are UP this year. It simply flies in the face of reality. Perhaps there are micro-geographic pockets where values have risen but overall…I don’t think so. All anecdotal evidence I see in the market shows that prices are DOWN.

I do take issue with the prediction from the professor that mortgage rates will increase to near 7.50% in the next few years (in the report). I believe rates will stay under 7% and may even dip under 6% (they’re almost there now). That will help buffer the blow a bit.

All this being said, I don’t believe we’re in a bubble and things will come crashing down. I do believe we are in a slow period of downward adjustments to prices that will finish playing itself out throughout 2007 as sellers finally wake up and smell the coffee. Will it be 20%? 10%? 5%?

No one really knows but I don’t believe it will be the extremely dour predictions of some. I hope I’m not wrong about that.

By TANC

November 23, 2006 05:52 AM | Link to this

Oh, and maxmoose, I believe the meaningfullness of Nov 22nd is the anniversary (bad word) of the assassination of Pres. Kennedy in the early 60’s. I think I was 4 at the time and I still sort of remember the shock of it all when we heard. A sad day indeed…

Today, however, it’s time to be thankful for all we have, and get down to some serious eating activities. I’ll be working out extra heavy the next few days!

By TANC

November 23, 2006 05:53 AM | Link to this

CORRECTION:

“He states that he believes prices may fall more in 2006 and even in 2007 as inventory is worked off.” SHOULD BE 2007 and 2008 for the years in question.

By maxmoose03

November 23, 2006 08:25 AM | Link to this

The dog has me awake again at 7:30 AM. He’s history. Dogburgers. If anyone wants a sweet but hyperactive purebred chocolate lab, let me know ASAP — must have a gentle family environment.

TANC - They say everyone remembers where they were when they heard JFK was assassinated, and I am no exception. A very sad reminder, but coming on the heels of a day of celebration, so I won’t dwell on it.

In view of the fact that today IS Thanksgiving, maybe everyone will stop groaning about their house values for a day, and be thankful to whatever they choose to be thankful to, for living in one of the most beautiful places in the greatest nation on earth. This country survived genocide of its native peoples, slavery, and civil war, only to learn from its mistakes and evolve “a more perfect union.” Similarly shall we survive the current Bush Administration, one the darkest and most despicable chapters of American history, although not without consequences for decades to come.

In our persistent neurotic preoccupatioon with statistics, we are implicitly striving to find a way to make the housing market more like the stock market, so that we could assign a value to each house every day. Hey, new Publix opening up a block away, my house up $1000 today. Uh oh, registered sex offender moving nearby, house down $5000 today.

TANC, this is why I must take issue with you when you say:

“If you’re a new homeowner who had the unfortunate luck of buying at the top, a 10 to 20% drop will feel like a bubble bursting.”

If you are not a flipper, and buy a house to create a homne for your familly for a number of years, why are you even thinking about what the value is? Why are you trying to put a daily or monthly price ticket on it? This neurotic insistence on knowing the price every minute is something our parents’ generation escaped, as well as most or all generations before them. One thing I will be thankful for today is that we don’t have the technique for doing this yet, although it is coming uncomfortably close.

I also have a problem with:

” All anecdotal evidence I see in the market shows that prices are DOWN.”

Exactly why everyone believes the market is diving. You, my friend, choose to believe the statistics when they say that prices are down, but only anecdotal evidence when they say prices are up. You can’t have it both ways, sorry.

The simple fact is that the costs of both materials and labor are soaring, the dollar is dropping, and there is simply no way to price an equivalent new home today at the same price as a year ago, - it’s impossible. Fundamental accounting principles match costs and revenues.

Does that mean homebuilders are doomed? Take a look at the recent performance of the homebuilding stocks and mutual funds on Wall Street, and see if the financial world thinks there will be a problem on Main Street.

Thanks for writing so prolifically, TANC. Happy Thanksgiving to you and all my neighbors in PBC and everywhere.

By maxmoose03

November 23, 2006 08:52 AM | Link to this

BTW TANC: There is nothing suspicious about that NAHB report — in fact it serves to confirm the earlier Association of Realtors report which you did not question.

The Realtor report foes from 3Q 05 to 3Q 06, whereas the NAHB report goes from 1Q 06 to 3Q 06. The Realtor report splits out single family houses from condos, and finds a 5% drop in prices for single family houses, but a 16% rise in condo prices. The NAHB report throws them all in one big pot and comes up with something like a 3% rise overall.

16% rise in condo prices, yet people have the impression the market is falling. I know in the buildings that I follow unit by unit, that 16% rise is for real.

Sorry if I am not always clear in which report I am referring to. I hope this clears it up.

As I said at the beginning of this little blogging adventure weeks ago, I am waiting to see what the season brings, especially in January and February. Moose may be a bit slow, but with a 16% rise in the condo market this year, I really don’t see the horrific crash we are supposedly experiencing.

By Econ 101

November 23, 2006 10:31 AM | Link to this

Wrong again Max, construction materials are tanking see this http://www.nahb.org/generic.aspx?genericContentID=527

By TANC

November 23, 2006 11:14 AM | Link to this

When I referred to anectdotal evidence I should have been more clear.

I am a mortgage banker, have my MBA and BS in Finance and have been in banking/financial services/mortgage banking for 28 yrs. I had my best year ever in the business in 2005 and my business is down 65% in 2006. For the first time in as long as I can remember, appraisals are not coming in at expectations. Some Realtors I work with and know are getting second jobs. Title company reps are getting laid off, hours reduced, and health benefits taken away.

You’re right maxmoose in that homeowners shouldn’t be so worried about values if they are living in the home as a primary residence and think they will be there for awhile. Human nature takes over, however, unless you are wealthy enough that it doesn’t really matter. This does not apply to most people.

When you know your value is way down (especially if it happens just after you purchased), you feel worse about it. You perhaps spend less money in the stores, go out to eat less often, etc. etc. Also, the average person owns a home only 7 years. In 7 years, if you’ve bought at the wrong time, you may or may not make up for the loss in value. You probably will, but, you may not. You wonder, you worry. It’s human nature.

As I said, I believe the market will not crash, but it will hurt for awhile. And, I also am suspicious of the NAR and FAR reports as well as the NAHB. I don’t have facts to back it up, just my experiences in the business.

I too anxiously await the “season”. It will no doubt be a harbinger.

Happy Thanksgiving to all…let the gastronomic festivities begin.

By maxmoose

November 23, 2006 01:08 PM | Link to this

Hmm..oh yeah.

ECON 101:

Leave it to a fool like you to quote board prices in a town where the buildings are made of concrete and steel. I don’t need a web page to tell me how much building costs are per square feet, I just call up the builder and ask how it’s going.

BTW: Why didn’t you point me to the article about the severe shortage of concrete, on the same website?

Kindly stop saying “wrong again” — since you haven’t shown me to be wrong about anything yet. (And don’t be a nit-wit and respond with “wrong again.”)

TANC - With the integrity you have shown on this board, I am hardly going to question your statements about your business.

I do know other MBB’s though, that claim to be enjoying a brisk re-fi trade.

For my part, I don’t get involved with loans too much for a simple but surprising reason: more than half the offers here (East Boca) are for cash.

Yes, the season will tell all of us what the story is, make geniuses of a few and liars of a few.

Meantime, you don’t need to count on any organizations’ numbers if you don’t trust them.
What I do is to follow all sales from specific buildings or subdivisions, getting the data directly from the property appraiser at www.pbcgov.com/papa

I sort the sales prices by date. I am finding no pattern of falling prices anywhere I look.

Enjoy!

By FL Rennaissance

November 23, 2006 04:10 PM | Link to this

Let’s go back to the Souffle analogy. If you were a saavy chef, having paid only 98 cents for a dozen eggs.. then through wisdom, sheer skill including lots of creativity and being in the proper location, whipped up an enticing 12 egg Souffle fetching a $10.99 brunch price tag. Am I stupid?? I think not! But neither is the purchaser who does not posess the nesessary culinary skills to prepare his own. Simply put do not blame the owners who have had the ability to buy right nor the renter who has not as yet wised up. The best time to buy a home has always been “5 years ago”. So it’s betterin the game before everyone else decides to do so once again! I am not a “cheerleader” nor do I really care if you ever learn your lesson, but you are welcome to eat in my restaurant anytime!

By TANC

November 23, 2006 11:58 PM | Link to this

As I sit here like a bellied up lion after the feast of the year, I begin to wonder when “season” will begin.

The weather was awesome today and looks to be getting better, and I hope it gets quite cold up North to spur on the buyers.

Waiting …and hoping.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 01:08 AM | Link to this

TANC and everyone ….I hope your Thanksgiving day was as enjoyable as mine.

Speaking narrowly of condos in downtown Boca - which concern me most right now - February is usually the month when they pop, although in 2006 it was January.

This is all backwards, however, and what I really want now is to find renters. I should be buying now. I want to avoid the familiar trap of selling when I should be buying (in a buyer’s market), then buying when I should be selling (in a seller’s market). That is probably the single most prevalent reason for people getting nowhere in the real estate or stock markets.

By Oscar De Low Renta

November 24, 2006 06:24 AM | Link to this

“I want to avoid the familiar trap of selling when I should be buying (in a buyer’s market)”

Buyer’s market? Nah. Buyer’s market will be in 2011. Prices will be much lower then. For all you buyer’s out there when the buyer’s market comes try not to haggle with the seller. When buying or selling you can hardly avoid sin. So, in either case, be sure you lose a little in the transaction.

By jupiterandthegardens.com

November 24, 2006 08:18 AM | Link to this

What most people don’t look at and should is that when prices are depressed buying a home can be a bargain as the taxes and insurance can be less.

By Oscar De Low Renta

November 24, 2006 08:24 AM | Link to this

“when prices are depressed buying a home can be a bargain”

I would rather be shackled to a funeral parlor.

By Econ 101

November 24, 2006 09:12 AM | Link to this

Max, facts are horrible things to you aren’t they? So you get your facts from the supplier. Man do I wish you were a customer of mine. So when you make a demonstrably false statement such as “construction prices are going up” you mean just for your builder buddy but not the nation at large? Have you ever taken a course in Economics? Do you understand we live in a nationwide or even a worldwide economy? Never mind I am trying to make a realtor cheerleader a critical thinker.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 09:41 AM | Link to this

Oscar — Thank heaven for people like you. You are the people that allow the rest of us to acquire something in life, because you are willing to pay for it.

You will have nothing in life, because you are satisfied to give away 700 after-tax dollars a month or more for an apartment the size of my closet. The next time you have to sign a new lease, it may be over $1,000. My tenant pays $1,800 a month for a 1 bedroom, in a building you will never be able to afford to live in, and I am raisng that.

You will be running behind, living paycheck to paycheck your whole life, because you will never have any appreciating assets.

What is an appreciating asset? I will demonstrate for you. A few years ago , I had some money in a bank account. The account paid less than 5% interest, but let’s say 5 for simplicity’s sake. Then I noticed something odd. The bank’s stock was up a lot more than 5% for the year, and it was early in the year. So here’s what I did. I took my money out of the account, and I bought bank stock instead (actually FSRBX). The result? I made 50% on my money that year instead of 5. Since this was incomprehensible in my hippie view of the world, I asked a friend in banking to explain it. He said: “The bank depends on rubes like you to lend it money for almost nothing. Then the bank goes and invests in things that matter.”

Even stock though, isn’t enough. Levitt houses peddled to GI’s like my Dad returning from World War II were sold for $6,000. Go on realtor.com and see what a house in Levittown, NY sells for today. As I noted earlier, houses in my neighborhood that sold for $60,000 when I was a kid, are worth 4 to 5 million today. Not only have prices increased to 60 or 70 times their value in a working lifetime, these prices were typically leveraged with 80% LTV loans, so the profit on investment is something like 350 times their value, or 35,000 per cent. Today, people can leverage with 90, 95 or even 100% LTV. As a broker, I buy with nothing down, so I can’t even give you a per centage.

Prices go up in a year, they go down in a year. I have said before, it hardly matters. Those who lose a house to foreclosures aren’t hanged for it. My last client who lost a house to foreclosure - despite my best efforts, I’ll admit - responded by buying a 100-unit apartment building in Belle Glade. This is a guy from a background of no money, let me assure you.

So, this thanksgiving day, I hope we all give thanks for people like Oscar, who are grateful for being ripped off.
Oscar, I take the time to write this in the hope that you are a good guy, or a young kid, who just happens to have a terminal case of the stupids.

Talk to a CPA, talk to someone who can talk “turkey” to you. Otherwise the system will just “gobble” you up.

Ciao.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 10:17 AM | Link to this

ECON 101 -

No, I don’t talk to suppliers, kindly learn to read.

You may go back and read some of my earlier posts on the effect that currency fluctuations in the global marketplace have on house prices.

I do not work as a realtor. I started a brokerage firm as a convenience to me. I hire and fire realtors for my firm, as a convenience to me. You clearly do not understand what the terms realtor, broker and salesperson mean.

I don’t mind arguing with a 20-something with 3 courses in economics and a job in Home Depot — but you really seem to be exceptionally stupid, and no better informed than Mr. De Low Ranter.

By Rebrowser

November 24, 2006 10:52 AM | Link to this

Just a few from listings on Palm Beach Post online :

VILLAGE OF NPB$355,000 JUST REDUCED, CHARMING 3 BEDROOM/2 BATHROOM HOME IN DESIRABLE NPB, OVERSIZED YARD, OVERSIZED DETACHED GARAGE, ATTACH CARPORT,ADD’L ROOM TO STORE BOAT. COMMUNITY OFFERS, PUBLIC DOCK, LIBRARY, POOL, GOLF.

4/3-pool, 100% updated, 1BR sep. entr or office, Reduced $392,500, 9744 Dahlia, Open Sun 1-4pm

VENETIAN ISLES DRASTICALLY REDUCED!! MOTIVATED SELLER!! THIS BEAUTIFUL HOME HAS THE THIRD BATHROOM WITHIN THE GUEST BEDROOM PROVIDING A MINI-SUITE FOR YOUR GUESTS AT THE OPPOSITE END OF THE HOME. HUGE EXPANDED & SCREENED PAVER PATIO OVERLOOKING A PRIVATE YARD.$399,000

$375,000 ReducedYou will be impressed! Complete Remodel in ‘05.3/2.5/2cg No HOA. New roof, windows, kit, baths flrs, pool. Corner lot. Motivated, 11885 Prosperity Farms Rd,

Historic Flamingo Park 718 Ardmore - $425,000 Bedrooms with 2 re-done baths! Where can you get a 3/2 at this price with no renovating necessary?! It even has a beautiful kitchen with granite counters and stainless appliances. THE OWNERS WANT TO SELL NOW! THE PRICE HAS JUST BEEN REDUCED AGAIN. They want offers on this truly crisp and tidy property.

Tons more houses and condos, all areas, reducing over and over. Just browse and see.

By Reduced

November 24, 2006 11:02 AM | Link to this

Historic Flamingo Park 718 Ardmore - $425,000 Bedrooms with 2 re-done baths! Where can you get a 3/2 at this price with no renovating necessary?! It even has a beautiful kitchen with granite counters and stainless appliances. THE OWNERS WANT TO SELL NOW! THE PRICE HAS JUST BEEN REDUCED AGAIN. They want offers on this truly crisp and tidy property.

Bear Island (WPB) 3/2/2 Price Reduced 50K! Lakefront & Gated Golf! Like New! Stainless Steel Appliances, Granite, New Carpet, etc. Motivated! $426,900

Motivated Seller ReducedTequesta Country Club Roomy 4/2/2, pool/spa, CBS, updated kit., Boat ramp, ocean access. Home Warr. $430K Mimi Delise

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this

Guys, stop being such rubes.

When a realtor puts a listing in MLS, there’s a field called “OLP” -original list price, and it’s automatically maintained by the system. A savvy realtor COULD list the property at 90K or so above where he wants to be listed. He COULD leave it on MLS for a few days just in case there is some nut out there who is interested at that price. Then he COULD modify the listing and lower the asking price to where it was meant to be in the first place — and guess what: PRICE REDUCED. When the buyer’s broker goes to verify the price reduction, sure enough, doggone it — the OLP was what the seller claimed. Of course, an honest old moose like Max would NEVER condone such a practice. :-)

Guys, ignore the verbiage. Do your homework. Take the asking price and compare it to actual sales prices on www.pbcgov.com/papa

Trust me, there is no way you are going to beat a realtor at his own game, unless you do some serious homework.

By REbrowser

November 24, 2006 11:32 AM | Link to this

Pool of buyers sharply reduced as two tier RE tax system and Insurance Costs now more known about via national publications.

At same time, normal number of sellers competing to sell with other owners who are trying to sell as ticked off with new INS. Bills and Taxes, traffic, overbuilding, etc.

Do not need advanced degrees to see tough times ahead for sellers, just browse the listings.

Smaller pool of buyers, larger supply of “motivated” sellers .Some very nice places have been on the market for more than a year despite multiple price drops. Some sales, but no where near enough to offset huge inventory.There is other factor :those who want to sell, but not bothering to list yet in this market. They will eventually add to inventory if market does start moving, ensuring steady supply of “motivated” sellers.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

REbrowser: Why don’t you try reading some of the voluminous material on this blog, instead of trying to reinvent the wheel?

Almost noon, time for all good moose to get out of bed. Have to go listem to Boca millionaires who want a $900,000 apt. for their kid, so he won’t have to live in a dorm while attending Lynn U. How worried do you suppose they are about the real estate tax, or thumb tax, or whatever tax?

By Reduced

November 24, 2006 12:00 PM | Link to this

3570 S OCEAN # 603, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/30/06 — $479,000 to $449,000 Days on Market: 450 3520 S OCEAN # 206 VA, Palm Beach, FL 33480** Price Reduced: 09/21/06 — $540,000 to $499,000 Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $499,000 to $479,000 2774 S OCEAN # 210, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/31/06 — $595,000 to $550,000 Price Reduced: 11/12/06 — $550,000 to $499,000 3610 S OCEAN # 505, Palm Beach, FL 33480Price Reduced: 09/07/06 — $579,000 to $559,000 Days on Market: 263

By REbrowser

November 24, 2006 12:20 PM | Link to this

Rereading these and other blogs is not very flattering to spinners such as you. Go back as far as you want, cheerleaders touting “prices going up” endlessly.

Vast majority of properties in SOFl have gone down and still not sold despite your efforts at spin.

If anyone listened to cheerleaders advice over past two years, 8 out 10 would now have seen market value of home dropped significantly, yet still be paying Tax and Ins on higher price they paid.

good luck with the millionaires.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 01:29 PM | Link to this

REbrowser:

“Vast majority of properties in SOFl have gone down “

If you bothered to read this newspaper — or even the blog topic introductions — you would know that condo prices are UP 16% since this time last year. If you don’t distinguish between houses and condos, those properties are UP 3% year to date.

Being poor and stupid, as you obviously are, is one thing. But when you continually spread false information because you are indifferent to finding out the truth, that militates heavily against your integrity as a person.

By Econ 101

November 24, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this

Max tell us the truth? How many listings to you have right now? Your ad-hominem attacks reveal a rather immature personality. So my guess is you inherited a little money and were too good for college. So the only way you could make some money on your own was some house flipping maybe a realtor who is hurting pretty bad right now. “Currency fluctuations in the global marketplace” and the influence they “have on house prices” is a good one. I guess when your car breaks down you try to impress your girlfriend by saying the flux capacitor is broken!? Come-on if you want to play with the big boys make some good logical and concise arguments.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 01:40 PM | Link to this

MaxMoose, Explain this these points. I am real economist with real data from California, but Florida is has all of the same issues. The housing market is toast and will drop 30 at a minimum:

  1. Long term interest rates have been relatively stable lately. The question is how does that impact the housing market and the house YOU want to buy? It really does not affect the housing market because 80% of the loans in the last 4 years were Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs). 60% of the loans in the last 4 years were Interest Only ARMs. What you need to evaluate is the short-term interest rates over the past 4 years. I’m not sure this link works:

http://www.bankrate.com/brm/graphs/graph_trend.asp?tf=1800&ct=Line&prods=325,360&gs=480,320&st=zz&c3d=False&web=brm&cc=1&prodtype=M

(short terms rates are up from 4% to nearly 6% - A MAJOR increase - play with a loan calculator)

http://www.mortgage-calc.com/mortgage/simple.php

I know you may ask, I am planning to use a fixed-loan product why does this matter to me?  It matters because if 80% of your neighbors used an ARM or refinanced with an ARM that their % rates will reset over the next 5 years.  For example if 80% of your neighbors bought and had a 4.8% ARM and the reset period for that loan is 1, 3, or 5 years, their current interest rate would be around 6%.  This is inevitably happening to ALL 80% of these people.  Their loan reset on a 500k home would take them from a mortgage payment of ~$2600/month to nearly $3000/month.  Realizing that most people bought with an ARM because they could not afford a 30-year fixed at the time an  ~20% increase in mortgage is going to put a lot of these people in trouble.  

Now on to the scary part.  60% (60% of your soon to be neighbors) of all of the loans in the past 4 years were Interest-Only ARMs.  These people got the loan based on paying no principle for 1, 3, 5 or 7 years.  Their mortgage payment is approximately ~ $1650/ month on a 500k loan and interest rate of 4.8%.  This term lasts for 1, 3, 5 or 7 years.  At the end of the introductory rate the person not only resets an interest rate from 4.8% to 6% BUT they have to pay the principle and it is amortized over a shorter period of time 29, 27, or 25 years typically.  The long and the short of this is that the mortgage payment for these people will jump to around $3400/month, an increase of OVER 100%.  I predict that at a minimum 50% of these people foreclose, which means 30% of the homes sold over the last 4 years will be foreclosed.  The graphs above show that it is IMPOSSIBLE for these people not to have a major increase in mortgage payment with an order of magnitude of 50-100% increase.  Remember that the MAJORITY of these people bought with an Interest Only loan or ARM because they could not afford the other loan to begin with.  How can they stomach a 100% increase?  They better get a big big big raise.  These people will not be able to refinance either because they do not have the income to qualify for a 30-year fixed loan!!!  Their mortgage payment is not locked!

Now imagine when all of these people start realizing they are screwed and put 0 money down to begin with.  They are going to file for bankruptcy and foreclose in waves.  It gets worse and worse as more neighbors foreclose because house values are dropping and will probably drop below the owed value of their loan to begin with.  It is basically an avalanche waiting to happen.  
Watch the skyrocketing foreclosure rates.  They are up over 100% from last year and trend will continue and increase exponentially.

www.dqnews.com has foreclosure rates BUT the site hasn’t been up for a few days. You can Google news “California foreclosure rates”.

"But wait, the Fed said they were going to stop raising interest rates and maybe even lower them...!!!"  Be very careful what you read.  It took almost 2 years for long term interest rates to START rising after the Fed started raising short term interest rates.  It is extremely difficult to say that they fed had much affect on these rates other than the fact you probably won't see a long term rate below a short term fed funds rate of 5.25%.  % rates are somewhat dependent on the Fed but MUCH MORE dependent on other things.  The short term interest rates rose as a direct cause of the increase of the fed funds rate.  The Feds #1 concern is inflation.  If inflation is not in check which is debatable at this point, they will NOT be cutting interest rates anytime soon.  Remember, rates are still NEAR all-time lows and cutting rates weakens and already weak dollar and RAISES inflation.  

The biggest question to ask is what happens to my loan after I purchase my home and what really controls interest rates?!  Few people understand this concept.  Mortgages get packaged together in lots of 100, 500 or 1000 and sold as a bond by Fanny Mae, Freddie Mac or the bank which originated the loan.  Who buys these loans you may ask?  The Chinese and Japanese purchase the majority of our homes loans because they are presumed to be VERY LOW RISK and keeping interest rates low helps keep the dollar strong and allows us to purchase more things from their country.  The Japanese sell us electronics and the Chinese sell us everything including the kitchen sink.  Imagine what happens if people begin to foreclose on their home loans?  The basic premise that our loans are LOW RISK no longer holds true and the Japanese and Chinese will not buy our mortgage backed securities or they will demand a higher interest rate because of the increase risk!  This is another part of the avalanche, if a few people start foreclosing interest rates tick upward which then triggers more people to foreclose and the cycle just multiplies.  Another likely scenario is that the old lending standards of 20% down and financial checks will ACTUALLY be enforced again which will kill everyone trying to refinance or buy/speculate.  Anyone with good credit and some cash is going to be sitting pretty.        

"Housing is coming down"  This is a very true statement.  If you look at the history of California real estate in particular it is extremely volatile.  It goes up a bunch it goes down a bunch.  The good thing is that the housing market is not a very "liquid asset".  This means houses can't be bought and sold over night or at the click of a mouse and that the transaction costs are HIGH ~6%.  The affect on the market is that it is much more momentum driven.  The turns are loooong as in years, the tops of cycles are looong as in years and the bottoms are looong as in years.  You will know you are at the bottom of a cycle when you see no change in the market for 1-2 years.  We dropped 8% last year and have a TON of crappy loans to deal with still, and everyone is priced out!  Housing will drop for the next 5 years at ~8-12% per year.   Condos will drop much more than houses.  

"They aren't making any more land"  They weren't making any more land in Japan when the real estate market went down 60% over 15 years (non-inflation adjusted)

"This is the best place to live, everyone wants to move here"  GREAT!!  Where is temperature on my mortgage application?  The only thing that plays into your ability to buy a home is your income and your ability to acquire credit.  Why were homes here the same ~price as everywhere else 5 years ago and for the prior 200 years?  What changed over night...absolutely nothing!  We just have a ton of speculators!!

PLEASE read this blog once a day:

http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/

Peer pressure - Everyone you know probably has made a ton of money in real estate and tells you it will never go down.  That's what I would say too if I had millions invested in something.  You know a market is overbought and due for a correction when the taxi cab driver, bathroom attendant, and McDonalds worker starts telling you about getting into real estate.  Follow the smart money and stay away while you can.  Warren Buffett the best investor in the world laughed at the southern California housing market and sold his house 2 years ago.  Follow the smart money!!

"The tax incentives are wonderful, I save soooo much money"  This is one of the biggest lies ever.  Few people really understand the tax incentives.  Lets do the math.
1 - You only receive a tax credit for the portion of the loan that you pay interest to someone else. This means if you are paying $25,000 per year and only $20,000 in interest you only can claim the $20,000 that you are giving away anyway. Additionally you do not get a 20k tax write off, you don’t get taxed on the 20k you are giving away to someone else. 2 - This means that if you are in the 37% tax bracket and pay 20k in interest that you get back 37% of the difference between your mortgage interest and the standard deduction = (20k - ~6500)*.37 = ~$5000 per year for paying 20k in interest to someone else!! 3 - Lets say you pay 40k per year in interest. You would get a write off of (40k - 6500)*.37 per year. Your net is about 12000 dollars per year of advantage for paying 40k in interest to someone else and having a 500,000 home loan. This tax write off decreases every year because you are paying less and less interest and the government increases your write off every year. Does that 12k really sounds like it is worth it in a decreasing home market? If your house drops 8% that year you already lose 40k . In fact that 40k drop probably covers rent pretty easily!!!
My plan is to save money like crazy and wait for the bottom and which point I won't need to take a large loan for the property AND I can refinance as rates drop.  Here is an old real estate adage, "Cash is King in a foreclose environment".  I would move to a place with cheaper rent and bankroll the money and buy CDs @ 5% or something like that.  It will pay off greatly in the end.  Just because the rest of the idiots jump off the bridge doesn't mean you have to follow them!

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this

Here is MaxMoose’s contact info for anyone who is interested.

Ingber, Joseph R maxmoose03@yahoo.com Technicity Inc. , (561) 866-5610 4400 N. Federal Hwy, Boca Raton, FL 33431

By REbrowser

November 24, 2006 01:55 PM | Link to this

mickeymouse03: Previous postings show listings on mkt for extensive time, not selling, despite good locations and large price drops . This dose of reality evidently struck a nerve.

Evidence of where prices are is easily found. Go to any open house this weekend.

Before Internet, which now allows access for all to sites like forsalebyowner, ziprealty, etc,etc, spinning of statistics by cheerleaders was easier.

Now, with THOUSANDS of SoFl listings, prices, and pleas to “bring all offers”, “must sell”,”owner anxious” readily viewable, you sound at best silly, at worst, pathetic.

Guess your Boca millionairs dont need to bother looking at online listings, lucky for you, hope the 900K apt deal went real well.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 02:11 PM | Link to this

His coworker and webiste:

http://bocahabitats.com/

By REbrowser

November 24, 2006 02:33 PM | Link to this

AMT is creeping down income scale. (never indexed for inflation) Wipes out most deductions, including State RE taxes. Excerpt from article at street.com : Families: Fight the AMT By Tracy Byrnes TheStreet.com Contributor 11/24/2006 9:58 AM EST AMT: A Time-Bomb “The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that 3.8 million taxpayers will be hit with the AMT this tax season. And if the rules don’t change, roughly 30 million tax households will be paying AMT by 2010. That’s one in every three tax returns.

Currently, folks who have household earnings between $100,000 and $200,000, own a house in a state with high state taxes and have dependents are the biggest targets.”

By Econ 101

November 24, 2006 02:59 PM | Link to this

Dear Maximoose,

Sorry, I saw your website I don’t blame you for your anger now. Feel free to vent on this blog as it will be a good stress relief. By the way your kitchen in the boca house is about the size of my kids closet! Talk about the wrong side of a flip! Good luck to you.

By To Markmax03

November 24, 2006 03:07 PM | Link to this

To: Markmax03

Why would you disclose somebody’s personal information like that!

Everybody has their own opinions on the real estate market. That’s what makes the blog interesting and fun.

We have many rivals here such as Easy, Rich R, and others. Most of us have a good sense of humor. Obviously, You don’t!

Obviously, You couldn’t handle his heat!

Very CHILDISH, IMMATURE, AND TRULY UNPROFESSIONAL!

Maxmoose03, I enjoy your posts. Keep up the good work. It’s very informative.

“What happens in the blog stays in the blog”

No need to get personal and get co-workers involved.

By ReBrowser

November 24, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this

By maxmoose03 : “I know in the buildings that I follow unit by unit, that 16% rise is for real”

Can you give hint on where the buildings with 16% rise in SELLING price are ?

Other postings citing condo price drops by address, apt no. and prices and reductions :

3570 S OCEAN # 603, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/30/06 — $479,000 to $449,000 Days on Market: 450

3520 S OCEAN # 206 VA, Palm Beach, FL 33480** Price Reduced: 09/21/06 — $540,000 to $499,000 Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $499,000 to $479,000

2774 S OCEAN # 210, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/31/06 — $595,000 to $550,000 Price Reduced: 11/12/06 — $550,000 to $499,000

3610 S OCEAN # 505, Palm Beach, FL 33480Price Reduced: 09/07/06 — $579,000 to $559,000 Days on Market: 263

By A.B.R. SYNDROME

November 24, 2006 03:32 PM | Link to this

Markmax:

You’re suffering from A.B.R. syndrome.

A.B.R. is the medical terminlology describing ANOTHER BITTER RENTER.

Ask Mike fink, he’s familiar with the illness.

The only cure is being a homeowner. Something you’re not.

By TANC

November 24, 2006 03:41 PM | Link to this

Markmax33,

I don’t profess to be a “real economist”, but I am a mortgage banker with many yrs of experience, and I take issue with your statements.

The statistic you give that 80% of the mortgage loans originated in the last 4 yrs were ARM’s is just plain wrong and especially in Florida. Certainly the percentage of ARM’s in California where the Median Priced Home is so, so much higher and harder to afford is higher. But in Florida, which is what is relevant to this blog, the number is far less than a third of that AND, Interest Only Loans did not account for 60% of the loans (even in Calif.). They may have acounted for 60% of the realistic number of ARM’s (in Calif), but no way 48% of all loans (80% X 60%). No way. Where do you get these numbers from?

Yes, long term interest rates have been stable for awhile now, and the way it impacts the housing market is significant. The spread between ARM rates and Fixed Rates has narrowed to virtually zilch thereby making it more sensible to get the fixed rate which creates less volatility, more certainty for the borrower, and thereby less risk for a homeowner. This certainly has an impact.

AND, evaluating short term interest rates over the last 4 years doesn’t provide you with that much useful information for the future. It’s history…done with…over with. The future is what matters and even “real economists” can’t predict the future with good success.

Now with stable fixed rates that are still pretty low historically, ARM holders should seriously consider refinancing into a fixed rate.

The problem of course comes in if you were a borrower who took out the ARM because that was the only way you could afford the home to begin with. And, perhaps you put down too little and now you’re value isn’t there anymore. If you did that, well, you knew what you were getting yourself into to begin with. No crying allowed now. The basic tenet of finance is the concept of Risk and Return. Investors(borrowers)will not realistically take on more risk (an ARM) without the prospect for a better return (lower rate and payment). But, there is RISK you must be willing to accept.

By TANC

November 24, 2006 03:51 PM | Link to this

And by the way, I am not a “cheerleader” either. I don’t believe maxmoose’s prices rising statement either as I believe we are in for some more hurt here in SFL as well. But, I don’t think we’re crashing. We’re adjusting to a new reality that will certainly include prices perhaps 10% lower within the next year (in general) as we work of huge inventory.

And putting someone’s personal info on here like that is ridiculous. What’s the point?

Personal opinions about the market are what’s important here, not childish words left better for the playground back in 4th grade. That goes for everyone on this blog.

By TANC

November 24, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

Further rantings…

Markmax33’s tax discussion coming under scrutiny.

“1 - You only receive a tax credit for the portion of the loan that you pay interest to someone else.”

That is a tax deduction my friend, not a tax credit. Big difference (it appears you recognize this later on).

“This means if you are paying $25,000 per year and only $20,000 in interest you only can claim the $20,000 that you are giving away anyway. Additionally you do not get a 20k tax write off, you don’t get taxed on the 20k you are giving away to someone else.”

Sorry, but I’m completely lost here. Is it a tax deduction or not?

“2 - This means that if you are in the 37% tax bracket and pay 20k in interest that you get back 37% of the difference between your mortgage interest and the standard deduction = (20k - ~6500)*.37 = ~$5000 per year for paying 20k in interest to someone else!!

Wait a minute…I think I get what you’re trying to say here, but in fact you do get a tax deduction for the whole amount. If your standard deduction is $6500 and you only have $6499 in write offs, you deduct $6500 saving 37% of that number. If your interest deduction is $20,000, far exceeding your standard deduction than you’ll itemize which will get you $20,000 X 37% in tax savings NOT $20,000 minus $6500 X 37%. Now, your “incremental savings” (there’s an economic word for you) is how you describe it, but you save the same amount of taxes either way on that first $6500 and the entire $20,000. Right? It’s not either/or.

“3 - Lets say you pay 40k per year in interest. You would get a write off of (40k - 6500)*.37 per year. Your net is about 12000 dollars per year of advantage for paying 40k in interest to someone else and having a 500,000 home loan. This tax write off decreases every year because you are paying less and less interest and the government increases your write off every year. Does that 12k really sounds like it is worth it in a decreasing home market? If your house drops 8% that year you already lose 40k . In fact that 40k drop probably covers rent pretty easily!!!”

First of all, you don’t lose anything unless you sell. Not a penny. And, you are also building some equity (assuming no interest only minimum payments of course - refer to previous post on this).

Also, don’t forget, you also get to deduct your annual real estate taxes on the property as well as your mortgage interest. Don’t forget that significant number.

Oh, and please let me know when the bottom is since you seem to know when it will be. If you can predict that with accuracy you should be a rich man.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this

wow…I missed a lot of fun.

Mr. Economist: I don’t mean this in a derogatory way, and perhaps the fault is mine, but I can not for the life of me follow your English. I’m sorry, but I have no idea of what you are trying to say. English is not my native language, so maybe, as I say, the fault is mine. I caught something about a 30% drop coming. Are you willing to stake your professional reputation on this? Will you inform all your future potential employers of your prediction, and the outcome?

To “To MarkMax” and others: Thank you for saying the obvious about MarkMax: he is an infant who can not play by the rules that adults implicity understand. Wounded, as he was, by commentary on this blog, he set to strike out personally. All he is going to accomplish is annoying my friend from whom I borrowed an email address. I am aware of one thing he mentioned, not of the others.
What is important, though, is his malicious intent. I think everyone now knows everything they need to about MarkMax :-)

Now, HE does sound like a starving realtor.

BTW: I am not 100% sure about this, but I think the address he gave is actually Lenson Realty. Can anyone verify this?

By AMTquestion

November 24, 2006 04:33 PM | Link to this

Anyone willing to take shot at AMT mentioned earlier ? As far as I can tell State RE taxes and some other deductions fazed out if family income certain amt. ? either way more and more families are going to have to get answer or risk penalties for not doing AMT ?

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this

TANC, You could only read part of my email so let me just clarify the points you are wrong about WITH PROOF:

  1. Let me quote something from your neck of the woods on the ARM usage:

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/business/epaper/2006/11/08/a1d_foreclosures1108.html

Not less than 1/2 of the people that bought on these exotic loans including ALL OF YOUR NEIGHBORS who recently bought will forclose. I can get more quotes on ARM usage The San Diego Tribune and DQNEWS.com regular quote the 80% ARMs figure and 60% Interest Only loan figure. It is fact and it is fact in your town too, probably to a slightly less extent.
2. Open this link and tell me how on God’s green earth someone who got an interest only loan at 4% 2 years ago can maintain a 4% and how their mortgage payment will not DOUBLE. Do the math:

http://www.bankrate.com/brm/graphs/graph_trend.asp?tf=1800&ct=Line&prods=325,360&gs=480,320&st=zz&c3d=False&web=brm&cc=1&prodtype=M

  1. You are ABSOLOUTLY incorrect about the loan spreads from 2-3 years ago. That graph proves it.

  2. Any other economic rookies that want to take me to the test? I will destroy your argument with facts and data in a heartbeat.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:38 PM | Link to this

As for my inclusion of his personal information, he should not spout off about something and spread bad press if he isn’t proud of it. Without credability a blog is nothing. He obviously has none.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:48 PM | Link to this

TANC, Let me correct you yet again. Everyone gets the standard deduction so your benefit over someone renting is 20k-~6500. Do the math it is simple. You may also get to write off thousands of dollars in tax payments, but you are probably paying AT LEAST that much in HOA fees, maintenance, etc. That means there is 0 benefit there.

The point you are CLEARLY missing is that the majority of people will be FORCED to sell because of the crappy loans. The more that sell, the further the market is under water and the avalanche begins. Don’t you see it??

As for my prediction, it is always hard to say what the government will do which will have a significant effect on the outcome BUT you will know there is a bottom when:

  1. The medium income can afford a home again with the interest rates at that time.
  2. The bad loans are all out of the system (atleast 5 years away)
  3. The majority of realtors go find another job
  4. It is not “cool” to be in real estate.
  5. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac go broke.

P.S. I am an EXTREMELY PROUD RENTER right now!! I live 3 blocks from the beach in an awesome house and $450/month and I am BANKROLLING $$ so I can buy 3 properties! IT IS COOL TO RENT!!

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:52 PM | Link to this

TANC, Historically low interest don’t mean a THING. The only thing that matters is what these people with 4% are going to do when they were already stretched to their limit! The only thing that matters is the realative interest rate compared to the peak of this bubble. That is going to be what makes history.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this

"This is the best place to live, everyone wants to move here"  GREAT!!  Where is temperature on my mortgage application?  The only thing that plays into your ability to buy a home is your income and your ability to acquire credit.  Why were homes here the same ~price as everywhere else 5 years ago and for the prior 200 years?  What changed over night...absolutely nothing!  We just have a ton of speculators!!

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this

“They aren’t making any more land” They weren’t making any more land in Japan when the real estate market went down 60% over 15 years (non-inflation adjusted)

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 04:57 PM | Link to this

This is the best place to live, everyone wants to move here… GREAT!! Where is temperature on my mortgage application? The only thing that plays into your ability to buy a home is your income and your ability to acquire credit. Why were homes here the same ~price as everywhere else 5 years ago and for the prior 200 years? What changed over night…absolutely nothing! We just have a ton of speculators!!

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this

  1. Long term interest rates have been relatively stable lately. The question is how does that impact the housing market and the house YOU want to buy? It really does not affect the housing market because 80% of the loans in the last 4 years were Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs). 60% of the loans in the last 4 years were Interest Only ARMs. What you need to evaluate is the short-term interest rates over the past 4 years. I’m not sure this link works:

http://www.bankrate.com/brm/graphs/graph_trend.asp?tf=1800&ct=Line&prods=325,360&gs=480,320&st=zz&c3d=False&web=brm&cc=1&prodtype=M

(short terms rates are up from 4% to nearly 6% - A MAJOR increase - play with a loan calculator)

http://www.mortgage-calc.com/mortgage/simple.php

I know you may ask, I am planning to use a fixed-loan product why does this matter to me?  It matters because if 80% of your neighbors used an ARM or refinanced with an ARM that their % rates will reset over the next 5 years.  For example if 80% of your neighbors bought and had a 4.8% ARM and the reset period for that loan is 1, 3, or 5 years, their current interest rate would be around 6%.  This is inevitably happening to ALL 80% of these people.  Their loan reset on a 500k home would take them from a mortgage payment of ~$2600/month to nearly $3000/month.  Realizing that most people bought with an ARM because they could not afford a 30-year fixed at the time an  ~20% increase in mortgage is going to put a lot of these people in trouble.  

Now on to the scary part.  60% (60% of your soon to be neighbors) of all of the loans in the past 4 years were Interest-Only ARMs.  These people got the loan based on paying no principle for 1, 3, 5 or 7 years.  Their mortgage payment is approximately ~ $1650/ month on a 500k loan and interest rate of 4.8%.  This term lasts for 1, 3, 5 or 7 years.  At the end of the introductory rate the person not only resets an interest rate from 4.8% to 6% BUT they have to pay the principle and it is amortized over a shorter period of time 29, 27, or 25 years typically.  The long and the short of this is that the mortgage payment for these people will jump to around $3400/month, an increase of OVER 100%.  I predict that at a minimum 50% of these people foreclose, which means 30% of the homes sold over the last 4 years will be foreclosed.  The graphs above show that it is IMPOSSIBLE for these people not to have a major increase in mortgage payment with an order of magnitude of 50-100% increase.  Remember that the MAJORITY of these people bought with an Interest Only loan or ARM because they could not afford the other loan to begin with.  How can they stomach a 100% increase?  They better get a big big big raise.  These people will not be able to refinance either because they do not have the income to qualify for a 30-year fixed loan!!!  Their mortgage payment is not locked!

Now imagine when all of these people start realizing they are screwed and put 0 money down to begin with.  They are going to file for bankruptcy and foreclose in waves.  It gets worse and worse as more neighbors foreclose because house values are dropping and will probably drop below the owed value of their loan to begin with.  It is basically an avalanche waiting to happen.  
Watch the skyrocketing foreclosure rates.  They are up over 100% from last year and trend will continue and increase exponentially.

www.dqnews.com has foreclosure rates BUT the site hasn’t been up for a few days. You can Google news “California foreclosure rates”.

"But wait, the Fed said they were going to stop raising interest rates and maybe even lower them...!!!"  Be very careful what you read.  It took almost 2 years for long term interest rates to START rising after the Fed started raising short term interest rates.  It is extremely difficult to say that they fed had much affect on these rates other than the fact you probably won't see a long term rate below a short term fed funds rate of 5.25%.  % rates are somewhat dependent on the Fed but MUCH MORE dependent on other things.  The short term interest rates rose as a direct cause of the increase of the fed funds rate.  The Feds #1 concern is inflation.  If inflation is not in check which is debatable at this point, they will NOT be cutting interest rates anytime soon.  Remember, rates are still NEAR all-time lows and cutting rates weakens and already weak dollar and RAISES inflation.  

The biggest question to ask is what happens to my loan after I purchase my home and what really controls interest rates?!  Few people understand this concept.  Mortgages get packaged together in lots of 100, 500 or 1000 and sold as a bond by Fanny Mae, Freddie Mac or the bank which originated the loan.  Who buys these loans you may ask?  The Chinese and Japanese purchase the majority of our homes loans because they are presumed to be VERY LOW RISK and keeping interest rates low helps keep the dollar strong and allows us to purchase more things from their country.  The Japanese sell us electronics and the Chinese sell us everything including the kitchen sink.  Imagine what happens if people begin to foreclose on their home loans?  The basic premise that our loans are LOW RISK no longer holds true and the Japanese and Chinese will not buy our mortgage backed securities or they will demand a higher interest rate because of the increase risk!  This is another part of the avalanche, if a few people start foreclosing interest rates tick upward which then triggers more people to foreclose and the cycle just multiplies.  Another likely scenario is that the old lending standards of 20% down and financial checks will ACTUALLY be enforced again which will kill everyone trying to refinance or buy/speculate.  Anyone with good credit and some cash is going to be sitting pretty.        

"Housing is coming down"  This is a very true statement.  If you look at the history of California real estate in particular it is extremely volatile.  It goes up a bunch it goes down a bunch.  The good thing is that the housing market is not a very "liquid asset".  This means houses can't be bought and sold over night or at the click of a mouse and that the transaction costs are HIGH ~6%.  The affect on the market is that it is much more momentum driven.  The turns are loooong as in years, the tops of cycles are looong as in years and the bottoms are looong as in years.  You will know you are at the bottom of a cycle when you see no change in the market for 1-2 years.  We dropped 8% last year and have a TON of crappy loans to deal with still, and everyone is priced out!  Housing will drop for the next 5 years at ~8-12% per year.   Condos will drop much more than houses.  

"They aren't making any more land"  They weren't making any more land in Japan when the real estate market went down 60% over 15 years (non-inflation adjusted)

"This is the best place to live, everyone wants to move here"  GREAT!!  Where is temperature on my mortgage application?  The only thing that plays into your ability to buy a home is your income and your ability to acquire credit.  Why were homes here the same ~price as everywhere else 5 years ago and for the prior 200 years?  What changed over night...absolutely nothing!  We just have a ton of speculators!!

PLEASE read this blog once a day:

http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/

Peer pressure - Everyone you know probably has made a ton of money in real estate and tells you it will never go down.  That's what I would say too if I had millions invested in something.  You know a market is overbought and due for a correction when the taxi cab driver, bathroom attendant, and McDonalds worker starts telling you about getting into real estate.  Follow the smart money and stay away while you can.  Warren Buffett the best investor in the world laughed at the southern California housing market and sold his house 2 years ago.  Follow the smart money!!

"The tax incentives are wonderful, I save soooo much money"  This is one of the biggest lies ever.  Few people really understand the tax incentives.  Lets do the math.
1 - You only receive a tax credit for the portion of the loan that you pay interest to someone else. This means if you are paying $25,000 per year and only $20,000 in interest you only can claim the $20,000 that you are giving away anyway. Additionally you do not get a 20k tax write off, you don’t get taxed on the 20k you are giving away to someone else. 2 - This means that if you are in the 37% tax bracket and pay 20k in interest that you get back 37% of the difference between your mortgage interest and the standard deduction = (20k - ~6500)*.37 = ~$5000 per year for paying 20k in interest to someone else!! 3 - Lets say you pay 40k per year in interest. You would get a write off of (40k - 6500)*.37 per year. Your net is about 12000 dollars per year of advantage for paying 40k in interest to someone else and having a 500,000 home loan. This tax write off decreases every year because you are paying less and less interest and the government increases your write off every year. Does that 12k really sounds like it is worth it in a decreasing home market? If your house drops 8% that year you already lose 40k . In fact that 40k drop probably covers rent pretty easily!!!
My plan is to save money like crazy and wait for the bottom and which point I won't need to take a large loan for the property AND I can refinance as rates drop.  Here is an old real estate adage, "Cash is King in a foreclose environment".  I would move to a place with cheaper rent and bankroll the money and buy CDs @ 5% or something like that.  It will pay off greatly in the end.  Just because the rest of the idiots jump off the bridge doesn't mean you have to follow them!

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this

I know you may ask, I am planning to use a fixed-loan product why does this matter to me? It matters because if 80% of your neighbors used an ARM or refinanced with an ARM that their % rates will reset over the next 5 years. For example if 80% of your neighbors bought and had a 4.8% ARM and the reset period for that loan is 1, 3, or 5 years, their current interest rate would be around 6%. This is inevitably happening to ALL 80% of these people. Their loan reset on a 500k home would take them from a mortgage payment of ~$2600/month to nearly $3000/month. Realizing that most people bought with an ARM because they could not afford a 30-year fixed at the time an ~20% increase in mortgage is going to put a lot of these people in trouble.

Now on to the scary part.  60% (60% of your soon to be neighbors) of all of the loans in the past 4 years were Interest-Only ARMs.  These people got the loan based on paying no principle for 1, 3, 5 or 7 years.  Their mortgage payment is approximately ~ $1650/ month on a 500k loan and interest rate of 4.8%.  This term lasts for 1, 3, 5 or 7 years.  At the end of the introductory rate the person not only resets an interest rate from 4.8% to 6% BUT they have to pay the principle and it is amortized over a shorter period of time 29, 27, or 25 years typically.  The long and the short of this is that the mortgage payment for these people will jump to around $3400/month, an increase of OVER 100%.  I predict that at a minimum 50% of these people foreclose, which means 30% of the homes sold over the last 4 years will be foreclosed.  The graphs above show that it is IMPOSSIBLE for these people not to have a major increase in mortgage payment with an order of magnitude of 50-100% increase.  Remember that the MAJORITY of these people bought with an Interest Only loan or ARM because they could not afford the other loan to begin with.  How can they stomach a 100% increase?  They better get a big big big raise.  These people will not be able to refinance either because they do not have the income to qualify for a 30-year fixed loan!!!  Their mortgage payment is not locked!

Now imagine when all of these people start realizing they are screwed and put 0 money down to begin with.  They are going to file for bankruptcy and foreclose in waves.  It gets worse and worse as more neighbors foreclose because house values are dropping and will probably drop below the owed value of their loan to begin with.  It is basically an avalanche waiting to happen.  
Watch the skyrocketing foreclosure rates.  They are up over 100% from last year and trend will continue and increase exponentially.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this

“But wait, the Fed said they were going to stop raising interest rates and maybe even lower them…!!!” Be very careful what you read. It took almost 2 years for long term interest rates to START rising after the Fed started raising short term interest rates. It is extremely difficult to say that they fed had much affect on these rates other than the fact you probably won’t see a long term rate below a short term fed funds rate of 5.25%. % rates are somewhat dependent on the Fed but MUCH MORE dependent on other things. The short term interest rates rose as a direct cause of the increase of the fed funds rate. The Feds #1 concern is inflation. If inflation is not in check which is debatable at this point, they will NOT be cutting interest rates anytime soon. Remember, rates are still NEAR all-time lows and cutting rates weakens and already weak dollar and RAISES inflation.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:10 PM | Link to this

The biggest question to ask is what happens to my loan after I purchase my home and what really controls interest rates?! Few people understand this concept. Mortgages get packaged together in lots of 100, 500 or 1000 and sold as a bond by Fanny Mae, Freddie Mac or the bank which originated the loan. Who buys these loans you may ask? The Chinese and Japanese purchase the majority of our homes loans because they are presumed to be VERY LOW RISK and keeping interest rates low helps keep the dollar strong and allows us to purchase more things from their country. The Japanese sell us electronics and the Chinese sell us everything including the kitchen sink. Imagine what happens if people begin to foreclose on their home loans? The basic premise that our loans are LOW RISK no longer holds true and the Japanese and Chinese will not buy our mortgage backed securities or they will demand a higher interest rate because of the increase risk! This is another part of the avalanche, if a few people start foreclosing interest rates tick upward which then triggers more people to foreclose and the cycle just multiplies. Another likely scenario is that the old lending standards of 20% down and financial checks will ACTUALLY be enforced again which will kill everyone trying to refinance or buy/speculate. Anyone with good credit and some cash is going to be sitting pretty.

"Housing is coming down"  This is a very true statement.  If you look at the history of California real estate in particular it is extremely volatile.  It goes up a bunch it goes down a bunch.  The good thing is that the housing market is not a very "liquid asset".  This means houses can't be bought and sold over night or at the click of a mouse and that the transaction costs are HIGH ~6%.  The affect on the market is that it is much more momentum driven.  The turns are loooong as in years, the tops of cycles are looong as in years and the bottoms are looong as in years.  You will know you are at the bottom of a cycle when you see no change in the market for 1-2 years.  We dropped 8% last year and have a TON of crappy loans to deal with still, and everyone is priced out!  Housing will drop for the next 5 years at ~8-12% per year.   Condos will drop much more than houses.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:11 PM | Link to this

My plan is to save money like crazy and wait for the bottom and which point I won’t need to take a large loan for the property AND I can refinance as rates drop. Here is an old real estate adage, “Cash is King in a foreclose environment”. I would move to a place with cheaper rent and bankroll the money and buy CDs @ 5% or something like that. It will pay off greatly in the end. Just because the rest of the idiots jump off the bridge doesn’t mean you have to follow them!

By TANC

November 24, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this

Okay Markmax33 I’ve been searching through the article on the link you provided to find out where I went wrong.

The only statement in the “foreclosure” article you provided about the percentage of ARM loans is this (copied directly):

“Forty-three percent of mortgages taken out by first-time home buyers nationwide were these exotic-style loans,” said Jack McCabe of McCabe Research & Consulting in Deerfield Beach. “That’s why many first-time homeowners are in jeopardy of foreclosure that could make their homeownership a very temporary situation.”

That’s 43% of FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS - NOT ALL BORROWERS. First Time Homebuyers represented about 40% (give or take a bit) of the market in the past, so 43% of 40% is less than 20% of all loans. How do we get to 80%? Perhaps you transposed 80 and 20?

Also, perhaps I was not clear about spreads between fixed rates and ARM’s. I was talking about the spreads RIGHT NOW and the impact on the housig market, not 2 or 3 yrs ago. Someone who took out a 4% interest only ARM loan that planned on being in the home for an extended time has no business being in that loan. I agree. It’s insane! Why did they do it? GREED.

And as far as the Standard Deduction v.s. Itemization, we are playing with words here. Whether you Itemize or take the Standard Deduction, you still get the same amount of tax savings? Right? These are mutually exclusive. You choose one or the other. You save the same amount of money on that first $6500 either way. If you so happen to have more deductions than that you choose to itemize and save even more. There is an incremental tax benefit to owning a home if your interest deduction and re taxes are greater than your std deduction. That’s my point.

As far as being an economic rookie, well, since you still haven’t produced anything that proves your numbers (that article doesn’t work, sorry) than I guess we’re in the same shoes.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:22 PM | Link to this

“Housing is coming down” This is a very true statement. If you look at the history of California real estate in particular it is extremely volatile. It goes up a bunch it goes down a bunch. The good thing is that the housing market is not a very “liquid asset”. This means houses can’t be bought and sold over night or at the click of a mouse and that the transaction costs are HIGH ~6%. The affect on the market is that it is much more momentum driven. The turns are loooong as in years, the tops of cycles are looong as in years and the bottoms are looong as in years. You will know you are at the bottom of a cycle when you see no change in the market for 1-2 years. We dropped 8% last year and have a TON of crappy loans to deal with still, and everyone is priced out! Housing will drop for the next 5 years at ~8-12% per year. Condos will drop much more than houses.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

TANC, I’ve made about 500 points non of which have been disproven with any fact. Yes I provided a link that said 43% of first time homebuyers and? I could search for REFIs and everyone else, but I’ll let you do that. As I said, credit spreads NOW don’t mean a thing, it is all the OTHER people that are trapped which will be screwed and forclose and force rates higher which will then inturn screw the next batch! The Ponzi scheme is over.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:32 PM | Link to this

TANC,
Go look at ARM usage at www.dqnews.com I can not pull it up right now. DQNEWS collects all of the data for California has the best data around. 60% interest only, 80% ARM = The housing market is screwed.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

TANC, On the tax write off you seem to be missing the MAJOR point that you are still paying someone else a TON of interest and getting nothing in return. People are banking on the expected return on house value which has fallen through the floor. You obviously must understand that in California if prices are dropping 5% that I SAVE money buy renting and don’t pay any interest!! WOWOWOWOW! That is the point, not the debate on basically 2k one way or the other.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:36 PM | Link to this

Anyone else got anything? Crickets? Did the broke realtors get their internet connection turned off?

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:45 PM | Link to this

Real men use real blogs: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com

Hit me up there.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 05:55 PM | Link to this

TANC http://www.dqnews.com/RRCAARM0306.shtm

I can’t pull the link up but it talks about ARM usage being down from historically high levels - 80%

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 06:05 PM | Link to this

Hey - HarpoMarx33:

An obscure idiot once wrote this in this blog:

“As for my inclusion of his personal information, he should not spout off about something and spread bad press if he isn’t proud of it. Without credability a blog is nothing. He obviously has none.”

Since this is your philosophy, HarpoMarx33, you will no doubt provide your REAL personal information here immediately. Failure to do so, after all, would clearly identify you as a hypocryte and complete fool.

I made clear a day or two ago, in this same blog, in responding to Madam Internet, that I was operating with a borrowed profile —and hence the email attached to it. I was not operating under false pretenses; you just never bothered to read it, you moron.

Stay tuned, p’t*t con.

By Markmax33

November 24, 2006 06:16 PM | Link to this

I provide real data and information. Can’t you respond to that? Can’t you refute any of these facts? I guess not. Facts can’t be refuted. You will get shot down EVERYTIME. You provide no facts and are a waste of people’s time, so I figured I would try a new technique to put you in your place.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 06:26 PM | Link to this

HEY MARKMAX (continued):

Speaking of not reading, no one except poor TANC is going to bother to read your voluminous and meaningless crap.

I did notice the “Put me to the test” remark somewhere.

Little One, you can’t even get INTO the test. Tell you what, here’s a softball question. If you handle this one convincingly, we’ll see about a test:

Demonstrate the use of the Poisson distribution in determining florida wind insurance rates.

While you’re at it, answer these questions: with all this vast psuedo-knowledge of economics that you have: 1) Why are you poor? 2) Why do you make so little money?

I know - the system is unfair. Nobody gives you credit for your ability. You just haven’t found the right job blah blah blah.

Maybe it’s that all your baloney isn’t worth anything in the real world?

Adults come here to talk about things that concern them — like home ownership. You are a little kid with big theories and no house. If you can’t provide something useful — i.e. your experiences with home ownership, you should just shut up.

Tell your friend you imported from “California” (i.e. China) to learn English.

I am sorry I wounded you so by refusing to look at your stupid website, but you have to learn to take it like an adult.

Now go play with your economics textbooks.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 06:44 PM | Link to this

Mr. MarkMax is speechless for a change.

Tant mieux.

He’s looking up “Poisson Distribution” in his textbooks.

Good night, folks.

By INTERNET MADAM

November 24, 2006 09:43 PM | Link to this

I made clear a day or two ago, in this same blog, in responding to Madam Internet, that I was operating with a borrowed profile —and hence the email attached to it. I was not operating under false pretenses;

You sure are operating under false pretenses using other peoples profiles and email addresses.

Yes, Max I know who you really are. I would know you anywhere and everywhere on these blogs. I also know the person whose profile you “borrowed”. There is such a person that has that profile. Do you consider that person your friend or your enemy? I thought it was flattering to the person whose profile you took. Why do you need to steal other people’s identites and use their email addresses to post your own opinions? That is a very deceptive practice.

Let the truth be told. Most of you are realtors or brokers who are busy writing your opinions on here. That is fine. But wouldn’t you be making money now if you went out and hustle and found some New Yorkers down here for the weekend that came down to look around?

I went to my favorite spa in Palm Beach today where there are 3 real estate offices in that particular strip mall. I could not help but notice all the cars that pulled into parking lot to walk into one of those real estate offices only to find that they were close for the holiday weekend. Not everyone went to the malls today.

Believe it or not, the season is on.

By alsowondering

November 24, 2006 10:45 PM | Link to this

Earlier post asked loc. of 16% Selling Price increases- I haven’t seen condos get asking price. Where are 16% increases being sold ?

November 24, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this

By maxmoose03 : “I know in the buildings that I follow unit by unit, that 16% rise is for real”

Can you give hint on where the buildings with 16% rise in SELLING price are ?

Other postings citing condo price drops by address, apt no. and prices and reductions :

3570 S OCEAN # 603, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/30/06 — $479,000 to $449,000 Days on Market: 450

3520 S OCEAN # 206 VA, Palm Beach, FL 33480** Price Reduced: 09/21/06 — $540,000 to $499,000 Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $499,000 to $479,000

2774 S OCEAN # 210, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/31/06 — $595,000 to $550,000 Price Reduced: 11/12/06 — $550,000 to $499,000

3610 S OCEAN # 505, Palm Beach, FL 33480Price Reduced: 09/07/06 — $579,000 to $559,000 Days on Market: 263

By TANC

November 24, 2006 10:58 PM | Link to this

Here’s a copy of the key part of the article you linked to about ARM usage:

“The use of ARMs, which are easier to get and are considered by many to be an indication that buyers are stretching their finances, peaked in May last year at 73.7 percent. Peak usage during the prior real estate cycle was in September 1988 when ARMs accounted for 66.1 percent of all home purchase loans.”

First of all, as I said previously about ARM usage, this article refers only to California ARM usage which has notoriously been a much higher percentage user of ARM and other exotic loans (primarily Option ARMs). And, it peaked at 73.7 pct in May. Not 80%. Sure 73.7 is close to 80 but again, it refers to California. Not Florida, and not the rest of the country. I do this for a living. I can tell you, ARM’s have never represented even close to half of the loans originated in Florida over the last couple of years and even fewer now.

If you’re a homeowner for the long haul you shouldn’t be as concerned about drops in value from one year to the next. Over time values increase, so again, you don’t lose one penny unless you sell.

Also, as I’ve argued in past blogs, you can’t simply put forth the argument that it’s a simple financial choice between renting and buying making the argument that the after tax cost of buying a home is more expensive, etc. etc.

The decision to own a home is very much an emotional one unless you are simply a pure investor. Given the choice of renting somewhere that is not yours, that you don’t have control over, that you might get kicked out of at some point, and you can’t truly make your own and having a place that is yours, that you can fix up and renovate and add on and decorate and make your own, pass on to your heirs AND build equity with, most individuals would love to own and gladly give up some financial benefit for doing so.

You say your throwing money away by paying interest for a home loan, but when you pay rent you build nothing, zilch. You p**s that $$ away for nothing.

It’s not a simple dollars to dollars comparison.

By TANC

November 24, 2006 11:18 PM | Link to this

Let’s get some perspective here regarding above Condo “price drops”:

3570 S OCEAN # 603, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/30/06 — $479,000 to $449,000 Days on Market: 450

The owner bought this condo for $71,000 in 1991 according to the PBC Property Appraiser. How is $449,000 a price drop? It’s simply priced incorrectly.

3520 S OCEAN # 206 VA, Palm Beach, FL 33480** Price Reduced: 09/21/06 — $540,000 to $499,000 Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $499,000 to $479,000

Current owner paid $170,000 for the property 3 yrs ago. Price drop?

2774 S OCEAN # 210, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/31/06 — $595,000 to $550,000 Price Reduced: 11/12/06 — $550,000 to $499,000

Owner paid $188,000 in 2002. Again, price drop?

3610 S OCEAN # 505, Palm Beach, FL 33480Price Reduced: 09/07/06 — $579,000 to $559,000 Days on Market: 263

Okay, now this guy is dreaming. He paid $405,000 February of this year. $559,000 is obviously way off the mark. Here is the crux of the problem in the current market. Sellers who still think they can make profits like this. Ain’t gonna happen.

Point is….you don’t lose anything until you sell and if you paid $71,000 for a property 15 yrs ago and sell it for even $300,000 now, you’ve MADE money not lost it.

It’s those who bought a year or maybe two yrs ago and now want to sell out for profits that will have a problem. Thankfully, that is not the majority of homeowners out there.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 11:21 PM | Link to this

Madam - What a nice surprise :-)

Should we really be holding an essentially private dialog here? I’ll try to keep it on a clinical level.

What I did was not deceptive — I told everyone what I was doing, and that information is supposed to be private anyway. Only a heel with no personal code of conduct would violate that understanding.

However, people like “MarkMax” do exist and you have to take measures to protect yourself from them. You saw how violently I had to handle his psyche, how I had to expose his soft white underbelly, just to get a few hours of peace. No, I don’t enjoy doing that, but you understand it -you have significant knowledge in that area.

Do I consider our mutual acquaintance a friend? I hope so. I did get permission to use his on-line “identity.” He is pretty much done with it. But by the same token, he uses his license to deal with the public, spends a lot of money to advertise the information that MarkMax published here - although without authority, and wouldn’t care about people associating him with brokerage — although he certainly does not share all my opinions, and is far more diplomatic with people. Remember what he says: “Say anything you want about me, but get my name right.” As luck would have it, I think MarkMax got the wrong brokerage anyway. At the same time I feel guilty, and feel maybe I should get my own ID.

Your favorite spa….mere de Dieu, Madame, some things never change.:-)

I can not remember, when was the last time we talked before here?

If I don’t see you, Joyeux Noel et Bonne Annee.

By AMTquestion

November 24, 2006 11:28 PM | Link to this

Looks like more taxpayers will be using their ATM cards to pay higher taxes becase of AMT. Sounds like more trouble coming if RE tax deductions help trigger AMT, which then negates deductions, causing higher tax bill.

http://realtytimes.com/rtnews/nlpages/20060614_amttaxing.htm?opendocument&Vol=91&ID=graycarswell

By Pricedirection

November 24, 2006 11:44 PM | Link to this

The listings of units with price CORRECTIONS DOWNWARD was to show sample of todays market(listings are active) direction.

In response to statement that 16% increases were norm at units being watched. Since Homes and Condos were listed with addresses and price CORRECTIONS DOWNWARD , it seems legit to ask where the units that are SELLING at 16% increases are located.

By maxmoose03

November 24, 2006 11:56 PM | Link to this

TANC - BRAVO!!!

I am so impressed. Your last 2 posts are the best material I have seen on this blog under any topic.

You have not only demonstrated the insignifance of the so-called “price drops” (which I explained before, are often a realtor trick), you have gotten to an essential truth about human nature in owning vs. renting.

There is an emotional difference in owning that the pseudo-economists here will never understand. It has been engrained in us for a thousand years in English Common Law. It has been embedded in our genes for a thousand generations of roaming the earth, trying to master it, yearning to call part of it ours. “Title” is why wars are fought, empires are built, blood is shed, and then people will toil indefatigably to till the soil that blood has stained, build upon it, and ultimately lie in it, face to the stars for eternity.

This is more than a cultural difference; the pseudo-economists are suffering a basic character flaw that will rob them of knowing a basic experience in human life. Their facts will not expose it, their equations will not capture it.

Ironically, they will miss a great financial opportunity as well. If we can all control - have title to - -just a million dollars in real estate, if we can hold onto it - beg, borrow, steal, but somehow keep our name on the title, in a few years that 1 million will be worth 2 million, and eventually 4 million. No, the dollars will not be quite the same, but it will be 4 million more than those who own nothing but rent receipts.

When that moment arrives, it will not matter whether you were a psychologist or a cab driver, whether you prepared taxes for a living or dug ditches. The time will have gone by fast, and your moment will have arrived.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 01:27 AM | Link to this

WHERE IS THE 16% UP?

WHERE IS THE 16% UP?

Okay folks, Uncle Moose is treating you too well, but here is a building I did the arithmetic on. This was a pain in the antlers, I want you to know. This is 2005 vs. 2006 year-to-date.

Address: 99 NE Mizner Blvd. Boca Raton

Apt size: 1310 sq ft

2005: 34 sales (+2 unknown mid-year)

Average: $446,294.11

2006: 10 sales (+1 unknown)

Average: $567,000

UP UP UP UP UP 27%

Please visit www.pbcgov.com/papa and verify

Same story everywhere in downtown Boca.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 09:11 AM | Link to this

Address correction:

99 SE Mizner Blvd. a.k.a. Palmetto Place

Do the math for yourself. Most of you will accuse the Property Appraiser of being in cahoots with me.

Funny thing, I don’t see this showing up in the newspaper. If Linda Crawls got her hands on this, the headline would be: Sales Plunge 71% !!!!!!! You might find out in paragraph 103 that PRICES are UP 27%.

By 99SEMizner

November 25, 2006 10:04 AM | Link to this

Those tricky realtors/sellers are at it again with insignificant price drops.

99 SE MIZNER # 321, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 09/12/06 — $499,900 to $475,000 Days on Market: 165

99 SE MIZNER # 745, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 10/05/06 — $515,000 to $499,900 Days on Market: 115

99 SE MIZNER # 809, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 09/27/06 — $599,900 to $579,000 Days on Market: 138

99 SE MIZNER # 805, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 09/26/06 — $639,500 to $597,500 Days on Market: 152

99 NE MIZNER # 525, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $405,000 to $359,900 Days on Market: 91

99 SE MIZNER # 835, Boca Raton List Price: $370,000 On Market: 269 days

99 SE MIZNER # 724 $387,000 On Market: 262 days

99 SE MIZNER # 610, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/25/06 — $434,900 to $399,900 Days on Market: 233

99 SE MIZNER # 626 $419,000 On Market: 109 days

99 SE MIZNER # PH904 Price Reduced: 11/14/06 — $615,000 to $599,900 Days on Market: 89

99 SE MIZNER # 329 List Price: $599,900 Corner unit reduced $100k to sell fast! 3 bedroom unit with unoque 400 sqft terrace. Fully upgraded w/ soturnia marble, crown molding, california closets. Comes with storage units valued at $5000

99 SE MIZNER # PH#934 Price Reduced: 10/25/06 — $859,900 to $849,900

Days on Market: 77

Got bored. Many more for sale @ 99 SE Mizner.

Will make interesting revist in 6 months.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 10:11 AM | Link to this

Changed your name again since you got burned again? I don’t blame you.

There is no question there are fewer sales this year and it’s taking longer. But the prices on those (2 br) apartmetns are way up, despite your BS.

How do you explain that?

Asking prices mean absolutely nothing. Stop reprinting MLS and tell us all why the actual sales prices are drastically up this year.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 10:35 AM | Link to this

Changed your name again after getting burned again? I don’t blame you.

Folks, we are not accomplishing anything here if you do not understand the difference between asking prices and sales prices.

Asking prices mean absolutely nothing — they are literally nothing more than an advertised wish on the part of the seller. The asking prices may be pulled out of the air, may change every hour; if the property is advertised in more than one place, each ad may have a different asking price. It means nothing.

The sales price, or “SOLD” price on MLS, is the actual MONEY received by the seller when the property is sold. This is the number a rational person is concerned with. This is the number comps are based on. This is the number you see reported as “prices” in the newspapers.

The only reason you are interested in an asking price is to see if the seller will be amenable to a reasonable offer.

This guy reprinting MLS figures is incredibly stupid — there is nothing he can print about asking prices which means a thing. By the way, he is likely to get sued by MLS for publishing proprietary data without permission.

So step 1, folks, the first thing we all learn about real estate is: ASKING PRICES MEAN NOTHING.

NB: I invented some of those asking prices the idiot is quoting.

By 99NE

November 25, 2006 10:55 AM | Link to this

As far as recent sales, someone (not PT B) had it right about a sucker born every minute.

Listing showing time on market, price adjustments over time, and final selling price are one of the ways I track Homes and Condos. Takes minutes online, provides trend info., number of similar units on mkt in any area Combine with neighborhood, open house visits, check records for original price seller paid, if reasonable, make offer.

99 NE MIZNER # 525, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $405,000 to $359,900 Days on Market: 91

Feb-2003 14812/0080 $219,000 WARRANTY DEED INGBER JOSEPH

Good Luck

By cw1900

November 25, 2006 11:13 AM | Link to this

Wow…I’m checking in this morning expecting things to be a little slow on the RE blogs the past few days, and omg, was I wrong.

I’m going to skip the normal response today as I’m short on time and I’m not reading most of the rants anymore, but here goes straight to….

Notes from CW:

  • Max ole’ buddy, a warning, you’re not going to like this, but somebody needs to let you three know you need some help.

  • Some you need a life. The worst in need of severe therapy are: maxmoose03, Markmax33, and TANC. Take a break or the others will stay on the sidelines or simply leave altogether. You sit there and cut and paste paragraph after paragraph of data trying to suggest you are brilliant and correct, but always fail to realize important that throw it all of such as real human life psychology, the herd mentality, many others. You’re arguments are childlike and petty. Pretty embarrassing. It sounds as if you sat in front of your freakin’ computers since Thanksgiving morning. Cmon, get real.

  • Maxmark33 – very uncool to post people’s real contact info, even if it was very easy to do. Too many kooks out there. Let’s be civil.

  • Here are the most ridiculous quotes I just read, and I couldn’t have read it all, too much of a time waster….

“As for my inclusion of his personal information, he should not spout off about something and spread bad press if he isn’t proud of it. Without credability a blog is nothing. He obviously has none.” – Markmax33 sounding like Mel Gibson or that Seinfeld guy.

“P.S. I am an EXTREMELY PROUD RENTER right now!! I live 3 blocks from the beach in an awesome house and $450/month and I am BANKROLLING $$ so I can buy 3 properties! IT IS COOL TO RENT!!” – Markmax33 again…Amateurs always go in too fast at everything. They get all excited. Do it right, slow, and reasoned and you will be better off. I own more properties than you will see in the next decade, and from how I’m observing you, you will crash and burn. Tortoise and the hare, tortoise and the hare…

“Real men use real blogs: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com” – Markmax33 once again…How junior high is that? Utterly ridiculous.

“Little One, you can’t even get INTO the test. Tell you what, here’s a softball question. If you handle this one convincingly, we’ll see about a test: Demonstrate the use of the Poisson distribution in determining florida wind insurance rates.” – maxmoose03…Max, you fell into his trap and now you are sounding like the junior high kid on the playground. Na na na na na, I think ‘m better than you…cmon max, you’re better than that.

  • Best quote of the blog comes from Internet Madam: “Let the truth be told. Most of you are realtors or brokers who are busy writing your opinions on here. That is fine. But wouldn’t you be making money now if you went out and hustle and found some New Yorkers down here for the weekend that came down to look around?” – no need to comment further, it says it all.

  • This blog is getting overrun by people with apparently no life who are rehashing old arguments over and over and over and over again, and it is getting old sifting through all of this mindless drivel. If it doesn’t get better, I’ll take a pause. I think Easy, Rich R, Mike Fink and others already have.

Have a nice weekend.

cw

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 12:03 PM | Link to this

CW - I am running behind. Be back later. Hilarious quote from the proud renter.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 12:12 PM | Link to this

Let’s say there is an incredibly dumb guy out there named Michael.

Michael thinks he is clever because he looks up real estate information here and there.

Let’s say Michael finds a deed that says the buy paid 219K — An unbelievable deal, since those units averaged $360,000 in 2006. Still, did the buyer pay 219K? No, he certainly did not.

I happen to know that unit, as well as most of the units in that building. I know an awful lot of the people, former customers. I have made some folks in that building a ton of money in the last two years.

Most of the folks bought in that building with subtantial - perfectly and ethhical - incentives. Does that show up on a deed? No, it does not.

Michael needs a realtor who knows the nighborhood. Change that, Michael would need a realtor if he could ever buy a house, which he can’t.

SO: REbrowser / 99N / whoever:

You are a poor idiot with no money, no brains, no useful info, and no house.

Like I said, folks, it’s not how full of crap they are, it’s how obvious they make it.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 12:36 PM | Link to this

Correction: above should read “perfectly LEGAL and ethical”

Now my old buddy CW: I don’t know what to do with you, because you don’t mean to be such a dork.

My intention here was to help people, give them insights that they could not otherwise get for free, explain how brokerage really works, etc.

Unfortunately, the mental cases in the slum apartments intend to obstruct the entire blog process, and scare people for no good reason.

I had to put “MarkMax” in his place. Besides, he challenged the world: PUT ME TO THE TEST. LOL. I don’t think the poor jerk understood how little he knows, so maybe I did him a favor.

This other mental case with the MLS data is wasting space and time. He does not understand that people like me create the data he is touting. If I make a phone call to a friend, that asking price will change, the “reduced” will go away, and the number of days on the market will go to zero.

That goes for most of the apartments in that building, many of the properties in the area.

We MAKE the listings he is quoting. Can the imbecile not understand that? We MAKE them say anything that is legally correct and in the seller’s best interests.

Maybe you are right, CW. Maybe it’s time for a break. I don’t think anyone is watching except the nut jobs.

By REbrowser / 99N / whoever

November 25, 2006 12:42 PM | Link to this

You are too easy.

Again, use all available info,easily available on line. Watch bldgs/developments with HUGE inventories, get original prices at county sites, let market work. Make an offer when ready. No rush. Works for me, if not for you, thats OK too.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 12:50 PM | Link to this

Correction: said “guy” when I meant “persona.”

Hey knucklehead: are you even in this country legally?

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 01:04 PM | Link to this

I’m easy?

LOL.

You are a nobody.

You have no money.

You have no useful skills.

You live in a $400 apartment in a slum area.

You can not even figure out what someone paid for a condo.

If I want, I will drop a dime and have sent back where you came from.

So, my good friend. Who’s easy?

By REbrowser / 99N / whoever

November 25, 2006 01:05 PM | Link to this

re : “If I make a phone call to a friend, that asking price will change, the “reduced” will go away, and the number of days on the market will go to zero.”

When bldg or area is of interest, save date,listing price, and number at listing. Extremely easy to automate.

Have many addresses with new MLS number at lower price shortly after going inactive on first number . Provides even better insight to willingness to deal.

Again, Good Luck.

By REbrowser / 99N / whoever

November 25, 2006 01:38 PM | Link to this

Some of these pesky aliases keep popping up. Coincidence.

November 24, 2006 01:43 PM | Link to this

Here is MaxMoose’s contact info for anyone who is interested.

Ingber, Joseph R maxmoose03@yahoo.com Technicity Inc. , (561) 866-5610 4400 N. Federal Hwy, Boca Raton, FL 33431

99 NE MIZNER # 525, Boca Raton

Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $405,000 to $359,900 Days on Market: 91

Price getting there, 523 sold 9/8/06 322,500

Feb-2003 14812/0080 $219,000 WARRANTY DEED INGBER JOSEPH

maybe time to zero out 91 days and price reduced info ?

By maxmoose

November 25, 2006 02:22 PM | Link to this

Some of these pesky aliases keep popping up. Coincidence.

HAHH HHAH HAHA

Sure.

Mo - you don’t mind if I call you that, do you? — Mo, when you do that, you’re not embarassing me or the person to whom the information belongs. But you are doing one thing. You are giving people who don’t like you a way of sending info that eventually gets back to me.

Real Estate is so boring, let’s talk about you.

What country are you from?

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 02:37 PM | Link to this

Mo??? You’re not your usual chatty self.

Come on, tell everyone.

What country are you from?

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 02:45 PM | Link to this

Well folks, Mo is going to be wrestling with this for a while. Here are his options. He can

1) tell a whopping lie that I will call him on

2) come back as a different alias, or

3) tell you where he is really from, in which case you would begin to understand his true MO-tivation.

This may take him a while, so I’ll be back much later.

Sorry to do this in public, folks.

By to maxmoose and markmax and REbrowser, yes, wasting their days arguing like a couple of frustrated o

November 25, 2006 03:42 PM | Link to this

talk, it’s only talk Arguments, agreements, advice, answers, Articulate announcements It’s only talk Talk, it’s only talk Babble, burble, banter, bicker bicker bicker Brouhaha, boulderdash, ballyhoo It’s only talk Back talk Talk talk talk, it’s only talk Comments, cliches, commentary, controversy Chatter, chit-chat, chit-chat, chit-chat, Conversation, contradiction, criticism It’s only talk Cheap talk Talk, talk, it’s only talk Debates, discussions These are words with a D this time Dialogue, dualogue, diatribe, Dissention, declamation Double talk, double talk Talk, talk, it’s all talk Too much talk Small talk Talk that trash Expressions, editorials, expugnations, exclamations, enfadulations It’s all talk Elephant talk, elephant talk, elephant talk

By hahahahahahahahahaha

November 25, 2006 03:50 PM | Link to this

to maxmoose and markmax and REbrowser, yes, wasting their days arguing like a couple of frustrated old queens who are not interested in peckering their wives anymore they would rather pecker each other on a blog

talk, it’s only talk Arguments, agreements, advice, answers, Articulate announcements It’s only talk Talk, it’s only talk Babble, burble, banter, bicker bicker bicker Brouhaha, boulderdash, ballyhoo It’s only talk Back talk Talk talk talk, it’s only talk Comments, cliches, commentary, controversy Chatter, chit-chat, chit-chat, chit-chat, Conversation, contradiction, criticism It’s only talk Cheap talk Talk, talk, it’s only talk Debates, discussions These are words with a D this time Dialogue, dualogue, diatribe, Dissention, declamation Double talk, double talk Talk, talk, it’s all talk Too much talk Small talk Talk that trash Expressions, editorials, expugnations, exclamations, enfadulations It’s all talk Elephant talk, elephant talk, elephant talk

how completely pathetic you freak boys

By sponge bob

November 25, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this

The sea was angry that day, my friends. Like an old man trying to send back soup in a deli.

Just remember, it’s not a lie, if you believe.

Worlds are colliding!! George is gettin very upset!!

The wheels are in motion, he said. But there was no motion. He is a very bad man.

When this wedding is postponed, it’s like a stay of execution!

I’m a great quitter. I come from a long line of quitters. I was raised to give up.

Did you just say ridicurous?

By Walrus

November 25, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this

goo goo goo joob

By This crest has a moose on it

November 25, 2006 04:43 PM | Link to this

For I am (enter your favorite poster here), Lord of the Idiots.

I can’t carry a pen, I’m afraid it’ll puncture my scrotum.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 04:47 PM | Link to this

In case you geniuses didn’t catch it, old Mo can not tell you his country of origin, because you would then understand why he is here trying to demoralize everyone, and fighting so aggressively in his other aliases.

IMHO, he is NOT just another bitter renter. He has an agenda.

By just a reader

November 25, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this

curious,

what does it matter what his country of origin is? who cares?

if, for some reason, you are tallying, my ancestors are from germany and my wife’s are from Spain.

Is it really that important to you?

Bigots even live in Boca Raton, it appears.

Many people do not like to do business with bigots.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this

Walrus — the line you were TRYING to get to is:

The reason I can’t carry a P***s…it’ll puncture my scrotum.

However, I don’t think you even realize what work you are referring to.

You need some comedy lessons from Mo.

“Mais je me retire, monsieur, heureux de vous avoir oblige’.”

Merry Christmas.

By to maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 05:12 PM | Link to this

wrong. The quote “I can’t carry a pen, I’m afraid it’ll puncture my scrotum.” has no reference to your family jewels, it does say “pen”. it is an seinfeld quote if I remember correctly.

Arrogance is funny to pull out of you when you think everything is about you.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 05:18 PM | Link to this

To: “just a reader”

My G-d. tell me you are not that dumb. Tell me you are kidding.

You have newspapers, cable TV, radio in your car, and you still don’t get it?

May the Lord love a fool.

I am not the bigot, by the way.

Peace out.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 05:35 PM | Link to this

To “to maxmoose03”

They are trying to parody something of which you would have no awareness, dickhead.

The only reason I know is because I started etudes a troisieme cycle in French Literature, no I don’t know what that equates to in the U.S. and I don’t care.

I am also tired of 23 year-old idiots who think they know everything, when they know nothing at all.

NOTHING!

not about literature, not about art, not about business, not about owning a home, raising a family, not about war, not about peace, not about devotion, not about servitude, not about science, not about life, not about death.

I am done baby-sitting and tutoring. If I teach college again I will deal with your ilk. Till then, I’m not responding to any more emails.

By max is not a bigot

November 25, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this

…he has a few friends in deerfield and delray. max believes everyone should own somebody from deerfield and employ people from lake worth to clean out his toilet.

i, also, do not see the reason you are so hell bent on country of origin. what about religion? if he is of a religion different than yours, does that make him an idiot in your eyes, almighty and knowing max?

what about political preference or what baseball team one follows?

I am a White Sox fans. Can I come into your brokerage office?

Bigots certainly like the White Sox, right?

By max likes me

November 25, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

i think he does, i mean, max is way cool, i wonder if he practices his typing and ranting on his little puppy dog.

the little puppy dog always agrees with maxie, maxie feeds him scraps, just like the old queen tosses the peasants cake.

By maxmoose03

November 25, 2006 06:04 PM | Link to this

to “max is not a bigot”:

I can not believe people like you can dress and feed themselves.

Let’s take this one step at time.

Is this country at war with someone? OK. Who are we at war with? Are we at war with Germany? Are we at war with Spain? Hmmm.

Do you suppose everyone who has negative opinions about the US runs around in black pajamas and carries an AK-47?

Tell me, the original WTC bombers — where did they live, prior to their attack?

They lived right here, in Palm Beach County.

Am I accusing Mo of being a terrorist? NO. I am accusing him of having negative attitudes toward our country, and a personal agenda of spreading dismay among people here — in particular towards our economy.

That’s why he took off like a thief in the night once I was on to him.

THAT’S IT — LAST ONE. I did my part and more. I showed you how to research public records, I told you how to ignore asking prices and realtor tricks, I showed you a building where prices are up 27% this year on 2br units. I proved everything I stated about R/E, I showed everyone everything they asked for.

I have seen informed opinions from 2 builders, as well as TANC.
The rest is mostly nonsense or propaganda. Someone else’s turn.

Ciao.

By good riddance max

November 25, 2006 06:16 PM | Link to this

Max, you are a prize. Arrogant fools as yourself honestly think they have provided the peons a valuable service.

Max, you have lost any respect you ever had from those who read this blog.

You have been played, and then your true colors have come out.

If what you say is true about your business, all I can say is there must be a pile of bigoted, racist, pompous basta#$s in Boca who want to do business with only “their kind”.

You and the old south rednecks have a lot in common….perhaps plantations and shackles as well.

By TANC

November 25, 2006 06:31 PM | Link to this

Next topic PLEASE…

My gosh. I’m ill

By i loved his pompous a@s

November 25, 2006 07:41 PM | Link to this

Oh how the mighty have fallen.

maxmoose03, yes, good riddance. you were a piece of work.

bye bye you nut job

By what was wrong with max?

November 25, 2006 08:02 PM | Link to this

oh, i don’t know, max wasn’t so bad, he did have some good insight on a few things relating to this real deal blog.

I would relate Max is good for local real estate as Hitler was good for the public transportation in Germany. Hitler wasn’t so bad. He made the trains run on time. You could set your watch by them.

By sarge

November 25, 2006 08:47 PM | Link to this

+++Hitler wasn’t so bad. He made the trains run on time. You could set your watch by them.+++

Y’all are sick f—- puppies.

By MaxQueeg

November 25, 2006 09:04 PM | Link to this

“Ah, but the strawberries! That’s, that’s where I had them. They laughed at me and made jokes, but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt, and with, with geometric logic, that, that a duplicate key to the wardroom icebox did exist”

Just watched blog version of classic tale. Historic.

By iowaboy

November 25, 2006 10:08 PM | Link to this

Actually that was Mussolini who made the “trains run on time”. remember, we are talking about Italy where this was a small miracle.

By go hawks

November 25, 2006 10:54 PM | Link to this

go hawks

By AmazingRuss

November 25, 2006 11:51 PM | Link to this

Mr Moose:

You are being trolled. Stop feeding them…they are sucking the life out of you. It isn’t one person with multiple aliases…word has spread. You have gathered an audience.

Look at your posting dates/times. How much time have you been wasting here? Feeling the way you feel now…angry, vengeful, and outnumbered.

Every insult you fling has them giggling at you all the harder…a grown man flinging i-know-you-are-but-what-am-I insults. Everybody can see you at the keyboard, brow beetled, delivering another devastating retort in your righteous fury.

They’re feeding off you dude. It may have started as an argument over housing, but they’re just pushing your buttons to watch you froth now. It’s the 21st century equivalent of bear baiting.

Don’t be the bear.

By AmazingRuss

November 25, 2006 11:55 PM | Link to this

Mr Moose:

You are being trolled. Stop feeding them…they are sucking the life out of you. It isn’t one person with multiple aliases…word has spread. You have gathered an audience.

Look at your posting dates/times. How much time have you been wasting here? Feeling the way you feel now…angry, vengeful, and outnumbered.

Every insult you fling has them giggling at you all the harder…a grown man flinging i-know-you-are-but-what-am-I insults. Everybody can see you at the keyboard, brow beetled, delivering another devastating retort in your righteous fury.

They’re feeding off you dude. It may have started as an argument over housing, but they’re just pushing your buttons to watch you froth now. It’s the 21st century equivalent of bear baiting.

Don’t be the bear.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 03:24 AM | Link to this

Amazing Russ:

I just checked in while I am watching the Kennedies on the History Channel.

You seem like a nice guy, so let me allay your concern.

This is a game for me, unlike for these guys. I have a life, these guys have none. These guys live on the web, to the extent that they are alive. They dream of being real estate magnates, meantime they own nothing. They are going to pick the right year, month and date to buy. Sure they are :-)

In that building I used for an example, I’ll show you an example of what I do for a living. I work with investors. I took an investor into and out of a unit there in two months. His investement: 40K. His profit: 150K. Maybe it was actually 3 months from closing to closing.

No, I am not looking for customers, but I was willing to teach people how to do the same thing for themselves. They don’t want to know. So who is laughing? I am — all the way to the bank. They will go home and sleep in a $450 a month apartment tonight. They will send their kids through the 3rd worst school system in the country, so their kids will have no better prospects than them.

So Russ: I can act nice, I can act mad. I can lecture, I can do arithmetic. I can choose the identity, background and language that I want. I can be diplomatic, I can insult them at will. Who do you think has the last laugh?

Here are some of the lines that amused me most in the past couple of days:

PUT ME TO THE TEST

Hilarious. He didn’t do so well on the qualifying question.

MAX, YOU WERE PLAYED.

LOL. No, YOU were played, because you will go home to that slum apartment. You gained nothing. You can’t gain anything until your attitude changes. Life has played you. Or maybe you have played yourself.

HOW THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN

I giggle just reading this. This guy actually believes one’s reception on this website means something to someone.

A bunch of losers, dreamers, would-be’s, also-rans. They hang out on a real estate website when they don’t own any property. How pathetic is that?

Russ, I am grinning even as I write this because they are so funny even if pathetic.

My friend says: “Say whatever you want about me, but spell my name right.” That’s how I feel about this blog.

If you need me for a question, write to the same address as always, I haven’t changed it or hidden it, but do put “Attention Jean-Luc” in the subject line. I am not looking for clients right now, and G-d knows I don’t want listings in this environment. I’ve had enough frantic sellers calling me up night and day.

So relax, Russ, and enjoy the show. This didn’t take inordinate, time - I was a professional writer in my field - but you’re right; I can put it to better use.

For this crowd, you really are amazing, Russ.

Well, Jaqueline Bouvier is becoming Mrs. Kennedy, so gotta go.

Ne t’en fais pas — no worries, mate :-)

By Jerry

November 26, 2006 03:52 AM | Link to this

Do home values really always increase? How about the values of the homes in neighborhoods that have been overrun by Section 8? How about all those houses have have been bulldozed or condemned? How about all the maintenance? The insurance and property taxes? The upkeep? The much higher energy costs? I pay $70/mo energy costs for my 2/2 apartment with 1150sf and $735/mo rent. My sister pays $600/mo for energy costs alone, not to mention sanitation and water. Her property taxes are $6K/yr for a home valued at $215K. I pay zero property taxes and $20/mo for sanitation and water. My savings are much greater than the equity they have built.

By Bob sold his house

November 26, 2006 04:05 AM | Link to this

A couple of Realtors sure do have alot of free time. HAHAHAHA

By Mike Fink

November 26, 2006 08:37 AM | Link to this

Jerry,

I think you were being facetious, but “NO” home values do not always go up!! :) If they did, no other investment instrument would even need to be created, we would all invest in homes, and all become very rich. Of course, there is a problem with that as well (if we all are very rich, none of us are rich), but let’s just let that one slide. Homes typically increase in value about .5-1% over the current inflation level. Actually, homes do not increase in value, land does, but I will save that for another day.

Your savings are greater then the equity they built? I commend you on saving, however, unless your saving your money by buying options on Pokemon dolls, of course your savings are better then the equity! :) First off, equity is not “built” so much as it is “paid” back into the home (moving from liability to asset). And second, the cost of ownership is so skewed from the price of rent, you could probably take one rent payment, send it to the landlord. Take another, light it on fire in your living room. And take a third, send it to the bank and put it in a savings account. Your cost of rent is still probably less then the cost of owning the same unit; you will get a 3-5% return on the money you invest each year, and get to enjoy watching money burn once a month.

Until the cost of ownership comes near the price of rent, or property goes back to appreciating at 30% per year, there is no reason to buy; it will just cost you more money, and you will never be able to make up the loss with typical home appreciation.

By Rich R

November 26, 2006 08:59 AM | Link to this

After reading post after post from Max, I’ve come to my own opinion.

I feel he/she is a non educated, starving Realtor who is here to do nothing more then bash absolutely every person who posts anything that he/she disagrees with. Taking it very personal.

I would NEVER consider using any Realtor that is so incredibly stupid.

Get a life, get a prospect and move on. PLEASE.

This blog has been very informative for the past year, but now, it’s just becoming nothing more then a frustrated realtor’s venue to vent.

Get educated, grow up, get a real job and move on.

PLEASE!

By PalmBeachmkt

November 26, 2006 09:00 AM | Link to this

If Palm Beach properties are “immune” to normal mkt forces (wealthy always buying here,etc) why are so many properties in obviously nice locations staying on the mkt so long ? Some are starting to believe the Insurance and Two Tier Tax System really has gotten so much noteriety on nationwide blogs and media articles that pool of buyers will be permanently shrunk.

Interesting times we live in.

MR Moose - please do not interpret this as attack on you. Just amazes at huge inventory available for so long.

From posting by Max “friend” earlier:

99 SE MIZNER # 321, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 09/12/06 — $499,900 to $475,000 Days on Market: 165

99 SE MIZNER # 745, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 10/05/06 — $515,000 to $499,900 Days on Market: 115

99 SE MIZNER # 809, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 09/27/06 — $599,900 to $579,000 Days on Market: 138

99 SE MIZNER # 805, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 09/26/06 — $639,500 to $597,500 Days on Market: 152

99 NE MIZNER # 525, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $405,000 to $359,900 Days on Market: 91

99 SE MIZNER # 835, Boca Raton List Price: $370,000 On Market: 269 days

99 SE MIZNER # 724 $387,000 On Market: 262 days

99 SE MIZNER # 610, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/25/06 — $434,900 to $399,900 Days on Market: 233

99 SE MIZNER # 626 $419,000 On Market: 109 days

99 SE MIZNER # PH904 Price Reduced: 11/14/06 — $615,000 to $599,900 Days on Market: 89

99 SE MIZNER # 329 List Price: $599,900 Corner unit reduced $100k to sell fast! 3 bedroom unit with unoque 400 sqft terrace. Fully upgraded w/ soturnia marble, crown molding, california closets. Comes with storage units valued at $5000

99 SE MIZNER # PH#934 Price Reduced: 10/25/06 — $859,900 to $849,900

Days on Market: 77

VILLAGE OF NPB$355,000 JUST REDUCED, CHARMING 3 BEDROOM/2 BATHROOM HOME IN DESIRABLE NPB, OVERSIZED YARD, OVERSIZED DETACHED GARAGE, ATTACH CARPORT,ADD’L ROOM TO STORE BOAT. COMMUNITY OFFERS, PUBLIC DOCK, LIBRARY, POOL, GOLF.

4/3-pool, 100% updated, 1BR sep. entr or office, Reduced $392,500, 9744 Dahlia, Open Sun 1-4pm

VENETIAN ISLES DRASTICALLY REDUCED!! MOTIVATED SELLER!! THIS BEAUTIFUL HOME HAS THE THIRD BATHROOM WITHIN THE GUEST BEDROOM PROVIDING A MINI-SUITE FOR YOUR GUESTS AT THE OPPOSITE END OF THE HOME. HUGE EXPANDED & SCREENED PAVER PATIO OVERLOOKING A PRIVATE YARD.$399,000

$375,000 ReducedYou will be impressed! Complete Remodel in ‘05.3/2.5/2cg No HOA. New roof, windows, kit, baths flrs, pool. Corner lot. Motivated, 11885 Prosperity Farms Rd,

Historic Flamingo Park 718 Ardmore - $425,000 Bedrooms with 2 re-done baths! Where can you get a 3/2 at this price with no renovating necessary?! It even has a beautiful kitchen with granite counters and stainless appliances. THE OWNERS WANT TO SELL NOW! THE PRICE HAS JUST BEEN REDUCED AGAIN. They want offers on this truly crisp and tidy property.

3570 S OCEAN # 603, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/30/06 — $479,000 to $449,000 Days on Market: 450

3520 S OCEAN # 206 VA, Palm Beach, FL 33480** Price Reduced: 09/21/06 — $540,000 to $499,000 Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $499,000 to $479,000

2774 S OCEAN # 210, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/31/06 — $595,000 to $550,000 Price Reduced: 11/12/06 — $550,000 to $499,000

3610 S OCEAN # 505, Palm Beach, FL 33480Price Reduced: 09/07/06 — $579,000 to $559,000 Days on Market: 263

Tons more houses and condos, all areas, reducing over and over. Just browse and see.

Even ignoring listed price, size of inventory and “motivated” seller listings bear watching.

By PalmBeachmkt

November 26, 2006 09:07 AM | Link to this

If Palm Beach properties are “immune” to normal mkt forces (wealthy always buying here,etc) why are so many properties in obviously nice locations staying on the mkt so long ? Some are starting to believe the Insurance and Two Tier Tax System really has gotten so much noteriety on nationwide blogs and media articles that pool of buyers will be permanently shrunk.

Interesting times we live in.

MR Moose - please do not interpret this as attack on you. Just amazed at huge inventory available for so long.(check myself, those posted are indeed just a sample)

From posting by Max “friend” earlier:

99 SE MIZNER # 321, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 09/12/06 — $499,900 to $475,000 Days on Market: 165

99 SE MIZNER # 745, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 10/05/06 — $515,000 to $499,900 Days on Market: 115

99 SE MIZNER # 809, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Price Reduced: 09/27/06 — $599,900 to $579,000 Days on Market: 138

99 SE MIZNER # 805, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 09/26/06 — $639,500 to $597,500 Days on Market: 152

99 NE MIZNER # 525, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $405,000 to $359,900 Days on Market: 91

99 SE MIZNER # 835, Boca Raton List Price: $370,000 On Market: 269 days

99 SE MIZNER # 724 $387,000 On Market: 262 days

99 SE MIZNER # 610, Boca Raton Price Reduced: 10/25/06 — $434,900 to $399,900 Days on Market: 233

99 SE MIZNER # 626 $419,000 On Market: 109 days

99 SE MIZNER # PH904 Price Reduced: 11/14/06 — $615,000 to $599,900 Days on Market: 89

99 SE MIZNER # 329 List Price: $599,900 Corner unit reduced $100k to sell fast! 3 bedroom unit with unoque 400 sqft terrace. Fully upgraded w/ soturnia marble, crown molding, california closets. Comes with storage units valued at $5000

99 SE MIZNER # PH#934 Price Reduced: 10/25/06 — $859,900 to $849,900

Days on Market: 77

VILLAGE OF NPB$355,000 JUST REDUCED, CHARMING 3 BEDROOM/2 BATHROOM HOME IN DESIRABLE NPB, OVERSIZED YARD, OVERSIZED DETACHED GARAGE, ATTACH CARPORT,ADD’L ROOM TO STORE BOAT. COMMUNITY OFFERS, PUBLIC DOCK, LIBRARY, POOL, GOLF.

4/3-pool, 100% updated, 1BR sep. entr or office, Reduced $392,500, 9744 Dahlia, Open Sun 1-4pm

VENETIAN ISLES DRASTICALLY REDUCED!! MOTIVATED SELLER!! THIS BEAUTIFUL HOME HAS THE THIRD BATHROOM WITHIN THE GUEST BEDROOM PROVIDING A MINI-SUITE FOR YOUR GUESTS AT THE OPPOSITE END OF THE HOME. HUGE EXPANDED & SCREENED PAVER PATIO OVERLOOKING A PRIVATE YARD.$399,000

$375,000 ReducedYou will be impressed! Complete Remodel in ‘05.3/2.5/2cg No HOA. New roof, windows, kit, baths flrs, pool. Corner lot. Motivated, 11885 Prosperity Farms Rd,

Historic Flamingo Park 718 Ardmore - $425,000 Bedrooms with 2 re-done baths! Where can you get a 3/2 at this price with no renovating necessary?! It even has a beautiful kitchen with granite counters and stainless appliances. THE OWNERS WANT TO SELL NOW! THE PRICE HAS JUST BEEN REDUCED AGAIN. They want offers on this truly crisp and tidy property.

3570 S OCEAN # 603, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/30/06 — $479,000 to $449,000 Days on Market: 450

3520 S OCEAN # 206 VA, Palm Beach, FL 33480** Price Reduced: 09/21/06 — $540,000 to $499,000 Price Reduced: 10/30/06 — $499,000 to $479,000

2774 S OCEAN # 210, Palm Beach, FL 33480 Price Reduced: 08/31/06 — $595,000 to $550,000 Price Reduced: 11/12/06 — $550,000 to $499,000

3610 S OCEAN # 505, Palm Beach, FL 33480Price Reduced: 09/07/06 — $579,000 to $559,000 Days on Market: 263

Tons more houses and condos, all areas, reducing over and over. Just browse and see.

Even ignoring listed price, size of inventory and “motivated” seller listings bear watching.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 11:07 AM | Link to this

“Every time I try to get out, they PULL me back.” — Godfather III

Just kidding.

early for me

Your polite question deserves an answer. After all, you are not resposnsible for that information.

I absolutely do not think Palm Beach County is immune to anything. I worry about things you guys take for granted, like global warming and gasoline shortages.

I think it’s taking forever to sell a house now, and I look at MLS month after month hardly seeing anything change.

Like TANC, I am “waiting and hoping.” Prices could very well decline, I am not in the prognostication business.

What I am saying that people have wrong is that TODAY, sale PRICES have not significantly declined. Volume of sales is down terribly, and it is a worry for me and everyone else, but sales PRICES — not what sellers asked, but what they received — have still not crumbled — yet. They may or may not — I just don’t know. I was astonished to do the arithmetic and find out the 2br’s in that building above were up 27% this year.

Now, people in that building, as an example, and not as an indictment of anyone, asked absolutely ridiculous, astronomical prices this year, against my advice and the advice of other realtors. It was inevitable that some had to be reduced. However, most of the information you have above is wrong with respect to original prices and days on market. For example, if someone switches realtors, the listing starts anew, and the clock starts again. I see at least one apartment there which has been on the market a couple of hundred days more than stated. On the other hand, I see some that have already been sold or rented out, and just left on the market forever. A huge per centage of that building is realtors, and they just flip and flip and flip.

The same applies to asking prices. I see some apartments that started out with another realtor and much higher, astronomical prices. In fact, I don’t even see the worst offenders in buiilding.

Asking prices are useless information even when they are correct, but the information above, if correct, is only correct for the current listing (i.e.realtor).

More important, what you don’t see is the money that was made on those apartments, even this year. A couple of 2br’s around the pool sold for between 600 and 700K, which I can’t even believe . The deed on one of them says the first owner paid in the low to mid 300’s, but even that’s not the story. That apartment was one of 19 bought as a package by 3 investors, so the prices on the deeds must be taken with a grain of salt.

There are eight million stories in the naked city, and every apartment has its own. The information above won’t help you in any way I can think of. You have to do your research to value a property that interests you. What the “asking” price is has no relevance to anything. You can make the seller a fair offer based in reality, if he doesn’t like it he can scream and shout, perhaps at his realtor if he has one. There are only two words that matter to you: YES or NO.

There are some great deals out there if you focus on the property you want, whether new construction or retail, and do your due diligence. Trying to come up with a place by looking at the info above is a wasate of your time.

Like TANC, waiting and hoping.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 11:33 AM | Link to this

I almost forgot: JERRY !

Jerry, I regret I don’t have time to give you the full explanation you deserve, but I wanted you to check one thing: Are you sure your sister is paying 6K on a house “valued” at 215K? Where are you getting that 215K number from? That would give her a tax rate of almost 2.8% . Can you check that?

Thanks.

By Listings

November 26, 2006 02:32 PM | Link to this

RE reps and sellers between rock and hard place with listings. Need to list to bring buyer while trying to tout unique value of property to justify price asked.

When too many sellers competing for smaller pool of buyers, the listings grow larger and larger, and if properly tracked by potential buyers are very useful.

I have printouts of saved listings over past year. Certain bldgs have so many listings it makes one leery of some local problem. In some of those cases sellers were trying to get out before huge new condo was to obliterate their views. In other case there happened to be large number of same age elders who had been in earlier wave of retirees. Some too old to live alone anymore, or inheritees did not want to hold. In this bldg there were good deals.

Maybe listings no value to those who already know everything. Or maybe the agent protests too much, methinks.

Anyone else find useful or consider waste of time ?

By Rich R

November 26, 2006 03:21 PM | Link to this

Bottom line is this:

Like anything else, your property is worth what someone’s willing to pay for it TODAY. Not tomorrow, not during snowbird season, TODAY.

You can listen to some mindless, high school educated Realtor (from the Goldcoast School) who wants nothing more then a bigger commission, or you can do the research and get the true facts (not from a reator).

When using a Realtor, keep in mind there are conflicts from the beginning. They really don’t care what you want; it’s more about what THEY want; the biggest commission.

They will show you only homes that yeild them more moeny, with little regard for your desires.

In 30 years, I’ve only used a realtor once, and it was a problem deal due to the realtor from the bloody beginning.

Whether it’s a buyers agent or listing agent, it don’t matter. They only want the money.

When you are selling, they tell you to be “Realistic” in your asking price. When you are buying, they simply tell you that the market is hot and this house won’t be here tomorrow.

WAKE UP FOLKS!

In my world Realtors are like Whale dung. It’s the lowest thing on earth as it sinks to the bottom of the deepest sea, and just above used car salesman, and attorneys.

I have to just speculate and say that Max is here because he/she don’t have any showings and/or closings and is riding this blog like nobody else (Me included). I would suggest, this person is just fishing for the next sucker.

BUYER BEWARE!

Just one man’s opinion.

By OpusFluke

November 26, 2006 03:42 PM | Link to this

Maxmoose03 is Ignatius O’Reilly.

By MonthlyCost

November 26, 2006 03:46 PM | Link to this

Is there a certain formula for rough estimate of monthly carrying costs ?

1% seems to fit with todays rates, taxes,insurance,etc,in SoFl. eg:

400K house with 20% down 1% = 4k per month to carry.

By Ignatius J. Reilly

November 26, 2006 03:59 PM | Link to this

You must be one of the dunces to suggest that.

By OpusFluke

November 26, 2006 04:13 PM | Link to this

Bwaaahaha… You got me. I even googled it first!

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 04:49 PM | Link to this

NB: To those who read Rich R’s (let’s call him Poor Richard henceforth) rant, a slight correction.

I have an advanced degree in a mathematical field. Poor Richard has a Mickey Mouse MBA, if we can even believe that — and I am beginning to doubt it.

People associated with me have REAL MBA’s like from Wharton, as does Donald Trump. One right now has a degree from Harvard and is a Certified Public Accountant. How does your background stack up to that, Poor Richard? They are all required to be investors controlling at least a million dollars in real estate.

We are technically “realtors” because we pay dues to the Florida Association of Realtors — that’s all that means. We have little paitience for dealing with people who are not investors themsleves. I think if I spent two hours explaining to Poor Richard how we operate, he still would not get it.

Here’s Poor Richard’s life story: He very cleverly dumped his Florida real estate just in time to avoid the boom, and moved his family to Klan Country in North Carolina. Now he is priced out of the Florida market. His family is unhappy, he is unhappy. He is bitter and misses Florida, but the closest he can get is this website. Would someone send him a bus ticket?

Incidentally, folks, Rich’s lies are how these things get started. This REALLY is a waste of time. This will start a spate of baloney from the renters, which I will ignore.

I will say this for the renters though — they are a heck of a lot smarter than Rich. They are at least living in a nice area, and choosing to do what they want.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 05:20 PM | Link to this

MonthlyCost: If I may:

Depends to a large degree on your financing.

80% LTV get you out of PMI. 7% interest-only balloon will be about $1867, you may get better rate with good credit, esp. 720+.

Property tax depends on location. Even in City of Boca should be under 6600/ yr, 6000 if you occupy by 1/1 and homestead by 3/1. In that case 500/mo. Call deputy tax appraiser for your area, see if you can get any clues.

Insurance rates vary, will be hundreds more per month. Flood zone involved?

Any HOA fees involved?

Depending on what you do, 4K may possibly be a safe estimate.

Please be advised this does not constitute financial advice. Please see a certified public accountant or other qualified financial advisor of your choice for financial advice.

Best of luck.

By maxmoose03=EASY

November 26, 2006 05:30 PM | Link to this

maxmoose03=Easy

I have been reading both scholars and have come to the conlusion that they are the one and same. Easy could not post as easy anymore as he was proved wrong time and time again so he came up with maxmoose03. maxmoose03 now states he has a advanced degree in math, that had me laughing so hard it almost left me gasping for breath. Come on maxi, million dollars in real estate and your an investor? People working in the mall have that and more. Hardly investor class in SFL. Come on go back to school and get that tech degree before it’s too late.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 05:46 PM | Link to this

Monthly Cost - add to above, amortizing note will cost more than interest only, plus if you get variable ARM, rate can change.

Once you homestead, assessed value will be capped at 3% increase per year - a little bit of good news.

If you escrow, you may have to send money each year to maintain minimum amount in escrow account.

Also, watch out for any special assessments from development or local government.

LOL - not trying to discourage you, but it would be a good idea to get professional financial advice.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 05:58 PM | Link to this

maxmoose03=EASY:

Illiterate friend, go back and read what I said. I said absolutely nothing about my holdings.

I do agree with one thing though: people working in the mall often do have a million dollars of real estate or more. But that’s a lot better than being a renter who owns/controls nothing.

Gigundo Realty, by comparison, does not even require that you own one thin dime in real estate, to be a realtor. See the difference?

Now: If I am correct, and I hold an advanced degree in a mathematical field - as I said, then you are pretty stupid. Do we agree?

And if I am not EASY, then you are also pretty stupid. Do we agree on that?

My friend: you are pretty stupid.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 06:09 PM | Link to this

POLL QUESTION :

Howmany think I am Easyabc?

How many think we are different people?

How man don’t give a sh—?

How many are too stoned to answer?

By maxmooseO3

November 26, 2006 06:24 PM | Link to this

Yo, I am the REAL max moosie. I am the real deal. I got me some big antlers, I got 12 sets of molars. Now you all don’t mess with me, OK?

By POLL QUESTION

November 26, 2006 06:38 PM | Link to this

I’m a fan of Easyasabc and Maxmoose03. No way, 2 different individuals. Their style of writing and expertise are different. One thing they have in common is they sure know how to get people riled up and disheveled.

Whether you like Maxmoose03 or not, it quite obvious that he’s knowledgeable about the buisness.

As usual, Rich R is easy to get hooked. His favorite bait is pie. Don’t worry Rich R, I’m also a fan of yours. How many pounds did you pack on during the holiday.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 06:53 PM | Link to this

“POLL QUESTION”: Thank you, your gentle humor made me laugh.

Now let me get this straight:

“knowledgeable”

but “judgment”

and “acknowledgment”

I don’t know how you guys ever learn to spell. It makes no sense to me. I admit it.

By Why is max still here? he said he was going away

November 26, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this

Hey Max,

You said earlier and I quote….

“Till then, I’m not responding to any more emails.”

Since then, yesterday, you have typed a great deal more.

Are you stupid? Are you an idiot? Are you 23? Are you a woman? You’re so thick you can’t even remember or follow what you preach.

Wow, max man, you are the bomb….I’m not sure about how old Max keeps the trains run on time, but maybe he can part the sea or hold back the tide.

But we thought he was going away?…..but no, he’s still here.

Dude, you are one screwed up old, Boca, Wildflower era, sugar daddy queen.

Go have another Benson & Hedges and put on the History Channel and bate to old pics of Winston Churchill.

People are tired of reading your excretions.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 07:08 PM | Link to this

You are my only excretion, little one.

You are a Hitler fan, how interesting. Are you also an Al Qaida supporter?

Don’t be shy, this is your chance to speak your mind.

By wildflower

November 26, 2006 07:34 PM | Link to this

The Wildflower? I haven’t thought about that place in years. I left Boca in 1995 and now live up in Juno.

That writer was right. It was a sugar daddy club. Priceless.

I wonder if it is still arounnd anymore as I don’t get down that way anymore.

Just priceless.

I love the entertainment here.

By maxmoose03

November 26, 2006 07:44 PM | Link to this

Mo, tell me more about why you support Al Qaida.

It is really interesting.

By sock and a sock and a shoe and a shoe

November 26, 2006 08:09 PM | Link to this

Archie: What about the other foot? There ain’t no sock on it! Mike: I’ll get to it! Archie: Don’t you know that the whole world puts on a sock and a sock and a shoe and a shoe? Mike: I like to take care of one foot at a time! Archie: That’s the dumbest thing I ever heard! Mike: It’s just as quick my way! Archie: Waitaminute! That ain’t the point! You see what I’m ta— [As Mike starts to put the sock on his other foot, Archie grabs at it.] Don’t be doin’ that! Suppose there’s a fire in the house and you gotta run for your life. Your way, all you got on is one shoe and a sock. My way, you got on a sock and a sock. You see? You’re even. Mike: Suppose it’s raining and snowing outside? Your way, with a sock on each foot, my feet would get wet. My way, with a sock and a shoe on one foot, I could hop around and stay dry! Archie: I think you been hoppin’ around on your head. [Mike starts to resume putting a sock on his other foot.] Waita…waita…LISTEN TO ME!!! [Archie grabs the sock.] Supposin’ the other sock’s got a hole in it? Mike: It doesn’t have a hole in it. Archie: I SAID SUPPOSIN’! Mike: Alright…it has a hole. Archie: So whaddya gonna do? Your way, you gotta take off a whole shoe and a sock. My way, all you gotta do is take off one sock. Mike and Archie stare at one another. Mike appears to be unable to refute this new argument, but obviously thinks it’s crazy. He finally gives up and starts to remove the boot from his left foot. Mike: Alright. If it’ll make you happy, I’ll start all over again! Archie: Naaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Grabbing at Mike’s hands to stop him.] You’re half way through! Jeez! Get on wid it! We’re in a hurry! [Archie starts to go out the door.] You can start doin’ it the right way tamarra mornin’! [Pause. Archie spins around.] AND DO IT THAT WAY FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE!

===

i thought i would liven up the blog with something that is actually funny and interesting instead of listening to this recent blather here. what garbage this blog has become.

By i worked at the gap once

November 26, 2006 08:45 PM | Link to this

A person working at the mall has a million dollars in real estate? name one.

or is it the same analogy as in 1999 when your chick who cut your hair said she just bought 100 shares of pets.com and she told you it was going to $200 a share? or in 2005 when the car wash attendant told you he was buying two lots up in Ocala and he told you his lots were going to triple in value in two months and then when he made a profit, he was going to start flipping houses for a living, so I better start looking for a new place to get my car washed….

when i worked in the mall, i worked at specs music and tried to pick up chicks in between putting away records.

By Michael Fink

November 26, 2006 08:48 PM | Link to this

MonthlyCost:

I would say about 1% of value is a pretty safe estimate, for anything under about 1 million. When you go higher then 1 million, you start to drop that percentage a bit, because some of the costs do not increase proportionaly. However, 1% is always the “guideline” used when determining affordability of a home. This should encompass all the ongoing costs, HOA, insurance, morgage, taxes, etc. It does not take into account electricity/water, etc, but those numbers are typically SO small compared to the carrying costs it hardly matters.

Now, to extrapolate this number a bit, 380K home (approx median price right now), 3,800K to carry month to month. No more then 33% (that’s actually VERY high, a safer number would be 25% of so) of income to housing costs.

3,800 * 3 = 11,400

So, 11,400 should be your monthly income to support this home price. Extrapolate a bit further:

11,400 * 12 = 136,800

136K yearly income to support median priced home.

And, as you can see, Huston, we have a problem.

That’s really where this bubble has gotten totally out of control.

One more quick one (with some guessing, admittedly):

Rent for 380K home? My guess would be about 1400-1500/mo. If your paying more then 1/2 the carrying costs right now in Palm Beach, your paying way too much for rent. I am moving to a 600K property for under 2K a month. I have seen 1M dollar properties for under 3K a month.

And there, with some very quick, easy to understand math, we have the fundamental driving factors of the housing bubble. :)

By sprinklers and water filters

November 26, 2006 09:30 PM | Link to this

It is raining tonite and my 11 zone sprinkler system is going. I’m too lazy and tired to go outside and turn it off.

I haven’t changed the water filter on my GE fridge I bought at Brands Mart two years ago and I drink the water that comes out of the water dispenser every day, and we’re on well water, you know the thing on the left side of the door where you put the cup into and push and the stream of water comes out?

My home in summer of 2005 I could have sold for an easy 675k, today it would be tough to get 600k.

I really don’t care the same that I don’t care if my sprinklers are on when it is raining.

But I will go into Home Depot tomorrow after work and buy a couple of bags of mulch.

By oh and ps...

November 26, 2006 09:35 PM | Link to this

oh, and by the way, i’ve never been inside a starbucks. i usually make my coffee in the morning in one of the plastic white coffee makers that i bought at walmart for $9.83, or if i’m feeling frisky, i’ll go get a cup of coffee at mcdonalds.

how much is a cup at starbucks? 3.00? that’s too much moeny for something like that.

By maxmooseO3

November 26, 2006 09:45 PM | Link to this

Whoa, that’s deep, Baby.

By rentVbuy

November 26, 2006 11:04 PM | Link to this

Anyone familiar with online calculators of rent versus buying ?

Would be interested in other opinions of calculator at site below.

http://www.mortgages-loans-calculators.com/calculator-rent-versus-buy.asp

Thanks.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 12:23 AM | Link to this

“rentvsbuy:”:

Tell me when a calculator will tell you if the house you might buy will double in 3 years; or if the apartment you rent is going to be next to section 8 housing. :-)

Finkydink: With all your analytical brilliance, why didn’t you buy a house 3 years ago? You would be ahead now by 6 figures no matter how you play with the figures.

“The Life of Adam and Eve” is getting banned from the Bible on the History Channel.

By to mike fink

November 27, 2006 06:34 AM | Link to this

once again, mike, you miss the point. great you can vomit these stats, but in the real world…

it just does not work that way.

lets say you rent for the next 5 years, and i buy.

500k, you say costs you around 1500 a month, i think more, but we will go with it.

500k to me is about 3500 a month, little high, but we will go with it.

you in 5 years have nothing, me i have the chance, the chance of walking away with something, maybe i live for free when everything is said and done, sell at around 800k. maybe i walk with some money in my pocket, sell at 900k. maybe i loose a little, but i tried.

i have been investing in real estate for close to 20years, i have not lost any huge amount of money before, quite the opposite, i have made great money in the past. if i give a little back now, so be it. i have had fun, and paid for some great times. i have made over 100k per year the last decade in my work life, some years i made more in real estate, than my job.

this includes, renovating, renting out, and just living in the property for several years.

mostly just living in a place for several years, then selling and moving to a new home.

By Mike Fink

November 27, 2006 07:05 AM | Link to this

Cross post from another board (more statistics):

I feel so bad for those people that got suckered into buying “boxes” for 2 times what they are worth. For example, if you look at the palm beach county property appraisal website, you can see some condo conversions where people got suckered into buying 1 BRs (sq footage around 700 sq feet) and 2 BRs(sq footage around 975 sq feet) for $190K and $270K respectively.

WOW. Are they in for a SHOCK. These places are worth half of this, more like $80K for the 1 BR and $120-$150K for the 2BR….We are in BIG trouble folks. As people have mentioned throughout this thread. Here are the rules of thumbs:

1) True property value =(7 to 10)(annual rent) 2) Max safe % of income to spend on property =(25%)(annual income) 3) Max amount of home you should buy =(annual income)*(1 to 3)

Now let’s see how the market looks like in Palm Beach County using these rules. The following example is for the condo market in this county using an avg 2 BR/ 2 BH that is about 1000-1100 sq ft

Here is the data: Avg rent in Palm Beach County for 2 BR/ 2 bath =$1200 month Avg actual market value =$220K Avg annual Salary =$45K

Rules:

1) Max True property value = 10 x (1200 x 12)=$144,000,

Problem: Avg actual market value is $220K but the true market value is nearly $100K lower and note the value of 10 I used is the Max.

2) Max safe % of income to spend on property = 25%

So lets figure out what a safe mortage is per month. This is a BEFORE tax calculation so the values are inflated:(Avg income/12) x 0.25 =$937.50.

Problem: Avg taxes in this county are $4,000 for the avg 2 BR so taxes account for $4000/12 =$333 per month. Add on an avg association/insurance fees of $300 per month and you end up spending ($333 +$300)/$937.50 =%68 of the 25% of your income for housing on taxes and association fees. That leaves %32 left for your mortgage payment which is (32%)($937.50)=$300. Now go tell me where to get a mortgage that cheap!

3) Max amount of home you should buy =(annual salary)*(1 to 3)

The max amount =$45K * 3 =$135K.

Problem: There is nothing in this county that you can live in that is that cheap. You can’t even get a nice 1 Br right now for that price.

What does this all mean??? Based on this example, the avg cost of a condo should be closer to $135K. So lets do some more math to determine how far prices must come down:% decrease =(actual market value - max amount from rule 3)=($220K -$135K)/($220K)=%38.

Since I used a multiplier of 3 with the third rule, it actually lessens the % decrease. In other words a smaller multiplier would increase the %decrease

Bottom-line here are the outcomes:

1)PRICES MUST DROP %40-50% BEFORE THE MARKET CORRECTS ITSELF

2) INCOMES MUST RISE pretty quickly. The calculations for income were not done here but using rule 3 we can determine that the annual income needed to afford the avg 2Br/2BH condo is minimally $75K. Of course a house is much greater and it can be shown that you need a minimum of $150K or higher.

By Mike Fink

November 27, 2006 07:19 AM | Link to this

Ok, lets work through the numbers, and figure out how much appreciation you need to break even in 5 years with your home.

500K home, 2K/mo rent for 5 years.

Total Rent paid = 120K

500K home, purchased, carrying cost per month ~ 5K

Total cost to own for 5 years = 300K

Now, we can take 120K as the minimum price to live somewhere for 5 years (you have to live somewhere, no options are free). The other 180K paid to own the property is the “cost of ownership” for that parcel.

So, does it make sense? Well, it totally depends on the rate of appreciation of the property. What do you expect that home will be worth in 5 years? If you assume 3% per year, the answer is definately NO! It would cost an extra 123K to own the home rather then rent it. Feel free to work it out for yourself:

http://buyvsrent.movingavg.com/calculate.html

5 year term. 3% appreciation per year 500K sales price 30 year morgage

Property Tax 10K Insurance 10K 200 Assn dues (monthly)

On the rent side, just put in 2K and 3% rent inflation per year.

Oh, and I started this with a question. How much appreciation do you need to break even? Using those numbers, 9% and you break even.

Anyone really expect 9% over the next 5 years anywhere in Palm Beach county? :)

By to Mike Fink

November 27, 2006 08:58 AM | Link to this

Mike: If you are so brilliant, why did you not buy a house when you could have made hundreds of thousands of dollars in a heartbeat?

Looking back, should anyone have listen to you 3 years ago?

By to mike fink

November 27, 2006 09:00 AM | Link to this

Hey mikey, Why didn’t you buy a home when the opportunity was right and the stars were aligned? I read something earlier on these posts that mentioned a A.B.R. Syndrome. If you didn’t read it, it describes the medical terminology describing ANOTHER BITTER RENTER. Guess who has it?

After all these years of renting, What do you have to show for it? NOTHING! We don’t live in a perfect world and all the rules and principles doesn’t always apply. We don’t live in a TEXTBOOK. Don’t put “all your eggs in one basket” because is you’re prophecies don’t come true you’ll be on miserable individual. Good luck mikey.

By TANC

November 27, 2006 09:06 AM | Link to this

If you try and drill down the analysis of owning v.s. renting to a simple numbers proposition, you are correct that in many cases, and certainly right now, the cost of renting is lower. But is renting more desirable to the average person than owning? For some it probably is, and certainly for Mike Fink. But, Mike, if you wait until the cost of renting is in line with the cost of owning as you lay out in your arguments, then you may not get to enjoy the myriad of benefits you will experience in owning your own piece of property any time soon, perhaps never.

The numbers analysis does not take into account some very, very important intangible factors which can not be measured in numbers.

Namely:

The pride one has in owning their own property. As a renter, you own nothing.

The joy in the ability do things to your own property such as landscape it wonderfully, add features and fixtures to your liking, put in a new pool or that beautiful backyard covered patio if you want to, renovate and add on to make the home more desirable to you, paint the walls the color you want without having to get permission from the owner, not have to worry about whether or not your lease will expire and the owner will ask you to leave. etc. etc. I could go on.

And, certainly in the current market it is difficult, but as an owner you have the opportunity to grow equity and gain appreciation over time and have something that you can leave to your kids later on in life.

The analysis should not be the “Cost” of owning v.s. “Renting”. The analysis should be a Cost/Benefit Analysis of which Cost is only half the analysis (and maybe not the most important one). I would argue the intangible benefits of owning your own home far exceed the intangibles in renting. Does it make the Cost/Benefit analysis tilt in favor or Renting or in favor of Owning?

That is an individiual choice. Just don’t make it solely a cost choice because it is far from that for most homeowners.

By Mike Fink

November 27, 2006 09:10 AM | Link to this

Did anyone really expect prices to double in 3 years? I certainly did not.

If I had a crystal ball, I certainly would have bought 3 years ago. Actually, I still would not have bought a home if I had said crystal ball. I would have bought GOOG. :)

Hindsight is 20/20, and predicting irrational markets is very close to impossible. Buying into one after it has become disconnected from fundamentals is however, always a big risk, and not one that I am willing to take.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 09:55 AM | Link to this

“MIKE FINK”:

I’m sure you’re a nice guy, but one of your problems in life is you can’t do basic arithmetic.

Appreciation on a house is on the current value of the house — not what you paid for it originally.

You do not need 9% a year to get 180K out of 500. In fact, you need less than 6.5% each year. To those who got past the eigth grade, this is known as “compound interest.”

I suggest you get yourself a 99 cent calculator, instead of relying on a Java applet on some web site, which was probably written for Programming 101.

Here’s what you can do with a $.99 calculator:

500,000 X 1.065 = 532,500

532,500 X 1.065 = 567,112.50

567,112.50 X 1.065 = 603974.81

603974.81 X 1.065 = 643,233.17

643,233.17 X 1.065 = 685,043.32

685,043.32 - 500,000 = 185,043.32

There’s your 180K, Mike. Is 6.5% possible? Very much so — but I won’t fall into the trap of predicting the future and pulling numbers out of my rear end.

By the way, that 180K was a BS number to start with, but I don’t have the time now.

Let’s hope people are getting financial advice from a CPA rather than a blog.

“The greatest force in the universe is…compound interest.”

  • Albert Einstein

By cw1900

November 27, 2006 10:03 AM | Link to this

Maxmoose,

I really cannot believe what I read on this blog this morning from the holiday weekend. When I checked in the other day, I expressed my disbelief on what has happened to this forum. Here is what I said on Saturday morning:

=========== By cw1900 November 25, 2006 11:13 AM Wow…I’m checking in this morning expecting things to be a little slow on the RE blogs the past few days, and omg, was I wrong. I’m going to skip the normal response today as I’m short on time and I’m not reading most of the rants anymore, but here goes straight to…. Notes from CW: • Max ole’ buddy, a warning, you’re not going to like this, but somebody needs to let you three know you need some help. • Some you need a life. The worst in need of severe therapy are: maxmoose03, Markmax33, and TANC. Take a break or the others will stay on the sidelines or simply leave altogether. You sit there and cut and paste paragraph after paragraph of data trying to suggest you are brilliant and correct, but always fail to realize important that throw it all of such as real human life psychology, the herd mentality, many others. You’re arguments are childlike and petty. Pretty embarrassing. It sounds as if you sat in front of your freakin’ computers since Thanksgiving morning. Cmon, get real. • Maxmark33 – very uncool to post people’s real contact info, even if it was very easy to do. Too many kooks out there. Let’s be civil. • Here are the most ridiculous quotes I just read, and I couldn’t have read it all, too much of a time waster…. “As for my inclusion of his personal information, he should not spout off about something and spread bad press if he isn’t proud of it. Without credability a blog is nothing. He obviously has none.” – Markmax33 sounding like Mel Gibson or that Seinfeld guy. “P.S. I am an EXTREMELY PROUD RENTER right now!! I live 3 blocks from the beach in an awesome house and $450/month and I am BANKROLLING $$ so I can buy 3 properties! IT IS COOL TO RENT!!” – Markmax33 again…Amateurs always go in too fast at everything. They get all excited. Do it right, slow, and reasoned and you will be better off. I own more properties than you will see in the next decade, and from how I’m observing you, you will crash and burn. Tortoise and the hare, tortoise and the hare… “Real men use real blogs: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com” – Markmax33 once again…How junior high is that? Utterly ridiculous. “Little One, you can’t even get INTO the test. Tell you what, here’s a softball question. If you handle this one convincingly, we’ll see about a test: Demonstrate the use of the Poisson distribution in determining florida wind insurance rates.” – maxmoose03…Max, you fell into his trap and now you are sounding like the junior high kid on the playground. Na na na na na, I think ‘m better than you…cmon max, you’re better than that. • Best quote of the blog comes from Internet Madam: “Let the truth be told. Most of you are realtors or brokers who are busy writing your opinions on here. That is fine. But wouldn’t you be making money now if you went out and hustle and found some New Yorkers down here for the weekend that came down to look around?” – no need to comment further, it says it all.

• This blog is getting overrun by people with apparently no life who are rehashing old arguments over and over and over and over again, and it is getting old sifting through all of this mindless drivel. If it doesn’t get better, I’ll take a pause. I think Easy, Rich R, Mike Fink and others already have.

Again, that is what I said on Saturday morning. Now it is Monday morning. It’s worse, much worse. Max, you, I believe have some valuable insight to what you say. I do not believe you and easyasabc are the same person as someone earlier has suggested. I do have to tell you I have lost total respect for you. You are indeed completely paranoid, and yes, you have been played. Your true colors came out in your last little rant when you said you will not be responding anymore in your little immature tirade. That was the moment you lost it and were played. Those people were saying anything to get under your skin. They succeeded. They won. You lost. You actually spent your entire Thanksgiving weekend glued to a computer monitor replying to every single post, night and day, good god, you wasted all of that time, and you weren’t teaching anybody anything except the fact that everyone here believes you to be a fool and the biggest boob on the block. Your arrogance I put up with earlier because, again, I thought you did have some decent knowledge of the local RE issues at hand. I cannot listen to your arrogance any longer. It is pathetic. You are rude, a self-proclaimed know it all, and nobody likes that. You sir, are an a*s. Max, I may not have as much money as you do, but I will. The way you and some others on this board talk, you would think all millionaires are arrogant a-holes. That is not the case. I know plenty of millionaires, my parents, my aunt and uncle, some other family members, and many parents of close friends of mine, and not one of them acts as you do, which questions really if you have any substantial dough at all. People with real money, who came from not much, and worked hard and built businesses and wealth, act differently than those of you with new money. You are also one of the reasons I left Boca years ago. One of my relatives was actually mayor of Boca Raton many, many years ago. He would role over in his grave if he could see that sleepy little beach town transformed into this. The attitude shift in the late 80s, early 90s was new money trash and wannabes, and it was plastic and rude, and it was pathetic, as you are today. It is true that you have put a black mark on this blog. That is probably why others such as Rich R and easyasabc have stayed on the sidelines mostly. I do see Mike Fink back, I’m not sure why he is wasting his time conversing with you. The best thing you can do is to stop participating here and get some mental help. You need it. I’m sure you will eventually come back under another name, but your true colors will eventually show through. We will call you out at that time also. Go away maxmoose03, you’re insight is compromised and not going to be taken seriously anymore. As your pattern, you will respond with some pseudo intellectual response deriding me, but who cares, it’s just you. I will not respond to you. Have a great day everyone. Time for a new subject. Cmon Jeff.

cw

By cw1900

November 27, 2006 10:15 AM | Link to this

Maxmoose,

I really cannot believe what I read on this blog this morning from the holiday weekend.

When I checked in the other day, I expressed my disbelief on what has happened to this forum. Here is what I said on Saturday morning:

===========

By cw1900 November 25, 2006 11:13 AM

Wow…I’m checking in this morning expecting things to be a little slow on the RE blogs the past few days, and omg, was I wrong. I’m going to skip the normal response today as I’m short on time and I’m not reading most of the rants anymore, but here goes straight to….

Notes from CW:

• Max ole’ buddy, a warning, you’re not going to like this, but somebody needs to let you three know you need some help.

• Some you need a life. The worst in need of severe therapy are: maxmoose03, Markmax33, and TANC. Take a break or the others will stay on the sidelines or simply leave altogether. You sit there and cut and paste paragraph after paragraph of data trying to suggest you are brilliant and correct, but always fail to realize important that throw it all of such as real human life psychology, the herd mentality, many others. You’re arguments are childlike and petty. Pretty embarrassing. It sounds as if you sat in front of your freakin’ computers since Thanksgiving morning. Cmon, get real.

• Maxmark33 – very uncool to post people’s real contact info, even if it was very easy to do. Too many kooks out there. Let’s be civil.

• Here are the most ridiculous quotes I just read, and I couldn’t have read it all, too much of a time waster…

“As for my inclusion of his personal information, he should not spout off about something and spread bad press if he isn’t proud of it. Without credability a blog is nothing. He obviously has none.” – Markmax33 sounding like Mel Gibson or that Seinfeld guy.

“P.S. I am an EXTREMELY PROUD RENTER right now!! I live 3 blocks from the beach in an awesome house and $450/month and I am BANKROLLING $$ so I can buy 3 properties! IT IS COOL TO RENT!!” – Markmax33 again…Amateurs always go in too fast at everything. They get all excited. Do it right, slow, and reasoned and you will be better off. I own more properties than you will see in the next decade, and from how I’m observing you, you will crash and burn. Tortoise and the hare, tortoise and the hare…

“Real men use real blogs: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com” – Markmax33 once again…How junior high is that? Utterly ridiculous.

“Little One, you can’t even get INTO the test. Tell you what, here’s a softball question. If you handle this one convincingly, we’ll see about a test: Demonstrate the use of the Poisson distribution in determining florida wind insurance rates.” – maxmoose03…Max, you fell into his trap and now you are sounding like the junior high kid on the playground. Na na na na na, I think ‘m better than you…cmon max, you’re better than that.

• Best quote of the blog comes from Internet Madam: “Let the truth be told. Most of you are realtors or brokers who are busy writing your opinions on here. That is fine. But wouldn’t you be making money now if you went out and hustle and found some New Yorkers down here for the weekend that came down to look around?” – no need to comment further, it says it all.

• This blog is getting overrun by people with apparently no life who are rehashing old arguments over and over and over and over again, and it is getting old sifting through all of this mindless drivel. If it doesn’t get better, I’ll take a pause. I think Easy, Rich R, Mike Fink and others already have.

========

Again, that is what I said on Saturday morning. Now it is Monday morning. It’s worse, much worse.

Max, you, I believe have some valuable insight to what you say. I do not believe you and easyasabc are the same person as someone earlier has suggested.

I do have to tell you I have lost total respect for you. You are indeed completely paranoid, and yes, you have been played. Your true colors came out in your last little rant when you said you will not be responding anymore in your little immature tirade. That was the moment you lost it and were played. Those people were saying anything to get under your skin. They succeeded. They won. You lost.

You actually spent your entire Thanksgiving weekend glued to a computer monitor replying to every single post, night and day, good god, you wasted all of that time, and you weren’t teaching anybody anything except the fact that everyone here believes you to be a fool and the biggest boob on the block.

Your arrogance I put up with earlier because, again, I thought you did have some decent knowledge of the local RE issues at hand. I cannot listen to your arrogance any longer. It is pathetic. You are rude, a self-proclaimed know it all, and nobody likes that. You sir, are an a*s.

Max, I may not have as much money as you do, but I will. The way you and some others on this board talk, you would think all millionaires are arrogant a-holes. That is not the case. I know plenty of millionaires, my parents, my aunt and uncle, some other family members, and many parents of close friends of mine, and not one of them acts as you do, which questions really if you have any substantial dough at all. People with real money, who came from not much, and worked hard and built businesses and wealth, act differently than those of you with new money. You are also one of the reasons I left Boca years ago. One of my relatives was actually mayor of Boca Raton many, many years ago. He would role over in his grave if he could see that sleepy little beach town transformed into this. The attitude shift in the late 80s, early 90s was new money trash and wannabes, and it was plastic and rude, and it was pathetic, as you are today.

It is true that you have put a black mark on this blog. That is probably why others such as Rich R and easyasabc have stayed on the sidelines mostly. I do see Mike Fink back, I’m not sure why he is wasting his time conversing with you.

The best thing you can do is to stop participating here and get some mental help. You need it. I’m sure you will eventually come back under another name, but your true colors will eventually show through. We will call you out at that time also.

Go away maxmoose03, you’re insight is compromised and not going to be taken seriously anymore. As your pattern, you will respond with some pseudo intellectual response deriding me, but who cares, it’s just you. I will not respond to you.

Have a great day everyone. Time for a new subject. Cmon Jeff.

cw

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 10:20 AM | Link to this

You are right CW.

Recently it’s been the same old topics that have been beat to death.

We now have some idiot Realtor in here fishing for propects again. We’ve seen this before. I think it’s going to backfire as every post does nothing more then further dispay their stupidity.

You are right, I am not posting like I used to.

This Realtor didn’t take the time to get a sense of this blog and just jumped in with babble and speculation.

It’s quite entertaining to me, I think Max is even better then Easy (if they are not the same person).

Either way, I’ll just sit tight and wait for he/she to get bored, or find some work to do. I’ll be back, but after the uneducated idiots evaporate.

By Turkey Talk

November 27, 2006 10:43 AM | Link to this

What happen over the holidays? It seems some of you had some bad turkey, fought with the relatives who came over and shacked out at your place. Did your toilets overflow? What ever happen, many of you took out your frustrations by writing here. Few of the notes i have looked over this morning was ok, but most of it was just crap.

Let me ask everyone this question, how did Hitler and Florida real estate get in the same conversation? I know our Palm Train system is not run by Mussolini. Maybe Hitler is cleaning pools at Century Village? Maybe that comment might bring a load of Simon Wiesenthal hunters down here now for a search? They might be ending up buying some property.

Yes, there was many people here who had too much time on their hands. The only body part that many of you exercised off was your fingers on the keyboard!

I really got lost of who is who anymore. We have many new writers it seems, bloggers who have changed names but have the same writing style. I can tell Mike Fink has a night job. He must be a guard at a Condo working the night shift and writes only in the early morning hours before he goes back to bed. Rich R. knowing now he made a mistake and cannot “flip” for a profit on his cabin in Carolina. Did you eat a lot of pie Rich? I bet you had both pecan and pumpkin.

Yes, the frustration was shown by the “have nots” here. Even our realtor friend who made her first sale in six months made several comments here. She is easy to spot out. She will always be a loser.

Yes, many of you got to the point this past weekend where you had to say “I am mad as hell, and i am not going to take it anymore”. I figure you had to say that when your out-of-town relative overflowed your toilet.

I came across my Worth Ave. realtor friend yesterday, who said that the R.E. industry claims that the Palm Beach Post has a large part of the blame for the slow down here due to their over-hyped, mis-guided negative stories. Maybe the Post should look should review their outlook. When the paper complains about less circulation and less advertisement revenue, they have no one to blame but themselves. Many local realtors have not advertise due to a certain writer (J.O.) views on the market. Who is he? He does not even own, he has no background in real estate. [EDITOR’S NOTE: IF THIS WERE JOURNALISM 101, TURKEY TALK/EASYASABC WOULD GET AN F FOR POSTING A FACT ERROR.] He is just bringing his paper down with only narrow view point negative news articles without researching his bias reports. At least the Post could hire someone who is a Broker/Agent that has years of experience in the area.

Which leads me into another point. We do have third rate realtors in the area who could only sell in certain price range. Once the median price range went up, they could not compete with the big boys. So their goal was to bad mouth the home prices and bring them back down to the level where they can compete. Their main weapon was this blog, to promote our area of being over price. Has anyone notice other housing markets and their prices? South Florida is far head for getting the most of a dollar for real estate. No matter what price range, style or location you are looking at, we have many great deals here. The Post is losing out on revenue by not giving their customers great deals on advertising their homes at this time. All about greed baby. The Post is guilty of it also. Not budging to lower ad prices, they want the top dollar from sellers and realtors to advertise property in their paper. God forbid if one of their $8 employees at the Post wants a raise, becaue their a*s is out the door.

My Worth Ave realtor friend says that the past three weeks, that sales went up. No matter how the bashers and “have nots” look at it, this is Florida, and it will always be at the top of people who want to live here.

If you like to have a condo, there are many out there. We have over 80,000 units from Miami to Jupiter. People buy condos for various reasons, down sizing in life, investment, rental property, or a vacation spot. People buy homes for mostly to raise a family.

I read a lot of bitterness here. Some of you really need to get a life. Will all of you be doing name calling at Christmas time? Will some of you be up all through the night tracking some guy and posting his name address and phone number because he does not agree with you? Take a look at yourself and seek some medical help. If you do not own property, who cares! Move on and start to make some money to change your status. You will not get anywhere in life you if take your frustrations out by being a “have not”.

Peace on earth and good will towards men does not apply here it seems to certain people.

Here is a poll we can have. Pick your best choice you want to see happen and tell it when you post a story in the next few days……

A) Palm Beach Post reduce ad rates for customers & realtors to sell homes

B) Jeff Ostrowski to get his a*s fired

C) To buy or sell property in Florida

D) Realtors to reduce their commissions from 6% to 2%

E) To watch Rich R. and easyasabc in a pie eatting contest.

easyasabc is back!

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 10:43 AM | Link to this

CW -

“I” should not waste my time on you folks, in that you are correct.

“My” best commentary here is exemplified by the email above, where you have someone spreading false information or just plain incorrect arithmetic.

The danger in these blogs is that someone is going to act on the opinions that idiots like you provide.

“My” overriding message to people: get the advice of a financial professional, perhaps a CPA. Not a broker, not a grad student in economics with poor manners and anti-US leanings, not a realtor, but a bona fide financial professional.

Your problem, CW, is that you are pathologically cheap, even with your own family, and I pity them. You need a psychiatrist, not just an accountant. and no, you are not worth the “intellectual” tirade.

“I” never mention my aggregate holdings, but while we are on the subject, the smarter people on this log have already figured out that Max is not one person, buy several people with different backgrounds, different languages, and vastly different temperaments. One can get fed up and quit, the “Max” ID is still around.

So up yours, CW. I think one of the Max’s told you to buy your wife something nice for Christmas, and that’s still a good idea.

By the way, how did you know about Jeff? I’ll give you credit for that one.

Is Easyabc an associated ID? Hmmmmm. Fascinating possibilty. Let’s see what he has to say.

Poor Richard is, as always, a stupid goober, and doesn’t merit a single keystroke more.

I have an idea, CW. If you don’t like the blog, why don’t you go somewhere else?

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 10:49 AM | Link to this

By the way CW — you had the opportunity to respond to legitimate questions posed by people on this board today. You had the opportunity to respond to real estate issues like those posed by Mike Fink, whether he is right, wrong or indifferent.

Instead, you chose to turn this blog into a pointless argument. That’s you. That’s what you are all about.

How long did it take you to type in that rant? Did you count how many lines of foolish invective you typed? It is unbelievable. Tell you what — if you don’t want to respond to questions about real estate, why don’t you just shut up? This blog is not entitled “cheap bast—-ds forum.”

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 10:54 AM | Link to this

This is just getting hilarious.

Welcome back Easy.

I can’t wait for what’s next. LOL.

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 11:01 AM | Link to this

if Max is not Easy, he/she def. needs the Meds.

Bipolar?

Get help!

By TANC

November 27, 2006 11:04 AM | Link to this

Forget about 6.5%, let’s use a 4% appreciation rate per year and Mike’s numbers and see where we are…

$5000 per month cost of owning is $300,000 over 5 Yrs. Easy math….

Now let’s back out the benefit of tax deductions available to the homeowner (assume 31% bracket). At a 6.375% interest rate for 30 years and $10,000 a year in real estate taxes rising 3% a year you get $207,628 in tax deductions saving the homeowner $64,365 in income taxes.

Cost of owning for 5 years is now down to $235,635.

In 5 years at 4% appreciation a $500,000 home is worth $608,326 and the loan balance is now $467,376 through amortization. Equity built up is now $140,905 bringing the cost to own down to $94,685.

(Side calculator tip: I used y to the x key on my calculator to obtain my new value in 2 steps - 1.04 Y to the X “5” X 500,000).

Cost to rent using MF’s numbers is $2,000 a month rent for 5 yrs = $120,000.

$120,000 less $94,685 makes the cost of owning under this scenario about $25,000 better. And the good thing….it gets better every year!

AND, this is without taking into account the intangible benefits of owning your own home.

You can manipulate the numbers all you want. I’m sure someone can show other numbers to refute mine.

Bottom line to me (personal opinion and I know I’m being repetitive here) is I would rather own than rent, more so for the intangible benefits of owning than the cost (as long as the cost is reasonable to me).

By cw1900

November 27, 2006 11:12 AM | Link to this

Welcome back easyasabc and Rich R.

Easy, that was one of your better posts. Just Beautiful.

Even TANC is at least trying to stay on topic.

The nuts, the have nots, and the desperate realtors are getting more bitter with each passing day.

cw

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 11:13 AM | Link to this

The Max’s defer to you once again, CW.

We hope no one comes along with a personal tirade that buries your good work.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 11:19 AM | Link to this

LOL LOL

That is, the Max’s defer to you again TANC..

HA HA AH

Jeff is poking me in the ribs, I can’t t

By easyasabc

November 27, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this

He who owns property is rich!

One who rents, becomes cash poor!

One who hesitates, pays more later on.

Did anyone know where Tojo is at? I know Hitler is cleaning the pool and rubbing suntain lotion on Grandma Bubba at Century Village. And Mussolini is punching train passes on Palm Train.

This just came in….Tojo is making sushi and ready to serve lunch at Crazy Buffet in WPB.

There are so many max’s out there, i am confuse who is who. Please people, stick with one name. Some of you will three or more names just hurt your creditability.

easyasabc

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 11:25 AM | Link to this

TANC,

Just one fly in the ointment.

As we’ve seen over the past few years, the cost of ownership with respect to taxes (even with SOH), and of course that nasty insurance has skyrocketed and continues to do so.

There were no storms this year, yet Citizens wants yet another 56%-Res. and as much as 600%-Biz increase.

I understand that Mikes rent may go up year over year, but as we’ve seen with this current market, many owners are getting desperate and renting very low compared to costs.

But, another season like ‘03/’04, could just make things with insurance worse.

Allot of what makes your senario work is the properties location, age of property etc.

I’d say that I do agree and I’d rather own, but keep in mind that over the years, any repairs and such have to be included in your colum, as the renter don’t have to bear any costs for repairs, appliances, HVAC etc.

Taking a very realistic look at your numbers, I feel that the spead is much less then $25,000.

Just a thought.

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 11:55 AM | Link to this

MaxMoose03, I’m back to correct you again. Your data on housing increases in those Zip codes listed above is purely anecedotal. You can not base a price increase for a town or city on 10 sales in a year. You better look or county as a whole and evaluate the # of houses on the market, new home incentives, etc, before you get all excited about an anecdotal 16% price increase. These people probably covered closing costs and gave away a free hummer to move those units. That data wouldn’t be included in the price!

Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE BEACH $450/MONTH”

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 12:10 PM | Link to this

Your rent versus own scenario is very flawed. I will use myself as an example. I spend $450/month for an extremely nice apartment 3 blocks from one of the nicest beaches in America - La Jolla, CA.

$450*60 months = $27,000.00

The median house in my area is ~500k. The median HOA fee for that house is $200/month. Mortgage interest on a 500k loan is 30k per year. Lets subtract out ~10k for tax benefit. That means you pay ~32k per year * 5 years = 160k in interest and HOA fees over 5 years. I paid 27k in rent and I am saving 12k per year. Housing prices are droping ~6% per year in my neck of the woods. Who is making out?
-Markmax33 - PROUD RENTER!!!!

By commercial property

November 27, 2006 12:16 PM | Link to this

Even though it doesn’t always seem like it, since this is a real estate forum, I hope to get some insight on a true real estate question.

Is it wise to hold on to a 700sf office/condo on Federal Hwy. near downtown Boynton Beach? No mortgage, just taxes/ins/fees.

What are opinions/predictions for commercial properties in this area? Rising/falling/flat? If flat or falling how long before prices rise?

What would proper rent be? Nice buildout with furniture/snack bar/private bath.

I understand that nobody really knows, but maybe somone out there deals in this type of product and has some knowledge.

By to markmax33

November 27, 2006 12:17 PM | Link to this

Your neighbors must be dregs, mutants, and scum bags. The popping that is heard a night is not fireworks. It’s gunfire. The red tape surrounding the area is not for an approaching parade. It’s a crime scene. Sounds like paradise.

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

Check that math owning costs ~22k per year at a cost of $110k over 5 years. Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE BEACH $450/MONTH”

“CASH IS KING IN A FORCLOSURE ENVIRONMENT”

By Gwen

November 27, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this

I would just have to say that I also put in my vote for no more of the maxmoose character. He is a “know it all”, good point.

Mark, please stop responding to him, it only encourages him.

One of the most influential human emotion is getting ignored. If we ignore him, he will rant for awhile longer, but then leave. If you keep responding to his typed verses, he will continue on.

There are many retirees here like him who just are bored out of their minds. Get a hobby, volunteer, do something, but I agree if someone spends a holiday belittling people he or she does not even know, that is a severe mental problem that a shrink would just love to study.

My favorite people here with the most to say, agree or disagree, are Mike Fink, Rich R, CW, and my favorite is also EasyABC. There were a few more good ones that I forgot, but they haven’t been on in awhile, therefore I can’t remember their names.

Gwen

PS it looks like black friday wasn’t as good as predicted. Could be a slow xmas season for the stores.

By to all the lonely people

November 27, 2006 12:27 PM | Link to this

Why would anyone from La Jolla CA spend so much time on a newspaper blog 3000 miles away.

we already have a few local lonelies here, please no more imports from clear across the US.

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 12:43 PM | Link to this

The only reason I wrote/write on this blog is because it was posted on a very informational blog: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/ Gwen, if you have a question I suggest you ask it there. It pains me to see false information spread on this blog and it is my mission to correct the information. http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/ has data on florida regularly and people who live in your town. The people are MUCH more educated than MaxMoose who needs to drive sales to keep his business alive. Come visit: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/

Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE NICEST BEACH IN AMERICA - LA JOLLA, CA $450/MONTH”

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 12:44 PM | Link to this

Florida specific: http://thehousingbubbleblog.com/?p=1895

Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE BEACH $450/MONTH”

“CASH IS KING IN A FORCLOSURE ENVIRONMENT”

By TANC

November 27, 2006 12:53 PM | Link to this

Markmax,

I lived in Southern Calif. most of my life (25 yrs) and I absolutely love La Jolla. But, I must say though that I am familiar with the cost of rents there and at $450 a month you must either be sharing a home/apt. with other roomates, and/or living in a very, very small place, and/or you have connections and know somebody. I lived in West LA in the early 90’s and rented a 3 bedroom apt in a so, so neighborhood where I could here gunshots at night sometimes and the rent was $1400 a month. La Jolla is much nicer and I think more expensive than that unless I’ve totally lost touch (which is possible).

Rich R,

Your points are well taken and I agree with them…I wanted to simply point out that homeownership is not just a numbers analysis and to make it such is a flawed approach.

On a happy note. The 2006 Hurricane Season ends this Thursday and for the first time in 2 years I did not get whacked, and lose power for 5 days in the middle of summer heat :)

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 01:02 PM | Link to this

Let’s just hope the “No Storms” trend continues. That’s probably what it will take to see some kind of relief from the insurance madness.

But who knows, no storms this year and still a huge increase from Citizens.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 01:02 PM | Link to this

TO “to loney people”:

What do you expect MarkMax to do? I mean, suppose you were a diminutive foreign grad student in economics at USC, living in the slum secton of a geographically nice area, struggling to sound natural in English, but winding up saying things like “real men use blogs” — bitter and resentful of Americans.

What would you do? Do you think you could just go to the beach and pick up a girl?

Speaking of which -Hey Gwen - Once you’ve had a moose, Baby, you’ll never go back to bipeds.

A Max :-)

By to markmax33

November 27, 2006 01:06 PM | Link to this

You’re definately a wannabe. The small fish in the pond. Your bark is bigger than your bite. Watch out for Great Whites while playing in the Pacific Ocean. Consider changing your name from markmax33 to Nemo. It’s more appropriate. It’s clear you don’t have much money to play with. Like easy would say a true “have not”. I have a better idea. Why don’t you move in with mommy and daddy. You can save a few more pennies. If thats not possible, consider getting mike fink as a roomate.

By cw1900

November 27, 2006 01:16 PM | Link to this

To Markmax33,

Gotcha.

You just told us your REAL reason to spend time on this blog all the way from CA. You’re selling that worthless housing bubble blog of yours like a used car salesman on a buy here pay here lot. The only reason you’re trying to get people to go there is to make a few bucks on that little site of yours, not to try and sway anybody with your RE knowledge.

That is probably your blog that you run, it is nothing but a little site with minimal info just to appease the Google Adsense people for relevant content.

Please be aware if anybody goes to his site and clicks on one of the google ads on the right hand side, the ad’s owner will be charged a fee for the click and our little Markmax33 here will get a cut of that fee, usually 50% of the amount billed to the client.

Always follow the money trail, and Markmax33 here is not being 100% truthful on why he wants you to go to his site all the way out in California.

There is nothing wrong with trying to drum up a little business, just be honest about it.

I will pass and I suggest intelligent people here do the same.

cw

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 01:20 PM | Link to this

Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE NICEST BEACH IN AMERICA - LA JOLLA, CA $450/MONTH”

Sticks and stones can break your bones but your words will never hurt me.

IT IS COOL TO RENT!!

By crazydem

November 27, 2006 01:20 PM | Link to this

Markmax-imillian: These arguments have been submitted before, discussed, and discarded. Please stop posting reams of trash on this blog. Some of us enjoy the dialogue back and forth-some of us even take comments with a grain of salt.

Only thing I can surmise is that you were really p##d off that you had nothing to do on a holiday Friday but read the Post online while searching the archives of So Cal newspapers.

Get over it and move on.

By max the bigot is back

November 27, 2006 01:22 PM | Link to this

cw, you’re wrong. maxmoose will not leave, but his bigoted comments are appearing again.

please, everybody, all of us, all at once, give maxmoose03 the bird and tell him to leave.

geez, what a bigoted loser.

  • z -

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 01:25 PM | Link to this

I am really starting to think that Max and Easy are the same person.

Take a close look at the work choose, and the structure of the phrases.

And then there’s that psycho ranting.

By easyasabc

November 27, 2006 01:34 PM | Link to this

The remark about someone who is renting for $450 in La Jolla, Ca….one of the most beautiful places in this country. I have to ask is that a family residence and you are getting a discount to stay there? Or is that a large cardboard refrigeration box you are writing from? Even the guy who is living in his van, down by the city dump is paying more for his rental space than you are. Something is not right here. Maybe you are paying more like $4450 a month in rent. La Jolla is one of the most prime real estate locations in California. Even the seals are paying high rent along the rock edges.

On the commericial property answer, there are several ways to look at your property. One is look at your fellow business owners. Are you in the same business as they are in? Attorneys, medical, or retail? Is the local occupancy rate in downtown Boynton Beach below 85%? Anything above that number shows a good economic development standard for the town. How old is your building? Most businesses look for newer technology type of buildings to operate from.

To Gwen….bless your little heart. I enjoy hearing from people like you that tell me i make you smile. Tell me Gwen, have you even been at a helm of a yacht? Do you own a bikini? Do you know how to play “All Hands on Deck” or “Treasure Hunt”???????

I bet Gwen is a very nice lady, and i know my lady friend is ready to hit me over my head when i see her later on. My lady friend wants only one mate for her Captain.

If i was in La Jolla area right now, i would be at one of the fishing piers with a fishing line in one hand and a “Del Taco” in my other hand. Life is very good in Southern California.

Slow Christmas buying season? If it is, that means people are saving for a house later on. One of the first steps to own property is to make sacrifices. Most of you made that turkey dinner for that out-of-town relative and gave him and his family a place to stay for free for the holidays. No need now to send them a Christmas gift. Put that money away for your future home. By pass that “Playstation 3” that you wanted to have and save for “Home Ownership One”. Your out-of-town relative will be back to vist you in your new home. And if they know new home ownership etiquette, they will get you a house gift. Just make sure your plumbing is updated and working for them.

And one final note, it is a yellow tape that the police use at crime scenes. It is a red tag they put on your toe as they carry you off. Don’t ask me how i know this, lets just say i drew my pistol faster than the other guy. Then again, the other guy never had a pistol. ha ha ha

easyasabc

By MikeG

November 27, 2006 01:35 PM | Link to this

TANC, I agree I Grew up in San Clemente, and the rent on a 2bd 1 ba was atleat $650 and that was in the early 90s

Markmax you must be living with roomates or have a friend or family member with an apt. building.

Mike Fink I think you are destined to be a renter the rest of your life. I belive real estate will go down a bit but a 40 or 50% decline would not be good for anyone. We are a global economy and if one domino starts to fall they will all fall.

Retail, service, manufacturing you name it it will be affected.

So I think that we are all in this together. If your a renter or home owner we will all be hurt.

As for Hurricanes I think what we went through in the last couple of years is pretty rare. There are natural occurances everywhere. Rich N.C. gets hit just as bad as FLA with hurricanes. If that bermuda high stays out in the atlantic N.C. is a #1 bulls eye for canes. And now you guys are in a property boom so it will not take much to be in the same boat as we are down here.

Oh and Markmax California has always been an extremly expensive state to live and if you are only banking 12K a year it will take you about 20 years to afford a house there. Even if there is a major crash in real estate you will most likley be out of a job. And will not be able to buy a house.

By Rich R is Paronoid again

November 27, 2006 01:40 PM | Link to this

No Rich R., i am not this maxmoose guy or any other mooses out here. Time for Rich R. to take his medicine. Next, Rich R. will say i am RCA/Postman.

Must be all that bad toxic ground water that those Carolina people are drinking that makes them like the way they are.

easyasabc

By crazydem

November 27, 2006 01:45 PM | Link to this

Who are the real suckers here, guys?

Our PB Post RE wizz Jeff just posted an article that brought in 200 hits to the blog. He’s not going anywhere anytime soon. In fact, he’ll probably be promoted to take over Pat’s schtick. I noticed she’s covering the mall scene with a new blog to boot.

By Mike Fink

November 27, 2006 01:49 PM | Link to this

I am beginnning to think that I might be going insane from reading these ramblings. :)

To the people who do speak english, and can make an arguement.

I do understand/agree that homeownership has some benefits that cannot be quantified in $$’s and cents. However, for most people (myself included), trying to own a home in this market would put me in a bad cashflow situation. 5K a month for home expenses is a huge nut to crack. Yes, I am sure some crazy mtg lender would tell me that I can afford it. But I would never feel comfortable carrying that much debt/having that kind of hump to overcome mo to mo. My 2K a month rent makes me nervous; I like to budget so that if I lost my job I could still carry my expenses for 6-10 months. 5K a month, along with the closing costs, money set aside for unexpected expenses (like stupid hurricanes), etc. I just can’t imagine going into that deal with less then 200K in the bank (100K for 20% down, another 10-20K for fees, and the rest to make sure I could make it through a year without killing myself financially). How many people are really in that situation? Maybe I just live a very crazy/finacially irresponsible life, but saving 200K would take me a very long time; and I make several times the median income in this area.

By Mike Fink

November 27, 2006 01:54 PM | Link to this

Mikeg,

Just saw your comment, and I just want to clarify one thing. I don’t think that RE, on a national level, is going to get anywhere near 50% down. Not even close. 10-15% nationally would be a CRASH in my eyes, and I doubt we will even see that.

However, Palm Beach county? 40-50% here would not shock me at all. I would say we are already 10-15% down from the peak; even if we just hold here for 3-5 years, adjusting for inflation, we will be 25-30% off. And I see us going no where but further down. At last count we had 5 years of inventory on the market. Makes me chuckle to even write that, I can’t believe we have inventory numbers like that. We are ground zero for this housing correction, along with a few other key areas (Las Vegas being, imho, the most similar to ourselves).

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 01:59 PM | Link to this

I think the fact that 90% of the working class cannot afford the median priced home is causing more problems then the possibility of a housing crash.

If values crash, you just have to stay put, you only loose if you sell. Even with a siginificant adjustment downward, longtime folks will still see gains if they sell.

It’s the poor joe that bought during the peek of the “Great SoFla Housing Boom” and then capped it with a HELOC to buy gas for the car, pay for daycare, or the best yet…. $5,000 for a bedrooms set.

Foreclosures are still skyrocketing. (Watch Fox29 News tonite).

I don’t see any bottom to this market anytime soon.

Max can isolate one building to show increases (but we’ll not talk about the SUV’s, Plasmas, and the new one: College Tuition as incentives), but everyone I know in SoFla that bought within the past few years, are now all in trouble.

One young couple I know: Purchased at $479K, put over $50K in granite, marble, cabnets etc. They did that 80/20 madness to avoid PMI, with their LIBOR adjustment coming up very soon. They are coming up on two years in the home.

They are trying to sell out, with no activity at all. On my advice, they got a recent appraisal.

They are not into this home for $529K. paying almost $5,000 per month PITI/HOA.

Oh yeah, the appraisal; it came in at $439,500. Idenntical home across the street was a comp that sold two months ago.

Equity loss/Remodel Cost: $80,000.

Interest Paid: about $100,000.

Insurance Paid: $14,000+/-.

If they sold today, they would have to come to the closing table with over $80K just to walk away.

This story is playing out all too often these days.

Don’t miss Fox29 special report on SoFla Foreclosures tonite. Might be very interesting.

By to mike fink

November 27, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this

You won’t be chuckling when your wife and kids leave you for a man who owns a home.

By A real world example

November 27, 2006 02:07 PM | Link to this

Remember, you make your money on the buy. A typical 3/2 w/ screened pool in Abacoa was selling last year for the mid 500s. There is now one listing for a flexible 439k. By waiting and renting for a year, a typical buyer in that area bought for 100k less. So easy and the other cheerleaders, in that case didn’t it make sense to rent for a year?

Tanc: I agree with you that is better to own than rent, and I also agree with you that owning is conditional on the cost being “reasonable”. The problem is that the monthly cost of a typical 500k house here is ~5k. If you spend about 50% of your annual salary on property (and nobody thinks that’s a good idea), you’d have to make about 3 times the median income here.

There just aren’t enough people in PB County making that kind of money to soak up the inventory at the current prices. And many of those young families and typical home buyers that could afford ~5k per month are electing to not buy now since its so much cheaper to rent and build up a downpayment, especially as prices stagnate or fall further.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 02:37 PM | Link to this

Poor Richard -

This Max can come up with any number of buildings where the situation is the same — slow sales but rising prices throughout 2006.

Guys, get real. Do you think anyone is seriously working for a living in Townsend Place? Or the Meridian? Or 200 East, now going up? If a 600K contract fell through on 200 East earlier this year, you can now buy the same unit for 900K. Along Dixie Hwy, new single family houses are going up starting from 700K — right on the damn railroad tracks!

There is a class of folks here - this Max is not one of them - who do not care about working, do not care about interest rates, do not care about financing. They don’t need to.

Of the working people I know here, the professionals generally make more than 1 million a year (lawyers, doctors, etc.).

Like it or not, they are the movers and shakers in Palm Beach County, and the rest of us are their servants. Stop with the statistics already, I can’t remember the last time anyone had me make an offer that wasn’t for cash.

Please see A.P.’s comment in the new topic. Some areas of the state are up significantly for 2006.

YOU guys have all been played — by the phony headlines in this newspaper. You have to read to the last paragraph to find out prices are actually UP in Palm Beach County this year, if you don’t slice and dice to manipulate the statistics.

By to that Max

November 27, 2006 02:50 PM | Link to this

Max why are you always here just after or just before easyasabc?

I will bet my eye-teeth that one of you is the same as easyasabc.If you take out the name on top, it is exactly the same. Same style with long words and going on forever. Same opinions.

You are not fooling anyone.

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 02:56 PM | Link to this

If the rich, retired folks were the vast majority of the market, I’d say you were correct Max.

But since the Non-working, Retirees account for less then 20% of the population in PBC (If even that), I’d say you still have about 80% of the market in turmoil.

You can sit with you head in the sand I really don’t care.

Where are all the buyers? It’s snowbird shopping season and no snowbirds buying….

Max, Easy and Internet Madam should really get together and form a club. LOL

Someone with an advanced Math degree selling RE. Just too funny.

Now Max wants us to beleive that he/she is right and we’ve all been played by the headlines.

Who is this person?

You just crack me up….

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 02:57 PM | Link to this

I said that earlier about Max.

Same Style, same word choice, same structure.

SAME PERSON!

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 03:04 PM | Link to this

Lawyers and Doctors are notoriously bad when dealing with money and always get burned. The don’t care about much and have the highest divorce and suicide rates in the country. Does that equal long term success? Ultimately they are working 80 hours/ week for what?
How does this “elite class” mulitiply quicker than the rest of the population all of sudden, aren’t they the servants of the Engineers, McDonalds workers and plumbers of this world? The median income for a doctor or a lawyer is close to 200k not 1 Million/year. See the link below:

http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos074.htm

Stop with lies.

-Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE NICEST BEACH IN AMERICA - LA JOLLA, CA $450/MONTH”

By To Rich R

November 27, 2006 03:08 PM | Link to this

What neighborhood was that young couple in?

By easyasabc

November 27, 2006 03:10 PM | Link to this

Medicine time for Rich R. and others.

Sorry, i am not max.

easyasabc

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 03:16 PM | Link to this

It dosen’t matter what neighborhood my friends are in, it’s playing out all across the region.

Just wait, as time goes on, you’ll see the numbers agree with me.

Don’t forget to watch Fox29 tonight. Topic; runaway/out of control foreclosures in SoFla.

Just the beginning, not the bottom.

Sit tight Mike F, you’ll get your deal. Sooner then you may think.

Just my opinion.

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 03:22 PM | Link to this

Max,

Who are you? What group are you with?

We had a very nice Realtor that had an MBA that was riding this blog for a while. I don’t know what happened to Roger the Realtor I think we called him.

Although I disagreed with him often, he at least debeated the issues with respect for others.

I find it very hard to believe that you work in the upper markets. People selling in that level MUST have the ability to listen, and navigate with grace. You do not.

Your ranting and raving, just makes you look like an idiot. Perhaps you are, I don’t know you.

If I did have you as a realtor, and you came off with that attitude with me, you’d be gone. Just gone. No deal, No Mish.

There you go Easy or Max or whatever we are calling you now, get your script filled again, and give up the dream of becoming a realtor to the stars.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 03:48 PM | Link to this

Rich, you are a fraud,

FOLKS - READ EASYABC’S EXPOSE’ ON THE NEW TOPIC. RICH THE REALTOR IS BUSTED.

MarkMax - I think I can make a useful suggestion to you.

Now, you have to understand that when my closest friends show me their pay stubs, I know what they are making. I nearly choke, but I know what they’re making.

When an attorney I used to have dealings with makes a fee of 330 million dollars on one case (that is not the settlement - that is just his fee), I know what he is making. It is in the newspapers, and has to be (was) approved by the State Senate.

You, my friend, must get into the real world. Put away the economics books. Put away the statistics. Get out. Meet some people. Get laid.

Statistics tell me the average family has 2.3 children. MarkMax, do you know anyone who has 2.3 children? Do you think you ever will?

Don’t mistake statistics for the real world — they’re not even close.

By Markmax33

November 27, 2006 03:58 PM | Link to this

Maxmoose3 er abcdefg, Again, your anecdotal use of evidence with a sample size of one person means nothing. One lawyer making a bizillion dollars even scews the median further from the truth. How many properties will one lawyer own? 500? Use real data with large sample sizes and get back to me.
-Markmax33 - “PROUD RENTER 3 BLOCKS FROM THE NICEST BEACH IN AMERICA - LA JOLLA, CA $450/MONTH”

“CASH IS KING IN A FORECLOSURE ENVIRONMENT”

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 04:06 PM | Link to this

I get a bigger kick out of whoever is walking around showing a paystub.

Too much. Just too much.

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this

Not a realtor here. Not by a long shot.

Actually, my opinion of RE brokers/agents is very low.

I personally rank them below whale dung. That’s lower then attorney and used car salesman. Keep in mind whale dung sinks to the bottom of the deepest sea, below that, you find Realtors.

Too many conflicts from the word Hello. No Thanks!

That’s just me though.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this

MarkMax - You’re not getting it.

There is a difference between real life and statistics. Go out and experience life, my friend.

You know, one of the listings we LOST this year was a 3.5 million condo on the Intracoastal. The guy owns a software company. Across from him lived a couple of the Enron bigshots. Next to them lives a developer who didn’t need financing when he put up a $60,000,000 building. These are my neighbors. Some others in this category are hopefully not only neighbors but friends. You will not find them in the statistics. I live in a community of well-to-do, but also very nice, creative people. These are people with ideas — ideas that work in the real world, not in a lecture hall.

Go out and meet some people who are really doing things, look at houses, look at art, look at architecture. There has to be a pulse somewhere in you, there has to be something more than mean, medium and mode.

Don’t be so convinced you can’t find it.

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 04:38 PM | Link to this

With neighbors like that, I guess we all should feel blessed to warrant Max’s time.

I feel honored.

LOL

Way too funny!

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 04:38 PM | Link to this

Rich - go slop the hogs. Not your wife and kids, the other hogs.

You are a lost cause. Nothing comes out of you but an endless stream of hatred. I understand your bitterness and frustration, being in the situation you put yourself into, but you can’t blame the rest of the world.

Why are you here?
You are not part of my community, what the hell are you doing here? I would tell you to get out and meet people also, but I am afraid you would bite them.

G-d have mercy on your soul, Rich. You are getting ready to meet your maker, and you have nothing to bring to the table :-(

By The national housing bubble...

November 27, 2006 05:03 PM | Link to this

Anyone notice that the souffle analogy that started this blog refers to a national housing bubble, not local markets?

So cheerleaders, don’t take comfort in that report…

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 05:40 PM | Link to this

It’s time to head to the clinic and have those med’s adjusted again EasyMax.

You amaze me.

You are a bitter and mean person.

GET HELP!

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 06:39 PM | Link to this

RICH IS BUSTED

Rich,you so full of sh—

Not even a psychopath like you would be keeping track of what the TV programs are in Palm Beach if he lives in Raleigh.

What a liar!

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 07:05 PM | Link to this

Rich-When will you ever understand, all that matters to me is money.

Unfortunately, I am not making any right now. I am a desperate realtor with no prospects whatsover.

Remember, I can’t even afford my own e-mail account. I had to use my friend’s (Joseph Ingber).

May God have mercy on my since, since Lord knows I have nothing to bring to the table.

By cw1900

November 27, 2006 07:18 PM | Link to this

two things.

first to Markmax33,

You did it again, linked to another website, at least it wasn’t your own.

We did notice you hushed up all of a sudden about your cheesy bubble site.

You still feel the need to make your argument using opd (other people’s data).

Next… Just received a call on one of my rentals out of state in a nice resort area.

Seems I have a new short term deal for the next two months in one of them. These are short term rentals (nightly, weekly, monthly), not my long terms ones here in the county as i have discussed in the past.

I have noticed a nice increase in off season business up there this year compared to last year. Many of these people this year were not just sumer vacationers. Many are retirees from the upper middle states, wanting to come a little farther south to see if they like the area i own in, enough to buy to retiree in. This has been a trend I have seen for the past 3 years as I have owned there for about 10 years now. Pre-2002, there was not the interest there is now. It is very noticeable.

The baby boomer buy is definitely happening people. It is happening there and never slowed down all year, much different than here. The area is nowhere near as expensive as here, and in the south (No Rich R, not NC or north GA)

These people, based on how much money they have, are looking and heading to the southern states. The ones with more will come here. They will be here this season. They always have and always will.

The naysayers will be sorry in a few years. It is inevitable. These are little blips we are experiencing, and we are all here bantering back and forth like the next great depression is coming. In a few years, we will all look back at these writings from all of us and laugh.

The tortoise and the hare, the tortoise and the hare….

cw

By MikeG

November 27, 2006 08:18 PM | Link to this

cw1900, You say you have places that you rent out daily monthly so on. I would like to rent a nice lake house once in awhile, a short drive from FLA. Do you have any or does anyone else have one in a nice area a nice cabin. I have looked on vacation rentals . com but it is hard to get a sense of what an area is like. I really hate spending money on something only to get there and it is a crummy little SH- hole.

Thank You Mike

By Rich R

November 27, 2006 08:25 PM | Link to this

I am Rich R and I am such a prick I have to borrow maxmoose’s blog name. I have to borrow what they said about me because I can’t think of anything to say.

By John

November 27, 2006 08:36 PM | Link to this

New Numbers come out tomorrow. Whats everyones prediction?

By easyasabc

November 27, 2006 08:46 PM | Link to this

Max, don’t even bother with Rich R. He is having the redneck sh— kicked out of him by everyone, on the new blog.

See you there.

By maxmoose03

November 27, 2006 09:10 PM | Link to this

Why easy….I didn’t know you cared :-)

OK, on to new blog.

By Where is Rich R.?

November 27, 2006 11:52 PM | Link to this

Where is Rich R. for this celebration of North Carolinean culture?

It seems to me he should be the Master of Ceremonies.

By Rich R

November 28, 2006 08:30 AM | Link to this

I am getting bashed by one person. One person only.

And that would be EasyMax.

I wouldn’t expect anything less from such a pinhead.

But hey, that’s what’s SoFla’s all about now.

Just a whole lot of fun for me to see just how low people can stoop.

As we speak, values are rising in NC. LOL

By Rich R

November 28, 2006 08:32 AM | Link to this

All this talk, but no numbers or data to back it up.

Where are the buyers? Where are all of the sales?

Easy, it’s time to get the script filled again.

By N8tive

November 28, 2006 11:18 AM | Link to this

Is there any gray matter out there? What I see is hysteria and cheap shots on both sides of the aisle. We are dealing with the most basic supply and demand situation, and it needs some correction. The fundamentals - interest rates, job creation, in-migration - are still there and strong. What is not there are all the weekend investors who thought they were real-estate moguls. Sorry for them, but take your licks and learn a lesson.

Everyone complains about the high cost of housing in South Florida, but what it really is is a reality check that South Florida is now a major metropolitan area, and housing prices are going to catch up to NY, LA, SF and Chicago - again supply and demand. What has changed is that we all had a sense of false prosperity for many years based on relatively cheap housing - which enabled people to drive Beamers and dress in designer clothes and go out to $200 per head dinners. Now for the real reality check - people who work for a living should be driving Toyotas, not Mercedes, and shop at Wal Mart, not Saks. Quit acting like rich wannabes, and start acting like the middle class you are. That is how people in NY and California afford their housing (which by the way is still much higher than here). And they don’t complain about it, it is the cost of living in a desireable place. And if you don’t like it, you always have a choice, move to the midwest where prices are the way they used to be in SoFla.

By cw1900

November 28, 2006 11:49 AM | Link to this

easy,

i must yield to the master….i couldn’t have said it any better.

cw

By N8tive

November 28, 2006 12:28 PM | Link to this

Is there any gray matter out there? What I see is hysteria and cheap shots on both sides of the aisle. We are dealing with the most basic supply and demand situation, and it needs some correction. The fundamentals - interest rates, job creation, in-migration - are still there and strong. What is not there are all the weekend investors who thought they were real-estate moguls. Sorry for them, but take your licks and learn a lesson.

Everyone complains about the high cost of housing in South Florida, but what it really is is a reality check that South Florida is now a major metropolitan area, and housing prices are going to catch up to NY, LA, SF and Chicago - again supply and demand. What has changed is that we all had a sense of false prosperity for many years based on relatively cheap housing - which enabled people to drive Beamers and dress in designer clothes and go out to $200 per head dinners. Now for the real reality check - people who work for a living should be driving Toyotas, not Mercedes, and shop at Wal Mart, not Saks. Quit acting like rich wannabes, and start acting like the middle class you are. That is how people in NY and California afford their housing (which by the way is still much higher than here). And they don’t complain about it, it is the cost of living in a desireable place. And if you don’t like it, you always have a choice, move to the midwest where prices are the way they used to be in SoFla.

By N8tive

November 28, 2006 01:09 PM | Link to this

Sorry about the duplicate post - copy/paste error

By easyasabc

November 28, 2006 04:12 PM | Link to this

Very good post by N8tive. Too many people are acting beyond their means. They are not putting money into real estate, but rather in clothes, cars and restuarants. that is why they will always be the “have nots” in the world.

easyasabc

By Comparison

November 28, 2006 09:51 PM | Link to this

I own in NYC, cabin on lake in NW NJ, House in Cape May, NJ and in Pompano.

Those of you who think SoFl carrying costs are same as areas above are either out of touch with current costs or do not own in other areas.

Pompano has become most expensive of my properties because of Insurance and two tier tax system.(While being smallest and least used because other areas more comfortable more months of the year .)

Have owned for years, not complaining. However, I do not see any reason anyone not currently owning would buy for seasonal use. Renting @ $3,000 a month for 3 months is too attractive compared to year round utilities, Taxes, Insurance, Maintenance, and eventual storms (those of us owners of many years know theres always gonna be another).

Even for young Floridians, with Insurance and their tax based on selling price with yearly increases, the desire to buy has to be thwarted by the huge monthly nut involved.

By N8tive

November 29, 2006 11:20 AM | Link to this

Agreed that insurance costs have gotten out of hand and must be dealt with by the state government, but property taxes are comparable to both NY and California. I purchased a home in Boynton last year for $850K and my taxes are $9K/year. In California, under prop 13, taxes would be 1% of the sale price, so it would be $8500, pretty close. A friend of mine lives in Westchester County NY, and pays $13K/year for a house worth @ $1M. Again, comparable. Cape May and NW NJ are not urban areas, but if you look at any major metro area and it’s suburbs, carrying costs are pretty even. And I bet your NYC property hasn’t been re-appraised for a while, so the taxes are based on a lower valuation. Add to that that Floridians pay no state income tax, which in NY and CA are 9-10% of income, and I don’t think there is a big difference in cost-of-living overall.

Bottom line, If a place costs more, it is more desirable to live there. The market determines prices. We just went through 5 years of double-digit growth, and now the inevitable pullback has all the henny-pennys out there screamin that the sky is falling. Add to that the media constantly looking for sensationalist stories, and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, because unfortunately most Americans are too lazy to dig for real facts, they rely on media interpretation for them. I’ve watched phenomenal growth periods and then pullbacks in CA multiple times since the 70s, and ultimately the value of property rises in the long-run

Everyone has to re-adjust to the notion that RE is a long-term investment, and the “flipping” mentality is meant for stocks, not housing.

By Comparison

November 30, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this

In earlier post I was talking about, lower tax I pay is on NYC home, not in suburb like Westchester. here are few examples for recent NYC sales : 735 Dean St Brooklyn NY 1/1 condo 700 sq ft 425 K taxes $1,015. 1 week on mkt

455 15th St Brooklyn NY 4/3 $1,354,300 taxes $4,977 3 weeks on mkt.

( these and others available online NY Times site Residential sales around region section Nov 24,2006)

Point I was making is NYC is much lower carrying costs for me and others. Insurance and two tier tax system have totally turned carrying costs upside down since I first bought years ago in SoFl

Still not complaining, just want to make clear SoFl is no longer as appealing to many who would have bought in earlier years before SOH and Insurance mess.

Friends who now rent yearly tease constantly about how much I pay in Taxes and Insurance while they enjoy 3 or 4 months in different (Some in same) places each year with no headaches and capital invested elsewhere.

Also, taxes paid in NJ shore property quite high, but there, we all, (year round and part-time residents) pay same, as oppossed to Fl where two tier system makes our payment much higher than year-round residents with similar homes.

By the way, these guys are in no way hurting financially. To save the subsidized lower rates paid by SOH residents I would not be surprised to eventually see some kind of means test. Those elderly residents financially in need should get all the assistance needed to pay taxes and Insurance.

Some of the trust-babies I know getting SOH could easily pay more RE tax to help others stay in their homes.

By EX-NY

December 3, 2006 02:54 AM | Link to this

Are you guys out of your minds? Do you know what the combined NY State/ NY City income tax rate is? Do you know what it is like not to have a place to park your car unless you buy a space for 100K four blocks away?
Dean Street? I hope you have a big dog, and the dog had better carry a gun. You focus on the single least important item and make an argument on that. You are either insincere or just plain nuts.

By Comparison

December 3, 2006 11:38 AM | Link to this

The 2 properties posted as examples of RE tax in NYC were from NY times sales listed last Sun. Showed dif of RE taxes than in Westchester refd to by earlier poster. Both locations happened to be in Brooklyn, NYC, which is in yet another rebirth. Not for everyone, please relax, don’t go if more comfortable elsewhere.

Listed today : 86 Rockrose Pl. Queens, 4/4 $1,499,0000 taxes $6,873. See website

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/realestate/index.html

click on “Residential Sales Around the Region”

The point is RE Taxes and Insurance for all new owners in SoFl, especially 2nd home or out of state residents, has changed much more drastically than in NYC.

These rises and the “annoyance” factor of paying triple the taxes of protected residents have encouraged people I know (newer boomers, mostly) to prefer renting @ approx 3K/month with No Headaches, enjoy warm winter, go elsewhere to avoid hot summers and ownership problems.

We all make decisions good for us, some still will buy, but obviously, some now prefer renting. Good Luck.

By EX-NY

December 3, 2006 06:58 PM | Link to this

Comparison - Our taxes are in property taxes rather than income taxes. You are not doing anyone a service if you suggest that it costs as much to live in, and own a home in, Florida as in NYC. By our standards in Florida, it takes an enormous amount of money just to get by in New York. In my own field salaries down here are just about 50% of New York, yet the gain in standard of living - at half salary - is striking here.

You are correct, though, about high rents now being a fact of life here. Today 2 realtors showed my house for $2500 a month, annual. A year ago I would have been laughed at if I asked $1800. The potential buyers did not disappear from Florida — they just became renters. Landlording is becoming a business with comfortable margins for the first time in years.

BUT, since the value of an income property is determined directly from its NOI, the values of these properties must rise. We should soon be seeing rising real estate prices here, not falling, because of the substantial revenues available to support them.

By Comparison

December 3, 2006 09:28 PM | Link to this

Again, all I am saying is the cost of owning in SoFl has changed over the past few years more drastically than properties I own elsewhwere.

The $1,499,000 home sold in Queens (earlier post) has RE taxes of $6,873. In FL the taxes for new owner would be over $28,000.

Insurance differences also huge.

You also seem to be looking at different situation than I am. You refer to buying for rental income. I am specifically referring to those looking to spend winter in warm climate, rest of year out of SoFl.

You may be correct if you are looking to cater to seasonal renters. As I said earlier many friends not interested at this time in buying in SoFl. They are happy to spend for seasonal rental, enjoy winter, let someone else deal with SoFl ownership costs and problems.

The NYT website above also has an article citing some caveats for taking dedeductions on 2nd homes rented part time, especially if owners income over 150K. As a SoFl owner, I would hope you are correct about prices rising soon, but I realistically have to disagree, and am very happy I have no need to sell any time soon.

By EX-NY

December 4, 2006 01:37 AM | Link to this

Comparison- I am more than familiar with Queens (the borough, not the people who work in the fashion industry). In Forest Hills Gardens I lived down the block from Gerri Ferraro and hubby. In Kew Gardens Hills I lived near Paul Simon. Houses there will get taxes updated, just as here, when sold.

My number on rent was more conservative than yours, so do you wish to argue with me, or with yourself?

How do you want to spend several months a year? You can get a quite serviceable home in upstate NY for 50K, and have woodwork like you would have to hunt for, even in Brooklyn Heights at 100 times the price.

In East Boca you can find a nice condo on the Lake for 3 million. In the West you can find a little place to tide you over for 3 months, at 60K. It all depends on what you want.

But again, to suggest that getting a place in the 5 boroughs is not, pound for pound, enormously more expensive than Florida is just crazy.

Interesting to note that the Brownstones that cost 6,000 bucks when I was a kid are now in some cases worht 1,000 times more. 1,000 times! Talk about investments. Are you old enough to remember when you didn’t even dare walk along Eastern Parkway, Rogers Avenue, Eigth Avenue, etc etc etc….?

Are prices rising? I am embarassed to admit I learned something from that kid who was playing the homebuilders. That day most were up 6%. A couple of other times in the last 2 weeks I find they had similar results. He was right about funds being up 40 to 60% YTD. Somebody is expecting something big. Jim Cramer recommends playing the “housing trough” by buying…are you ready? U.S. Gypsum.

Rising rents here mean rising NOI or GIM evaluations, it’s a simple equation. There’s really nothing to argue about.

Advertised prices on new construction are absolutely breath-taking. The builders don’t seem to think there’s a problem.

Most of all though, the opinion of the great unwashed on this board is that prices are crashing. That is the strongest indicator yet for rising prices.

Good luck??? Are you Max Moose?

By Comparison

December 4, 2006 09:49 PM | Link to this

EX-NY- For some reason you sound way over-stressed about RE price direction. As I said earlier I am only refering to vastly increased carrying costs over past few years on Fl property versus property I also own elsewhere. Most of the year we live in NYC (Dyker Heights, Bklyn), and Cape May on Jersey Shore. Also have home on Lake Hopatcong in NJ. Over same time frame the carrying costs on those properties (taxes, Insurance,etc) have increased no where near the increases for same expenses in SoFl.

Also, as I said previously, you may be correct in catering to seasonal renters as people I know, after looking at SOFl taxes and Insurance, have no problem with paying for 3 months. A few I know rent on Golf Course, others like condos on beach.

Relax, buy some property in those areas for rentals, if the ROI works for you, and go for it.

(Would wish you luck, but that also seems to upset you)

By EX-NY

December 5, 2006 01:59 AM | Link to this

Comparison -

What on earth is your point? That if costs keep going up in Florida it may become as bad as NY? Is that what you are so intent on preaching?

I am sorry you have to spend time in Dyker Heights, and I sincerely hope you and yours escape serious injury and the normal harassment.

Nowhere did I mention seasonal renters, I have no clue what you’re talking about, and I fear you don’t either. Go back and READ.

I am not stressed about anything, actually since I left New York. I asked you if you were Max Moose because he used to say “Good Luck.” Your paranoid reaction is understandable, though, spending time as you do in Brooklyn.

If you’re going to come back and repeat the same dribble yet again, you are wasting my time and that of everyone who may read this exchange.

By Comparison

December 5, 2006 08:42 AM | Link to this

ExNY- Point is, even as SoFl property owner, I understand why many now see renting as preferable to buying at this time in SoFl. You cited Jim Cramer, who made his fortune in the market. Here is what he said when asked about buying Real Estate :

““I think real estate is very similar right now to what the dotcoms were like in 2000. Everybody thinks you can’t miss with real estate. Actually I shouldn’t say that. In the last five months, I think it’s starting to dawn on people that real estate can go wrong,” says Cramer. “

By EX-NY

December 5, 2006 08:18 PM | Link to this

Whether Cramer said that with in the context you are providing, I don’t know. I do know he does not rent his home and is not about to start to.

Yes, real estate CAN go wrong. It just hasn’t so far, and when you point that out to people, the response invariably is: OH, but it WILL. Thank you, Nostradamus.

By Comparison

December 5, 2006 08:42 PM | Link to this

“I am sorry you have to spend time in Dyker Heights, and I sincerely hope you and yours escape serious injury and the normal harassment.”

Thanks for the sentiment. Have a look at few pictures of what I have to put up with (for over 35 years, no less) in Dyker Heights.

http://gonyc.about.com/od/christmassights/ig/Dyker-Heights-Christmas-Lights/index.htm

http://www.dykerheights.com/photos.html

By Cramerfan

December 5, 2006 10:28 PM | Link to this

Saw Cramer on 60 minutes last year warning about RE

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/10/60minutes/main1035353_page3.shtml

I think I remember hearing him say he puposely rents apt in DC area instead of buying for use when there(also owns home in NJ somewhere)

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Remember me?




*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Kudzu Services » Find the right people for the job