July 25, 2005
Block the latest attempt to open state for drilling
A White House plan that would give control over drilling in Florida waters to Louisiana, Alabama and oil companies threatened late last week to make its way into the federal energy bill, which could go to a vote in the Senate as early as Tuesday. The plan would be terrible for this state.
The proposal would lift offshore oil drilling bans in two areas of the Gulf of Mexico. It would allow oil companies to put the state's west coast beaches at risk to extract about 2 billion barrels of oil -- three months' worth of U.S. consumption. On Friday, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., urged members of a House-Senate conference committee preparing the energy bill to oppose the plan, which was revealed in an e-mail from a White House official listing what President Bush wants in the final bill.
The plan is similar to one proposed in June by Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La.. It would redraw state boundaries in the gulf to give Louisiana control over Florida waters in the Eastern Planning Area. That extends from the Florida-Alabama line south to a point parallel with the southern tip of Florida. Changing state boundaries would erase bans on oil drilling in Florida waters that extend to 2012 in some areas.
Interior Secretary Gale Norton had outlined a similar plan to Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla. The Landrieu plan was dropped after Sen. Nelson's filibuster, which won a pledge from Senate leaders not to allow drilling off Florida's coast. The president's plan seeks to circumvent that promise, Nelson aide Dan McLaughlin said, and some senators may be reneging on their public commitment to protect the state's coastline. The proposal also would allow drilling in the Bristol Bay region of Alaska.
The White House end run could "blow up" the energy bill, Mr. McLaughlin said. Sen. Nelson has told Sen. Pete Domenici, R-New Mexico, and others that if they break promises to honor a ban against drilling, he will try to block passage of the final bill. Senators from other coastal states, including California, North and South Carolina and Michigan, which has blocked drilling in the Great Lakes, could join Sen. Nelson. The pressure then would be on Sen. Martinez, who once agreed with Ms. Norton's plans, then backed Sen. Nelson to defend Florida's coasts.
Gov. Bush had supported a ban on drilling 100 miles off Florida's entire coastline. His decision, however, gave Sen. Landrieu's proposal room to grow, since the governor's design would not affect the waters she hopes Louisiana will control. Unlike in Florida, oil is a major industry in Louisiana, which hasn't objected to offshore drilling.
According to the White House e-mail, President Bush's plan would bring the oil companies about $680 million in nine years. For Florida, where tourism still drives the state's economy, the risk of damage to beaches from drilling or tanker mishaps remains unacceptable.
Posted by Opinion staff at July 25, 2005 2:52 PMWhich State Representative do we contact and do you know their email address?
Posted by: Dixie Lee at July 25, 2005 9:28 AMDixie Lee,
If you are directing your question to the Post's editors, I doubt if you'll ever get an answer. I don't believe anyone from the paper ever reads these messages. I think they just keep this site operating to give a few of us "gasbags" a place to vent.
Seriously, though, if you were directing your question to readers in general, I'll stick my nose in and say that I don't think any state representative will be able to do much about this. If you're really concerned, my guess would be the two people you should contact would be U.S. Senators Nelson and Martinez.
They both have Web sites -- www.billnelson.senate.gov and www.martinez.senate.gov -- where you can e-mail them.
Maybe some other reader has another suggestion?
Posted by: Gary Bokelmann at July 25, 2005 5:45 PMHi,
A great place for contacting your representatives is http://www.congress.org . At that site, you can type in your zip code and it will list out your representatives. Your best bet will be Senators Martinez and Nelson.
This news is incredible. It's like something you might read in the Onion. "Bush administration agrees to moratorium, then changes rules that redefine the topic of the moratorium." Ouch. As a former resident of Florida, I'm really sorry to hear that this is happening.
Chris
Everyone seems to agree that expanding these oil leases is a terrible idea. At the risk of being the skunk at the garden party, may I ask an awkward question:
Why?
What would be wrong with allowing more oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico? I know, I know, tourism, pristine beaches, etc. But what damage would more drilling cause?
The oil industry has been drilling and pumping oil in the western Gulf for at least 50 years -- maybe more. When was the last major spill? For that matter, has there ever been a serious spill from Gulf oil platform? Has there ever been a spill that damaged a beach? I'm not saying it never happened; I'm just saying I can't recall ever hearing about one. Can you?
Obviously, I don't know squat about offshore oil drilling. Maybe I'm just uninformed. So can someone who's more knowledgeable point out where oil drilling in the Gulf has actually caused any damage? If not, then why are we all accepting -- as an article of faith -- that drilling in the Gulf is a threat to the environment?
If more offshore drilling means we can rely less on giant oil tankers that actually HAVE caused disastrous spills, wouldn't that be a good thing?
Just asking...
Posted by: Gary Bokelmann at July 26, 2005 10:14 AM

