April 12, 2005
Abstain from sex ed lies
More than 80 percent of the abstinence-only curricula used by community organizations receiving federal grants "contain false, misleading or distorted information about reproductive health," according to a congressional study released in December.
One curriculum says "the popular claim that 'condoms help prevent the spread of STDs,' is not supported by the data." False.
One states that legal abortions increase the risk of "premature birth, a major cause of mental retardation," and tubal and cervical pregnancies. False.
One teaches that people can get infected with HIV through sweat and tears. False.
One teaches that women need "financial support," while men need "admiration." Another says "Women gauge their happiness and judge their success on their relationships. Men's happiness and success hinge on their accomplishments."
The lies and stereotypes promoted by some abstinence-only programs explain the need for an amendment proposed by Rep. Anne Gannon, D-Delray Beach, that would require Florida to abstain from spending public money on sex education programs that do not provide "medically accurate information." Abstinence-only education has been shown to be largely ineffective in decreasing rates of teen pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases. Yet the federal government is spending $170 million this year on such programs, and Gov. Bush and Lt. Gov. Toni Jennings have announced a $4 million say-no-to-abortion campaign.
Rep. Gannon is asking for facts over fear-mongering. True.
WAXMAN REPORT FLAWED; ABORTION LOBBY/PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFRAID OF ABSTINENCE THREATS TO THEIR PROFITS
Representative Waxman's report was a biased study conducted by his own private staff without any bi-partisan involvement or peer review. Waxman's "findings" have been cited for lack of evidence or any peer scientific review for his position, by the Heritage Foundation's policy analyst Melissa Pardue. (http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/wm615.cfm)
"Waxman's report falsely asserts that no studies exist to show the effectiveness of abstinence education, and claims that "abstinence-only education does not appear to decrease teen pregnancy or the risk of sexually transmitted diseases." She writes. "This is simply not true. There are currently 10 evaluations showing the effectiveness of abstinence education in reducing teen sexual activity. Of these 10 evaluations, four were published in peer-reviewed journals."
Also, a CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey shows a decrease in the number of teens who are sexually active from 1991 (54.1 percent of teens) to 2003 (46.7 percent of teens).
Finally, a National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health finds that teens who take a virginity pledge are 1/3 less likely to experience teen pregnancy, and less likely to give birth out of wedlock compared to adolescents who do not make such a pledge.
Consider who supports Rep Waxman's crusade against abstinence until marriage programs.
Representative Waxman is a 100% backer of Planned Parenthood's and NARAL (Pro Abort lobby) voting interests over the last 10 years. Planned Parenthood, a "non-profit agency", reaps huges yearly profits from abortions and contraceptive programs: In 2003 for example, $35 million in profit and a whopping $250 million taxpayer funds received. Their annual budget is $450 million dollars.
Who do you think stands to lose alot of money and power as abstinence programs succeed in reducing teen pregnancies out of wedlock? You got it - Planned Parenthood.
Abstinence programs have little to no effect on preventing unwanted pregnancies.
In colonial New England, where premarital sex could get one publicly tortured, studies have shown that more than half of the first child born to women were born out of wedlock or less than seven months after marriage.
The failure to distribute condoms and to teach about safe sex practices is a major part of the reason that we have unwanted pregnancies, which lead to abortions. They also lead to the spread of disease, which unnecessarily costs taxpayers millions of dollars a year in health care costs.
It is fundamentally immoral to prevent people from getting the means to prevent themselves from getting sick and to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Those who truly value life support the free flow of information and appropriate access to birth control.
Posted by: Steve in Boca at April 14, 2005 7:24 PM
